|
|
||||||||
Article |
Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Abstract
Abstract I. Introduction A. Basic Receptor/G-Protein-Coupling Principles II. Receptor Theories A. Ternary Complex and Modified/Revised Ternary Complex B. Alternative Models III. Agonist-Specific Signaling States A. Evidence from Multiple G-Protein Coupling or Efficacy B. Evidence from Kinetic/Binding Studies 1. Ligands. 2. GTP Analogs. 3. Fluorescent and Biophysical Studies. C. Evidence from Reversal of Efficacy (i.e., Protean Agonism) 1. Native Systems. 2. Transfected Systems. D. Evidence from Differential Phosphorylation, Desensitization, Internalization, and Palmitoylation E. Evidence from Inverse Agonism F. Evidence from Fusion Chimeras IV. Lessons from Rhodopsin A. Structural Basis for Mechanism of Activation in a G-Protein-Coupled Receptor, Mammalian Rhodopsin B. Lessons from Activation-Induced Events in the Rhodopsin Molecule C. Steric Changes in Chromophore D. Electrostatic Changes in Opsin E. Specific Transmembrane Helical Movements in Opsin F. Theory for Activation-Induced Conformations G. Lessons from Gain of Function Rhodopsin Mutations H. Lessons from the Mechanism of Loss of Function Caused in Retinitis Pigmentosa Mutations I. Rhodopsin as the Primer V. Therapeutic Implications A. G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Diseases Caused by Unregulated Internalization B. Differential Use of {beta}-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers C. Morphine Dependence and Tolerance D. Use of Stimulation-Biased Assay Systems
Studies have been amassed in the past several years indicating that an agonist can conform a receptor into an activation state that is dependent upon an intrinsic property of the agonist usually based upon its chemical composition. Theoretically, each different agonist could impart its own unique activation state. Evidence for multiple signaling states for the G-protein-coupled receptors will be reviewed and is derived from many different pharmacological behaviors: efficacy, kinetics, protean agonism, differential desensitization and internalization, inverse agonism, and fusion chimeras. A recent extension of the ternary complex model is suggested by evidence that the different processes that govern deactivation, such as desensitization and internalization, is also regulated by conformers specific to the agonist. Rhodopsin may serve as a primer for the study of multiple activation states. Therapeutic implications that utilize multiple signaling states hold vast promise in the rationale design of drugs.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Li, Y. Gao, Y. Qi, M. J. Katovich, N. Jiang, L. N. Braseth, D. A. Scheuer, P. Shi, and C. Sumners Macrophage migration inhibitory factor in hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus neurons decreases blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats FASEB J, September 1, 2008; 22(9): 3175 - 3185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lee, S. Bhatt, A. Shukla, R. W. Desnoyer, S. P. Yadav, M. Kim, S.-H. Jang, and S. S. Karnik Site-specific Cleavage of G Protein-coupled Receptor-engaged {beta}-Arrestin: INFLUENCE OF THE AT1 RECEPTOR CONFORMATION ON SCISSILE SITE SELECTION J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2008; 283(31): 21612 - 21620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kenakin Functional Selectivity through Protean and Biased Agonism: Who Steers the Ship? Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2007; 72(6): 1393 - 1401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Abrahamsson, B. Gustafsson, and E. Hanse Reversible Synaptic Depression in Developing Rat CA3 CA1 Synapses Explained by a Novel Cycle of AMPA Silencing-Unsilencing J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2604 - 2611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Michel and A. E. Alewijnse Ligand-Directed Signaling: 50 Ways to Find a Lover Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2007; 72(5): 1097 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-L. Lu, M. Coetsee, C. D. White, and R. P. Millar Structural Determinants for Ligand-Receptor Conformational Selection in a Peptide G Protein-coupled Receptor J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2007; 282(24): 17921 - 17929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Lane, B. Powney, A. Wise, S. Rees, and G. Milligan Protean Agonism at the Dopamine D2 Receptor: (S)-3-(3-Hydroxyphenyl)-N-propylpiperidine Is an Agonist for Activation of Go1 but an Antagonist/Inverse Agonist for Gi1,Gi2, and Gi3 Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 71(5): 1349 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Neubig Missing Links: Mechanisms of Protean Agonism Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 71(5): 1200 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Chelikani, V. Hornak, M. Eilers, P. J. Reeves, S. O. Smith, U. L. RajBhandary, and H. G. Khorana Role of group-conserved residues in the helical core of beta2-adrenergic receptor PNAS, April 24, 2007; 104(17): 7027 - 7032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Binet, B. Duthey, J. Lecaillon, C. Vol, J. Quoyer, G. Labesse, J.-P. Pin, and L. Prezeau Common Structural Requirements for Heptahelical Domain Function in Class A and Class C G Protein-coupled Receptors J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2007; 282(16): 12154 - 12163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Oliveira, C. M. Costa-Neto, C. R. Nakaie, S. Schreier, S. I. Shimuta, and A. C. M. Paiva The Angiotensin II AT1 Receptor Structure-Activity Correlations in the Light of Rhodopsin Structure Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 565 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Sun, H. Li, Y. Gao, T. Matsuura, P. A. Upchurch, M. K. Raizada, and C. Sumners Lack of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Regulation Is Linked to the Increased Chronotropic Action of Angiotensin II in SHR Neurons Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 528 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Moore, E. E. Millman, V. Godines, N. A. Hanania, T. M. Tran, H. Peng, B. F. Dickey, B. J. Knoll, and R. B. Clark Salmeterol Stimulation Dissociates beta2-Adrenergic Receptor Phosphorylation and Internalization Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., February 1, 2007; 36(2): 254 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. W. Tedford and G. W. Zamponi Direct G Protein Modulation of Cav2 Calcium Channels Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 58(4): 837 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Simmons Functional Selectivity of NK1 Receptor Signaling: Peptide Agonists Can Preferentially Produce Receptor Activation or Desensitization J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2006; 319(2): 907 - 913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chachisvilis, Y.-L. Zhang, and J. A. Frangos G protein-coupled receptors sense fluid shear stress in endothelial cells PNAS, October 17, 2006; 103(42): 15463 - 15468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Berg, S. Navailles, T. A. Sanchez, Y. M. Silva, M. D. Wood, U. Spampinato, and W. P. Clarke J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2006; 319(1): 260 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Johnson, S. Oldfield, E. Braksator, A. Gonzalez-Cuello, D. Couch, K. J. Hall, S. J. Mundell, C. P. Bailey, E. Kelly, and G. Henderson Agonist-Selective Mechanisms of {micro}-Opioid Receptor Desensitization in Human Embryonic Kidney 293 Cells Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2006; 70(2): 676 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Li, Y. Gao, C. D. Freire, M. K. Raizada, G. M. Toney, and C. Sumners Macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the PVN attenuates the central pressor and dipsogenic actions of angiotensin II FASEB J, August 1, 2006; 20(10): 1748 - 1750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Dai and J. J. Galligan Differential Trafficking and Desensitization of Human ETA and ETB Receptors Expressed in HEK 293 Cells. Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 746 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Hildebrandt Bring Your Own G Protein Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1079 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |