|
|
||||||||
Vol. 49, Issue 3, 253-278, September 1997
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology (S.J.H.), Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, England; Department of Chemistry (C.R.G.), University College London, Christopher Ingold Laboratories, London, England; Department of Pharmacochemistry (H.T.), Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Unité de Neurobiologie (J.C.S.), Paris, France; James Black Foundation (N.P.S.), King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, Dulwich, London, England; Department of Pharmacology (J.M.Y), University of Cambridge, Cambridge; Freie Universität Berlin (W.S.), Institut für Pharmazie I, Berlin (Dahlem), Germany; Department of Pharmacology (R.L.), Cornell University Medical College, New York; Department of Physiology (H.L.H.), Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
I. Introduction and Historical Perspective
II. Histamine H1-Receptor
A. Distribution and Function
B. H1-Selective Ligands
C. Receptor Structure
D. Signal Transduction Mechanisms
III. Histamine H2-Receptor
A. Distribution and Function
B. H2-Selective Ligands
C. Receptor Structure
D. Signal Transduction Mechanisms
IV. Histamine H3-Receptor
A. Distribution and Function
B. H3-Receptor Selective Ligands
C. Receptor Structure
D. Signal Transduction Mechanisms
V. Other Responses to Histamine
A. Potentiation of Responses to N-Methyl-D-Aspartate
B. A Role as an Intracellular Messenger?
References
| |
I. Introduction and Historical Perspective |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The classification of histamine receptors has to date been based
on rigorous classical pharmacological analysis, and as yet, the
classification of the three histamine receptors that have been defined
by this process, (i.e., the H1-,
H2-, and
H3-receptors) have not been added to
because of more recent molecular biological approaches (Schwartz et
al., 1991
, 1995
; Hill, 1990
; Leurs et al., 1995b
). The scant number of
known histamine receptors, compared with the plethora of receptors
for some other endogenous substances, probably reflects the relative
neglect of histamine rather than a paucity of its receptors. There is
some preliminary evidence of heterogeneity of the known histamine
receptors (which will be reviewed later in this article), but the
acceptance of additional subtypes still awaits the identification of
"sequence differences" within a single species and the development
of selective agonists and antagonists providing the structural,
recognition, and transductional information necessary for reliable
classification.
The first histamine receptor antagonists (popularly referred to as the
classical antihistamines but now called
H1-receptor antagonists) were synthesized (Bovet
and Staub, 1936
; Bovet, 1950
) over 20 years after the discovery (Barger
and Dale, 1910
) and descriptions of some of the physiological effects
(Dale and Laidlaw, 1910
) of histamine. These accomplishments had been
preceded, as for some other endogenous biogenic amines, by its
synthesis as a chemical curiosity (Windaus and Vogt, 1907
). Early
studies of the antihistamines were qualitative, for example, the
demonstration of their effectiveness in protecting against bronchospasm
produced in guinea pigs by anaphylaxis or administration of histamine
(Bovet and Staub, 1936
). Though qualitative, these studies yielded
compounds, e.g., mepyramine (pyrilamine), that remain major ligands to
define histamine receptors.
These antagonists were shown to reduce the effects of histamine on many
tissues, notably vascular and extravascular smooth muscle (e.g., guinea
pig ileum), but it became apparent that some of the effects of
histamine were refractory to these classical antihistamines (Loew,
1947
). For example, histamine-stimulated gastric secretion was shown to
be unresponsive to three different antihistamines (Ashford et al.,
1949
). The vasodilator response to histamine in the cat was shown to be
only partly sensitive to an antihistamine, leading to the suggestion
that histamine causes vasodilatation by combining with more than one
receptor (Folkow et al., 1948
). The application of the method of Schild (Arunlakshana and Schild, 1959
) to the classification of receptors revealed that the pA2 (
log
KB) value of mepyramine for antagonism of the
positive chronotropic effect of histamine on the right atrium of the
guinea pig differed from mepyramine's pA2 value for antagonism of the contractile response to histamine in guinea pig
ileum, implying that the receptors involved were distinct (Arunlakshana
and Schild, 1959
; Trendelenburg, 1960
). The histamine receptor in
guinea pig ileum and in other tissues that showed the same or similar
pA2 value for these early antihistamines was then
named the H1-receptor (Ash and Schild, 1966
). As
the relative potencies of these histamine antagonists and histamine
agonists on gastric acid secretion, relaxation of rat uterus, and
chronotropy of the guinea pig right atrium differed from those on the
H1-receptor, it was concluded that a separate
histamine receptor was involved in these responses.
The development of specific antagonists
(H2-antagonists) for this novel receptor
represents a classic example of rational drug design (Black et al.,
1972
; Black, 1989
) and showed the "practical value" (Green and
Maayani, 1987
; Jenkinson, 1987
) of a quantitative approach to the
analysis of receptor antagonism (Arunlakshana and Schild, 1959
).
Burimamide was the first compound to be described (Black et al., 1972
)
that had a higher pA2 for antagonism of the histamine-mediated responses on guinea pig atrium and rat uterus than
the pA2 determined for antagonism of the
contractile response to histamine in guinea pig ileum. Burimamide was
also able to reduce gastric acid secretion in dogs and humans and to
reduce the blood pressure response of the cat to histamine (Black et al., 1972
). A large number of more potent and selective
H2-receptor antagonists have since been developed
(Cooper et al., 1990
), although further quantitative investigations of
the antagonist potency of burimamide on other histamine-mediated
responses contributed to the definition and classification of the
histamine H3-receptor (Arrang et al.,
1983
).
The third histamine receptor was also defined by a functional assay.
Histamine was found to inhibit its own synthesis and release in rat
cerebral cortical slices, and the effects of H1- and H2- receptor agonists and antagonists
indicated a distinct receptor (Arrang et al., 1983
, 1987b
). A highly
selective agonist, R-(
)-methylhistamine, and antagonist,
thioperamide, clearly defined the
H3-receptor (Arrang et al., 1987
). Since
that time, considerable efforts have been made to develop other
H3-receptor-selective agonists and
antagonists (Garbarg et al., 1992
; Jansen et al., 1992
; Van der Goot et
al., 1992
; Vollinga et al., 1994
; Ganellin et al., 1995
; Ligneau et
al., 1995
; Stark et al., 1996b
,c
).
Table 1 summarizes some of the
operational characteristics used to define the nature of the histamine
receptor involved in different tissue responses. Histamine derivatives
are numbered according to the system given in figure
1 (Black and Ganellin, 1974
).
|
|
| |
II. Histamine H1-Receptor |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Distribution and Function
The study of the distribution of histamine
H1-receptors in different mammalian tissues has
been greatly aided by the development of selective radioligands for
this particular histamine receptor subtype.
[3H]mepyramine was originally developed in 1977 (Hill et al., 1977
) and since that time has been used successfully to
detect H1-receptors in a wide variety of tissues
including: mammalian brain; smooth muscle from airways,
gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary system, and the cardiovascular
system; adrenal medulla; and endothelial cells and lymphocytes (Hill,
1990
). In some tissues and cells, however, it is notable that
[3H]mepyramine additionally binds to secondary
non-H1-receptor sites (Chang et al., 1979a
; Hill
and Young, 1980
; Hadfield et al., 1983
; Mitsuhashi and Payan, 1988
;
Arias-Montano and Young, 1993
; Dickenson and Hill, 1994
; Leurs et al.,
1995b
). In rat liver, in which [3H]mepyramine
predominantly binds to a protein homologous with debrisoquine
4-hydroxylase cytochrome P450 (Fukui et al., 1990
), quinine can be used
to inhibit this nonspecific binding. This observation has led Liu et
al. (1992)
to suggest that quinine may be used to inhibit binding to
other lower affinity sites. However, it is clear that not all secondary
binding sites for [3H]mepyramine are sensitive
to inhibition by quinine (Dickenson and Hill, 1994
). Thus, in
DDT1MF-2 cells, a 38 to 40 kDa protein has been
isolated, which binds H1-receptor antagonists
with KD values in the micromolar range
(Mitsuhashi and Payan, 1988
, Mitsuhashi et al., 1989
) but which is not
sensitive to inhibition by quinine (Dickenson and Hill, 1994
).
Nevertheless, DDT1MF-2 cells can be shown to
additionally possess [3H]mepyramine binding
sites that have the characteristics of
H1-receptors (i.e., KD
values in the nanomolar range) and to mediate functional responses,
which are clearly produced by histamine
H1-receptor activation (Dickenson and Hill, 1992
;
White et al., 1993
; Dickenson and Hill, 1994
).
Other radioligands that have been used to study histamine
H1-receptors are
[3H]mianserin (Peroutka and Snyder, 1981
),
[3H]doxepin (Tran et al., 1981
; Kamba and
Richelson, 1984
; Taylor and Richelson, 1982
),
[125I]iodobolpyramine (Bouthenet et al., 1988
),
[125I]iodoazidophenpyramine (Ruat et al.,
1988
), and
[3H](+)-N-methyl-4-methyldiphenhydramine
(Treherne and Young, 1988b
). [125I]Iodobolpyramine has been used for
autoradiographic localization of H1-receptors in
guinea pig brain, although less success has been achieved in rat brain
(Körner et al., 1986
; Bouthenet et al., 1988
). The very slow
dissociation of [3H]mepyramine from
H1-receptors at low temperatures (e.g., 4°C) does, however, mean that this ligand can also be used for
autoradiography (Palacios et al., 1981a
,b
; Rotter and Frostholm, 1986
).
[125I]Iodoazidophenpyramine is a very potent
H1-receptor antagonist that can bind irreversibly
to H1-receptors following irradiation with
ultraviolet light (Ruat et al., 1988
).
[11C]Mepyramine and
[11C]doxepin have also proved useful for
imaging histamine H1-receptors in the living
human brain (Villemagne et al., 1991
; Yanai et al., 1992
, 1995
).
H1-receptors have been extensively studied in
blood vessels (Barger and Dale, 1910
; Dale and Laidlaw, 1910
; Folkow et
al., 1948
; Black et al., 1972
) and other smooth muscle preparations (Ash and Schild, 1966
; Black et al., 1972
; Marshall, 1955
; Hill, 1990
).
In smooth muscles, such as the guinea pig ileum,
which freely generate muscle action potentials, modulation of
action-potential discharge by low concentrations of histamine is an
important mechanism by which tension is increased (Bolton, 1979
; Bolton
et al., 1981
; Bülbring and Burnstock, 1960
). In guinea pig ileum,
there is also evidence that a component of the contractile response to histamine is mediated by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-induced mobilization of intracellular calcium (Morel et al., 1987
; Bolton and
Lim, 1989
; Donaldson and Hill, 1986b
). In nonexcitable smooth muscles, such as airway and vascular smooth muscle, contractile responses to H1-receptor stimulation primarily
involve mobilization of calcium from intracellular stores as a
consequence of inositol phospholipid hydrolysis (Matsumoto et al.,
1986
; Kotlikoff et al., 1987
; Takuwa et al., 1987
; Hall and Hill, 1988
;
Paniettieri et al., 1989
; Van Amsterdam et al., 1989
).
In vascular endothelial cells, H1-receptor
stimulation leads to several cellular responses including:
(a) changes in vascular permeability (particularly in
postcapillary venules) as a result of endothelial cell contraction
(Majno and Palade, 1961
; Majno et al., 1968
; Meyrick and Brigham, 1983
;
Grega, 1986
; Killackey et al., 1986
; Svensjo and Grega, 1986
);
(b) prostacyclin synthesis (McIntyre et al., 1985
;
Brotherton, 1986
; Carter et al., 1988
; Resink et al., 1987
);
(c) synthesis of platelet-activating factor (McIntyre et
al., 1985
); (d) release of Von Willebrand factor (Hamilton
and Sims, 1987
); and (e) release of nitric oxide (Van De
Voorde and Leusen, 1993
; Toda, 1984
). The
H1-receptor has also been characterized on human
T lymphocytes using [125I]iodobolpyramine
(Villemain et al., 1990
) and shown to increase [Ca2+]i (Kitamura et al.,
1996
).
Histamine H1-receptors have long been established
to be present in the adrenal medulla and to elicit the release of
catecholamines (Emmelin and Muren, 1949
; Staszewska-Barczak and Vane,
1965
; Robinson, 1982
; Livett and Marley, 1986
; Noble et al., 1988
).
Thus, histamine can induce the release of both adrenaline and
noradrenaline from cultured bovine adrenal chromaffin cells (Livett and
Marley, 1986
). In these cells, histamine can also stimulate
phosphorylation of the catecholamine biosynthesis enzyme tyrosine
hydroxylase via a mechanism that involves release of intracellular
calcium (Bunn et al., 1995
). In addition to its effects on
catecholamine synthesis and release from adrenal chromaffin cells,
histamine can also elicit the release of leucine- and
methionine-enkephalin (Bommer et al., 1987
). Furthermore, after
prolonged exposure to histamine, there is a marked increase in
messenger ribonucleic acid-encoding proenkephalin A (Bommer et al.,
1987
; Kley, 1988
; Wan et al., 1989
).
In human atrial myocardium and guinea pig
ventricle, histamine produces negative inotropic effects (Guo et al.,
1984
; Genovese et al., 1988
; Zavecz and Levi, 1978
). In human
myocardium, this response is associated with inhibitory effects on
heart rate and can be unmasked when the positive effects of histamine
on the rate and force of contraction (mediated via
H2-receptors) are attenuated by conjoint
administration of adenosine or adenosine A1-receptor agonists (Genovese et al., 1988
).
However, in guinea pig left atria (Reinhardt et al., 1974
, 1977
;
Steinberg and Holland, 1975
; Hattori et al., 1983
, 1988a
) and rabbit
papillary muscle (Hattori et al., 1988b
), histamine produces a positive
inotropic response via a mechanism that is not associated with a rise
in adenosine 3c,5c-cyclic monophosphate (cAMPb)
levels (see Hill, 1990
).
Histamine H1-receptors are widely distributed in
mammalian brain (Hill, 1990
; Schwartz et al., 1991
). In human brain,
higher densities of H1-receptors are found in
neocortex, hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, thalamus, and posterior
hypothalamus, whereas cerebellum and basal ganglia show lower densities
(Chang et al., 1979b
; Kamba and Richelson, 1984
; Martinez-Mir et al.,
1990
; Villemagne et al., 1991
; Yanai et al., 1992
). The distributions
in rat (Palacios et al., 1981a
) and guinea pig (Palacios et al., 1981b
;
Bouthenet et al., 1988
) are similar to each other and to humans with
the exception that the guinea pig cerebellum shows high density (Ruat and Schwartz, 1989
; Chang et al., 1979b
; Hill and Young, 1980
; Palacios
et al., 1981b
; Bouthenet et al., 1988
). In most brain areas, there was
overlap of H1-receptor binding sites and
messenger ribonucleic acid levels except in hippocampus and cerebellum
in which the discrepancy is likely to reflect the presence of abundant H1-receptors in dendrites of pyramidal and
Purkinje cells, respectively (Traiffort et al., 1994
). Histamine
H1-receptor activation causes inhibition of
firing and hyperpolarization in hippocampal neurons (Haas, 1981
) and an
apamine-sensitive outward current in olfactory bulb interneurons (Jahn
et al., 1995
), effects most likely produced by intracellular
Ca2+ release. However, many other notably
vegetative ganglia (Christian et al., 1989
), hypothalamic supraoptic
(Haas et al., 1975
), brainstem (Gerber et al., 1990
; Khateb et al.,
1990
), thalamic (McCormick and Williamson, 1991
), and human cortical
neurons (Reiner and Kamondi, 1994
) are excited by histamine
H1-receptor activation through a block of a
potassium conductance.
B. H1-Selective Ligands
Although a large number of compounds have been synthesized as
selective and competitive antagonists of the histamine
H1-receptor (see for example Casy, 1977
;
Ganellin, 1982
), chemical effort directed at the generation of highly
potent and selective H1-receptor agonists has not
achieved the same success. Modification of the ethylamine side chain of
histamine is not favorable for H1-receptor agonism (Leurs et al., 1995b
). Furthermore, resolution of the enantiomers of the chiral compounds generated by methylation of the
- or
-positions did not reveal any stereoselectivity of the side
chain for the H1-receptor (Arrang et al., 1987
;
Leurs et al., 1995
). Alkylation of the side chain amine group does not drastically reduce H1-receptor activity, but
N
- and
N
,N
-dimethylhistamine
are also potent agonists for the
H3-receptor (table
2; fig. 2;
Arrang et al., 1983
). Modification of the imidazole moiety of histamine
has been the most successful approach for obtaining agonists with
selectivity for the H1-receptor. Replacement of
the imidazole moiety of histamine by other aromatic heterocyclic ring
structures in 2-pyridylethylamine and 2-thiazolylethylamine yields two
compounds with selectivity for the H1-receptor
(table 2; fig. 2). Both compounds act as full agonists in producing contraction of guinea pig ileum (Donaldson and Hill, 1986c
), but in
other tissues (e.g., guinea pig cerebral cortical slices or DDT1MF-2 cells), 2-pyridylethylamine behaves as a
low-efficacy agonist (Donaldson and Hill, 1986a
; White et al., 1993
).
Substitutions in the 2-position of the imidazole ring of histamine have
produced compounds that are the most selective
H1-agonists available (Zingel et al., 1995
).
Thus, 2(3-bromophenyl)histamine and
2[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]histamine are both relatively potent
and highly selective H1-agonists (table 2; fig.
2; Leschke et al., 1995
). Both compounds appear to be potent
H1-agonists in guinea pig ileum (Leschke et al.,
1995
), although some of the halogenated 2-phenylhistamines are
low-efficacy agonists in DDT1MF-2 cells (Zingel
et al., 1990
; White et al., 1993
) and in guinea pig aorta (Leschke et
al., 1995
) and can exhibit partial agonist properties.
|
|
Mepyramine (also known as pyrilamine) is the reference selective and
high-affinity H1-receptor antagonist (table
3; Hill, 1990
). Other classical
H1-antagonists that have been used for characterization purposes include chlorpheniramine, tripelennamine, promethazine, and diphenhydramine (fig.
3). Some of these, however, possess
marked muscarinic receptor antagonist properties (Hill, 1990
, 1987
),
and consequently the selectivity of these compounds between the three
different histamine receptors (table 3) does not guarantee an
unambiguous characterization. This can only be achieved by appropriate
quantitative assessment of receptor antagonism, preferably with a range
of compounds of very different chemical structure. The stereoisomers of
chlorpheniramine are particularly useful in this regard (table 3). The
enantiomers of 4-methyl-diphenhydramine and brompheniramine also differ
by two orders of magnitude in their affinity for the
H1-receptor (Chang et al., 1979b
; Treherne and
Young, 1988b
). The geometric isomer trans-triprolidine is three orders
of magnitude more potent than its cis counterpart and is one of the
most potent H1-antagonists available for the guinea pig H1-receptor (tables 3 and
4; Ison et al., 1973
). The tricyclic
antidepressants amitriptyline and doxepin are also very potent
H1-receptor antagonists (KD
0.6 and 0.1 nM respectively; Figge et al., 1979
; Aceves et
al., 1985
).
|
|
|
At therapeutic dosages, many of the classical
H1-antihistamines give rise to sedative side
effects that have been attributed to occupancy of
H1-receptors in the central nervous system (CNS) (Schwartz et al., 1981
; Nicholson et al., 1991
; Leurs et al., 1995b
).
Most of the classical H1-antihistamines,
including promethazine and (+)-chlorpheniramine, readily cross the
blood-brain barrier. However, several compounds that penetrate poorly
into the CNS and appear to be devoid of central depressant effects are
now available (fig. 4). These include
terfenadine (Rose et al., 1982
; Wiech and Martin, 1982
), astemizole
(Laduron et al., 1982
; Niemegeers et al., 1982
), mequitazine (Uzan and
Le Fer, 1979
), loratadine (Ahn and Barnett, 1986
), acrivastine
(Leighton et al., 1983
; Cohen et al., 1985
), cetirizine (Timmerman,
1992b
), and temelastine (Brown et al., 1986
; Calcutt et al., 1987
). The
pKi values for these agents are given in table
5 (Ter Laak et al., 1994
).
|
|
C. Receptor Structure
Photoaffinity binding studies using
[125I]iodoazidophenpyramine and subsequent
sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis have
indicated that the H1-receptor protein has a
molecular weight of 56 kDa under reducing conditions in rat, guinea
pig, and mouse brain (Ruat et al., 1988
, 1990b
; Ruat and Schwartz, 1989
). Similarly, studies in bovine adrenal medullar membranes with
another photoaffinity ligand [3H]azidobenzamide
(Yamashita et al., 1991b
) found labeled peptides in the size range 53 to 58 kDa. Interestingly, the specifically labeled
H1-receptor (with
[125I]iodoazidophenpyramine) in guinea pig
heart was found to have a substantially higher molecular weight,
although there is no obvious difference in the pharmacological
characteristics of the H1-receptor in this tissue
(Ruat et al., 1990a
).
The bovine adrenal medulla H1-receptor was cloned
in 1991 by expression cloning in the Xenopus oocyte system
(Yamashita et al., 1991a
). The deduced amino acid sequence represents a
491 amino acid protein with a calculated molecular weight of 56 kDa (table 6). The protein has the seven
putative transmembrane (TM) domains expected of a G-protein-coupled
receptor and possesses N-terminal glycosylation sites. A striking
feature of the proposed structure is the very large third intracellular
loop (212 amino acids) and relatively short (17 amino acids)
intracellular C terminal tail. The availability of the bovine sequence
and lack of introns has enabled the H1-receptor
to be cloned from several species (table 6) including rat (Fujimoto et
al., 1993
), guinea pig (Horio et al., 1993
; Traiffort et al., 1994
),
mouse (Inove et al., 1996
), and human (De Backer et al., 1993
; Fukui et
al., 1994
; Moguilevsky et al., 1994
; Smit et al., 1996c
). The human
histamine H1-receptor gene has now been localized
to chromosome 3 bands 3p14-p21 (Le Coniat et al., 1994
).
|
At the present time, these different clones should be regarded as true
species homologues of the histamine H1-receptor,
even though there are notable differences between them in some
antagonist potencies (table 4). Unfortunately, the number of
H1-receptor antagonists evaluated in binding
studies in cells transfected with the different recombinant receptors
is rather limited. Nevertheless, it is clear that the stereoisomers of
chlorpheniramine show marked differences between species. For example,
the guinea pig H1-receptor has a
KD of 0.9 nM for
(+)-chlorpheniramine, whereas for the rat H1-receptor, the value is nearer 8 nM
(table 4). Similar differences for this compound and others (notably
mepyramine and triprolidine) have been reported for the native
H1-receptors in guinea pig and rat brain,
respectively (table 4; Chang et al., 1979b
; Hill and Young, 1980
; Hill,
1990
). Such species differences may also explain why
[125I]iodobolpyramine can label guinea pig CNS
H1-receptors but is unable to detect
H1-receptors in rat brain (Körner et al.,
1986
; Bouthenet et al., 1988
). The native
H1-receptor protein has been solubilized from
both guinea pig and rat brain membranes (Toll and Snyder, 1982
;
Treherne and Young, 1988a
), and the solubilized receptor retains the
same differences in H1-antagonist potency for
(+)-chlorpheniramine as that observed in membranes (Toll and Snyder,
1982
). What is not clear, however, is why mepyramine appears to be more
potent as an antagonist of the recombinant rat
H1-receptor (expressed in C6 cells) than it is of
the native H1-receptor in rat brain membranes
(table 4; Chang et al., 1979b
; Hill and Young, 1980
; Fujimoto et al.,
1993
). The recombinant study performed in rat C6 cells (Fujimoto et
al., 1993
) is complicated by the presence of a low level of endogenous
H1-receptors (Peakman and Hill, 1994
), but a high
affinity for mepyramine (KD = 1 nM)
has been deduced from functional studies in untransfected C6 cells (table 4; Peakman and Hill, 1994
).
Site-directed mutagenesis has begun to shed some light on the binding
domains for H1-agonists and -antagonists. Amino
acid sequence alignment of the cloned histamine
H1- and H2-receptors (see
fig. 5) has led to the suggestion that
the third (TM3) and fifth (TM5) transmembrane domains of the receptor
proteins are responsible for binding histamine (Birdsall, 1991
;
Timmerman, 1992a
). Aspartate (107) in TM3 of the human
H1-receptor, which is conserved in all aminergic
receptors, has been shown to be essential for the binding of histamine
and H1-receptor antagonists to the
H1-receptor (Ohta et al., 1994
). In the
2- and
2-adrenoceptors, two serine residues in TM5
accept the phenolic hydroxyl groups of the catechol ring of
noradrenaline. In the H1-receptor, the residues
corresponding to asparagine (198) and threonine (194) are in
corresponding positions in TM5 of the human
H1-receptor. However, substitution of an alanine
for threonine (194) did not influence either agonist or antagonist
binding (Ohta et al., 1994
; Moguilevsky et al., 1995
). Substitution of
alanine (198) for asparagine (198) substantially decreased agonist, but
not antagonist affinity (Ohta et al., 1994
; Moguilevsky et al., 1995
).
Similar mutations to the corresponding residues (threonine (203) and
asparagine (207) in the guinea pig H1-receptor
sequence produce very similar results (Leurs et al., 1994a
). It is
interesting to note, however, that whereas 2-methylhistamine is
similarly affected by the asparagine207 alanine
mutation, the H1-selective agonists
2-thiazolylethylamine, 2-pyridylethylamine, and
2-(3-bromophenyl)histamine are much less affected by this mutation
(Leurs et al., 1994a
). These data suggest that asparagine (207)
interacts with the N
-nitrogen of the imidazole
ring of histamine. Furthermore, Leurs et al. (1995a)
have recently
shown that lysine (200) interacts with the
N
-nitrogen of histamine and is important for
the activation of the H1-receptor by histamine
and the nonimidazole agonist, 2-pyridylethylamine. Interestingly,
however, the lysine (200) alanine mutation did not alter the binding
affinity of 2-pyridylethylamine to the guinea pig
H1-receptor (Leurs et al., 1995
).
|
D. Signal Transduction Mechanisms
The primary mechanism by which histamine
H1-receptors produce functional responses in
cells is the activation of phospholipase C via a pertussis
toxin-insensitive G-protein that is probably related to the
Gq/11 family of G-proteins (Hill, 1990
; Leurs et al., 1995b
). The number of tissues and cell types in which a histamine H1-receptor-mediated increase in either inositol
phosphate accumulation or intracellular calcium mobilization has been
described is extensive, and further details are provided in several
comprehensive reviews (Hill, 1990
; Hill and Donaldson, 1992
; Leurs et
al., 1995b
). Stimulation by histamine of
[3H]inositol phosphate accumulation and calcium
mobilization has also been observed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)
cells transfected with the human, bovine, and guinea pig
H1-receptor complementary deoxyribonucleic acid
(cDNA) (Leurs et al., 1994c
; Smit et al., 1996c
; Iredale et al., 1993
;
Megson et al., 1995
). It is worth noting, however, that in some
tissues, histamine can stimulate inositol phospholipid hydrolysis
independently of H1-receptors. Thus, in the
longitudinal smooth muscle of guinea pig ileum and neonatal rat brain
(Donaldson and Hill, 1985
, 1986b
; Claro et al., 1987
), a component can
be identified in the response to histamine that is resistant to
inhibition by H1-receptor antagonists. It remains
to be established, however, whether these effects are due to
"tyramine-like" effects of histamine on neurotransmitter release
(Bailey et al., 1987
; Young et al., 1988a
) or direct effects of
histamine on the associated G-proteins (Seifert et al., 1994
).
In addition to effects on the inositol phospholipid signaling systems,
histamine H1-receptor activation can lead to
activation of several other signaling pathways, many of which appear to
be secondary to changes in intracellular calcium concentration or the
activation of protein kinase C. Thus, histamine can stimulate nitric
oxide synthase activity (via a
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent pathway) and subsequent
activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase in a variety of different cell
types (Schmidt et al., 1990
; Leurs et al., 1991a
; Yuan et al., 1993
;
Casale et al., 1985
; Duncan et al., 1980
; Hattori et al., 1990
; Sertl
et al., 1987
). Arachidonic acid release and the synthesis of
arachidonic acid metabolites such as prostacyclin and thromboxane
A2 can also be enhanced by
H1-receptor stimulation (Carter et al., 1988
;
Resink et al., 1987
; Leurs et al., 1994c
; Muriyama et al., 1990
).
Interestingly, in CHO-K1 cells transfected with the guinea pig
H1-receptor, the histamine-stimulated release of
arachidonic acid is partially inhibited (approximately 40%) by
pertussis toxin, whereas the same response in HeLa cells possessing a
native H1-receptor was resistant to pertussis
toxin treatment (Leurs et al., 1994c
). The reason for this difference
remains to be established, but it does caution against the use of
signal transduction pathways in highly expressed recombinant cell
systems as a primary receptor classification tool. This point is best
illustrated by the fact that in intact cellular systems,
H1-receptor activation can produce substantial
changes in the intracellular levels of cAMP. In most tissues, histamine
H1-receptor activation does not activate adenylyl cyclase directly but acts to amplify direct cAMP responses to histamine
H2-, adenosine A2-, and
vasoactive intestinal polypeptide receptors (Palacios et al., 1978
;
Al-Gadi and Hill, 1987
, 1985
; Donaldson et al., 1989
; Garbarg and
Schwartz, 1988
; Magistretti and Schorderet, 1985
; Marley et al., 1991
).
In many of these cases, a role for both intracellular
Ca2+ ions and protein kinase C has been
implicated in this augmentation response (Al-Gadi and Hill, 1987
;
Schwabe et al., 1978
; Garbarg and Schwartz, 1988
). In CHO cells
transfected with the bovine or guinea pig
H1-receptor, H1-receptor
activation can also lead to both direct cAMP responses and to an
enhancement of forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation (Leurs et al.,
1994c
; Sanderson et al., 1996
).
| |
III. Histamine H2-Receptor |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Distribution and Function
Unlike the situation with H1-selective
radioligands, attempts to map the distribution of
H2-receptors by using radiolabeled H2-receptor antagonists have met with variable
success (Hill, 1990
). Thus, [3H]cimetidine and
[3H]ranitidine have proved unsuitable as
H2-radioligands, and in the case of cimetidine,
the binding to sites specifically labeled with the radioligand is
potently inhibited by imidazoles that have very low
H2-receptor binding affinities (Burkard, 1978
;
Kendall et al., 1980
; Smith et al., 1980
; Bristow et al., 1981
;
Warrender et al., 1983
). More success has been achieved with
[3H]tiotidine, which has a higher affinity for
the H2-receptor (table 7) in guinea pig brain, lung parenchyma,
and CHO-K1 cells transfected with the human
H2-receptor cDNA (Gajtkowski et al., 1983
; Norris et al., 1984
; Sterk et al., 1986
; Foreman et al., 1985a
; Gantz et al.,
1991a
), although studies in rat brain were not successful (Maayani et
al., 1982
). At the present time,
[125I]iodoaminopotentidine is the most
successful H2-radioligand (Hirschfeld et al.,
1992
). It has high affinity (KD = 0.3 nM) for the histamine H2-receptor in
brain membranes (Martinez-Mir et al., 1990
; Ruat et al., 1990b
;
Traiffort et al., 1992a
) and CHO-K1 cells expressing the cloned rat
H2-receptor (Traiffort et al., 1992b
). The
compound has also been used for autoradiographic mapping of
H2-receptors in mammalian brain (Ruat et al.,
1990a
; Traiffort et al., 1992a
). In human brain, histamine
H2-receptors are widely distributed with highest
densities (measured using
[125I]iodoaminopotentidine) in the basal
ganglia, hippocampus, amygdala, and cerebral cortex (Traiffort et al.,
1992a
). Lowest densities were detected in cerebellum and hypothalamus
(Traiffort et al., 1992a
). A similar distribution has been observed in
guinea pig brain (Ruat et al., 1990b
).
[125I]Iodoazidopotentidine has successfully
been used for irreversible labeling (Ruat et al., 1990b
; Hirschfeld et
al., 1992
).
|
Most information to date on the distribution of histamine
H2-receptor, however, has been provided by
functional studies in different tissues (Hill, 1990
). Histamine
H2-receptor-stimulated cAMP accumulation or
adenylyl cyclase activity has been demonstrated in a variety of tissues
including brain (Hegstrand et al., 1976
; Green et al., 1977
; Kanof et
al., 1977
; Palacios et al., 1978
; Gajtkowski et al., 1983
; Al-Gadi and
Hill, 1985
, 1987
), gastric cells (Soll and Wollin, 1979
; Gespach et
al., 1982
), and cardiac tissue (Johnson et al., 1979a
,b
; Kanof and
Greengard, 1979a
; Johnson, 1982
). Histamine
H2-receptors have a potent effect on gastric acid
secretion, and the inhibition of this secretory process by H2-receptor antagonists has provided evidence for
an important physiological role of histamine in the regulation of
gastric secretion (Black et al., 1972
; Black and Shankley, 1985
; Soll
and Berglindh, 1987
). High concentrations of histamine are also present
in cardiac tissues of most animal species and can mediate positive
chronotropic and inotropic effects on atrial or ventricular tissues via
H2-receptor stimulation (Black et al., 1972
; Inui
and Imamura, 1976
; Levi et al., 1982
; Hattori et al., 1983
; Hattori and
Levi, 1984
; Hescheler et al., 1987
; Levi and Alloatti, 1988
).
H2-receptor-mediated smooth muscle relaxation
has also been documented in airway, uterine, and vascular smooth muscle
(Black et al., 1972
; Reinhardt and Ritter, 1979
; Gross et al., 1981
;
Eyre and Chand, 1982
; Edvinsson et al., 1983
; Foreman et al., 1985b
;
Ottosson et al., 1989
). Finally, histamine
H2-receptors can inhibit a variety of functions
within the immune system (Hill, 1990
).
H2-receptors on basophils and mast cells have
been shown to negatively regulate the release of histamine (Bourne et
al., 1971
; Lichtenstein and Gillespie, 1975
; Lett-Brown and Leonard,
1977
; Ting et al., 1980
; Plaut and Lichtenstein, 1982
). Furthermore,
there is increasing evidence that H2-receptors on
lymphocytes can inhibit antibody synthesis, T-cell proliferation,
cell-mediated cytolysis, and cytokine production (Bourne et al., 1971
;
Melmon et al., 1974
, 1981
; Griswold et al., 1984
; Khan et al., 1985
,
1986
; Sansoni et al., 1985
; Melmon and Khan, 1987
). In the CNS,
histamine H2-receptor activation can inhibit
nerve cells (Haas and Bucher, 1975
; Haas and Wolf, 1977
), but the most
intriguing action is a block of the long-lasting after-hyperpolarization and the accommodation of firing, an effect with
a remarkably long duration leading to potentiation of excitation in
rodents (Haas and Konnerth, 1983
; Haas and Greene, 1986
) and human
brain (Haas et al., 1988
). A slow excitation is also common (Greene and
Haas, 1989
; Phelan et al., 1990
). Synaptic transmission in the
hippocampus is profoundly enhanced (Kostopoulos et al., 1988
), and
synaptic plasticity is induced or enhanced (Brown et al., 1995
). An
increase of the hyperpolarization-activated current has also been
described in thalamic relay neurons (McCormick and Williamson, 1991
).
Indications for non-cAMP mediated actions of H2-receptor activation are given by Haas et al.
(1978)
and Jahn et al. (1995)
.
B. H2-Selective Ligands
The initial definition of the H1- and
H2-subclasses of histamine receptor by Ash and
Schild (1966)
and Black and colleagues (1972)
led to a successful
search for H2-receptor selective antagonists with
clinical relevance for the treatment of peptic ulcer. Burimamide was
the first compound developed that showed selectivity for the H2-receptor (Black et al., 1972
), but more recent
work has shown that this compound is a more potent
H3-receptor antagonist (Arrang et al.,
1983
). Cimetidine and metiamide were developed directly from burimamide
(Black et al., 1974
; Brimblecombe et al., 1975
; Ganellin, 1978
). Since
then, a large number of compounds have been developed with
H2-receptor antagonist properties [see Ganellin (1992)
for review]. These include ranitidine (Bradshaw et al., 1979
),
tiotidine (Yellin et al., 1979
), nizatidine (Lin et al., 1986
),
famotidine (Takeda et al., 1982
), and mifentidine (Donetti et al.,
1984
), which have been extensively used for characterization purposes
(table 3; fig. 6). Iodoaminopotentidine
(KD = 2.5 nM) is one of the most
potent H2-receptor antagonists available,
and, as mentioned above, this compound has been used as a successful radioligand (Hirschfeld et al., 1992
). Most
H2-receptor antagonists are polar compounds and
penetrate poorly into the CNS. Although this property is of great use
for selective actions on peripheral tissues (e.g., gastric mucosa), it
does limit the use of the compounds for the in vivo evaluation of
H2-receptor function within the CNS. However, one
compound (zolantidine) is a potent and selective brain-penetrating
histamine H2-receptor antagonist (table 3; Calcutt et al., 1988
; Young et al., 1988b
). Both cimetidine and ranitidine have been shown to demonstrate inverse agonism on histamine H2-receptors transfected into CHO cells (Smit et
al., 1996a
). Thus, in CHO cells expressing high levels of
H2-receptors, in which a considerable
constitutive activation of H2-receptors was demonstrated, cimetidine and ranitidine inhibited basal adenylyl cyclase activity (Smit et al., 1996a
). In contrast, burimamide behaved
as a neutral antagonist (Smit et al., 1996a
).
|
4-Methylhistamine was the first agonist described that had any
selectivity for the H2-receptor (Black et al.,
1972
), although more potent and selective
H2-agonists are now available (table 2). It is
noteworthy that many of the selective H2-agonists
exhibit H1- or
H3-antagonist properties (see table 2);
consequently the demonstration of H2-agonism in a
given tissue or cell type needs confirming with
H2-antagonists. Impromidine is approximately 48 times more potent than histamine in mediating atrial chronotropic responses, but in several other
H2-receptor-containing tissues, its relative
potency and efficacy are lower (Durant et al., 1978
; Leurs et al.,
1995b
). A large number of impromidine analogues have been synthesized
and evaluated for H2-agonism. These studies have
led to the development of the potent H2-agonists,
sopromidine and arpromidine (table 2; Timmerman, 1992c
). Arpromidine
and analogues are potential candidates for treatment of congestive heart failure (Buschauer, 1989
; Buschauer and Baumann, 1991
;
Mörsdorf et al., 1990
). Another potent
H2-agonist has been derived as an analogue of
dimaprit by considering cyclic forms of the isothiourea group (Eriks et
al., 1992
).
C. Receptor Structure
Photoaffinity binding studies using
[125I]iodoazidopotentidine and sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis have
suggested that the H2-receptor in guinea pig
hippocampus and striatum has a molecular weight of 59 kDa (Ruat et al.,
1990b
). However, comparison with the calculated molecular weights (40.2 to 40.5 kDa) for the recently cloned H2-receptors
(table 6) suggests that the native H2-receptor in
guinea pig brain is glycosylated. Consistent with this proposal, it is
noteworthy that all of the cloned H2-receptor
proteins possess N-glycosylation sites in the N-terminus region (Gantz
et al., 1991a
,b
; Ruat et al., 1991
; Traiffort et al., 1995
). Removal of
these glycosylation sites by site-directed mutagenesis, however, has
shown that N-glycosylation of the H2-receptor is
not essential for cell surface localization, ligand binding, or
coupling via Gs to adenylyl cyclase (Fukushima et
al., 1995
).
The H2-receptor was first cloned
by Gantz and colleagues using the polymerase chain reaction to amplify
a partial length H2-receptor sequence from canine
gastric parietal cDNA using degenerate oligonucleotide primers (Gantz
et al., 1991b
). This sequence was then used to identify a full length
H2-receptor clone following screening of a canine
genomic library (Gantz et al., 1991b
). Rapid cloning of the rat, human,
guinea pig, and mouse H2-receptors followed (Gantz et al., 1991a
; Ruat et al., 1991
; Traiffort et al., 1995
; Kobayashi et al., 1996
). These DNA sequences encode for a 359 (canine,
human, guinea pig) or 358 (rat) receptor protein that has the
general characteristics of a G-protein-coupled receptor. The most
notable difference between the structure of the cloned H2- and H1- receptors is
the much shorter 3rd intracellular loop of the
H2-receptor and the longer
H2-receptor C terminus. Expression of the rat
and human H2-receptor proteins in CHO cells has
revealed the expected pharmacological specificity of
H2-receptors as judged by radioligand binding
studies using [125I]iodoaminopotentidine
(Traiffort et al., 1992b
; Leurs et al., 1994c
). Recent chromosomal
mapping studies have assigned the H2-receptor gene to human chromosome 5 (Traiffort et al., 1995
).
Comparison of the H2-receptor sequence with other
biogenic amine G-protein-coupled receptors has indicated that an
aspartate in TM3 and an aspartate and threonine residue in TM5 are
responsible for binding histamine (Birdsall, 1991
). Replacement of
aspartate (98) by an asparagine residue in the canine
H2-receptor results in a receptor that does not
bind the antagonist tiotidine and does not stimulate cAMP accumulation
in response to histamine (Gantz et al., 1992
). Similarly, changing the
aspirate (186) of TM5 to an alanine resulted in complete loss of
tiotidine binding without affecting the EC50 for
histamine-stimulated cAMP formation (Gantz et al., 1992
). Changing the
threonine (190) to an alanine, however, resulted in a lower
KD for tiotidine and a reduction in both the
maximal cAMP response and histamine EC50 value
(Gantz et al., 1992
). Mutation of Asp (186) and Gly (187) in the canine H2-receptor (to Ala (186) and Ser (187), however,
produces a bifunctional receptor that can be stimulated by adrenaline
and inhibited by both propranolol and cimetidine (Delvalle et al.,
1995
). Thus, these data suggest that the pharmacological specificity of
the H2-receptor resides in only a few key amino
acid residues.
Other site-directed mutagenesis studies on the
H2-receptor have been very limited. However, Smit
et al. (1996)
have identified a residue in the second intracellular
loop [leucine (124)] of the rat H2-receptor,
which appears necessary for efficient coupling to
Gs.
D. Signal Transduction Mechanisms
It is generally accepted that histamine
H2-receptors couple to adenylyl cyclase via the
GTP-binding protein Gs (Johnson, 1982
; Hill,
1990
; Leurs et al., 1995b
). Histamine is a potent stimulant of cAMP
accumulation in many cell types (Johnson, 1982
), particularly those of
CNS origin (Daly, 1977
). Thus,
H2-receptor-mediated effects on cAMP
accumulation have been observed in brain slices (Al-Gadi and Hill,
1985
; Palacios et al., 1978
), gastric mucosa (Soll and Wollin, 1979
;
Chew et al., 1980
; Batzri et al., 1982
; Gespach et al., 1982
), fat
cells (Grund et al., 1975
; Keller et al., 1981
), cardiac myocytes
(Warbanow and Wollenberger, 1979
), vascular smooth muscle (Reinhardt
and Ritter, 1979
), basophils (Lichtenstein and Gillespie, 1975
), and
neutrophils (Busse and Sosman, 1977
). Furthermore, H2-receptor-mediated cAMP accumulation has been
demonstrated in CHO cells transfected with the rat, canine, or human
H2-receptor cDNA (Gantz et al., 1991a
,b
; Leurs et
al., 1994b
; Fukushima et al., 1995
).
Direct stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity in cell-free
preparations has been detected in both brain and cardiac muscle membranes (Hegstrand et al., 1976
; Green et al., 1977
; Green and Maayani, 1977
; Kanof et al., 1977
; Johnson et al., 1979a
,b
; Kanof and
Greengard, 1979a
,b
; Newton et al., 1982
; Olianas et al., 1984
). However, caution is required regarding the interpretation of receptor characterization studies using histamine-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity alone (Hill, 1990
). A striking feature of studies of histamine
H2-receptor-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity
in membrane preparations is the potent antagonism observed with certain neuroleptics and antidepressants (table
8; Spiker et al., 1976
; Green et al.,
1977
; Green and Maayani, 1977
; Kanof and Greengard, 1978
; Green, 1983
).
It is notable, however, that most of the neuroleptics and
antidepressants are approximately 2 orders of magnitude weaker as
antagonists of histamine-stimulated cAMP accumulation in intact cellular systems (table 8; Tuong et al., 1980
; Kamba and Richelson, 1983
; Hill, 1990
). One potential explanation of these differences resides within the buffer systems used for the cell-free adenylyl cyclase assays. Some differences in potency of some antidepressants and
neuroleptics have been observed when membrane binding of
H2-receptors has been evaluated using
[125I]iodoaminopotentidine (table 8; Traiffort
et al., 1991
). However, invariably the differences observed in the
Ki values deduced from ligand binding studies in
different buffers are not as large as the differences in
KB values obtained from functional studies (table
8). For example, in the case of amitriptyline, no difference was
observed in binding affinity in Krebs and Tris buffers (Traiffort et
al., 1991
).
|
In addition to Gs-coupling to adenylyl cyclase,
there are reports of H2-receptors coupling to
other signaling systems. For example, in gastric parietal cells,
H2-receptor stimulation has been shown to
increase the intracellular free concentration of calcium ions (Chew,
1985
, 1986
; Chew and Petropoulos, 1991
; Malinowska et al., 1988
;
Delvalle et al., 1992a
). A similar calcium response to histamine
H2-receptor stimulation has also been observed in HL-60 cells (Mitsuhashi et al., 1989
; Seifert et al., 1992
) and in
hepatoma-derived cells transfected with the canine
H2-receptor cDNA (Delvalle et al., 1992b
). In
these latter cells, the influence on
[Ca2+]i was accompanied
by both an increase in inositol trisphosphate accumulation and a
stimulation of cAMP accumulation (Delvalle et al., 1992b
).
Interestingly, the H2-receptor-stimulated
calcium and inositol trisphosphate responses in these cells were both inhibited by cholera toxin treatment (but not by pertussis toxin), whereas cholera toxin produced the expected increase in cAMP levels (Delvalle et al., 1992a
,b
). In single parietal cells,
H2-receptors have been shown to release calcium
from intracellular calcium stores (Negulescu and Machen, 1988
). It
should be noted, however, that no effect of
H2-agonists was observed on inositol phosphate accumulation or intracellular calcium levels in CHO cells transfected with the human H2-receptor (Leurs et al., 1994a
).
Thus, the effect of H2-receptor stimulation on
intracellular calcium signaling may be very cell-specific.
In CHO cells transfected with the rat
H2-receptor, H2-receptor
stimulation produces both an increase in cAMP accumulation and an
inhibition of P2u-receptor-mediated arachidonic
acid release (Traiffort et al., 1992b
). Interestingly, however, the
effect on phospholipase A2 activity (i.e.,
arachidonic acid release) was not mimicked by forskolin,
PGE1, or 8-bromo-cAMP, suggesting a mechanism of
activation that is independent of cAMP-mediated protein kinase A
activity (Traiffort et al., 1992b
). However, in CHO cells transfected
with the human H2-receptor, no inhibitory effects
of H2-receptor stimulation were observed on
phospholipase A2 activity (Leurs et al., 1994b
).
This observation suggests that these cAMP-independent effects might
depend on the level of receptor expression or subtle differences
between clonal cell lines.
| |
IV. Histamine H3-Receptor |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Distribution and Function
The high apparent affinity of R-(
)-methylhistamine for the
histamine H3-receptor has enabled the use
of this compound as a radiolabeled probe (Arrang et al., 1987
). This
compound has been successfully used to identify a single binding site
in rat cerebral cortical membranes, which in phosphate buffer has the pharmacological characteristics of the
H3-receptor (Arrang et al., 1987
, 1990
).
[3H]R-(
)-methylhistamine binds with high
affinity (KD = 0.3 nM) to rat brain
membranes, although the binding capacity is generally low
(approximately 30 fmol/mg protein; (Arrang et al., 1987
). Autoradiographic studies with
[3H]R-(
)-methylhistamine have demonstrated
the presence of specific thioperamide-inhibitable binding in several
rat brain regions, particularly cerebral cortex, striatum, hippocampus,
olfactory nucleus, and the bed nuclei of the stria terminalis, which
receive ascending histaminergic projections from the magnocellular
nuclei of the posterior hypothalamus (Arrang et al., 1987
; Pollard et al., 1993
). H3-receptors have also been
visualized in human brain and the brain of nonhuman primates
(Martinez-Mir et al., 1990
). H3-receptor
binding has been additionally characterized using [3H]R-(
)-methylhistamine in guinea pig
cerebral cortical membranes (Kilpatrick and Michel, 1991
), guinea pig
lung (Arrang et al., 1987
), guinea pig intestine, and guinea pig
pancreas (Korte et al., 1990
).
N
-methylhistamine has also proved successful
as a radiolabeled probe for the
H3-receptor. Although the relative agonist
activity of N
-methylhistamine (with respect to
histamine) is fairly similar for all three histamine receptor subtypes
(table 2), the binding affinity of histamine and
N
-methylhistamine for the
H3-receptor is several orders of
magnitude higher than for either the H1- or
H2-receptors (Hill et al., 1977
; Ruat et al.,
1990b
). This ligand can identify high-affinity
H3-receptor sites in both guinea pig (Korte
et al., 1990
) and rat (West et al., 1990
; Kathman et al., 1993
; Clark
and Hill, 1995
) brain.
The binding of 3H-agonists to
H3-receptors in brain tissues has been
shown to be regulated by guanine nucleotides, implying a linkage to
heterotrimeric G-proteins (Arrang et al., 1987
, 1990
; Zweig et al.,
1992
; Clark and Hill, 1995
). The binding of
H3-receptor agonists also seems to be
sensitive to several cations. Magnesium and sodium ions have been shown
to inhibit [3H]R-(
)-methylhistamine binding
in rat and guinea pig brain (Kilpatrick and Michel, 1991
), and the
presence of calcium ions has been reported to reveal heterogeneity of
agonist binding (Arrang et al., 1990
). The inhibitory effect of sodium
ions on agonist binding means that higher Bmax
values are usually obtained in sodium-free Tris buffers compared with
that in Na/K phosphate buffers (Clark and Hill, 1995
). West et al.
(1990)
have suggested that multiple histamine H3-receptor subtypes exist in rat brain
(termed H3A and
H3B) on the basis of
[3H]N
-methylhistamine
binding in rat cerebral cortical membranes in 50 mM Tris
buffer. Under these conditions, the selective
H3-antagonist thioperamide can discriminate
two affinity binding states (West et al., 1990
). However, Clark and
Hill (1995)
have noted that the observed heterogeneity of thioperamide
binding is dependent on the concentration of sodium ions or guanine
nucleotides within the incubation medium. Thus, in the presence of 100 mM sodium chloride, thioperamide binding conforms to a
single binding isotherm (Clark and Hill, 1995
). The simplest
interpretation of these data is that the
H3-receptor can exist in different
conformations for which thioperamide, but not agonists or other
H3-antagonists (e.g., clobenpropit), can
discriminate. Clark and Hill (1995)
have suggested that the equilibrium
between these conformations is altered by guanine nucleotides or sodium
ions. If this hypothesis is correct, it is likely that the different
binding sites represented resting, active, or G-protein-coupled
conformations of the H3-receptor. Furthermore, if thioperamide preferentially binds to uncoupled receptors, then this compound should exhibit negative efficacy in
functional assays.
More recently, radiolabeled H3-receptor
antagonists have become available. The first compound to be developed
was [125I]iodophenpropit, which has been used
to successfully label H3-receptors in rat
brain membranes (Jansen et al., 1992
). Inhibition curves for
thioperamide and iodophenpropit were consistent with interaction with a
single binding site, but H3-receptor
agonists were able to discriminate high- [4 nM for
R-(
)-methylhistamine] and low- [0.2 µM for
R-(
)-methylhistamine] affinity binding sites (Jansen et al., 1992
).
More recently, [3H]GR16820 (Brown et al., 1994
)
and [125I]iodoproxyfan (Ligneau et al., 1994
)
have also proved useful as high-affinity radiolabeled
H3-antagonists.
[125I]iodoproxyfan (Stark et al., 1996a
) is the
most potent and selective ligand available at the present time with a
KD of 65 pM (Ligneau et al., 1994
).
In rat striatum, in the presence of guanine nucleotides such as
guanosine 5'O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTP
S), 40% of the binding sites exhibited a 40-fold lower affinity for
H3-agonists, providing further evidence for
a potential linkage of H3-receptors to
G-proteins (Ligneau et al., 1994
).
[3H]thioperamide and
[3H]5-methylthioperamide have also been used to
label H3-receptors in rat brain membranes
(Alves-Rodrigues et al., 1996
; Yanai et al., 1994
). However,
[3H]thioperamide was shown to bind additionally
to low-affinity, high-capacity, non
H3-receptor sites in this tissue
(Alves-Rodrigues et al., 1996
).
In addition to data obtained from ligand binding studies, evidence for
the localization of histamine H3-receptors
has also come from functional studies, primarily involving inhibition
of neurotransmitter release. The
H3-receptor was first characterized as an
autoreceptor-regulating histamine synthesis and release from rat
cerebral cortex, striatum, and hippocampus (Arrang et al., 1983
,
1985b
,c
, 1987a
, 1988a
,b
).
H3-receptor-mediated inhibition of
histamine release has also been observed in human cerebral cortex
(Arrang et al., 1988a
). Differences in the distribution of
H3-receptor binding sites and the levels of
histidine decarboxylase (an index of histaminergic nerve terminals)
suggested at an early stage that
H3-receptors were not confined to
histamine-containing neurons within the mammalian CNS (Arrang et al.,
1987
; Van der Werf and Timmerman, 1989
). This has been confirmed by the
observations that H3-receptors can regulate
serotonergic (Schlicker et al., 1988
), noradrenergic (Schlicker et al.,
1989
, 1992
), cholinergic (Clapham and Kilpatrick, 1992
), and
dopaminergic (Schlicker et al., 1993
) neurotransmitter release in
mammalian brain. Histamine H3-receptor
activation inhibits the firing of the histamine-neurons in the
posterior hypothalamus through a mechanism different from autoreceptor
functions found on other aminergic nuclei, presumably a block of
Ca2+-current (Haas, 1992
). Electrophysiological
evidence for reduction of excitatory transmitter release (glutamate)
has been presented by Brown and Reymann (unpublished data, 1996).
Inhibitory effects of H3-receptor
activation on neurotransmission have also been documented in the
periphery. Thus, H3-receptors have been
identified regulating the release of sympathetic neurotransmitters in
guinea pig mesenteric artery (Ishikawa and Sperelakis, 1987
), human
saphenous vein (Molderings et al., 1992
), guinea pig atria (Endou et
al., 1994
; Imamura et al., 1994
), and human heart (Imamura et al.,
1995
). Inhibition of parasympathetic nerve activity has also been
observed in guinea pig ileum and human bronchi and trachealis (Trzeciakowski, 1987
; Tamura et al., 1988
; Ichinose et al., 1989
; Ichinose and Barnes, 1989
; Hew et al., 1990
; Menkveld and Timmerman, 1990
; Leurs et al., 1991a
,b
; Poli et al., 1991
). An inhibitory effect
of H3-receptor stimulation on release of
neuropeptides (tachykinins or calcitonin gene-related peptide) from
sensory C fibers has been reported from airways (Ichinose et al.,
1990
), meninges (Matsubara et al., 1992
), skin (Ohkubo and Shibata,
1995
), and heart (Imamura et al., 1996
). A modulation of acetylcholine, capsaicin, and substance P effects by histamine
H3-receptors in isolated perfused rabbit
lungs has also been reported (Delaunois et al., 1995
).
There is evidence that H3-receptor
stimulation can inhibit the release of neurotransmitters from
nonadrenergic-noncholinergic nerves in guinea pig bronchioles (Burgaud
and Oudart, 1994
) and ileum (Taylor and Kilpatrick, 1992
).
Interestingly, in guinea pig ileum, the
H3-antagonists betahistine and
phenylbutanoylhistamine were much less potent as inhibitors of
H3-mediated effects on nonadrenergic-noncholinergic transmission than they were as antagonists of histamine release in rat cerebral cortex (Taylor and Kilpatrick, 1992
). A similar low potency has been observed for these two
antagonists for antagonism of
H3-receptor-mediated
[3H]acetylcholine release from rat entorhinal
cortex (Clapham and Kilpatrick, 1992
) and antagonism of
H3-receptor-mediated 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) release from porcine enterochromaffin cells (Schworer et al.,
1994
). These observations provide support for the possible existence of
distinct H3-receptor subtypes, but these
responses need to be investigated further to exclude alternative
explanations. For example, Arrang et al. (1995)
have recently shown
that phenylbutanoylhistamine can inhibit
[3H]acetylcholine release from rat entorhinal
cortex slices and synaptosomes via a nonhistamine receptor mechanism.
Thus, the potency of phenylbutanoylhistamine as an
H3-receptor antagonist in these
preparations may be greatly underestimated because of the additional
nonspecific properties of the drug (Arrang et al., 1995
).
The observed inhibitory effect of
H3-receptor stimulation on 5-HT release
from porcine enterochromaffin cells in strips of small intestine
(Schworer et al., 1994
) provides evidence for H3-receptors regulating secretory
mechanisms in nonneuronal cells. This observation suggests that
H3-receptors may also be present in gastric
mast cells or enterochromaffin cells and exert an inhibitory influence
on histamine release and gastric acid secretion. Consistent with this
suggestion, H3-receptor activation has been
shown to inhibit gastric acid secretion in conscious dogs (Soldani et
al., 1993
). An autoregulation of histamine synthesis by histamine
H3-receptors has also been reported in
isolated rabbit fundic mucosal cells (Hollande et al., 1993
).
H3-receptors have been shown to relax
rabbit middle cerebral artery via an endothelium-dependent mechanism
involving both nitric oxide and prostanoid release (Ea Kim and Oudart,
1988
; Ea Kim et al., 1992
). Finally, there is a report that
H3-receptor activation can stimulate
adrenocorticotropic hormone release from the pituitary cell line AtT-20
(Clark et al., 1992
)
B. H3-Receptor Selective Ligands
The initial characterization of the
H3-receptor made use of the relative high
affinity of the agonists N
-methylhistamine and
histamine for the H3-receptor compared with the H1- and H2-receptors
together with the H3-antagonist properties of impromidine (H2-agonist), burimamide
(H2-antagonist), and betahistine (H1-agonist) (Arrang et al., 1983
, 1985a
). Since
then, several selective ligands (both agonists and antagonists) have
been developed that show little effect on H1- and
H2-receptors. The first selective H3-agonist was R-(
)-methylhistamine
(fig. 2), which capitalized on the marked stereoselectivity of agonist
binding to the H3-receptor compared with
that to the other histamine receptors (Arrang et al., 1985c
). Thus,
R-(
)-methylhistamine is two orders of magnitude more potent as an
H3-agonist than the corresponding S-isomer
(table 2). R-
1S-
-dimethylhistamine showed
slightly higher potency and even higher selectivity (Lipp et al.,
1992
). Imetit [S-[2-4(5)-imidazolylethylisothiourea] is a highly
selective, full H3-agonist that appears to
be more potent than R-(
)-methylhistamine (table 2; Garbarg et al.,
1992
; Howson et al., 1992
; Van der Goot et al., 1992
). Both
R-(
)-methylhistamine and imetit have been shown to be active in vivo
at low doses (Arrang et al., 1987a
; Garbarg et al., 1992
). Azomethine
derivatives of R-(
)-methylhistamine were prepared as lipophilic
prodrugs to improve the bioavailability of the hydrophilic drug,
particularly its entry into the brain (Krause et al., 1995
). Immepip is
another potent H3-agonist that has been
developed from histamine by extending the alkyl side chain to four
methylene groups and incorporating the amino function within a
piperidine ring (table 2; Vollinga et al., 1994
). Most recently, the
H3-agonist potency of a cyclic, conformationally restricted analogue of histamine (immepyr) has been reported (Shih et al., 1995
). This compound has been resolved and
the (+)-immepyr shown to have an H3-binding
affinity (Ki = 2.8 nM) one order of
magnitude higher than the corresponding (-)-isomer (Shih et al., 1995
).
In guinea pig ileum, however, (+)-immepyr was one order of magnitude
less potent (pD2 7.1) than
R-(
)-methylhistamine (pD2 8.2) as an
H3-agonist (Shih et al., 1995
).
Thioperamide was the first potent and selective
H3-receptor antagonist to be described
(Arrang et al., 1987
). This compound appears to act as a competitive
antagonist in most functional assays of
H3-receptor activity (Arrang et al., 1987
;
Hew et al., 1990
; Menkveld and Timmerman, 1990
), although Clark and
Hill (1995)
have suggested that it may possess inverse agonist
properties. More recently, several other potent
H3-antagonists have been described (table
3; fig. 7), including clobenpropit
(Kathman et al., 1993
), iodophenpropit (Jansen et al., 1992
), GR175737
(Clitherow et al., 1996
), iodoproxyfan (Ligneau et al., 1994
; Schlicker
et al., 1996
), impentamine (Vollinga et al., 1995
; Leurs et al.,
1996
), ethers (Ganellin et al., 1996
; Stark et al., 1996a
), and
carbamates (Stark et al., 1996b
). These compounds have initiated some
further discussion regarding potential
H3-receptor subtypes. Thus, iodoproxyfan
behaves as a partial agonist in both guinea pig ileum and mouse
cerebral cortical slices, whereas its noniodinated analogue only
exhibits slight agonist activity in the mouse brain preparation
(Schlicker et al., 1996
). In guinea pig ileum, the noniodinated
analogue of iodoproxyfan is a pure antagonist
(pA2 7.12; Schlicker et al., 1996
). These
observations point to differences in receptor structure in the two
preparations (perhaps species homologues?), but they could equally well
be accommodated by differences in the efficiency of
H3-receptor-effector coupling between the
two tissues. A similar observation has been made with a series of
homologues of histamine in which the ethylene side chain was modified
(Leurs et al., 1996
). Lengthening the side chain of histamine from two
to five methylene groups results in the highly selective
H3-antagonist impentamine, which is
equipotent with thioperamide as a competitive antagonist in guinea pig
jejunum (table 3; Vollinga et al., 1995
). However, in mouse brain
cerebral cortical slices, impentamine (like iodoproxyfan) exhibits
partial agonist activity (Leurs et al., 1996
). At the present time,
differences in receptor-effector coupling (and hence H3-receptor reserve) between mouse brain
and guinea pig small intestine provide the simplest explanation for
these observations.
|
Although many of the H3-selective ligands
have been fully characterized in terms of selectivity for each of the
three histamine receptors, it is worth stressing that the evaluation of
H3-receptor ligands against other receptor
systems is more limited. This needs to be borne in mind, particularly,
when considering the in vivo use of these compounds. For example,
iodophenpropit (Ki 11 nM) and
thioperamide (Ki 120 nM) have both
been shown to interact with 5-HT3-receptors
(Leurs et al., 1995c
), whereas iodoproxyfan did not (Schlicker et al.,
1995
).
C. Receptor Structure
Structural information on the histamine
H3-receptor is very limited, primarily
because of a lack of success in cloning the H3-receptor cDNA. At the present time,
there are only two reports of H3-receptor
purification studies. Using [3H]histamine as a
radioligand, Zweig et al. (1992)
have reported the solubilization of an
H3-receptor protein from bovine whole brain. Size-exclusion chromatography has revealed an apparent molecular
mass of 220 kDa (Zweig et al., 1992
). However, because the solubilized
receptor retained its guanine nucleotide sensitivity, it is likely that
the molecular mass of 220 kDa represents a complex of receptor,
G-protein, and digitonin (Zweig et al., 1992
). Cherifi et al. (1992)
have reported the solubilization (with Triton X-100) and purification
of the H3-receptor protein from the human
gastric tumoral cell line HGT-1. After gel filtration and
sepharose-thioperamide affinity chromatography, protein has been
purified with a molecular mass of approximately 70 kDa (Cherifi et al.,
1992
). However, it remains to be established whether this protein is
the histamine H3-receptor.
D. Signal Transduction Mechanisms
The signal transduction pathways used by the histamine
H3-receptor remain largely subject to
speculation, but there is increasing evidence to suggest that this
receptor belongs to the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors.
Evidence for this has largely been obtained from ligand-binding studies
involving the modulation by guanine nucleotides of
H3-agonist binding (Arrang et al., 1990
; West et al., 1990
; Kilpatrick and Michel, 1991
; Zweig et al., 1992
;
Clark and Hill, 1995
) and of H3-agonist
inhibition of 3H-antagonist binding (Jansen
et al., 1992
, 1994
; Ligneau et al., 1994
). The most direct evidence for
a functional H3-receptor-G-protein linkage
has come from studies of [35S]GTP
S binding
to rat cerebral cortical membranes (Clark and Hill, 1996
). In the
presence of H1- and
H2-receptor antagonists (0.1 µM
mepyramine and 10 µM tiotidine), both
R-
-methylhistamine and N
-methylhistamine
produced a concentration-dependent stimulation of
[35S]GTP
S binding
(EC50 = 0.4 and 0.2 nM, respectively)
in rat cerebral cortical membranes (Clark and Hill, 1996
). Furthermore,
this response was abolished by pretreatment of membranes with pertussis
toxin, implying a direct coupling to a Gi or
Go protein (Clark and Hill, 1996
). Evidence for
an involvement of pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins in the response
to H3-receptor stimulation has also come
from studies of histamine H3-receptor
signaling in human and guinea pig heart (Endou et al., 1994
; Imamura et
al., 1995
). In these tissues, histamine
H3-receptor-stimulation seems to lead to
an inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels responsible
for voltage-dependent release of noradrenaline (Endou et al., 1994
;
Imamura et al., 1995
).
Very little is known about the intracellular signal transduction
pathways initiated by histamine H3-receptor
activation. Several research groups have failed to observe an
inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity in different tissues and cells
(Garbarg et al., 1989
; Schlicker et al., 1991
; Cherifi et al., 1992
),
which might indicate that H3-receptors
preferentially couple to Go proteins. There is
one interesting report of a negative coupling to phospholipase C in the
HGT-1 gastric tumor cell line (Cherifi et al., 1992
), but this
observation needs confirmation by other research.
| |
V. Other Responses to Histamine |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Potentiation of Responses to N-Methyl-D-Aspartate
Studies in hippocampal cell cultures, acutely dissociated neurons,
and Xenopus oocytes expressing the recombinant
N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunits NR2B and NR1
have shown that histamine is able to enhance NMDA-activated currents,
independently of the known histamine receptors, via a mechanism that
probably involves the polyamine-binding site on the NMDA-receptor
complex (Bekkers, 1993
; Vorobjev et al., 1993
; Williams, 1994
;
Saysbasili et al., 1995
). Histamine and the polyamines spermine and
spermidine have also been shown to enhance glutamate toxicity in human
NT2-N neurons (Munir et al., 1996
). Interestingly, attempts to
demonstrate a similar effect of histamine on NMDA-induced currents in
rat hippocampal slices, or outside-out patches pulled from the somas of
these cells, were without success (Bekkers et al., 1996
). However, two studies using conventional and whole cell recording of neurons in the
CA1 region of slices of rat hippocampus concluded that the modulation
of NMDA-mediated synaptic currents was dependent upon pH (Saysbasili et
al., 1995
; Janovsky et al., 1995
). Thus, at low pH (7.2), histamine
enhanced synaptic currents, whereas at pH 7.6 it reduced them.
Interestingly, at physiological pH (7.4), no significant action of
histamine was seen (Saysbasili et al., 1995
).
B. A Role as an Intracellular Messenger?
Although most actions of histamine can be attributed to an
extracellular action, there are reports that histamine may have intracellular actions. The activity of the enzyme, histidine
decarboxylase, which catalyzes the formation of histamine from
histidine, has been observed to be high in several tissues undergoing
rapid growth or repair (Ishikawa et al., 1970
; Kahlson and Rosengren,
1971
; Watanabe et al., 1981
; Bartholeyns and Bouclier, 1984
;
Bartholeyns and Fozard, 1985
). These observations have led to the
proposal that newly synthesized (nascent) histamine may have a role in cellular proliferation, perhaps via an intracellular site. Some evidence has been accumulated that intracellular histamine levels (or
the activity of histidine decarboxylase) can be regulated by
tumor-promoting phorbol esters (Saxena et al., 1989
). Furthermore, Brandes and colleagues (Saxena et al., 1989
; Brandes et al., 1990
, 1992
) have suggested that N,
N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine (DPPE) might be
an inhibitor of a specific intracellular histamine receptor
(HIC). However, at the present time, the evidence
in favor of an intracellular histamine receptor has not been generally accepted, and alternative possibilities need to be explored. For example, the direct effects of histamine, or its analogues, on polyamine sites (Vorobjev et al., 1993
; Bekkers, 1993
) and
heterotrimeric G-proteins (Hagelüken et al., 1995
; Seifert et
al., 1994
) could explain many of the observations to date.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
a Address for correspondence: Professor S. J. Hill, Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
cAMP, cyclic adenosine
3c,5c-cyclic monophosphate;
cNDA, complementary deoxyribonucleic acid;
CNS, central nervous system;
DPPE, N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine;
GTP
S, guanosine
5'O-(3-thiotriphosphate);
NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate;
TM, transmembrane.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
the principle of syntopic antagonism.
In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.
25: 311-320, 1989[Medline].
S binding to pertussis toxin.
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
296: 223-225, 1996[Medline].
-imidazolylethylamine.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
41: 318-344, 1910.
synthesis and pharmacology of sopromidine, a potent and stereoselective isomer of the achiral H2-agonist impromidine.
Eur. J. Med. Chem.
24: 259-262, 1989.
participation of vascular H1- and H2-receptors in vasodilatory responses to carotid arterial infusion.
J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.
1: 97-108, 1981[Medline].
-substituted histamine derivatives in human leukemia (HL-60) and human erythroleukemia (HEL) cells.
Biochem. Pharmacol.
49: 901-914, 1995[Medline].
2-adrenoceptor stimulation inhibits histamine-stimulated inositol phospholipid hydrolysis in bovine tracheal smooth muscle.
Br. J. Pharmacol.
95: 1204-1212, 1988[Medline].
-methyhistamine to homogenates of rat and guinea-pig cortex.
Agents Actions
33: 69-75, 1991.
-methylhistamine.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
168: 979-986, 1990[Medline].
-methylhistamine: highly potent and selective histamine H3 receptor agonists.
J. Med. Chem.
38: 4070-4079, 1995[Medline].
stable expression in Chinese hamster ovary cells reveals the interaction with three major signal transduction pathways.
J. Neurochem.
62: 519-527, 1994c[Medline].
R,
S)-
,
-dimethylhistamine: a novel highly potent histamine H3 receptor agonist.
J. Med. Chem.
35: 4434-4441, 1992[Medline].
1-adrenergic and H1-histaminergic receptors.
J. Neurochem.
35: 362-368, 1985.
the effect of histamine and serotonin on vascular permeability: an electron microscopy study.
J. Biophys. Cytol.
11: 571-606, 1961.
-methylhistamine, and Sms 201-995 block plasma protein leakage within dura mater by prejunctional mechanisms.
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
225: 145-150, 1992.
2-adrenoceptors on noradrenergic terminals in mouse and rat brain cortex.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol.
345: 639-646, 1992[Medline].
2 and 5-HT3 receptors.
Inflamm. Res.
44: 296-300, 1995[Medline].
gene cloning, characterization and tissue expression revealed by in situ hybridization.
J. Neurochem.
62: 507-518, 1994[Medline].
-adrenoceptor agonists.
Eur. J. Pharmacol. Mol. Pharmacol. Sect.
172: 175-183, 1989[Medline].
-methylhistamine binding to rat tissues.
Jpn. J. Pharmacol.
65: 107-112, 1994[Medline].
2-phenylhistamines with high histamine H1-agonistic activity.
Eur. J. Med. Chem.
25: 673-680, 1990.
0031-6997/97/4903-0253$03.00/0
PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-J. Wittmann, R. Seifert, and A. Strasser Contribution of Binding Enthalpy and Entropy to Affinity of Antagonist and Agonist Binding at Human and Guinea Pig Histamine H1-Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2009; 76(1): 25 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Fioretti, L. Catacuzzeno, L. Sforna, F. Aiello, F. Pagani, D. Ragozzino, E. Castigli, and F. Franciolini Histamine hyperpolarizes human glioblastoma cells by activating the intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): C102 - C110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Strasser, H.-J. Wittmann, M. Kunze, S. Elz, and R. Seifert Molecular Basis for the Selective Interaction of Synthetic Agonists with the Human Histamine H1-Receptor Compared with the Guinea Pig H1-Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2009; 75(3): 454 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Skovgaard, K. Moller, H. Gesser, and T. Wang Histamine induces postprandial tachycardia through a direct effect on cardiac H2-receptors in pythons Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2009; 296(3): R774 - R785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Korhonen, B. Fisslthaler, A. Moers, A. Wirth, D. Habermehl, T. Wieland, G. Schutz, N. Wettschureck, I. Fleming, and S. Offermanns Anaphylactic shock depends on endothelial Gq/G11 J. Exp. Med., February 16, 2009; 206(2): 411 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Strasser, H.-J. Wittmann, and R. Seifert Ligand-Specific Contribution of the N Terminus and E2-Loop to Pharmacological Properties of the Histamine H1-Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2008; 326(3): 783 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Davenas, A. Rouleau, S. Morisset, and J. M. Arrang Autoregulation of McA-RH7777 Hepatoma Cell Proliferation by Histamine H3 Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2008; 326(2): 406 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Willets, A. H. Taylor, H. Shaw, J. C. Konje, and R. A. J. Challiss Selective Regulation of H1 Histamine Receptor Signaling by G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 in Uterine Smooth Muscle Cells Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2008; 22(8): 1893 - 1907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Haas, O. A. Sergeeva, and O. Selbach Histamine in the Nervous System Physiol Rev, July 1, 2008; 88(3): 1183 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Pos, Z. Wiener, P. Pocza, M. Racz, S. Toth, Z. Darvas, V. Molnar, H. Hegyesi, and A. Falus Histamine Suppresses Fibulin-5 and Insulin-like Growth Factor-II Receptor Expression in Melanoma Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 68(6): 1997 - 2005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-M. Jangi, M.B. Ruiz-Larrea, F. Nicolau-Galmes, N. Andollo, Y. Arroyo-Berdugo, I. Ortega-Martinez, J. L. Diaz-Perez, and M. D. Boyano Terfenadine-induced apoptosis in human melanoma cells is mediated through Ca2+ homeostasis modulation and tyrosine kinase activity, independently of H1 histamine receptors Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2008; 29(3): 500 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Beghdadi, A. Porcherie, B. S. Schneider, D. Dubayle, R. Peronet, M. Huerre, T. Watanabe, H. Ohtsu, J. Louis, and S. Mecheri Inhibition of histamine-mediated signaling confers significant protection against severe malaria in mouse models of disease J. Exp. Med., February 18, 2008; 205(2): 395 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Strasser, B. Striegl, H.-J. Wittmann, and R. Seifert Pharmacological Profile of Histaprodifens at Four Recombinant Histamine H1 Receptor Species Isoforms J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2008; 324(1): 60 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Damaj, C. B. Becerra, H. J. Esber, Y. Wen, and A. A. Maghazachi Functional Expression of H4 Histamine Receptor in Human Natural Killer Cells, Monocytes, and Dendritic Cells J. Immunol., December 1, 2007; 179(11): 7907 - 7915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Bakker, M. W. Nicholas, T. T. Smith, E. S. Burstein, U. Hacksell, H. Timmerman, R. Leurs, M. R. Brann, and D. M. Weiner In Vitro Pharmacology of Clinically Used Central Nervous System-Active Drugs as Inverse H1 Receptor Agonists J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2007; 322(1): 172 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Preuss, P. Ghorai, A. Kraus, S. Dove, A. Buschauer, and R. Seifert Constitutive Activity and Ligand Selectivity of Human, Guinea Pig, Rat, and Canine Histamine H2 Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2007; 321(3): 983 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Preuss, P. Ghorai, A. Kraus, S. Dove, A. Buschauer, and R. Seifert Mutations of Cys-17 and Ala-271 in the Human Histamine H2 Receptor Determine the Species Selectivity of Guanidine-Type Agonists and Increase Constitutive Activity J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2007; 321(3): 975 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chhabra, Y-Z. Li, H. Alkhouri, A. E. Blake, Q. Ge, C. L. Armour, and J. M. Hughes Histamine and tryptase modulate asthmatic airway smooth muscle GM-CSF and RANTES release Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2007; 29(5): 861 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Bauer, R. J. Woolley, A. G. Teschemacher, and E. P. Seward Potentiation of Exocytosis by Phospholipase C-Coupled G-Protein-Coupled Receptors Requires the Priming Protein Munc13-1 J. Neurosci., January 3, 2007; 27(1): 212 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Ligneau, D. Perrin, L. Landais, J.-C. Camelin, T. P. G. Calmels, I. Berrebi-Bertrand, J.-M. Lecomte, R. Parmentier, C. Anaclet, J.-S. Lin, et al. BF2.649 [1-{3-[3-(4-Chlorophenyl)propoxy]propyl}piperidine, Hydrochloride], a Nonimidazole Inverse Agonist/Antagonist at the Human Histamine H3 Receptor: Preclinical Pharmacology J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 365 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kurata, T. Fujii, H. Tsutsui, T. Katayama, M. Ohkita, M. Takaoka, N. Tsuruoka, Y. Kiso, Y. Ohno, Y. Fujisawa, et al. Renoprotective Effects of l-Carnosine on Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Renal Injury in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2006; 319(2): 640 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Francis and W.H. W. Tang Histamine, Mast Cells, and Heart Failure: Is There a Connection? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1385 - 1386. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kim, A. Ogai, S. Nakatani, K. Hashimura, H. Kanzaki, K. Komamura, M. Asakura, H. Asanuma, S. Kitamura, H. Tomoike, et al. Impact of Blockade of Histamine H2 Receptors on Chronic Heart Failure Revealed by Retrospective and Prospective Randomized Studies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1378 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Nakano, C.-J. Kwak, K. Fujii, K. Ikemura, A. Satake, M. Ohkita, M. Takaoka, Y. Ono, M. Nakai, N. Tomimori, et al. Sesamin Metabolites Induce an Endothelial Nitric Oxide-Dependent Vasorelaxation through Their Antioxidative Property-Independent Mechanisms: Possible Involvement of the Metabolites in the Antihypertensive Effect of Sesamin J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2006; 318(1): 328 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-X. Xie, A. Kraus, P. Ghorai, Q.-Z. Ye, S. Elz, A. Buschauer, and R. Seifert N1-(3-Cyclohexylbutanoyl)-N2-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl]guanidine (UR-AK57), a Potent Partial Agonist for the Human Histamine H1- and H2-Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2006; 317(3): 1262 - 1268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-X. Xie, P. Ghorai, Q.-Z. Ye, A. Buschauer, and R. Seifert Probing Ligand-Specific Histamine H1- and H2-Receptor Conformations with NG-Acylated Imidazolylpropylguanidines J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2006; 317(1): 139 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Fryer, G. A. Reinhart, and T. A. Esbenshade Histamine in cardiac sympathetic Ganglia: a novel neurotransmitter? Mol. Interv., February 1, 2006; 6(1): 14 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Mondillo, Z. Patrignani, C. Reche, E. Rivera, and O. Pignataro Dual Role of Histamine in Modulation of Leydig Cell Steroidogenesis via HRH1 and HRH2 Receptor Subtypes Biol Reprod, November 1, 2005; 73(5): 899 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gutzmer, C. Diestel, S. Mommert, B. Kother, H. Stark, M. Wittmann, and T. Werfel Histamine H4 Receptor Stimulation Suppresses IL-12p70 Production and Mediates Chemotaxis in Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells J. Immunol., May 1, 2005; 174(9): 5224 - 5232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bruysters, A. Jongejan, M. Gillard, F. van de Manakker, R. A. Bakker, P. Chatelain, and R. Leurs Pharmacological Differences between Human and Guinea Pig Histamine H1 Receptors: Asn84 (2.61) as Key Residue within an Additional Binding Pocket in the H1 Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2005; 67(4): 1045 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-W. Fu, W. Schunack, and J. C. Longhurst Histamine Contributes to Ischemia-Related Activation of Cardiac Spinal Afferents: Role of H1 Receptors and PKC J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 713 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Iwata, J. Luo, R. B. Penn, and J. L. Benovic Bimodal Regulation of the Human H1 Histamine Receptor by G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase 2 J. Biol. Chem., January 21, 2005; 280(3): 2197 - 2204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Seyedi, C. J. Mackins, T. Machida, A. C. Reid, R. B. Silver, and R. Levi Histamine H3-Receptor-Induced Attenuation of Norepinephrine Exocytosis: A Decreased Protein Kinase A Activity Mediates a Reduction in Intracellular Calcium J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2005; 312(1): 272 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Slominski, D. J. Tobin, S. Shibahara, and J. Wortsman Melanin Pigmentation in Mammalian Skin and Its Hormonal Regulation Physiol Rev, October 1, 2004; 84(4): 1155 - 1228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. H. Moniri, D. Covington-Strachan, and R. G. Booth Ligand-Directed Functional Heterogeneity of Histamine H1 Receptors: Novel Dual-Function Ligands Selectively Activate and Block H1-Mediated Phospholipase C and Adenylyl Cyclase Signaling J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2004; 311(1): 274 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Fitzsimons, F. Monczor, N. Fernandez, C. Shayo, and C. Davio Mepyramine, a Histamine H1 Receptor Inverse Agonist, Binds Preferentially to a G Protein-coupled Form of the Receptor and Sequesters G Protein J. Biol. Chem., August 13, 2004; 279(33): 34431 - 34439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nakayama, Y. Kato, K. Hieshima, D. Nagakubo, Y. Kunori, T. Fujisawa, and O. Yoshie Liver-Expressed Chemokine/CC Chemokine Ligand 16 Attracts Eosinophils by Interacting with Histamine H4 Receptor J. Immunol., August 1, 2004; 173(3): 2078 - 2083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Thurmond, P. J. Desai, P. J. Dunford, W.-P. Fung-Leung, C. L. Hofstra, W. Jiang, S. Nguyen, J. P. Riley, S. Sun, K. N. Williams, et al. A Potent and Selective Histamine H4 Receptor Antagonist with Anti-Inflammatory Properties J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2004; 309(1): 404 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Blandina, M. Efoudebe, G. Cenni, P. Mannaioni, and M. B. Passani Acetylcholine, Histamine, and Cognition: Two Sides of the Same Coin Learn. Mem., January 1, 2004; 11(1): 1 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takeshita, K. Sakai, K. B. Bacon, and F. Gantner Critical Role of Histamine H4 Receptor in Leukotriene B4 Production and Mast Cell-Dependent Neutrophil Recruitment Induced by Zymosan in Vivo J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2003; 307(3): 1072 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Dere, M. A. De Souza-Silva, B. Topic, R. E. Spieler, H. L. Haas, and J. P. Huston Histidine-Decarboxylase Knockout Mice Show Deficient Nonreinforced Episodic Object Memory, Improved Negatively Reinforced Water-Maze Performance, and Increased Neo- and Ventro-Striatal Dopamine Turnover Learn. Mem., November 1, 2003; 10(6): 510 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Skelton, M. Cooper, M. Murphy, and A. Platt Human Immature Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Express the G Protein-Coupled Receptor GPR105 (KIAA0001, P2Y14) and Increase Intracellular Calcium in Response to its Agonist, Uridine Diphosphoglucose J. Immunol., August 15, 2003; 171(4): 1941 - 1949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Payne, J. A. Madri, W. C. Sessa, and S. S. Segal Abolition of arteriolar dilation but not constriction to histamine in cremaster muscle of eNOS-/- mice Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 11, 2003; 285(2): H493 - H498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Seifert, K. Wenzel-Seifert, T. Burckstummer, H. H. Pertz, W. Schunack, S. Dove, A. Buschauer, and S. Elz Multiple Differences in Agonist and Antagonist Pharmacology between Human and Guinea Pig Histamine H1-Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2003; 305(3): 1104 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Hofstra, P. J. Desai, R. L. Thurmond, and W.-P. Fung-Leung Histamine H4 Receptor Mediates Chemotaxis and Calcium Mobilization of Mast Cells J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2003; 305(3): 1212 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Koarai, M. Ichinose, S. Ishigaki-Suzuki, S. Yamagata, H. Sugiura, E. Sakurai, Y. Makabe-Kobayashi, A. Kuramasu, T. Watanabe, K. Shirato, et al. Disruption of L-Histidine Decarboxylase Reduces Airway Eosinophilia but not Hyperresponsiveness Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2003; 167(5): 758 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Fernandez, F. Monczor, B. Lemos, C. Notcovich, A. Baldi, C. Davio, and C. Shayo Reduction of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Expression in U-937 Cells Attenuates H2 Histamine Receptor Desensitization and Induces Cell Maturation Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2002; 62(6): 1506 - 1514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Brown, O. A. Sergeeva, K. S. Eriksson, and H. L. Haas Convergent Excitation of Dorsal Raphe Serotonin Neurons by Multiple Arousal Systems (Orexin/Hypocretin, Histamine and Noradrenaline) J. Neurosci., October 15, 2002; 22(20): 8850 - 8859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Toyota, C. Dugovic, M. Koehl, A. D. Laposky, C. Weber, K. Ngo, Y. Wu, D. H. Lee, K. Yanai, E. Sakurai, et al. Behavioral Characterization of Mice Lacking Histamine H3 Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2002; 62(2): 389 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Uveges, D. Kowal, Y. Zhang, T. B. Spangler, J. Dunlop, S. Semus, and P. G. Jones The Role of Transmembrane Helix 5 in Agonist Binding to the Human H3 Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2002; 301(2): 451 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Boehm and H. Kubista Fine Tuning of Sympathetic Transmitter Release via Ionotropic and Metabotropic Presynaptic Receptors Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2002; 54(1): 43 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gillard, C. Van Der Perren, N. Moguilevsky, R. Massingham, and P. Chatelain Binding Characteristics of Cetirizine and Levocetirizine to Human H1 Histamine Receptors: Contribution of Lys191 and Thr194 Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2002; 61(2): 391 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Takahashi, A. Yoshida, H. Iwagaki, T. Yoshino, H. Itoh, T. Morichika, M. Yokoyama, T. Akagi, N. Tanaka, S. Mori, et al. Histamine Regulation of Interleukin-18-Initiating Cytokine Cascade Is Associated with Down-Regulation of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Expression in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2002; 300(1): 227 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wenzel-Seifert, M. T. Kelley, A. Buschauer, and R. Seifert Similar Apparent Constitutive Activity of Human Histamine H2-Receptor Fused to Long and Short Splice Variants of Gsalpha J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2001; 299(3): 1013 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Muraki and Y. Imaizumi A novel function of sphingosine-1-phosphate to activate a non-selective cation channel in human endothelial cells J. Physiol., December 1, 2001; 537(2): 431 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Kelley, T. Burckstummer, K. Wenzel-Seifert, S. Dove, A. Buschauer, and R. Seifert Distinct Interaction of Human and Guinea Pig Histamine H2-Receptor with Guanidine-Type Agonists Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2001; 60(6): 1210 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I.-S. Jang, J.-S. Rhee, T. Watanabe, N. Akaike, and N. Akaike Histaminergic modulation of GABAergic transmission in rat ventromedial hypothalamic neurones J. Physiol., August 1, 2001; 534(3): 791 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yamasaki, I. Tamai, and Y. Matsumura Activation of histamine H3 receptors inhibits renal noradrenergic neurotransmission in anesthetized dogs Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): R1450 - R1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Megson, E. M. Walker, and S. J. Hill Role of Protein Kinase Calpha in Signaling from the Histamine H1 Receptor to the Nucleus Mol. Pharmacol., April 16, 2001; 59(5): 1012 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Hough Genomics Meets Histamine Receptors: New Subtypes, New Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2001; 59(3): 415 - 419. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Liu, X.-J. Ma, X. Jiang, S. J. Wilson, C. L. Hofstra, J. Blevitt, J. Pyati, X. Li, W. Chai, N. Carruthers, et al. Cloning and Pharmacological Characterization of a Fourth Histamine Receptor (H4) Expressed in Bone Marrow Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2001; 59(3): 420 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nguyen, D. A. Shapiro, S. R. George, V. Setola, D. K. Lee, R. Cheng, L. Rauser, S. P. Lee, K. R. Lynch, B. L. Roth, et al. Discovery of a Novel Member of the Histamine Receptor Family Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2001; 59(3): 427 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Silver, C. J. Mackins, N. C. E. Smith, I. L. Koritchneva, K. Lefkowitz, T. W. Lovenberg, and R. Levi Coupling of histamine H3 receptors to neuronal Na+/H+ exchange: A novel protective mechanism in myocardial ischemia PNAS, February 15, 2001; (2001) 51599198. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Drutel, N. Peitsaro, K. Karlstedt, K. Wieland, M. J. Smit, H. Timmerman, P. Panula, and R. Leurs Identification of Rat H3 Receptor Isoforms with Different Brain Expression and Signaling Properties Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2001; 59(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rouleau, H. Stark, W. Schunack, and J.-C. Schwartz Anti-Inflammatory and Antinociceptive Properties of BP 2-94, a Histamine H3-Receptor Agonist Prodrug J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2000; 295(1): 219 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jung, F. Pfeiffer, and J. W Deitmer Histamine-induced calcium entry in rat cerebellar astrocytes: evidence for capacitative and non-capacitative mechanisms J. Physiol., September 15, 2000; 527(3): 549 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Lovenberg, J. Pyati, H. Chang, S. J. Wilson, and M. G. Erlander Cloning of Rat Histamine H3 Receptor Reveals Distinct Species Pharmacological Profiles J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2000; 293(3): 771 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. M. Currie and A. P. Fox Voltage-Dependent, Pertussis Toxin Insensitive Inhibition of Calcium Currents by Histamine in Bovine Adrenal Chromaffin Cells J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2000; 83(3): 1435 - 1442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Levi and N. C. E. Smith Histamine H3-Receptors: A New Frontier in Myocardial Ischemia J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2000; 292(3): 825 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Giembycz and M. A. Lindsay Pharmacology of the Eosinophil Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 1999; 51(2): 213 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Lovenberg, B. L. Roland, S. J. Wilson, X. Jiang, J. Pyati, A. Huvar, M. R. Jackson, and M. G. Erlander ACCELERATED COMMUNICATION: Cloning and Functional Expression of the Human Histamine H3 Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 1999; 55(6): 1101 - 1107. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
X. Ligneau, J.-S. Lin, G. Vanni-Mercier, M. Jouvet, J. L. Muir, C. R. Ganellin, H. Stark, S. Elz, W. Schunack, and J.-C. Schwartz Neurochemical and Behavioral Effects of Ciproxifan, A Potent Histamine H3-Receptor Antagonist J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 1998; 287(2): 658 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gentilini, B.R. Curtis, and R.H. Aster An Antibody From a Patient With Ranitidine-Induced Thrombocytopenia Recognizes a Site on Glycoprotein IX That Is a Favored Target for Drug-Induced Antibodies Blood, October 1, 1998; 92(7): 2359 - 2365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Hatta, K. Yasuda, and R. Levi Activation of Histamine H3 Receptors Inhibits Carrier-Mediated Norepinephrine Release in a Human Model of Protracted Myocardial Ischemia, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 1997; 283(2): 494 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Oda, N. Morikawa, Y. Saito, Y. Masuho, and S.-i. Matsumoto Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Novel Type of Histamine Receptor Preferentially Expressed in Leukocytes J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 2000; 275(47): 36781 - 36786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Eto, T. Kitazawa, M. Yazawa, H. Mukai, Y. Ono, and D. L. Brautigan Histamine-induced Vasoconstriction Involves Phosphorylation of a Specific Inhibitor Protein for Myosin Phosphatase by Protein Kinase C alpha and delta Isoforms J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2001; 276(31): 29072 - 29078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Silver, C. J. Mackins, N. C. E. Smith, I. L. Koritchneva, K. Lefkowitz, T. W. Lovenberg, and R. Levi Coupling of histamine H3 receptors to neuronal Na+/H+ exchange: A novel protective mechanism in myocardial ischemia PNAS, February 27, 2001; 98(5): 2855 - 2859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |