Pharmacological Reviews xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnard, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Langer, S. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnard, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Langer, S. Z.

Vol. 50, Issue 2, 291-314, June 1998

International Union of Pharmacology. XV. Subtypes of gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors: Classification on the Basis of Subunit Structure and Receptor Function

E. A. Barnarda, P. Skolnick, R. W. Olsen, H. Mohler, W. Sieghart, G. Biggio, C. Braestrup, A. N. Bateson and S. Z. Langer

Molecular Neurobiology Unit (E.A.B.), Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London, England; Neuroscience Discovery (P.S.), Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Pharmacology (R.W.O.), U.C.L.A. School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California; Institute of Pharmacology (H.M.), ETH and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Biochemical Psychiatry (W.S.), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Experimental Biology (G.B.), University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; Pharmaceutical Division (C.B.), Schering A.G., Berlin, Germany; Department of Pharmacology, University of Alberta (A.N.B.), Edmonton, Canada; Synthélabo Recherche (L.E.R.S.) (S.Z.L.), Bagneux, France

I. Introduction
    A. Earlier Classifications of gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Receptors
        1. gamma -Aminobutyric acidA and gamma -aminobutyric acidB receptors.
        2. gamma -Aminobutyric acidC receptors.
        3. Benzodiazepine receptors.
        4. Excitatory gamma -aminobutyric acidA receptors.
    B. Conclusion on gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Receptor Types
II. Approaches to the Classification of the gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors
    A. Transductional Criteria
    B. Operational Criteria
    C. Structural Criteria
III. The Structures of the gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors
    A. The Repertoire of Subunit Types
    B. The Subunit Number per Receptor Molecule
    C. The Subunit Isoforms in One Receptor
    D. Possibilities for Subunit Stoichiometry
IV. Principles of the Classification
    A. Application of Selectivities at the Binding Site for Benzodiazepines and Their Functional Analogs
        1. The choice of a classification system.
        2. Benzodiazepine-responsive gamma -aminobutyric acid receptor subtypes.
        3. Notation.
    B. Advantages and Possible Modification of the Classification
    C. Nomenclature for the Site Binding Benzodiazepines and Modulators with Similar Activity
    D. Benzodiazepine Insensitivity
V. Chromosomal Localization of gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptor Genes
VI. Other Binding Sites in Relation to the Receptor Classification
    A. Other Modulatory Sites
    B. The gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Recognition Site
VII. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References

    I. Introduction
Top
Next
References

This article does not aim to review in detail the properties of gamma -aminobutyric acidA (GABAA)b receptors, because recent accounts of that topic are available. In this same journal, a review of the binding properties and pharmacology of these receptors has been published (Sieghart, 1995). Other reviews have dealt with their ion channel properties as well as their pharmacology (MacDonald and Olsen, 1994; Mohler et al., 1996a,b), whereas others have concentrated on their molecular biology and protein structure (Wisden and Seeburg, 1992; Smith and Olsen, 1995; Stephenson, 1995; McKernan and Whiting, 1996). Further, two recent books have provided many short review articles on the functional, behavioral, and psychopharmacological aspects of GABA receptors (Tanaka and Bowery, 1996; Enna and Bowery, 1997) and an account of these latter aspects will not be repeated here.

Building on that background, we will consider here how our knowledge of GABAA receptor structure and function could lead to a classification system. Such a system is not immediately obvious from those previous accounts, as it probably would have been with a one-subunit receptor of the G-protein-coupled class. It is surely no accident that all the present series of NC-IUPHAR reports in Pharmacological Reviews on the nomenclature of individual receptor types have so far concerned G protein-coupled receptors.c Certainly the G protein-coupled receptor class covers by far the largest numbers of receptor types; it includes most of the cases in which known clinical drug applications can be related so directly to those types that they have given a great impetus to the receptor analyses. However, beyond those considerations, a major reason for the success in classification of those types must surely be the distinction which can be made therein between the subtypes of a receptor, based on the fact that each will be created by a single polypeptide with a pharmacology which is encoded solely by its own sequence. This is not to say that the classification of any of the receptors previously surveyed in this series has been entirely obvious or without complexities. Nonetheless, the problems involved are generally concerned with borderline cases in which the sequence data or the discriminatory pharmacological tools were historically less satisfactory. How one longs for such a one-to-one correspondence in the case of the GABAA receptors!

The discussion here, therefore, is the first in the classification series to tackle a receptor of their class, i.e., the multisubunit, heteromeric ion channels directly activated by the transmitter. The combinatorial principle of receptor construction (to be discussed below) for these ionotropic receptors, which also is used extensively in glutamate and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, introduces a higher order of complexity. The functional unit is not the single polypeptide, and further, the functional properties contributed by a given subunit can vary with its interactions with the particular set of subunits in each receptor molecule. This complexity renders the recognition of the structures of receptor subtypes in their natural setting extremely difficult (in fact, at present, usually unattainable). Thus, it is not possible to construct a classification comparable with the comprehensive scheme for native receptor subtypes obtained in the previous articles in this series. Instead, a provisional version is presented which relies on the wealth of sequence and functional data available on the recombinant GABAA receptors.

A. Earlier Classifications of gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Receptors

1. gamma -Aminobutyric acidA and gamma -aminobutyric acidB receptors. GABA has been accepted as a neurotransmitter (in mammals and down to crustacea) for several decades. It is now evident that GABA mediates most inhibitory transmission events in the vertebrate brain. It was long clear that the fast, bicuculline-blocked response to GABA observed was caused by direct activation of an intrinsic anion channel in an entity subsequently termed the GABAA receptor. GABAB receptors were recognized later as bicuculline-insensitive, baclofen-stimulated metabotropic GABA receptors (Hill and Bowery, 1981) linked to G proteins. Confirmation by the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) cloning of a GABAB receptor, as a 7-transmembrane domain protein, has been accomplished recently (Kaupmann et al., 1997). The complete structural and functional distinction between GABAA and GABAB receptors has a clear parallel to that between nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, between 5-HT3 and metabotropic serotonin receptors, ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors, or ionotropic P2X and G protein-coupled P2Y receptors for nucleotides.

2. gamma -Aminobutyric acidC receptors. A third type of GABA receptor, insensitive to both bicuculline and baclofen, was designated GABAC (Drew et al., 1984). The GABAC responses are also of the fast type associated with the opening of an anion channel; they are, however, unaffected by typical modulators of GABAA receptor channels such as benzodiazepines and barbiturates (Sivilotti and Nistri, 1991; Bormann and Feigenspan, 1995; Johnston, 1996). Native responses of the GABAC type have occurred in retinal bipolar or horizontal cells across vertebrate species (Feigenspan et al., 1993; Quian and Dowling, 1993; Lukasiewicz, 1996) and can be expressed by rat retinal messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) injection in the oocyte system (Polenzani et al., 1991).

Although the term "GABAC receptors" still is used frequently for these bicuculline-insensitive ionotropic GABA receptors, we would argue that this terminology is no longer appropriate. The atypical GABA receptors at those retinal sites are mimicked when the recombinant rho  subunits are expressed, and rho  subunit mRNAs occur prominently in both human and rat retina (Cutting et al., 1991; Enz et al., 1995; Ogurusu et al., 1995, 1997; Zhang et al., 1995). rho  subunits are structurally part of the family of GABAA receptor subunits (Shimada et al., 1992; Kusama et al., 1993a,b), although their regulatory binding sites are obviously very distinctive. It would be unsatisfactory to separate these two branches of the ionotropic GABA receptor family as GABAA and GABAC receptors, with a metabotropic family, GABAB, lying between them. Moreover, if the designation of GABAC were retained, then it would be difficult to refuse the extension to GABAD, etc., types for ionotropic receptors which do not match either of the previously recognized GABAA and GABAC specifications. This would further decrease the logic of the GABAA/GABAB classification scheme. Thus, Sato et al. (1996) have proposed such a "GABAD" type, for an embryonic brainstem ionotropic GABA receptor that is insensitive to both GABAA and GABAB antagonists and is activated by both GABAA and GABAB agonists. Again, Perkins and Wong (1996) have suggested, based on an anomalous current evoked by GABA in hippocampal pyramidal neurons, that a "GABAD" channel may occur there with a different ionic selectivity. We therefore recommend that the term GABAC, as well as sequential terms for any new classes for ionotropic GABA receptors, be avoided. The rho -containing receptors are best classified as a specialized set of the GABAA receptors, as will be shown below.

3. Benzodiazepine receptors. The interaction with benzodiazepines (BZ) (fig. 1) has been a major influence in studies on GABA receptors because of the long history of therapeutic application of BZs as anxiolytics, anticonvulsants, sedative-hypnotics, and muscle relaxants. Although the BZs were introduced first into clinical practice in the early 1960s, it was not until 1975 that these drugs were recognized to act by potentiating the inhibitory action of GABA in the brain (Costa et al., 1975; Haefely et al., 1975). The presence of high-affinity, specific binding sites for BZs in the mammalian brain was then demonstrated (Braestrup and Squires, 1977; Mohler and Okada, 1977). Converging lines of evidence established that these sites are in the same macromolecule as the GABA sites and the chloride channel and that all three elements are coupled allosterically (Chang et al., 1981; Olsen, 1981; Paul et al., 1981; Sigel and Barnard, 1984). The term "GABA/BZ receptor" came into use for this complex (and is still encountered). Progress in this field until recently was driven by the synthesis of a vast range of BZs and BZ-like drugs, all acting at brain GABAA receptors and possessing clinical anxiolytic or sedative potencies correlated to their binding affinities there (Haefely et al., 1985).


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A diagrammatic representation of the spectrum of ligands with different efficacies, positive or negative, at the BZ binding site, and their allosteric actions on the GABA site (Haefely, 1989). The ligand efficacy depends on subunit composition. The evidence used was based on either whole animal responses or wild-type receptors. A similar profile would be obtained in, e.g., alpha 1beta ngamma 2 recombinants but not at some other subtypes.

Based on the finding that all the BZs then tested displaced in a monophasic manner the binding of [3H]BZs in different brain regions, it originally was thought that there was a single class of BZ receptors. However, the subsequent availability of compounds (for structures see fig. 2) with non-BZ structure such as the triazolopyridazine CL 218872, imidazopyridines (e.g., zolpidem), and certain beta -carbolines such as methyl-6,7-dimethoxyl-4-ethyl-beta -carboline 3-carboxylate (DMCM) or the propyl ester of beta -carboline 3-carboxylate (beta -CCP) (as well as 1-N-trifluoromethyl-benzodiazepines), which can displace [3H]BZ binding in a biphasic manner and possess a different affinity for BZ receptors in the cerebellum than those in the hippocampus or other brain regions, led to the concept of two BZ-receptor subtypes possessing a differential localization (Lippa et al., 1981; Braestrup et al., 1982; Leeb-Lundberg and Olsen, 1983; Sieghart and Schuster, 1984; Iorio et al., 1984; Arbilla and Langer, 1986; Corda et al., 1988). These were termed the BZ1 and BZ2 subtypes of the GABA/BZ receptor.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Structures of ligands discussed in the text. A, acting at the BZ site; B, C, and D acting at other sites.

In addition to these two central BZ receptor types, diazepam binding sites with high affinity for many BZs but with pharmacological properties clearly distinct from those of the "central" BZ receptors were identified in several peripheral tissues (Braestrup and Squires, 1977). These were designated "peripheral type BZ binding sites" (BZp) (Basile and Skolnick, 1986; Verma and Snyder, 1989) and frequently became referred to as "peripheral BZ receptors." These BZp receptors can be distinguished because they can be labeled selectively (at submicromolar levels) by a non-BZ ligand, the isoquinoline carboxamide PK 11195, and (in rodents but not in some other species; Basile et al., 1986) by an atypical BZ, 4'-chloro-diazepam (Ro5-4864) (Verma and Snyder, 1989), at sites that are insensitive to the antagonist BZ (fig. 1) flumazenil (Mohler and Richards, 1981).

The BZp receptors are unrelated to GABA receptors of any type, and the principal BZp type which has been identified by DNA cloning is a small protein that is associated largely with the mitochondrial membrane (Verma and Snyder, 1989). They are not relevant to the present classification scheme and we recommend that the term "BZ receptor" be dropped in relation to GABA receptors. The distinction made between central and peripheral BZ receptors will not be of value now, because BZp receptors subsequently have been found also in the brain.

Likewise, the term "GABA/BZ receptor," although useful for two decades, now may be considered obsolete, because (a) a binding site of some form for BZs is not specific to GABAA receptors, as just noted; (b) the BZ site is only one of a set of regulatory sites now known on GABAA receptors, as defined below, so it does not uniquely define these receptors; and (c) as will be discussed below, some GABAA receptors are insensitive to BZs because of one of several distinct molecular causes. Thus "GABA/BZ receptors" is neither synonymous with "GABAA receptors" nor does it define precisely a single receptor subset. Similarly, the terms BZ1 and BZ2 for subtypes of the GABAA receptor no longer are recommended. As described below, evidence on recombinant subunits now indicates that there are many more than two subtypes of GABAA receptors. This is paralleled by biochemical evidence on brain GABAA receptor proteins, e.g., using photoaffinity labeling of their BZ sites by irreversible reaction (Mohler et al., 1980) with [3H]flunitrazepam, which showed that multiple subunits carry BZ sites (reviewed by Olsen et al., 1996). BZ2, as the term has been used in the literature, does not equate to any one molecular subtype alone.

4. Excitatory gamma -aminobutyric acidA receptors. Yet another apparent distinction between sets of GABA receptors arises from observations that GABA can be an excitatory transmitter at certain loci in embryonic and early postnatal life in the mammal (reviewed by Cherubini et al., 1991; Ben-Ari et al., 1997). The excitatory response also may mediate the observed trophic role for GABA in nervous system development (Ben-Ari et al., 1997). Another form of excitatory GABA response is seen in tonically stimulated adult hippocampal pyramidal neurons (Staley et al., 1995; Perkins and Wong, 1996; Kaila et al., 1997). All the evidence on these excitatory receptors indicates that they are GABA-activated anion channels, in general similar to the inhibitory GABAA receptors. GABAA receptors therefore should be classified as one general type, whether their transduction is a depolarization or a hyperpolarization of the cell membrane. The subunit composition of these excitatory receptors has not been determined yet. It is possible that a different subunit composition increases the permeability of bicarbonate relative to chloride through the receptor channel, or that the subtypes involved are not necessarily different from those well known in the adult but that the chloride gradient across the cell membrane is inverted at the sites in question. Either of these situations could explain the observed excitatory GABAA receptor activity. The relative bicarbonate permeability of the channel rarely has been measured for any identified GABAA receptor subtype, but the possibility that it is increased in a particular case has been supported by Staley et al. (1995) and Perkins and Wong (1996). It need not be assumed that this would involve a receptor outside the range of GABAA receptor subtypes. Indeed, Kaila et al. (1997) have shown that activity-induced changes in intracellular chloride and bicarbonate and extracellular potassium, along with normal GABAA receptor function, can account for the GABA-excitatory phase in the tonically stimulated adult hippocampus. Further, the intracellular chloride activity of developing neurons (of the rat nucleus basalis) has been measured using gramicidin-perforated patch recording and shows a large decrease from the immediately postnatal to the mature brain, sufficient to account for the excitatory and inhibitory responses, respectively (Akaike et al., 1996). Likewise, the internal chloride concentration can be measured locally by confocal imaging based on a chloride-sensitive fluorescence, and this has shown that dendrites on some hippocampal or cortical neurons can exhibit a higher value than somatic locations (Inglefield and Schwartz-Bloom, 1996), confirming earlier suggestions of such a gradient. This also must be distinguished from subtype difference as a potential cause of the excitatory behavior of GABAA receptors on some dendrites. As further evidence for this, in the mature mammal the pituitary melanotropic cells are known to possess a very high internal chloride level, and activation of GABAA receptors (of normal pharmacology) there also is depolarizing (Tomiko et al., 1983). For all these reasons, it is unnecessary to provide a specific designation for receptors that mediate excitatory neuronal responses to GABA.

B. Conclusion on gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Receptor Types

All the available evidence suggests that GABA receptors can be classified simply as two types, i.e., ionotropic (the GABAA receptors) and metabotropic (the GABAB receptors). The criteria for classification into subtypes will be very different for these two receptor families. The combinatorial basis of GABAA receptor structure produces a remarkable diversity of receptor subtypes and requires a new form of classification scheme. The GABAB receptors must be classified separately and will not be considered further here. Likewise, the "peripheral BZ receptors" are unrelated to any GABA receptors and will not be classified here.

    II. Approaches to the Classification of the gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors
Top
Previous
Next
References

It previously has been accepted in this series of receptor classifications (see Hoyer et al., 1994) that the most fruitful comprehensive system is one in which evidence from three approaches, operational, structural, and transductional, is applied. How can these be applied here?

A. Transductional Criteria

For an ionotropic receptor the transduction (intrinsic ion channel opening or closing) is by definition the same for all of its subtypes. The alternative intracellular pathways used in other receptor classes have no counterpart here. However, in principle subtle differences within this single transduction pathway still could occur. Thus, for two subtypes being activated by the same agonist it might be possible to measure different kinetic constants in the channel opening or closing steps, or different desensitization behaviors, or different distributions of the open and closed channel states. Such cases are known for subtypes of other transmitter-gated channels, e.g., glutamate receptors or P2X nucleotide receptors (reviewed by North and Barnard, 1997). Differences in the kinetic properties among GABAA receptor subtypes have been investigated rarely so far. In one case, Angelotti and Macdonald (1993) found that some difference in the single-channel properties could be discerned in two recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in a nonneural cell line. Likewise, expressed recombinant receptors containing the alpha 6 subunit exhibit, at least in some cases, distinctive channel properties (Ducic et al., 1995). However, it may be difficult in practice to find such discriminatory differences in channel properties for many of the subtypes, as well as cumbersome to apply those in classification. Further, in the native setting it will be difficult, if not impossible, to determine whether any such difference instead is not caused either by some intracellular secondary reaction (e.g., a phosphorylation) or by the availability of a native modulator. Therefore, we will not consider transductional criteria for classifying these receptors.

B. Operational Criteria

Selective antagonists have been the most powerful operational tools for discriminating subtypes in other receptor classes (Kenakin et al., 1992). However, for the GABAA receptors, antagonists at the GABA site generally produce convulsions in vivo. Hence, therapeutic potential is limited and systematic exploration of antagonists has not been developed. A few compounds unrelated to GABA, such as certain arylaminopyridazines and cognate compounds (Heaulme et al., 1987; Melikian et al., 1992), have been developed as potent antagonists at GABAA receptors generally. Olsen et al. (1990) have shown that the binding of such compounds can discriminate between some subtypes in the brain; their functional study to identify selective actions on recombinant subtypes could be rewarding.

GABAA receptors are endowed with a variety of modulatory sites for which ligands have been found that can allosterically control the activation by GABA and/or the opening of the anion channel. With the possible exception of the N-methyl-D-aspartate subclass of glutamate receptors (another family of heteromeric ligand-gated ion channels ubiquitous in the brain), the number of different regulatory sites is greater than for any other receptor type. Modulatory sites offer the potential for discriminating among receptor subtypes, namely by the discovery or the design of agents that can act at these sites but can recognize differences in a given site as it occurs in different subunit combinations. Thus far, this possibility has been realized to some extent with the site at which BZ and molecules with BZ-like activity bind, as we shall see. Other established modulatory sites, which can exist on these receptors and which might be used thus include those for barbiturates, neuro-steroids, propofol, certain other anesthetics, furosemide, zinc, picrotoxin, and some other channel blockers, loreclezole, substituted pyrazinones, and dihydro-imidazoquinoxalines. Those compounds and the evidence of their interaction with GABAA receptors are reviewed by Sieghart (1995), Im et al. (1993a,b), Wafford et al. (1994), and Korpi et al. (1995). Only occasional clues to subunit selectivity have been obtained for any of the latter sites.

C. Structural Criteria

The multisubunit compositions of the GABAA receptors, which create the subtypes, are of primary importance in their classification. In practice, it is not a straightforward task to use the subunit sequences and the subunit assemblies as the primary basis of a classification, a topic which now requires a fuller discussion below.

    III. The Structures of the gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors
Top
Previous
Next
References

A. The Repertoire of Subunit Types

Cloning from cDNA libraries or genomically so far has generated 19 related GABAA receptor subunits in mammals, which are each encoded by different genes. These now comprise 6alpha , 4beta , 3gamma , 1delta , 1epsilon , 1pi , and 3rho mammalian types [for references see Burt and Kamatchi, 1991; plus (epsilon ) Davies et al., 1997 and Whiting et al., 1997; (pi ) Heblom and Kirkness, 1997; (rho 1-3), see Section I.A.2.; for database accession numbers see fig. 3]. These polypeptides are all ~50,000 daltons in size, and each carries four putative transmembrane hydrophobic segments (TM1-4). Figure 3 illustrates the seven different sequence families into which these fall structurally and their relationships. A mammalian counterpart of the avian gamma 4 subunit (Harvey et al., 1993) has not yet been isolated by cDNA cloning and so is not included here. However, the beta 4 subunit gene, likewise discovered in the chicken (Bateson et al., 1991), has been shown more recently in humans (Levin et al., 1996).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Dendrogram depicting the relatedness of amino acid sequences between GABAA receptor subunits. Amino acid sequences were retrieved from the SWISS-PROT or NCBI databases. Most GABAA receptor sequences are available from the rat and so were used for the analysis, except for the beta 4 and epsilon  subunits. The chicken beta 4 subunit sequence was incorporated because the human homologue has been identified recently (Levin et al., 1996), although only a partial human sequence has yet been published. Similarly, the human epsilon  subunit has been identified (Davies et al., 1997), but the rat sequence has yet to be published. Thus, accession numbers of GABAA receptor subunit sequences used were: alpha 1, P18504; alpha 2, P23576; alpha 3, P20236; alpha 4, P28471; alpha 5, P19969; alpha 6, P30191; beta 1, P15431; beta 2, P15432; beta 3, P15433; delta , P18506; epsilon , U66661; gamma 1, P23574; gamma 2, P18508; gamma 3, P28473; pi , U95368; rho 1, P50572; rho 2, P47742 and rho 3, P50573. Outgroup sequences (see below) were all from the rat: nicotinic acetylcholine receptor delta  (nAChR delta ), P25110; nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha 2, P12389; and 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor, P35563. The predicted signal-peptide cleavage sites of all subunits were determined by the method of Nielsen et al. (1997). These did not always correspond to those previously indicated in the corresponding database entries and in such cases the newly determined cleavage sites were taken to be the more accurate. These were (signal peptide length in parentheses): alpha 5 (25), beta 3 (25), delta  (21), and rho 3 (25). A multiple alignment of the predicted mature peptides and the consequent phylogenetic tree descriptive file were created using CLUSTAL W version 1.7 (Thompson et al., 1994) under the default parameters. NJPLOT (Perriere and Gouy, 1996) was used to generate the graphic output of the gene tree. The branch root was determined by including in the analysis sequences of two non-GABAA receptor subunits from the same superfamily (Barnard, 1996b). Shown in this figure is the tree generated from the rat nicotinic acetylcholine receptor delta  subunit and the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5HT3) receptor subunit as outgroup representatives. No significant differences were found when either of these were substituted with the rat nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha 2 subunit sequence. The sum of the horizontal branch lengths connecting any two sequences represents the fractional divergence in their amino acid sequence, the scale bar corresponding to 10% sequence divergence. Vertical branches connecting groups are presented only for clarity, and their lengths do not infer differences between separate sequences, or groups of sequences, on the tree.

This heterogeneity is increased by alternative exon splicing of the pre-mRNA, which generates two forms of the gamma 2 subunit from one gene (Whiting et al., 1990; Kofuji et al., 1991), which can be distributed differently in the brain (Glencorse et al., 1992). Two such forms are also known for the beta 2 and beta 4 subunits (Bateson et al., 1991; Harvey et al., 1994). In each case, the longer and shorter products were designated "L" and "S," and differ by some form or other of a short peptide in the long intracellular loop between TM3 and TM4. Splicing also occurs to express two alternative forms of exon-1 of the beta 3 subunit (Kirkness and Fraser, 1993). Three potential forms of the alpha 5 subunit mRNA also exist (Kim et al., 1997) but with unchanged protein sequence. Another product of alternative splicing deletes a short sequence at the N-terminus of the alpha 6 subunit (Korpi et al., 1994), although this abolishes the functional receptor activity in all the combinations tested so far. Therefore, in assessing possible combinations of subunit types (other than rho ) to form a GABAA receptor, we must consider in a given mammalian species, including the splice variants, at least 7 alpha  forms, 7 beta  forms, 4 gamma  forms, 1 delta , 1 pi , and 1 epsilon  form. The recently discovered epsilon  and pi  subunits in each case can combine with alpha  and beta  subunits to form a functional, BZ-insensitive receptor (Davies et al., 1997; Heblom and Kirkness, 1997; Whiting et al., 1997). The pi  subunit has been detected clearly so far only in certain peripheral tissues (Heblom and Kirkness, 1997), and its range of combinations has not been defined yet. The GABAA receptors in the central nervous system (CNS) are formed, on present knowledge, by combinations of both alpha  and beta  subunits with one or more of the gamma , delta  or epsilon  subunit types (or possibly, exceptionally, of alpha  and beta  types alone). In addition there are three known rho  subunits that occur in the retina: rho 1 (Cutting et al., 1991); rho 2 (Cutting et al., 1992; Kusama et al., 1993b); rho 3 (Ogurusu and Shingai, 1996; Shingai et al., 1996). In co-expressions, evidence was not obtained to show that a rho  subunit can participate in combinations with the aforementioned alpha , beta , or gamma  types (Shimada et al., 1992; Kusama et al., 1993a), although more recently a rho 1gamma 2 heteromer forming in heterologous expression was suggested (Pan et al., 1997). In the rat retina, however, a recent study by immunofluorescence microscopy showed punctate localizations of non-rho GABAA receptors and of rho -containing receptors, which occur at different synapses and do not overlap (Koulen et al., 1998). Hence, a pool of at least 20 subunit types may be used in forming combinatorially the CNS GABAA receptors, plus at least 3 rho  subunit types which assemble in a restricted manner.

B. The Subunit Number per Receptor Molecule

To understand the construction of GABAA receptor subtypes from this repertoire of subunits, it is necessary first to establish the total number of subunits in each receptor molecule, then to know whether this number is constant for all the native compositions, and finally to know the stoichiometry of the subunit types within that number. Regarding the number of subunits per receptor, the suggestion often has been made that this will be the same (five subunits) as for another transmitter-gated ion channel where the composition has been established unequivocally. Thus, the GABAA receptor subunits share a low but definite (~25%) amino acid sequence homology with the subunits of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, both being in the same superfamily of the transmitter-gated ion channels (Schofield et al., 1987; Barnard, 1996b). The muscle type of that receptor occurs in Torpedo electric organ at such a high density in large postsynaptic membrane sheets that it is possible to prepare membranes containing a surface lattice of the receptors, from which a low-resolution three-dimensional structure of the molecule could be obtained by electron optical diffraction techniques (Toyoshima and Unwin, 1988; Unwin, 1993). Those studies clearly showed that the muscle type nicotinic receptor is pentameric, with the ion channel located in the center of a rosette formed by five homologous subunits (with the stoichiometry alpha 2 beta gamma delta ).

For the GABAA receptors, the situation is necessarily more complex, because the unique situation in the Torpedo postsynaptic membranes does not recur in the mammalian CNS and because there are many types of subunits involved, in varying combinations, in the receptor population. It is preferable, therefore, to use the natural GABAA receptor population from the brain rather than a selected recombinant composition expressed in a nonneural cell, which may or may not be representative of the native population; further, when direct analyses are made on the latter, these will not be limited by an assumption of the subunit classes to be taken as co-assembling. Using purified GABAA receptors from pig brain cortex and image analysis in the electron microscope, dispersed single receptor molecules can be visualized and analyzed (fig. 4). This method yields a power spectrum for each particle with a peak at its dominant symmetry. Figure 4 illustrates that this symmetry is five-fold, over the population of particles analyzed (Nayeem et al., 1994). Further, the negatively stained images obtained for all the receptor particles indicated a central pore in the pentameric rosette. These data correspond to the images observed with negatively stained Torpedo receptor particles, because of a central channel in the membrane enclosed within the pentameric receptor in the latter case (Toyoshima and Unwin, 1988). The particles isolated from brain will comprise a variety of GABAA receptor subtypes. These data show that at least the majority of those receptors are pentameric; a deviating small minority with an atypical subunit number would not be distinguished from the experimental noise. Independent evidence to support the pentameric structure has been obtained in several ways. Hydrodynamic estimates of the size of GABAA receptors, either native (Mamalaki et al., 1989) or alpha 1beta 3gamma 2 recombinants (Tretter et al., 1997), in solution are consistent with the pentameric molecular weight. Further, the integral ratios of the subunits combined in several forms of functional recombinant receptors, as determined by diverse methods, fit best in each case with a subunit total of five (Im et al., 1995; Chang et al., 1996; Tretter et al., 1997). For parallel evidence, a method similar to that of Nayeem et al. (1994) has been used for the native 5HT3 receptors by Boess et al. (1995) and there is supporting evidence by other methods for the neuronal nicotinic receptors and the glycine receptor (reviewed by Barnard, 1996b), all of these being in the same superfamily and all being deduced to be pentameric. In view of this concurrence with other receptors in the same superfamily, it is presumed that the pentameric structure that has been observed, within experimental error, for GABAA receptors holds for at least the great majority of that receptor type.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Evidence for the pentameric structure of native GABAA receptors. The electron microscopic images of a population of pure GABAA receptor molecules analyzed to yield dominant symmetry for each particle were used in plotting the histogram (for details see Nayeem et al., 1994). Particles with only one-fold apparent symmetry, which is trivial, were rejected. The form of the distribution seen around the peak at five-fold symmetry is consistent with 100% being pentameric, because the apparent spread to some lower symmetries can be caused by tilted particles. The distribution shown was confirmed on a large number of the particles (from Nayeem et al., 1994; E. A. Barnard, personal communication).

It can be concluded that the repertoire of (at least) 24 mammalian subunit isoforms described above is drawn on to a total of 5 for each receptor molecule. Evidence discussed below will show that in most (but not all) GABAA receptors alpha , beta , and gamma  subunits co-exist in one molecule, and that yet other combinations exist accommodating in special ways the other subunit types, delta , epsilon , pi , and (separately) rho . It is assumed that the rho -containing receptors are also pentameric, but this question has not been studied as yet.

C. The Subunit Isoforms in One Receptor

The majority of GABAA receptors contain, as noted, alpha , beta , and gamma  subunits, whereas the total number of subunits per receptor is five (fig. 4). Hence the receptors in this set can have at least one of three general compositions: 2alpha .2beta .gamma ; 2alpha .beta .2gamma ; alpha .2beta .2gamma . Here, a notation is introduced in which the numeral represents the number of molecules of a given subunit class (alpha , beta , etc.) present in one receptor molecule and not the isoform identity within that class; separating points are then used, and are absent when the stoichiometry is not being indicated. Such additional cases as 3alpha .beta .gamma and alpha .beta .3gamma are theoretically possible, but measurements of an electrophysiological property determined quantitatively by the number of tagged recombinant subunits of each type forming the channel (Backus et al., 1993; Chang et al., 1996), in the cases of co-expression of the alpha 3beta 2gamma 2 or alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 subunits, have excluded (at least in those cases) the presence of three of any of those types in one receptor molecule. The next logical step in enumerating the potential combinations of subunits, therefore, is to ask whether two isoforms of alpha  or of beta  or of gamma  can occur in one receptor molecule, e.g., to produce compositions of the type (alpha 1alpha 2).2beta .gamma .

In the alpha  subunits, there is a variety of evidence for such a co-occurrence of isoforms in a minority of GABAA receptors. This evidence has come first from co-precipitation of a second alpha  isoform when a brain-derived population of GABAA receptors is treated with an antibody specific for a first alpha  isoform. Receptors containing at least the pairs alpha 1alpha 2, alpha 1alpha 3, alpha 1alpha 5, alpha 2alpha 3, and alpha 3alpha 5 have been detected thus (each in a minority, with the majority of receptors in the population containing a single alpha  isoform) (Duggan et al., 1991; Luddens et al., 1991; Zezula and Sieghart, 1991; Endo and Olsen, 1993; Mertens et al., 1993; Pollard et al., 1993; Khan et al., 1996; McKernan and Whiting, 1996). Further, for the alpha 6 subunit that occurs (in the mature brain) only in the cerebellar granule cells (Laurie et al., 1992; Thompson et al., 1992) and in the similar granule cells of the cochlear nucleus (Varecka et al., 1994), antibody reactivities show alpha 1 and alpha 6 co-occurring in one cerebellar receptor (Pollard et al., 1995; Khan et al., 1996), although not for all the alpha 6 subunits there. For the gamma  subunits, the similar use of isoform-specific antibodies has, on brain extracts or purified receptor preparations, shown evidence for the co-occurrence of gamma 2 with gamma 3 and also of gamma 2L with gamma 2S (Khan et al., 1994a,b; Quirk et al., 1994a).

A second method for investigation of possible co-occurrence of particular isoforms is the application of isoform-specific antibodies in situ, i.e., in light or electron microscopic studies (table 1). Thus, by confocal laser microscopy with double or triple immunofluorescent staining, Fritschy et al. (1992) and Mohler et al. (1996a) have found that certain alpha  pairs were co-localized on the membranes of various neurons (table 2). Co-localization of alpha 1 and alpha 6 subunits in single synapses of rat cerebellar granule cells also has been demonstrated by double-antibody labeling in postembedding electron microscopy (Nusser et al., 1996), although when used in a freeze-fracture method on such cells in culture a co-localization of alpha 1 and alpha 6 was not seen (Caruncho and Costa, 1994). Third, some electrophysiological properties of a recombinant alpha beta gamma assembly containing two isoforms of alpha  can be distinct from those with either isoform separately, demonstrated with alpha 1alpha 3 or alpha 1alpha 5 pairings (Ebert et al., 1994; Verdoorn, 1994).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Methods for recognition of gamma -aminobutyric acidA receptor subtypes in situ

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Some of the gamma -aminobutyric acidA receptor subtypes in specified rat neuronsa

Further, the delta  subunit often has been found to replace gamma  subunits: Quirk et al. (1995) found that delta  and gamma  are completely separable by antibodies [although Mertens et al. (1993) found some co-existence]. delta  subunits were present in only 11% of all the receptors in rat brain but in 27% of those in rat cerebellum, from which both alpha 6beta ndelta and alpha 6beta ngamma 2 combinations can be isolated (Quirk et al., 1995) and where Caruncho and Costa (1994) found in situ that the receptors contain either a gamma  or a delta  subunit, but not both, by a label-fracture method. The subunit epsilon  (which has some similarities to delta ) also may replace gamma  in some cells of the hypothalamus and hippocampus (Whiting et al., 1997).

Receptor gene knock-out can provide additional evidence. In favorable cases it can show the co-occurrence of certain pairs of subunits. Thus, the homozygous mice lacking the alpha 6 gene also lack the delta  subunit protein in the cerebellar granule cells and the results obtained support other evidence that alpha 6 and delta  are paired in receptors there and not alpha 1 and delta  without alpha 6 (Jones et al., 1997). The specific pharmacology of alpha 6delta -containing receptors was confirmed in vivo in this system (Mäkelä et al., 1997).

D. Possibilities for Subunit Stoichiometry

On the basis of the extensive evidence reviewed above, that two isoforms of the alpha  subunit can sometimes occur in one receptor, the receptors are considered as having two alpha  places in the pentamer. Pollard et al. (1995) supported this by quantitation in the alpha 1alpha 6-containing cerebellar receptor. Likewise, Khan et al. (1994a,b) and Quirk et al. (1994a,b) found that two different gamma  isoforms can co-occur, although Mossier et al. (1994) and Im et al. (1995) did not find this; if the former statement holds two gamma  places can also be in the pentamer. However, it is not known whether any conclusion of this type would apply to the entire native population of GABAA receptors. Because delta  has been observed at some sites (see above) to occur with alpha  and beta  subunits only, a plausible model is that either gamma  or delta  (and perhaps epsilon ) subunits can occupy the gamma  places (in different receptors). We will give an illustration here, only of the basis on which the theoretical maximum number of receptor compositions may be assessed.

Some of the native GABAA receptors may have the stoichiometry 2alpha .beta .2gamma (with the gamma  subunits in some cases being replaceable by delta  or by epsilon ). Several lines of evidence support this. Thus, for the gamma 2-containing receptors, there is evidence from immunoprecipitation analyses (as noted above) that the gamma 2gamma 3 pairing within one receptor molecule can occur in some cases (Khan et al., 1994b; Quirk et al., 1994a) and also that a subset of receptors in the cerebellum has the composition alpha 1alpha 6.beta .gamma 2S gamma 2L (Khan et al., 1994b, 1996). Further, Backus et al. (1993) have deduced, by incorporating mutant subunits with altered electrophysiological effects in the recombinant alpha 3beta 2gamma 2 receptor [expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells], that the 2alpha .beta .2gamma composition best fitted the properties found.

On the other hand, Chang et al. (1996), using a similar principle (in oocytes and using alpha 1, not alpha 3 subunits), found that there the evidence apparently favors the 2alpha .2beta .gamma composition. The same stoichiometry also was derived for alpha 1beta 3gamma 2 receptors, when expressed in HEK 293 cells, from the staining ratios of those subunits when separated in Western blots (Tretter et al., 1997). Moreover, the co-occurrence of beta 1 with beta 3, and of beta 2 with beta 3 (but not beta 1 with beta 2), isoforms has been indicated in some of the receptors from rat cortex by immunopurification (Li and De Blas, 1997) and likewise in rat cerebellum (Jechlinger et al., 1998). Benke et al. (1994) compared the fractions from rat whole brain containing beta 1, beta 2, or beta 3 subunits by immunoprecipitation and also excluded the beta 1beta 2 combination; however, in contrast to the findings just noted, they found that the beta 1beta 3 or beta 2beta 3 pairings also were absent. Overall, it is desirable to allow for possible 2alpha .2beta .gamma forms in the nomenclature. In view of this situation and of the evidence for 2alpha .beta .2gamma combinations, Li and De Blas (1997) suggested that the ratios of the beta  and gamma  subunits in the molecule (within the total of 5) may vary with the isoforms selected.

In the expression of recombinant receptors in either cultured cells or oocytes, any ternary combination of the alpha i beta j gamma k type tested so far can yield a functional receptor in the membrane (e.g., Kirsch et al., 1995). The limit to the number of ternary subtypes in vivo apparently is not set by barriers to the co-assembly in certain cases but by the program for gene expression of different isoforms in a given cell. However, in a case where this was tested (Angelotti and Macdonald, 1993), when such an alpha +beta +gamma set is expressed the ternary combination assembles (as far as the subunits are available) and is maintained at the cell membrane to the exclusion of binary combinations. Within the ternary assemblies, there are no obligate combinations or exclusions of alpha beta pairings known from the co-distribution data at the present resolution limits. However, some exclusions are known (see above) at the gamma /delta position. Moreover, the delta  subunit has a more restricted expression in the brain than gamma  subunits (Wisden and Seeburg, 1992) and has fewer co-occurrences with other subunits; the same is true for epsilon  (Whiting et al., 1997), whereas pi  is clearly detectable in certain peripheral tissues only (Heblom and Kirkness, 1997). Hence those subunits cannot be included on the same basis as the others in permutations of the possible compositions.

An enumeration is obtained on the basis that, for a given subunit set which will form one receptor, there will only be one arrangement and stoichiometry in the molecule. This is found to be so with all other heteromeric proteins containing tightly-bound subunits; for example, there is only one cyclic order of the subunits, alpha .,gamma .,alpha .,beta .,delta , present in the population of Torpedo acetylcholine receptors (Karlin, 1991). Moreover, with those subunits one does not find that the same receptor type, in a variety of skeletal muscles, can contain another stoichiometry. That constancy and the circular order of subunits around the rosette are fixed by the interactions between the interfaces of different subunits. In the case of a GABA receptor (the recombinant alpha 1beta 1gamma 2S), supporting evidence for a single configuration in the population, from the homogeneity of the channel properties, has been reported (Angelotti and Macdonald, 1993).

Therefore we do not count all possible permutations (n = 36) of 2 alpha  isoforms present (out of the 6), but only those for a fixed order (n = 21); likewise, for the others. Splice variants could increase these numbers on the same basis, except that two alternatives from one subunit cannot be assumed to be able necessarily to co-occur. From what is known so far of excluded compositions and the restricted co-occurrence of subunits in certain cases, Barnard (1996a) has suggested that a maximum of the order of 800 combinations, of the types observed so far, would then be calculated. The true number is likely to be far smaller than this, but still much larger than for other known receptor subtypes.

The rho  subunits apparently assemble separately from the others (discussed below). They do not affect the enumeration above, but can add a few separate subtypes in the total noted above.

    IV. Principles of the Classification
Top
Previous
Next
References

A. Application of Selectivities at the Binding Site for Benzodiazepines and Their Functional Analogs

1. The choice of a classification system. As noted above, this modulatory site presently offers by far the richest pharmacology for distinguishing subtypes of the GABAA receptors. BZs have no intrinsic activity on mammalian GABAA receptors, unlike some of the other modulators such as anesthetics (although such a direct effect of some BZs has been found at invertebrate GABAA receptors; Zaman et al., 1992). Most BZs act to enhance the action of GABA by increasing the frequency of channel openings and their bursts (Rogers et al., 1994). This can be explained partly by the ability of BZs to increase the affinity of GABA at its binding site. However, in tonic activation of hippocampal neurons by low GABA concentrations they also can increase the channel conductance (Eghbali et al., 1997).

Some other drugs were found to act in the opposite direction at this site, i.e., to decrease the action of GABA at its receptor (Polc et al., 1982; Braestrup et al., 1982), for which the late Willy Haefely introduced the term "inverse agonist," i.e., having negative efficacy at this site (fig. 1). One ligand class, exemplified by flumazenil, Ro14-7437, ZK 93426, or RP 60503, has such low efficacy (at most subtypes) that they effectively act as antagonists at this site (fig. 1). The wide range of BZs and other ligands active at the same site (table 3) that was examined has led to compounds which discriminate among some of the subtypes. When tested in recombinant subunits expressed (in either Xenopus oocytes or transfected mammalian cells) in various combinations, a variety of such effects can be found, as will be detailed below. For those cases where subtypes are established, the nomenclature for them ideally would be based only on molecular biology and would express the subunit composition, e.g., the "alpha 1beta 2gamma 2" subtype (which then could be abbreviated as GABAA122, etc.). Even this scheme would be cumbersome to use, e.g., needing expansion to cover all the subunit forms, etc., as discussed in Section IV.B. below. It is acceptable for stating the composition of an experimentally expressed mixture of recombinant