Department of Thoracic Medicine (P.J.B., K.F.C),
National
Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, and Department of
Pharmacology (C.P.P), Kings College, London, United Kingdom
 |
I. Introduction |
Asthma is a complex chronic inflammatory disease of the airways
that involves the activation of many inflammatory and structural cells,
all of which release inflammatory mediators that result in the typical
pathophysiological changes of asthma (Barnes, 1996a
) (table
1). By inflammatory mediators, we mean
cell products that are secreted and exert functional effects. We
reviewed the mediators of asthma in 1988 (Barnes et al.,
1988
), but since then there have been major advances in our
understanding of the mechanisms of asthma and the role of inflammatory
mediators. There is now greater understanding of each mediator; in
addition, novel mediators of asthma, such as the cytokines, have been
identified. To date, >50 different mediators have been identified in
asthma. Advances in this field have been greatly assisted by the
development of potent and specific inhibitors that either block the
inflammatory mediator receptors or inhibit mediator synthesis.
In writing this review, we have focused on new developments since 1988 and have emphasized studies in humans wherever possible. There is a
vast and rapidly increasing body of literature on mediators of asthma;
therefore, we have been forced to be somewhat selective. We have chosen
to emphasize the mediators and effects that we think are most relevant
to human asthma.
A. Cellular Origin of Mediators
Many inflammatory cells are recruited to asthmatic airways or are
activated in situ. These include mast cells, macrophages, eosinophils,
T lymphocytes, dendritic cells, basophils, neutrophils, and platelets.
It is now increasingly recognized that structural cells may also be
important sources of mediators in asthma. Airway epithelial cells,
smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts are all capable
of synthesizing and releasing inflammatory mediators (Levine, 1995
;
Saunders et al., 1997
; John et al., 1997
). Indeed, these cells may become the major sources of inflammatory mediators in the airway, and this may explain how asthmatic
inflammation persists even in the absence of activating stimuli.
B. Synthesis and Metabolism
There have been major advances in our understanding of the
synthetic pathways involved in the synthesis of inflammatory mediators. Many of the key enzymes have now been cloned; in several cases, specific inhibitors have been developed that may have useful
therapeutic effects. 5-Lipoxygenase
(5-LO)b inhibitors,
which inhibit the synthesis of leukotrienes (LTs), have already been
shown to have beneficial effects in the control of clinical asthma and
are now available for clinical use (Israel et al., 1996
).
C. Mediator Receptors
Many inflammatory mediator receptors have now been cloned. The
receptor for platelet-activating factor (PAF) was the first inflammatory mediator receptor to be cloned (Honda et al.,
1991
), and many inflammatory mediator receptors have been sequenced
since then. The receptors for many inflammatory mediators have the
typical seven-transmembrane domain structure that is expected for G
protein-coupled receptors. However, receptors for cytokines and growth
factors have markedly different structures, and usually two or more
subunits are involved (Kishimoto et al., 1994
). Receptor
cloning has yielded a much better understanding of receptor function,
because the receptors can be expressed in cell lines, allowing
investigation of the "pure" pharmacological features of the
receptor and enabling screening for drugs that interact with the
receptor. This has been important in elucidating the signal
transduction pathways involved in receptor function. Many signal
transduction pathways have now been identified. For noncytokine
mediators, inflammatory receptors are often coupled, through G proteins
(Gq and Gi), to phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis, but it is increasingly recognized that other pathways may also be activated, including the complex mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways that are involved in
more long term effects of mediators. Cytokine receptors signal through
complex pathways, including MAP kinases and other protein kinases, that
result in the activation of transcription factors. Transcription
factors regulate the expression of many genes, including inflammatory
genes themselves.
The cloning of receptors has made it possible to study the factors
regulating their expression. This may be of particular relevance in
asthma, because the inflammatory state may alter the gene expression,
translation, or function of receptors, thus affecting responsiveness to
different mediators.
D. Mediator Effects
Inflammatory mediators produce many effects in the airways,
including bronchoconstriction, plasma exudation, mucus secretion, neural effects, and attraction and activation of inflammatory cells.
Although the acute effects of mediators have been emphasized, there is
increasing recognition that mediators may result in long-lasting structural changes in the airways that are also mediated by the release
of inflammatory mediators. These changes may include fibrosis resulting
from the deposition of collagen, which is seen predominantly under the
epithelium even in patients with mild asthma. The airway smooth muscle
layer is also thickened in asthma, and this is likely the result of
increases in the number of smooth muscle cells (hyperplasia) and
increases in their size (hypertrophy) (Knox, 1994
). There may be
proliferation of airway vessels (angiogenesis) (Kuwano et
al., 1993
) and of mucus-secreting cells. There may also be changes
in the innervation of the airways.
E. Involvement of Mediators in Asthma
There are several lines of evidence that may implicate a mediator
in asthma. Firstly, it may mimic features of clinical asthma. Secondly,
the mediator may be produced in asthmatic patients. Thus, mediators or
their metabolites may be detected in plasma (e.g., histamine), urine
(e.g., LTE4), or, more likely, the airways (in
biopsies, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, induced sputum, or exhaled
air). However, this does not necessarily mean that the mediator plays
any important role in asthma. The best evidence for the involvement of
a mediator in asthma is obtained with the use of specific blockers.
These may be drugs that block the synthesis of the mediators (e.g.,
5-LO inhibitors) or drugs that block their receptors (e.g.,
antihistamines). Use of new and selective mediator blockers has
enormously increased our understanding of the individual mediators and
also of asthma itself. Although it is unlikely that blockade of a
single mediator will be entirely effective in controlling asthma, there
is accumulating evidence that some mediators are more important than
others. PAF receptor antagonists are of no obvious clinical benefit in
asthma (Kuitert et al., 1993
), but cysteinyl-LT (cys-LT)
receptor antagonists have considerable clinical effects (O'Byrne
et al., 1997
).
The role of a mediator in asthma may be difficult to assess when the
mediator has a long term effect on airway function. It is easy to
measure the effect of a mediator on airway smooth muscle, but it is
more difficult to determine its effect on airway microvascular leakage
and mucus secretion. It may be even more difficult to determine the
role of a mediator on chronic inflammatory effects, such as airway
smooth muscle proliferation and fibrosis, that may develop over many
years. However, prevention of the long term consequences of asthmatic
inflammation, such as irreversible airway narrowing, may be an
important goal of asthma therapy, and it is necessary to devise methods
to investigate how mediators may affect these long term consequences of asthma.
Asthma has a characteristic clinical pattern, and the histological
appearance of asthma is very similar among patients, even when there
are differences in asthma severity or in whether or not the asthma is
allergic. However, it is likely that there are differing mechanisms of
asthma among patients and that different patterns of inflammatory
mediators are involved. This suggests that mediator antagonists would
have different effects in different patients. This has already been
observed in the use of anti-LTs, because some patients appear to have
much better therapeutic responses than others. This might be related to
polymorphisms of the 5-LO gene (In et al., 1997
), but there
might be differences that relate to the type of asthma. Patients with
aspirinsensitive asthma are particularly helped by anti-LTs,
consistent with a critical role for cys-LTs in this type of asthma. As
more mediator antagonists become available, other patients who respond
well to a particular antagonist may be identified and the heterogeneity
of asthma may be revealed.
F. Chronic Inflammation
Although in the past much attention has been paid to acute
inflammatory responses (such as bronchoconstriction, plasma exudation, and mucus hypersecretion) in asthma, it is being increasingly recognized that chronic inflammation is an important aspect of asthma
(Redington and Howarth, 1997
). This chronic inflammation may result in
structural changes in the airway, such as fibrosis (particularly under
the epithelium), increased thickness of the airway smooth muscle layer
(hyperplasia and hypertrophy), hyperplasia of mucus-secreting cells,
and new vessel formation (angiogenesis). Some of these changes may be
irreversible, leading to fixed narrowing of the airways. These chronic
inflammatory changes are mediated by the secretion of distinct
mediators, although their role in asthma is still far from certain.
These factors include cytokines and growth factors. Cytokines are a
large group of protein mediators that play a critical role in
determining the nature of the inflammatory response and its
persistence. They play a key role in the pathophysiological changes in
chronic asthma and are being increasingly recognized as important
targets for treatment (Robinson et al., 1993c
; Barnes, 1994a
; Drazen et al., 1996
).
G. Transcription Factors
Transcription factors are DNA-binding proteins that regulate the
expression of inflammatory genes, including enzymes involved in the
synthesis of inflammatory mediators and protein and peptide mediators.
Transcription factors therefore play a critical role in the expression
of inflammatory proteins in asthma, because many of these proteins are
regulated at a transcriptional level (Barnes and Karin, 1997
; Barnes
and Adcock, 1998
). These transcription factors include nuclear
factor-
B (NF-
B) and activator protein-1 (AP-1), which are
universal transcription factors that are involved in the expression of
multiple inflammatory and immune genes and may play a key role in
amplifying the inflammatory response. Other transcription factors, such
as nuclear factor of activated T cells (NF-AT), are more specific and
regulate the expression of a restricted set of genes in particular
types of cell; NF-AT regulates the expression of interleukin (IL)-2 and
IL-5 in T lymphocytes.
H. Mediator Interactions
Many mediators are released in asthma, and it is clear that these
mediators interact with each other in some way. Mediators may act
synergistically to enhance each other's effects, or one mediator may
modify the release or action of another mediator. Little is currently
understood regarding these mediator interactions, however. The
development of mediator antagonists will greatly facilitate elucidation
of such interactions.
 |
II. Amine Mediators |
A. Histamine
Histamine [2-(4-imidazole)ethylamine] was the first mediator
implicated in the pathophysiological changes of asthma, when it was
found to mimic several features of the disease. Although histamine has
been studied extensively as a mediator of asthma, there are several new
findings regarding the role of this mediator in asthma.
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
Histamine is synthesized and
released by mast cells in the airway wall and by circulating and
infiltrating basophils. Although airway mast cells are likely to be the
major cellular source of histamine in asthma, there is increasing
evidence that basophils may be recruited to asthmatic airways and
may release histamine in response to cytokine histamine-releasing
factors (Schroeder and MacGlashan, 1997
).
Histamine is formed by decarboxylation of the amino acid histidine by
the enzyme L-histidine decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.22), which is dependent on the cofactor pyridoxal-5'-phosphate. Histamine is
stored in granules within mast cells and basophils, where it is closely
associated with the anionic proteoglycans heparin (in mast cells) and
chondroitin-4-sulfate (in basophils). Histamine may be released when
these cells degranulate in response to various immunological
[immunoglobulin (Ig)E or cytokines] or nonimmunological (compound
48/80, calcium ionophore, mastoparin, substance P (SP), opioids, or
hypo-osmolar solutions) stimuli.
Only a small amount of the histamine released (2 to 3%) is excreted
unchanged. The remainder is metabolized, via two major pathways, and
excreted in the urine. The majority (50 to 80%) is metabolized by
histamine N-methyltransferase (HMT) (EC 2.1.1.8) to N-methylhistamine,
which is itself metabolized by monoamine oxidase to N-methylimidazole
acetic acid, the major urinary metabolite. The remaining histamine is
metabolized by diamine oxidase (EC 1.4.3.6) to imidazole acetic acid,
which is excreted in the urine. HMT appears to be the most important
enzyme contributing to the degradation of histamine in the airways,
because blockers of HMT (such as SKF 91488) increase the
bronchoconstricting action of histamine in vitro and in vivo, whereas
diamine oxidase inhibition is without effect (Sekizawa et
al., 1993
). HMT is expressed in airway epithelial cells and may
therefore be responsible for the local metabolism of histamine released
from airway mast cells. Mechanical removal of airway epithelium
enhances the bronchoconstriction response to histamine in vitro (Barnes
et al., 1985
; Flavahan et al., 1985
; Knight
et al., 1990
); this might be the result, in part, of loss of
the metabolizing enzyme. Furthermore, experimental viral infections
result in reduced epithelial HMT activity in association with increased
responsiveness to inhaled histamine (Nakazawa et al., 1994
).
2. Receptors.
Histamine has multiple effects on airway
function that are mediated by specific surface receptors on target
cells (Barnes, 1991
). Three types of histamine receptors have now been
recognized pharmacologically (Hill, 1990
). Histamine receptors were
first differentiated into H1 and
H2 receptors by Ash and Schild in 1966, when it was found that some responses to histamine were blocked by low
doses of mepyramine (pyrilamine), whereas others were insensitive. This
classification was supported by the development of
H2 receptor-selective antagonists, such as
cimetidine and ranitidine. Both H1 and
H2 receptors have been cloned. Both have the
seven-transmembrane domain motif typical of G proteincoupled
receptors. A third histamine receptor subtype, termed
H3, has been described more recently; this
receptor acts as an inhibitory autoreceptor in the central nervous
system (Schultz et al., 1991
).
a. H1 receptors.
H1 receptors
have been cloned from cows (Yamashita et al., 1991
),
rats (Fujimoto et al., 1993
), guinea pigs (Horio
et al., 1993
), and humans (De Backer et
al., 1993
; Fukui et al., 1994
). The published
sequences suggest that there are surprisingly large differences among
species, consistent with the sometimes marked differences in the
responses to histamine among species, with lower activities in rats and
mice, compared with guinea pigs and humans (Hill, 1990
). H1
receptors mediate most of the effects of histamine that are relevant to
asthma. H1 receptors have been demonstrated in animal and
human lung by direct receptor binding techniques (Carswell and
Nahorski, 1982
; Casale et al., 1985
). [3H]Mepyramine binding to human lung homogenates is
complex, with at least three sites with different affinities (Casale
et al., 1985
). There have been no autoradiographic
mapping studies, because of the unsuitability of currently available
radioligands. Antigen-induced, IgE-dependent anaphylaxis in chopped
human lung causes increases in both cyclic adenosine monophosphate
(AMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP) levels. The rise in
cyclic GMP levels is blocked by an H1 receptor antagonist,
suggesting that this response is linked to H1 receptor
activation (Platshon and Kaliner, 1978
). The effect of histamine on
cyclic GMP levels in guinea pig lung is dependent on
L-arginine, suggesting that H1 receptor stimulation increases the release of nitric oxide (NO), which subsequently increases cyclic GMP levels by activating soluble guanylyl cyclase (Leurs et al., 1991
). The bronchoconstricting effect of
histamine is enhanced by NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors, suggesting that
the release of NO stimulated by histamine partially counteracts the direct bronchoconstricting action of airway smooth muscle
H1 receptors (Nijkamp et al., 1993
). This
may not occur in human airways, because there is no increase in the
bronchoconstriction response to histamine after inhalation of NOS
inhibitors (Yates et al., 1995
) and no increase in the
levels of exhaled NO (Kharitonov et al., 1995
).
Northern analysis has demonstrated that there is a high level of
expression of H1 receptor messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) in lung (Yamashita et al., 1991
; Horio et
al., 1993
; Fujimoto et al., 1993
; De Backer
et al., 1993
; Fukui et al., 1994
).
H1 receptor mRNA is strongly expressed in bovine tracheal
smooth muscle, and mRNA expression is inhibited by protein kinase C
(PKC) activation (Pype et al., 1998
). Because histamine
stimulates PKC via PI hydrolysis through H1 receptor
activation, this might be a mechanism of down-regulation of
H1 receptors. However, exposure of bovine tracheal smooth
muscle to histamine is not associated with any effect on H1
receptor mRNA levels, and regulation appears to be the result of
phosphorylation of the receptor by an unidentified G protein-related
kinase (Pype et al., 1998
).
H1 receptors are coupled to PI turnover, with release of
intracellular calcium ions. Thus, transfected H1 receptors
are coupled to a rise in the intracellular calcium ion concentration
([Ca2+]i) (Irfdale et al.,
1993
). In airway smooth muscle cells, the contractile response to
histamine is partly reduced by removal of extracellular
Ca2+ and by treatment with calcium channel blockers (Cheng
and Townley, 1983
; Drazen et al., 1983
). This suggests
that the bronchoconstriction response to histamine is partly mediated
by opening of voltage-dependent calcium channels. However, most of the
contractile response is unaffected by extracellular Ca2+.
Histamine stimulates a transient elevation of
[Ca2+]i (measured as fura-2 fluorescence in
cultured canine tracheal smooth muscle cells) that is largely
independent of extracellular Ca2+ (Kotlikoff et
al., 1987
; Kotlikoff, 1988
; Takuwa et al.,
1988
).
b. H2 receptors.
H2 receptors
have been cloned from dogs (Gantz et al., 1991b
) and
humans (Gantz et al., 1991a
). Although H2
receptors are present in the airways, their clinical relevance is
unclear, because H2 receptor antagonists have few
measurable effects on airway function. H2 receptors have
been detected in lung using [3H]tiotidine, although their
cellular localization has not yet been reported (Foreman et
al., 1985
). Histamine stimulates an increase in cyclic AMP
levels in lung fragments that is blocked by H2 receptor
antagonists, indicating that H2 receptors are positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase in lung (Platshon and Kaliner, 1978
).
c. H3 receptors.
Although H3
receptors have also been identified in lung by binding studies (Arrang
et al., 1987
), functional studies are limited. The
H3 receptor has not yet been cloned.
3. Effects on airways.
a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE.
Histamine stimulates PI
hydrolysis in airway smooth muscle (Grandordy and Barnes, 1987
; Hall
and Hill, 1988
; Daykin et al., 1993
), and there is a close
association of receptor occupancy, PI hydrolysis, and the contractile
response, indicating that there are few or no "spare" receptors
(Grandordy and Barnes, 1987
). Histamine also increases the
concentration of inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) in airway smooth muscle, although the
magnitude of the increase is less than with cholinergic agonists, which
may reflect lower receptor density (Chilvers et al., 1989
).
In cultured human airway smooth muscle cells, histamine increases
[Ca2+]i via an increase
in IP3 levels (Hardy et al., 1996
).
Bronchoconstriction was one of the first recognized effects of
histamine. Inhaled or intravenously administered histamine causes
bronchoconstriction, which is inhibited by H1
receptor antagonists (such as chlorpheniramine, terfenadine, or
astemizole). Histamine contracts both central and peripheral airways in
vitro, with a more potent effect on peripheral airways. Asthmatic
patients are more sensitive to the bronchoconstricting effects of
inhaled and intravenously administered histamine than are normal
individuals; this is a manifestation of airway hyperresponsiveness.
However, there is little evidence for increased contractile
responsiveness to histamine in asthmatic airways in vitro (Whicker
et al., 1988
), suggesting that the hyperresponsiveness to
histamine in asthma is not the result of any change in histamine
receptors in airway smooth muscle. In human airway smooth muscle in
vitro, there is a certain degree of basal tone. This is reduced by
H1 receptor antagonists, suggesting that basal
release of histamine (presumably derived from mast cells) contributes
to this tone (Ellis and Undem, 1994
). This is consistent with the
bronchodilating effects reported for intravenously administered
chlorpheniramine and orally administered terfenadine in asthmatic
patients but not in normal individuals (Eiser et al., 1981
;
Cookson, 1987
).
Histamine also induces proliferation of cultured airway smooth muscle,
and this is associated with increased expression of c-fos
(Panettieri et al., 1990
). It is not certain whether this effect of histamine is mediated by the H1
receptor but this is likely, because H1 receptor
stimulation may activate PKC and thereby c-fos expression.
H2 receptors that mediate bronchodilation have
been identified in some species, including cats, rats, rabbits, sheep,
and horses (Chand and Eyre, 1975
). In some species, such as rabbits, the H2 receptor-mediated response predominates,
because histamine itself is a bronchodilator. Histamine increases
cyclic AMP content in guinea pig tracheal smooth muscle cells, and this
is blocked by an H2 receptor antagonist (Florio
et al., 1992
). Interestingly, dexamethasone enhances this
response to histamine, without affecting the affinity or binding of
H2 receptors. Human peripheral lung strips show a
relaxation response to histamine via H2 receptors (Vincenc et al., 1984
), although this is more likely to
reflect a relaxation effect on pulmonary vessels, rather than
peripheral airways. H2-selective blockers, such
as cimetidine and ranitidine, do not cause bronchoconstriction in
normal or asthmatic individuals and do not increase the
bronchoconstriction response to inhaled histamine (Nogrady and Bevan,
1981
; Thomson and Kerr, 1980
; Braude et al., 1994
).
Similarly, the H2 receptor agonist impromidine has no effect on normal or asthmatic airways (White et al.,
1987
).
A defect in H2 receptor-mediated bronchodilation
has been reported in sheep with allergic airway inflammation (Ahmed
et al., 1983
), and there is evidence that
H2 receptor-mediated gastric secretion may be
impaired in patients with asthma (Gonzalez and Ahmed, 1986
). This has
suggested that there may be a defect in H2
receptor function in asthmatic airways (Chand, 1980
), although there is
no direct evidence that this is the case.
Histamine-induced bronchoconstriction shows desensitization in some
species, such as guinea pigs. This appears to be the result of release
of prostaglandin (PG)E2 and is blocked by
indomethacin (Orehek et al., 1975
; Haye-Legrand et
al., 1986
). Similar desensitization to inhaled histamine has been
reported in normal subjects and in patients with mild asthma (Manning
and O'Byrne, 1988
). This loss of effect is blocked by indomethacin and
appears to be mediated by H2 receptors (Jackson
et al., 1981
). Histamine desensitization in human airways in
vitro is mediated by H2 receptors and is blocked by indomethacin treatment and by epithelium removal (Knight et al., 1992
). This may contribute to the enhanced
bronchoconstricting effect of histamine in vitro after epithelium
removal (Knight et al., 1990
). Histamine may activate
H2 receptors on epithelial cells to release
PGE2, thus counteracting the bronchoconstricting action of histamine on airway smooth muscle (mediated by
H1 receptors).
The H3 receptor agonist
(R)-
-methylhistamine has no effect on airway smooth
muscle tone in vitro or in vivo (Ichinose et al., 1989
;
Ichinose and Barnes, 1989a
,b
), and the H3
receptor antagonist thioperamide does not influence either basal
activity or the bronchoconstriction response to histamine, suggesting
that H3 receptors are not functionally expressed
in airway smooth muscle. Furthermore, inhaled
(R)-
-methylhistamine has no effect on airway function in
asthmatic patients (O'Connor et al., 1993
).
b. VESSELS.
In human skin, histamine causes a
vasodilating response (flare) that is mediated by H1
receptors. Human bronchial vessels are relaxed by low concentrations of
histamine in vitro but are constricted by high concentrations (Liu
et al., 1990
). Both effects are blocked by mepyramine,
indicating that H1 receptors are involved. It is likely
that the vasodilating response is the result of the release of NO from
endothelial cells and that the vasoconstricting effect is the result of
the direct action of histamine on vascular smooth muscle H1
receptors. Histamine appears to increase airway blood flow in vivo, but
there are doubts regarding whether this is mediated by H1
or H2 receptors because, even in the same species, different effects of H1 and H2 blockers have
been reported (Long et al., 1985
; Webber et
al., 1988
).
Histamine also causes plasma extravasation from postcapillary venules
in the bronchial circulation, and this effect is blocked by
H1 receptor antagonists. Measurement of plasma exudation in human airways is difficult, but it is likely that histamine induces plasma exudation, as in rodent airways. In support of this is the
finding that histamine, when injected intradermally, causes a wheal
that is blocked by H1 but not H2 antagonists
(Summers et al., 1981
). Whether histamine contributes to
the plasma exudation seen after allergen challenge in humans has not
been determined, but in guinea pigs antihistamines had marked
inhibitory effects on allergen-induced plasma extravasation in proximal
airways, whereas a LT inhibitor had a greater effect in more peripheral airways (Evans et al., 1989
). Although histamine causes
plasma extravasation in the airways, this makes relatively little
contribution to the airway narrowing induced by histamine (Tokuyama
et al., 1991
).
Although vasodilating H2 receptors have been clearly
demonstrated in human pulmonary vessels (Barnes and Liu, 1995
), their role in the bronchial circulation is less well defined, and there appear to be species differences. In sheep and dogs, histamine induces
an increase in bronchial blood flow that is mediated by H2
receptors (Long et al., 1985
; Parsons et
al., 1992b
). In human bronchial vessels in vitro, the
vasodilating action of histamine is not blocked by H2
antagonists (Liu et al., 1990
). Lung permeability (measured by the clearance of 99mTc-labeled
diethylenetriaminepentaacetate) is increased by inhaled histamine, and
this is blocked by the H2 receptor antagonist ranitidine but not by the H1 receptor antagonist terfenadine (Braude
et al., 1994
). It is uncertain whether
diethylenetriaminepentaacetate clearance measures alveolar or airway
permeability or pulmonary blood flow.
c. SECRETIONS.
Histamine stimulates the secretion of
mucus glycoproteins in human airways in vitro, but this is not blocked
by H1 antagonists and the H1 agonists
2-methylhistamine and 2-pyridylethylamine are without effect (Shelhamer
et al., 1980
). It is difficult to study the production
of mucus from the lower respiratory tract in humans in vivo, but
studies have been performed on the more accessible nasal secretions.
Histamine induces a rise in secretory IgA and lactoferrin, which
implies active glandular secretion, and this is blocked by
chlorpheniramine, suggesting that H1 receptors are involved
(Raphael et al., 1989
).
Histamine also increases chloride ion transport in canine tracheal
epithelial cells, and this response is blocked by H1
antagonists (Marin et al., 1977
). In a bronchial
epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B), histamine increases
[Ca2+]i and releases a variety of mediators,
including interleukin (IL)-6 and fibronectin, but not lipid mediators
(Noah et al., 1991
). These effects are probably mediated
by H1 receptors. Histamine also increases the expression of
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and the surface marker
HLA-DR in primary cultured human bronchial epithelial cells (Vignola
et al., 1993
). This effect is largely mediated by
H1 receptors, but H2 antagonists at high concentrations also have an inhibitory effect. Interestingly, cycloheximide blocked these effects of histamine, suggesting that histamine induced the synthesis of a protein critical to these responses.
The increase in mucus glycoprotein secretion in human airways in vitro
in response to histamine is blocked by cimetidine and mimicked by the
H2 agonist dimaprit, confirming that H2
receptors are involved in this response (Shelhamer et
al., 1980
). However, the effect of histamine is very weak,
compared with that of other secretagogues such as muscarinic agonists,
suggesting that this effect of histamine is unlikely to be of major
importance. Histamine is reported to directly activate rodent airway
goblet cells via H2 receptors, but whether this is the case
in human airways is not yet known (Tamaoki et al.,
1997
).
d. NERVES.
In many species, the bronchoconstricting
effect of histamine is partially mediated by a vagal cholinergic reflex
and may be modulated by muscarinic receptor antagonists. In dogs,
histamine increases the discharge of "irritant" receptors in vivo
(A
-fibers), and these effects are abolished by H1
antagonists. However, in vitro measurements of single afferent fibers
in guinea pig trachea show no evidence for activation of either A
-
or C-fibers by histamine (Fox et al., 1993
). This
suggests that the in vivo effect of histamine on airway sensory nerves
may be secondary to some other effect, such as bronchoconstriction. In
guinea pig lung, histamine appears to release neuropeptides, such as SP
and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), from capsaicin-sensitive
sensory nerves via H1 receptors (Saria et
al., 1988
).
Histamine also augments vagus nerve-induced bronchoconstriction in
dogs, without increasing the response to acetylcholine (Loring
et al., 1978
; Kikuchi et al., 1984
). The
effect of histamine on cholinergic nerves is mediated, in part, by
stimulation of acetylcholine release from postganglionic nerve
terminals, because the enhancing effect of histamine in dogs is seen
even after vagus nerve sectioning, which abolishes all reflex effects
(Shore et al., 1983
). This suggests that histamine acts
on prejunctional H1 receptors to enhance acetylcholine
release (Barnes, 1992a
). In guinea pigs, there is evidence for direct
activation of parasympathetic neurons by histamine, acting via
H1 receptors (Myers and Undem, 1995
). The role of
cholinergic reflexes in the bronchoconstriction response to histamine
in human airways is less certain. A significant reduction of the
bronchoconstriction response to histamine after anticholinergic drug
treatment was reported in some studies (Eiser and Guz, 1982
), whereas
others found no effect (Casterline et al., 1976
). This
may be related to the dose of histamine administered, because
anticholinergic agents may block the bronchoconstricting effect of
small, but not large, doses of inhaled histamine.
(R)-
-Methylhistamine has an inhibitory effect on
vagus nerve-induced contraction of an innervated guinea pig tracheal
tube preparation but has no effect on acetylcholine-induced
contraction, indicating that it may modulate cholinergic
neurotransmission (Ichinose et al., 1989
). The
inhibitory effect is greater for vagus nerve stimulation
(preganglionic) than for electrical field stimulation (postganglionic),
indicating that modulation occurs both at parasympathetic ganglia and
at postganglionic nerve endings (Ichinose et al., 1989
).
These effects are blocked by thioperamide but not by mepyramine or
cimetidine, indicating that H3 receptors are involved and
presumably localized to parasympathetic ganglionic neurons and
postganglionic cholinergic nerve terminals. Histamine, in the presence
of H1 and H2 receptor antagonists, has similar inhibitory actions and has no effect at low concentrations. In human
bronchi in vitro, an inhibitory effect of
(R)-
-methylhistamine on electrical field
stimulation-induced contraction, but not acetylcholine-induced contraction, is seen, indicating a similar inhibitory effect on postganglionic cholinergic nerves, which is inhibited by thioperamide (Ichinose and Barnes, 1989a
). This demonstrates the presence of H3 receptors on cholinergic nerves in human airways.
Histamine may also exert prejunctional effects on the release of
neuropeptides from airway sensory nerves, via H3 receptors. (R)-
-Methylhistamine has an inhibitory effect on
vagus nerve-induced bronchoconstriction in guinea pig airways but has
no effect on the equivalent degree of bronchoconstriction induced by
tachykinins, indicating a modulatory effect on the release of
tachykinins from sensory nerves. This effect is blocked by
thioperamide, indicating that H3 receptors are involved
(Ichinose and Barnes, 1989b
). Similarly, (R)-
-methylhistamine inhibits vagus nerve-induced
plasma extravasation, without affecting leakage induced by SP,
indicating a modulatory effect of H3 receptors on
neurogenic inflammation (Ichinose et al., 1990b
). The
functional relevance of the inhibition of H3 receptors on
airway nerves may be that this acts as a protective inhibitory feedback
mechanism (Barnes and Ichinose, 1989
). There is a close relationship
between airway mast cells and nerves. If mast cells exhibit a basal
release of histamine in asthma, the low concentrations of histamine may
act on H3 receptors on cholinergic nerve terminals and
ganglia to inhibit neurotransmission and thus prevent activation of
bronchoconstricting reflexes. Similarly, histamine inhibits the release
of neuropeptides from sensory nerves in airways and thus prevent
neurogenic leak. When mast cells are degranulated by allergen, there is
a massive release of histamine, which overwhelms the H3
receptor system and predominantly activates H1 receptors on
airway smooth muscle and endothelial cells.
e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS.
Histamine may also have effects
on inflammatory cells, and it has been found to influence the release
of cytokines and inflammatory mediators from a variety of inflammatory
and immune cells (Falvs and Merety, 1992
). The relevance of this is
uncertain, because H1 antagonists do not appear to have
significant anti-inflammatory effects. Histamine is a selective
chemoattractant for eosinophils (Clark et al., 1975
) and
activates human eosinophils, as reflected by a rise in
[Ca2+]i (Raible et al., 1992
).
The nature of the receptor on eosinophils is not clear; the receptor
does not fit into the H1/H2/H3
receptor classification system (Raible et al., 1994
).
Histamine also activates human alveolar macrophages to release
-glucuronidase, and this effect is mediated by H1
receptors (Cluzel et al., 1990
). Histamine stimulates
suppressor T lymphocytes via H2 receptors, and there is
some evidence that this function may be depressed in atopic individuals
(Beer et al., 1982
). IgE-mediated release of histamine from human basophils is inhibited by histamine itself acting via H2 receptors, although it is possible that H3
receptors are involved, because inhibition is seen with impromidine,
which is now recognized to have H3 receptor-blocking
effects. Therefore, H2 receptor antagonists may
theoretically increase histamine release after allergen challenge, although H2 receptors have not been demonstrated in mast
cells of human lung. Furthermore, a decrease, rather than an increase, in responsiveness to inhaled allergen after chronic treatment with
cimetidine has been reported (Bergstrand et al., 1985
).
H3 agonists inhibit the release and synthesis of histamine
in central neurons (Schultz et al., 1991
). It is
possible that H3 receptors may similarly inhibit the
synthesis and release of histamine in lung mast cells. Allergen-induced
bronchoconstriction in sensitized guinea pigs is enhanced by
thioperamide but is unaffected by cimetidine, whereas it is almost
completely abolished by mepyramine (Ichinose and Barnes, 1990b
).
Because thioperamide has no effect on histamine-induced
bronchoconstriction, this strongly suggests that histamine released
from pulmonary mast cells by allergen challenge normally inhibits
further release via H3 receptors on mast cells
(autoinhibition). Histamine inhibits the release of tumor necrosis
factor (TNF)-
from rodent mast cells, and this appears to be
mediated by H2 and H3 receptors (Bissonnette,
1996
). When these receptors are inhibited, this results in enhanced
histamine release. Whether H3 receptors are important in
regulating the synthesis of histamine in these cells is not yet known,
and it is also uncertain whether H3 receptors are expressed
in human mast cells.
4. Role in asthma.
a. RELEASE.
Measurement of histamine in the
circulation is complicated by the spontaneous release from basophils,
and measurement of stable metabolites in the urine may not reflect
release from mast cells in the airways. Several previous studies
demonstrated elevations of plasma histamine concentrations in patients
with asthma, at rest, after exercise, at night, and after allergen
challenge, but these studies are difficult to interpret because of the
likelihood of contamination from basophil release in the collected
blood samples (Ind et al., 1983
). It is possible that
basophils from patients with asthma may be more "leaky" and that
this may contribute to the higher concentrations measured in asthmatic
patients. Studies of histamine infusions in normal volunteers have
demonstrated that doses of histamine that yield the plasma
concentrations reported in patients with asthma have marked
cardiovascular effects, indicating that the higher levels seen in the
blood of asthmatic patients are likely to be generated in vitro during
storage and preparation of the plasma samples. The histamine released
from the airways may increase plasma concentrations, but this may be
overwhelmed by the contribution from circulating basophils. Sampling
closer to the site of histamine release may overcome these problems. Venous sampling in the arm shows an increase in plasma histamine concentrations after mast cell degranulation in the skin of the arm,
induced by SP (Barnes et al., 1986
), but such sampling is not feasible in the airways. Measurement of histamine in
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is likely to provide a much more direct
measurement of airway histamine release. There is evidence that
histamine concentrations are elevated in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
of asthmatic patients, both at rest and after allergen challenge (Liu
et al., 1991
; Wenzel et al., 1988
). The source of
histamine is presumed to be mucosal mast cells, and the contribution of infiltrating basophils is unclear.
b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS.
Histamine mediates most of
its effects on airway function via H1 receptors, suggesting
that H1 antagonists may have therapeutic effects in airway
disease. Nonsedating potent H1 receptor antagonists, such
as terfenadine, loratidine, and astemizole, may be given in large doses
but, although these antihistamines have useful clinical effects in
allergic rhinitis, they are far from effective for asthmatic patients,
as demonstrated in a recent meta-analysis of clinical trials (Van Ganse
et al., 1997
). The effects of antihistamines, even when
taken in high doses, are small and clinically insignificant (Simmons
and Simons, 1994
). Terfenadine causes approximately 50% inhibition of
the immediate response to allergen but has no effect on the late
response. Antihistamines cause a small degree of bronchodilation in
asthmatic patients, indicating a certain degree of histamine "tone," presumably resulting from the basal release of histamine from activated mast cells, as discussed above. Chronic administration of terfenadine has a small clinical effect among patients with mild
allergic asthma (Taytard et al., 1987
) but is far less
effective than other antiasthma therapies; therefore, these drugs
cannot be recommended for the routine management of asthma. Some new antihistamines, such as cetirizine and azelastine, have been shown to
have beneficial effects in asthma (Spector et al., 1995
;
Busse et al., 1996
), but this may be unrelated to their
H1 antagonist effects (Walsh, 1994
).
H2 antagonists, such as cimetidine and ranitidine, may be
contraindicated in asthma on theoretical grounds, if H2
receptors are important in counteracting the bronchoconstricting effect of histamine. In clinical practice, however, there is no evidence that
H2 antagonists have any deleterious effect in asthma.
H3 receptor agonists may have some theoretical benefit in
asthma, because they may modulate cholinergic bronchoconstriction and
inhibit neurogenic inflammation. Although
(R)-
-methylhistamine relaxes rodent peripheral
airways in vitro (Burgaud et al., 1992
), it has no
effect, when given by inhalation, on airway caliber or
metabisulfite-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients, indicating that a useful clinical effect is unlikely (O'Connor et al., 1993
).
c. CONCLUSIONS.
Histamine is produced from mast cells
in asthmatic airways and exerts many effects that are relevant to the
pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma, including bronchoconstriction,
plasma exudation, and mucus secretion. There is also evidence for an
effect on the inflammatory process, particularly eosinophils. However,
antihistamine H1 antagonists have been disappointing in
asthma therapy, and this presumably reflects the fact that all of the
actions of histamine are mimicked by other mediators. New and more
potent antihistamines appear to have greater beneficial effects in
asthma, so that histamine may have a more important role than
previously recognized.
B. Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine)
Serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)] causes
bronchoconstriction in most animal species, but interest in this
mediator is minimal because it is not a constrictor of human airways
and its relevance in asthma seems doubtful (Barnes et al.,
1988
).
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
Serotonin is formed by
decarboxylation of tryptophan (obtained in the diet) and is stored in
secretory granules. Serotonin is present in mast cell granules from
rodents but not humans. The major source of serotonin in humans is
platelets, but serotonin is also found in neuroendocrine cells of the
respiratory tract and has been localized to peripheral nerves.
2. Receptors.
Multiple serotonin receptors have now been
recognized, based on the development of selective antagonists and
molecular cloning (Saxena, 1995
). There are up to seven types of 5-HT
receptors, each with several subtypes. Selective antagonists have now
become available for clinical use, but few have been used in
investigations of human airway cells or in the treatment of patients
with asthma.
3. Effects on airways.
Serotonin does not constrict human
airway smooth muscle in vitro and may even have bronchodilating
effects, although pulmonary vessels are constricted as expected
(Raffestin et al., 1985
). In animals, serotonin increases
acetylcholine release from airway nerves, and this has been
demonstrated in human airways (Takahashi et al., 1995
). The
receptor mediating this response appears to be a
5-HT3 receptor (Takahashi et al.,
1995
). In guinea pig airways, serotonin inhibits nonadrenergic
noncholinergic (NANC), neurally induced constriction resulting from
tachykinin release via a 5-HT1-like receptor
localized to sensory nerve endings (Ward et al., 1994
; Dupont et al., 1996
). In humans, infused serotonin has no
effect on airway function but may have an inhibitory effect on cough reflexes, possibly mediated by receptors on airway sensory nerves (Stone et al., 1993
). Serotonin is a potent inducer of
microvascular leakage in rodent airways, but it is not certain whether
serotonin has this property in human airways. Serotonin has a blocking
effect on sodium channels in human airway epithelial cells, but the
receptor subtype involved has not been established (Graham et
al., 1992
).
4. Role in asthma.
Plasma serotonin levels are reported to be
elevated in asthma and are significantly related to asthma severity
(Lechin et al., 1996
). The source of serotonin is likely to
be platelets, but the clinical relevance of this observation is unclear.
In animals, serotonin constricts airways via activation of
5-HT2 receptors on airway smooth muscle cells.
The 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ketanserin has no
effect on airway function but exerts a small inhibitory effect on
methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients (Cazzola
et al., 1990
). Inhaled ketanserin has no effect on
histamine-induced bronchoconstriction but exerts a small inhibitory
effect on adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction, indicating a possible
action on mast cells (Cazzola et al., 1992
).
C. Adenosine
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
Adenosine is a purine nucleoside
that is produced by dephosphorylation of 5'-AMP by the
membrane-associated enzyme 5'-nucleotidase and is liberated
intracellularly by cleavage of the high energy bonds of adenosine
triphosphate, adenosine diphosphate, and cyclic 5'-AMP. However, during
hypoxia or even excessive cell stimulation, when the utilization
of energy and oxygen exceeds the supply, 5'-AMP is metabolized to
adenosine (Mentzer et al., 1975
). This conversion is
performed by extracellular 5'-nucleotidase. Adenosine release was
originally demonstrated during myocardial hypoxia (Mentzer et
al., 1975
), although there is now evidence that all cells are
capable of producing adenosine in times of energy deficit. Adenosine
can be released by lung tissue in times of hypoxia, such as after
allergen-induced bronchoconstriction, when the circulating levels of
adenosine have been shown to be 3 times the base-line concentrations
(Mann et al., 1986
). Mast cells are a likely source of
adenosine in this situation, because these cells have been shown to be
capable of releasing adenosine in response to IgE cross-linking and
other stimuli for mast cell activation (Marquardt et al.,
1986
).
2. Receptors.
Three distinct subtypes of receptor have been
characterized to date, based on biochemical, functional, and more
recent cloning studies (Linden et al., 1991
; Linden, 1994
).
These receptors include the A1,
A2a, A2b, and
A3 receptor subtypes. Interaction of adenosine with these receptors leads to either inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (A1), stimulation of adenylyl cyclase
(A2a and A2b) (Collis and Hourani, 1993
), or activation of phospholipase C
(A3) (Ali et al., 1990
). The
A1 receptor is expressed in lung tissue (Ren and Stiles, 1994
) and, in particular, A1 receptors
have been identified on human epithelial cells (McCoy et
al., 1995
). The classification of adenosine receptors into
A2a and A2b subtypes is
based on distinct rank orders of potency of a range of agonists and
antagonists and distinct nucleotide sequences of the two complementary
deoxyribonucleic acids (cDNAs). A2a,
A2b, and A3 receptors are
expressed in several tissues, including lungs, and in mast cells and
fibroblasts (Linden et al., 1993
; Auchampach et
al., 1997
; Ciruela et al., 1997
; Shryock and
Belardinelli, 1997
; Fredholm, 1997
).
3. Effects on airways.
a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE.
Adenosine elicits little
or no contraction of human bronchi from nonasthmatic subjects but
potently constricts asthmatic airways in vitro (Björck et
al., 1992
). This constriction is blocked by histamine and LT
antagonists and is therefore likely to be attributable to the release
of mediators from mast cells in asthmatic airways. It is likely that
the bronchoconstricting effects of adenosine are indirect, resulting
from the activation of mast cell degranulation, because adenosine
causes histamine release from mast cells (Church et al.,
1986
). Comparable results have been observed in vivo, where adenosine
and AMP are able to elicit bronchoconstricting effects in atopic and
asthmatic subjects but have no effect in normal subjects (Cushley
et al., 1983
). Furthermore, dipyridamole (an inhibitor
of adenosine uptake into tissues) enhances adenosine-induced
bronchospasm in asthmatic subjects (Crimi et al.,
1988
), an effect that can be inhibited by theophylline (a nonselective adenosine antagonist) (Cushley et al., 1984
).
The receptor mediating the bronchoconstricting effect of adenosine in
asthma is not yet known. In rabbits, the A1
receptor is a likely candidate, because tracheal strips from rabbits
immunized with house dust mites are more responsive to adenosine and
the adenosine A1-selective agonist
cyclopentyladenosine than are tracheal strips isolated from naive
animals (Ali et al., 1994a
). Furthermore, immunized animals
are considerably more responsive to the bronchoconstricting effects of
adenosine (Thorne and Broadley, 1994
) and cyclopentyladenosine in vivo
(Ali et al., 1994b
; el Hashim et al., 1996
). No
bronchoconstricting effects of the A3-selective
agonist aminophenylethyladenosine have been found in rabbits (el Hashim
et al., 1996
) or guinea pigs (Hannon et al.,
1995
), although studies in rats have shown that
aminophenylethyladenosine can elicit bronchoconstriction (Meade
et al., 1996
). The histamine-releasing effect of adenosine may involve the A2b receptor, because this effect
is sensitive to enprofylline (an A2b receptor
antagonist) (Feoktistov and Biaggioni, 1995
). Certainly, there is
clinical evidence showing that elevated levels of histamine can be
demonstrated in plasma after the inhalation of AMP by atopic subjects
(Phillips et al., 1990
), and increased levels of histamine
have been detected after the instillation of AMP directly into the
airways (Polosa et al., 1995
). Furthermore, the
H1 receptor antagonist terfenadine has a
protective effect against adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction
in asthmatic subjects (Rafferty et al., 1987
).
b. VESSELS.
Adenosine has been shown to have a wide
range of effects in the cardiovascular system, which are well beyond
the scope of this review (Olsson and Pearson, 1990
). However, in the
context of asthma, adenosine acting as a vasodilator can function
synergistically with several inflammatory mediators, leading to
increased vascular permeability. If adenosine release occurs in the
vicinity of degranulating mast cells, such interactions may contribute
to the edema that accompanies allergic responses in the airway.
c. NERVES.
Another possible explanation for
adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction is that it occurs secondarily to
the activation of a neuronal reflex. Adenosine and related molecules
have long been known to modulate synaptic transmission, although
adenosine has been reported not to influence cholinergic responses in
human trachea (Bai et al., 1989
) or contraction of
guinea pig trachea induced by electrical field stimulation
(Grundström et al., 1981
). Data obtained from in
vivo experiments are inconclusive; some investigators failed to show
any effect of the muscarinic receptor antagonist ipratropium bromide on
the airway effects of inhaled adenosine (Mann et al.,
1985
), whereas other groups observed a significant effect of atropine
or ipratropium bromide on adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction (Crimi
et al., 1992
). Furthermore, it has been suggested that
AMP-induced effects in the airway may be secondary to the activation of
sensory C-fibers (Polosa et al., 1992b
), a suggestion
supported by clinical observations showing that the airway effects
induced by inhaled adenosine or AMP can be inhibited by sodium
cromoglycate and nedocromil sodium (drugs that can attenuate C-fiber
function). The neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitor phosphoramidon, which should enhance tachykinin-mediated effects, also has no effect on
adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction responses (Polosa et
al., 1997b
).
d. INFLAMMATORY CELLS.
Adenosine is a potent mediator
of mast cell degranulation, as described above, and therefore may
contribute to the inflammatory changes observed in asthma. On the other
hand, adenosine inhibits eosinophil degranulation (Yukawa et
al., 1989
). A3 receptors have been recently
identified on human eosinophils (Walker et al., 1997
),
and activation of these receptors by adenosine inhibits eosinophil
migration (Knight et al., 1997
). Activation of
A3 receptors on eosinophils has also been shown to lead to
an increase in [Ca2+]i (Kohno et
al., 1996
).
4. Role in asthma.
a. RELEASE.
Increased levels of adenosine have
been found in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained from asthmatic
subjects, compared with normal subjects (Driver et al.,
1993
), and, as discussed above, adenosine concentrations in plasma are
higher in allergic patients minutes after allergen provocation (Mann
et al., 1986
). A3 receptor expression
is increased in asthmatic lungs, compared with lungs of normal
subjects, although, because the A3 receptor is
expressed predominantly in eosinophils, this may be a reflection of
eosinophilic infiltration (Walker et al., 1997
).
b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS.
No specific receptor
antagonists for adenosine have been evaluated against
adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction in humans. Dipyridamole (an
inhibitor of adenosine uptake) enhances adenosine-induced bronchospasm
in asthmatic patients when administered intravenously or by inhalation
(Crimi et al., 1988
), an effect that can be inhibited by
theophylline (an adenosine receptor antagonist) (Cushley et al., 1984
). Adenosine-induced bronchospasm can also be
inhibited by a variety of other drugs, including the H1
antagonist terfenadine (Rafferty et al., 1987
), the
cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor indomethacin (Crimi et
al., 1989
), and sodium cromoglycate (Crimi et
al., 1988
), although this does not provide direct evidence for
the involvement of adenosine in asthma. Because theophylline has other
actions (including nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibition) that may contribute to its antiasthma effect, these findings cannot be taken as
evidence for a role for adenosine, and studies with more selective
adenosine antagonists are needed.
The role of endogenous adenosine in allergic responses has not been
evaluated because of the lack of suitable drugs to test. However, the
recent discovery that enprofylline is a selective A2b
receptor antagonist has provided a possible tool to evaluate the role
of adenosine in allergic responses (Feoktistov and Biaggioni, 1995
).
This observation also raises the distinct possibility that some of the
therapeutic activity of enprofylline and other xanthines, such as
theophylline, may in part be related to inhibition of adenosine
receptors (Pauwels and Joos, 1995
). Furthermore, recent studies using
an antisense oligonucleotide against the A1 receptor showed
that a reduction in A1 receptors had a very significant effect on allergen-induced bronchospasm and bronchial
hyperresponsiveness to inhaled histamine in an allergic rabbit model
(Nyce and Metzger, 1997
). Such results, if confirmed in human studies,
would suggest that the A1 receptor may play an important
role in the pathogenesis of allergic airway disease.
c. CONCLUSIONS.
Adenosine is likely to play some role
in asthma, because it is produced as part of the stress response and
this may be particularly important during exacerbations. Its effects in
asthma are largely explained by an effect on sensitized mast cells, via
A2b receptors, and this appears to be specific for asthma.
The mechanism by which A2b receptors are expressed or
activated in asthma is not yet known, but there is a strong indication
that the development of a specific A2b receptor antagonist
may be useful in asthma
 |
III. Lipid-Derived Mediators |
A. Prostanoids
Prostanoids include PGs and thromboxane (Tx), which are
generated from arachidonic acid, usually by the action of COX
(PGH2 synthase).
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
Prostanoids are generated from
arachidonic acid by two forms of COX (Mitchell et al.,
1995
). COX-1 is constitutive and is responsible for basal release of
prostanoids, whereas COX-2 is inducible by inflammatory stimuli, such
as endotoxin and proinflammatory cytokines, and its induction is
inhibited by glucocorticoids. Both COX-1 and COX-2 are expressed in
human lung (Demoly et al., 1997
). Human airway epithelial
cells basally express COX-1, whereas COX-2 is induced by IL-1
and
TNF-
(Mitchell et al., 1994
; Newton et al.,
1997b
; Asano et al., 1997
) and is enhanced by NO (Watkins et al., 1997
). COX-2 is also induced in cultured human
airway smooth muscle cells by proinflammatory cytokines and bradykinin (Belvisi et al., 1997
; Pang and Knox, 1997a
,b
), and the
formation of prostanoids is blocked by the selective COX-2 inhibitor
L745,337 (Saunders et al., 1998
). COX-2 expression is
inhibited by dexamethasone in both epithelial cells and smooth muscle
cells. The induction of COX-2 is regulated in part by NF-
B, and this
may also account for the inhibitory action of glucocorticoids (Newton
et al., 1997a
). There is no difference in the profiles of
prostanoids formed by COX-1 and COX-2. In epithelial cells and airway
smooth muscle cells, the predominant prostanoids are
PGE2 and
6-keto-PGF1
(metabolite of
PGI2), whereas there is relatively little
formation of Tx (Mitchell et al., 1994
; Belvisi et
al., 1997
). Tx is formed from the intermediate
PGH2 by a distinct enzyme, Tx synthase, which has
been cloned (Ohashi et al., 1992
).
Recently, a novel nonenzymatic pathway for prostanoid formation was
described. Isoprostanes are generated by lipid peroxidation of
arachidonic acid by oxidative stress (Morrow and Roberts, 1996
). The
most prevalent isoprostane in humans is
8-epi-PGF2
, which is a potent constrictor
of human airways in vitro (Kawikova et al., 1996
). All cells
in the airway have the capacity to release prostanoids, but the profile
of prostanoids released depends on the cell type and on the form of
cell stimulation, as discussed below.
2. Receptors.
Several prostanoid receptors have now been
cloned (Ushikubi et al., 1995
; Pierce et al.,
1995
). Pharmacologically, prostanoid receptors are classified according
to the prostanoid that causes selective activation;
PGE2 preferentially activates EP receptors, PGI2 (prostacyclin) activates IP receptors,
PGF2
activates FP receptors,
PGD2 activates DP receptors, and Tx activates TP receptors (Coleman et al., 1994
). Within each receptor type
there may be distinct subtypes, many of which have been identified
using selective ligands and cloning; the EP receptor has at least four subtypes, which are differentially expressed in different cell types.
EP1 receptors mediate activation responses and
are involved in hyperalgesic responses, whereas
EP2 and EP4 receptors
mediate smooth muscle relaxation responses and
EP3 receptors modulate neurotransmitter release.
In airway smooth muscle, several constrictor PGs
(PGD2, PGF2
, and
8-epi-PGF2
) appear to work through activation of TP receptors (Coleman and Sheldrick, 1989
; Kawikova et al., 1996
).
3. Effects on airways.
a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE.
PGE2 relaxes human airway smooth muscle in vitro
via EP receptors (Knight et al., 1995
). The relaxation
response to PGE2 in human airways is mediated by
EP2 receptors (McKenniff et al., 1988
), but in animal airways an EP1 receptor
subtype is also involved (Ndukwu et al., 1997
). Inhaled
PGE2 causes bronchodilation in normal subjects
(Walters and Davies, 1982
) but may cause constriction in patients with
asthma because of activation of reflex cholinergic bronchoconstriction.
Inhaled PGE2 protects against exercise-, metabisulfite-, and allergen-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients, however (Melillo et al., 1994
; Pavord et
al., 1992
, 1993
). PGI2 is less
potent than PGE2 in relaxing human airways in
vitro (Tamaoki et al., 1993
) and, in contrast to
PGE2, does not protect against histamine-induced
contraction (Knight et al., 1995
). Inhaled
PGI2 has little effect on airway function (Hardy et al., 1985
).
In contrast, PGF2
,
PGD2, 8-epi-PGF2
,
and Tx cause bronchoconstriction of human airways in vitro, and all are
antagonized by TP receptor antagonists (Coleman and Sheldrick, 1989
;
Kawikova et al., 1996
). Both
PGF2
and PGD2, when
inhaled, cause bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients (Hardy
et al., 1984
; Fish et al., 1984
). The stable Tx
analogue U46619 is a potent constrictor in asthmatic patients, and this
effect is mediated in part via acetylcholine release (Jones et
al., 1992
; Saroea et al., 1995
). There is considerable evidence obtained with animals to suggest that
TxA2 is involved in airway hyperresponsiveness,
but this is not supported by studies in asthmatic patients (O'Byrne
and Fuller, 1989
).
Prostanoids also have effects on airway smooth muscle proliferation.
PGE2 inhibits proliferation of human airway
smooth muscle in vitro after stimulation with fetal calf serum or
growth factors (Johnson et al., 1995
; Panettieri et
al., 1995
); because PGE2 is the major
product of COX-2 induced by inflammatory stimuli in human airway smooth
muscle, this provides an inhibitory feedback mechanism (Saunders
et al., 1998
). Tx increases proliferation of rabbit airway
smooth muscle (Noveral and Grunstein, 1992
).
b. VESSELS.
PGE2 and PGI2 are
vasodilators and therefore should theoretically increase leakage in
asthmatic airways. Tx is a potent vasoconstrictor, but it potently
increases plasma exudation in guinea pig airways (Lötvall
et al., 1992
; Tokuyama et al., 1992
). The
isoprostane 8-epi-PGF2
, like Tx, increases
plasma exudation in rodent airways (Okazawa et al.,
1997
).
c. SECRETIONS.
Prostanoids stimulate airway mucus
secretion in various animal species, but few studies have been
conducted in human airways.
d. NERVES.
PGE2 inhibits cholinergic nerve
constriction of human airways in vitro at concentrations lower than
those that cause bronchoconstriction, suggesting that there is an
inhibitory effect on acetylcholine release, presumably mediated by an
EP3 receptor (Ellis and Conanan, 1996
). In animals, this
has been confirmed by measurements of acetylcholine after neural
stimulation (Barnes, 1992a
). In rat airways, PGE2 also
inhibits neurogenic inflammation, suggesting an inhibitory action on
tachykinin release from sensory nerves (Morikawa et al.,
1992
). Inhaled PGE2 causes coughing in normal and asthmatic
subjects and increases the sensitivity of the cough reflex (Chaudry
et al., 1989
; Stone et al., 1992
). This
may be mediated by EP1 receptors. In addition,
PGE2 inhalation increases the sensation of dyspnea (Taguchi
et al., 1992
). PGF2
also induces coughing but does not appear to sensitize the cough reflex (Stone et al., 1992
). Tx increases the release of
acetylcholine from cholinergic nerves in animals in vitro (Chung
et al., 1985
), and the bronchoconstriction response to
inhaled U46619 is attenuated by prior treatment with a cholinergic
antagonist (Saroea et al., 1995
).
e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS.
Prostanoids have effects on the
release of inflammatory mediators from inflammatory cells. This has
been most carefully studied with PGE2, which inhibits the
release of mediators from mast cells, monocytes, neutrophils, and
eosinophils (Giembycz et al., 1990
; Peters et
al., 1982
; Talpain et al., 1995
; Meja et
al., 1997
). The EP receptors involved are probably
EP2 receptors. The effect of PGE2 on T
lymphocytes is less clearly delineated; PGE2 favors the
development of helper T (Th)2 cells by inhibiting IL-2 and interferon
(IFN)-
production in human CD4+ cells (Hilkens et
al., 1995
) and inhibiting the secretion of IL-12 from
macrophages (Van der Pouw Kraan et al., 1995
).
Furthermore, culture of dendritic cells in the presence of
PGE2 results in Th2 cell differentiation and increased
synthesis of IL-5 (Kalinski et al., 1997
). However, with
an allergen challenge, inhaled PGE2 protects against the
late response as well as the early response, suggesting that its
anti-inflammatory action against eosinophils may predominate over its T
cell action (Pavord et al., 1993
). The effects of other
prostanoids on inflammatory cells are less clear. Tx causes airway
hyperresponsiveness in animal models, but this has not been seen in
human studies with inhaled U46619 (Jones et al., 1992
).
4. Role in asthma.
a. RELEASE.
Bronchoalveolar lavage studies have
demonstrated increased concentrations of
PGF2
, PGD2, and
TxB2 in patients with asthma (Liu et
al., 1990
; Oosterhoff et al., 1995
; Dworski et
al., 1994
; Smith et al., 1992
).
PGD2 is the prostanoid present in highest concentration, and this is correlated with an increase in mast cell
tryptase, indicating the likely mast cell origin of the mediator. After
allergen challenge, there is an increase in PGD2
and TxB2 levels (Dworski et al.,
1994
). A urinary metabolite of Tx
(11-dehydro-TxB2) is increased in asthmatic
subjects after challenge with allergen (Kumlin et al.,
1992
). COX-2 shows increased expression in the airways of asthmatic
patients and is presumably induced by proinflammatory cytokines (Demoly
et al., 1997
). In peripheral leukocytes of asthmatic patients, there is increased expression of COX-1 and COX-2 mRNA (Kuitert et al., 1996
).
b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS.
Nonselective COX inhibitors,
including aspirin and flurbiprofen, have little or no beneficial effect
in challenge studies or in the treatment of clinical asthma, but this
may be because they block production of both bronchoconstricting
(PGD2, PGF2
, and
TxA2) and bronchodilating (PGE2 and
PGI2) mediators. Specific Tx synthase inhibitors have been
developed for use in asthma. Ozagrel (ONO-046), a moderately potent
orally active Tx synthase inhibitor, reduces airway hyperresponsiveness
to cholinergic agonists when given orally or by aerosol, but the effect
is very small and unlikely to be of clinical significance (Fujimura
et al., 1990a
,b
). Another, more potent, Tx synthase
inhibitor, pirmagrel (CGS13080), completely prevents the increase in
serum TxB2 levels after allergen challenge in asthmatic
patients. Although it causes a very small reduction in the early
response to allergen, there is no effect on the late response or on
airway hyperresponsiveness (Manning et al., 1991
).
Several TP receptor antagonists have also been studied in asthma and
have the advantage over Tx synthase inhibitors that they inhibit the
bronchoconstricting effects of PGF2
,
PGD2, and 8-epi-PGF2
, in
addition to TxA2. Vapiprost (GR32191) has no effect on
airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients after 3 weeks of
administration (Stenton et al., 1992
) and no effect in
exercise-induced asthma (Finnerty et al., 1991
), whereas
another TP receptor antagonist, ramatroban (Bay u3405), has a small
effect on methacholine responsiveness (Aizawa et al., 1996
). However, ramatroban is ineffective against exercise-induced asthma, at a dose that blocks PGD2induced
bronchoconstriction, and is ineffective against histamine and
bradykinin challenge (Magnussen et al., 1992
; Johnston
et al., 1992
; Rajakulasingam et al.,
1996
). The potent TP receptor antagonist seratrodast has a small
bronchodilating effect after prolonged administration (Samara et
al., 1997
). Overall, neither Tx synthase inhibitors nor
receptor antagonists have useful clinical effects in asthma, suggesting
that bronchoconstrictor prostanoids do not play a major role in the
pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma.
PGE2, in contrast, may be important in protecting against
bronchoconstriction and controlling the inflammatory response (Pavord and Tattersfield, 1995
). Inhibition of PGE2 formation by
COX inhibitors may therefore be potentially detrimental. Indeed, in a
small proportion of asthmatic patients, aspirin and other nonselective
COX inhibitors induce asthma (Szczeklik, 1997
). Aspirin challenge in
aspirin-sensitive patients inhibits the formation of PGE2
and increases LT formation but, surprisingly, also increases
concentrations of PGD2 and PGF2
(Szczeklik et al., 1996b
). PGE2 inhalation
protects against asthma induced by inhaled lysine-aspirin in
aspirin-sensitive asthmatic patients (Szczeklik et
al., 1996a
). Selective COX-2 inhibitors, such as L745,337 and
A398, may also prove to be safe in patients with aspirin-sensitive
asthma, because it is possible that bronchoconstriction in these
patients may be the result of inhibition of PGE2 synthesis by COX-1. Nimesulide, a COX-2 selective blocker, is reported to be well
tolerated in aspirin-sensitive asthmatics (Senna et al., 1996
). PGE2 may have additional therapeutic potential in
asthma, but its tendency to induce coughing is a serious limitation.
Because the receptors on sensory nerves (probably EP1
receptors) differ from those that mediate bronchodilation and
inhibition of anti-inflammatory effects (mainly EP2
receptors), selective EP agonists (such as butaprost) may be more useful.
c. CONCLUSIONS.
Prostanoids are produced in asthmatic
airways and appear to have several effects on the airways, including
bronchoconstriction, plasma exudation, sensitization of nerve endings,
and effects on inflammatory cells, which are mediated by prostanoid
receptors. However, inhibition of their formation with COX or Tx
synthase inhibitors or inhibition of TP receptors does not
appear to benefit asthmatic patients. One possibility is that COX
inhibitors, while blocking the formation of bronchoconstricting
prostanoids (PGD2, PGF2
, and
TxA2), also inhibit the formation of the bronchodilating PGs (PGE2 and PGI2), which may counteract these
effects. Furthermore, isoprostanes may be formed in response to
oxidative stress in asthma, and their formation occurs independently of
COX function.
B. Leukotrienes
There is increasing evidence that LTs play an important role in
the pathophysiological changes of asthma. This has mainly been provided
by studies with potent inhibitors of LT receptors, which are now in
clinical use for asthma therapy.
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
LTs are potent lipid mediators
produced by arachidonic acid metabolism in cell or nuclear membranes.
They are derived from arachidonic acid, which is released from membrane
phospholipids via the activation of phospholipase
A2. Arachidonic acid is subsequently metabolized
by the enzyme 5-LO, to produce LTs. The free 5-LO enzyme is found in
the cytoplasm and cannot metabolize arachidonic acid. However, after
the free 5-LO has been activated, it is translocated to the nuclear
membrane, where a membrane-bound protein termed 5-LO-activating protein
stabilizes the translocated 5-LO, thus allowing the transformation of
arachidonic acid into LTA4 (Evans et
al., 1991
). Recently, a family of mutations of 5-LO genes have been reported in asthmatics. These are characterized by a variable number of tandem repeat segments in the promoter region, and they modify reporter gene transcription. This may account for differences in
the susceptibility of patients to drugs modifying 5-LO activity (In
et al., 1997
). LTA4 is further
metabolized to LTC4 (via the activation of
LTC4 synthase) or to LTB4
(by LTA4 hydrolase). After release into the
extracellular environment, LTC4 can be further metabolized to LTD4 and
LTE4 by cleavage of the peptide side chain of
LTC4. Several types of airway cells, including
mast cells, eosinophils, macrophages, neutrophils, and epithelial
cells, can synthesize LTs in response to a variety of stimuli.
LTB4, synthesized predominantly by
LTA4 hydrolase in neutrophils, is an extremely potent activator of neutrophils, causing aggregation, chemotaxis, and
degranulation (Ford-Hutchinson, 1991
; Brain and Williams, 1990
).
LTC4, LTD4, and
LTE4 are the active constituents of what was once
termed "slow reacting substance of anaphylaxis."
2. Receptors.
The biological effects of LTs occur through
their ability to stimulate specific receptors, which have been
identified on several cell types. There are probably multiple
receptors, although two major classes have been well characterized. The
BLT receptors are activated by LTB4 and to a
lesser extent by 20-OH-LTB4 and 12-(R)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (HETE). The BLT receptor
is a 60-kDa plasma membrane protein (Miki et al., 1990
) and
has recently been cloned (Yokomizo et al., 1997
). Cys-LTs
act via cys-LT receptors, of which two types have been
pharmacologically characterized. Cys-LT1
receptors mediate all of the known airway effects of cys-LTs in human
cells (Coleman et al., 1995
). A second receptor type, the
cys-LT2 receptor, has been described on pulmonary
veins, on the basis of responses to certain LT antagonists (Metters,
1995
; Gorenne et al., 1996
). To date, none of these LT
receptors has been cloned.
3. Effects on airways.
a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE.
Cys-LTs are very potent
contractile agents for human bronchi in vitro, being approximately 1000 times more potent than histamine, and they elicit this effect via
activation of cys-LT1 receptors (Krell et
al., 1990
). There is a certain degree of tone in human airways in
vitro, and this is partly mediated by cys-LTs, because it can be
reduced by 5-LO inhibitors and by cys-LT1
receptor antagonists (Ellis and Undem, 1994
). The ability of cys-LTs to
act as potent bronchoconstricting agents has also been demonstrated in
vivo, both in normal subjects and in patients with asthma (Drazen,
1988
). Inhaled LTD4 also increases the maximal
airway narrowing induced by inhaled methacholine (Bel et
al., 1987
), and LTE4 induces airway hyperresponsiveness to inhaled histamine, an effect that may persist for several days (Arm et al., 1988
; O'Hickey et
al., 1991
). LTB4 has no direct effect on
human airway smooth muscle and does not cause bronchodilation after
inhalation in asthmatic patients, even when combined with
PGD2 (Black et al., 1989a
). Cys-LTs
may also stimulate airway smooth muscle proliferation (Cohen et
al., 1995
), although this has not yet been shown for human airway
smooth muscle and may be secondary to release of Tx.
b. VESSELS.
Cys-LTs potently elicit increased vascular
permeability in airways, leading to airway edema (Arakawa et
al., 1993
; Henderson, 1994
). The potential importance of
allergen-induced edema in the airways has been demonstrated with the
use of 5-LO inhibitors in experimental animals (Hui et
al., 1991
), although such studies have yet to be performed with
asthmatic patients.
c. SECRETION.
Cys-LTs increase mucus secretion, both
directly via effects on goblet cells and submucosal gland cells
(Hoffstein et al., 1990
; Goswami et al.,
1989
) and indirectly via the activation of airway nerves, leading to
reflex secretion from submucosal glands (Marom et al.,
1982
).
d. NERVES.
In guinea pigs, LTD4-induced
bronchoconstriction and plasma exudation are partly mediated by
tachykinin release, suggesting that LTD4 releases
neuropeptides from sensory nerves (Ishikawa et al.,
1996
). This is unlikely to be relevant in vivo in humans, because
inhaled LTD4 does not cause coughing and there is no effect of an anticholinergic drug on the bronchoconstriction response (Ayala
et al., 1988
).
e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS.
LTB4 and 5-HETE are
potent stimuli for leukocyte function, including chemotaxis and
aggregation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (Ford Hutchinson, 1990
),
effects that are mediated by activation of BLT receptors (Rola
Pleszczynski and Stankova, 1992
). Furthermore, LTB4 elicits
eosinophilic infiltration into guinea pig skin (Faccioli et
al., 1991
) and airways (Silbaugh et al., 1987
)
and is a potent activator of the oxidative burst in eosinophils
(Perkins et al., 1995
). Specific inhibitors of 5-LO
inhibit allergen-induced eosinophilic infiltration in guinea pig skin
(Teixeira et al., 1994
) and airways (Tohda et
al., 1997
) and in mouse airways, where they also block mucus
secretion (Henderson et al., 1996
). Furthermore,
LTB4 antagonists block allergen-induced eosinophilic
infiltration into guinea pig lungs (Richards et al.,
1989
, 1991
), although this finding has not been
confirmed in other studies (Seeds et al., 1995
). In
contrast to the potent effects of LTB4 in guinea pig
eosinophils, this mediator has little effect on human eosinophils.
Inhaled cys-LTs induce an eosinophil-rich infiltrate into the airways
in experimental animals (Foster and Chan, 1991
; Wegner et
al., 1993
; Underwood et al., 1996
). This
unexpected effect of cys-LTs appears to be the result of release of
IL-5 (Underwood et al., 1996
). An eosinophil response to
cys-LTs has also been observed in the lungs of a small group of
asthmatic patients, both in airway biopsies (Laitinen et
al., 1993
) and in induced sputum (Diamant et
al., 1997
). This is consistent with reports that cys-LT
antagonists reduce allergen-induced eosinophilic infiltration into the
airways of experimental animals (Chan et al., 1990
;
Nakagawa et al., 1993
), which suggests a potential
anti-inflammatory effect of anti-LTs. This suggestion is supported by
the observations that various 5-LO inhibitors can also inhibit
allergen-induced eosinophilic infiltration into the airways of
experiment animals (Gulbenkian et al., 1990
; Yeadon
et al., 1993
; Richards et al., 1989
).
Such observations have yet to be convincingly confirmed in asthma,
although several preliminary studies have suggested that anti-LTs
reduce the number of inflammatory cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
from allergic subjects undergoing segmental allergen challenge (Calhoun
et al., 1997
) and reduce circulating blood eosinophil
numbers (Reiss et al., 1996
). The 5-LO inhibitor
zileuton has also been reported to reduce the number of eosinophils in circulating blood of patients with nocturnal asthma, with clinical improvement (Wenzel et al., 1995
), although a trial of
the specific LTB4 antagonist LY293111 indicated no clinical
benefit in allergen-induced early or late responses (Evans et
al., 1996a
), despite a reduction in neutrophil numbers.
4. Role in asthma.
a. RELEASE.
In humans, elevated levels of cys-LTs
have been detected in plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and sputum
samples obtained from asthmatics during spontaneous exacerbations of
their asthma or after allergen exposure (Taylor et al.,
1989
; Wenzel et al., 1995
). Furthermore, several groups have
shown elevated levels of LTE4 in the urine of
allergic patients undergoing allergen exposure (Taylor et
al., 1989
; Drazen et al., 1992
) and exhibiting nocturnal asthma (Bellia et al., 1996
). In another study,
the increase in urinary LTE4 levels in allergic
asthmatics parallels the bronchoconstriction and subsides with
resolution of the airway response (Kumlin et al., 1992
).
Urinary LTE4 levels are increased in
aspirin-sensitive asthmatic patients (Kumlin et al., 1992
), supporting the view that in these patients aspirin produces its effect
by increasing cys-LT production. This is consistent with the recent
demonstration of increased LTC4 synthase
expression in bronchial biopsies of aspirin-sensitive asthmatics
(Sampson et al., 1997
), and this may be linked to a
polymorphism of the LTC4 synthase gene (Sanak
et al., 1997
).
b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS.
Numerous clinical studies
have been performed with cys-LT1 receptor antagonists and
5-LO inhibitors (collectively termed anti-LTs) and support a role for
cys-LTs in asthma (Chung, 1995
; O'Byrne et al., 1997
;
Smith, 1996
). There are no clear differences between 5-LO inhibitors
and cys-LT1 receptor antagonists, suggesting that LTB4 does not play a role in asthma. This is supported by
the lack of effect of an LTB4 antagonist in asthmatic
patients, at least during allergen challenge (Evans et
al., 1996a
). Several anti-LTs have been shown to improve
base-line lung function in asthmatic patients (Hui et
al., 1991
; Joos et al., 1991
; Kips et
al., 1991
; Gaddy et al., 1992
; Israel et
al., 1993b
; Reiss et al., 1997
) but not in
nonasthmatic subjects (Smith et al., 1990
; Spencer
et al., 1991
). This suggests that there is a certain degree of LT tone in asthmatic airways. The bronchodilating effect of
anti-LTs, although modest, is additive with that of
2-agonists (Hui et al., 1991
; Gaddy
et al., 1992
), indicating that anti-LTs may inhibit some
component of airway narrowing other than smooth muscle contraction
(such as edema).
Several studies have shown the efficacy of anti-LTs during various
provocation challenges. Anti-LTs protect against the early response to
allergen in allergic asthmatics (Fuller et al., 1989
; Taylor et al., 1991
) and shift the allergen
dose-response curve to the right approximately six-fold (Dahlen
et al., 1991
), supporting a role for mast cell-derived
LTs in allergen-induced bronchoconstriction (Holgate, 1996
). The
ability of anti-LTs to inhibit allergen-induced late responses is less
certain, because of the change in base-line lung function. In a
preliminary study with LY171883, no significant effect on the late
response was observed (Fuller et al., 1989
), a finding
confirmed by studies evaluating inhaled L-648,051 (Bel et al., 1990
). In contrast, the more potent antagonist
zafirlukast and the 5-LO-activating protein inhibitor Bay x1005 appear
to have some effect on the late response (Taylor et al.,
1991
; Dahlen et al., 1997
). Anti-LTs also protect
against cold air- and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic
subjects (Israel et al., 1990
; Manning et
al., 1990
; Robuschi et al., 1992
; Finnerty
et al., 1992
; Makker et al., 1993
).
Anti-LTs are particularly effective in blocking aspirininduced
asthma in aspirin-sensitive asthmatics, giving almost complete
protection (Christie et al., 1991
; Yamamoto et
al., 1994
; Israel et al., 1993a
; Dahlen
et al., 1993
; Nasser et al., 1994
), and
they also cause bronchodilation (Dahlen et al., 1993
).
There are now several well controlled studies with anti-LTs
demonstrating clinical efficacy in patients with asthma. For example, zafirlukast reduces symptoms and improves lung function, in addition to
reducing exacerbations (Barnes et al., 1997
; Spector
et al., 1994
; Suissa et al., 1997
).
Similar effects have been seen after regular treatment with montelukast
(administered once-daily) and pranlukast (administered twice-daily)
(Reiss et al., 1998
; Barnes et al.,
1997
). The effects of LT antagonists are supported by similar effects
of the 5-LO inhibitor zileuton (Israel et al., 1993b
, 1996
; Fischer et al., 1995
;
Dekhuijzen et al., 1997
). Furthermore, the addition of
zileuton to therapy with low doses of inhaled corticosteroid resulted
in greater control of asthma, compared with that achieved by increasing
the dose of the inhaled steroid, suggesting that drugs affecting the
synthesis or action of LTs may have biological activities
complementary to those of the inhaled corticosteroids (O'Connor
et al., 1996
). It is of interest that even high doses of
inhaled or orally administered steroids do not reduce LT production in
asthma, as measured by urinary LTE4 excretion (Dworski
et al., 1994
; O'Shaughnessy et al.,
1993
); therefore, anti-LTs may be usefully added to inhaled
corticosteroids for patients not achieving control with low doses.
One of the features of early studies of anti-LTs in asthma was the
heterogeneity of responses, with some patients (approximately one-third) showing a very good response and others being apparently unresponsive. This presumably reflects the varying contributions of LTs
in different patients and might be a reflection of polymorphism of the
5-LO gene (In et al., 1997
).
c. CONCLUSIONS.
There is now substantial evidence that
cys-LTs play an important role in asthma. Cys-LT production is
increased in asthma in response to various challenges that worsen
asthma. Cys-LTs are potent mediators of bronchoconstriction, plasma
exudation, and mucus secretion, and there is now a growing body of
evidence that they may also increase eosinophilic inflammation. The
importance of cys-LTs in asthma has been highlighted by the clinical
usefulness of LT receptor antagonists, which are now in routine use in
several countries. This has been supported by similar clinical benefits of 5-LO inhibitors. Some patients, particularly those with
aspirin-sensitive asthma, respond very well to anti-LTs, whereas others
show little benefit, indicating that LTs play a variable role. Anti-LTs
are less effective than corticosteroids in asthma treatment, suggesting that other inflammatory mediators play important roles in most patients. LTB4 does not appear to play an important role in
asthma, which is not surprising, because neutrophilic infiltration is not a feature of asthma in most patients.
C. Platelet-Activating Factor
PAF has long been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanisms
of asthma, because exogenous PAF closely mimics many of the clinical
features of asthma, including airway hyperresponsiveness.
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
PAF is an ether-linked
phospholipid (1-O-alkyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) that was first
described as a substance released from IgE-stimulated basophils. The
synthesis of PAF occurs in a wide variety of inflammatory cells,
including platelets, neutrophils, basophils, macrophages, and
eosinophils (Barnes et al., 1989
; Chung, 1992
). The
synthesis of PAF in inflammatory cells is generally via a two-step
enzymatic pathway involving first the activation of phospholipase
A2, which cleaves a free fatty acid from
ether-linked phospholipids (called plasmalogens) to yield lyso-PAF;
under appropriate conditions, lyso-PAF can be acetylated, to form the
biologically active PAF, by a rate-limiting enzyme that is termed
acetyl transferase and is found in the cytoplasm of inflammatory cells
(Barnes et al., 1989
). Large amounts of PAF can be
synthesized by several inflammatory cell types in the lung, including
resident cells such as mast cells (Triggiani et al., 1991
)
and alveolar macrophages (Bratton et al., 1994
).
PAF is not a single, biologically active molecule; rather, several
molecular species of PAF with significant biological activity are now
known to exist (McManus et al., 1993
). For example, the ester-linked, 1-acyl species
1-palmitoyl-2-acetoyl-sn-glyceryl-3-phosphocholine (PAGPC) is
synthesized by a wide variety of cells, including endothelial cells,
basophils, mast cells, and lymphocytes (Columbo et al., 1993
; Triggiani et al., 1991
). PAGPC and related members of
this family of lipids can interact with a G protein-linked receptor, with the acyl-PAFs being approximately 300 to 1000 times less potent
than PAF (Columbo et al., 1993
; Tordai et al.,
1994
). However, PAGPC can also act as a natural PAF receptor antagonist
(Columbo et al., 1993
; Tordai et al., 1994
; Mazer
et al., 1998
), raising the possibility that these other
forms of PAF may be involved as autoregulatory molecules for PAF.
The major enzyme responsible for the catabolism of PAF is PAF
acetylhydrolase, a PAF-specific esterase that cleaves the acetyl group
at the sn-2-position, producing lyso-PAF. PAF acetylhydrolase was
initially described as being abundant in human plasma and was later
shown to be associated with low density lipoproteins (Stafforini
et al., 1987
). Since these early observations,
acetylhydrolase has been described in various organs, including lung,
kidney, brain, and liver (Venable et al., 1993
). There is
now known to be an intracellular acetylhydrolase enzyme present in the
cytoplasm of several inflammatory cell types, including mast cells,
macrophages, and platelets. These cells can release acetylhydrolase and
probably contribute to the extracellular acetylhydrolase content that
has been identified in several biological fluids, such as skin (Teaford et al., 1992
) and nasal lavage fluid (Shin et
al., 1994
; Touqui et al., 1994
), after allergen
challenge. Furthermore, recent studies have identified an
acetylhydrolase in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid that is distinct from
either plasma acetylhydrolase or erythrocyte-derived acetylhydrolase
(Triggiani et al., 1997
). This novel enzyme is calcium
independent and has other characteristics that differentiate it from
other forms of acetylhydrolase that have been identified (Triggiani
et al., 1997
). This enzyme was present in smaller amounts in
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained from patients with mild asthma
(Triggiani et al., 1997
), supporting previous studies
showing reduced activity of plasma acetylhydrolase in young patients
with moderate to severe asthma (Miwa et al., 1988
; Tsukioka
et al., 1996
). It has been proposed that asthmatic patients
have a genetic defect in plasma acetylhydrolase (Miwa et
al., 1988
), although it is not yet clear what causes the reduced
acetylhydrolase activity in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. It is
certainly not the presence of an inflammatory condition in the airway,
because patients with fibrosis actually exhibited increased levels of
acetylhydrolase in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (Triggiani et
al., 1997
). The deficiency of PAF acetylhydrolase in Japanese
children is an autosomal recessive syndrome resulting from a missense
mutation that abolishes enzymatic activity, but it is not clear whether
this is associated with severe asthma (Stafforini et al.,
1996
). A recombinant human PAF acetylhydrolase has been produced and
has been shown to reduce PAF-induced inflammatory responses in the
airways (Tjoelker et al., 1995
). Such observations suggest
that local inactivation of PAF at local sites of inflammation might be
a practical therapeutic approach.
2. Receptors.
A PAF receptor has been cloned from human
platelets and leukocytes and shown to be a typical G protein-linked
receptor with seven transmembrane domains (Nakamura et al.,
1993
; Shimizu and Izumi, 1995
). PAF receptors are expressed in animal
and human lung (Shirasaki et al., 1994b
). Recent evidence
has shown that substitution of the Cys90, Cys95, or Cys173 residues in
the PAF receptor with alanine or serine yields mutant receptors that do not bind PAF and are not expressed on the surface of cells but are
found intracellularly (Le Gouill et al., 1997
). The cell
signaling pathways initiated by PAF interactions with its receptor are
well characterized and include increases in
[Ca2+]i (Mazer et
al., 1991
), increases in IP3 and
diacylglycerol levels, and induction of cell cycle-active genes, such
as fos, jun, and egr-1 (Mazer et
al., 1991
; Schulam et al., 1991
). PAF also activates the transcription factor AP-1 in bronchial epithelial cells (Le Van
et al., 1998
). The PAF receptor undergoes homologous
desensitization by phosphorylation of cytoplasmic tail sites in the
receptor molecule (Takano et al., 1994
), and related lipids
such as PAGPC can also desensitize the classical PAF receptor (Mazer
et al., 1998
). PAF exposure, however, leads to an increase
in PAF receptor mRNA levels, suggesting increased turnover of the
receptor (Shirasaki et al., 1994a
). Overexpression of the
PAF receptor in transgenic mice results in airway hyperresponsiveness,
which is attenuated by Tx, LT, and muscarinic antagonists (Nagase
et al., 1997
).
Many PAF receptor antagonists have been identified and have facilitated
the characterization of PAF receptors on a wide variety of inflammatory
cells. However, there have been findings with certain PAF receptor
antagonists that suggest that PAF may act via more than one receptor.
Evidence from both human and animal studies suggests that there may be
heterogeneity of PAF receptors (Hwang, 1990
; Lambrecht and Parnham,
1986
; Kroegel et al., 1989
). For example, PF10040 can
antagonize PAF-induced edema formation (Rossi et al., 1992
)
and PAF-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness (Herd et al.,
1994
) but has no effect on PAF-induced bronchoconstriction (Herd
et al., 1994
). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that only a small part of the total amount of PAF generated by cells is
actually released, with intracellular PAF having been proposed to be a
signaling molecule itself (Stewart and Harris, 1991
). Such observations
raise the possibility that a distinct PAF receptor may exist intracellularly.
3. Effects on airways.
a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE.
PAF has little direct
effect on human airway smooth muscle contraction in vitro but may
elicit constriction through the release of other mediators (Johnson
et al., 1992
). PAF produces acute bronchoconstriction when
inhaled by patients with asthma (Barnes et al., 1989
).
PAF-induced bronchoconstriction is not inhibited by the
H1 receptor antagonist ketotifen (Chung et
al., 1988
) or the Tx antagonist GR32191B (Stenton et
al., 1990b
). However, PAF-induced bronchoconstriction can be
inhibited by LT antagonists, including SKF 104353-Z (Spencer et
al., 1991
) and ICI 204,219 (Kidney et al., 1993
),
suggesting the involvement of LTD4 in this response.
b. VESSELS.
PAF has potent effects on vascular smooth
muscle and elicits hypotension in several species (Barnes et
al., 1989
). In the context of asthma, PAF is very potent in
causing vascular engorgement and increased vascular permeability in the
airways, leading to plasma exudation of protein-rich fluid into the
airway lumen (O'Donnell and Barnett, 1987
; Evans et
al., 1989
). This may contribute to the acute airway obstruction
elicited by PAF, because this effect is not totally reversed by the
airway smooth muscle relaxant salbutamol (Diaz et al.,
1997
). In animal studies, inhaled PAF is a potent inducer of airway
plasma exudation (Lötvall et al., 1991a
), and this
is mediated mainly via release of Tx (Tokuyama et al.,
1992
). Inhalation of PAF by patients with mild asthma induces arterial blood gas abnormalities and ventilation/perfusion imbalances
(Rodriguez-Roisin et al., 1994
; Felez et
al., 1994
). This hypoxemia is not the result of the
bronchoconstriction induced by PAF, because it cannot be fully
inhibited by salbutamol (Roca et al., 1995
; Diaz
et al., 1997
).
c. SECRETIONS.
PAF stimulates fluid secretion from
porcine isolated trachea via activation of PAF receptors and via a
mechanism that does not depend on the release of acetylcholine,
histamine, or cys-LTs (Steiger et al., 1987
). In feline
airways, activation of PKC is involved (Larivee et al.,
1994
). PAF also elicits mucus secretion from isolated human airways,
which may depend in part on the generation of cys-LTs but is
independent of acetylcholine release (Goswami et al.,
1989
). PAF stimulates mucin secretion from cultured tracheal explants
(Adler et al., 1987
).
d. NERVES.
One possible explanation for the ability of
PAF to induce increased responsiveness of the nose (Narita and Asakura,
1993
) and airways (reviewed above) is that it functions via the
activation of airway nerves. PAF-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in
experimental animals has been demonstrated to be inhibited by capsaicin
(Spina et al., 1991
; Perretti and Manzini, 1993
),
suggesting that PAF may have effects on the activation of sensory
C-fibers in the airways. PAF up-regulates the expression of
H1 receptor mRNA in trigeminal ganglia (Nakasaki et
al., 1998
) and stimulates the transcription factor AP-1 in
human neuroblastoma cells (Squinto et al., 1989
).
e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS.
PAF is a potent activator of
inflammatory cells. For example, PAF stimulates chemotaxis and adhesion
of eosinophils and neutrophils in vitro (Kimani et al.,
1988
; Kroegel et al., 1988
, 1991
) In addition, PAF can act as a priming agent for eosinophils (Koenderman et al., 1991
; Blom et al., 1992
; Zoratti
et al., 1992
). PAF-mediated priming of eosinophils is
via different signaling pathways, compared with IL-5induced
priming, because it is not blocked by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Van
der Bruggen et al., 1998
). PAF enhances LTC4
release from eosinophils from asthmatic patients but not from normal
subjects (Shindo et al., 1996
). PAF induces greater activation of circulating eosinophils in vitro after allergen challenge
of asthmatic patients, indicating an interaction between PAF and other
priming factors, such as IL-5 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Evans et al.,
1996b
). PAF also has a greater activating effect on neutrophils from
asthmatic patients, compared with those from normal control subjects
(Shindo et al., 1997
). In vivo, PAF elicits marked
eosinophilic infiltration into lung tissue after both intravenous and
aerosol administration to guinea pigs (Lellouch Tubiana et
al., 1988
; Sanjar et al., 1990
) and rabbits
(Coyle et al., 1990
). In both species, PAF-induced eosinophilic infiltration is reduced by selective platelet depletion with an antiplatelet antiserum, suggesting the involvement of platelets
in eosinophil recruitment in vivo. In primates, single and multiple
exposures to aerosolized PAF elicit an increase in the number of
eosinophils and neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid,
accompanied by increased bronchial responsiveness to inhaled methacholine (Wegner et al., 1992
). Although inhalation
of PAF has been reported to elicit bronchial hyperresponsiveness in
humans (Cuss et al., 1986
; Kaye and Smith, 1990
), this
has not been universally shown (Spencer et al., 1990
;
Lai et al., 1990b
), and it is associated with
neutrophilic infiltration into the lungs (Wardlaw et
al., 1990
). However, recent data from transgenic mice
overexpressing a guinea pig PAF receptor have shown that such mice
exhibit airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (Ishii et
al., 1997
). In humans, intradermal administration of PAF to
atopic subjects has been shown to induce eosinophilic infiltration
(Henocq and Vargaftig, 1986
).
4. Role in asthma.
a. RELEASE.
Several groups have attempted to
quantify the release of PAF in plasma or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
from asthmatic and allergic subjects, with conflicting results
(Nakamura et al., 1987
; Miadonna et al., 1989
;
Stenton et al., 1990a
; Tsukioka et al., 1996
).
However, high levels of lyso-PAF were found in these studies and,
because lyso-PAF is the precursor as well as the metabolite of PAF,
this complicates the interpretation of these data. After segmental
allergen challenge in asthmatic patients, high levels of lyso-PAF were
correlated with increased acetylhydrolase and phospholipase
A2 activity (Chilton et al., 1996
).
PAF has also been detected in the plasma of patients exhibiting a late asthmatic response (Chan Yeung et al., 1991
).
b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS.
Despite considerable in vitro
and in vivo data for humans suggesting that PAF is an important
mediator of asthma, clinical studies with PAF receptor antagonists have
been very disappointing. Apafant (WEB 2086) inhibited PAF-induced
bronchoconstriction (Adamus et al., 1990
) and platelet
responses to PAF (Hayes et al., 1991
) but had no
significant effect on allergen-induced early or late responses or
airway hyperresponsiveness (Freitag et al., 1993
). Furthermore, 12-week treatment of atopic asthmatics with apafant showed
no clinical benefit in terms of lung function or the use of rescue
medication or inhaled corticosteroids (Spence et al., 1994
). Similarly, UK74505 abolishes PAF-induced bronchospasm (O'Connor et al., 1994
) but has no effect on allergen-induced
early or late responses or on airway hyperresponsiveness (Kuitert
et al., 1993
). UK80067, the racemate of UK74505, has no
effect on adult asthmatics receiving this drug for 4 weeks (Kuitert
et al., 1995
). Recent data suggested that 1-week
treatment with the potent, long-acting, PAF receptor antagonist
foropafant (SR27417A) produced a modest reduction in the magnitude of
the allergen-induced late response, although there was no effect on the
early response, the allergen-induced airway responsiveness, or
base-line lung function (Evans et al., 1997
). Another
PAF antagonist, Y24180, has also been shown to reduce airway
responsiveness to inhaled methacholine in asthmatics (Hozawa et
al., 1995
), although these data are at variance with findings
from other studies (Hsieh, 1991
; Evans et al., 1997
). Overall, these clinical data with PAF antagonists suggest that extracellular PAF plays only a small part in human allergic asthma, which is surprising, in view of its prominent role in animal models.
c. CONCLUSIONS.
PAF is produced by many of the cells
that are activated in asthmatic airways and has a profound effect on
airway function, producing bronchoconstriction, inducing airway
hyperresponsiveness, plasma exudation, and mucus hypersecretion, and
recruiting and activating eosinophils. However, PAF antagonists have
proved to be very disappointing for the treatment of asthma, producing
minor or no effects, even during chronic treatment. This may be because PAF is not important in chronic asthma or because the antagonists used
are not capable of blocking endogenously produced PAF, which acts
locally in the airways almost as a "paracrine" mediator. A PAF
synthase inhibitor would be particularly valuable for elucidation of
the role of PAF and should also inhibit the production of intracellular PAF. It is possible that PAF may play a role in some patients with
asthma and during exacerbations, but this has not yet been explored.
D. Other Lipid Mediators
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
Several other lipid mediators,
including hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid (HPETEs), mono- and
di-HETEs, and lipoxins (LXs), have been shown to have effects in the
airways that are of potential relevance to asthma (Sigal and Nadel,
1991
). Most of these substances are metabolic products of the 15-LO
enzyme, which catalyzes the insertion of molecular oxygen at the carbon
atom at position 15 in the arachidonic acid molecule (Samuelsson
et al., 1987
). 15-LO has been demonstrated in human tracheal
epithelium (Hunter et al., 1985
), eosinophils (Turk et
al., 1982
), endothelial cells (Hopkins et al., 1984
),
and monocytes (Conrad et al., 1992
). Furthermore, immunohistochemical studies have revealed that 15-LO is expressed in
airway epithelium and eosinophils (Sigal et al., 1992
;
Bradding et al., 1995
). LXs (LO interaction products), of
which the most prevalent is LXA4, are produced by
interactions between 15-LO and 5-LO or between 12-LO and 5-LO.
2. Receptors.
Little is known regarding receptors for 15-LO
products, and it is not clear whether there are distinct receptors for
these HETEs and HPETEs. Specific LXA4 receptors
have been identified in murine and human cells (Takano et
al., 1997
; Fiore et al., 1994
).
3. Effects on airways.
Both mono- and di-HETEs are chemotactic
for neutrophils and eosinophils (Johnson et al., 1985
;
Kirsch et al., 1988
; Morita et al., 1990
; Schwenk
et al., 1992
). In addition, 15-HETE has been demonstrated to
induce LTC4 release from mastocytoma cells (Goetzl et al., 1983
) and mucus secretion from dog trachea
(Johnson et al., 1985
). LXs have been demonstrated to
contract airway smooth muscle (Dahlen et al., 1987
; Meini
et al., 1992
) and to activate PKC (Hansson et
al., 1986
). LXA4 inhibits neutrophil and
eosinophil activation by N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine and
PAF, respectively (Lee et al., 1991
; Soyombo et
al., 1994
), and inhibits adhesion of leukocytes (Scalia et
al., 1997
), suggesting that it has an anti-inflammatory role.
LXA4 also inhibits cholinergic neurotransmission
in airways, an effect that may be mediated by release of NO (Tamaoki
et al., 1995
).
The contribution of 15-LO metabolites of arachidonic acid to bronchial
hyperresponsiveness is not clear. 15-HETE has been shown to reduce
airway responsiveness but to prolong allergen-induced bronchospasm
(Lai et al., 1990a
,b
). Similarly, 15-HETE does not cause
airway hyperresponsiveness in rabbits, despite causing infiltration of
neutrophils into the airway (Riccio et al., 1997
). In
contrast, 15-HPETE produces a sustained increase in airway
responsiveness to inhaled histamine in rabbits, which is accompanied by
neutrophilic infiltration (Riccio et al., 1997
). The airway
hyperresponsiveness induced by inhaled 15-HPETE was significantly
reduced by pretreatment with capsaicin and atropine, suggesting the
involvement of airway cholinergic and peptidergic nerves (Riccio
et al., 1997
).
4. Role in asthma.
Immunoreactive LXA4
has been detected in increased concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage
fluid from asthmatic patients (Lee et al., 1990
). Inhaled
LXA4 has little effect on airway function but
antagonizes the bronchoconstricting effect of inhaled
LTC4 (Christie et al., 1992
),
supporting the view that LXs may function as endogenous antagonists of
cys-LTs (Lee, 1995
). Stable LXA4 analogues have
anti-inflammatory effects and inhibit neutrophil chemotaxis and
activation, suggesting that these endogenous substances are
anti-inflammatory (Scalia et al., 1997
). 15-LO may therefore function as an anti-inflammatory regulator in asthma by controlling the
formation of LXs in response to cys-LT formation in the airways. There
is an increase in levels of mRNA for 15-LO in circulating leukocytes of
asthmatic patients (Kuitert et al., 1996
) and increased expression of 15-LO in epithelial cells of asthmatic patients (Bradding
et al., 1995
). IL-4 selectively increases the expression of
15-LO in epithelial cells, and this may account for the increase in
expression in asthma (Sigal et al., 1993
).
 |
IV. Peptide Mediators |
Several peptides, including bradykinin, tachykinins, CGRP,
endothelins (ETs), and complement, are involved in asthma. They are
usually cleaved from larger precursors and are released in an active
form. They are subject to degradation by peptidases (such as NEP) both
in the circulation and in the airways.
A. Bradykinin
Bradykinin has long been considered to be a mediator involved in
asthma, since the first demonstration of bronchoconstriction in
asthmatic patients after bradykinin inhalation. The development of
potent and long-lasting bradykinin receptor antagonists has focused
attention on the role of bradykinin and other kinins in the
pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma, as well as on the potential
uses of bradykinin antagonists in asthma therapy (Barnes, 1992b
).
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
Kinins are vasoactive peptides
that are formed, during the inflammatory response, from the
2-globulins high molecular weight (HMW) and
low molecular weight (LMW) kininogens, by the action of kininogenases
(Bhoola et al., 1992
). Kininogenases include plasma
kallikrein and tissue kallikrein. HMW and LMW kininogens are produced
from the same gene (containing 11 exons and 10 introns) as a
consequence of alternative splicing (Nakanishi, 1987
). Both kininogens
are synthesized in the liver. HMW kininogen is present only in plasma,
whereas LMW kininogen also occurs in tissues. Two kinins are formed in
humans, i.e., the nonapeptide bradykinin (Arg-Pro-Pro-Gly-Phe-Ser-Pro-Phe-Arg), which is generated from HMW
kininogen, and the decapeptide lysyl-bradykinin (kallidin), which is
generated from LMW kininogen. Kallidin is rapidly converted to
bradykinin by the enzyme aminopeptidase-N (Proud and Kaplan, 1988
).
There is evidence for kinin activity in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
from asthmatic patients (Christiansen et al.,
1987
, 1992
), and it is likely that bradykinin is formed, by
the action of plasma and tissue kallikreins, in plasma that has been
exuded from the inflamed airways. The concentrations of kallikrein and kinins in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid increase after allergen challenge (Christiansen et al., 1992
). HMW kininogen is the
preferred substrate for plasma kallikrein, which is generated from
inactive prekallikrein by contact with certain negatively charged
surfaces, including basement membrane components and proteoglycans,
such as heparin released from mast cells. Tissue kallikreins are
produced in glandular secretions and release kinins from both HMW and
LMW kininogens. Tissue kallikrein has been localized
immunocytochemically to serous cells in the submucosal glands of human
airways (Proud and Vio, 1993
). Serine proteases, such as
1-antitrypsin, are effective inhibitors of
kallikrein in the circulation, but in tissues kallikrein may remain
activated for prolonged periods. Kallistatin is a kallikrein inhibitor
that is present in some tissues, but its role in airways is not yet
known (Chao et al., 1996
).
Other proteases that may be produced by inflammatory cells may also
generate kinins from kininogens. Mast cell tryptase is a weak
kininogenase in vitro under conditions of low pH, although it is
unlikely that activity occurs to any significant extent in vivo
(Proud et al., 1988
). There is also some evidence that neutrophils and platelets may release proteases with kininogen activity
(Proud, 1991
).
Bradykinin is subject to rapid enzymatic degradation and has a plasma
half-life of <30 sec. Bradykinin is metabolized by several peptidases
(collectively known as kininases), which may be present in asthmatic
airways. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) may be important for
degrading bradykinin in the circulation, because it is localized to
endothelial cells, but it may also be present in airway tissue (Dusser
et al., 1988
). ACE inhibitors, such as captopril and
enalapril, potentiate both the bronchoconstriction and microvascular
leakage produced by bradykinin (Ichinose and Barnes, 1990c
;
Lötvall et al., 1991b
), suggesting that this may be
the mechanism of ACE inhibitor-induced cough. In guinea pigs, chronic
administration of captopril causes spontaneous coughing, which is
blocked by the bradykinin antagonist icatibant (Fox et al.,
1996
).
NEP (EC 3.4.24.11) appears to be the most important enzyme for
degradation of bradykinin in the airways. Phosphoramidon, which
inhibits NEP, enhances the bronchoconstricting effect of bradykinin
both in vitro (Frossard et al., 1990
) and in vivo (Ichinose and Barnes, 1990c
; Lötvall et al., 1991b
) in animals.
Because NEP is expressed in human airway epithelium (Baraniuk et
al., 1995
), the shedding of airway epithelium in asthma may result in the enhanced airway responses to bradykinin seen in asthmatic patients.
A third enzyme, namely carboxypeptidase-N (kininase 1), may be
important in degrading bradykinin in the circulation, but an inhibitor
of this enzyme
(DL-mercaptomethyl-3-guanidinoethylthiopropionic acid) does
not have any effect on the bronchoconstriction response to bradykinin
in vivo (Ichinose and Barnes, 1990c
). Carboxypeptidase-N converts
bradykinin to [des-Arg9]-bradykinin, which is selective for
B1 receptors (Regoli and Barabé, 1980
).
Aminopeptidase-M, which converts lysyl-bradykinin to bradykinin, is
widely distributed, so that kallidin is rapidly converted to
bradykinin. This enzyme is expressed in airway epithelial cells (Proud
et al., 1994
).
2. Receptors.
Bradykinin exerts several effects on the
airways that are mediated by specific surface receptors. At least two
subtypes of bradykinin receptors are recognized, based on the rank
order of potency of kinin agonists (Regoli and Barabé, 1980
), as
follows: B1, [des-Arg10]-lysyl-bradykinin > [des-Arg9]-bradykinin = lysyl-bradykinin
bradykinin; B2, bradykinin = lysyl-bradykinin
[des-Arg10]-lysyl-bradykinin > [des-Arg9]-bradykinin. B1 receptors are
selectively activated by lysyl-bradykinin (kallidin) and
[des-Arg9]-bradykinin and are inducible by inflammatory signals.
B1 receptors are expressed in chronic
inflammation induced by IL-1
and IL-6 in rats and may play an
important role in hyperalgesia. The effects of bradykinin on airways
are mediated by B2 receptors, and there is no
evidence for functional B1 receptors in the
airways. A B3 receptor has also been proposed in
airway smooth muscle of sheep (Farmer et al., 1991
), but
there are doubts regarding its existence, because it has been defined
with weak antagonists.
The B2 receptor from animals and humans and a
human B1 receptor have been cloned (McEachern
et al., 1991
; Hess et al., 1992
; Mencke et
al., 1995
). Both have the typical seven-transmembrane segment
structure common to all G protein-coupled receptors (McEachern et
al., 1991
). Interestingly, [des-Arg10]-lysyl-bradykinin is much
more potent than [des-Arg9]-bradykinin at the human
B1 receptor, suggesting that potential
B1 receptor responses in human tissues may be
overlooked if [des-Arg9]-bradykinin is used as the only selective
probe (Mencke et al., 1995
). Pharmacological studies suggest
that there may be subtypes of B2 receptors (Braas
et al., 1988
; Hall, 1992
), which may be more clearly defined
using molecular probes. With low stringency probes, there is no
evidence for additional types of bradykinin receptors in human cDNA
libraries (Mencke et al., 1998
).
The distribution of B2 receptors has been mapped
in human lung by autoradiography using
[3H]bradykinin (Mak and Barnes, 1991
). There
are high densities of binding sites in bronchial and pulmonary vessels,
particularly on endothelial cells. Epithelial cells, airway smooth
muscle (particularly in peripheral airways), submucosal glands, and
nerves are also labeled, indicating that bradykinin may have diverse
effects on airway function. A particularly high density of labeling is
observed in the lamina propria immediately beneath the epithelium; it
is not clear what cellular structures are labeled, but nerves and superficial blood vessels are the most likely structures.
3. Effects on airways.
Bradykinin has many effects on airway
functions; some are mediated by direct activation of
B2 receptors on target cells, and others are
mediated indirectly via the release of other mediators or neurotransmitters.
a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE.
Inhaled bradykinin is a potent
bronchoconstrictor in asthmatic patients but has little or no effect,
even at high concentrations, in normal individuals, suggesting
increased responsiveness of airway smooth muscle to bradykinin, as
observed with other spasmogens (Fuller et al., 1987b
;
Polosa and Holgate, 1990
). In vitro, bradykinin is only a weak
constrictor of proximal human airways, suggesting that its potent
bronchoconstricting effect in asthmatic patients is mediated
indirectly. However, bradykinin is more potent in constricting
peripheral human airways (Molimard et al., 1994
; Hulsmann et al., 1994b
), partly via direct stimulation
of B2 receptors on airway smooth muscle cells and partly
via the release of Tx. Bradykinin contracts airway smooth muscle in
vitro, but in guinea pig airways in vitro bradykinin has weak and
variable effects, which are influenced by the presence of airway
epithelium and by the activity of local degrading enzymes. Bradykinin
causes relaxation of intact guinea pig airways in vitro, but it
constricts airways if the epithelium is mechanically removed (Frossard
et al., 1990
; Bramley et al., 1990
).
Bradykinin releases the bronchodilator PGE2 from epithelial
cells (Bramley et al., 1990
), and epithelium removal
therefore reduces the functional antagonism, resulting in a
bronchoconstricting effect of bradykinin. Furthermore, because NEP is
strongly expressed on airway epithelial cells, epithelium removal may
reduce bradykinin metabolism. A combination of indomethacin (to inhibit
PGE2 formation) and phosphoramidon (to inhibit NEP) mimics
the effect of epithelium removal (Frossard et al.,
1990
). The bronchoconstricting effect of bradykinin in ferrets in vitro and in guinea pigs in vivo is enhanced by the inhibition of both NEP
(by phosphoramidon) and ACE (by captopril) (Dusser et
al., 1988
; Ichinose and Barnes, 1990c
). In small human bronchi
in vitro, bradykinin may cause relaxation when the airway epithelium is intact but it consistently causes constriction after epithelium removal
or addition of phosphoramidon (Hulsmann et al., 1994b
).
Intravenously administered bradykinin causes intense
bronchoconstriction in guinea pigs, which is markedly inhibited by
indomethacin, suggesting that a bronchoconstricting COX product
(probably Tx) largely mediates this effect (Ichinose et
al., 1990a
). The bronchoconstriction response to bradykinin
instilled directly into the airways is not reduced by indomethacin,
however, suggesting a different mechanism of bronchoconstriction after
airway delivery of the mediator (Ichinose et al.,
1990a
). In airway inflammation, it is likely that bradykinin would be
formed at the airway surface from plasma kininogens exuded into the
airway lumen from leaky superficial blood vessels. In human subjects,
inhibition of COX by aspirin or flurbiprofen or treatment with a Tx
receptor antagonist had no effect on the bronchoconstricting effect of
inhaled bradykinin (Fuller et al., 1987b
; Polosa
et al., 1990
; Rajakulasingam et al.,
1996
), although in one study an inhibitory effect of inhaled
lysine-aspirin was observed (Polosa et al., 1997a
).
Similarly, antihistamines have no effect on bradykinin-induced bronchoconstriction, suggesting that mast cell mediator release is not
involved (Polosa et al., 1990
).
The bronchoconstricting effect of bradykinin in guinea pigs is also
modulated by NO, because pretreatment with aerosolized NOS inhibitors
markedly potentiates the bronchoconstricting effect of bradykinin
(administered intravenously or by inhalation) (Ricciardolo et
al., 1994
). The source of NO is unclear but may be from airway epithelium, which expresses constitutive NOS (cNOS) and inducible NOS
(iNOS) (Robbins et al., 1994
; Asano et
al., 1994
). In asthmatic patients, inhalation of the NOS
inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine
(L-NMMA) potentiates the bronchoconstricting action of
bradykinin, suggesting that bradykinin releases NO in the airways to
counteract the bronchoconstricting action of bradykinin (Ricciardolo
et al., 1996
). Interestingly, this potentiating effect is not seen in patients with more severe asthma, possibly because of
loss of the epithelial source of NO (Ricciardolo et al.,
1997
).
In human airways, the bronchoconstricting effect of bradykinin is
likely to be mediated by B2 receptors, because icatibant blocks the bronchoconstriction response to bradykinin in vitro (Molimard et al., 1994
; Hulsmann et al.,
1994b
) and the B1-selective agonist [des-Arg9]-bradykinin
has no effect on airway function in asthmatic patients (Polosa and
Holgate, 1990
). However, it is possible that B1 receptors
are induced in more severe asthma, and further studies with selective
B1 agonists are needed.
b. VESSELS.
Bradykinin is a potent inducer of airway
microvascular leakage and causes prolonged leakage at all airway
levels. This is partly mediated by the release of PAF, because a PAF
antagonist markedly inhibits the prolonged leakage (Rogers et
al., 1990
). The immediate leakage response to bradykinin is
partly mediated by the release of neuropeptides (probably SP) from
airway sensory nerves. The effect of bradykinin on plasma exudation is
partly reduced by pretreatment with neurokinin (NK)1
receptor antagonists (Sakamoto et al., 1993
; Nakajima
et al., 1994
). The effect of bradykinin on leakage is
mediated by B2 receptors (which have been localized to
endothelial cells on postcapillary venules), because B2
antagonists inhibit the leakage response (Ichinose and Barnes, 1990a
;
Sakamoto et al., 1992
). The microvascular leakage induced by bradykinin is enhanced by inhibition of both NEP and ACE
(Lötvall et al., 1991c
).
Bradykinin is a potent vasodilator of bronchial vessels and causes an
increase in airway blood flow (Parsons et al., 1992a
; Corfield et al., 1991
). This is consistent with the high
density of bradykinin receptors on bronchial vessels (Mak and Barnes, 1991
) and suggests that a major effect of bradykinin in asthma may
involve hyperemia of the airways.
c. SECRETIONS.
Bradykinin stimulates airway mucus
secretion from human submucosal glands in vitro, and these effects are
mediated by B2 receptors (Nagaki et al.,
1996
), presumably indicating a direct effect of bradykinin on
submucosal glands. This is consistent with the demonstration of
B2 receptors on these glands by autoradiographic mapping
(Mak and Barnes, 1991
). Bradykinin also stimulates the release of mucus glycoproteins from human nasal mucosa in vitro (Baraniuk et
al., 1990
). Bradykinin stimulates ion transport in airway
epithelial cells, which is mediated by the release of PGs (Leikauf
et al., 1985
). The effects of bradykinin on epithelial
cells are mediated by B2 receptors (Proud et
al., 1993
). In animals, bradykinin also stimulates mucociliary
clearance and ciliary beating via the release of PGs (Wong et
al., 1990
). Inhaled bradykinin increases mucociliary clearance
in normal humans, presumably reflecting the stimulatory effect of
bradykinin on airway secretions (Polosa et al., 1992a
).
d. NERVES.
Perhaps the most important property of
bradykinin in airways is its ability to activate C-fiber nociceptive
sensory nerve endings (Barnes, 1992b
). Bradykinin is the mediator of
inflammatory pain, and in the airways this may be manifested as cough
and tightness of the chest, which are commonly observed in asthmatic
patients after inhalation of bradykinin (Fuller et al.,
1987b
). Bradykinin stimulates bronchial C-fibers in dogs. In guinea
pigs, the bronchoconstriction response to instilled bradykinin is
reduced by atropine and by capsaicin pretreatment, which depletes
neuropeptides from sensory nerves, indicating that both a cholinergic
reflex and release of neuropeptides from sensory nerves are involved
(Ichinose et al., 1990a
). Indeed, a combination of
atropine and capsaicin pretreatment largely abolishes the
bronchoconstriction response to instilled bradykinin but has little
effect on the bronchoconstriction response to intravenously
administered bradykinin (which is largely inhibited by indomethacin)
(Ichinose et al., 1990a
). Bradykinin also releases tachykinins from perfused guinea pig lung (Saria et al.,
1988
) and rat trachea (Ray et al., 1991
). Bradykinin
enhances the bronchoconstriction response to electrical field
stimulation (mediated by release of endogenous tachykinins) in
guinea pig bronchi in vitro (Miura et al., 1992
) and the
NANC bronchoconstriction response to vagus nerve stimulation in vivo
(Miura et al., 1994
). Tachykinin antagonists have an
inhibitory effect on the bronchoconstriction and plasma exudation
responses to bradykinin in guinea pigs, suggesting that release of
tachykinins from sensory nerves is an important component of both
responses (Sakamoto et al., 1993
; Nakajima et
al., 1994
). The effect of bradykinin on airway sensory nerves
is blocked by icatibant, indicating that B2 receptors are
involved in the release of neuropeptides from sensory nerves (Miura
et al., 1992
). Although studies in human subjects are
more limited, a nonselective tachykinin antagonist (FK-224) has been
shown to reduce the bronchoconstriction response to inhaled bradykinin
in asthmatic patients, suggesting that bradykinin may release
tachykinins in asthmatic airways (Ichinose et al.,
1992
); however, this was not confirmed in another study using the same
antagonist (Schmidt et al., 1996
).
Single-fiber recordings from sensory nerves of guinea pig airways
indicate that bradykinin is a potent activator of C-fibers and that
this is a direct action, because it is not blocked by COX inhibition
but is blocked by icatibant (Fox et al., 1993
). In
guinea pigs treated with captopril, there is evidence for increased sensitization of C-fibers, which is blocked by icatibant, suggesting that bradykinin is responsible. Indeed, bradykinin sensitizes airway
C-fibers to other neural activators (Fox et al., 1996
). However, bradykinin has no direct effect on the release of
neurotransmitters from airway cholinergic nerves (Miura et
al., 1992
).
In asthmatic patients, the bronchoconstriction response to bradykinin
is reduced by anticholinergic pretreatment, indicating that a
cholinergic reflex is involved (Fuller et al., 1987b
). Pretreatment with sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil sodium is very
effective in inhibiting the airway response to bradykinin. This may
indicate the involvement of C-fiber activation in asthmatic airways
(Dixon and Barnes, 1989
), because both drugs have been found to inhibit
C-fibers in animals (Jackson et al., 1989
). This suggests that bradykinin may be an important mediator of cough and
chest discomfort in asthma. Bradykinin induces cough in normal and
asthmatic subjects (Choudry et al., 1989
) and has been
implicated in ACE inhibitor-induced cough, which is observed for
approximately 10% of patients receiving chronic therapy (Fuller,
1989
). ACE inhibitor cough is reduced by COX inhibitors and Tx
antagonists, suggesting that PGs (such as PGE2 or
PGF2
) may be involved (McEwan et
al., 1990
; Malini et al., 1997
). Endogenous
bradykinin may stimulate the release of these PGs in the larynx and
trachea, leading to cough, although it is not clear why only some
patients are affected.
e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS.
Bradykinin has few reported
direct effects on the recruitment or activation of inflammatory cells,
although it may act indirectly through the release of mediators from
structural cells. For example, bradykinin releases neutrophil and
monocyte chemotactic factors from airway epithelial cells (Koyama
et al., 1995
). Bradykinin activates alveolar macrophages
from asthmatic patients to release mediators, including
LTB4, PAF, and other eosinophilic chemotactic factors (Sato
et al., 1996
). In guinea pigs, a bradykinin antagonist inhibits allergen-induced eosinophilia, but whether bradykinin antagonists have such an effect in human airways has not been determined.
4. Role in asthma.
a. RELEASE.
Although the role of bradykinin in
asthma is still not clear, the development of potent, stable,
B2 receptor antagonists offers the possibility of
soon clarifying the role of bradykinin in airway disease (Burch
et al., 1990
). Bradykinin is generated in
asthmatic airways by the action of various kininogenases (generated in
the inflammatory response) on HMW kininogen present in the exuded plasma and on LMW kininogens secreted in the airways. Bradykinin has
been detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic patients
(Christiansen et al., 1992
). The degradation of bradykinin in the airways may be impaired when NEP is down-regulated in asthmatic airways or epithelial shedding occurs (Nadel, 1991
). In experimental animals, aerosol exposure to IL-1
markedly increases the
bronchoconstriction response to bradykinin (Tsukagoshi et
al., 1994a
), and this may be the result of reduced expression of
NEP in the airways (Tsukagoshi et al., 1995
).
b. RELEVANT EFFECTS.
Asthmatic patients are
hyperreactive to inhaled bradykinin; this is related to the degree of
eosinophilic inflammation in the airways (Roisman et
al., 1996
). Bradykinin has many effects on the airways that are
relevant to asthma. Perhaps the most important property of bradykinin
is its ability to activate nociceptive nerve fibers in the airway,
because these may mediate the cough and chest tightness that are such
characteristic symptoms of asthma. This effect of bradykinin may be
enhanced by hyperesthesia of sensory nerves in the airways that have
been sensitized by inflammatory mediators. Inhalation of bradykinin by
asthmatic patients rather closely mimics an asthma attack; in addition
to wheezing, patients experience chest tightness, coughing, and
sometimes itching under the chin, which are common sensory
manifestations during asthma exacerbation. Bradykinin is also a potent
bronchoconstrictor in asthmatic patients, and after allergen challenge
there is a disproportionate increase in responsiveness to bradykinin,
compared with methacholine, which may not be maximal until several days
after allergen challenge and may persist for several days (Berman
et al., 1995
). This may be a reflection of airway
sensory nerve hyperesthesia. In patients with perennial rhinitis, there
is a marked increase in the response to topically applied bradykinin,
with evidence of enhanced reflex effects (Baraniuk et
al., 1994
).
c. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS.
The contribution of
bradykinin to asthma can only be determined with the use of potent and
specific bradykinin antagonists, which are now in clinical development.
Such agents are predicted to be effective in symptom control, but it is
not clear whether they might also have anti-inflammatory effects. One
antagonist, [D-Arg0,Hyp3,D-Phe7]-bradykinin
(NPC567), was unable to inhibit the effect of bradykinin on nasal
secretions, even when administered at the same time as bradykinin
(Pongracic et al., 1991
), presumably because of rapid local metabolism. Icatibant (HOE 140, [D-Arg0,Hyp3,Thi6,D-Tic7,Oic8]-bradykinin)
is a selective B2 receptor antagonist that not only is
potent but also has a long duration of action in animals in vivo,
because it is resistant to enzymatic degradation (Hock et al., 1991
; Wirth et al., 1991
). This antagonist
is potent in inhibiting the bronchoconstriction and microvascular
leakage responses to bradykinin (Wirth et al., 1993
;
Sakamoto et al., 1992
) and the effect of bradykinin on
airway sensory nerves (Miura et al., 1992
). Clinical
studies with icatibant are limited, but there is some evidence that
nasal application reduces the nasal blockage induced by allergen in
patients with allergic rhinitis (Austin et al., 1994
).
In a clinical study of nebulized icatibant treatment of asthma, there
was a small improvement in airway function tests after 4 weeks of
treatment but no improvement in asthma symptoms (Akbary et
al., 1996
). Recently, nonpeptide antagonists have been identified. WIN 64338 is a nonpeptide B2 receptor
antagonist that has been shown to block the bronchoconstricting action
of bradykinin in airway smooth muscle in vitro (Scherrer et
al., 1995
). More potent nonpeptide antagonists, such as
FR167344, have been developed and have clinical potential (Inamura
et al., 1997
). Although FR167344 is not very
potent, it may lead to the future development of more potent nonpeptide drugs.
B. Tachykinins
Airway sensory nerves have the capacity to release neuropeptides,
particularly the tachykinins SP and NKA, as well as CGRP, which may
have proinflammatory effects in the airway. Because airway sensory
nerves are activated in asthma, this has suggested that the release of
sensory neuropeptides may contribute to the inflammatory response in
asthma (Barnes, 1995a
).
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
SP and NKA, but not NKB, are
localized to sensory nerves in the airways of several species (Barnes
et al., 1991
; Joos et al., 1994
; Uddman et
al., 1997
). SP-immunoreactive nerves are abundant in rodent
airways but are sparse in human airways (Martling et al.,
1987
; Laitinen et al., 1992
; Komatsu et al.,
1991
). Rapid enzymatic degradation of SP in airways, and the fact that
SP concentrations may decrease with age and possibly with cigarette
smoking, could explain the difficulty in demonstrating this peptide in
some studies. SP-immunoreactive nerves in the airway are found beneath
and within the airway epithelium, around blood vessels, and, to a
lesser extent, within airway smooth muscle. SP-immunoreactive nerves fibers also innervate parasympathetic ganglia, suggesting a sensory input that may modulate ganglionic transmission and thus result in
local reflexes. SP in the airways is localized predominantly to
capsaicin-sensitive unmyelinated nerves, but chronic administration of
capsaicin only partially depletes the lung of tachykinins, indicating the presence of a population of capsaicin-resistant SP-immunoreactive nerves, as in the gastrointestinal tract (Dey et al., 1991
). Similar capsaicin denervation studies are not
possible in human airways, but after extrinsic denervation during
heart-lung transplantation there appears to be a loss of
SP-immunoreactive nerves in the submucosa (Springall et al.,
1990
). Tachykinins are derived from preprotachykinins (PPTs) that are
expressed in nodose and jugular ganglia. There are three PPT genes;
-PPT codes for SP alone,
-PPT codes for SP and NKA, and
-PPT
codes for SP, NKA, and a novel, amino-terminally extended form of NKA
termed NP-
. Synthesis may be partly determined by local inflammation in the airways, because allergen exposure increases the expression of
PPT mRNA in nodose ganglia of guinea pigs (Fischer et al., 1996
). There is some evidence that tachykinins may be synthesized in
nonneuronal cells, such as macrophages. Human macrophages express
-PPT, and SP is released from these cells by capsaicin (Ho et al., 1997
). In rat alveolar macrophages,
-PPT mRNA and SP-like immunoreactivity are expressed in response to inflammatory stimuli, suggesting that this may result in increased SP release in inflammatory diseases (Killingsworth et al., 1997
).
Tachykinins are subject to degradation by at least two enzymes, ACE and
NEP (Nadel, 1991
). ACE is predominantly localized to vascular
endothelial cells and therefore breaks down intravascular peptides. ACE
inhibitors, such as captopril, enhance bronchoconstriction resulting
from intravenous administration of SP (Shore et al., 1988
;
Martins et al., 1990
) but not inhalation of SP
(Lötvall et al., 1990b
). NKA is not a good substrate
for ACE, however. NEP appears to be the most important enzyme for the
breakdown of tachykinins in tissues. Inhibition of NEP by
phosphoramidon or thiorphan markedly potentiates bronchoconstriction in
vitro in animal airways (Sekizawa et al., 1987
) and human
airways (Black et al., 1988
) and after inhalation in vivo
(Lötvall et al., 1990b
). NEP inhibition also
potentiates mucus secretion in response to tachykinins in human airways
(Rogers et al., 1989
). NEP inhibition enhances excitatory
NANC and capsaicin-induced bronchoconstriction, resulting from the
release of tachykinins from airway sensory nerves (Frossard et
al., 1989
; Djokic et al., 1989
). The activity of NEP in
the airways appears to be an important factor determining the effects
of tachykinins; any factors that inhibit the enzyme or its expression
may be associated with increased effects of exogenously applied or
endogenously released tachykinins. Several of the stimuli known to
induce bronchoconstriction responses in asthmatic patients have been
found to reduce the activity of airway NEP (Nadel, 1991
).
2. Receptors.
At least three subtypes of tachykinin receptors
have been characterized pharmacologically by the rank order of potency
of agonists, by the development of selective antagonists, and by molecular cloning (Nakanishi, 1991
). SP acts preferentially at NK1 receptors, NKA at NK2
receptors, and NKB at NK3 receptors. Tachykinin
receptors are differentially expressed and are also subject to
differential regulation, for example by inflammatory stimuli.
Tachykinins are typical G protein-coupled receptors and lead to
increased PI hydrolysis, with an increase in the release of
intracellular Ca2+, IP3,
and diacylglycerol. Tachykinin receptors in the airways have been
mapped using autoradiographic techniques and labeled tachykinins
(Carstairs and Barnes, 1986
; Walsh et al., 1994
; Strigas and
Burcher, 1996
; Miyayasu et al., 1993
; Zhang et
al., 1995
). NK1 receptors are localized to
bronchial vessels, epithelial cells, and submucosal glands, whereas
NK2 receptors are predominantly localized to
airway smooth muscle.
3. Effects on airways.
Tachykinins have many different effects
on the airways that may be relevant to asthma, and these effects are
mediated by NK1 and NK2
receptors. There is little evidence for the involvement of
NK3 receptors.
a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE.
Tachykinins constrict human
airway smooth muscle in vitro via NK2 receptors (Naline
et al., 1989
; Advenier et al., 1992b
; Sheldrick et al., 1995
). The contractile response to NKA
is significantly greater in smaller human bronchi than in more proximal
airways, indicating that tachykinins may have a more important
constricting effect in peripheral airways (Frossard and Barnes, 1991
),
whereas cholinergic constriction tends to be more pronounced in
proximal airways. This is consistent with the autoradiographic
distribution of tachykinin receptors, showing distribution to small and
large airways (Carstairs and Barnes, 1986
). NP-
is also a potent
constrictor of human airways and acts via NK2 receptors
(Burcher et al., 1991
). In vivo, SP does not cause
bronchoconstriction or cough when administered either by
intravenous infusion (Fuller et al., 1987c
; Evans
et al., 1988
) or by inhalation (Fuller et
al., 1987c
; Joos et al., 1987
), whereas NKA
causes bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects after both
intravenous administration (Evans et al., 1988
) and inhalation (Joos et al., 1987
). Inhalation of SP
increases airway responsiveness to methacholine in asthmatic subjects,
an effect that has been ascribed to airway edema (Cheung et
al., 1995
). Mechanical removal of airway epithelium potentiates
the bronchoconstriction response to tachykinins (Frossard et
al., 1989
; Devillier et al., 1988
), largely
because epithelial NEP is removed.
b. VESSELS.
Tachykinins have potent effects on airway
blood flow. Indeed, the effects of tachykinins on airway blood flow may
be the most important physiological and pathophysiological effects of
tachykinins in airways. In canine and porcine trachea, both SP and NKA
cause marked increases in blood flow (Salonen et al.,
1988
; Matran et al., 1989
). Tachykinins also dilate
canine bronchial vessels in vitro, probably via an
endothelium-dependent mechanism (McCormack et al.,
1989b
). Tachykinins also regulate bronchial blood flow in pigs;
stimulation of the vagus nerve causes vasodilation mediated by the
release of sensory neuropeptides, and it is likely that CGRP as well as
tachykinins are involved (Matran et al., 1989
).
Stimulation of the vagus nerve in rodents causes microvascular leakage,
which is prevented by prior treatment with capsaicin or a tachykinin
antagonist, indicating that release of tachykinins from sensory nerves
mediates this effect. Among the tachykinins, SP is most potent at
causing leakage in guinea pig airways (Rogers et al.,
1988
), and NK1 receptors have been localized to
postcapillary venules in the airway submucosa (Sertl et
al., 1988
). Inhaled SP also causes microvascular leakage in
guinea pigs, and its effect on the microvasculature is more marked than
its effect on airway smooth muscle (Lötvall et
al., 1990a
). It is difficult to measure airway microvascular
leakage in human airways, but SP causes weals in human skin when
injected intradermally, indicating its capacity to cause microvascular
leakage in human postcapillary venules; NKA is less potent, indicating
that an NK1 receptor mediates this effect (Fuller et
al., 1987a
).
c. SECRETIONS.
In vitro, SP stimulates mucus secretion
from submucosal glands (mediated by NK1 receptors) in
ferret and human airways (Rogers et al., 1989
; Ramnarine
et al., 1994
; Meini et al., 1993
) and is
a potent stimulant of goblet cell secretion in guinea pig airways (Kuo
et al., 1990
). Indeed, SP is likely to mediate the
increases in goblet cell discharge after vagus nerve stimulation and
exposure to cigarette smoke (Tokuyama et al., 1990
; Kuo
et al., 1992a
).
d. NERVES.
In guinea pig trachea, tachykinins also
potentiate cholinergic neurotransmission at postganglionic nerve
terminals, and an NK2 receptor appears to be involved (Hall
et al., 1989
). There is also potentiation at the
ganglionic level (Undem et al., 1991
; Watson et
al., 1993
), which appears to be mediated by a NK1
receptor (Watson et al., 1993
). There is evidence that
NK3 receptors may also be involved (Myers and Undem, 1993
).
Endogenous tachykinins may also facilitate cholinergic
neurotransmission, because capsaicin pretreatment results in a
significant reduction in cholinergic neural responses both in vitro and
in vivo (Martling et al., 1984
; Stretton et
al., 1992
). However, in human airways there is no evidence for
a facilitatory effect on cholinergic neurotransmission (Belvisi
et al., 1994
), although such an effect has been reported in the presence of potassium channel blockers (Black et
al., 1990
). In conscious guinea pigs, very low concentrations
of inhaled SP are reported to cause cough, and this effect is
potentiated by NEP inhibition (Kohrogi et al., 1988
).
Citric acid-induced cough and airway hyperresponsiveness are blocked by
a nonpeptide NK2 receptor antagonist (SR 48968), suggesting
the involvement of NK2 receptors, although these may be
centrally located (Advenier et al., 1992a
; Girard
et al., 1996
).
e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS.
Tachykinins may also interact
with inflammatory and immune cells (Daniele et al.,
1992
), although whether this is of pathophysiological significance
remains to be determined. SP degranulates certain types of mast cells,
such as those in human skin (although this effect is not mediated by a
tachykinin receptor) (Lowman et al., 1988
); however
there is no evidence that tachykinins degranulate lung mast cells (Ali
et al., 1986
). SP has a degranulating effect on
eosinophils (Kroegel et al., 1990
), but this is not
mediated by a tachykinin receptor. At lower concentrations, tachykinins have been reported to enhance eosinophil chemotaxis (Numao and Agrawal,
1992
). Tachykinins may activate alveolar macrophages (Brunelleschi
et al., 1990
) and monocytes to release inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 (Lötz et al., 1988
).
Topical application of SP to human nasal mucosa results in increased
expression of several cytokines, suggesting that SP may have important
chronic immunological effects (Okamoto et al., 1995
).
Tachykinins and vagus nerve stimulation also cause transient vascular
adhesion of neutrophils in the airway circulation (Umeno et
al., 1989
) and in human skin (Smith et al.,
1993
).
SP stimulates proliferation of blood vessels (angiogenesis) (Fan
et al., 1993
) and may therefore be involved in the new
vessel formation that is found in asthmatic airways. SP and NKA also stimulate the proliferation and chemotaxis of human lung fibroblasts, suggesting that tachykinins may contribute to the fibrotic process in
chronic asthma (Harrison et al., 1995
). These effects
appear to be mediated by both NK1 and NK2 receptors.
4. Role in asthma.
In rodents, there is now considerable
evidence for neurogenic inflammation in airways resulting from
antidromic release of neuropeptides from nociceptive nerves or
C-fibers, via an axon reflex, and this process may contribute to the
inflammatory response in asthma (Barnes, 1986
).
a. RELEASE.
Quantitative studies in humans indicate
that SP-immunoreactive fibers constitute only 1% of the total number
of intraepithelial fibers, whereas in guinea pigs they comprise 60% of
the fibers (Bowden and Gibbins, 1992
). A striking increase in
SP-immunoreactive nerves was reported in the airways of patients with
fatal asthma (Ollerenshaw et al., 1991
), but this
finding has not been confirmed in biopsies from patients with milder
asthma (Howarth et al., 1995
) and there is no increase
in the SP content of lungs from asthmatics (Lilly et
al., 1995
). After nasal challenge with allergen, an increase in
the SP content in nasal lavage fluid has been reported (Mosiman
et al., 1993
). Elevated concentrations of SP in
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with asthma have been
reported, with an additional increase after allergen challenge (Nieber
et al., 1992
), suggesting that there may be an increase
in the SP content in the airways of asthmatic patients. Similarly, SP
has been detected in the sputum of asthmatic patients after inhalation
of hypertonic saline solution (Tomaki et al., 1995
).
Allergen challenge is associated with a doubling of the number of PPT-A
mRNA-positive neurons in nodose ganglia of guinea pigs and an increase
in SP and CGRP immunoreactivity in the lungs (Fischer et
al., 1996
).
b. RELEVANCE IN ASTHMA.
Sensory nerves may be activated
in airway disease. In asthmatic airways the epithelium is often shed,
thereby exposing sensory nerve endings. Sensory nerves in asthmatic
airways may be "hyperalgesic" as a result of exposure to
inflammatory mediators such as PGs and certain cytokines (such as
IL-1
, TNF-
, and nerve growth factor) and may then be activated
more readily by other mediators, such as kinins. In animals, capsaicin
has been used as a tool to explore the release of sensory
neuropeptides. In humans, capsaicin inhalation causes cough and
transient bronchoconstriction, which is inhibited by cholinergic
blockade and is probably attributable to a laryngeal reflex (Fuller
et al., 1985
; Midgren et al., 1992
). This
suggests that neuropeptide release does not occur in human airways,
although it is possible that insufficient capsaicin reaches the lower
respiratory tract because the dose is limited by coughing. There is no
evidence that capsaicin induces a greater degree of bronchoconstriction
in patients with asthma than in normal individuals (Fuller et
al., 1985
).
In contrast to studies in rodents, the NEP inhibitor acetorphan has no
effect on base-line airway caliber or on bronchoconstriction induced by
a "neurogenic" trigger (sodium metabisulfite) in human subjects (Nichol et al., 1992
). The lack of
effect could be the result of inadequate inhibition of NEP in the
airways, particularly at the level of the epithelium. Nebulized
thiorphan has been shown to potentiate the bronchoconstriction response
to inhaled NKA in normal and asthmatic subjects (Cheung et
al., 1992a
,b
), but there is no effect on base-line lung
function in asthmatic patients (Cheung et al., 1992b
),
indicating that there is unlikely to be basal release of tachykinins.
It is possible that NEP may become dysfunctional after viral infections
or exposure to oxidants, thus contributing to asthma exacerbations
(Nadel, 1991
).
There is evidence that NK1 receptor gene expression might
be increased in the lungs of asthmatic patients (Adcock et
al., 1993
). This might be the result of increased transcription
in response to activation of transcription factors, such as AP-1, which
are activated in human lung by cytokines such as TNF-
. Expression of
NK2 receptors has also been described in asthma (Bai and
Bramley, 1993
).
c. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS.
There have recently been
several studies of tachykinin antagonists in asthma. The relatively
weak, nonselective, tachykinin antagonist FK-224 had an inhibitory
effect on bradykinin-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma (Ichinose
et al., 1992
), although this finding was not confirmed
in another study (Schmidt et al., 1996
). A more potent
NK1 receptor antagonist, FK-888, reduced the duration of
exercise-induced asthma but had no effect on maximal bronchoconstriction, suggesting an effect on blood vessels rather than
airway smooth muscle (Ichinose et al., 1996
). However,
another potent NK1 receptor antagonist, CP 99,994, had no
effect on hypertonic saline solutioninduced bronchoconstriction or
on cough (Fahy et al., 1995
).
Apart from tachykinin receptor antagonists, neurogenic inflammation may
be modulated by either preventing the activation of sensory nerves or
preventing the release of neuropeptides. Many drugs act on
prejunctional receptors to inhibit the release of neuropeptides (Barnes
et al., 1990
). Opioids are the most effective inhibitors, but an inhaled, peripherally acting, µ-opioid agonist (the pentapeptide BW443C) was found to be ineffective in inhibiting metabisulfite-induced bronchoconstriction, which is believed to occur
via neural mechanisms (O'Connor et al., 1991
).
d. CONCLUSIONS.
Tachykinins are increased in the
secretions of asthmatic patients and may be produced by sensory nerves,
although there is increasing evidence that inflammatory cells, such as
macrophages, may release SP. Tachykinins are potent bronchoconstrictors
(acting via NK2 receptors) and stimulate mucus secretion,
plasma exudation, neural activation, and structural changes (via
NK1 receptors). However, the negative results obtained with
tachykinin antagonists in asthma suggest that neurogenic inflammation
is unlikely to play a major role, at least in mild asthma. It is
possible that sensory neuropeptides play a role in more severe asthma,
and further studies are needed.
C. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
CGRP-immunoreactive nerves are
abundant in the respiratory tract of several species, and CGRP is
stored and localized with SP in afferent nerves. CGRP has been
extracted from and is localized to human airways (Palmer et
al., 1987
; Komatsu et al., 1991
). CGRP is found in
trigeminal, nodose-jugular, and dorsal root ganglia and has also been
detected in neuroendocrine cells of the lower airways (Uddman et
al., 1997
).
The metabolism of CGRP is less clear, although NEP inhibitors increase
some of the effects of CGRP in the airways (Katayama et al.,
1991
). Interestingly, metabolism of CGRP by NEP appears to liberate a
peptide fragment that has eosinophil chemotactic activity (Davies
et al., 1992
).
2. Receptors.
CGRP acts on specific receptors that are coupled
(via Gs) to adenylyl cyclase, resulting in an
increase in intracellular cyclic AMP concentrations. Subtypes of CGRP
receptors have been proposed, based on the selectivity of different
CGRP analogues and the related peptide amylin (Poyner, 1992
). CGRP
receptors have been mapped autoradiographically in human airways and
are predominantly located in bronchial vascular smooth muscle, rather
than airway epithelium (Mak and Barnes, 1988
).
3. Effects on airways.
a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE.
CGRP causes constriction of
human bronchi in vitro (Palmer et al., 1987
). This is
surprising, because CGRP increases cyclic AMP levels. There are few, if
any, CGRP receptors in airway smooth muscle in human or guinea pig
airways, and this suggests that the paradoxical bronchoconstriction
response reported in human airways may be mediated indirectly. In
guinea pig airways, CGRP has no consistent effect on tone (Martling
et al., 1988
). The variable effects of CGRP on airways may
be explained by the fact that CGRP may release other mediators that
have effects on tone. CGRP may release both NO and ET in airways, so
that its effects would depend on the balance between these
bronchodilating and bronchoconstricting mediators (Ninomiya et
al., 1996
).
b. VESSELS.
CGRP is a potent vasodilator that has
long-lasting effects. CGRP is an effective dilator of human pulmonary
vessels in vitro and acts directly on receptors in vascular smooth
muscle (McCormack et al., 1989a
). It also potently
dilates bronchial vessels in vitro (McCormack et al.,
1989a
) and produces a marked and long-lasting increase in airway blood
flow in vivo in anesthetized dogs (Salonen et al., 1988
)
and conscious sheep (Parsons et al., 1992a
). It is
possible that CGRP may be the predominant mediator of arterial vasodilation and increased blood flow in response to sensory nerve stimulation in the bronchi (Matran et al., 1989
). There
are high densities of CGRP receptors in bronchial vessels in human
airways (Mak and Barnes, 1988
), suggesting that CGRP may be an
important mediator of airway hyperemia in asthma. CGRP has no direct
effect on airway microvascular leakage (Rogers et al.,
1988
). CGRP may potentiate the leakage produced by SP by increasing
blood delivery to the sites of plasma extravasation in the
postcapillary venules; this has been seen in rat airways (Brokaw and
White, 1992
). This does not occur in guinea pig airways when CGRP and
SP are coadministered, possibly because blood flow in the airways is
already high (Rogers et al., 1988
).
c. SECRETIONS.
CGRP has a weak inhibitory effect on
cholinergically stimulated mucus secretion in ferret trachea (Webber
et al., 1991
) and on goblet cell discharge in guinea pig
airways (Kuo et al., 1990
), whereas it increases
secretion in feline submucosal glands (Nagaki et al.,
1994
). There are low densities of CGRP receptors on mucus secretory
cells (Mak and Barnes, 1988
), but this finding does not eliminate the
possibility that CGRP might increase mucus secretion in vivo by
increasing blood flow to submucosal glands.
d. INFLAMMATORY CELLS.
CGRP injection into human skin
causes a persistent flare, but biopsies have revealed an infiltration
of eosinophils (Pietrowski and Foreman, 1986
). CGRP itself does not
appear to be chemotactic for eosinophils, but proteolytic fragments of
the peptide are active (Davies et al., 1992
), suggesting
that CGRP released into the tissues may lead to eosinophilic
infiltration. CGRP inhalation induces eosinophilic inflammation in rat
lungs (Bellibas, 1996
). In contrast, CGRP inhibits macrophage secretion
and the capacity of macrophages to activate T lymphocytes (Nong
et al., 1989
), suggesting potential anti-inflammatory
actions. CGRP also induces proliferation of guinea pig airway
epithelial cells and may therefore be involved in healing the airway
after epithelial shedding in asthma (White et al.,
1993
).
4. Role in asthma.
To date there is little evidence for the
involvement of CGRP in asthma. Its most prominent action is prolonged
vasodilation, so it may contribute to the hyperemia of asthmatic
airways. There are currently no antagonists that are suitable for
clinical use, so it is difficult to evaluate the role of CGRP in asthma
D. Endothelins
ETs are potent constrictor peptides that were originally described
as vasoconstrictors released from endothelial cells. There is now
considerable circumstantial evidence that they are involved in the
pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma (Barnes, 1994b
; Hay et
al., 1996
).
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
There are three ET peptides, and
each is encoded by a distinct gene (Inoue et al., 1989
),
which codes for the precursor peptide. Prepro-ET-1 is cleaved to a
38-amino acid intermediate form termed big ET-1 or pro-ET-1. Pro-ET-1
is rapidly cleaved by a specific enzyme, termed ET-converting enzyme
(ECE), to form mature ET-1. ECE is a neutral metalloendopeptidase and
is inhibited by phosphoramidon (Ikegawa et al., 1990
). Mast
cell chymase may also cleave pro-ET-1 (Wypij et al., 1992
).
The human prepro-ET-1 gene is on chromosome 6, and its upstream
regulatory region reveals multiple regulatory elements, indicating that
several factors may regulate its expression (Masaki et al.,
1992
). Several proinflammatory cytokines, including transforming growth
factor (TGF)-
, TNF-
, and IL-1
, may increase expression of
ET-1. Less is known regarding the synthetic pathways and regulation of
ET-2 and ET-3.
ETs may be stored within cells but are predominantly synthesized upon
cell activation; secretion of ETs is therefore largely regulated at the
level of peptide synthesis. Although ET-1 was first described in
endothelial cells, it is now apparent that ETs can be synthesized by
many different cell types, including several types of airway cells.
ET-3 is relatively abundant in neuronal tissues and may be a neuronal
ET form. ET-like immunoreactivity is localized to airway epithelium in
human airways, with intense staining in goblet and Clara cells but only
intermittent staining in ciliated epithelial cells (Giaid et
al., 1991
). Specific antibodies have localized ET-1, pro-ET-1,
ET-3, and pro-ET-3 to airway epithelial cells and submucosal glands in
human lung (Marciniak et al., 1992
). ECE has been reported
in bovine lung membranes (Kundu and Wilson, 1992
), and guinea pig lung
is reported to synthesize and degrade ET-1 (Noguchi et al.,
1991
). The presence of pro-ETs and mRNA for prepro-ETs in lung suggests
that ETs are synthesized locally within lung cells. Furthermore,
ET-1 is detectable in cultured human epithelial cells (Black et
al., 1989b
; Mattoli et al., 1990
). ET-1 synthesis and
release from epithelial cells are stimulated by endotoxin and by
several proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1
, TNF-
, and IL-6), which
may be released from macrophages (Endo et al., 1992
). Human
alveolar macrophages have also been identified as a source of ETs
(Ehrenreich et al., 1990
), and these cells may be activated
in asthmatic patients by exposure to allergens via low affinity IgE receptors.
ETs are metabolized by NEP, which is localized in several cell types in
airways, especially airway epithelium. Inhibition of NEP with
phosphoramidon increases the potency of ETs in guinea pigs in vivo
(Boichot et al., 1991
) and in human airways in vitro (Candenas et al., 1992
).
2. Receptors.
Pharmacological responses to ETs are mediated by
at least two receptor subtypes. Two distinct receptors, with structures
typical of G protein-coupled receptors, have been cloned; they exhibit approximately 60% homology (Masaki et al., 1992
). For the
ETA receptor, the rank order of potency is
ET-1 > ET-2
ET-3 and the binding affinity for ET-1 is
approximately 100 times greater than that for ET-3.
ETB receptors show similar affinities for all
three ETs and for the related sarafotoxins. The distinction between
ETA and ETB receptors has
been confirmed with the development of selective agonists and
antagonists. Although the existence of a third ET receptor, which is
selective for ET-3 (ETC receptor), has been
proposed (Masaki et al., 1992
), there is little conclusive evidence for this in human tissues. Radioligand binding studies and in
situ hybridization studies with receptor cDNA probes have demonstrated
that ET receptors are widely distributed, in keeping with the multiple
actions of these peptides. ETA and
ETB receptors are expressed in lung and are
differentially distributed (Nakamichi et al., 1992
).
Selective ETA and ETB
agonists and antagonists have greatly aided the study of receptor
subtype expression. BQ-123, FR-139317, and PD 145065 are selective
ETA receptor antagonists, whereas IRL 1038 is a
selective antagonist of ETB receptors.
Autoradiographic studies with 125I-ET-1 and
selective antagonists have shown a widespread distribution of
ETA and ETB receptors in
human airways, with a predominance of ETB
receptors in airway smooth muscle (Knott et al., 1995
).
There is no difference in receptor distribution in airways from
asthmatic patients, compared with airways from normal subjects (Goldie
et al., 1995
).
3. Effects on airways.
a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE.
ET-1 and ET-2 are potent
constrictors of human airway smooth muscle in vitro, being even more
potent than LTD4 (Advenier et al.,
1990
; Henry et al., 1990
; McKay et al., 1991b
;
Takahashi et al., 1997
; Goldie et al., 1995
). The
contractile response is slow in onset and sustained, and ET-1 appears
to cause a maximal contractile response. The contractile response in
human airways is unaffected by calcium antagonists or (in contrast to
other species) COX inhibitors or LT antagonists (McKay et
al., 1991a
; Nally et al., 1994
), suggesting a direct
effect on airway smooth muscle. This is consistent with the
demonstration of ET binding sites on human airway smooth muscle, using
autoradiography (Henry et al., 1990
; McKay et
al., 1991b
; Brink et al., 1991
; Goldie et
al., 1995
; Knott et al., 1995
). ET-1 may produce a
prolonged contractile response in human airway smooth muscle by
activating PKC, because the PKC inhibitor staurosporine reduces the
constricting effect of ET-1 (McKay et al., 1996
). ET-3 is
less potent that ET-1 or ET-2 (Advenier et al., 1990
; Hay
et al., 1993
), but the potency differences are complicated
by differential metabolism. Mechanical removal of airway epithelium
potentiates the constricting effects of ETs, but the effect is greater
for ET-3 than for ET-1 (Candenas et al., 1992
; McKay
et al., 1992
). After epithelium removal or phosphoramidon
treatment, the potencies of ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3 are similar,
suggesting that any differences in previous studies were the result of
more rapid degradation of ET-3 by epithelial NEP. ET-3-mediated
contraction of human airways is partly reduced by COX inhibition (Nally
et al., 1994
).
The ETA antagonists BQ-123, FR-139317, and PD
145065 have no inhibitory effect on ET-induced constriction, suggesting
that ETB receptors mediate the direct
constriction response, and this is supported by the constriction
response to the ETB-selective agonists BQ-3020
and IRL1620 (Hay et al., 1993
; Takahashi et al., 1997
). Asthmatic airways show a similar, or even reduced, response to
ETB-selective agonists, compared with normal
airways (Goldie et al., 1995
). Interestingly, the release of
prostanoids (predominantly PGD2 and
PGE2) induced by ET-1 in human airways appears to
be mediated by an ETA receptor, because this is
effectively inhibited by BQ-123 (Hay et al., 1993
). Inhaled
ET-1 is a potent bronchoconstrictor (approximately 100-fold more potent
than methacholine) in asthmatic patients and causes a
bronchoconstriction response that lasts for >1 h, whereas ET-1 has no
effect in normal subjects (Chalmers et al., 1997a
).
ET-1 increases proliferation of rabbit and sheep cultured airway smooth
muscle cells (Noveral et al., 1992
; Glassberg et
al., 1994
; Carratu et al., 1997
), and this appears to
be via stimulation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/MAP
kinase pathway (Whelchel et al., 1997
). ET-1 alone has no
effect on cultured human airway smooth muscle cells but markedly
amplifies the proliferative effects of growth factors, such as
epidermal growth factor (EGF); this is mediated by an
ETA receptor (Panettieri et al.,
1996
).
b. VESSELS.
ET-1 constricts human bronchial arteries in
vitro (McKay et al., 1991a
), but its effects on airway
microvascular leakage are conflicting. ET-1 causes an increase in
plasma extravasation in rat trachea (Sirois et al.,
1992
) and this response is dependent on leukocytes (Helset et
al., 1993
), whereas ET-1 is without effect on plasma
extravasation in guinea pigs (Macquin-Mavier et al., 1989
). This may reflect relative vasoconstricting effects on
precapillary arterioles versus direct effects on endothelial cells of
postcapillary venules.
c. SECRETION.
ET-1, but not ET-2 or ET-3, stimulates
mucus glycoprotein secretion from feline airway submucosal glands via a
direct mechanism that involves calcium ion influx, suggesting that
ETA receptors are involved (Shimura et al.,
1992
). ET-1 also stimulates ion transport in cultured airway epithelial
cells (Wong et al., 1990
).
d. NERVES.
ETs bind to parasympathetic ganglia and
nerves in rat and rabbit airways (Turner et al., 1989
;
Power et al., 1989
; McKay et al., 1993
),
suggesting that ET-3 may have an effect on cholinergic neurotransmission. ET-3 enhances neurotransmission in postganglionic cholinergic nerves in rabbit airways via a direct effect on
prejunctional receptors on postganglionic cholinergic nerves (McKay
et al., 1993
). This suggests that ETs may potentiate
cholinergic reflex bronchoconstriction and this effect is mediated by
an ETB receptor. The ETB-selective agonist
sarafotoxin S6C enhances cholinergic nerve-induced contraction of human
airways in vitro, indicating the presence of ETB receptors
on cholinergic nerves as well as airway smooth muscle (Fernandes
et al., 1996
).
e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS.
It is not yet certain whether
ETs have inflammatory effects in the airways. Intravenously
administered or inhaled ET-1 has no effect on inflammatory cell influx
in guinea pigs (MacquinMavier et al., 1989
), and
there is no increase in airway responsiveness to other spasmogens
(Lagente et al., 1989
). ETs may increase the release of
inflammatory mediators from a variety of cells. ET-1 increases the
release of lipid mediators from cultured human nasal mucosa (Wu
et al., 1992
) and increases superoxide formation and TNF-
release in alveolar macrophages (Haller et al.,
1991
; Chanez et al., 1996
). ET-1 also releases histamine
from guinea pig lung, but not peritoneal, mast cells (Uchida et
al., 1992
). In a cultured human epithelial cell line, ET-1
induces the release of the cytokines IL-6, IL-8, and GM-CSF (Mullol
et al., 1996
).
ET-1 potently stimulates collagen secretion from pulmonary fibroblasts
(Peacock et al., 1992
) and may therefore be involved in
the increased collagen formation observed in asthmatic airways. ET-1 is
reported to increase fibronectin gene expression and protein release in human airway epithelial cells (Marini et al.,
1996
).
4. Role in asthma.
a. RELEASE.
There is increased formation of ETs in
asthma. Elevated concentrations of ET-1 have been detected in
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic patients (Mattoli et
al., 1991
; Sofia et al., 1993
; Redington et
al., 1995
), and these are reduced after treatment with steroids
(Vittori et al., 1992
). ET-1 is present in induced sputum,
but the levels are not elevated in asthmatic patients, compared with
normal subjects (Chalmers et al., 1997b
). An increase in the
concentration of plasma ET-1 has been reported in asthmatic children
and adults and is related to asthma severity (Aoki et al.,
1994
; Chen et al., 1995
), although another study showed no
increase in plasma ET-1 levels in patients with mild asthma (Chalmers
et al., 1997b
). Furthermore, in patients with nocturnal
asthma, there is a significantly lower level of ET-1 in bronchoalveolar
lavage fluid at night than during the day (Kraft et al.,
1994
). There is a significant increase in the expression of ET-1
immunoreactivity in the epithelial layer in fiber-optic bronchial
biopsies from asthmatic patients (Springall et al., 1991
).
It is tempting to speculate that this is the result of the action of
proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1
, TNF-
, and IL-6) released from
activated macrophages in asthmatic airways. Anti-CD23 also induces
release of ET-1 in epithelial cells from asthmatic patients, suggesting
that allergen acting via a low affinity IgE receptor (Fc
RII) may be
a mechanism for releasing ET-1 in asthma (Campbell et al.,
1994
). There is also an increase in the ET-1 content of alveolar
macrophages from asthmatic patients, compared with normal subjects,
although there is no increase in the release of ET-1 after stimulation
with lipopolysaccharide (Chanez et al., 1996
).
b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS.
Several nonpeptide
antagonists have been developed for clinical use (Warner et
al., 1996
), but they have not yet been tested in asthmatic
patients. Because bronchoconstriction is mediated by ETB
receptors but the remodeling effects are mediated by ETA receptors, it is likely that a nonselective antagonist would be preferable. Potent nonpeptide antagonists, such as SB217242, have been
developed and may be more suitable as drugs. If the major effect of ETs
is in tissue remodeling, it may be difficult to test the efficacy of
such compounds, because very prolonged studies may be needed. In a
guinea pig model of asthma, the early and late responses to inhaled
allergen are reduced by ET receptor antagonists; the early
bronchoconstriction response is blocked by ETB receptor
antagonists, whereas the late inflammatory response is reduced by
ETA receptor antagonists (Uchida et al.,
1996
). In mice, an ETA receptor antagonist but not an
ETB receptor antagonist reduces allergen-induced
eosinophilic responses, apparently via an increase in IFN-
release
(Fujitani et al., 1997
). This suggests that it might be
possible to assess ET receptor antagonists by measuring
allergen-induced responses. Glucocorticoids inhibit the expression of
ET-1 in epithelial cells of asthmatic patients (Vittori et
al., 1992
) and in animal lungs (Andersson et
al., 1992
), suggesting that treatment with inhaled
corticosteroids may reduce ET synthesis in asthma. ET-1 levels in
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic patients treated with
inhaled corticosteroids are lower than those in fluid from patients not
treated with steroids (Redington et al., 1997a
).
c. CONCLUSIONS.
ET-1 is abnormally expressed in asthma
and is likely to contribute to its pathophysiological mechanism.
Although ET-1 is a potent bronchoconstrictor and induces plasma
exudation and mucus secretion, its most striking effect is on airway
remodeling. ET receptor antagonists have been developed for clinical
application and may be useful in the treatment of asthma, although
their benefits may be difficult to assess in clinical trials, because
they may affect the long term progression of asthma.
E. Complement
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
The complement system contains a
series of 30 distinct circulating proteins, including proteolytic
proenzymes, nonenzymatic components that form functional enzymes when
activated, and receptors (Ember and Hugli, 1997
). The proenzymes become
sequentially activated in a cascade that finally leads to the formation
of the so-called terminal attack sequence, which can promote cell lysis
and is central to our defense against invading microorganisms. However, there are several by-products generated during the activation of the
complement cascade that have proinflammatory activity and therefore
have the potential to be involved in asthma. The larger fragments of C3
and C4 (i.e., C3b and C4b) are involved in a range of biological
activities, including opsonization, phagocytosis, and immunomodulation.
There are also several smaller fragments generated during the
activation of C5, such as C3a and C5a, which have been referred
to as anaphylatoxins and which have several airway effects (Ember and
Hugli, 1997
).
2. Receptors.
There are distinct receptors for C3a and C5a,
which have been cloned (Ember and Hugli, 1997
). Both are members of the
G protein-coupled receptor superfamily.
3. Effects on airways.
C3a and C5a induce airway smooth muscle
contraction and chemotaxis of leukocytes, including eosinophils
(Daffern et al., 1995
; Regal, 1997
). Aerosolization of C5a
into the airways induces transient hyperresponsiveness to inhaled
histamine (Irvin et al., 1986
; Armour et al.,
1987
), an effect that is partially inhibited by pretreatment with
indomethacin (Berend et al., 1986
). Both C3a and C5a are
potent stimulants of eosinophil degranulation (Takafuji et
al., 1996
), and the response of circulating eosinophils to C5a is
enhanced after the late response to inhaled allergen in asthmatic
patients (Evans et al., 1996b
). C5a is also a potent chemoattractant of human monocytes and may therefore be involved in
recruitment of macrophages into asthmatic airways (Pieters et
al., 1995
).
4. Role in asthma.
There have been conflicting reports
regarding changes in the complement cascade in asthmatic patients
(Barnes et al., 1988
). An increased amount of C3a has been
demonstrated in the circulation of asthmatics during exercise-induced
bronchoconstriction (Smith et al., 1990
), and increased
levels of C3a have been demonstrated in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
obtained from some, but not all, asthmatics (Van de Graaf et
al., 1992
). Furthermore, patients with severe asthma have been
reported to show increased serum levels of C3a and to exhibit a
different pattern of complement activation, compared with patients with
bronchial infections (Lin et al., 1992
). In asthmatic
patients, the neutrophil chemotactic activity of bronchoalveolar lavage
fluid is largely explained by C5a (Teran et al., 1997
),
suggesting that this is an important mediator of neutrophilic
infiltration in asthmatic airways.
Evaluation of the contribution of endogenous activation of complement
to the allergic asthmatic response is difficult, because there are no
selective inhibitors for the various complement components. However, in
experimental animals, treatment with soluble complement receptor 1, the
normal regulator of circulating C1, reduces allergen-induced bronchoconstriction (Regal et al., 1993
). Treatment of
animals with cobra venom factor to deplete circulating complement
components does not inhibit allergen-induced eosinophilic infiltration
into lungs, however (Regal and Fraser, 1996
).
 |
V. Small Molecules |
A. Reactive Oxygen Species
There is increasing evidence that oxidative stress and reactive
oxygen species (ROS) are involved in inflammatory airway diseases, including asthma (Barnes, 1990
; Repine et al., 1997
),
although relatively few studies have been undertaken in humans. This is partly because of the difficulties of measuring oxidative stress in the
airways in vivo and partly because of the relative inefficacy of
currently available antioxidants. However, new noninvasive techniques
have been developed to assess oxidative stress in the airways, making
it possible to reassess the role of oxidative stress in asthma.
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
Many inflammatory and structural
cells that are activated in asthmatic airways, including eosinophils,
macrophages, mast cells, and epithelial cells, produce ROS (Barnes,
1990
). Superoxide anions are generated by NADPH oxidase and then are
converted to hydrogen peroxide by superoxide dismutases (SODs).
Hydrogen peroxide is then degraded to water by catalases. Superoxide
and hydrogen peroxide may interact in the presence of free iron to form
the highly reactive hydroxyl radical. Superoxide may also combine with
NO to form peroxynitrite, which also generates hydroxyl radicals
(Beckman and Koppenol, 1996
). Oxidative stress describes an imbalance
between ROS and antioxidants. The normal production of oxidants is
counteracted by several antioxidant mechanisms in the human respiratory
tract (Cantin et al., 1990
). The major intracellular
antioxidants in the airways are catalase, SOD, and glutathione, which
is formed by the selenium-dependent enzyme glutathione peroxidase.
Extracellular antioxidants include the dietary antioxidants vitamin C
(ascorbic acid) and vitamin E (
-tocopherol), uric acid, and
lactoferrin. Oxidant stress activates the inducible enzyme heme
oxygenase-1, which converts heme and hemin to biliverdin, with the
formation of carbon monoxide (Wong and Wispe, 1997
; Choi and Alam,
1996
). Biliverdin is converted, by bilirubin reductase, to bilirubin, which is a potent antioxidant.
2. Effects on airways.
a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE.
Hydrogen peroxide
directly constricts airway smooth muscle in vitro, and this effect is
mediated partly via the release of prostanoids (Rhoden and Barnes,
1989
). ROS may damage airway epithelium, resulting in increased
epithelial shedding and increased bronchoconstriction responses (Yukawa
et al., 1990
). In vitro, hydrogen peroxide induces an
increase in the responsiveness of human airways (Hulsmann et al., 1994a
). Formation of peroxynitrite also increases airway responsiveness in guinea pigs in vitro and in vivo (Sadeghi-Hashjin et al., 1996
), but its effect in human airways is not yet known.
b. VESSELS.
Little is known regarding the effects of
ROS on the bronchial vasculature. Hydroxyl radical potently induces
plasma exudation in rodent airways (Lei et al., 1996
).
c. SECRETIONS.
The effects of ROS on mucus secretion
have not yet been investigated in human airways. In rats, oxidative
stress increases airway mucus secretion, an effect that is blocked by
COX inhibitors (Adler et al., 1990
).
d. NERVES.
Allergen impairs the function of
bronchodilating nerves in guinea pig airways in vivo by an effect that
is blocked by SOD, suggesting that superoxide anions may
scavenge NO released from motor nerves (Miura et al.,
1997
). In rat airways, oxidant stress increases cholinergic
nerve-induced bronchoconstriction, an effect that may be the result of
oxidative damage to acetylcholinesterase (Ohrui et al.,
1991
).
e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS.
Oxidants also activate NF-
B
(which orchestrates the expression of multiple inflammatory genes that
undergo increased expression in asthma), thereby amplifying the
inflammatory response (Barnes and Karin, 1997
). Many of the stimuli
that activate NF-
B appear to do so via the formation of ROS,
particularly hydrogen peroxide (Schreck et al., 1991
).
ROS activate NF-
B in an epithelial cell line (Adcock et
al., 1994
) and increase the release of proinflammatory cytokines from cultured human airway epithelial cells (Rusznak et al., 1996
).
ROS and peroxynitrite induce lipid peroxidation, resulting in the
formation of additional mediators. Isoprostanes are derived from lipid
peroxidation of arachidonic acid (Morrow and Roberts, 1996
). The most
prevalent isoprostane is 8-epi-PGF2
, which is a potent constrictor of human airways in vitro, acting predominantly via Tx receptors, as discussed above (Kawikova et al.,
1996
).
3. Role in asthma.
a. RELEASE.
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cells
from asthmatic patients show increased production of superoxide anions,
compared with cells from normal individuals (Jarjour and Calhoun,
1994
), and this production is increased further after allergen
challenge (Calhoun and Bush, 1990
). Increased generation of superoxide
has also been reported for circulating monocytes and neutrophils from
asthmatic patients (Vachier et al., 1994
), and there is
evidence for increased oxidative stress in the circulation (Rahman
et al., 1996
). Circulating eosinophils from asthmatic
patients produce excessive superoxide after activation (Chanez et
al., 1990
), and this is increased even further after allergen
challenge (Evans et al., 1996b
). In experimental animals,
certain viral infections (e.g., influenza) induce various indices of
oxidative stress in the lungs (Choi and Alam, 1996
), and this may be
relevant to exacerbations of asthma.
It has recently become possible to measure oxidative stress using less
invasive or noninvasive procedures, facilitating more detailed
exploration of these factors in asthma. Hydrogen peroxide levels in
exhaled condensates are increased in asthmatic adults and children
(Dohlman et al., 1993
; Jobsis et al., 1997
;
Antczak et al., 1997
; Horvath et al., 1998
) and
are increased further during exacerbations (Dohlman et al.,
1993
). An increase in exhaled carbon monoxide levels has been reported
for patients with asthma (Zayasu et al., 1997
). Other
noninvasive markers include thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances,
which are produced as a result of lipid peroxidation and are increased
in exhaled condensates from asthmatic patients (Antczak et
al., 1997
). Pentane, another product of lipid peroxidation, is
also increased in the exhaled air from asthmatic patients during
exacerbations of asthma (Olopade et al., 1997
). There is
immunocytochemical evidence for peroxynitrite formation in asthmatic
airways, obtained using an antibody to nitrotyrosine that detects
nitrosylated proteins and demonstrates increased immunoreactivity in
the airway mucosa, particularly in epithelial cells (Giaid et
al., 1998
).
In addition to the increased production of ROS in asthma, there may be
a deficiency in antioxidant defenses. Glutathione peroxidase activity
is reduced in platelets from asthmatic patients and this reduction is
correlated with a reduction in serum selenium concentrations (Powell
et al., 1994
; Misso et al., 1996
), but there is a
surprising increase in glutathione levels in bronchoalveolar lavage
fluid from asthmatic patients (Smith et al., 1993
). SOD
activity is reduced in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cells and
epithelial cells from asthmatic patients, without any change in
catalase activity (Smith and Harrison, 1997
). There is reduced SOD
activity in airway epithelial cells from asthmatic patients, because of
reduced expression of Cu/Zn-SOD, possibly from oxidative inactivation
(de Raeve et al., 1997
). Interestingly, there are no
abnormalities in antioxidant levels in asthmatic patients who achieve
control with inhaled corticosteroids. There is increasing
epidemiological evidence that a lack of dietary antioxidants may be an
important determinant of asthma (Greene, 1995
). Population surveys have
shown that a low dietary intake of the antioxidant vitamin C is
associated with poorer lung function and increased prevalence of
wheezing (Britton et al., 1995
; Cook et al.,
1997
). A low intake of vitamin C is associated with increased bronchial
reactivity (Soutar et al., 1997
), consistent with the
proposal that the increased prevalence of asthma may be a result of
reductions in the dietary intake of antioxidants (Seaton et
al., 1995
). Another study reported a weak association between low
vitamin E intake and asthma (Troisi et al., 1995
).
b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS.
Several antioxidants have
also been administered to asthmatic patients, to explore the effects of
these compounds on lung function and airway reactivity. There have been
several short term studies with vitamin C showing small beneficial
effects on either lung function or airway reactivity, but no
measurements of inflammation have been made (Bielory and Gandhi, 1994
).
There have been no formal trials of vitamin E or of another
antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine. Selenium administered for a 3-month
period to patients with chronic asthma produced a small but significant improvement in clinical symptoms but no improvement in lung function or
airway reactivity (Hasselmark et al., 1993
). Currently
available antioxidants are rather weak, but more potent drugs,
including spin-trap antioxidants (nitrones) and stable glutathione
analogues, are currently in clinical development.
B. Nitric Oxide
There is increasing evidence that endogenous NO plays a key role
in physiological regulation of airway functions and is implicated in
airway diseases, including asthma (Barnes and Belvisi, 1993
; Gaston
et al., 1994
; Barnes, 1995b
).
1. Synthesis and metabolism.
NO is a gas that is derived from
the amino acid L-arginine by the enzyme NOS, of which at
least three isoforms exist (Nathan and Xie, 1994
). There are two cNOS
forms; one was first described in brain and is localized to neural
tissue [neuronal NOS (nNOS) or NOSI], and the other is localized to
endothelial cells [endothelial NOS (eNOS) or NOSIII], although it has
become apparent that both enzymes are also expressed in other cells,
such as epithelial cells. Both enzymes are activated by increases in
[Ca2+]i and produce small
amounts of NO, which serve a local regulatory function. In contrast,
iNOS (NOSII) is not normally expressed but is induced by inflammatory
cytokines and endotoxin. This enzyme form is less dependent on
increases in [Ca2+]i,
because calmodulin is tightly bound to the enzyme; when the enzyme is
induced it is activated and produces much larger amounts of NO than do
cNOS isoforms. NO produced by cNOS is involved in physiological
regulation of airway function, whereas NO produced by iNOS is involved
in inflammatory diseases of the airways and in host defenses against infection.
Immunohistological studies have identified the presence of all three
isoforms of NOS in human airways (Kobzik et al., 1993
; Ward
et al., 1995b
; Giaid et al., 1998
). eNOS is
localized to endothelial cells in the bronchial circulation, but there
is also evidence for eNOS expression in epithelial cells (Shaul
et al., 1994
). nNOS is localized to cholinergic nerves in
airways (Fischer et al., 1993
) but has also been reported in
epithelial cells (Asano et al., 1994
). iNOS may be expressed
in several types of cells in response to cytokines, endotoxin, or
oxidants (Morris and Billiar, 1994
). In asthmatic airways, there is
increased immunocytochemical staining for iNO, which is localized
predominantly to airway epithelial cells (Hamid et al.,
1993
), and there is also localization to inflammatory cells, including
macrophages and eosinophils (Giaid et al., 1998
).
NO may be produced by several types of cells in the airways. In primary
cultured human airway epithelial cells, proinflammatory cytokines
increase NO production and increase iNOS immunoreactivity and mRNA
levels (Robbins et al., 1994
; Asano et al., 1994
;
Guo et al., 1995
). In a human epithelial cell line (A549)
and in rat type II pneumocytes, oxidants and ozone increase iNOS
expression (Adcock et al., 1994
; Punjabi et al.,
1994
). This is associated with activation of NF-
B, which is involved
in the transcription of many inflammatory and immune genes (Barnes and
Karin, 1997
). NF-
B is of critical importance in increasing the
transcription of the iNOS gene (Xie et al., 1994
) and may be
activated in several types of pulmonary cells by proinflammatory
cytokines. Glucocorticoids inhibit the induction of iNOS in epithelial
cells, and this is likely to be via a direct inhibitory interaction
between the activated glucocorticoid receptor and NF-
B (Barnes and
Karin, 1997
). Eosinophils also express iNOS and release nitrite (del
Pozo et al., 1997
). It has proven difficult to induce iNOS
in human, compared with rodent, macrophages. In human monocytes,
anti-CD23 antibody causes release of nitrite, suggesting that allergens
may trigger iNOS expression (Aubry et al., 1997
), and
similar results are seen in alveolar macrophages from normal and
asthmatic subjects (Donnelly et al., 1998
).
Progress in understanding the role of NO in health and disease has been
largely dependent on the development of specific NOS inhibitors. The
first inhibitors to be developed were analogues of
L-arginine, such as L-NMMA and
NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME) (which are nonselective inhibitors of NOS), and
aminoguanidine (which selectively inhibits iNOS). More potent and
selective inhibitors are now in development.
NO is rapidly transformed to nitrite and nitrate, which may be used to
monitor NO production. NO also rapidly combines with superoxide anions
to form peroxynitrite, which is highly reactive, nitrosylates proteins,
and forms hydroxyl radicals (Beckman and Koppenol, 1996
). Nitrosylation
of tyrosine residues on proteins and nitrotyrosine may be detected
immunocytochemically, providing evidence of local generation of
peroxynitrite (Beckman and Koppenol, 1996
). The presence of
nitrotyrosine has recently been demonstrated in asthmatic airways,
providing evidence for peroxynitrite generation within the airways. The
amount of nitrotyrosine immunostaining is correlated with airway
hyperresponsiveness, as measured by methacholine challenge (Giaid
et al., 1998
).
2. Receptors.
NO does not have conventional receptors but,
rather, diffuses into cells and activates soluble guanylyl cyclase,
resulting in an increase in the formation of cyclic GMP. In airway
smooth muscle, cyclic GMP causes relaxation (Ward et al.,
1995a
). Some of the effects of NO are mediated by the formation of
peroxynitrite, as discussed above.
3. Effects on airways.
NO has many effects on airway function,
although the effects of endogenous NO depend on the site of production
and the amount produced (Barnes, 1996b
).
a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE.
NO and NO donor compounds
relax human airway smooth muscle in vitro via activation of guanylyl
cyclase and increases in cyclic GMP levels (Ward et al.,
1995a
; Gaston et al., 1993
). High concentrations of
inhaled NO produce bronchodilation and protect against cholinergic bronchoconstriction in guinea pigs in vivo (Dupuy et
al., 1992
). In humans, inhalation of high concentrations of NO
(80 ppm) has no effect on lung function in normal subjects and produces
only weak and variable bronchodilation in asthmatic patients
(Högman et al., 1993
; Sanna et al.,
1994
; Kacmarek et al., 1996
). NO may, however, be the
major neurotransmitter of bronchodilating nerves in human airways. In
proximal human airways, there is a prominent inhibitory NANC (i-NANC)
bronchodilating neural mechanism, which assumes particular functional
importance because it is the only endogenous bronchodilating pathway in
human airways. The neurotransmitter of this i-NANC pathway in human
airways is NO, because NOS inhibitors virtually abolish this neural
response (Belvisi et al., 1992a
,b
; Bai and Bramley,
1993
). Furthermore, i-NANC stimulation of human airways results in an
increase in cyclic GMP levels without any increase in cyclic AMP levels
(Ward et al., 1995a
). The density of nNOS-immunoreactive
nerves is greatest in proximal airways and diminishes peripherally,
which is consistent with a reduction in i-NANC responses in more
peripheral airways (Ward et al., 1995b
). NOS is
predominantly localized to parasympathetic (cholinergic) nerves and may
be colocalized with vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), although
the functional role of endogenous VIP in human airways is obscure
(Belvisi et al., 1992b
).
b. VESSELS.
NO is a potent vasodilator in the bronchial
circulation and may play an important role in regulating airway blood
flow, as in the pulmonary circulation (Higenbottam, 1995
; Crawley
et al., 1990
; Liu et al., 1991
; Martinez
et al., 1995
). Endogenous NO may increase the exudation
of plasma by increasing blood flow to leaky postcapillary venules, thus
increasing airway edema (Kuo et al., 1992b
). However,
NOS inhibitors applied to the airway surface increase plasma exudation,
suggesting that basal release of NO has an inhibitory effect on
microvascular leakage (Erjefält et al., 1994
).
This paradox is resolved by considering the differing effects of NO,
depending on the amount produced. In rat airways, L-NAME
increases basal leakiness, whereas after endotoxin exposure, when iNOS
is induced, L-NAME inhibits leakage (Bernareggi et
al., 1997
). Thus, the effect of endogenous NO on plasma
exudation may depend on the amount produced and the site of production.
In the context of asthma, the increased production of NO is likely to result in increased plasma exudation. Furthermore, if peroxynitrite is
generated in asthma, this may lead to the formation of hydroxyl radicals that also increase airway plasma exudation (Lei et
al., 1996
).
c. SECRETIONS.
L-NAME increases basal
airway mucus secretions, suggesting that NO produced by cNOS normally
inhibits mucus secretion (Ramnarine et al., 1996
).
However, NO donors increase mucus secretion in human airways in vitro
(Nagaki et al., 1995
). In cultured guinea pig airways
after exposure to TNF-
and other inflammatory stimuli, there is
increased secretion of mucus, which is inhibited by L-NMMA, suggesting that large amounts of NO generated by iNOS stimulate mucus
secretion (Adler et al., 1995
). Endogenous NO may also
be important in regulating mucociliary clearance, because a NOS
inhibitor decreases ciliary beat frequency in bovine airway epithelial
cells (Jain et al., 1993
).
d. NERVES.
NO may be released with acetylcholine from
cholinergic nerves and may modulate cholinergic neural responses. NOS
inhibitors increase cholinergic neural bronchoconstriction in human and
guinea pig airways (Belvisi et al., 1991
,
1993
; Ward et al., 1993
). However, this appears to be
the result of functional antagonism at the level of airway smooth
muscle, rather than an effect on acetylcholine release from cholinergic
nerves (Brave et al., 1991
; Ward et al., 1993
).
e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS.
High concentrations of NO are
cytotoxic and are involved in basic defenses against microorganisms.
Targeted disruption ("knock-out") of the iNOS gene in mice results
in a marked increase in susceptibility to infections (Wei et
al., 1995
; Laubach et al., 1995
). It is possible
that NO is toxic to epithelial cells in the airways and may contribute
to epithelial shedding in asthma. These effects are likely to be
mediated by the formation of peroxynitrite.
There is increasing evidence that high concentrations of NO may have
effects on the immune system and the inflammatory response. NO inhibits
Th1 lymphocytes in mice and thus favors the development of a Th2
response, with eosinophilia (Taylor-Robinson et al., 1993
; Barnes and Liew, 1995
). There is also evidence that NO promotes the chemotaxis of eosinophils, because L-NAME blocks
eosinophil recruitment in the lungs (Ferreira et al.,
1996
). NO-donor compounds increase the survival of eosinophils by
inhibiting apoptosis (Beauvais et al., 1995
), and NO
inhibits Fas receptor-mediated apoptosis in these cells (Hebestreit
et al., 1998
).
4. Role in asthma.
a. RELEASE.
There is evidence for increased
expression of iNOS in asthmatic airways, particularly in epithelial
cells and macrophages (Hamid et al., 1993
; Giaid et
al., 1998
). It is likely that this arises from the effects of
proinflammatory cytokines, oxidants, and perhaps other inflammatory
mediators. Because NO is a gas, it diffuses into the airway lumen and
may be detected in exhaled air (Barnes and Kharitonov, 1996
). There is
an increase in NO levels in the exhaled air from asthmatic patients
(Alving et al., 1993
; Kharitonov et al., 1994
;
Persson et al., 1994
), which is derived from the lower
airways (Kharitonov et al., 1996b
; Massaro et
al., 1996
). The increased exhaled NO in asthma is related to airway inflammation (Jatakanon et al., 1998
), is increased
during the late response to allergen (Kharitonov et al.,
1995
) and during exacerbations (Massaro et al., 1995
), and
is decreased by treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (Kharitonov
et al., 1996a
).
b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS.
Although exhaled NO is a
useful noninvasive marker of inflammation in asthma, it is less certain
how endogenous NO contributes to the pathophysiological mechanisms of
asthma. Single inhalations of L-NMMA and L-NAME
(via a nebulizer) result in reduced exhaled NO levels for normal and
asthmatic patients (Kharitonov et al., 1994
; Yates
et al., 1995
, 1996
). Interestingly, there
is no fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec, even in
asthmatic patients with highly reactive airways, suggesting that basal
production of NO is not important in maintaining basal airway tone.
Although infusion of L-NMMA in normal subjects causes
an increase in blood pressure, neither nebulized L-NAME
nor L-NMMA has any effect on heart rate or blood pressure,
suggesting that inhibition of NOS is confined to the respiratory tract.
Although L-NMMA and L-NAME are nonselective
inhibitors of cNOS and iNOS, aminoguanidine has some selectivity for
iNOS. Inhalation of aminoguanidine has no effect on exhaled NO levels
of normal subjects but significantly reduces exhaled NO levels of
patients with asthma (Yates et al., 1996
), further
supporting the view that the elevated levels of exhaled NO in asthma
are produced by iNOS. More potent and selective iNOS inhibitors are now
in clinical development (Garvey et al., 1997
).
c. CONCLUSIONS.
There is good evidence for increased
formation of NO in asthma, as evidenced by the high levels of NO in
exhaled air, compared with normal subjects, and the fact that this
increase is correlated with eosinophilic inflammation. NO is a potent
vasodilator and may increase plasma exudation. It may also participate
in the inflammatory response by shifting the balance toward Th2 cells and by recruiting and increasing the survival of eosinophils in the
airways. Use of the potent selective iNOS inhibitors now in clinical
development should reveal the importance of NO in asthma.
 |
VI. Cytokines |
A. General Overview
1. The cytokine network in chronic inflammation.
Cytokines are
small protein mediators that play an integral role in the coordination
and persistence of inflammation in asthma, although the precise role of
each cytokine remains to be determined. The chronic airway inflammation
of asthma is unique, in that the airway wall is infiltrated by T
lymphocytes of the Th2 phenotype, eosinophils, macrophages/monocytes,
and mast cells. In addition, "acute-on-chronic" inflammation may be
observed in acute exacerbations, with increases in eosinophils and
neutrophils and release of mediators such as histamine and cys-LTs from
eosinophils and mast cells, to induce bronchoconstriction, airway
edema, and mucus secretion.
Th2 lymphocytes produce a panel of cytokines, including IL-3, IL-4,
IL-5, IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, and GM-CSF. The primary signals that activate
Th2 cells are unknown but may be related to the presentation of a
restricted panel of antigens in the presence of appropriate cytokines.
Dendritic cells are ideally suited to act as the primary contacts
between the immune system and external allergens. Interaction of
co-stimulatory molecules on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (in
particular, the B7.2/CD28 interaction) may lead to proliferation of Th2
cells, thus perpetuating mast cell activation and eosinophilic
inflammation. This may lead to the production of specific IgE by B
lymphocytes under the influence of IL-4, which plays a critical role in
the isotype switching of B lymphocytes from IgG to IgE production.
Other cytokines, including TNF-
and IL-6, may also be important. The
IgE produced in asthmatic airways binds to Fc
RI on mast
cells, priming them for activation by antigen. The development of mast
cells from bone marrow cells represents a process of maturation and
expansion, involving growth factors and cytokines [such as stem cell
factor (SCF) and IL-3] produced by structural cells. Mast cells
recovered from asthmatic patients by bronchoalveolar lavage show
increased release of mediators such as histamine.
IL-4 also increases the expression of an inducible form of the low
affinity receptor for IgE (Fc
RII or CD23) on B lymphocytes and
macrophages. This may account for the increased expression of CD23 on
alveolar macrophages from asthmatic patients, which in turn could
account for the increased release of cytokines from these macrophages.
In addition, IL-4 is very important in driving the differentiation of
CD4+ Th precursors into Th2-like cells.
The differentiation, migration, and pathobiological effects of
eosinophils may occur through the effects of GM-CSF, IL-3, and IL-5.
Once recruited from the circulation, mature eosinophils in the presence
of these cytokines change phenotype into hypodense eosinophils, which
show increased survival in bronchial tissue. These eosinophils are
primed for ligand-initiated generation of increased amounts of cys-LTs
and for cytotoxicity to other cells, such as those of the airway
epithelium. Eosinophils themselves may also generate other cytokines.
Cytokines may also play an important role in antigen presentation and
may enhance or suppress the ability of macrophages to act as
antigen-presenting cells. Airway macrophages are normally poor at
antigen presentation and suppress T cell proliferative responses
[possibly via release of cytokines such as IL-1 receptor antagonist
(IL-1ra)], but in asthma there is evidence for reduced suppression
after exposure to allergen (Spiteri et al., 1994
; Aubus
et al., 1984
). Both GM-CSF and IFN-
increase the ability of macrophages to present allergen and express HLA-DR (Fischer et
al., 1988
). IL-1 is important in activating T lymphocytes and is
an important co-stimulator of the expansion of Th2 cells after antigen
presentation (Chang et al., 1990
). Airway macrophages may be
an important source of "first wave" cytokines, such as IL-1,
TNF-
, and IL-6, which may be released (via Fc
RII) upon exposure
to inhaled allergens. These cytokines may then act on epithelial cells
to release a second wave of cytokines, including GM-CSF, IL-8, and the
regulated on activation, normal T cell-expressed, and secreted protein
(RANTES), which amplify the inflammatory response and lead to influx of
secondary cells such as eosinophils, which themselves may release
multiple cytokines.
Cytokines may also exert an important regulatory effect on the
expression of adhesion molecules, both on endothelial cells of the
bronchial circulation and on airway epithelial cells. IL-4 increases
the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) on
endothelial and airway epithelial cells, and this may be important in
eosinophil and lymphocyte trafficking (Schleimer et al.,
1992
). IL-1 and TNF-
increase the expression of ICAM-1 in both
vascular endothelium and airway epithelium (Tosi et al., 1992
).
Another feature of the chronic inflammation of asthma is the
proliferation of myofibroblasts and the hyperplasia of airway smooth
muscle. The mechanisms by which these structural changes occur are
unclear, but several growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth
factor (PDGF) and TGF-
, may be released from inflammatory cells in
the airways (such as macrophages and eosinophils) and also from
structural cells (such as airway epithelial cells, endothelial cells,
and fibroblasts). These growth factors may stimulate fibrogenesis by
recruiting and activating fibroblasts or transforming myofibroblasts. There is particular interest in the possibility that epithelial cells
may release growth factors, because collagen deposition occurs
underneath the basement membrane of the airway epithelium (Brewster
et al., 1990
). Growth factors may also stimulate the proliferation and growth of airway smooth muscle cells. PDGF and EGF
are potent stimulants of animal and human airway smooth muscle proliferation (Hirst et al., 1992
; Knox, 1994
), and these
effects are mediated by activation of tyrosine kinase and PKC. Growth factors may also be important in the proliferation of mucosal blood
vessels and the goblet cell hyperplasia that are characteristic of
chronically inflamed asthmatic airways. Cytokines such as TNF-
and
fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) may also play important roles in the
angiogenesis that is observed in chronic asthma.
Therefore, many cytokines are involved in the development of the atopic
state and the chronic inflammatory processes of asthma, ultimately
contributing to the release of mediators such as histamine and cys-LTs,
airway remodeling, bronchoconstriction, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (table 2). The role
of each cytokine in these processes can be evaluated by studying its
properties, its presence and localization in the airway wall and in
airway secretions of patients with asthma, and the effects of specific
inhibitors, such as receptor antagonists or specific antibodies.
Although these cytokines work in concert, the important cytokines
implicated in asthma are considered separately. It is difficult to
categorize these cytokines because they often have pleiotropic and
overlapping effects. With respect to asthma and allergy, the following
groupings are used in this review: (a) lymphokines, i.e.,
IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-15, IL-16, and IL-17; (b)
proinflammatory cytokines, i.e., IL-1, TNF, IL-6, IL-11, GM-CSF, and
SCF; (c) anti-inflammatory cytokines, i.e., IL-10, IL-1ra,
IFN-
, IL-12, and 1L-18; and (d) growth factors, i.e., PDGF, TGF-
, FGF, EGF, and insulin-like growth
factor (IGF). Chemotactic cytokine (chemokines) are discussed in
Section VII.
This section deals with the cytokines that appear to be most involved
in asthma. Their synthesis and release, receptors, effects with
particular relevance to asthma, and potential role in asthma are
discussed. As for the classical mediators, the potential role of each
cytokine can be judged from its expression in asthmatic airways, from
studies with transgenic or knock-out mice, or from studies involving
the use of synthesis inhibitors, antibodies, or blockers at the
receptor level.
2. Cytokine receptors.
The receptors for many cytokines have
now been cloned and, based on common homology regions, these have been
grouped into superfamilies (Kishimoto et al., 1994
).
a. CYTOKINE RECEPTOR SUPERFAMILY.
This largest receptor
superfamily includes IL-2 receptor
- and
-chains, IL-4 receptor,
IL-3 receptor
- and
-chains, IL-5
- and
-chains, IL-6
receptor, gp130, IL-12 receptor, and GM-CSF receptor. The extracellular
regions of the cytokine receptor family contain combinations of
cytokine receptor domains, fibronectin type III domains, and usually C2
Ig constant region-like domains. Some members are composed of a single
polypeptide chain that binds its ligand with high affinity. For other
receptors, there may be more than one binding site for the ligand
(typically sites with high and low binding affinities). For these
receptors, additional subunits that are required for high affinity
receptor expression have been identified. Some of these subunits are
shared by more than one cytokine receptor, giving rise to heterodimeric
structures. Such examples include (a) receptors sharing
the GM-CSF receptor
-chain (IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF);
(b) receptors sharing the IL-6 receptor
-chain, gp130
(IL-6, leukemia inhibitory factor, and oncostatin M); and
(c) receptors sharing the IL-2 receptor
-chain (IL-2,
IL-4, IL-7, and IL-15).
Many proteins of the cytokine receptor superfamily are secreted as
soluble forms, which are produced by alternative splicing of their mRNA
transcripts to yield proteins lacking the transmembrane region and the
cytoplasmic proximal charged residues that anchor the protein into the
membrane. They may act as antagonists, as transport proteins to carry
cytokines to other sites, or as agonists.
b. IMMUNOGLOBULIN SUPERFAMILY.
Cytokine receptors with
Ig superfamily domains in their extracellular sequences include IL-1,
IL-6, PDGF, and GM-CSF receptors. The Ig domains are
characterized by a structural unit of approximately 100 amino acids,
with a distinct folding pattern known as the Ig fold.
c. PROTEIN KINASE RECEPTOR SUPERFAMILY.
These receptors
have glycosylated, extracellular, ligand-binding domains, a single
transmembrane domain, and an intracellular, tyrosine kinase catalytic
domain. The superfamily includes receptors for growth factors such as
PDGF, EGF, and FGF.
d. INTERFERON RECEPTOR SUPERFAMILY.
This group includes
the IFN-
/
receptor, IFN-
receptor, and IL-10 receptor. They
are single-transmembrane domain glycoproteins that are characterized by
either one (IFN-
and IL-10 receptors) or two (IFN-
/
receptors)
homologous extracellular regions. Signal transduction involves
phosphorylation and activation of Janus protein kinase and tyrosine
kinase 2 protein tyrosine kinases.
e. NERVE GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR SUPERFAMILY.
These cytokine receptors include the nerve growth factor receptor, TNF
receptor-I (p55), and TNF receptor-II (p75). These are characterized by
three or four cysteine-rich repeats of approximately 40 amino acids in
the extracellular part of the molecule. The mode of signal transduction
has not been elucidated.
f. SEVEN-TRANSMEMBRANE DOMAIN G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR
SUPERFAMILY.
These receptors include the chemokine receptors,
which have a characteristic structure of a relatively short, acidic,
extracellular, amino-terminal sequence followed by seven transmembrane
domains with three extracellular and three intracellular loops. The
receptors are coupled to heterotrimeric G proteins, which induce PI
phosphate hydrolysis and activate kinases, phosphatases, and ion channels.
B. Lymphokines
Lymphokines are cytokines that are produced by T lymphocytes,
although it is now recognized that many other cell types may release
these cytokines. They play an important role in immunoregulation.
1. Interleukin-2.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
Activated T cells,
particularly Th0 and Th1 T cells, are major sources of IL-2 (Morgan
et al., 1976
), whereas B lymphocytes can be induced under
certain conditions to secrete IL-2 in vitro. IL-2 is secreted by
antigen-activated T cells 4 to 12 h after activation, accompanied
later by up-regulation of high affinity IL-2 receptors on the same
cells. Binding of IL-2 to IL-2 receptors induces proliferation of T
cells, secretion of cytokines, and enhanced expression of receptors for
other growth factors, such as insulin. The IL-2-receptor complex is
then removed from the T cell surface by internalization. IL-2 can also
be produced by eosinophils (Levi Schaffer et al., 1996
) and
by airway epithelial cells (Aoki et al., 1997
).
b. RECEPTORS.
The IL-2 receptor complex is composed of
three chains (
,
, and
) and belongs to the family of
hematopoietic cytokine receptors (Taniguchi and Minami, 1993
; Weiss and
Littman, 1994
). The
- and
-chains bind to IL-2 with low affinity,
whereas the
-chain does not bind IL-2 alone. The high affinity
complex is an 

heterotrimer, whereas 
and 
heterodimers have intermediate affinities. The
-chain, which is
expressed constitutively in T lymphocytes, is essential for signal
transduction, and the intracellular domain has critical sequences
necessary for growth-promoting signals (Hatakeyama et
al., 1989
). The
-chain also appears to be important for
signal transduction (Zurawski and Zurawski, 1992
), whereas the
-chain alone is unable to transduce any signal.
c. EFFECTS.
IL-2 stimulates the growth and
differentiation of T cells, B cells, natural killer cells,
lymphokine-activated cells, and monocytes/macrophages. IL-2 functions
as an autocrine growth factor for T cells and also exerts paracrine
effects on other T cells (Smith, 1988
). IL-2 is also involved in T cell
receptor-stimulated T cell apoptosis (Lenardo, 1991
). IL-2 promotes the
differentiation and Ig secretion of B cells. IL-2 acts on monocytes to
increase IL-1 secretion, cytotoxicity, and phagocytosis (Smith, 1988
). Experiments with IL-2 gene knock-out mice show that these animals develop a normal thymus and normal T cell subpopulations in peripheral tissues, indicating that IL-2 activity is redundant and not confined to
IL-2 alone (Schorle et al., 1991
). Together with IL-4,
IL-2 can reduce the glucocorticoid receptor binding affinity of blood mononuclear cells (Sher et al., 1994
). IL-2 stimulates
natural killer cells to secrete IFN-
, to proliferate, and to
increase cytolysis. IL-2 enhances GM-CSF production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from asthmatics and IL-5 production in T cells from
patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome (Nakamura et al., 1993
; Enokihara et al., 1989
). IL-2 is a
potent chemoattractant for eosinophils in vitro (Rand et
al., 1991b
).
Systemic infusion of IL-2 as part of chemotherapeutic treatment results
in eosinophilia, with an associated increase in eosinophil colony-stimulating activity (Sedgwick et al., 1990
;
Macdonald et al., 1990
). This activity was abolished by
neutralizing antibodies to IL-3, IL-5, or GM-CSF, indicating that IL-2
acts indirectly by promoting the synthesis of these substances.
Repeated administration of IL-2 induces bronchial hyperresponsiveness
in Lewis rats (Renzi et al., 1991
). In
ovalbuminsensitized Brown-Norway rats, IL-2 led to a 3-fold
increase in the late-phase response, compared with the response in rats
receiving only saline before allergen exposure (Renzi et
al., 1992
). IL-2 caused an inflammatory response around the
airways, with a significant increase in eosinophils, lymphocytes, and
mast cells.
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
Levels of IL-2 are increased in
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with symptomatic asthma
(Walker et al., 1992
; Broide et al.,
1992b
). Increased bronchoalveolar lavage cells expressing IL-2 mRNA are
also present (Robinson et al., 1992
), and a
nonsignificant increase in IL-2 mRNA-positive cells is observed in
asthmatics after allergen challenge (Bentley et al.,
1993
). Particularly high levels of IL-2 and IL-4 mRNA-positive
bronchoalveolar lavage cells are observed in steroid-resistant
asthmatics, compared with steroid-sensitive asthmatics (Leung et
al., 1995
); this increase is not abolished by pretreatment with
oral prednisolone for the steroid-resistant patients, and there are no
differences in the expression of IL-5 and IFN-
mRNA between the two groups.
Cyclosporin A, which inhibits IL-2 gene transcription in activated T
lymphocytes through interference with the transcription factors AP-1
and NF-AT, inhibits allergic airway eosinophilia but not bronchial
hyperresponsiveness in animal models (Elwood et al.,
1992
). However, for patients with severe asthma, cyclosporin A causes a
reduction in the amount of oral steroid therapy needed to control
asthmatic symptoms (Alexander et al., 1992
), although this finding was not confirmed in another study (Nizankowska et al., 1995
). These effects of cyclosporin A may result from
inhibition of IL-2 expression, as well as inhibition of the expression
of other cytokines, such as GM-CSF and IL-5.
2. Interleukin-3.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
Activated Th cells are
the predominant source of IL-3, together with mast cells (Arai et
al., 1990
; Fung et al., 1984
).
b. RECEPTORS.
The IL-3 receptor is formed by the
association of a low affinity IL-3-binding
-subunit with a
-subunit, which is common to the IL-5 and GM-CSF receptors but does
not itself bind to these cytokines (Hayashida et al.,
1990
). IL-3 binding to its receptor results in rapid tyrosine and
serine/threonine phosphorylation of several cellular proteins,
including the IL-3 receptor
-subunit itself (Isfort et
al., 1988
; Sorensen et al., 1989
). A monoclonal antibody to the IL-3 receptor
-chain abolishes its function (Sun et al., 1996
). The human IL-3 receptor is expressed on
myeloid, lymphoid, and vascular endothelial cells. It is selectively
induced in human endothelial cells by TNF-
, and it potentiates IL-8
secretion and neutrophil transmigration (Korpelainen et
al., 1993
).
c. EFFECTS.
IL-3 is a pluripotent hematopoietic growth
factor that, together with other cytokines such as GM-CSF, stimulates
the formation of erythroid cell, megakaryocyte, neutrophil, eosinophil,
basophil, mast cell, and monocytic lineages (Ottmann et
al., 1989
). GM-CSF also increases the responsiveness of
neutrophils to IL-3 (Smith et al., 1995
). Mice that
overexpress IL-3 show only modest eosinophilia but die early because of
massive tissue infiltration and destruction by myeloid cells such as
neutrophils and macrophages (Dent et al., 1990
).
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
An increase in the number of cells
expressing IL-3 mRNA has been reported in mucosal biopsies and in
bronchoalveolar lavage cells from patients with asthma (Robinson
et al., 1992
,1993a
). However, after inhalation
challenge, the number of IL-3 mRNA-positive cells does not increase, in
contrast to those expressing IL-5 (Bentley et al.,
1993
).
3. Interleukin-4.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
IL-4 is produced by
Th2-derived T lymphocytes and certain populations of thymocytes, as
well as eosinophils and cells of the basophil and mast cell lineages.
Cross-linking of the CD40 ligand on human CD4+ T
cells from normal nonallergic subjects generates a co-stimulatory signal that increases IL-4 synthesis (Blotta et al., 1996
).
Synthesis can also be induced by stimulation of the antigen receptor on T lymphocytes and by IgE Fc receptor cross-linking in mast cells and
basophils. Interestingly, corticosteroids enhance the capacity to
induce IL-4 synthesis from CD4+ T cells (Blotta
et al., 1997
).
b. RECEPTORS.
The IL-4 receptor is a complex consisting
of two chains, a high affinity IL-4-binding chain (p140,
-chain),
which binds IL-4 and transduces its growth-promoting and
transcription-activating functions (Galizzi et al.,
1990
; Idzerda et al., 1990
), and the IL-2 receptor
-chain (the common
-chain,
c), which amplifies signaling of
the IL-4 receptor (Russell et al., 1993
; Kondo et al., 1993
). The
-chain belongs to the cytokine receptor
superfamily. A recombinant extracellular domain of the human IL-4
receptor is a potent IL-4 antagonist (Garrone et al.,
1991
). The IL-2 receptor
-chain augments IL-4 binding affinity
(Kondo et al., 1993
; Russell et al.,
1993
). A low affinity IL-4 receptor has also been identified (Fanslow
et al., 1993
). High affinity IL-4 receptors are abundant in activated B and T cells. They are also present on hematopoietic progenitor cells, mast cells, macrophages, endothelial cells, epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and muscle cells (Park et
al., 1987a
,b
; Ohara and Paul, 1987
).
IL-4 induces phosphorylation of the IL-4-induced phosphotyrosine
substrate, which is associated with the p85 subunit of
phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase and with Stat-6 and Janus protein kinase
after cytokine stimulation (Imani et al., 1997
;
Hatakeyama et al., 1991
; Wang et al.,
1992
, 1993
). The transcription factor Stat-6 is essential for mediation
of the effects of IL-4 (Takeda et al., 1996
; Shimoda et al., 1996
). IL-4 also stimulates PI
hydrolysis, yielding IP3 and subsequent calcium
flux, followed by increased intracellular cyclic AMP levels (Finney
et al., 1990
). Interestingly, an association with atopy
has been found with a R567 allele of the IL-4 receptor
-subunit
(Khuruna Hershey et al., 1997
), which enhances signaling and decreases the binding of the phosphotyrosine phosphatase Src homology 2-containing protein tyrosine phosphate (which has
been implicated in termination of signaling by means of cytokine
receptors) (Imani et al., 1997
; Paulson et
al., 1996
).
c. EFFECTS.
IL-4 plays an important role in B
lymphocyte activation by increasing expression of class II major
histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, as well as enhancing
expression of CD23 (low affinity Fc
RII), CD40, and the
-chain of
the IL-2 receptor. It promotes Ig synthesis by B lymphocytes and plays
a central role in Ig class switching of activated B lymphocytes to the
synthesis of IgG4 and IgE. This switching is accompanied by germline
-chain synthesis. IL-4 promotes the development of Th2-like
CD4+ T cells and inhibits the development of Th1-like T
cells (Le Gros et al., 1990
; Swain et
al., 1990
). It also enhances the cytolytic activity of
CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. Virus-specific CD8+ T
cells can be induced by IL-4 to produce IL-5 (Coyle et
al., 1995a
).
IL-4 also exerts effects on monocytes and macrophages. It enhances the
surface expression of MHC class II molecules and the antigen-presenting
capacity of macrophages but inhibits the macrophage colony formation
and release of TNF, IL-1, IL-12, IFN-
, IL-8, and macrophage
inflammatory protein (MIP)-1
. Together with other cytokines such as
GM-CSF and IL-6, IL-4 can promote the growth of mast cell and
myeloid and erythroid progenitors. IL-4 also up-regulates endothelial
VCAM-1 expression on the endothelium. Interaction of VCAM-1 with very
late activation antigen-4 promotes eosinophil recruitment (Schleimer
et al., 1992
). IL-4 also induces fibroblast chemotaxis
and activation (Postlethwaite et al., 1992
; Postlethwaite and Seyer, 1991
) and, in concert with IL-3, IL-4 promotes
the growth of human basophils and eosinophils (Favre et
al., 1990
). IL-4 has inhibitory effects such as suppression of
metalloproteinase biosynthesis in human alveolar macrophages (Lacraz
et al., 1992
), inhibition of the expression of
iNOS in human epithelial cells (Berkman et al., 1996b
),
and reduction of RANTES and IL-8 expression in human airway smooth
muscle cells (John et al., 1997
, 1998a
).
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
IL-4 has been shown to be expressed
by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, eosinophils, and mast
cells in both atopic and nonatopic asthma (Bradding et
al., 1992
; Ying et al., 1997
). Increased numbers of lymphocytes expressing IL-4 mRNA together with IL-5 mRNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid have been reported after allergen challenge (Robinson et al., 1993a
). No increased levels
of IL-4 have been detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of
asthmatics (Broide et al., 1992b
). The potential
importance of IL-4 in inducing allergic airway inflammation has been
addressed with IL-4-knock-out mice. Sensitization and exposure to
ovalbumin did not induce lung eosinophilia as it did in the wild-type
littermates (Brusselle et al., 1994
). No
ovalbumin-specific IgE was observed with active sensitization, and
repeated exposures to ovalbumin did not induce bronchial
hyperresponsiveness (Brusselle et al., 1995
). The
crucial effects of IL-4 appear to lie in its effect on Th2 cell
development. The development of airway inflammation in the murine model
of allergen-induced airway inflammation is accompanied by the presence of Th2 cells in the airways (Coyle et al., 1995b
). In
IL-4-knock-out mice, T cells recovered from the airways do not
synthesize a Th2 cytokine pattern, which correlates with the absence of
inflammatory airway changes. When wild-type mice are treated with
anti-IL-4 during the exposure to aerosolized ovalbumin but not during
the sensitization process, the influx of eosinophils to the airways is
not inhibited (Corry et al., 1996
; Coyle et
al., 1995b
). IL-4 receptor blockade prevents the development of
antigen-induced airway hyperreactivity, goblet cell metaplasia, and
pulmonary eosinophilia in a mouse model (Gavett et al.,
1997
). Thus, IL-4 appears to be important in the early stages of Th2
cell development.
4. Interleukin-5.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
IL-5 was first isolated
from supernatants of activated murine spleen cells, which were shown to
induce eosinophil colony formation. The isolated soluble activity was
shown to selectively stimulate eosinophil production from murine bone
marrow and was termed eosinophil differentiation factor. IL-5 was
isolated from this soluble activity (Lopez et al., 1986
).
IL-5 is produced by T lymphocytes; in asthmatic airways, increased
expression of IL-5 mRNA has been demonstrated in
CD4+ T cells, using in situ hybridization (Hamid
et al., 1991
). Bronchoalveolar lavage
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells can
also secrete IL-5 (Till et al., 1995
). IL-5 mRNA has been
detected in the sputum and bronchial biopsies from patients with
asthma, but not nonasthmatic controls, using reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction (Gelder et al.,
1993
, 1995
). In addition, human eosinophils can express IL-5
mRNA and release IL-5 protein in vitro (Dubucquoi et al.,
1994
), and endobronchial challenge results in IL-5 mRNA expression in
eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (Broide et al.,
1992b
), with an increase in IL-5 concentrations of up to 300-fold
(Ohnishi et al., 1993b
; Sedgwick et al., 1991
). Elevated IL-5 concentrations have been reported in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from symptomatic but not asymptomatic asthmatics (Ohnishi
et al., 1993a
). Increased circulating levels of
immunoreactive IL-5 have been measured in the serum of patients with
exacerbations of asthma, and these levels fall with corticosteroid
treatment (Corrigan et al., 1993
). IL-5 levels are raised in
induced sputum after allergen challenge of asthmatic patients (Keatings
et al., 1997
). IL-5 protein has also been localized (by
immunochemical analysis) in mast cells in bronchial biopsies of
patients with asthma, together with IL-4, IL-6, and TNF-
(Bradding
et al., 1994
). Transcriptional control of the human IL-5
gene involves several transcription factors, including NF-AT (Stranick
et al., 1997
).
b. RECEPTORS.
The human IL-5 receptor has been
identified in vitro on eosinophils, basophils, and B lymphocytes but
not on neutrophils or monocytes (Lopez et al., 1991
). It
consists of a heterodimer with two polypeptide chains, i.e., a low
affinity binding
-chain and a nonbinding
-chain shared with the
IL-3 and GM-CSF receptors (Tavernier et al., 1991
). Both
chains belong to the cytokine receptor superfamily (Bazan, 1990
). The
-subunit alone is sufficient for ligand binding and is specific for
IL-5, but association with the
-chain leads to a 2- to 3-fold
increase in binding affinity and allows signaling to occur. Some IL-5
receptor mutants have antagonistic effects and may act as receptor
antagonists (Tavernier et al., 1995
). Transcriptional
regulation of the specific chain yields either membrane-bound or
soluble forms of the receptor (Tavernier et al., 1992
).
The membranous form interacts with the
-subunit, leading to
substantial increases in affinity for IL-5 (Koike and Takatsu, 1994
).
The soluble form is secreted in body fluids, interacts with IL-5, and
antagonizes the action of IL-5 on target cells (Devos et
al., 1993
; Tavernier et al., 1992
). The
expression of the IL-5 receptor is restricted to eosinophils and their
immediate precursors. An increase in the number of both forms of IL-5
receptors in bronchial biopsies from asthmatics has been reported, with
the expression of IL-5 receptor mRNA being predominantly in eosinophils
(Yasruel et al., 1997
). Ligand binding to IL-5 receptors
activates non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase and other protein
kinases in eosinophils (Bates et al., 1996
; Taniguchi,
1995
).
c. EFFECTS.
IL-5 can influence the production,
maturation, and activation of eosinophils (Egan et al.,
1996
). IL-5 acts predominantly at the later stages of eosinophil
maturation and activation (Clutterbuck et al., 1989
;
Lopez et al., 1988
). IL-5 can also prolong the survival of eosinophils (Yamaguchi et al., 1988
). IL-5 appears to
be the main cytokine involved in the development of eosinophilia in
vivo. Administration of exogenous IL-5 produces eosinophilia in many in
vivo models (Iwama et al., 1992
). IL-5-transgenic mice,
in which transcription of IL-5 is coupled to the dominant control region of the gene coding for the constitutive marker CD2, show life-long eosinophilia in organs with predicted T cell expression, such
as bone marrow, spleen, and peritoneum, with fewer cells in the airway
mucosa (Dent et al., 1990
). IL-5-knock-out transgenic mice behave normally, indicating that eosinophils require other factors
for degranulation and subsequent tissue damage. Intratracheal administration of another eosinophil chemotactic agent, eotaxin, leads
to further eosinophil accumulation in the lungs and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, an effect not observed in wild-type mice (Rothenberg et al., 1996
). IL-5 may cause eosinophils to
be released from the bone marrow, whereas local release of another
chemoattractant may be necessary to cause tissue localization of
eosinophils (Collins et al., 1995
). On the other hand,
IL-5 instilled into the airways of patients with asthma induces
significant airway eosinophilia (Shi et al., 1997
), and
inhaled IL-5 causes eosinophilia in induced sputum and bronchial
hyperresponsiveness but has no effect on airway caliber (Shi et
al., 1998
). The eosinophil chemotactic responses of
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of asthmatics during the pollen season is
accounted for by IL-5 and RANTES (Venge et al., 1996
).
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
IL-5 may play an important role in
eosinophil maturation, chemoattraction, and activation in asthma and
may underlie bronchial hyperreactivity. It may also interact with other
eosinophil chemoattractants and activators, such as chemokines, to
activate and induce chemoattraction of eosinophils (Rothenberg
et al., 1997
; Collins et al., 1995
). The
expression of IL-5 in tissues and cells from patients with asthma is
discussed above. Studies with IL-5 monoclonal antibodies clearly
support a role for IL-5 in asthma. Pretreatment with anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies can suppress allergen-induced airway eosinophilia (Chand et al., 1992
; Van Oosterhout et
al., 1993
; Mauser et al., 1993
, 1995
). There is
some debate regarding whether the IL-5induced eosinophilia is the
direct cause of bronchial hyperresponsiveness induced by allergen
exposure. There is an effect of anti-IL-5 antibodies on bronchial
hyperresponsiveness in some studies (Van Oosterhout et
al., 1993
; Mauser et al., 1995
), whereas other
studies do not report such an effect, despite inhibition of
eosinophilia (Corry et al., 1996
). In IL-5-knock-out
mice, both allergen-induced eosinophilia and airway hyperresponsiveness
are abolished (Foster et al., 1996
). The site of IL-5
expression may be critical to eosinophil recruitment and the
development of airway hyperresponsiveness. Studies of transgenic mice
expressing IL-5 from lung epithelial cells showed elevated levels of
IL-5 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and serum, lung histopathological
changes reminiscent of asthma, and base-line airway hyperresponsiveness
(Lee et al., 1997
). In addition to the effect of IL-5 in
mobilizing eosinophils from the bone marrow, there is evidence for its
effect as a regulator of eosinophil homing and migration into tissues
in response to local chemokine release (Mould et al.,
1997
).
Studies of the use of anti-IL-5 antibodies in the treatment of human
asthma are currently underway. Studies of the effect of systemic
corticosteroid treatment in patients with worsening asthma indicate
that there is a reduction in the expression of IL-5 mRNA in the airway
mucosa that is associated with an improvement in asthma (Robinson
et al., 1993b
). Cyclosporin A and tacrolimus (FK-506)
(immunosuppressant agents sometimes used in the treatment of severe
asthma) inhibit the expression of IL-5 mRNA in activated human T
lymphocytes in response to phytohemagglutinin or phorbol esters (Rolfe
et al., 1997
).
5. Interleukin-13.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
IL-13 is synthesized by
activated CD4+ and CD8+ T
cells and is a product of Th1, Th2, and Th0-like
CD4+ T cell clones (Minty et al.,
1993a
). Both CD4+ and CD8+
T cell clones synthesize IL-13 in response to antigen-specific or
polyclonal stimuli (Zurawski and de Vries, 1994
).
b. RECEPTORS.
There is a close similarity between IL-4
and IL-13 receptors. An IL-4 receptor antagonist derived from a mutant
protein (Zurawski et al., 1993
) is a potent receptor
antagonist of the biological activity of IL-4 and also of IL-13. It
particularly inhibits the effect of IL-13 in inducing IgE synthesis in
peripheral blood mononuclear cells. There is evidence from cDNA cloning
of the IL-13 receptor to suggest that the IL-4 receptor
-chain is a component of the IL-13 receptor (Aman et al., 1996
).
Despite this, these receptors appear to be distinct (Zurawski and de
Vries, 1994
).
c. EFFECTS.
IL-13 is a potent modulator of human
monocyte and B cell function (Minty et al., 1993a
).
IL-13 has profound effects on human monocyte morphological features,
surface antigen expression, antibody-dependent cellular toxicity, and
cytokine synthesis (McKenzie et al., 1993
; Minty
et al., 1993a
). In human monocytes stimulated by
lipopolysaccharide, the production of proinflammatory cytokines,
chemokines, and colony-stimulating factors is inhibited by IL-13,
whereas IL-1ra secretion is increased (Zurawski et al.,
1993
). Production of IL-1
, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IFN-
, and
GM-CSF from blood monocytes is inhibited (Berkman et
al., 1996c
; de Waal Malefyt et al., 1993
),
whereas MIP-1
, IL-1, and TNF-
release from human alveolar
macrophages is inhibited (Yanagawa et al., 1995
; Berkman
et al., 1995
). IL-13 inhibits the release of RANTES and
IL-8 from airway smooth muscle cells in vitro (John et
al., 1997
, 1998a
). These actions of IL-13 are similar to those of IL-4 and IL-10. The suppressive effects of IL-13
and of IL-4 are not related to endogenous production of IL-10.
Similarly to IL-4, IL-13 decreases the transcription of IFN-
and
IL-12. It is possible that IL-13 acts like IL-4 and suppresses the
development of Th1 cells by down-regulating IL-12 production by
monocytes, thereby favoring the development of Th2 cells (Le Gros
et al., 1990
; Swain et al., 1990
; Hsieh
et al., 1994
). IL-13, unlike IL-4, fails to activate
human T cells, which appears to be the result of a lack of IL-13
receptors on these cells. IL-13 diminishes monocyte glucocorticoid
receptor binding affinity (Spahn et al., 1996
). IL-13
activates eosinophils by inducing the expression of CD69 cell surface
protein and prolonging eosinophil survival (Luttmann et
al., 1996
).
IL-13 induces the expression of CD23 on purified human B cells and acts
as a switch factor directing IgE synthesis, similar to IL-4 (Punnonen
et al., 1993
; Cocks et al., 1993
). A
mutant protein of IL-4, which is a potent receptor antagonist of the biological activity of IL-4, antagonizes IL-13 actions, blocking B cell
proliferation and IgE synthesis (Aversa et al., 1993
). This mutant protein of IL-4 may therefore have therapeutic potential for the treatment of allergies.
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
Increased expression of IL-13 mRNA
has been reported in the airway mucosa of patients with atopic and
nonatopic asthma (Humbert et al., 1997a
; Naseer
et al., 1997
). In addition, levels of IL-13 together
with IL-4 are increased after segmental allergen challenge of patients
with asthma (Kroegel et al., 1996
). There is a
significant correlation between eosinophil counts and levels of IL-13.
6. Interleukin-15.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
IL-15 is produced by
both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
after activation (Grabstein et al., 1994
). IL-15 mRNA is
expressed in lung fibroblasts and epithelial cell lines, as well as
monocytes and human blood-derived dendritic cells (Jonuleit et
al., 1997
).
b. RECEPTORS.
IL-15 uses the
- and
-subunits of
the IL-2 receptor (Giri et al., 1994
; Grabstein
et al., 1994
), and both chains are needed for
IL-15-mediated actions. A high affinity IL-15 binding subunit has also
been described (Kennedy and Park, 1996
). Mitogen-activated macrophages,
natural killer cells, and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
express IL-15 receptor
-chains, which can bind IL-15 without
requiring IL-2 receptor
- or
-chains (Chae et al.,
1996
).
c. EFFECTS.
IL-15 shares some of the properties of
IL-2, such as stimulation of the proliferation of T cells and
lymphokine-activated killer cells. However, there are many other
distinct effects of IL-15. IL-15 can induce IL-8 and macrophage
chemotactic peptide (MCP)-1 production in human monocytes (Badolato
et al., 1997
). It also induces the release of soluble
IL-2 receptor
-chain from human blood mononuclear cells (Treiber
Held et al., 1996
). It promotes angiogenesis in vivo
(Angiolillo et al., 1997
). IL-15 can also activate
neutrophils and delay their apoptosis (Girard et al.,
1996
). IL-15 promotes the synthesis of IL-5 from house dust
mite-specific human T cell clones (Mori et al., 1996
),
an effect inhibited by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor herbimycin A. This
indicates that IL-15 produced at the site of allergic inflammation may
play a role in recruitment and activation of eosinophils by inducing
IL-5 production by T cells. IL-15 is also a chemoattractant for human
blood T lymphocytes, an effect inhibited by an anti-IL-2 receptor
-chain antibody (Wilkinson and Liew, 1995
).
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
There are no data specific to asthma.
7. Interleukin-16.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
IL-16, previously known
as lymphocyte chemoattractant factor, was first identified as a product
of peripheral blood mononuclear cells after mitogen and histamine
stimulation in vitro (Center et al., 1983
; Center and
Cruikshank, 1982
). IL-16 was subsequently shown to be produced by
CD8+ T cells after stimulation with histamine and
serotonin in vitro (Laberge et al., 1995
, 1996
). IL-16 can
also be produced by epithelial cells (Bellini et al., 1993
),
eosinophils (Lim et al., 1996
), and mast cells (Rumsaeng
et al., 1997
).
b. EFFECTS.
IL-16 has specific activities on
CD4+ T cells (Cruikshank et al., 1994
).
IL-16 selectively induces migration of CD4+ cells, including
CD4+ T cells and CD4-bearing eosinophils (Rand et
al., 1991a
). IL-16 acts as a growth factor for CD4+
T cells and induces IL-2 receptors and MHC class II molecules on these
cells (Cruikshank et al., 1987
).
c. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
Elevated concentrations of IL-16
have been found in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained from asthmatic
subjects after allergen challenge (Cruikshank et al.,
1995b
). In stable atopic asthmatic subjects, there is predominant
expression of IL-16 mRNA and immunoreactivity in airway epithelium
(Laberge et al., 1997
). IL-16-like activity has been
detected in cell culture supernatants generated from histamine-stimulated tracheal epithelial cells obtained from asthmatic subjects (Bellini et al., 1993
).
8. Interleukin-17.
IL-17 is a CD4+ T
cell-derived cytokine that stimulates NF-
B and IL-6 production in
fibroblasts and co-stimulates T cell proliferation (Yao et
al., 1995a
). It stimulates epithelial, endothelial, and fibroblastic cells to secrete cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF, and
PGE2 (Fossiez et al., 1996
; Yao
et al., 1995b
). In the presence of IL-17, fibroblasts can
sustain the proliferation of CD34+ hematopoietic
progenitors and their preferential maturation into neutrophils. IL-17
increases the release of NO in cartilage from patients with
osteoarthritis, via NF-
B activation (Attur et al., 1997
).
C. Proinflammatory Cytokines
Proinflammatory cytokines are involved in most types of
inflammation and appear to amplify and perpetuate the ongoing
inflammatory response. They may be important in disease severity and
resistance to anti-inflammatory therapy in asthma.
1. Interleukin-1.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
There are two distinct
forms of IL-1 (
and
), produced from two different genes.
Although the amino acid sequence homology between human IL-1
and
IL-1
is only 20%, the molecules bind to the same receptor and have
nearly identical properties. IL-1
(17.5 kDa) is synthesized as a
larger precursor molecule with a molecular mass of 31 kDa. IL-1
is
released into the extracellular space and the circulation. The most
active form of IL-1
is its cleaved mature form, resulting from the
action of a cysteine protease (IL-1-converting enzyme) (Thornberry
et al., 1992
; Cerretti et al., 1992
). In
contrast, IL-1
is usually retained intracellularly.
IL-1 is produced by a variety of cells, including
monocytes/macrophages, fibroblasts, B cells, both Th1 and Th2-like T
cell lines, natural killer cells, neutrophils, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells. The major source of IL-1 in most tissues
is stimulated monocytes/macrophages. Monocytes produce 10 times more
IL-1
than IL-1
(Nishida et al., 1987
; March
et al., 1985
); IL-1
is mostly cell-associated, whereas
IL-1
is mostly released. Eosinophils can produce IL-1
(Weller
et al., 1993
), whereas human epithelial cells can augment
IL-1
expression when exposed to the air pollutant nitrogen dioxide
(Devalia et al., 1993
). A wide variety of stimuli, including
IL-1 itself (Dinarello and Mier, 1987
), TNF-
(Turner et
al., 1989
), GM-CSF (Xu et al., 1989
), endotoxin, and
phagocytosis, can increase the expression of IL-1 in
monocytes/macrophages. IL-1 production by endothelial and vascular
smooth muscle cells can also be induced by IL-1
, TNF-
, or
endotoxin. On the other hand, PGE2 and
corticosteroids can attenuate the capacity of endotoxin and other
stimuli to release IL-1, through inhibition of transcription and
through a decrease in IL-1 mRNA stability (Knudsen et al.,
1986
; Pennington et al., 1992
; Kern et al.,
1988
). An inhibitor of IL-1-converting enzyme that inhibits the
inflammatory responses to IL-1
has been described (Ray et
al., 1992
).
b. RECEPTORS.
Two IL-1 receptors have been described.
The type I and type II receptors are transmembrane glycoproteins that
bind IL-1
, IL-1
, and IL-1ra. The type I IL-1 receptor is
expressed on many cells, including T cells, B cells, monocytes, natural
killer cells, basophils, neutrophils, eosinophils, dendritic cells,
fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and vascular endothelial cells, whereas
the type II receptor is also expressed on T cells, B cells, and
monocytes. An IL-1 receptor accessory protein has been described
(Greenfeder et al., 1995
), which, when associated with
the type I IL-1 receptor, increases its affinity for IL-1
. Only the
type I receptor transduces a signal in response to IL-1 (McKean
et al., 1993
); the type II IL-1 receptor, on binding to
IL-1, does not. Therefore, the type II IL-1 receptor may act as a decoy
receptor, preventing IL-1 from binding to the type I IL-1 receptor
(Colotta et al., 1994
). IL-1 signal transduction
pathways are associated with TNF receptor-associated factor (TRAF)
adaptor proteins, particularly TRAF-6 (Cao et al., 1996a
). TRAF-6 associates with IL-1 receptor-associated kinase, which
is recruited to and activated by the IL-1 receptor complex (Cao
et al., 1996b
).
A soluble receptor (found in normal human serum and secreted by the
human B cell line RAJI) that binds preferentially to IL-1
has been
described (Symons et al., 1995
). IL-1 down-regulates the
numbers of IL-1 receptors (Matsushima et al., 1986
;
Mizel et al., 1981
), whereas PGE2 increases
the expression of IL-1 receptors (Spriggs et al., 1990
;
Bonin et al., 1990
). PDGF can increase IL-1 receptor
expression and IL-1 receptor mRNA levels in fibroblasts (Chiou
et al., 1989
; Bonin and Singh, 1988
), whereas IL-4
increases receptor expression on T cells (Lacey and Erdmann, 1990
).
TGF-
may decrease the expression of IL-1 receptors (Dubois et
al., 1990
) and may also uncouple the response of the cells to
IL-1, without affecting IL-1 receptor expression or IL-1 binding
(Stoeck et al., 1990
).
Some of the effects of IL-1 can be mimicked by agents that increase
cyclic AMP levels and activate protein kinase A (Shirakawa et
al., 1986
; Onozaki et al., 1985
), whereas others
can be mimicked by agents that activate PKC (Emery et
al., 1989
; Suzuki and Cooper, 1985
; Shackelford and Trowbridge,
1984
). Many cells produce cyclic AMP in response to IL-1. Activation of
protein kinase A by an IL-1-induced increase in cyclic AMP levels may
lead to increased transcription of several cellular genes. These may
turn on activating transcription factors that bind to a
cis-acting cyclic AMP-responsive element (Yamamoto
et al., 1988
) and NF-
B, through the phosphorylation of an inhibitor protein, I
B. AP-1 activity may also be induced by
IL-1 (Muegge et al., 1989
) through PKC activation.
Phosphorylation of several cellular proteins through the action of
PKC-independent serine/threonine kinase may also occur upon activation
of the IL-1 receptor (Kaur and Saklatvala, 1988
).
c. EFFECTS.
IL-1 induces fever, like other endogenous
pyrogens such as TNF and IL-6. It causes leukocytosis by release of
neutrophils from the bone marrow and induces the production of other
cytokines, including IL-6.
IL-1 is a growth factor for mature and immature thymocytes and a
cofactor in the induction of proliferation of and IL-2 secretion by
peripheral blood CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after
engagement of their antigen receptors. IL-1
is an important growth
factor for Th2 cells in response to antigen-primed antigen-presenting
cells, but not for Th1 cells (Greenbaum et al., 1988
).
Synergistic effects between IL-1 and IL-6 have been reported for the
activation of T cells (Helle et al., 1989
; Elias et al., 1989
; Sironi et al., 1989
). IL-1
also functions as a growth factor for B cells (Paul and Ohara, 1987
;
Vink et al., 1988
; Lipsky et al., 1983
).
IL-1 induces many other cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4,
IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, RANTES, GM-CSF, IFN-
, PDGF, and TNF, in a variety
of cells. IL-1 induces fibroblasts to proliferate (Schmidt et
al., 1982
), an effect that may be the result of release of PDGF
(Raines et al., 1989
), it increases PG synthesis and
collagenase secretion (Postlethwaite et al., 1983
; Mizel
et al., 1981
), and it increases the synthesis of
fibronectin and types I, III, and IV collagen (Dinarello and Savage,
1989
). IL-1
together with TNF-
and IFN-
can induce or
up-regulate the expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on endothelial cells
and on respiratory epithelial cells, which may lead to increased
adhesion of eosinophils to the vascular endothelium and respiratory
epithelium (Godding et al., 1995
; Pober et
al., 1986
). IL-1-induced adhesion of eosinophils to endothelial
cell monolayers is inhibited by anti-ICAM and anti-VCAM antibodies
(Bochner et al., 1991
).
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
Levels of IL-1
in bronchoalveolar
lavage fluid from patients with asthma have been found to be elevated,
compared with those in fluid from nonasthmatic volunteers; there is
also an increase in IL-1
-specific mRNA transcripts in
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid macrophages (Borish et al.,
1992
). In addition, patients with symptomatic asthma show increased
levels of IL-1
in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, compared with
patients with asymptomatic asthma (Broide et al.,
1992b
). Increased expression of IL-1
in asthmatic airway epithelium
has been reported, together with an increased number of macrophages
expressing IL-1
(Sousa et al., 1996
). Selective inhibition of IL-1
expression in the epithelium of the airway wall
of patients with asthma, without a reduction in IL-1ra expression, after corticosteroid therapy has been described (Sousa et
al., 1997
).
IL-1
induces airway neutrophilia and selectively increases airway
responsiveness to bradykinin in rats (Tsukagoshi et al., 1994a
); these effects are mediated in part through the generation of
ROS (Tsukagoshi et al., 1994b
). IL-1
can induce
eosinophil accumulation in rat skin, an effect that is blocked by an
anti-IL-8 antibody (Sanz et al., 1995
). Of interest,
IL-1
has profound effects on the coupling of the
2-adrenergic receptor to adenylyl cyclase, an effect
that is mediated through the up-regulation of inhibitory G proteins
(Koto et al., 1996
).
2. Tumor necrosis factor-
.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
Two major forms of TNF
exist, i.e., TNF-
and TNF-
, which have only 35% amino acid
homology but bind to similar receptors. TNF-
(previously known as
cachectin) is expressed as a type II membrane protein attached by a
signal anchor transmembrane domain in the propeptide (Gearing et
al., 1994
). TNF-
is released from cells by proteolytic cleavage
of the membrane-bound form by a metalloproteinase (TNF-converting
enzyme). Inactivation of the TNF-converting enzyme gene compromises the
ability of cells to produce soluble TNF-
. TNF-
is produced by
many cells, including macrophages, T lymphocytes, mast cells, and
epithelial cells, but the principal source is macrophages. The
secretion of TNF-
by monocytes/macrophages is greatly enhanced by
other cytokines, such as IL-1, GM-CSF, and IFN-
. Human eosinophils
are also capable of releasing TNF-
(Costa et al., 1993
),
together with airway epithelial cells (Devalia et al.,
1993
). TNF-
is mainly produced by activated lymphocytes via a
similar pathway.
b. RECEPTORS.
TNF-
interacts with two cell surface
receptors, i.e., p55 and p75. Both receptors are members of the
nerve growth factor receptor superfamily. Soluble forms of human p55
and p75 receptors have been described; they are derived from the
extracellular domains of the receptors and may act as inhibitors of TNF
effects (Nophar et al., 1990
). TNF receptors are
distributed on nearly all cell types except red blood cells and resting
T lymphocytes. The p75 receptor is more restricted to hematopoietic
cells. p75 is the principal receptor released by human alveolar
macrophages and monocytes in the presence of IFN-
(Galve de
Rochemonteix et al., 1996
).
Several signaling pathways leading to activation of different
transcription factors, such as NF-
B and AP-1, have been identified. The TRAF family of adaptor proteins, particularly TRAF-2, is involved in signaling from the TNF receptors (Rothe et al.,
1995
). TRAF-2 may also play a role in the pathway of signal
transduction from the TNF receptors to activation of the MAP kinase
cascade. TNF activates a sphingomyelinase, resulting in the release of
ceramide from sphingomyelin, which in turn activates a
Mg2+-dependent protein kinase (Mathias et
al., 1991
).
c. EFFECTS.
Many of the actions of TNF-
occur in
combination with other cytokines as part of the cytokine network, and
the effects of TNF-
are very similar to those of IL-1
, because
there are close interactions between the signal transduction pathways
of these two cytokines (Eder, 1997
). TNF-
potently stimulates airway
epithelial cells to produce cytokines, including RANTES, IL-8, and
GM-CSF (Berkman et al., 1995c
; Kwon et
al., 1994a
, 1995
; Cromwell et al., 1992
), and it
increases the expression of ICAM-1 (Tosi et al., 1992
).
TNF-
also has synergistic effects with IL-4 and IFN-
to increase
VCAM-1 expression on endothelial cells (Thornhill et
al., 1991
). This has the effect of increasing the adhesion of
inflammatory leukocytes, such as neutrophils and eosinophils, at the
airway surface. TNF-
enhances the expression of class II MHC
molecules on antigen-presenting cells. In addition, it enhances the
release of IL-1 by these cells. It acts as a co-stimulatory factor for
activated T lymphocytes, enhancing proliferation and expression of IL-2
receptors. TNF-
also inhibits bone resorption and synthesis and
induces proliferation of fibroblasts (Rogalsky et al.,
1992
). TNF-
stimulates bronchial epithelial cells to produce
tenascin, an extracellular matrix glycoprotein (Harkonen et
al., 1995
).
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
TNF-
may have an important
amplifying effect in asthmatic inflammation (Kips et
al., 1993
; Shah et al., 1995
). There is evidence for increased TNF-
expression in asthmatic airways (Bradding et al., 1994
), and IgE triggering in sensitized lungs
leads to increased expression in epithelial cells in both rat and human lung (Ohkawara et al., 1992
; Ohno et al.,
1990
). Increased TNF-
mRNA expression in bronchial biopsies from
asthmatic patients has been reported (Ying et al., 1991
;
Bradding et al., 1994
). TNF-
is also present in the
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic patients (Broide et
al., 1992b
), and TNF-
release from bronchoalveolar
leukocytes from asthmatic patients is increased (Cembrzynska-Norvak
et al., 1993
). TNF-
is also released from alveolar
macrophages from asthmatic patients after allergen challenge (Gosset
et al., 1991
). Furthermore, both blood monocytes and
alveolar macrophages show increased gene expression of TNF-
after
IgE triggering in vitro, and this effect is enhanced by IFN-
(Gosset et al., 1992
). Alveolar macrophages of asthmatics
undergoing late-phase responses after allergen challenge release more
TNF-
and IL-6 ex vivo than do those from patients with only an early
response (Gosset et al., 1991
). There are polymorphisms
in the promoter of the TNF gene that may be more frequently associated
with asthma (Moffatt and Cookson, 1997
).
Infusion of TNF-
causes increased airway responsiveness in
Brown-Norway rats (Kips et al., 1992
), and inhalation of
TNF-
by normal human subjects results in increased airway
responsiveness at 24 h after inhalation, as well as an increase in
sputum neutrophils (Thomas et al., 1995
). TNF-
may be
an important mediator in the initiation of chronic inflammation, by
activating the secretion of cytokines from a variety of cells in the
airways. Several approaches to inhibition of TNF-
synthesis or
effects, including the use of monoclonal antibodies to TNF or soluble
TNF receptors, in asthma are now under investigation.
3. Interleukin-6.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
IL-6 was originally
described for its antiviral activity, its effects on hepatocytes, and
its growth-promoting effects on B lymphocytes and plasmacytomas. It is
secreted by monocytes/macrophages, T cells, B cells, fibroblasts, bone
marrow stromal cells, keratinocytes, and endothelial cells. Epithelial
cells also appear to produce IL-6 (Mattoli et al., 1991
).
Human airway smooth muscle cells, upon activation with IL-1
or
TGF-
, can release IL-6 (Elias et al., 1997
). Major basic
protein secreted from eosinophils can interact with IL-1 or TGF to
increase IL-6 release from fibroblasts (Rochester et al.,
1996
).
b. RECEPTORS.
High affinity IL-6 receptors are formed
by the association of the IL-6 receptor
-chain (which binds IL-6
with low affinity) with a
-chain (gp130) (which does not bind IL-6
but associates with the
-chain/IL-6 complex and is responsible for
signal transduction) (Kishimoto et al., 1992
).
c. EFFECTS.
IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine whose role
in asthma remains unclear. IL-6 has growth-regulatory effects on many
cells and is involved in T cell activation, growth, and
differentiation. It is a terminal differentiation factor for B cells
and induces Ig (IgG, IgA, and IgM) secretion (Akira et
al., 1993
). IL-6 is an important cofactor in IL-4-dependent IgE
synthesis (Vercelli et al., 1989
). IL-6 may also have
anti-inflammatory effects. IL-6 can inhibit the expression and release
of IL-1 and TNF from macrophages in vitro and can inhibit
endotoxin-induced TNF production and neutrophil influx in the airways
in vivo (Ulich et al., 1991a
,b
; Schindler et
al., 1990a
). IL-6-transgenic mice demonstrate lymphocytic infiltration around airways, which is associated with reduced airway
responsiveness (DiCosmo et al., 1994
).
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
IL-6 is released in asthma. There is
evidence for increased release of IL-6 from alveolar macrophages from
asthmatic patients after allergen challenge (Gosset et
al., 1991
) and increased basal release, compared with
nonasthmatic subjects (Broide et al., 1992b
). IgE-dependent triggering stimulates the secretion of IL-6 from both
blood monocytes and alveolar macrophages in vitro (Gosset et
al., 1992
). Increased levels of IL-6 can be measured in nasal washings from children after rhinovirus infection (Zhu et
al., 1996
). In addition, IL-6 mRNA expression and an increase
in NF
B DNA-binding activity can be induced by rhinovirus infection
of cells in vitro.
4. Interleukin-11.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
IL-11, which is
distantly related to IL-6, is produced by fibroblasts and human airway
smooth muscle cells when they are stimulated by IL-1 and
TGF-
1 (Maier et al., 1993
; Elias
et al., 1997
).
b. RECEPTORS.
A single class of specific receptors on
mouse cells has been described (Yin et al., 1992
). The
receptor has not yet been cloned. Like IL-6, IL-11 uses the IL-6 signal
transducer gp130. Upon ligand binding, phosphorylation of tyrosine
residues in several proteins occurs (Yin and Yang, 1993
; Yin et
al., 1994
).
c. EFFECTS.
Although IL-11 cDNA was cloned on the basis
of IL-6-like bioactivity, IL-11 has biological features distinct from
those of IL-6. IL-11 promotes multiple stages of human
megakaryocytopoeisis and thrombopoeisis. In combination with SCF or
IL-4, IL-11 supports the generation of B cells (similarly to IL-6)
(Hirayama et al., 1992
). IL-11 induces the production of
acute-phase reactants (Baumann and Schendel, 1991
). IL-11 induces the
synthesis of the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1. It inhibits
IL-12 and TNF-
production from monocytes/macrophages (Leng and
Elias, 1997
), effects mediated at the transcriptional level by
inhibition of NF-
B.
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
IL-11 is released into
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid during upper respiratory viral infections
in humans and induces nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness in mice
(Einarsson et al., 1996
). Targeted expression of IL-11
in mouse airways leads to a T cell inflammatory response with airway
remodeling, local accumulation of myofibroblasts, and airway
obstruction (Tang et al., 1996
).
5. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
GM-CSF is one of the
colony-stimulating factors that act to regulate the growth,
differentiation, and activation of hematopoietic cells of multiple
lineages. GM-CSF is produced by several airway cells, including
macrophages, eosinophils, T lymphocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial
cells, airway smooth muscle cells, and epithelial cells.
b. RECEPTORS.
The GM-CSF receptor consists of a low
affinity
-chain and a
-chain that is shared with the IL-3
and IL-5 receptor
-chains (Kitamura et al., 1991
;
Hayashida et al., 1990
). These receptors are usually
distributed on granulocytes, monocytes, endothelial cells, and
fibroblasts. Up-regulation of the expression of GM-CSF receptor
-chain mRNA in macrophages in airway biopsies from patients with
nonatopic asthma, but not those with atopic asthma, has been reported
(Kotsimbos et al., 1997
). Certain analogues of GM-CSF bind to the
-chain of the receptor, but not to the
-chain
complex, without agonist effects, indicating that these mutants could
act as antagonists of GM-CSF (Hercus et al., 1994
).
c. EFFECTS.
GM-CSF is a pleiotropic cytokine that can
stimulate the proliferation, maturation, and function of hematopoietic
cells. GM-CSF may be involved in priming inflammatory cells, such as
neutrophils and eosinophils. It can prolong the survival of eosinophils
in culture (Hallsworth et al., 1992
). GM-CSF can
enhance the release of superoxide anions and cys-LTs from eosinophils
(Silberstein et al., 1986
). GM-CSF can also induce the
synthesis and release of several cytokines, including IL-1 and TNF-
,
from monocytes. GM-CSF induces nonhematopoietic cells, such as
endothelial cells, to migrate and proliferate (Bussolino et
al., 1989
).
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
There is evidence for increased
expression of GM-CSF in the epithelium in bronchial biopsies from
asthmatic patients (Sousa et al., 1993
) and in T
lymphocytes and eosinophils after endobronchial challenge with allergen
(Broide and Firestein, 1991
; Broide et al., 1992a
).
Increased circulating concentrations of GM-CSF have been detected in
patients with acute severe asthma (Brown et al., 1991
),
and peripheral blood monocytes from asthmatic patients secrete
increased amounts of GM-CSF (Nakamura et al., 1993
). In addition to its release in asthmatic airways, GM-CSF can be
demonstrated to have various effects in asthma. GM-CSF has been found
to be the major LTC4-enhancing activity for eosinophils in
the supernatant of cultured asthmatic alveolar macrophages (Howell
et al., 1989
). Media obtained from cultured bronchial
epithelial cells from asthmatics increase the viability, superoxide
production, and LTC4 production of eosinophils in vitro
(Soloperto et al., 1991
), an effect that is abolished by
a neutralizing antibody to GM-CSF. Transient expression of the GM-CSF
gene in the epithelium of rats, using an adenoviral vector, leads to an
accumulation of eosinophils and macrophages that is associated with
irreversible fibrosis (Xing et al., 1996
). This
indicates that GM-CSF may be involved in the chronic eosinophilia and
airway remodeling of asthma.
6. Stem cell factor.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
SCF (previously known as
c-Kit ligand) is produced by bone marrow stromal cells, fibroblasts
(including bronchial subepithelial myofibroblasts and nasal polyp
fibroblasts), and epithelial cells, such as nasal polyp epithelial
cells (Kim et al., 1997
; Zhang et al., 1996
;
Galli et al., 1994
).
b. RECEPTORS.
The receptor for SCF is c-Kit, a receptor
protein kinase. It is expressed on early hematopoietic progenitor cells
and allows a synergistic response to SCF and lineage-committing growth
factors (such as GM-CSF for myelocytes). Expression of c-Kit decreases with cell maturation and is absent from mature cells released from the
bone marrow. However, c-Kit expression increases on mast cells as they
mature, and receptors are abundantly expressed on the surface of mast
cells. c-Kit is also expressed on human eosinophils (Yuan et
al., 1997
).
c. EFFECTS.
SCF acts as a survival factor for the early
hematopoietic progenitor cells and synergizes with other growth factors
to regulate the proliferation and differentiation of cells. SCF is a
major growth factor for human mast cells (Valent et al.,
1992
; Mitsui et al., 1993
). Two alternative splice
variants account for the different forms of SCF; one is primarily
membrane bound and the other is primarily soluble, after being released
from the cell surface by proteolysis (Flanagan et al.,
1991
). CD34+ bone marrow cells cultured in vitro with
recombinant human SCF and IL-3 induce the development of mast cells and
other hematopoietic lineages (Kirshenbaum et al., 1992
).
Membrane-bound SCF may influence mast cell adhesion (Kinashi and
Springer, 1994
), and soluble SCF is chemotactic for mast cells (Nilsson
et al., 1994
). Removal of either soluble or
membrane-bound SCF from mast cells causes the mast cells to undergo
apoptosis (Iemura et al., 1994
; Mekori et
al., 1993
). SCF has a modest capacity for directly activating
mast cells but is usually more active in priming mast cell responses to
other stimuli, such as IgE-stimulated mediator release (Columbo
et al., 1992
; Wershil et al., 1992
; Bischoff and Dahinden, 1992
). SCF causes the release of small amounts
of IL-4 and TNF-
from human lung mast cells (Gibbs et al., 1997
). SCF stimulates very late activation
antigen-4-mediated cell adhesion to fibronectin and VCAM-1 on human
eosinophils (Yuan et al., 1997
).
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
There is very little information on
the expression of SCF in asthmatic airways. SCF is expressed in the
epithelium of nasal polyps removed from patients with allergic rhinitis
(Kim et al., 1997
).
D. Inhibitory Cytokines
Although most cytokines initiate, amplify, or perpetuate
inflammation, some cytokines appear to have an inhibitory or
anti-inflammatory effect on allergic inflammation, either by blocking
the expression or effects of inflammatory cytokines or by shifting the
immune response away from the Th2 pattern of cytokines (Barnes and Lim, 1998
).
1. Interleukin-10.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
IL-10, previously known
as cytokine synthesis inhibitor factor, was originally identified as a
product of murine Th2 clones that suppressed the production of
cytokines by Th1 clones responding to antigen stimulation (Fiorentino
et al., 1989
). In humans, Th0, Th1, and Th2-like
CD4+ T cell clones, cytotoxic T cells, activated
monocytes, and peripheral blood T cells, including
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, have
the capacity to produce IL-10 (Spits and de Waal Malefyt, 1992
; Enk and
Katz, 1992
). Mast cells also have the capacity to produce IL-10.
Constitutive IL-10 secretion occurs in healthy lungs, with the major
source being alveolar macrophages; however, circulating monocytes
appear to be able to secrete more IL-10 than alveolar macrophages
(Berkman et al., 1995a
).
b. RECEPTORS.
The IL-10 receptor is a member of the
class II subgroup of cytokine receptors (the IFN receptor family). The
IL-10 receptor has been characterized and cloned from a human lymphoma
cell line (Liu et al., 1994
); it is expressed in several
lymphoid and myeloid cell types (Tan et al., 1993
) and
in natural killer cells (Carson et al., 1995
). The IL-10
receptor is highly effective in recruiting the signaling pathways of
IL-6-type cytokine receptors, including signal transduction-activated
transcription factors 1 and 3 (Lai et al., 1996
). The
inhibitory effects of IL-10 on monocytes appear to be dependent on
NF-
B (Wang et al., 1995
).
c. EFFECTS.
IL-10 is a pleiotropic cytokine that can
exert either immunosuppressive or immunostimulatory effects on a
variety of cell types. IL-10 is a potent inhibitor of
monocyte/macrophage function, suppressing the production of several
proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-
, IL-1
, IL-6, MIP-1
,
and IL-8 (Seitz et al., 1995
; de Waal Malefyt et
al., 1991a
; Fiorentino et al., 1991
), although
the release of MCP-1 is increased (Seitz et al., 1995
). IL-10 inhibits monocyte MHC class II, B7.1/B7.2, and CD23 expression and accessory cell function. Accessory signals mediated by B7 molecules
through CD28 on the surface of T cells are essential for T cell
activation. Expression of IL-10 by antigen-presenting cells may be an
established pathway for the induction of antigen-specific tolerance,
such as that to allergens (de Waal Malefyt et al., 1991b
). In contrast, IL-10 up-regulates the monocyte expression of
IL-1ra, another anti-inflammatory cytokine (de Waal Malefyt et
al., 1992
). IL-10 suppresses the synthesis of superoxide anions and NO by activated monocytes/macrophages (Cunha et al.,
1992
). An anti-IL-10 antibody enhances the release of cytokines from activated monocytes, suggesting that this cytokine may play an inhibitory role when the cell is stimulated (de Waal Malefyt et al., 1991a
). IL-10 inhibits the stimulated release of RANTES
and IL-8 from human airway smooth muscle cells in culture (John
et al., 1997
, 1998a
). IL-10 inhibits
IFN-
and IL-2 production by Th1 lymphocytes (Fiorentino et
al., 1989
) and IL-4 and IL-5 production by Th2 cells, by
interfering with B7/CD28-dependent signals (Moore et
al., 1993
; Schandene et al., 1994
). IL-10 also
inhibits eosinophil survival and IL-4-induced IgE synthesis. On the
other hand, IL-10 acts on B cells to enhance their viability, cell
proliferation, Ig secretion (with the isotype switch), and class II MHC
expression. IL-10 is also a growth co-stimulator for thymocytes and
mast cells (Thompson-Snipes et al., 1991
), as well as an
enhancer of cytotoxic T cell development (Chen and Zlotnik, 1991
).
IL-10 also activates the transcription of genes for mast-cell derived
proteases. IL-10 enhances the production of the tissue inhibitor of
metalloproteinases in monocytes and tissue macrophages, while
decreasing metalloproteinase biosynthesis (Lacraz et
al., 1995
).
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
There is significantly less IL-10
mRNA and protein expressed in alveolar macrophages from asthmatic
subjects, compared with those from nonasthmatic individuals (John
et al., 1998b
; Borish et al., 1996
).
Triggering of CD23 molecules by anti-CD23 monoclonal antibodies induces
IL-10 production by human monocytes (Dugas et al.,
1996
). An IL-10 polymorphism of the transcription initiation site could
be responsible for reduced IL-10 release. Patients with severe asthma
are more likely to exhibit polymorphisms in the promoter region that
are associated with lower production of IL-10 (Lim et
al., 1998
). Other studies indicate that inhaled corticosteroid
therapy can restore the reduced IL-10 release from macrophages from
asthmatic patients (John et al., 1998b
), and theophylline also increases IL-10 secretion (Mascali et
al., 1996
). On the other hand, some studies have indicated that
there are increased numbers of macrophages and T cells expressing IL-10 mRNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with asthma (Robinson et al., 1996
).
IL-10 inhibits the late response and the influx of eosinophils and
lymphocytes after allergen challenge in Brown-Norway rats (Woolley
et al., 1994
). Coinstillation of IL-10 by the intranasal route significantly inhibits the peritoneal and lung eosinophilia induced by ovalbumin in immunized mice (Zuany Amorim et
al., 1995
, 1996
). Given its anti-inflammatory
properties and these effects in animal models of allergic inflammation,
IL-10 may have beneficial effects in the treatment of asthma (Pretolani
and Goldman, 1997
). However, no studies of such effects have been
performed. Administration of IL-10 to normal volunteers induced a
decrease in circulating CD2+, CD3+,
CD4+, and CD8+ lymphocytes, with suppression of
mitogen-induced T cell proliferation and reduction of TNF-
and
IL-1
production from whole blood stimulated with endotoxin ex vivo
(Chernoff et al., 1995
).
2. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist.
IL-1ra has been isolated
from supernatants of monocytes cultured on aggregated Ig or with immune
complexes (Arend et al., 1985
, 1989
), from alveolar
macrophages (Galve de Rochemonteix et al., 1990
), and
from urine of patients with fever or myelomonocytic leukemia (Barak
et al., 1986
; Seckinger et al., 1990
; Balavoine et al., 1986
). IL-1ra shares 26 and 19% amino acid homology
with IL-1
and IL-1
, respectively. It binds to the IL-1 receptor
with affinity similar to that IL-1
or IL-1
(Seckinger et
al., 1987
), and it inhibits most effects of IL-1 on cells, such as
thymocyte proliferation, IL-2 synthesis by T cells, and
PGE2 and collagenase production by fibroblasts
(Hannum et al., 1990
; Seckinger et al., 1987
;
Bienkowski et al., 1990
; Arend et al., 1990
).
IL-1ra is preferentially produced by alveolar macrophages, compared
with monocytes (Monick et al., 1987
), which may underlie the
diminished IL-1 bioactivity exhibited by alveolar macrophages, compared
with monocytes (Monick et al., 1987
; Kern et al.,
1988
; Wewers et al., 1984
). Other IL-1 receptor inhibitors
have been described (Muchmore and Decker, 1985
; Giri et al.,
1990
).
IL-1ra blocks proliferation of Th2 but not Th1 clones in vitro (Abbas
et al., 1991
). Increased expression of IL-1
and IL-1ra in
asthmatic airway epithelium has been reported (Sousa et al., 1996
). Although the expression of IL-1
is reduced after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, IL-1ra levels are unchanged, thus shifting the balance away from inflammation (Sousa et al.,
1997
). In a human airway epithelial cell line, corticosteroids increase the expression of IL-1ra (Levine et al., 1996
). In an
ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pig model, aerosol administration of IL-1ra
immediately before allergen challenge results in protection against
bronchial hyperreactivity and accumulation of pulmonary eosinophils
(Watson et al., 1993
). In a similar model, the late-phase
response is inhibited and the number of hypodense eosinophils in
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is decreased (Okada et al.,
1995
). Trials of IL-1ra in the treatment of asthma are underway.
3. Interferon-
.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
IFN-
was originally
identified as a product of mitogen-stimulated T lymphocytes that
inhibited viral replication in fibroblasts. The only known sources of
IFN are CD4+ and CD8+ T
cells and natural killer cells.
b. RECEPTORS.
The IFN-
receptor is a single
transmembrane protein, a member of the cytokine receptor type II
superfamily. Although the receptor binds IFN-
with high
affinity, signal transduction requires a species-specific accessory
protein that associates with the extracellular domain of the receptor.
The receptor is expressed on T cells, B cells, monocytes/macrophages,
dendritic cells, granulocytes, and platelets. Epithelial and
endothelial cells also express these receptors.
c. EFFECTS.
IFN-
has extensive and diverse
immunoregulatory effects on various cells. It is produced by Th1 cells
and exerts an inhibitory effect on Th2 cells (Romagniani, 1990
).
IFN-
inhibits antigen-induced eosinophil recruitment in mice
(Nakajima et al., 1993
). However, IFN-
may also have
proinflammatory effects and may activate airway epithelial cells to
release cytokines and express adhesion molecules (Look et
al., 1992
). IFN-
has an amplifying effect on the release of
TNF-
from alveolar macrophages that is induced by IgE triggering or
by endotoxin (Gifford and Lohmann-Matthess, 1987
; Gosset et al., 1992
), and it increases the expression of class I and
class II MHC molecules on macrophages and epithelial cells. IFN-
is a powerful and relatively specific inhibitor of IL-4-induced IgE and
IgG4 synthesis by B cells.
IFN-
increases the production of IL-1, PAF, and hydrogen
peroxide in monocytes, in addition to down-regulating IL-8 mRNA expression, which is up-regulated by IL-2 (Gusella et
al., 1993
; Sen and Lenggel, 1992
; Billiau and Dijkmans, 1990
).
IFN-
also synergizes with the effects of TNF-
on the production
of RANTES from airway smooth muscle cells (John et al.,
1997
). On the other hand, IFN-
inhibits IL-10 production from
monocytes (Chomarat et al., 1993
), which leads to an
up-regulation of TNF-
transcription (Donnelly et al.,
1995
). Thus, IFN-
promotes cell-mediated cytotoxic responses while
inhibiting allergic inflammation and IgE synthesis. IFN-
up-regulates class II molecules on monocytes/macrophages and dendritic
cells and induces de novo expression on epithelial, endothelial, and
other cells, thus making them capable of antigen presentation.
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
There is evidence for reduced
production of IFN-
by T cells from asthmatic patients, and this
correlates with disease severity (Leonard et al., 1997
;
Koning et al., 1997
). This appears to be a feature of
atopic disease and is not specific to asthma (Tang et
al., 1993
). This suggests that defective IFN-
production may be important in asthma (Halonen and Martinez, 1997
), although no
polymorphisms of the IFN-
gene have been associated with asthma (Hayden et al., 1997
). Administration of exogenous
IFN-
prevents airway eosinophilia and hyperresponsiveness after
allergen exposure in mice (Iwamoto et al., 1993
; Lack
et al., 1996
). Liposome-mediated gene transfer of
IFN-
to the pulmonary epithelium in sensitized mice before secondary
antigen exposure also inhibits the pulmonary allergic response (Li
et al., 1996
). IFN-
-knock-out mice develop prolonged
airway eosinophilia in response to allergen (Coyle et al., 1996
). IFN-
inhibits allergic eosinophilia (Lack
et al., 1996
; Zuany Amorim et al., 1994
)
and airway hyperresponsiveness, probably by inducing the formation of
IL-10. These studies indicate that IFN-
has a potential modulating
effect on responses to allergen. Allergen immunotherapy of asthmatic
patients results in increased production of IFN-
by circulating T
cells (Lack et al., 1997
) and in increased
numbers of IFN-
-producing T cells in nasal biopsies (Durham
et al., 1996
). Corticosteroid treatment also increases IFN-
expression in asthmatic airways (Bentley et al.,
1996
), but IFN-
expression is unexpectedly reduced in
corticosteroid-resistant patients (Leung et al., 1995
).
In asthmatic patients, nebulized IFN-
reduces the number of
eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, indicating its therapeutic
potential in asthma (Boguniewicz et al., 1995
).
4. Interleukin-12.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
IL-12 was initially
recognized as a cytokine capable of synergizing with IL-2 to increase
cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses, as well as an inducer of IFN-
synthesis by resting human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro.
IL-12 is secreted by antigen-presenting cells, including B lymphocytes
and monocytes/macrophages (Trinchieri, 1995
; Gately et al.,
1998
).
b. RECEPTORS.
IL-12 receptors are expressed on T cells
and natural killer cells. One component of the IL-12 receptor complex
is related to gp130 (Chua et al., 1994
). The expression
of the IL-12 receptor
2-subunit under the influence of
IFN-
determines the responsiveness of Th1 cells to IL-12 and is of
critical importance in Th1/Th2 switching (Rogge et al.,
1997
).
c. EFFECTS.
IL-12 enhances the growth of activated T
cells and natural killer cells (Bertagnolli et al.,
1992
; Perussia et al., 1992
; Gately et
al., 1991
; Robertson et al., 1992
) and enhances
cytotoxic T cell and natural killer cell activity (Gately et
al., 1992
; Robertson et al., 1992
; Kobayashi
et al., 1989
). IL-12 stimulates natural killer cells and
T cells to produce IFN-
(Schoenhaut et al., 1992
;
Wolf et al., 1991
; Chan et al., 1991
;
Kobayashi et al., 1989
), promotes in vitro
differentiation of mouse and human T cells that secrete IFN-
and
TNF-
(Hsieh et al., 1993
; Manetti et
al., 1993
; Chan et al., 1991
; Perussia et
al., 1992
), and inhibits the differentiation of T cells into
IL-4-secreting cells (Hsieh et al., 1993
; Manetti
et al., 1993
). IL-12 indirectly inhibits IL-4-induced
human IgE responses by IFN-
-dependent and -independent mechanisms in
vitro (Kiniwa et al., 1992
). IL-12 can primarily
regulate Th1 cell differentiation, while suppressing the expansion of
Th2 cell clones (Manetti et al., 1993
), by early priming
of undifferentiated Th cells for IFN-
secretion (Manetti et
al., 1994
). Therefore, IL-12 may play an important role in directing the development of Th1-like T cell responses against intracellular pathogens, while inhibiting the development of Th2-like responses and IgE synthesis. IL-12 may play an important role in
inhibiting inappropriate IgE synthesis and allergic inflammation as a
result of allergen exposure.
d. ROLE IN ASTHMA.
IL-12 may play an important role in
inhibiting inappropriate IgE synthesis and allergic inflammation after
allergen exposure. IL-12 treatment of mice during active sensitization
reduces antigeninduced influx of eosinophils in bronchoalveolar
lavage fluid, inhibits IgE synthesis, and abolishes antigen-induced
bronchial hyperresponsiveness (Kips et al., 1996
). After
an inflammatory response is established, there is inhibition of
antigen-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness and inflammation (Gavett
et al., 1995
). The effects of IL-12 are largely mediated
by IFN-
(Brusselle et al., 1997
). In another study in
mice, IL-12 administered at the time of allergic sensitization decreased specific IgE levels, tracheal ring responsiveness to acetylcholine, and eosinophilia in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after allergen challenge, with IL-5 and IL-10 down-regulation; IL-12
administered after sensitization did not alter specific IgE levels, had
little effect on tracheal ring responsiveness, and produced a modest
effect on the recruitment of eosinophils, with IL-5 down-regulation but
IL-12 up-regulation (Sur et al., 1996
). Thus, the effect
of IL-12 was dependent on the timing of its administration, in relation
to active sensitization.
IL-12 production and IL-12-induced IFN-
release are reduced in
whole-blood cultures from patients with allergic asthma, compared with
normal subjects (Van der Pouw Kraan et al., 1997
). There is a reduction of IL-12 mRNA expression in airway biopsies from patients with allergic asthma, compared with normal subjects, but after
oral corticosteroid treatment the levels of IL-12 mRNA are increased in
corticosteroid-sensitive asthmatics, whereas no significant changes are
observed in corticosteroid-resistant asthmatics (Naseer et
al., 1997
). This contrasts with the inhibitory effects of
corticosteroids on IL-12 production in human monocytes in vitro (Blotta
et al., 1997
). Allergen immunotherapy results in an
increase in IL-12 expression (Hamid et al., 1997
).
PGE2 is a potent inhibitor of human IL-12 production from
monocytes (Van der Pouw Kraan et al., 1995
). Similarly,
2-agonists decrease IL-12 production, and this might
link regular inhaled
2-agonist therapy with a worsening
of asthma control (Panina-Bordignon et al., 1997
).
5. Interleukin-18.
IL-18 (IFN-
-inducing factor) is a
cytokine that is a potent inducer of IFN-
production and plays an
important role in Th1 responses (Ushio et al., 1996
). Human
IL-18 has been cloned from normal human liver cDNA libraries using
murine IL-18 cDNA clones. IL-18 is synthesized as a precursor molecule
without a signal peptide and requires the IL-1-converting enzyme
(caspase-1) for cleavage into a mature peptide.
The human IL-18 receptor has recently been purified and characterized.
Human IL-1 receptor protein is a functional IL-18 receptor component
(Torigoe et al., 1997
).
Recombinant human IL-18 induces IFN-
production by
mitogen-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, enhances natural killer cell cytotoxicity, increases GM-CSF production, and decreases IL-10 production. IL-18 induces IL-8, MIP-1
, and MCP-1 expression in
human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the absence of any
co-stimuli. IL-18 directly stimulates gene expression and synthesis of
TNF-
in CD3+/CD4+ T
cells and natural killer cells, with subsequent production of IL-1
and IL-8 in CD14+ monocytes (Puren et
al., 1998
). IL-18 induces phosphorylation of p56 (lck)
and MAP kinase, and these may be involved in TCR/CD3-mediated responses
(Tsuji Takayama et al., 1997
). IL-18 also activates NF-
B
in murine Th1 cells for enhancement of IL-2 gene expression by Th1
cells (Matsumoto et al., 1997
; Robinson et
al., 1997
). IL-18, together with IL-12, induces
anti-CD40-activated B cells to produce IFN-
, which inhibits
IL-4-dependent IgE production (Yoshimoto et al., 1997
).
E. Growth Factors
Chronic asthma is associated with structural remodeling of the
airways, with fibrosis (particularly under the epithelium), increased
thickness of the airway smooth muscle layer, increased numbers of
mucus-secreting cells, and angiogenesis (Redington and Howarth, 1997
).
These changes are presumably in response to growth factors secreted
from inflammatory and structural cells in the airways, and several
growth factors have been implicated in asthma.
1. Platelet-derived growth factor.
a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE.
PDGF is released from
many different cells in the airways and consists of two peptide chains,
so that AA, BB, or AB dimers may be secreted by different cells. PDGF-A
and -B chains are both synthesized as HMW precursors, which are then
extensively processed before secretion (Ostman et al., 1988
;
Bywater et al., 1988
). Posttranslational glycosylation and
proteolytic cleavage (Bywater et al., 1988
; Deuel et
al., 1981
; Raines and Ross, 1982
) both contribute to the
heterogeneity in the apparent molecular weights of the mature proteins.
Most of the PDGF present in human platelets (from which PDGF was
originally isolated) has been identified as AB dimer, although BB and
AA dimers also exist (Hart et al., 1990
; Hammacher et
al., 1988
; Heldin, 1988
). PDGF-like activity in the conditioned
media of various cells, such as those derived from smooth muscle,
consists predominantly of the AA dimer (Sejersen et al.,
1986
). The sources of PDGF include platelets, macrophages, endothelial
cells, fibroblasts, airway epithelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle
cells. Various stimuli, such as IFN-
for alveolar macrophages,
hypoxia, basic FGF (bFGF), and mechanical stress for endothelial cells,
and serum, TNF-
, IL-1, and TGF-
for fibroblasts, can induce PDGF release.
b. RECEPTORS.
The PDGF receptors belong to a family of
closely related receptor proteins that include the receptor for
monocyte-colony stimulating factor and the c-Kit receptor (Yarden
et al., 1986
). PDGFs exert their actions through a
family of at least two classes of PDGF receptors,
and
(Matsui
et al., 1989
; Hart et al., 1988
; Gronwald et al., 1988
). These are single-transmembrane domain
glycoproteins with an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain (Heldin,
1992
). Binding of PDGF dimers induces receptor dimerization, with three
possible configurations (
, 
, and 
). The PDGF receptor
-subunit binds both PDGF A- and B-chains, whereas the receptor
-subunit binds only PDGF B-chains. Therefore, PDGF-AA binds only to
PDGF receptor 
dimers, PDGF-AB to receptor 
and 
dimers, and PDGF-BB to all three configurations (
, 
, and

) (Westermark et al., 1989
; Seifert et
al., 1989
). These receptors are widely distributed on cells of
mesenchymal origin, including fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells.
Because of their critical role in cell growth, the expression of PDGF
receptors is usually tightly controlled. However, receptor levels can
be regulated by TGF-
, which can increase the expression of PDGF
receptors on human skin fibroblasts (Ishikawa et al.,
1990
; Bryckaert et al., 1988
).
c. EFFECTS.
PDGF is a major mitogen, with its primary
regulatory role being directed at the cell cycle; it acts as a
competence factor, triggering early events of the cell cycle that lead
to DNA synthesis and mitosis (Larsson et al., 1989
).
PDGF induces the expression of competence genes, including the
proto-oncogenes c-myc, c-fos, and
c-jun (Hall et al., 1989
; Greenberg
et al., 1986
). PDGF may activate fibroblasts to
proliferate and secrete collagen (Rose et al., 1986
),
and it may also stimulate proliferation of airway smooth muscle (Hirst
et al., 1992
), which is mediated by the
receptor
(Hirst et al., 1996