Pharmacological Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Page, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Page, C. P.

Vol. 50, Issue 4, 515-596, December 1998

Inflammatory Mediators of Asthma: An Update

Peter J. Barnesa, K. Fan Chung and Clive P. Page

Department of Thoracic Medicine (P.J.B., K.F.C), National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, and Department of Pharmacology (C.P.P), Kings College, London, United Kingdom

I. Introduction
    A. Cellular Origin of Mediators
    B. Synthesis and Metabolism
    C. Mediator Receptors
    D. Mediator Effects
    E. Involvement of Mediators in Asthma
    F. Chronic Inflammation
    G. Transcription Factors
    H. Mediator Interactions
II. Amine Mediators
    A. Histamine
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
    B. Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine)
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
    C. Adenosine
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
III. Lipid-Derived Mediators
    A. Prostanoids
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
    B. Leukotrienes
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
    C. Platelet-Activating Factor
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
    D. Other Lipid Mediators
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
IV. Peptide Mediators
    A. Bradykinin
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
    B. Tachykinins
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
    C. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
    D. Endothelins
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
    E. Complement
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
V. Small Molecules
    A. Reactive Oxygen Species
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Effects on airways.
        3. Role in asthma.
    B. Nitric Oxide
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
VI. Cytokines
    A. General Overview
        1. The cytokine network in chronic inflammation.
        2. Cytokine receptors.
    B. Lymphokines
        1. Interleukin-2.
        2. Interleukin-3.
        3. Interleukin-4.
        4. Interleukin-5.
        5. Interleukin-13.
        6. Interleukin-15.
        7. Interleukin-16.
        8. Interleukin-17.
    C. Proinflammatory Cytokines
        1. Interleukin-1.
        2. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha .
        3. Interleukin-6.
        4. Interleukin-11.
        5. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.
        6. Stem cell factor.
    D. Inhibitory Cytokines
        1. Interleukin-10.
        2. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist.
        3. Interferon-gamma .
        4. Interleukin-12.
        5. Interleukin-18.
    E. Growth Factors
        1. Platelet-derived growth factor.
        2. Transforming growth factor-beta .
        3. Fibroblast growth factor.
        4. Epidermal growth factor.
        5. Insulin-like growth factor.
VII. Chemokines
    A. CC Chemokines
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
    B. CXC Chemokines
        1. Synthesis and metabolism.
        2. Receptors.
        3. Effects on airways.
        4. Role in asthma.
VIII. Proteases
    A. Synthesis and Metabolism
    B. Receptors
    C. Effects on Airways
        1. Airway smooth muscle.
        2. Other effects.
    D. Role in Asthma
        1. Release.
        2. Effects of inhibitors.
References

    I. Introduction
Top
Next
References

Asthma is a complex chronic inflammatory disease of the airways that involves the activation of many inflammatory and structural cells, all of which release inflammatory mediators that result in the typical pathophysiological changes of asthma (Barnes, 1996a) (table 1). By inflammatory mediators, we mean cell products that are secreted and exert functional effects. We reviewed the mediators of asthma in 1988 (Barnes et al., 1988), but since then there have been major advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of asthma and the role of inflammatory mediators. There is now greater understanding of each mediator; in addition, novel mediators of asthma, such as the cytokines, have been identified. To date, >50 different mediators have been identified in asthma. Advances in this field have been greatly assisted by the development of potent and specific inhibitors that either block the inflammatory mediator receptors or inhibit mediator synthesis.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Effects of inflammatory mediators implicated in asthma

In writing this review, we have focused on new developments since 1988 and have emphasized studies in humans wherever possible. There is a vast and rapidly increasing body of literature on mediators of asthma; therefore, we have been forced to be somewhat selective. We have chosen to emphasize the mediators and effects that we think are most relevant to human asthma.

A. Cellular Origin of Mediators

Many inflammatory cells are recruited to asthmatic airways or are activated in situ. These include mast cells, macrophages, eosinophils, T lymphocytes, dendritic cells, basophils, neutrophils, and platelets. It is now increasingly recognized that structural cells may also be important sources of mediators in asthma. Airway epithelial cells, smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts are all capable of synthesizing and releasing inflammatory mediators (Levine, 1995; Saunders et al., 1997; John et al., 1997). Indeed, these cells may become the major sources of inflammatory mediators in the airway, and this may explain how asthmatic inflammation persists even in the absence of activating stimuli.

B. Synthesis and Metabolism

There have been major advances in our understanding of the synthetic pathways involved in the synthesis of inflammatory mediators. Many of the key enzymes have now been cloned; in several cases, specific inhibitors have been developed that may have useful therapeutic effects. 5-Lipoxygenase (5-LO)b inhibitors, which inhibit the synthesis of leukotrienes (LTs), have already been shown to have beneficial effects in the control of clinical asthma and are now available for clinical use (Israel et al., 1996).

C. Mediator Receptors

Many inflammatory mediator receptors have now been cloned. The receptor for platelet-activating factor (PAF) was the first inflammatory mediator receptor to be cloned (Honda et al., 1991), and many inflammatory mediator receptors have been sequenced since then. The receptors for many inflammatory mediators have the typical seven-transmembrane domain structure that is expected for G protein-coupled receptors. However, receptors for cytokines and growth factors have markedly different structures, and usually two or more subunits are involved (Kishimoto et al., 1994). Receptor cloning has yielded a much better understanding of receptor function, because the receptors can be expressed in cell lines, allowing investigation of the "pure" pharmacological features of the receptor and enabling screening for drugs that interact with the receptor. This has been important in elucidating the signal transduction pathways involved in receptor function. Many signal transduction pathways have now been identified. For noncytokine mediators, inflammatory receptors are often coupled, through G proteins (Gq and Gi), to phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis, but it is increasingly recognized that other pathways may also be activated, including the complex mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways that are involved in more long term effects of mediators. Cytokine receptors signal through complex pathways, including MAP kinases and other protein kinases, that result in the activation of transcription factors. Transcription factors regulate the expression of many genes, including inflammatory genes themselves.

The cloning of receptors has made it possible to study the factors regulating their expression. This may be of particular relevance in asthma, because the inflammatory state may alter the gene expression, translation, or function of receptors, thus affecting responsiveness to different mediators.

D. Mediator Effects

Inflammatory mediators produce many effects in the airways, including bronchoconstriction, plasma exudation, mucus secretion, neural effects, and attraction and activation of inflammatory cells. Although the acute effects of mediators have been emphasized, there is increasing recognition that mediators may result in long-lasting structural changes in the airways that are also mediated by the release of inflammatory mediators. These changes may include fibrosis resulting from the deposition of collagen, which is seen predominantly under the epithelium even in patients with mild asthma. The airway smooth muscle layer is also thickened in asthma, and this is likely the result of increases in the number of smooth muscle cells (hyperplasia) and increases in their size (hypertrophy) (Knox, 1994). There may be proliferation of airway vessels (angiogenesis) (Kuwano et al., 1993) and of mucus-secreting cells. There may also be changes in the innervation of the airways.

E. Involvement of Mediators in Asthma

There are several lines of evidence that may implicate a mediator in asthma. Firstly, it may mimic features of clinical asthma. Secondly, the mediator may be produced in asthmatic patients. Thus, mediators or their metabolites may be detected in plasma (e.g., histamine), urine (e.g., LTE4), or, more likely, the airways (in biopsies, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, induced sputum, or exhaled air). However, this does not necessarily mean that the mediator plays any important role in asthma. The best evidence for the involvement of a mediator in asthma is obtained with the use of specific blockers. These may be drugs that block the synthesis of the mediators (e.g., 5-LO inhibitors) or drugs that block their receptors (e.g., antihistamines). Use of new and selective mediator blockers has enormously increased our understanding of the individual mediators and also of asthma itself. Although it is unlikely that blockade of a single mediator will be entirely effective in controlling asthma, there is accumulating evidence that some mediators are more important than others. PAF receptor antagonists are of no obvious clinical benefit in asthma (Kuitert et al., 1993), but cysteinyl-LT (cys-LT) receptor antagonists have considerable clinical effects (O'Byrne et al., 1997).

The role of a mediator in asthma may be difficult to assess when the mediator has a long term effect on airway function. It is easy to measure the effect of a mediator on airway smooth muscle, but it is more difficult to determine its effect on airway microvascular leakage and mucus secretion. It may be even more difficult to determine the role of a mediator on chronic inflammatory effects, such as airway smooth muscle proliferation and fibrosis, that may develop over many years. However, prevention of the long term consequences of asthmatic inflammation, such as irreversible airway narrowing, may be an important goal of asthma therapy, and it is necessary to devise methods to investigate how mediators may affect these long term consequences of asthma.

Asthma has a characteristic clinical pattern, and the histological appearance of asthma is very similar among patients, even when there are differences in asthma severity or in whether or not the asthma is allergic. However, it is likely that there are differing mechanisms of asthma among patients and that different patterns of inflammatory mediators are involved. This suggests that mediator antagonists would have different effects in different patients. This has already been observed in the use of anti-LTs, because some patients appear to have much better therapeutic responses than others. This might be related to polymorphisms of the 5-LO gene (In et al., 1997), but there might be differences that relate to the type of asthma. Patients with aspirinsensitive asthma are particularly helped by anti-LTs, consistent with a critical role for cys-LTs in this type of asthma. As more mediator antagonists become available, other patients who respond well to a particular antagonist may be identified and the heterogeneity of asthma may be revealed.

F. Chronic Inflammation

Although in the past much attention has been paid to acute inflammatory responses (such as bronchoconstriction, plasma exudation, and mucus hypersecretion) in asthma, it is being increasingly recognized that chronic inflammation is an important aspect of asthma (Redington and Howarth, 1997). This chronic inflammation may result in structural changes in the airway, such as fibrosis (particularly under the epithelium), increased thickness of the airway smooth muscle layer (hyperplasia and hypertrophy), hyperplasia of mucus-secreting cells, and new vessel formation (angiogenesis). Some of these changes may be irreversible, leading to fixed narrowing of the airways. These chronic inflammatory changes are mediated by the secretion of distinct mediators, although their role in asthma is still far from certain. These factors include cytokines and growth factors. Cytokines are a large group of protein mediators that play a critical role in determining the nature of the inflammatory response and its persistence. They play a key role in the pathophysiological changes in chronic asthma and are being increasingly recognized as important targets for treatment (Robinson et al., 1993c; Barnes, 1994a; Drazen et al., 1996).

G. Transcription Factors

Transcription factors are DNA-binding proteins that regulate the expression of inflammatory genes, including enzymes involved in the synthesis of inflammatory mediators and protein and peptide mediators. Transcription factors therefore play a critical role in the expression of inflammatory proteins in asthma, because many of these proteins are regulated at a transcriptional level (Barnes and Karin, 1997; Barnes and Adcock, 1998). These transcription factors include nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) and activator protein-1 (AP-1), which are universal transcription factors that are involved in the expression of multiple inflammatory and immune genes and may play a key role in amplifying the inflammatory response. Other transcription factors, such as nuclear factor of activated T cells (NF-AT), are more specific and regulate the expression of a restricted set of genes in particular types of cell; NF-AT regulates the expression of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-5 in T lymphocytes.

H. Mediator Interactions

Many mediators are released in asthma, and it is clear that these mediators interact with each other in some way. Mediators may act synergistically to enhance each other's effects, or one mediator may modify the release or action of another mediator. Little is currently understood regarding these mediator interactions, however. The development of mediator antagonists will greatly facilitate elucidation of such interactions.

    II. Amine Mediators
Top
Previous
Next
References

A. Histamine

Histamine [2-(4-imidazole)ethylamine] was the first mediator implicated in the pathophysiological changes of asthma, when it was found to mimic several features of the disease. Although histamine has been studied extensively as a mediator of asthma, there are several new findings regarding the role of this mediator in asthma.

1. Synthesis and metabolism. Histamine is synthesized and released by mast cells in the airway wall and by circulating and infiltrating basophils. Although airway mast cells are likely to be the major cellular source of histamine in asthma, there is increasing evidence that basophils may be recruited to asthmatic airways and may release histamine in response to cytokine histamine-releasing factors (Schroeder and MacGlashan, 1997).

Histamine is formed by decarboxylation of the amino acid histidine by the enzyme L-histidine decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.22), which is dependent on the cofactor pyridoxal-5'-phosphate. Histamine is stored in granules within mast cells and basophils, where it is closely associated with the anionic proteoglycans heparin (in mast cells) and chondroitin-4-sulfate (in basophils). Histamine may be released when these cells degranulate in response to various immunological [immunoglobulin (Ig)E or cytokines] or nonimmunological (compound 48/80, calcium ionophore, mastoparin, substance P (SP), opioids, or hypo-osmolar solutions) stimuli.

Only a small amount of the histamine released (2 to 3%) is excreted unchanged. The remainder is metabolized, via two major pathways, and excreted in the urine. The majority (50 to 80%) is metabolized by histamine N-methyltransferase (HMT) (EC 2.1.1.8) to N-methylhistamine, which is itself metabolized by monoamine oxidase to N-methylimidazole acetic acid, the major urinary metabolite. The remaining histamine is metabolized by diamine oxidase (EC 1.4.3.6) to imidazole acetic acid, which is excreted in the urine. HMT appears to be the most important enzyme contributing to the degradation of histamine in the airways, because blockers of HMT (such as SKF 91488) increase the bronchoconstricting action of histamine in vitro and in vivo, whereas diamine oxidase inhibition is without effect (Sekizawa et al., 1993). HMT is expressed in airway epithelial cells and may therefore be responsible for the local metabolism of histamine released from airway mast cells. Mechanical removal of airway epithelium enhances the bronchoconstriction response to histamine in vitro (Barnes et al., 1985; Flavahan et al., 1985; Knight et al., 1990); this might be the result, in part, of loss of the metabolizing enzyme. Furthermore, experimental viral infections result in reduced epithelial HMT activity in association with increased responsiveness to inhaled histamine (Nakazawa et al., 1994).

2. Receptors. Histamine has multiple effects on airway function that are mediated by specific surface receptors on target cells (Barnes, 1991). Three types of histamine receptors have now been recognized pharmacologically (Hill, 1990). Histamine receptors were first differentiated into H1 and H2 receptors by Ash and Schild in 1966, when it was found that some responses to histamine were blocked by low doses of mepyramine (pyrilamine), whereas others were insensitive. This classification was supported by the development of H2 receptor-selective antagonists, such as cimetidine and ranitidine. Both H1 and H2 receptors have been cloned. Both have the seven-transmembrane domain motif typical of G proteincoupled receptors. A third histamine receptor subtype, termed H3, has been described more recently; this receptor acts as an inhibitory autoreceptor in the central nervous system (Schultz et al., 1991).

a. H1 receptors. H1 receptors have been cloned from cows (Yamashita et al., 1991), rats (Fujimoto et al., 1993), guinea pigs (Horio et al., 1993), and humans (De Backer et al., 1993; Fukui et al., 1994). The published sequences suggest that there are surprisingly large differences among species, consistent with the sometimes marked differences in the responses to histamine among species, with lower activities in rats and mice, compared with guinea pigs and humans (Hill, 1990). H1 receptors mediate most of the effects of histamine that are relevant to asthma. H1 receptors have been demonstrated in animal and human lung by direct receptor binding techniques (Carswell and Nahorski, 1982; Casale et al., 1985). [3H]Mepyramine binding to human lung homogenates is complex, with at least three sites with different affinities (Casale et al., 1985). There have been no autoradiographic mapping studies, because of the unsuitability of currently available radioligands. Antigen-induced, IgE-dependent anaphylaxis in chopped human lung causes increases in both cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP) levels. The rise in cyclic GMP levels is blocked by an H1 receptor antagonist, suggesting that this response is linked to H1 receptor activation (Platshon and Kaliner, 1978). The effect of histamine on cyclic GMP levels in guinea pig lung is dependent on L-arginine, suggesting that H1 receptor stimulation increases the release of nitric oxide (NO), which subsequently increases cyclic GMP levels by activating soluble guanylyl cyclase (Leurs et al., 1991). The bronchoconstricting effect of histamine is enhanced by NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors, suggesting that the release of NO stimulated by histamine partially counteracts the direct bronchoconstricting action of airway smooth muscle H1 receptors (Nijkamp et al., 1993). This may not occur in human airways, because there is no increase in the bronchoconstriction response to histamine after inhalation of NOS inhibitors (Yates et al., 1995) and no increase in the levels of exhaled NO (Kharitonov et al., 1995).

Northern analysis has demonstrated that there is a high level of expression of H1 receptor messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) in lung (Yamashita et al., 1991; Horio et al., 1993; Fujimoto et al., 1993; De Backer et al., 1993; Fukui et al., 1994). H1 receptor mRNA is strongly expressed in bovine tracheal smooth muscle, and mRNA expression is inhibited by protein kinase C (PKC) activation (Pype et al., 1998). Because histamine stimulates PKC via PI hydrolysis through H1 receptor activation, this might be a mechanism of down-regulation of H1 receptors. However, exposure of bovine tracheal smooth muscle to histamine is not associated with any effect on H1 receptor mRNA levels, and regulation appears to be the result of phosphorylation of the receptor by an unidentified G protein-related kinase (Pype et al., 1998).

H1 receptors are coupled to PI turnover, with release of intracellular calcium ions. Thus, transfected H1 receptors are coupled to a rise in the intracellular calcium ion concentration ([Ca2+]i) (Irfdale et al., 1993). In airway smooth muscle cells, the contractile response to histamine is partly reduced by removal of extracellular Ca2+ and by treatment with calcium channel blockers (Cheng and Townley, 1983; Drazen et al., 1983). This suggests that the bronchoconstriction response to histamine is partly mediated by opening of voltage-dependent calcium channels. However, most of the contractile response is unaffected by extracellular Ca2+. Histamine stimulates a transient elevation of [Ca2+]i (measured as fura-2 fluorescence in cultured canine tracheal smooth muscle cells) that is largely independent of extracellular Ca2+ (Kotlikoff et al., 1987; Kotlikoff, 1988; Takuwa et al., 1988).

b. H2 receptors. H2 receptors have been cloned from dogs (Gantz et al., 1991b) and humans (Gantz et al., 1991a). Although H2 receptors are present in the airways, their clinical relevance is unclear, because H2 receptor antagonists have few measurable effects on airway function. H2 receptors have been detected in lung using [3H]tiotidine, although their cellular localization has not yet been reported (Foreman et al., 1985). Histamine stimulates an increase in cyclic AMP levels in lung fragments that is blocked by H2 receptor antagonists, indicating that H2 receptors are positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase in lung (Platshon and Kaliner, 1978).

c. H3 receptors. Although H3 receptors have also been identified in lung by binding studies (Arrang et al., 1987), functional studies are limited. The H3 receptor has not yet been cloned.

3. Effects on airways. a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE. Histamine stimulates PI hydrolysis in airway smooth muscle (Grandordy and Barnes, 1987; Hall and Hill, 1988; Daykin et al., 1993), and there is a close association of receptor occupancy, PI hydrolysis, and the contractile response, indicating that there are few or no "spare" receptors (Grandordy and Barnes, 1987). Histamine also increases the concentration of inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) in airway smooth muscle, although the magnitude of the increase is less than with cholinergic agonists, which may reflect lower receptor density (Chilvers et al., 1989). In cultured human airway smooth muscle cells, histamine increases [Ca2+]i via an increase in IP3 levels (Hardy et al., 1996).

Bronchoconstriction was one of the first recognized effects of histamine. Inhaled or intravenously administered histamine causes bronchoconstriction, which is inhibited by H1 receptor antagonists (such as chlorpheniramine, terfenadine, or astemizole). Histamine contracts both central and peripheral airways in vitro, with a more potent effect on peripheral airways. Asthmatic patients are more sensitive to the bronchoconstricting effects of inhaled and intravenously administered histamine than are normal individuals; this is a manifestation of airway hyperresponsiveness. However, there is little evidence for increased contractile responsiveness to histamine in asthmatic airways in vitro (Whicker et al., 1988), suggesting that the hyperresponsiveness to histamine in asthma is not the result of any change in histamine receptors in airway smooth muscle. In human airway smooth muscle in vitro, there is a certain degree of basal tone. This is reduced by H1 receptor antagonists, suggesting that basal release of histamine (presumably derived from mast cells) contributes to this tone (Ellis and Undem, 1994). This is consistent with the bronchodilating effects reported for intravenously administered chlorpheniramine and orally administered terfenadine in asthmatic patients but not in normal individuals (Eiser et al., 1981; Cookson, 1987).

Histamine also induces proliferation of cultured airway smooth muscle, and this is associated with increased expression of c-fos (Panettieri et al., 1990). It is not certain whether this effect of histamine is mediated by the H1 receptor but this is likely, because H1 receptor stimulation may activate PKC and thereby c-fos expression.

H2 receptors that mediate bronchodilation have been identified in some species, including cats, rats, rabbits, sheep, and horses (Chand and Eyre, 1975). In some species, such as rabbits, the H2 receptor-mediated response predominates, because histamine itself is a bronchodilator. Histamine increases cyclic AMP content in guinea pig tracheal smooth muscle cells, and this is blocked by an H2 receptor antagonist (Florio et al., 1992). Interestingly, dexamethasone enhances this response to histamine, without affecting the affinity or binding of H2 receptors. Human peripheral lung strips show a relaxation response to histamine via H2 receptors (Vincenc et al., 1984), although this is more likely to reflect a relaxation effect on pulmonary vessels, rather than peripheral airways. H2-selective blockers, such as cimetidine and ranitidine, do not cause bronchoconstriction in normal or asthmatic individuals and do not increase the bronchoconstriction response to inhaled histamine (Nogrady and Bevan, 1981; Thomson and Kerr, 1980; Braude et al., 1994). Similarly, the H2 receptor agonist impromidine has no effect on normal or asthmatic airways (White et al., 1987).

A defect in H2 receptor-mediated bronchodilation has been reported in sheep with allergic airway inflammation (Ahmed et al., 1983), and there is evidence that H2 receptor-mediated gastric secretion may be impaired in patients with asthma (Gonzalez and Ahmed, 1986). This has suggested that there may be a defect in H2 receptor function in asthmatic airways (Chand, 1980), although there is no direct evidence that this is the case.

Histamine-induced bronchoconstriction shows desensitization in some species, such as guinea pigs. This appears to be the result of release of prostaglandin (PG)E2 and is blocked by indomethacin (Orehek et al., 1975; Haye-Legrand et al., 1986). Similar desensitization to inhaled histamine has been reported in normal subjects and in patients with mild asthma (Manning and O'Byrne, 1988). This loss of effect is blocked by indomethacin and appears to be mediated by H2 receptors (Jackson et al., 1981). Histamine desensitization in human airways in vitro is mediated by H2 receptors and is blocked by indomethacin treatment and by epithelium removal (Knight et al., 1992). This may contribute to the enhanced bronchoconstricting effect of histamine in vitro after epithelium removal (Knight et al., 1990). Histamine may activate H2 receptors on epithelial cells to release PGE2, thus counteracting the bronchoconstricting action of histamine on airway smooth muscle (mediated by H1 receptors).

The H3 receptor agonist (R)-alpha -methylhistamine has no effect on airway smooth muscle tone in vitro or in vivo (Ichinose et al., 1989; Ichinose and Barnes, 1989a,b), and the H3 receptor antagonist thioperamide does not influence either basal activity or the bronchoconstriction response to histamine, suggesting that H3 receptors are not functionally expressed in airway smooth muscle. Furthermore, inhaled (R)-alpha -methylhistamine has no effect on airway function in asthmatic patients (O'Connor et al., 1993).

b. VESSELS. In human skin, histamine causes a vasodilating response (flare) that is mediated by H1 receptors. Human bronchial vessels are relaxed by low concentrations of histamine in vitro but are constricted by high concentrations (Liu et al., 1990). Both effects are blocked by mepyramine, indicating that H1 receptors are involved. It is likely that the vasodilating response is the result of the release of NO from endothelial cells and that the vasoconstricting effect is the result of the direct action of histamine on vascular smooth muscle H1 receptors. Histamine appears to increase airway blood flow in vivo, but there are doubts regarding whether this is mediated by H1 or H2 receptors because, even in the same species, different effects of H1 and H2 blockers have been reported (Long et al., 1985; Webber et al., 1988).

Histamine also causes plasma extravasation from postcapillary venules in the bronchial circulation, and this effect is blocked by H1 receptor antagonists. Measurement of plasma exudation in human airways is difficult, but it is likely that histamine induces plasma exudation, as in rodent airways. In support of this is the finding that histamine, when injected intradermally, causes a wheal that is blocked by H1 but not H2 antagonists (Summers et al., 1981). Whether histamine contributes to the plasma exudation seen after allergen challenge in humans has not been determined, but in guinea pigs antihistamines had marked inhibitory effects on allergen-induced plasma extravasation in proximal airways, whereas a LT inhibitor had a greater effect in more peripheral airways (Evans et al., 1989). Although histamine causes plasma extravasation in the airways, this makes relatively little contribution to the airway narrowing induced by histamine (Tokuyama et al., 1991).

Although vasodilating H2 receptors have been clearly demonstrated in human pulmonary vessels (Barnes and Liu, 1995), their role in the bronchial circulation is less well defined, and there appear to be species differences. In sheep and dogs, histamine induces an increase in bronchial blood flow that is mediated by H2 receptors (Long et al., 1985; Parsons et al., 1992b). In human bronchial vessels in vitro, the vasodilating action of histamine is not blocked by H2 antagonists (Liu et al., 1990). Lung permeability (measured by the clearance of 99mTc-labeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetate) is increased by inhaled histamine, and this is blocked by the H2 receptor antagonist ranitidine but not by the H1 receptor antagonist terfenadine (Braude et al., 1994). It is uncertain whether diethylenetriaminepentaacetate clearance measures alveolar or airway permeability or pulmonary blood flow.

c. SECRETIONS. Histamine stimulates the secretion of mucus glycoproteins in human airways in vitro, but this is not blocked by H1 antagonists and the H1 agonists 2-methylhistamine and 2-pyridylethylamine are without effect (Shelhamer et al., 1980). It is difficult to study the production of mucus from the lower respiratory tract in humans in vivo, but studies have been performed on the more accessible nasal secretions. Histamine induces a rise in secretory IgA and lactoferrin, which implies active glandular secretion, and this is blocked by chlorpheniramine, suggesting that H1 receptors are involved (Raphael et al., 1989).

Histamine also increases chloride ion transport in canine tracheal epithelial cells, and this response is blocked by H1 antagonists (Marin et al., 1977). In a bronchial epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B), histamine increases [Ca2+]i and releases a variety of mediators, including interleukin (IL)-6 and fibronectin, but not lipid mediators (Noah et al., 1991). These effects are probably mediated by H1 receptors. Histamine also increases the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and the surface marker HLA-DR in primary cultured human bronchial epithelial cells (Vignola et al., 1993). This effect is largely mediated by H1 receptors, but H2 antagonists at high concentrations also have an inhibitory effect. Interestingly, cycloheximide blocked these effects of histamine, suggesting that histamine induced the synthesis of a protein critical to these responses.

The increase in mucus glycoprotein secretion in human airways in vitro in response to histamine is blocked by cimetidine and mimicked by the H2 agonist dimaprit, confirming that H2 receptors are involved in this response (Shelhamer et al., 1980). However, the effect of histamine is very weak, compared with that of other secretagogues such as muscarinic agonists, suggesting that this effect of histamine is unlikely to be of major importance. Histamine is reported to directly activate rodent airway goblet cells via H2 receptors, but whether this is the case in human airways is not yet known (Tamaoki et al., 1997).

d. NERVES. In many species, the bronchoconstricting effect of histamine is partially mediated by a vagal cholinergic reflex and may be modulated by muscarinic receptor antagonists. In dogs, histamine increases the discharge of "irritant" receptors in vivo (Adelta -fibers), and these effects are abolished by H1 antagonists. However, in vitro measurements of single afferent fibers in guinea pig trachea show no evidence for activation of either Adelta - or C-fibers by histamine (Fox et al., 1993). This suggests that the in vivo effect of histamine on airway sensory nerves may be secondary to some other effect, such as bronchoconstriction. In guinea pig lung, histamine appears to release neuropeptides, such as SP and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), from capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves via H1 receptors (Saria et al., 1988).

Histamine also augments vagus nerve-induced bronchoconstriction in dogs, without increasing the response to acetylcholine (Loring et al., 1978; Kikuchi et al., 1984). The effect of histamine on cholinergic nerves is mediated, in part, by stimulation of acetylcholine release from postganglionic nerve terminals, because the enhancing effect of histamine in dogs is seen even after vagus nerve sectioning, which abolishes all reflex effects (Shore et al., 1983). This suggests that histamine acts on prejunctional H1 receptors to enhance acetylcholine release (Barnes, 1992a). In guinea pigs, there is evidence for direct activation of parasympathetic neurons by histamine, acting via H1 receptors (Myers and Undem, 1995). The role of cholinergic reflexes in the bronchoconstriction response to histamine in human airways is less certain. A significant reduction of the bronchoconstriction response to histamine after anticholinergic drug treatment was reported in some studies (Eiser and Guz, 1982), whereas others found no effect (Casterline et al., 1976). This may be related to the dose of histamine administered, because anticholinergic agents may block the bronchoconstricting effect of small, but not large, doses of inhaled histamine.

(R)-alpha -Methylhistamine has an inhibitory effect on vagus nerve-induced contraction of an innervated guinea pig tracheal tube preparation but has no effect on acetylcholine-induced contraction, indicating that it may modulate cholinergic neurotransmission (Ichinose et al., 1989). The inhibitory effect is greater for vagus nerve stimulation (preganglionic) than for electrical field stimulation (postganglionic), indicating that modulation occurs both at parasympathetic ganglia and at postganglionic nerve endings (Ichinose et al., 1989). These effects are blocked by thioperamide but not by mepyramine or cimetidine, indicating that H3 receptors are involved and presumably localized to parasympathetic ganglionic neurons and postganglionic cholinergic nerve terminals. Histamine, in the presence of H1 and H2 receptor antagonists, has similar inhibitory actions and has no effect at low concentrations. In human bronchi in vitro, an inhibitory effect of (R)-alpha -methylhistamine on electrical field stimulation-induced contraction, but not acetylcholine-induced contraction, is seen, indicating a similar inhibitory effect on postganglionic cholinergic nerves, which is inhibited by thioperamide (Ichinose and Barnes, 1989a). This demonstrates the presence of H3 receptors on cholinergic nerves in human airways.

Histamine may also exert prejunctional effects on the release of neuropeptides from airway sensory nerves, via H3 receptors. (R)-alpha -Methylhistamine has an inhibitory effect on vagus nerve-induced bronchoconstriction in guinea pig airways but has no effect on the equivalent degree of bronchoconstriction induced by tachykinins, indicating a modulatory effect on the release of tachykinins from sensory nerves. This effect is blocked by thioperamide, indicating that H3 receptors are involved (Ichinose and Barnes, 1989b). Similarly, (R)-alpha -methylhistamine inhibits vagus nerve-induced plasma extravasation, without affecting leakage induced by SP, indicating a modulatory effect of H3 receptors on neurogenic inflammation (Ichinose et al., 1990b). The functional relevance of the inhibition of H3 receptors on airway nerves may be that this acts as a protective inhibitory feedback mechanism (Barnes and Ichinose, 1989). There is a close relationship between airway mast cells and nerves. If mast cells exhibit a basal release of histamine in asthma, the low concentrations of histamine may act on H3 receptors on cholinergic nerve terminals and ganglia to inhibit neurotransmission and thus prevent activation of bronchoconstricting reflexes. Similarly, histamine inhibits the release of neuropeptides from sensory nerves in airways and thus prevent neurogenic leak. When mast cells are degranulated by allergen, there is a massive release of histamine, which overwhelms the H3 receptor system and predominantly activates H1 receptors on airway smooth muscle and endothelial cells.

e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS. Histamine may also have effects on inflammatory cells, and it has been found to influence the release of cytokines and inflammatory mediators from a variety of inflammatory and immune cells (Falvs and Merety, 1992). The relevance of this is uncertain, because H1 antagonists do not appear to have significant anti-inflammatory effects. Histamine is a selective chemoattractant for eosinophils (Clark et al., 1975) and activates human eosinophils, as reflected by a rise in [Ca2+]i (Raible et al., 1992). The nature of the receptor on eosinophils is not clear; the receptor does not fit into the H1/H2/H3 receptor classification system (Raible et al., 1994). Histamine also activates human alveolar macrophages to release beta -glucuronidase, and this effect is mediated by H1 receptors (Cluzel et al., 1990). Histamine stimulates suppressor T lymphocytes via H2 receptors, and there is some evidence that this function may be depressed in atopic individuals (Beer et al., 1982). IgE-mediated release of histamine from human basophils is inhibited by histamine itself acting via H2 receptors, although it is possible that H3 receptors are involved, because inhibition is seen with impromidine, which is now recognized to have H3 receptor-blocking effects. Therefore, H2 receptor antagonists may theoretically increase histamine release after allergen challenge, although H2 receptors have not been demonstrated in mast cells of human lung. Furthermore, a decrease, rather than an increase, in responsiveness to inhaled allergen after chronic treatment with cimetidine has been reported (Bergstrand et al., 1985).

H3 agonists inhibit the release and synthesis of histamine in central neurons (Schultz et al., 1991). It is possible that H3 receptors may similarly inhibit the synthesis and release of histamine in lung mast cells. Allergen-induced bronchoconstriction in sensitized guinea pigs is enhanced by thioperamide but is unaffected by cimetidine, whereas it is almost completely abolished by mepyramine (Ichinose and Barnes, 1990b). Because thioperamide has no effect on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction, this strongly suggests that histamine released from pulmonary mast cells by allergen challenge normally inhibits further release via H3 receptors on mast cells (autoinhibition). Histamine inhibits the release of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha from rodent mast cells, and this appears to be mediated by H2 and H3 receptors (Bissonnette, 1996). When these receptors are inhibited, this results in enhanced histamine release. Whether H3 receptors are important in regulating the synthesis of histamine in these cells is not yet known, and it is also uncertain whether H3 receptors are expressed in human mast cells.

4. Role in asthma. a. RELEASE. Measurement of histamine in the circulation is complicated by the spontaneous release from basophils, and measurement of stable metabolites in the urine may not reflect release from mast cells in the airways. Several previous studies demonstrated elevations of plasma histamine concentrations in patients with asthma, at rest, after exercise, at night, and after allergen challenge, but these studies are difficult to interpret because of the likelihood of contamination from basophil release in the collected blood samples (Ind et al., 1983). It is possible that basophils from patients with asthma may be more "leaky" and that this may contribute to the higher concentrations measured in asthmatic patients. Studies of histamine infusions in normal volunteers have demonstrated that doses of histamine that yield the plasma concentrations reported in patients with asthma have marked cardiovascular effects, indicating that the higher levels seen in the blood of asthmatic patients are likely to be generated in vitro during storage and preparation of the plasma samples. The histamine released from the airways may increase plasma concentrations, but this may be overwhelmed by the contribution from circulating basophils. Sampling closer to the site of histamine release may overcome these problems. Venous sampling in the arm shows an increase in plasma histamine concentrations after mast cell degranulation in the skin of the arm, induced by SP (Barnes et al., 1986), but such sampling is not feasible in the airways. Measurement of histamine in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is likely to provide a much more direct measurement of airway histamine release. There is evidence that histamine concentrations are elevated in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of asthmatic patients, both at rest and after allergen challenge (Liu et al., 1991; Wenzel et al., 1988). The source of histamine is presumed to be mucosal mast cells, and the contribution of infiltrating basophils is unclear.

b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS. Histamine mediates most of its effects on airway function via H1 receptors, suggesting that H1 antagonists may have therapeutic effects in airway disease. Nonsedating potent H1 receptor antagonists, such as terfenadine, loratidine, and astemizole, may be given in large doses but, although these antihistamines have useful clinical effects in allergic rhinitis, they are far from effective for asthmatic patients, as demonstrated in a recent meta-analysis of clinical trials (Van Ganse et al., 1997). The effects of antihistamines, even when taken in high doses, are small and clinically insignificant (Simmons and Simons, 1994). Terfenadine causes approximately 50% inhibition of the immediate response to allergen but has no effect on the late response. Antihistamines cause a small degree of bronchodilation in asthmatic patients, indicating a certain degree of histamine "tone," presumably resulting from the basal release of histamine from activated mast cells, as discussed above. Chronic administration of terfenadine has a small clinical effect among patients with mild allergic asthma (Taytard et al., 1987) but is far less effective than other antiasthma therapies; therefore, these drugs cannot be recommended for the routine management of asthma. Some new antihistamines, such as cetirizine and azelastine, have been shown to have beneficial effects in asthma (Spector et al., 1995; Busse et al., 1996), but this may be unrelated to their H1 antagonist effects (Walsh, 1994).

H2 antagonists, such as cimetidine and ranitidine, may be contraindicated in asthma on theoretical grounds, if H2 receptors are important in counteracting the bronchoconstricting effect of histamine. In clinical practice, however, there is no evidence that H2 antagonists have any deleterious effect in asthma.

H3 receptor agonists may have some theoretical benefit in asthma, because they may modulate cholinergic bronchoconstriction and inhibit neurogenic inflammation. Although (R)-alpha -methylhistamine relaxes rodent peripheral airways in vitro (Burgaud et al., 1992), it has no effect, when given by inhalation, on airway caliber or metabisulfite-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients, indicating that a useful clinical effect is unlikely (O'Connor et al., 1993).

c. CONCLUSIONS. Histamine is produced from mast cells in asthmatic airways and exerts many effects that are relevant to the pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma, including bronchoconstriction, plasma exudation, and mucus secretion. There is also evidence for an effect on the inflammatory process, particularly eosinophils. However, antihistamine H1 antagonists have been disappointing in asthma therapy, and this presumably reflects the fact that all of the actions of histamine are mimicked by other mediators. New and more potent antihistamines appear to have greater beneficial effects in asthma, so that histamine may have a more important role than previously recognized.

B. Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine)

Serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)] causes bronchoconstriction in most animal species, but interest in this mediator is minimal because it is not a constrictor of human airways and its relevance in asthma seems doubtful (Barnes et al., 1988).

1. Synthesis and metabolism. Serotonin is formed by decarboxylation of tryptophan (obtained in the diet) and is stored in secretory granules. Serotonin is present in mast cell granules from rodents but not humans. The major source of serotonin in humans is platelets, but serotonin is also found in neuroendocrine cells of the respiratory tract and has been localized to peripheral nerves.

2. Receptors. Multiple serotonin receptors have now been recognized, based on the development of selective antagonists and molecular cloning (Saxena, 1995). There are up to seven types of 5-HT receptors, each with several subtypes. Selective antagonists have now become available for clinical use, but few have been used in investigations of human airway cells or in the treatment of patients with asthma.

3. Effects on airways. Serotonin does not constrict human airway smooth muscle in vitro and may even have bronchodilating effects, although pulmonary vessels are constricted as expected (Raffestin et al., 1985). In animals, serotonin increases acetylcholine release from airway nerves, and this has been demonstrated in human airways (Takahashi et al., 1995). The receptor mediating this response appears to be a 5-HT3 receptor (Takahashi et al., 1995). In guinea pig airways, serotonin inhibits nonadrenergic noncholinergic (NANC), neurally induced constriction resulting from tachykinin release via a 5-HT1-like receptor localized to sensory nerve endings (Ward et al., 1994; Dupont et al., 1996). In humans, infused serotonin has no effect on airway function but may have an inhibitory effect on cough reflexes, possibly mediated by receptors on airway sensory nerves (Stone et al., 1993). Serotonin is a potent inducer of microvascular leakage in rodent airways, but it is not certain whether serotonin has this property in human airways. Serotonin has a blocking effect on sodium channels in human airway epithelial cells, but the receptor subtype involved has not been established (Graham et al., 1992).

4. Role in asthma. Plasma serotonin levels are reported to be elevated in asthma and are significantly related to asthma severity (Lechin et al., 1996). The source of serotonin is likely to be platelets, but the clinical relevance of this observation is unclear.

In animals, serotonin constricts airways via activation of 5-HT2 receptors on airway smooth muscle cells. The 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ketanserin has no effect on airway function but exerts a small inhibitory effect on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients (Cazzola et al., 1990). Inhaled ketanserin has no effect on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction but exerts a small inhibitory effect on adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction, indicating a possible action on mast cells (Cazzola et al., 1992).

C. Adenosine

1. Synthesis and metabolism. Adenosine is a purine nucleoside that is produced by dephosphorylation of 5'-AMP by the membrane-associated enzyme 5'-nucleotidase and is liberated intracellularly by cleavage of the high energy bonds of adenosine triphosphate, adenosine diphosphate, and cyclic 5'-AMP. However, during hypoxia or even excessive cell stimulation, when the utilization of energy and oxygen exceeds the supply, 5'-AMP is metabolized to adenosine (Mentzer et al., 1975). This conversion is performed by extracellular 5'-nucleotidase. Adenosine release was originally demonstrated during myocardial hypoxia (Mentzer et al., 1975), although there is now evidence that all cells are capable of producing adenosine in times of energy deficit. Adenosine can be released by lung tissue in times of hypoxia, such as after allergen-induced bronchoconstriction, when the circulating levels of adenosine have been shown to be 3 times the base-line concentrations (Mann et al., 1986). Mast cells are a likely source of adenosine in this situation, because these cells have been shown to be capable of releasing adenosine in response to IgE cross-linking and other stimuli for mast cell activation (Marquardt et al., 1986).

2. Receptors. Three distinct subtypes of receptor have been characterized to date, based on biochemical, functional, and more recent cloning studies (Linden et al., 1991; Linden, 1994). These receptors include the A1, A2a, A2b, and A3 receptor subtypes. Interaction of adenosine with these receptors leads to either inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (A1), stimulation of adenylyl cyclase (A2a and A2b) (Collis and Hourani, 1993), or activation of phospholipase C (A3) (Ali et al., 1990). The A1 receptor is expressed in lung tissue (Ren and Stiles, 1994) and, in particular, A1 receptors have been identified on human epithelial cells (McCoy et al., 1995). The classification of adenosine receptors into A2a and A2b subtypes is based on distinct rank orders of potency of a range of agonists and antagonists and distinct nucleotide sequences of the two complementary deoxyribonucleic acids (cDNAs). A2a, A2b, and A3 receptors are expressed in several tissues, including lungs, and in mast cells and fibroblasts (Linden et al., 1993; Auchampach et al., 1997; Ciruela et al., 1997; Shryock and Belardinelli, 1997; Fredholm, 1997).

3. Effects on airways. a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE. Adenosine elicits little or no contraction of human bronchi from nonasthmatic subjects but potently constricts asthmatic airways in vitro (Björck et al., 1992). This constriction is blocked by histamine and LT antagonists and is therefore likely to be attributable to the release of mediators from mast cells in asthmatic airways. It is likely that the bronchoconstricting effects of adenosine are indirect, resulting from the activation of mast cell degranulation, because adenosine causes histamine release from mast cells (Church et al., 1986). Comparable results have been observed in vivo, where adenosine and AMP are able to elicit bronchoconstricting effects in atopic and asthmatic subjects but have no effect in normal subjects (Cushley et al., 1983). Furthermore, dipyridamole (an inhibitor of adenosine uptake into tissues) enhances adenosine-induced bronchospasm in asthmatic subjects (Crimi et al., 1988), an effect that can be inhibited by theophylline (a nonselective adenosine antagonist) (Cushley et al., 1984). The receptor mediating the bronchoconstricting effect of adenosine in asthma is not yet known. In rabbits, the A1 receptor is a likely candidate, because tracheal strips from rabbits immunized with house dust mites are more responsive to adenosine and the adenosine A1-selective agonist cyclopentyladenosine than are tracheal strips isolated from naive animals (Ali et al., 1994a). Furthermore, immunized animals are considerably more responsive to the bronchoconstricting effects of adenosine (Thorne and Broadley, 1994) and cyclopentyladenosine in vivo (Ali et al., 1994b; el Hashim et al., 1996). No bronchoconstricting effects of the A3-selective agonist aminophenylethyladenosine have been found in rabbits (el Hashim et al., 1996) or guinea pigs (Hannon et al., 1995), although studies in rats have shown that aminophenylethyladenosine can elicit bronchoconstriction (Meade et al., 1996). The histamine-releasing effect of adenosine may involve the A2b receptor, because this effect is sensitive to enprofylline (an A2b receptor antagonist) (Feoktistov and Biaggioni, 1995). Certainly, there is clinical evidence showing that elevated levels of histamine can be demonstrated in plasma after the inhalation of AMP by atopic subjects (Phillips et al., 1990), and increased levels of histamine have been detected after the instillation of AMP directly into the airways (Polosa et al., 1995). Furthermore, the H1 receptor antagonist terfenadine has a protective effect against adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects (Rafferty et al., 1987).

b. VESSELS. Adenosine has been shown to have a wide range of effects in the cardiovascular system, which are well beyond the scope of this review (Olsson and Pearson, 1990). However, in the context of asthma, adenosine acting as a vasodilator can function synergistically with several inflammatory mediators, leading to increased vascular permeability. If adenosine release occurs in the vicinity of degranulating mast cells, such interactions may contribute to the edema that accompanies allergic responses in the airway.

c. NERVES. Another possible explanation for adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction is that it occurs secondarily to the activation of a neuronal reflex. Adenosine and related molecules have long been known to modulate synaptic transmission, although adenosine has been reported not to influence cholinergic responses in human trachea (Bai et al., 1989) or contraction of guinea pig trachea induced by electrical field stimulation (Grundström et al., 1981). Data obtained from in vivo experiments are inconclusive; some investigators failed to show any effect of the muscarinic receptor antagonist ipratropium bromide on the airway effects of inhaled adenosine (Mann et al., 1985), whereas other groups observed a significant effect of atropine or ipratropium bromide on adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction (Crimi et al., 1992). Furthermore, it has been suggested that AMP-induced effects in the airway may be secondary to the activation of sensory C-fibers (Polosa et al., 1992b), a suggestion supported by clinical observations showing that the airway effects induced by inhaled adenosine or AMP can be inhibited by sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil sodium (drugs that can attenuate C-fiber function). The neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitor phosphoramidon, which should enhance tachykinin-mediated effects, also has no effect on adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction responses (Polosa et al., 1997b).

d. INFLAMMATORY CELLS. Adenosine is a potent mediator of mast cell degranulation, as described above, and therefore may contribute to the inflammatory changes observed in asthma. On the other hand, adenosine inhibits eosinophil degranulation (Yukawa et al., 1989). A3 receptors have been recently identified on human eosinophils (Walker et al., 1997), and activation of these receptors by adenosine inhibits eosinophil migration (Knight et al., 1997). Activation of A3 receptors on eosinophils has also been shown to lead to an increase in [Ca2+]i (Kohno et al., 1996).

4. Role in asthma. a. RELEASE. Increased levels of adenosine have been found in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained from asthmatic subjects, compared with normal subjects (Driver et al., 1993), and, as discussed above, adenosine concentrations in plasma are higher in allergic patients minutes after allergen provocation (Mann et al., 1986). A3 receptor expression is increased in asthmatic lungs, compared with lungs of normal subjects, although, because the A3 receptor is expressed predominantly in eosinophils, this may be a reflection of eosinophilic infiltration (Walker et al., 1997).

b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS. No specific receptor antagonists for adenosine have been evaluated against adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction in humans. Dipyridamole (an inhibitor of adenosine uptake) enhances adenosine-induced bronchospasm in asthmatic patients when administered intravenously or by inhalation (Crimi et al., 1988), an effect that can be inhibited by theophylline (an adenosine receptor antagonist) (Cushley et al., 1984). Adenosine-induced bronchospasm can also be inhibited by a variety of other drugs, including the H1 antagonist terfenadine (Rafferty et al., 1987), the cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor indomethacin (Crimi et al., 1989), and sodium cromoglycate (Crimi et al., 1988), although this does not provide direct evidence for the involvement of adenosine in asthma. Because theophylline has other actions (including nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibition) that may contribute to its antiasthma effect, these findings cannot be taken as evidence for a role for adenosine, and studies with more selective adenosine antagonists are needed.

The role of endogenous adenosine in allergic responses has not been evaluated because of the lack of suitable drugs to test. However, the recent discovery that enprofylline is a selective A2b receptor antagonist has provided a possible tool to evaluate the role of adenosine in allergic responses (Feoktistov and Biaggioni, 1995). This observation also raises the distinct possibility that some of the therapeutic activity of enprofylline and other xanthines, such as theophylline, may in part be related to inhibition of adenosine receptors (Pauwels and Joos, 1995). Furthermore, recent studies using an antisense oligonucleotide against the A1 receptor showed that a reduction in A1 receptors had a very significant effect on allergen-induced bronchospasm and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled histamine in an allergic rabbit model (Nyce and Metzger, 1997). Such results, if confirmed in human studies, would suggest that the A1 receptor may play an important role in the pathogenesis of allergic airway disease.

c. CONCLUSIONS. Adenosine is likely to play some role in asthma, because it is produced as part of the stress response and this may be particularly important during exacerbations. Its effects in asthma are largely explained by an effect on sensitized mast cells, via A2b receptors, and this appears to be specific for asthma. The mechanism by which A2b receptors are expressed or activated in asthma is not yet known, but there is a strong indication that the development of a specific A2b receptor antagonist may be useful in asthma

    III. Lipid-Derived Mediators
Top
Previous
Next
References

A. Prostanoids

Prostanoids include PGs and thromboxane (Tx), which are generated from arachidonic acid, usually by the action of COX (PGH2 synthase).

1. Synthesis and metabolism. Prostanoids are generated from arachidonic acid by two forms of COX (Mitchell et al., 1995). COX-1 is constitutive and is responsible for basal release of prostanoids, whereas COX-2 is inducible by inflammatory stimuli, such as endotoxin and proinflammatory cytokines, and its induction is inhibited by glucocorticoids. Both COX-1 and COX-2 are expressed in human lung (Demoly et al., 1997). Human airway epithelial cells basally express COX-1, whereas COX-2 is induced by IL-1beta and TNF-alpha (Mitchell et al., 1994; Newton et al., 1997b; Asano et al., 1997) and is enhanced by NO (Watkins et al., 1997). COX-2 is also induced in cultured human airway smooth muscle cells by proinflammatory cytokines and bradykinin (Belvisi et al., 1997; Pang and Knox, 1997a,b), and the formation of prostanoids is blocked by the selective COX-2 inhibitor L745,337 (Saunders et al., 1998). COX-2 expression is inhibited by dexamethasone in both epithelial cells and smooth muscle cells. The induction of COX-2 is regulated in part by NF-kappa B, and this may also account for the inhibitory action of glucocorticoids (Newton et al., 1997a). There is no difference in the profiles of prostanoids formed by COX-1 and COX-2. In epithelial cells and airway smooth muscle cells, the predominant prostanoids are PGE2 and 6-keto-PGF1alpha (metabolite of PGI2), whereas there is relatively little formation of Tx (Mitchell et al., 1994; Belvisi et al., 1997). Tx is formed from the intermediate PGH2 by a distinct enzyme, Tx synthase, which has been cloned (Ohashi et al., 1992).

Recently, a novel nonenzymatic pathway for prostanoid formation was described. Isoprostanes are generated by lipid peroxidation of arachidonic acid by oxidative stress (Morrow and Roberts, 1996). The most prevalent isoprostane in humans is 8-epi-PGF2alpha , which is a potent constrictor of human airways in vitro (Kawikova et al., 1996). All cells in the airway have the capacity to release prostanoids, but the profile of prostanoids released depends on the cell type and on the form of cell stimulation, as discussed below.

2. Receptors. Several prostanoid receptors have now been cloned (Ushikubi et al., 1995; Pierce et al., 1995). Pharmacologically, prostanoid receptors are classified according to the prostanoid that causes selective activation; PGE2 preferentially activates EP receptors, PGI2 (prostacyclin) activates IP receptors, PGF2alpha activates FP receptors, PGD2 activates DP receptors, and Tx activates TP receptors (Coleman et al., 1994). Within each receptor type there may be distinct subtypes, many of which have been identified using selective ligands and cloning; the EP receptor has at least four subtypes, which are differentially expressed in different cell types. EP1 receptors mediate activation responses and are involved in hyperalgesic responses, whereas EP2 and EP4 receptors mediate smooth muscle relaxation responses and EP3 receptors modulate neurotransmitter release. In airway smooth muscle, several constrictor PGs (PGD2, PGF2alpha , and 8-epi-PGF2alpha ) appear to work through activation of TP receptors (Coleman and Sheldrick, 1989; Kawikova et al., 1996).

3. Effects on airways. a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE. PGE2 relaxes human airway smooth muscle in vitro via EP receptors (Knight et al., 1995). The relaxation response to PGE2 in human airways is mediated by EP2 receptors (McKenniff et al., 1988), but in animal airways an EP1 receptor subtype is also involved (Ndukwu et al., 1997). Inhaled PGE2 causes bronchodilation in normal subjects (Walters and Davies, 1982) but may cause constriction in patients with asthma because of activation of reflex cholinergic bronchoconstriction. Inhaled PGE2 protects against exercise-, metabisulfite-, and allergen-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients, however (Melillo et al., 1994; Pavord et al., 1992, 1993). PGI2 is less potent than PGE2 in relaxing human airways in vitro (Tamaoki et al., 1993) and, in contrast to PGE2, does not protect against histamine-induced contraction (Knight et al., 1995). Inhaled PGI2 has little effect on airway function (Hardy et al., 1985).

In contrast, PGF2alpha , PGD2, 8-epi-PGF2alpha , and Tx cause bronchoconstriction of human airways in vitro, and all are antagonized by TP receptor antagonists (Coleman and Sheldrick, 1989; Kawikova et al., 1996). Both PGF2alpha and PGD2, when inhaled, cause bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients (Hardy et al., 1984; Fish et al., 1984). The stable Tx analogue U46619 is a potent constrictor in asthmatic patients, and this effect is mediated in part via acetylcholine release (Jones et al., 1992; Saroea et al., 1995). There is considerable evidence obtained with animals to suggest that TxA2 is involved in airway hyperresponsiveness, but this is not supported by studies in asthmatic patients (O'Byrne and Fuller, 1989).

Prostanoids also have effects on airway smooth muscle proliferation. PGE2 inhibits proliferation of human airway smooth muscle in vitro after stimulation with fetal calf serum or growth factors (Johnson et al., 1995; Panettieri et al., 1995); because PGE2 is the major product of COX-2 induced by inflammatory stimuli in human airway smooth muscle, this provides an inhibitory feedback mechanism (Saunders et al., 1998). Tx increases proliferation of rabbit airway smooth muscle (Noveral and Grunstein, 1992).

b. VESSELS. PGE2 and PGI2 are vasodilators and therefore should theoretically increase leakage in asthmatic airways. Tx is a potent vasoconstrictor, but it potently increases plasma exudation in guinea pig airways (Lötvall et al., 1992; Tokuyama et al., 1992). The isoprostane 8-epi-PGF2alpha , like Tx, increases plasma exudation in rodent airways (Okazawa et al., 1997).

c. SECRETIONS. Prostanoids stimulate airway mucus secretion in various animal species, but few studies have been conducted in human airways.

d. NERVES. PGE2 inhibits cholinergic nerve constriction of human airways in vitro at concentrations lower than those that cause bronchoconstriction, suggesting that there is an inhibitory effect on acetylcholine release, presumably mediated by an EP3 receptor (Ellis and Conanan, 1996). In animals, this has been confirmed by measurements of acetylcholine after neural stimulation (Barnes, 1992a). In rat airways, PGE2 also inhibits neurogenic inflammation, suggesting an inhibitory action on tachykinin release from sensory nerves (Morikawa et al., 1992). Inhaled PGE2 causes coughing in normal and asthmatic subjects and increases the sensitivity of the cough reflex (Chaudry et al., 1989; Stone et al., 1992). This may be mediated by EP1 receptors. In addition, PGE2 inhalation increases the sensation of dyspnea (Taguchi et al., 1992). PGF2alpha also induces coughing but does not appear to sensitize the cough reflex (Stone et al., 1992). Tx increases the release of acetylcholine from cholinergic nerves in animals in vitro (Chung et al., 1985), and the bronchoconstriction response to inhaled U46619 is attenuated by prior treatment with a cholinergic antagonist (Saroea et al., 1995).

e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS. Prostanoids have effects on the release of inflammatory mediators from inflammatory cells. This has been most carefully studied with PGE2, which inhibits the release of mediators from mast cells, monocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils (Giembycz et al., 1990; Peters et al., 1982; Talpain et al., 1995; Meja et al., 1997). The EP receptors involved are probably EP2 receptors. The effect of PGE2 on T lymphocytes is less clearly delineated; PGE2 favors the development of helper T (Th)2 cells by inhibiting IL-2 and interferon (IFN)-gamma production in human CD4+ cells (Hilkens et al., 1995) and inhibiting the secretion of IL-12 from macrophages (Van der Pouw Kraan et al., 1995). Furthermore, culture of dendritic cells in the presence of PGE2 results in Th2 cell differentiation and increased synthesis of IL-5 (Kalinski et al., 1997). However, with an allergen challenge, inhaled PGE2 protects against the late response as well as the early response, suggesting that its anti-inflammatory action against eosinophils may predominate over its T cell action (Pavord et al., 1993). The effects of other prostanoids on inflammatory cells are less clear. Tx causes airway hyperresponsiveness in animal models, but this has not been seen in human studies with inhaled U46619 (Jones et al., 1992).

4. Role in asthma. a. RELEASE. Bronchoalveolar lavage studies have demonstrated increased concentrations of PGF2alpha , PGD2, and TxB2 in patients with asthma (Liu et al., 1990; Oosterhoff et al., 1995; Dworski et al., 1994; Smith et al., 1992). PGD2 is the prostanoid present in highest concentration, and this is correlated with an increase in mast cell tryptase, indicating the likely mast cell origin of the mediator. After allergen challenge, there is an increase in PGD2 and TxB2 levels (Dworski et al., 1994). A urinary metabolite of Tx (11-dehydro-TxB2) is increased in asthmatic subjects after challenge with allergen (Kumlin et al., 1992). COX-2 shows increased expression in the airways of asthmatic patients and is presumably induced by proinflammatory cytokines (Demoly et al., 1997). In peripheral leukocytes of asthmatic patients, there is increased expression of COX-1 and COX-2 mRNA (Kuitert et al., 1996).

b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS. Nonselective COX inhibitors, including aspirin and flurbiprofen, have little or no beneficial effect in challenge studies or in the treatment of clinical asthma, but this may be because they block production of both bronchoconstricting (PGD2, PGF2alpha , and TxA2) and bronchodilating (PGE2 and PGI2) mediators. Specific Tx synthase inhibitors have been developed for use in asthma. Ozagrel (ONO-046), a moderately potent orally active Tx synthase inhibitor, reduces airway hyperresponsiveness to cholinergic agonists when given orally or by aerosol, but the effect is very small and unlikely to be of clinical significance (Fujimura et al., 1990a,b). Another, more potent, Tx synthase inhibitor, pirmagrel (CGS13080), completely prevents the increase in serum TxB2 levels after allergen challenge in asthmatic patients. Although it causes a very small reduction in the early response to allergen, there is no effect on the late response or on airway hyperresponsiveness (Manning et al., 1991). Several TP receptor antagonists have also been studied in asthma and have the advantage over Tx synthase inhibitors that they inhibit the bronchoconstricting effects of PGF2alpha , PGD2, and 8-epi-PGF2alpha , in addition to TxA2. Vapiprost (GR32191) has no effect on airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients after 3 weeks of administration (Stenton et al., 1992) and no effect in exercise-induced asthma (Finnerty et al., 1991), whereas another TP receptor antagonist, ramatroban (Bay u3405), has a small effect on methacholine responsiveness (Aizawa et al., 1996). However, ramatroban is ineffective against exercise-induced asthma, at a dose that blocks PGD2induced bronchoconstriction, and is ineffective against histamine and bradykinin challenge (Magnussen et al., 1992; Johnston et al., 1992; Rajakulasingam et al., 1996). The potent TP receptor antagonist seratrodast has a small bronchodilating effect after prolonged administration (Samara et al., 1997). Overall, neither Tx synthase inhibitors nor receptor antagonists have useful clinical effects in asthma, suggesting that bronchoconstrictor prostanoids do not play a major role in the pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma.

PGE2, in contrast, may be important in protecting against bronchoconstriction and controlling the inflammatory response (Pavord and Tattersfield, 1995). Inhibition of PGE2 formation by COX inhibitors may therefore be potentially detrimental. Indeed, in a small proportion of asthmatic patients, aspirin and other nonselective COX inhibitors induce asthma (Szczeklik, 1997). Aspirin challenge in aspirin-sensitive patients inhibits the formation of PGE2 and increases LT formation but, surprisingly, also increases concentrations of PGD2 and PGF2alpha (Szczeklik et al., 1996b). PGE2 inhalation protects against asthma induced by inhaled lysine-aspirin in aspirin-sensitive asthmatic patients (Szczeklik et al., 1996a). Selective COX-2 inhibitors, such as L745,337 and A398, may also prove to be safe in patients with aspirin-sensitive asthma, because it is possible that bronchoconstriction in these patients may be the result of inhibition of PGE2 synthesis by COX-1. Nimesulide, a COX-2 selective blocker, is reported to be well tolerated in aspirin-sensitive asthmatics (Senna et al., 1996). PGE2 may have additional therapeutic potential in asthma, but its tendency to induce coughing is a serious limitation. Because the receptors on sensory nerves (probably EP1 receptors) differ from those that mediate bronchodilation and inhibition of anti-inflammatory effects (mainly EP2 receptors), selective EP agonists (such as butaprost) may be more useful.

c. CONCLUSIONS. Prostanoids are produced in asthmatic airways and appear to have several effects on the airways, including bronchoconstriction, plasma exudation, sensitization of nerve endings, and effects on inflammatory cells, which are mediated by prostanoid receptors. However, inhibition of their formation with COX or Tx synthase inhibitors or inhibition of TP receptors does not appear to benefit asthmatic patients. One possibility is that COX inhibitors, while blocking the formation of bronchoconstricting prostanoids (PGD2, PGF2alpha , and TxA2), also inhibit the formation of the bronchodilating PGs (PGE2 and PGI2), which may counteract these effects. Furthermore, isoprostanes may be formed in response to oxidative stress in asthma, and their formation occurs independently of COX function.

B. Leukotrienes

There is increasing evidence that LTs play an important role in the pathophysiological changes of asthma. This has mainly been provided by studies with potent inhibitors of LT receptors, which are now in clinical use for asthma therapy.

1. Synthesis and metabolism. LTs are potent lipid mediators produced by arachidonic acid metabolism in cell or nuclear membranes. They are derived from arachidonic acid, which is released from membrane phospholipids via the activation of phospholipase A2. Arachidonic acid is subsequently metabolized by the enzyme 5-LO, to produce LTs. The free 5-LO enzyme is found in the cytoplasm and cannot metabolize arachidonic acid. However, after the free 5-LO has been activated, it is translocated to the nuclear membrane, where a membrane-bound protein termed 5-LO-activating protein stabilizes the translocated 5-LO, thus allowing the transformation of arachidonic acid into LTA4 (Evans et al., 1991). Recently, a family of mutations of 5-LO genes have been reported in asthmatics. These are characterized by a variable number of tandem repeat segments in the promoter region, and they modify reporter gene transcription. This may account for differences in the susceptibility of patients to drugs modifying 5-LO activity (In et al., 1997). LTA4 is further metabolized to LTC4 (via the activation of LTC4 synthase) or to LTB4 (by LTA4 hydrolase). After release into the extracellular environment, LTC4 can be further metabolized to LTD4 and LTE4 by cleavage of the peptide side chain of LTC4. Several types of airway cells, including mast cells, eosinophils, macrophages, neutrophils, and epithelial cells, can synthesize LTs in response to a variety of stimuli. LTB4, synthesized predominantly by LTA4 hydrolase in neutrophils, is an extremely potent activator of neutrophils, causing aggregation, chemotaxis, and degranulation (Ford-Hutchinson, 1991; Brain and Williams, 1990). LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4 are the active constituents of what was once termed "slow reacting substance of anaphylaxis."

2. Receptors. The biological effects of LTs occur through their ability to stimulate specific receptors, which have been identified on several cell types. There are probably multiple receptors, although two major classes have been well characterized. The BLT receptors are activated by LTB4 and to a lesser extent by 20-OH-LTB4 and 12-(R)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (HETE). The BLT receptor is a 60-kDa plasma membrane protein (Miki et al., 1990) and has recently been cloned (Yokomizo et al., 1997). Cys-LTs act via cys-LT receptors, of which two types have been pharmacologically characterized. Cys-LT1 receptors mediate all of the known airway effects of cys-LTs in human cells (Coleman et al., 1995). A second receptor type, the cys-LT2 receptor, has been described on pulmonary veins, on the basis of responses to certain LT antagonists (Metters, 1995; Gorenne et al., 1996). To date, none of these LT receptors has been cloned.

3. Effects on airways. a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE. Cys-LTs are very potent contractile agents for human bronchi in vitro, being approximately 1000 times more potent than histamine, and they elicit this effect via activation of cys-LT1 receptors (Krell et al., 1990). There is a certain degree of tone in human airways in vitro, and this is partly mediated by cys-LTs, because it can be reduced by 5-LO inhibitors and by cys-LT1 receptor antagonists (Ellis and Undem, 1994). The ability of cys-LTs to act as potent bronchoconstricting agents has also been demonstrated in vivo, both in normal subjects and in patients with asthma (Drazen, 1988). Inhaled LTD4 also increases the maximal airway narrowing induced by inhaled methacholine (Bel et al., 1987), and LTE4 induces airway hyperresponsiveness to inhaled histamine, an effect that may persist for several days (Arm et al., 1988; O'Hickey et al., 1991). LTB4 has no direct effect on human airway smooth muscle and does not cause bronchodilation after inhalation in asthmatic patients, even when combined with PGD2 (Black et al., 1989a). Cys-LTs may also stimulate airway smooth muscle proliferation (Cohen et al., 1995), although this has not yet been shown for human airway smooth muscle and may be secondary to release of Tx.

b. VESSELS. Cys-LTs potently elicit increased vascular permeability in airways, leading to airway edema (Arakawa et al., 1993; Henderson, 1994). The potential importance of allergen-induced edema in the airways has been demonstrated with the use of 5-LO inhibitors in experimental animals (Hui et al., 1991), although such studies have yet to be performed with asthmatic patients.

c. SECRETION. Cys-LTs increase mucus secretion, both directly via effects on goblet cells and submucosal gland cells (Hoffstein et al., 1990; Goswami et al., 1989) and indirectly via the activation of airway nerves, leading to reflex secretion from submucosal glands (Marom et al., 1982).

d. NERVES. In guinea pigs, LTD4-induced bronchoconstriction and plasma exudation are partly mediated by tachykinin release, suggesting that LTD4 releases neuropeptides from sensory nerves (Ishikawa et al., 1996). This is unlikely to be relevant in vivo in humans, because inhaled LTD4 does not cause coughing and there is no effect of an anticholinergic drug on the bronchoconstriction response (Ayala et al., 1988).

e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS. LTB4 and 5-HETE are potent stimuli for leukocyte function, including chemotaxis and aggregation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (Ford Hutchinson, 1990), effects that are mediated by activation of BLT receptors (Rola Pleszczynski and Stankova, 1992). Furthermore, LTB4 elicits eosinophilic infiltration into guinea pig skin (Faccioli et al., 1991) and airways (Silbaugh et al., 1987) and is a potent activator of the oxidative burst in eosinophils (Perkins et al., 1995). Specific inhibitors of 5-LO inhibit allergen-induced eosinophilic infiltration in guinea pig skin (Teixeira et al., 1994) and airways (Tohda et al., 1997) and in mouse airways, where they also block mucus secretion (Henderson et al., 1996). Furthermore, LTB4 antagonists block allergen-induced eosinophilic infiltration into guinea pig lungs (Richards et al., 1989, 1991), although this finding has not been confirmed in other studies (Seeds et al., 1995). In contrast to the potent effects of LTB4 in guinea pig eosinophils, this mediator has little effect on human eosinophils.

Inhaled cys-LTs induce an eosinophil-rich infiltrate into the airways in experimental animals (Foster and Chan, 1991; Wegner et al., 1993; Underwood et al., 1996). This unexpected effect of cys-LTs appears to be the result of release of IL-5 (Underwood et al., 1996). An eosinophil response to cys-LTs has also been observed in the lungs of a small group of asthmatic patients, both in airway biopsies (Laitinen et al., 1993) and in induced sputum (Diamant et al., 1997). This is consistent with reports that cys-LT antagonists reduce allergen-induced eosinophilic infiltration into the airways of experimental animals (Chan et al., 1990; Nakagawa et al., 1993), which suggests a potential anti-inflammatory effect of anti-LTs. This suggestion is supported by the observations that various 5-LO inhibitors can also inhibit allergen-induced eosinophilic infiltration into the airways of experiment animals (Gulbenkian et al., 1990; Yeadon et al., 1993; Richards et al., 1989). Such observations have yet to be convincingly confirmed in asthma, although several preliminary studies have suggested that anti-LTs reduce the number of inflammatory cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from allergic subjects undergoing segmental allergen challenge (Calhoun et al., 1997) and reduce circulating blood eosinophil numbers (Reiss et al., 1996). The 5-LO inhibitor zileuton has also been reported to reduce the number of eosinophils in circulating blood of patients with nocturnal asthma, with clinical improvement (Wenzel et al., 1995), although a trial of the specific LTB4 antagonist LY293111 indicated no clinical benefit in allergen-induced early or late responses (Evans et al., 1996a), despite a reduction in neutrophil numbers.

4. Role in asthma. a. RELEASE. In humans, elevated levels of cys-LTs have been detected in plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and sputum samples obtained from asthmatics during spontaneous exacerbations of their asthma or after allergen exposure (Taylor et al., 1989; Wenzel et al., 1995). Furthermore, several groups have shown elevated levels of LTE4 in the urine of allergic patients undergoing allergen exposure (Taylor et al., 1989; Drazen et al., 1992) and exhibiting nocturnal asthma (Bellia et al., 1996). In another study, the increase in urinary LTE4 levels in allergic asthmatics parallels the bronchoconstriction and subsides with resolution of the airway response (Kumlin et al., 1992). Urinary LTE4 levels are increased in aspirin-sensitive asthmatic patients (Kumlin et al., 1992), supporting the view that in these patients aspirin produces its effect by increasing cys-LT production. This is consistent with the recent demonstration of increased LTC4 synthase expression in bronchial biopsies of aspirin-sensitive asthmatics (Sampson et al., 1997), and this may be linked to a polymorphism of the LTC4 synthase gene (Sanak et al., 1997).

b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS. Numerous clinical studies have been performed with cys-LT1 receptor antagonists and 5-LO inhibitors (collectively termed anti-LTs) and support a role for cys-LTs in asthma (Chung, 1995; O'Byrne et al., 1997; Smith, 1996). There are no clear differences between 5-LO inhibitors and cys-LT1 receptor antagonists, suggesting that LTB4 does not play a role in asthma. This is supported by the lack of effect of an LTB4 antagonist in asthmatic patients, at least during allergen challenge (Evans et al., 1996a). Several anti-LTs have been shown to improve base-line lung function in asthmatic patients (Hui et al., 1991; Joos et al., 1991; Kips et al., 1991; Gaddy et al., 1992; Israel et al., 1993b; Reiss et al., 1997) but not in nonasthmatic subjects (Smith et al., 1990; Spencer et al., 1991). This suggests that there is a certain degree of LT tone in asthmatic airways. The bronchodilating effect of anti-LTs, although modest, is additive with that of beta 2-agonists (Hui et al., 1991; Gaddy et al., 1992), indicating that anti-LTs may inhibit some component of airway narrowing other than smooth muscle contraction (such as edema).

Several studies have shown the efficacy of anti-LTs during various provocation challenges. Anti-LTs protect against the early response to allergen in allergic asthmatics (Fuller et al., 1989; Taylor et al., 1991) and shift the allergen dose-response curve to the right approximately six-fold (Dahlen et al., 1991), supporting a role for mast cell-derived LTs in allergen-induced bronchoconstriction (Holgate, 1996). The ability of anti-LTs to inhibit allergen-induced late responses is less certain, because of the change in base-line lung function. In a preliminary study with LY171883, no significant effect on the late response was observed (Fuller et al., 1989), a finding confirmed by studies evaluating inhaled L-648,051 (Bel et al., 1990). In contrast, the more potent antagonist zafirlukast and the 5-LO-activating protein inhibitor Bay x1005 appear to have some effect on the late response (Taylor et al., 1991; Dahlen et al., 1997). Anti-LTs also protect against cold air- and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects (Israel et al., 1990; Manning et al., 1990; Robuschi et al., 1992; Finnerty et al., 1992; Makker et al., 1993). Anti-LTs are particularly effective in blocking aspirininduced asthma in aspirin-sensitive asthmatics, giving almost complete protection (Christie et al., 1991; Yamamoto et al., 1994; Israel et al., 1993a; Dahlen et al., 1993; Nasser et al., 1994), and they also cause bronchodilation (Dahlen et al., 1993).

There are now several well controlled studies with anti-LTs demonstrating clinical efficacy in patients with asthma. For example, zafirlukast reduces symptoms and improves lung function, in addition to reducing exacerbations (Barnes et al., 1997; Spector et al., 1994; Suissa et al., 1997). Similar effects have been seen after regular treatment with montelukast (administered once-daily) and pranlukast (administered twice-daily) (Reiss et al., 1998; Barnes et al., 1997). The effects of LT antagonists are supported by similar effects of the 5-LO inhibitor zileuton (Israel et al., 1993b, 1996; Fischer et al., 1995; Dekhuijzen et al., 1997). Furthermore, the addition of zileuton to therapy with low doses of inhaled corticosteroid resulted in greater control of asthma, compared with that achieved by increasing the dose of the inhaled steroid, suggesting that drugs affecting the synthesis or action of LTs may have biological activities complementary to those of the inhaled corticosteroids (O'Connor et al., 1996). It is of interest that even high doses of inhaled or orally administered steroids do not reduce LT production in asthma, as measured by urinary LTE4 excretion (Dworski et al., 1994; O'Shaughnessy et al., 1993); therefore, anti-LTs may be usefully added to inhaled corticosteroids for patients not achieving control with low doses.

One of the features of early studies of anti-LTs in asthma was the heterogeneity of responses, with some patients (approximately one-third) showing a very good response and others being apparently unresponsive. This presumably reflects the varying contributions of LTs in different patients and might be a reflection of polymorphism of the 5-LO gene (In et al., 1997).

c. CONCLUSIONS. There is now substantial evidence that cys-LTs play an important role in asthma. Cys-LT production is increased in asthma in response to various challenges that worsen asthma. Cys-LTs are potent mediators of bronchoconstriction, plasma exudation, and mucus secretion, and there is now a growing body of evidence that they may also increase eosinophilic inflammation. The importance of cys-LTs in asthma has been highlighted by the clinical usefulness of LT receptor antagonists, which are now in routine use in several countries. This has been supported by similar clinical benefits of 5-LO inhibitors. Some patients, particularly those with aspirin-sensitive asthma, respond very well to anti-LTs, whereas others show little benefit, indicating that LTs play a variable role. Anti-LTs are less effective than corticosteroids in asthma treatment, suggesting that other inflammatory mediators play important roles in most patients. LTB4 does not appear to play an important role in asthma, which is not surprising, because neutrophilic infiltration is not a feature of asthma in most patients.

C. Platelet-Activating Factor

PAF has long been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma, because exogenous PAF closely mimics many of the clinical features of asthma, including airway hyperresponsiveness.

1. Synthesis and metabolism. PAF is an ether-linked phospholipid (1-O-alkyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) that was first described as a substance released from IgE-stimulated basophils. The synthesis of PAF occurs in a wide variety of inflammatory cells, including platelets, neutrophils, basophils, macrophages, and eosinophils (Barnes et al., 1989; Chung, 1992). The synthesis of PAF in inflammatory cells is generally via a two-step enzymatic pathway involving first the activation of phospholipase A2, which cleaves a free fatty acid from ether-linked phospholipids (called plasmalogens) to yield lyso-PAF; under appropriate conditions, lyso-PAF can be acetylated, to form the biologically active PAF, by a rate-limiting enzyme that is termed acetyl transferase and is found in the cytoplasm of inflammatory cells (Barnes et al., 1989). Large amounts of PAF can be synthesized by several inflammatory cell types in the lung, including resident cells such as mast cells (Triggiani et al., 1991) and alveolar macrophages (Bratton et al., 1994).

PAF is not a single, biologically active molecule; rather, several molecular species of PAF with significant biological activity are now known to exist (McManus et al., 1993). For example, the ester-linked, 1-acyl species 1-palmitoyl-2-acetoyl-sn-glyceryl-3-phosphocholine (PAGPC) is synthesized by a wide variety of cells, including endothelial cells, basophils, mast cells, and lymphocytes (Columbo et al., 1993; Triggiani et al., 1991). PAGPC and related members of this family of lipids can interact with a G protein-linked receptor, with the acyl-PAFs being approximately 300 to 1000 times less potent than PAF (Columbo et al., 1993; Tordai et al., 1994). However, PAGPC can also act as a natural PAF receptor antagonist (Columbo et al., 1993; Tordai et al., 1994; Mazer et al., 1998), raising the possibility that these other forms of PAF may be involved as autoregulatory molecules for PAF.

The major enzyme responsible for the catabolism of PAF is PAF acetylhydrolase, a PAF-specific esterase that cleaves the acetyl group at the sn-2-position, producing lyso-PAF. PAF acetylhydrolase was initially described as being abundant in human plasma and was later shown to be associated with low density lipoproteins (Stafforini et al., 1987). Since these early observations, acetylhydrolase has been described in various organs, including lung, kidney, brain, and liver (Venable et al., 1993). There is now known to be an intracellular acetylhydrolase enzyme present in the cytoplasm of several inflammatory cell types, including mast cells, macrophages, and platelets. These cells can release acetylhydrolase and probably contribute to the extracellular acetylhydrolase content that has been identified in several biological fluids, such as skin (Teaford et al., 1992) and nasal lavage fluid (Shin et al., 1994; Touqui et al., 1994), after allergen challenge. Furthermore, recent studies have identified an acetylhydrolase in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid that is distinct from either plasma acetylhydrolase or erythrocyte-derived acetylhydrolase (Triggiani et al., 1997). This novel enzyme is calcium independent and has other characteristics that differentiate it from other forms of acetylhydrolase that have been identified (Triggiani et al., 1997). This enzyme was present in smaller amounts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained from patients with mild asthma (Triggiani et al., 1997), supporting previous studies showing reduced activity of plasma acetylhydrolase in young patients with moderate to severe asthma (Miwa et al., 1988; Tsukioka et al., 1996). It has been proposed that asthmatic patients have a genetic defect in plasma acetylhydrolase (Miwa et al., 1988), although it is not yet clear what causes the reduced acetylhydrolase activity in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. It is certainly not the presence of an inflammatory condition in the airway, because patients with fibrosis actually exhibited increased levels of acetylhydrolase in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (Triggiani et al., 1997). The deficiency of PAF acetylhydrolase in Japanese children is an autosomal recessive syndrome resulting from a missense mutation that abolishes enzymatic activity, but it is not clear whether this is associated with severe asthma (Stafforini et al., 1996). A recombinant human PAF acetylhydrolase has been produced and has been shown to reduce PAF-induced inflammatory responses in the airways (Tjoelker et al., 1995). Such observations suggest that local inactivation of PAF at local sites of inflammation might be a practical therapeutic approach.

2. Receptors. A PAF receptor has been cloned from human platelets and leukocytes and shown to be a typical G protein-linked receptor with seven transmembrane domains (Nakamura et al., 1993; Shimizu and Izumi, 1995). PAF receptors are expressed in animal and human lung (Shirasaki et al., 1994b). Recent evidence has shown that substitution of the Cys90, Cys95, or Cys173 residues in the PAF receptor with alanine or serine yields mutant receptors that do not bind PAF and are not expressed on the surface of cells but are found intracellularly (Le Gouill et al., 1997). The cell signaling pathways initiated by PAF interactions with its receptor are well characterized and include increases in [Ca2+]i (Mazer et al., 1991), increases in IP3 and diacylglycerol levels, and induction of cell cycle-active genes, such as fos, jun, and egr-1 (Mazer et al., 1991; Schulam et al., 1991). PAF also activates the transcription factor AP-1 in bronchial epithelial cells (Le Van et al., 1998). The PAF receptor undergoes homologous desensitization by phosphorylation of cytoplasmic tail sites in the receptor molecule (Takano et al., 1994), and related lipids such as PAGPC can also desensitize the classical PAF receptor (Mazer et al., 1998). PAF exposure, however, leads to an increase in PAF receptor mRNA levels, suggesting increased turnover of the receptor (Shirasaki et al., 1994a). Overexpression of the PAF receptor in transgenic mice results in airway hyperresponsiveness, which is attenuated by Tx, LT, and muscarinic antagonists (Nagase et al., 1997).

Many PAF receptor antagonists have been identified and have facilitated the characterization of PAF receptors on a wide variety of inflammatory cells. However, there have been findings with certain PAF receptor antagonists that suggest that PAF may act via more than one receptor. Evidence from both human and animal studies suggests that there may be heterogeneity of PAF receptors (Hwang, 1990; Lambrecht and Parnham, 1986; Kroegel et al., 1989). For example, PF10040 can antagonize PAF-induced edema formation (Rossi et al., 1992) and PAF-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness (Herd et al., 1994) but has no effect on PAF-induced bronchoconstriction (Herd et al., 1994). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that only a small part of the total amount of PAF generated by cells is actually released, with intracellular PAF having been proposed to be a signaling molecule itself (Stewart and Harris, 1991). Such observations raise the possibility that a distinct PAF receptor may exist intracellularly.

3. Effects on airways. a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE. PAF has little direct effect on human airway smooth muscle contraction in vitro but may elicit constriction through the release of other mediators (Johnson et al., 1992). PAF produces acute bronchoconstriction when inhaled by patients with asthma (Barnes et al., 1989). PAF-induced bronchoconstriction is not inhibited by the H1 receptor antagonist ketotifen (Chung et al., 1988) or the Tx antagonist GR32191B (Stenton et al., 1990b). However, PAF-induced bronchoconstriction can be inhibited by LT antagonists, including SKF 104353-Z (Spencer et al., 1991) and ICI 204,219 (Kidney et al., 1993), suggesting the involvement of LTD4 in this response.

b. VESSELS. PAF has potent effects on vascular smooth muscle and elicits hypotension in several species (Barnes et al., 1989). In the context of asthma, PAF is very potent in causing vascular engorgement and increased vascular permeability in the airways, leading to plasma exudation of protein-rich fluid into the airway lumen (O'Donnell and Barnett, 1987; Evans et al., 1989). This may contribute to the acute airway obstruction elicited by PAF, because this effect is not totally reversed by the airway smooth muscle relaxant salbutamol (Diaz et al., 1997). In animal studies, inhaled PAF is a potent inducer of airway plasma exudation (Lötvall et al., 1991a), and this is mediated mainly via release of Tx (Tokuyama et al., 1992). Inhalation of PAF by patients with mild asthma induces arterial blood gas abnormalities and ventilation/perfusion imbalances (Rodriguez-Roisin et al., 1994; Felez et al., 1994). This hypoxemia is not the result of the bronchoconstriction induced by PAF, because it cannot be fully inhibited by salbutamol (Roca et al., 1995; Diaz et al., 1997).

c. SECRETIONS. PAF stimulates fluid secretion from porcine isolated trachea via activation of PAF receptors and via a mechanism that does not depend on the release of acetylcholine, histamine, or cys-LTs (Steiger et al., 1987). In feline airways, activation of PKC is involved (Larivee et al., 1994). PAF also elicits mucus secretion from isolated human airways, which may depend in part on the generation of cys-LTs but is independent of acetylcholine release (Goswami et al., 1989). PAF stimulates mucin secretion from cultured tracheal explants (Adler et al., 1987).

d. NERVES. One possible explanation for the ability of PAF to induce increased responsiveness of the nose (Narita and Asakura, 1993) and airways (reviewed above) is that it functions via the activation of airway nerves. PAF-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in experimental animals has been demonstrated to be inhibited by capsaicin (Spina et al., 1991; Perretti and Manzini, 1993), suggesting that PAF may have effects on the activation of sensory C-fibers in the airways. PAF up-regulates the expression of H1 receptor mRNA in trigeminal ganglia (Nakasaki et al., 1998) and stimulates the transcription factor AP-1 in human neuroblastoma cells (Squinto et al., 1989).

e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS. PAF is a potent activator of inflammatory cells. For example, PAF stimulates chemotaxis and adhesion of eosinophils and neutrophils in vitro (Kimani et al., 1988; Kroegel et al., 1988, 1991) In addition, PAF can act as a priming agent for eosinophils (Koenderman et al., 1991; Blom et al., 1992; Zoratti et al., 1992). PAF-mediated priming of eosinophils is via different signaling pathways, compared with IL-5induced priming, because it is not blocked by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Van der Bruggen et al., 1998). PAF enhances LTC4 release from eosinophils from asthmatic patients but not from normal subjects (Shindo et al., 1996). PAF induces greater activation of circulating eosinophils in vitro after allergen challenge of asthmatic patients, indicating an interaction between PAF and other priming factors, such as IL-5 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Evans et al., 1996b). PAF also has a greater activating effect on neutrophils from asthmatic patients, compared with those from normal control subjects (Shindo et al., 1997). In vivo, PAF elicits marked eosinophilic infiltration into lung tissue after both intravenous and aerosol administration to guinea pigs (Lellouch Tubiana et al., 1988; Sanjar et al., 1990) and rabbits (Coyle et al., 1990). In both species, PAF-induced eosinophilic infiltration is reduced by selective platelet depletion with an antiplatelet antiserum, suggesting the involvement of platelets in eosinophil recruitment in vivo. In primates, single and multiple exposures to aerosolized PAF elicit an increase in the number of eosinophils and neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, accompanied by increased bronchial responsiveness to inhaled methacholine (Wegner et al., 1992). Although inhalation of PAF has been reported to elicit bronchial hyperresponsiveness in humans (Cuss et al., 1986; Kaye and Smith, 1990), this has not been universally shown (Spencer et al., 1990; Lai et al., 1990b), and it is associated with neutrophilic infiltration into the lungs (Wardlaw et al., 1990). However, recent data from transgenic mice overexpressing a guinea pig PAF receptor have shown that such mice exhibit airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (Ishii et al., 1997). In humans, intradermal administration of PAF to atopic subjects has been shown to induce eosinophilic infiltration (Henocq and Vargaftig, 1986).

4. Role in asthma. a. RELEASE. Several groups have attempted to quantify the release of PAF in plasma or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic and allergic subjects, with conflicting results (Nakamura et al., 1987; Miadonna et al., 1989; Stenton et al., 1990a; Tsukioka et al., 1996). However, high levels of lyso-PAF were found in these studies and, because lyso-PAF is the precursor as well as the metabolite of PAF, this complicates the interpretation of these data. After segmental allergen challenge in asthmatic patients, high levels of lyso-PAF were correlated with increased acetylhydrolase and phospholipase A2 activity (Chilton et al., 1996). PAF has also been detected in the plasma of patients exhibiting a late asthmatic response (Chan Yeung et al., 1991).

b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS. Despite considerable in vitro and in vivo data for humans suggesting that PAF is an important mediator of asthma, clinical studies with PAF receptor antagonists have been very disappointing. Apafant (WEB 2086) inhibited PAF-induced bronchoconstriction (Adamus et al., 1990) and platelet responses to PAF (Hayes et al., 1991) but had no significant effect on allergen-induced early or late responses or airway hyperresponsiveness (Freitag et al., 1993). Furthermore, 12-week treatment of atopic asthmatics with apafant showed no clinical benefit in terms of lung function or the use of rescue medication or inhaled corticosteroids (Spence et al., 1994). Similarly, UK74505 abolishes PAF-induced bronchospasm (O'Connor et al., 1994) but has no effect on allergen-induced early or late responses or on airway hyperresponsiveness (Kuitert et al., 1993). UK80067, the racemate of UK74505, has no effect on adult asthmatics receiving this drug for 4 weeks (Kuitert et al., 1995). Recent data suggested that 1-week treatment with the potent, long-acting, PAF receptor antagonist foropafant (SR27417A) produced a modest reduction in the magnitude of the allergen-induced late response, although there was no effect on the early response, the allergen-induced airway responsiveness, or base-line lung function (Evans et al., 1997). Another PAF antagonist, Y24180, has also been shown to reduce airway responsiveness to inhaled methacholine in asthmatics (Hozawa et al., 1995), although these data are at variance with findings from other studies (Hsieh, 1991; Evans et al., 1997). Overall, these clinical data with PAF antagonists suggest that extracellular PAF plays only a small part in human allergic asthma, which is surprising, in view of its prominent role in animal models.

c. CONCLUSIONS. PAF is produced by many of the cells that are activated in asthmatic airways and has a profound effect on airway function, producing bronchoconstriction, inducing airway hyperresponsiveness, plasma exudation, and mucus hypersecretion, and recruiting and activating eosinophils. However, PAF antagonists have proved to be very disappointing for the treatment of asthma, producing minor or no effects, even during chronic treatment. This may be because PAF is not important in chronic asthma or because the antagonists used are not capable of blocking endogenously produced PAF, which acts locally in the airways almost as a "paracrine" mediator. A PAF synthase inhibitor would be particularly valuable for elucidation of the role of PAF and should also inhibit the production of intracellular PAF. It is possible that PAF may play a role in some patients with asthma and during exacerbations, but this has not yet been explored.

D. Other Lipid Mediators

1. Synthesis and metabolism. Several other lipid mediators, including hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid (HPETEs), mono- and di-HETEs, and lipoxins (LXs), have been shown to have effects in the airways that are of potential relevance to asthma (Sigal and Nadel, 1991). Most of these substances are metabolic products of the 15-LO enzyme, which catalyzes the insertion of molecular oxygen at the carbon atom at position 15 in the arachidonic acid molecule (Samuelsson et al., 1987). 15-LO has been demonstrated in human tracheal epithelium (Hunter et al., 1985), eosinophils (Turk et al., 1982), endothelial cells (Hopkins et al., 1984), and monocytes (Conrad et al., 1992). Furthermore, immunohistochemical studies have revealed that 15-LO is expressed in airway epithelium and eosinophils (Sigal et al., 1992; Bradding et al., 1995). LXs (LO interaction products), of which the most prevalent is LXA4, are produced by interactions between 15-LO and 5-LO or between 12-LO and 5-LO.

2. Receptors. Little is known regarding receptors for 15-LO products, and it is not clear whether there are distinct receptors for these HETEs and HPETEs. Specific LXA4 receptors have been identified in murine and human cells (Takano et al., 1997; Fiore et al., 1994).

3. Effects on airways. Both mono- and di-HETEs are chemotactic for neutrophils and eosinophils (Johnson et al., 1985; Kirsch et al., 1988; Morita et al., 1990; Schwenk et al., 1992). In addition, 15-HETE has been demonstrated to induce LTC4 release from mastocytoma cells (Goetzl et al., 1983) and mucus secretion from dog trachea (Johnson et al., 1985). LXs have been demonstrated to contract airway smooth muscle (Dahlen et al., 1987; Meini et al., 1992) and to activate PKC (Hansson et al., 1986). LXA4 inhibits neutrophil and eosinophil activation by N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine and PAF, respectively (Lee et al., 1991; Soyombo et al., 1994), and inhibits adhesion of leukocytes (Scalia et al., 1997), suggesting that it has an anti-inflammatory role. LXA4 also inhibits cholinergic neurotransmission in airways, an effect that may be mediated by release of NO (Tamaoki et al., 1995).

The contribution of 15-LO metabolites of arachidonic acid to bronchial hyperresponsiveness is not clear. 15-HETE has been shown to reduce airway responsiveness but to prolong allergen-induced bronchospasm (Lai et al., 1990a,b). Similarly, 15-HETE does not cause airway hyperresponsiveness in rabbits, despite causing infiltration of neutrophils into the airway (Riccio et al., 1997). In contrast, 15-HPETE produces a sustained increase in airway responsiveness to inhaled histamine in rabbits, which is accompanied by neutrophilic infiltration (Riccio et al., 1997). The airway hyperresponsiveness induced by inhaled 15-HPETE was significantly reduced by pretreatment with capsaicin and atropine, suggesting the involvement of airway cholinergic and peptidergic nerves (Riccio et al., 1997).

4. Role in asthma. Immunoreactive LXA4 has been detected in increased concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic patients (Lee et al., 1990). Inhaled LXA4 has little effect on airway function but antagonizes the bronchoconstricting effect of inhaled LTC4 (Christie et al., 1992), supporting the view that LXs may function as endogenous antagonists of cys-LTs (Lee, 1995). Stable LXA4 analogues have anti-inflammatory effects and inhibit neutrophil chemotaxis and activation, suggesting that these endogenous substances are anti-inflammatory (Scalia et al., 1997). 15-LO may therefore function as an anti-inflammatory regulator in asthma by controlling the formation of LXs in response to cys-LT formation in the airways. There is an increase in levels of mRNA for 15-LO in circulating leukocytes of asthmatic patients (Kuitert et al., 1996) and increased expression of 15-LO in epithelial cells of asthmatic patients (Bradding et al., 1995). IL-4 selectively increases the expression of 15-LO in epithelial cells, and this may account for the increase in expression in asthma (Sigal et al., 1993).

    IV. Peptide Mediators
Top
Previous
Next
References

Several peptides, including bradykinin, tachykinins, CGRP, endothelins (ETs), and complement, are involved in asthma. They are usually cleaved from larger precursors and are released in an active form. They are subject to degradation by peptidases (such as NEP) both in the circulation and in the airways.

A. Bradykinin

Bradykinin has long been considered to be a mediator involved in asthma, since the first demonstration of bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients after bradykinin inhalation. The development of potent and long-lasting bradykinin receptor antagonists has focused attention on the role of bradykinin and other kinins in the pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma, as well as on the potential uses of bradykinin antagonists in asthma therapy (Barnes, 1992b).

1. Synthesis and metabolism. Kinins are vasoactive peptides that are formed, during the inflammatory response, from the alpha 2-globulins high molecular weight (HMW) and low molecular weight (LMW) kininogens, by the action of kininogenases (Bhoola et al., 1992). Kininogenases include plasma kallikrein and tissue kallikrein. HMW and LMW kininogens are produced from the same gene (containing 11 exons and 10 introns) as a consequence of alternative splicing (Nakanishi, 1987). Both kininogens are synthesized in the liver. HMW kininogen is present only in plasma, whereas LMW kininogen also occurs in tissues. Two kinins are formed in humans, i.e., the nonapeptide bradykinin (Arg-Pro-Pro-Gly-Phe-Ser-Pro-Phe-Arg), which is generated from HMW kininogen, and the decapeptide lysyl-bradykinin (kallidin), which is generated from LMW kininogen. Kallidin is rapidly converted to bradykinin by the enzyme aminopeptidase-N (Proud and Kaplan, 1988). There is evidence for kinin activity in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic patients (Christiansen et al., 1987, 1992), and it is likely that bradykinin is formed, by the action of plasma and tissue kallikreins, in plasma that has been exuded from the inflamed airways. The concentrations of kallikrein and kinins in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid increase after allergen challenge (Christiansen et al., 1992). HMW kininogen is the preferred substrate for plasma kallikrein, which is generated from inactive prekallikrein by contact with certain negatively charged surfaces, including basement membrane components and proteoglycans, such as heparin released from mast cells. Tissue kallikreins are produced in glandular secretions and release kinins from both HMW and LMW kininogens. Tissue kallikrein has been localized immunocytochemically to serous cells in the submucosal glands of human airways (Proud and Vio, 1993). Serine proteases, such as alpha 1-antitrypsin, are effective inhibitors of kallikrein in the circulation, but in tissues kallikrein may remain activated for prolonged periods. Kallistatin is a kallikrein inhibitor that is present in some tissues, but its role in airways is not yet known (Chao et al., 1996).

Other proteases that may be produced by inflammatory cells may also generate kinins from kininogens. Mast cell tryptase is a weak kininogenase in vitro under conditions of low pH, although it is unlikely that activity occurs to any significant extent in vivo (Proud et al., 1988). There is also some evidence that neutrophils and platelets may release proteases with kininogen activity (Proud, 1991).

Bradykinin is subject to rapid enzymatic degradation and has a plasma half-life of <30 sec. Bradykinin is metabolized by several peptidases (collectively known as kininases), which may be present in asthmatic airways. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) may be important for degrading bradykinin in the circulation, because it is localized to endothelial cells, but it may also be present in airway tissue (Dusser et al., 1988). ACE inhibitors, such as captopril and enalapril, potentiate both the bronchoconstriction and microvascular leakage produced by bradykinin (Ichinose and Barnes, 1990c; Lötvall et al., 1991b), suggesting that this may be the mechanism of ACE inhibitor-induced cough. In guinea pigs, chronic administration of captopril causes spontaneous coughing, which is blocked by the bradykinin antagonist icatibant (Fox et al., 1996).

NEP (EC 3.4.24.11) appears to be the most important enzyme for degradation of bradykinin in the airways. Phosphoramidon, which inhibits NEP, enhances the bronchoconstricting effect of bradykinin both in vitro (Frossard et al., 1990) and in vivo (Ichinose and Barnes, 1990c; Lötvall et al., 1991b) in animals. Because NEP is expressed in human airway epithelium (Baraniuk et al., 1995), the shedding of airway epithelium in asthma may result in the enhanced airway responses to bradykinin seen in asthmatic patients.

A third enzyme, namely carboxypeptidase-N (kininase 1), may be important in degrading bradykinin in the circulation, but an inhibitor of this enzyme (DL-mercaptomethyl-3-guanidinoethylthiopropionic acid) does not have any effect on the bronchoconstriction response to bradykinin in vivo (Ichinose and Barnes, 1990c). Carboxypeptidase-N converts bradykinin to [des-Arg9]-bradykinin, which is selective for B1 receptors (Regoli and Barabé, 1980). Aminopeptidase-M, which converts lysyl-bradykinin to bradykinin, is widely distributed, so that kallidin is rapidly converted to bradykinin. This enzyme is expressed in airway epithelial cells (Proud et al., 1994).

2. Receptors. Bradykinin exerts several effects on the airways that are mediated by specific surface receptors. At least two subtypes of bradykinin receptors are recognized, based on the rank order of potency of kinin agonists (Regoli and Barabé, 1980), as follows: B1, [des-Arg10]-lysyl-bradykinin > [des-Arg9]-bradykinin = lysyl-bradykinin >> bradykinin; B2, bradykinin = lysyl-bradykinin >> [des-Arg10]-lysyl-bradykinin > [des-Arg9]-bradykinin. B1 receptors are selectively activated by lysyl-bradykinin (kallidin) and [des-Arg9]-bradykinin and are inducible by inflammatory signals. B1 receptors are expressed in chronic inflammation induced by IL-1beta and IL-6 in rats and may play an important role in hyperalgesia. The effects of bradykinin on airways are mediated by B2 receptors, and there is no evidence for functional B1 receptors in the airways. A B3 receptor has also been proposed in airway smooth muscle of sheep (Farmer et al., 1991), but there are doubts regarding its existence, because it has been defined with weak antagonists.

The B2 receptor from animals and humans and a human B1 receptor have been cloned (McEachern et al., 1991; Hess et al., 1992; Mencke et al., 1995). Both have the typical seven-transmembrane segment structure common to all G protein-coupled receptors (McEachern et al., 1991). Interestingly, [des-Arg10]-lysyl-bradykinin is much more potent than [des-Arg9]-bradykinin at the human B1 receptor, suggesting that potential B1 receptor responses in human tissues may be overlooked if [des-Arg9]-bradykinin is used as the only selective probe (Mencke et al., 1995). Pharmacological studies suggest that there may be subtypes of B2 receptors (Braas et al., 1988; Hall, 1992), which may be more clearly defined using molecular probes. With low stringency probes, there is no evidence for additional types of bradykinin receptors in human cDNA libraries (Mencke et al., 1998).

The distribution of B2 receptors has been mapped in human lung by autoradiography using [3H]bradykinin (Mak and Barnes, 1991). There are high densities of binding sites in bronchial and pulmonary vessels, particularly on endothelial cells. Epithelial cells, airway smooth muscle (particularly in peripheral airways), submucosal glands, and nerves are also labeled, indicating that bradykinin may have diverse effects on airway function. A particularly high density of labeling is observed in the lamina propria immediately beneath the epithelium; it is not clear what cellular structures are labeled, but nerves and superficial blood vessels are the most likely structures.

3. Effects on airways. Bradykinin has many effects on airway functions; some are mediated by direct activation of B2 receptors on target cells, and others are mediated indirectly via the release of other mediators or neurotransmitters.

a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE. Inhaled bradykinin is a potent bronchoconstrictor in asthmatic patients but has little or no effect, even at high concentrations, in normal individuals, suggesting increased responsiveness of airway smooth muscle to bradykinin, as observed with other spasmogens (Fuller et al., 1987b; Polosa and Holgate, 1990). In vitro, bradykinin is only a weak constrictor of proximal human airways, suggesting that its potent bronchoconstricting effect in asthmatic patients is mediated indirectly. However, bradykinin is more potent in constricting peripheral human airways (Molimard et al., 1994; Hulsmann et al., 1994b), partly via direct stimulation of B2 receptors on airway smooth muscle cells and partly via the release of Tx. Bradykinin contracts airway smooth muscle in vitro, but in guinea pig airways in vitro bradykinin has weak and variable effects, which are influenced by the presence of airway epithelium and by the activity of local degrading enzymes. Bradykinin causes relaxation of intact guinea pig airways in vitro, but it constricts airways if the epithelium is mechanically removed (Frossard et al., 1990; Bramley et al., 1990). Bradykinin releases the bronchodilator PGE2 from epithelial cells (Bramley et al., 1990), and epithelium removal therefore reduces the functional antagonism, resulting in a bronchoconstricting effect of bradykinin. Furthermore, because NEP is strongly expressed on airway epithelial cells, epithelium removal may reduce bradykinin metabolism. A combination of indomethacin (to inhibit PGE2 formation) and phosphoramidon (to inhibit NEP) mimics the effect of epithelium removal (Frossard et al., 1990). The bronchoconstricting effect of bradykinin in ferrets in vitro and in guinea pigs in vivo is enhanced by the inhibition of both NEP (by phosphoramidon) and ACE (by captopril) (Dusser et al., 1988; Ichinose and Barnes, 1990c). In small human bronchi in vitro, bradykinin may cause relaxation when the airway epithelium is intact but it consistently causes constriction after epithelium removal or addition of phosphoramidon (Hulsmann et al., 1994b).

Intravenously administered bradykinin causes intense bronchoconstriction in guinea pigs, which is markedly inhibited by indomethacin, suggesting that a bronchoconstricting COX product (probably Tx) largely mediates this effect (Ichinose et al., 1990a). The bronchoconstriction response to bradykinin instilled directly into the airways is not reduced by indomethacin, however, suggesting a different mechanism of bronchoconstriction after airway delivery of the mediator (Ichinose et al., 1990a). In airway inflammation, it is likely that bradykinin would be formed at the airway surface from plasma kininogens exuded into the airway lumen from leaky superficial blood vessels. In human subjects, inhibition of COX by aspirin or flurbiprofen or treatment with a Tx receptor antagonist had no effect on the bronchoconstricting effect of inhaled bradykinin (Fuller et al., 1987b; Polosa et al., 1990; Rajakulasingam et al., 1996), although in one study an inhibitory effect of inhaled lysine-aspirin was observed (Polosa et al., 1997a). Similarly, antihistamines have no effect on bradykinin-induced bronchoconstriction, suggesting that mast cell mediator release is not involved (Polosa et al., 1990).

The bronchoconstricting effect of bradykinin in guinea pigs is also modulated by NO, because pretreatment with aerosolized NOS inhibitors markedly potentiates the bronchoconstricting effect of bradykinin (administered intravenously or by inhalation) (Ricciardolo et al., 1994). The source of NO is unclear but may be from airway epithelium, which expresses constitutive NOS (cNOS) and inducible NOS (iNOS) (Robbins et al., 1994; Asano et al., 1994). In asthmatic patients, inhalation of the NOS inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) potentiates the bronchoconstricting action of bradykinin, suggesting that bradykinin releases NO in the airways to counteract the bronchoconstricting action of bradykinin (Ricciardolo et al., 1996). Interestingly, this potentiating effect is not seen in patients with more severe asthma, possibly because of loss of the epithelial source of NO (Ricciardolo et al., 1997).

In human airways, the bronchoconstricting effect of bradykinin is likely to be mediated by B2 receptors, because icatibant blocks the bronchoconstriction response to bradykinin in vitro (Molimard et al., 1994; Hulsmann et al., 1994b) and the B1-selective agonist [des-Arg9]-bradykinin has no effect on airway function in asthmatic patients (Polosa and Holgate, 1990). However, it is possible that B1 receptors are induced in more severe asthma, and further studies with selective B1 agonists are needed.

b. VESSELS. Bradykinin is a potent inducer of airway microvascular leakage and causes prolonged leakage at all airway levels. This is partly mediated by the release of PAF, because a PAF antagonist markedly inhibits the prolonged leakage (Rogers et al., 1990). The immediate leakage response to bradykinin is partly mediated by the release of neuropeptides (probably SP) from airway sensory nerves. The effect of bradykinin on plasma exudation is partly reduced by pretreatment with neurokinin (NK)1 receptor antagonists (Sakamoto et al., 1993; Nakajima et al., 1994). The effect of bradykinin on leakage is mediated by B2 receptors (which have been localized to endothelial cells on postcapillary venules), because B2 antagonists inhibit the leakage response (Ichinose and Barnes, 1990a; Sakamoto et al., 1992). The microvascular leakage induced by bradykinin is enhanced by inhibition of both NEP and ACE (Lötvall et al., 1991c).

Bradykinin is a potent vasodilator of bronchial vessels and causes an increase in airway blood flow (Parsons et al., 1992a; Corfield et al., 1991). This is consistent with the high density of bradykinin receptors on bronchial vessels (Mak and Barnes, 1991) and suggests that a major effect of bradykinin in asthma may involve hyperemia of the airways.

c. SECRETIONS. Bradykinin stimulates airway mucus secretion from human submucosal glands in vitro, and these effects are mediated by B2 receptors (Nagaki et al., 1996), presumably indicating a direct effect of bradykinin on submucosal glands. This is consistent with the demonstration of B2 receptors on these glands by autoradiographic mapping (Mak and Barnes, 1991). Bradykinin also stimulates the release of mucus glycoproteins from human nasal mucosa in vitro (Baraniuk et al., 1990). Bradykinin stimulates ion transport in airway epithelial cells, which is mediated by the release of PGs (Leikauf et al., 1985). The effects of bradykinin on epithelial cells are mediated by B2 receptors (Proud et al., 1993). In animals, bradykinin also stimulates mucociliary clearance and ciliary beating via the release of PGs (Wong et al., 1990). Inhaled bradykinin increases mucociliary clearance in normal humans, presumably reflecting the stimulatory effect of bradykinin on airway secretions (Polosa et al., 1992a).

d. NERVES. Perhaps the most important property of bradykinin in airways is its ability to activate C-fiber nociceptive sensory nerve endings (Barnes, 1992b). Bradykinin is the mediator of inflammatory pain, and in the airways this may be manifested as cough and tightness of the chest, which are commonly observed in asthmatic patients after inhalation of bradykinin (Fuller et al., 1987b). Bradykinin stimulates bronchial C-fibers in dogs. In guinea pigs, the bronchoconstriction response to instilled bradykinin is reduced by atropine and by capsaicin pretreatment, which depletes neuropeptides from sensory nerves, indicating that both a cholinergic reflex and release of neuropeptides from sensory nerves are involved (Ichinose et al., 1990a). Indeed, a combination of atropine and capsaicin pretreatment largely abolishes the bronchoconstriction response to instilled bradykinin but has little effect on the bronchoconstriction response to intravenously administered bradykinin (which is largely inhibited by indomethacin) (Ichinose et al., 1990a). Bradykinin also releases tachykinins from perfused guinea pig lung (Saria et al., 1988) and rat trachea (Ray et al., 1991). Bradykinin enhances the bronchoconstriction response to electrical field stimulation (mediated by release of endogenous tachykinins) in guinea pig bronchi in vitro (Miura et al., 1992) and the NANC bronchoconstriction response to vagus nerve stimulation in vivo (Miura et al., 1994). Tachykinin antagonists have an inhibitory effect on the bronchoconstriction and plasma exudation responses to bradykinin in guinea pigs, suggesting that release of tachykinins from sensory nerves is an important component of both responses (Sakamoto et al., 1993; Nakajima et al., 1994). The effect of bradykinin on airway sensory nerves is blocked by icatibant, indicating that B2 receptors are involved in the release of neuropeptides from sensory nerves (Miura et al., 1992). Although studies in human subjects are more limited, a nonselective tachykinin antagonist (FK-224) has been shown to reduce the bronchoconstriction response to inhaled bradykinin in asthmatic patients, suggesting that bradykinin may release tachykinins in asthmatic airways (Ichinose et al., 1992); however, this was not confirmed in another study using the same antagonist (Schmidt et al., 1996).

Single-fiber recordings from sensory nerves of guinea pig airways indicate that bradykinin is a potent activator of C-fibers and that this is a direct action, because it is not blocked by COX inhibition but is blocked by icatibant (Fox et al., 1993). In guinea pigs treated with captopril, there is evidence for increased sensitization of C-fibers, which is blocked by icatibant, suggesting that bradykinin is responsible. Indeed, bradykinin sensitizes airway C-fibers to other neural activators (Fox et al., 1996). However, bradykinin has no direct effect on the release of neurotransmitters from airway cholinergic nerves (Miura et al., 1992).

In asthmatic patients, the bronchoconstriction response to bradykinin is reduced by anticholinergic pretreatment, indicating that a cholinergic reflex is involved (Fuller et al., 1987b). Pretreatment with sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil sodium is very effective in inhibiting the airway response to bradykinin. This may indicate the involvement of C-fiber activation in asthmatic airways (Dixon and Barnes, 1989), because both drugs have been found to inhibit C-fibers in animals (Jackson et al., 1989). This suggests that bradykinin may be an important mediator of cough and chest discomfort in asthma. Bradykinin induces cough in normal and asthmatic subjects (Choudry et al., 1989) and has been implicated in ACE inhibitor-induced cough, which is observed for approximately 10% of patients receiving chronic therapy (Fuller, 1989). ACE inhibitor cough is reduced by COX inhibitors and Tx antagonists, suggesting that PGs (such as PGE2 or PGF2alpha ) may be involved (McEwan et al., 1990; Malini et al., 1997). Endogenous bradykinin may stimulate the release of these PGs in the larynx and trachea, leading to cough, although it is not clear why only some patients are affected.

e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS. Bradykinin has few reported direct effects on the recruitment or activation of inflammatory cells, although it may act indirectly through the release of mediators from structural cells. For example, bradykinin releases neutrophil and monocyte chemotactic factors from airway epithelial cells (Koyama et al., 1995). Bradykinin activates alveolar macrophages from asthmatic patients to release mediators, including LTB4, PAF, and other eosinophilic chemotactic factors (Sato et al., 1996). In guinea pigs, a bradykinin antagonist inhibits allergen-induced eosinophilia, but whether bradykinin antagonists have such an effect in human airways has not been determined.

4. Role in asthma. a. RELEASE. Although the role of bradykinin in asthma is still not clear, the development of potent, stable, B2 receptor antagonists offers the possibility of soon clarifying the role of bradykinin in airway disease (Burch et al., 1990). Bradykinin is generated in asthmatic airways by the action of various kininogenases (generated in the inflammatory response) on HMW kininogen present in the exuded plasma and on LMW kininogens secreted in the airways. Bradykinin has been detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic patients (Christiansen et al., 1992). The degradation of bradykinin in the airways may be impaired when NEP is down-regulated in asthmatic airways or epithelial shedding occurs (Nadel, 1991). In experimental animals, aerosol exposure to IL-1beta markedly increases the bronchoconstriction response to bradykinin (Tsukagoshi et al., 1994a), and this may be the result of reduced expression of NEP in the airways (Tsukagoshi et al., 1995).

b. RELEVANT EFFECTS. Asthmatic patients are hyperreactive to inhaled bradykinin; this is related to the degree of eosinophilic inflammation in the airways (Roisman et al., 1996). Bradykinin has many effects on the airways that are relevant to asthma. Perhaps the most important property of bradykinin is its ability to activate nociceptive nerve fibers in the airway, because these may mediate the cough and chest tightness that are such characteristic symptoms of asthma. This effect of bradykinin may be enhanced by hyperesthesia of sensory nerves in the airways that have been sensitized by inflammatory mediators. Inhalation of bradykinin by asthmatic patients rather closely mimics an asthma attack; in addition to wheezing, patients experience chest tightness, coughing, and sometimes itching under the chin, which are common sensory manifestations during asthma exacerbation. Bradykinin is also a potent bronchoconstrictor in asthmatic patients, and after allergen challenge there is a disproportionate increase in responsiveness to bradykinin, compared with methacholine, which may not be maximal until several days after allergen challenge and may persist for several days (Berman et al., 1995). This may be a reflection of airway sensory nerve hyperesthesia. In patients with perennial rhinitis, there is a marked increase in the response to topically applied bradykinin, with evidence of enhanced reflex effects (Baraniuk et al., 1994).

c. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS. The contribution of bradykinin to asthma can only be determined with the use of potent and specific bradykinin antagonists, which are now in clinical development. Such agents are predicted to be effective in symptom control, but it is not clear whether they might also have anti-inflammatory effects. One antagonist, [D-Arg0,Hyp3,D-Phe7]-bradykinin (NPC567), was unable to inhibit the effect of bradykinin on nasal secretions, even when administered at the same time as bradykinin (Pongracic et al., 1991), presumably because of rapid local metabolism. Icatibant (HOE 140, [D-Arg0,Hyp3,Thi6,D-Tic7,Oic8]-bradykinin) is a selective B2 receptor antagonist that not only is potent but also has a long duration of action in animals in vivo, because it is resistant to enzymatic degradation (Hock et al., 1991; Wirth et al., 1991). This antagonist is potent in inhibiting the bronchoconstriction and microvascular leakage responses to bradykinin (Wirth et al., 1993; Sakamoto et al., 1992) and the effect of bradykinin on airway sensory nerves (Miura et al., 1992). Clinical studies with icatibant are limited, but there is some evidence that nasal application reduces the nasal blockage induced by allergen in patients with allergic rhinitis (Austin et al., 1994). In a clinical study of nebulized icatibant treatment of asthma, there was a small improvement in airway function tests after 4 weeks of treatment but no improvement in asthma symptoms (Akbary et al., 1996). Recently, nonpeptide antagonists have been identified. WIN 64338 is a nonpeptide B2 receptor antagonist that has been shown to block the bronchoconstricting action of bradykinin in airway smooth muscle in vitro (Scherrer et al., 1995). More potent nonpeptide antagonists, such as FR167344, have been developed and have clinical potential (Inamura et al., 1997). Although FR167344 is not very potent, it may lead to the future development of more potent nonpeptide drugs.

B. Tachykinins

Airway sensory nerves have the capacity to release neuropeptides, particularly the tachykinins SP and NKA, as well as CGRP, which may have proinflammatory effects in the airway. Because airway sensory nerves are activated in asthma, this has suggested that the release of sensory neuropeptides may contribute to the inflammatory response in asthma (Barnes, 1995a).

1. Synthesis and metabolism. SP and NKA, but not NKB, are localized to sensory nerves in the airways of several species (Barnes et al., 1991; Joos et al., 1994; Uddman et al., 1997). SP-immunoreactive nerves are abundant in rodent airways but are sparse in human airways (Martling et al., 1987; Laitinen et al., 1992; Komatsu et al., 1991). Rapid enzymatic degradation of SP in airways, and the fact that SP concentrations may decrease with age and possibly with cigarette smoking, could explain the difficulty in demonstrating this peptide in some studies. SP-immunoreactive nerves in the airway are found beneath and within the airway epithelium, around blood vessels, and, to a lesser extent, within airway smooth muscle. SP-immunoreactive nerves fibers also innervate parasympathetic ganglia, suggesting a sensory input that may modulate ganglionic transmission and thus result in local reflexes. SP in the airways is localized predominantly to capsaicin-sensitive unmyelinated nerves, but chronic administration of capsaicin only partially depletes the lung of tachykinins, indicating the presence of a population of capsaicin-resistant SP-immunoreactive nerves, as in the gastrointestinal tract (Dey et al., 1991). Similar capsaicin denervation studies are not possible in human airways, but after extrinsic denervation during heart-lung transplantation there appears to be a loss of SP-immunoreactive nerves in the submucosa (Springall et al., 1990). Tachykinins are derived from preprotachykinins (PPTs) that are expressed in nodose and jugular ganglia. There are three PPT genes; alpha -PPT codes for SP alone, beta -PPT codes for SP and NKA, and gamma -PPT codes for SP, NKA, and a novel, amino-terminally extended form of NKA termed NP-gamma . Synthesis may be partly determined by local inflammation in the airways, because allergen exposure increases the expression of PPT mRNA in nodose ganglia of guinea pigs (Fischer et al., 1996). There is some evidence that tachykinins may be synthesized in nonneuronal cells, such as macrophages. Human macrophages express alpha -PPT, and SP is released from these cells by capsaicin (Ho et al., 1997). In rat alveolar macrophages, alpha -PPT mRNA and SP-like immunoreactivity are expressed in response to inflammatory stimuli, suggesting that this may result in increased SP release in inflammatory diseases (Killingsworth et al., 1997).

Tachykinins are subject to degradation by at least two enzymes, ACE and NEP (Nadel, 1991). ACE is predominantly localized to vascular endothelial cells and therefore breaks down intravascular peptides. ACE inhibitors, such as captopril, enhance bronchoconstriction resulting from intravenous administration of SP (Shore et al., 1988; Martins et al., 1990) but not inhalation of SP (Lötvall et al., 1990b). NKA is not a good substrate for ACE, however. NEP appears to be the most important enzyme for the breakdown of tachykinins in tissues. Inhibition of NEP by phosphoramidon or thiorphan markedly potentiates bronchoconstriction in vitro in animal airways (Sekizawa et al., 1987) and human airways (Black et al., 1988) and after inhalation in vivo (Lötvall et al., 1990b). NEP inhibition also potentiates mucus secretion in response to tachykinins in human airways (Rogers et al., 1989). NEP inhibition enhances excitatory NANC and capsaicin-induced bronchoconstriction, resulting from the release of tachykinins from airway sensory nerves (Frossard et al., 1989; Djokic et al., 1989). The activity of NEP in the airways appears to be an important factor determining the effects of tachykinins; any factors that inhibit the enzyme or its expression may be associated with increased effects of exogenously applied or endogenously released tachykinins. Several of the stimuli known to induce bronchoconstriction responses in asthmatic patients have been found to reduce the activity of airway NEP (Nadel, 1991).

2. Receptors. At least three subtypes of tachykinin receptors have been characterized pharmacologically by the rank order of potency of agonists, by the development of selective antagonists, and by molecular cloning (Nakanishi, 1991). SP acts preferentially at NK1 receptors, NKA at NK2 receptors, and NKB at NK3 receptors. Tachykinin receptors are differentially expressed and are also subject to differential regulation, for example by inflammatory stimuli. Tachykinins are typical G protein-coupled receptors and lead to increased PI hydrolysis, with an increase in the release of intracellular Ca2+, IP3, and diacylglycerol. Tachykinin receptors in the airways have been mapped using autoradiographic techniques and labeled tachykinins (Carstairs and Barnes, 1986; Walsh et al., 1994; Strigas and Burcher, 1996; Miyayasu et al., 1993; Zhang et al., 1995). NK1 receptors are localized to bronchial vessels, epithelial cells, and submucosal glands, whereas NK2 receptors are predominantly localized to airway smooth muscle.

3. Effects on airways. Tachykinins have many different effects on the airways that may be relevant to asthma, and these effects are mediated by NK1 and NK2 receptors. There is little evidence for the involvement of NK3 receptors.

a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE. Tachykinins constrict human airway smooth muscle in vitro via NK2 receptors (Naline et al., 1989; Advenier et al., 1992b; Sheldrick et al., 1995). The contractile response to NKA is significantly greater in smaller human bronchi than in more proximal airways, indicating that tachykinins may have a more important constricting effect in peripheral airways (Frossard and Barnes, 1991), whereas cholinergic constriction tends to be more pronounced in proximal airways. This is consistent with the autoradiographic distribution of tachykinin receptors, showing distribution to small and large airways (Carstairs and Barnes, 1986). NP-gamma is also a potent constrictor of human airways and acts via NK2 receptors (Burcher et al., 1991). In vivo, SP does not cause bronchoconstriction or cough when administered either by intravenous infusion (Fuller et al., 1987c; Evans et al., 1988) or by inhalation (Fuller et al., 1987c; Joos et al., 1987), whereas NKA causes bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects after both intravenous administration (Evans et al., 1988) and inhalation (Joos et al., 1987). Inhalation of SP increases airway responsiveness to methacholine in asthmatic subjects, an effect that has been ascribed to airway edema (Cheung et al., 1995). Mechanical removal of airway epithelium potentiates the bronchoconstriction response to tachykinins (Frossard et al., 1989; Devillier et al., 1988), largely because epithelial NEP is removed.

b. VESSELS. Tachykinins have potent effects on airway blood flow. Indeed, the effects of tachykinins on airway blood flow may be the most important physiological and pathophysiological effects of tachykinins in airways. In canine and porcine trachea, both SP and NKA cause marked increases in blood flow (Salonen et al., 1988; Matran et al., 1989). Tachykinins also dilate canine bronchial vessels in vitro, probably via an endothelium-dependent mechanism (McCormack et al., 1989b). Tachykinins also regulate bronchial blood flow in pigs; stimulation of the vagus nerve causes vasodilation mediated by the release of sensory neuropeptides, and it is likely that CGRP as well as tachykinins are involved (Matran et al., 1989).

Stimulation of the vagus nerve in rodents causes microvascular leakage, which is prevented by prior treatment with capsaicin or a tachykinin antagonist, indicating that release of tachykinins from sensory nerves mediates this effect. Among the tachykinins, SP is most potent at causing leakage in guinea pig airways (Rogers et al., 1988), and NK1 receptors have been localized to postcapillary venules in the airway submucosa (Sertl et al., 1988). Inhaled SP also causes microvascular leakage in guinea pigs, and its effect on the microvasculature is more marked than its effect on airway smooth muscle (Lötvall et al., 1990a). It is difficult to measure airway microvascular leakage in human airways, but SP causes weals in human skin when injected intradermally, indicating its capacity to cause microvascular leakage in human postcapillary venules; NKA is less potent, indicating that an NK1 receptor mediates this effect (Fuller et al., 1987a).

c. SECRETIONS. In vitro, SP stimulates mucus secretion from submucosal glands (mediated by NK1 receptors) in ferret and human airways (Rogers et al., 1989; Ramnarine et al., 1994; Meini et al., 1993) and is a potent stimulant of goblet cell secretion in guinea pig airways (Kuo et al., 1990). Indeed, SP is likely to mediate the increases in goblet cell discharge after vagus nerve stimulation and exposure to cigarette smoke (Tokuyama et al., 1990; Kuo et al., 1992a).

d. NERVES. In guinea pig trachea, tachykinins also potentiate cholinergic neurotransmission at postganglionic nerve terminals, and an NK2 receptor appears to be involved (Hall et al., 1989). There is also potentiation at the ganglionic level (Undem et al., 1991; Watson et al., 1993), which appears to be mediated by a NK1 receptor (Watson et al., 1993). There is evidence that NK3 receptors may also be involved (Myers and Undem, 1993). Endogenous tachykinins may also facilitate cholinergic neurotransmission, because capsaicin pretreatment results in a significant reduction in cholinergic neural responses both in vitro and in vivo (Martling et al., 1984; Stretton et al., 1992). However, in human airways there is no evidence for a facilitatory effect on cholinergic neurotransmission (Belvisi et al., 1994), although such an effect has been reported in the presence of potassium channel blockers (Black et al., 1990). In conscious guinea pigs, very low concentrations of inhaled SP are reported to cause cough, and this effect is potentiated by NEP inhibition (Kohrogi et al., 1988). Citric acid-induced cough and airway hyperresponsiveness are blocked by a nonpeptide NK2 receptor antagonist (SR 48968), suggesting the involvement of NK2 receptors, although these may be centrally located (Advenier et al., 1992a; Girard et al., 1996).

e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS. Tachykinins may also interact with inflammatory and immune cells (Daniele et al., 1992), although whether this is of pathophysiological significance remains to be determined. SP degranulates certain types of mast cells, such as those in human skin (although this effect is not mediated by a tachykinin receptor) (Lowman et al., 1988); however there is no evidence that tachykinins degranulate lung mast cells (Ali et al., 1986). SP has a degranulating effect on eosinophils (Kroegel et al., 1990), but this is not mediated by a tachykinin receptor. At lower concentrations, tachykinins have been reported to enhance eosinophil chemotaxis (Numao and Agrawal, 1992). Tachykinins may activate alveolar macrophages (Brunelleschi et al., 1990) and monocytes to release inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 (Lötz et al., 1988). Topical application of SP to human nasal mucosa results in increased expression of several cytokines, suggesting that SP may have important chronic immunological effects (Okamoto et al., 1995). Tachykinins and vagus nerve stimulation also cause transient vascular adhesion of neutrophils in the airway circulation (Umeno et al., 1989) and in human skin (Smith et al., 1993).

SP stimulates proliferation of blood vessels (angiogenesis) (Fan et al., 1993) and may therefore be involved in the new vessel formation that is found in asthmatic airways. SP and NKA also stimulate the proliferation and chemotaxis of human lung fibroblasts, suggesting that tachykinins may contribute to the fibrotic process in chronic asthma (Harrison et al., 1995). These effects appear to be mediated by both NK1 and NK2 receptors.

4. Role in asthma. In rodents, there is now considerable evidence for neurogenic inflammation in airways resulting from antidromic release of neuropeptides from nociceptive nerves or C-fibers, via an axon reflex, and this process may contribute to the inflammatory response in asthma (Barnes, 1986).

a. RELEASE. Quantitative studies in humans indicate that SP-immunoreactive fibers constitute only 1% of the total number of intraepithelial fibers, whereas in guinea pigs they comprise 60% of the fibers (Bowden and Gibbins, 1992). A striking increase in SP-immunoreactive nerves was reported in the airways of patients with fatal asthma (Ollerenshaw et al., 1991), but this finding has not been confirmed in biopsies from patients with milder asthma (Howarth et al., 1995) and there is no increase in the SP content of lungs from asthmatics (Lilly et al., 1995). After nasal challenge with allergen, an increase in the SP content in nasal lavage fluid has been reported (Mosiman et al., 1993). Elevated concentrations of SP in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with asthma have been reported, with an additional increase after allergen challenge (Nieber et al., 1992), suggesting that there may be an increase in the SP content in the airways of asthmatic patients. Similarly, SP has been detected in the sputum of asthmatic patients after inhalation of hypertonic saline solution (Tomaki et al., 1995). Allergen challenge is associated with a doubling of the number of PPT-A mRNA-positive neurons in nodose ganglia of guinea pigs and an increase in SP and CGRP immunoreactivity in the lungs (Fischer et al., 1996).

b. RELEVANCE IN ASTHMA. Sensory nerves may be activated in airway disease. In asthmatic airways the epithelium is often shed, thereby exposing sensory nerve endings. Sensory nerves in asthmatic airways may be "hyperalgesic" as a result of exposure to inflammatory mediators such as PGs and certain cytokines (such as IL-1beta , TNF-alpha , and nerve growth factor) and may then be activated more readily by other mediators, such as kinins. In animals, capsaicin has been used as a tool to explore the release of sensory neuropeptides. In humans, capsaicin inhalation causes cough and transient bronchoconstriction, which is inhibited by cholinergic blockade and is probably attributable to a laryngeal reflex (Fuller et al., 1985; Midgren et al., 1992). This suggests that neuropeptide release does not occur in human airways, although it is possible that insufficient capsaicin reaches the lower respiratory tract because the dose is limited by coughing. There is no evidence that capsaicin induces a greater degree of bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma than in normal individuals (Fuller et al., 1985).

In contrast to studies in rodents, the NEP inhibitor acetorphan has no effect on base-line airway caliber or on bronchoconstriction induced by a "neurogenic" trigger (sodium metabisulfite) in human subjects (Nichol et al., 1992). The lack of effect could be the result of inadequate inhibition of NEP in the airways, particularly at the level of the epithelium. Nebulized thiorphan has been shown to potentiate the bronchoconstriction response to inhaled NKA in normal and asthmatic subjects (Cheung et al., 1992a,b), but there is no effect on base-line lung function in asthmatic patients (Cheung et al., 1992b), indicating that there is unlikely to be basal release of tachykinins. It is possible that NEP may become dysfunctional after viral infections or exposure to oxidants, thus contributing to asthma exacerbations (Nadel, 1991).

There is evidence that NK1 receptor gene expression might be increased in the lungs of asthmatic patients (Adcock et al., 1993). This might be the result of increased transcription in response to activation of transcription factors, such as AP-1, which are activated in human lung by cytokines such as TNF-alpha . Expression of NK2 receptors has also been described in asthma (Bai and Bramley, 1993).

c. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS. There have recently been several studies of tachykinin antagonists in asthma. The relatively weak, nonselective, tachykinin antagonist FK-224 had an inhibitory effect on bradykinin-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma (Ichinose et al., 1992), although this finding was not confirmed in another study (Schmidt et al., 1996). A more potent NK1 receptor antagonist, FK-888, reduced the duration of exercise-induced asthma but had no effect on maximal bronchoconstriction, suggesting an effect on blood vessels rather than airway smooth muscle (Ichinose et al., 1996). However, another potent NK1 receptor antagonist, CP 99,994, had no effect on hypertonic saline solutioninduced bronchoconstriction or on cough (Fahy et al., 1995).

Apart from tachykinin receptor antagonists, neurogenic inflammation may be modulated by either preventing the activation of sensory nerves or preventing the release of neuropeptides. Many drugs act on prejunctional receptors to inhibit the release of neuropeptides (Barnes et al., 1990). Opioids are the most effective inhibitors, but an inhaled, peripherally acting, µ-opioid agonist (the pentapeptide BW443C) was found to be ineffective in inhibiting metabisulfite-induced bronchoconstriction, which is believed to occur via neural mechanisms (O'Connor et al., 1991).

d. CONCLUSIONS. Tachykinins are increased in the secretions of asthmatic patients and may be produced by sensory nerves, although there is increasing evidence that inflammatory cells, such as macrophages, may release SP. Tachykinins are potent bronchoconstrictors (acting via NK2 receptors) and stimulate mucus secretion, plasma exudation, neural activation, and structural changes (via NK1 receptors). However, the negative results obtained with tachykinin antagonists in asthma suggest that neurogenic inflammation is unlikely to play a major role, at least in mild asthma. It is possible that sensory neuropeptides play a role in more severe asthma, and further studies are needed.

C. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide

1. Synthesis and metabolism. CGRP-immunoreactive nerves are abundant in the respiratory tract of several species, and CGRP is stored and localized with SP in afferent nerves. CGRP has been extracted from and is localized to human airways (Palmer et al., 1987; Komatsu et al., 1991). CGRP is found in trigeminal, nodose-jugular, and dorsal root ganglia and has also been detected in neuroendocrine cells of the lower airways (Uddman et al., 1997).

The metabolism of CGRP is less clear, although NEP inhibitors increase some of the effects of CGRP in the airways (Katayama et al., 1991). Interestingly, metabolism of CGRP by NEP appears to liberate a peptide fragment that has eosinophil chemotactic activity (Davies et al., 1992).

2. Receptors. CGRP acts on specific receptors that are coupled (via Gs) to adenylyl cyclase, resulting in an increase in intracellular cyclic AMP concentrations. Subtypes of CGRP receptors have been proposed, based on the selectivity of different CGRP analogues and the related peptide amylin (Poyner, 1992). CGRP receptors have been mapped autoradiographically in human airways and are predominantly located in bronchial vascular smooth muscle, rather than airway epithelium (Mak and Barnes, 1988).

3. Effects on airways. a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE. CGRP causes constriction of human bronchi in vitro (Palmer et al., 1987). This is surprising, because CGRP increases cyclic AMP levels. There are few, if any, CGRP receptors in airway smooth muscle in human or guinea pig airways, and this suggests that the paradoxical bronchoconstriction response reported in human airways may be mediated indirectly. In guinea pig airways, CGRP has no consistent effect on tone (Martling et al., 1988). The variable effects of CGRP on airways may be explained by the fact that CGRP may release other mediators that have effects on tone. CGRP may release both NO and ET in airways, so that its effects would depend on the balance between these bronchodilating and bronchoconstricting mediators (Ninomiya et al., 1996).

b. VESSELS. CGRP is a potent vasodilator that has long-lasting effects. CGRP is an effective dilator of human pulmonary vessels in vitro and acts directly on receptors in vascular smooth muscle (McCormack et al., 1989a). It also potently dilates bronchial vessels in vitro (McCormack et al., 1989a) and produces a marked and long-lasting increase in airway blood flow in vivo in anesthetized dogs (Salonen et al., 1988) and conscious sheep (Parsons et al., 1992a). It is possible that CGRP may be the predominant mediator of arterial vasodilation and increased blood flow in response to sensory nerve stimulation in the bronchi (Matran et al., 1989). There are high densities of CGRP receptors in bronchial vessels in human airways (Mak and Barnes, 1988), suggesting that CGRP may be an important mediator of airway hyperemia in asthma. CGRP has no direct effect on airway microvascular leakage (Rogers et al., 1988). CGRP may potentiate the leakage produced by SP by increasing blood delivery to the sites of plasma extravasation in the postcapillary venules; this has been seen in rat airways (Brokaw and White, 1992). This does not occur in guinea pig airways when CGRP and SP are coadministered, possibly because blood flow in the airways is already high (Rogers et al., 1988).

c. SECRETIONS. CGRP has a weak inhibitory effect on cholinergically stimulated mucus secretion in ferret trachea (Webber et al., 1991) and on goblet cell discharge in guinea pig airways (Kuo et al., 1990), whereas it increases secretion in feline submucosal glands (Nagaki et al., 1994). There are low densities of CGRP receptors on mucus secretory cells (Mak and Barnes, 1988), but this finding does not eliminate the possibility that CGRP might increase mucus secretion in vivo by increasing blood flow to submucosal glands.

d. INFLAMMATORY CELLS. CGRP injection into human skin causes a persistent flare, but biopsies have revealed an infiltration of eosinophils (Pietrowski and Foreman, 1986). CGRP itself does not appear to be chemotactic for eosinophils, but proteolytic fragments of the peptide are active (Davies et al., 1992), suggesting that CGRP released into the tissues may lead to eosinophilic infiltration. CGRP inhalation induces eosinophilic inflammation in rat lungs (Bellibas, 1996). In contrast, CGRP inhibits macrophage secretion and the capacity of macrophages to activate T lymphocytes (Nong et al., 1989), suggesting potential anti-inflammatory actions. CGRP also induces proliferation of guinea pig airway epithelial cells and may therefore be involved in healing the airway after epithelial shedding in asthma (White et al., 1993).

4. Role in asthma. To date there is little evidence for the involvement of CGRP in asthma. Its most prominent action is prolonged vasodilation, so it may contribute to the hyperemia of asthmatic airways. There are currently no antagonists that are suitable for clinical use, so it is difficult to evaluate the role of CGRP in asthma

D. Endothelins

ETs are potent constrictor peptides that were originally described as vasoconstrictors released from endothelial cells. There is now considerable circumstantial evidence that they are involved in the pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma (Barnes, 1994b; Hay et al., 1996).

1. Synthesis and metabolism. There are three ET peptides, and each is encoded by a distinct gene (Inoue et al., 1989), which codes for the precursor peptide. Prepro-ET-1 is cleaved to a 38-amino acid intermediate form termed big ET-1 or pro-ET-1. Pro-ET-1 is rapidly cleaved by a specific enzyme, termed ET-converting enzyme (ECE), to form mature ET-1. ECE is a neutral metalloendopeptidase and is inhibited by phosphoramidon (Ikegawa et al., 1990). Mast cell chymase may also cleave pro-ET-1 (Wypij et al., 1992). The human prepro-ET-1 gene is on chromosome 6, and its upstream regulatory region reveals multiple regulatory elements, indicating that several factors may regulate its expression (Masaki et al., 1992). Several proinflammatory cytokines, including transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta , TNF-alpha , and IL-1beta , may increase expression of ET-1. Less is known regarding the synthetic pathways and regulation of ET-2 and ET-3.

ETs may be stored within cells but are predominantly synthesized upon cell activation; secretion of ETs is therefore largely regulated at the level of peptide synthesis. Although ET-1 was first described in endothelial cells, it is now apparent that ETs can be synthesized by many different cell types, including several types of airway cells. ET-3 is relatively abundant in neuronal tissues and may be a neuronal ET form. ET-like immunoreactivity is localized to airway epithelium in human airways, with intense staining in goblet and Clara cells but only intermittent staining in ciliated epithelial cells (Giaid et al., 1991). Specific antibodies have localized ET-1, pro-ET-1, ET-3, and pro-ET-3 to airway epithelial cells and submucosal glands in human lung (Marciniak et al., 1992). ECE has been reported in bovine lung membranes (Kundu and Wilson, 1992), and guinea pig lung is reported to synthesize and degrade ET-1 (Noguchi et al., 1991). The presence of pro-ETs and mRNA for prepro-ETs in lung suggests that ETs are synthesized locally within lung cells. Furthermore, ET-1 is detectable in cultured human epithelial cells (Black et al., 1989b; Mattoli et al., 1990). ET-1 synthesis and release from epithelial cells are stimulated by endotoxin and by several proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta , TNF-alpha , and IL-6), which may be released from macrophages (Endo et al., 1992). Human alveolar macrophages have also been identified as a source of ETs (Ehrenreich et al., 1990), and these cells may be activated in asthmatic patients by exposure to allergens via low affinity IgE receptors.

ETs are metabolized by NEP, which is localized in several cell types in airways, especially airway epithelium. Inhibition of NEP with phosphoramidon increases the potency of ETs in guinea pigs in vivo (Boichot et al., 1991) and in human airways in vitro (Candenas et al., 1992).

2. Receptors. Pharmacological responses to ETs are mediated by at least two receptor subtypes. Two distinct receptors, with structures typical of G protein-coupled receptors, have been cloned; they exhibit approximately 60% homology (Masaki et al., 1992). For the ETA receptor, the rank order of potency is ET-1 > ET-2 >> ET-3 and the binding affinity for ET-1 is approximately 100 times greater than that for ET-3. ETB receptors show similar affinities for all three ETs and for the related sarafotoxins. The distinction between ETA and ETB receptors has been confirmed with the development of selective agonists and antagonists. Although the existence of a third ET receptor, which is selective for ET-3 (ETC receptor), has been proposed (Masaki et al., 1992), there is little conclusive evidence for this in human tissues. Radioligand binding studies and in situ hybridization studies with receptor cDNA probes have demonstrated that ET receptors are widely distributed, in keeping with the multiple actions of these peptides. ETA and ETB receptors are expressed in lung and are differentially distributed (Nakamichi et al., 1992). Selective ETA and ETB agonists and antagonists have greatly aided the study of receptor subtype expression. BQ-123, FR-139317, and PD 145065 are selective ETA receptor antagonists, whereas IRL 1038 is a selective antagonist of ETB receptors.

Autoradiographic studies with 125I-ET-1 and selective antagonists have shown a widespread distribution of ETA and ETB receptors in human airways, with a predominance of ETB receptors in airway smooth muscle (Knott et al., 1995). There is no difference in receptor distribution in airways from asthmatic patients, compared with airways from normal subjects (Goldie et al., 1995).

3. Effects on airways. a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE. ET-1 and ET-2 are potent constrictors of human airway smooth muscle in vitro, being even more potent than LTD4 (Advenier et al., 1990; Henry et al., 1990; McKay et al., 1991b; Takahashi et al., 1997; Goldie et al., 1995). The contractile response is slow in onset and sustained, and ET-1 appears to cause a maximal contractile response. The contractile response in human airways is unaffected by calcium antagonists or (in contrast to other species) COX inhibitors or LT antagonists (McKay et al., 1991a; Nally et al., 1994), suggesting a direct effect on airway smooth muscle. This is consistent with the demonstration of ET binding sites on human airway smooth muscle, using autoradiography (Henry et al., 1990; McKay et al., 1991b; Brink et al., 1991; Goldie et al., 1995; Knott et al., 1995). ET-1 may produce a prolonged contractile response in human airway smooth muscle by activating PKC, because the PKC inhibitor staurosporine reduces the constricting effect of ET-1 (McKay et al., 1996). ET-3 is less potent that ET-1 or ET-2 (Advenier et al., 1990; Hay et al., 1993), but the potency differences are complicated by differential metabolism. Mechanical removal of airway epithelium potentiates the constricting effects of ETs, but the effect is greater for ET-3 than for ET-1 (Candenas et al., 1992; McKay et al., 1992). After epithelium removal or phosphoramidon treatment, the potencies of ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3 are similar, suggesting that any differences in previous studies were the result of more rapid degradation of ET-3 by epithelial NEP. ET-3-mediated contraction of human airways is partly reduced by COX inhibition (Nally et al., 1994).

The ETA antagonists BQ-123, FR-139317, and PD 145065 have no inhibitory effect on ET-induced constriction, suggesting that ETB receptors mediate the direct constriction response, and this is supported by the constriction response to the ETB-selective agonists BQ-3020 and IRL1620 (Hay et al., 1993; Takahashi et al., 1997). Asthmatic airways show a similar, or even reduced, response to ETB-selective agonists, compared with normal airways (Goldie et al., 1995). Interestingly, the release of prostanoids (predominantly PGD2 and PGE2) induced by ET-1 in human airways appears to be mediated by an ETA receptor, because this is effectively inhibited by BQ-123 (Hay et al., 1993). Inhaled ET-1 is a potent bronchoconstrictor (approximately 100-fold more potent than methacholine) in asthmatic patients and causes a bronchoconstriction response that lasts for >1 h, whereas ET-1 has no effect in normal subjects (Chalmers et al., 1997a).

ET-1 increases proliferation of rabbit and sheep cultured airway smooth muscle cells (Noveral et al., 1992; Glassberg et al., 1994; Carratu et al., 1997), and this appears to be via stimulation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/MAP kinase pathway (Whelchel et al., 1997). ET-1 alone has no effect on cultured human airway smooth muscle cells but markedly amplifies the proliferative effects of growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor (EGF); this is mediated by an ETA receptor (Panettieri et al., 1996).

b. VESSELS. ET-1 constricts human bronchial arteries in vitro (McKay et al., 1991a), but its effects on airway microvascular leakage are conflicting. ET-1 causes an increase in plasma extravasation in rat trachea (Sirois et al., 1992) and this response is dependent on leukocytes (Helset et al., 1993), whereas ET-1 is without effect on plasma extravasation in guinea pigs (Macquin-Mavier et al., 1989). This may reflect relative vasoconstricting effects on precapillary arterioles versus direct effects on endothelial cells of postcapillary venules.

c. SECRETION. ET-1, but not ET-2 or ET-3, stimulates mucus glycoprotein secretion from feline airway submucosal glands via a direct mechanism that involves calcium ion influx, suggesting that ETA receptors are involved (Shimura et al., 1992). ET-1 also stimulates ion transport in cultured airway epithelial cells (Wong et al., 1990).

d. NERVES. ETs bind to parasympathetic ganglia and nerves in rat and rabbit airways (Turner et al., 1989; Power et al., 1989; McKay et al., 1993), suggesting that ET-3 may have an effect on cholinergic neurotransmission. ET-3 enhances neurotransmission in postganglionic cholinergic nerves in rabbit airways via a direct effect on prejunctional receptors on postganglionic cholinergic nerves (McKay et al., 1993). This suggests that ETs may potentiate cholinergic reflex bronchoconstriction and this effect is mediated by an ETB receptor. The ETB-selective agonist sarafotoxin S6C enhances cholinergic nerve-induced contraction of human airways in vitro, indicating the presence of ETB receptors on cholinergic nerves as well as airway smooth muscle (Fernandes et al., 1996).

e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS. It is not yet certain whether ETs have inflammatory effects in the airways. Intravenously administered or inhaled ET-1 has no effect on inflammatory cell influx in guinea pigs (MacquinMavier et al., 1989), and there is no increase in airway responsiveness to other spasmogens (Lagente et al., 1989). ETs may increase the release of inflammatory mediators from a variety of cells. ET-1 increases the release of lipid mediators from cultured human nasal mucosa (Wu et al., 1992) and increases superoxide formation and TNF-alpha release in alveolar macrophages (Haller et al., 1991; Chanez et al., 1996). ET-1 also releases histamine from guinea pig lung, but not peritoneal, mast cells (Uchida et al., 1992). In a cultured human epithelial cell line, ET-1 induces the release of the cytokines IL-6, IL-8, and GM-CSF (Mullol et al., 1996).

ET-1 potently stimulates collagen secretion from pulmonary fibroblasts (Peacock et al., 1992) and may therefore be involved in the increased collagen formation observed in asthmatic airways. ET-1 is reported to increase fibronectin gene expression and protein release in human airway epithelial cells (Marini et al., 1996).

4. Role in asthma. a. RELEASE. There is increased formation of ETs in asthma. Elevated concentrations of ET-1 have been detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic patients (Mattoli et al., 1991; Sofia et al., 1993; Redington et al., 1995), and these are reduced after treatment with steroids (Vittori et al., 1992). ET-1 is present in induced sputum, but the levels are not elevated in asthmatic patients, compared with normal subjects (Chalmers et al., 1997b). An increase in the concentration of plasma ET-1 has been reported in asthmatic children and adults and is related to asthma severity (Aoki et al., 1994; Chen et al., 1995), although another study showed no increase in plasma ET-1 levels in patients with mild asthma (Chalmers et al., 1997b). Furthermore, in patients with nocturnal asthma, there is a significantly lower level of ET-1 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid at night than during the day (Kraft et al., 1994). There is a significant increase in the expression of ET-1 immunoreactivity in the epithelial layer in fiber-optic bronchial biopsies from asthmatic patients (Springall et al., 1991). It is tempting to speculate that this is the result of the action of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta , TNF-alpha , and IL-6) released from activated macrophages in asthmatic airways. Anti-CD23 also induces release of ET-1 in epithelial cells from asthmatic patients, suggesting that allergen acting via a low affinity IgE receptor (Fcepsilon RII) may be a mechanism for releasing ET-1 in asthma (Campbell et al., 1994). There is also an increase in the ET-1 content of alveolar macrophages from asthmatic patients, compared with normal subjects, although there is no increase in the release of ET-1 after stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (Chanez et al., 1996).

b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS. Several nonpeptide antagonists have been developed for clinical use (Warner et al., 1996), but they have not yet been tested in asthmatic patients. Because bronchoconstriction is mediated by ETB receptors but the remodeling effects are mediated by ETA receptors, it is likely that a nonselective antagonist would be preferable. Potent nonpeptide antagonists, such as SB217242, have been developed and may be more suitable as drugs. If the major effect of ETs is in tissue remodeling, it may be difficult to test the efficacy of such compounds, because very prolonged studies may be needed. In a guinea pig model of asthma, the early and late responses to inhaled allergen are reduced by ET receptor antagonists; the early bronchoconstriction response is blocked by ETB receptor antagonists, whereas the late inflammatory response is reduced by ETA receptor antagonists (Uchida et al., 1996). In mice, an ETA receptor antagonist but not an ETB receptor antagonist reduces allergen-induced eosinophilic responses, apparently via an increase in IFN-gamma release (Fujitani et al., 1997). This suggests that it might be possible to assess ET receptor antagonists by measuring allergen-induced responses. Glucocorticoids inhibit the expression of ET-1 in epithelial cells of asthmatic patients (Vittori et al., 1992) and in animal lungs (Andersson et al., 1992), suggesting that treatment with inhaled corticosteroids may reduce ET synthesis in asthma. ET-1 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids are lower than those in fluid from patients not treated with steroids (Redington et al., 1997a).

c. CONCLUSIONS. ET-1 is abnormally expressed in asthma and is likely to contribute to its pathophysiological mechanism. Although ET-1 is a potent bronchoconstrictor and induces plasma exudation and mucus secretion, its most striking effect is on airway remodeling. ET receptor antagonists have been developed for clinical application and may be useful in the treatment of asthma, although their benefits may be difficult to assess in clinical trials, because they may affect the long term progression of asthma.

E. Complement

1. Synthesis and metabolism. The complement system contains a series of 30 distinct circulating proteins, including proteolytic proenzymes, nonenzymatic components that form functional enzymes when activated, and receptors (Ember and Hugli, 1997). The proenzymes become sequentially activated in a cascade that finally leads to the formation of the so-called terminal attack sequence, which can promote cell lysis and is central to our defense against invading microorganisms. However, there are several by-products generated during the activation of the complement cascade that have proinflammatory activity and therefore have the potential to be involved in asthma. The larger fragments of C3 and C4 (i.e., C3b and C4b) are involved in a range of biological activities, including opsonization, phagocytosis, and immunomodulation. There are also several smaller fragments generated during the activation of C5, such as C3a and C5a, which have been referred to as anaphylatoxins and which have several airway effects (Ember and Hugli, 1997).

2. Receptors. There are distinct receptors for C3a and C5a, which have been cloned (Ember and Hugli, 1997). Both are members of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily.

3. Effects on airways. C3a and C5a induce airway smooth muscle contraction and chemotaxis of leukocytes, including eosinophils (Daffern et al., 1995; Regal, 1997). Aerosolization of C5a into the airways induces transient hyperresponsiveness to inhaled histamine (Irvin et al., 1986; Armour et al., 1987), an effect that is partially inhibited by pretreatment with indomethacin (Berend et al., 1986). Both C3a and C5a are potent stimulants of eosinophil degranulation (Takafuji et al., 1996), and the response of circulating eosinophils to C5a is enhanced after the late response to inhaled allergen in asthmatic patients (Evans et al., 1996b). C5a is also a potent chemoattractant of human monocytes and may therefore be involved in recruitment of macrophages into asthmatic airways (Pieters et al., 1995).

4. Role in asthma. There have been conflicting reports regarding changes in the complement cascade in asthmatic patients (Barnes et al., 1988). An increased amount of C3a has been demonstrated in the circulation of asthmatics during exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (Smith et al., 1990), and increased levels of C3a have been demonstrated in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained from some, but not all, asthmatics (Van de Graaf et al., 1992). Furthermore, patients with severe asthma have been reported to show increased serum levels of C3a and to exhibit a different pattern of complement activation, compared with patients with bronchial infections (Lin et al., 1992). In asthmatic patients, the neutrophil chemotactic activity of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is largely explained by C5a (Teran et al., 1997), suggesting that this is an important mediator of neutrophilic infiltration in asthmatic airways.

Evaluation of the contribution of endogenous activation of complement to the allergic asthmatic response is difficult, because there are no selective inhibitors for the various complement components. However, in experimental animals, treatment with soluble complement receptor 1, the normal regulator of circulating C1, reduces allergen-induced bronchoconstriction (Regal et al., 1993). Treatment of animals with cobra venom factor to deplete circulating complement components does not inhibit allergen-induced eosinophilic infiltration into lungs, however (Regal and Fraser, 1996).

    V. Small Molecules
Top
Previous
Next
References

A. Reactive Oxygen Species

There is increasing evidence that oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS) are involved in inflammatory airway diseases, including asthma (Barnes, 1990; Repine et al., 1997), although relatively few studies have been undertaken in humans. This is partly because of the difficulties of measuring oxidative stress in the airways in vivo and partly because of the relative inefficacy of currently available antioxidants. However, new noninvasive techniques have been developed to assess oxidative stress in the airways, making it possible to reassess the role of oxidative stress in asthma.

1. Synthesis and metabolism. Many inflammatory and structural cells that are activated in asthmatic airways, including eosinophils, macrophages, mast cells, and epithelial cells, produce ROS (Barnes, 1990). Superoxide anions are generated by NADPH oxidase and then are converted to hydrogen peroxide by superoxide dismutases (SODs). Hydrogen peroxide is then degraded to water by catalases. Superoxide and hydrogen peroxide may interact in the presence of free iron to form the highly reactive hydroxyl radical. Superoxide may also combine with NO to form peroxynitrite, which also generates hydroxyl radicals (Beckman and Koppenol, 1996). Oxidative stress describes an imbalance between ROS and antioxidants. The normal production of oxidants is counteracted by several antioxidant mechanisms in the human respiratory tract (Cantin et al., 1990). The major intracellular antioxidants in the airways are catalase, SOD, and glutathione, which is formed by the selenium-dependent enzyme glutathione peroxidase. Extracellular antioxidants include the dietary antioxidants vitamin C (ascorbic acid) and vitamin E (alpha -tocopherol), uric acid, and lactoferrin. Oxidant stress activates the inducible enzyme heme oxygenase-1, which converts heme and hemin to biliverdin, with the formation of carbon monoxide (Wong and Wispe, 1997; Choi and Alam, 1996). Biliverdin is converted, by bilirubin reductase, to bilirubin, which is a potent antioxidant.

2. Effects on airways. a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE. Hydrogen peroxide directly constricts airway smooth muscle in vitro, and this effect is mediated partly via the release of prostanoids (Rhoden and Barnes, 1989). ROS may damage airway epithelium, resulting in increased epithelial shedding and increased bronchoconstriction responses (Yukawa et al., 1990). In vitro, hydrogen peroxide induces an increase in the responsiveness of human airways (Hulsmann et al., 1994a). Formation of peroxynitrite also increases airway responsiveness in guinea pigs in vitro and in vivo (Sadeghi-Hashjin et al., 1996), but its effect in human airways is not yet known.

b. VESSELS. Little is known regarding the effects of ROS on the bronchial vasculature. Hydroxyl radical potently induces plasma exudation in rodent airways (Lei et al., 1996).

c. SECRETIONS. The effects of ROS on mucus secretion have not yet been investigated in human airways. In rats, oxidative stress increases airway mucus secretion, an effect that is blocked by COX inhibitors (Adler et al., 1990).

d. NERVES. Allergen impairs the function of bronchodilating nerves in guinea pig airways in vivo by an effect that is blocked by SOD, suggesting that superoxide anions may scavenge NO released from motor nerves (Miura et al., 1997). In rat airways, oxidant stress increases cholinergic nerve-induced bronchoconstriction, an effect that may be the result of oxidative damage to acetylcholinesterase (Ohrui et al., 1991).

e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS. Oxidants also activate NF-kappa B (which orchestrates the expression of multiple inflammatory genes that undergo increased expression in asthma), thereby amplifying the inflammatory response (Barnes and Karin, 1997). Many of the stimuli that activate NF-kappa B appear to do so via the formation of ROS, particularly hydrogen peroxide (Schreck et al., 1991). ROS activate NF-kappa B in an epithelial cell line (Adcock et al., 1994) and increase the release of proinflammatory cytokines from cultured human airway epithelial cells (Rusznak et al., 1996).

ROS and peroxynitrite induce lipid peroxidation, resulting in the formation of additional mediators. Isoprostanes are derived from lipid peroxidation of arachidonic acid (Morrow and Roberts, 1996). The most prevalent isoprostane is 8-epi-PGF2alpha , which is a potent constrictor of human airways in vitro, acting predominantly via Tx receptors, as discussed above (Kawikova et al., 1996).

3. Role in asthma. a. RELEASE. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cells from asthmatic patients show increased production of superoxide anions, compared with cells from normal individuals (Jarjour and Calhoun, 1994), and this production is increased further after allergen challenge (Calhoun and Bush, 1990). Increased generation of superoxide has also been reported for circulating monocytes and neutrophils from asthmatic patients (Vachier et al., 1994), and there is evidence for increased oxidative stress in the circulation (Rahman et al., 1996). Circulating eosinophils from asthmatic patients produce excessive superoxide after activation (Chanez et al., 1990), and this is increased even further after allergen challenge (Evans et al., 1996b). In experimental animals, certain viral infections (e.g., influenza) induce various indices of oxidative stress in the lungs (Choi and Alam, 1996), and this may be relevant to exacerbations of asthma.

It has recently become possible to measure oxidative stress using less invasive or noninvasive procedures, facilitating more detailed exploration of these factors in asthma. Hydrogen peroxide levels in exhaled condensates are increased in asthmatic adults and children (Dohlman et al., 1993; Jobsis et al., 1997; Antczak et al., 1997; Horvath et al., 1998) and are increased further during exacerbations (Dohlman et al., 1993). An increase in exhaled carbon monoxide levels has been reported for patients with asthma (Zayasu et al., 1997). Other noninvasive markers include thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, which are produced as a result of lipid peroxidation and are increased in exhaled condensates from asthmatic patients (Antczak et al., 1997). Pentane, another product of lipid peroxidation, is also increased in the exhaled air from asthmatic patients during exacerbations of asthma (Olopade et al., 1997). There is immunocytochemical evidence for peroxynitrite formation in asthmatic airways, obtained using an antibody to nitrotyrosine that detects nitrosylated proteins and demonstrates increased immunoreactivity in the airway mucosa, particularly in epithelial cells (Giaid et al., 1998).

In addition to the increased production of ROS in asthma, there may be a deficiency in antioxidant defenses. Glutathione peroxidase activity is reduced in platelets from asthmatic patients and this reduction is correlated with a reduction in serum selenium concentrations (Powell et al., 1994; Misso et al., 1996), but there is a surprising increase in glutathione levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic patients (Smith et al., 1993). SOD activity is reduced in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cells and epithelial cells from asthmatic patients, without any change in catalase activity (Smith and Harrison, 1997). There is reduced SOD activity in airway epithelial cells from asthmatic patients, because of reduced expression of Cu/Zn-SOD, possibly from oxidative inactivation (de Raeve et al., 1997). Interestingly, there are no abnormalities in antioxidant levels in asthmatic patients who achieve control with inhaled corticosteroids. There is increasing epidemiological evidence that a lack of dietary antioxidants may be an important determinant of asthma (Greene, 1995). Population surveys have shown that a low dietary intake of the antioxidant vitamin C is associated with poorer lung function and increased prevalence of wheezing (Britton et al., 1995; Cook et al., 1997). A low intake of vitamin C is associated with increased bronchial reactivity (Soutar et al., 1997), consistent with the proposal that the increased prevalence of asthma may be a result of reductions in the dietary intake of antioxidants (Seaton et al., 1995). Another study reported a weak association between low vitamin E intake and asthma (Troisi et al., 1995).

b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS. Several antioxidants have also been administered to asthmatic patients, to explore the effects of these compounds on lung function and airway reactivity. There have been several short term studies with vitamin C showing small beneficial effects on either lung function or airway reactivity, but no measurements of inflammation have been made (Bielory and Gandhi, 1994). There have been no formal trials of vitamin E or of another antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine. Selenium administered for a 3-month period to patients with chronic asthma produced a small but significant improvement in clinical symptoms but no improvement in lung function or airway reactivity (Hasselmark et al., 1993). Currently available antioxidants are rather weak, but more potent drugs, including spin-trap antioxidants (nitrones) and stable glutathione analogues, are currently in clinical development.

B. Nitric Oxide

There is increasing evidence that endogenous NO plays a key role in physiological regulation of airway functions and is implicated in airway diseases, including asthma (Barnes and Belvisi, 1993; Gaston et al., 1994; Barnes, 1995b).

1. Synthesis and metabolism. NO is a gas that is derived from the amino acid L-arginine by the enzyme NOS, of which at least three isoforms exist (Nathan and Xie, 1994). There are two cNOS forms; one was first described in brain and is localized to neural tissue [neuronal NOS (nNOS) or NOSI], and the other is localized to endothelial cells [endothelial NOS (eNOS) or NOSIII], although it has become apparent that both enzymes are also expressed in other cells, such as epithelial cells. Both enzymes are activated by increases in [Ca2+]i and produce small amounts of NO, which serve a local regulatory function. In contrast, iNOS (NOSII) is not normally expressed but is induced by inflammatory cytokines and endotoxin. This enzyme form is less dependent on increases in [Ca2+]i, because calmodulin is tightly bound to the enzyme; when the enzyme is induced it is activated and produces much larger amounts of NO than do cNOS isoforms. NO produced by cNOS is involved in physiological regulation of airway function, whereas NO produced by iNOS is involved in inflammatory diseases of the airways and in host defenses against infection.

Immunohistological studies have identified the presence of all three isoforms of NOS in human airways (Kobzik et al., 1993; Ward et al., 1995b; Giaid et al., 1998). eNOS is localized to endothelial cells in the bronchial circulation, but there is also evidence for eNOS expression in epithelial cells (Shaul et al., 1994). nNOS is localized to cholinergic nerves in airways (Fischer et al., 1993) but has also been reported in epithelial cells (Asano et al., 1994). iNOS may be expressed in several types of cells in response to cytokines, endotoxin, or oxidants (Morris and Billiar, 1994). In asthmatic airways, there is increased immunocytochemical staining for iNO, which is localized predominantly to airway epithelial cells (Hamid et al., 1993), and there is also localization to inflammatory cells, including macrophages and eosinophils (Giaid et al., 1998).

NO may be produced by several types of cells in the airways. In primary cultured human airway epithelial cells, proinflammatory cytokines increase NO production and increase iNOS immunoreactivity and mRNA levels (Robbins et al., 1994; Asano et al., 1994; Guo et al., 1995). In a human epithelial cell line (A549) and in rat type II pneumocytes, oxidants and ozone increase iNOS expression (Adcock et al., 1994; Punjabi et al., 1994). This is associated with activation of NF-kappa B, which is involved in the transcription of many inflammatory and immune genes (Barnes and Karin, 1997). NF-kappa B is of critical importance in increasing the transcription of the iNOS gene (Xie et al., 1994) and may be activated in several types of pulmonary cells by proinflammatory cytokines. Glucocorticoids inhibit the induction of iNOS in epithelial cells, and this is likely to be via a direct inhibitory interaction between the activated glucocorticoid receptor and NF-kappa B (Barnes and Karin, 1997). Eosinophils also express iNOS and release nitrite (del Pozo et al., 1997). It has proven difficult to induce iNOS in human, compared with rodent, macrophages. In human monocytes, anti-CD23 antibody causes release of nitrite, suggesting that allergens may trigger iNOS expression (Aubry et al., 1997), and similar results are seen in alveolar macrophages from normal and asthmatic subjects (Donnelly et al., 1998).

Progress in understanding the role of NO in health and disease has been largely dependent on the development of specific NOS inhibitors. The first inhibitors to be developed were analogues of L-arginine, such as L-NMMA and NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (which are nonselective inhibitors of NOS), and aminoguanidine (which selectively inhibits iNOS). More potent and selective inhibitors are now in development.

NO is rapidly transformed to nitrite and nitrate, which may be used to monitor NO production. NO also rapidly combines with superoxide anions to form peroxynitrite, which is highly reactive, nitrosylates proteins, and forms hydroxyl radicals (Beckman and Koppenol, 1996). Nitrosylation of tyrosine residues on proteins and nitrotyrosine may be detected immunocytochemically, providing evidence of local generation of peroxynitrite (Beckman and Koppenol, 1996). The presence of nitrotyrosine has recently been demonstrated in asthmatic airways, providing evidence for peroxynitrite generation within the airways. The amount of nitrotyrosine immunostaining is correlated with airway hyperresponsiveness, as measured by methacholine challenge (Giaid et al., 1998).

2. Receptors. NO does not have conventional receptors but, rather, diffuses into cells and activates soluble guanylyl cyclase, resulting in an increase in the formation of cyclic GMP. In airway smooth muscle, cyclic GMP causes relaxation (Ward et al., 1995a). Some of the effects of NO are mediated by the formation of peroxynitrite, as discussed above.

3. Effects on airways. NO has many effects on airway function, although the effects of endogenous NO depend on the site of production and the amount produced (Barnes, 1996b).

a. AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE. NO and NO donor compounds relax human airway smooth muscle in vitro via activation of guanylyl cyclase and increases in cyclic GMP levels (Ward et al., 1995a; Gaston et al., 1993). High concentrations of inhaled NO produce bronchodilation and protect against cholinergic bronchoconstriction in guinea pigs in vivo (Dupuy et al., 1992). In humans, inhalation of high concentrations of NO (80 ppm) has no effect on lung function in normal subjects and produces only weak and variable bronchodilation in asthmatic patients (Högman et al., 1993; Sanna et al., 1994; Kacmarek et al., 1996). NO may, however, be the major neurotransmitter of bronchodilating nerves in human airways. In proximal human airways, there is a prominent inhibitory NANC (i-NANC) bronchodilating neural mechanism, which assumes particular functional importance because it is the only endogenous bronchodilating pathway in human airways. The neurotransmitter of this i-NANC pathway in human airways is NO, because NOS inhibitors virtually abolish this neural response (Belvisi et al., 1992a,b; Bai and Bramley, 1993). Furthermore, i-NANC stimulation of human airways results in an increase in cyclic GMP levels without any increase in cyclic AMP levels (Ward et al., 1995a). The density of nNOS-immunoreactive nerves is greatest in proximal airways and diminishes peripherally, which is consistent with a reduction in i-NANC responses in more peripheral airways (Ward et al., 1995b). NOS is predominantly localized to parasympathetic (cholinergic) nerves and may be colocalized with vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), although the functional role of endogenous VIP in human airways is obscure (Belvisi et al., 1992b).

b. VESSELS. NO is a potent vasodilator in the bronchial circulation and may play an important role in regulating airway blood flow, as in the pulmonary circulation (Higenbottam, 1995; Crawley et al., 1990; Liu et al., 1991; Martinez et al., 1995). Endogenous NO may increase the exudation of plasma by increasing blood flow to leaky postcapillary venules, thus increasing airway edema (Kuo et al., 1992b). However, NOS inhibitors applied to the airway surface increase plasma exudation, suggesting that basal release of NO has an inhibitory effect on microvascular leakage (Erjefält et al., 1994). This paradox is resolved by considering the differing effects of NO, depending on the amount produced. In rat airways, L-NAME increases basal leakiness, whereas after endotoxin exposure, when iNOS is induced, L-NAME inhibits leakage (Bernareggi et al., 1997). Thus, the effect of endogenous NO on plasma exudation may depend on the amount produced and the site of production. In the context of asthma, the increased production of NO is likely to result in increased plasma exudation. Furthermore, if peroxynitrite is generated in asthma, this may lead to the formation of hydroxyl radicals that also increase airway plasma exudation (Lei et al., 1996).

c. SECRETIONS. L-NAME increases basal airway mucus secretions, suggesting that NO produced by cNOS normally inhibits mucus secretion (Ramnarine et al., 1996). However, NO donors increase mucus secretion in human airways in vitro (Nagaki et al., 1995). In cultured guinea pig airways after exposure to TNF-alpha and other inflammatory stimuli, there is increased secretion of mucus, which is inhibited by L-NMMA, suggesting that large amounts of NO generated by iNOS stimulate mucus secretion (Adler et al., 1995). Endogenous NO may also be important in regulating mucociliary clearance, because a NOS inhibitor decreases ciliary beat frequency in bovine airway epithelial cells (Jain et al., 1993).

d. NERVES. NO may be released with acetylcholine from cholinergic nerves and may modulate cholinergic neural responses. NOS inhibitors increase cholinergic neural bronchoconstriction in human and guinea pig airways (Belvisi et al., 1991, 1993; Ward et al., 1993). However, this appears to be the result of functional antagonism at the level of airway smooth muscle, rather than an effect on acetylcholine release from cholinergic nerves (Brave et al., 1991; Ward et al., 1993).

e. INFLAMMATORY CELLS. High concentrations of NO are cytotoxic and are involved in basic defenses against microorganisms. Targeted disruption ("knock-out") of the iNOS gene in mice results in a marked increase in susceptibility to infections (Wei et al., 1995; Laubach et al., 1995). It is possible that NO is toxic to epithelial cells in the airways and may contribute to epithelial shedding in asthma. These effects are likely to be mediated by the formation of peroxynitrite.

There is increasing evidence that high concentrations of NO may have effects on the immune system and the inflammatory response. NO inhibits Th1 lymphocytes in mice and thus favors the development of a Th2 response, with eosinophilia (Taylor-Robinson et al., 1993; Barnes and Liew, 1995). There is also evidence that NO promotes the chemotaxis of eosinophils, because L-NAME blocks eosinophil recruitment in the lungs (Ferreira et al., 1996). NO-donor compounds increase the survival of eosinophils by inhibiting apoptosis (Beauvais et al., 1995), and NO inhibits Fas receptor-mediated apoptosis in these cells (Hebestreit et al., 1998).

4. Role in asthma. a. RELEASE. There is evidence for increased expression of iNOS in asthmatic airways, particularly in epithelial cells and macrophages (Hamid et al., 1993; Giaid et al., 1998). It is likely that this arises from the effects of proinflammatory cytokines, oxidants, and perhaps other inflammatory mediators. Because NO is a gas, it diffuses into the airway lumen and may be detected in exhaled air (Barnes and Kharitonov, 1996). There is an increase in NO levels in the exhaled air from asthmatic patients (Alving et al., 1993; Kharitonov et al., 1994; Persson et al., 1994), which is derived from the lower airways (Kharitonov et al., 1996b; Massaro et al., 1996). The increased exhaled NO in asthma is related to airway inflammation (Jatakanon et al., 1998), is increased during the late response to allergen (Kharitonov et al., 1995) and during exacerbations (Massaro et al., 1995), and is decreased by treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (Kharitonov et al., 1996a).

b. EFFECTS OF INHIBITORS. Although exhaled NO is a useful noninvasive marker of inflammation in asthma, it is less certain how endogenous NO contributes to the pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma. Single inhalations of L-NMMA and L-NAME (via a nebulizer) result in reduced exhaled NO levels for normal and asthmatic patients (Kharitonov et al., 1994; Yates et al., 1995, 1996). Interestingly, there is no fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec, even in asthmatic patients with highly reactive airways, suggesting that basal production of NO is not important in maintaining basal airway tone. Although infusion of L-NMMA in normal subjects causes an increase in blood pressure, neither nebulized L-NAME nor L-NMMA has any effect on heart rate or blood pressure, suggesting that inhibition of NOS is confined to the respiratory tract. Although L-NMMA and L-NAME are nonselective inhibitors of cNOS and iNOS, aminoguanidine has some selectivity for iNOS. Inhalation of aminoguanidine has no effect on exhaled NO levels of normal subjects but significantly reduces exhaled NO levels of patients with asthma (Yates et al., 1996), further supporting the view that the elevated levels of exhaled NO in asthma are produced by iNOS. More potent and selective iNOS inhibitors are now in clinical development (Garvey et al., 1997).

c. CONCLUSIONS. There is good evidence for increased formation of NO in asthma, as evidenced by the high levels of NO in exhaled air, compared with normal subjects, and the fact that this increase is correlated with eosinophilic inflammation. NO is a potent vasodilator and may increase plasma exudation. It may also participate in the inflammatory response by shifting the balance toward Th2 cells and by recruiting and increasing the survival of eosinophils in the airways. Use of the potent selective iNOS inhibitors now in clinical development should reveal the importance of NO in asthma.

    VI. Cytokines
Top
Previous
Next
References

A. General Overview

1. The cytokine network in chronic inflammation. Cytokines are small protein mediators that play an integral role in the coordination and persistence of inflammation in asthma, although the precise role of each cytokine remains to be determined. The chronic airway inflammation of asthma is unique, in that the airway wall is infiltrated by T lymphocytes of the Th2 phenotype, eosinophils, macrophages/monocytes, and mast cells. In addition, "acute-on-chronic" inflammation may be observed in acute exacerbations, with increases in eosinophils and neutrophils and release of mediators such as histamine and cys-LTs from eosinophils and mast cells, to induce bronchoconstriction, airway edema, and mucus secretion.

Th2 lymphocytes produce a panel of cytokines, including IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, and GM-CSF. The primary signals that activate Th2 cells are unknown but may be related to the presentation of a restricted panel of antigens in the presence of appropriate cytokines. Dendritic cells are ideally suited to act as the primary contacts between the immune system and external allergens. Interaction of co-stimulatory molecules on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (in particular, the B7.2/CD28 interaction) may lead to proliferation of Th2 cells, thus perpetuating mast cell activation and eosinophilic inflammation. This may lead to the production of specific IgE by B lymphocytes under the influence of IL-4, which plays a critical role in the isotype switching of B lymphocytes from IgG to IgE production. Other cytokines, including TNF-alpha and IL-6, may also be important. The IgE produced in asthmatic airways binds to Fcepsilon RI on mast cells, priming them for activation by antigen. The development of mast cells from bone marrow cells represents a process of maturation and expansion, involving growth factors and cytokines [such as stem cell factor (SCF) and IL-3] produced by structural cells. Mast cells recovered from asthmatic patients by bronchoalveolar lavage show increased release of mediators such as histamine.

IL-4 also increases the expression of an inducible form of the low affinity receptor for IgE (Fcepsilon RII or CD23) on B lymphocytes and macrophages. This may account for the increased expression of CD23 on alveolar macrophages from asthmatic patients, which in turn could account for the increased release of cytokines from these macrophages. In addition, IL-4 is very important in driving the differentiation of CD4+ Th precursors into Th2-like cells.

The differentiation, migration, and pathobiological effects of eosinophils may occur through the effects of GM-CSF, IL-3, and IL-5. Once recruited from the circulation, mature eosinophils in the presence of these cytokines change phenotype into hypodense eosinophils, which show increased survival in bronchial tissue. These eosinophils are primed for ligand-initiated generation of increased amounts of cys-LTs and for cytotoxicity to other cells, such as those of the airway epithelium. Eosinophils themselves may also generate other cytokines.

Cytokines may also play an important role in antigen presentation and may enhance or suppress the ability of macrophages to act as antigen-presenting cells. Airway macrophages are normally poor at antigen presentation and suppress T cell proliferative responses [possibly via release of cytokines such as IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra)], but in asthma there is evidence for reduced suppression after exposure to allergen (Spiteri et al., 1994
; Aubus et al., 1984). Both GM-CSF and IFN-gamma increase the ability of macrophages to present allergen and express HLA-DR (Fischer et al., 1988). IL-1 is important in activating T lymphocytes and is an important co-stimulator of the expansion of Th2 cells after antigen presentation (Chang et al., 1990). Airway macrophages may be an important source of "first wave" cytokines, such as IL-1, TNF-alpha , and IL-6, which may be released (via Fcepsilon RII) upon exposure to inhaled allergens. These cytokines may then act on epithelial cells to release a second wave of cytokines, including GM-CSF, IL-8, and the regulated on activation, normal T cell-expressed, and secreted protein (RANTES), which amplify the inflammatory response and lead to influx of secondary cells such as eosinophils, which themselves may release multiple cytokines.

Cytokines may also exert an important regulatory effect on the expression of adhesion molecules, both on endothelial cells of the bronchial circulation and on airway epithelial cells. IL-4 increases the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) on endothelial and airway epithelial cells, and this may be important in eosinophil and lymphocyte trafficking (Schleimer et al., 1992). IL-1 and TNF-alpha increase the expression of ICAM-1 in both vascular endothelium and airway epithelium (Tosi et al., 1992).

Another feature of the chronic inflammation of asthma is the proliferation of myofibroblasts and the hyperplasia of airway smooth muscle. The mechanisms by which these structural changes occur are unclear, but several growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and TGF-beta , may be released from inflammatory cells in the airways (such as macrophages and eosinophils) and also from structural cells (such as airway epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts). These growth factors may stimulate fibrogenesis by recruiting and activating fibroblasts or transforming myofibroblasts. There is particular interest in the possibility that epithelial cells may release growth factors, because collagen deposition occurs underneath the basement membrane of the airway epithelium (Brewster et al., 1990). Growth factors may also stimulate the proliferation and growth of airway smooth muscle cells. PDGF and EGF are potent stimulants of animal and human airway smooth muscle proliferation (Hirst et al., 1992; Knox, 1994), and these effects are mediated by activation of tyrosine kinase and PKC. Growth factors may also be important in the proliferation of mucosal blood vessels and the goblet cell hyperplasia that are characteristic of chronically inflamed asthmatic airways. Cytokines such as TNF-alpha and fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) may also play important roles in the angiogenesis that is observed in chronic asthma.

Therefore, many cytokines are involved in the development of the atopic state and the chronic inflammatory processes of asthma, ultimately contributing to the release of mediators such as histamine and cys-LTs, airway remodeling, bronchoconstriction, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (table 2). The role of each cytokine in these processes can be evaluated by studying its properties, its presence and localization in the airway wall and in airway secretions of patients with asthma, and the effects of specific inhibitors, such as receptor antagonists or specific antibodies. Although these cytokines work in concert, the important cytokines implicated in asthma are considered separately. It is difficult to categorize these cytokines because they often have pleiotropic and overlapping effects. With respect to asthma and allergy, the following groupings are used in this review: (a) lymphokines, i.e., IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-15, IL-16, and IL-17; (b) proinflammatory cytokines, i.e., IL-1, TNF, IL-6, IL-11, GM-CSF, and SCF; (c) anti-inflammatory cytokines, i.e., IL-10, IL-1ra, IFN-gamma , IL-12, and 1L-18; and (d) growth factors, i.e., PDGF, TGF-beta , FGF, EGF, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF). Chemotactic cytokine (chemokines) are discussed in Section VII.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Effects of cytokines in asthma

This section deals with the cytokines that appear to be most involved in asthma. Their synthesis and release, receptors, effects with particular relevance to asthma, and potential role in asthma are discussed. As for the classical mediators, the potential role of each cytokine can be judged from its expression in asthmatic airways, from studies with transgenic or knock-out mice, or from studies involving the use of synthesis inhibitors, antibodies, or blockers at the receptor level.

2. Cytokine receptors. The receptors for many cytokines have now been cloned and, based on common homology regions, these have been grouped into superfamilies (Kishimoto et al., 1994).

a. CYTOKINE RECEPTOR SUPERFAMILY. This largest receptor superfamily includes IL-2 receptor beta - and gamma -chains, IL-4 receptor, IL-3 receptor alpha - and beta -chains, IL-5 alpha - and beta -chains, IL-6 receptor, gp130, IL-12 receptor, and GM-CSF receptor. The extracellular regions of the cytokine receptor family contain combinations of cytokine receptor domains, fibronectin type III domains, and usually C2 Ig constant region-like domains. Some members are composed of a single polypeptide chain that binds its ligand with high affinity. For other receptors, there may be more than one binding site for the ligand (typically sites with high and low binding affinities). For these receptors, additional subunits that are required for high affinity receptor expression have been identified. Some of these subunits are shared by more than one cytokine receptor, giving rise to heterodimeric structures. Such examples include (a) receptors sharing the GM-CSF receptor beta -chain (IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF); (b) receptors sharing the IL-6 receptor beta -chain, gp130 (IL-6, leukemia inhibitory factor, and oncostatin M); and (c) receptors sharing the IL-2 receptor gamma -chain (IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, and IL-15).

Many proteins of the cytokine receptor superfamily are secreted as soluble forms, which are produced by alternative splicing of their mRNA transcripts to yield proteins lacking the transmembrane region and the cytoplasmic proximal charged residues that anchor the protein into the membrane. They may act as antagonists, as transport proteins to carry cytokines to other sites, or as agonists.

b. IMMUNOGLOBULIN SUPERFAMILY. Cytokine receptors with Ig superfamily domains in their extracellular sequences include IL-1, IL-6, PDGF, and GM-CSF receptors. The Ig domains are characterized by a structural unit of approximately 100 amino acids, with a distinct folding pattern known as the Ig fold.

c. PROTEIN KINASE RECEPTOR SUPERFAMILY. These receptors have glycosylated, extracellular, ligand-binding domains, a single transmembrane domain, and an intracellular, tyrosine kinase catalytic domain. The superfamily includes receptors for growth factors such as PDGF, EGF, and FGF.

d. INTERFERON RECEPTOR SUPERFAMILY. This group includes the IFN-alpha /beta receptor, IFN-gamma receptor, and IL-10 receptor. They are single-transmembrane domain glycoproteins that are characterized by either one (IFN-gamma and IL-10 receptors) or two (IFN-alpha /beta receptors) homologous extracellular regions. Signal transduction involves phosphorylation and activation of Janus protein kinase and tyrosine kinase 2 protein tyrosine kinases.

e. NERVE GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR SUPERFAMILY. These cytokine receptors include the nerve growth factor receptor, TNF receptor-I (p55), and TNF receptor-II (p75). These are characterized by three or four cysteine-rich repeats of approximately 40 amino acids in the extracellular part of the molecule. The mode of signal transduction has not been elucidated.

f. SEVEN-TRANSMEMBRANE DOMAIN G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR SUPERFAMILY. These receptors include the chemokine receptors, which have a characteristic structure of a relatively short, acidic, extracellular, amino-terminal sequence followed by seven transmembrane domains with three extracellular and three intracellular loops. The receptors are coupled to heterotrimeric G proteins, which induce PI phosphate hydrolysis and activate kinases, phosphatases, and ion channels.

B. Lymphokines

Lymphokines are cytokines that are produced by T lymphocytes, although it is now recognized that many other cell types may release these cytokines. They play an important role in immunoregulation.

1. Interleukin-2. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. Activated T cells, particularly Th0 and Th1 T cells, are major sources of IL-2 (Morgan et al., 1976), whereas B lymphocytes can be induced under certain conditions to secrete IL-2 in vitro. IL-2 is secreted by antigen-activated T cells 4 to 12 h after activation, accompanied later by up-regulation of high affinity IL-2 receptors on the same cells. Binding of IL-2 to IL-2 receptors induces proliferation of T cells, secretion of cytokines, and enhanced expression of receptors for other growth factors, such as insulin. The IL-2-receptor complex is then removed from the T cell surface by internalization. IL-2 can also be produced by eosinophils (Levi Schaffer et al., 1996) and by airway epithelial cells (Aoki et al., 1997).

b. RECEPTORS. The IL-2 receptor complex is composed of three chains (alpha , beta , and gamma ) and belongs to the family of hematopoietic cytokine receptors (Taniguchi and Minami, 1993; Weiss and Littman, 1994). The alpha - and beta -chains bind to IL-2 with low affinity, whereas the gamma -chain does not bind IL-2 alone. The high affinity complex is an alpha beta gamma heterotrimer, whereas alpha gamma and beta gamma heterodimers have intermediate affinities. The beta -chain, which is expressed constitutively in T lymphocytes, is essential for signal transduction, and the intracellular domain has critical sequences necessary for growth-promoting signals (Hatakeyama et al., 1989). The gamma -chain also appears to be important for signal transduction (Zurawski and Zurawski, 1992), whereas the alpha -chain alone is unable to transduce any signal.

c. EFFECTS. IL-2 stimulates the growth and differentiation of T cells, B cells, natural killer cells, lymphokine-activated cells, and monocytes/macrophages. IL-2 functions as an autocrine growth factor for T cells and also exerts paracrine effects on other T cells (Smith, 1988). IL-2 is also involved in T cell receptor-stimulated T cell apoptosis (Lenardo, 1991). IL-2 promotes the differentiation and Ig secretion of B cells. IL-2 acts on monocytes to increase IL-1 secretion, cytotoxicity, and phagocytosis (Smith, 1988). Experiments with IL-2 gene knock-out mice show that these animals develop a normal thymus and normal T cell subpopulations in peripheral tissues, indicating that IL-2 activity is redundant and not confined to IL-2 alone (Schorle et al., 1991). Together with IL-4, IL-2 can reduce the glucocorticoid receptor binding affinity of blood mononuclear cells (Sher et al., 1994). IL-2 stimulates natural killer cells to secrete IFN-gamma , to proliferate, and to increase cytolysis. IL-2 enhances GM-CSF production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from asthmatics and IL-5 production in T cells from patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome (Nakamura et al., 1993; Enokihara et al., 1989). IL-2 is a potent chemoattractant for eosinophils in vitro (Rand et al., 1991b).

Systemic infusion of IL-2 as part of chemotherapeutic treatment results in eosinophilia, with an associated increase in eosinophil colony-stimulating activity (Sedgwick et al., 1990; Macdonald et al., 1990). This activity was abolished by neutralizing antibodies to IL-3, IL-5, or GM-CSF, indicating that IL-2 acts indirectly by promoting the synthesis of these substances. Repeated administration of IL-2 induces bronchial hyperresponsiveness in Lewis rats (Renzi et al., 1991). In ovalbuminsensitized Brown-Norway rats, IL-2 led to a 3-fold increase in the late-phase response, compared with the response in rats receiving only saline before allergen exposure (Renzi et al., 1992). IL-2 caused an inflammatory response around the airways, with a significant increase in eosinophils, lymphocytes, and mast cells.

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. Levels of IL-2 are increased in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with symptomatic asthma (Walker et al., 1992; Broide et al., 1992b). Increased bronchoalveolar lavage cells expressing IL-2 mRNA are also present (Robinson et al., 1992), and a nonsignificant increase in IL-2 mRNA-positive cells is observed in asthmatics after allergen challenge (Bentley et al., 1993). Particularly high levels of IL-2 and IL-4 mRNA-positive bronchoalveolar lavage cells are observed in steroid-resistant asthmatics, compared with steroid-sensitive asthmatics (Leung et al., 1995); this increase is not abolished by pretreatment with oral prednisolone for the steroid-resistant patients, and there are no differences in the expression of IL-5 and IFN-gamma mRNA between the two groups.

Cyclosporin A, which inhibits IL-2 gene transcription in activated T lymphocytes through interference with the transcription factors AP-1 and NF-AT, inhibits allergic airway eosinophilia but not bronchial hyperresponsiveness in animal models (Elwood et al., 1992). However, for patients with severe asthma, cyclosporin A causes a reduction in the amount of oral steroid therapy needed to control asthmatic symptoms (Alexander et al., 1992), although this finding was not confirmed in another study (Nizankowska et al., 1995). These effects of cyclosporin A may result from inhibition of IL-2 expression, as well as inhibition of the expression of other cytokines, such as GM-CSF and IL-5.

2. Interleukin-3. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. Activated Th cells are the predominant source of IL-3, together with mast cells (Arai et al., 1990; Fung et al., 1984).

b. RECEPTORS. The IL-3 receptor is formed by the association of a low affinity IL-3-binding alpha -subunit with a beta -subunit, which is common to the IL-5 and GM-CSF receptors but does not itself bind to these cytokines (Hayashida et al., 1990). IL-3 binding to its receptor results in rapid tyrosine and serine/threonine phosphorylation of several cellular proteins, including the IL-3 receptor beta -subunit itself (Isfort et al., 1988; Sorensen et al., 1989). A monoclonal antibody to the IL-3 receptor alpha -chain abolishes its function (Sun et al., 1996). The human IL-3 receptor is expressed on myeloid, lymphoid, and vascular endothelial cells. It is selectively induced in human endothelial cells by TNF-alpha , and it potentiates IL-8 secretion and neutrophil transmigration (Korpelainen et al., 1993).

c. EFFECTS. IL-3 is a pluripotent hematopoietic growth factor that, together with other cytokines such as GM-CSF, stimulates the formation of erythroid cell, megakaryocyte, neutrophil, eosinophil, basophil, mast cell, and monocytic lineages (Ottmann et al., 1989). GM-CSF also increases the responsiveness of neutrophils to IL-3 (Smith et al., 1995). Mice that overexpress IL-3 show only modest eosinophilia but die early because of massive tissue infiltration and destruction by myeloid cells such as neutrophils and macrophages (Dent et al., 1990).

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. An increase in the number of cells expressing IL-3 mRNA has been reported in mucosal biopsies and in bronchoalveolar lavage cells from patients with asthma (Robinson et al., 1992,1993a). However, after inhalation challenge, the number of IL-3 mRNA-positive cells does not increase, in contrast to those expressing IL-5 (Bentley et al., 1993).

3. Interleukin-4. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. IL-4 is produced by Th2-derived T lymphocytes and certain populations of thymocytes, as well as eosinophils and cells of the basophil and mast cell lineages. Cross-linking of the CD40 ligand on human CD4+ T cells from normal nonallergic subjects generates a co-stimulatory signal that increases IL-4 synthesis (Blotta et al., 1996). Synthesis can also be induced by stimulation of the antigen receptor on T lymphocytes and by IgE Fc receptor cross-linking in mast cells and basophils. Interestingly, corticosteroids enhance the capacity to induce IL-4 synthesis from CD4+ T cells (Blotta et al., 1997).

b. RECEPTORS. The IL-4 receptor is a complex consisting of two chains, a high affinity IL-4-binding chain (p140, alpha -chain), which binds IL-4 and transduces its growth-promoting and transcription-activating functions (Galizzi et al., 1990; Idzerda et al., 1990), and the IL-2 receptor gamma -chain (the common gamma -chain, gamma c), which amplifies signaling of the IL-4 receptor (Russell et al., 1993; Kondo et al., 1993). The alpha -chain belongs to the cytokine receptor superfamily. A recombinant extracellular domain of the human IL-4 receptor is a potent IL-4 antagonist (Garrone et al., 1991). The IL-2 receptor gamma -chain augments IL-4 binding affinity (Kondo et al., 1993; Russell et al., 1993). A low affinity IL-4 receptor has also been identified (Fanslow et al., 1993). High affinity IL-4 receptors are abundant in activated B and T cells. They are also present on hematopoietic progenitor cells, mast cells, macrophages, endothelial cells, epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and muscle cells (Park et al., 1987a,b; Ohara and Paul, 1987).

IL-4 induces phosphorylation of the IL-4-induced phosphotyrosine substrate, which is associated with the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase and with Stat-6 and Janus protein kinase after cytokine stimulation (Imani et al., 1997; Hatakeyama et al., 1991; Wang et al., 1992, 1993). The transcription factor Stat-6 is essential for mediation of the effects of IL-4 (Takeda et al., 1996; Shimoda et al., 1996). IL-4 also stimulates PI hydrolysis, yielding IP3 and subsequent calcium flux, followed by increased intracellular cyclic AMP levels (Finney et al., 1990). Interestingly, an association with atopy has been found with a R567 allele of the IL-4 receptor alpha -subunit (Khuruna Hershey et al., 1997), which enhances signaling and decreases the binding of the phosphotyrosine phosphatase Src homology 2-containing protein tyrosine phosphate (which has been implicated in termination of signaling by means of cytokine receptors) (Imani et al., 1997; Paulson et al., 1996).

c. EFFECTS. IL-4 plays an important role in B lymphocyte activation by increasing expression of class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, as well as enhancing expression of CD23 (low affinity Fcepsilon RII), CD40, and the alpha -chain of the IL-2 receptor. It promotes Ig synthesis by B lymphocytes and plays a central role in Ig class switching of activated B lymphocytes to the synthesis of IgG4 and IgE. This switching is accompanied by germline epsilon -chain synthesis. IL-4 promotes the development of Th2-like CD4+ T cells and inhibits the development of Th1-like T cells (Le Gros et al., 1990; Swain et al., 1990). It also enhances the cytolytic activity of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. Virus-specific CD8+ T cells can be induced by IL-4 to produce IL-5 (Coyle et al., 1995a).

IL-4 also exerts effects on monocytes and macrophages. It enhances the surface expression of MHC class II molecules and the antigen-presenting capacity of macrophages but inhibits the macrophage colony formation and release of TNF, IL-1, IL-12, IFN-gamma , IL-8, and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha . Together with other cytokines such as GM-CSF and IL-6, IL-4 can promote the growth of mast cell and myeloid and erythroid progenitors. IL-4 also up-regulates endothelial VCAM-1 expression on the endothelium. Interaction of VCAM-1 with very late activation antigen-4 promotes eosinophil recruitment (Schleimer et al., 1992). IL-4 also induces fibroblast chemotaxis and activation (Postlethwaite et al., 1992; Postlethwaite and Seyer, 1991) and, in concert with IL-3, IL-4 promotes the growth of human basophils and eosinophils (Favre et al., 1990). IL-4 has inhibitory effects such as suppression of metalloproteinase biosynthesis in human alveolar macrophages (Lacraz et al., 1992), inhibition of the expression of iNOS in human epithelial cells (Berkman et al., 1996b), and reduction of RANTES and IL-8 expression in human airway smooth muscle cells (John et al., 1997, 1998a).

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. IL-4 has been shown to be expressed by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, eosinophils, and mast cells in both atopic and nonatopic asthma (Bradding et al., 1992; Ying et al., 1997). Increased numbers of lymphocytes expressing IL-4 mRNA together with IL-5 mRNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid have been reported after allergen challenge (Robinson et al., 1993a). No increased levels of IL-4 have been detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of asthmatics (Broide et al., 1992b). The potential importance of IL-4 in inducing allergic airway inflammation has been addressed with IL-4-knock-out mice. Sensitization and exposure to ovalbumin did not induce lung eosinophilia as it did in the wild-type littermates (Brusselle et al., 1994). No ovalbumin-specific IgE was observed with active sensitization, and repeated exposures to ovalbumin did not induce bronchial hyperresponsiveness (Brusselle et al., 1995). The crucial effects of IL-4 appear to lie in its effect on Th2 cell development. The development of airway inflammation in the murine model of allergen-induced airway inflammation is accompanied by the presence of Th2 cells in the airways (Coyle et al., 1995b). In IL-4-knock-out mice, T cells recovered from the airways do not synthesize a Th2 cytokine pattern, which correlates with the absence of inflammatory airway changes. When wild-type mice are treated with anti-IL-4 during the exposure to aerosolized ovalbumin but not during the sensitization process, the influx of eosinophils to the airways is not inhibited (Corry et al., 1996; Coyle et al., 1995b). IL-4 receptor blockade prevents the development of antigen-induced airway hyperreactivity, goblet cell metaplasia, and pulmonary eosinophilia in a mouse model (Gavett et al., 1997). Thus, IL-4 appears to be important in the early stages of Th2 cell development.

4. Interleukin-5. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. IL-5 was first isolated from supernatants of activated murine spleen cells, which were shown to induce eosinophil colony formation. The isolated soluble activity was shown to selectively stimulate eosinophil production from murine bone marrow and was termed eosinophil differentiation factor. IL-5 was isolated from this soluble activity (Lopez et al., 1986). IL-5 is produced by T lymphocytes; in asthmatic airways, increased expression of IL-5 mRNA has been demonstrated in CD4+ T cells, using in situ hybridization (Hamid et al., 1991). Bronchoalveolar lavage CD4+ and CD8+ T cells can also secrete IL-5 (Till et al., 1995). IL-5 mRNA has been detected in the sputum and bronchial biopsies from patients with asthma, but not nonasthmatic controls, using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (Gelder et al., 1993, 1995). In addition, human eosinophils can express IL-5 mRNA and release IL-5 protein in vitro (Dubucquoi et al., 1994), and endobronchial challenge results in IL-5 mRNA expression in eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (Broide et al., 1992b), with an increase in IL-5 concentrations of up to 300-fold (Ohnishi et al., 1993b; Sedgwick et al., 1991). Elevated IL-5 concentrations have been reported in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from symptomatic but not asymptomatic asthmatics (Ohnishi et al., 1993a). Increased circulating levels of immunoreactive IL-5 have been measured in the serum of patients with exacerbations of asthma, and these levels fall with corticosteroid treatment (Corrigan et al., 1993). IL-5 levels are raised in induced sputum after allergen challenge of asthmatic patients (Keatings et al., 1997). IL-5 protein has also been localized (by immunochemical analysis) in mast cells in bronchial biopsies of patients with asthma, together with IL-4, IL-6, and TNF-alpha (Bradding et al., 1994). Transcriptional control of the human IL-5 gene involves several transcription factors, including NF-AT (Stranick et al., 1997).

b. RECEPTORS. The human IL-5 receptor has been identified in vitro on eosinophils, basophils, and B lymphocytes but not on neutrophils or monocytes (Lopez et al., 1991). It consists of a heterodimer with two polypeptide chains, i.e., a low affinity binding alpha -chain and a nonbinding beta -chain shared with the IL-3 and GM-CSF receptors (Tavernier et al., 1991). Both chains belong to the cytokine receptor superfamily (Bazan, 1990). The alpha -subunit alone is sufficient for ligand binding and is specific for IL-5, but association with the beta -chain leads to a 2- to 3-fold increase in binding affinity and allows signaling to occur. Some IL-5 receptor mutants have antagonistic effects and may act as receptor antagonists (Tavernier et al., 1995). Transcriptional regulation of the specific chain yields either membrane-bound or soluble forms of the receptor (Tavernier et al., 1992). The membranous form interacts with the beta -subunit, leading to substantial increases in affinity for IL-5 (Koike and Takatsu, 1994). The soluble form is secreted in body fluids, interacts with IL-5, and antagonizes the action of IL-5 on target cells (Devos et al., 1993; Tavernier et al., 1992). The expression of the IL-5 receptor is restricted to eosinophils and their immediate precursors. An increase in the number of both forms of IL-5 receptors in bronchial biopsies from asthmatics has been reported, with the expression of IL-5 receptor mRNA being predominantly in eosinophils (Yasruel et al., 1997). Ligand binding to IL-5 receptors activates non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase and other protein kinases in eosinophils (Bates et al., 1996; Taniguchi, 1995).

c. EFFECTS. IL-5 can influence the production, maturation, and activation of eosinophils (Egan et al., 1996). IL-5 acts predominantly at the later stages of eosinophil maturation and activation (Clutterbuck et al., 1989; Lopez et al., 1988). IL-5 can also prolong the survival of eosinophils (Yamaguchi et al., 1988). IL-5 appears to be the main cytokine involved in the development of eosinophilia in vivo. Administration of exogenous IL-5 produces eosinophilia in many in vivo models (Iwama et al., 1992). IL-5-transgenic mice, in which transcription of IL-5 is coupled to the dominant control region of the gene coding for the constitutive marker CD2, show life-long eosinophilia in organs with predicted T cell expression, such as bone marrow, spleen, and peritoneum, with fewer cells in the airway mucosa (Dent et al., 1990). IL-5-knock-out transgenic mice behave normally, indicating that eosinophils require other factors for degranulation and subsequent tissue damage. Intratracheal administration of another eosinophil chemotactic agent, eotaxin, leads to further eosinophil accumulation in the lungs and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, an effect not observed in wild-type mice (Rothenberg et al., 1996). IL-5 may cause eosinophils to be released from the bone marrow, whereas local release of another chemoattractant may be necessary to cause tissue localization of eosinophils (Collins et al., 1995). On the other hand, IL-5 instilled into the airways of patients with asthma induces significant airway eosinophilia (Shi et al., 1997), and inhaled IL-5 causes eosinophilia in induced sputum and bronchial hyperresponsiveness but has no effect on airway caliber (Shi et al., 1998). The eosinophil chemotactic responses of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of asthmatics during the pollen season is accounted for by IL-5 and RANTES (Venge et al., 1996).

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. IL-5 may play an important role in eosinophil maturation, chemoattraction, and activation in asthma and may underlie bronchial hyperreactivity. It may also interact with other eosinophil chemoattractants and activators, such as chemokines, to activate and induce chemoattraction of eosinophils (Rothenberg et al., 1997; Collins et al., 1995). The expression of IL-5 in tissues and cells from patients with asthma is discussed above. Studies with IL-5 monoclonal antibodies clearly support a role for IL-5 in asthma. Pretreatment with anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies can suppress allergen-induced airway eosinophilia (Chand et al., 1992; Van Oosterhout et al., 1993; Mauser et al., 1993, 1995). There is some debate regarding whether the IL-5induced eosinophilia is the direct cause of bronchial hyperresponsiveness induced by allergen exposure. There is an effect of anti-IL-5 antibodies on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in some studies (Van Oosterhout et al., 1993; Mauser et al., 1995), whereas other studies do not report such an effect, despite inhibition of eosinophilia (Corry et al., 1996). In IL-5-knock-out mice, both allergen-induced eosinophilia and airway hyperresponsiveness are abolished (Foster et al., 1996). The site of IL-5 expression may be critical to eosinophil recruitment and the development of airway hyperresponsiveness. Studies of transgenic mice expressing IL-5 from lung epithelial cells showed elevated levels of IL-5 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and serum, lung histopathological changes reminiscent of asthma, and base-line airway hyperresponsiveness (Lee et al., 1997). In addition to the effect of IL-5 in mobilizing eosinophils from the bone marrow, there is evidence for its effect as a regulator of eosinophil homing and migration into tissues in response to local chemokine release (Mould et al., 1997).

Studies of the use of anti-IL-5 antibodies in the treatment of human asthma are currently underway. Studies of the effect of systemic corticosteroid treatment in patients with worsening asthma indicate that there is a reduction in the expression of IL-5 mRNA in the airway mucosa that is associated with an improvement in asthma (Robinson et al., 1993b). Cyclosporin A and tacrolimus (FK-506) (immunosuppressant agents sometimes used in the treatment of severe asthma) inhibit the expression of IL-5 mRNA in activated human T lymphocytes in response to phytohemagglutinin or phorbol esters (Rolfe et al., 1997).

5. Interleukin-13. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. IL-13 is synthesized by activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and is a product of Th1, Th2, and Th0-like CD4+ T cell clones (Minty et al., 1993a). Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell clones synthesize IL-13 in response to antigen-specific or polyclonal stimuli (Zurawski and de Vries, 1994).

b. RECEPTORS. There is a close similarity between IL-4 and IL-13 receptors. An IL-4 receptor antagonist derived from a mutant protein (Zurawski et al., 1993) is a potent receptor antagonist of the biological activity of IL-4 and also of IL-13. It particularly inhibits the effect of IL-13 in inducing IgE synthesis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. There is evidence from cDNA cloning of the IL-13 receptor to suggest that the IL-4 receptor alpha -chain is a component of the IL-13 receptor (Aman et al., 1996). Despite this, these receptors appear to be distinct (Zurawski and de Vries, 1994).

c. EFFECTS. IL-13 is a potent modulator of human monocyte and B cell function (Minty et al., 1993a). IL-13 has profound effects on human monocyte morphological features, surface antigen expression, antibody-dependent cellular toxicity, and cytokine synthesis (McKenzie et al., 1993; Minty et al., 1993a). In human monocytes stimulated by lipopolysaccharide, the production of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and colony-stimulating factors is inhibited by IL-13, whereas IL-1ra secretion is increased (Zurawski et al., 1993). Production of IL-1beta , IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IFN-gamma , and GM-CSF from blood monocytes is inhibited (Berkman et al., 1996c; de Waal Malefyt et al., 1993), whereas MIP-1alpha , IL-1, and TNF-alpha release from human alveolar macrophages is inhibited (Yanagawa et al., 1995; Berkman et al., 1995). IL-13 inhibits the release of RANTES and IL-8 from airway smooth muscle cells in vitro (John et al., 1997, 1998a). These actions of IL-13 are similar to those of IL-4 and IL-10. The suppressive effects of IL-13 and of IL-4 are not related to endogenous production of IL-10. Similarly to IL-4, IL-13 decreases the transcription of IFN-gamma and IL-12. It is possible that IL-13 acts like IL-4 and suppresses the development of Th1 cells by down-regulating IL-12 production by monocytes, thereby favoring the development of Th2 cells (Le Gros et al., 1990; Swain et al., 1990; Hsieh et al., 1994). IL-13, unlike IL-4, fails to activate human T cells, which appears to be the result of a lack of IL-13 receptors on these cells. IL-13 diminishes monocyte glucocorticoid receptor binding affinity (Spahn et al., 1996). IL-13 activates eosinophils by inducing the expression of CD69 cell surface protein and prolonging eosinophil survival (Luttmann et al., 1996).

IL-13 induces the expression of CD23 on purified human B cells and acts as a switch factor directing IgE synthesis, similar to IL-4 (Punnonen et al., 1993; Cocks et al., 1993). A mutant protein of IL-4, which is a potent receptor antagonist of the biological activity of IL-4, antagonizes IL-13 actions, blocking B cell proliferation and IgE synthesis (Aversa et al., 1993). This mutant protein of IL-4 may therefore have therapeutic potential for the treatment of allergies.

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. Increased expression of IL-13 mRNA has been reported in the airway mucosa of patients with atopic and nonatopic asthma (Humbert et al., 1997a; Naseer et al., 1997). In addition, levels of IL-13 together with IL-4 are increased after segmental allergen challenge of patients with asthma (Kroegel et al., 1996). There is a significant correlation between eosinophil counts and levels of IL-13.

6. Interleukin-15. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. IL-15 is produced by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after activation (Grabstein et al., 1994). IL-15 mRNA is expressed in lung fibroblasts and epithelial cell lines, as well as monocytes and human blood-derived dendritic cells (Jonuleit et al., 1997).

b. RECEPTORS. IL-15 uses the beta - and gamma -subunits of the IL-2 receptor (Giri et al., 1994; Grabstein et al., 1994), and both chains are needed for IL-15-mediated actions. A high affinity IL-15 binding subunit has also been described (Kennedy and Park, 1996). Mitogen-activated macrophages, natural killer cells, and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells express IL-15 receptor alpha -chains, which can bind IL-15 without requiring IL-2 receptor alpha - or beta -chains (Chae et al., 1996).

c. EFFECTS. IL-15 shares some of the properties of IL-2, such as stimulation of the proliferation of T cells and lymphokine-activated killer cells. However, there are many other distinct effects of IL-15. IL-15 can induce IL-8 and macrophage chemotactic peptide (MCP)-1 production in human monocytes (Badolato et al., 1997). It also induces the release of soluble IL-2 receptor alpha -chain from human blood mononuclear cells (Treiber Held et al., 1996). It promotes angiogenesis in vivo (Angiolillo et al., 1997). IL-15 can also activate neutrophils and delay their apoptosis (Girard et al., 1996). IL-15 promotes the synthesis of IL-5 from house dust mite-specific human T cell clones (Mori et al., 1996), an effect inhibited by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor herbimycin A. This indicates that IL-15 produced at the site of allergic inflammation may play a role in recruitment and activation of eosinophils by inducing IL-5 production by T cells. IL-15 is also a chemoattractant for human blood T lymphocytes, an effect inhibited by an anti-IL-2 receptor beta -chain antibody (Wilkinson and Liew, 1995).

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. There are no data specific to asthma.

7. Interleukin-16. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. IL-16, previously known as lymphocyte chemoattractant factor, was first identified as a product of peripheral blood mononuclear cells after mitogen and histamine stimulation in vitro (Center et al., 1983; Center and Cruikshank, 1982). IL-16 was subsequently shown to be produced by CD8+ T cells after stimulation with histamine and serotonin in vitro (Laberge et al., 1995, 1996). IL-16 can also be produced by epithelial cells (Bellini et al., 1993), eosinophils (Lim et al., 1996), and mast cells (Rumsaeng et al., 1997).

b. EFFECTS. IL-16 has specific activities on CD4+ T cells (Cruikshank et al., 1994). IL-16 selectively induces migration of CD4+ cells, including CD4+ T cells and CD4-bearing eosinophils (Rand et al., 1991a). IL-16 acts as a growth factor for CD4+ T cells and induces IL-2 receptors and MHC class II molecules on these cells (Cruikshank et al., 1987).

c. ROLE IN ASTHMA. Elevated concentrations of IL-16 have been found in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained from asthmatic subjects after allergen challenge (Cruikshank et al., 1995b). In stable atopic asthmatic subjects, there is predominant expression of IL-16 mRNA and immunoreactivity in airway epithelium (Laberge et al., 1997). IL-16-like activity has been detected in cell culture supernatants generated from histamine-stimulated tracheal epithelial cells obtained from asthmatic subjects (Bellini et al., 1993).

8. Interleukin-17. IL-17 is a CD4+ T cell-derived cytokine that stimulates NF-kappa B and IL-6 production in fibroblasts and co-stimulates T cell proliferation (Yao et al., 1995a). It stimulates epithelial, endothelial, and fibroblastic cells to secrete cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF, and PGE2 (Fossiez et al., 1996; Yao et al., 1995b). In the presence of IL-17, fibroblasts can sustain the proliferation of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors and their preferential maturation into neutrophils. IL-17 increases the release of NO in cartilage from patients with osteoarthritis, via NF-kappa B activation (Attur et al., 1997).

C. Proinflammatory Cytokines

Proinflammatory cytokines are involved in most types of inflammation and appear to amplify and perpetuate the ongoing inflammatory response. They may be important in disease severity and resistance to anti-inflammatory therapy in asthma.

1. Interleukin-1. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. There are two distinct forms of IL-1 (alpha  and beta ), produced from two different genes. Although the amino acid sequence homology between human IL-1alpha and IL-1beta is only 20%, the molecules bind to the same receptor and have nearly identical properties. IL-1beta (17.5 kDa) is synthesized as a larger precursor molecule with a molecular mass of 31 kDa. IL-1beta is released into the extracellular space and the circulation. The most active form of IL-1beta is its cleaved mature form, resulting from the action of a cysteine protease (IL-1-converting enzyme) (Thornberry et al., 1992; Cerretti et al., 1992). In contrast, IL-1alpha is usually retained intracellularly.

IL-1 is produced by a variety of cells, including monocytes/macrophages, fibroblasts, B cells, both Th1 and Th2-like T cell lines, natural killer cells, neutrophils, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells. The major source of IL-1 in most tissues is stimulated monocytes/macrophages. Monocytes produce 10 times more IL-1beta than IL-1alpha (Nishida et al., 1987; March et al., 1985); IL-1alpha is mostly cell-associated, whereas IL-1beta is mostly released. Eosinophils can produce IL-1alpha (Weller et al., 1993), whereas human epithelial cells can augment IL-1beta expression when exposed to the air pollutant nitrogen dioxide (Devalia et al., 1993). A wide variety of stimuli, including IL-1 itself (Dinarello and Mier, 1987), TNF-alpha (Turner et al., 1989), GM-CSF (Xu et al., 1989), endotoxin, and phagocytosis, can increase the expression of IL-1 in monocytes/macrophages. IL-1 production by endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells can also be induced by IL-1beta , TNF-alpha , or endotoxin. On the other hand, PGE2 and corticosteroids can attenuate the capacity of endotoxin and other stimuli to release IL-1, through inhibition of transcription and through a decrease in IL-1 mRNA stability (Knudsen et al., 1986; Pennington et al., 1992; Kern et al., 1988). An inhibitor of IL-1-converting enzyme that inhibits the inflammatory responses to IL-1beta has been described (Ray et al., 1992).

b. RECEPTORS. Two IL-1 receptors have been described. The type I and type II receptors are transmembrane glycoproteins that bind IL-1alpha , IL-1beta , and IL-1ra. The type I IL-1 receptor is expressed on many cells, including T cells, B cells, monocytes, natural killer cells, basophils, neutrophils, eosinophils, dendritic cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and vascular endothelial cells, whereas the type II receptor is also expressed on T cells, B cells, and monocytes. An IL-1 receptor accessory protein has been described (Greenfeder et al., 1995), which, when associated with the type I IL-1 receptor, increases its affinity for IL-1beta . Only the type I receptor transduces a signal in response to IL-1 (McKean et al., 1993); the type II IL-1 receptor, on binding to IL-1, does not. Therefore, the type II IL-1 receptor may act as a decoy receptor, preventing IL-1 from binding to the type I IL-1 receptor (Colotta et al., 1994). IL-1 signal transduction pathways are associated with TNF receptor-associated factor (TRAF) adaptor proteins, particularly TRAF-6 (Cao et al., 1996a). TRAF-6 associates with IL-1 receptor-associated kinase, which is recruited to and activated by the IL-1 receptor complex (Cao et al., 1996b).

A soluble receptor (found in normal human serum and secreted by the human B cell line RAJI) that binds preferentially to IL-1beta has been described (Symons et al., 1995). IL-1 down-regulates the numbers of IL-1 receptors (Matsushima et al., 1986; Mizel et al., 1981), whereas PGE2 increases the expression of IL-1 receptors (Spriggs et al., 1990; Bonin et al., 1990). PDGF can increase IL-1 receptor expression and IL-1 receptor mRNA levels in fibroblasts (Chiou et al., 1989; Bonin and Singh, 1988), whereas IL-4 increases receptor expression on T cells (Lacey and Erdmann, 1990). TGF-beta may decrease the expression of IL-1 receptors (Dubois et al., 1990) and may also uncouple the response of the cells to IL-1, without affecting IL-1 receptor expression or IL-1 binding (Stoeck et al., 1990).

Some of the effects of IL-1 can be mimicked by agents that increase cyclic AMP levels and activate protein kinase A (Shirakawa et al., 1986; Onozaki et al., 1985), whereas others can be mimicked by agents that activate PKC (Emery et al., 1989; Suzuki and Cooper, 1985; Shackelford and Trowbridge, 1984). Many cells produce cyclic AMP in response to IL-1. Activation of protein kinase A by an IL-1-induced increase in cyclic AMP levels may lead to increased transcription of several cellular genes. These may turn on activating transcription factors that bind to a cis-acting cyclic AMP-responsive element (Yamamoto et al., 1988) and NF-kappa B, through the phosphorylation of an inhibitor protein, Ikappa B. AP-1 activity may also be induced by IL-1 (Muegge et al., 1989) through PKC activation. Phosphorylation of several cellular proteins through the action of PKC-independent serine/threonine kinase may also occur upon activation of the IL-1 receptor (Kaur and Saklatvala, 1988).

c. EFFECTS. IL-1 induces fever, like other endogenous pyrogens such as TNF and IL-6. It causes leukocytosis by release of neutrophils from the bone marrow and induces the production of other cytokines, including IL-6.

IL-1 is a growth factor for mature and immature thymocytes and a cofactor in the induction of proliferation of and IL-2 secretion by peripheral blood CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after engagement of their antigen receptors. IL-1beta is an important growth factor for Th2 cells in response to antigen-primed antigen-presenting cells, but not for Th1 cells (Greenbaum et al., 1988
). Synergistic effects between IL-1 and IL-6 have been reported for the activation of T cells (Helle et al., 1989; Elias et al., 1989; Sironi et al., 1989). IL-1 also functions as a growth factor for B cells (Paul and Ohara, 1987; Vink et al., 1988; Lipsky et al., 1983). IL-1 induces many other cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, RANTES, GM-CSF, IFN-gamma , PDGF, and TNF, in a variety of cells. IL-1 induces fibroblasts to proliferate (Schmidt et al., 1982), an effect that may be the result of release of PDGF (Raines et al., 1989), it increases PG synthesis and collagenase secretion (Postlethwaite et al., 1983; Mizel et al., 1981), and it increases the synthesis of fibronectin and types I, III, and IV collagen (Dinarello and Savage, 1989). IL-1beta together with TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma can induce or up-regulate the expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on endothelial cells and on respiratory epithelial cells, which may lead to increased adhesion of eosinophils to the vascular endothelium and respiratory epithelium (Godding et al., 1995; Pober et al., 1986). IL-1-induced adhesion of eosinophils to endothelial cell monolayers is inhibited by anti-ICAM and anti-VCAM antibodies (Bochner et al., 1991).

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. Levels of IL-1beta in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with asthma have been found to be elevated, compared with those in fluid from nonasthmatic volunteers; there is also an increase in IL-1beta -specific mRNA transcripts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid macrophages (Borish et al., 1992). In addition, patients with symptomatic asthma show increased levels of IL-1beta in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, compared with patients with asymptomatic asthma (Broide et al., 1992b). Increased expression of IL-1beta in asthmatic airway epithelium has been reported, together with an increased number of macrophages expressing IL-1beta (Sousa et al., 1996). Selective inhibition of IL-1beta expression in the epithelium of the airway wall of patients with asthma, without a reduction in IL-1ra expression, after corticosteroid therapy has been described (Sousa et al., 1997).

IL-1beta induces airway neutrophilia and selectively increases airway responsiveness to bradykinin in rats (Tsukagoshi et al., 1994a); these effects are mediated in part through the generation of ROS (Tsukagoshi et al., 1994b). IL-1beta can induce eosinophil accumulation in rat skin, an effect that is blocked by an anti-IL-8 antibody (Sanz et al., 1995). Of interest, IL-1beta has profound effects on the coupling of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor to adenylyl cyclase, an effect that is mediated through the up-regulation of inhibitory G proteins (Koto et al., 1996).

2. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha . a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. Two major forms of TNF exist, i.e., TNF-alpha and TNF-beta , which have only 35% amino acid homology but bind to similar receptors. TNF-alpha (previously known as cachectin) is expressed as a type II membrane protein attached by a signal anchor transmembrane domain in the propeptide (Gearing et al., 1994). TNF-alpha is released from cells by proteolytic cleavage of the membrane-bound form by a metalloproteinase (TNF-converting enzyme). Inactivation of the TNF-converting enzyme gene compromises the ability of cells to produce soluble TNF-alpha . TNF-alpha is produced by many cells, including macrophages, T lymphocytes, mast cells, and epithelial cells, but the principal source is macrophages. The secretion of TNF-alpha by monocytes/macrophages is greatly enhanced by other cytokines, such as IL-1, GM-CSF, and IFN-gamma . Human eosinophils are also capable of releasing TNF-alpha (Costa et al., 1993), together with airway epithelial cells (Devalia et al., 1993). TNF-beta is mainly produced by activated lymphocytes via a similar pathway.

b. RECEPTORS. TNF-alpha interacts with two cell surface receptors, i.e., p55 and p75. Both receptors are members of the nerve growth factor receptor superfamily. Soluble forms of human p55 and p75 receptors have been described; they are derived from the extracellular domains of the receptors and may act as inhibitors of TNF effects (Nophar et al., 1990). TNF receptors are distributed on nearly all cell types except red blood cells and resting T lymphocytes. The p75 receptor is more restricted to hematopoietic cells. p75 is the principal receptor released by human alveolar macrophages and monocytes in the presence of IFN-gamma (Galve de Rochemonteix et al., 1996).

Several signaling pathways leading to activation of different transcription factors, such as NF-kappa B and AP-1, have been identified. The TRAF family of adaptor proteins, particularly TRAF-2, is involved in signaling from the TNF receptors (Rothe et al., 1995). TRAF-2 may also play a role in the pathway of signal transduction from the TNF receptors to activation of the MAP kinase cascade. TNF activates a sphingomyelinase, resulting in the release of ceramide from sphingomyelin, which in turn activates a Mg2+-dependent protein kinase (Mathias et al., 1991).

c. EFFECTS. Many of the actions of TNF-alpha occur in combination with other cytokines as part of the cytokine network, and the effects of TNF-alpha are very similar to those of IL-1beta , because there are close interactions between the signal transduction pathways of these two cytokines (Eder, 1997). TNF-alpha potently stimulates airway epithelial cells to produce cytokines, including RANTES, IL-8, and GM-CSF (Berkman et al., 1995c; Kwon et al., 1994a, 1995; Cromwell et al., 1992), and it increases the expression of ICAM-1 (Tosi et al., 1992). TNF-alpha also has synergistic effects with IL-4 and IFN-gamma to increase VCAM-1 expression on endothelial cells (Thornhill et al., 1991). This has the effect of increasing the adhesion of inflammatory leukocytes, such as neutrophils and eosinophils, at the airway surface. TNF-alpha enhances the expression of class II MHC molecules on antigen-presenting cells. In addition, it enhances the release of IL-1 by these cells. It acts as a co-stimulatory factor for activated T lymphocytes, enhancing proliferation and expression of IL-2 receptors. TNF-alpha also inhibits bone resorption and synthesis and induces proliferation of fibroblasts (Rogalsky et al., 1992). TNF-alpha stimulates bronchial epithelial cells to produce tenascin, an extracellular matrix glycoprotein (Harkonen et al., 1995).

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. TNF-alpha may have an important amplifying effect in asthmatic inflammation (Kips et al., 1993; Shah et al., 1995). There is evidence for increased TNF-alpha expression in asthmatic airways (Bradding et al., 1994), and IgE triggering in sensitized lungs leads to increased expression in epithelial cells in both rat and human lung (Ohkawara et al., 1992; Ohno et al., 1990). Increased TNF-alpha mRNA expression in bronchial biopsies from asthmatic patients has been reported (Ying et al., 1991; Bradding et al., 1994). TNF-alpha is also present in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic patients (Broide et al., 1992b), and TNF-alpha release from bronchoalveolar leukocytes from asthmatic patients is increased (Cembrzynska-Norvak et al., 1993). TNF-alpha is also released from alveolar macrophages from asthmatic patients after allergen challenge (Gosset et al., 1991). Furthermore, both blood monocytes and alveolar macrophages show increased gene expression of TNF-alpha after IgE triggering in vitro, and this effect is enhanced by IFN-gamma (Gosset et al., 1992). Alveolar macrophages of asthmatics undergoing late-phase responses after allergen challenge release more TNF-alpha and IL-6 ex vivo than do those from patients with only an early response (Gosset et al., 1991). There are polymorphisms in the promoter of the TNF gene that may be more frequently associated with asthma (Moffatt and Cookson, 1997).

Infusion of TNF-alpha causes increased airway responsiveness in Brown-Norway rats (Kips et al., 1992), and inhalation of TNF-alpha by normal human subjects results in increased airway responsiveness at 24 h after inhalation, as well as an increase in sputum neutrophils (Thomas et al., 1995). TNF-alpha may be an important mediator in the initiation of chronic inflammation, by activating the secretion of cytokines from a variety of cells in the airways. Several approaches to inhibition of TNF-alpha synthesis or effects, including the use of monoclonal antibodies to TNF or soluble TNF receptors, in asthma are now under investigation.

3. Interleukin-6. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. IL-6 was originally described for its antiviral activity, its effects on hepatocytes, and its growth-promoting effects on B lymphocytes and plasmacytomas. It is secreted by monocytes/macrophages, T cells, B cells, fibroblasts, bone marrow stromal cells, keratinocytes, and endothelial cells. Epithelial cells also appear to produce IL-6 (Mattoli et al., 1991). Human airway smooth muscle cells, upon activation with IL-1beta or TGF-beta , can release IL-6 (Elias et al., 1997). Major basic protein secreted from eosinophils can interact with IL-1 or TGF to increase IL-6 release from fibroblasts (Rochester et al., 1996).

b. RECEPTORS. High affinity IL-6 receptors are formed by the association of the IL-6 receptor alpha -chain (which binds IL-6 with low affinity) with a beta -chain (gp130) (which does not bind IL-6 but associates with the alpha -chain/IL-6 complex and is responsible for signal transduction) (Kishimoto et al., 1992).

c. EFFECTS. IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine whose role in asthma remains unclear. IL-6 has growth-regulatory effects on many cells and is involved in T cell activation, growth, and differentiation. It is a terminal differentiation factor for B cells and induces Ig (IgG, IgA, and IgM) secretion (Akira et al., 1993). IL-6 is an important cofactor in IL-4-dependent IgE synthesis (Vercelli et al., 1989). IL-6 may also have anti-inflammatory effects. IL-6 can inhibit the expression and release of IL-1 and TNF from macrophages in vitro and can inhibit endotoxin-induced TNF production and neutrophil influx in the airways in vivo (Ulich et al., 1991a,b; Schindler et al., 1990a). IL-6-transgenic mice demonstrate lymphocytic infiltration around airways, which is associated with reduced airway responsiveness (DiCosmo et al., 1994).

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. IL-6 is released in asthma. There is evidence for increased release of IL-6 from alveolar macrophages from asthmatic patients after allergen challenge (Gosset et al., 1991) and increased basal release, compared with nonasthmatic subjects (Broide et al., 1992b). IgE-dependent triggering stimulates the secretion of IL-6 from both blood monocytes and alveolar macrophages in vitro (Gosset et al., 1992). Increased levels of IL-6 can be measured in nasal washings from children after rhinovirus infection (Zhu et al., 1996). In addition, IL-6 mRNA expression and an increase in NFkappa B DNA-binding activity can be induced by rhinovirus infection of cells in vitro.

4. Interleukin-11. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. IL-11, which is distantly related to IL-6, is produced by fibroblasts and human airway smooth muscle cells when they are stimulated by IL-1 and TGF-beta 1 (Maier et al., 1993; Elias et al., 1997).

b. RECEPTORS. A single class of specific receptors on mouse cells has been described (Yin et al., 1992). The receptor has not yet been cloned. Like IL-6, IL-11 uses the IL-6 signal transducer gp130. Upon ligand binding, phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in several proteins occurs (Yin and Yang, 1993; Yin et al., 1994).

c. EFFECTS. Although IL-11 cDNA was cloned on the basis of IL-6-like bioactivity, IL-11 has biological features distinct from those of IL-6. IL-11 promotes multiple stages of human megakaryocytopoeisis and thrombopoeisis. In combination with SCF or IL-4, IL-11 supports the generation of B cells (similarly to IL-6) (Hirayama et al., 1992). IL-11 induces the production of acute-phase reactants (Baumann and Schendel, 1991). IL-11 induces the synthesis of the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1. It inhibits IL-12 and TNF-alpha production from monocytes/macrophages (Leng and Elias, 1997), effects mediated at the transcriptional level by inhibition of NF-kappa B.

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. IL-11 is released into bronchoalveolar lavage fluid during upper respiratory viral infections in humans and induces nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness in mice (Einarsson et al., 1996). Targeted expression of IL-11 in mouse airways leads to a T cell inflammatory response with airway remodeling, local accumulation of myofibroblasts, and airway obstruction (Tang et al., 1996).

5. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. GM-CSF is one of the colony-stimulating factors that act to regulate the growth, differentiation, and activation of hematopoietic cells of multiple lineages. GM-CSF is produced by several airway cells, including macrophages, eosinophils, T lymphocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, airway smooth muscle cells, and epithelial cells.

b. RECEPTORS. The GM-CSF receptor consists of a low affinity alpha -chain and a beta -chain that is shared with the IL-3 and IL-5 receptor alpha -chains (Kitamura et al., 1991; Hayashida et al., 1990). These receptors are usually distributed on granulocytes, monocytes, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts. Up-regulation of the expression of GM-CSF receptor alpha -chain mRNA in macrophages in airway biopsies from patients with nonatopic asthma, but not those with atopic asthma, has been reported (Kotsimbos et al., 1997). Certain analogues of GM-CSF bind to the alpha -chain of the receptor, but not to the beta -chain complex, without agonist effects, indicating that these mutants could act as antagonists of GM-CSF (Hercus et al., 1994).

c. EFFECTS. GM-CSF is a pleiotropic cytokine that can stimulate the proliferation, maturation, and function of hematopoietic cells. GM-CSF may be involved in priming inflammatory cells, such as neutrophils and eosinophils. It can prolong the survival of eosinophils in culture (Hallsworth et al., 1992). GM-CSF can enhance the release of superoxide anions and cys-LTs from eosinophils (Silberstein et al., 1986). GM-CSF can also induce the synthesis and release of several cytokines, including IL-1 and TNF-alpha , from monocytes. GM-CSF induces nonhematopoietic cells, such as endothelial cells, to migrate and proliferate (Bussolino et al., 1989).

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. There is evidence for increased expression of GM-CSF in the epithelium in bronchial biopsies from asthmatic patients (Sousa et al., 1993) and in T lymphocytes and eosinophils after endobronchial challenge with allergen (Broide and Firestein, 1991; Broide et al., 1992a). Increased circulating concentrations of GM-CSF have been detected in patients with acute severe asthma (Brown et al., 1991), and peripheral blood monocytes from asthmatic patients secrete increased amounts of GM-CSF (Nakamura et al., 1993). In addition to its release in asthmatic airways, GM-CSF can be demonstrated to have various effects in asthma. GM-CSF has been found to be the major LTC4-enhancing activity for eosinophils in the supernatant of cultured asthmatic alveolar macrophages (Howell et al., 1989). Media obtained from cultured bronchial epithelial cells from asthmatics increase the viability, superoxide production, and LTC4 production of eosinophils in vitro (Soloperto et al., 1991), an effect that is abolished by a neutralizing antibody to GM-CSF. Transient expression of the GM-CSF gene in the epithelium of rats, using an adenoviral vector, leads to an accumulation of eosinophils and macrophages that is associated with irreversible fibrosis (Xing et al., 1996). This indicates that GM-CSF may be involved in the chronic eosinophilia and airway remodeling of asthma.

6. Stem cell factor. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. SCF (previously known as c-Kit ligand) is produced by bone marrow stromal cells, fibroblasts (including bronchial subepithelial myofibroblasts and nasal polyp fibroblasts), and epithelial cells, such as nasal polyp epithelial cells (Kim et al., 1997; Zhang et al., 1996; Galli et al., 1994).

b. RECEPTORS. The receptor for SCF is c-Kit, a receptor protein kinase. It is expressed on early hematopoietic progenitor cells and allows a synergistic response to SCF and lineage-committing growth factors (such as GM-CSF for myelocytes). Expression of c-Kit decreases with cell maturation and is absent from mature cells released from the bone marrow. However, c-Kit expression increases on mast cells as they mature, and receptors are abundantly expressed on the surface of mast cells. c-Kit is also expressed on human eosinophils (Yuan et al., 1997).

c. EFFECTS. SCF acts as a survival factor for the early hematopoietic progenitor cells and synergizes with other growth factors to regulate the proliferation and differentiation of cells. SCF is a major growth factor for human mast cells (Valent et al., 1992; Mitsui et al., 1993). Two alternative splice variants account for the different forms of SCF; one is primarily membrane bound and the other is primarily soluble, after being released from the cell surface by proteolysis (Flanagan et al., 1991). CD34+ bone marrow cells cultured in vitro with recombinant human SCF and IL-3 induce the development of mast cells and other hematopoietic lineages (Kirshenbaum et al., 1992).

Membrane-bound SCF may influence mast cell adhesion (Kinashi and Springer, 1994), and soluble SCF is chemotactic for mast cells (Nilsson et al., 1994). Removal of either soluble or membrane-bound SCF from mast cells causes the mast cells to undergo apoptosis (Iemura et al., 1994; Mekori et al., 1993). SCF has a modest capacity for directly activating mast cells but is usually more active in priming mast cell responses to other stimuli, such as IgE-stimulated mediator release (Columbo et al., 1992; Wershil et al., 1992; Bischoff and Dahinden, 1992). SCF causes the release of small amounts of IL-4 and TNF-alpha from human lung mast cells (Gibbs et al., 1997). SCF stimulates very late activation antigen-4-mediated cell adhesion to fibronectin and VCAM-1 on human eosinophils (Yuan et al., 1997).

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. There is very little information on the expression of SCF in asthmatic airways. SCF is expressed in the epithelium of nasal polyps removed from patients with allergic rhinitis (Kim et al., 1997).

D. Inhibitory Cytokines

Although most cytokines initiate, amplify, or perpetuate inflammation, some cytokines appear to have an inhibitory or anti-inflammatory effect on allergic inflammation, either by blocking the expression or effects of inflammatory cytokines or by shifting the immune response away from the Th2 pattern of cytokines (Barnes and Lim, 1998).

1. Interleukin-10. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. IL-10, previously known as cytokine synthesis inhibitor factor, was originally identified as a product of murine Th2 clones that suppressed the production of cytokines by Th1 clones responding to antigen stimulation (Fiorentino et al., 1989). In humans, Th0, Th1, and Th2-like CD4+ T cell clones, cytotoxic T cells, activated monocytes, and peripheral blood T cells, including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, have the capacity to produce IL-10 (Spits and de Waal Malefyt, 1992; Enk and Katz, 1992). Mast cells also have the capacity to produce IL-10. Constitutive IL-10 secretion occurs in healthy lungs, with the major source being alveolar macrophages; however, circulating monocytes appear to be able to secrete more IL-10 than alveolar macrophages (Berkman et al., 1995a).

b. RECEPTORS. The IL-10 receptor is a member of the class II subgroup of cytokine receptors (the IFN receptor family). The IL-10 receptor has been characterized and cloned from a human lymphoma cell line (Liu et al., 1994); it is expressed in several lymphoid and myeloid cell types (Tan et al., 1993) and in natural killer cells (Carson et al., 1995). The IL-10 receptor is highly effective in recruiting the signaling pathways of IL-6-type cytokine receptors, including signal transduction-activated transcription factors 1 and 3 (Lai et al., 1996). The inhibitory effects of IL-10 on monocytes appear to be dependent on NF-kappa B (Wang et al., 1995).

c. EFFECTS. IL-10 is a pleiotropic cytokine that can exert either immunosuppressive or immunostimulatory effects on a variety of cell types. IL-10 is a potent inhibitor of monocyte/macrophage function, suppressing the production of several proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-alpha , IL-1beta , IL-6, MIP-1alpha , and IL-8 (Seitz et al., 1995; de Waal Malefyt et al., 1991a; Fiorentino et al., 1991), although the release of MCP-1 is increased (Seitz et al., 1995). IL-10 inhibits monocyte MHC class II, B7.1/B7.2, and CD23 expression and accessory cell function. Accessory signals mediated by B7 molecules through CD28 on the surface of T cells are essential for T cell activation. Expression of IL-10 by antigen-presenting cells may be an established pathway for the induction of antigen-specific tolerance, such as that to allergens (de Waal Malefyt et al., 1991b). In contrast, IL-10 up-regulates the monocyte expression of IL-1ra, another anti-inflammatory cytokine (de Waal Malefyt et al., 1992). IL-10 suppresses the synthesis of superoxide anions and NO by activated monocytes/macrophages (Cunha et al., 1992). An anti-IL-10 antibody enhances the release of cytokines from activated monocytes, suggesting that this cytokine may play an inhibitory role when the cell is stimulated (de Waal Malefyt et al., 1991a). IL-10 inhibits the stimulated release of RANTES and IL-8 from human airway smooth muscle cells in culture (John et al., 1997, 1998a). IL-10 inhibits IFN-gamma and IL-2 production by Th1 lymphocytes (Fiorentino et al., 1989) and IL-4 and IL-5 production by Th2 cells, by interfering with B7/CD28-dependent signals (Moore et al., 1993; Schandene et al., 1994). IL-10 also inhibits eosinophil survival and IL-4-induced IgE synthesis. On the other hand, IL-10 acts on B cells to enhance their viability, cell proliferation, Ig secretion (with the isotype switch), and class II MHC expression. IL-10 is also a growth co-stimulator for thymocytes and mast cells (Thompson-Snipes et al., 1991), as well as an enhancer of cytotoxic T cell development (Chen and Zlotnik, 1991). IL-10 also activates the transcription of genes for mast-cell derived proteases. IL-10 enhances the production of the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases in monocytes and tissue macrophages, while decreasing metalloproteinase biosynthesis (Lacraz et al., 1995).

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. There is significantly less IL-10 mRNA and protein expressed in alveolar macrophages from asthmatic subjects, compared with those from nonasthmatic individuals (John et al., 1998b; Borish et al., 1996). Triggering of CD23 molecules by anti-CD23 monoclonal antibodies induces IL-10 production by human monocytes (Dugas et al., 1996). An IL-10 polymorphism of the transcription initiation site could be responsible for reduced IL-10 release. Patients with severe asthma are more likely to exhibit polymorphisms in the promoter region that are associated with lower production of IL-10 (Lim et al., 1998). Other studies indicate that inhaled corticosteroid therapy can restore the reduced IL-10 release from macrophages from asthmatic patients (John et al., 1998b), and theophylline also increases IL-10 secretion (Mascali et al., 1996). On the other hand, some studies have indicated that there are increased numbers of macrophages and T cells expressing IL-10 mRNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with asthma (Robinson et al., 1996).

IL-10 inhibits the late response and the influx of eosinophils and lymphocytes after allergen challenge in Brown-Norway rats (Woolley et al., 1994). Coinstillation of IL-10 by the intranasal route significantly inhibits the peritoneal and lung eosinophilia induced by ovalbumin in immunized mice (Zuany Amorim et al., 1995, 1996). Given its anti-inflammatory properties and these effects in animal models of allergic inflammation, IL-10 may have beneficial effects in the treatment of asthma (Pretolani and Goldman, 1997). However, no studies of such effects have been performed. Administration of IL-10 to normal volunteers induced a decrease in circulating CD2+, CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ lymphocytes, with suppression of mitogen-induced T cell proliferation and reduction of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta production from whole blood stimulated with endotoxin ex vivo (Chernoff et al., 1995).

2. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. IL-1ra has been isolated from supernatants of monocytes cultured on aggregated Ig or with immune complexes (Arend et al., 1985, 1989), from alveolar macrophages (Galve de Rochemonteix et al., 1990), and from urine of patients with fever or myelomonocytic leukemia (Barak et al., 1986; Seckinger et al., 1990; Balavoine et al., 1986). IL-1ra shares 26 and 19% amino acid homology with IL-1alpha and IL-1beta , respectively. It binds to the IL-1 receptor with affinity similar to that IL-1alpha or IL-1beta (Seckinger et al., 1987), and it inhibits most effects of IL-1 on cells, such as thymocyte proliferation, IL-2 synthesis by T cells, and PGE2 and collagenase production by fibroblasts (Hannum et al., 1990; Seckinger et al., 1987; Bienkowski et al., 1990; Arend et al., 1990). IL-1ra is preferentially produced by alveolar macrophages, compared with monocytes (Monick et al., 1987), which may underlie the diminished IL-1 bioactivity exhibited by alveolar macrophages, compared with monocytes (Monick et al., 1987; Kern et al., 1988; Wewers et al., 1984). Other IL-1 receptor inhibitors have been described (Muchmore and Decker, 1985; Giri et al., 1990).

IL-1ra blocks proliferation of Th2 but not Th1 clones in vitro (Abbas et al., 1991). Increased expression of IL-1beta and IL-1ra in asthmatic airway epithelium has been reported (Sousa et al., 1996). Although the expression of IL-1beta is reduced after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, IL-1ra levels are unchanged, thus shifting the balance away from inflammation (Sousa et al., 1997). In a human airway epithelial cell line, corticosteroids increase the expression of IL-1ra (Levine et al., 1996). In an ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pig model, aerosol administration of IL-1ra immediately before allergen challenge results in protection against bronchial hyperreactivity and accumulation of pulmonary eosinophils (Watson et al., 1993). In a similar model, the late-phase response is inhibited and the number of hypodense eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is decreased (Okada et al., 1995). Trials of IL-1ra in the treatment of asthma are underway.

3. Interferon-gamma . a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. IFN-gamma was originally identified as a product of mitogen-stimulated T lymphocytes that inhibited viral replication in fibroblasts. The only known sources of IFN are CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells.

b. RECEPTORS. The IFN-gamma receptor is a single transmembrane protein, a member of the cytokine receptor type II superfamily. Although the receptor binds IFN-gamma with high affinity, signal transduction requires a species-specific accessory protein that associates with the extracellular domain of the receptor. The receptor is expressed on T cells, B cells, monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, granulocytes, and platelets. Epithelial and endothelial cells also express these receptors.

c. EFFECTS. IFN-gamma has extensive and diverse immunoregulatory effects on various cells. It is produced by Th1 cells and exerts an inhibitory effect on Th2 cells (Romagniani, 1990). IFN-gamma inhibits antigen-induced eosinophil recruitment in mice (Nakajima et al., 1993). However, IFN-gamma may also have proinflammatory effects and may activate airway epithelial cells to release cytokines and express adhesion molecules (Look et al., 1992). IFN-gamma has an amplifying effect on the release of TNF-alpha from alveolar macrophages that is induced by IgE triggering or by endotoxin (Gifford and Lohmann-Matthess, 1987; Gosset et al., 1992), and it increases the expression of class I and class II MHC molecules on macrophages and epithelial cells. IFN-gamma is a powerful and relatively specific inhibitor of IL-4-induced IgE and IgG4 synthesis by B cells.

IFN-gamma increases the production of IL-1, PAF, and hydrogen peroxide in monocytes, in addition to down-regulating IL-8 mRNA expression, which is up-regulated by IL-2 (Gusella et al., 1993; Sen and Lenggel, 1992; Billiau and Dijkmans, 1990). IFN-gamma also synergizes with the effects of TNF-alpha on the production of RANTES from airway smooth muscle cells (John et al., 1997). On the other hand, IFN-gamma inhibits IL-10 production from monocytes (Chomarat et al., 1993), which leads to an up-regulation of TNF-alpha transcription (Donnelly et al., 1995). Thus, IFN-gamma promotes cell-mediated cytotoxic responses while inhibiting allergic inflammation and IgE synthesis. IFN-gamma up-regulates class II molecules on monocytes/macrophages and dendritic cells and induces de novo expression on epithelial, endothelial, and other cells, thus making them capable of antigen presentation.

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. There is evidence for reduced production of IFN-gamma by T cells from asthmatic patients, and this correlates with disease severity (Leonard et al., 1997; Koning et al., 1997). This appears to be a feature of atopic disease and is not specific to asthma (Tang et al., 1993). This suggests that defective IFN-gamma production may be important in asthma (Halonen and Martinez, 1997), although no polymorphisms of the IFN-gamma gene have been associated with asthma (Hayden et al., 1997). Administration of exogenous IFN-gamma prevents airway eosinophilia and hyperresponsiveness after allergen exposure in mice (Iwamoto et al., 1993; Lack et al., 1996). Liposome-mediated gene transfer of IFN-gamma to the pulmonary epithelium in sensitized mice before secondary antigen exposure also inhibits the pulmonary allergic response (Li et al., 1996). IFN-gamma -knock-out mice develop prolonged airway eosinophilia in response to allergen (Coyle et al., 1996). IFN-gamma inhibits allergic eosinophilia (Lack et al., 1996; Zuany Amorim et al., 1994) and airway hyperresponsiveness, probably by inducing the formation of IL-10. These studies indicate that IFN-gamma has a potential modulating effect on responses to allergen. Allergen immunotherapy of asthmatic patients results in increased production of IFN-gamma by circulating T cells (Lack et al., 1997) and in increased numbers of IFN-gamma -producing T cells in nasal biopsies (Durham et al., 1996). Corticosteroid treatment also increases IFN-gamma expression in asthmatic airways (Bentley et al., 1996), but IFN-gamma expression is unexpectedly reduced in corticosteroid-resistant patients (Leung et al., 1995). In asthmatic patients, nebulized IFN-gamma reduces the number of eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, indicating its therapeutic potential in asthma (Boguniewicz et al., 1995).

4. Interleukin-12. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. IL-12 was initially recognized as a cytokine capable of synergizing with IL-2 to increase cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses, as well as an inducer of IFN-gamma synthesis by resting human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. IL-12 is secreted by antigen-presenting cells, including B lymphocytes and monocytes/macrophages (Trinchieri, 1995; Gately et al., 1998).

b. RECEPTORS. IL-12 receptors are expressed on T cells and natural killer cells. One component of the IL-12 receptor complex is related to gp130 (Chua et al., 1994). The expression of the IL-12 receptor beta 2-subunit under the influence of IFN-gamma determines the responsiveness of Th1 cells to IL-12 and is of critical importance in Th1/Th2 switching (Rogge et al., 1997).

c. EFFECTS. IL-12 enhances the growth of activated T cells and natural killer cells (Bertagnolli et al., 1992; Perussia et al., 1992; Gately et al., 1991; Robertson et al., 1992) and enhances cytotoxic T cell and natural killer cell activity (Gately et al., 1992; Robertson et al., 1992; Kobayashi et al., 1989). IL-12 stimulates natural killer cells and T cells to produce IFN-gamma (Schoenhaut et al., 1992; Wolf et al., 1991; Chan et al., 1991; Kobayashi et al., 1989), promotes in vitro differentiation of mouse and human T cells that secrete IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha (Hsieh et al., 1993; Manetti et al., 1993; Chan et al., 1991; Perussia et al., 1992), and inhibits the differentiation of T cells into IL-4-secreting cells (Hsieh et al., 1993; Manetti et al., 1993). IL-12 indirectly inhibits IL-4-induced human IgE responses by IFN-gamma -dependent and -independent mechanisms in vitro (Kiniwa et al., 1992). IL-12 can primarily regulate Th1 cell differentiation, while suppressing the expansion of Th2 cell clones (Manetti et al., 1993), by early priming of undifferentiated Th cells for IFN-gamma secretion (Manetti et al., 1994). Therefore, IL-12 may play an important role in directing the development of Th1-like T cell responses against intracellular pathogens, while inhibiting the development of Th2-like responses and IgE synthesis. IL-12 may play an important role in inhibiting inappropriate IgE synthesis and allergic inflammation as a result of allergen exposure.

d. ROLE IN ASTHMA. IL-12 may play an important role in inhibiting inappropriate IgE synthesis and allergic inflammation after allergen exposure. IL-12 treatment of mice during active sensitization reduces antigeninduced influx of eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, inhibits IgE synthesis, and abolishes antigen-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness (Kips et al., 1996). After an inflammatory response is established, there is inhibition of antigen-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness and inflammation (Gavett et al., 1995). The effects of IL-12 are largely mediated by IFN-gamma (Brusselle et al., 1997). In another study in mice, IL-12 administered at the time of allergic sensitization decreased specific IgE levels, tracheal ring responsiveness to acetylcholine, and eosinophilia in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after allergen challenge, with IL-5 and IL-10 down-regulation; IL-12 administered after sensitization did not alter specific IgE levels, had little effect on tracheal ring responsiveness, and produced a modest effect on the recruitment of eosinophils, with IL-5 down-regulation but IL-12 up-regulation (Sur et al., 1996). Thus, the effect of IL-12 was dependent on the timing of its administration, in relation to active sensitization.

IL-12 production and IL-12-induced IFN-gamma release are reduced in whole-blood cultures from patients with allergic asthma, compared with normal subjects (Van der Pouw Kraan et al., 1997). There is a reduction of IL-12 mRNA expression in airway biopsies from patients with allergic asthma, compared with normal subjects, but after oral corticosteroid treatment the levels of IL-12 mRNA are increased in corticosteroid-sensitive asthmatics, whereas no significant changes are observed in corticosteroid-resistant asthmatics (Naseer et al., 1997). This contrasts with the inhibitory effects of corticosteroids on IL-12 production in human monocytes in vitro (Blotta et al., 1997). Allergen immunotherapy results in an increase in IL-12 expression (Hamid et al., 1997). PGE2 is a potent inhibitor of human IL-12 production from monocytes (Van der Pouw Kraan et al., 1995). Similarly, beta 2-agonists decrease IL-12 production, and this might link regular inhaled beta 2-agonist therapy with a worsening of asthma control (Panina-Bordignon et al., 1997).

5. Interleukin-18. IL-18 (IFN-gamma -inducing factor) is a cytokine that is a potent inducer of IFN-gamma production and plays an important role in Th1 responses (Ushio et al., 1996). Human IL-18 has been cloned from normal human liver cDNA libraries using murine IL-18 cDNA clones. IL-18 is synthesized as a precursor molecule without a signal peptide and requires the IL-1-converting enzyme (caspase-1) for cleavage into a mature peptide.

The human IL-18 receptor has recently been purified and characterized. Human IL-1 receptor protein is a functional IL-18 receptor component (Torigoe et al., 1997).

Recombinant human IL-18 induces IFN-gamma production by mitogen-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, enhances natural killer cell cytotoxicity, increases GM-CSF production, and decreases IL-10 production. IL-18 induces IL-8, MIP-1alpha , and MCP-1 expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the absence of any co-stimuli. IL-18 directly stimulates gene expression and synthesis of TNF-alpha in CD3+/CD4+ T cells and natural killer cells, with subsequent production of IL-1beta and IL-8 in CD14+ monocytes (Puren et al., 1998). IL-18 induces phosphorylation of p56 (lck) and MAP kinase, and these may be involved in TCR/CD3-mediated responses (Tsuji Takayama et al., 1997). IL-18 also activates NF-kappa B in murine Th1 cells for enhancement of IL-2 gene expression by Th1 cells (Matsumoto et al., 1997; Robinson et al., 1997). IL-18, together with IL-12, induces anti-CD40-activated B cells to produce IFN-gamma , which inhibits IL-4-dependent IgE production (Yoshimoto et al., 1997).

E. Growth Factors

Chronic asthma is associated with structural remodeling of the airways, with fibrosis (particularly under the epithelium), increased thickness of the airway smooth muscle layer, increased numbers of mucus-secreting cells, and angiogenesis (Redington and Howarth, 1997). These changes are presumably in response to growth factors secreted from inflammatory and structural cells in the airways, and several growth factors have been implicated in asthma.

1. Platelet-derived growth factor. a. SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE. PDGF is released from many different cells in the airways and consists of two peptide chains, so that AA, BB, or AB dimers may be secreted by different cells. PDGF-A and -B chains are both synthesized as HMW precursors, which are then extensively processed before secretion (Ostman et al., 1988; Bywater et al., 1988). Posttranslational glycosylation and proteolytic cleavage (Bywater et al., 1988; Deuel et al., 1981; Raines and Ross, 1982) both contribute to the heterogeneity in the apparent molecular weights of the mature proteins. Most of the PDGF present in human platelets (from which PDGF was originally isolated) has been identified as AB dimer, although BB and AA dimers also exist (Hart et al., 1990; Hammacher et al., 1988; Heldin, 1988). PDGF-like activity in the conditioned media of various cells, such as those derived from smooth muscle, consists predominantly of the AA dimer (Sejersen et al., 1986). The sources of PDGF include platelets, macrophages, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, airway epithelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells. Various stimuli, such as IFN-gamma for alveolar macrophages, hypoxia, basic FGF (bFGF), and mechanical stress for endothelial cells, and serum, TNF-alpha , IL-1, and TGF-beta for fibroblasts, can induce PDGF release.

b. RECEPTORS. The PDGF receptors belong to a family of closely related receptor proteins that include the receptor for monocyte-colony stimulating factor and the c-Kit receptor (Yarden et al., 1986). PDGFs exert their actions through a family of at least two classes of PDGF receptors, alpha  and beta  (Matsui et al., 1989; Hart et al., 1988; Gronwald et al., 1988). These are single-transmembrane domain glycoproteins with an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain (Heldin, 1992). Binding of PDGF dimers induces receptor dimerization, with three possible configurations (alpha alpha , alpha beta , and beta beta ). The PDGF receptor alpha -subunit binds both PDGF A- and B-chains, whereas the receptor beta -subunit binds only PDGF B-chains. Therefore, PDGF-AA binds only to PDGF receptor alpha alpha dimers, PDGF-AB to receptor alpha alpha and alpha beta dimers, and PDGF-BB to all three configurations (alpha alpha , alpha beta , and beta beta ) (Westermark et al., 1989; Seifert et al., 1989). These receptors are widely distributed on cells of mesenchymal origin, including fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. Because of their critical role in cell growth, the expression of PDGF receptors is usually tightly controlled. However, receptor levels can be regulated by TGF-beta , which can increase the expression of PDGF receptors on human skin fibroblasts (Ishikawa et al., 1990; Bryckaert et al., 1988).

c. EFFECTS. PDGF is a major mitogen, with its primary regulatory role being directed at the cell cycle; it acts as a competence factor, triggering early events of the cell cycle that lead to DNA synthesis and mitosis (Larsson et al., 1989). PDGF induces the expression of competence genes, including the proto-oncogenes c-myc, c-fos, and c-jun (Hall et al., 1989; Greenberg et al., 1986). PDGF may activate fibroblasts to proliferate and secrete collagen (Rose et al., 1986), and it may also stimulate proliferation of airway smooth muscle (Hirst et al., 1992), which is mediated by the alpha  receptor (Hirst et al., 1996