|
|
||||||||
Vol. 50, Issue 4, 723-757, December 1998
Department of Pharmacology II, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
I. Introduction
II. Functional Analysis of G Protein-Mediated Activation of Muscarinic K+ Channels in Cardiac Atrial Myocytes
A. Time-Dependent Response of the Whole-Cell Muscarinic K+ Current to Acetylcholine
1. The G protein cyclic reaction mediating the receptor-to-channel signal transmission.
2. Activation phase.
3. The phase of short-term desensitization.
4. Deactivation of the response of the muscarinic K+ channel.
B. Quantitative Analysis of G Protein-Mediated Activation of the Muscarinic K+ Channel
1. Single-channel characteristics of the muscarinic K+ channel.
2. Positive cooperative effect of GTP on muscarinic K+ channel activity.
3. Spectral analysis of the muscarinic K+ channel currents in the presence of different concentrations of intracellular GTP.
4. A possible mechanism for the G protein-mediated increase in the functional numbers of muscarinic K+ channels.
C. Modulation of G Protein-Mediated Activation of the Muscarinic K+ Channel
III. Molecular Analysis of G Protein-Gated K+ Channels
A. Cloning of Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels
B. Subunits of G Protein-Gated K+ Channels
C. Tissue Distribution of GIRK Subunits
1. Peripheral tissues.
2. Central nervous system.
D. Expression of G Protein-Gated K+ Channels
E. Tetrameric Structure
F. Molecular Mechanism Underlying G Protein Activation of G Protein-Gated K+ Channels
1. Interaction between G proteinsubunits and subunits of G protein-gated K+ channels.
2. Mechanism underlying G proteinsubunitinduced activation of G protein-gated K+ channels.
3. Interaction between subunits of G protein-gated K+ channels, Gproteins, and membrane agonist receptors.
4. Possible mechanisms underlying specific signal transduction in the receptor/G protein/G protein-gated K+ channel system.
IV. Voltage-Dependent Properties of G Protein-Gated K+ Channels
A. Inwardly-Rectifying K+ Channels
1. Voltage-dependent change in inwardly rectifying K+ channel activity.
2. Mg2+ and polyamine block.
3. Mg2+/polyamine block sites in the inwardly rectifying K+ channel pore.
B. Inward Rectification of G Protein-Gated K+ Channels
1. Inward rectification of the muscarinic K+ channel.
2. Mg2+/polyamine block of G protein-gated K+ channels.
3. The Mg2+/polyamine-binding sites in G protein-gated K+ channels.
4. Slow relaxation of G protein-gated K+ channels containing GIRK1.
V. Pharmacological Properties of G Protein-Gated K+ Channels
VI. Localization of the G Protein-Gated K+ Channel in Different Organs
A. Cardiac Atrial Myocytes
B. Neurons
1. Differential cellular and subcellular distribution of GIRK subunits.
2. Functional significance of differential subcellular distribution of GIRK subunits.
C. Endocrine Cells
VII. Weaver Mutant Mice and the GIRK2 Gene
VIII. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
| |
I. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Upon stimulation of vagal nerves, acetylcholine
(ACh)c is released from axonal
terminals and decelerates the heart beat. This historic discovery by
Otto Loewi in the 1920s established the concept of chemical synaptic
transmission (Loewi, 1921
; Loewi and Navaratil, 1926
). Since then, many
physiologists have been trying to elucidate the mechanism(s) underlying
neurotransmitter (Vagusstoff)-induced bradycardia. Del Castillo and
Katz (1955)
first described hyperpolarization of the membrane induced
by ACh in frog heart. Hutter and Trautwein (1955)
measured an increase of K+ efflux across the cardiac cell membrane
with vagal stimulation. Trautwein and Dudel (1958)
showed an increase
of K+ conductance under voltage-clamp conditions.
Trautwein and colleagues analyzed the kinetics of the ACh-induced
K+ current in the rabbit sinoatrial node and
proposed that ACh induces activation of a specific population of
K+ channels, named muscarinic
K+ (KACh) channels, to
decelerate pacemaker activity (Noma and Trautwein, 1978
; Osterrieder
et al., 1981
). The single channel currents of the
KACh channels were recorded for the first time by
Sakmann et al. (1983)
, who showed that the channel exhibited
kinetic properties that clearly differed from those of the background
inwardly rectifying K+
(IK1) channel in cardiac myocytes.
The next big step was the discovery that pertussis toxin
(PTX)-sensitive heterotrimeric G proteins are involved in the
activation of the KACh channel by
M2-muscarinic and A1
adenosine receptors (Pfaffinger et al., 1985
; Breitwieser
and Szabo, 1985
; Kurachi et al., 1986a
and b
). Because the
KACh channel could be activated by intracellular
guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP) (in the presence of agonists)
and GTP
S (even in the absence of agonists) in cell-free inside-out
patches, the system seemed to be delimited to the cell membrane, which
led to the proposal that the channel is directly activated by G
proteins (Kurachi et al., 1986a
,b
,c
). The G protein responsible for activation of the KACh channel
was designated GK according to its
function (Breitwieser and Szabo, 1985
).
It was quite a surprise that the 
subunit
(G
) but not the
subunit
(G
) of the GK protein,
was proposed to mediate the GK-induced activation
of KACh channels (Logothetis et al.,
1987
, 1988
; Kurachi et al, 1989a
), because it was strongly believed at
that time that regulation of different effectors by G proteins was
mediated only by G
, although
G
merely served to bind to the
GDP-form of G
(G
-GDP) to anchor the trimeric G protein
to the cell membrane (Gilman, 1987
). Actually, Brown, Birnbaumer, and
their colleagues proposed GK
and not GK
as the physiological
activator of KACh channels (Yatani et
al., 1987
, 1988
; Codina et al., 1987
; for review see
Brown and Birnbaumer, 1990
). The dispute concerning the G protein
subunit responsible for the physiological activation of
KACh channels continued for nearly a decade (Ito
et al., 1992
; Yamada et al., 1993
,
1994a
,b
; Nanavati et al., 1990
; Kurachi, 1989
, 1990
,
1993
, 1994
, 1995
; Kurachi et al., 1992
; Clapham and Neer,
1993
; Wickman and Clapham, 1995
) until the functional interaction
between the channel and G
was shown at
the molecular level with cloned G protein-gated
K+ (KG) channel and/or G
protein subunits (Kubo et al., 1993b
; Dascal et
al., 1993
; Wickman et al., 1994
; Reuveny et
al., 1994
; Krapivinsky et al., 1995a
; Inanobe et
al., 1995b
). Now it is established that GK
is the physiological activator
of KG channels not only in cardiac myocytes, but
also in neurons and endocrine cells. Recently, it was indicated that G
protein-inhibition of neuronal Ca2+ channels is
also mediated by G
and not by
G
(Herlitze et al., 1996
; Ikeda,
1996
). Efforts are now being made to elucidate the molecular mechanisms
underlying G
-control of
KG and N-type Ca2+ channels.
The importance of the G protein-activation of KG
channel system in receptor-mediated regulation of cell responses is now
more widely appreciated than before because a wide variety of membrane receptors, such as M2-muscarinic,
A1 adenosine,
2-adrenergic, D2
dopamine, µ-,
-, and
-opioid, 5-HT1A
serotonin, somatostatin, galanin, m-Glu, GABAB,
and sphingosine-1phosphate receptors, have been shown to use this
system in inhibiting cell excitation in various organs (North et
al., 1987
; Lacey et al., 1988
; Hille, 1992a
; Grudt and
Williams, 1993
; Oh et al., 1995
; Saugstad et al.,
1996
; Sharon et al., 1997
; Bünemann et al.,
1995
; Koppen et al., 1996
). In this review, we will first
summarize ACh-activation of cardiac KACh
channels, the prototype of this system, and then recent progress in
molecular dissection of the KG channel system.
| |
II. Functional Analysis of G Protein-Mediated Activation of Muscarinic K+ Channels in Cardiac Atrial Myocytes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Time-Dependent Response of the Whole-Cell Muscarinic K+ Current to Acetylcholine
ACh added to the extracellular solution elicits a
KACh channel current in cardiac atrial myocytes
(fig. 1). The activation time-course is
sigmoidal and takes several hundred milliseconds to reach a peak
(Breitwieser and Szabo, 1988
). Thereafter, the evoked current gradually
decreases to a quasi-steady-state level within 1 min in the presence of
high concentrations of ACh (> 0.3 µM). This reduction of
cell K+ current in the continuous presence of ACh
is called "short-term" desensitization (Kurachi et al.,
1987b
). After wash-out of the agonist, the current disappears within
several seconds (deactivation). It is worth noting that in the
inside-out patch configuration of the patch-clamp method, one measures
KACh channel activity only in the steady-state
phase. Thus, in these experiments, limited information is available
regarding the desensitization of the channel.
|
These three phases of the response involve interactions between an agonist (i.e., ACh), an M2-muscarinic receptor, a PTX-sensitive G protein, and the KACh channel. Therefore, to understand the reaction of the KACh channel to ACh, it is necessary to know how the receptor-generated signal is transferred to the channel through the G protein and how this signal transmission might be modulated by other factors interacting with these different reactions.
1. The G protein cyclic reaction mediating the receptor-to-channel
signal transmission.
Activation of KACh
channel induced by M2-muscarinic receptor
stimulation is mediated by a heterotrimeric G protein
(GK) (fig. 2). The
heterotrimeric G proteins are membrane-bound proteins which transduce
signals from receptors to effectors such as adenylyl cyclase,
phospholipase C, the KACh channel, and other ion
channels (Gilman, 1987
). These proteins are composed of
,
, and
subunits (G
, G
,
and G
, respectively). Up to now, at least 16 G
, 5 G
, and 11 G
genes have been identified (Bourne, 1997
). Heterotrimeric G proteins
interact with receptors through G
. It is well
known that the interaction between M2-muscarinic receptors and GK
is blocked by the toxin
from Bordetella pertussis (PTX) (Ui, 1984
; Kurose et
al., 1986
). PTX modifies covalently a cysteine residue at the
carboxyl-terminal end of G
subunits belonging
to Gi, Go, and
Gt families by transferring an ADP-ribose group
from the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide moiety to the
cysteine residue (Gilman, 1987
). Because the receptor-mediated activation of KG channels in cardiac atrial
myocytes and neurons are inhibited by PTX (Pfaffinger et
al., 1985
; Kurachi et al., 1986a
),
GK seems to belong to one of these G protein
families. However, its molecular identity has not been fully
elucidated, although GK is proposed to be a
member of the Gi class of G proteins in some
systems (Kozasa et al., 1996
; Takano et al.,
1997
)
|
is in the
GDP-bound form (G
- GDP) (fig. 2).
G
-GDP has high affinity for
G
, thereby forming a heterotrimer with
G
(Gilman, 1987
does release GDP even in the absence of
agonists, and in turn binds GTP (GDP/GTP exchange) and becomes a
GTP-bound form (G
-GTP). Receptor
stimulation substantially increases the GDP dissociation rate, which
results in marked acceleration of the GDP/GTP exchange reaction.
Formation of G
-GTP leads to dissociation
of G
from G
.
The dissociated G
, which is always a
dimer under physiological conditions, interacts with the
KACh channel to activate the channel. Besides the
KACh channel, many effectors of G proteins have
been known to be regulated by G
(table
1) (Clapham and Neer, 1993
|
has a slow intrinsic GTPase activity: its
Kcat value is typically 1 to 5/min (Gilman,
1987
, therefore, hydrolyses the GTP on its
own molecule to GDP, thereby returning to the GDP-bound form and
re-associating with G
. This reaction
terminates the effector activation. In the continuous presence of
agonists, the heterotrimeric G protein restarts the cyclic reaction by
interacting with an agonist-bound receptor.
2. Activation phase.
The time to peak of the ACh-induced
response of the KACh channel is dependent on ACh
concentration: the higher the concentration of ACh, the faster the
activation. In the presence of a maximum effective concentration of
ACh, the time to peak is several hundred milliseconds. If the
M2-muscarinic receptor, GK,
and the KACh channel encountered by simple
diffusion in the membrane, the response time requires that all these
signaling molecules be within less than 1.5 µm of each other (Hille,
1992a
). The molecular mechanism satisfying such a topological
requirement has not been clearly identified. However, it was recently
suggested that KACh channel subunits may directly
interact with not only GK
but also GK
, trimeric
GK, and the receptor and thereby might form a
complex with these proteins (Huang et al., 1995
; Slesinger et al., 1995
) (detailed in the Sections III.F.3. and 4.).
3. The phase of short-term desensitization.
Short-term
desensitization becomes more prominent as the concentration of ACh is
increased above 0.3 µM (Kurachi et al.,
1987b
). This may at least partly arise from the transition of
M2-muscarinic receptors from the high to low
affinity-binding state due to dissociation of GK
from receptors after agonist application (Gilman, 1987
). Recent studies
demonstrated that heterologous coexpression of RGS proteins with
M2-receptors and recombinant
KG channels reestablishes the short-term
desensitization, which normally cannot be seen in the absence of RGS
proteins in the reconstituted system (Doupnik et al., 1997
).
Therefore, this protein may also be one of the molecules responsible
for the short-term desensitization of the KG
channel system. Other possible candidates for the short-term desensitization include phosphorylation of
M2-muscarinic receptors by
-adrenergic
receptor kinase (
ARK), dephosphorylation of
KACh channels and functional modulation of G proteins.
ARK is responsible
for the short time desensitization because receptor phosphorylation
occurs much slower than the desensitization (Kwatra and Hosey, 1986
ARK may
underlie the slow desensitization of KACh
channels which occurs in an order of minutes (Shui et al.,
1995
subunits, the addition of
mM intracellular ATP enhanced channel activity by
prolonging open time (Yamada M and Kurachi Y, unpublished observation).
Huang et al. (1998)
in inside-out patch membranes of Xenopus oocytes. Because
activation of M2-muscarinic receptors in atrial
cardiac myocytes induces the phosphoinositide turnover (Quist, 19824. Deactivation of the response of the muscarinic K+
channel.
The ACh-induced K+ current
disappears quickly when the agonist is washed out from the
extracellular solution (fig. 1). The rate of deactivation of the
whole-cell KACh channel current was estimated as
~30 to 200/min, which is much more rapid than either the GTP
hydrolysis rate of G proteins (~1 to 5/min) or the rate of
dissociation of G
from
KG channel subunits (~0.01/min) estimated in
vitro (Breitwieser and Szabo, 1988
; Nakajima et al., 1992
;
Gilman, 1987
; Doupnik et al., 1997
; Krapivinsky et
al., 1995c
). This discrepancy might in part be attributed to
positive cooperativity in the interaction between the channel and
GK
that will be described in the
Section II.B.2., where even a slight decrease in free
GK
concentration in the membrane
should cause a larger reduction of the channel activity.
> Br
> I
> SO4
or aspartate. Because the potency of the
nonhydrolyzable GTP analogue, GTP
S is not affected by intracellular
anion species, the GTPase activity of GK seems to
be modulated by intracellular anions. These effects of intracellular
anions need to be taken into consideration because in most studies the
internal side of the inside-out patch membrane is perfused with
solution containing a much higher concentration of
Cl
than that in the cytosol of most cells.
One related issue to be discussed here is the basal activity of the
KG channel system that is observed in the absence
of agonists. The native KACh channel exhibits
much smaller basal activity relative to the agonistinduced maximum
activity than heterologously expressed recombinant
KG channels (Kurachi, 1990B. Quantitative Analysis of G Protein-Mediated Activation of the Muscarinic K+ Channel
The unique feature of the KG channel is the
increase in channel activity in response to GK
activation. This response is mediated by interaction between
GK
and a KG
channel. How they interact with each other and how the interaction
leads to channel activation are intriguing questions.
The mechanism of
GK
/KG
channel interaction has been mainly investigated in the
KACh channel with inside-out patch membranes of
cardiac atrial myocytes because in this system it is relatively easy to
obtain many KG channels that will respond to
guanine nucleotides and G protein subunits applied to the internal side
of the patch membranes. One can then directly analyze the membrane-delimited activation of the KG channel
by GK in detail. In the following, we discuss the
results obtained from such studies. We first describe the
single-channel characteristics of the KACh channel and then go into the detail of the quantitative analysis of the
GK/KACh channel interaction.
1. Single-channel characteristics of the muscarinic K+
channel.
Fig. 3A shows
single-channel recording of the KACh channel
obtained from a cell-attached membrane of a guinea-pig atrial myocyte (Kurachi et al., 1986a
). In general,
K+ ions flow through K+
channels depending on the electrochemical gradient for
K+ ions across the plasma membrane. This gradient
is the difference between the membrane potential
(Vm) and the K+ equilibrium
potential (EK): Vm
EK. The single-channel current flowing through a
K+-selective channel can be described as follows:
|
(1) |
is the single-channel conductance of the channel. The
current is positive (outwardly flowing across the membrane) at
Vm positive to
EK, although it is negative (inwardly
flowing) at Vm negative to
EK.
|
60
mV, although EK across the patch membrane
was ~0 mV. Therefore, the ACh-activated KACh
channel elicited inward K+ currents at potentials
negative to Er + 60 mV (i.e.,
Vm < EK) and outward currents at potentials positive to
Er + 60 mV (fig. 3A). The outward
currents were, however, very small compared with the inward currents at
the corresponding potential relative to EK
(compare the data at Er + 100 mV and
Er + 20 mV). Thus, the KACh channel current readily flowed in the inward
but not the outward direction. This occurs because intracellular
Mg2+
(Mg2+i) blocks the channel at
the depolarized potentials (Horie et al, 1987
of the KACh channel estimated
at Vm negative to
EK is ~40 pS in the presence of 145 mM extracellular K+
(K+o) (fig. 3B). Based on the
constant field theory, the permeability of K+
through a single KACh channel has been estimated
to be of the order of 10
13 cm3
sec
1, a value comparable to that of the
IK1 channel or the axonal delayed rectifier
K+ channel (Sakmann et al., 1983
increases approximately in proportion to the square root
of the concentration of K+o
([K+]o) (Sakmann et
al., 1983
is estimated as ~8 pS
at physiological [K+]o.
The mean open time of the KACh channel at
potentials negative to EK is ~1 msec
(fig. 3C), which is several orders of magnitude shorter than that of
the IK1 channel (Sakmann and Trube, 1984b2. Positive cooperative effect of GTP on muscarinic K+
channel activity.
Activation of KACh
channels by intracellular GTP (GTPi) can be
reproduced in inside-out patch membranes of atrial myocytes in the
presence of ACh in the pipette (Kurachi et al., 1986a
, 1990
;
Ito et al., 1991
). Fig. 4
shows the concentration-dependent effect of GTPi
in the presence of different concentrations of ACh.
|
|
(2) |
60 mV and
is independent of G protein activity (Hosoya et al., 1996
in the presence of higher
concentrations of the agonist.
The Hill coefficient for the response was almost constant at ~3
irrespective of ACh concentration (fig. 4B). Therefore, the receptor/GK/KACh channel
interaction includes a certain positive cooperative process at step(s)
distal to the receptor/GK interaction. Because
dissociation of G protein subunits induced by GTP is a one to one
reaction (Gilman, 1987
/KACh
channel interaction (Kurachi et al., 1990
subunits
applied to the internal side of inside-out patch membranes activate
KACh channels reversibly (Yamada et
al., 1994a
exhibited
apparently higher sensitivity to GTPi than the
control (Yamada et al. 1993
- and
GTPi-induced channel activation. We might be able
to understand how GK
activates
the KACh channel when we can determine which
kinetic parameter(s) of the KACh channel is
modulated by GTPi in a positive cooperative manner.
3. Spectral analysis of the muscarinic K+ channel
currents in the presence of different concentrations of intracellular
GTP.
Precise and reliable analysis of the single-channel kinetics
of the KACh channel is difficult because multiple
KACh channels are usually included in a single
membrane patch of atrial myocytes (fig. 4A). In these cases, the
spectral analysis of the channel currents (an analysis based on a
frequency domain) is one of the most reliable and powerful ways to
assess the channel kinetics (fig. 5). The
power spectrum constructed from inside-out patch recordings of the
KACh channel currents is always well fitted with
the sum of two Lorenzian curves irrespective of
GTPi concentration (Hosoya et al.,
1996
). These observations indicate that the KACh channel possesses three distinct open/closed states. Because the channel possesses a single open state (Sakmann et al.,
1983
), the equilibrium of the states can be described as
C2
C1
O, where O represents the
open state although C1 and C2 are closed states. It is likely that the transition among these three states is
responsible for the open and closure of KACh
channel currents observed at the single-channel level (figs. 3A, 4A and
5A). The corner frequencies of the two Lorenzian functions (the
frequencies at which the power of the each component is the
half-maximum) were constant irrespective of GTPi
concentration (fig, 5B). The ratio of the powers of the two Lorenzians
at 0 Hz was also unaffected by GTPi
concentration. These results indicate that the kinetics of the fast
open-close transition of the channel is not a function of
GK activity. In other words,
GK activates the KACh
channel without altering the channel's fast open-close kinetics.
|
A, where
U and A, respectively, represent
"unavailable" and "available" states of the channel. In this
framework, the U
A transition is independent of the fast
transition C2
C1
O and the A but not the
U state allows the channel to be conducting when the channel
passes into the O state. Furthermore, it is hypothesized
that GK causes a shift of the equilibrium toward
A to increase channel activity.
Based on these assumptions, one should be able to calculate the
fraction of the A state (i.e., A/(A + U)) in the
presence of a given concentration of GTPi by
extracting some parameters from the spectral analysis (the corner
frequencies and the ration of the powers at 0 Hz) and the
single-channel analysis (the single-channel open time and the
N*Po value). Fig.
6A shows the calculated fraction of the
A state, which increased as the concentration of
GTPi was raised in such a way that the
concentration-response relationship could be well fitted by a Hill
coefficient of ~3. From this result we conclude that
GK modulates a slow process in the
KACh channel that corresponds to an increase in
the number of operational ion channels in the membrane. The fast
open-close kinetics of the channels seem not to be influenced by
GK. Thus, N, but not
Po, in equation 2 is affected by
GK.
|
4. A possible mechanism for the G protein-mediated increase in the
functional numbers of muscarinic K+ channels.
Recent
studies have revealed that Kir channels, including
KACh channel, have an oligomeric structure (Yang
et al., 1995b
; Krapivinsky et al., 1995a
) that
may underlie the positive cooperativity of the
GK
protein/KACh channel interaction (Monod et al., 1965
).
1
µM), G
exogenously
applied to the internal side of inside-out patch membranes does not
further increase the channel activity once the channel is preactivated
with more than 1 µM of GTPi (Ito et al., 1992
available in a patch membrane.
Under these conditions, the interaction between
GK
and KACh channel subunits can be quantitatively assessed by analyzing the relationship between GTPi concentration and the
fraction of the A state with Monod-Wyman-Changeux's (MWC) allosteric
model (fig. 6B) (Monod et al., 1965
; (c) each subunit
has two distinct conformations: relaxed (R) and tense (T); (d) R and T bind
GK
with microscopic dissociation constant KR and
KT, respectively. R has higher
affinity for GK
than T
(i.e., KR < KT); (e) all subunits in an
oligomer must change the conformation simultaneously. As a result, any
oligomer is either Rn or
Tn; (f)
Rn and Tn are
in the equilibrium through an allosteric constant L.
According to this model, an increase in
GK
concentration leads to an
increase in the fraction of Rn [i.e.,
Rn/(Rn + Tn)]. When one replaces
Rn and Tn of
the MWC model with the A and U states of the
KACh channel, the data shown in fig. 6A can be
fitted with this model by changing the assumed number of n.
Such analysis indicates that n must be greater than 3 to
account for the data (fig. 6A) (Hosoya et al., 1996
/KACh
channel interaction. This property can be explained in terms of the
oligomeric structure of the KACh channel that is
composed of more than three functionally identical subunits,
each of which independently binds one
GK
molecule. As we shall see
later in Section IV., KACh channel activity is controlled not only by GK but by
Vm. However, ACh does not modulate the
relationship between channel activity and
Vm (Kurachi, 1990C. Modulation of G Protein-Mediated Activation of the Muscarinic K+ Channel
Although the
GK
/KACh
channel interaction is the essential step of G protein-mediated
activation of the KACh channel, this reaction is
modulated by many factors such as intracellular ATP,
Na+ ions, and arachidonic acid metabolites.
Intracellular ATP has been shown to activate native and recombinant
KG channels in an Mg2+i-dependent manner (Otero
et al., 1988
; Heidbüchel et al., 1990
; Kaibara et al., 1991
; Kim, 1991
; Lesage et al.,
1995
; Sui et al., 1996
). Although the molecular mechanism
underlying this phenomenon has not been unequivocally identified,
PIP2 may be involved in this phenomenon (Huang
et al., 1998
).
The activity of KG channels pretreated with
intracellular MgATP could be further enhanced by intracellular
Na+ (Lesage et al., 1995
; Sui et
al., 1996
). The site of action of Na+ is
unknown. Sui et al. (1996)
showed that intracellular
Na+ increased the activity of the
KACh channel (and also the corresponding recombinant KG channel) with an
EC50 of ~40 mM mainly by
increasing the frequency of the channel's opening. They found that
priming of channels with MgATP was a prerequisite for the action of
Na+. Lesage et al. (1995)
, however,
found that 20 mM intracellular Na+ activated recombinant
KG channel whether or not they had been pretreated with MgATP. This discrepancy might have occurred due to the
different subunit composition of the KG channels
used in these two studies. Interestingly, Sui et al. (1996)
showed that a cardiac glycoside ouabain, an inhibitor of the
Na+/K+ pump, induced the
opening of the KACh channel. They found that the
N*Po value of the channel increased
although the mean open time was unchanged, indicating that the
activating effect of ouabain was probably mediated by accumulation of
intracellular Na+ but not a possible local
increase in ATP concentration. However, they did not directly measure
intracellular Na+ concentration nor reported the
apparent change in the reversal potential of the
KACh channel that might be expected when
intracellular K+ concentration decreased due to
blockade of Na+/K+ pump.
Therefore, further studies may be necessary to conclude that cardiac
glycosides activate the KACh channel through
accumulation of intracellular Na+. This
phenomenon might, at least in part, underlie the "direct" negative
chrono- and dromo-tropic effects of the agent on the heart.
Arachidonic acid (AA) metabolites are known to modulate
KACh channels (Kurachi et al., 1989c
;
Kim et al., 1989
; Yamada et al., 1994b
).
The effect of AA is mimicked by leukotriene C4
(LTC4) and specifically blocked by AA861, a
5-lipoxygenase inhibitor (Kurachi et al., 1989c
). Therefore,
the effect of AA may be mediated by LTC4 or its
metabolites. Although the site of action of LTC4 has not been clearly identified, the complete dependency of the LTC4 effect on the presence of
GTPi indicates that LTC4
does not directly act on the KACh channel
(Kurachi et al., 1989c
). In the absence of receptor
agonists, GTPi usually induces only 20% of the
maximum KACh channel activity in the inside-out
patch membranes even when Cl
is used as an
intracellular anion. However, GTPi fully
activated the channel in an agonist-independent manner when the patches were pretreated with AA before patch excision (Kurachi et
al., 1989c
). Thus, AA metabolites may stimulate the basal turn-on
reaction of GK. Stimulation of
KACh channels by platelet-activating factor or
1-adrenergic receptors may be mediated by this
second-messenger pathway (Nakajima et al., 1991
, Kurachi
et al., 1989b
).
| |
III. Molecular Analysis of G Protein-Gated K+ Channels |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Cloning of Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels
In 1993, the molecular structure of inwardly rectifying
K+ channels (Kir) was disclosed. The cDNAs
encoding an ATP-dependent Kir channel, ROMK1 (Ho et al.,
1993
), and a classical Kir channel, IRK1 (Kubo et al.,
1993a
), were isolated by expression cloning from the outer medulla of
rat kidney and a mouse macrophage cell line, respectively (fig.
7). The primary structure of these
channels were similar with two putative membrane-spanning regions (M1
and M2) and one potential pore-forming region (H5). This structure resembles that of the S5, H5, and S6 segments of the voltage-gated K+ (Kv) channels. Because
the voltage-sensor of the Kv channel subunit exists in the S4 segment that possesses repeated positively-charged amino acid residues, Kir channel subunits lack an obvious
voltage-sensor region. This is consistent with electrophysiological
studies that show the kinetics of Kir channels apparently depends on
the difference of Vm from EK and
not on Vm itself.
|
After the cloning of ROMK1 and IRK1, the cDNAs encoding the main
subunits of KG and KATP
channels (GIRK1 and BIR) were also cloned (Kubo et al.,
1993b
; Dascal et al., 1993
; Inagaki et al., 1995a
). All of these Kir channel subunits exhibit basically the same
primary structure. So far, at least 11 cDNAs encoding Kir channel
subunits have been isolated. The evolutionary tree of this family is
depicted in fig. 7.
These cloned Kir subunit cDNAs encode proteins composed of 327 to 501 amino acids. The identity of the predicted amino acid sequences is
~30 to 40% among the members of the different Kir subfamilies
and more than 60% among those in the same subfamilies. The highest
level of sequence identity (50 to 60%) is found in the H5 region and
the proximal part of the C-terminal cytosolic domain. The cloned Kir
channel subunits have been classified at least into four groups
(Doupnik et al., 1995a
): (a) IRK (Kir2.x) subfamily made of the classical constitutively active "inward rectifier" Kir channels: IRK1 (Kubo et al., 1993a
;
Morishige et al., 1993
), IRK2 (Koyama et al.,
1994
; Takahashi et al., 1994
) and IRK3 (Morishige et
al., 1994
; Makhina et al., 1994
; Pärier et
al., 1994
); (b) GIRK (Kir3.x) subfamily, corresponding
to G protein-regulated K+ channels: GIRK1 (Kubo
et al., 1993b
; Dascal et al., 1993
), GIRK2 (Lesage et al., 1994
, 1995
; Isomoto et al., 1996
;
Tsaur et al., 1995
; Stoffel et al., 1995
;
Bond et al, 1995
; Ferrer et al., 1995
), GIRK3 (Lesage
et al., 1994
), GIRK4 (Ashford et al., 1994
;
Krapivinsky et al., 1995a
; Chan et al., 1996
),
and GIRK5 (Hedin et al., 1996
); (c)
KAB subfamily of ATP-dependent
K+ channels (Kir1.1 and Kir4.1): ROMKs (Ho
et al., 1993
; Zhou et al., 1994
; Yano et
al., 1994
; Shuck et al., 1994
; Boim et al., 1995
; Kondo et al., 1996
) and KAB-2
(Bond et al., 1994
; Takumi et al., 1995
); and
(d) KATP subfamily (Kir6.x), the
ATP-sensitive K+ channels:
uKATP-1 and BIR (Inagaki et al.,
1995a
,b
; Sakura et al., 1995
).
Recent progress in the molecular biology of Kir channels has enabled us to study the structure-function relationship of biophysics, physiological regulation, and pharmacology of these channels at the molecular level.
B. Subunits of G Protein-Gated K+ Channels
GIRK1 was first isolated from the rat atrium (Kubo et
al., 1993b
; Dascal et al., 1993
). From a mouse brain
cDNA library, two additional homologues of GIRK1 were isolated and
designated GIRK2 and GIRK3 (table 2) (Lesage et al., 1994
).
Furthermore, it has been shown that at least three different isoforms
of mouse GIRK2 are generated by alternative splicing of transcripts
from a single gene, and we designated them GIRK2A, GIRK2B, and GIRK2C
in the order of identification (Isomoto et al., 1997
). These
alternatively spliced transcripts share an N-terminal end and a central
core, and differ at their C-terminal ends. GIRK2B was isolated from mouse brain cDNA library and shown to be ubiquitously expressed in
various tissues (Isomoto et al., 1996
). Its amino acid
sequence is shorter than that of GIRK2A by 87 amino acids. The eight
amino acid residues in the C-terminal end of GIRK2B are different from those of GIRK2A. GIRK2C has a C-terminus which is longer than that of
GIRK2A by 11 amino acids. GIRK2C was isolated from cDNA libraries of
insulinoma cells and brain (Lesage et al., 1994
, 1995
; Tsaur et al., 1995
; Stoffel et al., 1995
;
Bond et al., 1995
; Ferrer et al., 1995
).
GIRK2C was originally termed KATP-2 because it
was thought to be a subunit of the KATP channel
(Stoffel et al., 1995
; Tsaur et al., 1995
) due to
its sequence similarity to cKATP-1, which was
isolated by Ashford et al. (1994)
. However, GIRK4, which is virtually identical with rat cKATP-1,
reconstitutes cardiac KACh channel with GIRK1 and
does not contribute to the KATP channel as
described in the Section III.D. (Krapivinsky et al.,
1995a
,b
). Thus, it is now clear that both cKATP-1
and KATP-2 belong to the GIRK subfamily. GIRK5
was cloned from Xenopus oocytes (Hedin et al.,
1996
). Although its mammalian homologue has not been reported, the
amino acid sequence of GIRK5 is most homologous to that of GIRK4 among
mammalian GIRKs.
The GIRK clones contain various known functional motifs in their amino
acid sequences that may be important for the physiological functions of
the subunits in KG channels (fig.
8). GIRK1 possesses an amino acid
sequence homologous to the G
-binding
domain of
ARK1 in its C-terminus, which is therefore the candidate
for the site of G
-binding to the
KG channel (Reuveny et al., 1994
). As
with all the other Kir channel subunits, GIRKs possess conserved
cationic residues adjacent to the C-terminal end of the M2 domain. One
of these positively charged residues, arginine (R) at position 188 of
ROMK1, was shown to be critically involved in
PIP2-induced activation of rundown ROMK1 channels (Huang et al., 1998
). Thus, it is conceivable that the
corresponding residues in GIRK subunits (R190 for GIRK1; R201 for
GIRK2s; R167 for GIRK3; and R196 for GIRK4) also participate in the
PIP2-induced activation of
KG channels. All of the GIRK clones have an
arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) motif in their linker region between
M1 and H5. This motif could be an integrin receptor-site (Hynes
et al., 1992
), whose role in KG
channels has not been examined yet. The characteristic feature of
GIRK2C is the serine/threonine-X-valine/isoleucine (S/T-X-V/I) motif at
its C-terminus end (Gomparts, 1996
). This motif has been