|
|
||||||||
Vol. 51, Issue 3, 533-591, September 1999
Department of Psychiatry, Neurobiological Psychiatry Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
I. Introduction
II. Morphological Aspects of the 5-HT Rostral System
A. 5-HT Nuclei
1. The Caudal Linear Nucleus.
2. The Dorsal Raphe Nucleus.
3. The Median Raphe Nucleus.
4. The Supralemniscal Region.
B. Ultrastructure
1. Sources of Extracellular 5-HT in Rostral Raphe Nuclei
2. Cell Bodies Found in the 5-HT Nuclei.
C. Afferents to Midbrain 5-HT Nuclei
D. Efferent Pathways and Terminal Projection Areas
1. Efferent Pathways.
2. Terminal Projection Areas.
III. Physiological and Pharmacological Aspects of the 5-HT System
A. Firing Activity of 5-HT Neurons
1. Autoregulation of 5-HT Neuron Firing Activity.
2. Role of Non-5-HT Receptors in the Regulation of 5-HT Neuron Firing Activity.
3. Heteroregulation of 5-HT Neuron Firing Activity.
B. Effect of Antidepressant Drug Administration on 5-HT Neuron Firing Activity
C. 5-HT Release
1. Neurotransmitter Release and Its Regulation: Cellular and Molecular Aspects.
2. Physiological Role of Extracellular 5-HT Bioavailability in Midbrain Raphe Nuclei.
3. Autoregulation of 5-HT Release in the Raphe Nuclei.
4. Heteroregulation of Neurotransmitter Release in Midbrain Raphe Nuclei.
5. Autoregulation of 5-HT Release in Terminal Projection Areas: Cortex and Hippocampus.
6. Heteroregulation of Neurotransmitter Release from 5-HT Fibers in Cortex and Hippocampus.
7. 5-HT1B versus 5-HT1D Receptors.
D. Effect of Antidepressant Drug Administration on 5-HT Release
1. Administration of 5-HT Reuptake Blockers.
2. Prolonged Administration of MAOIs.
3. Antidepressants with2 Adrenoceptor Antagonistic Properties.
4. Activation of 5-HT1A Receptors by 5-HT1A Agonists.
E. 5-HT Reuptake
1. Molecular Characteristics of the 5-HT Transporter (SERT).
2. The Mechanism of 5-HT Uptake.
3. Anatomical and Cellular Localization of the SERT.
4. Pharmacological Properties of the SERT.
5. Tianeptine, a Class by Itself?
F. Regulation of 5-HT Uptake Activity by Antidepressant Drugs
IV. Concluding Remarks
Acknowledgments
References
| |
I. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The existence of an endogenous vasoconstrictor in blood serum
(Stevens and Lee, 1984
; Brodie, 1900
) and the presence in the gut of a
substance that increases intestinal motility (Vialli and Ersparmer,
1933
) had been known to scientists since the beginning of the century.
However, it was not until the serum vasoconstrictor was identified as
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2 (Rapport et al., 1948
) that it
became clear that this amine was also present in the mammalian central
nervous system (CNS) (Twarog and Page,
1953
). Shortly after its discovery in the CNS, and based on the
observation that it was heterogeneously distributed in the dog brain
(Bogdansky et al., 1956
), 5-HT was considered for the first time a
putative neurotransmitter in the CNS. A major turning point in 5-HT
neurotransmission research then came about when Fuxe and
Dahlström, using Falck-Hillarp histochemical fluorescence, provided the first description of 5-HT neurons (Dahlström and Fuxe, 1964
) and their projections (Fuxe, 1965
). Today, it is an established fact that no region in the mammalian CNS lacks 5-HT innervation (Dahlström and Fuxe, 1964
; Steinbusch, 1981
, 1984
; see Azmitia, 1986
; Jacobs and Azmitia, 1992
; Azmitia-Whitaker and
Azmitia, 1995
).
As a neurotransmitter, the ubiquity of 5-HT is not only anatomical but
also phylogenetic. Having been identified in neurons of the cnidarian
Renilla koellikeri (Umbriaco et al., 1990
), it could be one
of the most ancient of currently known transmitters. From primates (see
Azmitia and Gannon, 1986
; Törk, 1990
) to Chondrichtyes (Stuesse and Cruce, 1992
), the adult 5-HT system is organized into two
subsystems, i.e., a rostral division with cell bodies localized in the
midbrain and rostral pons, providing projections to the forebrain, and
a caudal division located primarily in the medulla oblongata with
descending projections to the spinal cord and brainstem nuclei.
Similarities found among such divergent vertebrate brains indicate that
the major nuclear organization and the 5-HT projection network have
remained remarkably stable across phylogeny. In spite of its remarkable
evolutionary stability (Jacobowitz and MacLean, 1978
), careful scrutiny
of comparative anatomical evidence indicates that differences are as
important as similarities. These phylogenetic differences may be
summarized as follows: in higher mammals the system has evolved toward
a fast, precise type of neurotransmission in which 5-HT neurons give
rise to few collaterals (Fallon and Loughlin, 1982
), have a high
proportion of myelinated axons, and, due to the existence of a high
proportion of junctional synapses, terminal field innervation is
localized. In lower mammals the system is diffuse, highly branched, unmyelinated, and nonjunctional innervation predominates in terminal fields (see Azmitia 1986
; Descarries et al., 1990
; Törk, 1990
; Jacobs and Azmitia, 1992
; Azmitia and Whitaker-Azmitia, 1995
).
Because 5-HT neurons are among the first neuroblasts to differentiate,
the 5-HT system is also ontogenically ancient. Indeed, in the rat brain
5-HT-immunoreactivity appears as early as gestational day 12 (Olsen and
Seiger, 1972
; Lidov and Molliver, 1982
), tryptophan hydroxylase
activity is present at fertilization, and nearly every embryonic cell
contains 5-HT until the gastrula stage (Harris, 1981
). The first 5-HT
neurons appear in early development and are located rostrally, within
the mesencephalon (Lidov and Molliver, 1982
) Two days later, a more
caudal rhombencephalic group appears (Wallace and Lauder, 1983
). In the
next sections, focus will be on the rostral group.
| |
II. Morphological Aspects of the 5-HT Rostral System |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. 5-HT Nuclei
Dahlström and Fuxe (1964)
divided 5-HT cell clusters into
nine groups (B1-9), B1
being the most caudal group of cells. Today, however, the nomenclature
most frequently used refers to 5-HT cells contained within
cytoarchitectonic brainstem entities known as the raphe nuclei. Rostral
5-HT neurons are not confined to midline (raphe) nuclei, they are also
present in more lateralized sites of the reticular formation,
especially 1) dorsal to the medial lemniscus (rat: Dahlström and
Fuxe, 1964
; Baker et al., 1990
) and 2) dorsal to the nucleus raphe
pontis oralis (Lidov and Molliver, 1982
; Baker et al., 1991
).
1. The Caudal Linear Nucleus.
The caudal linear nucleus (CLN),
described in primates by Törk (1990)
and Azmitia (see Azmitia,
1986
; Azmitia and Gannon, 1986
; Jacobs and Azmitia, 1992
; Azmitia and
Whitaker-Azmitia, 1995
), is the most rostral group of serotonergic
neurons in the mesencephalic midline, extending along the rostral
boundary of the superior cerebellar decussation. Its ventral limit is
defined by the interpeduncular nucleus and dorsally it contacts the
dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) through the gap left between the two medial longitudinal fasciculi. In rats, 5-HT neurons located rostral to the
decussation of the superior cerebellar peduncle and above the
interpeduncular nucleus have been considered in some cases a rostral
extension of the median raphe nucleus (MRN) (Lorez et al., 1978
; Parent
et al., 1981
). However, CLN and MRN neurons do not share common
terminal projection fields (Imai et al., 1986
) and display dissimilar
dendritic morphology (Hornung and Fristchy, 1988
). On the other hand,
because DRN and CLN 5-HT neurons innervate similar terminal fields
(e.g., caudate-putamen in adult rat brain; Imai et al., 1986
) and share
a common developmental origin (Wallace and Lauder, 1983
), an
alternative approach proposes that CLN neurons should be considered
similar to those in DRN (see Jacobs and Azmitia, 1992
).
2. The Dorsal Raphe Nucleus.
The DRN is the largest of the
brainstem serotonergic nuclei containing about 50% of 5-HT neurons in
the rat CNS (Wiklund and Björklund, 1980
; Descarries et al.,
1982
), 40% in the cat CNS (Wiklund et al., 1981
), and 50 to 60% in
the human CNS (Baker et al., 1990
). Rostrally, the dorsal raphe is
bound by the Edingher Westphal nucleus (III) and, caudally, it extends
just ventral to the confluence of the fourth ventricle and the cerebral
aqueduct (Steinbusch, 1981
; Descarries et al., 1982
; Imai et al., 1986
; Törk, 1990
; Jacobs and Azmitia; 1992
). In most species, the DRN is composed of several subregions distinguished by their different cell
density, morphology, and projections (Azmitia and Gannon, 1986
; Baker
et al., 1991
; Johnson and Ma, 1993
): 1) a medial portion, subdivided in
turn into dorsomedial and ventromedial components, just below the
cerebral aqueduct and surrounding the medial longitudinal fasciculus
(MLF), respectively; 2) lateral portions or wings (much more prominent
in primates than other mammals due to a lateralization process through
phylogeny; Descarries et al., 1982
; Azmitia and Gannon, 1986
; Baker et
al., 1991
); and 3) a caudal component. During development (15 days of
gestation), 5-HT-immunoreactive cells group themselves into two
different clusters, dorsolateral and ventrolateral to the MLF (Wallace
and Lauder, 1983
). The dorsolateral portion will give rise to the
lateral wings of the DRN, whereas the ventrolateral group will split to
form the interfascicular portion of DRN and MRN. For this reason, it
has been proposed that, in the primate CNS (see Jacobs and Azmitia,
1992
; Azmitia and Whitaker-Azmitia, 1995
), the interfascicular
subregion of the DRN should be best considered an entity along with the
MRN. Olzewski and Baxter (1954)
had previously defined an anatomical entity, nucleus centralis superior, consisting of three groups of
cells: 1) a dorsalis component situated between MLF, 2) a medialis component or MRN, and 3) a lateralis component which includes the 5-HT
cells that form the ring around the nucleus reticularis pontis oralis
(see Table 1). The absence of anatomical boundaries between the main
rostral portion of the DRN (B7) and the main rostral portion of the MRN (B8) has also been
observed in rats (Descarries et al., 1982
) and cats (Wiklund et al.,
1981
). The main rostral component of the DRN (B7)
also merges, in its rear end, with the caudal component
(B6) of this same nucleus (see Jacobs and
Azmitia, 1992
; Azmitia and Whitaker-Azmitia, 1995
). Furthermore, the
latter caudal component is in continuity with the dorsocaudal portion
of the MRN (see Jacobs and Azmitia, 1992
; Azmitia and Whitaker-Azmitia,
1995
) and the lateral wings of the DRN (Lidov and Molliver, 1982
).
Hence, anatomical proximity between different 5-HT cell clusters
provides the ground for a network of homotypic interconnections among
5-HT neurons. Such interconnections constitute in turn the
morphological ground for the high degree of cross-talk existing among
5-HT neurons at the somatodendritic level. The major implication
underlying this arrangement is that the more closely knit and the
larger the number of cells in a functional cluster, the more powerful
will be the effect of the group on the target structure toward which it
projects (Azmitia, 1986
).
3. The Median Raphe Nucleus.
The MRN consists of two distinct
parts, i.e., a group of densely packed cells, vertically oriented and
concentrated in the midline, and a second group, the paramedian
columns, consisting of cells scattered in the periphery of the midline
cluster (Köhler and Steinbusch, 1982
). The nucleus is situated
ventral to the MLF and has a rostrocaudal oblique orientation (Azmitia,
1981
; Lidov and Molliver, 1982
). In its rostral end, beyond the MLF, it
is separated from the DRN in its rostral end by the superior cerebellar
peduncle decussation. Its medial portion extends from the mesencephalic
interpeduncular nucleus to the trapezoid body in the pons. Laterally,
the limits of the nucleus are poorly defined toward the reticular
formation (Köhler and Steinbusch, 1982
), and in the rat the MRN
merges laterally with the 5-HT group in nucleus raphe pontis oralis
(Lidov and Molliver, 1982
). The MRN forms the second largest cluster of
5-HT neurons in the mammalian CNS (Baker et al., 1990
).
4. The Supralemniscal Region.
The last group of 5-HT neurons
to be considered corresponds to 5-HT cells in the supralemniscal
region. In the rat, 5-HT cells belonging to this group are scattered
along the dorsal border of the medial lemniscus and extend their
dendrites in between the fiber bundles of the latter (Parent et al.,
1981
; Steinbusch, 1981
). A similarity between supralemniscal 5-HT cells
and those of the MRN was first noted by Dahlström and Fuxe (1964)
in the rat CNS and has been later confirmed in primates (Hubbard and Di
Carlo, 1974
). In fact, the cells in the supralemniscal region may be
continuous with those of the paramedian columns of the MRN (Azmitia and
Gannon, 1986
). Unlike rodents in which the supralemniscal cell cluster
is predominantly mesencephalic, in humans it is entirely located in the
pons (Baker et al., 1991
).
B. Ultrastructure
In all species studied thus far, neurons containing 5-HT consist
of a morphologically heterogeneous population (Steinbusch, 1981
; Jacobs
et al., 1984
; Azmitia and Gannon, 1986
; Törk and Hornung, 1990
).
The average cell diameter varies between 15 and 25 µm (Azmitia, 1978
;
Descarries et al., 1982
), and, ultrastructurally, "5-HT specificity
does not closely correlate with any particular neuronal configuration
and/or intracellular build-up" (Descarries et al., 1982
). No unique
element allows to distinguish 5-HT cell bodies from non-5-HT
surrounding neurons.
The average number of axosomatic boutons received by 5-HT neuron
perikarya in the DRN has been quantified by Descarries et al. (1982)
.
Although 100 µm of somatic membrane receive seven axonic boutons, the
average number of spines on the same membrane length is 2.7 (Park et
al., 1982
). On the dendrites, the number of axonic boutons per 100-µm
membrane length is roughly 60% higher than on the soma (Descarries et
al., 1982
). In cats and rats, the fibers contributing to these
axosomatic or axodendritic contacts are non-5-HT fibers (Descarries et
al., 1982
; Chazal and Ralston, 1987
). In primates, Kapadia et al.
(1985)
have described 5-HT fibers impinging on 5-HT dendrites.
1. Sources of Extracellular 5-HT in Rostral Raphe
Nuclei
The existence of serotonergic axon
terminals in the raphe nuclei of cats and rats has been repeatedly
reported (Baraban and Aghajanian, 1981
; Chan-Palay, 1982
; Descarries et
al., 1982
; Chazal and Ralston, 1987
), but the terminals endowed with
synaptic specializations have been found to be consistently in low
numbers, ranging from "none" (Baraban and Aghajanian, 1981
),
"exceedingly small number" (Descarries et al., 1982
), to "a
few" (Chazal and Ralston, 1987
). Furthermore, Baraban and Aghajanian
(1981)
found 5-HT fibers exclusively in axon bundles rather than in
proximity to dendrites or cell bodies, and when 5-HT terminals were
observed to make somatodendritic synaptic contacts, these were on
non-5-HT neurons (Descarries et al., 1982
; Chazal and Ralston, 1987
).
In the rare cases in which a 5-HT axon terminal was observed in close
apposition to a 5-HT cell body, no demonstrable synaptic contact was
present (Chazal and Ralston, 1987
). Nonsynaptic 5-HT axon terminals are not exclusive to the raphe nuclei; they also exist in projection areas
such as the cortex, striatum, and hippocampus (Descarries et al., 1990
;
Törk, 1990
). 5-HT release therefore occurs not only from
junctional but also from nonjunctional sites (Descarries et al., 1975
,
1982
, 1990
).
2. Cell Bodies Found in the 5-HT Nuclei.
Quantitative studies
of the total number of 5-HT neurons located in the ascending raphe
nuclei indicate that there are about 288,000 in the human brain
(Törk, 1990
), 33,000 in the cat brain (Wiklund et al., 1981
), and
15,200 in the rat brain (see Jacobs and Azmitia, 1992
). Moreover, 5-HT
neurons represent but a small percentage of the total neuronal
population of the raphe nuclei. Using histofluorescence-imaging
techniques, Wiklund et al. (1981)
reported that in the cat 5-HT neurons
constitute 70% of medium-sized cells in the dorsal raphe and 35% of
medium-sized neurons of the MRN. This percentage could be lower,
serotonergic cells constituting 25 to 50% of the total DRN neuronal
population and 20 to 30% of the MRN's. In the supralemniscal 5-HT cell
group (B9), the percentage of 5-HT neurons
appears to be much lower than in the other two nuclei (O'Hearn and
Molliver, 1984
).
-hydroxylase-negative neurons, there is general agreement that DA cell bodies in the midbrain
raphe are numerous. Two primary subpopulations of DA neurons have been
described: 1) A10dc, lying on the extreme dorsal border of the rostral half of the DRN, ventral to the cerebral aqueduct
and 2) A10c, occupying the medial aspect of the
DRN and extending dorsocaudally from the ventrorostral border of this nucleus, where the cells appear contiguous with those of
A10 (Hökfelt et al., 1984
-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in midbrain raphe nuclei
has been repeatedly reported (Massari et al., 1976
-aminobutyric acid
decarboxylase activity after lesioning afferents to the DRN, as
well as the presence in this nucleus of terminals, dendrites, and nerve
cell bodies accumulating [3H]GABA (Belin et
al., 1979C. Afferents to Midbrain 5-HT Nuclei
Afferent connections to the raphe nuclei have been studied using
multiple techniques such as lesion and axon degeneration, histofluorescence, anterograde/retrograde tracer injection,
autoradiography, and immunohistochemistry (Brodal et al., 1960
; Fuxe,
1965
; Aghajanian and Wang, 1977
; Mosko et al., 1977
; Sakai et al.,
1977
; Baraban and Aghajanian, 1981
; Kalen et al., 1985
; Stratford and
Wirtshafter, 1988
; Marzienkiewicz et al., 1989
; Behzadi et al., 1990
).
Results from such studies have been summarized in Table
2.
|
|
Interconnections among raphe nuclei using
retrograde-tracing techniques suggest a moderate-to-high density of
5-HT input. These observations contrast with those from most of the
immunocytochemical or radioautographic ultrastructural studies
indicating a low number of 5-HT fibers in the rostral raphe. Mosko et
al. (1977)
have reported that the main source of 5-HT fibers reaching
the DRN arise either from the DRN itself or the MRN. The latter input has been confirmed by other groups (Sakai et al., 1977
; Aghajanian and
Wang, 1977
; Kalen et al., 1985
; Vertes and Kocsis, 1994
). However,
given the proximity between injection and labeled sites, it cannot be
ruled out that tissue damage and tracer diffusion may account for part
of the retrograde staining observed in the MRN after tracer injection
into the DRN. Furthermore, since retrograde transport of horseradish
peroxidase by dendrites has been reported (Smith et al., 1974
),
this raises the possibility that the accumulation of tracer by dorsal
and median raphe perikarya resulted from retrograde transport by
dendrites, rather than the axon terminals of these neurons. On the
other hand, tracer diffusion or retrograde dendrite transport cannot
account for the projections arising from more distant nuclei (Sakai et
al., 1977
; Kalen et al., 1985
; Marzienkiewicz et al., 1989
; Behzadi et
al., 1990
). Histochemical confirmation of the neurotransmitter
contained in connections among 5-HT nuclei has been performed on rare
occasions (Stratford and Wirtshafter, 1988
), and when done, numerous
nonserotonergic cells were retrogradely labeled after tracer injection
into the MRN. It is then possible that not all of the retrogradely
labeled fibers are serotonergic. The general impression would be that
5-HT axons connecting 5-HT nuclei are "diluted" within the dorsal
and median raphe neuropil.
An important afferent area to the raphe, both in terms of selectivity
and density, is the lateral habenula (Aghajanian and Wang, 1977
; Wang
and Aghajanian, 1977b
). This habenular circuit appears to be comprised
of both a monosynaptic GABAergic pathway (Wang and Aghajanian, 1977b
;
Stern et al., 1981
; Park, 1987
) and a polysynaptic pathway in which
GABA, Substance P (Neckers et al., 1979
; Nishikawa and Scatton, 1985
),
and excitatory amino acids serve as components (Kalen et al., 1985
,
1989
).
Noradrenergic fibers impinge directly onto the dendrites of 5-HT
neurons (Baraban and Aghajanian, 1981
), producing an excitatory input
on the firing activity of 5-HT neurons (Baraban and Aghajanian, 1980
).
The lateral hypothalamus also gives rise to a monosynaptic excitatory
input to the DRN (Aghajanian et al., 1987
) although the transmitter is
unknown. Multiple afferent fibers immunoreactive for different
neuropeptides, such as
-endorphin (Bloom et al., 1978
), Substance P
(Ljungdahl et al., 1978
; Shults et al., 1984
), neurotensin fibers (Uhl
et al., 1979
), CCK fibers (Vanderhaeghen et al., 1980
),
CLIP/adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) fibers (Romagnano and Joseph,
1983
; Zheng et al., 1991
; Léger et al., 1994
), and VIP fibers (El
Kafi et al., 1994
), have also been described.
D. Efferent Pathways and Terminal Projection Areas
1. Efferent Pathways.
The rostral 5-HT nuclei are the main
source of 5-HT fibers projecting to telencephalon and diencephalon
(Fuxe, 1965 2. Terminal Projection Areas.
Dorsal and median raphe nuclei
each innervate specific terminal areas (Bobillier et al., 1975
; Azmitia and Segal, 1978
; Parent et al., 1981
; Villar et
al., 1987
). Although the main contingent of fibers from these nuclei is
ascending, they also innervate more sparely numerous brainstem
structures (Vertes and Kocsis, 1994
), the cerebellar cortex (Waterhouse
et al., 1986
; Zimny et al., 1988
), and the spinal cord (Skagerberg and
Björklund, 1985
). In the nonhuman primate brain, two main ascending bundles have been described, a dorsal bundle (immediately ventral to the MLF), which receives fibers mainly from lateral wings
and the ventromedial portion of the DRN, and a ventral bundle, which
receives fibers from the midline DRN and MRN (Schofield and Everitt,
1981
, Azmitia and Gannon, 1986
). In the human fetus, two ascending axon
bundles have also been observed, in the central gray, ventral to the
fourth ventricle and the aqueduct ependyma, and between ventromedial
and ventrolateral 5-HT groups (Nobin and Bjorklund, 1973
). In the rat
CNS, two major projection systems to the forebrain have also been
described, a transtegmental system, which probably corresponds to the
above-mentioned ventral bundle, courses through the midbrain forebrain
bundle (MFB) and is the most prominent of the two systems described by
Descarries in the rat brain, and a periventricular system, dorsally
located along the longitudinal fasciculus of Schütz (Parent et
al., 1981
). In primates, unlike in rats, the dorsal component (dorsal
raphe cortical tract) is much more developed than the MFB system,
presumably due to an increase in fibers projecting to the cortex
through the dorsal pathway. Moreover, the percentage of myelinated 5-HT fibers in rat MFB is 0.7% of the total immunoreactive 5-HT fibers, whereas it is as much as 25% in primate MFB (Azmitia and Gannon, 1983
).
; Azmitia
and Segal, 1978
; Jacobs et al., 1978
), and, in turn, each terminal
projection area has its unique topographic representation within the
respective nuclei. Labeling studies using wheat germ agglutinin,
horseradish peroxidase, or fluorescent dyes have been used to unveil
the midbrain raphe projection network. The more rostral portions of the
midbrain raphe relate to the basal-ganglia-motor system and caudal
areas are more related to the limbic system. Neurons projecting to the striatum occupy the caudal linear nucleus and a rostral portion of the
DRN (Jacobs et al., 1978
; Imai et al., 1986
), whereas those projecting
to substantia nigra (Imai et al., 1986
) and the motor cortex (O'Hearn
and Molliver, 1984
; Waterhouse et al., 1986
) reside within the rostral
portions of the dorsal raphe (Imai et al., 1986
).
Hippocampus-projecting neurons are situated caudally in the DRN (caudal
ventromedial portion and B6), the MRN, and
B9 (Jacobs et al., 1978
; Köhler and
Steinbusch, 1982
; Imai et al., 1986
), similar to neurons projecting to
the locus ceruleus (Imai et al., 1986
) and to the entorhinal cortex
(Köhler and Steinbusch, 1982
). The raphe representation of the
amygdala, on the other hand, bridges the "basal-ganglia-motor
system" and the "limbic system representation" (Jacobs et al.,
1978
; Imai et al., 1986
), possibly as a reflection of the functional
diversity of amygdaloid nuclei. The consequence of this topographic
arrangement is that the selective activation of a given functional
group would simultaneously influence interconnected brain circuits.
Neurons projecting to interrelated brain circuits, such as the
sensorimotor cortex and cerebellar crus II, the visual cortex and
cerebellar paraflocculus (Waterhouse et al., 1986
), or to the
substantia nigra and caudate-putamen (Imai et al., 1986
), the
entorhinal cortex and hippocampus (Köhler and Steinbusch, 1982
),
the trigeminal sensory complex and nucleus accumbens or amygdala (Li et
al., 1993
), arise from overlapping areas within the different nuclei.
Moreover, in these regions, a single neuron may provide a common input
to two different but functionally interrelated terminal areas. In the
ventromedial portion of the DRN, the same neuron was found to project
to at least three different forebrain structures related with the
limbic system: septum, medial thalamus, and olfactory cortex (de Olmos and Heimer, 1980
). Colateralization provides not only a means for
producing concurrent influences on numerous functionally related circuits, but it is also a way of achieving extensive serotonergic innervation from a small number of raphe neurons.
; Mulligan and Törk, 1988
). In
neocortical areas, dorsal raphe-fine axons have been found to be far
more numerous than beaded axons (Kosofsky and Molliver, 1987
; Mamounas
et al., 1991
) and to follow a rostrocaudal pattern of distribution with
a greater concentration in more frontal regions. These findings are in
agreement with those obtained in retrograde-labeling experiments in
which the frontal cortex received twice as many projections from cells
in the DRN than those in the parietal and occipital cortex (O'Hearn
and Molliver, 1984
). Morphological duality has also been reported in
the cat cortex (Mulligan and Törk, 1988
), but such results were
not replicated in the rat brain where immunostained varicosities
exhibited similar shape and size irrespective of the cortical region or
sector examined (Séguéla et al., 1989
).
| |
III. Physiological and Pharmacological Aspects of the 5-HT System |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Firing Activity of 5-HT Neurons
Midbrain raphe 5-HT neurons exhibit a spontaneous, slow (1-5
spikes/s), regular discharge pattern (Aghajanian and
Vandermaelen, 1982
; Vandermaelen and Aghajanian, 1983
).
Intracellular recordings from dorsal raphe neurons reveal that 5-HT
cells undergo repetitive cycles of interspike hyperpolarization and
depolarization, spikes arising from depolarizing ramps rather than from
excitatory postsynaptic potentials (Aghajanian and Vandermaelen, 1982
;
Vandermaelen and Aghajanian, 1983
). The ionic basis for this electrical
activity is summarized in Fig. 1.
|
In freely moving cats, regular stereotyped intrinsic activity of 5-HT
neurons remains unchanged over exposure to a hot environment or
administration of a pyrogen, increase in blood pressure,
insulin-induced hypoglycemia, administration of painful stimuli,
physical restraint, or exposure to powerful aversive stimuli (see
Jacobs and Fornal, 1993
). However, the basic pattern of activity is not
constantly the same, and it has been shown to change dramatically
during the sleep-wake-arousal cycle. Firing activity progressively
slows down from an aroused state through quiet waking and slow wave sleep (SWS), to become almost silent during rapid eye movement (REM)
sleep (for review, see McGinty and Harper, 1976
; Jacobs and Fornal,
1993
). The suppression of firing of 5-HT neuron during REM sleep
correlates well with the production of muscle atonia secondary to
inhibition of motoneurons controlling antigravity muscles (Trulson et
al., 1981
; Steinfels et al., 1983
). More recently, a relationship
between motor output and 5-HT neuron activity has been observed. During
quiet wakefulness, when cats engage in various types of stereotyped
oral-buccal activities such as chewing and biting, licking, or grooming
with the tongue, approximately 25% of DRN and MRN increase their
firing activity 2- to 5-fold (see Jacobs and Azmitia, 1992
; Jacobs and
Fornal, 1993
). This increased neuronal activity precedes the onset of
stereotyped motor behaviors and ends with its offset; it does not occur
during purposive episodic movements, but some of the neurons may be
activated by somatosensory and proprioceptive stimulations of the head
and neck area. These data have given support to the current motor
hypothesis of 5-HT function in which the primary role of the 5-HT
system would be facilitation of motor output and concurrent inhibition
of sensory information processing (Jacobs and Fornal, 1993
).
The firing activity of midbrain 5-HT neurons is controlled by two main mechanisms, i.e., autoregulatory influences arising from 5-HT neurons themselves and heteroregulation by local neurons or afferents to the raphe nuclei.
1. Autoregulation of 5-HT Neuron Firing Activity.
The firing
rate of 5-HT neurons is decreased by 5-HT, and this effect is mediated
by somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptors (Aghajanian et al., 1972
; Vandermaelen et al., 1986
; Blier and de
Montigny, 1987
). 5-HT and 5-HT1A agonists inhibit
5-HT firing activity by inducing membrane hyperpolarization which is
brought about by a 2-fold mechanism, i.e., by increasing conductance to potassium ions (Aghajanian and Lakoski, 1984
; Yoshimura and Higashi, 1985
) and by reducing a high-threshold Ca2+
current (Fig. 1; Penington and Kelly, 1990
; Penington and Fox, 1994
).
In both cases, the response to 5-HT is G protein-mediated via a direct
interaction between G proteins and the respective ion channel (Innis
and Aghajanian, 1987
; Penington et al., 1991
; Penington et al., 1993
;
Penington and Fox, 1994
).
-adrenergic/5-HT1A antagonist
(±)-propranolol (Middlemiss, 1984a
-adrenergic/5-HT1A antagonist (
)-tertatolol
(Lanfumey et al., 1993
1-adrenergic agonist
phenylephrine but not by (
)-tertatolol, suggesting that the latter
effect is not due to partial agonism on 5-HT1A
receptors, but rather to the blockade of firing stimulating
1 adrenoceptors on 5-HT neurons (Lanfumey et
al., 1993
)-tertatolol have been
consistently shown to block the effect of 5-HT1A
agonists without affecting 5-HT neuron firing (Jolas et al., 1993
1-adrenergic
blocking properties (Lanfumey et al., 1993
|
)-tertatolol remains to be determined, and, for the time
being, pindolol seems the only useful alternative of a presynaptic
5-HT1A antagonist to be used in clinical trials.
Finally, it is also worth mentioning the case of (
)-propranolol,
which in spite of its moderate affinity for
5