|
|
||||||||
Vol. 52, Issue 1, 11-34, March 2000
Department of Pharmacology, Osaka City University Medical School, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Japan
I. Introduction
II. Classification and Biochemical Characteristics of Angiotensin Receptors
A. AT1 Receptor
B. AT2 Receptor
III. Molecular and Cellular Actions of Angiotensin II in Heart
A. Molecular Characteristics of Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy
B. Cultured Cardiac Myocytes
C. Neonatal versus Adult Cardiac Myocytes
D. Cultured Cardiac Fibroblasts
E. Effects of In Vivo Angiotensin II Infusion on Heart
F. Effects of Angiotensin Blockade on Experimental Cardiac Diseases
1. Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats and Other Hypertensive Models.
2. Acute Pressure Overload Model.
3. Myocardial Infarction.
4. Volume Overload Model.
5. Diabetes.
IV. Molecular and Cellular Actions of Angiotensin II in Blood Vessels
A. Cultured Smooth Muscle Cells
B. Cultured Endothelial Cells
C. Effects of In Vivo Angiotensin II Infusion on Vascular Tissues
D. Effects of Angiotensin Blockade on Experimental Vascular Diseases
1. Hypertensive Rats.
2. Balloon Injury.
3. Other Models.
V. Molecular and Cellular Actions of Angiotensin II in Kidney
A. Cultured Glomerular Cells
B. Effects of In Vivo Angiotensin II Infusion on Kidney
C. Effects of Angiotensin Blockade on Experimental Glomerular Diseases
VI. AT1 Receptor Antagonists versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
A. Pharmacological Differences
B. Is the AT2 Receptor Beneficial or Detrimental?
C. Combination Therapy
VII. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A growing body of evidence supports the notion that angiotensin II (Ang II), the central product of the renin-angiotensin system, may play a central role not only in the etiology of hypertension but also in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular and renal diseases in humans. In this review, we focus on the role of Ang II in cardiovascular and renal diseases at the molecular and cellular levels and discuss up-to-date evidence concerning the in vitro and in vivo actions of Ang II and the pharmacological effects of angiotensin receptor antagonists in comparison with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Ang II, via AT1 receptor, directly causes cellular phenotypic changes and cell growth, regulates the gene expression of various bioactive substances (vasoactive hormones, growth factors, extracellular matrix components, cytokines, etc.), and activates multiple intracellular signaling cascades (mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades, tyrosine kinases, various transcription factors, etc.) in cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts, vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells, and renal mesangial cells. These actions are supposed to participate in the pathophysiology of cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling, heart failure, vascular thickening, atherosclerosis, and glomerulosclerosis. Furthermore, in vivo recent evidence suggest that the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases and activator protein-1 by Ang II may play the key role in cardiovascular and renal diseases. However, there are still unresolved questions and controversies on the mechanism of Ang II-mediated cardiovascular and renal diseases.
| |
I. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Classically, angiotensin II (Ang
II),2
the central product of the renin-angiotensin
system (Fig. 1), is well known to cause potent increases in systemic and local blood pressure via its vasoconstrictive effect, to influence renal tubules to retain sodium
and water, and to stimulate aldosterone release from the adrenal gland
(Timmermans et al., 1993
). A growing body of evidence, from
pharmacological investigations and clinical studies on the effects of
angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, supports the notion
that Ang II may play a central role not only in the etiology of
hypertension but also in the pathophysiology of cardiac hypertrophy and
remodeling, heart failure, vascular thickening, atherosclerosis, and
glomerulosclerosis in humans. An excellent and comprehensive review on
pharmacology of angiotensin receptor antagonists was published in 1993 (Timmermans et al., 1993
). However, since then, a great number of in
vitro and in vivo findings on the functions of Ang II have emerged,
showing that Ang II directly causes cell growth, regulates the gene
expression of various bioactive substances [vasoactive hormones,
growth factors, extracellular matrix (ECM) components, cytokines, and
so on], and activates multiple intracellular signaling cascades
[mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascades, tyrosine kinases,
various transcription factors, and so on] in cardiovascular and renal
cells. Furthermore, accumulating in vivo evidence supports the notion
that Ang II may directly cause cardiovascular and renal diseases,
independent of its blood pressure-elevating effect. Thus, recent in
vivo work, coupled with in vitro findings, has provided new insights
into the molecular and cellular mechanisms of Ang II-mediated
cardiovascular and renal diseases. In this review, we focus on the role
of Ang II in cardiovascular and renal diseases at the molecular and
cellular levels and discuss up-to-date evidence concerning the actions of Ang II and the pharmacological effects of angiotensin receptor antagonists. Furthermore, we discuss recent progress, clearly separating the in vitro and in vivo evidence, because previous data
have largely come from in vitro studies using cultured cells, and most
of these data have not yet been demonstrated to apply to in vivo
conditions.
|
| |
II. Classification and Biochemical Characteristics of Angiotensin Receptors |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. AT1 Receptor
Excellent detailed reviews, dealing with biochemical properties
and molecular biology of angiotensin receptors, have been published
previously (Brown and Sernia, 1994
; Unger et al., 1996
). Therefore, in
this review, we only briefly discuss the characteristics of angiotensin
receptors. The existence of two subtypes of Ang II receptors, including
Ang II types 1 and 2 (AT1 and
AT2) receptors (Fig. 1), was first confirmed by a
pharmacological approach using various specific Ang II receptor
antagonists (Chiu et al., 1989
). The successful cloning of
AT1 receptor in 1991 (Murphy et al., 1991
; Sasaki
et al., 1991
) allowed the development of further research on the
structure and function of this receptor. In rats or mice,
AT1 receptor consists of two subtypes,
AT1a and AT1b, which have
94% homology with regard to amino acid sequence and have similar
pharmacological properties and tissue distribution patterns.
AT1 receptor is a member of the seven
transmembrane-spanning, G protein-coupled receptor family; binds to
heterotrimeric G proteins; and lacks intrinsic tyrosine kinase
activity. Human AT1 receptor gene is mapped to
chromosome 3, and AT1a and
AT1b receptor genes in rats are mapped to
chromosomes 17 and 2, respectively. AT1 receptor
is ubiquitously and abundantly distributed in adult tissues, including
blood vessel, heart, kidney, adrenal gland, liver, brain, and lung.
AT1 receptor mediates all the classic well known
effects of Ang II, such as elevation of blood pressure,
vasoconstriction, increase in cardiac contractility, aldosterone
release from the adrenal gland, facilitation of catecholamine release
from nerve endings, renal sodium and water absorption, and so on, as
reviewed previously in detail (Timmermans et al., 1993
). In addition,
recent accumulating in vitro and in vivo evidence supports the notion that Ang II, mediated by AT1 receptor, may
participate directly in the pathogenesis of various cardiovascular and
renal diseases, and this evidence is the focus of this review. Thus,
the molecular and cellular actions of Ang II in cardiovascular and
renal diseases are almost exclusively mediated by
AT1 receptor. Numerous selective and potent
nonpeptide AT1 receptor antagonists have been
developed, such as losartan, candesartan, valsartan, irbesartan,
eprosartan, telmisartan, tasosartan, and others, and in recent years,
several of these compounds, including losartan, candesartan, valsartan, and others, have been in use clinically for the treatment of
hypertension (Bauer and Reams, 1995
; Johnston, 1995
; Pitt and Konstam,
1998
).
B. AT2 Receptor
Molecular cloning, structural features, regulation of gene
expression, and the possible functions of AT2
receptor have been reviewed elsewhere (Unger et al., 1996
; Matsubara,
1998
). Selective AT2 receptor ligands include
PD123177, PD123319, CGP42112, L-162,686, L-162,638, EXP801, and
CGP42112A. The cDNA and genomic DNAs of human, rat, and mouse
AT2 receptors have been cloned.
AT2 receptor is ubiquitously expressed in
developing fetal tissues, suggesting a possible role of this receptor
in fetal development and organ morphogenesis. In contrast,
AT2 receptor expression rapidly decreases after
birth, and in the adult, expression of this receptor is limited mainly
to the uterus, ovary, certain brain nuclei, heart, and adrenal medulla.
The AT2 receptor gene is localized as a single copy on the X chromosome. Unlike the AT1
receptor, which has been shown to have subtypes in rats and mice, there
is no evidence for subtypes of the AT2 receptor.
Although a comparison of amino acid sequences of
AT1a and AT2 receptors in
rats, deduced from nucleotide sequences, shows a low homology between
these receptors (32%), AT2 receptor is also a
seven-transmembrane domain receptor. Recent work showed that
AT2 receptor is coupled to the G protein Gi (Hayashida et al., 1996
; Zhang and Pratt,
1996
). In various cell lines, AT2
receptor-activated protein tyrosine phosphatase was shown to inhibit
cell growth (Matsubara, 1998
) or induce programmed cell death
(apoptosis) (Yamada et al., 1996
). AT2 receptor
inhibited AT1 receptor-mediated cell growth,
demonstrating an antagonistic action. However, there have also been
conflicting findings regarding these receptors. In contrast to
extensive data on the molecular and cellular functions and
pathophysiological significance of AT1 receptor,
the role of AT2 receptor in cardiovascular and
renal diseases remains to be defined. At present, an
AT2 receptor ligand has not been developed for
clinical use. However, because up-to-date evidence suggests that
AT2 receptor may contribute to the
pharmacological differences between AT1 receptor
antagonists and ACE inhibitors, we discuss the potential functional
role of AT2 receptor in VI. AT1
Receptor Antagonists versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors.
| |
III. Molecular and Cellular Actions of Angiotensin II in Heart |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Molecular Characteristics of Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy
We first discuss the characteristics of pathological cardiac
hypertrophy as background for understanding the role of Ang II in
cardiac diseases. The characteristics of pathological cardiac hypertrophy have been reviewed in detail previously (Schwartz et al.,
1993
; Parker, 1995
). Generally, pathological left ventricular hypertrophy is characterized not only by an increase in myocyte size
(quantitative change) but also by myocyte gene reprogramming (qualitative change), as shown by enhanced expression of fetal phenotypes of genes such as
-myosin heavy chain (
-MHC), skeletal
-actin, and atrial natriuretic factor (ANF). In the cardiac
ventricle of most mammalian species, including humans, MHC consists of
two isoforms:
- and
-MHCs. In the rat,
-MHC is the predominant isoform in adult hearts (Lompre et al., 1984
), has high
Ca2+ and actin-activated ATPase activity, and is
associated with increased shortening velocity of the cardiac fibers
(Barany, 1967
; Alpert and Mulieri, 1982
). On the other hand,
-MHC is
the predominant isoform in fetal hearts (Lompre et al., 1984
), has
lower ATPase activity, and is associated with slower shortening
velocity (Barany, 1967
; Alpert and Mulieri, 1982
). Therefore, changes
in the ratio of
-MHC (fetal phenotype) to
-MHC (adult phenotype)
in the cardiac ventricle significantly alter the contractile properties
of the heart. Cardiac sarcomeric actin is also composed of two
isoforms: cardiac
-actin and skeletal
-actin. Cardiac
-actin
is predominantly expressed in adult rat hearts, whereas skeletal
-actin is normally expressed in fetal and neonatal rat hearts (Minty
et al., 1982
; Mayer et al., 1984
). Because skeletal
-actin has
greater contractility than cardiac
-actin (Hewett et al., 1994
), the
ratio of skeletal
-actin to cardiac
-actin in the ventricle plays
a significant role in cardiac function. Thus, an increase in
ventricular myocyte expression of fetal isoforms of contractile
proteins (
-MHC and skeletal
-actin), which often occurs in the
hypertrophic heart (Schwartz et al., 1986
; Izumo et al., 1987
),
modulates cardiac performance. Furthermore, in addition to showing
enhanced expression of
-MHC and skeletal
-actin, hypertrophic
ventricular myocytes are also characterized by significant
up-regulation of ANF (Izumo et al., 1988
), which is scarcely expressed
in normal adult ventricular myocytes.
Another important property of pathological cardiac hypertrophy is
increased accumulation of ECM proteins such as collagen (particularly
collagen types I and III) and fibronectin in the interstitium and
around blood vessels within the heart. These changes play a central
role in ventricular fibrosis or remodeling. The detailed
characteristics and significance of these processes have been reviewed
elsewhere (Brilla et al., 1992
; Pelouch et al., 1993
; Weber et al.,
1994b
; Weber, 1997
). Increased interstitial collagen deposition in the
heart enhances cardiac stiffness (Abrahams et al., 1987
; Doering et
al., 1988
; Jalil et al., 1989
) and results in diastolic dysfunction
(Pelouch et al., 1993
; Weber et al., 1994b
). Fibronectin is localized
on the surface of cardiac myocytes, connects cardiac myocytes to
perimyocytic collagen (Ahumada and Saffitz, 1984
), and is thought to
affect cardiac systolic and diastolic functions. Thus, increased ECM
accumulation, as well as the above-mentioned ventricular myocyte gene
reprogramming, plays a critical role in the impairment of cardiac
performance and pathophysiology of cardiac failure. ECM proteins within
the heart are predominantly produced by fibroblasts. Notably, unlike cardiac myocytes, cardiac fibroblasts proliferate and increase the
production of ECM proteins when the heart is exposed to hypertrophic stimuli such as hemodynamic overload. Thus, cardiac fibroblasts and
cardiac myocytes play key roles in the development of pathological cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction. Accumulating in vitro and in vivo
evidence supports the concept that Ang II is involved in all of these
important processes of pathological cardiac hypertrophy, including
myocyte hypertrophy, myocyte gene reprogramming, fibroblast proliferation, and ECM protein accumulation, as described later.
B. Cultured Cardiac Myocytes
The molecular mechanism of hypertrophy of cultured cardiac
myocytes has been extensively studied, mostly using neonatal rat cardiac myocytes, and was reviewed recently (Baker et al., 1992
; Sadoshima and Izumo, 1997
; Sugden and Clerk, 1998a
). In this article, we briefly discuss the effects of Ang II on cultured cardiac myocyte gene expressions and signaling transduction cascades only to highlight their significance for pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Although cardiac myocytes express both AT1 and
AT2 receptors (Booz and Baker, 1996
), almost all
of the biological responses to Ang II reported so far are mediated by
AT1 receptor. The effects of Ang II, which we
describe in this section, are apparently all mediated by this receptor.
Accumulating evidence has established that Ang II causes hypertrophy of
neonatal cardiac myocytes (Baker and Aceto, 1990
; Baker et al., 1992
;
Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993
, 1997
) and adult myocytes (Wada et al., 1996
;
Liu et al., 1998
; Ritchie et al., 1998
). Ang II directly induced the
fetal phenotype of gene expressions, such as those of
-MHC, skeletal
-actin, and ANF, in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes, indicating the
direct involvement of AT1 receptor in cardiac
gene reprogramming in vitro (Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993
). Furthermore,
Ang II stimulated the expression of immediate-early genes, including
c-fos, c-jun, jun B,
Egr-1, and c-myc (Sadoshima and Izumo,
1993
). However, it is unclear whether the induction of these
immediate-early genes is necessary for myocyte hypertrophy or gene
reprogramming by Ang II, and the significance of induction of these
immediate-early genes in hypertrophy remains to be determined.
Interestingly, Ang II, via AT1 receptor,
activates a diversity of intracellular signaling cascades in neonatal
rat cardiac myocytes, although the role of these signaling cascades in
myocyte hypertrophy or gene reprogramming remains to be elucidated.
Cardiac myocyte AT1 receptor couples to a
heterotrimeric G protein, Gq. As with other G
protein-coupled receptors, Ang II stimulates
phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PLC)-
isoform through
Gq, and the activation of PLC causes increases in
inositol triphosphate and diacylglycerol, which in turn lead to an
increase in release of Ca2+ from intracellular
stores and activation of protein kinase C (PKC), respectively. Besides
the above-mentioned basic cascades via Gq, it has
been reported that Ang II in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes activates
tyrosine kinases (Sadoshima et al., 1995
), extracellular
signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), c-Jun amino-terminal kinases (JNKs;
Kudoh et al., 1997
), 70-kDa ribosomal S6 kinase (p70S6K; Takano et al.,
1996
), 90-kDa ribosomal S6 kinase (p90RSK; Sadoshima and Izumo, 1995
),
p2lras, and phospholipases A2 and D and increases
phosphatidic acid and arachidonic acid, as mentioned in a previous
review (Sadoshima and Izumo, 1997
). Although AT1 receptor has no intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity, the addition of Ang
II (10
7 M) to neonatal rat cardiac myocytes
induced rapid phosphorylation of Janus kinase 2, Tyk2, signal
transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)1
and STAT2 in the early stage up to 30 min, and
phosphorylated STAT3 in the late stage at 120 min
(Kodama et al., 1998
), although the significance of these observations
is unknown. Ang II (10
7 M) activated RhoA,
which is responsible for Ang II-induced sarcomeric actin organization
and ANF expression (Aoki et al., 1998
). However, it remains unclear
whether Ang II can indeed simultaneously activate all of the
above-mentioned signaling cascades in myocytes. Furthermore, it remains
to be determined to what extent each signaling cascade is involved in
Ang II-induced cardiac myocyte hypertrophy and gene reprogramming seen
in pathological cardiac hypertrophy in vivo.
We emphasize that despite abundant evidence for the activation of
multiple signaling cascades by Ang II, the molecular mechanism of
hypertrophy of cultured neonatal rat myocytes by Ang II is poorly
understood. Ang II (10
6 M) activated p70S6K in
myocytes, and inhibition of this activation by rapamycin (0.5 ng/ml),
an immunosuppressant, abolished the Ang II-induced increase in protein
synthesis, without blocking ERK activation or c-fos mRNA
induction, confirming the contribution of p70S6K to Ang II-induced
hypertrophy (Takano et al., 1996
). However, p70S6 kinase was not
involved in Ang II-induced myocyte gene reprogramming, as shown by the
lack of effect of rapamycin on Ang II-induced skeletal
-actin,
-MHC, or ANF expression (Sadoshima and Izumo, 1995
). Notably, no
information is available on the role of ERK activation in Ang
II-induced myocyte hypertrophy or gene expression, although ERK
activation is thought to be important for myocyte hypertrophy in
response to other hypertrophic stimuli, such as phenylephrine (Force et
al., 1996
; Glennon et al., 1996
; Sugden and Clerk, 1998a
). Ang II (100 nM) induced the generation of reactive oxygen intermediates in neonatal
rat cardiac myocytes, and the antioxidant, butylated hydroxyanisole (10 µM), significantly inhibited Ang II-induced myocyte enlargement and
increased 3H-leucine incorporation, suggesting an
important role of reactive oxygen intermediates in Ang II-induced
myocyte hypertrophy (Nakamura et al., 1998
). Ang II also stimulated
endothelin-1 production in neonatal rat myocytes by activating PKC,
which is involved in Ang II-induced myocyte hypertrophy via an
autocrine mechanism (Ito et al., 1993
).
C. Neonatal versus Adult Cardiac Myocytes
So far, most studies on the effects of Ang II on cardiac myocytes
have been carried out using cultured neonatal rat cardiac myocytes.
These cells have the ability to divide with serum stimulation, whereas
adult rat cardiac myocytes are terminally differentiated and have no
ability to divide, indicating a significant difference in phenotype
between neonatal and adult cardiac myocytes. In fact, Schunkert et al.
(1995)
showed that the Ang II-induced increase in protein synthesis of
isolated perfused adult rat heart was not accompanied by induction of
c-fos and c-jun expression, in contrast to the
situation in neonatal myocytes. Stretching of neonatal rat cardiac
myocytes, the most popular in vitro model for investigation of the
effect of load on cardiac myocytes, causes myocyte hypertrophy and gene
reprogramming (Sadoshima and Izumo, 1997
). It has been reported that
Ang II secreted from myocytes plays a central role in stretch-induced
hypertrophy, functioning as an autocrine in the neonatal rat myocyte
culture system (Sadoshima et al., 1993
). On the other hand, recent
studies using isolated perfused adult rat heart preparation (Thienelt
et al., 1997
) or isolated perfused adult feline heart (Kent and
McDermott, 1996
) showed that increases in protein synthesis or
c-fos and c-myc mRNA in the heart that were
induced by systolic pressure overload were not prevented by an
AT1 receptor antagonist, which does not support a
role for AT1 receptor in pressure-induced acute
growth responses in the adult heart. Thus, the data appear to be
inconsistent for neonatal versus adult myocytes regarding the molecular
mechanism of Ang II-induced hypertrophic response. The findings for
neonatal myocytes should be interpreted with caution.
D. Cultured Cardiac Fibroblasts
The heart is composed of not only cardiac myocytes but also
nonmyocyte cells, particularly fibroblasts. Unlike cardiac myocytes, cardiac fibroblasts can proliferate even in the adult heart.
Furthermore, cardiac fibroblasts play a major role in the production of
ECM proteins such as fibronectin and collagen (Dostal et al., 1996
). Therefore, fibroblasts are critical for the development of cardiac fibrosis. Neonatal rat cardiac fibroblasts possess abundant
AT1 receptors. On the other hand,
AT2 receptors were undetectable in neonatal or
adult rat cardiac fibroblasts (Villarreal et al., 1993
; Crabos et al.,
1994
), indicating that the responses of cardiac fibroblasts to Ang II
are due to AT1 receptor. Unlike the situation with neonatal myocytes, Ang II treatment stimulated the proliferation of neonatal rat cardiac fibroblasts, as shown by significant increases in [3H]phenylalanine incorporation,
[3H]thymidine uptake, and cell number (Schorb
et al., 1993
). These mitogenic effects of Ang II were completely
blocked by losartan but not by PD123319, demonstrating the primary role
of AT1 receptor in Ang II-induced cardiac
fibroblast proliferation. Ang II also exerted mitogenic effects on
adult cardiac fibroblasts (Crabos et al., 1994
). As in the case of
neonatal cardiac myocytes, Ang II increased mRNA levels for
c-fos, c-jun, jun B, Egr-1,
and c-myc in cardiac fibroblasts via
AT1 receptor (Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993
).
Furthermore, Ang II increased collagen type I mRNA and the synthesis
and secretion of collagen (Crabos et al., 1994
), as well as mRNA
expression and protein secretion of transforming growth factor-
1
(TGF-
1; Campbell and Katwa, 1997
) and fibronectin (Iwami et al.,
1996
). Ang II also increased cardiac fibroblast osteopontin expression,
and stimulation of cardiac fibroblast DNA synthesis by Ang II was
completely blocked by antibodies against osteopontin and
3 integrin,
suggesting that Ang II-induced cardiac fibroblast proliferation may
require osteopontin engagement of
3 integrin (Ashizawa et al.,
1996
).
AT1 receptor in cardiac fibroblasts couples to
Gi, in contrast to AT1
receptor in cardiac myocytes, which couples to
Gq. Ang II signaling cascades differ
significantly between cardiac fibroblasts and myocytes (Zou et al.,
1998
). Ang II (10
6 M) activated the STAT
signaling pathway as shown by gel mobility shift assay (Bhat et al.,
1994
). Immunoblot analysis showed that Ang II induced tyrosine
phosphorylation of ERK, focal adhesion kinase, and Shc in neonatal rat
cardiac fibroblasts, which was mediated not by PKC, as shown by the
lack of inhibition with phorbol ester-sensitive PKC down-regulation,
but rather by a Gi protein as shown by partial
inhibition with pertussis toxin pretreatment (100 ng/ml; Schorb et al.,
1994
). Ang II (10
6 M) activated ERK, and
pretreatment with the specific MAP kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor
PD98059 (5 × 10
5 M) completely blocked
the Ang II-induced increase in thymidine incorporation, suggesting that
Ang II-induced DNA synthesis in cardiac fibroblasts is mediated by MEK
and, probably, ERK (Zou et al., 1998
). However, the signaling cascade
underlying the production of ECM proteins in cardiac fibroblasts by Ang
II remains unclear.
E. Effects of In Vivo Angiotensin II Infusion on Heart
Figure 2 illustrates the cardiac
molecular and cellular effects of Ang II in vivo. Ang II infusion in
rats can induce cardiac hypertrophy via AT1
receptor, independent of its blood pressure-elevating effect (Dostal
and Baker, 1992
). Furthermore, continuous infusion of Ang II (200 ng/min i.p.) in adult rats, while causing a moderate increase in blood
pressure, produced both myocyte necrosis and myocytolysis, as shown by
labeling of cardiac myocytes with exogenously administered monoclonal
anti-myosin antibody; this subsequently caused cardiac fibroblast
proliferation and resulted in significant scar formation, indicating
the cardiotoxic effects of Ang II in vivo (Tan et al., 1991
). Ang II
(200 ng/kg/min s.c.) infusion in rats caused a small and gradual
increase in blood pressure; elevated left ventricular mRNAs for
skeletal
-actin,
-MHC, ANF, and fibronectin, preceding an
increase in left ventricular mass; and elevated TGF-
1 and types I
and III collagen mRNA levels (Kim et al., 1995c
); these increases were
completely inhibited by candesartan cilexetil (3 mg/kg/day p.o.) but
not by hydralazine (10 mg/kg/day). Thus, Ang II in vivo, via
AT1 receptor, directly induces cardiac myocyte
hypertrophy and gene reprogramming, and probably fibroblast proliferation and subsequent fibrosis as well, independent of the
elevation of blood pressure (Fig. 2), indicating the key role of Ang II
in the development of pathological cardiac hypertrophy.
|
Investigations of the in vivo effects of Ang II on cardiac
intracellular signaling cascades are essential to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying Ang II-induced pathological cardiac hypertrophy. In contrast to the detailed in vitro studies on cultured myocytes and fibroblasts described above, the action of Ang II on
cardiac signaling cascades in vivo is poorly understood. Accumulating in vitro evidence on cultured cardiac myocytes or fibroblasts suggests
that MAP kinases, including ERK or JNK, may be responsible for myocyte
hypertrophy and gene reprogramming or fibroblast proliferation (Force
et al., 1996
; Sugden and Clerk, 1998b
; Wang et al., 1998
). Recent work
on the effects of Ang II infusion in vivo in conscious rats showed that
Ang II-induced cardiac activation of JNK occurs in a more sensitive
manner than that of ERK, and JNK activation by Ang II without ERK
activation is followed by activation of activator protein-1 (AP-1;
composed of c-Fos and c-Jun proteins) (Yano et al., 1998
). Importantly,
AP-1 regulates the expression of various genes by binding the AP-1
consensus sequence present in their promoter regions. Interestingly,
fetal phenotypes of cardiac genes such as skeletal
-actin and ANF
(Karin, 1995
; Force et al., 1996
), and cardiac fibrosis-associated
genes such as TGF-
1 (Kim et al., 1989
) and collagen type I (Katai et
al., 1992
) have AP-1 responsive sequences in their promoter regions.
Indeed, AP-1 activation has been demonstrated to lead to increased
promoter activity of skeletal
-actin (Bishopric et al., 1992
) and
TGF-
1 (Kim et al., 1990
). Therefore, it is intriguing to postulate
that JNK activation, in part through activation of AP-1, may be
implicated in Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophic response in vivo
(Fig. 3). Thus, important differences in
the molecular mechanism of Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy exist
between the adult heart in vivo and neonatal cardiac myocytes in vitro.
However, it remains unclear whether the increased MAP kinase induced by
Ang II infusion originates in myocytes, fibroblasts, or both. Further
detailed work is needed to demonstrate whether activation of JNK/AP-1
by Ang II infusion is responsible for the above-mentioned cardiac hypertrophy-associated gene expressions.
|
Ang II, via AT1 receptor, is known to facilitate
the release of norepinephrine from cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals
(Zimmerman, 1981
; Rump et al., 1994
). In situ and in vitro studies in
dogs have demonstrated that Ang II enhances cardiac myocyte function via AT1 receptor present in intrinsic adrenergic
neurons (Horackova and Armour, 1997
). In Ang II-infused rats, surgical
cardiac sympathectomy or treatment with atenolol, a
1-adrenergic receptor blocker, significantly
prevented cardiac myocyte necrosis, showing that Ang II-induced cardiac
damage is at least in part mediated by catecholamine release from
cardiac sympathetic neurons (Henegar et al., 1998
). Thus, the
activation of cardiac sympathetic neurons by Ang II also contributes to
pathological cardiac hypertrophy.
F. Effects of Angiotensin Blockade on Experimental Cardiac Diseases
1. Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats and Other Hypertensive
Models.
As shown in Table 1,
molecular phenotypes of pathological cardiac hypertrophy differ among
various types of cardiac diseases. In spontaneously hypertensive rats
(SHR), the most popular model of human essential hypertension, left
ventricular mRNAs for skeletal
-actin, ANF, and collagen types I and
III were higher and
-MHC mRNA levels were lower than those in
normotensive control Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY; Ohta et al., 1996a
). Thus,
SHR exhibited not only cardiac hypertrophy but also cardiac gene
reprogramming. As shown in Table 2, an
AT1 receptor antagonist (SC-52458) or an ACE
inhibitor (imidapril) with a mildly hypotensive effect (~30 mm Hg)
attenuated the increases in cardiac ANF and collagen types I and III
mRNAs and significantly normalized the decreased
-MHC mRNA. On the other hand, a calcium channel blocker or an
1-adrenergic blocker had no effect on these
mRNA expressions in SHR, despite blood pressure-lowering effects
comparable with those of SC-52458 and imidapril. These observations
show that cardiac gene reprogramming in SHR can be attributed at least
in part to direct AT1 receptor activation by Ang
II. Furthermore, the combination of doxazosin with atenolol suppressed
cardiac collagen types I and III expressions, indicating that the
enhanced collagen expression was also in part mediated by
-adrenergic receptor (Table 2; Ohta et al., 1996a
). Treatment of SHR
with M17055, a diuretic, normalized only cardiac collagen type III (Kim
et al., 1996a
).
TABLE 1
Differential molecular phenotypes among various rat cardiac disease
models
TABLE 2
Effects of various antihypertensive drugs on left ventricular gene
expressions in SHR
-adrenergic blocker (atenolol), and an
-adrenergic blocker (doxazosin), the cardiac
AT1 receptor, but not high blood pressure, was
involved in cardiac hypertrophy and gene reprogramming in TGR(mRen2)27,
and the cardiac renin-angiotensin system via AT1
receptor may be involved in cardiac hypertrophy and gene expressions in
this transgenic rat (Ohta et al., 1996b
-MHC and TGF-
1 mRNAs (Kim et
al., 1995b
-MHC, skeletal
-actin, ANF, TGF-
1, and collagen
types I and III in SHRSP to a greater extent than amlodipine (5 mg/kg/day) despite comparable hypotensive effects (Kim et al., 1996b
-MHC mRNA levels in SHRSP was not
significantly inhibited by losartan or amlodipine. Thus, up-regulation
of
-MHC mRNA in SHRSP seems to be due to neither Ang II nor
hypertension, although the mechanism remains unknown. Left ventricular
ERK and JNK activities were chronically higher in SHRSP than in WKY
(Izumi et al., 19982. Acute Pressure Overload Model.
So far, acute pressure
overload, produced by aortic banding or coarctation, has been the most
popular model for study of the mechanism of cardiac hypertrophy in
vivo. This model is characterized by acute cardiac hypertrophy induced
by rapid and severe pressure overload to the heart, in contrast to the
above-mentioned slow and mild development of cardiac hypertrophy in
hypertensive rats such as SHR or SHRSP. Therefore, it should be noted
that this model is rather artificial and may not be a suitable
physiological model of human cardiac hypertrophy, which develops slowly
and chronically over the long term. Acute pressure overload in rats due
to aortic banding rapidly caused left ventricular increases in mRNAs
for
-MHC, skeletal
-actin, ANF, TGF-
1, and collagen types I
and III and a reciprocal decrease in
-MHC mRNA (Table 1;
Parker and Schneider, 1991
; Villarreal and Dillmann, 1992
; Parker,
1995
). In this model, as in SHRSP, the decrease in left ventricular
-MHC mRNA occurred earlier than the increase in
-MHC mRNA . Treatment with losartan (10 mg/kg/day) suppressed left ventricular
hypertrophy and ANF and TGF-
1 up-regulation after aortic
coarctation, suggesting that AT1 receptor may
participate in cardiac hypertrophy and ANF and TGF-
1 up-regulation
in this model (Everett et al., 1994
). However, the effects of losartan on genes other than ANF and TGF-
1 were not examined in this study. Acute pressure overload, produced by abdominal aortic constriction in
rats, caused tyrosine phosphorylation of left ventricular JAK1, JAK2,
Tyk2, STAT1, STAT2, and
STAT3, whereas treatment with an AT1 receptor antagonist (30 mg/kg/day E4177) or
an ACE inhibitor (10 mg/kg/day cilazapril) suppressed tyrosine
phosphorylation of Tyk2 completely and that of JAK2 partially but
failed to inhibit JAK1 (Pan et al., 1997
). Thus, cardiac
AT1 receptor may directly contribute to the
activation of JAK2 and Tyk2 in acute pressure-overloaded rats.
Recently, AT1a receptor knockout mice were
successfully developed (Sugaya et al., 1995
), in which cardiac
AT1 receptor mRNA levels (probably due to
AT1b receptor) are less than 10% of those in
wild-type mice (Harada et al., 1998a
). In contrast to the contribution
of AT1 receptor to pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy in adult rats, acute pressure overload by aortic
constriction elicited significant activation of ERK and increased the
expression of immediate-early genes and the fetal phenotype of genes
such as
-MHC and ANF, myocyte hypertrophy, and fibrosis in the heart
of both AT1a knockout and wild-type mice (Harada
et al., 1998a
,b
). However, blockade of pressure overload cardiac
hypertrophy in adult animals with an AT1 receptor
antagonist is not at all equivalent to the pressure overload model
using AT1 receptor knockout animals. It is
possible that deletion of the AT1a receptor gene
from early embryogenesis promotes a compensatory ability to use
pathways other than AT1 receptor for cardiac
hypertrophic response, which may explain the sufficient response to
hypertrophic stimuli seen in knock-out mice as well as wild-type mice.
Furthermore, the possible contribution of AT1b
receptor to cardiac hypertrophy in AT1a receptor
knockout mice cannot be excluded. Thus, the findings obtained using
this model should be interpreted with cautious.
3. Myocardial Infarction.
Myocardial infarction is the most
common cause of heart failure. Clinically, ACE inhibitors have proved
effective in reducing death and complications, improving symptomatic
status, and attenuating the progressive nature of cardiac failure in
symptomatic patients with ventricular diastolic and/or systolic
dysfunction (The CONSENSUS Trial Study Group, 1987
; The SOLVD
Investigators, 1991
). AT1 receptor antagonists
had beneficial effects similar to those of ACE inhibitors on cardiac
dysfunction, hypertrophy, and fibrosis after myocardial infarction in
the rat (Schieffer et al., 1994
; Weber, 1997
). Interestingly, as shown
in Table 1, the molecular phenotype in nonischemic left ventricular
myocardium of myocardial infarcted rats differed from that of
hypertensive or acute pressure-overloaded models, as shown by the lack
of change in
-MHC mRNA (Hanatani et al., 1995
; Yoshiyama et al.,
1999
). An AT1 receptor antagonist (1 and 10 mg/kg/day candesartan cilexetil) and an ACE inhibitor (1 and 10 mg/kg/day imidapril) significantly and similarly suppressed cardiac
hypertrophy and the increased mRNA expressions of
-MHC, ANP, and
skeletal
-actin in nonischemic left ventricular myocardium at 1 and
4 weeks and collagen types I and III mRNA up-regulation at 4 weeks after coronary arterial ligation (Yoshiyama et al., 1999
). Furthermore, these molecular effects of candesartan cilexetil and imidapril were
associated with improvements in cardiac systolic and diastolic dysfunction, as assessed with Doppler echocardiography. These findings
support the notion that normalization of the molecular phenotype in the
nonischemic left ventricle after myocardial infarction may be linked to
improvement of cardiac dysfunction. Furthermore, unlike the situation
in SHRSP, up-regulation of
-MHC in the left ventricle with
myocardial infarction seems to be mediated by AT1 receptor.
4. Volume Overload Model.
Previous work on the effects of
AT1 receptor antagonist (40 mg/kg/day losartan)
treatment on rat cardiac hypertrophy due to aortocaval shunt showed the
contribution of AT1 receptor to the development
of cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction in the volume overload model
(Ruzicka et al., 1994b
). As shown in Table 1, the molecular phenotype
in cardiac volume overload was characterized only by increases in left
ventricular ANF and collagen type III mRNAs, indicating that the
volume-overloaded heart has a very unique molecular phenotype (Kim et
al., 1997b
). The lack of increase in collagen type I and TGF-
1
expressions may explain why volume overload due to aortocaval shunt
does not increase cardiac collagen accumulation (Ruzicka et al.,
1994a
), in contrast to the increased collagen accumulation seen in
other hypertrophic models, such as hypertension, acute pressure
overload, or myocardial infarction. Treatment with an
AT1 receptor antagonist (10 mg/kg/day CS-866) or
an ACE inhibitor (10 mg/kg/day temocapril) for 7 days decreased left
ventricular mass and ANF and collagen type III mRNAs in this model (Kim
et al., 1997b
). Together with the lack of change in plasma renin
activity or aldosterone in this model, these findings suggest that
cardiac AT1 receptor is at least partly involved in not only cardiac hypertrophy but also altered gene expression caused
by volume overload.
5. Diabetes.
Clinical data show that myocardial dysfunction
frequently occurs in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), even in the
absence of coronary artery disease, supporting the concept of primary diabetic cardiomyopathy (Regan et al., 1977
; Mahgoub and Abd-Elfattah, 1998
). Furthermore, abnormalities in cardiac function, including decreased cardiac contractility, are reported to occur in
streptozotocin-induced diabetic animals (Feuvray et al., 1979
; Litwin
et al., 1990
). However, the mechanism responsible for cardiomyopathy in
DM, particularly NIDDM, is poorly understood. Sechi et al. (1994)
found
that hyperglycemia leads to increases in cardiac
AT1 receptor density and mRNA levels without
altering plasma renin concentrations, suggesting possible activation of
the cardiac renin-angiotensin system in diabetic rats. Otsuka
Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats, a recently developed model of
human NIDDM (Kawano et al., 1992
), show a unique cardiac molecular
phenotype (Table 1; Yagi et al., 1997
). An AT1
receptor antagonist (10 mg/kg/day E-4177) and an ACE inhibitor (1 and
10 mg/kg/day cilazapril) similarly prevented left ventricular up-regulation of TGF-
1 mRNA and down-regulation of
-MHC mRNA in
OLETF rats, suggesting that AT1 receptor may be
involved in these gene expressions (Kim et al., 1997c
).
| |
IV. Molecular and Cellular Actions of Angiotensin II in Blood Vessels |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Cultured Smooth Muscle Cells
Ang II has been established to stimulate protein synthesis and
induce cellular hypertrophy in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells
(SMCs) via AT1 receptor (Geisterfer et al., 1988
;
Berk et al., 1989
). Because the abnormal growth of vascular SMCs plays a major role in the development of various vascular diseases such as
hypertension and atherosclerosis (Gibbons and Dzau, 1994
), this article
focuses on the signal transduction underlying Ang II-induced vascular
SMC growth. Cultured vascular SMCs express AT1
receptor but not AT2 receptor. A growing body of
evidence shows that AT1 receptor activation in
cultured vascular SMCs, coupled to the G protein
Gq, causes not only activation of PLC-
leading
to increases in diacylglycerol and intracellular calcium but also
activation of multiple signal transduction cascades. Many excellent
reviews that focus on the mechanism of Ang II-activated signal
transduction in vascular SMC have recently been published (Schieffer et
al., 1996
; Berk and Corson, 1997
; Griendling et al., 1997
; Bernstein et
al., 1998
).
Ang II treatment of cultured rat aortic SMCs caused activation of ERK
(Duff et al., 1992
; Tsuda et al., 1992
), p70S6K (Giasson and Meloche,
1995
), and p90RSK (Takahashi et al., 1997
) and phosphorylation of
multiple protein tyrosine residues (Molloy et al., 1993
), including focal adhesion kinase (Polte et al., 1994
), paxillin (Leduc and Meloche, 1995
), PLC-
(Marrero et al., 1994
), JAK2,
STAT1 (Marrero et al., 1995
), c-Src (Ishida et
al., 1995
), p130 CAS (Sayeski et al., 1998
), and Pyk2. Furthermore, Ang
II has recently been reported to activate JNK (Schmitz et al., 1998
)
and p38 (Kusuhara et al., 1998
). However, little is known about
the role of these signal cascades in Ang II-induced hypertrophic
response. Treatment of rat aortic SMCs with two tyrosine kinase
inhibitors, genistein and herbimycin A, completely abolished the
stimulatory effect of Ang II (100 nM) on protein synthesis, without
affecting Ang II-stimulated inositol triphosphate production,
Ca2+ mobilization, ERK activation, or
c-fos mRNA induction (Leduc et al., 1995
). Thus, the
tyrosine kinase pathway contributes to Ang II-induced cellular
hypertrophy in rat aortic SMCs, independent of PLC activation, ERK
activation, or c-fos induction. Rapamycin, an
immunosuppressant drug that selectively blocks S6 kinase, significantly inhibited Ang II (100 nM)-induced protein synthesis as well as activation of p70S6K, without inhibiting activation of ERK or induction
of c-fos mRNA (Giasson and Meloche, 1995
). Thus, p70S6K plays a critical role in the hypertrophic response of vascular SMCs to
Ang II. Without affecting p70S6 kinase activity, PLC activity, or
protein tyrosine phosphorylation, a specific MEK inhibitor, PD98059 (30 µM), inhibited Ang II (100 nM)-induced protein synthesis in rat
aortic SMCs by 70%, and PD98059 (30 µM) and rapamycin (10 ng/ml)
exerted additive inhibitory effects on Ang II-induced protein synthesis, suggesting that activation of MEK and probably activation of
ERK are obligatory steps for Ang II-induced hypertrophy in vascular
SMCs, with a mechanism distinct from that of p70S6K (Servant et al.,
1996
). Ang II also promoted the activation of both NADH and NADPH
oxidases in cultured rat aortic SMCs, associated with an increase in
superoxide generation, whereas treatment with an NADPH oxidase
inhibitor (10 µM diphenylene iodinium) or an NADH oxidase inhibitor
(50 µM quinacrine) led to inhibition of both Ang II (100 nM)-induced
protein synthesis and superoxide generation (Griendling et al., 1994
).
Thus, Ang II-induced superoxide generation seems to function as a
second messenger implicated in cellular hypertrophy of vascular SMCs.
Furthermore, Ang II induced tyrosine phosphorylation of epidermal
growth factor (EGF) receptor and its association with Shc and Grb2 in
rat aortic SMCs, whereas treatment with AG1478, a specific EGF receptor
kinase inhibitor, inhibited Ang II-induced ERK activation and protein
synthesis, supporting the notion that Ang II causes cellular
hypertrophy, at least in part mediated by EGF receptor transactivation
(Eguchi et al., 1998
). Thus, tyrosine kinases, p70S6K, ERK, superoxide, or EGF receptor, via different mechanisms, may be responsible for Ang
II-induced cellular hypertrophy in vascular SMCs. However, it remains
unresolved whether these signal cascades are indeed all simultaneously
activated by Ang II in vivo. Tyrosine phosphorylation of
platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)
-receptor by Ang II in
vascular SMCs has been also reported, although the role of transactivation of this receptor is unknown (Linseman et al., 1995
).
Long-term treatment with Ang II can induce delayed mitogenic effects on
cultured rat aortic SMCs, as shown by the observation that Ang II
increased DNA synthesis 5- to 8-fold in vascular SMCs after 48 h,
followed by an increase in cell number after 5 days (Weber et al.,
1994a
). This delayed mitogenic effect of Ang II could be inhibited by
suramin, a compound shown to interfere with autocrine cell
transformation, suggesting the involvement of suramin-sensitive autocrine growth factors in Ang II-induced delayed proliferation. Furthermore, Ang II-induced proliferation of vascular SMCs was suggested to be mediated by the autocrine action of PDGF or basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) released into the medium (Gibbons et
al., 1992
). In porcine coronary SMC, Ang II
(10
6 M) also induced cell proliferation after
96 h and activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase), a
heterodimeric protein composed of 85- and 110-kDa subunits that
catalyzes the synthesis of 3-phosphorylated phosphoinositides, whereas
LY294002 (10
5 to 10
10
M), a specific inhibitor of PI3-kinase, inhibited the increases in both
RNA and DNA synthesis as well as the increase in cell number generated
by Ang II stimulation, supporting the important role of PI3-kinase in
Ang II-induced vascular SMC proliferation (Saward and Zahradka, 1997
).
Vascular diseases are triggered and developed by a variety of factors,
such as growth factors, ECM proteins, cytokines, or chemokines.
Accumulating evidence indicates that Ang II in vascular SMCs regulates
various gene expressions implicated in vascular diseases. Ang II
stimulated the induction of various growth factors, including TGF-
1
mRNA and protein (Gibbons et al., 1992
), PDGF mRNA (Naftilan et al.,
1989
), bFGF (Gibbons et al., 1992
), vascular endothelial growth factor
mRNA (VEGF; Williams et al., 1995
), and insulin-like growth factor-I
mRNA and protein (Delafontaine and Lou, 1993
). Ang II-induced TGF-
1
mRNA expression in vascular SMCs was mediated by activation of ERK and
AP-1 (Hamaguchi et al., 1999
). Ang II also stimulated induction of
various kinds of ECM components, including fibronectin mRNA and protein
(Tamura et al., 1998
), collagen protein (Kato et al., 1991
), laminin, and tenascin mRNA and protein (Sharifi et al., 1992
). Ang II increased glucose transporter GLUT- I mRNA and activity in rat aortic SMCs (Low
et al., 1992
). Ang II stimulated mRNA expression and activity of
plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 and -2 in rat aortic SMCs,
suggesting the involvement of Ang II in thrombosis (Feener et al.,
1995
). Ang II also stimulated the induction of monocyte chemoattractant
protein-1 (MCP-1) mRNA and protein in rat aortic SMCs, which was due to
activation of tyrosine kinases and ERK or generation of superoxide,
suggesting the participation of Ang II in monocyte infiltration into
the vessel wall (Chen et al., 1998
). It is intriguing that these
factors may play an important role in Ang II-mediated vascular diseases
in an autocrine or a paracrine manner.
B. Cultured Endothelial Cells
As in rat aortic SMCs, Ang II promoted PAI-1 and PAI-2 mRNA and
protein expressions in rat microvessel endothelial cells isolated from
epididymal fat pads via AT1 receptor (Feener et
al., 1995
). Thus, AT1 receptor in endothelial
cells may regulate plasminogen activation. In coronary endothelial
cells from explanted human heart, Ang II, via AT1
receptor, induced concentration-dependent increases in E-selectin mRNA
and protein and significantly increased leukocyte adhesion at wall
shear stress. This adhesion to endothelial cells was due to E-selectin
expression, as demonstrated by the inhibition of leukocyte adhesion
with anti-E-selectin antibody (Grafe et al., 1997
). Therefore,
AT1 receptor in endothelial cells may participate
in leukocyte accumulation in the vessel wall, which is a hallmark of
early atherosclerosis and plaque progression. Ang II has also been
shown to induce expression of endothelin-1 mRNA and protein in bovine
carotid arterial endothelial cells via AT1
receptor (Imai et al., 1992
). In bovine retinal microcapillary endothelial cells, Ang II alone had no effect on cell growth or tube
formation, but Ang II in a dose-dependent manner induced significant
increases in mRNA and protein for kinase domain-containing receptor/total liver kinase (KDR/Flk-1), which is a VEGF receptor, and
significantly enhanced VEGF-induced cell proliferation and tube
formation, mediated by AT1 receptor (Otani et
al., 1998
). These findings suggest that AT1
receptor may contribute to the development of diabetic retinopathy by
enhancing VEGF-induced angiogenic activity.
C. Effects of In Vivo Angiotensin II Infusion on Vascular Tissues
Several in vivo experiments have shown that Ang II can induce
vascular SMC proliferation in vivo (Daemen et al., 1991
; Griffin et
al., 1991
; Simon and Altman, 1992
; Su et al., 1998
). Interestingly, Ang
II infusion (200 ng/min i.p.) in rats subjected to balloon injury 2 weeks earlier showed that the proliferative influence of Ang II is more
remarkable in neointimal SMCs than in SMCs of the underlying media or
of the normal vessel wall, indicating that the proliferative activity
of Ang II in vivo depends on the preexisting proliferative status of
vascular SMCs (Daemen et al., 1991
). Ang II infusion (200 ng/kg/min
s.c. for 10-12 days) in rats increased mesenteric vascular media
width, media cross-sectional area, and media/lumen ratio, and these
changes were not inhibited by treatment with hydralazine despite
normalization of blood pressure, indicating that Ang II caused vascular
growth in vivo at least in part in a direct manner (Griffin et al.,
1991
).
Despite detailed investigations into the molecular mechanism of Ang
II-mediated vascular SMC growth in vitro, this process is poorly
understood. Ang II infusion, at least in part independent of its blood
pressure-elevating effect, increased aortic mRNA and protein expression
of fibronectin, which is an ECM protein that induces phenotypic change
of vascular SMCs from a contractile to a synthetic phenotype (Kim et
al., 1994a
). bFGF may play a key role in Ang II-mediated vascular SMC
replication in vivo, as shown by the observation that i.v. injection of
anti-bFGF antibody significantly inhibited the mitogenic effect of Ang
II infusion on rat carotid arteries (Su et al., 1998
). Ang II (0.7 mg/kg/day) infusion in rats doubled superoxide production in rat aorta
(mainly media) by activation of NADH/NADPH oxidase, which was
completely blocked by treatment with losartan (25 mg/kg/day;
Rajagopalan et al., 1996
; Laursen et al., 1997
). On the other hand,
norepinephrine (2.8 mg/kg/day) infusion did not increase vascular
superoxide production, despite a hypertensive effect comparable with
that of Ang II, suggesting that SMC growth due to Ang II may be
specifically mediated by increased superoxide generation. Ang II
infusion (0.7 mg/kg/day s.c.) in rats increased heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1)
mRNA and protein in the endothelium and adventitia of the aorta, which was prevented by treatment with losartan (25 mg/kg/day; Ishizaka et
al., 1997
). Because HO-1 is an oxidant-sensitive gene, it is possible
that increased oxidative stress is a trigger for HO-1 mRNA
up-regulation in Ang II-infused rat aorta and that HO-1 may serve to
abrogate this increased stress caused by Ang II. Ang II infusion (0.75 mg/kg/day s.c.) stimulated aortic thrombin receptor mRNA expression in
rats, which was blocked by either losartan or heparin-binding chimera
of human Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase but not by normalization of blood
pressure with hydralazine treatment, suggesting that Ang II increases
vascular thrombin receptor by AT1
receptor-mediated superoxide production and may be implicated in the
pathophysiology of atherosclerosis by thrombin cascade activation
(Capers et al., 1997
). The i.p. injection of Ang II (10
7 M once daily for 2 days) in mice resulted
in increased oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake by
peritoneal macrophages and increased macrophage proteoglycan content,
suggesting that Ang II may accelerate atherosclerosis by promoting foam
cell formation and cholesterol accumulation in the vascular wall
(Keidar and Attias, 1997
).
D. Effects of Angiotensin Blockade on Experimental Vascular
Diseases
1. Hypertensive Rats.
Table 3
summarizes the in vivo molecular effects of AT1
receptor antagonists on various rat vascular diseases. Accumulating evidence indicates that TGF-
1 and various ECM proteins are
responsible for the development of vascular remodeling. Aortic
TGF-
1, fibronectin, and collagen type IV mRNA levels are higher in
SHR than in WKY, and all of these elevated mRNAs in the aorta of SHR
were significantly reduced by an ACE inhibitor, alacepril (50 mg/kg/day), or an AT1 receptor antagonist,
SC-52458 (50 mg/kg/day; Ohta et al., 1994
). In the mesenteric artery
and aorta of SHRSP, the increases in mRNA levels for TGF-
1;
fibronectin; collagen types I, III, and IV; and laminin were suppressed
by candesartan (1 and 10 mg/kg) or enalapril (10 mg/kg; Kim et al.,
1995b
). Importantly, these effects were associated with the suppression
of medial hypertrophy of the aorta and mesenteric artery of SHRSP,
suggesting that AT1 receptor may be responsible
for vascular thickening via stimulation of TGF-
1 and ECM protein
expressions.
TABLE 3
In vivo molecular effects of AT1 receptor antagonists on
various rat vascular disease models
2. Balloon Injury.
Arterial injury produced by balloon
angioplasty causes proliferation and migration of medial smooth muscle
cells, leading to progressive neointimal thickening and narrowing of
the vascular lumen (Gibbons and Dzau, 1994
). This arterial repair
process has been shown to be associated with significant induction of
various kinds of genes, including immediate-early genes (Miano et al., 1990
), growth factors, and ECM components (Majesky et al., 1990
), suggesting the importance of these genes in the formation of neointima. Ang II, via AT1 receptor, is responsible for
neointima formation in rat artery after balloon injury (Powell et al.,
1989
; Prescott et al., 1991
). As shown in Table 3, candesartan
cilexetil (10 mg/kg/day) significantly inhibited induction of
c-fos, c-jun, and Egr-1 mRNAs after
balloon injury and significantly inhibited fibronectin mRNA, suggesting
that inhibition of fibronectin expression by AT1
receptor antagonist may be in part responsible for inhibition of
vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and/or migration (Kim et al.,
1995a
). Furthermore, arterial JNK and ERK activities were rapidly and
transiently increased with peaks at 5 min (Kim et al., 1998
). Treatment
with AT1 receptor antagonist (20 mg/kg/day E4177)
significantly inhibited the activation of JNK and ERK in injured
artery, demonstrating that Ang II, via AT1
receptor, is responsible for balloon injury-induced arterial JNK and
ERK activations (Fig. 4). Notably,
inhibition of JNK activation by AT1 receptor antagonist was greater than 80%, whereas that of ERK activation was
about 40%, suggesting that JNK activation may be due more to
AT1 receptor than ERK activation. Furthermore,
after activation of JNK and ERK, transcription factor AP-1 complex,
composed of c-Fos and c-Jun proteins, was activated with a peak at
3 h after injury, and this was blocked 47% by E4177 (Fig.
5). These findings support the notion
that AT1 receptor seems to participate in
neointima formation after balloon injury, probably mediated by
activation of JNK or ERK followed by AP-1 activation. The inhibition of
neointima in balloon-injured artery by AT1
receptor antagonist also may be in part due to suppression of PDGF
receptor activation, as shown by the findings that PDGF receptor
tyrosine phosphorylation was enhanced in injured artery and was
suppressed by candesartan cilexetil (10 mg/kg/day) but not by
amlodipine (10 mg/kg/day; Abe et al., 1997
).
|
|
3. Other Models.
ACE inhibitors have been reported to exert
potent antiatherosclerotic actions in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic
rabbits (Chobanian et al., 1990
) and high-cholesterol-fed rabbits
(Schuh et al., 1993
). In the latter model, treatment with an
AT1 receptor antagonist (20 mg/kg/day E4177) as
well as an ACE inhibitor (10 mg/kg/day enalapril) for 5 weeks reduced
aortic cholesterol content (Sugano et al., 1996
), whereas an other
study showed that treatment with an AT1 receptor
antagonist (30 mg/kg/day SC-51316 p.o.) for 3 months did not
significantly attenuate aortic atherosclerosis (Schuh et al., 1993
).
Thus, the role of AT1 receptor in hyperlipidemic atherosclerosis in rabbits is controversial. However, recent work showed that AT1 receptor mRNA expression and
binding were significantly increased mainly in the media and to some
extent in the intima of atherosclerotic aorta from high-cholesterol-fed
rabbits (Yang et al., 1998
). Furthermore, without affecting plasma
cholesterol levels, losartan (25 mg/kg/day for 3 months) in
apolipoprotein E-deficient mice with severe hypercholesterolemia and
extensive atherosclerosis increased the resistance of LDL to
CuSO4-induced oxidative modification, and this
was associated with a reduction in atherosclerotic lesion area by 80%
(Keidar et al., 1997
). Thus, AT1 receptor
antagonists may have beneficial effects on atherosclerosis due to
inhibition of LDL lipid peroxidation. DM is also an important risk
factor for atherosclerosis. Cilazapril (1 and 10 mg/kg/day) and E4177
(10 mg/kg/day) prevented wall thickening and increased perivascular
fibrosis in arterioles and small coronary arteries of OLETF rats,
suggesting an important role of AT1 receptor in diabetic vascular disease (Kim et al., 1997c
). However, the molecular mechanism underlying the contribution of AT1
receptor to diabetic vascular lesions remains to be elucidated.
| |
V. Molecular and Cellular Actions of Angiotensin II in Kidney |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Cultured Glomerular Cells
Glomerular diseases are mainly caused by glomerular hypertension,
DM, or inflammation and are commonly characterized by mesangial cell
overgrowth and excessive accumulation of ECM proteins. The development
of such glomerular injuries is largely responsible for glomerular
capillary obliteration and decline in the glomerular filtration rate
(GFR), ultimately leading to renal failure, as reviewed elsewhere
(Wesson, 1998
). Thus, glomerular diseases are the most clinically
important kidney diseases. Accumulating evidence suggests that
mesangial cells, which are a major determinant in regulation of GFR,
play a key role in progression from glomerular injury to
glomerulosclerosis, due to their overgrowth and synthesis of excess ECM
proteins. Therefore, in this review, we focus on the molecular effects
of Ang II on glomerular mesangial cells.
Interestingly, Ang II concentrations within the kidney are ~1000-fold
higher than those in circulating blood, suggesting the presence of an
intrarenal renin-angiotensin system (Seikaly et al., 1990
; Ingelfinger
and Dzau, 1991
). Ang II plays a critical role not only in the
regulation of GFR but also in the development of glomerulosclerosis by
increasing glomerular capillary pressure caused by preferential
constriction of efferent arterioles (Miller et al., 1991
). The
hemodynamic effects of Ang II in the kidney have been extensively
reviewed elsewhere (Ichikawa and Harris, 1991
; Stockand and Sansom,
1998
). Besides its unique hemodynamic effects in the kidney, Ang II has
been shown to have various important direct actions on mesangial cells,
and these nonhemodynamic effects of Ang II may play a crucial role in
Ang II-mediated glomerular injury. Mesangial cells exclusively express
AT1 receptor but not AT2
receptor, and mesangial AT1 receptor is coupled
to G protein, causing activation of PLC (Douglas and Hopfer, 1994
;
Matsubara, 1998
). In cultured murine mesangial cells, Ang II
(10
6 M) stimulated cellular hypertrophy, as
indicated by increases in cell size and total protein content and
synthesis, without an increase in [3H]thymidine
incorporation, and these effects were blocked by losartan (Anderson et
al., 1993
). On the other hand, other investigators showed that Ang II
caused not only cellular hypertrophy but also proliferation in
mesangial cells (Wolf et al., 1992
; Gomez-Garre et al., 1996
). However,
the molecular mechanism responsible for Ang II-mediated mesangial cell
growth is poorly understood. Ang II activated ERK (Huwiler et al.,
1995
; Anderson et al., 1996
) and JNK (Huwiler et al., 1998
) in rat
mesangial cells, although the role of ERK or JNK activation has not
been defined. Ang II (10
5 to
10
8 M) dose dependently increased superoxide
anion production in rat mesangial cells, in parallel with mesangial
cell hypertrophy and proliferation, and the latter effects were
completely abolished by blockade of superoxide anion production with
diphenyleneiodonium chloride (10
5 M;
Jaimes et al., 1998
). Furthermore, stimulation of superoxide anion
production by Ang II in mesangial cells was completely blocked by
PD98059 (50 µM) or calphostin C (1 µM) but not by tyrosine kinase
inhibitors, herbimycin A (1 µM) and genistein (10 µM), suggesting
that ERK cascade and PKC participate in mesangial cell growth by
enhancing superoxide anion production.
Accumulating evidence supports the notion that TGF-
1 plays a key
role in progression of glomerulosclerosis by directly enhancing mesangial cell hypertrophy and ECM production (Border and Ruoslahti, 1992
; Border and Noble, 1994
). Glomerulosclerosis due to Ang II is
postulated to be closely linked to TGF-
1, as previously reviewed (Peters and Noble, 1997
; Border and Noble, 1998
). The treatment of rat
mesangial cells with Ang II (10
6 M) increased
mRNA and protein levels for TGF-
1 and ECM components including
biglycan, fibronectin, and collagen type I, and neutralizing antibody
to TGF-
1 blocked both Ang II-induced mesangial cell hypertrophy and
ECM expression, demonstrating that newly synthesized and released
TGF-
1 is involved in Ang II-induced mesangial cell hypertrophy and
ECM production in a autocrine manner (Kagami et al., 1994
). Ang
II-induced fibronectin production in rat mesangial cells was mediated
by PKC, as indicated by inhibition with staurosporine (10
7 M) or H-7 (10
6 M;
Gomez-Garre et al., 1996
). Ang II treatment of rat mesangial cells
increased PAI-1 mRNA and protein, and anti-TGF-
1 antibody inhibited
Ang II-induced PAI-1 production, demonstrating the contribution of
TGF-
1 to Ang II-induced PAI-1 synthesis (Kagami et al., 1997
). All
of these in vitro findings support the notion that TGF-
1 may be a
key mediator in Ang II-induced glomerulosclerosis. Exposure of rat
mesangial cells to Ang II increased nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B) DNA-binding activity, and subsequently increased MCP-1 mRNA and protein; pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (200 µM), an antioxidant capable
of inhibiting NF-
B activation, abolished Ang II
(10
7 M)-induced NF-
B activation and MCP-1
gene expression, suggesting that NF-
B activation may be responsible
for MCP-1 induction by Ang II (Ruiz-Ortega et al., 1998
). Thus, Ang II
also seems to be responsible for inflammatory responses of mesangial cells.
Glomerular cells are composed of not only mesangial cells but also
endothelial and epithelial cells, although little is known about the
role of these cells in glomerular injury. Notably, cultured rat
glomerular endothelial cells were found to possess not only AT1 receptor but also AT2
receptor, and Ang II treatment stimulated RANTES (chemokine with
chemoattractant properties for macrophages/monocytes) mRNA and protein
synthesis; these processes were blocked by AT2 receptor ligand PD123177 or CGP-42112 but not by
AT1 receptor antagonist losartan, suggesting a
possible role of endothelial AT2 receptor in Ang
II-induced RANTES expression (Wolf et al., 1997
). Thus, glomerular
endothelial AT2 receptor may be implicated in the
development of glomerular inflammation. Glomerular epithelial cells,
which play an important role as a glomerular filtration barrier, have
both AT1 and AT2 receptors,
and Ang II was shown to increase cAMP accumulation in these cells via
AT1 receptor but not AT2
receptor (Sharma et al., 1998
), although the significance of this
observation is unknown.
B. Effects of In Vivo Angiotensin II Infusion on Kidney
Ang II infusion in vivo in rats was shown to cause
glomerulosclerosis (Miller et al., 1991
), and several important
findings on cellular and molecular mechanisms of glomerular injury by
Ang II infusion have been previously reported. In various types of glomerular diseases in rats and humans, glomerular mesangial cells undergo phenotypic changes, as shown by expression of significant amounts of
-smooth muscle actin, which is not expressed in normal mesangial cells (Johnson et al., 1992b
). Furthermore, glomerular diseases are also characterized by a significant increase in the expression of desmin, an intermediate filament, by glomerular epithelial cells. Thus, phenotypic changes in glomerular mesangial and
epithelial cells are believed to play an important role in the
pathophysiology of glomerular diseases. Continuous Ang II infusion (200 ng/min s.c.) in rats led to dramatic up-regulations of
-smooth
muscle actin in glomerular mesangial cells and desmin in epithelial
cells, indicating that Ang II caused the phenotypic changes in these
glomerular cells (Johnson et al., 1992a
). However, the significance of
these phenotypic changes induced by Ang II remains to be clarified.
Continuous administration of Ang II (100 ng/min s.c.) in rats for 7 days caused increases in glomerular mRNAs for TGF-
1 and
collagen type I (Kagami et al., 1994
). The i.p. infusion of Ang II (500 ng/h) in rats for 4 days significantly stimulated glomerular mRNA and
protein expression of RANTES and increased glomerular
macrophage/monocyte influx. Notably, oral treatment with PD123177 (50 mg/l drinking water) did not affect blood pressure but did attenuate
glomerular RANTES expression or glomerular macrophage/monocyte influx,
showing the involvement of Ang II in glomerular chemotaxis of
macrophages/monocytes through local RANTES induction via
AT2 receptor (Wolf et al., 1997
). Acute i.v.
infusion of Ang II (100 or 1000 ng/kg/min) in conscious rats rapidly
and transiently induced activation of glomerular ERK and JNK, followed
by an increase in glomerular AP-1 binding activity (Hamaguchi et al.,
1998
). Thus, as in cardiovascular diseases, the ERK and JNK signaling
cascades, via activation of AP-1, may be implicated in the development
of Ang II-induced glomerular injury.
C. Effects of Angiotensin Blockade on Experimental Glomerular Diseases
Table 4 shows the potential
molecular mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of
AT1 receptor antagonists in a variety of renal
disease models. In deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt hypertensive
rats or SHRSP, which prominently exhibit progressive glomerulosclerosis, renal TGF-
1 and ECM protein mRNA levels are higher than those in normotensive control rats (Kim et al., 1994b
,c
). Treatment of DOCA-salt hypertensive rats with candesartan cilexetil (1 mg/kg/day) or enalapril (10 mg/kg/day), although not decreasing blood
pressure, significantly reduced urinary protein and albumin excretion
and induced histological improvement in renal lesions, in association
with decreases in renal cortical mRNA levels for TGF-
1, fibronectin,
laminin, and collagen types I, III, and IV (Fig.
6; Kim et al., 1994c
). Also in SHRSP,
candesartan cilexetil (0.1 mg/kg/day), without significantly decreasing
blood pressure, significantly reduced renal TGF-
1, fibronectin,
laminin, and collagen types I, III, and IV mRNA levels (Kim et al.,
1994b
). These findings provide in vivo evidence implicating Ang II, via AT1 receptor, in renal injury in these
hypertensive models, due to enhanced renal TGF-
1 and ECM
expressions.
|
|
Nephropathy is a major cause of complications and death in DM.
AT1 receptor antagonists as well as ACE
inhibitors have been shown to decrease proteinuria and slow the
progression of diabetic glomerular injury in streptozotocin-induced
diabetic rats (the most popular model of insulin-dependent DM; Remuzzi
et al., 1993
; Wolf and Ziyadeh, 1997
) and OLETF rats, an NIDDM model
(Kim et al., 1997c
). Thus, it is possible that
AT1 receptor blockade may be effective for
treating nephropathy in NIDDM patients as well as in IDDM patients,
although the molecular mechanism is unknown.
In rats with subtotal renal ablation (remnant kidney model),
candesartan cilexetil (1 mg/kg/day) significantly reduced the expression of glomerular
-smooth muscle actin and desmin, while decreasing urinary albumin excretion and inducing histological improvement of glomerulosclerosis (Hamaguchi et al., 1996
). These findings suggest a contribution of the AT1
receptor to glomerular cell phenotypic changes in the remnant kidney
model. In the rat remnant kidney model with a 40% protein diet,
treatment with losartan (180 mg/l drinking water) for 8 or 14 days
attenuated increases in renal TGF-
1 mRNA and protein and improved
glomerulosclerosis, whereas treatment with a combination of reserpine,
hydralazine, and hydrochlorothiazide, despite hypotensive effects
comparable with those of losartan, failed to lessen renal TGF-
1
expression or glomerulosclerosis (Junaid et al., 1997
). Thus, Ang II
may participate in glomerulosclerosis in the remnant kidney model by
enhancing glomerular TGF-
1 expression.
In Thy 1.1 glomerulonephritic rats, losartan or enalapril treatment
significantly, but not completely, lowered glomerular TGF-
1,
fibronectin, and PAI-1 mRNAs and proteins (Peters et al., 1998
). In rat
nephropathy induced by a daily s.c. injection of 15 mg/kg cyclosporin A
(an important immunosuppressive drug), the administration of losartan
(10 mg/kg) ameliorated renal lesions, with simultaneous reductions in
renal cortical TGF-
1, PAI-1, collagen types I and IV, and biglycan
(Shihab et al., 1997
). Thus, Ang II-mediated TGF-
1 up-regulation may
contribute to glomerulosclerosis induced by hypertension, subtotal
nephrectomy, glomerulonephritis, or cyclosporin A nephropathy.
| |
VI. AT1 Receptor Antagonists versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Pharmacological Differences
In humans, ACE inhibitors have been demonstrated to be powerful
agents for the treatment of hypertension, congestive heart failure (The
CONSENSUS Trial Study Group, 1987
; The SOLVD Investigators, 1991
), and
renal diseases (Maschio et al., 1996
) and the prevention of myocardial
infarction in patients with NIDDM (Estacio et al., 1998
). Recently, in
elderly patients with heart failure, treatment with losartan was
associated with a lower mortality rate than that found with captopril
(Pitt et al., 1997
). Therefore, it is a very important clinical
question whether AT1 receptor antagonists have
different pharmacological actions than ACE inhibitors. Table 5 summarizes possible pharmacological
differences between AT1 receptor antagonists and
ACE inhibitors. It has been well established that ACE inhibitors not
only attenuate ACE-mediated formation of Ang II in the circulation and
peripheral tissues but also allow the accumulation of bradykinin
through the inhibition of its degradation, because ACE is identical
with kininase II (Linz et al., 1995
; Waeber and Brunner, 1996
).
The recent availability of the specific bradykinin
B2 receptor antagonist icatibant has allowed
researchers to determine whether various pharmacological effects of ACE
inhibitors are due to accumulated bradykinin by examining the effects
of icatibant on pharmacological actions of ACE inhibitors in vitro in
cultured cells or in various disease models. As reviewed in detail by
Linz et al. (1995)
, accumulated bradykinin in tissues due to ACE
inhibition contributes to blood pressure reduction in renovascular
hypertensive rats, prevention of balloon injury-induced neointima
formation in rat carotid artery, improvement of cardiac performance,
increase in coronary blood flow, prevention of
ischemia/reperfusion-induced arrhythmias, and regression of left
ventricular hypertrophy in pressure-overloaded rats by aortic
coarctation. Recently, it has been reported that bradykinin contributes
to ACE inhibitor-induced vasodilation in the human forearm, as shown by
inhibition with icatibant (Hornig et al., 1997
). Furthermore, in both
normotensive and hypertensive humans, bradykinin was shown to be
responsible for the short-term hypotensive effect of captopril (25 mg/day), as indicated by attenuation of this effect with
coadministration of icatibant (Gainer et al., 1998
). Thus, accumulation
of tissue bradykinin by ACE inhibitors probably produces significant
beneficial effects in certain cardiovascular diseases. However,
AT1 receptor antagonists have no such action. In
this regard, ACE inhibitors seem to be superior to
AT1 receptor antagonists.
|
On the other hand, accumulating evidence indicates the existence of an
alternative pathway for generation of Ang II, independent of ACE, in
cardiovascular and renal tissues of various species, including humans
(Hollenberg et al., 1998
). In particular, chymase, which is a potent
and specific Ang II-forming serine protease that is not affected by ACE
inhibitors, has been identified in human cardiac and vascular tissues
in high concentrations, suggesting that ACE inhibitors may not
completely block Ang II production in human tissues (Urata et al.,
1990
, 1993
; Shiota et al., 1993
; Liao and Husain, 1995
). Thus, with
regard to inhibition of Ang II action via AT1
receptor, AT1 receptor antagonists may be
superior to ACE inhibitors.
Chronic blockade of AT1 receptor results in
increased plasma renin activity and Ang II levels due to loss of the
negative feedback mechanism of renin release via
AT1 receptor. Increased plasma Ang II is expected
to compete with and displace AT1 receptor antagonists at the receptor site, which may attenuate the inhibition of
AT1 receptor by these agents. Furthermore, at the
same time, increased circulating Ang II is expected to activate
AT2 receptor. Interestingly, in failing human
hearts, the ratio of AT2 to
AT1 receptor is increased because of
down-regulation of AT1 receptor (Asano et al.,
1997
). Therefore, AT2 receptor activation may
play a key role in the pharmacological differences between
AT1 receptor antagonists and ACE inhibitors, as
discussed later.
B. Is the AT2 Receptor Beneficial or Detrimental?
There are conflicting data concerning the role of
AT2 receptor in cardiovascular and renal
diseases. Furthermore, it is not easy to determine whether the effects
of AT2 receptor-selective ligands, particularly
in vivo effects, represent antagonistic or agonistic actions, because
the molecular, cellular, and physiological functions of
AT2 receptor have not been clearly identified. In this article, we discuss conflicting data on the functions of AT2 receptor. The recent successful development
of AT2 receptor gene-manipulated animals has
provided evidence regarding the function of AT2
receptor in vivo (Hein, 1998
). AT2 receptor gene
knockout mice exhibited a higher basal blood pressure than wild-type
mice and enhanced pressor sensitivity in response to i.v. infusion of
Ang II compared with the wild type, suggesting that
AT2 receptor has an opposing effect to
AT1 receptor on blood pressure in vivo (Hein et
al., 1995
; Ichiki et al., 1995
). However, the mechanism for the
hypotensive effect of AT2 receptor remains
unresolved, because AT2 receptor expression is
negligible in normal vascular tissues. Cardiac-specific overexpression
of AT2 receptor in mice produced no obvious
cardiac morphological changes, but increases in blood pressure and
heart rate in this transgenic model in response to Ang II infusion were
significantly less than those of wild-type mice, suggesting that
AT2 receptor may decrease the sensitivity of
pacemaker cells to Ang II (Masaki et al., 1998
). Gene transfer of
AT2 receptor in rat carotid artery in vivo
significantly decreased neointimal formation induced by balloon injury,
showing the antiproliferative effect of AT2
receptor on vascular smooth muscle cells in vivo (Nakajima et al.,
1995
). In rats with heart failure induced by myocardial infarction,
treatment with AT1 receptor antagonist (1.5 mg/kg/day L-158809) significantly improved cardiac hypertrophy and
remodeling and cardiac dysfunction, and these effects were partially
blocked by AT2 receptor antagonist (10 mg/kg/day
PD123319 via osmotic minipump), suggesting that
AT2 receptor may have the cardioprotective
effects (Liu et al., 1997
). Furthermore, recent in vitro studies showed
that in contrast to AT1 receptor, under certain
experimental conditions, AT2 receptor exerts
antiproliferative effects on neonatal rat cardiac myocytes (Booz and
Baker, 1996
), fibroblasts (Ohkubo et al., 1997
), and rat coronary
endothelial cells (Stoll et al., 1995
). All of these findings support
the concept that AT2 receptor activation may
produce beneficial effects in cardiovascular diseases. An up-to-date
review on the functions of this receptor, which emphasizes the
beneficial role of AT2 receptor in cardiovascular
and renal diseases, was published recently (Matsubara, 1998
).
However, it should be noted that conflicting data have also been
reported. In global, no-flow ischemia in left atrium-perfused isolated
working rat hearts, PD123,319 (0.3 µM) administered before ischemia
improved the recovery of left ventricular work and efficiency, whereas
losartan (1 µM) blocked the recovery of left ventricular work and
depressed efficiency, suggesting that AT2
receptor is involved in mechanical dysfunction after
ischemia/reperfusion in the heart (Ford et al., 1996
). The
administration of PD123319 (30 mg/kg/day) in rats receiving Ang II
infusion (120 ng/kg/min) had no effect on hemodynamic parameters or
cardiac hypertrophy but antagonized the effects of Ang II on smooth
muscle cell growth and ECM expression, whereas the administration of
losartan (10 mg/kg/day) prevented Ang II-induced hemodynamic effects
but did not significantly affect Ang II-induced vascular hypertrophy
(Levy et al., 1996
). Therefore, vascular hypertrophy and remodeling by
Ang II in vivo may be mediated by AT2 receptor
rather than AT1 receptor. Furthermore, Ang II
infusion (200 ng/kg/min) in rats decreased the proliferation of left
and right ventricular and right atrial myoendothelial cells, and these
effects were not at all blocked by losartan treatment (10 mg/kg/day),
indicating an important role of non-AT1 receptor
in the suppression of myoendothelial proliferation, although this study
did not examine the effects of AT2 receptor
ligands (McEwan et al., 1998
). These in vivo data support the concept
that AT2 receptor activation may have detrimental effects in cardiovascular diseases. The role of
AT2 receptor is still controversial and probably
differs among various cardiovascular diseases.
C. Combination Therapy
Theoretically, monotherapy with an AT1
receptor antagonist or ACE inhibitor may be insufficient to block the
renin-angiotensin system in vivo. Indeed, in mildly salt-depleted
normotensive healthy volunteers, a combination of single oral doses of
captopril (50 mg) and losartan (50 mg) induced additive blood pressure
reduction, whereas a combination of single oral doses of 50 mg losartan
with 10 mg enalapril decreased blood pressure and stimulated plasma renin activity to a greater extent than enalapril alone at 10 to 20 mg
(Azizi et al., 1997
). Furthermore, recent animal studies that compared
the effects of of combined AT1 receptor
antagonist and ACE inhibitor at a wide range of doses with those of
each agent alone with regard to blood pressure and cardiac weight in SHR demonstrated that a low-dose combination of losartan (3 mg/kg/day) and enalapril (3 mg/kg/day) induced greater reductions in blood pressure and left ventricular weight/body weight ratio in SHR than
monotherapy with higher doses (each 10 mg/kg/day) and had effects
comparable with those of monotherapy with 20 mg/kg/day enalapril or 30 mg/kg/day losartan (Menard et al., 1997
). In this work, as expected,
the combination of enalapril with losartan in SHR prevented the
increase in circulating Ang II levels observed with losartan alone,
which is expected to prevent the AT2 receptor activation that is induced by losartan alone. Furthermore, in SHR,
hypotensive effects and regression of cardiac hypertrophy due to ACE
inhibition are not mediated by bradykinin, as shown by the lack of
effect of icatibant on the hypotensive action of ACE inhibitors in SHR
(Linz et al., 1995
). Therefore, these synergistic effects of combined
ACE inhibitor and AT1 receptor antagonist in SHR
seem to be due not to bradykinin or AT2 receptor
but rather to more potent blockade of AT1
receptor action. These findings clearly demonstrate that combination
therapy with an AT1 receptor antagonist and an
ACE inhibitor is more effective for inhibiting the renin-angiotensin
system than either agent alone and may be more powerful for
cardiovascular protection than either monotherapy. However, detailed
comparisons of combination therapy with monotherapy, using a broad
ranges of doses and long-term treatment periods in both animal models
and humans, are essential to establish the advantages and mechanisms of
combination therapy using both types of drugs.
| |
VII. Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There remain unresolved questions regarding the pathophysiological mechanisms of Ang II-mediated cardiovascular and renal diseases.
Although both cultured cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts in vitro
significantly respond to Ang II via AT1 receptor,
the relative importance of myocytes and fibroblasts in pathological
cardiac hypertrophy in vivo remains unclear. Interestingly, recent in vitro findings suggest that cardiac myocyte hypertrophy due to Ang II
may be mediated by paracrine action of TGF-
1, endothelin-1, or an
unknown factor released from fibroblasts rather than by direct action
(Sil and Sen, 1997
; Gray et al., 1998
). Thus, further study on
cross-talk between cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts is needed to
elucidate the mechanism underlying Ang II-induced pathological cardiac
hypertrophy. Furthermore, it remains controversial whether cardiac Ang
II actually participates in cardiac hypertrophy due to pressure overload.
Ang II, via AT1 receptor, promotes phenotypic change and growth of cardiac, vascular, and glomerular cells and induces expression of various growth factors, ECM proteins, cytokines, and chemokines. These actions seem to play a central role in the molecular mechanism of cardiovascular hypertrophy and remodeling or glomerulosclerosis. Although AT1 receptor is coupled to G protein and has no intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity, recent in vitro evidence suggests that AT1 receptor activation leads to activation of not only PLC but also a variety of intracellular signal transduction cascades and transactivation of EGF or PDGF receptor. However, even in in vitro experiments, the role of these multiple signaling cascades in the above-mentioned molecular effects of Ang II remains to be elucidated, and little is known about whether AT1 receptor activation significantly and simultaneously activates these multiple signal cascades under in vivo conditions. Future studies, particularly in vivo experiments, must determine which signal cascades activated by Ang II are responsible for cellular phenotypic change, cellular growth, and gene expression.
AT1 receptor-mediated ERK or JNK activation may play some role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular and renal diseases, partially mediated by activation of AP-1. Unfortunately, at present, specific and potent pharmacological inhibitors of MAP kinases or AP-1 are not available for use in in vivo experiments. Therefore, in vivo inhibition of MAP kinase activation with dominant interfering mutants of MAP kinases, using gene transfer techniques, is a powerful strategy for elucidating the role of MAP kinases in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular and renal diseases. This approach may provide important clues to in vivo molecular mechanisms of Ang II-mediated cardiovascular and renal diseases.
In vivo, Ang II exerts systemic effects, including vasoconstriction, elevation of systemic blood pressure, glomerular hypertension, activation of sympathetic nervous system, and retention of sodium and body fluids. Undoubtedly, these well known systemic effects of Ang II, with various direct molecular effects, significantly participate in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular and renal diseases in an additive or a synergistic manner. It remains unclear which is more responsible for Ang II-mediated cardiovascular and renal diseases: the molecular and cellular effects or the systemic effects. To answer this question, elucidation of the relative roles of local and circulating renin-angiotensin systems is essential. Furthermore, in vivo experiments using transgenic or knockout animals targeted to angiotensin receptor genes in a tissue-specific manner will begin to elucidate the importance of local actions of Ang II in cardiovascular and renal diseases, distinct from systemic effects. Elucidation of these questions should provide new concepts regarding the pathophysiological mechanisms of cardiovascular and renal diseases.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The work has been supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (11670098 and 09470527) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
1 Address for correspondence: Shokei Kim, MD, PhD, Department of Pharmacology, Osaka City University Medical School, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abeno, Osaka 545-8585, Japan. E-mail: kims{at}med.osaka-cu.ac.jp
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
Ang II, angiotensin II;
ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme;
AT1, angiotensin II type 1;
ECM, extracellular matrix;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
AT2, angiotensin II type 2;
MHC, myosin heavy chain;
ANF, atrial natriuretic factor;
PLC, phospholipase C;
PKC, protein kinase C;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
JNK, c-jun
NH2-terminal kinase;
p70S6K, 70-kDa ribosomal S6 kinase;
NIDDM, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus;
p90RSK, 90-kDa ribosomal S6
kinase;
NF-
B, nuclear factor-
B;
STAT, signal transducer and
activator of transcription;
TGF-
1, transforming growth factor-
1;
MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase;
AP-1, activator
protein-1;
SHR, spontaneously hypertensive rats;
WKY, Wistar-Kyoto
rats;
SHRSP, stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats;
AC, aortocaval;
DM, diabetes mellitus;
OLETF, Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima
Fatty;
SMC, smooth muscle cell;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor;
bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor;
VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor;
LDL, low-density lipoprotein;
MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1;
PAI, plasminogen activator
inhibitor;
PI3-kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase;
KDR/Flk-1, kinase
domain-containing receptor/total liver kinase;
DOCA, deoxycorticosterone acetate.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-actin gene by fos and jun in cardiac myocytes.
J Biol Chem
267:
25535-25540
in disease: The dark side of tissue repair.
J Clin Invest
90:
1-7.
1 expression in vascular smooth muscle cells.
Hypertension
34:
126-131
expression in rat glomerular mesangial cells.
J Clin Invest
93:
2431-2437.
1 is mediated by the AP-1 complex.
Mol Cell Biol
10:
1492-1497
1 gene.
J Biol Chem
264:
402-408
and angiotensin II.
Circulation
98:
794-799
0031-6997/00/5201-0011$03.00/0
PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Castro-Chaves, R. Fontes-Carvalho, M. Pintalhao, P. Pimentel-Nunes, and A. F. Leite-Moreira Angiotensin II-induced increase in myocardial distensibility and its modulation by the endocardial endothelium in the rabbit heart Exp Physiol, June 1, 2009; 94(6): 665 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-H. Hsu, K. Duning, H. H. Meyer, M. Stolting, T. Weide, S. Kreusser, T. van Le, C. Gerard, R. Telgmann, S.-M. Brand-Herrmann, et al. Hypertension in mice lacking the CXCR3 chemokine receptor Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): F780 - F789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. de Cavanagh, M. Ferder, F. Inserra, and L. Ferder Angiotensin II, mitochondria, cytoskeletal, and extracellular matrix connections: an integrating viewpoint Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2009; 296(3): H550 - H558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-X. Zhang, S. Kimura, K. Murao, J. Shimizu, H. Matsuyoshi, and M. Takaki Role of neuronal NO synthase in regulating vascular superoxide levels and mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2009; 81(2): 389 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zhu, Y. Liu, L. Wang, and Q. H. Meng Transforming growth factor-{beta}1 is associated with kidney damage in patients with essential hypertension: renoprotective effect of ACE inhibitor and/or angiotensin II receptor blocker Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2841 - 2846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Yamamoto, Y.-F. Dong, K. Kataoka, T. Yamashita, Y. Tokutomi, S. Matsuba, H. Ichijo, H. Ogawa, and S. Kim-Mitsuyama Olmesartan Prevents Cardiovascular Injury and Hepatic Steatosis in Obesity and Diabetes, Accompanied by Apoptosis Signal Regulating Kinase-1 Inhibition Hypertension, September 1, 2008; 52(3): 573 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Block, A. Eid, K. K. Griendling, D.-Y. Lee, Y. Wittrant, and Y. Gorin Nox4 NAD(P)H Oxidase Mediates Src-dependent Tyrosine Phosphorylation of PDK-1 in Response to Angiotensin II: ROLE IN MESANGIAL CELL HYPERTROPHY AND FIBRONECTIN EXPRESSION J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2008; 283(35): 24061 - 24076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chandrasekaran, O. Dar, and T. McDonagh The role of apelin in cardiovascular function and heart failure Eur J Heart Fail, August 1, 2008; 10(8): 725 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ootaki, M. Yamashita, Y. Ootaki, K. Kamohara, S. Weber, R. S. Klatte, W. A. Smith, A. L. Massiello, S. N. Emancipator, L. A.R. Golding, et al. Reduced Pulsatility Induces Periarteritis in Kidney: Role of the Local Renin-Angiotensin System J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2008; 136(1): 150 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sriramula, M. Haque, D. S.A. Majid, and J. Francis Involvement of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} in Angiotensin II-Mediated Effects on Salt Appetite, Hypertension, and Cardiac Hypertrophy Hypertension, May 1, 2008; 51(5): 1345 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cosentino, P. Francia, G. G. Camici, P. G. Pelicci, M. Volpe, and T. F. Luscher Final Common Molecular Pathways of Aging and Cardiovascular Disease: Role of the p66Shc Protein Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2008; 28(4): 622 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-Y. Kim, R. Gul, S.-Y. Rah, S. H. Kim, S. K. Park, M.-J. Im, H. J. Kwon, and U.-H. Kim Molecular mechanism of ADP-ribosyl cyclase activation in angiotensin II signaling in murine mesangial cells Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): F982 - F989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nakamura, E. Yamamoto, K. Kataoka, T. Yamashita, Y. Tokutomi, Y.-F. Dong, S. Matsuba, H. Ogawa, and S. Kim-Mitsuyama Beneficial Effects of Pioglitazone on Hypertensive Cardiovascular Injury Are Enhanced by Combination With Candesartan Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 296 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yogi, C. Mercure, J. Touyz, G. E. Callera, A. C.I. Montezano, A. B. Aranha, R. C. Tostes, T. Reudelhuber, and R. M. Touyz Renal Redox-Sensitive Signaling, but Not Blood Pressure, Is Attenuated by Nox1 Knockout in Angiotensin II-Dependent Chronic Hypertension Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 500 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. W. van den Brink, L. M D. Delbridge, T. Pedrazzini, F. L Rosenfeldt, and S. Pepe Augmented myocardial methionine-enkephalin in a murine model of cardiac angiotensin II-overexpression Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2007; 8(4): 153 - 159. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Mendez-Bolaina, J. Sanchez-Gonzalez, I. Ramirez-Sanchez, E. Ocharan-Hernandez, M. Nunez-Sanchez, E. Meaney-Mendiolea, A. Meaney, J. Asbun-Bojalil, A. Miliar-Garcia, I. Olivares-Corichi, et al. Effect of caveolin-1 scaffolding peptide and 17 -estradiol on intracellular Ca2+ kinetics evoked by angiotensin II in human vascular smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): C1953 - C1961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Guzik, N. E. Hoch, K. A. Brown, L. A. McCann, A. Rahman, S. Dikalov, J. Goronzy, C. Weyand, and D. G. Harrison Role of the T cell in the genesis of angiotensin II induced hypertension and vascular dysfunction J. Exp. Med., October 1, 2007; 204(10): 2449 - 2460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Yamamoto, K. Kataoka, T. Yamashita, Y. Tokutomi, Y.-F. Dong, S. Matsuba, H. Ogawa, and S. Kim-Mitsuyama Role of Xanthine Oxidoreductase in the Reversal of Diastolic Heart Failure by Candesartan in the Salt-Sensitive Hypertensive Rat Hypertension, October 1, 2007; 50(4): 657 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kobori, M. Nangaku, L. G. Navar, and A. Nishiyama The Intrarenal Renin-Angiotensin System: From Physiology to the Pathobiology of Hypertension and Kidney Disease Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2007; 59(3): 251 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Choudhary, M. Lu, R. Cui, and A. R. Brasier Involvement of a Novel Rac/RhoA Guanosine Triphosphatase-Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Inducing Kinase Signaling Pathway Mediating Angiotensin II-Induced RelA Transactivation Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 21(9): 2203 - 2217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kilic, A. Bubikat, B. Gassner, H. A. Baba, and M. Kuhn Local Actions of Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Counteract Angiotensin II Stimulated Cardiac Remodeling Endocrinology, September 1, 2007; 148(9): 4162 - 4169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. deS. Senanayake, J. Drazba, K. Shadrach, A. Milsted, E. Rungger-Brandle, K. Nishiyama, S.-I. Miura, S. Karnik, J. E. Sears, and J. G. Hollyfield Angiotensin II and Its Receptor Subtypes in the Human Retina Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3301 - 3311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Q. Velez, A. M. Bland, J. M. Arthur, J. R. Raymond, and M. G. Janech Characterization of renin-angiotensin system enzyme activities in cultured mouse podocytes Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): F398 - F407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M Maharsy, L. N Kadi, N. G Issa, K. M Bitar, A. H Der-Boghossian, R. Abrahamian, and A. B Bikhazi Cross-talk related to insulin and angiotensin II binding on myocardial remodelling in diabetic rat hearts Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2007; 8(2): 59 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-L. Li, Z.-G. She, T.-B. Li, A.-B. Wang, Q. Yang, Y.-S. Wei, Y.-G. Wang, and D.-P. Liu Overexpression of Myofibrillogenesis Regulator-1 Aggravates Cardiac Hypertrophy Induced by Angiotensin II in Mice Hypertension, June 1, 2007; 49(6): 1399 - 1408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sanchez, F. Lodi, R. Vera, I. C. Villar, A. Cogolludo, R. Jimenez, L. Moreno, M. Romero, J. Tamargo, F. Perez-Vizcaino, et al. Quercetin and Isorhamnetin Prevent Endothelial Dysfunction, Superoxide Production, and Overexpression of p47phox Induced by Angiotensin II in Rat Aorta J. Nutr., April 1, 2007; 137(4): 910 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Yamamoto, T. Yamashita, T. Tanaka, K. Kataoka, Y. Tokutomi, Z.-F. Lai, Y.-F. Dong, S. Matsuba, H. Ogawa, and S. Kim-Mitsuyama Pravastatin Enhances Beneficial Effects of Olmesartan on Vascular Injury of Salt-Sensitive Hypertensive Rats, via Pleiotropic Effects Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2007; 27(3): 556 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cotton, P.-L. Boulay, T. Houndolo, N. Vitale, J. A. Pitcher, and A. Claing Endogenous ARF6 Interacts with Rac1 upon Angiotensin II Stimulation to Regulate Membrane Ruffling and Cell Migration Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2007; 18(2): 501 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Soga, S. Takai, H. Okabayashi, A. Nagasawa, T. Yokota, K. Nishimura, M. Miyazaki, and M. Komeda Human gastroepiploic artery has greater chymase activity than the internal thoracic artery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 30(6): 877 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Ocaranza, I. Godoy, J. E. Jalil, M. Varas, P. Collantes, M. Pinto, M. Roman, C. Ramirez, M. Copaja, G. Diaz-Araya, et al. Enalapril Attenuates Downregulation of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 in the Late Phase of Ventricular Dysfunction in Myocardial Infarcted Rat Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 572 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Messerli and J. A. Staessen Amlodipine Better Than Lisinopril?: How One Randomized Clinical Trial Ended Fallacies From Observational Studies Hypertension, September 1, 2006; 48(3): 359 - 361. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Martin, E. J. Lee, J. A. Buckenberger, T. D. Schmittgen, and T. S. Elton MicroRNA-155 Regulates Human Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Expression in Fibroblasts J. Biol. Chem., July 7, 2006; 281(27): 18277 - 18284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Buraczynska, P. Ksiazek, A. Drop, W. Zaluska, D. Spasiewicz, and A. Ksiazek Genetic polymorphisms of the renin-angiotensin system in end-stage renal disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 979 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Dhalla, M. R. Dent, P. S. Tappia, R. Sethi, J. Barta, and R. K. Goyal Subcellular Remodeling as a Viable Target for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2006; 11(1): 31 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Ying, L. Jin, T. Palmer, and R. C. Webb Angiotensin II Up-Regulates the Leukemia-Associated Rho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor (RhoGEF), a Regulator of G Protein Signaling Domain-Containing RhoGEF, in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2006; 69(3): 932 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Liebau, D. Lang, J. Bohm, N. Endlich, M. J. Bek, I. Witherden, P. W. Mathieson, M. A. Saleem, H. Pavenstadt, and K.-G. Fischer Functional expression of the renin-angiotensin system in human podocytes Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): F710 - F719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bolbrinker, S. Markovic, M. Wehland, W. B. W. H. Melenhorst, H. van Goor, and R. Kreutz Expression and Response to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in Renal Glomerular Damage in Young Transgenic Rats with Renin-Dependent Hypertension J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2006; 316(1): 8 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Miner and W. L. Miller A Look Between the Cardiomyocytes: The Extracellular Matrix in Heart Failure Mayo Clin. Proc., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 71 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang, P. Paradis, A. Aries, H. Komati, C. Lefebvre, H. Wang, and M. Nemer Convergence of Protein Kinase C and JAK-STAT Signaling on Transcription Factor GATA-4 Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2005; 25(22): 9829 - 9844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Woolfolk, S. Eguchi, H. Ohtsu, H. Nakashima, H. Ueno, W. T. Gerthoffer, and E. D. Motley Angiotensin II-induced activation of p21-activated kinase 1 requires Ca2+ and protein kinase C{delta} in vascular smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): C1286 - C1294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Matsuno, H. Yamada, K. Iwata, D. Jin, M. Katsuyama, M. Matsuki, S. Takai, K. Yamanishi, M. Miyazaki, H. Matsubara, et al. Nox1 Is Involved in Angiotensin II-Mediated Hypertension: A Study in Nox1-Deficient Mice Circulation, October 25, 2005; 112(17): 2677 - 2685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ibaraki, M. Muramatsu, S. Takai, D. Jin, H. Maruyama, T. Orino, T. Katsumata, and M. Miyazaki The relationship of tryptase- and chymase-positive mast cells to angiogenesis in stage I non-small cell lung cancer Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 28(4): 617 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Page, H. Reich, J. Zhou, V. Lai, D. C. Cattran, J. W. Scholey, and J. A. Miller Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene/Gender Interactions and the Renal Hemodynamic Response to Angiotensin II J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 3053 - 3060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Nagai, K. Miyata, G.-P. Sun, M. Rahman, S. Kimura, A. Miyatake, H. Kiyomoto, M. Kohno, Y. Abe, M. Yoshizumi, et al. Aldosterone Stimulates Collagen Gene Expression and Synthesis Via Activation of ERK1/2 in Rat Renal Fibroblasts Hypertension, October 1, 2005; 46(4): 1039 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ohtsu, M. Mifune, G. D. Frank, S. Saito, T. Inagami, S. Kim-Mitsuyama, Y. Takuwa, T. Sasaki, J. D. Rothstein, H. Suzuki, et al. Signal-Crosstalk Between Rho/ROCK and c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase Mediates Migration of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Stimulated by Angiotensin II Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(9): 1831 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bouzeghrane, D. P. Reinhardt, T. L. Reudelhuber, and G. Thibault Enhanced expression of fibrillin-1, a constituent of the myocardial extracellular matrix in fibrosis Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): H982 - H991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Graiani, C. Lagrasta, E. Migliaccio, F. Spillmann, M. Meloni, P. Madeddu, F. Quaini, I. M. Padura, L. Lanfrancone, P. Pelicci, et al. Genetic Deletion of the p66Shc Adaptor Protein Protects From Angiotensin II-Induced Myocardial Damage Hypertension, August 1, 2005; 46(2): 433 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mifune, H. Ohtsu, H. Suzuki, H. Nakashima, E. Brailoiu, N. J. Dun, G. D. Frank, T. Inagami, S. Higashiyama, W. G. Thomas, et al. G Protein Coupling and Second Messenger Generation Are Indispensable for Metalloprotease-dependent, Heparin-binding Epidermal Growth Factor Shedding through Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor J. Biol. Chem., July 15, 2005; 280(28): 26592 - 26599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hernandez-Vargas, O. Lopez-Franco, G. Sanjuan, M. Ruperez, G. Ortiz-Munoz, Y. Suzuki, P. Aguado-Roncero, G. Perez-Tejerizo, J. Blanco, J. Egido, et al. Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling Regulate Angiotensin II-Activated Janus Kinase-Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription Pathway in Renal Cells J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2005; 16(6): 1673 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wesseling, D. A. Ishola Jr., J. A. Joles, H. A. Bluyssen, H. A. Koomans, and B. Braam Resistance to oxidative stress by chronic infusion of angiotensin II in mouse kidney is not mediated by the AT2 receptor Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): F1191 - F1200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S R. Sprovieri and Y A. Sens Polymorphisms of the renin-angiotensin system genes in Brazilian patients with lupus nephropathy Lupus, May 1, 2005; 14(5): 356 - 362. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim-Mitsuyama, E. Yamamoto, T. Tanaka, Y. Zhan, Y. Izumi, Y. Izumiya, T. Ioroi, H. Wanibuchi, and H. Iwao Critical Role of Angiotensin II in Excess Salt-Induced Brain Oxidative Stress of Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Stroke, May 1, 2005; 36(5): 1077 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vecchione, E. Patrucco, G. Marino, L. Barberis, R. Poulet, A. Aretini, A. Maffei, M. T. Gentile, M. Storto, O. Azzolino, et al. Protection from angiotensin II-mediated vasculotoxic and hypertensive response in mice lacking PI3K{gamma} J. Exp. Med., April 18, 2005; 201(8): 1217 - 1228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Barnes, E. Reiter, J. D. Violin, X.-R. Ren, G. Milligan, and R. J. Lefkowitz {beta}-Arrestin 1 and G{alpha}q/11 Coordinately Activate RhoA and Stress Fiber Formation following Receptor Stimulation J. Biol. Chem., March 4, 2005; 280(9): 8041 - 8050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Morganti Should a Diuretic Always Be the First Choice in Patients with Essential Hypertension? The Case for No J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2005; 16(3_suppl_1): S70 - S73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fujita, I. Hayashi, S. Yamashina, A. Fukamizu, M. Itoman, and M. Majima Angiotensin type 1a receptor signaling-dependent induction of vascular endothelial growth factor in stroma is relevant to tumor-associated angiogenesis and tumor growth Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2005; 26(2): 271 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Hakam and T. Hussain Renal Angiotensin II Type-2 Receptors Are Upregulated and Mediate the Candesartan-Induced Natriuresis/Diuresis in Obese Zucker Rats Hypertension, February 1, 2005; 45(2): 270 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Watanabe, T. A. Barker, and B. C. Berk Angiotensin II and the Endothelium: Diverse Signals and Effects Hypertension, February 1, 2005; 45(2): 163 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Xiang, J. Kong, S. Chen, L.-P. Cao, G. Qiao, W. Zheng, W. Liu, X. Li, D. G. Gardner, and Y. C. Li Cardiac hypertrophy in vitamin D receptor knockout mice: role of the systemic and cardiac renin-angiotensin systems Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2005; 288(1): E125 - E132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Casas, A. D. Hingorani, L. E. Bautista, and P. Sharma Meta-analysis of Genetic Studies in Ischemic Stroke: Thirty-two Genes Involving Approximately 18 000 Cases and 58 000 Controls Arch Neurol, November 1, 2004; 61(11): 1652 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Schwartz, A. Duka, I. Duka, J. Cui, and H. Gavras Novel targets of ANG II regulation in mouse heart identified by serial analysis of gene expression Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): H1957 - H1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Tomaselli and D. P. Zipes What Causes Sudden Death in Heart Failure? Circ. Res., October 15, 2004; 95(8): 754 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Thomas and T. J. Thekkumkara Glucose Mediates Transcriptional Repression of the Human Angiotensin Type-1 Receptor Gene: Role for a Novel Cis-acting Element Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2004; 15(10): 4347 - 4355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lundequist, E. Tchougounova, M. Abrink, and G. Pejler Cooperation between Mast Cell Carboxypeptidase A and the Chymase Mouse Mast Cell Protease 4 in the Formation and Degradation of Angiotensin II J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32339 - 32344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-M. Hu, Y.-H. Chen, M.-T. Chiang, and L.-Y. Chau Heme Oxygenase-1 Inhibits Angiotensin II-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy In Vitro and In Vivo Circulation, July 20, 2004; 110(3): 309 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Nagashio, H. Asaumi, S. Watanabe, Y. Nomiyama, M. Taguchi, M. Tashiro, T. Sugaya, and M. Otsuki Angiotensin II type 1 receptor interaction is an important regulator for the development of pancreatic fibrosis in mice Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2004; 287(1): G170 - G177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Roncal, J Orbe, J.A Rodriguez, M Belzunce, O Beloqui, J Diez, and J.A Paramo Influence of the 4G/5G PAI-1 genotype on angiotensin II-stimulated human endothelial cells and in patients with hypertension Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2004; 63(1): 176 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hokamaki, H. Kawano, M. Yoshimura, H. Soejima, S. Miyamoto, I. Kajiwara, S. Kojima, T. Sakamoto, S. Sugiyama, N. Hirai, et al. Urinary biopyrrins levels are elevated in relation to severity of heart failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2004; 43(10): 1880 - 1885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Jiang, S. Xu, X. Hou, D. R. Pimentel, and R. A. Cohen Angiotensin II Differentially Regulates Interleukin-1-{beta}-inducible NO Synthase (iNOS) and Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1) Expression: ROLE OF p38 MAPK J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 20363 - 20368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Chen, D. Lasaitiene, B. G. Gabrielsson, L. M.S. Carlsson, H. Billig, B. Carlsson, N. Marcussen, X.-F. Sun, and P. Friberg Neonatal Losartan Treatment Suppresses Renal Expression of Molecules Involved in Cell-Cell and Cell-Matrix Interactions J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2004; 15(5): 1232 - 1243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ishiyama, P. E. Gallagher, D. B. Averill, E. A. Tallant, K. B. Brosnihan, and C. M. Ferrario Upregulation of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 After Myocardial Infarction by Blockade of Angiotensin II Receptors Hypertension, May 1, 2004; 43(5): 970 - 976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Han, S. H. Park, and Y. J. Lee Signaling cascade of ANG II-induced inhibition of {alpha}-MG uptake in renal proximal tubule cells Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2004; 286(4): F634 - F642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nishiyama, L. Yao, Y. Nagai, K. Miyata, M. Yoshizumi, S. Kagami, S. Kondo, H. Kiyomoto, T. Shokoji, S. Kimura, et al. Possible Contributions of Reactive Oxygen Species and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase to Renal Injury in Aldosterone/Salt-Induced Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, April 1, 2004; 43(4): 841 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Li, S. Wheatcroft, L. M. Fan, M. T. Kearney, and A. M. Shah Opposing Roles of p47phox in Basal Versus Angiotensin II-Stimulated Alterations in Vascular O2- Production, Vascular Tone, and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation Circulation, March 16, 2004; 109(10): 1307 - 1313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Paul, K. W.S. Ko, L. Li, V. Yechoor, M. A. McCrory, A. J. Szalai, and L. Chan C-Reactive Protein Accelerates the Progression of Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice Circulation, February 10, 2004; 109(5): 647 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nishiyama, M. Yoshizumi, H. Hitomi, S. Kagami, S. Kondo, A. Miyatake, M. Fukunaga, T. Tamaki, H. Kiyomoto, M. Kohno, et al. The SOD Mimetic Tempol Ameliorates Glomerular Injury and Reduces Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activity in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Rats J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2004; 15(2): 306 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Nanus Of Peptides and Peptidases: The Role of Cell Surface Peptidases in Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 9(17): 6307 - 6309. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ferron, V. Capuano, Y. Ruchon, E. Deroubaix, A. Coulombe, and J.-F. Renaud Angiotensin II Signaling Pathways Mediate Expression of Cardiac T-Type Calcium Channels Circ. Res., December 12, 2003; 93(12): 1241 - 1248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Trongtorsak, T. O Morgan, and L. M. Delbridge Combined renin-angiotensin system blockade and dietary sodium restriction impairs cardiomyocyte contractility Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2003; 4(4): 213 - 219. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G Friedrich, B. Dahlof, U. Sechtem, T. Unger, M. Knecht, R. Dietz, and TELMAR Investigators Telmisartan Effectiveness on Left ventricular MAss Reduction (TELMAR) as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension -- a prospective, randomised, double-blind comparison of telmisartan with metoprolol over a period of six months -- rationale and study design Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2003; 4(4): 234 - 243. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-H. Cheng, P.-Y. Cheng, N.-L. Shih, I.-B. Chen, D. L. Wang, and J.-J. Chen Involvement of reactive oxygen species in angiotensin II-induced endothelin-1 gene expression in rat cardiac fibroblasts J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 19, 2003; 42(10): 1845 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Izumiya, S. Kim, Y. Izumi, K. Yoshida, M. Yoshiyama, A. Matsuzawa, H. Ichijo, and H. Iwao Apoptosis Signal-Regulating Kinase 1 Plays a Pivotal Role in Angiotensin II-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy and Remodeling Circ. Res., October 31, 2003; 93(9): 874 - 883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Perez de Lema, C. de Wit, C. D. Cohen, E. Nieto, A. Molina, B. Banas, B. Luckow, A. B. Vicente, F. Mampaso, and D. Schlondorff Angiotensin Inhibition Reduces Glomerular Damage and Renal Chemokine Expression in MRL/lpr Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2003; 307(1): 275 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Iwanciw, M. Rehm, M. Porst, and M. Goppelt-Struebe Induction of Connective Tissue Growth Factor by Angiotensin II: Integration of Signaling Pathways Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2003; 23(10): 1782 - 1787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Montanari, A. Biggi, N. Carra, M. Ziliotti, E. Fasoli, L. Musiari, P. Perinotto, and A. Novarini Endothelin-A Receptors Mediate Renal Hemodynamic Effects of Exogenous Angiotensin II in Humans Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 825 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Z. Zhang, L. Gao, M. Widness, X. Xi, and T. S. Kern Captopril Inhibits Glucose Accumulation in Retinal Cells in Diabetes Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 4001 - 4005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. S. Santos, A. C. S. e Silva, C. Maric, D. M. R. Silva, R. P. Machado, I. de Buhr, S. Heringer-Walther, S. V. B. Pinheiro, M. T. Lopes, M. Bader, et al. Angiotensin-(1-7) is an endogenous ligand for the G protein-coupled receptor Mas PNAS, July 8, 2003; 100(14): 8258 - 8263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Jacoby and D. J. Rader Renin-Angiotensin System and Atherothrombotic Disease: From Genes to Treatment Arch Intern Med, May 26, 2003; 163(10): 1155 - 1164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-M. Cheng, H.-J. Hong, J.-C. Liu, N.-L. Shih, S.-H. Juan, S.-H. Loh, P. Chan, J.-J. Chen, and T.-H. Cheng Crucial Role of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathway in Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Endothelin-1 Gene Expression Induced by Endothelin-1 in Rat Cardiac Fibroblasts Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2003; 63(5): 1002 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Li and A. M. Shah Mechanism of Endothelial Cell NADPH Oxidase Activation by Angiotensin II. ROLE OF THE p47phox SUBUNIT J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2003; 278(14): 12094 - 12100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Takai, H. Sakonjo, K. Fukuda, D. Jin, M. Sakaguchi, K. Kamoshita, K. Ishida, Y. Sukenaga, and M. Miyazaki A Novel Chymase Inhibitor, 2-(5-Formylamino-6-oxo-2-phenyl-1,6-dihydropyrimidine-1-yl)-N-[{3,4-dioxo-1-phenyl-7-(2-pyridyloxy)}-2-heptyl]acetamide (NK3201), Suppressed Intimal Hyperplasia after Balloon Injury J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2003; 304(2): 841 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Boschmann, J. Jordan, F. Adams, N.-J. Christensen, J. Tank, G. Franke, M. Stoffels, A. M. Sharma, F. C. Luft, and S. Klaus Tissue-Specific Response to Interstitial Angiotensin II in Humans Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 37 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |