|
|
||||||||
Vol. 52, Issue 1, 63-90, March 2000
Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
I. Introduction
II. Modulation of Neurochemical Transmission: Role of Receptors and Plasma Membrane Transporters
A. Presynaptic Receptor-Mediated Modulation of Transmitter Release
1. Heteroreceptor-Mediated Control of Transmitter Release.
2. Autoreceptor-Mediated Control of Transmitter Release.
3. Presynaptic Ionotropic Receptors.
4. Presynaptic Metabotropic Receptors.
B. Plasma Membrane Transporters.
1. Characteristics of Transporters.
2. Substrate Selectivity.
III. Nonsynaptic Varicosities
IV. Extracellular Space as a Communication Channel of Nonsynaptic Interaction
V. Nonsynaptically Expressed Receptors and Membrane Transporters of High Affinity as Therapeutic Targets
A. Nonsynaptic Receptors
B. Nonsynaptic Transporters
C. Nonsynaptic Interaction between Neurons without Receptors
VI. Clinical Implications
VII. Summary
Acknowledgments
References
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neurochemical and morphological evidence has shown that some neurotransmitters or substances may be released from both synaptic and nonsynaptic sites for diffusion to target cells more distant than those observed in regular synaptic transmission. There are functional interactions between neurons without synaptic contacts, and matches between release sites and localization of receptors sensitive to the chemical signal are exceptions rather than the rule in the central nervous system. This also indicates that besides cabled information signaling (through synapses), there is a "wireless" nonsynaptic interaction between axon terminals. This would be a form of communication transitional between discrete classical neurotransmission (in Sherrington's synapse) and the relatively nonspecific neuroendocrine secretion. Recent findings indicate that in addition to monoamines (norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin), other transmitters, such as acetylcholine and nitric oxide (NO), may also be involved in these nonsynaptic interactions. It has been shown that NO, an ideal mediator of nonsynaptic communication, can influence the function of uptake carrier systems, which may be an important factor in the regulation of extracellular concentration of different transmitters. This review will focus on the role of nonsynaptic receptors and transporters in presynaptic modulation of chemical transmission in the central nervous system. The nonsynaptic interaction between neurons mediated via receptors and transports of high affinity not localized in synapses has the potential to be an important contributor to the properties and function of neuronal networks. In addition, it will be suggested for the first time that the receptors and transporters expressed nonsynaptically and being of high affinity are the target of drugs taken by the patient.
| |
I. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our understanding of chemical
signal transmission between neurons and between axon terminals and
target cells has advanced significantly since Elliott (1904)
, Loewi
(1921)
, and Dale (1934)
first elaborated on the concept that
epinephrine and acetylcholine (ACh)2 are released
from the neuron and may be able to transmit signals toward target
cells. Today, our knowledge of how information is conveyed chemically
from one cell to another has been heavily influenced by textbook data
on the neuromuscular junction (Katz, 1969
), in which the transmitter
ACh is stored in vesicles and released into the junctional gap in
quanta. This system is adopted for very fast signaling: The information
transfer occurs within millisecond time intervals and is able to
transmit messages of several hundred impulses per second. Each synaptic
vesicle releases a quantum of 7000 to 12,000 ACh molecules into
the narrow junctional cleft, raising the local concentration to the
millimolar range (Kuffler and Yoshikami, 1975
; cf. Van der Kloot and
Molgo, 1994
). Under this condition, the receptors receiving the
chemical messages are of low affinity. As far as the structure for
chemical information processing is concerned, since the work of
Ramon-y-Cajal (1893)
and Sherrington (1906)
, much of our current
knowledge comes from studies based on junctional architecture (cf.
Tansey, 1998
). The idea that the transmitter is released in quanta on
the arrival of the action potential is well established and has been
accepted at the neuromuscular junction, but it is not at all clear that this is the case at the autonomic neuroeffector transmission site. In
contrast to striatal muscle, autonomic neuroeffector systems are thus
not organized in units, but the innervation is quite diffuse. The
quantal release is less clearly established in the central nervous
system (CNS), although evidence is presented that this is probably the
case. Accordingly, the brain was considered a telephone network that
receives signals via synapse processing by means of a high
concentration of transmitters through receptors. A chemical signal
transmission system that primarily uses synaptic transmission in the
CNS possesses several characteristics. Because transmitter
concentration in the synaptic gap can be high (~0.01-1 mM), the
receptors expressed on both presynaptic and postsynaptic sites are of
low affinity (MacDermott et al., 1999
). Additionally, once released,
the transmitter is removed from the cleft either enzymatically or by an
uptake system and by diffusion.
One well characterized mechanism by which chemical
neurotransmission can be modulated is the presynaptic modulation of
transmitter release via presynaptic receptors expressed on axon
terminals. Activation of these receptors by endogenous or exogenous
ligands results in inhibition or facilitation of the amount of
transmitters released into the extracellular space by an action
potential (Starke et al., 1977
, 1989
; Westfall 1977
; cf. Starke, 1981
;
Langer, 1981a
; Vizi, 1979
; Muscholl, 1980a
,b
; Kalsner and Westfall,
1990
; Wu and Saggau, 1997
). It is interesting to note that Koelle
(1990)
mentioned in his review that the first concrete evidence of
presynaptic receptors was published in a classic report by Masland and
Wigton (1940)
. These authors claimed that the fasciculation that
follows the intra-arterial injection of ACh or an anticholinesterase
drug into a skeletal muscle reflects the firing of the motor units rather than stimulation of the muscle fibers. The other possibility to
modulate the extracellular concentration of transmitters, once released, is their removal by one of the
Na+/Cl
-dependent
neurotransmitter transporters. The transporter is a plasma membrane
protein that operates by reuptake of the released transmitter. The
tricyclic antidepressants exert their effect on monoamine transporters
by prolonging the time needed for clearance of transmitters from the
extracellular space.
Neurochemical (Vizi, 1980
, 1984
; cf. Vizi and Kiss, 1998
) and
morphological (Descarries et al., 1987
; Oleskevich et al., 1989
; Umbriaco et al., 1995
) evidence has shown that some neurotransmitters may be released from both synaptic and nonsynaptic sites (Fig. 1) for diffusion to target cells more
distant than those observed in synaptic transmission. It has been shown
in the gut and brain that in response to activation of the
noradrenergic neurons, there was an
-adrenoceptor-mediated
inhibition of ACh release from neighboring cholinergic terminals (Vizi
and Knoll, 1971
, 1976
; Vizi, 1974
, 1980b
) without any morphologic
(synaptic) contact between them. These findings indicate that there is
functional interaction (presynaptic inhibition) between neurons without
any morphological contact (cf. Vizi, 1980a
, 1984a
). This was supported by the fact that matches between release sites and localization of
receptors sensitive to the chemical signal are exceptions rather than
the rule (Herkenham, 1987
). Although the disparities between axon
terminals (release sites) and receptors were noted in several reports
(cf. Herkenham, 1991
), Herkenham was the first who studied this
mismatch carefully. Even in the report on substance P receptors (Rothman et al., 1984
), they put forth that mismatches were the rule rather than the exception. The conclusion (Herkenham, 1987
; McLean
et al., 1987
) drawn from this "mismatch" problem was that mismatches reflect on the existence of high-affinity nonsynaptic receptors that are able to mediate "parasynaptic" (Schmitt, 1984
) signal transmission. The nonsynaptic interactions between neurons would
be a form of communication transitional between discrete classic
neurotransmission (in Sherrington's synapse) and the relatively nonspecific neuroendocrine secretion. Recent findings indicate that in
addition to monoamines [norepinephrine (NE), dopamine (DA), and
serotonin(5-hydroxytryptamine, or 5-HT)], other transmitters, such as
ACh (Descarries et al., 1997
) and nitric oxide (NO; Dawson and Snyder,
1994
), also may be involved in these nonsynaptic interactions. NO can
influence the function of uptake carrier systems (Cutillas et al.,
1998
; Kiss et al., 1999
), which may be an important factor in the
regulation of extracellular concentration of different transmitters
(Gainetdinov et al., 1998
; Segovia and Mora, 1998
).
|
This review focuses on the role of nonsynaptic receptors and transporters in presynaptic modulation of chemical transmission in the CNS, and I outline some of the potential points at which we might expect the occurrence of nonsynaptic functional interaction between neurons. It should be clear from this review that nonsynaptic interaction between neurons mediated via receptors and transporters of high affinity not localized in synapses has the potential to be an important contributor to the properties and function of neuronal networks. In addition, receptors and transporters expressed nonsynaptically and of high affinity are the target of drugs taken by the patient.
| |
II. Modulation of Neurochemical Transmission: Role of Receptors and Plasma Membrane Transporters |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Presynaptic Receptor-Mediated Modulation of Transmitter Release
Action potential at the nerve terminal results in an increase in
Ca2+ influx through Ca2+
channels, activating Ca2+ sensors, which in turn
trigger the release machinery to cause vesicle fusion and transmitter
release (cf. Llinas, 1977
). Extracellular Ca2+
concentration
([Ca2+]o)-dependent
release of transmitters [glutamate (Glu): Uchihashi et al., 1998
;
Nakai et al., 1999
; DA: Milusheva et al., 1992
, 1996
; and NE: West and
Fillenz, 1980
) is vesicular (Katz, 1969
)], has a high
requirement for energy, and is very sensitive to the intracellular ATP
level. The
[Ca2+]o-dependent release
can be blocked by tetrodotoxin and subjected to presynaptic modulation
via activation of different presynaptic receptors (Table
1).
|
It was not until the late 1960s that the concept of presynaptic
receptors (i.e., receptors on nerve endings, as opposed to postsynaptic
receptors on effector cells) was proposed and the hypothesis was
advanced that presynaptic receptor mechanisms are involved in the
modulation of neuronal ACh and NE release via
- and muscarinic
heteroreceptors (Lindmar et al., 1968
; Vizi, 1968
; Löffelholz and
Muscholl, 1969a
,b
; Paton and Vizi, 1969
).
In 1971, in different laboratories (De Potter and Chubb, 1971
; Farnebo
and Hamberger, 1971
; Kirpekar and Puig, 1971
; Starke, 1971
), NE was
shown to inhibit its own release from noradrenergic terminals via
presynaptic
-adrenoceptors. This was named "negative feedback"
modulation. Later, similar autoreceptor-mediated modulation was
described for other transmitters. It was even shown that there is a
positive feedback modulation when the transmitter released into the
synaptic cleft increases its own release via stimulation of receptors
located on terminals from which the transmitter is released.
The release of transmitter is subjected to presynaptic
receptor-mediated modulation (Langer, 1977
, 1981a
; Nicoll and Alger, 1979
; Vizi, 1979
, 1984
; cf. Starke et al., 1989
) if the release is of
vesicular origin, is
[Ca2+]o-dependent (Table
1), and is associated with axonal conduction. The ligand-gated release
by nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) or P2X receptor stimulation
is also [Ca2+]o-dependent
(Sershen et al., 1997
; cf. Wonnacott, 1997
). Because it has been shown
that
2-adrenoceptor activation (Vizi et al., 1995b
) inhibits the release of NE evoked by nAChR stimulation, it seems
very likely that this type of release is subjected to presynaptic inhibition.
There is a
[Ca2+]o-independent
release that is not associated with neuronal conduction and not of
vesicular origin. It has been reported that transmitters can be
released by drugs (e.g., ouabain, indirectly acting sympathomimetic
amines) or conditions (e.g., ischemia) in the absence of
[Ca2+]o (cf.
Ádam-Vizi, 1992
; Bernáth, 1992
), which has been attributed to an increase in intracellular Na+
concentration ([Na+]i;
Vizi, 1972
; Baker and Crawford, 1975
; Erulkar and Rahamimoff, 1978
;
Schoffelmeer and Mulder, 1983
). This type of release is not subject to
presynaptic modulation (Vizi, 1984
) and is carried out by reversed
operation of the plasma membrane transporter mediated via an increase
in [Na+]i (Table 1). The
carrier-mediated release (Vizi, 1972
, 1978
; Vizi et al., 1985
;
Kauppinenen et al., 1988
; Pin and Bockaert, 1989
; Attwell et al., 1993
;
Levi and Raiteri, 1993
; Milusheva et al., 1994
, 1996
; Malva et al.,
1998a
,b
; cf. Vizi and Kiss, 1998
) does not require energy and is
consistent with a drop in intracellular ATP levels and the consequent
inhibition of
Na+,K+-activated ATPase
activity, which leads to a decline in the Na+
electrochemical gradient across the plasma membrane and accumulation of
[Na+]i (Nicholls and
Attwell, 1990
). The excessive transmitter release of nonvesicular
origin (Attwell et al., 1993
) cannot be modulated via presynaptic
receptors (Table 1). A similar mechanism is responsible for
[Ca2+]o-independent
release of different transmitters during ischemia simulated by oxygen
and glucose withdrawal (Kauppinenen et al., 1988
; Budd, 1998
).
K+ excess has been used for a long time to study transmitter release. It is [Ca2+]o-dependent and is likely to be of vesicular origin (Table 1), at least at low concentrations.
The overwhelming majority of the evidence for presynaptic receptor-mediated modulation of transmitter release derives from assays of agonist- and antagonist-induced changes in the release rate from in vitro (slice, synaptosomes) and in vivo (microdialysis, amperometry) preparations. Although assay of the amount of transmitters in the superfusate or in the dialysate is limited in spatial and temporal resolution, electrophysiological methods (e.g., whole-cell recording) in brain slices or in cell culture help us to overcome these problems and to study the effects of ligands on presynaptic terminals recording the postsynaptic responses. However, even the electrophysiological recordings of the frequency of spontaneous postsynaptic currents or the amplitude of the evoked postsynaptic current, without a change in postsynaptic sensitivity to the synaptic transmitter, provide convincing evidence that the receptor in the study is expressed on the terminal. This technique fails to exclude the possibility that a chemical is released from the postsynaptic site that may act retrogradely, affecting the release of transmitter from the presynaptic site. Therefore, to circumvent these difficulties, the final conclusion should be drawn from data obtained from different techniques.
1. Heteroreceptor-Mediated Control of Transmitter Release. An important consequence of the expression of receptors on axon terminals is the capability of modulation (increase or decrease) of transmitter release triggered by the action potentials when they invade presynaptic terminals. Heteroreceptors are located presynaptically; they bind transmitters other than those released by the axon terminal on which they reside. Heteroreceptors can be ionotropic or metabotropic.
The first neurochemical and pharmacological evidence of heteroreceptors was obtained when it was shown in guinea pig ileal longitudinal muscle strip preparation that the stimulation-evoked release of ACh from the Auerbach plexus is tonically controlled by NE released from the neighboring noradrenergic neurons via
-adrenoceptors (Vizi, 1968
-adrenoceptor antagonist
phentolamine was present, indicating that the release was tonically
controlled by endogenous NE. This was the first indication of
inhomogeneity of
-adrenoceptors; NE and phenylephrine, two
-adrenoceptor agonists, have different effects on ACh release.
Today, they are designated
2- and
1-adrenoceptors. Also, the stimulation-evoked
release of NE from sympathetic nerve in the heart is inhibited by ACh
released from the vagal nerve (Lindmar et al., 1968
2A,
2B, M2, µ , and so on) located on
varicosities has been shown (cf. Vizi, 1979
conductance and
are coupled to G proteins reduce the release. This type of presynaptic
modulation is graded. Only axodendritic axosomatic and dendrodendritic
synaptic or nonsynaptic interactions regulate the generation of an
action potential.
|
2. Autoreceptor-Mediated Control of Transmitter Release.
The
first evidence was provided in the 1970s when Starke (1971)
and others
(De Potter and Chubb, 1971
; Farnebo and Hamberger, 1971a
; Kirpekar and
Puig, 1971
) showed that NE inhibits its own release via
-adrenoceptors. Later, it turned out that these receptors are
different from those located on the postsynaptic site. Therefore, presynaptic
-adrenoceptors have been named
2-adrenoceptors (Langer, 1977
, 1981a
,b
).
2, M2, µ, and so on) sensitive to
transmitter released from axon terminal on which the receptor is
expressed is now widely accepted (Table 2). This can be envisaged as an
attempt to limit the release of excessive amounts of transmitter to
keep postsynaptic responses within the physiological range.
3. Presynaptic Ionotropic Receptors.
Recent convergence of
data from morphological and functional (pharmacological, neurochemical,
and electrophysiological) studies provided new insights into the role
of presynaptic ligand-gated ion channels (cf. McGehee and Role, 1996
;
MacDermott et al., 1999
) in modulation of transmitter release, thereby
in the efficacy of synaptic and nonsynaptic communication. Activation
of ionotropic receptors results in very rapid changes of ion channels.
-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and DA release via
nACh heteroreceptors (cf. Wonnacott, 1997
-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methysoxazole-4-propionic Acid, and Kainate
Receptors).
The vast majority of excitatory synapses are
glutamatergic, in which Glu transmits the signal through postsynaptic
ionotropic [N-methyl-D-aspartic acid
(NMDA),
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methysoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA),
and kainate (KA)] and metabotropic receptors (Bettler and Mulle,
1995
-Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors.
Frank and
Fuortes (1951)
-subunit-expressing GABAA receptors suggests
that tonic inhibition could be mediated mainly by nonsynaptic
6
2/3
receptors, whereas phasic inhibition is due to the
stimulation of intrasynaptic GABAA receptors. It
has been shown (Herrero et al., 19994. Presynaptic Metabotropic Receptors.
The activation of
membrane receptors expressed in the membrane is a common mechanism
through which cellular functions, including neurotransmitter release,
can be modulated (Table 2). Metabotropic receptors are coupled to G
proteins. The latter are proteins (containing
-,
-, and
-subunits) that are present in membranes of the cell and transduce
the receptor activation event to changes in enzyme or ion-channel activity.
2-Adrenoceptors.
It is clear from their
structure and pharmacology that
2-adrenoceptors belong to the G protein-linked
family and, in most cell types, are coupled to PTX-sensitive G
proteins. It is well established that some receptors inhibit adenylyl
cyclase through the G protein Gi. The activation
of
2-adrenoceptor subtype has been shown to
inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity, decrease cAMP levels, and inhibit
Ca2+ channels in many cell types, including
neurons. cAMP has a facilitatory effect on many transmitter systems,
including the noradrenergic system (Majewski et al., 1990
2-adrenoceptors may
inhibit transmitter release (e.g., NE) by inhibiting adenylyl cyclase
(Schoffelmeer et al., 1986
2-adrenoceptor have been identified:
2A,
2B,
2C, and
2D (Bylund et
al., 1988a
2A and
2D subtypes were shown as orthologs, with the
2A being present in humans (Bylund et al.,
1988a
2-adrenoceptors. It is interesting to note
that the
2B subtype of autoreceptors is mainly
located in varicosities of noradrenergic terminals in the periphery and
that
2A is mainly located in the CNS.
Both subtypes are involved in autoregulation of NE release. The
heteroreceptors expressed on varicosities synthesizing ACh and 5-HT are
of the
2A subtype (Table 3).
|
2-adrenoceptors are
present on serotonergic nerve endings of the human neocortex (Raiteri
et al., 1990a
-Aminobutyric AcidB Receptors.
The
metabotropic GABAB receptors are widely
distributed in the CNS, where they are located (Bowery, 1993B. Plasma Membrane Transporters.
Na+/Cl
-dependent
transporters, such as DA, 5-HT, NE, GABA, glycine, taurine, proline,
and betaine, are members of a large family of
Na+/Cl
-containing
putative transmembrane domains (Kanner and Schuldiner, 1987
; Amara and
Kuhar, 1993
; Lester et al., 1994
; Nelson, 1998
). These ion-coupled
transporters are "electrogenic" and lead to conductive properties
(cf. Lester et al., 1996
). These transporters are different from that
expressed in the membrane of vesicles (Henry et al., 1998
). It is
generally accepted that these high-affinity transporters located on the
nerve terminals and surrounding glial cells (cf. Nelson, 1998
) control
the temporal and spatial concentration of transmitters released into
the intrasynaptic and extrasynaptic spaces via rapid uptake into nerve
terminals. For example, in tissue with dense noradrenergic and
GABAergic innervation, as much as 70 to 80% of released NE
(Bönisch and Brüss, 1994
) and GABA (Iversen and Kelly,
1975
) may be recaptured, indicating that the transporter plays an
important role in setting the concentration of transmitter in the
extracellular space. Thus, plasma membrane transporters maintain low
intrasynaptic and extrasynaptic neurotransmitter concentrations,
thereby regulating synaptic and nonsynaptic efficacy; many of the
transporters have been implicated as important sites for drug actions.
1. Characteristics of Transporters.
a. Protein Kinase C Dependence.
It has been suggested that
protein kinase C (PKC) plays a role in acute modulation of
Na+/Cl
-coupled
transporters, including GABA, DA, and 5-HT (Corey et al., 1994
; Osawa
et al., 1994
; Zhang et al., 1997
; Ramamoorthy et al., 1998
). Activation
of PKC by phorbol ester inhibits the uptake of GABA (Osawa et al.,
1994
), DA (Zhu et al., 1997
), 5-HT (Qian et al., 1997
; Ramamoorthy et
al., 1998
), and NE (Apparsundaram et al., 1998
).
/
), the DA transporter
(DAT) function was lacking, compared with D2+/+ mice, and that raclopride
(D2 receptor antagonist) decreased the activity
of the transporter in D2+/+
mice. That DAT can be modulated by D2
autoreceptors has already been suggested (Meiergerd et al., 19932. Substrate Selectivity.
a. Norepinephrine Transporter.
NE transporters (NETs) located
in the neuronal plasma membrane mediate the removal of NE from the
extracellular space (cf. Graefe and Bönisch, 1988
; cf.
Trendelenburg, 1991
; Nelson, 1998
), limiting the activation of auto-
and hetero-adrenoceptors expressed on different neurons by reducing the
extracellular concentration of NE and thereby the amount of NE
available for diffusion. NETs also transport structurally similar
molecules, including DA, tyramine, and amphetamine (Bönisch,
1986
; Bönisch and Brüss, 1994
). Similar to other
transporters, NETs use the energy of the transmembrane Na+ gradient to take up NE inside the neuron from
the intrasynaptic and/or extrasynaptic space. The direction of
transport can be reversed by inward transport of any substrate (cf.
Chen and Justice, 1998
). At a high frequency of stimulation, so much
transmitter is being released that the transporter capacity (which has
been used up) becomes fully exploited and unable to continue to clear the extracellular space.
. In line with
these observations using electron microscopy, it has been shown
(Hoffmann et al., 1998
/
) that DA released from
nigrostriatal varicose axon terminals into the extrasynaptic space
persists at least 100 times longer than in wild-type animals and that
diffusion is the only mechanism for clearance (Gainetdinov et al.,
1998
-Aminobutyric Acid Transporter.
The role of GABA
transporter is to terminate synaptic events evoked by GABA released
from GABAergic terminals. GABA uptake inhibitors increase and prolong
GABAB receptor-mediated transmission (Dingledine
and Korn, 1985
-dependent neurotransmitter transporters,
which are important targets for both drugs of abuse and antidepressant
compounds (Amara and Kuhar, 1993
/
mice demonstrated a complete lack of
high-affinity 5-HT uptake and have increased extracellular 5-HT levels
and an increased anxiety-related behavior (cf. Murphy et al., 1999| |
III. Nonsynaptic Varicosities |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is well known that axons both in the CNS and in the autonomic
nervous system form varicose (boutons-en-passant) branches. The varicose axon terminals, which in the overwhelming majority do not
make synaptic contacts, are the main target of presynaptic modulation.
A substance released in or diffusing to the vicinity of the axon
terminal can modulate the release of the principal transmitter or that
of another modulator provided the axon is equipped with sensitive
receptors. Many authors (cf. Langer, 1977
; cf. Starke, 1977
) support
the idea that presynaptic modulation is a question of secretion
coupling. However, others (Alberts et al., 1981
; Stjärne, 1981
)
suggest that mechanisms related to the failure of varicosity invasion
are responsible for presynaptic inhibition. It was suggested that
presynaptic inhibition is the reduction in the safety factor for
terminal varicosity invasion by the axonal nerve impulse
(Stjärne, 1981
, 1989
). The release of NE from sympathetic nerve
terminals by the invading nerve impulse is a very uncertain process,
with a high proportion of failures at any individual varicosity
(Blakeley and Cunnane, 1979
), so that any procedure marginally reducing
the chance of invasion may have profound effects. Alberts et al. (1981)
suggested that varicosity hillocks could control the excitability of
the varicosity and the invasion of the more distal parts of the branch.
The wave of depolarization arriving at the varicosity hillock reaches
the firing level and generates a propagating impulse in the next
intervaricose section. However, this site of action seems very unlikely
because it is based on acceptance that the method of action potential conduction in a varicose terminal is similar to that in a neuron, and
this is not the case. The action potential attempts to invade the whole
branch without alternating depolarization with action potential
generation and intervaricosital axonal conduction. The bouton is small;
therefore, the action potential arriving at the first and consecutive
boutons tries simply to depolarize and pass them. Although methods for
analysis of the mode of impulse conduction in
boutons-en-passage terminals are not available, it is
tempting to speculate that the difference in size between the cross
section of the intervaricosital axonal part and the bouton makes it
difficult for impulses to invade the whole branch. The sudden change in size of the varicose branch at the bouton might produce changes in, for
example, the length constant (Vizi, 1984
) and thereby influence the
length of invasion of the rather lengthy arborization.
There is convincing neurochemical evidence, mainly based on studies
with synaptosomal preparations and potassium-induced release, that the
site of action is on the axon terminals. Therefore, there is general
agreement that secretion coupling is affected by the modulators (cf.
Langer, 1977
; cf. Starke, 1977
).
Although the axo-axonic synapse is the anatomical correlate of
presynaptic modulation, convincing anatomical evidence is available that noradrenergic (cf. Oleskevich et al., 1989
), serotonergic (Descarries et al., 1975
; Seguela et al., 1989
; Oleskevich et al.,
1991
), dopaminergic (Descarries et al., 1991
), and cholinergic (Descarries et al., 1997
) varicosities in the CNS in a rather high
percentage do not make synaptic contact. A very low synaptic incidence
of monoaminergic innervation has already been documented in the adult
rat cortex (Descarries et al., 1975
, 1977
; Beaudet and Descarries,
1978
; Seguela et al., 1990
, 1989
), hippocampus (Oleskevich et al.,
1989
; Daszuta et al., 1991
; Umbriaco et al., 1995
), dorsal horn of the
spinal cord (Ridet et al., 1993
), and cerebellum (Beaudet and Sotelo,
1981
).
Although the incidence of nonsynaptic nerve terminals amounted to 64%
for 5-HT and 57% for NE in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (Ridet
et al., 1993
), in the ventral horn (Privat et al., 1988
) the synaptic
contacts were the predominant, indicating that nonsynaptic
communication is characteristic of the dorsal horn, and
low-affinity 5-HT2 receptors are numerous in the
ventral horn but scarce in the dorsal horn (Pazos et al., 1985
, Pazos
and Palacios, 1985
).
Recent immunoelectromicroscopic studies have revealed a low incidence
(14% in the cerebral cortex, 7% in the hippocampus, and 9% in the
neostriatum) of synaptic specializations of cholinergic varicosities
using cholineacetyltransferase immunostaining (Descarries et al.,
1997
). A similar observation was made by Kása et al. (1995
, 1997
)
in the main olfactory bulb.
Although anatomical studies reveal the presence of nonsynaptic varicosities, functional studies are required to establish the precise mode of chemical transmission.
Indeed, strong neurochemical evidence is available that nonsynaptic
varicosities release transmitters. Descarries et al. (1977
, 1980
, 1987
)
demonstrated that nonsynaptic varicosities in the CNS appear to have
all the apparatus normally associated with synaptic release.
Subsequently, ultrastructural examination of noradrenergic varicosities
in several tissues confirmed that both large and small vesicles could
undergo exocytosis in the absence of structurally specialized active
zones (Thureson-Klein and Stjärne, 1981
; Thureson-Klein, 1983
,
1984
; Zhu et al., 1986
). In addition, morphological evidence was
provided (Buma, 1989
) for exocytosis release sites that do not make
synaptic contact in rat median eminence and mesencephalic central gray substance.
The hippocampus is very rich in noradrenergic innervation originating
from the locus ceruleus (Loy et al., 1980
). Fine varicose axons are
present in every layer of the hippocampus, but the overwhelming majority of varicosities (2.1 million/mm3) do not
make synaptic contact (Table 4). This
means that each varicosity, provided they are evenly distributed, may
control a volume of ~500 µm3. The distance
between varicosities plays an important role in setting the
concentration of transmitters in the extracellular space, because the
concentration of transmitter drops in a function of 3. This means that
~10 µm is the average distance between each varicosity (Fig.
2), but they are not evenly distributed,
indicating that there are regions in which the local concentration of
transmitters could be much higher.
|
|
Descarries et al. (1977)
presented evidence that like the hippocampus,
the cerebral cortex has rather dense noradrenergic innervation with
remarkably uniform distribution. The latter is different from that
of hippocampus. The cerebral cortex contains 346 noradrenergic
varicosities/mm2 and
>6000/mm3; therefore, each varicosity may
control a volume of 150.000 µm3.
This arrangement suggests that every varicose arborization equipped with heteroreceptors may lie within 66 µm of a noradrenergic varicosity devoid of synaptic specialization (Fig. 1).
With this calculation, we anticipated that noradrenergic varicosities in the hippocampus and cortex are evenly distributed, but this is certainly not the case. Of course, the extracellular concentration of transmitters may vary from site to site and from time to time, because there is a possibility of spatial and temporal summation of transmitters released from different varicosities.
The density of serotonergic varicosities varies between 0.24 and 2 million/mm3 (Beaudet and Sotelo, 1981
; Table 4)
in the cerebellar cortex.
| |
IV. Extracellular Space as a Communication Channel of Nonsynaptic Interaction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microdialysis studies show that virtually all the transmitters in
the CNS are present in the extracellular space. A very important factor
that determines the peak concentration of transmitter in this space is
its volume accessible for the transmitter. It has been shown
(Nicholson, 1985
; cf. Nicholson and Rice, 1991
) that this space is
~12 to 25% of the brain volume. Activity-induced changes of
extracellular space in excitable tissues are a well known phenomenon.
In response to neuronal activity and in parallel with an increase in
extracellular K+ concentration, shrinkage
of the extracellular space can be observed in vivo (Svoboda and Sykova,
1991
; cf. Holthoff and Witte, 1998
). This, in fact, can influence the
concentration of transmitters released into the extracellular space.
Another important factor is the amount of transmitter released from axon terminals. A critical aspect of nonsynaptic interaction theory is that a given neuron with its numerous nonsynaptically ending varicosities (which could be a few hundred thousand!) need not, by itself, be of sufficient strength to significantly change the extraneuronal concentration of the transmitter. If that neuron is fired at the same time as a number of other neurons, their combined action may be able to increase transmitter concentration in the extracellular space to such a level that a large field will be influenced; of course, only those neurons whose terminals or dendrites are equipped with receptor sensitive to the transmitter are affected. If, in contrast, a given neuron fires asynchronously with most of the other neurons, there will be no effect on the target cell. Table 5 shows the extracellular concentration of different transmitters in the extracellular space determined by microdialysis.
|
Diffusion of transmitters through the extracellular space in brain
slices (McBain et al., 1990
) is anisotropic in both hippocampus and
cortex (Nicholson and Syková, 1998
), indicating some specificity. The half-life of extracellular 5-HT is 0.21 s in the substantia nigra and 0.09 s in the dorsal raphe nucleus (Bunin et al., 1998
), suggesting that in the dorsal raphe nucleus, the nonsynaptic
transmission is a more likely mode of communication than in the
substantia nigra.
Richfield et al. (1989)
succeeded in showing that there are differences
in anatomical distributions and affinity states of D1 and D2 receptors in the
rat brain. The proportion of high-affinity sites is quite different
between the two subtypes. The high affinities for DA binding to
receptors in striatal slices were near 40 nM (range, 9-74 nM), and the
low affinities for DA were near 2 to 4 µM.
One question regarding the cellular location of D1 and D2 receptors is whether they are both located on the same neuron and/or they are expressed presynaptically or postsynaptically, synaptically or nonsynaptically. For the time being, no method is available to answer these questions. It is therefore a plausible assumption that the affinity of DA for the DA receptors and the DAT and nonsynaptic DA concentration should be related to each other.
It has been speculated that the synaptic DA concentration is in the
range of 10 µM and that DA is accordingly able to act on the
low-affinity states of the receptors (Gonon and Buda, 1985
).
The release of GABA, reaching a peak concentration of ~1 mM (Clements
et al., 1992
), would correspond to 3.000 to 7.500 molecules of
transmitter released (Destexhe and Sejnowski, 1995
). A spillover of
GABA may account for differences between inhibitory responses in the
hippocampus and thalamus (Destexhe and Sejnowski, 1995
). It is highly
probable that diffusion of transmitter between two neighboring synapses
(i.e., cross-talk; Barbour and Häusser, 1997
) plays an important
role in long-term potentiation and long-term depression phenomena
(Kullmann et al., 1996
) in which associativity and cooperativity of
synapses are important. This may be also involved in the activation of
nearby synapses (cf. Barbour and Häusser, 1997
),
affecting presynaptic and postsynaptic ionotropic receptors and
producing electrophysiologically detectable changes in synaptic current
waveform and metabotropic receptors that may not produce a direct
electrical action. However, the fact that low-affinity receptors are
expressed in the synapse makes it seems likely that the cross-talk will
only occasionally affect them, with the concentration of the
transmitter outside the synaptic gap being much lower than that in the
gap (~100 µM).
A similar observation was made with DA in the striatum (Wightman et
al., 1988
; Van Horne et al., 1992
). DA released from the varicose axon
terminals of the nigrostriatal pathway may be able to diffuse far away
from release sites (Schneider et al., 1994
) and inhibit the release of
ACh from cholinergic interneurons. However, all of the observations
made with microdialysis suggest that transmitters (NE, DA, 5-HT, and
ACh) released mainly from nonsynaptic terminals are present in the
extracellular space.
| |
V. Nonsynaptically Expressed Receptors and Membrane Transporters of High Affinity as Therapeutic Targets |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many instances have been found in which the distribution of the
receptors does not match the distribution of transmitter (Herkenham, 1987
, 1991
). Several lines of data (Table
6) indicate there are extrasynaptic
receptors and transporters in different brain regions (Somogyi et al.,
1989
; Baude et al., 1995
; Yung et al., 1995
; Venkatesan et al., 1996
;
Descarries et al., 1997
; Nusser et al., 1998
) that are accessible for
endogenous ligands. These, being located nonsynaptically, however,
possess a high-affinity property and may play a physiological role in
accepting chemical messages from distant neurons. Even when the
synaptic and nonsynaptic receptors do not differ in affinity, however,
they may be used with a different level of neuronal activity. Somogyi
et al. (1989)
showed in cerebellum that at a low frequency of neuronal
firing, GABA released into the synaptic cleft acts at the synaptic
junctions. The small amount of GABA can be removed by the transporter
without reaching the extrasynaptic receptors. However, at increased
excitatory input, GABA released in a much higher amount may reach
remote receptors of nonsynaptic location.
|
In contrast, there are heteroreceptors or transporters expressed on some neurons that are not accessible by transmitters. These receptors and transporters, in addition to those previously mentioned, are of pharmacological importance because they may never reach effective concentrations of the appropriate endogenous ligands in vivo but they could be the target for drugs or they could be occupied by endogenous ligands in toxic conditions.
A. Nonsynaptic Receptors
To act effectively at a distance and at a low concentration,
transmitters require high-affinity receptors (Isaacson et al., 1993
).
The affinity of receptors expressed in the synapse cannot be
determined, because there is no method available to separate intrasynaptic and extrasynaptic receptors. Katz and Miledi (1977)
showed that a low concentration of ACh has a minimal effect on the
postsynaptic nAChRs, which are known to possess a low affinity for ACh
(Colguhoun and Odgen, 1988
). Because the intrasynaptic concentration of
transmitters (see Table 5) is in the range of 0.01 to 6 mM (Kuffler and
Yoshikami, 1975
; Clements et al., 1992
; Bunin and Wightman, 1998
,
1999
), the postsynaptic receptors are relatively insensitive and are of
low affinity. It is therefore suggested that these receptors cannot be
affected by drugs being distributed in the body in low concentrations;
drugs may be able to affect these intrasynaptic receptors only at
extremely high and toxic concentrations. These receptors are not
targets for remote (i.e., nonsynaptic) modulation or remote signal
transmission. However, there are receptors and transporters expressed
on varicosities without synaptic contact that are easily reached by
endogenous substances (i.e., transmitters, modulators, and so on) and
drugs (antidepressants, nicotine), and they might be affected by
relatively low (0.01-1 µM) concentrations of drugs (Table
7) with a selective effect on receptors
(Vizi, 1984a
; Vizi and Lábos, 1991
). Dense nonsynaptic
localization of 5-HT1 receptors was shown (Kia et al., 1996
) in substantia nigra pars reticulata, where the extracellular concentration of 5-HT is 55 nM (Bunin and Wightman, 1999
). Therefore, it is suggested that receptors located on varicosities without making
synaptic contact seem likely to be the target for exogenous compounds
(medications) acting as agonists, partial agonists, or antagonists
(Vizi and Lábos, 1991
). Indeed, several drugs used in clinical
practice have been developed on the concept of presynaptic modulation
of chemical transmission (cf. Langer, 1997
; Langer et al., 1998
).
|
B. Nonsynaptic Transporters
There are only few reports of transporter density or localization
in the CNS. These data will help us to better understand the
nonsynaptic interactions between neurons. It is possible that there are
regions in which the density of a transporter is much lower than that
in other regions; therefore, remote interaction in this region is more
likely. It has been shown (Descarries et al.,1977
, 1995
) that labeled
5-HT and NE can be taken up from the extracellular space by
varicosities without making synaptic contact. Since then, much evidence
has been provided (Lester et al., 1996
) that transmitter-selective
transporters are expressed on nonsynaptic varicosities and are able to
take up transmitters from the extracellular space, limiting the
concentration of transmitter released from varicosities. Transporters
regulate the lifetime of the transmitter in the extracellular
space and thus the distance it can diffuse away from its release site.
Therefore, the area over which a transmitter released into the
extracellular space can act and the concentration of transmitter may
vary from region to region, depending on the local density of
transporter. It has been shown that Glu is removed from the synapse
into the nerve terminal and into the glia by a low-affinity transporter
(Gelagashvili and Schousboe, 1998
). Similarly, the nonsynaptic and
synaptic GABA transporters restrict fast GABAA
receptor-mediated transmission, preventing its spillover, and spread to
reach remote presynaptic GABAB receptors.
The importance of noradrenergic, serotonergic, and dopaminergic
transporters has long been appreciated (e.g., the therapeutic effect of
antidepressants is based on their blocking action on these
transporters; cf. Barker and Blakely, 1995
). Antidepressants (e.g.,
imipramine, fluoxetine), acting at low concentrations on nonsynaptically located membrane transporters of high affinity, are
able to inhibit the uptake of NE and/or 5-HT, thereby increasing the
concentration, life span, and transmission distance of the transmitter
released into the microenvironment.
The diffusion of DA over long distances (a few millimeters) through a
large volume of striatal tissue was observed (Doucet et al., 1986
;
Schneider et al., 1994
) when either the nigrostriatal dopaminergic
pathway was destroyed or the reuptake was inhibited. In these
experiments in intact animals, DA released in response to neuronal
activity diffused ~50 µm in the striatum (Schneider et al., 1994
).
C. Nonsynaptic Interaction between Neurons without Receptors
Within the past few years, evidence has accumulated that NO and
carbon monoxide are present in the CNS (cf. Szabó, 1996
; Moncada
et al., 1997
) and are able to operate as signal transmitters. Nevertheless, they have not yet met all criteria necessary to be
classified as transmitters. They are not synthesized in synaptic vesicles, but they are liberated as gases and then they are simply diffusing far away from their synthesis site, able to activate G
proteins of remote cells and influence transporters. It has been shown
that the free radical NO might play a role as an intercellular messenger in the brain (Garthwaite et al., 1988
). One of the
physiological functions of NO may be to prevent the uptake of different
neurotransmitters. Several studies provided evidence that NO inhibits
the plasma membrane transporters of different neurotransmitters. NO
inhibited [3H]DA (Lonart and Johnson, 1994
;
Pogun et al., 1994a
; Cutillas et al., 1998
) and
[3H]Glu uptake (Lonart and Johnson, 1994
; Pogun
et al., 1994b
) but increased 5-HT uptake (Miller and Hoffman, 1994
). In
regard to NE uptake, according to Pogun et al. (1994a)
NO had no
effect, whereas Lonart and Johnson (1995a
,b
) reported an inhibitory
effect. In all of these studies, the authors directly measured the
transmitter uptake (usually in synaptosomes) in the presence of
exogenously applied NO produced from different NO generators. In our
study, in hippocampal slice preparation (Kiss et al., 1996
), we
inhibited the neuronal NO synthase, which reduced the endogenous NO
production. This manipulation increased the ability of
dimethylphenyl-piperazinium, an nAChR agonist, to evoke
carrier-mediated release. These data suggest that endogenously produced
NO is able to inhibit the operation of NE uptake carrier (at least if
the direction of NE transport is reversed due to certain conditions).
In addition, with the use of microdialysis, it has been shown (Kiss et
al., 1999
) that the systemic administration of
N
-nitro-L-arginine
methyl ester, an NO synthase inhibitor, significantly reduced the
release of DA from the striatum (Kiss et al., 1999
). It was also seen
that NO synthesized in neurons by inducible NO synthase in several
regions of the brain can release ACh (Ikarashi et al., 1998
) and that
the NO generator sodium nitroprusside (500 µM) increases
extracellular DA levels in the striatum (West and Galloway, 1999
) in a
[Ca2+]o-dependent manner.
The synthesis of NO in the CNS is mainly linked to the activation of
NMDA receptors by Glu. Montague et al. (1994)
have shown that the
activation of NMDA receptors in synaptosomal preparations from guinea
pig cerebral cortex released both Glu and NE and that the release is
blocked by drugs that inhibit NO production or remove NO from the
extracellular space. In addition, the activation of AMPA/KA receptors
also increases NO production. It is also known that the stimulation of
NO production is a
[Ca2+]o-dependent process
(Garthwaite and Boulton, 1995
). These findings suggest that Glu
released from axon terminals increases NO production via NMDA receptor
activation and is able to potentiate the release of Glu and other
transmitters from the neighboring synapses. Therefore, it seems likely
that NO is involved in the modulation of NMDA-induced release of
neurotransmitters (Montague et al., 1994
; Sandor et al., 1995
; Segovia
and Mora, 1998
; cf. West and Galloway, 1999
).
With a half-life of a few seconds, NO generated at a single point
source should be able to influence function within a sphere with a
diameter of ~300 to 350 µm (Garthwaite and Boulton, 1995
), which is
very large compared with the dimensions of a synapse. According to
Gally et al. (1990)
, NO may diffuse up to 100 µm in 5 s.
Therefore, it is suggested that NO is an ideal endogenous substance for
nonsynaptic interaction and may transmit long-distance messages from
transmitters (e.g., Glu) exclusively released into the synaptic gap.
| |
VI. Clinical Implications |
|---|
|
|
|---|
High-affinity transmitter receptors and transporters located
nonsynaptically are the targets of many drugs of therapy and abuse. Are
the receptors and transporters located outside the postsynaptic density
of the synapse functionally part of a single synapse? Taking into
account the morphology of arborization of noradrenergic, dopaminergic,
serotonergic, and cholinergic systems, the answer is certainly no.
These receptors and transporters, having no synaptic arrangements, are
promiscuous and accessible to chemicals released from numerous synapses
and/or nonsynaptic boutons. They are certainly accessible to drugs
taken by the patients with agonist/antagonist activity on these
receptors. It is well established, for example, that the uptake of NE
by noradrenergic varicosities is largely mediated by high-affinity NETs
(cf. Trendelenburg, 1991
). The monoamine transporters are the
therapeutic targets for tricyclic antidepressants, psychostimulants
(amphetamine), and cocaine. Serotonin uptake blockers, such as
fluoxetine (Prozac), have been used for the treatment of depression,
obsessive-compulsive disorder, and sleep and eating disorders.
It has been observed that the activity of GABA transporter is reduced
in human epileptic hippocampus (During et al., 1995
). Therefore, it was
suggested that GABA uptake blockers may be used as anticonvulsive
drugs. Although a loss of benzodiazepine binding sites is
characteristic of temporal lobe epilepsy, recent data show that an
up-regulation of GABAA receptors (Nusser et al., 1998
) in hippocampal dentate gyrus granule cells represents a compensatory mechanism (cf. Fritschy et al., 1999
). There is an interaction between serotonergic and GABAergic neurons in the hippocampus (cf. Gulyás et al., 1999
); the evoked
GABAB receptor-mediated slow inhibitory
postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) measured in pyramidal cells and
mediated via nonsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors (Segal,
1990
) are reduced, and the GABAA
receptor-mediated IPSPs are increased (via 5-HT3
and 5-HT2 receptors; Shen and Andrade,
1998
), thereby shifting the GABAergic inhibition into the perisomatic
region. The possible involvement of GABAergic interneurons (cf. Freund and Buzsáki, 1996
) in schizophrenia and other psychoses has been recently reviewed (Keverne, 1999
). Inhibitory GABAergic interneurons with their serotonergic, dopaminergic, and cholinergic inputs play an
important role in maintaining network oscillations (Buzsáki and
Chrobak, 1995
).
Cocaine inhibits monoamine (NE, DA, and 5-HT) transporters (Ritz et
al., 1987
; cf. Lester et al., 1994
). As far as its reinforcing action
is concerned, the inhibition of the DAT is the most important (Ritz et
al.,1987
). Cocaine blockade of DAT results in an increased level of
extracellular DA (Rocha et al., 1998
) in the limbic system, an effect
widely accepted to be the primary cause of the reinforcing and additive
effects of cocaine (Kuhar et al., 1991
).
It seems likely that the mode of effect of
3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (Ecstasy) is mediated via
serotonin transporter, producing a heterologous exchange (Rudnick and
Wall, 1992
). Amphetamine is taken up by NETs and DATs in expense of
transporting NE and DA out from the cytoplasm.
It seems plausible that the effects on the manic-depressive state that
are due to influences on noradrenergic transmission may be mediated
through changes in the release of other transmitters at the cortical
level. Several reports have suggested that long- but not short-term
treatment with certain tricyclic antidepressants decreases the
functional sensitivity of
2-adrenoceptors in
brain (McMillen et al., 1980
; Spyraki and Fibiger, 1980
). It has been shown that clonidine inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex in the
rat, a behavioral measure of
2-adrenoceptor
sensitivity after desipramine administration, was also attenuated
(McMillen et al., 1980
; Davis and Menkes, 1982
). The presynaptic link
between the noradrenergic and serotonergic (Feuerstein et al., 1993
)
axon terminals, NE, reduces the release of 5-HT and
could explain how by increasing the biophase concentration of
endogenous NE in the vicinity of
2
heteroreceptors, a selective NE uptake blocker may inhibit or reduce
the release of 5-HT. As a consequence, both
2-
and 5-HT receptors are up-regulated. Under this condition, any increase
in 5-HT release might induce suicidal behavior. Thus, the density or
sensitivity of the presynaptic
2-autoreceptor expressed on the noradrenergic varicosities and of the
heteroreceptor expressed on the serotonergic varicosities could
result in inhibition of neuronal release of NE/5-HT and lead to
depression. Increased density (Callado et al., 1998
) and sensitivity of
2A-adrenoceptors in prefrontal cortex could
represent a common feature of the reduced monoaminergic (noradrenergic
and/or serotonergic) function postulated in depression (Garcia-Sevilla
et al., 1999
).
On the basis of the hypothesis that an increased 5-HT release relieves
certain symptoms of depression, blockade of the negative feedback
modulation of 5-HT release has become an attractive concept for
antidepressant drug development (cf. Göthert and Schlicker, 1997
), in particular when combined with selective uptake blocker.
2-Adrenoceptors other than autoreceptors are
also down-regulated by chronic inhibition of NE uptake by tricyclic
antidepressant treatment (Bill et al., 1989
). Although many studies
indicate that a down-regulation of central
-adrenoceptor sensitivity
accompanies chronic antidepressant administration, the consequences of
such treatment on
2-adrenoceptor function are
more equivocal (Charney et al., 1981
; Sugrue, 1988
). Accordingly,
biochemical and functional studies have demonstrated that depressed
patients have an increased density and sensitivity of platelet
2-adrenoceptors (Piletz et al., 1986
) and that
these receptor abnormalities are confined to the high-affinity state
(
2H) of the receptor that preferentially recognizes agonists (Garcia-Sevilla et al., 1981
, 1986
, 1987
). In
addition, a correlation between
2-adrenoceptors and suicide was established
(De Permentier et al., 1997
). There is some evidence that suggests that
mania is related to disturbances in catecholaminergic neurotransmission
(Silverstone, 1985
). In contrast to depression, mania may be
characterized by increased noradrenergic and/or dopaminergic transmission. An increase in noradrenergic metabolism is supported by
the higher excretion of urinary 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol in
manic compared with depressive episodes and the notable increase in
cerebrospinal fluid NE itself. Moreover, there are some indirect pharmacological data suggesting that drugs able to decrease
noradrenergic transmission, such as reserpine, might be associated with
an increased incidence of depression and therapeutic effects in mania.
Conversely, most tricyclic and monoamine oxidase inhibitor
antidepressants potentiate the noradrenergic system and may potentiate
manic shifts (cf. Mongeau et al., 1997
). Moreover, the
-adrenoceptor
agonist clonidine, which decreases firing of the noradrenergic cells of the locus ceruleus by acting preferentially at presynaptic
autoreceptors (Svensson et al., 1975
) and reduces the NE release, has
antimanic properties. Many antipsychotic drugs inhibit MK-801
(dizocilpine) binding to NMDA receptors with IC50
values in the micromolar range (Shim et al., 1999
), but their clinical
effect may not be mediated via these receptors.
There is increasing interest in developing therapeutic agents that will
prevent Glu neurotoxicity, an effect mediated via postsynaptic
receptors. Therefore, most of the efforts are involved in a search for
Glu receptor antagonists. However, presynaptic receptors able to
inhibit Glu release offer another target at which the drug would be
able to reduce Glu release. This type of drug would be effective in
convulsion and in ischemic insult (cf. Tapia et al., 1999
). The NMDA
receptor may also be involved in a variety of psychiatric illnesses,
including schizophrenia (cf. Shim et al., 1999
).
It is generally accepted that the activity of cholinergic innervation
of the cerebral cortex plays a crucial role in cortical arousal and
attention and is critically involved in memory and learning (Dunnett et
al., 1991
; Harder et al., 1998
). The specific lesions of basal nucleus
of Meynert produce cognitive impairment, whereas lesions of the medial
septum result in large and permanent impairments of certain types of
conditional learning. In addition, the discovery that in Alzheimer's
disease there is a very substantial loss of this cholinergic input
(Whitehouse et al., 1982
; cf. Kása et al., 1997
) and its
involvement in cognitive deficits observed in patients (Dunnett et al.,
1991
) just further increased the interest in this topic (Giacobini,
1998
). Cholinesterase inhibitors are the current drugs of choice in the
treatment of Alzheimer's disease (cf. Giacobini, 1998
). A direct
correlation was found between the level of acetylcholinesterase
inhibition, increase in extracellular concentration of ACh in cortex
and hippocampus, and cognitive improvement (cf. Kiss et al., 1999
). In
addition, it has been shown (Kiss et al., 1999
) that cholinesterase
inhibition enhanced both ACh (Moor et al., 1995
) and NE release in the
hippocampus. These findings may help to understand the beneficial
effect of cholinesterase inhibition in Alzheimer's disease. Similarly,
a selective M2 subtype antagonist with an exclusive effect on
cholinergic varicosities and able to cross the blood-brain barrier and
to increase ACh release by preventing the negative-feedback inhibition of ACh release would be a potential therapy.
Activation of presynaptic inhibitory muscarinic receptors inhibits the
excitatory intrinsic fiber synaptic glutamatergic transmission and
prevents recall of previously learned memories from interfering with
the learning of new memories (Hasselmo and Bower, 1992
, 1993
; Hasselmo
and Schnell, 1994
; Hasselmo and Barkai, 1995
).
If the cholinergic high-affinity M2 receptor-mediated suppression of
intrinsic glutamatergic input to pyramidal cells is in operation, the
advantage of increased ACh release can be used in learning, provided
the effect of ACh on dendrites to increase excitability of pyramidal
cells is not inhibited (cf. Hasselmo and Bower, 1993
).
The effect of nicotine to increase NE release (cf. Wonnacott, 1997
) and
synaptic transmission (cf. Chiodini et al., 1999
) from the hippocampal
noradrenergic varicosities is in correlation with its beneficial action
on learning and memory. Because this effect is mediated via
high-affinity nAChRs of presynaptic location (cf. Wonnacott, 1997
; cf.
Vizi and Kiss, 1998
), attempts have been made to find an nAChR agonist
for treatment of Alzheimer's patients. It is also a very well
established concept that activation of dopaminergic transmission
(increase of DA release) via activation of nAChRs is beneficial in
Parkinson's disease (cf. Reader and Dewar, 1999
).
| |
VII. Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The synaptic information flow has been the most frequently studied
field of neuroscience for the past ~50 years, but recent developments
that point to different types of release of transmitter (Table 1) from
varicosities without synaptic contact and receptors and transporters of
nonsynaptic location is based on nonsynaptic communication (Vizi and
Knoll, 1971
; Vizi, 1974
, 1979
, 1980b
, 1984
, 1990
, 1991
; Fuxe and
Agnati, 1991
; Vizi et al., 1991
; Vizi and Lábos, 1991
;
Bach-y-Rita, 1993
; Zoli and Agnati, 1996
; Vizi and Kiss, 1998
; Zoli et
al., 1999
) not requiring impulse frequency coding. The findings of
Herkenham (1987
, 1991
) that there are mismatches between release sites
and receptors, represented important support for the nonsynaptic
interaction hypothesis. The formerly more restricted view of chemical
signal transmission within the synapse has to be extended, because
considerable evidence has accumulated to show that although the brain
is a wired instrument, its neurons, besides cabled information
signaling (through synapses), are able to talk to each other without
synaptic contact (i.e., "wireless"). These apparently nonsynaptic
arrangements furnish an efficient way to influence neuronal activity
continuously in a large field, involving vast neuronal ensembles,
without directly contacting every single cell. They are comparable with
radiowave transmission instead of the telephone system; the message is
sent in a long-distance manner, and only a properly tuned receiver can
accept it. Thus, only cells that are equipped with proper receptors
sensitive to the ligand can accept the chemical message. Because recent
studies (Nicholson and Rice, 1991
; Routtenberg, 1991
) showed that the
size of extracellular space is ~20% of brain volume, it is suggested
that this is the space in which transmitter released from varicosities
can diffuse away from the release site. Because the extracellular
concentrations of transmitters in this space are in the nanomolar to
micromolar ranges, the receptors of nonsynaptic location are of high
affinity. The high-affinity uptake system located nonsynaptically plays
a critical role in terminating the effect of transmitters released from
nonsynaptic varicosities on receptors expressed nonsynaptically.
The nonsynaptic communication system has a similar degree of selectivity as that of synaptic circuitry but possesses, in addition, a domain of versatility and plasticity in "hardwared" circuitry.
Gone is our understanding of hard-wired neuronal circuitry created for the amplification of digital information in the synapse, with the use of very fast transmitters able to produce "on" and "off" signals within us; we have to change our mentality and accept there is a nonsynaptic communication system that in the brain, an analog information transfer, whose time constant may be seconds or even minutes. The digital information traffic is affected from time to time by chemical messages sent from neurons located far away. Thus, if a transmitter is released from neurons in concert, resulting in a long-lasting high concentration of the transmitter, it will be able to modulate tonically the release of another transmitter.
The original observations made in 1968 and 1969 (Lindmar et al., 1968
;
Vizi, 1968
; Löffelholz and Muscholl, 1969a
,b
; Paton and Vizi,
1969
) that the release of transmitter can be influenced (inhibited or
increased) through the activation of presynaptic receptors by chemicals
released from another neuron led to a novel mechanism of interaction of
neurons equipped with different transmitters and opened a new strategy
of drug therapy. Therefore, it seems likely that compounds with a
selective effect on high-affinity receptors and transporters expressed
on varicosities of nonsynaptic location may represent the beginning of
a new generation of innovative drugs.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This work was supported by the Hungarian Research Fund (OTKA), the Medical Research Council (ETT), and a Philip Morris research grant.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
1 Address for correspondence: Dr. E. Sylvester Vizi, Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, POB 67, H-1450 Budapest, Hungary. E-mail: ESVIZI@KOKI.HU
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
ACh, acetylcholine;
AMPA,
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid;
[Ca2+]o, extracellular Ca2+
concentration;
[Na+]i, intracellular
Na+ concentration;
CNS, central nervous system;
DA, dopamine;
DAT, dopamine transporter;
GABA,
-aminobutyric acid;
Glu, glutamate;
IPSP, inhibitory postsynaptic potential;
KA, kainate;
nAChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor;
NE, norepinephrine;
NET, norepinephrine transporter;
NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartic acid;
NO, nitric oxide;
PKC, protein kinase C;
5-HT, serotonin;
TTX, tetrodotoxin.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-autoinhibition and facilitation of 3H-noradrenaline secretion in guinea-pig vas deferens.
J Physiol (Lond)
312:
297-334
-aminobutyric acidA receptors on hippocampal neurons.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
279:
1491-1506
-aminobutyric acid release from CA1 neurons or rat hippocampal slices.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
283:
1396-1411
2-adrenoceptors in brain slices.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol
345:
402-409[Medline].
-aminobutyric acidA receptors: Classification on the basis of subunit structure and receptor function.
Pharmacol Rev
50:
291-313
2-Adrenergic agonists reduce glutamate release and glutamate receptor-mediated calcium changes in hippocampal slices during hypoxia.
Neuropharmacology
35:
679-687[Medline].
2-agonists in reserpinized and normal mice.
Br J Pharmacol
96:
144-152[Medline].
2A-adrenoceptor subtype.
Eur J Pharmacol
205:
311-313[Medline].
2 adrenoceptor subtypes.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
267:
1054-1060
2 Adrenergic receptors: A historical perspective, in
The
2 Adrenergic Receptors (Limbird L ed) pp 1-13,
Humana Press, Clifton, NJ.
2C and
2D adrenergic receptor subtypes, in
Adrenoceptors: Structure, Mechanism, Function (Szabadi E andBradshaw CM eds) pp 27-36,
Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.
2-adrenergic receptors: Comparison of pharmacologically defined subtypes with subtypes identified by molecular cloning.
Mol Pharmacol
42:
1-5[Abstract].
2A And
2B adrenergic receptor subtypes: Antagonist binding in tissues and cell lines containing only one subtype.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
245:
600-607
2-adrenergic receptors in chicken pineal gland using [3H]rauwolscine.
J Neurochem
51:
81-86[Medline].
2A-adrenoceptor agonist binding sites in brains of depressed suicide victims.
J Neurochem
70:
1114-1123[Medline].
-aminobutyric acid transporter expressed in Xenopus oocytes via regulated subcellular redistribution of the transporter.
J Biol Chem
269:
14759-14767
-aminobutyric acid release by kainate receptor activation in rat hippocampal synaptosomes.
Eur J Pharmacol
323:
167-172[Medline].
2-adrenoceptor sensitivity with chronic treatment: Assessment with clonidine inhibition of acoustic startle.
Br J Pharmacol
77:
217-222[Medline].
2-adrenoceptors in depressed suicides.
Brain Res
757:
60-68[Medline].
-hydroxylase at low stimulation frequencies by
-blocking agents.
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther
193:
191-197[Medline].
-aminobutyric acid may account for differences between inhibitory responses in the hippocampus and thalamus.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:
9515-9519
2 adrenergic receptor subtypes.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
278:
1215-1227
-Aminobutyric acid uptake and the termination of inhibitory synaptic potentials in the rat hippocampal slice.
J Physiol (Lond)
366:
387-409
2-adrenoceptors on serotonergic nerve endings in human and rat neocortex.
J Neurochem
61:
474-480[Medline].
-receptor blockade.
Acta Physiol Scand
96:
422-430.
2A-adrenoceptors, Gi coupling proteins and regulatory receptor kinases in the prefrontal cortex of depressed suicides.
J Neurochem
72:
282-291[Medline].
2-adrenoceptors in major affective disorder.
Arch Gen Psychiatry
43:
51-57
2-adrenergic receptors in major depressive disorder.
Arch Gen Psychiatry
38:
1327-1333
2B-adrenoceptor subtype.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol
342:
382-386[Medline].
2-Adrenoceptor subtypes in the human brain: a pharmacological delineation of [3H]RX-821002 binding to membranes and tissue sections.
Eur J Pharmacol
310:
83-93[Medline].
2A-autoreceptors in the human gastric and ileocolic arteries.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol
358:
207-211[Medline].
-aminobutyric acid by neurons and glial cells.
Biochem Pharmacol
24:
933-938[Medline].
2-heteroreceptor function.
Brain Res Bull
48:
49-59[Medline].
2-adrenoceptor-mediated inhibition of hypothalamic norepinephrine release.
J Neurosci
13:
3448-3455[Abstract].
2-adrenoceptors modulating hippocampal norepinephrine release in rat.
Brain Res
674:
238-244[Medline].
-Conotoxin MII blocks nicotine-stimulated dopamine release in rat striatal synaptosomes.
J Neurosci
17:
5263-5270
2-adrenoceptors in guinea-pig atria.
Nature (Lond)
294:
671-672[Medline].
2A is the predominant
2 adrenergic receptor subtype in human spinal cord.
Anesthesiology
77:
983-991[Medline].
2 adrenoceptor-subtype function.
Trends Pharmacol Sci
18:
211-219[Medline].
2-adrenoceptors in the locus coeruleus are involved in the in vivo modulation of cortical noradrenaline release by the antidepressant desipramine.
J Neurochem
71:
790-798[Medline].
-adrenergic drugs.
Eur J Pharmacol
61:
239-246[Medline].
neurotransmitter transporters.
J Neurochem
71:
1785-1803[Medline].
1-adrenoceptors in the modulation of [3H]noradrenaline release in rat brain cortical and hippocampal synaptosomes.
Neurosci Lett
216:
187-190[Medline].
-aminobutyric acidB (GABAB) receptor subtype.
Brain Res
604:
325-330[Medline].
2-adrenoceptors in depressive illness.
Life Sci
39:
1589-1616[Medline].
2-autoreceptors in human brain cortex.
Br J Pharmacol
107:
1146-1151[Medline].
-aminobutyric acid release in rat corpus striatum and their pharmacological characterization.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
254:
496-501
2-adrenoceptors in the human cerebral cortex.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol
342:
508-512[Medline].
2A adrenoceptors and Gi proteins in the human brain: Ratio of high-affinity agonist sites to antagonist sites and effect of age.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
269:
1062-1072
2-Adrenoceptor subtypes identified by [3H]RX821002 binding in the human brain: The agonist guanoxabenz does not discriminate different forms of the predominant
2A-subtype.
J Neurochem
63:
1077-1085[Medline].
2-adrenoceptor and µ-opioid receptor mediated inhibition of [3H]-noradrenaline release from rat brain cortex slices.
J Neurochem
46:
1711-1717[Medline].
-aminobutyric acid from a retinal neuron.
Science (Wash DC)
238:
350-355
2-adrenoceptors.
Neuroscience
82:
511-520[Medline].
2-receptors after chronic desipramine treatment.
Life Sci
27:
1863-1867[Medline].
-receptor stimulants on noradrenaline release.
Naturwissenschaften
58:
420[Medline].
-autoinhibition of [3H]noradrenaline secretion in guinea-pig vas deferens: Possible role of extracellular sodium.
Neuroscience
6:
2759-2771[Medline].
2-adrenoceptors during chronic antidepressants.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol
320:
90-92.
-adrenergic agonist clonidine.
Brain Res
92:
291[Medline].
2-autoreceptors in brain cortex:
2D in the rat and
2A in the rabbit.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol
348:
35-45[Medline].
2-adrenoceptors at serotonergic axons in rat and rabbit brain: Evidence for pharmacological identity with
2-autoreceptors.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol
349:
25-33[Medline].
2A subtype of presynaptic
2-adrenoceptors modulates the release of [3H]-noradrenaline from rat spinal cord.
Brain Res Bull
42:
129-132[Medline].
conductance in cultured rat hippocampal neurons.
J Physiol (Lond)
479:
53-63
2A-adrenergic receptors in the visual cortex of neonatal and adult rats.
J Comp Neurol
365:
79-95[Medline].
2 adrenoceptors during rat brain development. I.
2A messenger RNA expression.
Neuroscience
76:
241-260[Medline].
2 adrenoceptors during rat brain development . II.
2C messenger RNA expression and [3H]rauwolscine binding.
Neuroscience
76:
261-272[Medline].
0031-6997/00/5201-0063$03.00/0
PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Nikolaeva, S. Richard, A. Mouihate, and P. K. Stys Effects of the Noradrenergic System in Rat White Matter Exposed to Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation In Vitro J. Neurosci., February 11, 2009; 29(6): 1796 - 1804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sykova and C. Nicholson Diffusion in Brain Extracellular Space Physiol Rev, October 1, 2008; 88(4): 1277 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lendvai and E. S. Vizi Nonsynaptic Chemical Transmission Through Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 333 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Sarna Are interstitial cells of Cajal plurifunction cells in the gut? Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): G372 - G390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bonanno, R. Giambelli, L. Raiteri, E. Tiraboschi, S. Zappettini, L. Musazzi, M. Raiteri, G. Racagni, and M. Popoli Chronic Antidepressants Reduce Depolarization-Evoked Glutamate Release and Protein Interactions Favoring Formation of SNARE Complex in Hippocampus J. Neurosci., March 30, 2005; 25(13): 3270 - 3279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ma, N. Rajakumaraswamy, and M. Maze {alpha}2-Adrenoceptor agonists: shedding light on neuroprotection? Br. Med. Bull., January 31, 2005; 71(1): 77 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Vizi, G. Zsilla, M. G. Caron, and J. P. Kiss Uptake and Release of Norepinephrine by Serotonergic Terminals in Norepinephrine Transporter Knock-Out Mice: Implications for the Action of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors J. Neurosci., September 8, 2004; 24(36): 7888 - 7894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Noga, A. Pinzon, R. P. Mesigil, and I. D. Hentall Steady-State Levels of Monoamines in the Rat Lumbar Spinal Cord: Spatial Mapping and the Effect of Acute Spinal Cord Injury J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 567 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. FREUND, I. KATONA, and D. PIOMELLI Role of Endogenous Cannabinoids in Synaptic Signaling Physiol Rev, July 1, 2003; 83(3): 1017 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. U. Adachi, K. Watanabe, T. Satoh, and E. S. Vizi Halothane potentiates the effect of methamphetamine and nomifensine on extracellular dopamine levels in rat striatum: a microdialysis study Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 837 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. J. Elenkov, R. L. Wilder, G. P. Chrousos, and E. S. Vizi The Sympathetic Nerve---An Integrative Interface between Two Supersystems: The Brain and the Immune System Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2000; 52(4): 595 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Köfalvi, B. Sperlágh, T. Zelles, and E. S. Vizi Long-Lasting Facilitation of 4-Amino-n-[2,3-3H]butyric Acid ([3H]GABA) Release from Rat Hippocampal Slices by Nicotinic Receptor Activation J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2000; 295(2): 453 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |