Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Medicine and
Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Thomas Jefferson University,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (K.A.L., G.M.P., S.K., I.R.-S., J.P., S.S.,
K.P.C., S.A.W.); and Institute of Pharmacology, University of Catania
Medical School, Catania, Italy (G.M.P.)
Guanylyl cyclases are a family of enzymes that catalyze the
conversion of GTP to cGMP. The family comprises both
membrane-bound and soluble isoforms that are expressed in nearly all
cell types. They are regulated by diverse extracellular agonists that
include peptide hormones, bacterial toxins, and free radicals, as well as intracellular molecules, such as calcium and adenine nucleotides. Stimulation of guanylyl cyclases and the resultant accumulation of cGMP
regulates complex signaling cascades through immediate downstream
effectors, including cGMP-dependent protein kinases, cGMP-regulated
phosphodiesterases, and cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels. Guanylyl
cyclases and cGMP-mediated signaling cascades play a central role in
the regulation of diverse (patho)physiological processes, including
vascular smooth muscle motility, intestinal fluid and electrolyte
homeostasis, and retinal phototransduction. Topics addressed in this
review include the structure and chromosomal localization of the genes
for guanylyl cyclases, structure and function of the members of the
guanylyl cyclase family, molecular mechanisms regulating enzymatic
activity, and molecular sequences coupling ligand binding to catalytic
activity. A brief overview is presented of the downstream events
controlled by guanylyl cyclases, including the effectors that are
regulated by cGMP and the role that guanylyl cyclases play in cell
physiology and pathophysiology.
 |
I. Introduction |
Guanylyl cyclases have evolved to synthesize cGMP in response to
diverse signals, such as nitric oxide
(NO),2 peptide
ligands, and fluxes in intracellular Ca2+
([Ca2+]i). These signals
use specific guanylyl cyclase-coupled receptors and cofactors to
initiate the conversion of the cytosolic purine nucleotide GTP to cGMP.
Intracellular cGMP ([cGMP]i) regulates cellular
physiology by activating protein kinases, directly gating specific ion
channels, or altering intracellular cyclic nucleotide concentrations
through regulation of phosphodiesterases (PDEs). The structure and
function of the family of guanylyl cyclases, the molecular mechanisms
regulating their activities, and the downstream effectors that underlie
the physiology of cGMP-dependent processes are summarized in this review.
 |
II. Guanylyl Cyclases |
A. Molecular Biology
1. Identification of the Members of the Guanylyl Cyclase
Family.
It was established by the mid-1970s that guanylyl cyclase
activity was found in both the soluble and particulate fractions of
most cells (Hardman and Sutherland, 1969
; Ishikawa et al., 1969
;
Schultz et al., 1969
; White and Aurbach, 1969
), and that these
activities were due to different proteins (Garbers and Gray, 1974
;
Kimura and Murad, 1974
; Chrisman et al., 1975
). However, only with the
development of molecular cloning techniques more than a decade later
could the breadth of this enzyme family be fully explored (Tables 1 and
2).
Purification of guanylyl cyclase from the cytosolic compartment
revealed the soluble isoform was a heterodimer composed of
- and
-subunits. The
-subunit had a molecular mass of ~70 kDa,
whereas the
-subunit was reported to be 73 to 82 kDa (Gerzer et al.,
1981c
; Kamisaki et al., 1986
). Soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) was
purified to apparent homogeneity from bovine or rat lungs (Koesling et
al., 1988
, 1990
; Nakane et al., 1988
, 1990
). Degenerate oligonucleotide
probes based on the structure of purified subunits were used to screen
cDNA libraries and thereby clone
1- and
1-subunits. The
C-terminal region of both subunits had a high degree of sequence
identity with cloned adenylyl and particulate guanylyl cyclases (pGCs),
suggesting this was the catalytic domain. Sodium nitroprusside
(SNP)-sensitive guanylyl cyclase activity was expressed when the cloned
cDNAs for
1 and
1 were cotransfected into a heterologous cell
system, but not when transfected individually (Harteneck et al., 1990
; Nakane et al., 1990
). These data demonstrated both subunits of sGC are
required for basal and nitrovasodilator-stimulated catalytic activity.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2
Particulate guanylyl cyclase isoforms, ligand and cofactor
specificities, chromosomal localization, and tissue distribution
|
|
Studies of pGCs suggested a new paradigm for signal transduction.
Sea urchin sperm is one of the richest sources of pGC. In echinoderms,
peptides secreted by eggs activate pGC of sperm in a species-specific
manner (Suzuki et al., 1984
; Ramarao and Garbers, 1985
). Moreover,
radiolabeled egg peptides could be chemically cross-linked to a sperm
cell surface protein of the same size as that recognized by antiserum
against guanylyl cyclase (Shimomura et al., 1986
). These observations
suggested that pGC might also serve as a receptor for peptide ligands.
While these studies were being conducted in the sea urchin, atrial
natriuretic peptide (ANP) was demonstrated to activate guanylyl cyclase
and to increase [cGMP]i in mammalian tissues
(Hamet et al., 1984
; Waldman et al., 1984
; Winquist et al., 1984
).
Subsequently, ANP binding and guanylyl cyclase activity were
copurified, strongly suggesting the two activities reside in a single
molecule (Kuno et al., 1986
; Paul et al., 1987
; Shimonaka et al., 1987
;
Meloche et al., 1988
). In 1988, pGC was first cloned from a sea urchin
testis cDNA library using probes based on tryptic peptides obtained
from the purified protein (Singh et al., 1988
). This clone provided the
necessary probe for isolating mammalian cDNAs encoding pGCs. The
natriuretic peptide receptors, guanylyl cyclase A (GC-A) and B (GC-B),
were the first pGCs cloned from mammalian tissues (Chang et al., 1989
; Chinkers et al., 1989
; Lowe et al., 1989
; Schulz et al., 1989
). The
deduced primary sequences of the natriuretic peptide receptors predicted a protein with a single transmembrane domain that divides an
extracellular ligand-binding domain from an intracellular domain. Deletion mutagenesis studies have demonstrated that the intracellular domain serves regulatory, dimerization, and catalytic functions (Chinkers and Garbers, 1989
). This regulatory domain has sequence similarity with protein kinases, particularly the protein tyrosine kinases, which are also single transmembrane domain receptors (Singh et
al., 1988
). The sequences of the C-terminal catalytic domains are
highly homologous to those of the
- and
-subunits of sGC and have
limited identity with the two catalytic domains of adenylyl cyclases
(Krupinski et al., 1989
; Thorpe and Garbers, 1989
).
Development of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) facilitated the
search for new members of the guanylyl cyclase family. Degenerate PCR
primers based on conserved amino acid sequences in the catalytic
domains of both sGCs and pGCs were used to preferentially amplify
guanylyl, as opposed to adenylyl, cyclases and yielded sequences of a
second
- and a second
-subunit of sGC and five unique pGC
sequences (GC-C to GC-G) (Yuen et al., 1990
; Harteneck et al., 1991
). A
third pair of sGC subunits, cloned by screening a human cDNA library
with rat cDNA clones, is most likely the human ortholog of
1/
1
(Giuili et al., 1992
). Guanylyl cyclase C (GC-C) is the receptor for
the bacterial heat-stable enterotoxins (STs) (Schulz et al., 1990
; de
Sauvage et al., 1991
), and for the endogenous peptides guanylin and
uroguanylin (Currie et al., 1992
; Hamra et al., 1993
). The remaining
cloned mammalian pGCs are orphan receptors without known extracellular
ligands. Guanylyl cyclase D (GC-D) is expressed in the olfactory
neuroepithelium in a zonal pattern resembling that of the
seven-transmembrane domain odorant receptors (Fülle et al.,
1995
). Two other members of the sensory tissue subfamily of guanylyl
cyclases, guanylyl cyclase E (GC-E, retGC-1) and guanylyl cyclase F
(GC-F, retGC-2), are expressed in retina (Shyjan et al., 1992
; Lowe et
al., 1995
; Yang et al., 1995
). GC-E also is expressed in the pineal
gland (Yang et al., 1995
). Although these enzymes are orphan receptors, their extracellular domains are homologous to that of GC-D and share a
similar arrangement of cysteine residues in the extracellular domain
with the other pGCs. This suggests they may have an extracellular ligand, although the catalytic activity of the retinal cyclases is
regulated by [Ca2+]i
through guanylyl cyclase-activating proteins (GCAPs). The recently cloned GC-G most closely resembles the natriuretic peptide receptors, although it is not activated by natriuretic peptides (Schulz et al.,
1998b
). Apparently, the family of mammalian guanylyl cyclases is
relatively small because low stringency library screening and degenerate PCR have not yielded an abundance of unique cDNAs. In
contrast, Caenorhabditis elegans has approximately 30 genes encoding guanylyl cyclase-like sequences and is seemingly rich in
cGMP-coupled pathways (Yu et al., 1997
).
2. Structure and Location of Guanylyl Cyclase Genes.
The
chromosomal loci of the genes encoding isoforms of guanylyl cyclase and
their ligands have been mapped in the human and/or the mouse (Tables 1,
2) and are unlinked and scattered throughout the genome, with notable
exceptions. Thus, the genes encoding the natriuretic peptide ligands
for GC-A, ANP and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are organized in
tandem in both the human and the mouse (Huang et al., 1996
; Tamura et
al., 1996b
). Similarly, guanylin and uroguanylin, the endogenous
activators of GC-C, are encoded by closely linked genes (Whitaker et
al., 1997
). Retinal guanylyl cyclase activity is regulated by GCAPs,
which are calcium-binding proteins. To date, three members of the GCAP
family have been identified. GCAP1 and GCAP2 are found in a
tail-to-tail arrangement on human chromosome 6, whereas GCAP3 is
located on chromosome 3 (Subbaraya et al., 1994
; Haeseleer et al.,
1999
).
The genes encoding human sGC subunits
3 (equivalent to
1) and
3 (equivalent to
1) have been mapped to chromosome 4q32 (Giuili
et al., 1993
). Because both subunits are required in a 1:1
stoichiometry for activity, their common chromosomal locus may imply a
coordinated regulation of gene expression. The genes encoding
1 and
1 sGC subunits in the medaka fish are organized in tandem within a
34-kb span (Mikami et al., 1999
). The activity of the 5'-upstream
region of each of the medaka fish genes was analyzed using green
fluorescent protein reporter constructs expressed in medaka embryos
(Mikami et al., 1999
). Although the
1 upstream region promoted
expression of green fluorescent protein, the
1 5' region was
insufficient, suggesting expression of the
1- and
1-genes is
coordinated. However, the
2-subunit, which also can form an active
dimer in vitro with
1, is encoded by a gene on chromosome 11 (Yu et
al., 1996
). That
2- and
1-subunits dimerize under physiological
conditions argues against the requirement for coordinated regulation of
expression of
- and
-subunits (Russwurm et al., 1998
).
The structure of several genes for pGC has been determined, and the
organization of their domains is reflected in the conservation of the
intron/exon arrangement. This arrangement is most highly conserved in
the portion of the gene encoding the catalytic and kinase homology
domains. The extracellular domains of the guanylyl cyclases are
conserved among, but not between, subfamilies and the structure varies
most in those parts of the genes. Genes for GC-A and -B are similar in
size (16.5-17.5 kb) and structure, with 22 exons and virtually
identical intron/exon boundaries (Yamaguchi et al., 1990
; Rehemudula et
al., 1999
). However, the size of introns is not conserved between these
genes. Similarly, the guanylyl cyclases in sensory tissue share a
conserved gene structure and have only 20 exons (Yang et al., 1996
).
The gene for GC-C is much larger (>50 kb) than genes encoding the
other guanylyl cyclases and has a unique intron/exon arrangement (S. Schulz, J. Park, and S. A. Waldman, unpublished data). The
structures of the genes for sGC subunits have not yet been reported.
Little is known regarding the regulation of expression of the genes for
guanylyl cyclase. The 5' regulatory regions of genes that have been
sequenced (GC-A, -C, -E) have no typical TATA box and an absent or
inverted CAAT box. While consensus binding sites for many general
transcription factors are present, the elements controlling
tissue-specific expression are only now beginning to be explored. The
GC-A gene promoter has at least three consensus binding sites for Sp1,
a transcription factor that is implicated in the expression of a number
of genes in the vasculature (Liang et al., 1999
). Assays using
electromobility shift and reporter gene techniques have demonstrated
all three sites bind Sp1 and are essential for basal transcription of
the GC-A gene (Liang et al., 1999
). Expression of the gene for GC-A
also is regulated by its ligand, ANP. Levels of GC-A mRNA were
suppressed by ANP in a time- and concentration-dependent manner in
cultured aortic smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and primary cultures of
inner medullary collecting duct cells (Cao et al., 1995
, 1998
). A
cell-permeable analog of cGMP also inhibited transcription of GC-A,
suggesting the second messenger, rather than the natriuretic peptide,
is responsible for modulating gene activity (Cao et al., 1995
, 1998
). The ANP/cGMP-responsive element in the promoter for GC-A has not been identified.
Whereas GC-A is expressed in a variety of cell types and in many
tissues, expression of GC-C in the adult human appears to be confined
to the intestinal epithelium and primary and metastatic colorectal
cancers (Carrithers et al., 1996
). In the marsupial North American
opossum, a guanylyl cyclase-coupled ST receptor, possibly the opossum
ortholog of GC-C, is expressed in epithelial cells of the kidney,
liver, testis, trachea, and intestine (Forte et al., 1989
; London et
al., 1999
). The mRNA for GC-C and binding of radiolabeled ST are
detectable in neonatal and weanling mouse liver, and in fetal,
neonatal, and regenerating rat liver (Laney et al., 1992
, 1994
;
Scheving and Russell, 1996
; Swenson et al., 1996
). Although the
sensitive reverse transcription-PCR technique has been used to
amplify the mRNA for GC-C in a number of tissues, production of cGMP in
response to ST has only been observed outside the intestine in rodent
stomach and inner ear (Krause et al., 1997
; London et al., 1997
).
An initial characterization of the 5' flanking region of the gene for
GC-C, using reporter gene constructs, suggested intestine-specific transcriptional activity lies within the proximal 128 bp (Mann et al.,
1996a
). An analysis of this region, which is conserved between the
human and the mouse, revealed potential binding sites for several
transcription factors. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-4 (HNF-4) binds to a
specific element in the proximal promoter for GC-C and stimulates
expression of GC-C when transfected into a cell line that normally
expresses neither GC-C nor HNF-4 (Swenson et al., 1999
). Mutation of
the HNF-4 binding site abolished activity of the promoter for GC-C in
intestinal cells, demonstrating that HNF-4 is necessary for basal gene
expression (Swenson et al., 1999
).
Recent observations suggest the transcription factor Cdx2 mediates the
intestine-specific expression of GC-C. Cdx2 is a member of the
homeodomain family of transcription factors related to caudal, a
Drosophila protein, and is required for the selective expression of several other genes in intestinal tissues (Traber and
Silberg, 1996
). Deletion, or mutation, of a Cdx2 consensus binding site
in the proximal GC-C gene promoter reduced the activity of a reporter
gene construct expressed in intestinal cells to the level observed in
extraintestinal cells (Park et al., 2000
).
3. Genetic Disorders Associated with Guanylyl Cyclases.
The
only human diseases mapped to a gene for guanylyl cyclase involve
retinal dystrophies. Leber's congenital amaurosis (LCA1), dominant
cone-rod dystrophy (CORD6), cone dystrophy (CORD5), and central areolar
choroidal dystrophy have been mapped to chromosome 17p12-p13, the
interval containing the gene for GC-E (Balciuniene et al., 1995
;
Perrault et al., 1996
; Hughes et al., 1998
; Kelsell et al., 1998
). In
LCA1, the gene for GC-E contains mutations, including frameshifts,
which result in truncated proteins that lack the kinase-like and
catalytic domains due to premature termination of translation or a
missense mutation in the kinase-like domain (Perrault et al., 1996
).
Expression of GC-E with this missense mutation in a heterologous cell
line demonstrated that the mutant protein is stable but not activated
by GCAP1 (Duda et al., 1999
). In CORD6, GC-E contains mutations in the
intracellular dimerization domain (Kelsell et al., 1998
). It was
postulated these mutations might cause a steric change in the
protein that affects both mutant/mutant and mutant/wild-type
dimers and thereby results in the dominant phenotype of CORD6. Indeed,
one of the mutants has an increased affinity for GCAP-1, producing an
enzyme that is stimulated at higher [Ca2+]i
than wild-type GC-E (Tucker et al., 1999
). Thus, an abnormal increase
in [cGMP]i in dark-adapted photoreceptor cells may be the
cause of their degeneration. When the gene encoding GC-E was eliminated
in mice by targeted disruption, cones disappeared by 5 weeks of age
(Yang et al., 1999
). Although the numbers and morphology of rods from
GC-E null mice were similar to those from wild-type mice and the dark
current was normal, retinas from null mice had a decreased response to
light. The reason for the paradoxical rod behavior is not known.
Genetic alterations in other members of the guanylyl cyclase family are
not associated with any described disease phenotype in humans. Several
of the genes encoding guanylyl cyclases have been functionally
eliminated in mice by targeted disruption. This approach can provide
insight into the normal physiological role of a gene product. Targeted
disruption of the GC-A gene resulted in mice with salt-resistant
hypertension (Lopez et al., 1995
; Oliver et al., 1997
). GC-A null mice
were unable to respond either to an infusion of ANP or to acute volume
expansion, stimuli that induced diuresis and natriuresis in their
wild-type littermates (Kishimoto et al., 1996
). Null mice developed
cardiac hypertrophy. In one study, all GC-A null male mice died of
congestive heart failure or aortic dissection by 6 months of age
(Oliver et al., 1997
; Franco et al., 1998
). Thus, the GC-A null mice
exhibit many of the features of human essential hypertension and may
prove to be a valuable model in which to study and develop treatment for this disease. Alterations in the sGC signaling pathway also may
contribute to the development of hypertension. In the spontaneously hypertensive rat, an animal model for hypertension, the expression of
both
1- and
1-subunits of sGC and the expression of
cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) I are reduced in the aorta (Ruetten
et al., 1999
). The reduction in expression was observed even in young (normotensive) spontaneously hypertensive rats, suggesting this is an
early event in the pathogenesis of the disease.
The gene encoding GC-C has also been subjected to targeted disruption
(Mann et al., 1997
; Schulz et al., 1997
). Null mice were viable and
healthy and were resistant to infection with the enterotoxigenic
bacteria that cause diarrhea and death in wild-type mice. The normal
physiological role of GC-C therefore remains undefined.
B. Membrane-Bound Guanylyl Cyclases
1. Introduction.
Seven eutherian mammalian pGC isoforms (GC-A
to GC-G) have been identified (Table 2). They exhibit highly conserved
domain structures, including (1) an extracellular binding domain at the N terminus that in some cases binds defined ligands (GC-A, -B, -C), (2)
a single transmembrane domain, (3) a cytoplasmic juxtamembrane domain,
(4) a regulatory domain that shares significant homology with protein
kinases, (5) a hinge region, and (6) a C-terminal catalytic domain
(Fig. 1). Isoforms expressed in
intestinal mucosal cells (GC-C) and in sensory organs (GC-D, -E, -F)
also possess a C-terminal tail.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Domain structure of guanylyl cyclases. The cognate
domains of ANPCRs, pGCs, and sGCs are compared. ANPCRs are homodimeric
truncated guanylyl cyclases that possess extracellular ligand binding,
transmembrane, and juxtamembrane domains but lack kinase homology,
hinge, and catalytic domains. The pGC illustrated is a homodimer
modeled after GC-A and -B and possesses a single ligand-binding site
formed by two extracellular amino terminal domains. In addition to the
domains present in ANPCRs, pGCs also possess kinase homology domains,
hinge regions, and catalytic domains that form two functional catalytic
sites. GC-C, -D, -E, and -F possess a carboxyl terminal tail that is
not depicted here. sGCs are heterodimers possessing amino terminal
regulatory domains containing a heme prosthetic group with a ferrous
(Fe2+) core that forms an imidazole axial bond with
His105 of the -subunit. In addition, sGCs possess
dimerization domains and carboxyl terminal catalytic domains that form
one active and one inactive (flat blue) catalytic site. Colors identify
domains with significant homology.
|
|
Based on their ligand specificities, pGCs have been classified as (1)
natriuretic peptide receptors, (2) intestinal peptide-binding receptors, and (3) orphan receptors (Table 2). GC-A and GC-B bind to
and are activated by natriuretic peptides, including ANP, BNP, and
C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP). GC-C originally was characterized as
the receptor for the family of homologous STs that produce secretory
diarrhea. Recently, endogenous mammalian peptides, including guanylin,
uroguanylin, and lymphoguanylin, were demonstrated to bind to and
activate GC-C (Currie et al., 1992
; Hamra et al., 1993
; Forte et al.,
1999
). GC-D, -E, -F, and -G are orphan receptors for which ligands
remain to be identified.
PGCs are expressed in almost all tissues in placental mammals (Table
2). GC-A mRNA is highly expressed in kidney, adrenal, and adipose
tissue, and at lower levels in terminal ileum and human placenta (Lowe
et al., 1989
). GC-B mRNA is abundant in brain, lung, and kidney (Schulz
et al., 1989
). The mRNA for GC-C has been identified not only in
intestinal mucosal cells in adult placental mammals, but also in many
epithelia in marsupials (Forte et al., 1988
; Schulz et al., 1990
;
Carrithers et al., 1996
). In the central nervous system, GC-D is
expressed in a subpopulation of olfactory sensory neurons, GC-E is
expressed in retinal rod and cone cells, whereas GC-F is expressed only
in retinal rod cells (Fülle et al., 1995
; Yang et al., 1995
).
GC-G is predominantly expressed in the lung, the intestine, and
skeletal muscle (Schulz et al., 1998b
). Thus, the natriuretic peptide
receptor-like cyclases, including GC-A, -B, and -G, are broadly
expressed in many tissues. In contrast, GC-C and the sensory organ
cyclases, GC-D, -E, and -F, all possess a C-terminal tail and are
expressed in a tissue-specific fashion.
2. Isotypes of Particulate Guanylyl Cyclases.
a. Natriuretic Peptide Receptors.
Mammalian atrial
cardiomyocytes produce ANP, which mediates a pleiotropic response
designed to maintain cardiovascular homeostasis in the face of a
pressure or volume challenge (de Bold, 1985
). Thus, ANP induces
natriuresis, diuresis, and hypotension and inhibits secretion of renin
and aldosterone (de Bold et al., 1981
; Atarashi et al., 1984a
,b
).
Indeed, ANP appears to mediate short- and long-term control of blood
pressure and fluid and electrolyte balance (de Bold, 1985
; John et al.,
1995
, 1996
; Lopez et al., 1995
; Kishimoto et al., 1996
; Oliver et al.,
1997
; Franco et al., 1998
). In addition to ANP, other natriuretic
peptides identified to date include BNP and CNP. ANP is synthesized as
a prepro-polypeptide of 151 residues in which the C-terminal portion
contains the biologically active sequences (de Bold, 1985
). The
circulating form of this hormone is the mature 28-amino acid peptide
consisting of a 17-amino acid loop stabilized by a single intrachain
disulfide bridge and N- and C-terminal extensions, all of which are
required for biological activity. BNP is a 26-amino acid peptide that
was first isolated from acid extracts of porcine brain (Sudoh et al.,
1988
). Subsequently, this peptide also was identified in heart and
blood (Aburaya et al., 1989
). The disulfide-stabilized 17-amino acid
ring and C-terminal sequence, essential for ANP bioactivity, are
conserved in BNP. The genes encoding ANP and BNP are organized in
tandem, and in humans, the BNP gene is located upstream of ANP (Huang
et al., 1996
; Tamura et al., 1996b
). CNP is a 22-amino acid peptide
that was first identified in acid extracts of porcine brain. CNP
contains the disulfide-stabilized 17-residue ring structure found in
ANP and BNP. In contrast, CNP lacks a C-terminal extension and the N-terminal region is not homologous with that of ANP and BNP. Although
CNP induces natriuresis, diuresis, and vascular smooth muscle
relaxation, it is significantly less potent than ANP or BNP (Sudoh et
al., 1990
).
The principal signaling mechanism by which natriuretic peptides induce
their physiological effects involves activation of guanylyl
cyclase-coupled receptors and accumulation of
[cGMP]i. ANP has a selective affinity for GC-A,
compared with GC-B, with a concentration for half-maximal response that
is 1,000 times lower for the former than the latter (Schulz et al.,
1989
). ANP binding to GC-A has been demonstrated by both ligand binding
analysis and affinity cross-linking studies (Leitman et al., 1988
;
Chinkers et al., 1989
; Lowe et al., 1989
; Jewett et al., 1993
). ANP
increases [cGMP]i in a concentration- and
time-dependent fashion in a variety of cells and tissues (Chinkers et
al., 1989
; Schulz et al., 1989
). Similarly, ANP activates guanylyl
cyclase in cell-free membranes prepared from various cells and tissues
(Hamet et al., 1984
; Waldman et al., 1984
; Leitman et al., 1987
). The
concentration-dependence of guanylyl cyclase activation and
[cGMP]i accumulation induced by ANP compares
favorably with that of receptor binding (Wong et al., 1995
).
Heterologous expression of GC-A in cells lacking endogenous expression
of this protein results in the development of the ability of ANP to
specifically bind to those cells, increase their pGC activity, and
induce intracellular accumulation of [cGMP]i (Chinkers et al., 1989
). ANP does not bind to tissues from animals that
are homozygous null mutants for GC-A. These animals do not undergo
natriuresis or diuresis in response to ANP and their aortic rings do
not relax in response to that peptide (Kishimoto et al., 1996
; Lopez et
al., 1997
). Furthermore, ANP directly activates GC-A purified from
mammalian tissues (Kuno et al., 1986
; Inagami et al., 1991
; Waldman et
al., 1991
).
The endogenous receptor for BNP also appears to be GC-A, but BNP is
10-fold less potent than ANP in stimulating that receptor (Goeddel,
1991
). BNP increases guanylyl cyclase activity and accumulation of
[cGMP]i in cells and tissues in a pattern that
mimics that of ANP (Goeddel, 1991
). Similarly, BNP binds to
heterologously expressed GC-A and increases guanylyl cyclase activity
and [cGMP]i accumulation in those cells (Schulz
et al., 1989
). Aortic rings from animals that are homozygous null
mutants for GC-A do not relax in response to BNP (Lopez et al., 1997
).
The primary ligand for GC-B is CNP. Although ANP and BNP bind to this
receptor with low affinity, CNP has a 50- to 500-fold greater affinity
for GC-B than the other natriuretic peptides (Koller et al., 1991
). CNP
stimulates guanylyl cyclase activity and increases
[cGMP]i in cells and tissues that express GC-B
(Moriwaki et al., 1998
; Chrisman and Garbers, 1999
; Tao et al., 1999
).
Also, CNP binds to cells in which GC-B is heterologously expressed and increases activity of guanylyl cyclase and accumulation of
[cGMP]i in those cells (Koller et al., 1991
;
Chrisman et al., 1993
). CNP induces physiological effects in animals
that are homozygous null mutants for GC-A (Lopez et al., 1997
).
b. Intestinal Peptide Receptor Guanylyl
Cyclase.
GC-Coriginally was identified and cloned
from mRNA extracted from intestinal mucosal cells (Schulz et al.,
1990
). Although GC-C possesses the conserved domain structure
characteristic of the guanylyl cyclase family (Fig. 1), it does not
serve as a receptor for natriuretic peptides. The first ligand
identified for GC-C was ST, and binding of ST to GC-C activates
guanylyl cyclase and increases [cGMP]i in intestinal
cells (Schulz et al., 1990
). ST is produced by bacteria that colonize
the intestine, including Escherichia coli, Enterobacter
sp., Klebsiella sp., and Yersinia enterocolitica (Rao et al., 1979
; Thorne et al., 1979
). This
peptide contains six cysteines that form three intrachain disulfide
bridges which stabilize the tertiary structure and confer the
heat-stability characteristic of ST (Guerrant et al., 1980
;
Gariépy et al., 1987
). Reduction of the disulfide bridges
eliminates the ability of ST to bind to receptors, stimulate
transmembrane signaling, and induce intestinal secretion and diarrhea
(Staples et al., 1980
). GC-C appears to be the only identified receptor
for ST that is expressed in adult placental mammals (Guerrant et al., 1980
). ST binds to GC-C in a concentration- and time-dependent manner
(Guarino et al., 1987
). Similarly, GC-C is activated by ST in a
concentration-dependent manner and is not influenced by natriuretic
peptides (Schulz et al., 1990
; Krause et al., 1994a
). Specific
association of ST and GC-C has been demonstrated by ligand binding
analysis and affinity cross-linking (Guarino et al., 1987
; Schulz et
al., 1990
; Hugues et al., 1992
). Interaction of ST and GC-C activates
guanylyl cyclase in cell-free membranes prepared from intestinal cells
(Gazzano et al., 1991a
; Hugues et al., 1991
). Similarly, ST induces
accumulation of [cGMP]i in cells derived from intestine
(Guerrant et al., 1980
; Rao et al., 1980
). Heterologous expression of
GC-C confers specific ST binding to cells (Schulz et al., 1990
; de
Sauvage et al., 1991
; Deshmane et al., 1995
). Similarly, ST activates
guanylyl cyclase and induces [cGMP]i accumulation in
cells heterologously expressing GC-C (Schulz et al., 1990
; de Sauvage
et al., 1991
). Disruption of the gene encoding GC-C results in mice
that are resistant to ST-induced secretory diarrhea (Mann et al., 1997
;
Schulz et al., 1997
). Homogenates of intestinal membranes from GC-C
null animals specifically bind ST at very low levels, potentially
identifying a binding protein other than GC-C (Mann et al., 1997
).
However, that novel binding protein has not yet been identified or
characterized. Thus, GC-C remains the only identified receptor for ST
and directly mediates the pathophysiological consequences of
ligand-receptor interaction, including secretory diarrhea. A detailed
discussion of the postreceptor mechanisms mediating ST-induced
intestinal secretion is presented in a later section.
Unlike natriuretic peptide receptors, significant expression of GC-C
appears limited to intestinal mucosal cells found from the duodenum to
the rectum in adult placental mammals (Krause et al., 1994a
).
Expression of GC-C in intestinal, but not extraintestinal, cells has
been identified by specific ST binding, stimulation of guanylyl
cyclase, accumulation of cGMP, and detection of specific mRNA (Guerrant
et al., 1980
; Guarino et al., 1987
; Schulz et al., 1990
; Hugues et al.,
1992
; Krause et al., 1994a
). Similarly, intestinal mucosal cells
continue to express functional GC-C after undergoing neoplastic
transformation to colorectal adenocarcinomas. Detection of this protein
or its specific mRNA in extraintestinal sites appears to be a sensitive
and specific marker for detecting metastatic colorectal cancer cells
(Carrithers et al., 1996
; Waldman et al., 1998
; Cagir et al., 1999
).
Functional GC-C also has been detected in regenerating rat liver after
surgical or chemical hepatectomy, but the functional significance of
this observation remains to be elucidated (Laney et al., 1994
). In
contrast to placental mammals, GC-C in marsupials is expressed in the
epithelia of the gut, gall bladder, lung, renal, and testis (Forte et
al., 1988
, 1989
; White et al., 1989
).
ST-like peptides that bind to and stimulate GC-C have been isolated
from mammals. Guanylin and uroguanylin were isolated from intestinal
mucosa; uroguanylin also has been isolated from urine (Currie et al.,
1992
; Hamra et al., 1993
). These peptides share significant homology
with ST, and their tertiary structure stabilized by two intrachain
disulfide bonds is essential for biological activity (Currie et al.,
1992
; Hamra et al., 1993
). The precise physiological importance of
guanylin and uroguanylin remains to be elucidated. They may play a role
in the regulation of fluid and electrolytes in the intestine (Hamra et
al., 1993
). However, mice that are homozygous null mutants for GC-C
appear to develop normally, with normal intestinal function (Mann et
al., 1997
; Schulz et al., 1997
). Uroguanylin, guanylin, and ST appear
to induce natriuresis, diuresis, and kaliuresis in rodent kidney. These
peptides may play a role in regulating fluid and electrolytes in the
intestinal-renal axis (Greenberg et al., 1997
; Fonteles et al., 1998
).
However, it is notable that analysis by sensitive nested reverse
transcription-PCR does not detect expression of mRNA for GC-C in the
kidney (Carrithers et al., 1996
). Recently, a novel mRNA transcript
encoding lymphoguanylin, a polypeptide related to guanylin and
uroguanylin, was identified in spleen and lymphoid tissues from opossum
(Forte et al., 1999
). In these studies, the cDNA of lymphoguanylin was
produced from isolated RNA and used to synthesize a putative endogenous
peptide. Although ST, guanylin, and uroguanylin possess multiple
disulfide bonds, synthetic lymphoguanylin contains only a single
intrachain disulfide bond yet is biologically active (Forte et al.,
1999
). Because these studies did not isolate an endogenous peptide from
tissues, the significance of this finding remains to be established.
c. Orphan Receptor Guanylyl Cyclases.
PGCs for which
endogenous ligands have not yet been identified are categorized as
orphan receptors. Ligands known to activate other guanylyl cyclases do
not activate GC-D, -E, -F, or -G (Fülle et al., 1995
; Yang et
al., 1995
; Schulz et al., 1998b
). The primary structures of GC-D, -E,
and -F extracellular domains are homologous, and the expression of
these pGCs is restricted to sensory tissues (Yang et al., 1995
). The
ligand of GC-G may resemble the natriuretic peptides because the
extracellular domain of this pGC is homologous to that of the
natriuretic peptide receptors (Schulz et al., 1998b
).
3. Structure of Particulate Guanylyl Cyclases.
a. Extracellular Domain.
Extracellular domains of pGCs
exhibit the least homology among the members of the family. This
diversity in structure presumably reflects the functional specificity
of binding and induction of transmembrane signaling by different
ligands. The precise molecular mechanisms mediating interaction of
ligand with the extracellular domain and coupling of ligand binding
with activation of the catalytic domain remain to be defined. In GC-B,
Glu332 appears to be required for CNP binding and signaling
because its removal or substitution with His or Lys results in complete
loss of cyclase activity (Duda et al., 1994
). However, it is not known
whether Glu322 is essential for proper folding of receptor
protein required for ligand binding, or if it is located in the binding
site for the ligand (Duda et al., 1994
). Similarly, amino acids 387 to
393 in the extracellular domain of GC-C interact directly with and are
required for binding to ST (Hasegawa et al., 1999
).
i. Glycosylation of Receptors.
All mammalian pGCs, except
GC-F, contain at least one N-linked glycosylation site in
the extracellular domain, although the extent of glycosylation varies
among receptors (Chinkers et al., 1989
). Glycosylation results in
heterogeneity in the size of guanylyl cyclase receptors. Thus,
pulse-chase studies revealed two species of GC-A that are synthesized
during the first 7.5 h of incubation, but only one species in
incubations longer than 7.5 h. The two species identified in
shorter incubations were heterogeneously glycosylated GC-A, and the
less glycosylated receptor served as a precursor for the fully
glycosylated protein (Lowe and Fendly, 1992
). Similarly, affinity
labeling of GC-C with radiolabeled ST revealed multiple, specifically
labeled proteins that could be resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE) (Thompson and Giannella, 1990
; Hugues et al.,
1992
). Heterologously expressed GC-C also yielded multiple receptor
proteins specifically labeled with ST, demonstrating they were derived
from a single transcript by post-translational processing (de
Sauvage et al., 1992
; Vaandrager et al., 1993a
,b
). Receptors of
different sizes were converted to a single molecular weight by treating
membranes with endoglycosidase, which removes N-linked
carbohydrates (Vaandrager et al., 1993a
). Similarly, cells grown in
tunicamycin, an inhibitor of glycosylation, generated a single receptor
species (Vaandrager et al., 1993a
).
Glycosylation appears to play a role in the binding of ligand to the
extracellular domain of pGCs. In a study performed in human embryonic
kidney cells that were stably transfected with GC-A, fully glycoslyated
GC-A specifically bound ANP, but removal of carbohydrate residues with
endoglycosidase prevented binding of ANP to this receptor (Lowe and
Fendly, 1992
). In other studies performed in rat glioma cells that were
stably transfected with GC-A, inhibition of N-glycosylation
of GC-A by tunicamycin did not alter the ability of ANP to bind to
cells and activate guanylyl cyclase (Heim et al., 1996
). However,
tunicamycin pretreatment inhibited the response of GC-A to ANP analogs,
such as urodilatin [ANP (95-126)] (Heim et al., 1996
). The different
results obtained in these two studies might reflect differences in the
type of ANP (native or analog) used. Similarly, when membranes prepared from cells that heterologously express GC-B were treated with endoglycosidase to remove carbohydrate from glycosylated sites in the
protein, binding of CNP to the membranes was lost (Fenrick et al.,
1996
). Also, the activity of GC-B that had been deglycosylated was
lower under stimulated conditions compared with the activity of fully
glycosylated receptor (Fenrick et al., 1996
). In close agreement,
deglycosylation with endoglycosidase eliminated ST binding from the
extracellular domain of GC-C (Hasegawa et al., 1999b
). Studies in which
each of the N-linked glycosylation sites was replaced with
Ala demonstrated that Asn379, which is close to
the transmembrane domain, was required for ligand binding and catalytic
activity (Hasegawa et al., 1999a
). Although glycosylation is important
for binding of ligand, it does not appear to be required for
distribution of receptors to the cell surface (Lowe and Fendly, 1992
;
Fenrick et al., 1996
; Hasegawa et al., 1999b
).GC-D contains two potential N-linked glycosylation sites,
whereas GC-E only contains one (Fülle et al., 1995
; Yang et al., 1995
). The extracellular domain of GC-G contains five potential N-linked glycosylation sites and is about 40% homologous
with the extracellular domain of GC-A (Schulz et al., 1998b
). Whether glycosylation of these orphan receptors is essential for expression on
the cell surface or for transducing a signal has not yet been determined.
ii. Cysteines and Oligomerization of Receptors.
All mammalian
pGCs have two conserved cysteine residues at the N terminus and one
midway in the extracellular domain (Chinkers et al., 1989
; Schulz et
al., 1989
, 1990
, 1998b
; Fülle et al., 1995
; Yang et al., 1995
;
Foster et al., 1999
). All pGCs, except GC-C, also contain two conserved
cysteine residues at the C-terminus of the extracellular domain
proximal to the membrane-spanning domain (Chinkers et al., 1989
; Schulz
et al., 1989
, 1990
, 1998b
; Fülle et al., 1995
; Yang et al.,
1995
). GC-C shares two cysteine residues that are located midway in the
extracellular domain with GC-A, but shares only one cysteine residue
with other pGCs (Chinkers et al., 1989
; Schulz et al., 1989
, 1990
,
1998b
; Fülle et al., 1995
; Yang et al., 1995
). Historically, it
has been presumed that the cysteines in the extracellular domain form
intrachain disulfide bonds important for stabilizing the tertiary
structure of the receptor, similar to their function in other members
of the superfamily of growth factor receptors (Itakura et al., 1994
;
Stults et al., 1994
). The ANP clearance receptor (ANPCR), a truncated
isoform of GC-A that lacks the cytoplasmic domain beyond the
juxtamembrane domain, possesses five cysteines in the extracellular
domain (Lowe et al., 1990a
) (Fig. 1). Site-specific mutagenesis
demonstrated the first four cysteines are joined sequentially, forming
Cys104-Cys132 and
Cys209-Cys257 intrachain disulfide bridges
(Itakura et al., 1994
; Iwashina et al., 1994
). The precise role of
these intrachain disulfide bridges in the function of the extracellular
domain and in transmembrane signaling remains to be defined.
Cysteine residues in the extracellular domain appear to mediate
ligand-independent oligomerization of receptor monomers (Chinkers and
Wilson, 1992
). In ANPCR, the fifth cysteine in the extracellular domain
(Cys469) is proximal to the membrane-spanning
domain and forms an interchain disulfide bridge that stabilizes a
dimeric structure (Itakura et al., 1994
). Heterologously expressed
human GC-A migrates as high molecular weight oligomeric complexes when subjected to SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions. These oligomeric complexes can be converted to monomers after SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions (Lowe, 1992
). Truncated mutants of GC-A possessing only the
extracellular domain also form oligomeric complexes, supporting the
suggestion that the extracellular domain contributes the cysteines that
form the interchain disulfide bonds mediating oligomerization (Lowe,
1992
). GC-A from bovine adrenal gland migrates as a tetrameric 550-kDa
complex when subjected to SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions but as
a 140-kDa monomer when exposed to reducing conditions (Iwata et al.,
1991
). GC-C migrates as complexes of high molecular weight when
subjected to SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions, but these complexes
were converted to monomers on exposure to reducing conditions (Ivens et
al., 1990
). Heterologously expressed GC-C also forms higher order
complexes that are converted to monomers on exposure to reducing
conditions (Vaandrager et al., 1993a
,b
).These data support the suggestion that, in the absence of ligands, pGCs
spontaneously form complexes that are stabilized by disulfide bonds in
the extracellular domain. Those cysteines that contribute to the
formation of interchain disulfide bridges remain to be defined for each
isoform of guanylyl cyclase. GC-A mutants, in which
Cys423 near the membrane-spanning domain was
replaced, spontaneously formed interchain disulfide bonds and underwent dimerization, presumably mediated by Cys432 that
was unpaired in the mutant protein (Labrecque et al., 1999
). However,
the relevance of this observation to native receptors is unclear
because dimerization in this study was associated with constitutive
activity (Labrecque et al., 1999
). Furthermore, GC-C, which also
undergoes ligand-independent oligomerization, does not possess these
conserved cysteines proximal to the membrane-spanning domain (Hasegawa
et al., 1999b
).
b. Transmembrane Domain.
All pGCs have a single transmembrane
domain similar to that in other members of the superfamily of growth
factor receptors. The
-helix found in the transmembrane domain
creates a hydrophobic region that permits insertion into the
hydrophobic membrane lipid bilayer. Deletion of hydrophobic amino acids
in the transmembrane domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor
(EGFR) did not alter ligand binding or dimerization, suggesting this
domain is required for localization to the membrane, but not for signal transduction (Kashles et al., 1988
). In contrast, deletions in the
transmembrane domain of the transforming growth factor-
receptor alter its ability to mediate transmembrane signaling (Zhu and Sizeland,
1999
). In addition to membrane insertion, transmembrane domains may
facilitate receptor oligomerization through
helix-helix interactions (Lemmon and Engelman, 1994
; Lemmon et al., 1994
). The
precise role of the transmembrane domain in pGCs beyond membrane localization remains to be defined. However, it is notable that truncated mutants of GC-A and GC-C, which contain the extracellular domain but lack the transmembrane domain, are capable of forming dimers
and binding ligand (Chinkers and Wilson, 1992
; Hasegawa et al., 1999b
).
c. Juxtamembrane domain.
The juxtamembrane domain is a short
region of approximately 25 amino acids distal to the transmembrane
domain in the cytoplasmic region of the protein. Although a precise
function has not been ascribed to this domain, it may mediate alternate
signaling mechanisms involving pGCs. This region in pGCs contains a
consensus sequence that exists in other single transmembrane domain
receptors and is important for their coupling to heterotrimeric G
proteins (G proteins) and their downstream effectors.
Traditionally, G proteins are activated by the heptahelical family of
receptors (Gudermann et al., 1995
). However, members of the single
transmembrane domain growth factor receptor superfamily, of which pGCs
are members, also activate G proteins and signal through their
downstream effectors. These receptors include EGFR, the insulin-like
growth factor receptor, and the insulin receptor (Okamoto et al., 1990
;
Okamoto and Nishimoto, 1991
; Ramirez et al., 1995
; Krieger-Brauer et
al., 1997). All the G protein-coupled single transmembrane domain
receptors contain a consensus sequence in their juxtamembrane domains.
This consensus sequence interacts with and activates G proteins. The
consensus sequence ranges in length from 14 to 20 amino acids, contains
two basic residues in the N-terminal end and a BBXXB motif in the
C-terminal end (B is a basic residue and X is a nonbasic, nonaromatic
residue). Interestingly, GC-A, -B, and -C contain this consensus
sequence in a homologous position in their juxtamembrane domains.
Similarly, ANPCR possesses the above consensus sequence in its
juxtamembrane domain (Fuller et al., 1988
; Lowe et al., 1990a
). This
truncated guanylyl cyclase has a short cytoplasmic domain of 37 amino
acids (Lowe et al., 1990a
) (Fig. 1). ANPCR binds ANP, BNP, and CNP, and
its primary function appears to be clearance of natriuretic peptides
from the circulation through constitutive ligand-independent
endocytosis (Nussenzveig et al., 1990
). However, this receptor also
regulates a variety of physiological processes (Anand-Srivastava and
Trachte, 1993
), including inhibition of adenylyl cyclase in rat and
human platelets (Anand-Srivastava et al., 1991
; Marcil et al., 1996
),
atrial and ventricular cardiocytes (Anand-Srivastava and Cantin, 1986
),
rat heart (Anand-Srivastava et al., 1996
), and pheochromocytoma cells
(Drewett et al., 1992
). ANPCR also regulates cellular growth in
hepatoblastoma cells (Rashed et al., 1993
), proliferation and invasion
of matrix by endothelial cells (Pedram et al., 1997
),
[Ca2+]i in adrenal
glomerulosa cells (Isales et al., 1992
), activation of endothelial NO
synthase (eNOS) in gastric SMCs (Murthy et al., 1998
), activation of
phospholipase C-
3 in tenia coli SMCs (Murthy and Makhlouf, 1999
),
and inhibition of MAP kinase in astrocytes (Prins et al., 1996
).
Of significance, the juxtamembrane domain of ANPCR is required for
receptor signaling (Murthy and Makhlouf, 1999
). Antibodies directed
against the cytoplasmic domain of ANPCR prevent signaling by this
domain (Anand-Srivastava et al., 1996
). Also, the juxtamembrane domain
interacts with Go in membranes isolated from PC12
cells, presumably mediating inhibition of catecholamine secretion by ANP (Takida et al., 1999
). Similarly, heterologously expressed ANPCR
was coupled to activation of coexpressed eNOS through
Gi in gastric SMCs (Murthy et al., 1998
). In
tenia coli SMCs, interaction of ANPCR with Gi and
activation of phospholipase C-
3 by the 
-subunit of
Gi was mediated by the juxtamembrane domain
consensus sequence. Mutation of the sequence eliminated coupling
between the clearance receptor and activation of phospholipase C-
3
(Murthy and Makhlouf, 1999
).
These studies demonstrate that the G protein-regulating consensus
sequence within the context of the juxtamembrane domain of a member of
the guanylyl cyclase family can couple with G proteins and regulate
downstream effectors in a ligand-dependent manner. This consensus
sequence mediates alternate transmembrane signaling in other single
transmembrane receptors including EGFR, insulin-like growth factor
receptor, and insulin receptor. These observations suggest the
intriguing possibility that pGCs may signal through different pathways,
including synthesis of cGMP through activation of the catalytic domain
and regulation of G protein-coupled effectors through the consensus
sequence in the juxtamembrane domain.
d. Kinase Homology Domain.
i. Structure.
All pGCs possess between the
juxtamembrane and catalytic domains a ~250-residue kinase homology
domain (KHD) that is absent in sGCs. The KHDs of pGCs are
~30% homologous with a wide range of protein kinases (Koller et al.,
1992
). Generally, protein kinases contain 11 conserved subdomains and
33 invariant amino acids that are critical for kinase activity (Hanks
et al., 1988
). Within the natriuretic peptide receptor-like cyclases,
GC-A, GC-B, and GC-G, the KHD possesses 9, 9, or 8 of the conserved
subdomains and 28, 27, or 22 of the invariant residues, respectively.
The intestinal receptor cyclase GC-C contains 8 of the conserved
subdomains and 25 of the 33 invariant residues and is 30% conserved
relative to GC-A and GC-B (Koller et al., 1992
). The sensory organ
cyclases, GC-D, -E, and -F contain 9, 7, or 8 of the conserved
subdomains and 22, 21, or 22 of the invariant residues, respectively.
An invariant aspartate residue found in subdomain VI of protein
kinases, which functions as the catalytic base, is substituted in all
pGCs (Knighton et al., 1991
; Taylor et al., 1992
). Similarly, the
glycine-rich region of subdomain I (GXGXXG) that mediates nucleotide
binding to protein kinases is present in GC-A and -B, but absent in
GC-C. This structural difference may underlie some of the functional differences in regulation of these receptors by adenine nucleotides (Koller et al., 1992
).
ii. Kinase Activity.
All protein kinases contain an HRD
consensus sequence in subdomain VI in which the acidic Asp mediates the
transfer of a phosphate group from ATP to the appropriate substrate
(Hanks et al., 1988
). The HRD consensus sequence is absent from the JH2
domain of the JAK protein kinase family, which does not exhibit kinase
activity (Foster et al., 1999
). Similarly, mutation of the invariant
Asp to Asn in c-Kit and v-Fps results in loss of kinase activity (Moran et al., 1988
; Tan et al., 1990
). This catalytic Asp residue is replaced
in all pGCs, commonly by Ser, Arg, or Asn. Thus, the prevailing
hypothesis is that pGCs do not possess kinase activity, reflecting the
absence of the catalytic Asp residue in subdomain VI (Potter and
Hunter, 1998b
). Although no other guanylyl cyclase possesses protein
kinase activity, retinal pGC exhibits intrinsic kinase activity
(Aparicio and Applebury, 1996
). Thus, ATP binds to purified retinal
guanylyl cyclase at a site distinct from the catalytic GTP
substrate-binding site. The protein kinase activity is
magnesium-dependent, autophosphorylates serine residues, and transfers
phosphate groups to myelin basic protein. The
Km for ATP is 81 µM, and the kinase
activity is unaffected by cyclic nucleotides, phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate (PMA), L-
-phosphatidylserine, or
Ca2+, but is inhibited by staurosporine. These properties
are distinct from other Ser/Thr kinases identified in rod outer
segments including protein kinase A, protein kinase C (PKC), and
rhodopsin kinase. This observation of intrinsic kinase and
autophosphorylation activity in a pGC remains an isolated result, and
its functional significance continues to be unclear.
iii. Phosphorylation.
Receptor guanylyl cyclases exist as
phosphoproteins in the basal state. Upon binding of ligand,
dephosphorylation of the receptor occurs, resulting in desensitization
and a reduction in ligand-induced guanylyl cyclase activity. GC-A
possesses six phosphorylation sites within the KHD, including
Ser497, Thr500, Ser502,
Ser506, Ser510, and Thr513, that
are necessary for ligand-dependent activation of GC-A (Potter and
Garbers, 1992
; Koller et al., 1993
; Potter and Hunter, 1998b
). Mutation
of these sites individually to Ala reduced GC-A activation by ANP, and
replacement of five of the sites simultaneously yielded a receptor that
was unresponsive to ligand. Similarly, GC-B exists as a phosphoprotein
in the basal state when no ligand is bound to the receptor. GC-B
possesses five residues within the KHD, including Ser513,
Thr516, Ser518, Ser523, and
Ser526, that are phosphorylated (Potter and Hunter, 1998a
).
As in GC-A, the phosphorylation state of GC-B at these residues
correlates with catalytic responsiveness, and dephosphorylation results
in desensitization. Mutation of these five residues to Ala results in a
90% decrease in CNP-dependent cyclase activity, demonstrating that
phosphorylation of these sites is necessary for ligand-induced
activation of GC-B.
e. Hinge Region.
The hinge region is a 43-residue domain in
GC-A between the KHD and catalytic domain. This region mediates
dimerization of catalytic subunits and is required for the expression
of enzymatic activity. Truncated mutants of GC-A possessing only the
catalytic domain migrate on SDS-PAGE as monomers that are devoid of
enzymatic activity (Wilson and Chinkers, 1995
). However,
truncated mutants inclusive of the hinge region migrate as homodimers
on SDS-PAGE and possess guanylyl cyclase catalytic activity (Thompson
and Garbers, 1995
; Wilson and Chinkers, 1995
). The primary structure of
the hinge domain is consistent with a coiled coil configuration that
favors specific protein-protein interactions (Thompson and Garbers,
1995
; Wilson and Chinkers, 1995
). Indeed, incorporating this sequence
into a yeast two-hybrid system demonstrated the hinge domain mediates
spontaneous formation of protein multimers (Wilson and Chinkers, 1995
).
The hinge region mediates dimerization of catalytic subunits.
Dimerization is generally required for catalytic activity of sGC, pGCs,
and adenylyl cyclases (Thompson and Garbers, 1995
; Wilson and Chinkers,
1995
). In addition, this region may play a larger role in mediating
holoreceptor dimerization because truncation mutants of GC-A lacking
cytoplasmic domains failed to form dimers or higher-order structures in
one study (Lowe, 1992
). Whether this domain is necessary for
dimerization of catalytic subunits or plays a role in mediating
receptor oligomerization in guanylyl cyclases other than GC-A remains
to be elucidated.
f. Catalytic Domain.
i. Dimerization of Catalytic Domains Is Required for Enzymatic
Activity.
Guanylyl cyclases must undergo dimerization to express
catalytic activity. Heterodimeric sGCs require coexpression of both
- and
-subunits for catalytic activity, and expression of either subunit individually yields catalytically inactive protein (Harteneck et al., 1990
; Buechler et al., 1991
). Expression of truncated
and
catalytic domains in Sf9 cells yielded catalytically active heterodimers (Wedel et al., 1995
). Mammalian adenylyl cyclases contain
two catalytic domains in a single polypeptide chain (Krupinski et al.,
1989
). The hinge region in GC-A, discussed above, is absolutely required for GC-A catalytic subunits to dimerize and express catalytic activity (Thompson and Garbers, 1995
; Wilson and Chinkers, 1995
). Similarly, GC-C forms oligomers in a ligand-independent fashion that
are important for producing catalytically active protein (Hasegawa et
al., 1999b
). Interestingly, coexpression of the
1-subunit of sGC and
the C-terminal catalytic domain of adenylyl cyclase (type I, II, or V),
each of which is inactive when expressed alone, produced a
catalytically active adenylyl cyclase (Weitmann et al., 1999
). This
chimeric enzyme was regulated by P-site inhibitors but was not
stimulated by G
s or forskolin. These data
support the suggestion that two catalytic domains are required for
expression of nucleotide cyclase activity. Also, they support the
suggestion that the catalytic domains of adenylyl and guanylyl cyclase
are structurally and functionally homologous.
ii. Determinants of Purine Specificity.
The primary structure
of the catalytic domain is highly conserved in both pGCs and sGCs and
closely related to the catalytic domain of adenylyl cyclases (Krupinski
et al., 1989
). Thus, insights into the function of guanylyl cyclase
catalytic domains were obtained using the solution structure of the
X-ray crystal of the rat type II adenylyl cyclase C2
catalytic domain. This provided critical information about substrate
binding to the catalytic domain (Tesmer et al., 1997
). Three invariant
residues (Lys, Asp, Gln) present in the active site of adenylyl cyclase
interact with the purine ring, which determines substrate specificity.
The catalytic subunits of rat sGC (
1
1)
contain three invariant residues (Glu, Cys, Arg) in positions
homologous to those of the three invariant residues in adenylyl cyclase
(Fig. 2). Mutations of adenylyl and
guanylyl cyclase, in which these three residues were exchanged,
resulted in the exchange of nucleotide substrate specificity: the
guanylyl cyclase mutant specifically utilized ATP as substrate, whereas the adenylyl cyclase mutant became a nonselective purine nucleotide cyclase (Sunahara et al., 1998
). Both enzymes retained their ability to
be regulated by activators that were specific for the parent nucleotide
cyclase. Thus, cAMP production by the mutant guanylyl cyclase was
regulated by SNP, whereas cyclic nucleotide production by the mutant
adenylyl cyclase was activated by G
s.
Similarly, mutation of retinal guanylyl cyclase (Ret GC 1) based on the
structural model of adenylyl cyclase, in which Glu925 was
substituted with Lys and Cys995 was substituted with Asp,
reversed substrate specificity from GTP to ATP (Tucker et al., 1998
).
This mutant retained the characteristic ability of retinal guanylyl
cyclases to be regulated by GCAP-1 and GCAP-2.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Catalytic mechanism of guanylyl cyclase activity.
GTP binds to a single catalytic site in soluble and two catalytic sites
in pGCs. The purine ring is specifically bound to residues in the
-subunit (red), and the divalent cation cofactor (Me2+),
which stabilizes the - and -phosphates of the nucleotide
substrate, binds to acidic residues in the -subunit (green).
Both subunits contribute residues to the catalytic center that mediates
cleavage of the -phosphoanhydride bond through a single direct
displacement reaction. The products of that catalysis are cGMP and
pyrophosphate (PPi).
|
|
iii. Configuration of the Catalytic Site.
A model of the
catalytic mechanism of adenylyl and guanylyl cyclases was developed
based on the crystal structure of the rat type II adenylyl cyclase
C2 catalytic domain (Liu et al., 1997b
) (Fig. 2). This
model predicts that heterodimeric cyclases such as sGCs and adenylyl
cyclases have a single active site formed by two catalytic subunits
that can bind one substrate molecule per dimer (Figs. 1, 2).
Homodimeric cyclases such as pGCs have two sites within a single cleft
and are capable of binding two substrate molecules per dimer (Fig. 1).
Three residues are required to form a catalytic center, an Asp from one
catalytic domain and an Asn/Arg pair from the other. In heterodimeric
cyclases, the two domains form one catalytic center, with one domain
providing the Asp and the other domain providing the Asn/Arg pair (Fig. 2). In homodimeric cyclases, each domain contributes both an Asp and an
Asn/Arg pair forming two catalytic centers. This model of catalytic
center formation is consistent with the characteristic kinetic behavior
of guanylyl cyclases (Waldman and Murad, 1987
). Purified sGCs exhibit
linear Michaelis plots with Hill coefficients of 1.0, consistent with a
single class of substrate binding sites that are not interactive
(Chrisman et al., 1975
; Garbers, 1979
; Wolin et al., 1982
). In
contrast, purified pGCs exhibit curvilinear Michaelis plots with Hill
coefficients >1.0, consistent with multiple substrate-binding sites
that interact in a positively cooperative fashion (Wong et al., 1995
).
In GCA, Glu974 represents an invariant residue in
all cloned guanylyl cyclases and a conserved residue in most adenylyl
cyclases (Wedel et al., 1997
). Mutation of this residue to Ala in GC-A yielded an enzyme that was constitutively activated and unresponsive to
ANP and ATP. These effects were independent of the KHD because replacing Glu974 with Ala constitutively
activated a truncated mutant of GC-A lacking the extracellular domain,
transmembrane domain, and KHD. The precise role of
Glu974 in mechanisms regulating pGCs remains to
be defined.
g. Carboxyl Terminal Tail.
GC-C and the sensory organ
guanylyl cyclases GC-D, -E, and -F contain a C-terminal tail that
extends beyond the catalytic domain (Schulz et al., 1990
; Fülle
et al., 1995
; Yang et al., 1995
). The precise function of the tail
remains to be defined, although deletion of a portion of this domain
eliminated the ability of ST to stimulate production of cGMP by GC-C
(Wada et al., 1996
). PMA potentiates activation of GC-C by ST, and this
is associated with increased phosphate incorporation into receptor
protein (Weikel et al., 1990
; Crane and Shanks, 1996
; Wada et al.,
1996
). However, PMA did not potentiate ST activation of, or phosphate
incorporation into, a truncated mutant lacking the C-terminal 22 residues or a substitution mutant in which Ser1029 was
replaced with Ala. These observations suggest that PMA regulates
ST-dependent activity by inducing PKC-mediated phosphorylation of
Ser1029 in the C-terminal tail of GC-C.
There is speculation the C-terminal tail may be involved in associating
guanylyl cyclase receptors with the cytoskeleton. GC-C, -E, and -F are
resistant to detergent solubilization, compared with GC-A and -B
(Fleischman and Denisevich, 1979
; Fleischman et al., 1980
; Waldman et
al., 1986
; Hakki et al., 1993
). Indeed, chaotropic agents are required
to optimally solubilize guanylyl cyclases from membrane preparations of
intestinal epithelial cells (GC-C) or retinal rod outer segments (GC-E,
GC-F) (Fleischman et al., 1980
; Waldman et al., 1986
). This relative
insolubility may reflect association of those receptor cyclases with
the cytoskeleton, which may be mediated by the C-terminal tail,
rendering them refractory to solubilization by detergents. It is
interesting to note that GC-C in intestinal brush border membranes and
GC-E and GC-F in retinal rod outer segments are localized in membrane
specializations with common origins (modified ciliary processes) that
are stabilized by an intricate and well-developed cytoskeleton
(Wiederhold, 1976
).
The C-terminal tail may mediate internalization of guanylyl cyclase
receptors. GC-C undergoes ST-dependent endocytosis in intestinal cells
(Urbanski et al., 1995
). Receptors that undergo ligand-dependent
receptor-mediated endocytosis typically contain cytoplasmic domain
consensus sequences that interact with the endocytotic apparatus. One
such consensus sequence is YXXZ (Z is one of the following hydrophobic
amino acids: L, I, V, M, C, A) (Johnson et al., 1990
; Canfield et al.,
1991
; Thomas and Roth, 1994
). GC-C contains this consensus sequence in
the C-terminal tail, which is presumed to mediate ligand-dependent
endocytosis in intestinal cells (Urbanski et al., 1995
).
4. Receptor-Effector Coupling and Particulate Guanylyl Cyclase
Function.
The mechanisms by which ligand-receptor interaction is
translated into catalytic activation and a cellular signal, and the termination of that signal have not been completely elucidated for
pGCs. However, the details of receptor function, receptor-effector coupling, effector activation, and signal termination are outlined below.
a. Interaction of Ligand and Receptor.
Initial studies of the
equilibrium binding characteristics of GC-C in membranes from
intestinal cells demonstrated that ST associates with a single class of
receptor with a nanomolar Kd (Hugues et al.,
1991
). However, further examination with a broad range of ST
concentrations under well-defined equilibrium conditions revealed two
populations of ST binding sites. One population of receptors exhibits a
low capacity (~5% of the total receptors) and high affinity, whereas
the other population of receptors exhibits a high capacity (>95% of
the total receptors) and low affinity (Crane et al., 1992b
). Although
high affinity ST receptors exhibit robust ligand binding, they are not
coupled to activation of guanylyl cyclase, and their functional
significance remains to be defined (Crane et al., 1992b
). The molecular
mechanism underlying the appearance of high versus low affinity
receptors remains unclear, but may reflect receptor oligomerization,
glycosylation, or ligand heterogeneity (de Sauvage et al., 1992
;
Vaandrager et al., 1993a
; Schulz et al., 1998a
; Hasegawa et al.,
1999b
).
Low affinity ST receptors (GC-C) appear to be homologous to
functionally coupled ANP receptors (GC-A). Interestingly, both GC-A and
GC-C undergo a ligand-induced shift in affinity, which appears to be
important in transmembrane signaling. Thus, ST binding induces a
time-dependent shift from higher (0.1 nM) to lower (1.0 nM) affinity,
and the lowest affinity state of GC-C appears to be the receptor
subtype functionally coupled to catalytic activation (Crane et al.,
1992b
). Similarly, ANP binding to GC-A results in a time-dependent
shift in affinity. At equilibrium, 70% of ANP receptors exist in the
lower affinity state (Kd = 2.5 nM), whereas
30% remain in the higher affinity state
(Kd = 0.3 nM) (Larose et al., 1991
; Jewett
et al., 1993
).
The ligand-induced shift in receptor affinity appears to be mediated by
the KHD. Deletion of this domain yields GC-A and GC-C mutants
"locked" in the higher affinity state, unable to undergo transition
to the lower affinity state (Crane et al., 1992b
; Jewett et al., 1993
;
Rondeau et al., 1995
). ATP potentiates the shift of GC-A from higher to
lower affinity induced by ANP binding. Potentiation of the affinity
shift by ATP is blocked by amiloride, which competitively inhibits ATP
binding to protein kinases (Heim et al., 1988
; Jewett et al., 1993
;
Rondeau et al., 1995
). The shift from higher to lower affinity is
associated with coupling of ligand-receptor interaction to activation
of guanylyl cyclase. GC-C locked in the higher affinity state is
insensitive to activation by ST, whereas occupancy of the lowest
affinity state is specifically associated with ligand-sensitive
activation (Crane et al., 1992a
). These observations suggest a model in
which ligand binding to the extracellular domain of pGCs induces an
alteration in the cytoplasmic domain that permits ATP to bind to the
KHD. Adenine nucleotide association with the KHD derepresses the
catalytic domain, resulting in activation and a subsequent decrease in
ligand affinity for the extracellular domain (Potter and Hunter,
1998b
). This paradigm, wherein ligand-receptor interaction activates
downstream effectors in a nucleotide-dependent fashion that is
associated with reduced ligand affinity, is a characteristic that pGCs
share with G protein-coupled receptors and effectors. In the latter system, receptor, effector, and nucleotide regulatory functions reside
on separate proteins, whereas in pGCs they are functions of individual
domains within a single polypeptide.
b. Oligomerization of Receptors.
Receptor guanylyl cyclases
exhibit a general structure that is similar to the tyrosine kinase
family of receptors. The accepted model for tyrosine kinase activation
includes a requirement for ligand-induced dimerization of receptor
monomers. Interestingly, the mechanism underlying guanylyl cyclase
activation deviates from this model. Thus, pGCs appear to exist as
preformed oligomers in the basal state, and ligand-receptor interaction
does not alter receptor oligomerization. The requirement for preformed
receptor oligomers in the absence of ligand may reflect, in part, the
requirement of nucleotide cyclases for two catalytic subunits to
convert nucleotide triphosphates to cyclic nucleotides (Harteneck et
al., 1990
; Thompson and Garbers, 1995
; Yan et al., 1996
). Among the
pGCs, GC-A, -B, -C, and -E exist as oligomers (Iwata et al., 1991
;
Chinkers and Wilson, 1992
; Rondeau et al., 1995
; Hasegawa et al.,
1999b
; Yu et al., 1999
).
Oligomerization of GC-A has been the most extensively characterized of
the pGCs. Covalent cross-linking and gel filtration experiments
demonstrated the presence of both monomers and higher molecular weight
complexes consistent with receptor oligomers (Ishido et al., 1986
;
Iwata et al., 1991
; Lowe, 1992
). GC-A immunoprecipitated in the absence
of ANP yielded oligomeric complexes supporting the suggestion that this
receptor self-associates in a ligand-independent fashion. Constructs
lacking both the kinase homology and catalytic domains were monomers in
the basal state, but formed oligomers in the presence of ANP,
suggesting that cytoplasmic domains of GC-A contribute to
oligomerization (Lowe, 1992
). However, mutants lacking the
extracellular domain did not coimmunoprecipitate with full-length GC-A,
suggesting that the extracellular domain also is important in
ligand-independent receptor oligomerization (Chinkers and Wilson,
1992
).
Although GC-C forms oligomers in a ligand-independent fashion, the
receptor appears to undergo ligand-dependent disulfide-stabilized dimerization (Almenoff et al., 1993
; Vaandrager et al., 1993b
, 1994
).
Receptor labeling and ligand-receptor cross-linking demonstrated that
GC-C exists in an oligomerized state independent of ST (Vaandrager et
al., 1993b
, 1994
). Coimmunoprecipitation of differentially tagged GC-C
expressed in COS cells confirmed that oligomerization is independent of
ligand stimulation (Rudner et al., 1995
). Incubation with ST resulted
in the formation of GC-C dimers stabilized by interchain disulfide
bonds (Vaandrager et al., 1993b
). Thus, GC-C may exist in the basal
state as an inactive homotrimer that undergoes ligand-dependent
internal rearrangement to form a catalytically active disulfide
cross-linked dimer (Vaandrager et al., 1994
). Interestingly, GC-C
mutants lacking cytoplasmic domains formed trimers only in the presence
of ligand, in close agreement with results obtained with homologous
GC-A mutants (Lowe, 1992
; Hasegawa et al., 1999b
). Again, these
observations support a role for cytoplasmic domains in mediating
ligand-independent oligomerization of pGCs.
c. Regulation by Adenine Nucleotides.
i. Allosteric Activation of Guanylyl Cyclases by
Nucleotides.
ATP potentiates the activation of GC-A and -B
by natriuretic peptides 2- to 3-fold by increasing maximum enzyme
velocity (Vmax) without altering substrate
affinity (Kurose et al., 1987
; Chang et al., 1990
; Gazzano et al.,
1991b
). The EC50 for ATP potentiation of ligand activation
is ~0.1 mM, which is within the physiological range of cellular
concentrations of this nucleotide (Kurose et al., 1987
; Chang et al.,
1990
; Gazzano et al., 1991b
). The rank order of potency of nucleotides
to potentiate natriuretic peptide receptor activation is
adenosine-5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (ATP
S) > ATP > adenylylimidodiphosphate (Chang et al., 1990
; Chinkers et
al., 1991
; Gazzano et al., 1991b
; Foster and Garbers, 1998
). The
superior efficacy of ATP
S and ATP likely reflects their ability to
serve both as: (1) allosteric modulators of guanylyl cyclases, and (2)
substrates for protein kinases that mediate the phosphorylation of
these receptors (Foster and Garbers, 1998
). In contrast,
adenylylimidodiphosphate is a nonhydrolyzable analog of ATP, which is
not a kinase substrate. Potentiation of ligand activation by adenine
nucleotides reflects direct interaction of nucleotides with guanylyl
cyclases, rather than nucleotide-dependent accessory proteins or
enzymes. Thus, in addition to the nonhydrolyzable analogs of ATP, other
nucleotides that are not substrates for nucleotide or protein kinases
potentiate activation, including ADP,
adenosine-5'-O-(3-thiodiphosphate, and
adenosine-5'-O-(3-thiomonophosphate) (AMPS) (Kurose et al., 1987
; Chang et al., 1990
; Gazzano et al., 1991b
; Parkinson et al.,
1994
). Also, adenine nucleotides potentiate ANP activation of GC-A
purified to apparent homogeneity (Larose et al., 1991
; Wong et al.,
1995
). Indeed, GC-A expressed in baculovirus or purified to homogeneity
could not be activated by ANP in the absence of ATP, demonstrating that
adenine nucleotides are absolutely required for receptor-effector
coupling by natriuretic peptide receptors (Chinkers et al., 1991
;
Larose et al., 1991
; Wong et al., 1995
).
In addition to their effects on receptor-effector coupling, adenine
nucleotides also allosterically regulate the affinity of natriuretic
peptide receptors for ligands. GC-A undergoes a ligand-induced
time-dependent shift from higher (0.1 nM) to lower (1 nM) affinity
(Kd) (Larose et al., 1991
; Jewett et al.,
1993
). ATP potentiated this shift in affinity that was associated with nucleotide effects on activation. Amiloride, an antagonist of ATP
binding to kinase catalytic domains, blocked the effects of ATP on
ligand binding and catalytic activation (Jewett et al., 1993
; Rondeau
et al., 1995
). Indeed, amiloride "locked" GC-A in a high affinity
state that was unresponsive to ANP. These data suggest that allosteric
regulation of natriuretic peptide receptors by adenine nucleotides
coordinately modulates ligand-receptor interaction and
receptor-effector coupling.Adenine nucleotides also potentiate the activation of GC-C by ST 2- to
3-fold with an EC50 of 0.1 mM (Gazzano et al.,
1991a
; Vaandrager et al., 1993a
). The rank order of potency of adenine nucleotides for potentiating ligand activation of GC-C is similar to
that for the natriuretic peptide receptors, and the superior potency of
ATP
S and ATP, compared with the hydrolysis-resistant nucleotides,
likely reflects their ability to serve both as allosteric modulators
and substrates for protein kinases. However, in contrast to natriuretic
peptide receptors, GC-C activation by ST does not absolutely require
ATP (Gazzano et al., 1991a
; Vaandrager et al., 1993a
). Also, ATP does
not alter the Vmax or substrate
affinity of GC-C (Vaandrager et al., 1993a
). Rather, adenine
nucleotides potentiate ST activation of GC-C by stabilizing the
activated form of the enzyme, preventing its time-dependent
desensitization. GC-E and -F are similar to GC-C in that they do not
require ATP for catalytic activation, but are potentiated by adenine
nucleotides (Tucker et al., 1997
). Like GC-C, potentiation of GC-E and
-F by adenine nucleotides may reflect protection against catalytic inactivation (Vaandrager et al., 1993a
; Tucker et al., 1997
).Allosteric regulation of catalytic activation and receptor binding of
pGCs by adenine nucleotides appears to be mediated by the KHD. Mutants
of GC-A and GC-B lacking the KHD are unresponsive to adenine
nucleotides and ANP (Chinkers et al., 1991
; Koller et al., 1992
; Jewett
et al., 1993
). These mutants are "frozen" in the high-affinity
state, unable to undergo the ligand-dependent shift to the lower
affinity state (Jewett et al., 1993
). Indeed, the binding
characteristics of these mutants mimics wild-type receptors treated
with amiloride (Jewett et al., 1993
; Rondeau et al., 1995
). GC-A and -B
possess in their KHD a glycine-rich subdomain with the consensus
sequence GXGXXXG, which mediates nucleotide binding in protein kinase
catalytic domains by immobilizing the terminal phosphate of ATP (Hanks
et al., 1988
). Mutants of GC-A and -B in which this glycine-rich domain
was altered were refractory to the effects of ligand and adenine
nucleotides (Duda et al., 1993
). These data suggest that allosteric
regulation of GC-A and -B by adenine nucleotides occurs through the
interaction of adenine nucleotide with the KHD, initiated by
ligand-receptor interaction and mediated by the glycine-rich region of
the KHD. Nucleotide-KHD interaction transmits information distally to
the catalytic domain and is required for ligand-dependent catalytic activation. In addition, information is transmitted proximally across
the membrane to effect a shift in the affinity of the receptor domain
for ligand. Interestingly, GC-C lacks the glycine-rich subdomain of the
KHD, ATP is not required for ligand activation of this protein, adenine
nucleotides do not alter the kinetics of catalysis, and those
nucleotides do not regulate ligand-receptor interaction (Vaandrager et
al., 1993b
; Deshmane et al., 1997
). It is notable that the role of
adenine nucleotides in guanylyl cyclase receptor-effector coupling is
analogous to that of guanine nucleotides in coupling heptahelical
receptors to their downstream effectors. Indeed, the KHD of pGCs and G
proteins appear to subserve analogous functions in mediating purine
nucleotide regulation of receptor-effector coupling in their respective systems.
ii. Allosteric Inhibition of Guanylyl Cyclases by
Nucleotides.
Adenine nucleotides substituted in the 2-position of
the purine ring, including 2-chloroATP and 2-methylthioATP, inhibited basal and ST-stimulated GC-C with a Ki of 1 µM (Parkinson et al., 1994
, 1997
; Parkinson and Waldman, 1996
).
Inhibition was associated with a ~90% reduction in
Vmax, but it had only minor effects on the
affinity of the enzyme for substrate. 2-Substituted nucleotides did not alter ST-induced cGMP accumulation in intact intestinal cells
but blocked this effect in permeabilized cells, suggesting that
allosteric inhibition was not mediated by purinergic receptors. Nucleotide inhibition was mediated by a site on the receptor that was
separate and distinct from that mediating nucleotide activation (Parkinson et al., 1994
). Interestingly, the guanylyl cyclase substrate
GTP increased the potency of 2-substituted nucleotides to inhibit GC-C
in a concentration-dependent fashion (Parkinson and Waldman, 1996
). In
addition, the hydrolysis-resistant guanine nucleotide analog
guanosine-5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) was more potent in
supporting 2-substituted nucleotide inhibition of GC-C compared with
GTP. Furthermore, high concentrations of GTP mimicked the effects of
2-substituted nucleotides and directly inhibited GC-C. These data are
consistent with a model in which inhibition of GC-C by 2-substituted
nucleotides may be mediated by an accessory guanine nucleotide binding
protein possessing intrinsic GTP hydrolase activity (Parkinson and
Waldman, 1996
). Although the endogenous ligands regulating this
allosteric inhibitory pathway remain undefined, this mechanism can be
exploited to block ST-induced fluid and electrolyte secretion by intact
intestinal cells (Zhang et al., 1999
).
d. Kinase Homology Domain.
The KHD is a key regulatory
component coupling ligand-receptor interaction with effector activation
in pGCs. Indeed, in this respect it subserves a function that is
analogous to G proteins, which couple heptahelical receptors to their
downstream effectors. Deletion of the KHD from GC-A, -B, and -C
resulted in constitutive activation of those enzymes (Chinkers and
Garbers, 1989
; Koller et al., 1992
; Rudner et al., 1995
). Also, mutant
receptors lacking the KHD were insensitive to stimulation by adenine
nucleotides and ligand. In addition, GC-A and -B lacking the KHD were
"locked" in the high affinity state, insensitive to the effects of
adenine nucleotides on receptor affinity, and unable to undergo the
ligand-dependent shift to lower affinity characteristic of these
receptors (Jewett et al., 1993
). These data are consistent with a model
in which the KHD behaves as a repressor of the catalytic domain in the basal state (Chinkers and Garbers, 1989
; Koller et al., 1992
; Jewett et
al., 1993
; Rudner et al., 1995
). Ligand-receptor interaction results in
an alteration in the KHD that permits adenine nucleotide binding,
derepression of the catalytic domain reflected as activation, and a
decrease in the affinity of the receptor for ligand. Of note, KHDs from
individual isoforms of pGCs appear to be functionally specific for each
isoform. Thus, the KHDs of GC-A and -B, which are structurally
homologous proteins with similar functions, can be exchanged without
altering the ability of these receptors to respond to adenine
nucleotides and natriuretic peptides (Koller et al., 1992
). However,
exchange of the KHD of GC-A with that from GC-C or the kinase domain of
the EGFR produced enzymes that were unresponsive to natriuretic
peptides (Koller et al., 1992
). These data suggest that KHDs are
structurally and/or functionally "matched" to specific pGC
isoforms. The molecular mechanisms underlying this component
compatibility remain to be elucidated.
e. Phosphorylation and Homologous and Heterologous
Desensitization.
Early studies demonstrated that sea urchin sperm
pGCs underwent activation followed by rapid desensitization upon
interacting with their cognate egg peptides (Garbers, 1989
). These
receptors were highly phosphorylated in the basal state, and
ligand-receptor interaction resulted in massive dephosphorylation.
Activation of these receptors by ligand required that they be fully
phosphorylated. Thus, treatment of these preparations with phosphatases
yielded receptors that were unresponsive to ligand. In addition,
dephosphorylation of receptors associated with ligand-receptor
interaction resulted in desensitization of receptors. Similarly, GC-A
and -B require receptor phosphorylation for ligand-dependent catalytic
activation (Potter and Garbers, 1992
, 1994
; Koller et al., 1993
).
Purified preparations of GC-A in which the enzyme is phosphorylated
retain full sensitivity to natriuretic peptides and adenine nucleotides (Foster and Garbers, 1998
). Also, phosphatase treatment of GC-A results
in desensitization and an inability of ligand to activate the catalytic
domain (Potter and Garbers, 1992
). These data suggest that
phosphorylation is an important mechanism regulating pGCs. In the basal
state, pGCs are phosphorylated, which is required for ligand-induced
activation. Ligand-receptor interaction associated with catalytic
activation initiates a cascade leading to dephosphorylation of the
receptor resulting in homologous desensitization. It is interesting to
note that this mechanism of homologous desensitization is the converse
of that regulating heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors, which are
unphosphorylated in the basal state but desensitized by kinase-mediated
phosphorylation, induced by ligand-receptor interaction (Gudermann et
al., 1995
).
Phosphorylation sites that are important for ligand activation and
homologous desensitization have been identified in the KHD of GC-A and
-B (Duda et al., 1993
; Potter and Hunter, 1998a
,b
). However, the
kinase(s) responsible for maintaining phosphorylation of GC-A and -B in
the basal state have not been identified. Similarly, the phosphatase(s)
responsible for ligand-induced dephosphorylation of GC-A and -B
mediating homologous desensitization have not been identified, although
evidence for a guanylyl cyclase-associated phosphatase was presented
previously (Chinkers, 1994
). Although this mechanism appears to be
generalizable to sea urchin sperm pGCs and the natriuretic peptide
receptor cyclases, homologous desensitization by dephosphorylation has
not been demonstrated for other pGC isoforms.
GC-A and -B also undergo heterologous desensitization by a number of
ligands that activate PKC, including PMA, endothelin, vasopressin, and
angiotensin (Potter and Garbers, 1994
). Activation of PKC uncouples
GC-A and -B from ligand-induced cGMP production (Jaiswal et al., 1988
;
Potter and Garbers, 1994
). However, unlike other receptor systems, GC-A
and -B appear to be desensitized by PKC-mediated dephosphorylation
(Potter and Garbers, 1994
). Indeed, PMA, a direct activator of PKC,
induced the dephosphorylation of natriuretic peptide receptors that was
associated with receptor desensitization (Potter and Garbers, 1994
). A
specific inhibitor of PKC blocked dephosphorylation and desensitization
induced by PMA but not by ANP (Potter and Garbers, 1994
). Furthermore,
PMA treatment resulted in dephosphorylation of receptor residues that did not overlap with those residues dephosphorylated by ANP. These data
suggest that GC-A and -B undergo heterologous desensitization mediated
by dephosphorylation of residues distinct from those involved in
homologous desensitization (Potter and Garbers, 1994
). The precise
mechanisms underlying heterologous desensitization and whether PKC
stimulation results in the inhibition of a pGC kinase or the activation
of a pGC phosphatase remain to be defined.
f. Accessory Protein Regulation.
Retinal pGCs (GC-E, -F) are
modulated by a family of calcium-regulated accessory proteins, GCAPs.
In the vision process, phototransduction of light into electrical
impulses occurs in the retina (Lolley and Lee, 1990
). pGCs located in
outer segments of the retinal membrane are central in the cascade
mediating phototransduction (Lolley and Lee, 1990
). Light-activated
rhodopsin is coupled to a G protein that activates a cGMP-specific PDE
(Yarfitz and Hurley, 1994
). This PDE hydrolyzes cGMP, resulting in the
closure of cGMP-gated channels that mediate Ca2+ influx.
Reduced [Ca2+]i mediates GCAP activation of
GC-E and -F and production of cGMP (Shyjan et al., 1992
; Lowe et al.,
1995
; Nakatani et al., 1995
). The resulting accumulation of cGMP
reopens cGMP-gated channels reestablishing the resting state (dark) current.
GCAPs share significant homology with the calmodulin family of
calcium-binding proteins (Palczewski et al., 1994
). Thus far, three
mammalian GCAPs have been identified (Palczewski et al., 1994
; Dizhoor
et al., 1995
; Gorczyca et al., 1995
; Haeseleer et al., 1999
). These
GCAPs exhibit guanylyl cyclase specificity: GCAP-1 only activates GC-E,
whereas GCAP-2 activates both GC-E and GC-F (Gorczyca et al., 1995
;
Otto-Bruc et al., 1997a
,b
). In general, GCAPs activate guanylyl cyclase
when [Ca2+]i is <300 nM
and inhibit activity when
[Ca2+]i is >500 nM
(Dizhoor and Hurley, 1996
; Dizhoor et al., 1998
). Although GCAPs
modulate guanylyl cyclase activity in a calcium-dependent manner, the
association of GCAPs with guanylyl cyclases is calcium-independent (Dizhoor and Hurley, 1996
; Laura and Hurley, 1998
).
GCAP activation of retinal guanylyl cyclases has been suggested to
occur by two mechanisms: enhancement of dimerization of retinal
guanylyl cyclase catalytic subunits through dimerization of GCAPs,
and/or GCAP-mediated stabilization of GTP bound to the catalytic
subunit (Olshevskaya et al., 1999
; Sokal et al., 1999
). The
dimerization model suggests: (1) GCAPs bind to retinal guanylyl cyclases independently of
[Ca2+]i, (2) at high
[Ca2+]i, GCAPs bind
Ca2+ and have a low affinity for
self-association, (3) at low
[Ca2+]i, GCAPs dissociate
from Ca2+ and homodimerize, and (4) GCAP
homodimerization promotes pGC dimerization, and therefore enhances
catalytic activity (Olshevskaya et al., 1999
). This proposed mechanism
offers a reasonable explanation for the calcium-sensitive regulation of
guanylyl cyclases by GCAPs, however further work defining the
association of GCAP and guanylyl cyclase dimerization is required.
Although multiple potential GCAP binding sites have been identified,
thus far only a binding site on the retinal guanylyl cyclase catalytic
domain has been characterized (Sokal et al., 1999
). Interestingly, this
binding site has homology to a region in the adenylyl cyclase catalytic
domain that mediates activation by Gs
(Tesmer
et al., 1997
; Sokal et al., 1999
). Gs
activates adenylyl cyclase at the catalytic site by stabilizing the
transition state with ATP (Tesmer et al., 1997
). Similarly, it has been
suggested that GCAPs may modulate catalytic activity by stabilizing the
guanylyl cyclase-GTP transition state (Sokal et al., 1999
). Although
there is substantial homology between the structure of retinal and
other pGCs, accessory proteins regulating nonretinal guanylyl cyclases
remain to be identified.
g. Model for Coupling of Particulate Guanylyl Cyclase Receptor and
Effector.
The above discussion suggests the following general
model of receptor-effector coupling for ligand regulation of pGCs (Fig. 3). In the inactive state, pGC exists as
self-associated homo-oligomerized complexes in the absence of ligand.
Each monomer within the complex is phosphorylated on key serine or
threonine residues surrounding the glycine-rich region of the ATP
binding site within the KHD. Oligomerization and phosphorylation are
requirements for the extracellular binding domains to exist in the high
affinity state and for the cytoplasmic domains to be competent to
respond to ligand-receptor interaction. Under these conditions, ligand
binding to high affinity sites is translated through the plasma
membrane by an undefined mechanism into an alteration in the KHD,
resulting in the binding of ATP to that domain. Association of ATP with
the KHD initiates three important processes. First, the KHD represses
the catalytic domain of pGC in the basal state, and adenine nucleotide
interaction with the KHD results in derepression, reflected as
activation of the catalytic domain and an increase in the
Vmax of cGMP production. Derepression of the
catalytic domain may be associated with internal rearrangement of
homo-oligomers with formation of interchain disulfide bonds, but not
with overall disruption of oligomers to monomers. Second, association
of ATP with the KHD is translated back through the plasma membrane into
a reduction in the affinity of the extracellular binding domain for
ligand. Third, there is a time-dependent dephosphorylation of the KHD
resulting in homologous desensitization of receptors to adenine
nucleotides and ligand. The precise trigger initiating dephosphorylation, including ligand-receptor interaction, adenine nucleotide binding to the KHD, and/or activation of the catalytic domain remains unclear. Signal termination reflects three processes, including ligand dissociation from the extracellular domain, the reduction in binding affinity of the extracellular domain initiated by
adenine nucleotide binding to the KHD, and homologous desensitization of the receptor by dephosphorylation of the KHD. In this model, requirements for receptor-effector coupling include receptor
oligomerization, phosphorylation of the KHD, ligand occupancy of the
extracellular binding domain, and adenine nucleotide binding to the
KHD. Failure to fulfill any of these requirements results in uncoupling
of receptors and effectors. Although the above process is offered as a
general model of receptor-effector coupling for pGCs, it should be
noted that it was specifically generated from studies of natriuretic
peptide receptors. Indeed, GC-C does not possess a glycine-rich ATP
binding domain in the KHD, ATP is not required for GC-C
receptor-effector coupling, and there is no apparent role for KHD
dephosphorylation and homologous desensitization for this receptor. In
addition, the other known pGCs are orphan receptors, with no defined
ligands. Although the above process is specifically referable to
natriuretic peptide receptors, it serves as a working model to study
the other members of the family.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Regulation of particulate and soluble guanylyl
cyclases by their ligands. Particulate guanylyl cyclases: the model of
ligand regulation of pGCs depicted is based on regulation of GC-A by
natriuretic peptides. In the basal unliganded state, pGC exists as a
self-associated homo-oligomerized complex (1). Each monomer within the
complex is phosphorylated on key serine or threonine residues within
the KHD. Oligomerization and phosphorylation are requirements for the
extracellular binding domains to exist in the high affinity state and
for the cytoplasmic domains to be competent to respond to
ligand-receptor interaction. Under these conditions, natriuretic
peptide binding to a single high affinity site formed by a homodimer
(2) is translated through the plasma membrane into an alteration in the
KHD, resulting in the binding of ATP to that domain (3). In the basal
state, the KHD represses the catalytic domain of pGC, and ATP
interaction with that domain results in derepression, reflected as
activation of two functional catalytic domains and an increase in the
Vmax of cGMP production (4). However,
association of ATP with the KHD also reduces the affinity of the
extracellular binding domain for natriuretic peptides and induces
dephosphorylation of the KHD, resulting in dissociation of ATP and
ligand, leading to desensitization (5). Regeneration of receptors in
the basal state that are responsive to ligand presumably requires
rephosphorylation of sites in the KHD. Soluble guanylyl cyclases: sGCs
are heterodimers that possess a heme prosthetic group with a
pentacoordinated ferrous (Fe2+) core associated with an
imidazole axial ligand at His105 of the -subunit. NO
activates sGC by directly binding to the sixth position of the ferrous
core, breaking the bond between iron and histidine, dissociating it
from that axial imidazole ligand, and displacing the iron from the
plane of the porphyrin ring. This creates a structure resembling PPIX,
a potent activator of sGC. Termination of activation presumably results
from dissociation of NO from the axial ligand position of the heme and
return of the iron core to the plane of the porphyrin ring. CO binds to
the heme group of sGC, yielding a hexacoordinated complex in which the
iron core is associated with imidazole and CO axial ligands
simultaneously. The inability of CO to dissociate the imidazole axial
ligand to form a pentacoordinated complex does not permit displacement
of the heme iron from the plane of the porphyrin ring. Consequently, CO
is far less efficacious as an activator of sGC, compared with NO. The
precise mechanism by which PPIX activates sGC remains unclear. In one
model (depicted), PPIX displaces heme from the sGC, resulting in
activation. Alternatively, sGC-bound heme may exchange Fe2+
with free PPIX, resulting in free heme, occupancy of the regulatory
domain of the enzyme by PPIX, and activation.
|
|
C. Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase
sGC is expressed in the cytoplasm of almost all mammalian cells
and mediates a wide range of important physiological functions, such as
inhibition of platelet aggregation, relaxation of smooth muscle,
vasodilatation, neuronal signal transduction, and immunomodulation (Collier and Vallance, 1989
). This enzyme is a heterodimeric protein consisting of
- and
-subunits, and expression of both subunits is
required for catalytic activity (Kamisaki et al., 1986
; Harteneck et
al., 1990
; Buechler et al., 1991
). Each subunit has an N-terminal regulatory domain and a C-terminal catalytic domain that shares sequence homology with the corresponding domains in particulate guanylyl and adenylyl cyclases (Chinkers et al., 1989
; Krupinski et
al., 1989
; Thorpe and Morkin, 1990
).
1. Subunit Structure and Isotypes of Soluble Guanylyl
Cyclase.
Analysis of sGC from different tissues demonstrated
multiple isotypes with different subunit compositions. The most
abundant subunits are
1 and
1, which are found in many tissues
(Braughler et al., 1979
; Garbers, 1979
; Lewicki et al., 1980
). These
subunits were first cloned from rat and bovine lung (Koesling et al.,
1988
, 1990
; Nakane et al., 1988
, 1990
). Expression of
1 and
1
individually yields a protein that does not exhibit catalytic activity,
whereas coexpression of these subunits yields sGC, which can be
activated by NO (Buechler et al., 1991
). The
2-subunit, cloned from
rat kidney, contains 86 additional amino acids in its C-terminal region compared with
1 (Yuen et al., 1990
). This additional sequence contains a consensus sequence (CVVL) that is involved in
post-translational modifications, such as isoprenylation and
carboxymethylation, suggesting that
2 might serve to localize sGC to
membranes. This ~76-kDa subunit is most abundant in kidney and liver.
Although the
2-subunit can form a heterodimer with
1, this
holoenzyme exhibits lower specific activity compared with
1/
1.
Thus, NO-stimulation of COS-7 cells cotransfected with
1/
1
resulted in three times more cGMP production than in cells transfected
with
1/
2 (Gupta et al., 1997
). Coexpression of
2 with
1/
1 decreased the formation of the
1/
1 heterodimer,
presumably due to competition between
1 and
2 for binding to
1. These data support the hypothesis that expression of
2 may
serve to regulate
1/
1 sGC activity. In fact, expression of
2
has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of hypertension
in the Dahl rat (Gupta et al., 1997
). The ~82-kDa
2 cloned from
human fetal brain forms heterodimers with
1 or
2, but has lower
affinity for
1. Indeed,
2/
1 has a lower specific activity than
1/
1 (Harteneck et al., 1991
). Two other subunits of human sGC,
3 (82 kDa) and
3 (70 kDa), have been cloned from adult brain.
Although
3 and
3 have limited homology in their N-terminal
regions, there is 72% homology between their 310-residue C-terminal
regions (Giuili et al., 1992
). The presence of homologous regions could
reflect the existence of a common ancestor for these subunits (Giuili
et al., 1992
).
RNA splicing also contributes to the heterogeneity of sGC subunits. A
variant of the
2-subunit,
2i, was
identified in a number of cell lines and tissues by PCR using primers
based on conserved sequences in the catalytic domain of mammalian
guanylyl cyclase (Behrends et al., 1995
). The subunit
2i is produced through alternative splicing of
RNA that adds 31 amino acids to the catalytic domain, with homology to
a region within the catalytic domain of adenylyl cyclases. Previous
studies demonstrated sGC catalyzed the conversion of ATP to cAMP
(Mittal and Murad, 1977
). The region of homology in
2i was postulated to increase the ability of
this isoform of sGC to utilize ATP as a substrate and produce cAMP (Behrends et al., 1995
). However, coexpression of the
2i/
1 in Sf9 cells abolished the ability of
sGC to produce cAMP (Behrends et al., 1995
). In addition, Sf9 cells
transfected with
2i/
1 are devoid of
guanylyl cyclase activity, whereas coexpression of
2/
1 results in
production of cGMP in these cells, suggesting the
2i-subunit can compete with
2 for binding
to
1 and act as a dominant negative inhibitor. Expression of this
subunit may serve as a mechanism to regulate sGC activity in specific
cells (Behrends et al., 1995
). Additionally, two forms of the
-subunit of human sGC, HSGC-1 and HSGC-2, were detected in lung
using PCR with oligonucleotide primers corresponding to conserved
sequences from rat and bovine sGC (Chhajlani et al., 1991
). HSGC-1 is
identical with the smaller subunit in bovine and rat lung, whereas
HSGC-2 contains a 33-amino acid deletion. Splice variants of sGC may reflect tissue specific expression of the enzyme, as well as mechanisms regulating activity.
A novel isoform of sGC that does not require heterodimer formation to
express catalytic activity has been isolated from the nervous system of
the tobacco hornworm moth Manduca sexta. This novel isoform,
MsGC-
3, is closely related to the rat
1-subunit (Nighorn et al.,
1999
). However, MsGC-
3 contains an additional 315 amino acids at the
C-terminus, which are not homologous with any known protein. MsGC-
3
lacks those conserved sequences present in other sGCs that are
important for activation of the enzyme by NO. The catalytic activity of
MsGC-
3 expressed in COS-7 cells is less than that of MsGC-
1 and
MsGC-
1 isoforms. MsGC-
3 is activated weakly in the presence of
SNP, which generates NO. However, like all other known cyclases,
MsGC-
3 exhibits higher enzyme activity when
Mn2+, rather than Mg2+, is
used as the metal substrate cofactor (Nighorn et al., 1999
).
In addition to MsGC-
3, a second new class of guanylyl cyclases has
been isolated from the soluble fraction of cells in the nervous system
of Manduca sexta. MsGC-I is similar to pGCs, with the
greatest homology to GC-B. However, it does not contain a signal
sequence or the ligand binding, transmembrane, and kinase homology
domains characteristic of mammalian pGCs. Although the location of this
enzyme is postulated to be in the cytoplasm of the cell, MsGC-I has no
similarities to the regulatory domains of
- and
-subunits of sGC.
It contains a sequence of 149 amino acids extending beyond the
catalytic domain that has no homology to any known protein. MsGC-I
expressed in COS cells forms homodimers with high levels of basal
guanylyl cyclase activity, but cannot be activated by SNP. The fact
that an extracellular ligand or NO cannot activate this enzyme suggests
the existence of a new regulatory mechanism for this guanylyl cyclase
(Simpson et al., 1999
).
Although naturally occurring homodimers have not been isolated,
extensive homology between sGC
and sGC
subunits suggests that
possibility (Wilson and Chinkers, 1995
). Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tagged recombinant human
1- and
1-subunits can form both homodimeric GST-
1/
1 and GST-
1/
1 complexes in Sf9 insect
cells. Cotransfection of complementary subunits results in
catalytically active heterodimers, although homodimers are detectable.
Both homodimers are catalytically inactive and are detected in lower amounts than heterodimers. The preference for heterodimer formation in
Sf9 cells may reflect a higher affinity between complementary subunits.
These results suggest the possibility of a physiological equilibrium
between homo- and heterodimers that could regulate sGC activity in
cells (Zabel et al., 1999
). Although the presence of both complementary
subunits is necessary for catalytic activity, these subunits may not be
expressed with the same temporal pattern. In rat brain,
1 is
expressed earlier than
1 during fetal brain development. This
observation suggests the existence of an uncharacterized
-subunit
that substitutes for
1 during this developmental period (Smigrodzki
and Levitt, 1996
).
2. Domain Structure.
Each subunit of sGC can be divided into
three functional domains: heme-binding, dimerization, and catalytic
(Fig. 1). The heme-binding domain is located at the N terminus of each
subunit. The presence of the heme prosthetic group is required for
activation of sGC by NO (Craven and DeRubertis, 1978
, 1983
; Gerzer et
al., 1982
; Ignarro et al., 1982a
; Ohlstein et al., 1982
). Heme is a five-membered nitrogen-containing ring wherein four nitrogen atoms are
coordinated with a central iron that can be either Fe2+
(ferrous or the reduced form) or Fe3+ (ferric or the
oxidized form) (Fig. 1). The fifth member of the ring in sGC is an
imidazole axial ligand coordinated by the
1-subunit at
His105 (Stone and Marletta, 1994
). Mutation of this
histidine, located near the N terminus of the
1-subunit, results in
the inability of sGC to bind heme and produces an enzyme that is
unresponsive to NO. Mutation of other conserved histidines does not
affect the ability of the enzyme to bind heme (Wedel et al., 1994
). The enzyme mutated at His105 can be purified and reconstituted
with heme, but it remains unresponsive to NO.
Both
1- and
1-subunits are required to express basal catalytic
activity and activation of sGC by NO (Buechler et al., 1991
). This
observation is consistent with the hypothesis that both subunits play a
role in the association of the heme with the enzyme. To define the role
of each subunit in the binding of heme, deletions of the less conserved
N-terminal sequence of either
1 (deletion of 131 residues) or
1
(deletion of 64 residues) were performed. Deletions in the
-subunit
resulted in a loss of sensitivity to NO, confirming the importance of
this subunit in the activation of the enzyme by NO (Foerster et al.,
1996
). Deletions in the
1-subunit did not alter the NO
responsiveness of sGC (Foerster et al., 1996
). However, heme binding by
sGC requires the presence of both full-length subunits implying a role
for the
-subunit in coordinating heme (Stone and Marletta, 1994
).
The presence of Cys78 and
Cys124 in the
-subunit is important for
coordinating the heme group of sGC (Foerster et al., 1996
). This is in
agreement with the observed importance of Cys residues in other
heme-containing proteins. In cytochrome C, heme is covalently bound to
the protein through thioether bonds to two Cys residues, consistent
with the suggestion that heme in sGC also may be bound through a Cys
residue in the
-subunit.
In sGC, each heterodimer contains approximately one heme with a high
affinity for NO (Gerzer et al., 1981a
). This is in contrast to heme in
other proteins, such as hemoglobin and myoglobin, which has a high
affinity for oxygen and in the aerobic environment binds oxygen
preferentially to form a ferrous-oxy species, rather than a
ferrous-nitrosyl species. Even in an aerobic environment, sGC prefers
to bind NO rather than oxygen. If sGC binds oxygen, it forms a
ferrous-oxy species that must exchange oxygen with NO to form a ferrous
nitrosyl complex (Gerzer et al., 1981a
,b
,c
). Oxidation of the heme
group to the ferric state results in the loss of enzyme activity and
often a complete loss of the heme moiety from the protein. Ferricyanide
oxidizes sGC to the ferric state, which is insensitive to NO
stimulation. Thus, reducing agents such as thiols, ascorbate, or
dithiothreitol enhance enzyme activation, presumably by maintaining the
iron of the metalloporphyrin in the ferrous state that is sensitive to
NO.
3. Regulation of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase by Ligands.
a. Nitric Oxide.
NO is a free radical that activates sGC by
binding directly to heme to form a ferrous-nitrosyl-heme complex (Fig.
3). The half-life of the ferrous-nitrosyl heme is between 4 min and
3 h at 20°C (Hille et al., 1979
; Sharma and Ranney,
1978
). NO binds to the sixth position of the heme ring, breaks
the bond between the axial histidine and iron, and forms a bond with
iron (Fig. 3). This results in a 5-coordinated ring where NO is now in
the fifth position. Removal of heme results in loss of NO
responsiveness. Carbon monoxide (CO), another activator of sGC, also is
capable of binding to the heme group of sGC, yielding a 6-coordinated complex (Fig. 3). However, NO is a more potent activator of sGC than
CO, and the purified enzyme is activated 100- to 200-fold by NO, but
only about 4-fold by CO (Stone and Marletta, 1994
).
Binding of NO to sGC appears to fit a model based on two populations of
heme. The minor population, which contains 28% of the heme, initially
forms a 6-coordinate complex with NO and then is rapidly converted to a
5-coordinate nitrosyl complex. NO dissociates from this population with
a rate of ~ 20 s
1. The second
population, which contains 72% of the heme, also forms a 6-coordinate
nitrosyl complex, but the conversion to a 5-coordinate complex is much
slower. NO dissociates from this population with a rate of 0.1 to 1.0 s
1, which is too slow to deactivate the enzyme.
This slow dissociation from the ferrous heme in the second population
is due to reassociation of the histidine with the iron in the
heme. The dimerization state of sGC is not affected by binding
of NO to heme. Both the 5-coordinate ferrous enzyme and the
5-coordinate nitrosyl form of the enzyme exhibited the same molecular
mass of ~200 kDa (Stone and Marletta, 1996
).
Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy of sGC suggests a model in
which the formation of a 5-coordinated nitrosyl-heme complex results
from the breaking of a bond between the axial imidazole ligand and the
heme iron. This creates a conformational change in the structure of the
protein that activates sGC. The iron is displaced from the plane due to
steric hindrance, creating a structure that resembles protoporphyrin IX
(PPIX) with an open central core (Fig. 3). The presence of an open
central core in the structure of the protoporphyrin ring is crucial for
activation of the enzyme (Stone et al., 1995
).
b. Protoporphyrin IX.
PPIX, the precursor of heme, is a
naturally occurring compound synthesized from glycine that activates
heme-deficient, heme-free, and heme-containing forms of sGC in a heme-
and NO-independent manner. PPIX binds to sGC at low concentrations
(Kd = 1.4 nM) and forms a stable
complex that does not dissociate during gel filtration or dialysis
(Ignarro et al., 1982b
; Wolin et al., 1982
). There are two parts of the
porphyrin ring that are important for binding of heme to sGC. Two vinyl
groups at positions 2 and 4 are essential for creating a hydrophobic
interaction between the porphyrin ring and the enzyme. If these vinyl
groups are substituted with less hydrophobic or polar groups, sGC has
reduced enzyme activity due to a weaker interaction between the
porphyrin ring and the enzyme. Also, the negatively charged COOH groups
of the vicinal propionic acid residues at position 6 and 7 form
electrostatic bonds with basic residues, such as arginine, in the sGC
apoprotein (Ignarro et al., 1984
).
The effects of PPIX on the kinetic parameters of sGC are similar to
those of NO. In the presence of Mg2+-GTP, PPIX
increases the specific activity of heme-containing bovine lung sGC from
0.1-0.2 to 2-8 µmol cGMP/min/mg protein and decreases the
Km from 100 to 56 µM. In the
presence of Mn2+-GTP, PPIX increases the specific
activity slightly (from 0.3-0.6 to 1-1.4 µmol cGMP/min/mg protein),
but the Km remains unchanged (Ignarro
et al., 1982b
; Wolin et al., 1982
). PPIX alters enzyme catalysis, in
part, by increasing the affinity of the enzyme for Mg2+-GTP or free Mg2+,
because divalent cations readily form complexes with PPIX. This direct
interaction between PPIX and divalent cations may be critical for
activation of sGC by this porphyrin. Enzyme-associated PPIX binds
Mg2+-GTP or uncomplexed
Mg2+, but not GTP alone (Ignarro et al., 1984
).
Divalent cations (Mg2+,
Mn2+) that complex with GTP are absolutely
required as substrate cofactors to support guanylyl cyclase catalytic activity.
An iron atom can be incorporated after the protoporphyrin has been
assembled into the protein to form heme (ferroprotoporphyrin with
Fe2+) or hematin (ferriprotoporphyrin with
Fe3+). Although heme is the required prosthetic
group mediating NO activation of sGC, ferro-PPIX is a competitive
inhibitor of PPIX (Ki = 350 nM)
(Ignarro, 1994
). Hematin inhibits basal activity in a noncompetitive
manner in the presence of either Mg2+-GTP
(Ki = 2.8 µM) or
Mn2+-GTP (Ki = 8.3 µM). Hematin concentrations below 1.5 µM competitively inhibit
PPIX without altering guanylyl cyclase activity
(Ki = 0.35 µM). This indicates that
ferroprotoporphyrin and ferriprotoporphyrin compete for the same
binding site on sGC (Wolin et al., 1982
). However, hematoporphyrin IX,
a ferriprotoporphyrin with two hydroxyethyl groups instead of the vinyl
groups found in protoporphyrin, activates sGC. Hematoporphyrin IX does
not occur naturally and is a less potent activator than PPIX.
Alterations in the structure of PPIX produce analogs, such as
uroporphyrin I, coproporphyrin I, and the dimethyl ester of PPIX, that
have no effect on sGC activity (Ignarro et al., 1982b
).
c. Catalytic Mechanism.
Catalytic domains present in the
C-terminus of both
- and
-subunits share significant homology
with the C1 and C2 catalytic domains of
adenylyl cyclase and the catalytic domains of pGCs. As discussed above,
coexpression of
- and
-subunits, which form a heterodimer
possessing two catalytic domains, is required for expression of
enzymatic activity. Although two catalytic domains are present, each
contributes specific residues to a single substrate binding and
catalytic site (Liu et al., 1997b
) (Fig. 1). Dimerization is mediated
by a specific region that is homologous to the dimerization domain of
pGCs and is located proximal to the catalytic domains of
- and
-subunits (Fig. 1). Indeed, coexpression of the C-terminal domains
of
1 and
1 that possess dimerization and catalytic regions is
sufficient for basal cGMP production (Wedel et al., 1995
). NMR
spectroscopy of sGC purified from rat liver demonstrated that cGMP and
pyrophosphate are the sole products of catalysis of GTP (Tsai et al.,
1980
). Analyses of pGC purified from sea urchin sperm established the
-phosphoanhydride bond as the site of cleavage during catalysis
(Walseth et al., 1981
) (Fig. 2). Examination of the stereochemical
course of the catalytic reaction of sGC purified from bovine lung using
[
-18O]GTP established that formation of cGMP is a
single direct displacement reaction (Senter et al., 1983
) (Fig. 2).
d. Divalent Cations.
Both pGCs and sGCs require divalent
cations as substrate cofactors and allosteric modulators to express
maximum catalytic activity (reviewed in Waldman and Murad, 1987
). All
nucleotide cyclases require that their purine nucleotide substrates
form a chelate with a divalent cation to bind to the catalytic domain and undergo enzymatic cyclization. Mn2+ and
Mg2+ are the optimum divalent cation substrate cofactors
(reviewed in Waldman and Murad, 1987
). Using Mg2+ as the
substrate cation cofactor, sGCs and pGCs exhibit basal catalytic
activities that are fully sensitive to activation by ATP and ligands.
Indeed, Mg2+ likely is the physiological cation supporting
guanylyl cyclase activity in vivo. In contrast, using Mn2+
as the substrate cation cofactor, guanylyl cyclases exhibit maximum catalytic activity that is insensitive to further activation by nucleotides and ligand (Hardman and Sutherland, 1969
; Kimura et al.,
1976
; Tsai et al., 1978
; Garbers, 1979
; Levine et al., 1979
; Gerzer et
al., 1981c
; Zwiller et al., 1981
). This is a general characteristic of
nucleotide cyclases. Adenylyl cyclase also is activated in a
ligand-independent fashion using Mn2+ as the substrate
cation cofactor. The precise mechanism by which Mn2+
activates guanylyl cyclases in a ligand-independent fashion remains unclear. However, it is an intrinsic characteristic of the protein because Mn2+ activated GC-A purified to homogeneity in a
ligand-independent fashion (Wong et al., 1995
). In addition to serving
as a required substrate cofactor, divalent cations also activate
guanylyl cyclases in an allosteric fashion (Garbers and Gray, 1974
;
Waldman and Murad, 1987
). Indeed, divalent cation concentrations in
excess of nucleotide substrate are required for maximum catalytic
activity. The precise molecular mechanisms by which divalent cations
allosterically modulate guanylyl cyclases remain unclear.
Calcium also supports guanylyl cyclase catalytic activity as a
substrate cofactor, but appears to be a negative allosteric modulator
of sGC (Levine et al., 1979
). Indeed, Ca2+ and
cGMP have antagonistic functions in several physiological systems. In
vascular smooth muscle, contraction is mediated by an increase in
[Ca2+]i, whereas
relaxation occurs as the result of an increase in [cGMP]i. In retinal photoreceptor cells, light
induces a decrease in [cGMP]i and a decrease in
[Ca2+]i, whereas
increases in [cGMP]i and
[Ca2+]i are associated
with dark recovery after exposure to light. However, it has been
difficult to examine the regulation of guanylyl cyclase by
Ca2+ because of the presence of calcium-dependent
regulatory mechanisms extrinsic to guanylyl cyclases in cells. For
example, Ca2+ interaction with GCAPs regulates
retinal guanylyl cyclase, and Ca2+ is a required
cofactor for NO synthase (NOS), whose product is a potent activator of
sGC (Yarfitz and Hurley, 1994
; Yu et al., 1999
). Recently,
Ca2+ regulation of sGC was studied in a
heterologous system in which other Ca2+-dependent
regulatory mechanisms were absent (Parkinson et al., 1999
). Human
embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293), which do not express NOS and express
low amounts of endogenous sGC activity, were cotransfected with
1-
and
1- subunits of rat sGC. Ca2+ inhibited
both basal and NO-stimulated crude and immunopurified sGC prepared from
those cells. In the physiological range of GTP, Ca2+ inhibition was concentration- and guanine
nucleotide-dependent with a Ki = 2.6 µM. Inhibition of sGC was mediated by extracellular Ca2+ and by release of
[Ca2+]i pools through
receptor-mediated mechanisms. Ca2+ decreased both
Vmax and
Km of sGC, consistent with an
uncompetitive mechanism of inhibition in which
Ca2+ interacts either with the substrate
(Mg2+-GTP) or one of the products [cGMP or
pyrophosphate (PPi)] at the catalytic site. This mechanism is similar
to that of P-site inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, wherein purine
nucleotides inhibit enzyme activity by binding to the catalytic
apparatus in the presence of the product Mg2+-PPi
(Dessauer, 1997
). This study suggests sGC may function as a
specific sensor of
[Ca2+]i that mediates
coordinated reciprocal regulation of
[Ca2+]i and
[cGMP]i.
 |
III. Cyclic GMP and Cell Signaling |
A. Introduction
Endogenous and exogenous compounds, including autocoids, hormones,
neurotransmitters, and toxins, produce cellular responses through cGMP.
The biochemical mechanisms underlying those responses include synthesis
(guanylyl cyclase, see above), targeting (various, see below), and
degradation (PDEs, see below) of cGMP. The specificity of cellular
responses to cGMP is dictated by cGMP-binding motifs in target
proteins. Two evolutionarily distinct allosteric sites for binding cGMP
are present in eukaryotic cells. One occurs with significant sequence
homology in PKGs and cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) and in the
cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) cation channels, while the other occurs
in cGMP-regulated PDEs. In addition, the outcome of increased
[cGMP]i is determined by the type and
combination of target proteins and substrates, the cGMP-metabolizing
enzymes expressed in cells, and their intracellular colocalization and organization into selective compartments and organelles. For example, phospholamban and the IP3 receptor in the
sarcoplasmic reticulum are substrates for both PKG and PKA, but the
pattern of colocalization of the kinase and its substrates differs
according to cell type. PKG colocalizes with these two substrates in
SMCs, whereas PKA colocalizes with them in cardiac myocytes (Lincoln et
al., 1995
). Therefore, the phosphorylation of phospholamban and
IP3 receptors in SMCs contributes to the
relaxation response and is cGMP-dependent. In contrast, the
phosphorylation of the same substrates in cardiac myocytes occurs
through the cAMP/PKA pathway and promotes Ca2+
sequestration and a shortened cardiac systole. Finally, cGMP may have
different effects under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. For example, in activated neutrophils, cGMP/PKG
phosphorylates the intermediate filament vimentin after transient
colocalization of the enzyme to the filament. In quiescent neutrophils,
cGMP analogs do not induce phosphorylation of vimentin (Wyatt et al., 1991
).
The following sections provide a brief perspective on how guanylyl
cyclases and cGMP are integrated into transmembrane signaling cascades
and a broad overview of events downstream from regulation of guanylyl
cyclases and [cGMP]i accumulation in placental
mammalian systems. For this reason, the physiological role of cGMP in
specific cellular systems, such as human blood cells, and in primitive unicellular organisms is not described. For the interested reader, outstanding reviews are available that focus specifically on PKA and
PKG (Francis and Corbin, 1999
), CNG cation channels (Kaupp, 1995
;
Zimmerman, 1995
; Biel et al., 1999b
), and cGMP-regulated PDEs
(Beavo, 1995
; Juilfs et al., 1999
). In addition, a complete compendium
of the functions of cGMP is available (Murad, 1994
).
B. Protein Kinases
1. Cyclic GMP-Dependent Protein Kinases.
PKG represents the
principal intracellular mediator of cGMP signals. Ligand-induced
elevation of [cGMP]i induces a binding-dependent activation of PKG leading to the catalytic transfer of the
-phosphate from ATP to a serine or threonine residue on the target
protein. This phosphorylated protein then mediates the translation of
the extracellular stimulus into a specific biological function.
Two different genes for PKG have been identified in mammals. One gene
is located on human chromosome 10 and codes for the I
and I
isoforms of PKG I, which arise from alternative splicing of the
N-terminal region (Tamura et al., 1996a
). The other is located on human
chromosome 4 and encodes PKG II (Orstavik et al., 1996
). PKG I is a
cytosolic 76-kDa homodimer widely expressed in mammalian tissues,
especially in cerebellum, platelet, and smooth muscle (Lohmann et al.,
1997
). The difference in the N-terminal domain between the two PKG
subtypes confers different binding affinities for cGMP. PKG I
has
high and low affinity binding sites that display positive cooperative
behavior. PKG I
has two cGMP binding sites characterized by lower
affinity and cooperativity (Pfeifer et al., 1999
). Moreover, although
expression of these two isoforms has been detected in the same human
tissues, PKG I
was detected mainly in the vascular system, kidney,
and adrenal gland, whereas only PKG I
was detected in the uterus
(Tamura et al., 1996a
).
PKG II is an 86-kDa membrane-bound homodimer. It is absent from the
cardiovascular system, abundant in brain and intestine, and is also
expressed in lung, kidney, and bone (Uhler, 1993
; Jarchau et al., 1994
;
Lohmann et al., 1997
). The amino acid sequence of PKG II differs from
the sequence of PKG I principally at the N terminus; unique sites in
this region direct intracellular localization of the enzyme. PKG II
contains a myristoylated site that is required for membrane
association, whereas PKG I contains an acetylated site (Lohmann et al.,
1997
). A major difference between the two PKGs is that the cGMP binding
sites in PKG II have minimal affinity and cooperativity. Another
difference is a significant divergence in their substrate selectivity,
which becomes more evident in vivo (Pfeifer et al., 1999
). Moreover,
the two forms of PKG are expressed in different cells, with the
exception of chondrocytes in the growth plate in the tibia of newborn
mice (Pfeifer et al., 1996
).
All known PKGs are composed of N-terminal, regulatory, and catalytic
domains. The N-terminal domain contains five regulatory sites: (1) the
subunit dimerization site, consisting of an
-helix with a conserved
leucine/isoleucine heptad repeat; (2) autoinhibitory sites, involved in
the inhibition of the catalytic domain in the absence of cGMP; (3)
autophosphorylation sites, which in the presence of cGMP may increase
the basal catalytic activity and the affinity of PKGs for cAMP; (4) a
site regulating the affinity and the cooperative behavior of the cGMP
binding sites; and (5) the intracellular localization site, which
determines the interaction of the enzyme with specific subcellular
structures. The regulatory domain contains two cyclic nucleotide
binding sites (conventionally termed "A" and "B") that allow
for full activation of the enzyme after specific binding of two
molecules of cGMP. Finally, the catalytic domain, located at the
C-terminus of PKGs, contains the binding sites for
Mg2+-ATP and the target protein (Lincoln et al.,
1995
; Lohmann et al., 1997
; Pfeifer et al., 1999
).
A broad range of proteins are phosphorylated by PKGs in vitro, but
phosphorylation of only a few has been demonstrated in vivo. This
apparent discrepancy may be explained by the fact that, in addition to
the recognition sequence of the substrate, under physiological
conditions the substrate specificity for PKG is dictated by
intracellular spatial localization. This results in a unique
macromolecular aggregate comprised of the enzyme-target protein complex.
The current working hypothesis suggests that PKG I acts as a soluble
intracellular modulator of
[Ca2+]i, while PKG II
regulates fluid homeostasis at the cell membrane. Biological substrates
for PKG I may be conceptually subdivided into three main groups,
"classical," "new," and "hypothetical" targets.
"Classical" targets are clearly recognized as substrates, in vitro
and/or in vivo, are phosphorylated by PKG I, and have well established
functions. This group includes: (1) the IP3
receptor and phospholamban, which are primarily implicated in SMC
relaxation (Raeymaekers et al., 1990
; Komalavilas and Lincoln, 1996
);
(2) the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein and vimentin, which are
involved in platelet and neutrophil activation, respectively (Pryzwansky et al., 1995
; Aszódi et al., 1999
); (3) the G
substrate, which is strongly expressed in cerebellar Purkinje cells
where it acts as a phosphatase inhibitor (Endo et al., 1999
); and (4) the thromboxane A2 receptor, whose activation was
found to be inhibited by PKG-mediated phosphorylation in platelets
(Wang et al., 1998
). "New" target proteins are PKG I substrates
that either have been described recently or have conflicting evidence
regarding their phosphorylation by PKG I. This group includes: (1) the
L-type Ca2+ channel and the
Ca2+-activated K+ channel
which, upon phosphorylation, contribute to the regulation of vascular
smooth muscle tone and cardiac contractility (Jahn et al., 1988
; Fukao
et al., 1999
); (2) the Ca2+-dependent cytosolic
phospholipase A2, implicated in intestinal smooth
muscle relaxation (Murthy and Makhlouf, 1998
); (3) a tyrosine hydroxylase whose activity in intact bovine chromaffin cells was observed to increase after PKG I-mediated phosphorylation
(Rodríguez-Pascual et al., 1999
); and (4) the myosin-binding
subunit of myosin light chain phosphatase, which mediates SMC
relaxation and vasodilation (Surks et al., 1999
). Most, if not all, of
these substrates are phosphorylated by the subtype I
of PKG.
"Hypothetical" target proteins have been suggested, but not
demonstrated, to be phosphorylated by PKG I
. This group contains
putative substrates predicted on the basis of experimental
demonstrations of cGMP/PKG I mediated processes. For example,
cytoskeletal and contractile proteins (i.e., myosin light chain,
calponin, desmin, connexins) are thought to be PKG I
target
molecules in the regulation of vascular remodeling and neoangiogenesis
(Lincoln et al., 1998
; Eigenthaler et al., 1999
). Similarly, synaptic
vesicle proteins (i.e., rabphilin-3A) may be phosphorylated by PKG I
and mediate synaptic plasticity and neurotransmission (Qian et al.,
1996
; Gray et al., 1999
; Yawo, 1999
). The cGMP/PKG I pathway has been
implicated in the control of gene expression of various promoter
response elements (i.e., serum response element, AP-1 binding site, and
cAMP response element) (Gudi et al., 1996
, 1997
).
In contrast to PKG I, the only recognized "classical" substrate
that is phosphorylated by PKG II is the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) in intestinal mucosal cells (Vaandrager et
al., 1997
). Localization of PKG II in the apical membranes of the
enterocytes of the small intestine permits it to phosphorylate CFTR in
response to GC-C-induced cGMP formation. The phosphorylation of CFTR
induces an electrogenic chloride current and subsequent water secretion
in the intestine. Colocalization and coregulation of the expression of
PKG II and a chloride channel in the inner medulla of rat kidney
suggest a similar mechanism may regulate renal function (Gambaryan et
al., 1996
). PKG II also may control the renin system and endochondral
ossification and growth of bone (Pfeifer et al., 1996
; Wagner et al.,
1998
). However, the target molecules in these latter processes are unknown.
2. Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases and Cyclic GMP
Signaling.
Because PKAs contain specific cyclic nucleotide
binding domains with significant homology to PKGs, they may be
activated by cGMP, although with a 50-fold lower selectivity than cAMP.
Although the nucleotide binding sites of PKAs and PKGs are homologous
(Pfeifer et al., 1999
), differences between these sites exist,
specifically in the substitution of key amino acid residues (Lohmann et
al., 1997
).
There is some controversy concerning cross-activation of protein
kinases by cyclic nucleotides. Interestingly, many of the known
physiological substrates for PKGs are also substrates for PKAs. In
addition, cGMP appears to act in concert with cAMP in a variety of
cellular processes. Thus, PKG and PKA inhibit
IP3-dependent release of
Ca2+ and induce relaxation in dispersed rabbit
and guinea pig gastric muscle cells (Murthy and Makhlouf, 1995
).
Similarly, isoproterenol or SNP induce the phosphorylation of cytosolic
Ca2+-dependent phospholipase
A2 by activating PKA or PKG, respectively, in
SMCs from the longitudinal muscle layer of rabbit intestine (Murthy and
Makhlouf, 1998
). The same effect is achieved by simultaneous stimulation of both kinases by VIP and isoproterenol, contributing to
the relaxation response of these cells.
In vertebrates, cGMP and cAMP relax vascular smooth muscle, inhibit
platelet activation, and regulate chloride and water secretion in the
intestine. Cyclic AMP cross-activates PKG in various vascular tissues,
including rat aorta and pig coronary artery (Jiang et al., 1992
;
Eckly-Michel et al., 1997
). In vitro, cGMP cross-activated PKA, which
mediates secretion of fluid induced by ST in human intestinal cells
(Forte et al., 1992
; Chao et al., 1994
). Functional convergence between
cGMP and cAMP also might occur at a downstream level, such as at the
level of the kinase target proteins. Based on the identity of
substrates phosphorylated by PKA and PKG, there is substantial overlap
between the two cyclic nucleotides in their ability to regulate
CO2-induced cerebrovasodilatation of adult rat
pial arteries (Wang et al., 1999
). These kinases may act in a
cooperative manner and the phosphorylation activity of one is required
for a full effect of the other. Overexpression of NOS, leading to
increased levels of NO, results in cross-activation of PKA by a large
increase in cGMP (Lincoln et al., 1995
). This mechanism mediates
inhibition of SMC proliferation and PKG I
expression in rat aorta
and underlies the development of nitrovasodilator tolerance in bovine
and rat aortic SMCs continuously exposed to these agents (Cornwell et
al., 1994
; Soff et al., 1997
; Lincoln et al., 1998
).
Although the above in vitro observations suggest cGMP could signal via
PKA in vivo, other considerations do not support this hypothesis.
Intact cells exhibit extensive subcellular compartmentalization that
confines second messengers, enzymes, and their substrates to finite
"work units" and represents an obstacle to cross-activation. In
addition, PKA and PKG must anchor to specific intracellular proteins to
perform their physiological functions. Thus, only PKA I
, but not PKA
II
, is redistributed and colocalized with the T-cell receptor
complex during anti-CD3 induced T-lymphocyte activation and capping.
PKA I
thereby mediates the inhibition by cAMP of T-cell
proliferation (Skålhegg et al., 1994
). Similarly, PKG transiently
colocalized with, and phosphorylated, vimentin in human neutrophils
activated by A23187, but not in quiescent cells (Pryzwansky et al.,
1995
). Colocalization of kinases and substrates, mediated by targeting
proteins, is now considered a primary determinant of the specificity of
their effects (Pfeifer et al., 1999
).
Physiologically relevant cross-regulation of protein kinases by cyclic
nucleotides has been challenged by studies in mice with homozygous PKG
I- or PKG II-null mutations. Cyclic GMP-induced relaxation in aortic
rings or gastric fundus muscle strips prepared from PKG I-deficient
mice was impaired, whereas cAMP-induced relaxation was not (Pfeifer et
al., 1998
). These mutant mice were hypertensive and lacked regular
intestinal peristalsis, indicating PKG I is the specific mediator of
cGMP effects in smooth muscle, in vivo. Furthermore, there was a
defective cGMP-mediated inhibition of the activation response in
platelets from the mutant mice, whereas cAMP-mediated inhibition was
not impaired (Massberg et al., 1999
). Indeed, no cross-activation of
platelet PKA by cGMP was observed. Finally, mice with a homozygous PKG
II null mutation displayed a selective reduction of ST- and
8-bromo-cGMP-induced intestinal secretion (Pfeifer et al., 1996
). In
contrast, electrogenic anion secretion from the small intestine
elicited by cAMP analogs was not affected by the mutation.
These observations suggest that, in vivo, cGMP and cAMP signaling
cascades elicit various important physiological effects largely
independently, and that neither cGMP activation of PKA nor cAMP
activation of PKG can completely compensate for the loss of the other
nucleotide. Although direct cross-regulation of protein kinases by
cyclic nucleotides may not appear to be a dominant process regulating
signaling, there is evidence that cGMP regulates electrogenic chloride
secretion in the small and large intestine by inhibiting the type 3 isoform of PDE, increasing intracellular cAMP, and activating PKA
(Vaandrager et al., 2000
). These data are discussed in more detail in a
later section of this review.
C. Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channels
CNG channels are a family of voltage-gated cation channels
expressed in a variety of cells. Characteristics of CNG channels include: (1) the presence of six transmembrane segments (S1-S6), (2)
an ion-conducting pore between the S5 and S6 regions, and (3) two
interactive regulatory domains on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane,
represented by both the N and C terminus of the channel. In addition,
CNG channels responsive to specific cyclic nucleotides contain a cyclic
nucleotide-binding domain in the C terminus homologous to that of
cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinases (Biel et al., 1999c
). Their
selective sensitivity to cyclic nucleotides resides in the eight
-rolls and three
-helices of the C terminus, as in PKAs and PKGs.
Thus, although all CNG channels are activated by both cGMP and cAMP,
certain isotypes are more sensitive to cGMP than cAMP, and vice versa.
Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels are
a specific subfamily of CNG channels. These channels are expressed in
brain and heart and are modulated by both direct binding of cyclic
nucleotides and hyperpolarization of the plasma membrane (Ludwig et
al., 1998
, 1999
). Three distinct HCN channels (HCN 1-3) have been
cloned from mouse brain, and a putative fourth member also has been
reported (McCoy et al., 1995
). These channels possess unique structural
characteristics in their pore region and in the S4 transmembrane
segment that confer selective ion permeability and unique voltage
sensitivity, respectively. Cyclic GMP enhanced the current amplitude
and rate of channel activation in membranes from HEK 293 cells
transiently expressing HCN2, and cAMP had an even greater effect
(Ludwig et al., 1998
). HCN2 is permeable to Na+
and K+ and demonstrates functional properties
similar to the ion current of pacemaker cells in the central nervous
system and the heart. Furthermore, two distinct human genes encoding
HCN channels cloned from human heart and expressed in HEK 293 cells
demonstrated electrophysiological characteristics compatible with a
putative function as effectors of cardiac pacemaking in vivo (Ludwig et
al., 1999
).
The principal family of CNG channels regulates influx of
Na+ and Ca2+ into cells and
is comprised of tetrameric proteins that are directly "opened" by
cyclic nucleotides. In contrast to HCN, CNG proteins display very weak
voltage sensitivity and consist of a heterotetrameric assemblage of
- and
-subunits. Only
-subunits form functional monomeric
channels when expressed in heterologous systems (Biel et al., 1999c
).
Three highly homologous
-subunits (CNG 1-3), initially cloned from
rods, cones, and olfactory neurons, have been found in pancreas,
spleen, testis, ovary, kidney, lung, brain, heart, adrenal gland, and
intestine (McCoy et al., 1995
). CNG 3-like channels were found in taste
buds of rat tongue and may be crucial molecules in sensory organs
(Misaka et al., 1997
). Only two
-subunits (CNG4 and CNG5) have been
identified (Biel et al., 1999c
). The CNG 4 gene is differentially
spliced, giving rise to several cell-specific isoforms (Biel et al.,
1999c
). Native CNG channels are thought to be composed of both
- and
-subunits, although homotetramers
4 and
4 may exist. Specific structural features of
the pore region of CNG channels confer ion-selective permeability. All
channels conduct monovalent cations but are more permeable to
Ca2+ than Na+ under
physiological conditions (extracellular Ca2+ > other monovalent cations). Furthermore, Ca2+
regulates the channel from either the extra- or intracellular compartment in a voltage-dependent manner (Biel et al., 1999c
). Ca2+ blocks channel activity directly by
interacting with high affinity binding sites and indirectly by
activating other proteins, such as calmodulin. The latter effect is an
important component of olfactory channel activity.
It has been suggested that
-subunits act as internal regulators of
the CNG channel activity, conferring specific properties, such as
single channel "flickering" and affinity for cAMP (Biel et al.,
1999c
). Other modulatory regions of CNG channels include the N-terminal
segment and the linker peptide between the S6 transmembrane domain and
the cytoplasmic cyclic nucleotide-binding domain. These determine
agonist affinity and channel gating and underlie cGMP regulation of
visual transduction in rod and cone photoreceptors and cAMP regulation
of olfaction (Biel et al., 1999c
).
Cyclic GMP mediates phototransduction at the level of rod and cone
photoreceptors and regulates neurotransmission within the retina. These
processes depend on CNG channels and high
[cGMP]i in ganglion, bipolar, and Muller glial
cells. Indeed, photoreceptors represent the principal cell types
exhibiting cGMP/CNG effects. Deletion of CNG 3 in mice results in
selective disruption of cone-mediated photoresponses and is
characterized by a progressive degeneration of cone photoreceptors, but
not rods or any other retinal cell types (Biel et al., 1999a
). Such
mice are fertile and develop normally. These data support the
hypothesis that a selective mutation in the human CNG 3 gene underlies
achromatopsia, a human disease characterized by total color-blindness
(Biel et al., 1999a
).
D. Cyclic GMP-Regulated Phosphodiesterases
Characterization of biochemical, pharmacological, and structural
profiles has identified at least 10 different gene families of PDEs in
mammals. Each member contains a conserved catalytic domain of ~270
amino acids in the C-terminus. This domain cleaves the phosphodiester
bond, hydrolyzing the 3', 5'-cyclic nucleotide to its corresponding
nucleotide, 5' monophosphate (McAllister-Lucas et al., 1995
). All PDEs
contain heterogeneous regulatory domains and function as dimers,
although the functional significance of this latter feature remains undefined.
PDE families 1, 2, 3, and 10 hydrolyze both cGMP and cAMP; PDE families
4, 7, and 8 preferentially cleave cAMP; and PDE families 5, 6, and 9 specifically hydrolyze cGMP. The activity of PDEs is crucial for
cellular signaling because metabolism of cyclic nucleotides modulates
their intracellular concentrations and affects subsequent cellular and
behavioral responses. PDEs regulate cardiac functions, adrenal
steroidogenesis, the male erectile response, and phototransduction
(Juilfs et al., 1999
). Specific PDE targeting sites may localize the
enzyme in close proximity to selected proteins, thereby modulating
cyclic nucleotide levels in specific compartments.
Cyclic GMP regulates PDEs through three different mechanisms: (1)
increasing activity through mass action (PDE5, 6, and 9), (2) altering
the rate of hydrolysis of cAMP through competition at the catalytic
site (PDE1, 2, and 3), and (3) regulating enzymatic activity through
direct binding to specific allosteric sites (PDE2, 5, 6, and 10)
(Corbin and Francis, 1999
).
The presence of noncatalytic allosteric sites permits cGMP to regulate
the activity of PDEs in several ways. The cGMP binding domain in PDE2,
5, 6, and 10 contains two in-tandem homologous sites of about 110 amino
acids located at the N terminus. They contain an amino acid sequence
different from that of cyclic nucleotide-dependent kinases and CNG
channels, representing a separate class of cGMP-regulated proteins
(Corbin and Francis, 1999
). PDE10 catalyzes the hydrolysis of both
cyclic nucleotides, but its physiological function is still unclear.
PDE2 is widely distributed, exists as homodimers of 100- to 150-kDa
subunits, and catalyzes the hydrolysis of cGMP and cAMP. Cyclic GMP
binds to allosteric sites, stimulates PDE2 activity, and increases cGMP
hydrolysis, forming a negative-feedback mechanism regulating
[cGMP]i. Similarly, cGMP enhances the
PDE2-mediated degradation of cAMP, thus cross-regulating its
intracellular concentration (McAllister-Lucas et al., 1993
).
PDE5, a homodimer of 93-kDa subunits, specifically degrades cGMP.
Direct binding of cGMP to allosteric sites promotes phosphorylation of
PDE5 by either PKG or PKA, thereby indirectly stimulating enzyme activity. It has been suggested that binding of cGMP to the allosteric sites directly activates PDE5, but this effect has not been
demonstrated (Corbin and Francis, 1999
). Finally, PDE6 in rod (PDE6-A
and -B) and cone (PDE6-C) photoreceptors is comprised of two large
catalytically active subunits (
,
in rods;
'2 in cones) associated with various smaller
inhibitory
-subunits and a regulatory
-subunit. It is believed
that cGMP binding to allosteric sites of PDE6 regulates the interaction
between catalytic subunits, inhibitory subunits, and transducin, an
important step in phototransduction (McAllister-Lucas et al., 1993
,
1995
).
E. Cyclic GMP and Cell Physiology
1. Motility of Vascular Smooth Muscle.
The mechanism
underlying contraction of vascular smooth muscle is based on
synergistic and antagonistic forces regulating [Ca2+]i. Contractile forces elevate
[Ca2+]i and/or sensitize the intracellular
environment to Ca2+, whereas dilating forces reduce
[Ca2+]i and/or desensitize the intracellular
environment to Ca2+. The effect of these opposing processes
is phosphorylation of the 20-kDa light chain of myosin (MLC20) on
serine 19 by myosin light chain kinase to produce vasoconstriction, and
dephosphorylation of MLC20 by myosin light chain phosphatase to produce
vasorelaxation, respectively (Bennett and Waldman, 1995
).
Exogenous and endogenous compounds (such as nitrovasodilators,
endothelium-derived relaxing factor, and natriuretic peptides) produce
vasodilatation through increases in [cGMP]i.
Cyclic GMP relaxes vascular SMCs by both desensitizing the contractile
apparatus to Ca2+ and lowering
[Ca2+]i (Fig.
4). Glyceryl trinitrate- or SNP-mediated
vascular relaxation in the absence of significant reductions of
[Ca2+]i has been reported
in porcine carotid and coronary arteries (Abe et al., 1990
; McDaniel et
al., 1992
). Cyclic GMP induces a shift to the right of the
pCa2+-tension curve in rat mesenteric arteries
permeabilized with
-toxin and depleted of stores of
[Ca2+]i (Nishimura and
van Breemen, 1989
). In a similar experiment with de-endothelized smooth
muscle strips from rabbit femoral arteries, 8-bromo-cGMP elevated the
ED50 of Ca2+ for both
contractile force and MLC20 phosphorylation via indirect activation of myosin light chain phosphatase (Lee et al., 1997
).

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Molecular mechanisms underlying vascular smooth
muscle relaxation mediated by cyclic GMP. Cyclic GMP induces smooth
muscle relaxation by reducing [Ca2+]i and
desensitizing the contractile apparatus to Ca2+. Cyclic GMP
reduces [Ca2+]i by (1) inhibiting
Ca2+ influx through L-type Ca2+ channels; (2)
increasing Ca2+ efflux through activation of (2d) the
Ca2+-pumping ATPase and (2b) the
Na+/Ca2+ exchanger; also, cGMP may produce
membrane hyperpolarization through activation of (2c) the
Na+/K+ ATPase and (2a) K+ channels,
thereby increasing Ca2+ extrusion by the
Na+/Ca2+ exchanger; (3) increasing of
Ca2+ sequestration through activation of the sarcoplasmic
reticulum Ca2+-pumping ATPase [Ph, phospholamban]; and
(4) decreasing of Ca2+ mobilization through inhibition of
agonist-induced IP3 formation or inhibition of the IP3 receptor in the
sarcoplasmic reticulum. R, receptor; G, G protein; PLC, phospholipase
C; IP3R, IP3 receptor. Cyclic GMP desensitizes the contractile
apparatus to Ca2+ (5) probably by activating myosin light
chain phosphatase, resulting in dephosphorylation of the 20 kDa myosin
light chain.
|
|
Although PKG I has been proposed as the principal candidate mediating
these cGMP effects, other molecular targets cannot be excluded from
consideration. Among these, PKA is a possible candidate, based on
biochemical and functional convergence between mechanisms underlying
cGMP and cAMP-induced vascular relaxation. However, as described above,
this hypothetical cyclic nucleotide cross talk does not appear to occur
in the cardiovascular system, in vivo, in which cGMP signals via
cAMP-independent pathways.
Cyclic GMP mediates vascular smooth muscle relaxation principally by
lowering [Ca2+]i (Fig.
4). Depending on the tissue, species, and cellular genotype and
phenotype, cGMP could affect
[Ca2+]i in four different
ways: (1) by reducing Ca2+ influx, (2) by
increasing Ca2+ efflux, (3) by promoting
Ca2+ sequestration in the sarcoplasmic reticulum,
and (4) by decreasing Ca2+ mobilization. Thus,
cGMP/PKG-dependent mechanisms inhibit voltage-dependent activation of
L-type Ca2+ channels by both direct impairment of
the channel activity and indirect hyperpolarization of the SMC surface
via an increase in the open probability of
KCa channels (Archer et al., 1994
; Carrier et al., 1997
; Liu et al., 1997a
; Ruiz-Velasco et al., 1998
).
PKG phosphorylation of putative receptor-operated
Ca2+ channels and of the
-subunit of large
conductance KCa channels has been
demonstrated, strongly supporting a physiological role for the
cGMP-mediated reduction in Ca2+ influx (Blayney
et al., 1991
; Fukao et al., 1999
).
Activation of two different ionic channels, the plasma membrane
Ca2+-pumping ATPase and the
Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, may
mediate an increased efflux of Ca2+ from vascular
SMCs. The driving force for extrusion of Ca2+
from the cell through the
Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, in
turn, may be dependent on two other effects mediated by cGMP, depletion
of intracellular Na+ via activation of
Na+-K+ ATPase and
hyperpolarization of the cell membrane via activation of
K+ channels. The
Ca2+-pumping ATPase and the
Na+-K+ ATPase in the plasma
membrane are activated by cGMP through PKG (Yoshida et al., 1992
;
Tamaoki et al., 1997
). As described above, cGMP also could indirectly
promote Ca2+ transport out of cells through
activation of K+ channels and the resultant
hyperpolarization. Moreover, 8-bromo cGMP may stimulate the
Na+/Ca2+ exchanger
independently of any modifications in the membrane potential (Furukawa
et al., 1991
).
Cyclic GMP induces uptake of Ca2+ into
intracellular stores via activation of the sarcoplasmic reticulum
Ca2+-pumping ATPase (Andriantsitohaina et al.,
1995
). The molecular mechanism underlying this effect appears to be PKG
phosphorylation of phospholamban, as demonstrated in cultured rat
cardiomyocytes (Sabine et al., 1995
). Finally, it seems cGMP may
inhibit the IP3 signal transduction pathway and
thereby lower [Ca2+]i.
Indeed, cGMP blocks agonist-induced IP3 formation
and induces PKG-mediated phosphorylation of the
IP3 receptor in the sarcoplasmic reticulum,
subsequently attenuating mobilization of Ca2+
(Fujii et al., 1986
; Ruth et al., 1993
; Komalavilas and Lincoln, 1994
,
1996
).
In summary, there is evidence suggesting a complex role for cGMP in
vascular smooth muscle relaxation exerted through the control of
[Ca2+]i (Fig. 4). It is
likely that, in vivo, different mechanisms operate synergistically to
lower levels of [Ca2+]i
and induce vascular relaxation utilizing cGMP as a second messenger.
2. Intestinal Fluid and Electrolyte Homeostasis.
ST induces
secretory diarrhea by activating guanylyl cyclase and increasing
[cGMP]i (Fig. 5). The
cellular targets of this pathological effect are the epithelial cells
lining the intestine, where the only detected guanylyl cyclase isoform
is GC-C, the receptor for ST (Vaandrager and De Jonge, 1994
).
Disruption of the gene encoding GC-C in mice resulted in resistance to
ST-induced diarrhea, demonstrating that GC-C is absolutely required for
ST-induced intestinal secretion (Mann et al., 1997
; Schulz et al.,
1997
). In animal models, binding of ST to GC-C stimulated intestinal secretion via increases in cGMP, and the effects of ST on intestinal secretion were mimicked by cell-permeant analogs of cGMP (Field et al.,
1978
; Hughes et al., 1978
; Mezoff et al., 1992
). High affinity
receptors for ST are localized in brush border membranes of enterocytes
from the duodenum to the rectum, with the highest density in the small
intestine (Krause et al., 1994b
).

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Regulation of intestinal secretion by the ST and
GC-C. Bacteria, such as E. coli, containing plasmids
encoding a member of the homologous peptide family of STs colonize the
intestine after the consumption of contaminated food and/or water.
Bacterial colonization leads to production of ST in the gut lumen,
which specifically recognizes and binds to the extracellular domain of
GC-C, expressed in the brush border membranes of intestinal mucosa
cells from the duodenum to the rectum. Interaction of ST and the
extracellular domain of GC-C is translated across the plasma membrane
into activation of the cytoplasmic catalytic domain resulting in the
production and accumulation of [cGMP]i. This cyclic
nucleotide binds to and activates PKG II, also localized in the
intestinal cell brush border membrane. Also, cGMP may activate PKA,
either directly or by inhibiting a cAMP-specific PDE and inducing the
accumulation of cAMP. The CFTR that is colocalized with GC-C and PKG II
in brush border membranes is a substrate for that protein kinase and
PKA. CFTR is a chloride channel, and its phosphorylation by PKA or PKG
results in a persistent open state, permitting chloride to flow down
its concentration gradient from the intracellular to the extracellular
compartment. Other ion channels and transporters in the cell maintain
the electroneutrality of ST-induced chloride efflux. Vectoral water
flux from the basolateral to the apical surface is driven by these
ionic conductances, resulting in the accumulation of fluid and
electrolytes in the intestinal lumen and secretory diarrhea.
|
|
CFTR is a key component mediating the enterotoxigenic effect of ST
(Fig. 5). In the absence of functional CFTR, which occurs in patients
with cystic fibrosis or in mice with null mutations for CFTR, ST and
cGMP analogs fail to induce diarrhea. In addition, the intestine,
lung, and pancreas develop severe abnormalities in the regulation of
water and salt content (Quinton, 1990
). CFTR is recognized as a major
mediator of cyclic nucleotide regulation of fluid and electrolyte
transport across a variety of epithelia, conducting chloride current
across the apical cellular membrane. In addition to CFTR, recent
evidence suggests a role for inhibition of brush border membrane
electroneutral sodium absorption, possibly mediated by a
Na+/H+ exchanger, in
mechanisms underlying ST-induced fluid and electrolyte secretion
(Vaandrager et al., 2000
).
Cyclic GMP activates CFTR and promotes chloride efflux, which
presumably drives water transport into the lumen in the intestine (Fig.
5). PKG appears to be the principal molecular target of cGMP in the
signal sequence leading to CFTR activation. PKG I
and PKG II
phosphorylate CFTR, in vitro, with similar kinetics, suggesting the
absence of a specific PKG-mediated function in this process (French et
al., 1995
). However, PKG II, but not PKG I
, colocalizes with GC-C in
brush borders of enterocytes and activates CFTR in excised membrane
patches of various cell lines transfected with CFTR (Lohmann et al.,
1997
). Cotransfection of rat intestinal cells with CFTR and PKG II
results in activation of CFTR, while cotransfection with PKG I
does
not activate that channel (Vaandrager et al., 1998
). Mutation of the
PKG II N-terminal myristoylation site reduces localization of the
enzyme to the membrane and impairs activation of CFTR. In contrast, a
chimeric construct of soluble PKG I
and the membrane-directed
N-terminal domain of PKG II acquired the ability to activate CFTR. Of
significance, agents that increased cGMP in the small intestine of PKG
II-deficient mice inhibited the induction of secretion or electrogenic
chloride currents, whereas cAMP-induced intestinal secretion was not
affected (Pfeifer et al., 1996
; Vaandrager et al., 2000
). These studies suggest that PKG II is a major physiological mediator of CFTR activation in the small intestine and targeting of this kinase to the
membrane is a major determinant for its function in intact cells.
Interestingly, in addition to PKG II, other mechanisms appear to
mediate activation of CFTR by cGMP in small intestine and colon (Fig.
5). Cyclic GMP can directly activate PKA and stimulate CFTR-mediated
chloride currents in human colonic cells that do not express PKG II
(Forte et al., 1992
; Chao et al., 1994
). Also, ST induces electrogenic
chloride secretion in the colon and jejunum of PKG II-deficient mice
(Vaandrager et al., 2000
). The effect of ST on intestinal anion
secretion in PKG II-deficient mice was potentiated by addition of
amrinone, an inhibitor of the PDE3 isoform that catalyzes the
degradation of cAMP but is inhibited by cGMP (Vaandrager et al., 2000
).
Taken together, these data suggest that increases in
[cGMP]i stimulated by ST may induce phosphorylation of CFTR and electrogenic chloride transport by activating PKG II or PKA. The latter protein kinase may be activated directly by cGMP or by local accumulation of
[cAMP]i that reflects inhibition of PDE3 by
increases in [cGMP]i (Fig. 5).
A key question concerning cGMP-mediated regulation of intestinal fluid
and electrolyte transport was the identity of the endogenous ligand
that activated GC-C. The paradox that there exists a unique mammalian
receptor for bacterial enterotoxins was resolved by the demonstration
that extracts of intestine from rats stimulated GC-C and increased cGMP
concentrations in T84 human intestinal cells (Currie et al., 1992
). The
bioactive substance, guanylin, is a 15-residue peptide structurally and
functionally homologous to ST. Guanylin is produced by epithelial cells
or cells controlling epithelial function in small intestine, colon,
adrenal gland, uterus, kidney, pancreas, and oviduct. In T84 human
intestinal cells, guanylin stimulates cGMP synthesis with a 10-fold
lower potency compared with ST (Forte and Currie, 1995
). Uroguanylin, a
guanylin-like peptide isolated from the urine of opossum and humans,
stimulates GC-C in rat colon, in vitro, and in T84 cells, although with
lower potency than ST (Hamra et al., 1993
; Kita et al., 1994
).
Intriguingly, the effect on T84 cells is strongly influenced by the
extracellular pH: at low pH (i.e., 5.0-5.5) uroguanylin is 100-fold
more potent than guanylin, whereas at a pH of 8.0, guanylin is 4-fold
more potent than uroguanylin (Hamra et al., 1997
). These latter
findings suggest the possibility of a segmental regulation of the
intestine by these endogenous peptides because the pH of the intestinal
lumen varies considerably from the stomach to the rectum.
The signaling cascade mediated by guanylin/uroguanylin in the intestine
is identical with that described for ST (Fig. 5). After binding to GC-C
at the apical membrane of enterocytes, the ligands stimulate the
intrinsic guanylyl cyclase catalytic activity, initiating a cascade in
which there is (1) accumulation of [cGMP]i, (2)
stimulation of the membrane-associated PKG II and/or PKA, and (3)
phosphorylation of CFTR (Gudi et al., 1996
). The electrogenic chloride
current, reflecting activation of CFTR, causes net secretion of salt
and water into the intestinal lumen. It has been proposed that
physiological concentrations of guanylin may act as an intestinal fluid
sensor to prevent excessive dehydration and to cleanse the intestinal
mucosa (Lohmann et al., 1997
). However, at abnormally high
concentrations (i.e., in pathological states), guanylin may cause an
exaggerated loss of fluid and diarrhea (Forte and Currie, 1995
).
The pattern of water and ion movements induced by guanylin, in vivo,
was recently studied in closed intestinal loops in rats (Volant et al.,
1997
). Guanylin (2 µM) stimulated secretion of water,
Na+, and Cl
in the
duodenum, ileum, and colon through inhibition of
Na+ absorption and stimulation of
Cl
efflux. This effect was lower than that of
ST in all intestinal segments. In contrast, no detectable electrolyte
fluxes were observed in the jejunum. However, in a subsequent
experiment with closed jejunal loops of anesthetized rats, rat and
human guanylin (1 µM) inhibited absorption of fluids and NaCl (Ieda
et al., 1999
). In the same experiment, guanylin, uroguanylin, and ST
induced isotonic fluid movement into the jejunal lumen, but only ST and uroguanylin increased the luminal pH by stimulating bicarbonate secretion.
Although the above discussion suggests an involvement of cGMP in the
regulation of intestinal fluid and electrolyte homeostasis, the
physiological significance of this mechanism remains unclear. Thus, the
presence of GC-C in the intestines of reptiles and birds indicates a
clear evolutionary conservation for this isoform of guanylyl cyclase
(Krause et al., 1995
, 1997
). However, mice in which the genes for GC-C
or its downstream molecular target, PKG II, have been disrupted have no
apparent abnormalities in their intestinal development and function,
except for guanylin/uroguanylin/ST unresponsiveness (Schulz et al.,
1997
; Foster et al., 1999
; Pfeifer et al., 1999
).
3. Phototransduction.
Phototransduction in the outer segment
of the retina represents a vivid example of the importance of cGMP in
physiological processes. Indeed, cGMP regulates the recovery phase of
visual excitation and adaptation to background light (Ames et al.,
1999
). Both rod and cone photoreceptors contain unique proteins that act cooperatively to control key second messengers,
[cGMP]i and [Ca2+]i. These, in
turn, regulate the entire mechanism underlying phototransduction and
determine physiological responses to light.
Retinal cells contain two isoforms of membrane-bound guanylyl cyclase,
GC-E and -F. These isoforms are expressed only in photoreceptor cells
in vertebrates, where they form homodimers that are activated by
interaction with specific Ca2+-binding proteins,
GCAPs, in the cytoplasmic compartment. In contrast, no putative
extracellular ligands have been identified, and these sensory cyclases
are considered orphan receptors. GC-E has been detected in both rods
and cones, whereas GC-F appears to be present only in rod cells.
Disruption of the gene encoding GC-E in mice results in a selective
degeneration of cones, but not of rods. Specific mutations of the human
GC-E gene are associated with two congenital retinal diseases (Foster
et al., 1999
).
A similar pathological outcome was observed in CNG 3-deficient mice
(Biel et al., 1999a
). These mice display a loss of cone cells and an
impaired response to light, mimicking achromatopsia (Biel et al.,
1999a
). The CNG channel, another essential component of the
phototransduction mechanisms, is the principal molecular target of cGMP
in the plasma membrane of rods and cones. Like the retinal guanylyl
cyclases, two distinct, yet homologous, heterotetrameric CNG channels
are present in mammalian retina. CNG 3, with high Ca2+ conductance, is in cones, and CNG 1, with
low Ca2+ conductance, is in rods. Therefore, in
cone photoreceptors, Ca2+ influx during the dark
phase is double that in rods (10% of the total ionic current). These
inward Ca2+ currents are proportionally
counteracted by outward Ca2+ currents carried by
Na+/Ca2+K+-exchangers
in the plasma membrane of photoreceptors and provide the molecular
basis for the difference in timing of photoresponses in cones and rods
(Frings, 1997
).
The last component of the cGMP-related phototransduction machinery is
PDE6, the enzyme that degrades cGMP in photoreceptors. The preferred
substrate for this enzyme is cGMP. The enzyme is maximally activated by
a cooperative mechanism that involves activated transducin, the
-subunit of PDE6, and the binding of cGMP to specific allosteric
sites in PDE6. In retinal rods, PDE6 exists in a membrane protein
complex. In the active state, this complex consists of heterodimers
(
- and
-subunits), and in the inactive state it consists of
tetramers (
-,
-, and
2-subunits). A
fourth subunit, called
, serves as a regulatory component of the
PDE6 complex and directs translocation of enzymatic activity from
membrane to cytoplasm through binding at the prenylated C-terminus of
the PDE6
-subunit (Linari et al., 1999
). The PDE6 complex in membrane discs of rods is colocalized with rhodopsin and transducin, the two
proteins upstream from PDE6 in phototransduction. Rhodopsin contains a
chromophore (11-cis-retinal) that confers the ability to
respond to photons of light. Transducin is a heterotrimeric GTP-binding
protein (

-trimer); it releases an activated complex formed by
the
-subunit and a molecule of GTP upon interaction with activated rhodopsin.
Ca2+-binding proteins play important roles in
phototransduction (Fig. 6). Recoverin
binds Ca2+, and this complex inhibits rhodopsin
kinase, which permits activation of rhodopsin by light. Calmodulin
activated by Ca2+ binds the
-subunit of
retinal CNG channels and lowers their affinity for cGMP. Finally, the
family of guanylyl cyclase activating proteins (GCAP 1-3) activate
retinal guanylyl cyclase at low
[Ca2+]i (Foster et al.,
1999
). In general, all of these Ca2+-binding
proteins work as [Ca2+]i
sensors to promote an integrated response to light. At low [Ca2+]i they inhibit the
hydrolysis of cGMP, stimulate the synthesis of cGMP, and enhance the
ability of cGMP to open CNG channels, thereby raising
[Ca2+]i. In contrast, at
high [Ca2+]i they
contribute to decreasing the [cGMP]i and
lowering [Ca2+]i.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
The role of cGMP in phototransduction in
vertebrate rods. Light (hv) activates, in sequence, rhodopsin (Rh),
transducin (TR), and phosphodiesterase type 6 (PDE), resulting
in the hydrolysis of cGMP to GMP. Decreased [cGMP]i
results in the closure of the CNG channel, CNG1, inducing
hyperpolarization, a key signal translating photon energy into central
nervous system impulses. In addition, closure of CNG1 reduces the
influx of Ca2+ while Ca2+ efflux persists
through the cation exchanger, reducing
[Ca2+]i, which permits modulation of the
response to light by decreasing interaction of that cation with (1)
GCAPs, resulting in the activation of retinal guanylyl cyclases (RGC)
to replenish [cGMP]i; (2) calmodulin (CAM), resulting in
its dissociation from CNG1, reducing the potency of cGMP to open that
channel; and (3) recoverin (Rec), which inhibits that protein,
preventing interaction with rhodopsin kinase (RK), which phosphorylates
and inactivates rhodopsin. In the dark state, transducin (TR) and the
phosphodiesterase (PDE) are inactive, reflecting the low availability
of activated rhodopsin (Rh), and [cGMP]i accumulates,
maintaining the cation channel CNG1 in the open conformation and
photoreceptors in a depolarized state. In addition, CNG1 in the open
state elevates [Ca2+]i, which binds to (1)
GCAPs, inhibiting retinal guanylyl cyclase (RGC); (2) calmodulin (CAM),
resulting in its association with CNG1, increasing the potency of cGMP
to maintain that channel in the open state; and (3) recoverin (Rec),
promoting interaction with and inhibition of rhodopsin kinase (RK),
potentiating rhodopsin activation. Figure adapted from Current
Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 9, Pugh EN Jr, Nikonov S and Lamb
TD. Molecular mechanisms of vertebrate photoreceptor light adaption,
410-418, Copyright 1999, with permission from Elsevier Science.
|
|
The molecular components of the mammalian phototransduction machinery
combine to create a complex cascade in which cGMP and Ca2+ strictly interact to convert external energy
(light in the form of photons) to internal messages (electrical
impulses) (Fig. 6). Thus, during the dark state, high levels of cGMP
ensure a [Ca2+]i of about
500 nM and maintain the rod outer segment in a depolarized state. Under
these conditions, the PDE6 complex is weakly active, the CNG1 channel
is open, and the activity of the plasma membrane Na+/Ca2+K+-exchangers
limits the rise in
[Ca2+]i. Light triggers
the sequential activation of rhodopsin, transducin, and the PDE6
complex, leading to hydrolysis of cGMP. The subsequent decrease in
[cGMP]i closes the CNG1 channel and disrupts
the flux of Ca2+.
[Ca2+]i is thereby
lowered to about 50 nM, associated with hyperpolarization of the
photoreceptor membrane. The light-induced decrease in
[Ca2+]i is sensed by the
Ca2+-binding proteins, which then inhibit
activation of rhodopsin and stimulate guanylyl cyclase, thereby
increasing [cGMP]i mediating recovery from photoexcitation.
 |
IV. Conclusions |
Over the last decade, with the advent of molecular cloning
techniques, our understanding of the family of guanylyl cyclases and
their role in physiological and pathophysiological processes has
dramatically expanded. However, there are many outstanding questions
and exciting challenges for the future. Thus, the precise molecular
mechanisms regulating the flow of information between the various
domains of guanylyl cyclase to mediate receptor-effector coupling
require elucidation. The cellular components regulating guanylyl
cyclase activity, including kinases and phosphatases, are important to
define. The relationship between guanylyl cyclase activity and cellular
metabolism deserves attention, particularly because pGCs are tightly
regulated by ATP and alterations in the intracellular concentrations of
this nucleotide could have profound consequences on pGC signaling. The
integration of guanylyl cyclases into general mechanisms underlying
cellular signal transduction and cross talk between the guanylyl
cyclase system and other signaling cascades should be examined.
Finally, identification and characterization of new downstream
receptors of cGMP will further define the role of this important
signaling mechanism in cellular physiology.
This work was supported by grants from the
National Institutes of Health (HL59214, CA75123, CA79663). K.A.L. was
supported by National Institutes of Health training Grant 5T32 CA09137. I.R.-S. was supported by an NIH minority supplement. J.P. was supported
by NIH training Grant T32 DK07705. S.A.W is the Samuel M.V. Hamilton
Professor of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson
University, Philadelphia, PA.