Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Medicine and
Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Thomas Jefferson University,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (K.A.L., G.M.P., S.K., I.R.-S., J.P., S.S.,
K.P.C., S.A.W.); and Institute of Pharmacology, University of Catania
Medical School, Catania, Italy (G.M.P.)
Guanylyl cyclases are a family of enzymes that catalyze the
conversion of GTP to cGMP. The family comprises both
membrane-bound and soluble isoforms that are expressed in nearly all
cell types. They are regulated by diverse extracellular agonists that
include peptide hormones, bacterial toxins, and free radicals, as well as intracellular molecules, such as calcium and adenine nucleotides. Stimulation of guanylyl cyclases and the resultant accumulation of cGMP
regulates complex signaling cascades through immediate downstream
effectors, including cGMP-dependent protein kinases, cGMP-regulated
phosphodiesterases, and cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels. Guanylyl
cyclases and cGMP-mediated signaling cascades play a central role in
the regulation of diverse (patho)physiological processes, including
vascular smooth muscle motility, intestinal fluid and electrolyte
homeostasis, and retinal phototransduction. Topics addressed in this
review include the structure and chromosomal localization of the genes
for guanylyl cyclases, structure and function of the members of the
guanylyl cyclase family, molecular mechanisms regulating enzymatic
activity, and molecular sequences coupling ligand binding to catalytic
activity. A brief overview is presented of the downstream events
controlled by guanylyl cyclases, including the effectors that are
regulated by cGMP and the role that guanylyl cyclases play in cell
physiology and pathophysiology.
 |
I. Introduction |
Guanylyl cyclases have evolved to synthesize cGMP in response to
diverse signals, such as nitric oxide
(NO),2 peptide
ligands, and fluxes in intracellular Ca2+
([Ca2+]i). These signals
use specific guanylyl cyclase-coupled receptors and cofactors to
initiate the conversion of the cytosolic purine nucleotide GTP to cGMP.
Intracellular cGMP ([cGMP]i) regulates cellular
physiology by activating protein kinases, directly gating specific ion
channels, or altering intracellular cyclic nucleotide concentrations
through regulation of phosphodiesterases (PDEs). The structure and
function of the family of guanylyl cyclases, the molecular mechanisms
regulating their activities, and the downstream effectors that underlie
the physiology of cGMP-dependent processes are summarized in this review.
 |
II. Guanylyl Cyclases |
A. Molecular Biology
1. Identification of the Members of the Guanylyl Cyclase
Family.
It was established by the mid-1970s that guanylyl cyclase
activity was found in both the soluble and particulate fractions of
most cells (Hardman and Sutherland, 1969
; Ishikawa et al., 1969
;
Schultz et al., 1969
; White and Aurbach, 1969
), and that these
activities were due to different proteins (Garbers and Gray, 1974
;
Kimura and Murad, 1974
; Chrisman et al., 1975
). However, only with the
development of molecular cloning techniques more than a decade later
could the breadth of this enzyme family be fully explored (Tables 1 and
2).
Purification of guanylyl cyclase from the cytosolic compartment
revealed the soluble isoform was a heterodimer composed of
- and
-subunits. The
-subunit had a molecular mass of ~70 kDa,
whereas the
-subunit was reported to be 73 to 82 kDa (Gerzer et al.,
1981c
; Kamisaki et al., 1986
). Soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) was
purified to apparent homogeneity from bovine or rat lungs (Koesling et
al., 1988
, 1990
; Nakane et al., 1988
, 1990
). Degenerate oligonucleotide
probes based on the structure of purified subunits were used to screen
cDNA libraries and thereby clone
1- and
1-subunits. The
C-terminal region of both subunits had a high degree of sequence
identity with cloned adenylyl and particulate guanylyl cyclases (pGCs),
suggesting this was the catalytic domain. Sodium nitroprusside
(SNP)-sensitive guanylyl cyclase activity was expressed when the cloned
cDNAs for
1 and
1 were cotransfected into a heterologous cell
system, but not when transfected individually (Harteneck et al., 1990
; Nakane et al., 1990
). These data demonstrated both subunits of sGC are
required for basal and nitrovasodilator-stimulated catalytic activity.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2
Particulate guanylyl cyclase isoforms, ligand and cofactor
specificities, chromosomal localization, and tissue distribution
|
|
Studies of pGCs suggested a new paradigm for signal transduction.
Sea urchin sperm is one of the richest sources of pGC. In echinoderms,
peptides secreted by eggs activate pGC of sperm in a species-specific
manner (Suzuki et al., 1984
; Ramarao and Garbers, 1985
). Moreover,
radiolabeled egg peptides could be chemically cross-linked to a sperm
cell surface protein of the same size as that recognized by antiserum
against guanylyl cyclase (Shimomura et al., 1986
). These observations
suggested that pGC might also serve as a receptor for peptide ligands.
While these studies were being conducted in the sea urchin, atrial
natriuretic peptide (ANP) was demonstrated to activate guanylyl cyclase
and to increase [cGMP]i in mammalian tissues
(Hamet et al., 1984
; Waldman et al., 1984
; Winquist et al., 1984
).
Subsequently, ANP binding and guanylyl cyclase activity were
copurified, strongly suggesting the two activities reside in a single
molecule (Kuno et al., 1986
; Paul et al., 1987
; Shimonaka et al., 1987
;
Meloche et al., 1988
). In 1988, pGC was first cloned from a sea urchin
testis cDNA library using probes based on tryptic peptides obtained
from the purified protein (Singh et al., 1988
). This clone provided the
necessary probe for isolating mammalian cDNAs encoding pGCs. The
natriuretic peptide receptors, guanylyl cyclase A (GC-A) and B (GC-B),
were the first pGCs cloned from mammalian tissues (Chang et al., 1989
; Chinkers et al., 1989
; Lowe et al., 1989
; Schulz et al., 1989
). The
deduced primary sequences of the natriuretic peptide receptors predicted a protein with a single transmembrane domain that divides an
extracellular ligand-binding domain from an intracellular domain. Deletion mutagenesis studies have demonstrated that the intracellular domain serves regulatory, dimerization, and catalytic functions (Chinkers and Garbers, 1989
). This regulatory domain has sequence similarity with protein kinases, particularly the protein tyrosine kinases, which are also single transmembrane domain receptors (Singh et
al., 1988
). The sequences of the C-terminal catalytic domains are
highly homologous to those of the
- and
-subunits of sGC and have
limited identity with the two catalytic domains of adenylyl cyclases
(Krupinski et al., 1989
; Thorpe and Garbers, 1989
).
Development of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) facilitated the
search for new members of the guanylyl cyclase family. Degenerate PCR
primers based on conserved amino acid sequences in the catalytic
domains of both sGCs and pGCs were used to preferentially amplify
guanylyl, as opposed to adenylyl, cyclases and yielded sequences of a
second
- and a second
-subunit of sGC and five unique pGC
sequences (GC-C to GC-G) (Yuen et al., 1990
; Harteneck et al., 1991
). A
third pair of sGC subunits, cloned by screening a human cDNA library
with rat cDNA clones, is most likely the human ortholog of
1/
1
(Giuili et al., 1992
). Guanylyl cyclase C (GC-C) is the receptor for
the bacterial heat-stable enterotoxins (STs) (Schulz et al., 1990
; de
Sauvage et al., 1991
), and for the endogenous peptides guanylin and
uroguanylin (Currie et al., 1992
; Hamra et al., 1993
). The remaining
cloned mammalian pGCs are orphan receptors without known extracellular
ligands. Guanylyl cyclase D (GC-D) is expressed in the olfactory
neuroepithelium in a zonal pattern resembling that of the
seven-transmembrane domain odorant receptors (Fülle et al.,
1995
). Two other members of the sensory tissue subfamily of guanylyl
cyclases, guanylyl cyclase E (GC-E, retGC-1) and guanylyl cyclase F
(GC-F, retGC-2), are expressed in retina (Shyjan et al., 1992
; Lowe et
al., 1995
; Yang et al., 1995
). GC-E also is expressed in the pineal
gland (Yang et al., 1995
). Although these enzymes are orphan receptors, their extracellular domains are homologous to that of GC-D and share a
similar arrangement of cysteine residues in the extracellular domain
with the other pGCs. This suggests they may have an extracellular ligand, although the catalytic activity of the retinal cyclases is
regulated by [Ca2+]i
through guanylyl cyclase-activating proteins (GCAPs). The recently cloned GC-G most closely resembles the natriuretic peptide receptors, although it is not activated by natriuretic peptides (Schulz et al.,
1998b
). Apparently, the family of mammalian guanylyl cyclases is
relatively small because low stringency library screening and degenerate PCR have not yielded an abundance of unique cDNAs. In
contrast, Caenorhabditis elegans has approximately 30 genes encoding guanylyl cyclase-like sequences and is seemingly rich in
cGMP-coupled pathways (Yu et al., 1997
).
2. Structure and Location of Guanylyl Cyclase Genes.
The
chromosomal loci of the genes encoding isoforms of guanylyl cyclase and
their ligands have been mapped in the human and/or the mouse (Tables 1,
2) and are unlinked and scattered throughout the genome, with notable
exceptions. Thus, the genes encoding the natriuretic peptide ligands
for GC-A, ANP and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are organized in
tandem in both the human and the mouse (Huang et al., 1996
; Tamura et
al., 1996b
). Similarly, guanylin and uroguanylin, the endogenous
activators of GC-C, are encoded by closely linked genes (Whitaker et
al., 1997
). Retinal guanylyl cyclase activity is regulated by GCAPs,
which are calcium-binding proteins. To date, three members of the GCAP
family have been identified. GCAP1 and GCAP2 are found in a
tail-to-tail arrangement on human chromosome 6, whereas GCAP3 is
located on chromosome 3 (Subbaraya et al., 1994
; Haeseleer et al.,
1999
).
The genes encoding human sGC subunits
3 (equivalent to
1) and
3 (equivalent to
1) have been mapped to chromosome 4q32 (Giuili
et al., 1993
). Because both subunits are required in a 1:1
stoichiometry for activity, their common chromosomal locus may imply a
coordinated regulation of gene expression. The genes encoding
1 and
1 sGC subunits in the medaka fish are organized in tandem within a
34-kb span (Mikami et al., 1999
). The activity of the 5'-upstream
region of each of the medaka fish genes was analyzed using green
fluorescent protein reporter constructs expressed in medaka embryos
(Mikami et al., 1999
). Although the
1 upstream region promoted
expression of green fluorescent protein, the
1 5' region was
insufficient, suggesting expression of the
1- and
1-genes is
coordinated. However, the
2-subunit, which also can form an active
dimer in vitro with
1, is encoded by a gene on chromosome 11 (Yu et
al., 1996
). That
2- and
1-subunits dimerize under physiological
conditions argues against the requirement for coordinated regulation of
expression of
- and
-subunits (Russwurm et al., 1998
).
The structure of several genes for pGC has been determined, and the
organization of their domains is reflected in the conservation of the
intron/exon arrangement. This arrangement is most highly conserved in
the portion of the gene encoding the catalytic and kinase homology
domains. The extracellular domains of the guanylyl cyclases are
conserved among, but not between, subfamilies and the structure varies
most in those parts of the genes. Genes for GC-A and -B are similar in
size (16.5-17.5 kb) and structure, with 22 exons and virtually
identical intron/exon boundaries (Yamaguchi et al., 1990
; Rehemudula et
al., 1999
). However, the size of introns is not conserved between these
genes. Similarly, the guanylyl cyclases in sensory tissue share a
conserved gene structure and have only 20 exons (Yang et al., 1996
).
The gene for GC-C is much larger (>50 kb) than genes encoding the
other guanylyl cyclases and has a unique intron/exon arrangement (S. Schulz, J. Park, and S. A. Waldman, unpublished data). The
structures of the genes for sGC subunits have not yet been reported.
Little is known regarding the regulation of expression of the genes for
guanylyl cyclase. The 5' regulatory regions of genes that have been
sequenced (GC-A, -C, -E) have no typical TATA box and an absent or
inverted CAAT box. While consensus binding sites for many general
transcription factors are present, the elements controlling
tissue-specific expression are only now beginning to be explored. The
GC-A gene promoter has at least three consensus binding sites for Sp1,
a transcription factor that is implicated in the expression of a number
of genes in the vasculature (Liang et al., 1999
). Assays using
electromobility shift and reporter gene techniques have demonstrated
all three sites bind Sp1 and are essential for basal transcription of
the GC-A gene (Liang et al., 1999
). Expression of the gene for GC-A
also is regulated by its ligand, ANP. Levels of GC-A mRNA were
suppressed by ANP in a time- and concentration-dependent manner in
cultured aortic smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and primary cultures of
inner medullary collecting duct cells (Cao et al., 1995
, 1998
). A
cell-permeable analog of cGMP also inhibited transcription of GC-A,
suggesting the second messenger, rather than the natriuretic peptide,
is responsible for modulating gene activity (Cao et al., 1995
, 1998
). The ANP/cGMP-responsive element in the promoter for GC-A has not been identified.
Whereas GC-A is expressed in a variety of cell types and in many
tissues, expression of GC-C in the adult human appears to be confined
to the intestinal epithelium and primary and metastatic colorectal
cancers (Carrithers et al., 1996
). In the marsupial North American
opossum, a guanylyl cyclase-coupled ST receptor, possibly the opossum
ortholog of GC-C, is expressed in epithelial cells of the kidney,
liver, testis, trachea, and intestine (Forte et al., 1989
; London et
al., 1999
). The mRNA for GC-C and binding of radiolabeled ST are
detectable in neonatal and weanling mouse liver, and in fetal,
neonatal, and regenerating rat liver (Laney et al., 1992
, 1994
;
Scheving and Russell, 1996
; Swenson et al., 1996
). Although the
sensitive reverse transcription-PCR technique has been used to
amplify the mRNA for GC-C in a number of tissues, production of cGMP in
response to ST has only been observed outside the intestine in rodent
stomach and inner ear (Krause et al., 1997
; London et al., 1997
).
An initial characterization of the 5' flanking region of the gene for
GC-C, using reporter gene constructs, suggested intestine-specific transcriptional activity lies within the proximal 128 bp (Mann et al.,
1996a
). An analysis of this region, which is conserved between the
human and the mouse, revealed potential binding sites for several
transcription factors. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-4 (HNF-4) binds to a
specific element in the proximal promoter for GC-C and stimulates
expression of GC-C when transfected into a cell line that normally
expresses neither GC-C nor HNF-4 (Swenson et al., 1999
). Mutation of
the HNF-4 binding site abolished activity of the promoter for GC-C in
intestinal cells, demonstrating that HNF-4 is necessary for basal gene
expression (Swenson et al., 1999
).
Recent observations suggest the transcription factor Cdx2 mediates the
intestine-specific expression of GC-C. Cdx2 is a member of the
homeodomain family of transcription factors related to caudal, a
Drosophila protein, and is required for the selective expression of several other genes in intestinal tissues (Traber and
Silberg, 1996
). Deletion, or mutation, of a Cdx2 consensus binding site
in the proximal GC-C gene promoter reduced the activity of a reporter
gene construct expressed in intestinal cells to the level observed in
extraintestinal cells (Park et al., 2000
).
3. Genetic Disorders Associated with Guanylyl Cyclases.
The
only human diseases mapped to a gene for guanylyl cyclase involve
retinal dystrophies. Leber's congenital amaurosis (LCA1), dominant
cone-rod dystrophy (CORD6), cone dystrophy (CORD5), and central areolar
choroidal dystrophy have been mapped to chromosome 17p12-p13, the
interval containing the gene for GC-E (Balciuniene et al., 1995
;
Perrault et al., 1996
; Hughes et al., 1998
; Kelsell et al., 1998
). In
LCA1, the gene for GC-E contains mutations, including frameshifts,
which result in truncated proteins that lack the kinase-like and
catalytic domains due to premature termination of translation or a
missense mutation in the kinase-like domain (Perrault et al., 1996
).
Expression of GC-E with this missense mutation in a heterologous cell
line demonstrated that the mutant protein is stable but not activated
by GCAP1 (Duda et al., 1999
). In CORD6, GC-E contains mutations in the
intracellular dimerization domain (Kelsell et al., 1998
). It was
postulated these mutations might cause a steric change in the
protein that affects both mutant/mutant and mutant/wild-type
dimers and thereby results in the dominant phenotype of CORD6. Indeed,
one of the mutants has an increased affinity for GCAP-1, producing an
enzyme that is stimulated at higher [Ca2+]i
than wild-type GC-E (Tucker et al., 1999
). Thus, an abnormal increase
in [cGMP]i in dark-adapted photoreceptor cells may be the
cause of their degeneration. When the gene encoding GC-E was eliminated
in mice by targeted disruption, cones disappeared by 5 weeks of age
(Yang et al., 1999
). Although the numbers and morphology of rods from
GC-E null mice were similar to those from wild-type mice and the dark
current was normal, retinas from null mice had a decreased response to
light. The reason for the paradoxical rod behavior is not known.
Genetic alterations in other members of the guanylyl cyclase family are
not associated with any described disease phenotype in humans. Several
of the genes encoding guanylyl cyclases have been functionally
eliminated in mice by targeted disruption. This approach can provide
insight into the normal physiological role of a gene product. Targeted
disruption of the GC-A gene resulted in mice with salt-resistant
hypertension (Lopez et al., 1995
; Oliver et al., 1997
). GC-A null mice
were unable to respond either to an infusion of ANP or to acute volume
expansion, stimuli that induced diuresis and natriuresis in their
wild-type littermates (Kishimoto et al., 1996
). Null mice developed
cardiac hypertrophy. In one study, all GC-A null male mice died of
congestive heart failure or aortic dissection by 6 months of age
(Oliver et al., 1997
; Franco et al., 1998
). Thus, the GC-A null mice
exhibit many of the features of human essential hypertension and may
prove to be a valuable model in which to study and develop treatment for this disease. Alterations in the sGC signaling pathway also may
contribute to the development of hypertension. In the spontaneously hypertensive rat, an animal model for hypertension, the expression of
both
1- and
1-subunits of sGC and the expression of
cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) I are reduced in the aorta (Ruetten
et al., 1999
). The reduction in expression was observed even in young (normotensive) spontaneously hypertensive rats, suggesting this is an
early event in the pathogenesis of the disease.
The gene encoding GC-C has also been subjected to targeted disruption
(Mann et al., 1997
; Schulz et al., 1997
). Null mice were viable and
healthy and were resistant to infection with the enterotoxigenic
bacteria that cause diarrhea and death in wild-type mice. The normal
physiological role of GC-C therefore remains undefined.
B. Membrane-Bound Guanylyl Cyclases
1. Introduction.
Seven eutherian mammalian pGC isoforms (GC-A
to GC-G) have been identified (Table 2). They exhibit highly conserved
domain structures, including (1) an extracellular binding domain at the N terminus that in some cases binds defined ligands (GC-A, -B, -C), (2)
a single transmembrane domain, (3) a cytoplasmic juxtamembrane domain,
(4) a regulatory domain that shares significant homology with protein
kinases, (5) a hinge region, and (6) a C-terminal catalytic domain
(Fig. 1). Isoforms expressed in
intestinal mucosal cells (GC-C) and in sensory organs (GC-D, -E, -F)
also possess a C-terminal tail.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Domain structure of guanylyl cyclases. The cognate
domains of ANPCRs, pGCs, and sGCs are compared. ANPCRs are homodimeric
truncated guanylyl cyclases that possess extracellular ligand binding,
transmembrane, and juxtamembrane domains but lack kinase homology,
hinge, and catalytic domains. The pGC illustrated is a homodimer
modeled after GC-A and -B and possesses a single ligand-binding site
formed by two extracellular amino terminal domains. In addition to the
domains present in ANPCRs, pGCs also possess kinase homology domains,
hinge regions, and catalytic domains that form two functional catalytic
sites. GC-C, -D, -E, and -F possess a carboxyl terminal tail that is
not depicted here. sGCs are heterodimers possessing amino terminal
regulatory domains containing a heme prosthetic group with a ferrous
(Fe2+) core that forms an imidazole axial bond with
His105 of the -subunit. In addition, sGCs possess
dimerization domains and carboxyl terminal catalytic domains that form
one active and one inactive (flat blue) catalytic site. Colors identify
domains with significant homology.
|
|
Based on their ligand specificities, pGCs have been classified as (1)
natriuretic peptide receptors, (2) intestinal peptide-binding receptors, and (3) orphan receptors (Table 2). GC-A and GC-B bind to
and are activated by natriuretic peptides, including ANP, BNP, and
C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP). GC-C originally was characterized as
the receptor for the family of homologous STs that produce secretory
diarrhea. Recently, endogenous mammalian peptides, including guanylin,
uroguanylin, and lymphoguanylin, were demonstrated to bind to and
activate GC-C (Currie et al., 1992
; Hamra et al., 1993
; Forte et al.,
1999
). GC-D, -E, -F, and -G are orphan receptors for which ligands
remain to be identified.
PGCs are expressed in almost all tissues in placental mammals (Table
2). GC-A mRNA is highly expressed in kidney, adrenal, and adipose
tissue, and at lower levels in terminal ileum and human placenta (Lowe
et al., 1989
). GC-B mRNA is abundant in brain, lung, and kidney (Schulz
et al., 1989
). The mRNA for GC-C has been identified not only in
intestinal mucosal cells in adult placental mammals, but also in many
epithelia in marsupials (Forte et al., 1988
; Schulz et al., 1990
;
Carrithers et al., 1996
). In the central nervous system, GC-D is
expressed in a subpopulation of olfactory sensory neurons, GC-E is
expressed in retinal rod and cone cells, whereas GC-F is expressed only
in retinal rod cells (Fülle et al., 1995
; Yang et al., 1995
).
GC-G is predominantly expressed in the lung, the intestine, and
skeletal muscle (Schulz et al., 1998b
). Thus, the natriuretic peptide
receptor-like cyclases, including GC-A, -B, and -G, are broadly
expressed in many tissues. In contrast, GC-C and the sensory organ
cyclases, GC-D, -E, and -F, all possess a C-terminal tail and are
expressed in a tissue-specific fashion.
2. Isotypes of Particulate Guanylyl Cyclases.
a. Natriuretic Peptide Receptors.
Mammalian atrial
cardiomyocytes produce ANP, which mediates a pleiotropic response
designed to maintain cardiovascular homeostasis in the face of a
pressure or volume challenge (de Bold, 1985
). Thus, ANP induces
natriuresis, diuresis, and hypotension and inhibits secretion of renin
and aldosterone (de Bold et al., 1981
; Atarashi et al., 1984a
,b
).
Indeed, ANP appears to mediate short- and long-term control of blood
pressure and fluid and electrolyte balance (de Bold, 1985
; John et al.,
1995
, 1996
; Lopez et al., 1995
; Kishimoto et al., 1996
; Oliver et al.,
1997
; Franco et al., 1998
). In addition to ANP, other natriuretic
peptides identified to date include BNP and CNP. ANP is synthesized as
a prepro-polypeptide of 151 residues in which the C-terminal portion
contains the biologically active sequences (de Bold, 1985
). The
circulating form of this hormone is the mature 28-amino acid peptide
consisting of a 17-amino acid loop stabilized by a single intrachain
disulfide bridge and N- and C-terminal extensions, all of which are
required for biological activity. BNP is a 26-amino acid peptide that
was first isolated from acid extracts of porcine brain (Sudoh et al.,
1988
). Subsequently, this peptide also was identified in heart and
blood (Aburaya et al., 1989
). The disulfide-stabilized 17-amino acid
ring and C-terminal sequence, essential for ANP bioactivity, are
conserved in BNP. The genes encoding ANP and BNP are organized in
tandem, and in humans, the BNP gene is located upstream of ANP (Huang
et al., 1996
; Tamura et al., 1996b
). CNP is a 22-amino acid peptide
that was first identified in acid extracts of porcine brain. CNP
contains the disulfide-stabilized 17-residue ring structure found in
ANP and BNP. In contrast, CNP lacks a C-terminal extension and the N-terminal region is not homologous with that of ANP and BNP. Although
CNP induces natriuresis, diuresis, and vascular smooth muscle
relaxation, it is significantly less potent than ANP or BNP (Sudoh et
al., 1990
).
The principal signaling mechanism by which natriuretic peptides induce
their physiological effects involves activation of guanylyl
cyclase-coupled receptors and accumulation of
[cGMP]i. ANP has a selective affinity for GC-A,
compared with GC-B, with a concentration for half-maximal response that
is 1,000 times lower for the former than the latter (Schulz et al.,
1989
). ANP binding to GC-A has been demonstrated by both ligand binding
analysis and affinity cross-linking studies (Leitman et al., 1988
;
Chinkers et al., 1989
; Lowe et al., 1989
; Jewett et al., 1993
). ANP
increases [cGMP]i in a concentration- and
time-dependent fashion in a variety of cells and tissues (Chinkers et
al., 1989
; Schulz et al., 1989
). Similarly, ANP activates guanylyl
cyclase in cell-free membranes prepared from various cells and tissues
(Hamet et al., 1984
; Waldman et al., 1984
; Leitman et al., 1987
). The
concentration-dependence of guanylyl cyclase activation and
[cGMP]i accumulation induced by ANP compares
favorably with that of receptor binding (Wong et al., 1995
).
Heterologous expression of GC-A in cells lacking endogenous expression
of this protein results in the development of the ability of ANP to
specifically bind to those cells, increase their pGC activity, and
induce intracellular accumulation of [cGMP]i (Chinkers et al., 1989
). ANP does not bind to tissues from animals that
are homozygous null mutants for GC-A. These animals do not undergo
natriuresis or diuresis in response to ANP and their aortic rings do
not relax in response to that peptide (Kishimoto et al., 1996
; Lopez et
al., 1997
). Furthermore, ANP directly activates GC-A purified from
mammalian tissues (Kuno et al., 1986
; Inagami et al., 1991
; Waldman et
al., 1991
).
The endogenous receptor for BNP also appears to be GC-A, but BNP is
10-fold less potent than ANP in stimulating that receptor (Goeddel,
1991
). BNP increases guanylyl cyclase activity and accumulation of
[cGMP]i in cells and tissues in a pattern that
mimics that of ANP (Goeddel, 1991
). Similarly, BNP binds to
heterologously expressed GC-A and increases guanylyl cyclase activity
and [cGMP]i accumulation in those cells (Schulz
et al., 1989
). Aortic rings from animals that are homozygous null
mutants for GC-A do not relax in response to BNP (Lopez et al., 1997
).
The primary ligand for GC-B is CNP. Although ANP and BNP bind to this
receptor with low affinity, CNP has a 50- to 500-fold greater affinity
for GC-B than the other natriuretic peptides (Koller et al., 1991
). CNP
stimulates guanylyl cyclase activity and increases
[cGMP]i in cells and tissues that express GC-B
(Moriwaki et al., 1998
; Chrisman and Garbers, 1999
; Tao et al., 1999
).
Also, CNP binds to cells in which GC-B is heterologously expressed and increases activity of guanylyl cyclase and accumulation of
[cGMP]i in those cells (Koller et al., 1991
;
Chrisman et al., 1993
). CNP induces physiological effects in animals
that are homozygous null mutants for GC-A (Lopez et al., 1997
).
b. Intestinal Peptide Receptor Guanylyl
Cyclase.
GC-Coriginally was identified and cloned
from mRNA extracted from intestinal mucosal cells (Schulz et al.,
1990
). Although GC-C possesses the conserved domain structure
characteristic of the guanylyl cyclase family (Fig. 1), it does not
serve as a receptor for natriuretic peptides. The first ligand
identified for GC-C was ST, and binding of ST to GC-C activates
guanylyl cyclase and increases [cGMP]i in intestinal
cells (Schulz et al., 1990
). ST is produced by bacteria that colonize
the intestine, including Escherichia coli, Enterobacter
sp., Klebsiella sp., and Yersinia enterocolitica (Rao et al., 1979
; Thorne et al., 1979
). This
peptide contains six cysteines that form three intrachain disulfide
bridges which stabilize the tertiary structure and confer the
heat-stability characteristic of ST (Guerrant et al., 1980
;
Gariépy et al., 1987
). Reduction of the disulfide bridges
eliminates the ability of ST to bind to receptors, stimulate
transmembrane signaling, and induce intestinal secretion and diarrhea
(Staples et al., 1980
). GC-C appears to be the only identified receptor
for ST that is expressed in adult placental mammals (Guerrant et al., 1980
). ST binds to GC-C in a concentration- and time-dependent manner
(Guarino et al., 1987
). Similarly, GC-C is activated by ST in a
concentration-dependent manner and is not influenced by natriuretic
peptides (Schulz et al., 1990
; Krause et al., 1994a
). Specific
association of ST and GC-C has been demonstrated by ligand binding
analysis and affinity cross-linking (Guarino et al., 1987
; Schulz et
al., 1990
; Hugues et al., 1992
). Interaction of ST and GC-C activates
guanylyl cyclase in cell-free membranes prepared from intestinal cells
(Gazzano et al., 1991a
; Hugues et al., 1991
). Similarly, ST induces
accumulation of [cGMP]i in cells derived from intestine
(Guerrant et al., 1980
; Rao et al., 1980
). Heterologous expression of
GC-C confers specific ST binding to cells (Schulz et al., 1990
; de
Sauvage et al., 1991
; Deshmane et al., 1995
). Similarly, ST activates
guanylyl cyclase and induces [cGMP]i accumulation in
cells heterologously expressing GC-C (Schulz et al., 1990
; de Sauvage
et al., 1991
). Disruption of the gene encoding GC-C results in mice
that are resistant to ST-induced secretory diarrhea (Mann et al., 1997
;
Schulz et al., 1997
). Homogenates of intestinal membranes from GC-C
null animals specifically bind ST at very low levels, potentially
identifying a binding protein other than GC-C (Mann et al., 1997
).
However, that novel binding protein has not yet been identified or
characterized. Thus, GC-C remains the only identified receptor for ST
and directly mediates the pathophysiological consequences of
ligand-receptor interaction, including secretory diarrhea. A detailed
discussion of the postreceptor mechanisms mediating ST-induced
intestinal secretion is presented in a later section.
Unlike natriuretic peptide receptors, significant expression of GC-C
appears limited to intestinal mucosal cells found from the duodenum to
the rectum in adult placental mammals (Krause et al., 1994a
).
Expression of GC-C in intestinal, but not extraintestinal, cells has
been identified by specific ST binding, stimulation of guanylyl
cyclase, accumulation of cGMP, and detection of specific mRNA (Guerrant
et al., 1980
; Guarino et al., 1987
; Schulz et al., 1990
; Hugues et al.,
1992
; Krause et al., 1994a
). Similarly, intestinal mucosal cells
continue to express functional GC-C after undergoing neoplastic
transformation to colorectal adenocarcinomas. Detection of this protein
or its specific mRNA in extraintestinal sites appears to be a sensitive
and specific marker for detecting metastatic colorectal cancer cells
(Carrithers et al., 1996
; Waldman et al., 1998
; Cagir et al., 1999
).
Functional GC-C also has been detected in regenerating rat liver after
surgical or chemical hepatectomy, but the functional significance of
this observation remains to be elucidated (Laney et al., 1994
). In
contrast to placental mammals, GC-C in marsupials is expressed in the
epithelia of the gut, gall bladder, lung, renal, and testis (Forte et
al., 1988
, 1989
; White et al., 1989
).
ST-like peptides that bind to and stimulate GC-C have been isolated
from mammals. Guanylin and uroguanylin were isolated from intestinal
mucosa; uroguanylin also has been isolated from urine (Currie et al.,
1992
; Hamra et al., 1993
). These peptides share significant homology
with ST, and their tertiary structure stabilized by two intrachain
disulfide bonds is essential for biological activity (Currie et al.,
1992
; Hamra et al., 1993
). The precise physiological importance of
guanylin and uroguanylin remains to be elucidated. They may play a role
in the regulation of fluid and electrolytes in the intestine (Hamra et
al., 1993
). However, mice that are homozygous null mutants for GC-C
appear to develop normally, with normal intestinal function (Mann et
al., 1997
; Schulz et al., 1997
). Uroguanylin, guanylin, and ST appear
to induce natriuresis, diuresis, and kaliuresis in rodent kidney. These
peptides may play a role in regulating fluid and electrolytes in the
intestinal-renal axis (Greenberg et al., 1997
; Fonteles et al., 1998
).
However, it is notable that analysis by sensitive nested reverse
transcription-PCR does not detect expression of mRNA for GC-C in the
kidney (Carrithers et al., 1996
). Recently, a novel mRNA transcript
encoding lymphoguanylin, a polypeptide related to guanylin and
uroguanylin, was identified in spleen and lymphoid tissues from opossum
(Forte et al., 1999
). In these studies, the cDNA of lymphoguanylin was
produced from isolated RNA and used to synthesize a putative endogenous
peptide. Although ST, guanylin, and uroguanylin possess multiple
disulfide bonds, synthetic lymphoguanylin contains only a single
intrachain disulfide bond yet is biologically active (Forte et al.,
1999
). Because these studies did not isolate an endogenous peptide from
tissues, the significance of this finding remains to be established.
c. Orphan Receptor Guanylyl Cyclases.
PGCs for which
endogenous ligands have not yet been identified are categorized as
orphan receptors. Ligands known to activate other guanylyl cyclases do
not activate GC-D, -E, -F, or -G (Fülle et al., 1995
; Yang et
al., 1995
; Schulz et al., 1998b
). The primary structures of GC-D, -E,
and -F extracellular domains are homologous, and the expression of
these pGCs is restricted to sensory tissues (Yang et al., 1995
). The
ligand of GC-G may resemble the natriuretic peptides because the
extracellular domain of this pGC is homologous to that of the
natriuretic peptide receptors (Schulz et al., 1998b
).
3. Structure of Particulate Guanylyl Cyclases.
a. Extracellular Domain.
Extracellular domains of pGCs
exhibit the least homology among the members of the family. This
diversity in structure presumably reflects the functional specificity
of binding and induction of transmembrane signaling by different
ligands. The precise molecular mechanisms mediating interaction of
ligand with the extracellular domain and coupling of ligand binding
with activation of the catalytic domain remain to be defined. In GC-B,
Glu332 appears to be required for CNP binding and signaling
because its removal or substitution with His or Lys results in complete
loss of cyclase activity (Duda et al., 1994
). However, it is not known
whether Glu322 is essential for proper folding of receptor
protein required for ligand binding, or if it is located in the binding
site for the ligand (Duda et al., 1994
). Similarly, amino acids 387 to
393 in the extracellular domain of GC-C interact directly with and are
required for binding to ST (Hasegawa et al., 1999
).
i. Glycosylation of Receptors.
All mammalian pGCs, except
GC-F, contain at least one N-linked glycosylation site in
the extracellular domain, although the extent of glycosylation varies
among receptors (Chinkers et al., 1989
). Glycosylation results in
heterogeneity in the size of guanylyl cyclase receptors. Thus,
pulse-chase studies revealed two species of GC-A that are synthesized
during the first 7.5 h of incubation, but only one species in
incubations longer than 7.5 h. The two species identified in
shorter incubations were heterogeneously glycosylated GC-A, and the
less glycosylated receptor served as a precursor for the fully
glycosylated protein (Lowe and Fendly, 1992
). Similarly, affinity
labeling of GC-C with radiolabeled ST revealed multiple, specifically
labeled proteins that could be resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE) (Thompson and Giannella, 1990
; Hugues et al.,
1992
). Heterologously expressed GC-C also yielded multiple receptor
proteins specifically labeled with ST, demonstrating they were derived
from a single transcript by post-translational processing (de
Sauvage et al., 1992
; Vaandrager et al., 1993a
,b
). Receptors of
different sizes were converted to a single molecular weight by treating
membranes with endoglycosidase, which removes N-linked
carbohydrates (Vaandrager et al., 1993a
). Similarly, cells grown in
tunicamycin, an inhibitor of glycosylation, generated a single receptor
species (Vaandrager et al., 1993a
).
Glycosylation appears to play a role in the binding of ligand to the
extracellular domain of pGCs. In a study performed in human embryonic
kidney cells that were stably transfected with GC-A, fully glycoslyated
GC-A specifically bound ANP, but removal of carbohydrate residues with
endoglycosidase prevented binding of ANP to this receptor (Lowe and
Fendly, 1992
). In other studies performed in rat glioma cells that were
stably transfected with GC-A, inhibition of N-glycosylation
of GC-A by tunicamycin did not alter the ability of ANP to bind to
cells and activate guanylyl cyclase (Heim et al., 1996
). However,
tunicamycin pretreatment inhibited the response of GC-A to ANP analogs,
such as urodilatin [ANP (95-126)] (Heim et al., 1996
). The different
results obtained in these two studies might reflect differences in the
type of ANP (native or analog) used. Similarly, when membranes prepared from cells that heterologously express GC-B were treated with endoglycosidase to remove carbohydrate from glycosylated sites in the
protein, binding of CNP to the membranes was lost (Fenrick et al.,
1996
). Also, the activity of GC-B that had been deglycosylated was
lower under stimulated conditions compared with the activity of fully
glycosylated receptor (Fenrick et al., 1996
). In close agreement,
deglycosylation with endoglycosidase eliminated ST binding from the
extracellular domain of GC-C (Hasegawa et al., 1999b
). Studies in which
each of the N-linked glycosylation sites was replaced with
Ala demonstrated that Asn379, which is close to
the transmembrane domain, was required for ligand binding and catalytic
activity (Hasegawa et al., 1999a
). Although glycosylation is important
for binding of ligand, it does not appear to be required for
distribution of receptors to the cell surface (Lowe and Fendly, 1992
;
Fenrick et al., 1996
; Hasegawa et al., 1999b
).GC-D contains two potential N-linked glycosylation sites,
whereas GC-E only contains one (Fülle et al., 1995
; Yang et al., 1995
). The extracellular domain of GC-G contains five potential N-linked glycosylation sites and is about 40% homologous
with the extracellular domain of GC-A (Schulz et al., 1998b
). Whether glycosylation of these orphan receptors is essential for expression on
the cell surface or for transducing a signal has not yet been determined.
ii. Cysteines and Oligomerization of Receptors.
All mammalian
pGCs have two conserved cysteine residues at the N terminus and one
midway in the extracellular domain (Chinkers et al., 1989
; Schulz et
al., 1989
, 1990
, 1998b
; Fülle et al., 1995
; Yang et al., 1995
;
Foster et al., 1999
). All pGCs, except GC-C, also contain two conserved
cysteine residues at the C-terminus of the extracellular domain
proximal to the membrane-spanning domain (Chinkers et al., 1989
; Schulz
et al., 1989
, 1990
, 1998b
; Fülle et al., 1995
; Yang et al.,
1995
). GC-C shares two cysteine residues that are located midway in the
extracellular domain with GC-A, but shares only one cysteine residue
with other pGCs (Chinkers et al., 1989
; Schulz et al., 1989
, 1990
,
1998b
; Fülle et al., 1995
; Yang et al., 1995
). Historically, it
has been presumed that the cysteines in the extracellular domain form
intrachain disulfide bonds important for stabilizing the tertiary
structure of the receptor, similar to their function in other members
of the superfamily of growth factor receptors (Itakura et al., 1994
;
Stults et al., 1994
). The ANP clearance receptor (ANPCR), a truncated
isoform of GC-A that lacks the cytoplasmic domain beyond the
juxtamembrane domain, possesses five cysteines in the extracellular
domain (Lowe et al., 1990a
) (Fig. 1). Site-specific mutagenesis
demonstrated the first four cysteines are joined sequentially, forming
Cys104-Cys132 and
Cys209-Cys257 intrachain disulfide bridges
(Itakura et al., 1994
; Iwashina et al., 1994
). The precise role of
these intrachain disulfide bridges in the function of the extracellular
domain and in transmembrane signaling remains to be defined.
Cysteine residues in the extracellular domain appear to mediate
ligand-independent oligomerization of receptor monomers (Chinkers and
Wilson, 1992
). In ANPCR, the fifth cysteine in the extracellular domain
(Cys469) is proximal to the membrane-spanning
domain and forms an interchain disulfide bridge that stabilizes a
dimeric structure (Itakura et al., 1994
). Heterologously expressed
human GC-A migrates as high molecular weight oligomeric complexes when subjected to SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions. These oligomeric complexes can be converted to monomers after SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions (Lowe, 1992
). Truncated mutants of GC-A possessing only the
extracellular domain also form oligomeric complexes, supporting the
suggestion that the extracellular domain contributes the cysteines that
form the interchain disulfide bonds mediating oligomerization (Lowe,
1992
). GC-A from bovine adrenal gland migrates as a tetrameric 550-kDa
complex when subjected to SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions but as
a 140-kDa monomer when exposed to reducing conditions (Iwata et al.,
1991
). GC-C migrates as complexes of high molecular weight when
subjected to SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions, but these complexes
were converted to monomers on exposure to reducing conditions (Ivens et
al., 1990
). Heterologously expressed GC-C also forms higher order
complexes that are converted to monomers on exposure to reducing
conditions (Vaandrager et al., 1993a
,b
).These data support the suggestion that, in the absence of ligands, pGCs
spontaneously form complexes that are stabilized by disulfide bonds in
the extracellular domain. Those cysteines that contribute to the
formation of interchain disulfide bridges remain to be defined for each
isoform of guanylyl cyclase. GC-A mutants, in which
Cys423 near the membrane-spanning domain was
replaced, spontaneously formed interchain disulfide bonds and underwent dimerization, presumably mediated by Cys432 that
was unpaired in the mutant protein (Labrecque et al., 1999
). However,
the relevance of this observation to native receptors is unclear
because dimerization in this study was associated with constitutive
activity (Labrecque et al., 1999
). Furthermore, GC-C, which also
undergoes ligand-independent oligomerization, does not possess these
conserved cysteines proximal to the membrane-spanning domain (Hasegawa
et al., 1999b
).
b. Transmembrane Domain.
All pGCs have a single transmembrane
domain similar to that in other members of the superfamily of growth
factor receptors. The
-helix found in the transmembrane domain
creates a hydrophobic region that permits insertion into the
hydrophobic membrane lipid bilayer. Deletion of hydrophobic amino acids
in the transmembrane domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor
(EGFR) did not alter ligand binding or dimerization, suggesting this
domain is required for localization to the membrane, but not for signal transduction (Kashles et al., 1988
). In contrast, deletions in the
transmembrane domain of the transforming growth factor-
receptor alter its ability to mediate transmembrane signaling (Zhu and Sizeland,
1999
). In addition to membrane insertion, transmembrane domains may
facilitate receptor oligomerization through
helix-helix interactions (Lemmon and Engelman, 1994
; Lemmon et al., 1994
). The
precise role of the transmembrane domain in pGCs beyond membrane localization remains to be defined. However, it is notable that truncated mutants of GC-A and GC-C, which contain the extracellular domain but lack the transmembrane domain, are capable of forming dimers
and binding ligand (Chinkers and Wilson, 1992
; Hasegawa et al., 1999b
).
c. Juxtamembrane domain.
The juxtamembrane domain is a short
region of approximately 25 amino acids distal to the transmembrane
domain in the cytoplasmic region of the protein. Although a precise
function has not been ascribed to this domain, it may mediate alternate
signaling mechanisms involving pGCs. This region in pGCs contains a
consensus sequence that exists in other single transmembrane domain
receptors and is important for their coupling to heterotrimeric G
proteins (G proteins) and their downstream effectors.
Traditionally, G proteins are activated by the heptahelical family of
receptors (Gudermann et al., 1995
). However, members of the single
transmembrane domain growth factor receptor superfamily, of which pGCs
are members, also activate G proteins and signal through their
downstream effectors. These receptors include EGFR, the insulin-like
growth factor receptor, and the insulin receptor (Okamoto et al., 1990
;
Okamoto and Nishimoto, 1991
; Ramirez et al., 1995
; Krieger-Brauer et
al., 1997). All the G protein-coupled single transmembrane domain
receptors contain a consensus sequence in their juxtamembrane domains.
This consensus sequence interacts with and activates G proteins. The
consensus sequence ranges in length from 14 to 20 amino acids, contains
two basic residues in the N-terminal end and a BBXXB motif in the
C-terminal end (B is a basic residue and X is a nonbasic, nonaromatic
residue). Interestingly, GC-A, -B, and -C contain this consensus
sequence in a homologous position in their juxtamembrane domains.
Similarly, ANPCR possesses the above consensus sequence in its
juxtamembrane domain (Fuller et al., 1988
; Lowe et al., 1990a
). This
truncated guanylyl cyclase has a short cytoplasmic domain of 37 amino
acids (Lowe et al., 1990a
) (Fig. 1). ANPCR binds ANP, BNP, and CNP, and
its primary function appears to be clearance of natriuretic peptides
from the circulation through constitutive ligand-independent
endocytosis (Nussenzveig et al., 1990
). However, this receptor also
regulates a variety of physiological processes (Anand-Srivastava and
Trachte, 1993
), including inhibition of adenylyl cyclase in rat and
human platelets (Anand-Srivastava et al., 1991
; Marcil et al., 1996
),
atrial and ventricular cardiocytes (Anand-Srivastava and Cantin, 1986
),
rat heart (Anand-Srivastava et al., 1996
), and pheochromocytoma cells
(Drewett et al., 1992
). ANPCR also regulates cellular growth in
hepatoblastoma cells (Rashed et al., 1993
), proliferation and invasion
of matrix by endothelial cells (Pedram et al., 1997
),
[Ca2+]i in adrenal
glomerulosa cells (Isales et al., 1992
), activation of endothelial NO
synthase (eNOS) in gastric SMCs (Murthy et al., 1998
), activation of
phospholipase C-
3 in tenia coli SMCs (Murthy and Makhlouf, 1999
),
and inhibition of MAP kinase in astrocytes (Prins et al., 1996
).
Of significance, the juxtamembrane domain of ANPCR is required for
receptor signaling (Murthy and Makhlouf, 1999
). Antibodies directed
against the cytoplasmic domain of ANPCR prevent signaling by this
domain (Anand-Srivastava et al., 1996
). Also, the juxtamembrane domain
interacts with Go in membranes isolated from PC12
cells, presumably mediating inhibition of catecholamine secretion by ANP (Takida et al., 1999
). Similarly, heterologously expressed ANPCR
was coupled to activation of coexpressed eNOS through
Gi in gastric SMCs (Murthy et al., 1998
). In
tenia coli SMCs, interaction of ANPCR with Gi and
activation of phospholipase C-
3 by the 
-subunit of
Gi was mediated by the juxtamembrane domain
consensus sequence. Mutation of the sequence eliminated coupling
between the clearance receptor and activation of phospholipase C-
3
(Murthy and Makhlouf, 1999
).
These studies demonstrate that the G protein-regulating consensus
sequence within the context of the juxtamembrane domain of a member of
the guanylyl cyclase family can couple with G proteins and regulate
downstream effectors in a ligand-dependent manner. This consensus
sequence mediates alternate transmembrane signaling in other single
transmembrane receptors including EGFR, insulin-like growth factor
receptor, and insulin receptor. These observations suggest the
intriguing possibility that pGCs may signal through different pathways,
including synthesis of cGMP through activation of the catalytic domain
and regulation of G protein-coupled effectors through the consensus
sequence in the juxtamembrane domain.
d. Kinase Homology Domain.
i. Structure.
All pGCs possess between the
juxtamembrane and catalytic domains a ~250-residue kinase homology
domain (KHD) that is absent in sGCs. The KHDs of pGCs are
~30% homologous with a wide range of protein kinases (Koller et al.,
1992
). Generally, protein kinases contain 11 conserved subdomains and
33 invariant amino acids that are critical for kinase activity (Hanks
et al., 1988
). Within the natriuretic peptide receptor-like cyclases,
GC-A, GC-B, and GC-G, the KHD possesses 9, 9, or 8 of the conserved
subdomains and 28, 27, or 22 of the invariant residues, respectively.
The intestinal receptor cyclase GC-C contains 8 of the conserved
subdomains and 25 of the 33 invariant residues and is 30% conserved
relative to GC-A and GC-B (Koller et al., 1992
). The sensory organ
cyclases, GC-D, -E, and -F contain 9, 7, or 8 of the conserved
subdomains and 22, 21, or 22 of the invariant residues, respectively.
An invariant aspartate residue found in subdomain VI of protein
kinases, which functions as the catalytic base, is substituted in all
pGCs (Knighton et al., 1991
; Taylor et al., 1992
). Similarly, the
glycine-rich region of subdomain I (GXGXXG) that mediates nucleotide
binding to protein kinases is present in GC-A and -B, but absent in
GC-C. This structural difference may underlie some of the functional differences in regulation of these receptors by adenine nucleotides (Koller et al., 1992
).
ii. Kinase Activity.
All protein kinases contain an HRD
consensus sequence in subdomain VI in which the acidic Asp mediates the
transfer of a phosphate group from ATP to the appropriate substrate
(Hanks et al., 1988
). The HRD consensus sequence is absent from the JH2
domain of the JAK protein kinase family, which does not exhibit kinase
activity (Foster et al., 1999
). Similarly, mutation of the invariant
Asp to Asn in c-Kit and v-Fps results in loss of kinase activity (Moran et al., 1988
; Tan et al., 1990
). This catalytic Asp residue is replaced
in all pGCs, commonly by Ser, Arg, or Asn. Thus, the prevailing
hypothesis is that pGCs do not possess kinase activity, reflecting the
absence of the catalytic Asp residue in subdomain VI (Potter and
Hunter, 1998b
). Although no other guanylyl cyclase possesses protein
kinase activity, retinal pGC exhibits intrinsic kinase activity
(Aparicio and Applebury, 1996
). Thus, ATP binds to purified retinal
guanylyl cyclase at a site distinct from the catalytic GTP
substrate-binding site. The protein kinase activity is
magnesium-dependent, autophosphorylates serine residues, and transfers
phosphate groups to myelin basic protein. The
Km for ATP is 81 µM, and the kinase
activity is unaffected by cyclic nucleotides, phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate (PMA), L-
-phosphatidylserine, or
Ca2+, but is inhibited by staurosporine. These properties
are distinct from other Ser/Thr kinases identified in rod outer
segments including protein kinase A, protein kinase C (PKC), and
rhodopsin kinase. This observation of intrinsic kinase and
autophosphorylation activity in a pGC remains an isolated result, and
its functional significance continues to be unclear.
iii. Phosphorylation.
Receptor guanylyl cyclases exist as
phosphoproteins in the basal state. Upon binding of ligand,
dephosphorylation of the receptor occurs, resulting in desensitization
and a reduction in ligand-induced guanylyl cyclase activity. GC-A
possesses six phosphorylation sites within the KHD, including
Ser497, Thr500, Ser502,
Ser506, Ser510, and Thr513, that
are necessary for ligand-dependent activation of GC-A (Potter and
Garbers, 1992
; Koller et al., 1993
; Potter and Hunter, 1998b
). Mutation
of these sites individually to Ala reduced GC-A activation by ANP, and
replacement of five of the sites simultaneously yielded a receptor that
was unresponsive to ligand. Similarly, GC-B exists as a phosphoprotein
in the basal state when no ligand is bound to the receptor. GC-B
possesses five residues within the KHD, including Ser513,
Thr516, Ser518, Ser523, and
Ser526, that are phosphorylated (Potter and Hunter, 1998a
).
As in GC-A, the phosphorylation state of GC-B at these residues
correlates with catalytic responsiveness, and dephosphorylation results
in desensitization. Mutation of these five residues to Ala results in a
90% decrease in CNP-dependent cyclase activity, demonstrating that
phosphorylation of these sites is necessary for ligand-induced
activation of GC-B.
e. Hinge Region.
The hinge region is a 43-residue domain in
GC-A between the KHD and catalytic domain. This region mediates
dimerization of catalytic subunits and is required for the expression
of enzymatic activity. Truncated mutants of GC-A possessing only the
catalytic domain migrate on SDS-PAGE as monomers that are devoid of
enzymatic activity (Wilson and Chinkers, 1995
). However,
truncated mutants inclusive of the hinge region migrate as homodimers
on SDS-PAGE and possess guanylyl cyclase catalytic activity (Thompson
and Garbers, 1995
; Wilson and Chinkers, 1995
). The primary structure of
the hinge domain is consistent with a coiled coil configuration that
favors specific protein-protein interactions (Thompson and Garbers,
1995
; Wilson and Chinkers, 1995
). Indeed, incorporating this sequence
into a yeast two-hybrid system demonstrated the hinge domain mediates
spontaneous formation of protein multimers (Wilson and Chinkers, 1995
).
The hinge region mediates dimerization of catalytic subunits.
Dimerization is generally required for catalytic activity of sGC, pGCs,
and adenylyl cyclases (Thompson and Garbers, 1995
; Wilson and Chinkers,
1995
). In addition, this region may play a larger role in mediating
holoreceptor dimerization because truncation mutants of GC-A lacking
cytoplasmic domains failed to form dimers or higher-order structures in
one study (Lowe, 1992
). Whether this domain is necessary for
dimerization of catalytic subunits or plays a role in mediating
receptor oligomerization in guanylyl cyclases other than GC-A remains
to be elucidated.
f. Catalytic Domain.
i. Dimerization of Catalytic Domains Is Required for Enzymatic
Activity.
Guanylyl cyclases must undergo dimerization to express
catalytic activity. Heterodimeric sGCs require coexpression of both
- and
-subunits for catalytic activity, and expression of either subunit individually yields catalytically inactive protein (Harteneck et al., 1990
; Buechler et al., 1991
). Expression of truncated
and
catalytic domains in Sf9 cells yielded catalytically active heterodimers (Wedel et al., 1995
). Mammalian adenylyl cyclases contain
two catalytic domains in a single polypeptide chain (Krupinski et al.,
1989
). The hinge region in GC-A, discussed above, is absolutely required for GC-A catalytic subunits to dimerize and express catalytic activity (Thompson and Garbers, 1995
; Wilson and Chinkers, 1995
). Similarly, GC-C forms oligomers in a ligand-independent fashion that
are important for producing catalytically active protein (Hasegawa et
al., 1999b
). Interestingly, coexpression of the
1-subunit of sGC and
the C-terminal catalytic domain of adenylyl cyclase (type I, II, or V),
each of which is inactive when expressed alone, produced a
catalytically active adenylyl cyclase (Weitmann et al., 1999
). This
chimeric enzyme was regulated by P-site inhibitors but was not
stimulated by G
s or forskolin. These data
support the suggestion that two catalytic domains are required for
expression of nucleotide cyclase activity. Also, they support the
suggestion that the catalytic domains of adenylyl and guanylyl cyclase
are structurally and functionally homologous.
ii. Determinants of Purine Specificity.
The primary structure
of the catalytic domain is highly conserved in both pGCs and sGCs and
closely related to the catalytic domain of adenylyl cyclases (Krupinski
et al., 1989
). Thus, insights into the function of guanylyl cyclase
catalytic domains were obtained using the solution structure of the
X-ray crystal of the rat type II adenylyl cyclase C2
catalytic domain. This provided critical information about substrate
binding to the catalytic domain (Tesmer et al., 1997
). Three invariant
residues (Lys, Asp, Gln) present in the active site of adenylyl cyclase
interact with the purine ring, which determines substrate specificity.
The catalytic subunits of rat sGC (
1
1)
contain three invariant residues (Glu, Cys, Arg) in positions
homologous to those of the three invariant residues in adenylyl cyclase
(Fig. 2). Mutations of adenylyl and
guanylyl cyclase, in which these three residues were exchanged,
resulted in the exchange of nucleotide substrate specificity: the
guanylyl cyclase mutant specifically utilized ATP as substrate, whereas the adenylyl cyclase mutant became a nonselective purine nucleotide cyclase (Sunahara et al., 1998
). Both enzymes retained their ability to
be regulated by activators that were specific for the parent nucleotide
cyclase. Thus, cAMP production by the mutant guanylyl cyclase was
regulated by SNP, whereas cyclic nucleotide production by the mutant
adenylyl cyclase was activated by G
s.
Similarly, mutation of retinal guanylyl cyclase (Ret GC 1) based on the
structural model of adenylyl cyclase, in which Glu925 was
substituted with Lys and Cys995 was substituted with Asp,
reversed substrate specificity from GTP to ATP (Tucker et al., 1998
).
This mutant retained the characteristic ability of retinal guanylyl
cyclases to be regulated by GCAP-1 and GCAP-2.