Pharmacological Reviews Get Tables of Contents delivered automatically
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guimarães, S.
Right arrow Articles by Moura, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guimarães, S.
Right arrow Articles by Moura, D.

Vol. 53, Issue 2, 319-356, June 2001

Vascular Adrenoceptors: An Update

Serafim Guimarães1 and Daniel Moura

Institute of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Alameda Hernani Monteiro, Porto, Portugal

Abstract
I. Introduction
II. Subclassification of Adrenoceptors
    A. alpha 1-Adrenoceptors
    B. alpha 2-Adrenoceptors
    C. beta -Adrenoceptors
III. Postjunctional Adrenoceptors in Vascular Smooth Muscle
    A. alpha 1-Adrenoceptors
        1. In Vitro.
        2. In Vivo.
        3. alpha 1-Adrenoceptor Antagonists in the Symptomatic Treatment of Prostatic Hypertrophy.
    B. alpha 2-Adrenoceptors
        1. In Vitro.
        2. In Vivo.
        3. Blood Pressure Regulation in alpha 2-Adrenoceptor-Deficient Mice.
    C. beta -Adrenoceptors
        1. In Vitro
            a. beta 1- and beta 2-Adrenoceptors.
            b. beta 3-Adrenoceptors.
            c. Putative beta 4-Adrenoceptors.
        2. In Vivo.
IV. Prejunctional Adrenoceptors
    A. alpha 2-Adrenoceptors
    B. beta -Adrenoceptors
V. Endothelial Adrenoceptors
    A. alpha 2-Adrenoceptors
    B. beta -Adrenoceptors
VI. Distribution of Vascular Adrenoceptors
    A. Localization in Relation to Sympathetic Nerve Terminals
    B. Distribution Upstream and Downstream
    C. Distribution in Particular Vascular Beds
VII. Influence of Maturation and Aging
    A. On alpha -Adrenoceptors
    B. On beta -Adrenoceptors
VIII. Influence of Temperature on Vascular Adrenoceptor-Mediated Responses
IX. Vascular Adrenoceptors in Some Diseases
X. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References


    Abstract
Top
Next
References

The total and regional peripheral resistance and capacitance of the vascular system is regulated by the sympathetic nervous system, which influences the vasculature mainly through changes in the release of catecholamines from both the sympathetic nerve terminals and the adrenal medulla. The knowledge of the targets for noradrenaline and adrenaline, the main endogenous catecholamines mediating that influence, has recently been greatly expanded. From two types of adrenoceptors (alpha  and beta ), we have now nine subtypes (alpha 1A, alpha 1B, alpha 1D, alpha 2A/D, alpha 2B, alpha 2A/D, beta 1, beta 2, and beta 3) and two other candidates (alpha 1L and beta 4), which may be conformational states of alpha 1A and beta 1-adrenoceptors, respectively. The vascular endothelium is now known to be more than a pure anatomical entity, which smoothly contacts the blood and forms a passive barrier against plasma lipids. Instead, the endothelium is an important organ possessing at least five different adrenoceptor subtypes (alpha 2A/D, alpha 2C, beta 1, beta 2, and beta 3), which either directly or through the release of nitric oxide actively participate in the regulation of the vascular tone. The availability of transgenic models has resulted in a stepwise progression toward the identification of the role of each adrenoceptor subtype in the regulation of blood pressure and fine-tuning of blood supply to the different organs: alpha 2A/D-adrenoceptors are involved in the central control of blood pressure; alpha 1-(primarily) and alpha 2B-adrenoceptors (secondarily) contribute to the peripheral regulation of vascular tone; and alpha 2A/D- and alpha 2C-adrenoceptors modulate transmitter release. The increased knowledge on the involvement of vascular adrenoceptors in many diseases like Raynaud's, scleroderma, several neurological degenerative diseases (familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy, Parkinson disease, multiple-system atrophy), some kinds of hypertension, etc., will contribute to new and better therapeutic approaches.


    I. Introduction
Top
Previous
Next
References

"The nerves controlling the blood-vessels that supplied his face functioned so well that the skin, robbed of all its blood, went quite cold, the nose looked peaked, and the hollows beneath the young eyes were lead-couloured as any corpse's. And the Sympathicus caused his heart, Hans Castorp's heart, to thump, in such a way that it was impossible to breathe except in gasps; and shivers ran over him, due to the functioning of the sebaceous glands, which, with the hair follicles, erected themselves".---Thomas Mann, 1924

The operation of the sympathetic nervous system, especially of its cardiovascular branches, is nowhere in literature described better than in this passage from Thomas Mann's Magic Mountain, that great novel on pre-1914 Europe that the author places in a sanatorium at Davos in the Swiss mountains. Vasoconstriction, tachycardia, and contraction of the musculi arrectorum pilorum are Hans Castorp's autonomic responses when he first addresses his beloved Claudia Chaucat on Walpurgis-Night to borrow a pencil from her. This review probes the mechanisms that noradrenaline, the classical transmitter substance of the sympathetic vasoconstrictor fibers, uses to make blood vessels constrict; probes, in other words, the events that occurred in Hans Castorp when he borrowed the pencil.

Directly or indirectly, the blood vessels are the source of many and serious diseases that affect millions of people. In many respects, vascular physiology and pharmacology have changed dramatically over the last years. The discovery by Furchgott and Zawadzski in 1980 of endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF2) revolutionized our knowledge and placed the endothelium in the center of the physiology and pathophysiology of the vascular tree; the cloning of many receptors brought about a true "Renaissance" in receptor pharmacology (Kenakin, 1997); and the possibility to "knock out" specific genes in experimental animals represents a new and important tool for a detailed study of the adrenoceptors, including those of the vascular system.

The present review aims at updating adrenoceptors in blood vessels, particularly on a functional point of view. Occasionally, some information is derived from nonvascular tissues; however, emphasis is placed on results obtained in blood vessels. Some reviews covering part of the present theme were published in the last few years (Insel, 1996; Strosberg, 1997; Summers et al., 1997; Docherty, 1998; Miller, 1998; Brodde and Michel, 1999; Bünemann et al., 1999; Freissmuth et al., 1999; Guimarães, 1999; Hein, 1999; Zhong and Minemann, 1999; Garcia-Sáinz et al., 2000; Gauthier et al., 2000; Hein, 2000; Kable et al., 2000).


    II. Subclassification of Adrenoceptors
Top
Previous
Next
References

The adrenoceptors are the cell membrane sites through which noradrenaline and adrenaline act as important neurotransmitters and hormones in the periphery and in the central nervous system. The adrenoceptors are targets for many therapeutically important drugs, including those for some cardiovascular diseases, asthma, prostatic hypertrophy, nasal congestion, obesity, and pain.

The first step leading to the discovery of the adrenoceptors was made in the cardiovascular system---the observation by Dale (1905) that the pressor effect of adrenaline was reversed by ergotoxine into a depressor effect. An explanation for this phenomenon was not apparent until 43 years later! In 1948, Ahlquist noted two patterns in the relative ability of several sympathomimetic agonists to cause pharmacological responses in a series of organs and proposed the division of adrenoceptors into two types, alpha  and beta . This was subsequently confirmed by the identification of selective antagonists for these two sites: phentolamine and ergotamine for alpha -adrenoceptors; dichloroisoprenaline (Powell and Slater, 1958) and propranolol (Black et al., 1964) for beta -adrenoceptors. Nineteen years later, it was shown that certain agonists and antagonists could distinguish beta -adrenoceptor-mediated responses among tissues such as cardiac muscle and bronchial smooth muscle, implying the existence of subtypes of beta -adrenoceptors (beta 1 in cardiac muscle and beta 2 in the bronchi) (Furchgott 1967, 1972; Lands et al., 1967a,b). Later on, the existence and differential tissue localization of alpha 1 and alpha 2 subtypes of alpha -adrenoceptors were discovered and characterized. The existence of subclasses of alpha -adrenoceptors has become evident from the results obtained by Starke and coworkers, who showed that pre- and postjunctional alpha -adrenoceptors differ with respect to the relative potencies of some agonists: low concentrations of clonidine and oxymetazoline selectively activate the prejunctional alpha -adrenoceptors, whereas phenylephrine and methoxamine selectively activate the postjunctional alpha -adrenoceptors (Starke, 1972; Starke et al., 1974, 1975b). Similarly, the relative potency of antagonists supported this differentiation: phenoxybenzamine was about 30 times more potent in blocking postjunctional than prejunctional alpha -adrenoceptors (Dubocovich and Langer, 1974) and yohimbine preferentially blocked prejunctional alpha -adrenoceptors (Starke et al., 1975a). Langer (1974) suggested that alpha -adrenoceptors mediating responses of effector organs should be referred to as alpha 1 and those mediating a reduction of the transmitter release during nerve stimulation as alpha 2. Later, it was found that alpha -adrenoceptors pharmacologically very similar to the prejunctional alpha 2-adrenoceptors are also found postjunctionally. Consequently, the nomenclature of alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptors, depending exclusively on the relative potencies of certain alpha -agonists and antagonists, was accepted (Berthelsen and Pettinger, 1977). In the late 1980s, the development of more selective drugs and the use of molecular cloning technology showed that there are more adrenoceptor subtypes than previously suspected. Nine different subtypes have now been cloned and pharmacologically characterized (Alexander and Peters, 1999).

A. alpha 1-Adrenoceptors

alpha 1-Adrenoceptors were first divided into two subtypes, alpha 1A and alpha 1B, based on the differential affinity of the receptors for 5-methyl urapidil (5-MU), WB-4101 (Morrow and Creese, 1986; Gross et al., 1988; Hanft and Gross, 1989; Boer et al., 1989) and the irreversible antagonist chloroethylclonidine (Han et al., 1987). alpha 1A-Adrenoceptors showed high affinity for 5-MU and WB-4101 and were insensitive to chloroethylclonidine, and alpha 1B-adrenoceptors were sensitive to CEC and had low affinity for 5-MU and WB-4101. At the present time, a consensus has been reached, such that the subdivision of alpha 1-adrenoceptors into three subtypes is generally accepted: alpha 1A (formerly alpha 1c; Schwinn et al., 1990), alpha 1B (Cotecchia et al., 1988), and alpha 1D (formerly alpha 1a/d; Lomasney et al., 1991; Perez et al., 1991; Bylund et al., 1994; Ford et al., 1994). In humans, alpha 1A-, alpha 1B-, and alpha 1D-adrenoceptors are encoded by distinct genes located on chromosomes 8, 5, and 20, respectively (Hieble et al., 1995; Michel et al., 1995). Furthermore, human alpha 1A-adrenoceptor heterogeneity comes from the existence of multiple variants that differ in length and sequence of their C-terminal domains (Hirasawa et al., 1995). Additional truncated alpha 1A-adrenoceptor proteins have been reported (Chang et al., 1998). More importantly, no pharmacological or signaling differences were observed on expression of these different splice variants. According to Lattion et al. (1994), they may exhibit differential susceptibility to desensitization. A fourth alpha 1-adrenoceptor, the so-called alpha 1L-adrenoceptor, has been postulated (Holck et al., 1983; Flavahan and Vanhoutte, 1986a; Muramatsu et al., 1990), based exclusively on pharmacological criteria (e.g., relatively low affinity for prazosin and other antagonists such as RS-17053). This alpha 1L-adrenoceptor seems to mediate constriction of human (Ford et al., 1996) and rabbit (Van der Graaf et al., 1997; Kava et al., 1998) lower urinary tract, guinea pig aorta (Muramatsu et al., 1990), and rat small mesenteric arteries (Stam et al., 1999). However, this hypothetical additional subtype resisted identification by biochemical and/or molecular techniques so far. Recent studies indicate that the alpha 1L-adrenoceptor may not be derived from a distinct gene, but represents a particular, energetically favorable, conformational state of the alpha 1A-adrenoceptor (Ford et al., 1998). Why these two pharmacological phenotypes occur requires further investigation (Ford et al., 1997, 1998).

It is well known that alpha 1-adrenoceptors are mainly coupled to Gq/11-protein to stimulate phospholipase C activity and that this enzyme promotes the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate producing inositol trisphosphate and diacylglycerol. These molecules act as second messengers mediating intracellular Ca2+ release from nonmitochondrial pools and activating protein kinase C, respectively (for reviews, see Hein and Kobilka, 1995; Zhong and Minneman, 1999; García-Sáinz et al., 2000). The three cloned alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtypes have different efficiencies in activating phospholipase C. According to Theroux et al. (1996), the ranking order of coupling efficiency (increase in inositol triphosphate formation and intracellular Ca2+) after agonist occupation of recombinant alpha 1-adrenoceptors expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells was: alpha 1A > alpha 1B > alpha 1D. All three alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtypes can couple to phospholipase C through protein Galpha q/11, only alpha 1A- and alpha 1B-subtypes couple to protein Galpha 14, and only the alpha 1B-subtype couples to protein Galpha 16 (Wu et al., 1992). Other studies support that native alpha 1B-adrenoceptors (but not alpha 1A- or alpha 1D-adrenoceptors) can also couple to protein Galpha o in rat aorta (Gurdal et al., 1997) suggesting a functional role for this coupling. Other signaling pathways have also been shown to be activated by alpha 1-adrenoceptors: Ca2+ influx, arachidonic acid release, phospholipase D activation, and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (for a review, see Zhong and Minneman, 1999). Currently, no close relationship can be established between specific subtypes and signaling mechanisms.

alpha 1-Adrenoceptor subtypes are differentially regulated. Although the maximal down-regulation after a prolonged exposure to phenylephrine was similar for alpha 1A- and alpha 1B-adrenoceptors, the threshold concentration of phenylephrine for significant reduction was 100-fold higher for alpha 1A- than for alpha 1B-adrenoceptors. In contrast, phenylephrine up-regulated alpha 1D-adrenoceptors in a time- and concentration-dependent manner (Yang et al., 1999).

B. alpha 2-Adrenoceptors

It is now clear that there are three subtypes of alpha 2-adrenoceptors: alpha 2A/D, alpha 2B, and alpha 2C. This subdivision, although primarily based on radioligand binding data, was preceded by results obtained in functional studies and confirmed by molecular cloning. For the alpha 2B- and alpha 2C-adrenoceptors, the pharmacological characteristics are consistent across mammalian species; however, the alpha 2A-adrenoceptor cloned from human and porcine tissue differs slightly in its amino acid composition from the homologous receptor cloned from the rat, mouse, or guinea pig in having a serine residue rather than a cysteine, at the position corresponding to Cys201. To the three different genes, four pharmacological subtypes correspond since the Ser201 receptor possesses pharmacological properties different from the Cys201 receptor, and the two have been distinguished as alpha 2A (e.g., humans) and as alpha 2D (e.g., rodents) (Bylund et al., 1992; Starke et al., 1995; Trendelenburg et al., 1996; Paiva et al., 1997; Guimarães et al., 1998). These two orthologs will be simply referred to as alpha 2A/D, unless some distinction between them has to be made. In humans, the genes coding for alpha 2A-, alpha 2B-, and alpha 2C-adrenoceptors are localized in chromosomes 10, 2, and 4, respectively (Regan et al., 1988; Lomasney et al., 1990; Weinshank et al., 1990).

Pharmacologically it is well known that the different alpha -adrenoceptor antagonists possess different potency/affinity for the different alpha 2-adrenoceptor subtypes: prazosin for example, has relatively high affinity for alpha 2B- and alpha 2C-adrenoceptors and very low affinity for alpha 2A- and alpha 2D-adrenoceptors (Latifpour et al., 1982; Nahorski et al., 1985; Bylund et al., 1988); yohimbine and rauwolscine are more potent than phentolamine and idazoxan on alpha 2A-adrenoceptors, whereas reversed relative potencies are observed for alpha 2D-adrenoceptors (Starke, 1981; Ennis, 1985; Lattimer and Rhodes, 1985; Alabaster et al., 1986; Limberger et al., 1989). The comparison of the functional potency of several antagonists with their affinity to all subtypes, as determined either in radioligand assays in native tissues possessing only one subtype or in cells transfected with recombinant alpha 2-adrenoceptors, shows full agreement. So, this functional approach has been extensively used to characterize alpha 2-autoreceptor subtypes in the different tissues (Hieble et al., 1996). Systematic studies recently undertaken to characterize prejunctional alpha 2-adrenoceptor subtypes in different species confirmed that receptors with alpha 2A properties occur in some species and receptors with alpha 2D properties occur in others (Bylund et al., 1994; Starke et al., 1995; Trendelenburg et al., 1996; Paiva et al., 1997; Guimarães et al., 1998) (Table 1).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Distribution of alpha 2-adrenoceptor subtypes in blood vessels

However, some rare discrepancies to this postulate have been reported: in the rat vena cava (Molderings and Göthert, 1993) and rat atria (Connaughton and Docherty, 1990), where the prejunctional receptors were classified as alpha 2B, and in the human kidney cortex (Trendelenburg et al., 1994) and human right atrium (Rump et al., 1995), where they appeared to belong to the alpha 2C-subtype. However, a reinvestigation of these unexpected subclassifications showed that the prejunctional receptors in rat vena cava and atria and in guinea pig urethra were alpha 2D, and those of human kidney were alpha 2A. Thus, in contrast to previous suggestions, all these receptors conform to the rule that alpha 2-autoreceptors belong, at least predominantly, to the genetic alpha 2A/D-subtype (Trendelenburg et al., 1997).

Although the vast majority of tissues express more than one subtype, there are rare tissues expressing only one subtype: alpha 2A in human platelets (Bylund et al., 1988), alpha 2B in the rat neonatal lung (Bylund et al., 1988), alpha 2C in opossum cells (Murphy and Bylund, 1988), and alpha 2D in the rat submaxillary gland (Michel et al., 1989).

alpha 2-Adrenoceptors are predominantly coupled to the inhibitory heterotrimeric GTP-binding protein inhibiting the activity of adenylyl cyclase (Cotecchia et al., 1990; Wise et al., 1997), inhibiting the opening of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (Cotecchia et al., 1990) and activating K+ channels (Surprenant et al., 1992). The alpha 2-adrenoceptors may also couple to other intracellular pathways involving Na+/H+ exchange and the activation of phospholipase A2, C, and D (Limbird, 1988; Cotecchia et al., 1990; MacNulty et al., 1992; Kukkonen et al., 1998). In neurons, alpha 2-adrenoceptors inhibit N-, P-, and Q-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (Waterman, 1997; Delmas et al., 1999; Jeong and Ikeda, 2000).

Like the alpha 1-adrenoceptors, the three alpha 2-adrenoceptor subtypes are regulated differentially. Human alpha 2C-adrenoceptors do not appear to down-regulate following exposure to agonists (Eason and Liggett, 1992; Kurose and Lefkowitz, 1994); alpha 2A/D- and alpha 2B-adrenoceptors down-regulate apparently due to an increase in the rate of receptor disappearance (Heck and Bylund, 1998).

C. beta -Adrenoceptors

Three distinct beta -adrenoceptor subtypes have been cloned so far: beta 1, beta 2, and beta 3 (Bylund et al., 1994). These subtypes are encoded by three different genes located on human chromosomes 10 (beta 1), 5 (beta 2), and 8 (beta 3). The human beta 3-adrenoceptor has 49 and 51% overall homology at the amino acid level with human beta 2- and beta 1-adrenoceptors, respectively (Emorine et al., 1989; Granneman and Lahners, 1994). Other species homologs of the human beta 3-adrenoceptor have also been cloned (for a review, see Strosberg, 1997). beta 1 and beta 2-Adrenoceptors are well known pharmacologically since the classical papers by Lands et al. (1967a,b). They mediate cardiovascular responses to noradrenaline released from sympathomimetic nerve terminals and to circulating adrenaline. They are stimulated or blocked by many compounds that are used to treat important and common diseases, such as hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, and ischemic heart disease.

The existence of a third beta -adrenoceptor subtype (beta 3-adrenoceptor), which was previously shown to mediate lipolysis in rat adipocytes (Harms et al., 1974; Arch et al., 1984; Wilson et al., 1984; Bojanic et al., 1985; Emorine et al., 1989), was also found in blood vessels where it mediates vasodilation (Cohen et al., 1984; Molenaar et al., 1988; Rohrer et al., 1999). beta 3-Adrenoceptors are not blocked by propranolol, and other conventional beta -adrenoceptor antagonists are activated by beta 3-adrenoceptor selective agonists like BRL 37344 and CL 316243 (for reviews, see Manara et al., 1995; Strosberg, 1997; Summers et al., 1997; Fischer et al., 1998) and are blocked by beta 3-adrenoceptor antagonists like SR-59230, which has been described as beta 3-adrenoceptor selective in rat brown adipocytes (Nisoli et al., 1996), rat colonic motility assays (Manara et al., 1996), and human colonic circular smooth muscle relaxation activity assays (De Ponti et al., 1996). More recently, Candelore et al. (1999) did not confirm the selectivity of SR-59230 for human beta 3-adrenoceptors, but described two compounds, namely L-748328 and L-748337 that display greater than 90-fold selectivity for human beta 3- versus beta 1-adrenoceptors, and 20- and 45-fold selectivity versus human beta 2-adrenoceptors, respectively. The pharmacology of beta 3-adrenoceptors is clearly distinct from that of beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors; however, one has to bear in mind that there are differences between rodents, where beta 3-adrenoceptors were studied initially, and humans, and this contributes to some confusion in the subclassification of beta -adrenoceptors (Wilson et al., 1996; Arch, 1998). Furthermore, there are also differences depending on the methodological approach used. For example, the potency of catecholamines at the human beta 3-adrenoceptor was found to be 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher when determined in an intact cell cAMP accumulation assay than in a membrane-based adenylyl cyclase activation assay (Wilson et al., 1996).

On the basis of many pharmacological and molecular studies, the existence of a fourth beta -adrenoceptor subtype was postulated (for reviews, see Arch and Kaumann, 1993; Barnes, 1995; Strosberg and Pietri-Rouxel, 1996; Kaumann, 1997; Strosberg, 1997; Summers et al., 1997; Galitzky et al., 1998; Strosberg et al., 1998; Brodde and Michel, 1999). These receptors would include the receptor in rat soleus muscle, which mediates glucose uptake (Roberts et al., 1993) and the receptor in human and rat heart, which mediates positive chronotropism and inotropism (Kaumann and Molenaar, 1996, 1997; Kaumann et al., 1998; Oostendorp and Kaumann, 2000) (putative beta 4-adrenoceptor). A receptor cloned from turkey (beta t-adrenoceptor) has no mammalian counterpart (Chen et al., 1994). In mouse brown adipose tissue (±)-CGP-12177, a partial agonist at beta 3-adrenoceptors, which is also antagonist at beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors, evoked a full metabolic response that was of a similar magnitude in wild-type and beta 3-adrenoceptor knockout mice; however, the metabolic response to CL-316243 was abolished (Preitner et al., 1998). This unexpected result supports the view that a new beta -adrenoceptor, distinct from beta 1-, beta 2-, and beta 3-adrenoceptor and referred to as putative beta 4-adrenoceptor, is present in brown adipose tissue and can mediate a maximal lipolytic stimulation (Preitner et al., 1998). A similar occurrence was reported for the heart. In beta 3-adrenoceptor knockout mice, CGP-12177A increased the force and rate of atrial contractions, and these effects were not antagonized by propranolol, but were antagonized by bupranolol (Kaumann et al., 1998). Furthermore, the binding of (-)-[3H]CGP-12177A was similar in ventricular membranes from hearts of wild-type and beta 3-adrenoceptor knockout mice; this provides evidence that the cardiac putative beta 4-adrenoceptor is distinct from the beta 3-adrenoceptor (Kaumann et al., 1998). More recently, evidence was obtained that this putative fourth beta -adrenoceptor subtype is a particular state of beta 1-adrenoceptor (see Section III.C.1.c.).

All beta -adrenoceptor subtypes signal by coupling to the stimulatory G-protein Galpha s leading to activation of adenylyl cyclase and accumulation of the second messenger cAMP (Dixon et al., 1986; Frielle et al., 1987; Emorine et al., 1989). However, some recent studies indicate that, under certain circumstances, beta -adrenoceptors, and particularly the beta 3-adrenoceptor, can couple to Gi as well as to Gs (Asano et al., 1984; Chaudry et al., 1994; Xiao et al., 1995; Gauthier et al., 1996).

Intracellular events following beta -adrenoceptor activation are also linked to ion transport. It is well known, for example, that protein kinase A activated by cAMP phosphorylates L-type Ca2+ channels, facilitating Ca2+ entry, and producing the positive inotropic effect in atria and ventricles, increased heart rate in the sino-auricular node, and accelerated the conduction in the atrio-ventricular node. In addition to mechanisms that indirectly lead to alterations in ion transport, beta -adrenoceptor activation is more directly linked to ion channels: beta -adrenoceptor stimulation is able to activate L-type Ca2+ channels via Galpha s (Brown, 1990); in airway smooth muscle, beta -adrenoceptor activation opens Ca2+-dependent K+ channels and charybdotoxin---a specific inhibitor of the high conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel---antagonizes the relaxant effects of beta -adrenoceptor agonists (Miura et al., 1992; Jones et al., 1993).

Multiple mechanisms control the signaling and density of G-protein-coupled receptors. The termination of G-protein-coupled receptor signals involves binding of proteins to the receptor. This process is initiated by serine-threonine phosphorylation of agonist-occupied receptors, both by members of the G-protein-coupled receptor kinase family and by second-messenger-activated protein kinases such as protein kinase A and protein kinase C. Receptor phosphorylation by G-protein-coupled receptor kinase is followed by binding of proteins termed arrestins, which bind to the phosphorylated receptor and sterically inhibit further G-protein activation (Luttrell et al., 1999). Desensitized receptor-arrestin complexes undergo arrestin-dependent targeting for sequestration through clathrin-coated pits (Goodman et al., 1996; Luttrell et al., 1999). Sequestrated receptors are ultimately either dephosphorylated and recycled to the cell surface or targeted for degradation (Luttrell et al., 1999).

In addition, many other G-protein-coupled receptors are sequestrated from the cell membrane and become inaccessible to their ligands. Both receptor/G-protein uncoupling and receptor sequestration may involve the participation of arrestins or other proteins. A model for receptor regulation has been developed on the basis of data from studies of the beta -adrenoceptors. However, according to recent reports, other G-protein-coupled receptors, like muscarinic receptors in the cardiovascular system, may be regulated by mechanisms other than those that regulate the beta -adrenoceptors (for a review, see Bünemann et al., 1999).


    III. Postjunctional Adrenoceptors in Vascular Smooth Muscle
Top
Previous
Next
References

Because vascular smooth muscles possess both alpha - and beta -adrenoceptors, the net response to agonists that like adrenaline stimulate both types of receptors depends on the relative importance of each population. For example, while in the dog saphenous vein, in vitro adrenaline causes contraction, which is enhanced by beta -adrenoceptor blockade (Guimarães, 1975); in the rabbit facial vein, adrenaline causes relaxation, which is enhanced by alpha -adrenoceptor blockade (Pegram et al., 1976). On the other hand, the contractile response of the saphenous vein to adrenaline is converted into a relaxation when an alpha -adrenoceptor antagonist is present (Guimarães and Paiva, 1981a), and the relaxation caused by adrenaline in the rabbit facial vein is converted into a contraction when a beta -adrenoceptor antagonist is present (Pegram et al., 1976). Thus, while in the dog saphenous vein, the alpha -adrenoceptor-mediated influence dominates, in the rabbit facial vein the dominating influence is exerted by beta -adrenoceptor.

In the vast majority of vascular tissues, alpha -adrenoceptor-mediated effects predominate, such that to demonstrate in vitro beta -adrenoceptor-mediated responses using adrenaline as agonist, both alpha -adrenoceptor blockade and active tone of the tissue must be present. When a pure or almost pure beta -adrenoceptor agonist like isoprenaline is used, the only requirement to obtain beta -adrenoceptor-mediated responses is the presence of tone. The threshold for alpha -adrenoceptor-mediated effects in large arteries and veins is between 1 and 10 nM noradrenaline (Guimarães, 1975; Bevan, 1977). The levels of noradrenaline and adrenaline in human arterial plasma at rest are about 2 and 0.5 nM, respectively (Engleman and Portnoy, 1970; DeQuattro and Chan, 1972). In the dog, the level of noradrenaline is similar. Thus, at rest, most vessels are scarcely influenced by circulating catecholamines. However, in the rat mesentery, precapillary sphincters have a threshold response to adrenaline and noradrenaline of 0.1 to 1 nM (Altura, 1971), and rat plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline levels average 2.5 and 3 nM, respectively (Donoso and Barontini, 1986). Although in vivo sensitivity cannot be directly related to plasma catecholamine levels, these data suggest that precapillary sphincters may be affected by circulating catecholamines even under resting conditions, in contrast to other vessels. In humans, during exercise, plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline may reach levels 30 times higher than those at rest, which may have a profound effect on vessels.

A. alpha 1-Adrenoceptors

It is important to underline that many of the advances made in the last years in the field of receptors in general and on vascular adrenoceptors in particular were due to the possibility to generate knockout mice. However, one should not forget that the lack of a given receptor from conception may be compensated by adequate adjustments, whereas its functional elimination by an antagonist is not acutely compensated (Rohrer and Kobilka, 1998). This is something one must bear in mind when results obtained in wild-type mice are compared with results obtained in knockout mice. It is dangerous to assume that knockout animals differ from the wild-type by no more than the absence of one receptor subtype.

1. In Vitro. In most mammalian species, contraction of vascular smooth muscle is predominantly mediated via alpha 1-adrenoceptors. Although the existence of both alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptors has been shown by functional studies in vivo, it has been difficult to demonstrate functional postjunctional alpha 2-adrenoceptors in most arteries in vitro (De Mey and Vanhoutte, 1981; McGrath, 1982; Timmermans and van Zwieten, 1982; Polónia et al., 1985; Guimarães, 1986; Aboud et al., 1993; Burt et al., 1995, 1998). In isolated canine aorta and canine femoral, mesenteric, jejunal, renal, and splenic arteries, contractile responses were exclusively alpha 1-adrenoceptor-mediated (Polónia et al., 1985; Shi et al., 1989; Daniel et al., 1999). In the arteries of other mammalian species, alpha 1-adrenoceptors also predominate: in rat aorta (Han et al., 1990; Aboud et al., 1993); in rat carotid, mesenteric, renal, and tail arteries (Han et al., 1990; Villalobos-Molina and Ibarra, 1996); and in human arteries (Flavahan et al., 1987a).

In veins, particularly in cutaneous veins, at the postjunctional level, alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptors both contribute to vasoconstriction (Flavahan and Vanhoutte, 1986a; Guimarães et al., 1987). In dog and human saphenous veins, alpha 2-adrenoceptors are the predominant receptors mediating contraction (Müller-Schweinitzer, 1984; Guimarães and Nunes, 1990; Docherty, 1998).

The question of which alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtype is involved in vasoconstrictive responses to sympathomimetic agonists is not easy to answer. Vascular smooth muscle tissues express mixtures of alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtypes (Miller et al., 1996) and in most cases responses to alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonists are probably due to activation of more than one subtype (Van der Graaf et al., 1996a; Zhong and Minneman, 1999). mRNA for the alpha 1A-adrenoceptor is expressed at very high levels in peripheral arteries, around 90% of the total alpha 1-adrenoceptors message pool (Guarino et al., 1996), but in most cases, there is lack of correlation between protein expression of one adrenoceptor subtype and the function this receptor mediates (Hrometz et al., 1999; Ohmi et al., 1999). The rat is a good case to exemplify this pharmacological problem (Aboud et al., 1993; Kong et al., 1994; Saussy et al., 1996; Piascik et al., 1997; Stam et al., 1999). Despite the fact that the mRNA for all three cloned alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtypes has been found in the rat mesenteric artery, as well as the aorta and pulmonary artery (Xu et al., 1997), the contraction in response to phenylephrine in these three vessels is primarily alpha 1D-adrenoceptor-mediated, alpha 1B-adrenoceptor being secondarily involved (Hussain and Marshall, 2000). A similar lack of correlation was demonstrated in a study involving several arteries of the rat: although in terms of level of mRNA expression for alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtypes, the ranking order was alpha 1A- > alpha 1B- alpha 1D, only alpha 1B-adrenoceptors played a functional role in mesenteric resistance artery, whereas alpha 1D-adrenoceptors were implicated in mediating the contraction of the aorta and femoral, iliac, and superior mesenteric arteries (Piascik et al., 1997). Similarly, in the rabbit, all alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtypes coexist in the aorta and in the mesenteric, renal, and iliac arteries. However, although the renal and iliac arteries contract predominantly via the activation of alpha 1D-adrenoceptors in response to noradrenaline and secondarily via activation of alpha 1A- and alpha 1B-adrenoceptors, the aorta contracts via the activation of alpha 1A- and alpha 1B-adrenoceptors (Satoh et al., 1998, 1999). According to functional results, it seems that in the rat the alpha 1A- and alpha 1D-adrenoceptor subtypes regulate the larger vessels, whereas the alpha 1B-adrenoceptors control the small resistance vessels (Leech and Faber, 1996; Piascik et al., 1997; Gisbert et al., 2000). In the dog mesenteric artery, alpha 1-adrenoceptors are predominantly of the alpha 1A-subtype (Daniel et al., 1999).

Table 2 summarizes the alpha 1-adrenoceptors subtypes primarily responsible for the contractile responses of the main arteries from species mostly currently used in research: alpha 1A- and alpha 1D-subtypes are those mainly involved in the contractions evoked by alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonists.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Distribution of alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtypes in blood vessels

alpha 1-Adrenoceptors are also involved in the regulation of vascular smooth muscle growth. Findings by some authors suggest that prolonged stimulation of chloroethylclonidine-sensitive, possibly alpha 1B-adrenoceptors, induce hypertrophy of arterial smooth muscle cells, whereas stimulation of alpha 1A-adrenoceptors attenuates this growth response (Chen et al., 1995; Siwik and Brown, 1996).

2. In Vivo. There is also longstanding evidence that multiple alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtypes are involved in the regulation of peripheral vascular function in vivo (McGrath, 1982; Minneman, 1988; Bylund et al., 1995b). However, the individual contribution of each of the alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtypes has not been established. Of the three known alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtypes, alpha 1A- and alpha 1D-adrenoceptors have most often been implicated in the regulation of vascular smooth muscle tone (see Table 2). There are discrepancies between results obtained in vitro and in vivo involving alpha 1-adrenoceptors. Although in vitro studies in rats had indicated a predominant role of the alpha 1D-adrenoceptor in the vascular contractions caused by alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonists (Piascik et al., 1995; Hussain and Marshall, 2000), surprisingly experiments in alpha 1B-knockout mice show that the maximal contractile response of aortic rings to phenylephrine was reduced by 40% and the mean arterial blood pressure response to phenylephrine was decreased by 45%, showing that the alpha 1B-adrenoceptor is important for blood pressure and the contractile response of the aorta evoked by alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonists (Cavalli et al., 1997). In the pithed rat, the systemic blood pressure is tonically regulated by the interaction of peripheral sympathetic nerves with vascular alpha 1A-adrenoceptors (Vargas et al., 1994), although vascular alpha 1D-adrenoceptors have a role in the pressor response to phenylephrine (Zhou and Vargas, 1996). Also, in the pithed rat, it was shown that the selective alpha 1D-adrenoceptor antagonist BMY-7378 not only antagonized the pressor effect of phenylephrine, but also was more potent in young prehypertensive spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) than in young WKY rats. The presence of alpha 1D-adrenoceptors in the resistance vasculature of prehypertensive and hypertensive rats may indicate that they are involved in the development/maintenance of hypertension (Villalobos-Molina et al., 1999). Thus, it may be concluded that, in rats in vivo, the pressor response to phenylephrine is mediated by vascular alpha 1A- and alpha 1D-adrenoceptors (Vargas et al., 1994; Guarino et al., 1996; Zhou and Vargas, 1996).

In human vasculature, as in that of other mammals, alpha 1-adrenoceptors play a crucial role in the regulation of vascular tone. In healthy volunteers, Schäfers et al. (1997, 1999) showed that, whereas 2 mg of doxazosin (a selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist) nearly completely antagonized the blood pressure increasing effect of i.v. administered noradrenaline (10 to 160 ng/kg · min), 15 mg of yohimbine (a selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist) only slightly attenuated noradrenaline effect. With regard to this finding, one should bear in mind that the administration of exogenous noradrenaline does not necessarily result in identical concentrations in the biophase of the postjunctional alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptors; there may develop a certain ratio biophase alpha 1/biophase alpha 2. Moreover, this ratio may be different for noradrenaline released from sympathetic nerves (see Distribution of vascular adrenoceptors). The available information regarding alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtypes mediating vasoconstriction in humans is still very scarce.

In conclusion to the role played by each alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtype in the maintenance of vascular tone and in vascular responses to alpha 1-adrenoceptor ligands, one can say that there is a lack of correlation between two sets of results disturbing their interpretation. First, the lack of correlation between protein expression of a given adrenoceptor and the functional role this adrenoceptor plays; second, the lack of correlation between the results obtained in vitro (Table 2) and in vivo. Despite that, according to the vast majority of the authors, it seems that in the rat alpha 1A-adrenoceptors have a prominent role in the regulation of blood pressure, although alpha 1B- and alpha 1D-adrenoceptors are also functionally present and participate in the responses to exogenous agonists (Piascik et al., 1990; Schwietert et al., 1992; Vargas et al., 1994; Guarino et al., 1996; Zhou and Vargas, 1996).

3. alpha 1-Adrenoceptor Antagonists in the Symptomatic Treatment of Prostatic Hypertrophy. Clinical interest in this target comes from the fact that selective alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonists may have significant therapeutic advantages over nonsubtype selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists in the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Which is the basis for the hypothetical differential effect of alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonists at vascular tissue and prostate? Are alpha 1-adrenoceptors of vascular- and prostatic smooth muscle different? Several studies have shown that the alpha 1A-adrenoceptor subtype accounts for the majority of alpha 1-adrenoceptor mRNAs and expressed protein in human prostatic smooth muscle and mediates contraction in this tissue (Price et al., 1993; Faure et al., 1994; Lepor et al., 1995; Michel et al., 1996; Schwinn and Kwatra, 1998). However, recent experiments carried out in rat mesenteric arteries (a tissue the alpha 1-adrenoceptors of which, like those of the prostate, have low affinity for prazosin and RS-17053) (Ford et al., 1996), showed that the affinity of prazosin and RS-17053 was not altered by changing the experimental conditions (lowering temperature, inducing tone via KCl or U-46619---a derivative of prostaglandin F2alpha ), calling again our attention to the problem of the putative alpha 1L-adrenoceptors (Yousif et al., 1998; Stam et al., 1999). On the other hand, which is the alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtype that mediates contractile vascular responses in humans? The few reports on alpha 1-adrenoceptors in resistance arteries failed to show that a particular alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtype is of primary importance in the sympathetic control of these vessels. Probably, as animal studies have suggested, each vessel possesses mixtures of alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtypes, and responses to alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonists are due to stimulation of more than one subtype (Michel et al., 1998b; Ruffolo and Hieble, 1999; Zhong and Minneman, 1999; Argyle and McGrath, 2000). In a very recent study, it was shown that the receptor subtype mediating the constriction of canine resistance vessels is an alpha 1A-/alpha 1L adrenoceptor (Argyle and McGrath, 2000), which is the same that has been proposed as mediating the adrenergic responses in prostate (McGrath et al., 1996). Thus, the relative selectivity of alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonists, if there is any, may not depend on differences between subtypes, but rather on differences between local functional expressions of the receptors. In single human prostatic smooth muscle cells, MacKenzie et al. (2000) showed that the affinity of a prazosin analog for native human alpha 1A-adrenoceptors was higher than for human cloned alpha 1A-adrenoceptors expressed in cell cultures. This suggests that a tissue-specific affinity state of the same receptor genotype exists, and this could be a potential differentiator of drug action (MacKenzie et al., 2000).

Halotano et al. (1994) reported a slightly lower potency for 5-MU and WB-4101 in the human iliac artery, compared with the human urethra suggesting a therapeutic benefit in prostatic symptoms without causing the vascular side effects associated with alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade. However, the degree of selectivity of the different compounds until now available to treat benign prostatic hypertrophy (doxazosin, alfusosin, terazosin) is not enough to eliminate cardiovascular side effects, such as dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, asthenia, and occasionally syncope (Michel et al., 1998a; Chapple and Chess-Williams, 1999; Pulito et al., 2000). The moderately selective alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonist tamsulosin has been introduced for this purpose (Foglar et al., 1995). When directly comparing equieffective dosis of terazosin (a selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist) with tamsulosin in patients with prostatic hyperplasia, Lee and Lee (1997) observed that tamsulosin caused significantly fewer side effects; however, Schäfers et al. (1998) less enthusiastically concluded that further experimental and clinical work was required to unequivocally demonstrate this advantage of selective alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonists. Very recently, the selectivity of tamsulosin, doxazosin, and alfuzosin was determined by comparing their effects on the human prostate and human mesenteric arteries in vitro. It was observed that tamsulosin exhibited a 10-fold selectivity for the prostate over the artery, a degree of selectivity that was compatible with its claimed clinical benefit (Davis et al., 2000). A possible explanation for the clinical advantages of tamsulosin was given by Hein et al. (2001), who showed that the alpha 1-antagonist with the least vascular effects in humans in vivo also was the drug with the least inverse agonism in vitro (tamsulosin).

Some new aryl piperazine compounds were recently synthesized, which in binding experiments to recombinant human alpha 1-adrenoceptors showed high alpha 1A-adrenoceptor subtype selectivity (Pulito et al., 2000). Furthermore, some of them were more potent in inhibiting noradrenaline-evoked contraction of rat prostate tissue than those of rat aorta tissue: RWJ-38063 and RWJ-69736 were 319- and 100-fold more potent in their effects on prostate tissue than aorta tissue. In anesthetized dogs, both compounds suppressed the intraurethral pressure response to phenylephrine to a greater extent than the mean arterial pressure response (Pulito et al., 2000). Other new compounds like RO-70-0004 and RS-100329 (Williams et al., 1999) and some aryldihydropyrimidinones (Barrow et al., 2000) also show an approximately 100-fold selectivity for alpha 1A- versus alpha 1B- and alpha 1D-adrenoceptor subtypes.

alpha 1-Adrenoceptor agonists have been used clinically in the treatment of stress incontinence, acting to increase urethral tone by contracting urethra smooth muscle. Efforts are also being made to identify agents of this kind, selective enough to act on the urethra without causing increases in blood pressure (Ruffolo and Hieble, 1999).

B. alpha 2-Adrenoceptors

1. In Vitro. At the postjunctional level, alpha 2-adrenoceptors were not found in vitro in the vast majority of the arterial vessels (Table 1). No constrictor activity of alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonists is present in large arteries; when it appears, it is generally restricted to small arteries/arterioles (Docherty and Starke, 1981; Polónia et al., 1985; Aboud et al., 1993; Leech and Faber, 1996; Daniel et al., 1999). Using rabbit polyclonal antibodies for the alpha 2-adrenoceptor subtypes, it was observed that alpha 2A/D- and alpha 2C-adrenoceptors are present in the smooth muscle of mouse tail arteries, the expression of alpha 2C-adrenoceptors being smaller in distal arteries than in proximal arteries (Chotani et al., 2000). In contrast to the difficulty in demonstrating postjunctional alpha 2-adrenoceptors in arteries in vitro, they are consistently found in many isolated veins of different species (De Mey and Vanhoutte, 1981; Constantine et al., 1982; Shoji et al., 1983; Guimarães et al., 1987). This is why the characterization of alpha 2-adrenoceptor subtypes involved in vascular responses to sympathomimetic agonists is being made in veins (or in vivo). The alpha 2A/D-subtype is the predominant one in almost all the veins until now studied: alpha 2A/D in dog saphenous vein (Hicks et al., 1991; MacLennan et al., 1997); alpha 2A/D in rabbit skeletal muscle venules (although predominantly alpha 1D) (Leech and Faber, 1996); and alpha 2A/D (most probably) in the porcine palmar lateral vein (Blaylock and Wilson, 1995). In good agreement with the premise that the alpha 2A- and alpha 2D-adrenoceptors represent species orthologs (Bylund et al., 1995a)---alpha 2A occurring in humans, dogs, pigs, and rabbits and alpha 2D occurring in rats, mice, and cows---it was observed that postjunctional alpha 2-adrenoceptors of the canine mesenteric vein are predominantly alpha 2A, whereas those of the rat femoral vein are predominantly alpha 2D (Paiva et al., 1999). In human saphenous vein, correlation of alpha 2-adrenoceptors antagonist potency with binding affinity suggests the contribution of the alpha 2C-subtype (Gavin et al., 1997).

2. In Vivo. alpha 2-Adrenoceptors are essential components of the neural complex system regulating cardiovascular function (Ruffolo et al., 1991) (see Section IV.). When clonidine-like alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonists are intra-arterially administered to wild-type mice, they cause an initial brief pressor effect that is gradually reversed to hypotension at the same time as the animal experiences a severe bradycardia (Link et al., 1996; MacMillan et al., 1996). This is a typical cardiovascul