|
|
||||||||
Vol. 53, Issue 4, 527-552, December 2001
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (B.B.F.); Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden, The Netherlands (A.P.I.); Molecular Recognition Section, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.A.J.); Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (K.-N.K.); and Department of Physiology, Health Sciences Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia (J.L.)
Abstract
I. Introduction
II. Molecular Basis for Receptor Nomenclature
III. Formation and Levels of the Endogenous Agonist Adenosine
IV. Structure
V. Gene Structure
VI. Binding Sites As Revealed by Site-Directed Mutagenesis
VII. Distribution
VIII. Classification of Adenosine Receptors Using Pharmacological Tools
IX. Signaling
A. G Protein Coupling
B. Second Messengers and Signals
C. Adenosine Receptor-Mediated Changes in Cell Proliferation and in Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation
D. Interactions with Other Receptor Systems
X. Receptor Regulation
XI. Assay Systems
XII. Physiological RolesTherapeutic Potential
References
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Four adenosine receptors have been cloned and characterized from several mammalian species. The receptors are named adenosine A1, A2A, A2B, and A3. The A2A and A2B receptors preferably interact with members of the Gs family of G proteins and the A1 and A3 receptors with Gi/o proteins. However, other G protein interactions have also been described. Adenosine is the preferred endogenous agonist at all these receptors, but inosine can also activate the A3 receptor. The levels of adenosine seen under basal conditions are sufficient to cause some activation of all the receptors, at least where they are abundantly expressed. Adenosine levels during, e.g., ischemia can activate all receptors even when expressed in low abundance. Accordingly, experiments with receptor antagonists and mice with targeted disruption of adenosine A1, A2A, and A3 expression reveal roles for these receptors under physiological and particularly pathophysiological conditions. There are pharmacological tools that can be used to classify A1, A2A, and A3 receptors but few drugs that interact selectively with A2B receptors. Testable models of the interaction of these drugs with their receptors have been generated by site-directed mutagenesis and homology-based modelling. Both agonists and antagonists are being developed as potential drugs.
| |
I. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The nomenclature and classification
of adenosine receptors has been covered in two publications by members
of a previous NC-IUPHAR subcommittee, which was devoted to
"purinoceptors" (Fredholm et al., 1994a
, 1997
). However, these two
publications were progress reports and were not official documents of
the NC-IUPHAR. They dealt with both adenosine receptors and
P2 receptors. As a result of this work, separate
subcommittees were set up for adenosine receptors, P2X receptors, and
P2Y receptors. The present review will therefore cover adenosine
receptors only. The previous publications contain the historical
background and this will not be recapitulated.
The term adenosine receptor is used to denote this group of receptors.
First, use of the name adenosine follows the recommendation of
NC-IUPHAR that receptors be named after the preferred endogenous agonist. Second, and as discussed in the previous publications, the
concept of adenosine receptors precedes the later concept of
purinoceptors (P1 and P2)
(Burnstock, 1978
) by several years. The discovery by Drury and
Szent-Györgyi (1929)
that adenosine can influence several bodily
functions inspired much research interest; the pronounced
cardiovascular effects of adenosine were particularly well
investigated. Several adenosine analogs were synthesized, and
examination of the dose-response relationships suggested the presence
of specific adenosine receptors (Cobbin et al., 1974
). The essentially
competitive nature of the antagonism by methylxanthines, including
caffeine and theophylline, of adenosine effects in the heart (De
Gubareff and Sleator, 1965
) and in the brain (Sattin and Rall, 1970
)
also supported the idea of adenosine receptors. Finally, as the term
P2 receptor has been superseded by the names P2X
and P2Y there is little room for the term P1 except when referring specifically to older publications.
There are four different adenosine receptors, denoted
A1, A2A,
A2B, and A3 (Table
1). This terminology is well established and is coherent with the principles of receptor nomenclature adopted by
NC-IUPHAR. Although the primary basis for adenosine receptor nomenclature is structural, historical reasons also played a role. As
discussed previously (Fredholm et al., 1994a
), careful pharmacological analysis first identified two subforms
A1 and
A2 (van Calker et al., 1979
; Londos et al.,
1980a
). Later pharmacological studies revealed that the
A2 receptors, coupled to adenylyl cyclase, were heterogenous, necessitating subdivision into A2A
and A2B.
|
| |
II. Molecular Basis for Receptor Nomenclature |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Once the adenosine A1 receptor was defined
using binding assays, several attempts were made to purify the
receptor. Despite considerable progress by several groups the receptor
was never sufficiently pure to allow sequencing. Instead, the cloning
of the first adenosine receptors was serendipitous. Four novel members of the G protein-coupled receptor family were cloned from a canine thyroid library (Libert et al., 1989
). Of these, one turned out to be
the adenosine A2A receptor (Maenhaut et al.,
1990
), and another the adenosine A1 receptor
(Libert et al., 1991
). Once these first sequences were obtained the
same receptors were soon cloned from other mammals including human
(Furlong et al., 1992
; Libert et al., 1992
; Townsend-Nicholson and
Shine, 1992
; Ren and Stiles, 1995
; Deckert et al., 1996
; Peterfreund et
al., 1996
). In addition, the adenosine A2B
receptor was cloned (Stehle et al., 1992
; Jacobson et al., 1995
). More
surprisingly, a fourth adenosine receptor, denoted
A3, was cloned, first as an orphan (Meyerhof et
al., 1991
), later as a bona fide methylxanthine-insensitive adenosine
receptor in rat (Zhou et al., 1992
), a xanthine-sensitive receptor in
sheep (Linden et al., 1993
), and a partially xanthine-sensitive receptor in humans (Sajjadi and Firestein, 1993
; Salvatore et al.,
1993
; Linden, 1994
). Thus, a family of four adenosine receptors has
been cloned from several mammalian and nonmammalian species (see
below). The current nomenclature is summarized in Table 1.
| |
III. Formation and Levels of the Endogenous Agonist Adenosine |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adenosine is the main agonist at this receptor class, and this is
the reason for the name. In addition, the adenosine metabolite inosine
can activate at least some of the receptors (Jin et al., 1997
; Fredholm
et al., 2001
), and there may be circumstances under which inosine
provides a larger activation than adenosine, but this remains to be proven.
When given in very high amounts, adenosine can affect intracellular
nucleotide pools and even provide a source of metabolizable energy. In
addition, it was reported very recently that the human growth hormone
secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) also accepts adenosine as a highly potent
endogenous agonist, in addition to the endogenous peptide GHS-R
agonist, ghrelin (Smith et al., 2000
; Tullin et al., 2000
). However,
most effects of adenosine are due to activation of adenosine receptors.
Before we describe the activation of adenosine receptors under
physiological conditions and hence the actions of antagonists, the
mechanisms regulating levels of extracellular adenosine must be briefly
presented. Under normal conditions, adenosine is continuously formed
intracellularly as well as extracellularly. The intracellular production is mediated either by an intracellular 5'-nucleotidase, which dephosphorylates AMP (Schubert et al., 1979
; Zimmermann et al.,
1998
), or by hydrolysis of S-adenosyl-homocysteine (Broch and Ueland, 1980
). Adenosine generated intracellularly is transported into the extracellular space mainly via specific bi-directional transporters through facilitated diffusion that efficiently evens out
the intra- and extracellular levels of adenosine. In some tissues
(e.g., kidney brush-border membranes) there is a concentrative nucleoside transport protein capable of maintaining high adenosine concentrations against a concentration gradient. These transport proteins have been cloned and were termed ENT1 and ENT2 (for the equilibrative transport proteins) and CNT1 and CNT2 (for the
concentrative types) (e.g., Williams and Jarvis, 1991
; Anderson et al.,
1996
; Baldwin et al., 1999
). When the activity of transporters is
decreased, e.g., by drugs or by reducing temperature, extracellular
biologically active levels of adenosine increase (Dunwiddie and Diao,
2000
). In view of the fact that several of the transporters are
equilibrative, this might seem to be a paradox. However, as discussed
previously (e.g., Fredholm et al., 1994b
), it must be remembered that
in tissue, some cells are net producers of adenosine, and in these, intracellular levels rise whereas most cells are net eliminators of the nucleoside.
The dephosphorylation of extracellular AMP to adenosine, mediated by
ecto-5'-nucleotidase, is the last step in the enzymatic chain that
catalyzes the breakdown of extracellular adenine nucleotides, such as
ATP, to adenosine. Ectonucleotidases include ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolases, including CD39, which can
hydrolyze ATP or ADP, ectonucleotide
pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterases, alkaline phosphatases and
5'-nucleotidases such as CD73 (Zimmermann, 2000
). These enzymes are
essential for the nerve activity-dependent production of adenosine from
released ATP under physiological conditions (Dunwiddie et al., 1997a
;
Zimmermann et al., 1998
). The entire catalytic pathway is complete in a
few hundred milliseconds, and the rate-limiting step seems to be the
dephosphorylation of AMP to adenosine by ecto-5'-nucleotidase
(Dunwiddie et al., 1997a
). Recent data provide evidence for the
presence of soluble 5'-nucleotidases of unknown structure that are
released together with ATP from stimulated sympathetic nerve endings
and participate in the extracellular hydrolysis of ATP to adenosine
(Todorov et al., 1997
). In striatum, local application of a
5'-nucleotidase inhibitor dose dependently decreases the normal levels
of adenosine and thereby emphasizes the relevance of this enzyme in
vivo (Delaney and Geiger, 1998
). Nonetheless, there is good evidence
that intracellular formation of adenosine is at least as important as
adenosine formation from breakdown of extracellular ATP (Lloyd et al.,
1993
; Lloyd and Fredholm, 1995
). Intracellular formation predominantly
occurs as a consequence of activity of intracellular 5'-nucleotidases, of which two forms, cN-I and cN-II, have been cloned (Sala-Newby et
al., 1999
). These two enzymes may play different roles
cN-I breaking
down AMP to adenosine and cN-II breaking down IMP and GMP to inosine
and guanosine, respectively (Sala-Newby et al., 2000
).
When adenosine levels in the extracellular space are high, adenosine is
transported into cells by means of transporters. It is then
phosphorylated to AMP by adenosine kinase
(Km = approximately 100 nM; Spychala
et al., 1996
) or degraded to inosine by adenosine deaminase, a process
with a severalfold lower affinity (Km = 20-100 µM; Arch and Newsholme, 1978
; Lloyd and Fredholm, 1995
). In
the heart, and probably also other tissues, hypoxia-induced inhibition of adenosine kinase amplifies small changes in free myocardial AMP,
resulting in a major rise in adenosine (Decking et al., 1997
). Adenosine deaminase, but not adenosine kinase, is also present in the
extracellular space (Lloyd and Fredholm, 1995
).
Adenosine can also be released into the extracellular space after
application of specific neurotransmitter ligands. Glutamatergic agonists, such as NMDA or kainate, dose dependently increase adenosine levels (Carswell et al., 1997
; Delaney et al., 1998
). Activation of
NMDA receptors seems to release adenosine itself rather than a
precursor (Manzoni et al., 1994
; Harvey and Lacey, 1997
). Dopamine D1 receptors enhance adenosine release via an
NMDA receptor-dependent increase in extracellular adenosine levels
(Harvey and Lacey, 1997
), but dopamine depletion causes no significant
changes in the extracellular levels of striatal adenosine as measured
by in vivo microdialysis (Ballarin et al., 1987
). Thus, dopaminergic input may be important to transiently elevate adenosine but not so
important in maintaining a basal level of the nucleoside. Nitric oxide
can also control basal levels of endogenous adenosine in vivo (Fischer
et al., 1995
; Delaney et al., 1998
) as well as in vitro (Fallahi et
al., 1996
).
Another potential source of extracellular adenosine is cAMP, which can
be released from neurons and converted by extracellular phosphodiesterases into AMP and thereafter by an ecto-5'-nucleotidase to adenosine. Functional evidence for a relevant role of this pathway
has been obtained in the ventral tegmental area and hippocampus (Bonci
and Williams, 1996
; Brundege et al., 1997
; Dunwiddie et al., 1997a
,b
).
However, to provide a physiologically important adenosine release, it
seems that multiple cells must release cAMP over a prolonged period
(Brundege et al., 1997
).
Levels of adenosine in the rodent and cat brain have been determined by
different methods including freeze-blowing (Winn et al., 1981
),
high-energy focused microwave irradiation (Delaney et al., 1998
;
Delaney and Geiger, 1998
) and microdialysis (Zetterström et al.,
1982
; Porkka-Heiskanen et al., 1997
) and have been estimated to be
approximately 30 to 300 nM. These levels are sufficient to cause
activation of adenosine A1 and
A2A receptors.
The levels of adenosine, at least in the basal forebrain, striatum,
hippocampus, and thalamus, are higher during wakefulness than sleep
(Huston et al., 1996
; Porkka-Heiskanen et al., 1997
). The highest
levels of adenosine in hippocampus were estimated during the hours
before rats entered into a sleep-like behavior, suggesting that
adenosine has sleep-promoting properties (Huston et al., 1996
).
Moreover, extracellular adenosine levels increased 2-fold in the basal
forebrain of the cat after 4 h of handling to ensure prolonged
wakefulness (Porkka-Heiskanen et al., 1997
).
As is well known, levels of adenosine increase, up to 100-fold, as a
result of oxidative stress and ischemia (Rudolphi et al., 1992a
; Latini
et al., 1999
). Excitatory amino acid-mediated release of adenosine is
certainly involved; however, of greater importance is probably the fact
that whenever intracellular levels of adenine nucleotides fall as a
result of excessive energy use, the intracellular levels of adenosine
will rise dramatically (Rudolphi et al., 1992a
). For example, following
hypoxia (Zetterström et al., 1982
), ischemia (Berne et al.,
1974
), or electrical stimulation (Pull and McIlwain, 1972
), there is a
decrease of intracellular ATP, accompanied by an accumulation of 5'-AMP
and subsequently adenosine. The nucleoside is thereafter transported
into the extracellular space via the above-mentioned transporters
(Jonzon and Fredholm, 1985
; Fredholm et al., 1994b
). An elegant
illustration of the capacity of these transporters to move adenosine
from the intra- to the extracellular space was provided by loading a
high concentration of adenosine into a single hippocampal CA 1 neuron
and shortly thereafter, identifying in the same cell an inhibition of
the excitatory postsynaptic potential mediated by extracellular
adenosine (Brundege and Dunwiddie, 1996
). Furthermore, when the
intracellular level of adenosine is very high, adenosine simply
diffuses out of cells. Direct release of intracellular adenine
nucleotides, such as ATP, that is thereafter converted extracellularly
by ecto-ATPase and ecto-ATP-diphosphohydrolase (ecto-apyrase) to AMP
and dephosphorylated by ecto-5'-nucleotidase to adenosine, should also
be considered (Rudolphi et al., 1992a
; Zimmermann et al., 1998
).
| |
IV. Structure |
|---|
|
|
|---|
By now all four adenosine receptors have been cloned from rat, mouse, and human (the structural information is available e.g., via GPCRDB www.gpcr.org/7tm/). In addition, A1 receptors are cloned from dog, cow, rabbit, guinea pig, and chick; the A2A receptor from dog and guinea pig; the A2B receptor from chick; and the A3 receptor from dog, sheep, rabbit, and chick. As seen from the dendrogram in Fig. 1, there is a close similarity between receptors of the same subtype, at least among mammals. The largest variability is seen for the A3 receptor for which there is almost a 30% difference at the amino acid level between human and rat. This difference is in fact larger than that between human and chick A1 receptors.
|
The four adenosine receptor subtypes are asparagine-linked
glycoproteins and all but the A2A have sites for
palmitoylation near the carboxyl terminus (Linden, 2001
).
Depalmitoylation of A3 (but not
A1) receptors renders them susceptible to
phosphorylation by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), which in
turn results in rapid phosphorylation and desensitization (Palmer and
Stiles, 2000
).
It has long been known that A1 and
A3 receptors couple to Gi/o
and that A2A and A2B
receptors couple to Gs (see Section
IX.). Experiments with chimeric
A1/A2A receptors indicate
that structural elements in both the third intracellular loop and the
carboxyl terminus influence coupling of A1
receptors to Gi, whereas elements in the third
intracellular loop but not the carboxyl terminus contribute to
A2A receptor coupling to Gs
(Tucker et al., 2000
). Reconstitution experiments have revealed that
the coupling of A1 receptors is influenced by the
composition, prenylation state (Yasuda et al., 1996
) and
phosphorylation state (Yasuda et al., 1998
) of G protein
-subunits.
A2A receptors vary in their affinity for
Gs proteins containing various types of
-subunits and interact most avidly with G proteins containing
4
(McIntire et al., 2001
).
| |
V. Gene Structure |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The genomic structure appears to be similar for all the human
adenosine receptors. There is a single intron that interrupts the
coding sequence in a region corresponding to the second intracellular loop (Ren and Stiles, 1994
; Fredholm et al., 2000
; Olah and Stiles, 2000
). The best studied receptor is the A1
receptor. Already when the structure of the A1
receptor was first reported, the presence of two major transcripts was
noted. It was originally thought that they might represent alternative
splicing, and more recent data have yielded additional information (Ren
and Stiles, 1994
, 1995
). Transcripts containing three exons, called
exons 4, 5, and 6 were found in all tissues expressing the receptor,
whereas transcripts containing exons 3, 5, and 6 are in addition found in tissues such as brain, testis, and kidney, which express high levels
of the receptor. There are two promoters, a proximal one denoted
promoter A, and a distal one denoted promoter B, which are about 600 base pairs apart. Promoter B and exon 1B are part of an intron when
promoter A is active (Ren and Stiles, 1995
). Both promoters were
suggested to have nontraditional TATA boxes.
Reporter assay studies in DDT1 MF-2 cells show
that 500 base pairs of promoter A contained essential elements for
A1 receptor expression, and mice expressing
promoter A driving the
-galactosidase reporter gene confirmed this
(Rivkees et al., 1999b
). Furthermore, this promoter contained binding
sites for GATA and for Nkx2.5, which factors individually drive
promoter activity and also act synergistically (Rivkees et al., 1999b
).
Promoter B has been shown to be activated by, among other things,
glucocorticoids (Ren and Stiles, 1999
). It is known that
glucocorticoids can stimulate the expression of
A1 receptors in DDT1 MF-2
cells (Gerwins and Fredholm, 1991
) and in brain (Svenningsson and
Fredholm, 1997
). The exact reason for this is unknown, since neither
promoter contains a canonical glucocorticoid response element (Ren and
Stiles, 1999
), but interactions with e.g., SRE-2 elements and AP-1
sites may be involved. The magnitude of the glucocorticoid effect that
could be shown using reporter constructs was much higher when promoter B acted alone than when both promoters were present and active (Ren and
Stiles, 1999
). In DDT1 MF-2 cells and in brain,
promoter A appears important (Rivkees et al., 1999b
).
The cloning of much of chromosome 22, where the
A2A receptor is located (MacCollin et al., 1994
),
suggested a two exon structure (Fredholm et al., 2000
), which is
similar to that reported for the rat A2A receptor
(Chu et al., 1996
; Peterfreund et al., 1996
). By comparing the human
sequence data with data from rodents, putative regulatory elements were
identified, including AP-1, NF 1 and AP-4 elements (Fredholm et al.,
2000
). The A2A receptor shows one hybridizing
transcript in most tissues examined (Maenhaut et al., 1990
; Stehle et
al., 1992
; Peterfreund et al., 1996
). However, examination of RNA
isolated from PC12 cells suggested two different start sites (Chu et
al., 1996
). The expression of A2A receptor can be
stimulated by protein kinase C (Peterfreund et al., 1997
) and hypoxia
(Kobayashi et al., 1998
). We do not know the transcription factors
involved in either case. It should also be mentioned that the human
adenosine A2A receptor is polymorphic. In
particular, a (silent) T1083C mutation occurs in various populations, more frequently in caucasians than in Asians (Deckert et al., 1996
; Le
et al., 1996
; Soma et al., 1998
).
Analysis of the A2B receptor gene, localized on
chromosome 17 in man, reveals a similar overall structure as for the
other adenosine receptors. The rat A2B receptor
shows two hybridizing transcripts of 1.8 and 2.2 kb, where the latter
is the dominant one (Stehle et al., 1992
). This could, in analogy with
the above, suggest the presence of multiple promoters, but so far this
has not been studied to our knowledge.
The mouse A3 receptor appears to have two exons
with coding sequences of 354 and 1135 base pairs separated by an intron
of about 2.3 kb (Zhao et al., 1999
). Several putative transcription factor-binding sites could be detected in the mouse gene (Zhao et al.,
1999
), but surprisingly, few of these are matched by similar elements
in the human gene. This could mean that the truly important sites have
not been identified, or else that the expression of the receptor is
regulated very differently in the two species. The fact that the
distribution of A3 receptors in humans and
rodents is very different might indicate the latter. The human
A3 receptor shows two transcripts: the most
abundant is approximately 2 kb in size, and the much less abundant one
is about 5 kb (Atkinson et al., 1997
). There are several possible
explanations for this, one of which being a similarity with the
A1 receptor gene.
| |
VI. Binding Sites As Revealed by Site-Directed Mutagenesis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adenosine receptors, like the other G protein-coupled receptors
(GPCR), are integral membrane proteins. Such macromolecules are not
easily amenable to crystallization and, hence, to precise structure
elucidation through X-ray diffraction. However, substantial progress
has been made over the last decade or so in unraveling the
three-dimensional architecture of two related membrane-bound proteins,
i.e., bacteriorhodopsin and (mammalian) rhodopsin. The pivotal
suggestion that the GPCR family bears structural homology to these two
proteins has been an impetus to our current understanding of receptor
structure. Bacteriorhodopsin, a proton pump present in the cell wall of
Halobacterium halobium, and rhodopsin, itself a G
protein-coupled receptor, are of similar size and share many characteristics between themselves and with other mammalian G protein-coupled receptors. They both have the typical
seven-transmembrane
-helical architecture and bind retinal, their
endogenous ligand, in the cavity formed by the barrel-like arrangement
of the seven transmembrane domains. On the other hand there is little
sequence (i.e., amino acid) homology between the two proteins and an
almost total lack of homology between bacteriorhodopsin and G
protein-coupled receptors. Hibert and coworkers were the first to
realize and analyze in depth the opportunities and pitfalls of using
the atomic coordinates of bacteriorhodopsin, at that time available at
low resolution only (Henderson et al., 1990
), and later, of rhodopsin, to construct putative receptor models (Hibert et al., 1991
; Hoflack et
al., 1994
). In subsequent years ever greater resolution and accuracy
were achieved (Kimura et al., 1997
; Unger et al., 1997
), eventually
resulting in the elucidation of the structures of bacteriorhodopsin (Fig. 2A) and rhodopsin (Fig. 2B) at 1.55 and 2.8 Å, respectively (Luecke et al., 1999
; Palczewski et al.,
2000
).
|
It is obvious that so-called homology modeling, i.e., the construction
of a three-dimensional model of a given protein (e.g., one of the
adenosine receptor subtypes) on the basis of an experimentally determined structure of another related protein (e.g.,
bacteriorhodopsin or rhodopsin) can only generate highly speculative
models. This is particularly true when it comes to apparent differences
between the macromolecules under study, for instance in their ligand
binding sites. Nevertheless, a number of receptor models have been
developed on the basis of either bacteriorhodopsin or rhodopsin (at
various degrees of resolution). Thus, Baldwin combined structural
information on rhodopsin with a sequence analysis of other GPCRs to
suggest a probable arrangement (including "borders") of the seven
-helices (Baldwin et al., 1997
). This template structure was used to
provide models for all G protein-coupled receptors in an automated
fashion, which can be easily retrieved from the internet (for
information on G protein-coupled receptors, including these
three-dimensional models, see the GPCR Database
http://www.gpcr.org/7tm/). Although met with skepticism, such receptor
models have been useful in clarifying the putative molecular basis of
receptor-ligand recognition, in particular when combined with and
adjusted to available pharmacological and structure-activity
relationship data.
In the adenosine receptor field, the first receptor model targeted the
adenosine A1 receptor (IJzerman et al., 1992
)
based on the sequence of the canine orphan receptor RDC7, later
identified as an A1 receptor (Libert et al.,
1989
, 1991
), and the low resolution structure of bacteriorhodopsin
(Henderson et al., 1990
). It was found that the pore formed by the
seven amphipathic
-helices was characterized by a rather distinct
partition between hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions. Chemical
modification of histidine residues in the receptor, of which two are
present in the transmembrane domains, one in helix VI and one in helix
VII, strongly affects ligand binding. This provided the basis for
docking the potent and A1-selective agonist
N6-cyclopentyladenosine into this
cavity. A similar model, again based on the bacteriorhodopsin structure
and the two histidine residues, was developed for the rat adenosine
A2A receptor (IJzerman et al., 1994
).
Later, mutation studies indicated these and other amino acid residues
as being important for either agonist or antagonist binding or both
(see next four paragraphs). This led to further but similar
models for instance for the human A2A receptor,
based on the low resolution structure of rhodopsin (Kim et al.,
1995
). As can be inferred from Fig. 2, A and B, the two
rhodopsin proteins are similar but certainly not identical in their
transmembrane organization (at the time of the first receptor models,
there was no structural information on the extracellular and
intracellular domains). Studies of an increasing number of point
mutations (often conceived and selected from the receptor models) led
to further insight in the ligand binding site, giving rise to some
refinement of the existing models. In Fig.
3 a snapshot of the most recently published adenosine A1 receptor model highlights
the six residues in helices III and VII probably involved in agonist
binding (Rivkees et al., 1999a
). With the recent structure elucidation
of rhodopsin (Fig. 2B), earlier results that were somewhat anomalous
can be rationalized. For instance, Jacobson and coworkers identified glutamate residues in the second extracellular loop as being important for either direct or indirect ligand recognition (Kim et al., 1996
). In
rhodopsin, part of this domain folds deeply into the center of the
macromolecule, the site where ligand binding in both rhodopsin and
adenosine receptors is thought to take place. This arrangement causes
the second extracellular loop to be in extensive contact with both the
extracellular regions and the ligand binding site. The proteolytic
analysis of A1 receptors photoaffinity-labeled
with a xanthine antagonist indicates that the site of alkylation is in
TM3 (Kennedy et al., 1996
).
|
Extensive mutagenesis, consisting of single amino acid replacement
(typically Ala scanning), has been carried out for both A1 and A2A receptors
(Tables 2 and
3), and to a lesser extent for
A2B receptors (Table
4). The most essential interactions required for recognition of agonist and/or antagonist occur in TMs 3, 5, 6, and 7. Two His residues (6.52 and 7.43) are conserved among most
of the adenosine receptor subtypes, with the exception of the
A3 receptor, which lacks His at 6.52. These His
residues are important for ligand recognition (Olah et al., 1992
; Kim
et al., 1995
; Gao et al., 2000
). Mutation of His at 6.52 to Leu in the
A1 receptor selectively weakened binding of an
antagonist, whereas at 7.43 the same mutation impaired both agonist and
antagonist binding (Olah et al., 1992
). When either of these residues
in the A2A receptor was mutated to Ala, there was
a dramatic loss of affinity for both agonist and antagonist (Kim et
al., 1995
). Some substitutions by amino acids having aromatic and other
side chains partially restored function of the binding site. At the A2A receptor, substitution at 7.43 with Tyr
selectively reduced agonist affinity (Gao et al., 2000
). The
hydrophilic residue at 7.42 (Thr in A1 and Ser in
A2A receptors; also see Fig. 3) when mutated to
Ala caused a significant loss of affinity for agonists while having
little effect on antagonist binding (Townsend-Nicholson and Schofield,
1994
; Kim et al., 1995
). The hydrophobic residue at 7.35 in the
A1 receptor (Ile in bovine and Met in canine)
appeared to correlate with the species-related differences in agonist
pharmacology (Tucker et al., 1994
). Mutation of an Asn at 7.36 of the
A2B receptor to Tyr, the homologous residue at
the other subtypes, selectively enhanced the affinity of 2-substituted
agonists (Beukers et al., 2000
).
|
|
|
TM3 in the A2A receptor contains a sequence of
four hydrophilic amino acids, of which the first two (Thr at 3.36 and
Gln at 3.37) when mutated had major effects on ligand affinity (Jiang et al., 1996
). An enhancement of affinity for
N6-substituted adenosine derivatives
(140-fold for IB-MECA) in the Gln to Ala mutant appeared to correlate
inversely with size of the amino acid side chain. At the
A1 receptor, mutation of the identical residues
at 3.36 and 3.37 (Fig. 2) to Ala impaired agonist binding and caused a
structure-dependent reduction of antagonist affinity (Rivkees et al.,
1999a
).
Modulatory residues have also been found in TM1, including a Glu
residue (1.39) in both A1 and
A2A receptors, which affects agonist binding
selectively (Barbhaiya et al., 1996
; IJzerman et al., 1996
). A Gly to
Thr mutation in TM1 (1.37) of the A1 receptor increases agonist affinity (Rivkees et al., 1999a
). At the
A2B receptor, mutation at the same position had
no functional consequences (Beukers et al., 2000
). A conserved Asp
residue in TM2 (2.50) is the site of binding of
Na+, which regulates agonist affinity (Barbhaiya
et al., 1996
). No mutations of TM4 in any of the adenosine receptors
have yet been found to affect ligand binding.
Negatively charged residues in the second extracellular loop of the
A2A receptor have been found to be required for
binding of both agonist and antagonist (Kim et al., 1996
). Among nine native Cys residues of the human A1 receptor,
only a single pair, Cys80 and Cys169, were found to be essential for
ligand binding (Scholl and Wells, 2000
). This pair corresponds to Cys
residues conserved among rhodopsin-like GPCRs, which form a disulfide
bridge required for the structural integrity of the receptor.
| |
VII. Distribution |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is important to study the distribution of receptors, because
this will tell us where agonists and antagonists given to the intact
organism can act. Furthermore, in general, the higher the number of
receptors the more potent and/or efficacious will be the agonist. Thus,
the rather low levels of endogenous adenosine present under basal
physiological conditions have the potential of activating receptors
where they are abundant, but not where they are sparse (Kenakin, 1993
,
1995
; Svenningsson et al., 1999c
; Kull et al., 2000b
; Fredholm et al.,
2001
).
There is much information on the distribution of the
A1 and A2A receptors
because good pharmacological tools including radioligands (see below)
are available. There are also several studies that have used antibodies
to localize adenosine A1 receptors in brain (Swanson et al., 1995
; Saura et al., 1998
; Middlekauff et al., 1998
)
and A2A receptors in striatum (Rosin et al.,
1998
; Hettinger et al., 2001
), carotid body (Gauda et al., 2000
), and T
cells (Koshiba et al., 1999
). In the case of the
A2B and A3 receptors, the
data are less impressive. Here one tends to rely on data on the
expression of the corresponding mRNA. Some of this information is
summarized in Table 5. The results
presented there clearly show that there is much left to examine
regarding the distribution of especially A2B and
A3 receptors. Furthermore, it is likely that a
better understanding of the transcriptional regulation (see above) will
be of considerable help in understanding the spatio-temporal aspects of
adenosine receptor distribution.
|
Receptor protein and the corresponding message are often colocalized
but there are important differences. For example, in several regions of
the central nervous system, receptor binding and expression of
transcript do not exactly match (Johansson et al., 1993a
), and the two
are differently regulated by e.g., long term antagonist treatment
(Johansson et al., 1993a
) and during development (Ådén et al.,
2000
, 2001
). Much of the differential distribution can probably be
explained by the fact that a substantial number of adenosine
A1 receptors are present at nerve terminals. A
similar explanation probably underlies the observations that A2A receptors are present in globus pallidus,
despite the fact that A2A receptor mRNA cannot be
detected there (Svenningsson et al., 1997
, 1999c
). These receptors are
probably located at the terminals of the striatopallidal GABAergic
neurons (Rosin et al., 1998
; Svenningsson et al., 1999b
; Linden, 2001
).
Besides regulation at the level of gene transcription, targeting of the
receptor protein to different locations within the cell is crucial.
This important aspect of receptor distribution is just starting to be
explored in the case of adenosine receptors. Recently it was found that
in MDCK cells (a canine kidney cell line) the adenosine
A1 receptor is targeted to the apical surface, whereas the
-adrenoceptor, which is also Gi
coupled, is directed to the basolateral surface (Saunders et al.,
1996
). The distribution is highly dependent on the third intracellular
loop and/or the carboxyl-terminal segment of the receptor as judged by
the distribution of receptor chimeras (Saunders et al., 1998
).
Interestingly, the apical distribution of adenosine
A1 receptors was disrupted by agents that
interfere with microtubules, whereas the basolateral distribution of
adrenergic receptors was not (Saunders and Limbird, 1997
). Thus, G
protein-coupled receptors appear to use several different targeting
mechanisms. This is also borne out by the fact that distribution of
these receptors in the kidney epithelial cell line does not predict
distribution in neurons (Wozniak and Limbird, 1998
).
| |
VIII. Classification of Adenosine Receptors Using Pharmacological Tools |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since adenosine receptors have been studied for a long time there are several useful pharmacological tools (Table 6). The structures of some typical drugs used in receptor classification are shown in Fig. 4. Data on their binding to human and rat receptors are presented in Tables 7 and 8. These tables contain information on some of the most widely used compounds, but a large number of other compounds have also been examined over the years using more or less selective functional assay systems (see Section XI.). Here we will just comment on a few points of more general interest not contained in the tables.
|
|
|
|
Ideally, agonists and antagonists should differ in potency by at least
two orders of magnitude at different receptors to be really useful in
receptor classification. It is apparent from Tables 7 and 8 that this
is rarely the case for any of the compounds often used in classifying
adenosine receptors. Nevertheless, with a judicious use of agonists and
antagonists at A1, A2A, and
A3 receptors in in vitro experiments, strong
conclusions can be drawn. The situation is less fortunate in vivo as
the pharmacokinetics of these compounds have not been studied
extensively. It has been found, however, that the
A1-selective agonist CPA has a terminal half-life
in conscious rats of 6 min in blood (Mathôt et al., 1993
),
whereas the half-life of the A3-selective agonist
Cl-IB-MECA is significantly longer, i.e., 62 min (Van Schaick et al.,
1996
). The relatively short half-life of CPA may be due to its
substantial uptake into erythrocytes (Pavan and IJzerman, 1998
).
In the case of human, rat, and mouse A1 receptors
the full agonist CCPA (and to a somewhat lesser extent CPA) and the
antagonist DPCPX are quite useful. A minor problem with DPCPX is that
it also interacts with appreciable affinity with
A2B receptors. This does not appear to be a major
problem, however, since binding of DPCPX is virtually eliminated in
animals lacking the A1 receptor (Johansson et
al., 2001
). For the adenosine A1 receptor,
partial agonists are available as well. Careful chemical manipulation of the CPA molecule yielded such compounds, for instance by
substitution at the C8-position (Roelen et al., 1996
) or by
modification of the ribose 5'-substituent (van der Wenden et al.,
1998
). These compounds showed tissue selectivity in vivo, exploiting
differences in receptor density, and in the efficiency of receptor
coupling to further signal transduction (Mathot et al., 1995
; van
Schaick et al., 1998
).
Another interesting class of compounds acting on adenosine
A1 receptors are the so-called allosteric
enhancers. The prototype here is PD81723 (Bruns and Fergus, 1990
),
which has been shown by various research groups to (allosterically)
increase agonist binding and effect (e.g., Linden, 1997
). In recent
years, analogs of PD81723 have been synthesized that show similar
effects (van der Klein et al., 1999
; Baraldi et al., 2000b
).
NECA was long considered to be a selective adenosine
A2 receptor agonist, but as seen from the tables
this view can no longer be upheld. Based on evidence that
2-substitution of NECA increased selectivity, CGS 21680 was developed
as an A2A receptor-selective agonist (Hutchison
et al., 1989
). However, in humans it is less potent and less selective
than in rats (Kull et al., 1999
). Indeed, there are clear-cut
differences in the order of potency of agonists, but not antagonists,
between human and rat A2A receptors (Kull et al.,
1999
). There is an additional problem with CGS 21680 as a tool; it also
binds to sites unrelated to A2A receptors
(Johansson et al., 1993b
; Johansson and Fredholm, 1995
; Cunha et al.,
1996
; Lindström et al., 1996
). This means that at least in organs
or cells with few A2A receptors, effects of CGS
21680 must be viewed with skepticism. ATL146e was recently developed as
a new A2A agonist that is over 50 times more
potent than CGS 21680 at the human receptor (Rieger et al., 2001
). It
has strong in vivo effects on e.g., reperfusion injury in the rabbit
lung (Ross et al., 1999
) and the rat kidney (Okusa et al., 1999
), and
reduces expression of adhesion molecules on the reperfused vascular
endothelium (Okusa et al., 2000
). There are several useful
A2A receptor antagonists. The most selective so
far is SCH 58261. The structurally related ZM 241385 is more readily
available (Poucher et al., 1995
), but shows appreciable affinity to
A2B receptors (Ongini et al., 1999
).
The adenosine A2B receptor has low affinity for
most agonists. For the other receptors, agonists with potency in the
low nanomolar range are available, but in the case of
A2B receptors the most potent agonists have
affinities only marginally below 1 µM. Furthermore, selectivity is
negligible. The situation is somewhat more favorable in the case of
antagonists, where some potent and relatively selective antagonists
have been found (Kim et al., 2000
).
The most recently discovered adenosine receptor
the
A3 receptor
is notably insensitive to several
xanthines. Hence, most A3 antagonists have a
nonxanthine structure, including dihydropyridines, pyridines, and
flavonoids (Baraldi et al., 2000a
). Isoquinoline and quinazoline
derivatives constitute another class of highly selective
human A3 receptor antagonists. VUF8504
(4-methoxy-N-[2-(2-pyridinyl)quinazolin-4-yl]benzamide) was the first representative of this class, with a
Ki value of 17 nM (van
Muijlwijk-Koezen et al., 1998
). Later, VUF5574
(N-(2-methoxyphenyl)-N-(2-(3-pyridyl)quinazolin-4-yl)urea) proved even more potent, with a Ki
value of 4 nM, being at least 2500-fold selective versus
A1 and A2A receptors (van
Muijlwijk-Koezen et al., 2000
). One of the most selective compounds
(for human A3 receptors) is MRE-3008-F20, which
is also a useful antagonist radioligand at human
A3 receptors (Varani et al., 2000
).
Species differences in the affinity of adenosine receptor ligands,
especially antagonists, have been noted. For example, 8-phenylxanthines such as XAC that are selective for A1 receptors
in the rat are less selective in the human, due to a decrease in the
A1 affinity and a concomitant rise in the
A2A receptor affinity. As expected from the
structural data (see above), species differences in pharmacology are
most marked for ligands at the A3 receptor. In
general, the affinity at A3 receptors of most
xanthines and other classes of antagonists is highly species-dependent,
and the affinity at human receptors is typically >100-fold greater
than that at rat receptors. While MRS 1523 is an
A3 antagonist of broad applicability to various species, both MRS 1220 and MRE-3008-F20 are extremely potent in binding
to the human but not rat A3 receptors and should
be used cautiously in nonprimate species. In the rat, MRS 1220 is
selective for the A2A receptor. In contrast, the
affinity of the A3 agonist Cl-IB-MECA typically
does not vary beyond an order of magnitude between species examined.
Nevertheless, one must caution against receptor classification based on
pharmacological tools alone, especially in nonmammalian species where
the receptors have not been cloned and characterized. Despite the fact
that there is much interest in mouse adenosine receptors owing to the
development of several mouse strains with targeted deletions, the
information on mouse adenosine receptor pharmacology is deficient. In
one study potencies of selected agonists and antagonists were virtually identical at mouse and rat A1 receptors (Maemoto
et al., 1997
).
| |
IX. Signaling |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. G Protein Coupling
The adenosine A1 and
A2 receptors were initially subdivided on the
basis of their inhibiting and stimulating adenylyl cyclase, respectively (van Calker et al., 1979
; Londos et al., 1980a
). Indeed,
A1 and A2 receptors are
coupled to Gi and Gs
proteins, respectively (Table 9). The
A3 receptor is also Gi
coupled. In addition there is some evidence that the adenosine
receptors may signal via other G proteins (Tables 1 and 9). However,
much of the data on coupling to other G proteins are from transfection experiments and it is not known if such coupling is physiologically important. Recently, evidence was presented that the
A2A receptor may be coupled to different G
proteins in different areas (Kull et al., 2000a
). In most peripheral
tissues, the receptor subtype is coupled to Gs.
However, in striatum, where the brain A2A
receptors are enriched, Gs is very sparse. Here
the dominant G protein of the class is instead
Golf. Indeed, immunoprecipitation experiments show that A2A receptors and
Golf are associated with each other in the
medium-sized spiny neurons of striatum.
|
One adenosine receptor may also be coupled to more than one G protein.
This is common after transfection. Furthermore, endogenous A2B receptors of HEK 293 cells, human HMC-1 mast
cells and canine BR mast cells are dually coupled to
Gs and Gq (Auchampach et
al., 1997
; Linden et al., 1999
).
B. Second Messengers and Signals
After activation of the G proteins, enzymes and ion channels are
affected as can be predicted from what is known about G protein signaling (see Tables 1 and 9). Thus, A1
receptors mediate inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, activation of several
types of K+-channels (probably via
,
-subunits), inactivation of N-, P-, and Q-type
Ca2+ channels, activation of phospholipase C
,
etc. The same appears to be true for A3
receptors. In CHO cells transfected with the human
A3 adenosine receptor both adenylyl cyclase
inhibition and a Ca2+ signal are mediated via a
Gi/o-dependent pathway (Klotz et al., 2000
).
Given that many of the steps in the signaling cascade involve signal
amplification, it is not surprising that the position of the
dose-response curve for agonists will depend on which particular effect
is measured. For example, it was recently found that the so called
receptor reserve in DDT1 MF-2 cells appears very
different depending on whether G protein activation or cAMP
accumulation is measured (Baker et al., 2000
). Both
A2A and A2B receptors
stimulate the formation of cAMP, but other actions, including
mobilization of intracellular calcium, have also been described.
Actions of adenosine A2A receptors on neutrophil
leukocytes are due in part to cAMP (Fredholm et al., 1996
; Fredholm,
1997
; Sullivan et al., 2001
), but cAMP-independent effects of
A2A receptor activation in these cells have also
been suggested (Cronstein, 1994
).
C. Adenosine Receptor-Mediated Changes in Cell Proliferation and in Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation
It was shown more than 15 years ago that adenosine
A1 and A2B receptors could
regulate proliferation and differentiation in vascular smooth muscle
cells (Jonzon et al., 1985
). Since then several examples of such
effects have been described, and they may be related to changes in
mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), which play an essential role
in processes such as cell differentiation, survival, proliferation, and
death. The family of MAPK consists of the extracellular regulated
kinases (ERK) such as ERK1/2, and the stress-activated protein kinases
(SAPK), such as p38 and jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK). These kinases,
usually activated via receptor tyrosine kinases (Seger and Krebs,
1995
), have also been shown to be activated by G protein-coupled receptors.
Adenosine A1 receptors transiently expressed in
COS-7 cells can activate ERK1/2 via
,
-subunits released from
pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins Gi/o (Faure
et al., 1994
). Studies in CHO cells stably expressing the human
A1 receptor later showed that the activation of
ERK1/2 by A1 receptors is time- and
dose-dependent (Schulte and Fredholm, 2000
) and sensitive to the
phosphoinositol-3-kinase inhibitors wortmannin and LY 294002 (Dickenson
et al., 1998
). Although speculative, this may imply a receptor tyrosine
kinase transactivation as described for the epidermal growth factor
(Daub et al., 1997
).
Activation of A2A receptors also increases MAPK
activity. Adenosine agonists exerting mitogenic effects on human
endothelial cells via the adenosine A2A receptor
activate ERK1/2 using the cAMP-ras-MEK1 pathway (Sexl et al., 1997
).
However, the signaling pathways used by the A2A
receptor seem to vary with the cellular background and the signaling
machinery that the cell possesses. Thus, the A2A
receptor-mediated ERK1/2 activation in CHO cells is dependent on
Gs-cAMP-PKA-rap1-p68 B-raf-MEK1. On the other hand, the A2A receptor-mediated activation in HEK
293 cells involves PKC, ras, and sos, but not Gs,
cAMP, or PKA, even though cAMP levels do rise in a
Gs-dependent manner (Seidel et al., 1999
).
A2A receptor activation may not only stimulate,
but also inhibit ERK phosphorylation. Activation of guinea pig
A2A receptors expressed in CHO cells inhibited
thrombin-induced ERK1/2 activation (Hirano et al., 1996
). This
inhibition was cAMP- and wortmannin-sensitive, implying that the
nonselective adenosine analog NECA affects the two distinct pathways
leading from the thrombin receptor to MAPK. In PC12 cells, activation
of endogenously expressed A2A receptors inhibits
nerve growth factor (NGF)-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Arslan et
al., 1997
), even though activation of these receptors alone (i.e., in
the absence of NGF) can lead to an activation (Arslan and Fredholm,
2000
).
The adenosine A2B receptor is the only subtype
that so far has been shown to activate not only ERK1/2 but also JNK and
p38. In human mast cells (HMC), adenosine receptor activation leads to
a time- and dose-dependent activation of ERK1/2 with a maximal degree
of phosphorylation at 5 min, whereas p38 and JNK show a different
kinetic profile with maximal phosphorylation at 1 and 10 to 15 min,
respectively (Feoktistov et al., 1999
). Adenosine A2B receptor-mediated activation of MAPK is
relevant for IL-8 secretion and consequently for mast cell activation.
In untransfected HEK 293 cells, a cascade depending on
Gq/11, PLC, genistein-insensitive tyrosine
kinases, ras, B-raf, and MEK1/2 has been delineated (Gao et al., 1999
).
NECA concentrations used in these studies of endogenous HEK 293 A2B receptors revealed the same potency in
activating ERK and adenylyl cyclase (EC50 values
in the micromolar range) whereas results from another study in
transfected cells (Schulte and Fredholm, 2000
) show a nearly 100-fold
higher potency of both NECA and adenosine in inducing ERK1/2
phosphorylation than in inducing cAMP production. The
EC50 value for ERK1/2 phosphorylation in
transfected CHO lies in the nanomolar range, whereas cAMP production is
half-maximally activated around 1 to 5 µM NECA. Thus, a G
protein-coupled receptor can have substantially different potencies on
different signaling pathways in the same cellular system.
It was recently reported that, in addition to binding adenosine and
adenosine analogs, the A2B receptor in complex
with another protein, DCC (deleted in colorectal cancer), may bind
netrin-1, a protein that is involved in controlling axon elongation,
and that netrin effects depend on the presence of the
A2B receptor (Corset et al., 2000
). These results
have, however, recently been contested (Stein et al., 2001
).
Nevertheless, it seems possible that the A2B
receptors play very important roles in cell proliferation and/or
differentiation. These effects may not only be stimulatory, however. In
vascular smooth muscle cells, activation of A2B
receptors strongly decreases the mitogenic effects of different growth
factors (Jonzon et al., 1985
; Dubey et al., 1996
, 1998
), probably
secondary to a blockade of MAP kinases (Dubey et al., 2000
) stimulated
by these growth factors.
The adenosine A3 receptor has been suggested to
activate ERK1/2 in human fetal astrocytes (Neary et al., 1998
). A
recent study, indeed, shows a clear activation of ERK1/2 via the human
A3 receptor expressed in CHO cells (Schulte and
Fredholm, 2000
). Both NECA and the endogenous agonist adenosine lead to
a time- and dose-dependent increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation already
at concentrations as low as 10 to 30 nM. The A3
receptor agonists Cl-IB-MECA and IB-MECA have been reported to potently
inhibit and less potently to activate apoptosis in various cells
(Abbracchio et al., 1997
). In RBL-2H3 mast-like cells, Cl-IB-MECA
potently blocks UV irradiation-induced apoptosis by a process that
correlates with protein kinase B phosphorylation and is blocked by
pertussis toxin and wortmannin (Gao et al., 2001
).
Thus, the adenosine receptor-mediated activation of MAPK is similar to
that encountered in the remainder of the field of GPCR-mediated MAPK
activation (Gutkind, 1998
; Sugden and Clerk, 1998
; Luttrell et al.,
1999
). The common feature of all adenosine receptors, however, is the
positive coupling to ERK1/2 even though the classical cAMP/PKA pathway
is both activated (A2) and inhibited
(A1/3). Depending on the cellular background the
required signaling elements vary widely, although activation of one of
the small GTP-binding proteins p21ras and rap1 is essential.
D. Interactions with Other Receptor Systems
Adenosine is believed to play modulatory roles in a variety of tissues and physiological circumstances. Adenosine is, as discussed above, not primarily released in a transmitter- or hormone-like fashion, but instead it appears to be formed by groups of cells as part of a response, e.g., to challenges in energy metabolism. It can also be formed by breakdown of ATP released by cells either in a regulated fashion or in response to massive trauma. Adenosine is therefore likely to act in concert with several other messengers (transmitters, hormones, growth factors, autacoids). It is outside the scope of this type of review to delineate all such interactions and a few examples will have to suffice.
Adenosine can, as noted above, activate phospholipase C via adenosine
A1 receptors and a
Gi-dependent mechanism. Interestingly, adenosine
acts synergistically with nucleotides, such as ATP or UTP (Gerwins and
Fredholm, 1992a
), histamine (Dickenson and Hill, 1993
), or with
bradykinin (Gerwins and Fredholm, 1992b
). ATP, histamine, and
bradykinin instead act via Gq/11. The interaction was believed to involve
,
-subunits released from
Gi proteins by A1
receptors, and
q/11-subunits derived via the
other receptor, somehow acting synergistically at the level of PLC. The
involvement of
,
-subunits has been confirmed (Dickenson and Hill,
1998
). More recently, good evidence was provided that the mechanism
involved exchange of
,
-subunits between the two G protein
pathways (Quitterer and Lohse, 1999
), but other mechanisms cannot be
excluded. It was also recently shown that activation of PLC by
Gi-coupled receptors requires that the enzyme is
already activated (Chan et al., 2000
), e.g., by ATP. Given that ATP is
rapidly broken down to adenosine and that ATP and adenosine act
synergistically, we may be dealing with a biologically quite important mechanism.
In the brain there is evidence of important interactions between
adenosine A1, dopamine D1,
and NMDA receptors. First, it is known that activation of NMDA
receptors can increase the release of adenosine (Hoehn et al., 1990
;
Pedata et al., 1991
; Chen et al., 1992
; Manzoni et al., 1994
; Delaney
et al., 1998
; Delaney and Geiger, 1998
). Second, it is well known that
adenosine, by activating presynaptic receptors, can decrease the
release of glutamate, and thereby the activation of NMDA receptors
(Fredholm and Hedqvist, 1980
; Fredholm and Dunwiddie, 1988
; Poli et
al., 1991
; Dunwiddie and Fredholm, 1997
). In addition, activation of adenosine A1 receptors reduces the NMDA currents
by a postsynaptic action (de Mendonca and Ribeiro, 1993
; de Mendonca et
al., 1995
) and reduces toxicity (Finn et al., 1991
). A third
interaction is that dopamine D1 and NMDA
receptors act synergistically in the brain, e.g., on the expression of
immediate early genes (Berretta et al., 1992
) and several long-term
effects of dopamine D1 activation can be blocked
by antagonizing NMDA receptors (Wolf et al., 1994
; Konradi et al.,
1996
). However, this synergistic interaction differs between regions
(Keefe and Gerfen, 1996
). Part of this enhancement may depend on the
ability of dopamine D1 agonists to phosphorylate DARPP-32, which in turn acts to decrease the dephosphorylation of NMDA
receptors, leading to their remaining in an active conformation (Blank
et al., 1997
). Activation of NMDA receptors conversely leads to
decreased DARPP-32 phosphorylation (Halpain et al., 1990
). A fourth
interaction is between dopamine D1 receptors and
adenosine A1 receptors, which have been shown to
act antagonistically (Ferré et al., 1994b
, 1998
; Popoli et al.,
1996
). All these interactions may be functionally connected
(Harvey and Lacey, 1997
). Thus, dopamine D1
activation has been shown to reduce release of glutamate by enhancing
NMDA activity and thereby release of adenosine, which is the agent that
acts at presynaptic A1 receptors.
Adenosine A2A receptors are highly enriched in
the basal ganglia of several species including human. There they are
present in highest abundance on a subset of the GABAergic output
neurons, namely those that project to the globus pallidus (Schiffmann
et al., 1991
; Fink et al., 1992
; Svenningsson et al., 1997
; Rosin et
al., 1998
). These neurons also express dopamine
D2 receptors and it is abundantly clear that the
two receptors interact in binding assays (Ferré et al., 1991
), on
signal transduction (Kull et al., 1999
), and behaviorally (Fink et al.,
1992
; Fredholm et al., 1999
; Svenningsson et al., 1999b
). It appears
that one major role of dopamine in the striatum is to suppress
signaling via A2A receptors (Svenningsson et al.,
1998b
, 1999a
; Chen et al., 2001
). Given that antagonists of
D2 receptors are used in the treatment of
schizophrenia, there are interesting implications for the
pathophysiology of that disease. Adenosine A2A
and dopamine D2 receptors also are colocalized on
arterial chemoreceptors of the carotid body (Gauda et al., 2000
).
Carotid sinus nerve activity is augmented by adenosine binding to
adenosine A2A receptors and attenuated by
dopamine binding to dopamine D2 receptors.
Adenosine A2B receptors are present on many
cells, although in low abundance. It has been repeatedly found that
signaling via the A2B receptor is strongly
influenced by concurrent signaling via other receptors that affect
PLC-Ca2+-PKC. However, the type of interaction
varies from cell to cell. In brain slices the cAMP accumulation
mediated by activation of A2B receptors is
markedly enhanced by drugs that stimulate PKC (Hollingsworth et al.,
1985
; Fredholm et al., 1987b
; Nordstedt and Fredholm, 1987
). Since cAMP
accumulation in brain slices predominantly reflects events in glial
cells, it seems likely that this is the target cell for the
interaction. In glial cells the positive effect of PKC activation can,
however, be counteracted by an inhibitory effect of strong increases in
intracellular calcium (Altiok et al., 1992
; Altiok and Fredholm, 1992
,
1993
; Balmforth et al., 1992
). A similar effect is seen in lymphocytes
(Fredholm et al., 1987a
; Nordstedt et al., 1987
, 1989
; Kvanta et al.,
1989
). In these cells it could be shown that the stimulatory effect of
PKC activation predominantly occurs not at the receptor itself but at a
signaling step after the receptor.
Numerous other examples of interaction between adenosine receptors and other receptors have been reported, and such interactions are likely to be the rule rather than the exception. This has important consequences. For example, if two receptors act synergistically then blockade of either receptor will virtually abolish the response. This can easily be erroneously interpreted as evidence that the receptor that is blocked is solely responsible for the response studied. Another important case should also be mentioned. Sometimes more than one adenosine receptor is expressed on a single cell. The resultant response will therefore be a mixed one and consequently pharmacology may be quite atypical.
| |
X. Receptor Regulation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Exposure of any GPCR to agonists for shorter or longer times
generally leads to the attenuation of the agonist response (for recent
reviews, see Krupnick and Benovic, 1998
; Lefkowitz, 1998
; Pitcher et
al., 1998
; Ferguson, 2001
). Adenosine receptors are no exception (Olah
and Stiles, 2000
). However, the magnitude of this response and the
mechanisms involved seem to vary between the adenosine receptor
subtypes. For example, there are major differences between the two
Gi/o coupled receptors, A1
and A3, when stably transfected into CHO cells
(Palmer et al., 1996
). Whereas the A1 receptor
appears to desensitize slowly and incompletely, the
A3 receptor desensitizes very rapidly. This
difference may be due to differences in the ability of G protein
receptor kinases to phosphorylate the two receptors. However, there may
be additional factors to consider. Thus in DDT1
MF-2 cells, which constitutively express A1
receptors, desensitization is slow when cyclase responses are studied
(Ramkumar et al., 1991
), but have been reported to be rapid when,
instead, phospholipase C activation is examined (Ciruela et al., 1997
).
In this case, phosphorylation mediated via other kinases might be
involved. The receptor has also been reported to internalize within
half an hour of agonist stimulation together with adenosine deaminase
(Saura et al., 1996
). However, many questions remain to be solved in
the case of receptor regulation in DDT1 MF-2
cells, and not all reports are consistent (Olah and Stiles, 2000
).
Recently, it was found that agonist treatment can rapidly translocate
adenosine A1 receptors out of caveolae, providing
another type of explanation for altered receptor signaling (Lasley et al., 2000
). In addition, using still other types of cells or examining the situation in vivo, several groups have described a more or less
rapid decrease in receptor number following agonist administration (Green, 1987
; Longabaugh et al., 1989
; Green et al., 1990
; Fernandez et
al., 1996
; Hettinger et al., 1998
). These changes are not accompanied by changes in the mRNA. Furthermore, antagonist treatment has long been
known to up-regulate adenosine A1 receptors
(Fredholm, 1982
), even though other adenosine receptors are unaffected.
Thus, we still do not understand the factors that are important in
regulating adenosine A1 and
A3 receptors under physiological and
pathophysiological conditions.
Relatively little is known about desensitization of
A2B receptors, except that desensitization does
occur in different cell lines (Mundell and Kelly, 1998
; Peters et al.,
1998
; Haynes et al., 1999
). The mechanism may involve G protein
receptor kinases. A2A receptors coupled to
Gs proteins are believed to desensitize rapidly
(Ramkumar et al., 1991
; Chern et al., 1993
, 1995
; Palmer and Stiles,
1997
). Several mechanisms, including phosphorylation of Thr298 via
receptor kinases, and phosphorylation via cAMP-dependent kinases have
been implicated. Nevertheless, there is good evidence that under in
vivo conditions A2A receptors on leukocytes can be tonically activated by endogenous adenosine (Cronstein, 1994
; Fredholm, 1997
). Similarly, there is excellent evidence that
A2A receptors on striatopallidal neurons are
tonically activated by endogenous adenosine (Svenningsson et al., 1995
,
1999a
, 2000
). Conversely, when tonic adenosine
A2A receptor activation is unopposed by dopamine
for a long period of time, the response to agonist stimulation
decreases (Zahniser et al., 2000
), even though significant effects
remain (Chen et al., 2001
). This is not due to any change in the
receptor number, however. Thus, desensitization of adenosine A2A receptors, via whatever mechanism, may be
important mainly under experimental or pathological situations.
| |
XI. Assay Systems |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adenosine receptors and their ligands may be investigated in
binding and functional assays. The first useful adenosine analogs R-PIA and NECA were developed using assays in intact
animals. Specifically, blood pressure, heart rate, and body temperature were some of the readouts (Vapaatalo et al., 1975
; Raberger, 1979
). Studies using changes in cAMP in fat cells, liver, Leydig cells, brain
homogenates, and cultured brain cells were instrumental in the
definition of A1
(Ri) and A2
(Rs) receptors (van Calker et al.,
1978
, 1979
; Londos et al., 1980b
). Binding assays became available in
the early 1980s, but functional assays continued to play an important
role. For example, studies on coronary blood flow in dogs were used to
screen and develop a large number of compounds acting at
A2A receptors (Daly et al., 1986
). Even today several functional assays remain very useful, not least because they
examine receptors associated with the natural signaling pathways. For
example, A1 receptor-mediated inhibition of
adenylyl cyclase can be studied in fat cells (Fredholm, 1978
; Londos et
al., 1978
; Longabaugh et al., 1989
) whereas platelet membranes is a
preferred system for stimulation of adenylyl cyclase via
A2A adenosine receptors (Klotz et al., 1985
).
A2B receptors have been examined using
fibroblasts (Bruns, 1980
, 1981
) and rat aorta (Collis and Brown, 1983
;
Poucher et al., 1995
).
For a long time rat brain membranes were the standard system for
examining binding to A1 (whole brain; Bruns et
al., 1980
; Schwabe and Trost, 1980
) and A2A
receptors (striatum; Bruns et al., 1986
). Now cell lines stably
transfected with the receptor subtype of interest have become the
standard systems for the characterization of ligands, as they have
several major advantages (Klotz et al., 1998
). Transfected cells allow
for the comparative characterization of receptor subtypes from
different species including humans. With the expression of single
receptor subtypes, cross-reaction of nonselective ligands with
receptors not under investigation does not occur. In addition,
receptors like the A3 subtype that occur
naturally only at low expression levels become available for in vitro
studies. Cellular models with transfected receptors may also be used
for the characterization of effector coupling. All the typical second
messenger responses for the adenosine receptor subtypes have been
identified in CHO cells stably transfected with the human subtypes.
However, these results may not represent the physiological situation
because the receptor density and the availability of G proteins and
other components necessary for signal generation may be different in
artificial cellular models.
| |
XII. Physiological Roles Therapeutic Potential |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, genetically modified mice have been generated that
provide insights into the physiology and pathophysiology of the different adenosine receptors. The adenosine A2A
receptor was first knocked out. The group in Brussels that first cloned
the adenosine receptors also generated the first knock-out mice, in which the first coding exon of the A2A receptor
was targeted (Ledent et al., 1997
). Later a group in Boston targeted
the second exon (Chen et al., 1999
). Using these mice has shown that
A2A receptors play a role in mediating pain via
peripheral sites, inhibiting platelet aggregation and regulating blood
pressure (Ledent et al., 1997
). A2A receptors are
also critically important for the motor stimulant effects of caffeine
(Ledent et al., 1997
; El Yacoubi et al., 2000
). It has also been
demonstrated that A2A receptors contribute to
ischemic brain damage in adult mice (Chen et al., 1999
).
Mice with a targeted disruption of the A3
receptor show a decreased effect of adenosine analogs on mast cell
degranulation (Salvatore et al., 2000
) and a consequent decrease in
vascular permeability (Tilley et al., 2000
). These animals also,
surprisingly, show increased cardiovascular effects of administered
adenosine (Zhao et al., 2000
). Given the species differences in
A3 receptor distribution and pharmacology it is,
however, not clear that the roles of this receptor are similar in humans.
Mice with a targeted disruption of A1 receptors
have also been generated (Johansson et al., 2001
). These mice show
increased anxiety and are hyperalgesic, indicating a role for
A1 receptors in mediating endogenous
antinociception. In these animals, the effect of adenosine on
excitatory neurotransmission is totally eliminated (Dunwiddie et al.,
2000
), and the neuronal response to hypoxia is markedly altered. They
also lack tubuloglomerular feedback and have elevated renin levels
(Brown et al., 2001
; Sun et al., 2001
). Interestingly, all these mice
show essentially normal viability and fertility.
Adenosine protects tissues from ischemic damage in e.g., brain and
heart through multiple receptor subtypes (Lasley et al., 1990
;
Marangos, 1990
; Rudolphi et al., 1992a
,b
; Auchampach and Gross, 1993
;
Deckert and Gleiter, 1994
; Fredholm, 1996
). A1
and possibly A3 receptor activation produces
preconditioning to protect the heart and other tissues from subsequent
ischemic injury. Rapid preconditioning is mediated by a pathway
including PKC and increased mitochondrial K-ATP channel activation
(Sato et al., 2000
). A late phase of preconditioning due to
A1 receptor activation in the rabbit heart is
mediated in part by the induction of manganese superoxide dismutase
(Dana et al., 2000
).
Fishman and coworkers demonstrated that low doses of adenosine cause a
strong inhibition of lymphoma cell proliferation. A similar effect was
seen with low doses of IB-MECA, a somewhat selective agonist for
A3 receptors, whereas no such action was observed
with the selective A1 receptor agonist CCPA
(Fishman et al., 2000b
). The same research group showed that adenosine also acts as a chemoprotective agent by stimulating
granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor production. In this case,
a combined action via both A1 and
A3 receptors appeared causal (Fishman et al.,
2000a
).
Activation of A2A receptors protects tissues from
injury by reducing inflammation during reperfusion following ischemia.
CGS 21680 inhibits neutrophil accumulation and protects the heart from
reperfusion injury (Jordan et al., 1997
). However, similar cardiac
protection has recently been attributed to A3
receptor activation (Jordan et al., 1999
).
The localization of A2A receptors to the dopamine
rich areas of the brain and the behavioral effects of methylxanthines
suggested that antagonists at A2A receptors might
be useful as adjuvants to dopaminergic drugs in Parkinson's disease
(Fredholm et al., 1976
; Ongini and Fredholm, 1996
; Ferré et al.,
1997
; Svenningsson et al., 1999b
; Impagnatiello et al., 2000
) as well
as schizophrenia (Ferré et al., 1994a
; Rimondini et al., 1997
).
This idea has gained additional support by the demonstration that the
adenosine A2A receptor exerts effects that are at
least to some extent independent of dopamine acting at
D2 receptors (Svenningsson et al., 1995
, 1998a
,
1999a
, 2000
; Chen et al., 2001
). The effect of an
A2A receptor antagonist is synergistic with
dopamine receptor agonists in primate models of Parkinson's disease
(Kanda et al., 2000
). Rapid tolerance develops to the motor stimulant
effects of caffeine, but no such tolerance is seen following long-term
treatment with selective adenosine A2A receptor
antagonists (Halldner et al., 2000
; Popoli et al., 2000
; Pinna et al.,
2001
).
There is evidence that IgE antibodies and mast cells play a central
role in the symptoms and pathology of asthma. Aerosolized adenosine has
the effect of causing mast cell-dependent bronchoconstriction in
asthmatic subjects, but causes bronchodilation in nonasthmatics (Cushley et al., 1983
; Vilsvik et al., 1990
). Moreover, the
nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline is widely used
as an antiasthmatic drug although its mechanism of action is uncertain. A related xanthine, enprofylline (3-propylxanthine) (Robeva et al.,
1996
; Jacobson et al., 1999
), is also therapeutically efficacious in
the treatment of asthma, and was thought to act through a nonadenosine receptor-mediated mechanism due to its low affinity at
A1 and A2A receptors.
Recently, attention has shifted to the A2B and
A3 receptor subtypes found on mast cells that,
when activated, facilitate antigen-mediated mast cell degranulation.
The adenosine A3 receptor was initially implicated as the receptor subtype that triggers the degranulation of
rat RBL 2H3 mast-like cells (Ramkumar et al., 1993
) and perivascular mast cells of the hamster cheek pouch (Jin et al., 1997
). There is also
evidence of mast cell degranulation when agonists of
A3 receptors are administered to rats or mice
(Fozard et al., 1996
; Tilley et al., 2000
). In contrast, the
A2B receptor has been implicated as the receptor
subtype that facilitates the release of allergic mediators from canine
and human HMC-1 mastocytoma cells (Feoktistov and Biaggioni, 1995
;
Auchampach et al., 1997
). A role for A2B receptors in human asthma is also suggested by the efficacy of enprofylline, which at therapeutic concentrations of 20 to 50 µM,
only blocks the A2B receptor subtype (Fredholm
and Persson, 1982
; Linden et al., 1999
). In sum, the literature
indicates that the release of allergic mediators from mast cells is
mediated by A3 receptors and/or
A2B receptors. This may result from tissue difference and/or species differences, with rodent (rat, guinea pig,
and mouse) responding primarily to A3, and canine
or human mast cells mainly to A2B adenosine
receptor stimulation.
It is remarkable that despite intensive efforts, relatively few adenosine receptor ligands have made it into clinical trials. Adenosine itself is being marketed in several countries, for two purposes. Adenocard (i.v.) restores normal heart rhythm in patients with abnormally rapid heartbeats originating in the upper chambers of the heart, so-called paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Adenoscan (i.v.) is indicated as an adjunct to thallium cardiac imaging in the evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients unable to exercise adequately. In the 1970s, metabolically stable adenosine receptor agonists were tested clinically as antihypertensives. In the last decade GR79236 (N-[(1S, trans)-2-hydroxycyclopentyl]adenosine) has been tested in human volunteers for various indications such as adjuvant therapy in insulin resistance (type II diabetes) and, more recently, in primary headache (P. P. A. Humphrey, personal communication).
With respect to antagonists, it can be argued that caffeine, the most widely used psychotropic substance, has its main action via adenosine receptors. The same might hold true for theophylline and enprofylline, both used in the treatment of asthma. Currently, selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonists are undergoing clinical trials. A recently concluded Phase II trial with BG9719 ((S)-1,3-dipropyl-8-[2-(5,6-epoxynorbornyl)]xanthine) was successful in treating acute renal failure in patients with congestive heart failure. This was seen as a critical factor for future development of a second-generation product, BG 9928. The A2A adenosine antagonist KW6002 (1,3-diethyl-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-7-ethylxanthine) is undergoing clinical trials as an anti-Parkinson agent (F. Suzuki, personal communication). Other compounds of this class are also under development. Thus, adenosine receptors remain an attractive target for drug development.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
1 Address for correspondence: Bertil B. Fredholm, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: Bertil.Fredholm{at}fyfa.ki.se
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
NC-IUPHAR, International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification; GHS-R, growth hormone secretagogue receptor; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; 6-OHDA, 6-hydroxydopamine; AP-1, activator protein-1; DARPP-32, dopamine and adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate-regulated phosphoprotein of a molecular weight of 32,000; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; PLC, phospholipase C; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; DPCPX, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine; kb, kilobase(s); MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular regulated kinase; SAPK, stress-activated protein kinase; JNK, jun-N-terminal kinase; NGF, nerve growth factor.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Adrenoceptor stimulation, but not muscarinic stimulation, increases cyclic AMP accumulation in brain slices due to protein kinase C mediated enhancement of adenosine receptor effects.
Acta Physiol Scand
131:
543-551[Medline].
a selective high affinity antagonist radioligand for A1 adenosine receptors.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol
336:
204-210[Medline].
)[3H]-N6- phenylisopropyladenosine.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol
313:
179-187[Medline]
0031-6997/01/5304-527-552$3.00
PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Nadeem, D. S. Ponnoth, H. R. Ansari, T. P. Batchelor, R. D. Dey, C. Ledent, and S. J. Mustafa A2A Adenosine Receptor Deficiency Leads to Impaired Tracheal Relaxation via NADPH Oxidase Pathway in Allergic Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2009; 330(1): 99 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. van der Putten, E. A. Zuiderwijk-Sick, L. van Straalen, E. D. de Geus, L. A. Boven, I. Kondova, A. P. IJzerman, and J. J. Bajramovic Differential Expression of Adenosine A3 Receptors Controls Adenosine A2A Receptor-Mediated Inhibition of TLR Responses in Microglia J. Immunol., June 15, 2009; 182(12): 7603 - 7612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhou, A. Mohsenin, E. Morschl, H. W. J. Young, J. G. Molina, W. Ma, C.-X. Sun, H. Martinez-Valdez, and M. R. Blackburn Enhanced Airway Inflammation and Remodeling in Adenosine Deaminase-Deficient Mice Lacking the A2B Adenosine Receptor J. Immunol., June 15, 2009; 182(12): 8037 - 8046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Lange, S. Yamamoto, S. Partida-Sanchez, Y. Mori, A. Fleig, and R. Penner TRPM2 Functions as a Lysosomal Ca2+-Release Channel in {beta} Cells Sci. Signal., May 19, 2009; 2(71): ra23 - ra23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Yu, J. E. Coelho, X. Zhang, Y. Fu, A. Tillman, U. Karaoz, B. B. Fredholm, Z. Weng, and J.-F. Chen Uncovering multiple molecular targets for caffeine using a drug target validation strategy combining A2A receptor knockout mice with microarray profiling Physiol Genomics, May 13, 2009; 37(3): 199 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K. Yang, J.-F. Chen, T. J. Kieffer, and Y. N. Kwok Regulation of Somatostatin Release by Adenosine in the Mouse Stomach J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2009; 329(2): 729 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Epperson, L. L. Brunton, I. Ramirez-Sanchez, and F. Villarreal Adenosine receptors and second messenger signaling pathways in rat cardiac fibroblasts Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): C1171 - C1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Auchampach, L. M. Kreckler, T. C. Wan, J. E. Maas, D. van der Hoeven, E. Gizewski, J. Narayanan, and G. E. Maas Characterization of the A2B Adenosine Receptor from Mouse, Rabbit, and Dog J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2009; 329(1): 2 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-N. Yang, J.-F. Chen, and B. B. Fredholm Physiological roles of A1 and A2A adenosine receptors in regulating heart rate, body temperature, and locomotion as revealed using knockout mice and caffeine Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): H1141 - H1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Jeffe, K. A. Stegmann, F. Broelsch, M. P. Manns, M. Cornberg, and H. Wedemeyer Adenosine and IFN-{alpha} synergistically increase IFN-{gamma} production of human NK cells J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2009; 85(3): 452 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rajakariar, J. Newson, E. K. Jackson, P. Sawmynaden, A. Smith, F. Rahman, M. M. Yaqoob, and D. W. Gilroy Nonresolving Inflammation in gp91phox-/- Mice, a Model of Human Chronic Granulomatous Disease, Has Lower Adenosine and Cyclic Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate J. Immunol., March 1, 2009; 182(5): 3262 - 3269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-N. Yang, O. Bjorklund, K. Lindstrom-Tornqvist, E. Lindgren, T. M. Eriksson, J. Kahlstrom, J.-F. Chen, M. A. Schwarzschild, I. Tobler, and B. B. Fredholm Mice heterozygous for both A1 and A2A adenosine receptor genes show similarities to mice given long-term caffeine J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2009; 106(2): 631 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Rieg and V. Vallon ATP and adenosine in the local regulation of water transport and homeostasis by the kidney Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2009; 296(2): R419 - R427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Oishi, Z.-L. Huang, B. B. Fredholm, Y. Urade, and O. Hayaishi Adenosine in the tuberomammillary nucleus inhibits the histaminergic system via A1 receptors and promotes non-rapid eye movement sleep PNAS, December 16, 2008; 105(50): 19992 - 19997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Reyes, C. Y. Loong, M. Harbinson, J. Donovan, C. Anagnostopoulos, and S. R. Underwood High-Dose Adenosine Overcomes the Attenuation of Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Caused by Caffeine J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 9, 2008; 52(24): 2008 - 2016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Morschl, J. G. Molina, J. B. Volmer, A. Mohsenin, R. S. Pero, J.-S. Hong, F. Kheradmand, J. J. Lee, and M. R. Blackburn A3 Adenosine Receptor Signaling Influences Pulmonary Inflammation and Fibrosis Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., December 1, 2008; 39(6): 697 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Liclican, J. C. McGiff, J. R. Falck, and M. A. Carroll Failure to upregulate the adenosine2A receptor-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid pathway contributes to the development of hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): F1696 - F1704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V.-P. Jaakola, M. T. Griffith, M. A. Hanson, V. Cherezov, E. Y. T. Chien, J. R. Lane, A. P. IJzerman, and R. C. Stevens The 2.6 Angstrom Crystal Structure of a Human A2A Adenosine Receptor Bound to an Antagonist Science, November 21, 2008; 322(5905): 1211 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Csoka, L. Himer, Z. Selmeczy, E. S. Vizi, P. Pacher, C. Ledent, E. A. Deitch, Z. Spolarics, Z. H. Nemeth, and G. Hasko Adenosine A2A receptor activation inhibits T helper 1 and T helper 2 cell development and effector function FASEB J, October 1, 2008; 22(10): 3491 - 3499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Sitkovsky, J. Kjaergaard, D. Lukashev, and A. Ohta Hypoxia-Adenosinergic Immunosuppression: Tumor Protection by T Regulatory Cells and Cancerous Tissue Hypoxia Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 14(19): 5947 - 5952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. N. Berti-Mattera, T. S. Kern, R. E. Siegel, I. Nemet, and R. Mitchell Sulfasalazine Blocks the Development of Tactile Allodynia in Diabetic Rats Diabetes, October 1, 2008; 57(10): 2801 - 2808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Roseti, K. Martinello, S. Fucile, V. Piccari, A. Mascia, G. Di Gennaro, P. P. Quarato, M. Manfredi, V. Esposito, G. Cantore, et al. Adenosine receptor antagonists alter the stability of human epileptic GABAA receptors PNAS, September 30, 2008; 105(39): 15118 - 15123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kreth, C. Ledderose, I. Kaufmann, G. Groeger, and M. Thiel Differential expression of 5'-UTR splice variants of the adenosine A2A receptor gene in human granulocytes: identification, characterization, and functional impact on activation FASEB J, September 1, 2008; 22(9): 3276 - 3286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Novitskiy, S. Ryzhov, R. Zaynagetdinov, A. E. Goldstein, Y. Huang, O. Y. Tikhomirov, M. R. Blackburn, I. Biaggioni, D. P. Carbone, I. Feoktistov, et al. Adenosine receptors in regulation of dendritic cell differentiation and function Blood, September 1, 2008; 112(5): 1822 - 1831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Hider, W. Thomson, L. F. Mack, D. J. Armstrong, M. Shadforth, and I. N. Bruce Polymorphisms within the adenosine receptor 2a gene are associated with adverse events in RA patients treated with MTX Rheumatology, August 1, 2008; 47(8): 1156 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Mills, L. F. Thompson, C. Mueller, A. T. Waickman, S. Jalkanen, J. Niemela, L. Airas, and M. S. Bynoe CD73 is required for efficient entry of lymphocytes into the central nervous system during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis PNAS, July 8, 2008; 105(27): 9325 - 9330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Peng, P. Fernandez, T. Wilder, H. Yee, L. Chiriboga, E. S. L. Chan, and B. N. Cronstein Ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) -mediated extracellular adenosine production plays a critical role in hepatic fibrosis FASEB J, July 1, 2008; 22(7): 2263 - 2272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. DeSesa, R. P. Vaughan, M. J. Lanosa, K. G. Fontaine, and J. B. Morris Sulfur-Containing Malodorant Vapors Enhance Responsiveness to the Sensory Irritant Capsaicin Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2008; 104(1): 198 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Alvarez, A. Coulombe, O. Cazorla, M. Ugur, J.-M. Rauzier, J. Magyar, E.-L. Mathieu, G. Boulay, R. Souto, P. Bideaux, et al. ATP/UTP activate cation-permeable channels with TRPC3/7 properties in rat cardiomyocytes Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): H21 - H28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ryzhov, R. Zaynagetdinov, A. E. Goldstein, S. V. Novitskiy, M. M. Dikov, M. R. Blackburn, I. Biaggioni, and I. Feoktistov Effect of A2B Adenosine Receptor Gene Ablation on Proinflammatory Adenosine Signaling in Mast Cells J. Immunol., June 1, 2008; 180(11): 7212 - 7220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Guntz, H. Dumont, E. Pastijn, A. de Kerchove d'Exaerde, K. Azdad, M. Sosnowski, S. N. Schiffmann, and D. Gall Expression of Adenosine A2A Receptors in the Rat Lumbar Spinal Cord and Implications in the Modulation of N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Currents Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1882 - 1889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Fernandez, S. Trzaska, T. Wilder, L. Chiriboga, M. R. Blackburn, B. N. Cronstein, and E. S. L. Chan Pharmacological Blockade of A2A Receptors Prevents Dermal Fibrosis in a Model of Elevated Tissue Adenosine Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2008; 172(6): 1675 - 1682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Cerqueira, P. Nguyen, P. Staehr, S. R. Underwood, A. E. Iskandrian, and on behalf of the ADVANCE-MPI Trial Investigators Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2008; 1(3): 307 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-T. Cheng, Y.-K. Leung, B. Shen, Y.-C. Kwok, C.-O. Wong, H.-Y. Kwan, Y.-B. Man, X. Ma, Y. Huang, and X. Yao CNGA2 Channels Mediate Adenosine-Induced Ca2+ Influx in Vascular Endothelial Cells Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2008; 28(5): 913 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Hasko and P. Pacher A2A receptors in inflammation and injury: lessons learned from transgenic animals J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 83(3): 447 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Cordeaux, S. J. Briddon, S. P. H. Alexander, B. Kellam, and S. J. Hill Agonist-occupied A3 adenosine receptors exist within heterogeneous complexes in membrane microdomains of individual living cells FASEB J, March 1, 2008; 22(3): 850 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Rieg, K. Pothula, J. Schroth, J. Satriano, H. Osswald, J. Schnermann, P. A. Insel, R. A. Bundey, and V. Vallon Vasopressin regulation of inner medullary collecting ducts and compensatory changes in mice lacking adenosine A1 receptors Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): F638 - F644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shen and P. E. DiCorleto Adenosine Prompts the Heart to Recruit Endothelial Progenitors Circ. Res., February 15, 2008; 102(3): 280 - 282. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ryzhov, N. V. Solenkova, A. E. Goldstein, M. Lamparter, T. Fleenor, P. P. Young, J. P. Greelish, J. G. Byrne, D. E. Vaughan, I. Biaggioni, et al. Adenosine Receptor-Mediated Adhesion of Endothelial Progenitors to Cardiac Microvascular Endothelial Cells Circ. Res., February 15, 2008; 102(3): 356 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ryzhov, R. Zaynagetdinov, A. E. Goldstein, S. V. Novitskiy, M. R. Blackburn, I. Biaggioni, and I. Feoktistov Effect of A2B Adenosine Receptor Gene Ablation on Adenosine-Dependent Regulation of Proinflammatory Cytokines J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2008; 324(2): 694 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. von Kugelgen, A. C. Schiedel, K. Hoffmann, B. B. A. Alsdorf, A. Abdelrahman, and C. E. Muller Cloning and Functional Expression of a Novel Gi Protein-Coupled Receptor for Adenine from Mouse Brain Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2008; 73(2): 469 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ohta, D. Lukashev, E. K. Jackson, B. B. Fredholm, and M. Sitkovsky 1,3,7-Trimethylxanthine (Caffeine) May Exacerbate Acute Inflammatory Liver Injury by Weakening the Physiological Immunosuppressive Mechanism J. Immunol., December 1, 2007; 179(11): 7431 - 7438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Fewell, C. Zhang, and A. M. Gillis Influence of adenosine A1-receptor blockade and vagotomy on the gasping and heart rate response to hypoxia in rats during early postnatal maturation J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2007; 103(4): 1234 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Kreda, S. F. Okada, C. A. van Heusden, W. O'Neal, S. Gabriel, L. Abdullah, C. W. Davis, R. C. Boucher, and E. R. Lazarowski Coordinated release of nucleotides and mucin from human airway epithelial Calu-3 cells J. Physiol., October 1, 2007; 584(1): 245 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Massari, F. Benazzo, M. De Mattei, S. Setti, and M. Fini Effects of Electrical Physical Stimuli on Articular Cartilage J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2007; 89(suppl_3): 152 - 161. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Csoka, Z. H. Nemeth, L. Virag, P. Gergely, S. J. Leibovich, P. Pacher, C.-X. Sun, M. R. Blackburn, E. S. Vizi, E. A. Deitch, et al. A2A adenosine receptors and C/EBP{beta} are crucially required for IL-10 production by macrophages exposed to Escherichia coli Blood, October 1, 2007; 110(7): 2685 - 2695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mohsenin, T. Mi, Y. Xia, R. E. Kellems, J.-F. Chen, and M. R. Blackburn Genetic removal of the A2A adenosine receptor enhances pulmonary inflammation, mucin production, and angiogenesis in adenosine deaminase-deficient mice Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): L753 - L761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Tostes, F. R. C. Giachini, F. S. Carneiro, R. Leite, E. W. Inscho, and R. C. Webb Determination of Adenosine Effects and Adenosine Receptors in Murine Corpus Cavernosum J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2007; 322(2): 678 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. H. Nemeth, D. Bleich, B. Csoka, P. Pacher, J. G. Mabley, L. Himer, E. S. Vizi, E. A. Deitch, C. Szabo, B. N. Cronstein, et al. Adenosine receptor activation ameliorates type 1 diabetes FASEB J, August 1, 2007; 21(10): 2379 - 2388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Merighi, A. Benini, P. Mirandola, S. Gessi, K. Varani, C. Simioni, E. Leung, S. Maclennan, P. G. Baraldi, and P. A. Borea Caffeine Inhibits Adenosine-Induced Accumulation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1{alpha}, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, and Interleukin-8 Expression in Hypoxic Human Colon Cancer Cells Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2007; 72(2): 395 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. H. Huxley, J. J. Wang, and I. H. Sarelius Adaptation of coronary microvascular exchange in arterioles and venules to exercise training and a role for sex in determining permeability responses Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): H1196 - H1205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Reutershan, R. E. Cagnina, D. Chang, J. Linden, and K. Ley Therapeutic Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Myeloid Cell Adenosine Receptor A2a Stimulation in Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Lung Injury J. Immunol., July 15, 2007; 179(2): 1254 - 1263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-B. Zhu, J. A. Steiner, J. L. Munn, L. C. Daws, W. A. Hewlett, and R. D. Blakely Rapid Stimulation of Presynaptic Serotonin Transport by A3 Adenosine Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2007; 322(1): 332 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Blackburn A role for neural pathways in adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): L22 - L24. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Swoap, M. Rathvon, and M. Gutilla AMP does not induce torpor Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): R468 - R473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gundlfinger, J. Bischofberger, F. W. Johenning, M. Torvinen, D. Schmitz, and J. Breustedt Adenosine modulates transmission at the hippocampal mossy fibre synapse via direct inhibition of presynaptic calcium channels J. Physiol., July 1, 2007; 582(1): 263 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tabata, D. Kawakami, K. Hashimoto, H. Kassai, T. Yoshida, Y. Hashimotodani, B. B. Fredholm, Y. Sekino, A. Aiba, and M. Kano G protein-independent neuromodulatory action of adenosine on metabotropic glutamate signalling in mouse cerebellar Purkinje cells J. Physiol., June 1, 2007; 581(2): 693 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Haschemi, O. Wagner, R. Marculescu, B. Wegiel, S. C. Robson, N. Gagliani, D. Gallo, J.-F. Chen, F. H. Bach, and L. E. Otterbein Cross-Regulation of Carbon Monoxide and the Adenosine A2a Receptor in Macrophages J. Immunol., May 1, 2007; 178(9): 5921 - 5929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Burnstock Physiology and Pathophysiology of Purinergic Neurotransmission Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 659 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mohsenin, M. D. Burdick, J. G. Molina, M. P. Keane, and M. R. Blackburn Enhanced CXCL1 production and angiogenesis in adenosine-mediated lung disease FASEB J, April 1, 2007; 21(4): 1026 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Carrega, E. Fenouillet, P. Giaime, A. Charavil, L. Mercier, V. Gerolami, J.-L. Berge-Lefranc, Y. Berland, J. Ruf, A. Saadjian, et al. Influence of haemodialysis and left ventricular failure on peripheral A2A adenosine receptor expression Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 851 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Li, K. Ye, C. C. Blad, H. den Dulk, J. Brouwer, A. P. IJzerman, and M. W. Beukers ZM241385, DPCPX, MRS1706 Are Inverse Agonists with Different Relative Intrinsic Efficacies on Constitutively Active Mutants of the Human Adenosine A2B Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2007; 320(2): 637 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ryzhov, J. L. McCaleb, A. E. Goldstein, I. Biaggioni, and I. Feoktistov Role of Adenosine Receptors in the Regulation of Angiogenic Factors and Neovascularization in Hypoxia J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2007; 320(2): 565 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Husain, T. W. Shearer, and C. E. Crosson Mechanisms Linking Adenosine A1 Receptors and Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Activation in Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 258 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Lasley, G. Kristo, B. J. Keith, and R. M. Mentzer Jr. The A2a/A2b receptor antagonist ZM-241385 blocks the cardioprotective effect of adenosine agonist pretreatment in in vivo rat myocardium Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H426 - H431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Chen, R. Corriden, Y. Inoue, L. Yip, N. Hashiguchi, A. Zinkernagel, V. Nizet, P. A. Insel, and W. G. Junger ATP Release Guides Neutrophil Chemotaxis via P2Y2 and A3 Receptors Science, December 15, 2006; 314(5806): 1792 - 1795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Lewis, A. Pexa, K. Francis, V. Verma, A. M. McNicol, M. Scanlon, A. Deussen, W. H. Evans, D. A. Rees, and J. Ham Adenosine stimulates connexin 43 expression and gap junctional communication in pituitary folliculostellate cells FASEB J, December 1, 2006; 20(14): 2585 - 2587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang and V. H. Huxley Adenosine A2A receptor modulation of juvenile female rat skeletal muscle microvessel permeability Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H3094 - H3105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ilie, D. Ciocan, A.-M. Zagrean, D. A. Nita, L. Zagrean, and M. Moldovan Endogenous Activation of Adenosine A1 Receptors Accelerates Ischemic Suppression of Spontaneous Electrocortical Activity J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2809 - 2814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. W. J. Young, C.-X. Sun, C. M. Evans, B. F. Dickey, and M. R. Blackburn A3 Adenosine Receptor Signaling Contributes to Airway Mucin Secretion after Allergen Challenge Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., November 1, 2006; 35(5): 549 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhong, Y. Wu, L. Belardinelli, and D. Zeng A2B Adenosine Receptors Induce IL-19 from Bronchial Epithelial Cells, Resulting in TNF-{alpha} Increase Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., November 1, 2006; 35(5): 587 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Faria, T. Magalhaes-Cardoso, J.-M. Lafuente-de-Carvalho, and P. Correia-de-Sa Corpus Cavernosum from Men with Vasculogenic Impotence Is Partially Resistant to Adenosine Relaxation due to Endothelial A2B Receptor Dysfunction J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2006; 319(1): 405 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Ethier and J. M. Madison Adenosine A1 Receptors Mediate Mobilization of Calcium in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., October 1, 2006; 35(4): 496 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Vaughan, M. T. Szewczyk Jr, M. J. Lanosa, C. R. DeSesa, G. Gianutsos, and J. B. Morris Adenosine Sensory Transduction Pathways Contribute to Activation of the Sensory Irritation Response to Inspired Irritant Vapors Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2006; 93(2): 411 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mojsilovic-Petrovic, G.-B. Jeong, A. Crocker, A. Arneja, S. David, D. Russell, and R. G. Kalb Protecting Motor Neurons from Toxic Insult by Antagonism of Adenosine A2a and Trk Receptors J. Neurosci., September 6, 2006; 26(36): 9250 - 9263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Y. Tan, C. L. Richard, H. Zhang, D. W. Hoskin, and J. Blay Adenosine downregulates DPPIV on HT-29 colon cancer cells by stimulating protein tyrosine phosphatase(s) and reducing ERK1/2 activity via a novel pathway Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): C433 - C444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chuaychoo, M.-G. Lee, M. Kollarik, R. Pullmann Jr, and B. J. Undem Evidence for both adenosine A1 and A2A receptors activating single vagal sensory C-fibres in guinea pig lungs J. Physiol., September 1, 2006; 575(2): 481 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ohta, E. Gorelik, S. J. Prasad, F. Ronchese, D. Lukashev, M. K. K. Wong, X. Huang, S. Caldwell, K. Liu, P. Smith, et al. A2A adenosine receptor protects tumors from antitumor T cells PNAS, August 29, 2006; 103(35): 13132 - 13137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ryzhov, A. E. Goldstein, I. Biaggioni, and I. Feoktistov Cross-Talk between Gs- and Gq-Coupled Pathways in Regulation of Interleukin-4 by A2B Adenosine Receptors in Human Mast Cells Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2006; 70(2): 727 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Yu, L. C. Zacharia, E. K. Jackson, and G. Apodaca Adenosine receptor expression and function in bladder uroepithelium Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): C254 - C265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-i. Otsuguro, Y. Yamaji, M. Ban, T. Ohta, and S. Ito Involvement of adenosine in depression of synaptic transmission during hypercapnia in isolated spinal cord of neonatal rats J. Physiol., August 1, 2006; 574(3): 835 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vallon, B. Muhlbauer, and H. Osswald Adenosine and kidney function. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 901 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zernecke, K. Bidzhekov, B. Ozuyaman, L. Fraemohs, E. A. Liehn, J. M. Luscher-Firzlaff, B. Luscher, J. Schrader, and C. Weber CD73/Ecto-5'-Nucleotidase Protects Against Vascular Inflammation and Neointima Formation Circulation, May 2, 2006; 113(17): 2120 - 2127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. C. Cavalcante, M. V. Castro, A. R. F. Barreto, G. W. Sullivan, M. Vale, P. R. C. Almeida, J. Linden, J. M. Rieger, F. Q. Cunha, R. L. Guerrant, et al. Effect of Novel A2A Adenosine Receptor Agonist ATL 313 on Clostridium difficile Toxin A-Induced Murine Ileal Enteritis. Infect. Immun., May 1, 2006; 74(5): 2606 - 2612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. H. Nemeth, B. Csoka, J. Wilmanski, D. Xu, Q. Lu, C. Ledent, E. A. Deitch, P. Pacher, Z. Spolarics, and G. Hasko Adenosine A2A Receptor Inactivation Increases Survival in Polymicrobial Sepsis J. Immunol., May 1, 2006; 176(9): 5616 - 5626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Bonneau, D. Wyss, S. Ferretti, C. Blaydon, C. S. Stevenson, and A. Trifilieff Effect of adenosine A2A receptor activation in murine models of respiratory disorders Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): L1036 - L1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Brown, P. Thoren, A. Steege, R. Mrowka, J. Sallstrom, O. Skott, B. B. Fredholm, and A. E. G. Persson Influence of the adenosine A1 receptor on blood pressure regulation and renin release Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): R1324 - R1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wei, P. Sun, Z. Wang, B. Yang, M. A. Carroll, and W.-H. Wang Adenosine inhibits ENaC via cytochrome P-450 epoxygenase-dependent metabolites of arachidonic acid Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): F1163 - F1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Volmer, L. F. Thompson, and M. R. Blackburn Ecto-5'-Nucleotidase (CD73)-Mediated Adenosine Production Is Tissue Protective in a Model of Bleomycin-Induced Lung Injury J. Immunol., April 1, 2006; 176(7): 4449 - 4458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Khoa, M. Postow, J. Danielsson, and B. N. Cronstein Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Prevents Desensitization of G{alpha}s-Coupled Receptors by Regulating GRK2 Association with the Plasma Membrane Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1311 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N P Riksen, P Barrera, P H H van den Broek, P L C M van Riel, P Smits, and G A Rongen Methotrexate modulates the kinetics of adenosine in humans in vivo Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2006; 65(4): 465 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Fortin, D. Harbour, M. Fernandes, P. Borgeat, and S. Bourgoin Differential expression of adenosine receptors in human neutrophils: up-regulation by specific Th1 cytokines and lipopolysaccharide J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2006; 79(3): 574 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Chunn, A. Mohsenin, H. W. J. Young, C. G. Lee, J. A. Elias, R. E. Kellems, and M. R. Blackburn Partially adenosine deaminase-deficient mice develop pulmonary fibrosis in association with adenosine elevations Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): L579 - L587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Szebeni, L. Baranyi, S. Savay, M. Bodo, J. Milosevits, C. R. Alving, and R. Bunger Complement activation-related cardiac anaphylaxis in pigs: role of C5a anaphylatoxin and adenosine in liposome-induced abnormalities in ECG and heart function Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): H1050 - H1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Varani, G. Caramori, F. Vincenzi, I. Adcock, P. Casolari, E. Leung, S. MacLennan, S. Gessi, S. Morello, P. J. Barnes, et al. Alteration of Adenosine Receptors in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2006; 173(4): 398 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Dhalla, M.-Y. Wong, W.-Q. Wang, I. Biaggioni, and L. Belardinelli Tachycardia Caused by A2A Adenosine Receptor Agonists Is Mediated by Direct Sympathoexcitation in Awake Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2006; 316(2): 695 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhou and C. K. Kost Jr. Adenosine A1 Receptor Antagonist Blunts Urinary Potassium Excretion, but Not Renal Hemodynamic Effects, Induced by Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2006; 316(2): 530 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |