Review
Contextual approaches to the physiology and classification of erectile function, erectile dysfunction, and sexual arousal

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00022-1Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper offers a reexamination of some long-held beliefs relating to the physiology of erectile function and dysfunction, including the idea that there is a singular physiology of erection. Rather, there appear to be plural neural, neurochemical, and endocrine mechanisms whose participation in erectile function depends on the behavioral context in which erection occurs. The best examples of this context-dependent physiology come from research on rats. For example, the medial amygdala is essential for noncontact erection in response to inaccessible estrous females, but not for erection during copulation. Also, androgen is necessary for touch-based and noncontact erection, but not for erection during copulation. Even the specific dopamine receptors important to erection may differ, depending on the context. If there is not a singular physiology of erection, then it follows that the physiology of erectile dysfunction may also vary from context to context. Thus, some disorders of the central nervous system may not be manifested in sleep-related erection, and therefore may be misinterpreted as “psychogenic” erectile dysfunction. This term belies the axiom that all psychological processes have a somatic basis; therefore, there can be no psychogenic dysfunction that does not involve organic processes which may respond to pharmacotherapy. A revised classification of erectile dysfunction based on this premise is offered. Finally, closer attention to erectile context may also illuminate male “sexual arousal” and its relation to “sexual motivation”. The former term has so many meanings in current usage as to impede research, especially into the physiology of sexual arousal, which depends on comparisons between animals and humans. It is proposed that attention be given to two variables: whether or not erection occurs and whether or not the context is sexual. The occurrence of penile erection within a sexual context is viewed as the only case in which sexual arousal may be inferred unambiguously.

Section snippets

Contexts for erection

My use of “context” may best be paraphrased as “stimulus complex,” and refers to the set of stimuli that comprise each organism's environment. This set would include the social, external physical, and internal physical stimuli (including circadian and other rhythms) that characterize the situation in which erection develops, with due consideration of the developmental and experiential history of the individual male.

Properties of erection vary with context

The distinctions being made among erectile contexts should not of themselves be construed as indicating that there are different “types” of erection. Pending evidence to the contrary, it is reasonable to suppose that the characteristics of human erection are similar across different contexts. However, in rats the physical and temporal features of erection clearly vary according to context, as the upper portion of Table 3 shows (modified from Ref. [105]). For example, although tumescence of the

Physiology of erection varies with context

In addition to context-dependent changes in the spatiotemporal properties of erection, the physiology of erection also varies with context (Table 3, lower portion). The foundations for this idea were laid at least 50 years ago. However, some of those foundations were flawed, and the several different contexts have usually been reduced to the reflexive–psychogenic dichotomy that, as noted above, seems to be untenable. Because the differential physiological regulation of erection in different

Implication for distinction between organic and psychogenic erectile dysfunction

If the physiology of erectile function varies significantly from one context to another, then it follows that the physiology of erectile dysfunction (ED) may also vary from context to context. This principle is receiving greater recognition, but one can find recent examples of failure to recognize it, especially in certain attempts by clinicians to determine whether instances of ED are due to “organic” or “psychogenic” causes. For decades, sleep-related erection (SRE) was the test of first

A contextual definition of sexual arousal

The recent availability of effective drug treatments for ED has made clear how much less we understand about the mediation of two other processes related to erectile function: sexual arousal and sexual motivation. (The latter term is also commonly referred to as sexual desire or libido.) Only sexual arousal will be addressed in detail here. Further on, I will make explicit why I consider it important to distinguish between sexual arousal and desire (see Section 5.3).

The concept of sexual

Conclusion

On the evidence reviewed here, it is not true that an erection is an erection is an erection. Though erections share many features, it becomes clear when one looks more closely at the erectile context that there are striking differences in the physiology of erection and even in the form and temporal patterning of erection. Because there is value in considering context for erectile function, there may also be value in viewing erectile dysfunction from a similar perspective. For example, the

Acknowledgements

Supported by NSF research grant IBN-9603917. Discussions with John Bancroft, Ross Buck, François Giuliano, Erick Janssen, James Pfaus, Raymond Rosen, Jacqueline Sachs, John Salamone and several other colleagues over the past few years helped to shape the ideas presented in this paper, in some cases despite their express disagreement. I thank Jacqueline Sachs, Raymond Rosen and an anonymous referee for their valuable suggestions on the manuscript itself.

References (137)

  • B.J. Everitt

    Sexual motivation: a neural and behavioral analysis of the mechanisms underlying appetitive and copulatory responses of male rats

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (1990)
  • F. Giuliano et al.

    Neural control of penile erection

    Urol Clin N Am

    (1995)
  • F. Giuliano et al.

    Neural control of penile erection in the rat

    J Auton Nerv Syst

    (1995)
  • G. Goldenberg et al.

    Cerebral correlates of imagining colours, faces, and a map. I. SPECT of regional cerebral blood flow

    Neuropsychologia

    (1989)
  • D.A. Granger et al.

    Salivary testosterone determination in studies of child health and development

    Horm Behav

    (1999)
  • B. Greco et al.

    Fos induced by mating or noncontact sociosexual interaction is colocalized with androgen receptors in neurons within the forebrain, midbrain, and lumbosacral spinal cord of male rats

    Horm Behav

    (1998)
  • V.S. Harris et al.

    Copulatory behavior in male rats following amygdaloid lesions

    Brain Res

    (1975)
  • G.M. Holmes et al.

    Erectile function and bulbospongiosus EMG activity in estrogen-maintained castrated rats vary with behavioral context

    Horm Behav

    (1992)
  • Y. Kondo

    Lesions of the medial amygdala produce severe impairment of copulatory behavior in sexually inexperienced male rats

    Physiol Behav

    (1992)
  • Y. Kondo et al.

    Importance of the medial amygdala in rat penile erection evoked by remote stimuli from estrous females

    Behav Br Res

    (1997)
  • Y.-C. Liu et al.

    Erectile function in male rats after lesions in nucleus paragigantocellularis

    Neurosci Lett

    (1999)
  • Y.-C. Liu et al.

    Sexual behavior of male rats after radiofrequency and dopamine-depleting lesions in nucleus accumbens

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (1998)
  • A. Louilot et al.

    Sex-related olfactory stimuli induce a selective increase in dopamine release in the nucleus accimbens of male rats. A voltammetric study

    Brain Res

    (1991)
  • J. Manzo et al.

    Regulation of noncontact erection in rats by gonadal steroids

    Horm Behav

    (1999)
  • L. Marson et al.

    The identification of a brainstem site controlling spinal sexual reflexes in male rats

    Brain Res

    (1990)
  • L. Marson et al.

    Lesions of the nucleus paragigantocellularis alter ex copula penile reflexes

    Brain Res

    (1992)
  • L. Marson et al.

    Stimulation of the hypothalamus initiates the urethrogenital reflex in male rats

    Brain Res

    (1994)
  • M. Mas

    Neurobiological correlates of masculine sexual behavior

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (1995)
  • M.K. McClintock

    Group mating in the domestic rat as a context for sexual selection: consequences for the analysis of sexual behavior and neuroendocrine responses

    Adv Study Behav

    (1984)
  • R.L. Meisel et al.

    Differential maintenance of penile responses and copulatory behavior by gonadal hormones in castrated male rats

    Horm Behav

    (1984)
  • M.R. Melis et al.

    Dopamine and sexual behavior

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (1995)
  • J.B. Mitchell et al.

    Opioid modulation and sensitization of dopamine release elicited by sexually relevant stimuli: a high speed chronoamperometric study in freely behaving rats

    Brain Res

    (1991)
  • G. Morali et al.

    Motor aspects of masculine sexual behavior in rats and rabbits

    Adv Study Behav

    (1992)
  • L.M. Mukhametov et al.

    Interhemispheric asymmetry of the electroencephalographic sleep patterns in dolphins

    Brain Res

    (1977)
  • R. Nadler

    Penile erection: a reflection of sexual arousal and arousability in male chimpanzees

    Physiol Behav

    (1997)
  • J.G. Pfaus

    Homologies of animal and human sexual behaviors

    Horm Behav

    (1996)
  • J.G. Pfaus et al.

    Sexual behavior enhances central dopamine transmission in the male rat

    Brain Res

    (1990)
  • J.G. Pfaus et al.

    A correlational and factor analysis of anticipatory and consummatory measures of sexual behavior in the male rat

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1990)
  • E.O. Price et al.

    Stimulus conditions influencing self-enurination, genital grooming and flehmen in male goats

    Appl Anim Behav Sci

    (1986)
  • K.E. Andersson et al.

    Physiology of penile erection

    Physiol Rev

    (1995)
  • R.J. Andrew

    Arousal and the causation of behaviour

    Behaviour

    (1974)
  • Z.M. Bacq

    Impotence of the male rodent after sympathetic denervation of the genital organs

    Am J Physiol

    (1931)
  • R. Balon

    Antidepressants in the treatment of premature ejaculation

    J Sex Marital, Ther

    (1996)
  • J. Bancroft

    Human sexuality and its problems

    (1989)
  • Bancroft J. Central inhibition of sexual response in the male: a theoretical perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev...
  • Bancroft J., Janssen E. The dual control model of male sexual response: a theoretical approach to psychogenic erectile...
  • R.J. Barfield

    Animal models of human sexual behavior

  • F.A. Beach

    Analysis of factors involved in the arousal, maintenance and manifestation of sexual excitement in male animals

    Psychosom Med

    (1942)
  • F.A. Beach

    The characteristics of masculine sex drive

  • F.A. Beach
  • Cited by (113)

    • The Suggestive Effect of Apo A, Apo B, and Apo A/Apo B on Erectile Dysfunction

      2021, Journal of Sexual Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, we performed a ROC curve analysis of ED and apolipoprotein for the high vascular risk group and the low vascular risk group, and we found that only the lipid profile of the low vascular risk group had a notable effect on ED. ED is usually divided into 3 categories: organic ED, psychogenic ED, and mixed ED.15 Among them, mixed ED undoubtedly accounts for the largest number of ED patients.16

    • Male Sexual Behavior

      2017, Hormones, Brain and Behavior: Third Edition
    • Male sexual behavior

      2016, The Curated Reference Collection in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology
    • Anatomy and physiology of genital organs - men

      2015, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In humans and animals, penile erection occurs in several contexts, some of which have no sexual content (in utero or during paradoxic sleep). It is thought that several different cerebral regions participate in erection in different contexts (Sachs, 2000). Each context may reflect the contribution of a unique combination of several brain nuclei, and one brain nucleus may participate in the occurrence of erection in several contexts.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text