Table 5

Evidence of TAM-stimulated growth in breast tumors and biopsies

TAM Withdrawal Responses
PatientsWorse than PR5-aPRCRPR + CR/Duration (Range)Citation
Advanced disease19 /190 /190 /190% Beex et al., 1981
Postmenopausal with metastatic disease5-b 6 /91 /92 /922%/10–14 months Rudolph, 1986
Postmenopausal with metastatic disease84 /873 /870 /873%/9–10.3 months Taylor et al., 1986
Postmenopausal56 /615-c 4 /611 /618%/3–10 months Canney et al., 1989
Advanced disease60 /655 /650 /658%/3–40 months Howell et al., 1992
Mean (PR+CR)225 /24113 /2413 /2416.6%
Overall (PR+CR+DS)19.5% (47/241)5-d
TAM Stimulation of Primary Breast Tumors In Vitro5-e
ER StatusResponsen (%)
ER-positiveTAM-stimulated11/153 (7)
ER-negativeTAM-stimulated1/71 (1.4)
ER-positiveEstradiol-stimulated47/153 (31)
ER-negativeEstradiol-stimulated10/71 (14)
ER-positiveTAM-stimulated and estradiol-stimulated6/153 (4)
ER-negativeTAM-stimulated and estradiol-stimulated0/71 (0)
  • 5-a  PR, partial response; CR, complete response.

  • 5-b  All patients were selected on the basis of having experienced a response to TAM.

  • 5-c  All responses were seen in the group of 28 patients who had originally responded to TAM (18% of initial responders).

  • 5-d  DS = disease stabilization.

  • 5-e  Data adapted from Fig. 1 in Nomura et al., 1990.