TABLE 6

Cannabinoids, endogenous lipids, and synthetic CB1 and/or CB2 receptor ligands that interact with TRP receptors

CompoundTRPV1TRPV2TRPM8TRPA1
Calcium Assay or Mesenteric Artery TensionCurrents by Patch Clamp
AnandamideEC50 = 1.15 μMa; EC50 = 0.63 μMb; EC50 = 0.16 μMc (rat TRPV1)EC50 = 4.9 μMd; EC50 = 2.5 μMeN.E. at 100 μMfIC50 = 0.15 μM (HEK293 cells) or 10 μM (DRG neurons) (vs. icilin); IC50 = 3.1 μM (vs. menthol in HEK293 cells)g,hEC50 = 4.9 μMi
2-AGN.E. at 10 μMb; EC50 = 8.4 μMfN.T.N.E. at 100 μMfN.E.N.T.
NADAEC50 = 26 nMbEC50 = 1.6 μM (DRG); 794 nM (TG)jN.T.IC50 = 0.7 μM (vs. icilin); IC50 = 2.0 μM (vs. menthol)gN.E. at 10 μMk
OEAEC50 = 3.7 μMl; EC50 = 0.4 μMcEC50 = 6.3 μMcN.T.N.T.N.T.
Δ9-THCN.E. at 100 μMfN.T.EC50 = 15.5 μMfIC50 = 0.16 μM (vs. icilin); IC50 = 0.15 μM (vs. menthol)hEC50 = 12 ± 2 μMm; EC50 = 32.3 μMf; EC50 = 0.23 μMh in HEK293 cells
HU-210EC50 = 1.2 μM but very low maximal effectb; no effect at 100 μMfN.T.Slight agonism at 100 μMfN.T.N.E. at 100 μMf
CP55940N.E. at 100 μMfN.T.Slight effect at 100 μMfN.T.Slight effect at 100 μMf
R-(+)-WIN55212Slight effect at 100 μMfN.T.N.E. at 100 μMfN.T.EC50 = 9.8 μMf
RimonabantAntagonist 1–5 μMnN.T.N.T.IC50 = 52.3 nM vs. icilin; no effect vs mentholgN.T.
JWH-015EC50 = 41.2 μMfN.T.N.E. at 100 μMfN.T.Slight effect at 100 μMf
CannabidiolEC50 = 3.5 μM (human)o; very little effect (rat)fN.T.EC50 = 3.7 μMfIC50 = 80 nM (vs. icilin); IC50 = 0.14 μM (vs. menthol)h>10 μMm; EC50 = 96 nMh in HEK293 cells; EC50 = 81.4 μMf
CannabinolN.E. at 100 μMfN.T.EC50 = 77.7 μMfIC50 = 0.21 μM (vs. icilin)k>10 μMm; very little effect at 100 μMf; EC50 = 0.18 μM in HEK293 cellsk
CannabichromeneEC50 >50 μMpN.T.N.T.40 μM (vs. icilin)kEC50 = 60 nMh
CannabigerolEC50 = 11.5 μMpN.T.N.T.IC50 = 0.14 μM (vs. icilin); IC50 = 0.16 μM (vs. menthol)hEC50 = 3.4 μMh
  • N.E., no effect; N.T., not tested; NADA, N-arachidonoyl dopamine; OEA, oleoyl ethanolamide; TG, trigeminal ganglia.

  • a Smart et al., 2000.

  • b De Petrocellis et al., 2000.

  • c Movahed et al., 2005.

  • d Zygmunt et al., 1999.

  • e Roberts et al., 2002.

  • f Qin et al., 2008.

  • g De Petrocellis et al., 2007.

  • h De Petrocellis et al., 2008.

  • i De Petrocellis and Di Marzo, 2009.

  • j McDonald et al., 2008.

  • k L. De Petrocellis and V. Di Marzo, unpublished observations.

  • l Appendino et al., 2009.

  • m Jordt et al., 2004.

  • n De Petrocellis et al., 2001.

  • o Bisogno et al., 2001.

  • p Ligresti et al., 2006.