TABLE 1

Size comparisons for physical delivery in immunology applications

Particle SizesPolymerDelivery MethodMeasured Immune ResponseEfficient SizeReference
110 nm, 800–900 nmPLGA (RG 503)I.P., I.M., I.N./I.M.IgG1/IgG2 levelNo differenceWendorf et al., 2008
1–10 μm, >10 μmPLGAS.C.IgG1–10 μmEldridge et al., 1991
1.5 μm, 72.6 μmPLGAS.C.IgG1.5 μmO'Hagan et al., 1993
200 nm, 500 nm, 1 μmPLGA (RG 506)S.C., P.O., I.N.IgG2a/IgG1No differenceGutierro et al., 2002
<500nm, 2 μm, >7 μmPLGA (RG 505)I.P.T-cell activation<500 nmNixon et al., 1996
200–600 nm, 1.5–4.7 μmPLGA (RG 505)ParenteralT-cell activation200–600 nm primed the Th2 response, whereas 1.5–4.7 μm induced the Th1 responseConway et al., 2001
7.5, 15.7, 40.4, 50.0 μmPLLAI.P., S.C.IgGI.P., 7.5 μm; S.C., no differenceNakaoka et al., 1996
1, 4, 7, 15, 21 μmPDLLAP.O.IgG4 μmTabata et al., 1996
4, 7, 26 μmPDLLAP.O.IgA7 μmTabata et al., 1996
<2, 2–8, 10–70, 50–150 μmPDLLAI.M.IgG2–8 μmKatare et al., 2005
200 nm, 1.5 μmPEG-PLAI.N.IgG and IgANo differenceVila et al., 2004
100 nm, 500 nm, >1 μmSB(43)-PVAL-g-PLGAP.O., I.N.IgG and IgAP.O., 100 nm; I.N., 100 and 500 nmJung et al., 2001
0.4, 1, 3 μmChitosanI.N.IgG and IgAIgG production, no difference; IgA production, 0.4 and 1 μmNagamoto et al., 2004
35 nm, 3.5 μmpH-sensitive hydrogelS.C.T-cell activationNo differenceCohen et al., 2009
  • I.N., intranasal; PLLA, poly(l-lactic acid); PDLLA, poly(dl-lactic acid); SB(43)-PVAL-g-PLGA, sulfobutylated poly(vinyl alcohol)-graft-poly(lactide-coglycolide).