TABLE 6

In vivo pharmacological effects of TAAR1-selective agonists

Study TypeSpecies/Test SystemPretreatment/DurationAnimals per Group (M/F)RO5166017 Dose/ConcentrationKey Results
minnmg/kg
Cocaine-induced hyperlocomotionaC57Bl6 mice30/308 M0.03–3 p.o.Attenuation at 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg p.o.
Cocaine-induced hyperlocomotionaC57Bl6 TAAR1-KO and WT littermate mice30/30 10 M0.3–1 p.o.Attenuation at 0.3 and 1 mg/kg p.o. in WT mice, no effect in TAAR1-KO mice
Spontaneous hyperlocomotion in DAT-KO miceaC57Bl6 DAT-KO and WT littermate miceNone/90 8 M0.2–1 p.o.Attenuation at 0.5 and 1 mg/kg p.o.
L-687,414–induced hyperlocomotionaNMRI mice30/30 8 M0.01–0.1 p.o.Attenuation at 0.1 mg/kg p.o.
L-687,414–induced hyperlocomotionaC57Bl6 TAAR1-KO and WT littermate mice60/30 8 M1 p.o.Attenuation at 1 mg/kg p.o. in WT mice, no effect in TAAR1-KO mice
SIHaNMRI mice45/158–16 M0.01–1 p.o.Reversal of SIH (dT) at doses 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg without affecting Tb
SIHaC57Bl6 TAAR1-KO and WT littermate mice45/15 8–10 M0.1 p.o.Reversal of SIH (dT) at 0.1 mg/kg in WT mice, no effect in TAAR1-KO mice
Cocaine-induced CPPbSprague-Dawley rats109 to 10 M10 i.p.Inhibition of expression, but not retention of cocaine reward memory at 10 mg/kg i.p.
Abuse-related effects of nicotinecSprague-Dawley rats106–9 M3.2–10 i.p.Reduction of nicotine self-administration (at 5.6 and 10 mg/kg i.p.) and attenuation of cue- and drug-induced reinstatement of nicotine-seeking (at 10 mg/kg i.p.)
oGTTdC57Bl6 TAAR1-KO and WT littermate mice45/120 5–8 M0.3 mg/kg p.o.Glucose-lowering effect at 0.3 mg/kg p.o. in WT mice and increased PYY and GLP-1 levels, no effect in TAAR1-KO mice
oGTTdDiabetic db/db C57Bl6 mice, DIO mice, DIO Glp1R-KO mice45/120 8 M0.3 mg/kg p.o.Glucose-lowering effect at 0.3 mg/kg p.o. in diabetic db/db mice
ivGTTdC57Bl6 mice30/10 10 M3 mg/kg s.c.Lower amount of meal emptied at 0.3 mg/kg p.o.
Gastric emptyingdC57Bl6 mice45/308 M0.3 mg/kg p.o.Lower amount of meal emptied at 0.3 mg/kg p.o.
Food intake and body weightdC57Bl6 mice, DIO mice,45/606 M0.3 mg/kg s.c.Reduction in food intake and body weight, reduced triglyceride levels, increased insulin sensitivity at 0.3 mg/kg p.o.
Study TypeSpecies/Test SystemPretreatment/DurationAnimals per Group (M/F)RO5203648 Dose/ConcentrationKey Results
minnmg/kg
Cocaine-induced hyperlocomotioneC57Bl6 mice30/308–16 M0.3–10 p.o.Attenuation at 1 and 3 mg/kg p.o.
Cocaine-induced hyperlocomotioneWistar rats60/307 to 8 M1–10 p.o.Attenuation at 10 mg/kg p.o.
Spontaneous hyperlocomotion in DAT-KO miceeC57Bl6 DAT-KO and WT littermate miceNone/605–9 M1 p.o.Attenuation at 1 mg/kg p.o. in DAT-KO mice, but no effect in DAT-KO/TAAR1-KO mice
Spontaneous hyperlocomotion in DAT-KO miceeC57Bl6 DAT-KO, TAAR1-KO, and WT littermate miceNone/608–11 M0.1–1 p.o.Attenuation at 0.1, 0.3, and 1 mg/kg p.o.
L-687,414–induced hyperlocomotioneNMRI mice15/308 M0.01–0.1 p.o.Attenuation at 0.1 mg/kg p.o.
Spontaneous hyperlocomotion in NR1 KD miceeC57Bl6 NR1 KD and WT littermate miceNone/606 to 7 M0.3–1 p.o.Attenuation at 0.3 and 1 mg/kg p.o. in WT mice, no effect in NR1-KD mice
SIHeNMRI mice45/156–8 M0.1–1 p.o.Reversal of SIH (dT) at 0.3 mg/kg without affecting Tb
Forced swim stresseWistar rats24 h, 18 h, 1 h/608 F3–30 p.o.Significant decrease in immobility time at 10 and 30 mg/kg p.o.
Cocaine self-administrationeLong-Evans rats60/607 to 8 M3–10 i.p.Reduction of cocaine intake in rats with a stable history of intravenous cocaine self-administration at 3 and 10 mg/kg i.p.
minnmg/kg
Context-induced cocaine relapsefLong-Evans rats15/906–8 M3–10 i.p.Suppression of cocaine seeking after a 2-wk period of withdrawal from chronic cocaine self-administration at 3 and 10 mg/kg i.p.
Methamphetamine self-administrationgLong-Evans rats10/606–10 M3–10 i.p.Reduction of methamphetamine intake in rats with a stable history of intravenous methamphetamine self-administration at 3 and 10 mg/kg i.p.
Methamphetamine-stimulated hyperactivitygLong-Evans rats70/605 to 6 M1.67–5 i.p.Attenuation of methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity and prevention of development of methamphetamine sensitization at 1.67 and 5 mg/kg i.p.
Differential reinforcement of low-rate behavioreCynomolgus macaques4-h injection test interval5 to 6 M1–30 p.o.Reduced response rate at 10 and 30 mg/kg p.o. and increased inter-response time at 30 mg/kg p.o.
Object retrievaleCynomolgus macaques90/9012 M1–10 p.o.Procognitive effect at 10 mg/kg p.o.
Haloperidol-induced catalepsyeWistar rats60/1012 M0.3–10 p.o.Reduction of catalepsy at 0.3, 3, and 10 mg/kg p.o.
Sleep/wake parameterseSprague-Dawley rats6 h8 M1–10 p.o.Wake-promoting activity at 10 mg/kg p.o.
Study TypeSpecies/Test SystemPretreatment/DurationAnimals per Group (M/F)RO5263397 Dose/ConcentrationKey Results
minnmg/kg
Cocaine-induced hyperlocomotionhC57Bl6 mice60/306–8 M0.3–3 p.o.Attenuation at 1 and 3 mg/kg p.o.
PCP-induced hyperlocomotionhC57Bl6 mice30/607–16 M0.003–1 p.o.Attenuation at 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mg/kg p.o.
L-687,414–induced hyperlocomotionhNMRI mice15/308–24 M0.0003–1 p.o.Attenuation at 0.003, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, and 1 mg/kg p.o.
Olanzapine-induced weight gainhSprague-Dawley ratsNone/14 d8 M1 p.o.Reduction of fat mass change induced by olanzapine at 1 mg/kg p.o.
ICSSiWistar rats60/208 M1–10 i.p.Reversal of cocaine (1 mg/kg i.p.)–induced facilitation of changes in ICSS threshold at 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg i.p.; no significant change by RO5263397 alone and therefore no reinforcing effects and no abuse potential anticipated
Abuse-related effects of cocainejSprague-Dawley rats10/156–18 M1–10 i.p.Reduction of expression of cocaine behavioral sensitization (at 3.2 mg/kg i.p.), cue- and cocaine prime-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking (at 3.2 and 5.6 mg/kg i.p.), and expression but not development of cocaine-induced place preference (at 10 mg/kg i.p.)
Abuse-related effects of methamphetaminekSprague-Dawley rats10/157 to 8 M3.2–10 i.p.Reduction of expression of behavioral sensitization (at 10 mg/kg i.p.), methamphetamine self-administration (at 3.2 mg/kg i.p.), and both cue- and a priming dose of methamphetamine-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behaviors (at 3.2 and 10 mg/kg i.p.)
Chronic methamphetamine-treatment 5-CSRTTlSprague-Dawley rats3 d/608 M5.6 i.p.Attenuation of forced abstinence-induced impulsivity (at 5.6 mg/kg)
minnmg/kg
Abuse-related effects of nicotinecSprague-Dawley rats10–208–10 M3.2–17.8 i.pReduction of expression and development of behavioral sensitization (at 10 mg/kg i.p.), nicotine self-administration (at 3.2 and 5.6 mg/kg i.p.) and discriminative stimulus effect of nicotine (at 10 mg/kg i.p.), attenuation of the subjective effects of nicotine (at 10 mg/kg i.p.)
Abuse-related effects of morphinemSprague-Dawley rats103.2–5.6 i.pReduction of morphine self-administration (at 3.2 and 5.6 mg/kg i.p.) and attenuation of cue- and drug-induced reinstatement of morphine-seeking) at 5.6 mg/kg i.p.); no effect on the expression of morphine-induced CPP, naltrexone precipitated withdrawal-induced jumping of CPA, or antinociceptive effect of morphine
phMRIhSprague-Dawley rats90/129 M1–30 p.o.Activity profile comparable to marketed antipsychotics in a dose-dependent manner.
Forced swim stresshWistar rats24 h, 16 h, 2 h/608 F3–30 p.o.Significant decrease in immobility time at 10 and 30 mg/kg p.o.
Differential reinforcement of low-rate behaviorhCynomolgus macaques90/9010 M1–10 p.o.Number of reinforcers increased at 10 mg/kg p.o.
Object retrievalhCynomolgus macaques90/9011 M0.3–10 p.oProcognitive effect at 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg p.o.
Haloperidol-induced catalepsyhWistar rats60/106–12 M0.3–10 p.oReduction of catalepsy at 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg p.o.
Sleep/wake parametersnC57Bl6 TAAR1-KO, OE, and WT littermate mice6 h8 M0.1–1 p.o.Wake-promoting activity and decreased REM and NREM in WT mice at 0.3 and 1 mg/kg p.o., no effect in TAAR1-KO and potentiated effect in TAAR1-OE mice
Sleep/wake parametershSprague-Dawley rats6 h8 M0.3–30 p.o.Wake-promoting activity and decreased REM at 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg p.o.
Study TypeSpecies/Test SystemPretreatment/DurationAnimals per Group (M/F)RO5256390 Dose/ConcentrationKey Results
minnmg/kg
Cocaine-induced hyperlocomotionhC57Bl6 mice30/606–8 M0.3–3 p.o.Attenuation at 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg p.o.
PCP-induced hyperlocomotionhC57Bl6 mice30/607–16 M0.03–3 p.o.Attenuation at 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg p.o.
L-687,414–induced hyperlocomotionhNMRI mice15/308–24 M0.01–1 p.o.Attenuation at 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, and 1 mg/kg p.o.
ICSSiWistar rats60/208 M0.3–3 i.p.Reversal of the cocaine (1 mg/kg i.p.)–induced facilitation of changes in ICSS threshold at 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg i.p.; no significant change by RO5256390 alone and therefore no reinforcing effects and no abuse potential anticipated
phMRIhSprague-Dawley rats90/129 M1–30 p.o.Activity profile comparable to marketed antipsychotics in a dose-dependent manner
Attentional set-shiftinghLong-Evans rats60/3052 M1–10 p.o.Procognitive effect: improvement of set-shifting performance at 1 and 3 mg/kg p.o.
Object retrievalhCynomolgus macaques60/511 M0.3–3 i.m.Procognitive effect: improvement of performance during difficult trials at 3 mg/kg i.m.
Differential reinforcement of low-rate behaviorhCynomolgus macaques60/9010 M0.3–3 i.m.Increased number of reinforcers at 1 mg/kg i.m.
Context-induced cocaine relapsefLong-Evans rats15/906–8 M310 i.p.Suppression of cocaine seeking after a 2-wk period of withdrawal from chronic cocaine self-administration at 3 and 10 mg/kg i.p.
minnmg/kg
Compulsive binge-like eatingoWistar rats30/6012 M1–10 i.p.Inhibition of binge-like eating behavior at 3 and 10 mg/kg i.p.
Haloperidol-induced catalepsyhWistar rats60/106–12 M0.3–3 p.oReduction of catalepsy at 0.3 mg/kg p.o.
Sleep/wake parametershSprague-Dawley rats6 h8 M1–10 p.o.No significant effect at 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg p.o. on sleep/wake cycle and core body temperature
  • 5-CSRTT, five-choice serial reaction time task; F, female; ICSS, intracranial self-stimulation; ivGTT, intravenous glucose tolerance test; KD, knockdown; M, male; NMRI, Naval Medical Research Institute; oGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; REM, rapid eye movement; SIH, stress-induced hyperthermia; Tb, basal temperature; WT, wild type.

  • a Revel et al. (2011).

  • b Liu et al. (2016).

  • c Liu et al. (2018).

  • d Raab et al. (2015).

  • e Revel et al. (2012b).

  • f Pei et al. (2014).

  • g Cotter et al. (2015).

  • h Revel et al. (2013).

  • i Pei et al. (2015).

  • j Thorn et al. (2014b).

  • k Jing and Li (2015).

  • l Xue et al. (2018).

  • m Liu et al. (2017a).

  • n Schwartz et al. (2017).

  • o Ferragud et al. (2017).