Research Articles
Increased Erythrocyte and Protein Binding of Codeine in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease

https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600821109Get rights and content

Abstract

Erythrocyte binding and plasma protein binding of codeine in sickle cell patients and healthy controls were determined. A reversed-phase HPLC procedure was used for codeine analysis. Codeine was extracted from alkalinized plasma, separated on a CN column, and assayed by fluorescence detection. The erythrocyte–buffer partition coefficient was significantly higher in sickle cell patients (1.72 ± 0.21) than in healthy controls (1.25 ± 0.14). No time dependence of partitioning was observed. The fraction of codeine bound to plasma proteins, determined by ultrafiltration, was significantly higher in sickle cell patients (66.0% ± 8.6%) than in healthy controls (30.5% ± 2.7%). No concentration dependence of erythrocyte or protein binding was observed. Further studies were performed to elucidate the binding mechanisms. From a ghost cell binding study it was concluded that the major binding sites for codeine are in the cell membrane. A decrease in codeine binding was observed in the presence of bilirubin. Codeine binding to α1-acid glycoprotein was found to be minimal. The levels of α1-acid glycoprotein and other glycoproteins in sickle cell patients and healthy controls were measured by glycoprotein electrophoresis. The results showed no significant difference between the two groups. Plasma protein electrophoresis was performed for the two groups. The results showed a significant difference in γ-globulin levels between sickle cell patients and healthy controls. Codeine is known to bind to γ-globulin, a fact that may explain in part the observed increase in the plasma protein binding of codeine in sickle cell patients. Because only the free fraction of the drug can cross biological membranes and is considered to be pharmacologically active, the increase in codeine binding in sickle cell patients may be a reason for the observed decreased response to normal doses of codeine in this population.

References and Notes (21)

  • JudisJ.

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1977)
  • DerendorfH. et al.

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1983)
  • GarrettE.R. et al.

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1973)
  • SchreierH. et al.

    Life Sci

    (1989)
  • GarrettE.R. et al.

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1979)
  • DerendorfH. et al.

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1984)
  • GarrettE.R. et al.

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1985)
  • DiggsL.W. et al.

    Clin. Pediatr.

    (1979)
  • LubinB. et al.

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (1988)
  • RankB.H. et al.

    J. Clin. Invest.

    (1985)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (13)

  • Prescription Opioids: An Overview

    2020, Fighting the Opioid Epidemic: The Role of Providers and the Clinical Laboratory in Understanding Who is Vulnerable
  • The effect of hematocrit on solid-phase microextraction

    2018, Analytica Chimica Acta
    Citation Excerpt :

    In fact, when MM-F was used, the slopes for methamphetamine and codeine were statistically higher in blood samples adjusted at 20% Hct than for blood samples adjusted at 70% Hct (methamphetamine (20% vs 70% Hct): t(6) = 3.52, p-value<0.01 (one-tailed); codeine (20% vs 70% Hct): t(6) = 4.42, p < 0.01 (one-tailed)). Since these compounds are slightly hydrophobic, and considering the fact that codeine binds to the red blood cell plasma membrane, the presence of variable levels of matrix components is likely to alter the concentration of analytes available for SPME extractions [43]. Interestingly, this effect becomes more pronounced when devices with weaker affinities and lower extraction capacities, such as MM-F, are employed for extraction.

  • In vitro studies of teicoplanin binding to rat tissues and erythrocytes

    1998, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text