Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Desensitization of acetylcholine receptors in BC3H-1 cells

  • Published:
Pflügers Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied desensitization of nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor channels in the clonal BC3H-1 cell line. We measured the current response to rapid perfusion of outside-out patches with 1 μM to 5 mM ACh, carbamylcholine and suberyldicholine. After binding to the receptors and opening the ion channels, all agonists induce a rapid, concentration-dependent decay of channel activity. The time constant of the current decay ranged from several seconds at low agonist concentrations to about 50 ms at saturating concentrations. The decay rate at saturating concentrations was independent of voltage. The ratio of steady-state to peak current ranged from 0.5 at low agonist concentrations to 0.02 or less at high concentrations. The rate of recovery from desensitization after removal of agonist was also measured. For ACh, the recovery time constant was 320 ms; recovery from desensitization by carbamylcholine was twice as fast. A linear kinetic scheme does not provide a complete description of these results. The data are consistent with a cyclic model, although, it is not possible to uniquely determine all of the rate constants in this scheme. The results are compared with competitive binding and single channel studies of desensitization in BC3H-1 cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anwyl R, Narahashi T (1980) Desensitization of the acetylcholine receptor of denervated rat soleus muscle and the effect of calcium. Br J Pharmacol 69:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brett RS, Dilger JP, Adams PR, Lancaster B (1986) A method for the rapid exchange of solutions bathing excised membrane patches. Biophys J 50:987–992

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cachelin AB, Colquhoun D (1989) Desensitization of the acetylcholine receptor of frog end-plates measured in a vaselinegap voltage clamp. J Physiol (Lond) 415:159–188

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chesnut TJ (1983) Two-component desensitization at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol (Lond) 336:229–241

    Google Scholar 

  5. Colquhoun D, Ogden DC (1988) Activation of ion channels in the frog end-plate by high concentrations of acetylcholine. J Physiol (Lond) 395:131–159

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colquhoun D, Sakmann B (1985) Fast events in single-channel currents activated by acetylcholine and its analogues at the frog muscle end-plate. J Physiol (Lond) 369:501–557

    Google Scholar 

  7. Connor EA, Fiekers JF, Neel DS, Parsons RL, Schnitzler RM (1984) Comparison of cholinergic activation and desensitization at snake twitch and slow muscle fibre end-plates. J Physiol (Lond) 351:657–674

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dilger JP, Brett RS (1990) Direct measurement of the concentration-and time-dependent open probability of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel. Biophys J 57:723–731

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dilger JP, Brett RS, Poppers DM, Liu Y (1991) The temperature dependence of some kinetic and conductance properties of acetylcholine receptor channels. Biochim Biophys Acta 1063:253–258

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fiekers JF, Spannbauer PM, Scubon-Mulieri B, Parsons RL (1980) Voltage dependence of desensitization. J Gen Physiol 75:511–529

    Google Scholar 

  11. Franke C, Hatt H, Dudel J (1991) Steep concentration dependence and fast desensitization of nicotinic channel currents elicited by acetylcholine pulses, studied in adult vertebrate muscle. Pflügers Arch 417:509–516

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell free membrane patches. Pflügers Arch 391:85–100

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson MB (1988) Dependence of acetylcholine receptor channel kinetics on agonist concentration in cultured mouse muscle fibres. J Physiol (Lond) 397:555–583

    Google Scholar 

  14. Katz B, Thesleff S (1957) A study of the ‘desensitization’ produced by acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. J Physiol (Lond) 138:63–80

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu Y (1990) A study of acetylcholine receptor channel kinetics using rapid perfusion of patches. PhD thesis, State University of New York at Stony Brook

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Y, Dilger J (1991) Opening rate of acetylcholine receptor channels. Biophys J 60:424–432

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maconochie DJ, Knight DE (1989) A method for making solution changes in the sub-millisecond range at the tip of a patch pipette. Pflügers Arch 414:589–596

    Google Scholar 

  18. Magazanik LG, Vyskocil F (1970) Dependence of acetylcholine desensitization on the membrane potential of frog muscle fibres and on the ionic changes in the medium. J Physiol (Lond) 210:507–518

    Google Scholar 

  19. Magleby KL, Pallotta BS (1981) A study of desensitization of acetylcholine receptors using nerve-released transmitter in the frog. J Physiol (Lond) 316:225–250

    Google Scholar 

  20. Manthey AA (1991) Voltage dependence of desensitization to carbamylcholine in frog muscle fibers reverses in low-calcium solutions. J Neurophysiol 65:980–988

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ochoa ELM, Chattopadhyay A, McNamee MG (1989) Desensitization of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: Molecular mechanisms and effects of modulators. Cell Mol Neurobiol 9:141–178

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ogden DC, Colquhoun D (1985) Ion channel block by acetylcholine, carbachol and suberyldicholine at the frog neuro-muscular junction. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 225:329–355

    Google Scholar 

  23. Papke RL, Oswald RE (1986) Effects of allosteric ligands on the gating of single channel currents in BC3H-1 cells. In: Maelicke A (ed) Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 243–257

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sine SM, Steinbach JH (1984) Activation of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Biophys J 45:175–185

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sine SM, Steinbach JH (1984) Agonists block currents through acetylcholine receptor channels. Biophys J 46:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sine SM, Steinbach JH (1986) Activation of acetylcholine receptors on clonal mammalian BC3H-1 cells by low concentrations of agonist. J Physiol (Lond) 373:129–162

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sine SM, Steinbach JH (1987) Activation of acetylcholine receptors on clonal mammalian BC3H-1 cells by high concentrations of agonist. J Physiol (Lond) 385:325–359

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sine S, Taylor P (1982) Local anesthetics and histrionicotoxin are allosteric inhibitors of the acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem 257:8106–8114

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sine SM, Claudio T, Sigworth FJ (1990) Activation of Torpedo acetylcholine receptors expressed in mouse fibroblasts — Single channel current kinetics reveal distinct agonist binding affinities. J Gen Physiol 96:395–437

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weber M, David-Pfeuty T, Changeux J-P (1975) Regulation of binding properties of the nicotinic receptor protein by cholinergic ligands in membrane fragments from Torpedo marmorata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:3443–3447

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Anesthesiology and Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York, 11794-8480, Stony Brook, NY, USA

    James P. Dilger & Yi Liu

Authors
  1. James P. Dilger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dilger, J.P., Liu, Y. Desensitization of acetylcholine receptors in BC3H-1 cells. Pflugers Arch. 420, 479–485 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374622

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374622

Key words

Search

Navigation