Abstract
Mathematical solutions for two possible pharmacodynamic interactions (linear nonsaturable and nonlinear saturable) between antibiotics and microorganisms derived from the incorporation of clinically relevant antibiotic dosage regimens such as single bolus dosing, multiple doses, and constant infusion at steady state have been obtained. It is concluded that the saturable nonlinear interaction model between the tested antibiotic and microorganism appears appropriate. The model and its derived equations are capable of describing in vivobacterial growth of P. aeruginosaafter single bolus dosing and multiple doses of piperacillin as described by a linear one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. The activity of piperacillin against P. aeruginosain the neutropenic mouse systemic infection model can be described by an equation with three dynamic parameters: the bacterial growth rate constant k app ,0.02345min −1, the bacterial killing rate constant k′ kill ,0.02623 min −1, and the Michaelis-Menten type saturation constant Km, 0.05467 μg/ml. The concept and derived equations for the optimal dosing interval and minimum critical concentration are of clinical importance for the proper selection of antibiotic dosage regimens.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Levy. Relationship between elimination rate of drugs and rate of decline of their pharmacologic effects.J. Pharm. Sci. 53:342–343 (1964).
J. G. Wagner. Kinetics of pharmacologic response. I. Proposed relationships between response and drug concentration in the intact animal and man.J. Theor. Biol. 20:173–201 (1968).
M. Gibaldi. Measurement and interpretation of certain biopharmaceutic and pharmacodynamic parameters.Chemotherapy 13:1–15 (1968).
L. B. Sheiner, D. R. Stanski, S. Vozeh, R. Miller and J. Ham. Simultaneous modeling of pharamacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application of d-tubocurarine.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 25:358–371 (1979).
M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier.Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker. New York, 1982, pp. 221–269.
W. J. Jusko. Pharmacodynamics of chemotherapeutic effects: dose-time-response relationships for phase-nonspecific agents.J. Pharm. Sci. 60:892–895 (1971).
E. R. Garrett. Kinetics of antimicrobial action.Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 14(suppl.):54–85 (1978).
A. Tsuji, S. Hamano, T. Asano, E. Nakashima, T. Yamana, and S. Mitsuhashi. Microbial kinetics of beta-lactam antibiotics againstEscherichia coli.J. Pharm. Sci. 73:1418–1422 (1984).
A. U. Gerber and W. A. Craig. Aminoglycoside-selected subpopulations ofPseudomonas aeruginosa: characterization and virulence in normal and leukopenic mice.J. Lab. Clin. Med. 100:671–681 (1982).
J. B. Schiff and J. E. Pennington. Comparative efficacies of piperacillin, azelocillin, ticarcillin, aztreonam, and tobramycin against experimentalPseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 25:49–52 (1984).
H. Mattie. Kinetics of antimicrobial action.Rev. Infection Dis. 3:19–27 (1981).
D. Lewis, D. Reeves, B. Wiedemann, and S. Zinner (eds).Methodology and evaluation of in vitro models of antimicrobial chemotherapy. Proceedings of a joint meeting held in Bad Honnef (Bonn). March 1984.J. Antimicrob. Chemother. (Suppl. A) (1985).
T. Bergan, I. B. Carlsen and J. E. Fuglesang. Anin vitro model for monitoring bacterial responses to antibiotic agents under simulatedin vivo conditions.Infection 8(Suppl. 1):S96-S102 (1980).
S. Grasso, G. Meinardi, G. de Carneri, and V. Tamassia. Newin vitro model to study the effect of antibiotic concentration and rate of elimination on antibacterial activity.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13:570–576 (1978).
R. D. Toothaker, P. G. Welling, and W. A. Craig. Anin vitro model for the study of antibacterial dosage regimen design.J. Pharm. Sci. 71:861–864 (1982).
I. M. Gould, J. Dent, and R. Wise.In vitro bacterial killing kinetics of ticarcillin/clavulanic acid.J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 19:307–312 (1987).
P. König, J. P. Guggenbichler, E. Semenitz, and W. Foisner. Kill kinetics of bacteria under fluctuating concentrations of various antibiotics I. Description of the model; II. Description of experiments.Chemotherapy 32:37–58 (1986).
W. J. Jusko. A pharmacodynamic model for cell-cycle-specific chemotherapeutic agents.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 1:175–200 (1973).
W. J. Jusko. Interpreting of cell proliferation curves using a two-compartment cell model.Math. Biosci. 21:31–37 (1974).
E. R. Garrett. The pharmacokinetic bases of biological response quantification in toxicology, pharmacology and pharmacodynamics.Prog. Drug. Res. 21:105–230 (1977).
J. Zhi, C. H. Nightingale, and R. Quintiliani. A pharmacodynamic model for the activity of antibiotics against microorganisms under nonsaturable conditions.J. Pharm. Sci. 75:1063–67 (1986).
H. Lineweaver and D. Burk. The determination of enzyme dissociation constants.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 56:658–666 (1934).
J. Zhi. Pharmacodynamic modeling of antimicrobial activity: piperacillin versusPseudomonas aeruginosa Ph. D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1987.
R. Cleeland and E. Grunberg. Laboratory evaluation of new antibioticsin vitro and in experimental animal infections. In V. Lorian (ed.)Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine. 2nd ed., Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1986, pp. 825–876.
C. M. Metzler, G. L. Elfring, and A. J. McEwen. A package of computer program for pharmacokinetic modeling.Biometrics. September 1974, p. 562.
S. Bolton.Pharmaceutical Statistics, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1986, p. 156.
P. D. Ellner and H. C. Neu. The inhibitory quotient: A method for interpreting minimum inhibitory concentration data.J. Am. Med. Assoc. 246:1575–1578 (1981).
G. E. Schumacher. Comparison of antibiotic dosage regimens using pharmacokinetic and microbiological factors.Clin. Pharm. 6:59–68 (1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhi, J., Nightingale, C.H. & Quintiliani, R. Microbial pharmacodynamics of piperacillin in neutropenic mice of systematic infection due toPseudomonas aeruginosa . Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 16, 355–375 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062551
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062551