Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal sampling times for pharmacokinetic experiments

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A sequential estimation procedure is presented which uses optimal sampling times to estimate the parameters of a model from data obtained from a group of subjects. This optimal sampling sequential estimation procedure utilizes parameter estimates from previous subjects in the group to determine the optimal sampling times for the next subject. Parameter estimates obtained from the optimal sampling procedure are compared to those obtained from a conventional sampling scheme by using Monte Carlo simulations which include noise terms for both assay error and intersubject variability. The results of these numerical experiments, for the two examples considered here, show that the parameter estimates obtained from data collected at optimal sampling times have significantly less variability than those generated using the conventional sampling procedure. We conclude that optimal sampling and preexperiment simulation may be useful tools for designing informative pharmacokinetic experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Myhill. Investigation of the effect of data error in the analysis of biological tracer data from three compartment systems.J. Theor. Biol. 23:218–231 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W. J. Westlake. Problems associated with analysis of pharmacokinetic models.J. Pharm. Sci. 60:882–885 (1971).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. W. J. Westlake. Use of statistical methods in evaluation ofin vivo performance of dosage forms.J. Pharm. Sci. 62:1579–1589 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. H. G. Boxenbaum, S. Riegelman, and R. M. Elashoff. Statistical estimation in pharmacokinetics.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 3:123–148 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. J. Fell and M. T. Stevens. Pharmacokinetics—uses and abuses.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 8:241–248 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. C. M. Metzler, G. L. Elfring, and A. J. McEwen.A User's Manual for NONLIN and Associated Programs. Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, Mich., April 20, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Mori and J. J. DiStefano, III. Optimal nonuniform sampling interval and test-input design for identification of physiological systems from very limited data.IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 24:893–900 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Gaillot, J. J. Steimer, A. J. Mallet, J. J. Thebault, and A. Beider. A prior lithium dosage regimen using population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 7:579–628 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. P. K. Wilkinson, A. J. Sedman, E. Sakmar, R. H. Earhart, D. J. Weidler, and J. G. Wagner. Blood ethanol concentrations during and following constant-rate intravenous infusions of alcohol.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 19:213–223 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. K. J. Himmelstein and J. F. Gross. Mathematical model for cyclocytidine pharmacokinetics.J. Pharm. Sci. 66:1441–1444 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. J. J. Lima, D. R. Conti, A. L. Goldfarb, W. J. Tilstone, L. H. Golden, and W. J. Jusko. Clinical pharmacokinetics of procainamide infusions in relation to acetylator phenotype.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 7:69–85 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. L. B. Sheiner, B. Rosenberg, and V. V. Marathe. Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 5:445–479 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. G. E. P. Box and H. L. Lucas. Design of experiments in nonlinear situations.Biometrika 46:77–90 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. K. Mehra. Optimal input signals for parameter estimation in dynamic systems—survey and new results.IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 19:753–768 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. E. P. Box, W. G. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter.Statistics for Experimenters: An introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978, pp. 546–554.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Z. D'Argenio and A. Schumitzky. A program package for simulation and parameter estimation in pharmacokinetic systems.Comput. Programs Biomed. 9:115–134 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. F. C. Schweppe.Uncertain Dynamic Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1973, pp. 367–385.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. J. Box. Some experience with a nonlinear experimental design criterion.Technometrics 12:569–588 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Rowland, P. D. Thomson, A. Guichard, and K. L. Melmon. Disposition kinetics of lidocaine in normal subjects.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 179:383–398 (1971).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries, Inc. Library 2, Houston (1977).

  21. M. Hollander and D. A. Wolfe.Nonparametric Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1973, pp. 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. A. Afifi and S. P. Azen.Statistical Analysis: A Computer Oriented Approach, Academic Press, New York, 1972, pp. 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. J. Hill, W. G. Hunter, and D. W. Wichern. A joint design criterion for the dual problem of model discrimination and parameter estimation.Technometrics 10:145–160 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

D'Argenio, D.Z. Optimal sampling times for pharmacokinetic experiments. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 9, 739–756 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01070904

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01070904

Key words

Navigation