Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Morphine acts in the parabrachial nucleus, a pontine viscerosensory relay, to produce discriminative stimulus effects

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphine is known to act centrally to produce discriminative stimulus effects, but the specific neuroanatomical sites mediating this action have not been identified. We used morphine as a discriminative stimulus in a taste aversion paradigm to elucidate the neural basis of morphine's cueing properties. Rats were injected subcutaneously with 5 mg/kg morphine 15 min prior to the presentation of a 0.1% saccharin solution. After 20 min of exposure to the flavor, lithium chloride (130 mg/kg, IP) was injected. On alternate days, an injection of 0.9% physiological saline both preceded and followed the presentation of saccharin. Animals learned to consume significantly less saccharin after morphine than after saline injections. Unilateral guide cannulae were then implanted into brain areas containing relatively high densities of opiate binding sites, comprising the medial prefrontal cortex, the nucleus accumbens, the anterior dorsolateral striatum, the medial thalamus, the basolateral amygdaloid nucleus, the dorsal hippocampus, the caudal periaqueductal grey and the parabrachial nucleus. Generalization to central routes of administration was then evaluated by microinjecting morphine (2.5, 5, 10 and 20 µg) into these brain areas. Dose-dependent decreases in saccharin consumption similar to those of systemic morphine were produced by the administration of morphine into the parabrachial nucleus and the nucleus accumbens. Control data showed that only in the parabrachial nucleus could these effects be attributed to the cueing properties of morphine; in the nucleus accumbens, morphine administration induced unconditioned decreases in saccharin consumption. In the remaining brain areas, morphine generalized to the systemic saline condition. The data point to ascending visceral pathways (parabrachial nucleus), but not dopamine terminal fields (nucleus accumbens), as possible substrates for opiate discriminative effects. These putative discriminative substrates are distinct from the medial forebrain bundle pathways mediating the positive reinforcing effects of opiates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atweh SF, Kuhar MJ (1977a) Autoradiographic localization of opiate receptors in rat brain. II. The brain stem. Brain Res 129:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Atweh SF, Kuhar MJ (1977b) Autoradiographic localization of opiate receptors in rat brain. III. The telencephalon. Brain Res 134:393–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarth MA, Wise RA (1983) Dissociation of the rewarding and physical dependence-producing properties of morphine. In: Harris LS (ed) Problems of drug dependence, 1982. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Washington, DC, pp 171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarth MA, Wise RA (1984) Anatomically distinct opiate receptor fields mediate reward and physical dependence. Science 224:516–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne RG, Fondren B (1978) β-Endorphin and the narcotic cue. In: Colpaert FC, Rosecrans JA (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 137–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipkin RE, Stewart JM, Morris DH, Crowley TJ (1978) Generalization of [dAla2)-enkephalinamide but not of substance P to the morphine cue. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9:129–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC (1978) Theoretical review: discriminative stimulus properties of narcotic analgesic drugs. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9:863–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ, van Ree JM (1978) Narcotic cueing properties of intraventricularly administered sufentanil, fentanyl, morphine and met-enkephalin. Eur J Pharmacol 47:115–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugé V, Rossignol P, Roques BP (1989) Blockade of dopamine receptors reverses the behavioral effects of endogenous enkephalins in the nucleus caudatus but not in the nucleus accumbens: differential involvement of δ and μ opioid receptors. Psychopharmacology 99:168–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman JE, Aghajanian GK (1985) Opiate and α2-adrenoceptor responses of rat amygdaloid neurons: co-localization and interactions during with drawal. J Neurosci 5:3016–3024

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulwiler CE, Saper CB (1984) Subnuclear organization of the efferent connections of the parabrachial nucleus in the rat. Brain Res Rev 7:229–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KE (1978) Brain mechanisms of conditioned taste aversion learning: a review of the literature. Physiol Psychol 6:340–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkenham M, Pert CB (1982) Light microscopic localization of brain opiate receptors: a general autoradiographic method which preserves tissue quality. J Neurosci 2:1129–1149

    Google Scholar 

  • Herling S, Woods JH (1981) Discriminative stimulus effects of narcotics: evidence for multiple receptor-mediated actions. Life Sci 28:1571–1584

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill HE, Jones BE, Bell EC (1971) State dependent control of discrimination by morphine and pentobarbital. Psychopharmacologia 22:305–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman SG (1983) Discriminative stimulus properties of opioid agonists and antagonists. In: Cooper SJ (ed) Theory in psychopharmacology, vol 2. Academic Press, London, pp 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova SF, Bures J (1990) Acquisition of conditioned taste aversion in rats is prevented by tetrodotoxin blockade of a small midbrain region centered around the parabrachial nuclei. Physiol Behav 48:543–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger TV, Mucha RF (1990) A taste aversion model of drug discrimination learning: training drug and condition influence rate of learning, sensitivity and drug specificity. Psychopharmacology 100:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke KW, Holtzman SG (1985) Characterization of the discriminative stimulus effects of centrally administered morphine in the rat. Psychopharmacology 87:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke KW, Holtzman SG (1986) Behavioral effects of opioid peptides selective formu ordelta receptors. I. Morphine-like discriminative stimulus effects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 238:990–996

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucki I (1988) Rapid discrimination of the stimulus properties of 5-hydroxytryptamine agonists using conditioned taste aversion. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 247:1120–1127

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin GM, Gans M, van der Kooy D (1990) Discriminative properties of morphine that modulate associations between tastes and lithium chloride. J Exp Psychol [Anim Behav Proc] 16:56–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin GM, Bechara A, van der Kooy D (1991) The perception of emotion: parallel neural processing of the affective and discriminative properties of opiates. Psychobiol 19:147–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastropaolo JP, Moskowitz KH, Dacanay RJ, Riley AL (1989) Conditioned taste aversions as a behavioral baseline for drug discrimination learning: an assessment with phencyclidine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 32:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucha RF, Iversen SD (1986) Increased food intake after opioid microinjections into nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area of rat. Brain Res 397:214–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumaier JF, Mailheau S, Chavkin C (1988) Opioid receptor-mediated responses in the dentate gyrus and CAI region of the rat hippocampus. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 244:564–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgren R (1978) Projections from the nucleus of the solitary tract in the rat. Neuroscience 3:207–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgren R, Leonard CM (1973) Ascending central gustatory connections. J Comp Neurol 150:217–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds ME (1982) Reinforcing effects of morphine in the nucleus accumbens. Brain Res 237:429–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1987) Applications and limitations of the drug discrimination method for the study of drug abuse. In: Bozarth MA (ed) Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 291–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxinos G, Watson C (1986) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley AL, Jeffreys RD, Pournaghash S, Titley TL, Kufera AM (1989) conditioned taste aversions as a behavioral baseline for drug discrimination learning: assessment with the dipsogenic compound pentobarbital. Drug Dev Res 16:229–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosecrans JA, Krynock GM (1977) A possible role of the PAG in the mediation of subjective effects of morphine. Pharmacologist 19:171

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger DJ (1983) Opiates and ingestive behaviour. In: Cooper SJ (ed) Theory in psychopharmacology, vol 2. Academic Press, London, pp 75–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger DJ, McCarthy PS (1980) Differential effects of morphine on food and water intake in food deprived and freely-feeding rats. Psychopharmacology 72:103–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon HE, Holtzman SG (1977) Discriminative effects of morphine administered intracerebrally in the rat. Life Sci 21:585–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearman GT, Herz A (1982)d-Ala2,D-Leu5-enkephalin generalizes to a discriminative stimulus produced by fentanyl but not ethylketocyclazocine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 16:249–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearman GT, Schulz R, Schiller PW, Herz A (1985) Generalization tests with intraventricularly applied pro-enkephalinB-derived peptides in rats trained to discriminate the opioid kappa receptor agonist ethylketocyclazocine. Psychopharmacology 85:440–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector AC, Norgren R, Grill HJ (1992) Parabrachial gustatory lesions impair taste aversion learning in rats. Behav Neurosci 106:147–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukai M, Holtzman SG (1988) Morphine-like discriminative stimulus effects of opioid peptides: Possible modulatory role ofd-Ala2-d-Leu5-enkephalin (DADL) and dynorphin A (1–13). Psychopharmacology 94:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Kooy D, Mucha RF, O'Shaughnessy M, Bucenieks P (1982) Reinforcing effects of brain microinjections of morphine revealed by conditioned place preference. Brain Res 243:107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ree JM (1977) Multiple brain sites involved in morphine antinociception. J Pharm Pharmacol 29:765–767

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ree JM, Smyth DG, Colpaert FC (1979) Dependence creating properties of lipotropin C-fragment (β-endorphin): evidence for its internal control of behavior. Life Sci 24:495–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA (1988) The neurobiology of craving: implications for the understanding and treatment of addiction. J Abnorm Psychol 97:118–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA (1989) The brain and reward. In: Liebman JM, Cooper SJ (eds) The neuropharmacological basis of reward. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 377–424

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neurobiology Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto, M5S 1A8, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Thomas V. Jaeger & Derek van der Kooy

Authors
  1. Thomas V. Jaeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Derek van der Kooy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaeger, T.V., van der Kooy, D. Morphine acts in the parabrachial nucleus, a pontine viscerosensory relay, to produce discriminative stimulus effects. Psychopharmacology 110, 76–84 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246953

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246953

Key words

Search

Navigation