Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of CYP2C19 genotype on the pharmacokinetics of R483, a CYP2C19 substrate, in healthy subjects and type 2 diabetes patients

  • Pharmacogenetics
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

R483 is a thiazolidinedione peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonist with anti-diabetic properties and also a cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) substrate. The aim of the clinical studies reported here was to investigate the influence of the CYP2C19 genotype on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of R483 in healthy subjects and in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.

Methods

Data came from two clinical studies, one including 58 Japanese and Caucasian healthy subjects and another including 93 Asian T2DM patients. All subjects received multiple doses of R483, 20 mg once daily for the healthy subjects and 12 mg once daily for the T2DM patients. Blood samples were taken up to 24 h after the last dose to determine plasma concentrations of R483 and its major metabolites.

Results

Poor metabolizers (PMs; CYP2C19*2/*2 or *2/*3 or *3/*3) had a higher plasma exposure and a lower clearance of the parent drug than extensive metabolizers (EMs; CYP2C19*1/*1 or *1/*2 or *1/*3). The homozygous PM/EM ratio for the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC0–24) [95% confidence interval] was 3.9 [2.7–5.7] for healthy subjects versus 2.0 [1.5–2.6] in T2DM patients. The heterozygous EMs were all T2DM patients, the PM/EM ratio for AUC0–24 was 1.5 [1.2–1.8]. The dose-normalized exposure to R483 was 1.2- (for PMs) and 2.4-fold (for EMs) higher in T2DM patients than in healthy subjects. R483 was well tolerated in both studies.

Conclusions

The plasma exposure to R483 was significantly higher in PMs than in EMs. R483 exhibits different PK in healthy subjects and T2DM patients, and the difference in exposure between EM and PM was less pronounced in T2DM patients than in healthy subjects. Factors such as diabetes condition and age may influence the metabolism of R483. This knowledge allowed for a realistic dose recommendation for poor metabolizer T2DM patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carey DG, Cowin GJ, Galloway GJ, Jones NP, Richards JC, Biswas N et al (2002) Effect of rosiglitazone on insulin sensitivity and body composition in type 2 diabetic patients [corrected]. Obes Res 10(10):1008–1015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hauner H (2002) The mode of action of thiazolidinediones. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 18(Suppl 2):S10–S15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weber C, Funk C, Frank K, MacDonald A, Charoin J (2005) In vitro studies and computer simulation of interactions between R483, a novel thiazolidinedione, and cytochrome P450 substrates. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Abstracts of Papers—2005 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacoloty and Therapeutics 77(2):P74

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstein JA (2001) Clinical relevance of genetic polymorphisms in the human CYP2C subfamily. Br J Clin Pharmacol 52(4):349–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gwilt PR, Nahhas RR, Tracewell WG (1991) The effects of diabetes mellitus on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in humans. Clin Pharmacokinet 20(6):477–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng Q, Aleksunes LM, Manautou JE, Cherrington NJ, Scheffer GL, Yamasaki H et al (2008) Drug-metabolizing enzyme and transporter expression in a mouse model of diabetes and obesity. Mol Pharm 5(1):77–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sotaniemi EA, Pelkonen O, Arranto AJ, Tapanainen P, Rautio A, Pasanen M (2002) Diabetes and elimination of antipyrine in man: an analysis of 298 patients classified by type of diabetes, age, sex, duration of disease and liver involvement. Pharmacol Toxicol 90(3):155–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim SK, Novak RF (2007) The role of intracellular signaling in insulin-mediated regulation of drug metabolizing enzyme gene and protein expression. Pharmacol Ther 113(1):88–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarlis NJ, Gourgiotis L (2005) Hormonal effects on drug metabolism through the CYP system: perspectives on their potential significance in the era of pharmacogenomics. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord 5(4):439–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Iber H, Li-Masters T, Chen Q, Yu S, Morgan ET (2001) Regulation of hepatic cytochrome P450 2C11 via cAMP: implications for down-regulation in diabetes, fasting, and inflammation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 297(1):174–180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Morais SM, Wilkinson GR, Blaisdell J, Meyer UA, Nakamura K, Goldstein JA (1994) Identification of a new genetic defect responsible for the polymorphism of (S)—mephenytoin metabolism in Japanese. Mol Pharmacol 46(4):594–598

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roche Molecular Systems. AmpliChip CYP450 Test. Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg

  13. Gibaldi MPD (1982) Pharmacokinetics, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Naritomi Y, Terashita S, Kagayama A (2004) Identification and relative contributions of human cytochrome P450 isoforms involved in the metabolism of glibenclamide and lansoprazole: evaluation of an approach based on the in vitro substrate disappearance rate. Xenobiotica 34(5):415–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Desta Z, Zhao X, Shin JG, Flockhart DA (2002) Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism. Clin Pharmacokinet 41(12):913–958

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd (2004) Data on file. F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd, Basel

  17. Ishizawa Y, Yasui-Furukori N, Takahata T, Sasaki M, Tateishi T (2005) The effect of aging on the relationship between the cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype and omeprazole pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet 44(11):1179–1189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weber C, Kuhn B, Fotteler B, Funk C (2005) Lack of interaction between R483, a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist, and drugs metabolized by CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Abstracts of Papers—2005 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacoloty and Therapeutics 77(2):P38

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dai D, Zeldin DC, Blaisdell JA, Chanas B, Coulter SJ, Ghanayem BI et al (2001) Polymorphisms in human CYP2C8 decrease metabolism of the anticancer drug paclitaxel and arachidonic acid. Pharmacogenetics 11(7):597–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakajima M, Fujiki Y, Noda K, Ohtsuka H, Ohkuni H, Kyo S et al (2003) Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C8 in Japanese population. Drug Metab Dispos 31(6):687–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments and conflict of interest statement

The reported studies were supported by F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd. The authors that are employees of F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd are thus eligible for stock options of the company. The authors were responsible for the analysis and interpretation of the data and the preparation of the manuscript. Chan S.P. and Tomlinson B. have no financial or personal relationships that could be perceived as influencing the research described.

The authors want to acknowledge all investigators and their staff for their commitment and enthusiasm.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrijn Bogman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bogman, K., Silkey, M., Chan, S.P. et al. Influence of CYP2C19 genotype on the pharmacokinetics of R483, a CYP2C19 substrate, in healthy subjects and type 2 diabetes patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 66, 1005–1015 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0840-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0840-3

Keywords

Navigation