Skip to main content
Log in

Catechol-O-methyltransferase: variation in enzyme activity and inhibition by entacapone and tolcapone

  • PHARMACODYNAMICS
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this investigation was to study the variation of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) activity in the human liver, duodenal mucosa and renal cortex, and to investigate the inhibition of COMT by entacapone and tolcapone. This study included 87 samples of human liver, 94 samples of the duodenum and 72 samples of the renal cortex.

Results: The activity of COMT was measured with 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (242 μmol · l−1), the methyl acceptor substrate, and adenosyl-l-methionine (44 μmol · l−1), the methyl donor substrate. The hepatic activity of COMT activity was significantly higher in men than in women, whereas it was not sex-dependent in the duodenum or renal cortex. The activity of COMT varied 4.4-fold in the liver of men, 2.6-fold in the duodenum and 5.3-fold in the renal cortex. The median estimates of COMT activity were 577, 499, 103 and 159 pmol · min−1 · mg−1 in the liver of men and women, in the duodenum and in the renal cortex, respectively.

Conclusion: Entacapone and tolcapone were powerful inhibitors of COMT and their IC50 estimates were 151 and 773 nM (P = 0.008), respectively, in the liver; consistent results were obtained with the other tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Santi, C., Giulianotti, P., Pietrabissa, A. et al. Catechol-O-methyltransferase: variation in enzyme activity and inhibition by entacapone and tolcapone. E J Clin Pharmacol 54, 215–219 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050448

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050448

Navigation