Abstract
Quantitative genetic studies (i.e., twin and adoption studies) suggest that genetic influences contribute substantially to the development of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Over the past 15 years, considerable efforts have been made to identify genes involved in the etiology of this disorder resulting in a large and often conflicting literature of candidate gene associations for ADHD. The first aim of the present study was to conduct a comprehensive meta-analytic review of this literature to determine which candidate genes show consistent evidence of association with childhood ADHD across studies. The second aim was to test for heterogeneity across studies in the effect sizes for each candidate gene as its presence might suggest moderating variables that could explain inconsistent results. Significant associations were identified for several candidate genes including DAT1, DRD4, DRD5, 5HTT, HTR1B, and SNAP25. Further, significant heterogeneity was observed for the associations between ADHD and DAT1, DRD4, DRD5, DBH, ADRA2A, 5HTT, TPH2, MAOA, and SNAP25, suggesting that future studies should explore potential moderators of these associations (e.g., ADHD subtype diagnoses, gender, exposure to environmental risk factors). We conclude with a discussion of these findings in relation to emerging themes relevant to future studies of the genetics of ADHD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by persistent and pervasive symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity (American Psychiatric Association 2000). Approximately 3–7% of children are diagnosed with ADHD, making it one of the most prevalent childhood psychiatric disorders (American Psychiatric Association 2000). Twin and adoption studies of ADHD suggest that genetic influences contribute substantially to its etiology, with heritability estimates ranging from 60 to 90% (Waldman and Rhee 2002). Thus, molecular genetic studies attempting to identify the specific genes involved in the etiology of ADHD are being published at a rapid rate (Faraone and Khan 2006; Waldman and Gizer 2006).
Despite such efforts, the search for susceptibility genes for ADHD, like those for other complex traits (Ioannidis et al. 2001; Lohmueller et al. 2003), has yielded largely inconsistent results (Faraone et al. 2005; Waldman and Gizer 2006). For example, one of the first candidate gene studies of ADHD reported a significant association between the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) and ADHD (Cook et al. 1995). This report was followed by studies attempting to replicate the original association that yielded approximately equal numbers of positive and negative results (Curran et al. 2001b; Swanson et al. 2000b; Todd et al. 2001a; Waldman et al. 1998). Notably, this pattern of results is not specific to candidate gene studies of ADHD, as similar findings have been reported for genetic association studies of most if not all complex traits that have been studied (Ioannidis 2003).
Geneticists typically refer to a ‘complex trait’ as a phenotype with a genetic etiology that is composed of a multitude of susceptibility genes, each contributing only a small magnitude of the overall risk for the disorder (Lander and Schork 1994). This polygenic etiology presents several challenges to identify genes that confer risk for a complex trait (Chakravarti 1999; Lander and Schork 1994; Risch and Merikangas 1996; Risch 2000). For example, there is likely to be genetic heterogeneity in the etiology of a complex trait, such that different genes can result in the same phenotype. Further, each susceptibility gene is likely to have low penetrance, thus not all carriers will develop the disorder. Specific environmental influences are also more likely to be important risk factors for complex disorders than for simple Mendelian diseases, and gene–environment interactions are more likely to be involved in the etiology of complex disorders.
Given these challenges, candidate gene studies require large samples to achieve adequate statistical power and replicable results (Ioannidis et al. 2003). Nonetheless, many published candidate gene studies have employed relatively small samples. It is thus difficult to interpret discrepant findings that are the norm across genetic association studies of complex traits as several competing explanations for the discrepant findings are possible. First, the initial reported association may simply represent a false positive result. Second, the initial reported association may reflect an upwardly biased estimate relative to the true effect size (Lohmueller et al. 2003), thus subsequent studies may be substantially underpowered to detect an association if this inflated estimate was used to determine an appropriate sample size. These two potential explanations are the direct consequence of using small samples to conduct tests of association between complex traits and candidate gene polymorphisms that likely confer only a small risk for the disorder.
A third potential explanation for the discrepant findings is the presence of unmeasured sources of heterogeneity that modify the association between the candidate gene and the disorder, thus contributing to the heterogenous findings across studies. For example, differences in the genetic backgrounds of the populations sampled, in the assessment or diagnostic methods used, or in unmeasured environmental risk factors could each contribute to difficulties in replicating genetic associations. By aggregating data across studies, meta-analyses provide a systematic method of evaluating discrepant association findings between a candidate gene and a disorder that can be used to determine whether a true association exists and estimate its magnitude. Further, meta-analysis can be used to determine whether true heterogeneity may be contributing to the lack of consistent results across studies.
In this paper, we present a series of meta-analyses of the more commonly studied candidate gene polymorphisms for childhood ADHD. For each candidate gene, the most frequently examined polymorphisms were identified and the extant literature meta-analyzed to answer two specific questions: (1) is there evidence of a significant association between this polymorphism and ADHD? and (2) is there significant and substantial heterogeneity in the effect sizes across studies that might explain the discrepant findings? Results are presented for each candidate gene, starting with genes involved predominately in dopaminergic function, followed by candidate genes in the other major neurotransmitter systems (e.g., adrenergic and serotonergic), and ending with genes involved in various aspects of brain and nervous system development outside of such neurotransmitter systems (see Table 1 for a summary of these findings).
Methods
Study sample identification and inclusion/exclusion criteria
We used a four-stage approach to identify relevant studies for meta-analysis. In the first stage, we conducted searches of three databases—PubMed, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar—to identify an initial set of articles. The search terms used to query the databases included “ADHD” and related terms such as “inattention” and “hyperactivity.” Each of these terms was used to conduct searches with all relevant names of the candidate gene of interest and its protein product. For example, for DAT1, the terms “dopamine transporter gene,” “DAT1,” and “SLC6A3” were each used to query the database in conjunction with the terms “ADHD,” “inattention,” and “hyperactivity”, resulting in a total of nine queries. In the second stage, we searched the reference sections of the most recently published studies identified in stage 1, as well as any recently published review articles, to identify studies that might have been missed in stage 1. In stage 3, we used the Web of Science Cited Reference Search® (http://www.thomsonreuters.com/products_services/scientific/Web_of_Science) to compile a list of publications citing the initial association studies for the candidate gene of interest. This list was then reviewed to identify any published studies that might have been missed in stages 1 and 2. Finally, in stage 4, we contacted researchers conducting genetic association studies of ADHD to collect any relevant unpublished data that could be included in the meta-analyses. Researchers were contacted through the Collaborative ADHD Genetics Consortium (PI-Dr. Stephen Faraone, R13MH59126-0641) and were asked to provide only summary statistics for each candidate gene polymorphism included in this review. For family-based TDT studies, this included the number of ‘high-risk’ alleles transmitted and non-transmitted to ADHD cases. For case-control studies, this included the allele counts of the ‘high-risk’ and ‘low-risk’ alleles in both the ADHD cases and non-disordered controls.
After all relevant studies were identified, a series of inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to determine which studies would be included in the meta-analysis for a given polymorphism. First, each study had to be published prior to December 2008 unless an online version of the study had been released prior to this date. Second, each study was reviewed to ensure that the necessary aforementioned data for meta-analysis were presented in the publication. Third, each study was required to report data from an independent sample. When multiple publications from a particular research group reported data for overlapping samples, results for the study that presented the largest dataset were included. This typically occurred when a more recent study was published using an expanded dataset from an earlier publication. Fourth, only studies that used child samples were included. Differences may exist between the etiology, operationalization, and assessment of childhood and adult ADHD, thus studies using adult samples were excluded from the present review. Fifth, only studies were included in which ADHD diagnoses were made by best-estimate diagnosis or symptom checklists that correspond to DSM-IV symptoms. As a result, studies that approximated diagnoses using measures such as the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) (Achenbach and Edelbrock 1979) that do not provide comprehensive assessments of DSM ADHD symptomatology were excluded. Sixth, studies that selected samples based on a disorder other than ADHD (e.g., Tourette’s syndrome, reading disability, or substance abuse) were excluded. Following the application of these inclusion/exclusion criteria, meta-analyses were performed for all polymorphisms for which usable data were reported in at least four published studies.
Meta-analytic methods
Meta-analyses of TDT and Case-Control/HHRR studies were performed using the catmap package (version 1.6) (Nicodemus 2008) in R (version 2.7.0; http://www.r-project.org). The catmap package was specifically designed to conduct meta-analyses of combined data from both TDT and Case-Control/HHRR studies (Kazeem and Farrall 2005). For TDT studies, odds ratios were estimated from the number of transmissions versus non-transmissions of the designated ‘high-risk’ allele to ADHD cases from heterozygous parents. For case-control studies, odds ratios were estimated by contrasting the ratio of counts of the ‘high-risk’ versus ‘low-risk’ alleles in ADHD cases versus non-disordered controls. Odds ratios for HHRR studies were estimated using a similar approach, in which the number of transmissions of the ‘high-risk’ and ‘low-risk’ alleles from both homozygous and heterozygous parents to ADHD cases was contrasted with the number of non-transmissions of the ‘high-risk’ and ‘low-risk’ alleles.
The catmap package analyzes these data to generate both fixed- and random-effect estimates of pooled odds ratios and their significance tests, tests of heterogeneity thereof, cumulative meta-analytic and sensitivity analysis results, and forest and funnel plots. Heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies was tested using the Q-statistic and its magnitude was quantified using I 2, which is an index that describes the proportion of total variation in study effect size estimates that is due to heterogeneity and that is independent of the number of studies included in the meta-analysis and the metric of effect sizes (Higgins and Thompson 2002). Note that random effects meta-analyses were not performed in the absence of heterogeneity among study effect sizes, as in such cases, the random effect estimates are identical to the fixed effect estimates.
For those polymorphisms in which the previous literature provided an indication of the risk-inducing allele, one-tailed P values were reported. In the absence of such prior data, two-tailed P values were reported and were indicated as such in the text. It should also be noted that some studies reported data for both TDT and case-control analyses. A recent review of candidate gene studies using both designs suggested that, in aggregate, estimates of association were equivalent across methods with observed differences most likely due to uncertainty in the estimates resulting from small sample sizes (Evangelou et al. 2006). Given this result and the larger sample sizes provided by case-control studies, when a study reported results from both case-control and TDT analyses, data from the case-control analysis were included in the meta-analysis.
Results
Dopaminergic pathway
Dopamine transporter gene (DAT1)
The dopamine transporter gene (DAT1, SLC6A3) has been mapped to chromosome 5p15 (Vandenbergh et al. 1992). It codes for a solute carrier protein responsible for the reuptake of dopamine from the synaptic cleft back to the presynaptic neuron. This protein is densely distributed in the striatum and nucleus accumbens and represents the primary mechanism of dopamine regulation in these brain regions (Ciliax et al. 1999). Several lines of research justify DAT1 as a candidate gene for ADHD. For example, stimulant medications such as methylphenidate, which are the most widely prescribed and among the most effective treatments available for ADHD symptoms, have been shown to inhibit the function of the dopamine transporter and thereby increase the levels of available dopamine in the synapse (Ritz et al. 1987; Volkow et al. 1995). Further, mice that were bred lacking both copies of the DAT1 gene (i.e., DAT1 “knockout” mice) exhibited behaviors analogous to ADHD such as greater motor activity, compared to “wild-type” controls and mice bred with a single intact copy of the gene (Giros et al. 1996).
The most widely studied DAT1 polymorphism is a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) sequence in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) that is 40 base pairs (bp) in length (Vandenbergh et al. 1992). The most common alleles are the 10 (480-bp) (71.9%) and 9 (440-bp) (23.4%) repeats (Doucette-Stamm et al. 1995). There is some evidence suggesting that this polymorphism is functional, with studies using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) showing that dopamine transporter availability (Heinz et al. 2000) and binding potential (Jacobsen et al. 2000) are influenced by genotype at this VNTR, and additional studies suggesting that DAT1 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in post-mortem brain tissue are also influenced by genotype at this VNTR (Brookes et al. 2007; Mill et al. 2002).
The first study to test for association between the VNTR in the DAT1 3′UTR and ADHD was conducted by Cook et al. (1995) using a sample of 57 children diagnosed with ADHD. They reported a significant association between DAT1 and ADHD using an HHRR analysis, and found that the 10-repeat allele was preferentially transmitted to ADHD probands. Since this initial report, more than 100 studies have been published examining the relations between DAT1 polymorphisms and ADHD and ADHD-related phenotypes. In the present review, we meta-analyzed the association between childhood ADHD and 5 markers in DAT1, including the VNTR in the 3′UTR, a VNTR in intron 8, and 3 SNPs.
For the 3′UTR VNTR, independent data were available from 15 TDT (Asherson et al. 2007; Brookes et al. 2006b; Curran et al. 2001b; Feng et al. 2005b; Galili-Weisstub and Segman 2003; Hebebrand et al. 2006; Kim et al. 2005b; Kustanovich et al. 2004; Lim et al. 2006; Maher et al. 2002; Mick et al. unpublished data; Todd et al. 2001a; Waldman et al. 1998) and 19 Case-Control/HHRR studies (Bakker et al. 2005; Banoei et al. 2008; Bobb et al. 2005; Carrasco et al. 2004; Cheuk et al. 2006b; Cook et al. 1995; Cornish et al. 2005; Das and Mukhopadhyay 2007; Genro et al. 2007; Hawi et al. 2003; Jiang et al. 1999; Kim et al. 2006b; Kopeckova et al. 2008; Langley et al. 2005; Qian et al. 2004; Simsek et al. 2005; Smith et al. 2003; Swanson et al. 2000b; Wang et al. 2008), with the 480-bp (or 10-repeat) allele designated as the “risk” allele. Results of this meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 1, indicated a significant but modest association between ADHD and the 480-bp allele (fixed effects: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.03–1.17, χ2 = 8.70, P = 0.002; random effects: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.00–1.27, χ2 = 3.66, P = 0.028) with substantial heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 92.97, P < 0.000001; I 2 = 65). Sensitivity analyses for this polymorphism, as well as similar analyses conducted for each of the polymorphisms described below, indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study, as these remained very similar with the exclusion of each study in turn, including the first study and the studies with the highest and lowest odds ratios.
More recently, studies have begun to genotype additional markers in and around DAT1 to conduct more comprehensive tests of association. For example, a VNTR in intron 8 of DAT1 has been genotyped in several recent studies. This VNTR is a 30-bp repeat sequence with two common alleles of 5- and 6-repeats, and there is some evidence that it is functional with an increasing number of repeats associated, with increased DAT1 mRNA levels (Brookes et al. 2007) and reduced expression in response to cocaine exposure (Guindalini et al. 2006). Four TDT studies (Asherson et al. 2007; Brookes et al. 2006b; Mick et al. unpublished data) and one Case-Control/HHRR study (Genro et al. 2008) were identified that tested for association between this polymorphism and childhood ADHD that were appropriate for meta-analysis. Based on the initial association report (Brookes et al. 2006b), the 6-repeat allele was designated as the “risk” allele. Results of the meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 2a, indicated a significant but modest association between ADHD and the 6-repeat allele of this polymorphism (fixed effects: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.05–1.34, χ2 = 8.10, P = 0.002; random effects: OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.98–1.58, χ2 = 3.35, P = 0.034). Substantial heterogeneity in effect sizes was again observed across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 11.22, P = 0.012; I 2 = 64) suggesting that future studies are needed to identify the sources of this variation.
In addition to these VNTRs, three SNPs in DAT1 were identified that had been tested for association with childhood ADHD in sufficient numbers to allow for meta-analysis. Data for the first SNP, rs6347 located in exon 8, were available from three TDT (Brookes et al. 2006a; Feng et al. 2005b; Friedel et al. 2007) and three Case-Control/HHRR (Bobb et al. 2005; Genro et al. 2008; Guan et al. 2008) studies. Because rs6347 has not shown evidence of an association with ADHD in the extant literature, a ‘risk’ allele was not designated. Results of the meta-analysis did not support an association between ADHD and rs6347 as shown in Fig. 2b (fixed effects: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.96–1.20, χ2 = 1.39, two-tailed P = 0.238; random effects: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.94–1.22, χ2 = 1.21, two-tailed P = 0.272), with minimal heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 5.81, P = 0.325; I 2 = 14). Thus, there was no evidence to suggest an association between this SNP and ADHD.
The two remaining SNPs that were meta-analyzed (rs27072 and rs40184) were located in the 3′ UTR of DAT1. For rs27072, data were available from five TDT (Brookes et al. 2006a; Feng et al. 2005b; Friedel et al. 2007; Galili-Weisstub and Segman 2003; Mick et al. unpublished data) and two Case-Control/HHRR (Genro et al. 2008; Guan et al. 2008) studies. Based on the initial association study (Galili-Weisstub and Segman 2003), the “G” allele of this polymorphism was designated as the “risk” allele. The results of this meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 2c, indicated a significant and modest association between ADHD and the “G” allele (fixed effects: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05–1.31, χ2 = 7.49, P = 0.003; random effects: OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.04–1.38, χ2 = 6.32, P = 0.006) with modest but non-significant heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 8.29, P = 0.217; I 2 = 28).
Data were available from two TDT (Brookes et al. 2008; Mick et al. unpublished data) and two Case-Control/HHRR (Genro et al. 2008; Guan et al. 2008) studies that tested for association between rs40184 and ADHD. The ‘G’ allele was designated as the ‘risk’ allele for this analysis based on the initial association report (Brookes et al. 2006a). The fixed effects meta-analysis of these studies (Fig. 2d) indicated a trend towards a modest association between this allele and ADHD (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.99–1.21, χ2 = 3.25, P = 0.036), but random effects meta-analysis yielded a nonsignificant result (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.90–1.24, χ2 = 0.46, P = 0.249). Notably, moderate but non-significant heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies was observed (Q-statistic χ2 = 5.47, P = 0.141; I 2 = 45). An important caveat to these findings is that the results are based on only 4 studies, thus further studies are needed to better establish the nature and magnitude of association of this SNP with ADHD.
As noted above, several of the meta-analyzed polymorphisms in DAT1 exhibited significant or suggestive evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies, and there are several potential sources, which might contribute to this heterogeneity. First, differences in study sample characteristics could contribute. For example, previous studies have suggested that DAT1 is more strongly associated with the hyperactive–impulsive symptoms of ADHD and similarly the Combined ADHD subtype than with the inattentive symptoms or Inattentive ADHD subtype (Mill et al. 2005; Waldman et al. 1998). Second, there may be important environmental variables that moderate the association between DAT1 polymorphisms and ADHD. Several studies have now tested for gene-environment interactions using variables such as maternal smoking and/or alcohol use during pregnancy (Becker et al. 2008; Brookes et al. 2006b; Kahn et al. 2003; Langley et al. 2008; Neuman et al. 2007) and psychosocial adversity (Laucht et al. 2007) to examine the association between DAT1 and ADHD, though the results have been mixed.
A third potential source of heterogeneity could be the presence of allelic heterogeneity if multiple polymorphisms within DAT1 were providing unique contributions to the genetic risk underlying ADHD, either directly or indirectly through linked, causal polymorphisms. For example, the DAT1 polymorphisms that were meta-analyzed in the present review are located in the middle to 3′ end of the gene, but it is notable that several studies have also reported significant associations with polymorphisms at the 5′ end of the gene. For example, two SNPs (rs2550946 and rs11564750) located in the promoter region of DAT1 have shown evidence of association with ADHD in the International Multi-site ADHD Genetics (IMAGE) (Faraone and Asherson 2005) sample (Brookes et al. 2006a; Brookes et al. 2008), and although they tested for association using different sets of SNPs, two additional studies have reported significant associations with SNPs in the 5′ region (Friedel et al. 2007; Genro et al. 2007). Given that there is little evidence of linkage disequilibrium between polymorphisms at the 5′ and 3′ ends of DAT1 (Greenwood et al. 2002), these results, in addition to those of the present review, suggest that there may be multiple functional variants within DAT1 that confer risk for ADHD. If so, it may be that different polymorphisms within DAT1 are contributing to the genetic risk across studies, which could explain a portion of the heterogeneity in effect sizes observed across studies (Brookes et al. 2008). Relatively few studies investigating potential sources of heterogeneity such as those described have been conducted to date, thus it should be stressed that identifying potential moderating variables that can explain the heterogeneity in the association between DAT1 polymorphisms and ADHD represents an important priority for future research.
Dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4)
The dopamine D4 receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor belonging to the dopamine D2-like receptor family, which act to inhibit adenylyl cyclase (Oldenhof et al. 1998). The dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) has been mapped to chromosome 11p15.5 (Gelernter et al. 1992; Petronis et al. 1993). Given that abnormalities in the dopamine neurotransmitter system have been hypothesized to underlie ADHD (Levy 1991), the genes that code for the dopamine receptors have been identified as candidate loci for ADHD. More specifically, DRD4 is predominantly expressed in frontal lobe regions, such as the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate, and these brain regions are thought to be involved in the etiology of the disorder (Floresco and Tse 2007; Noain et al. 2006). Additional interest in DRD4 as a candidate gene for ADHD was sparked by association studies that linked the gene to the personality trait of novelty seeking (Benjamin et al. 1996; Ebstein et al. 1996), which has been compared to the high levels of impulsivity and excitability often seen in ADHD (Faraone et al. 1999). Further, the DRD4 “knockout” mouse has been shown to exhibit a heightened response to cocaine and methamphetamine relative to controls, as indicated by increases in locomotor behavior (Rubinstein et al. 1997).
The most widely studied DRD4 polymorphism in association studies of ADHD has been the 48-bp VNTR in exon 3. The most common alleles of this polymorphism are the 2-, 4-, and 7-repeat alleles, though allele frequencies have been shown to vary significantly across ethnic groups (Chang et al. 1996; Van Tol et al. 1992). There is some evidence that this VNTR is functional with studies suggesting that the 7-repeat allele differs, albeit slightly, from the 2- and 4-repeat alleles in secondary messenger (i.e., cAMP) activity and possibly also in response to the antipsychotic medication clozapine (Asghari et al. 1995; Asghari et al. 1994). The initial study to test for an association between the DRD4 exon 3 VNTR and ADHD was a case-control study that included 39 cases and 39 ethnically matched controls (LaHoste et al. 1996). The authors reported increased prevalence of the 7-repeat allele and the 7/7 genotype in cases (i.e., 29 and 49%, respectively) compared to controls (i.e., 12 and 21%, respectively). A number of replication studies have investigated this association, but the results across studies have been mixed. Thus, it is noteworthy that several meta-analyses have demonstrated a significant DRD4–ADHD association (Faraone et al. 2001, 2005; Li et al. 2006a).
Since the publication of the last meta-analysis (Li et al. 2006a), several additional studies have been published examining the association between the exon 3 VNTR and ADHD. The present meta-analysis included independent data available from 10 TDT (Arcos-Burgos et al. 2004a; Brookes et al. 2006a; Kustanovich et al. 2004; Lunetta et al. 2000; Maher et al. 2002; Mick et al. unpublished data; Sunohara et al. 2000; Tahir et al. 2000b; Todd et al. 2001b) and 16 Case-Control/HHRR (Bakker et al. 2005; Bhaduri et al. 2006; Carrasco et al. 2006; Curran et al. 2001a; El-Faddagh et al. 2004; Frank et al. 2004; Gornick et al. 2007; Hawi et al. 2000a; Holmes et al. 2000; Kotler et al. 2000; LaHoste et al. 1996; Mill et al. 2001; Roman et al. 2001; Rowe et al. 1998; Smith et al. 2003; Swanson et al. 1998) studies, with the 7-repeat considered the “high-risk” allele. Two studies in Asian populations could not be included in the meta-analysis, given insufficient frequencies of the 7-repeat allele (Cheuk et al. 2006a; Kim et al. 2005b). Results of this meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 3, indicated a significant, moderate association between ADHD and the 7-repeat allele (fixed effects: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.16–1.39, χ2 = 28.01, P < 0.00001; random effects: OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.15–1.54, χ2 = 14.51, P = 0.00007), thus replicating the findings of previous meta-analytic reviews (Faraone et al. 2001, 2005; Li et al. 2006a). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study, as these remained very similar with the exclusion of each study in turn, including the first study and the studies with the highest and lowest odds ratios. It is noteworthy, however, that substantial heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies was observed (Q-statistic χ2 = 54.32, P = 0.0006; I 2 = 54).
After the exon 3 VNTR, the two most widely studied DRD4 polymorphisms in association studies of ADHD are found in the promoter region of the gene. The first is an 120-bp duplication located 1.2 kilobases upstream of the transcription start site consisting of 2 common alleles of 120- and 240-bps (Seaman et al. 1999). There is some data suggesting that this polymorphism influences transcription with the 120-bp allele exhibiting higher transcriptional activity in transfected cell lines relative to the 240-bp allele (D’Souza et al. 2004; Kereszturi et al. 2007). The first study to investigate this polymorphism in relation to ADHD reported an over-representation of the 240-bp allele among children diagnosed with ADHD relative to controls (McCracken et al. 2000), and this finding was later replicated in an expanded sample (Kustanovich et al. 2004). Nonetheless, there have also been several failures to replicate (Barr et al. 2001; Todd et al. 2001b) as well as reported associations with the 120-bp rather than the 240-bp allele (Kereszturi et al. 2007).
The meta-analysis of association between childhood ADHD and the DRD4 Promoter Insertion/Deletion included data from six TDT (Arcos-Burgos et al. 2004a; Barr et al. 2001; Brookes et al. 2005; Kustanovich et al. 2004; Lowe et al. 2004b; Todd et al. 2001b) and two Case-Control/HHRR (Bhaduri et al. 2006; Kereszturi et al. 2007) studies. Given the conflicting reports regarding which allele is associated with increased risk for ADHD, a ‘risk’ allele was not designated for meta-analysis. The results, shown in Fig. 4a, suggested no association between ADHD and either allele (fixed effects: OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.87–1.14, χ2 = 0.00, two-tailed P = 0.998; random effects: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.86–1.31, χ2 = 0.29, two-tailed P = 0.590), but substantial heterogeneity was observed in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 15.16, P = 0.033; I 2 = 54). Based on these results, a clear priority for future research is investigating the sources of the heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies.
The second frequently studied polymorphism studied in the DRD4 promoter region is a SNP located 521 bp upstream of the transcription start site (−521 C/T; rs1800955). This SNP is thought to influence promoter activity with the “T” allele exhibiting a 40% reduction in promoter activity relative to the “C” allele in transfected cells (Okuyama et al. 1999). Three TDT (Barr et al. 2001; Lowe et al. 2004b; Payton et al. 2001) and two Case-Control/HHRR (Kereszturi et al. 2007; Yang et al. 2008) studies were identified for the meta-analysis of association between childhood ADHD and the DRD4 −521 C/T SNP (rs1800955). Based on previous studies (Barr et al. 2001; Lowe et al. 2004b), the “T” allele was considered the “risk” allele. Results of this meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 4b, indicated a significant, modest association between ADHD and the T allele (fixed effects: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.04–1.41, χ2 = 6.01, P = 0.007) with no evidence for heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 3.54, P = 0.472; I 2 = 0). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study.
As noted, both the exon 3 VNTR and the insertion/deletion in the promoter region showed significant evidence of heterogeneity in the effect sizes across studies. Studies that have further explored the association between DRD4 and ADHD have often relied on two approaches with the potential to explain a portion of this heterogeneity. The first approach has been to test for differences in association between the Inattentive and Combined ADHD subtypes or the inattentive or hyperactive–impulsive symptom dimensions that underlie ADHD. Though the findings from these studies have been mixed, several studies have suggested that DRD4 is more strongly related to the inattentive than the hyperactive–impulsive symptoms of ADHD (Lasky-Su et al. 2007a; Lasky-Su et al. 2008; McCracken et al. 2000; Rowe et al. 1998) and is related to attention problems in the general population (Laucht et al. 2006; Schmidt et al. 2001). The second approach has been to use neuropsychological measures as alternative phenotypes for ADHD with the assumption that such measures more directly assess the underlying genetic liability to disorder than symptom ratings (see Kebir et al. 2009 for a detailed review). Results from these studies have been conflicting, with several studies reporting associations between the 7-repeat allele and poor performance on neuropsychological measures (Kieling et al. 2006; Langley et al. 2004; Waldman 2005), and other studies reporting associations between the 7-repeat allele and improved performance on these measures (Bellgrove et al. 2005; Manor et al. 2002a; Swanson et al. 2000a). Given such findings, it is difficult to draw further conclusions regarding the association between ADHD and DRD4 from these studies. Thus, a priority for future studies should be to explore potential sources of heterogeneity in this association to further our understanding of how DRD4 confers risk towards the development of ADHD.
Dopamine D2 receptor gene (DRD2)
The dopamine D2 receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor, which acts to inhibit adenyl cyclase (Andersen et al. 1990). The dopamine D2 receptor gene (DRD2) has been mapped to chromosome 11q23.1 (Eubanks et al. 1992). It is expressed in several brain regions thought to be relevant to ADHD such as the basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex, and plays a key role in regulating the mesolimbic “reward” pathways (Usiello et al. 2000). Initial studies of DRD2 focused on the relation of a TaqIA restriction site (rs1800497) to alcohol dependence phenotypes (Blum et al. 1990; Noble et al. 1991). Notably, more recent studies have shown this polymorphism lies more than 10 kb downstream from DRD2 in an exon of a neighboring gene, ANKK1 (Neville et al. 2004). Nonetheless, the TaqIA polymorphism remains an interesting polymorphism for studying DRD2 associations given that it has been related to DRD2 expression levels (Laakso et al. 2005; Thompson et al. 1997) and urinary levels of the dopamine metabolite homovanillic acid (Ponce et al. 2004).
The initial published studies reported significant evidence for association between ADHD and the A1 allele in a sample selected for Tourette’s syndrome (Comings et al. 1991, 1996). More recent studies have been conducted in samples selected specifically for ADHD (Kirley et al. 2002; Rowe et al. 1999), and thus, were considered for inclusion in the present review. The meta-analysis of the association between childhood ADHD and the TaqI DRD2 polymorphism included three TDT (Kirley et al. 2002; Kustanovich et al. 2004; Rowe et al. 1999) and three Case-Control/HHRR (Huang et al. 2003; Kopeckova et al. 2008; Sery et al. 2006) studies. Given the conflicting findings regarding which allele is associated with ADHD (Huang et al. 2003; Kirley et al. 2002; Rowe et al. 1999), a ‘risk’ allele was not designated. The results of the meta-analysis (shown in Fig. 5) were statistically mixed, with the fixed effects analysis indicating a significant association between ADHD and the ‘A1’ allele (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.29–1.83, χ2 = 23.36, two-tailed P < 0.001) and the random effects analysis indicating a weak trend towards such an association (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 0.89–3.06, χ2 = 2.56, two-tailed P = 0.110). These mixed results may have been due to the significant and substantial heterogeneity in the effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 55.01, P < 0.001; I 2 = 91). Further, sensitivity analyses indicated that the Kopeckova et al. (2008) study was an outlier in providing by far the largest contribution to the overall effect size and observed heterogeneity as removing this study reduced the Q-statistic to non-significance (Q-statistic χ2 = 7.31, P = 0.120; I 2 = 45), and appreciably weakened the evidence for association (fixed effects: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.00–1.46, χ2 = 4.05, P = 0.044; random effects: OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.93–1.62, χ2 = 2.16, P = 0.142). Nonetheless, due to the magnitude of the observed heterogeneity, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions regarding the association between childhood ADHD and DRD2, and further studies are needed to explore this relation.
Dopamine D5 receptor gene (DRD5)
The dopamine D5 receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor that belongs to the D1 class of dopamine receptors and serves to stimulate adenyl cyclase activity (Sunahara et al. 1991). The dopamine D5 receptor gene (DRD5) has been mapped to chromosome 4p15.3 (Sherrington et al. 1993). DRD5 is highly expressed in the hippocampus and related structures (Beischlag et al. 1995), and is thought to be involved in the induction of long-term potentiation related to novel events (Li et al. 2003). A highly polymorphic dinucleotide repeat 18.5 kb 5′ of the gene has been described consisting of 12 alleles ranging from 134 to 156 bps in length with the 148-bp allele being the most common (Sherrington et al. 1993).
This dinucleotide repeat has been widely studied in relation to psychiatric disorders including ADHD (Hoenicka et al. 2007). The first study to test for an association with this polymorphism reported preferential transmission of the 148-bp allele to probands using HHRR and TDT analyses in a sample of 118 children diagnosed with ADHD (Daly et al. 1999). A subsequent meta-analysis that included this study as well as 3 subsequently published studies and 10 additional unpublished studies also reported a significant association between the 148-bp allele and ADHD with an odds ratio of 1.24 (Lowe et al. 2004a). This result was replicated in a more recent meta-analysis of published studies that reported a combined odds ratio of 1.34 (Li et al. 2006a). Notably, while the initial meta-analysis did not detect significant heterogeneity among samples, the subsequent meta-analysis did report heterogeneity.
The present meta-analysis of association between childhood ADHD and the dinucleotide repeat flanking DRD5 included all of the available data from six TDT (Barr et al. 2000a; Hawi et al. 2005; Kustanovich et al. 2004; Manor et al. 2004; Payton et al. 2001; Tahir et al. 2000b) and 3 Case-Control/HHRR (Bakker et al. 2005; Bobb et al. 2005; Mill et al. 2004a) studies, with the 148-bp allele considered the ‘high-risk’ allele. Results of this meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 6, indicated a significant, moderate association between ADHD and the 148-bp allele (fixed effects: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.10–1.36, χ2 = 13.91, P = 0.000095; random effects: OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.06–1.43, χ2 = 7.73, P = 0.0027) with moderate and marginally significant heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 14.80, P = 0.063; I 2 = 46). These results are consistent with those of the previous meta-analysis (Li et al. 2006a) in suggesting the presence of heterogeneity in effect sizes. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study.
As noted, the studied dinucleotide repeat lies more than 18 kb upstream of the transcription start site for DRD5, and thus, it has been assumed that this repeat is unlikely to influence DRD5 expression or function. Nonetheless, only a few studies have tested for associations between DRD5 and ADHD beyond this repeat (Hawi et al. 2003; Lasky-Su et al. 2007b), perhaps due to the difficulty of genotyping polymorphisms that lie within the gene itself, rather than in adjoining pseudogenes (Housley et al. 2009). The results of the present and previous meta-analyses strongly support association between DRD5 and ADHD, thus additional studies are needed to further explore this relation and attempt to identify the functional polymorphism(s) within the gene that underlie this association. In addition, future studies of this microsatellite should be conducted to investigate the sources of the heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies.
Dopamine D3 receptor gene (DRD3)
The dopamine D3 receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor belonging to the D2 family of dopamine receptors, which act to inhibit adenylyl cyclase (Vallone et al. 2000). The dopamine D3 receptor gene (DRD3) has been mapped to chromosome 3q13.3 (Le Coniat et al. 1991). It is primarily expressed in the nucleus accumbens and substantia nigra, and has been shown to play an important role in incentive-based learning (Beninger and Banasikowski 2008). The initial study testing for association and linkage between DRD3 and ADHD focused on a functional polymorphism in exon 1 that results in an amino acid change (Ser9Gly; rs6280) and a polymorphism in intron 5 (Barr et al. 2000b). The authors conducted a TDT analysis of 100 ADHD parent–child trios and reported no evidence of an association between ADHD and either DRD3 polymorphism. Despite this initial negative result, a sufficient number of studies have since tested for association between the exon 1 SNP and ADHD to allow for meta-analysis.
The present meta-analysis of association between childhood ADHD and rs6280 of DRD3 included data from four TDT (Barr et al. 2000b; Brookes et al. 2006a; Kirley et al. 2002; Payton et al. 2001) and two Case-Control/HHRR (Guan et al. 2008; Kopeckova et al. 2008) studies. Given that there are no reported significant associations between this polymorphism and ADHD in the literature, a ‘risk’ allele was not designated. Results of this meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 7, were non-significant (fixed effects: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.95–1.21, χ2 = 1.23, two-tailed P = 0.268) with no evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 1.12, P = 0.952; I 2 = 0). Due to the absence of heterogeneity, a random effects meta-analysis was not performed. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study, as these remained very similar with the exclusion of each study in turn, including the first study and the studies with the highest and lowest odds ratios. In support of these negative findings, two studies that tested for association between ADHD and DRD3 using additional SNPs spanning the length of the gene also failed to detect an ADHD–DRD3 association (Brookes et al. 2006a; Guan et al. 2008). Thus, the present review does not support a relation between DRD3 and ADHD.
Catechol-O-methyl-transferase (COMT)
Catechol-O-methyl-transferase (COMT) is an enzyme responsible for the degradation of the catecholamines dopamine and norepinephrine. It is highly expressed in frontal lobe regions where it plays an important role in regulating synaptic dopamine levels (Hong et al. 1998). COMT represents an interesting candidate gene for ADHD given that functional imaging (Pliszka et al. 1996; Schulz et al. 2004) and neuropsychological (Pennington and Ozonoff 1996; Willcutt et al. 2005) studies have suggested that frontal regions are implicated in ADHD. In addition, individuals diagnosed with velo-cardio-facial syndrome, which is caused by a hemizygous deletion of the chromosomal region in which COMT lies (22q11), exhibit ADHD-like symptoms, further suggesting a relation between this gene and ADHD (Driscoll et al. 1992).
Studies examining the association between COMT and ADHD have largely focused on a functional single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in exon 4 that leads to an amino acid substitution (valine → methionine). This polymorphism has been shown to substantially affect COMT enzyme activity, such that homozygosity for the valine allele shows 3–4 times greater activity than homozygosity for the methionine allele (Lotta et al. 1995; Scanlon et al. 1979; Weinshilboum and Dunnette 1981). Despite the potential relevance of this functional polymorphism to ADHD and an initial small study suggesting that the valine allele of this polymorphism was associated with increased risk for ADHD (Eisenberg et al. 1999), the majority of studies have reported negative results (Barr et al. 1999; Hawi et al. 2000b; Payton et al. 2001). Further, a previous meta-analysis failed to detect significant evidence for such an association (Cheuk and Wong 2006).
The present meta-analysis of the val/met exon 4 SNP (rs4680) included data from seven TDT studies (Barr et al. 1999; Biederman et al. 2008; Brookes et al. 2006a; Payton et al. 2001; Taerk et al. 2004; Turic et al. 2005; Waldman et al. unpublished data) and nine Case-Control/HHRR studies (Bobb et al. 2005; Eisenberg et al. 1999; Guan et al. 2008; Hawi et al. 2000b; Jiang et al. 2005; Manor et al. 2000; Qian et al. 2003; Tahir et al. 2000a; Zhang et al. 2003), with the valine allele designated as the ‘high risk’ allele. Results of this meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 8, indicated no association between ADHD and the val/met SNP (fixed effects: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.92–1.06, χ2 = 0.08, P = 0.615; random effects: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.91–1.08, χ2 = 0.04, P = 0.575) with non-significant and minimal heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 17.55, P = 0.287; I 2 = 15). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study, as these remained very similar with the exclusion of each study in turn, including the first study and the studies with the highest and lowest odds ratios.
In addition to studies examining the exon 4 val/met polymorphism rs4680, the present review also identified three studies that tested for association between COMT and ADHD using additional markers. The first study genotyped 2 additional markers in COMT (Turic et al. 2005), and 2 subsequent studies genotyped more than 20 markers across the length of the gene (Brookes et al. 2006a; Guan et al. 2008). All three studies reported negative results, further suggesting the absence of an association between COMT and ADHD.
Despite these negative findings, however, two studies have suggested that gender may moderate an association between the val/met COMT polymorphism and ADHD. These studies presented evidence suggesting that the methionine allele conferred risk to ADHD in boys, whereas the valine allele conferred risk to ADHD in girls (Biederman et al. 2008; Qian et al. 2003). While a third study failed to detect such an effect (Turic et al. 2005), this sexually dimorphic result has some support in the literature with studies in both mice and humans suggesting that COMT is differentially expressed in males and females (Dempster et al. 2006; Gogos et al. 1998; Jiang et al. 2003). Nonetheless, these results should be interpreted with caution until further replicated. Thus, while the results of the present meta-analysis did not suggest an association between COMT and ADHD, future studies might consider testing gender as a moderator of this association.
Adrenergic pathway
Dopamine beta hydroxylase (DβH)
The dopamine beta hydroxylase gene (DβH) has been mapped to chromosome 9q34 (Craig et al. 1988). Dopamine beta hydroxylase converts dopamine to norepinephrine, and thus represents an interesting candidate gene for ADHD given suggestions that the underlying pathophysiology of ADHD involves norepinephrine as well as dopamine dysregulation (Biederman and Faraone 2002; Pliszka et al. 1996). Further, DβH polymorphisms have been shown to strongly influence plasma levels of dopamine beta hydroxylase (Cubells et al. 2000; Zabetian et al. 2001, 2003), and low plasma levels of dopamine beta hydroxylase have been associated with conduct disorder (Bowden et al. 1988; Rogeness et al. 1989, 1982), which often co-occurs with ADHD (Hinshaw 1987).
The initial study to test for an association between ADHD and DβH was conducted by Daly et al. (1999) using a sample of 118 children diagnosed with ADHD. They reported a significant association with a SNP in intron 5 of DβH that results in a TaqI restriction site (rs2519152). Since this initial report, a sufficient number of studies have been published examining the relation between this DβH SNP and ADHD as well as two additional SNPs (rs1108580; rs1611115 [−1021C/T]) to allow for a meta-analysis of the association between ADHD and each SNP. Notably, the DβH SNPs rs1108580 and rs1611115 have shown evidence of an association with plasma levels of dopamine beta hydroxylase, whereas the TaqI polymorphism (rs2519152) has not (Cubells et al. 2000; Zabetian et al. 2001, 2003).
For the meta-analysis of the TaqI restriction polymorphism (rs2519152), data from one TDT study (Wigg et al. 2002) and five Case-Control/HHRR studies (Bhaduri and Mukhopadhyay 2006; Hawi et al. 2003; Kopeckova et al. 2008; Roman et al. 2002; Smith et al. 2003) were included, with the ‘A2’ allele considered the “high-risk” allele based on the initial study to test for an association between this SNP and ADHD (Daly et al. 1999). The results (Fig. 9a) were mixed with the fixed effects meta-analysis showing a trend towards an association between the A2 allele of the TaqI polymorphism and ADHD across studies (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.96–1.35, χ2 = 2.08, P = 0.074), and the random effects meta-analysis failing to support such an association (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.80–1.55, χ2 = 0.43, P = 0.206). Notably, significant and substantial evidence of heterogeneity in the study effect sizes was observed (Q-statistic χ2 = 17.54, P = 0.004; I 2 = 71). Sensitivity analyses suggested that the Smith et al. (2003) study provided the largest contribution to this heterogeneity, as removal of this study reduced the Q-statistic to a trend (Q-statistic χ2 = 9.18, P = 0.057; I 2 = 56) and led to a moderate increase in the evidence for an association (random effects: OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.94–1.68, χ2 = 2.37, P = 0.062). Nonetheless, a substantial level of heterogeneity remained even after removing this study.
As described, rs1108580 and rs1611115 have shown evidence of an association with plasma levels of dopamine beta hydroxylase (Cubells et al. 2000; Zabetian et al. 2001; Zabetian et al. 2003), which suggests they would be strong candidates for genetic association studies. One TDT study (Brookes et al. 2006a) and three Case-Control/HHRR (Bhaduri and Mukhopadhyay 2006; Guan et al. 2008; Kopeckova et al. 2008) studies were identified for the meta-analysis of rs1611115. This polymorphism has not shown significant evidence for association with ADHD in the extant literature, and as a result, a ‘risk’ allele was not designated. The meta-analysis of rs1611115 (see Fig. 9b for results) did not detect a significant association with childhood ADHD (fixed effects: OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.85–1.15, χ2 = 0.03, two-tailed P = 0.855; random effects: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.83–1.33, χ2 = 0.16, two-tailed P = 0.692), and there was no significant evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 4.77, P = 0.189; I 2 = 37). The meta-analysis of rs1108580 (Fig. 9c), which included data from one TDT study (Brookes et al. 2006a) and four Case-Control/HHRR (Bhaduri and Mukhopadhyay 2006; Guan et al. 2008; Hawi et al. 2003; Kopeckova et al. 2008) studies with the ‘A’ allele designated as the “high-risk” allele (Hawi et al. 2003), was similarly non-significant (fixed effects: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.95–1.22, χ2 = 1.37, P = 0.121; random effects: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.93–1.28, χ2 = 1.12, P = 0.145) with no significant evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 5.04, P = 0.284; I 2 = 20). Sensitivity analyses for both SNPs indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study.
In summary, only the TaqI polymorphism showed a trend towards an association with childhood ADHD. As noted, significant heterogeneity was observed in the effect sizes for this relation across studies. Further, an inspection of the study-specific odds ratios (Fig. 9a) suggests that studies have reported significant evidence for association with both of the TaqI alleles. Thus, it is possible that the reported results are simply due to stochastic fluctuations in the data due to the use of small samples, or the TaqI polymorphism is in partial linkage disequilibrium with a true causal variant. As a result, further studies are needed to determine whether DβH is involved in the development of ADHD.
Norepinephrine transporter gene (SLC6A2)
The human norepinephrine transporter gene (SLC6A2), located on chromosome 16q12.2 (Gelernter et al. 1993), codes for a protein responsible for the reuptake of norepinephrine from the synaptic cleft back into the presynaptic neuron (Pacholczyk et al. 1991). It is highly expressed in the frontal lobes and is actively involved in both noradrenergic and dopaminergic reuptake and regulation in this region (Stahl 2003). Thus, SLC6A2 represents an interesting candidate gene for ADHD. Further interest has been generated from pharmacological studies suggesting reductions in ADHD symptoms through increases in dopamine and norepinephrine activity via both stimulant medications (Solanto 1998) and atomoxetine, a norepinephrine transporter antagonist (Michelson et al. 2002; Spencer et al. 2002).
Early candidate gene studies of SLC6A2 selected 2–3 SNPs to test for association with ADHD, but failed to detect an association (Barr et al. 2002; McEvoy et al. 2002). More recent studies (Guan et al. 2008; Xu et al. 2005a) have selected SNPs spanning the length of SLC6A2 to comprehensively test for association with ADHD. Conflicting results have been reported, with each study yielding evidence of an association, but differing in which specific SNPs are associated. The present review identified two SNPs that had been tested for association with ADHD in a sufficient number of studies to allow for a meta-analysis.
The first SNP (rs5569 or G1287A) is a synonymous SNP located in exon 9. Data were available for meta-analysis from three TDT (Barr et al. 2002; Brookes et al. 2006a; Kim et al. 2008) and two Case-Control/HHRR (Cho et al. 2008a; Guan et al. 2008) studies. Given that no previous studies had reported a significant association between this polymorphism and ADHD, no ‘risk’ allele was indicated. The results of the meta-analysis (shown in Fig. 10a) were nonsignificant (fixed effects: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.95–1.18, χ2 = 1.17, two-tailed P = 0.279). No evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies was observed (Q-statistic χ2 = 0.27, P = 0.992; I 2 = 0), and as a result a random effects meta-analysis was not performed.
The second SNP (rs2242447) is a T → C transition located in intron 13. Data were available for meta-analysis from two TDT (Barr et al. 2002; Brookes et al. 2006a) and two Case-Control/HHRR (Guan et al. 2008; Xu et al. 2005a) studies. None of the individual studies had reported a significant association with this SNP, thus no ‘risk’ allele was indicated. As shown in Fig. 10b, no evidence for association was observed between childhood ADHD and rs2242447 (fixed effects: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.91–1.16, χ2 = 0.22, two-tailed P = 0.641; random effects: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.91–1.19, χ2 = 0.29, two-tailed P = 0.589), and there was no significant heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 3.51, P = 0.319; I 2 = 14). Further, sensitivity analyses conducted for both SLC6A2 SNPs indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study, as these remained very similar with the exclusion of each study in turn, including the first study and the studies with the highest and lowest odds ratios.
Despite these negative results, compelling reasons remain for future studies to investigate the relation between ADHD and the norepinephrine transporter gene. First, significant ADHD–SLC6A2 associations have been reported, though due to a lack of consistency in the SLC6A2 SNPs genotyped across studies, these associations could not be evaluated via meta-analysis. Nonetheless, the results of these studies suggest that a true susceptibility locus that has yet to be examined or widely studied may reside within SLC6A2. In support of this hypothesis, a common, functional A/T SNP (rs28386840) at position −3081 upstream of the transcription initiation site has been identified and associated with ADHD (Kim et al. 2006a). This SNP is positioned within a sequence critical for cell type-specific promoter function of the SLC6A2 gene, and the T-allele of this polymorphism significantly reduced promoter function relative to the A-allele (Kim et al. 2006a). Based on such evidence, future studies investigating the relations between ADHD and SLC6A2 are warranted despite the negative evidence for association with the two SNPs reported in the present review.
Alpha 2A adrenergic receptor (ADRA2A)
The alpha-2A-adrenergic receptor gene (ADRA2A) has been mapped to chromosome 10q23-q25 (Yang-Feng et al. 1987). Adrenergic neurotransmitter systems are hypothesized to influence attentional processes and certain aspects of executive control (Arnsten 2006), and thus, ADRA2A represents an interesting candidate gene for ADHD. Specific evidence supporting ADRA2A involvement in the etiology of ADHD comes from studies suggesting that alpha 2a-adrenoreceptors in the prefrontal cortex influence executive functions such as attention, inhibitory control, and working memory (Arnsten and Li 2005; Waldman et al. 2006), which are impaired in children with ADHD (Pennington and Ozonoff 1996; Willcutt et al. 2005). Further, methylphenidate, which is commonly prescribed to treat ADHD symptoms, has been shown to increase catecholaminergic activity through increased stimulation of alpha-2A-adrenergic receptors (Andrews and Lavin 2006).
The first study to test for association and linkage between ADRA2A and ADHD genotyped 94 families for a SNP in the promoter region that creates a MspI restriction site (rs1800544), but a TDT failed to yield evidence for association (Xu et al. 2001). Since this initial study, nine independent studies have been published examining the association of ADHD with this SNP and additional polymorphisms within ADRA2A (Bobb et al. 2005; Brookes et al. 2006a; Cho et al. 2008b; Deupree et al. 2006; Guan et al. 2008; Park et al. 2005; Roman et al. 2003; Schmitz et al. 2006; Stevenson et al. 2005). In the present review, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies testing for association between ADHD and 3 ADRA2A polymorphisms (rs1800544, rs1800545, and rs553668).
For the meta-analysis of association between childhood ADHD and the ADRA2A MspI restriction polymorphism (rs1800544), data from five TDT (Brookes et al. 2006a; Deupree et al. 2006; Park et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2006; Xu et al. 2001) and six Case-Control/HHRR (Bobb et al. 2005; Cho et al. 2008b; Guan et al. 2008; Roman et al. 2003; Schmitz et al. 2006; Stevenson et al. 2005) studies were included, with the G allele considered the “high-risk” allele based on previous research (Park et al. 2005). Results of this meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 11a, were non-significant (fixed effects: OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.90–1.10, χ2 = 0.00, P = 0.473; random effects: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.89–1.11, χ2 = 0.01, P = 0.542) with no significant evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 12.20, P = 0.272; I 2 = 18). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study.
In addition to the MspI polymorphism, ADRA2A HhaI (rs1800545) and DraI (rs553668) restriction fragment length polymorphisms have been studied in relation to ADHD. Three TDT studies (Brookes et al. 2006a; Deupree et al. 2006; Park et al. 2005) and one Case-Control/HHRR study (Guan et al. 2008) were identified for the meta-analysis of the HhaI polymorphism (rs1800545). Given that no previous studies have reported a significant association between this polymorphism and ADHD, a ‘risk’ allele was not designated. Results of this meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 11b, were nonsignificant (fixed effects: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.81–1.21, χ2 = 0.01, two-tailed P = 0.914) with no significant evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 1.55, P = 0.670; I 2 = 0). Due to the absence of heterogeneity, a random effects meta-analysis was not performed. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study.
For the meta-analysis of the DraI restriction polymorphism (rs553668), data from three TDT (Deupree et al. 2006; Park et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2006) studies and one Case-Control/HHRR study (Cho et al. 2008b) were included, with the ‘T’ allele considered the “high-risk” allele based on the initial study to test for an association between this SNP and ADHD (Park et al. 2005). The results (Fig. 11c) did not show evidence of a significant association between the DraI polymorphism and ADHD across studies (fixed effects: OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.78–1.09, χ2 = 0.87, P = 0.825; random effects: OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.66–1.34, χ2 = 0.12, P = 0.638) but significant and substantial evidence of heterogeneity in the study effect sizes was observed (Q-statistic χ2 = 8.09, P = 0.044; I 2 = 63). Further sensitivity analyses suggested that the Park et al. (2005) study provided the largest contribution to this association and heterogeneity, as removal of this study reduced the Q-statistic to non-significance (Q-statistic χ2 = 2.58, P = 0.275; I 2 = 22), and altered the effect size estimates of association across studies (random effects: OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.70–1.08, χ2 = 1.64, P = 0.900).
Overall, the present review provides little evidence to support the involvement of ADRA2A in the etiology of ADHD. Nonetheless, the heterogeneity in effect sizes observed among studies testing for an association between ADHD and the DraI polymorphism suggest that some future research exploring this heterogeneity may be warranted. For example, two studies have reported that there may be an association between ADHD and ADRA2A that is specific to inattentive ADHD symptoms (Roman et al. 2003; Schmitz et al. 2006). This would not explain the heterogeneity observed in the present meta-analysis, however, given that Park et al. (2005) observed significant associations between both symptom dimensions and ADRA2A polymorphisms. Thus, additional sources of heterogeneity would need to be explored to explain the present result.
Serotonergic pathway
Serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4; 5HTT)
The serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4; 5HTT) is located on the long arm of chromosome 17 (Gelernter et al. 1995). It codes for a solute carrier protein responsible for the reuptake of serotonin from the synaptic cleft back into the presynaptic neuron (Heils et al. 1996; Lesch et al. 1996), and thus represents a primary mechanism for the regulation of serotonergic activity in the brain. 5HTT is expressed in brain regions implicated in attention, memory, and motor activities such as the amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, putamen, and anterior cingulate cortex (Frankle et al. 2004; Oquendo et al. 2007). Based on such evidence, 5HTT represents a strong functional candidate for ADHD, which is further strengthened by studies suggesting its involvement in the etiology of impulsivity (Halperin et al. 1997; Spivak et al. 1999; Stein et al. 1993) and in modulating stimulant response in alleviating hyperactivity (Gainetdinov et al. 1999). 5HTT represents a strong positional candidate as well given that multiple genome scans have found linkage or association of ADHD to the 17q11.1-q12 region in which 5HTT is located (Arcos-Burgos et al. 2004b; Ogdie et al. 2003).
A functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the gene (the 5HTTLPR) is one of the most frequently studied genetic markers in psychiatric genetic research and has been extensively tested for association with depressive and anxiety disorders and related traits (Lotrich and Pollock 2004; Munafo et al. 2005; Schinka et al. 2004; Sen et al. 2004). The 5HTTLPR is a 44-bp insertion/deletion yielding long and short alleles. The long variant is associated with more rapid serotonin reuptake resulting in lower levels of active serotonin, whereas the short variant appears to be associated with reduced serotonin reuptake resulting in higher levels of active serotonin (Lesch et al. 1996). Twenty case-control or within-family studies have been conducted testing for association between ADHD and the 5HTTLPR. The first study was conducted in a sample of 98 Israeli parent–proband trios, and reported an over-representation of the long allele of the 5HTTLPR only among children diagnosed with the ADHD Combined subtype (Manor et al. 2001). Similar to the results for other psychiatric disorders and genetic markers, this ADHD-5HTTLPR association replicated in some subsequent studies but not in others.
Ten TDT (Banerjee et al. 2006; Heiser et al. 2007; Kent et al. 2002; Kim et al. 2005a; Li et al. 2007; Waldman et al. unpublished data; Wigg et al. 2006; Xu et al. 2008, 2005b) and nine Case-Control/HHRR (Beitchman et al. 2003; Curran et al. 2005; Guimares et al. 2007; Kopeckova et al. 2008; Langley et al. 2003; Manor et al. 2001; Seeger et al. 2001; Zhao et al. 2005; Zoroglu et al. 2002) studies were identified for the present meta-analysis of the association between childhood ADHD and the 5HTTLPR with the long variant designated as the “risk” allele. Results of this meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 12, indicated a significant but modest association between ADHD and the 5HTTLPR “long” allele (fixed effects: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.02–1.17, χ2 = 7.13, P = 0.004; random effects: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.02–1.33, χ2 = 5.40, P = 0.010) with substantial heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 52.80, P = 0.00003; I 2 = 66). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study, as these remained very similar with the exclusion of each study in turn, including the first study and the studies with the highest and lowest odds ratios.
Given that significant heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies investigating the association between the 5HTTLPR and ADHD was observed, a clear priority for future research is investigating the sources of this heterogeneity. Two early studies suggested that the 5HTTLPR-ADHD association might be specific to the combined ADHD subtype (Manor et al. 2001; Seeger et al. 2001), which could indicate that differences in the proportion of ADHD subtype diagnoses across study samples might contribute to the observed heterogeneity. Nonetheless, a more recent study utilizing the IMAGE sample failed to observe such an association among children diagnosed with the combined ADHD subtype (Xu et al. 2008). This would suggest that additional variables need to be identified that can explain the heterogeneity in effect sizes for the 5HTTLPR-ADHD association.
In addition to the 5HTTLPR, a 17-bp repeat in intron 2 (STin2) and a SNP in the 3′ UTR (rs3813034) of 5HTT have been repeatedly studied in relation to childhood ADHD. The STin2 has been shown to act as a transcription regulator with the 12-repeat allele demonstrating enhanced transcription relative to the 10-repeat allele (Fiskerstrand et al. 1999; MacKenzie and Quinn 1999). The function of the 3′UTR SNP is not known, though it lies within a putative polyadenylation site, and thus could influence mRNA stability (Battersby et al. 1999).
For the meta-analysis of association between childhood ADHD and the 5HTT STin2 polymorphism, two TDT (Li et al. 2007; Xu et al. 2008) and seven Case-Control/HHRR (Banerjee et al. 2006; Heiser et al. 2007; Kim et al. 2005a; Langley et al. 2003; Xu et al. 2005b; Zoroglu et al. 2002) studies were identified. Based on an initial study reporting reduced prevalence of the 12-repeat allele among children diagnosed with ADHD (Zoroglu et al. 2002), the 10-repeat allele of the STin2 polymorphism was designated as the “risk” allele. The results of the fixed-effects meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 13a, indicated no association between ADHD and the 5HTT STin2 polymorphism (fixed effects: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.92–1.10, χ2 = 0.03, P = 0.428) with no heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 4.08, P = 0.850; I 2 = 0). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study. A random-effect meta-analysis was not performed given the absence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies.
Two TDT (Kent et al. 2002; Wigg et al. 2006) and three Case-Control/HHRR (Heiser et al. 2007; Xu et al. 2005b) studies were identified for the meta-analysis of the association between childhood ADHD and the 5HTT rs3813034 3′UTR SNP. The initial study testing this association reported preferential transmission of the “T” allele to ADHD probands in a sample of 113 children (Kent et al. 2002), and thus, the “T” allele was designated as the “risk” allele in the present meta-analysis. The results, shown in Fig. 13b, indicated a non-significant and weak association between ADHD and the 5HTT rs3813034 SNP (fixed effects: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.89–1.20, χ2 = 0.23, P = 0.317; random effects: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.87–1.26, χ2 = 0.26, P = 0.304) with non-significant heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 5.71, P = 0.222; I 2 = 30). Sensitivity analyses indicated that these results did not depend on any particular study. In summary, the present review provides significant evidence of an association between ADHD and the 5HTTLPR, but failed to detect an association with the STin2 and rs3813034 polymorphisms.
Serotonin 1B receptor (HTR1B; 5HT1B)
Serotonin dysregulation has been related to impulsive and aggressive behavior in children (Halperin et al. 1997; Spivak et al. 1999), and thus has been hypothesized to play a causal role in ADHD. In addition to the serotonin transporter, a number of researchers have investigated associations between ADHD and genes that code for receptors in the serotonin system (Heiser et al. 2007; Ribases et al. 2009). The most widely studied serotonin receptor gene in relation to ADHD is the serotonin 1b receptor (HTR1B; 5-HT1B). It has been mapped to chromosome 6q13 (Jin et al. 1992) and consists of a single exon (Demchyshyn et al. 1992). HTR1B is a G protein-coupled receptor that inhibits cyclic AMP formation (Murphy et al. 1998). It is highly expressed in the dorsal raphe nucleus, which is involved in the sleep/wake cycle, and to lesser degrees in the striatum and frontal regions such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Ichikawa et al. 2005). HTR1B “knockout” mice show increased aggression and impulsive behavior (Brunner and Hen 1997; Saudou et al. 1994), fail to show the normal hyperlocomotion associated with amphetamine administration (Saudou et al. 1994), and display an increased response to novel stimuli (Malleret et al. 1999).
Given such evidence, several studies have tested for association between polymorphisms in HTR1B and ADHD. The first such study used the HHRR to test for association between a G → C transition at nucleotide position 861 (G861C; rs6296) and ADHD in a sample of 273 nuclear families, and reported significant preferential transmission of the ‘G’ allele to ADHD probands (Hawi et al. 2002). Including this study, ten independent studies were identified that tested for an association between HTR1B and ADHD, and two polymorphisms, rs6296 (G861C) and rs6298, were genotyped in a sufficient number of studies to conduct a meta-analysis. Only the results for the meta-analysis of rs6296 are presented, however, as these two polymorphisms have been shown to be in perfect LD (International HapMap Consortium 2003), a greater number of studies have tested for an association with rs6296, and those studies that genotyped rs6298 also genotyped rs6296.
For the meta-analysis of rs6296, data were available from four TDT (Brookes et al. 2006a; Ickowicz et al. 2007; Li et al. 2005; Smoller et al. 2006) and five Case-Control/HHRR (Bobb et al. 2005; Guan et al. 2008; Hawi et al. 2002; Heiser et al. 2007; Ribases et al. 2009) studies. Based on the initial study (Hawi et al. 2002), the ‘G’ allele was designated as the ‘risk’ allele. Results of this meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 14, indicated a modest but significant association between ADHD and the HTR1B rs6296 “G” allele (fixed effects: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02–1.20, χ2 = 5.45, P = 0.010) with no heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 7.92, P = 0.441; I 2 = 0). A random effects meta-analysis was not conducted given the absence of heterogeneity across studies. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study, as these remained very similar with the exclusion of each study in turn, including the first study and the studies with the highest and the lowest odds ratios. Thus, the present review provides significant evidence suggesting an association between childhood ADHD and HTR1B.
Serotonin 2A receptor (HTR2A; 5HT2A)
In addition to HTR1B, the serotonin 2A receptor (HTR2A; 5-HT2A) has received significant attention as a candidate gene for ADHD. HTR2A has been mapped to chromosome 13q15-q21 (Sparkes et al. 1991) and consists of three exons (Chen et al. 1992). It codes for a G-coupled protein that serves to stimulate phospholipase C activity, which leads to increased protein kinase C activity (Lesch 2001). HTR2A is highly expressed throughout the cortex as well as in regions such as the hippocampus, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens (Dwivedi and Pandey 1998). Evidence suggesting the involvement of HTR2A in ADHD comes from studies demonstrating that the inhibition of serotonin 2A receptors attenuates the increases in dopamine activity and hyper-locomotion caused by amphetamine administration (O’Neill et al. 1999) and anti-psychotic medications such as clozapine (Martin et al. 1998).
Three polymorphisms in HTR2A have been studied in relation to a number of psychiatric conditions (see Norton and Owen 2005 for a review). These include a nonsynonymous C → T transition at nucleotide 1,354 in exon 3 that leads to a histidine to tyrosine change (rs6314 or His452Tyr) (Erdmann et al. 1996; Ozaki et al. 1996), a silent T → C polymorphism at nucleotide position +102 (rs6313) (Warren et al. 1992), and an A → G polymorphism that is 1,438 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site (rs6311). The first study to test for association between ADHD and HTR2A genotyped rs6313 and rs6314 in a sample of 143 parent–child trios selected for ADHD (Quist et al. 2000). The authors reported preferential transmission of the ‘T’ allele of rs6314 to ADHD probands using the TDT, but detected no evidence of association to rs6313. Since this initial report, nine additional studies were identified that tested for an association between HTR2A and ADHD using one or more of the polymorphisms described. Thus, sufficient data were provided to conduct meta-analyses of all three SNPs.
For the meta-analysis of the association between ADHD and rs6314 (His452Tyr), two TDT (Brookes et al. 2006a; Quist et al. 2000) and four Case-Control/HHRR (Bobb et al. 2005; Guimares et al. 2007; Hawi et al. 2002; Heiser et al. 2007) studies were identified. Based on the initial report (Quist et al. 2000), the ‘T’ allele was designated as the ‘risk’ allele. The results for this meta-analysis (Fig. 15a) were non-significant (fixed effects: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.86–1.21, χ2 = 0.07, P = 0.392; random effects: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.82–1.34, χ2 = 0.16, P = 0.343) with moderate but nonsignificant evidence of heterogeneity (Q-statistic χ2 = 8.71, P = 0.121; I 2 = 42). Sensitivity analyses for this polymorphism, as well as similar analyses conducted for each of the polymorphisms described below, indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study, as these remained very similar with the exclusion of each study in turn, including the first study and the studies with the highest and lowest odds ratios.
Population genetic data have suggested that rs6313 and rs6311 are in near perfect linkage disequilibrium (International HapMap Consortium 2003), which would indicate that these markers would provide redundant information in tests of association. Nonetheless, there was imperfect overlap in ADHD association studies that genotyped these two polymorphisms, and thus meta-analyses were conducted for the association of ADHD with each marker. For rs6313, three TDT (Brookes et al. 2006a; Li et al. 2006b; Quist et al. 2000) and three Case-Control/HHRR (Bobb et al. 2005; Heiser et al. 2007; Zoroglu et al. 2003) studies were identified. Given that no previous studies had reported a significant association between this polymorphism and ADHD, no ‘risk’ allele was indicated. The results of the meta-analysis (shown in Fig. 15b) were nonsignificant (fixed effects: OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.86–1.06, χ2 = 0.77, two-tailed P = 0.379). No evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies was observed (Q-statistic χ2 = 3.36, P = 0.644; I 2 = 0), and as a result a random effects meta-analysis was not performed. For rs6311, two TDT (Brookes et al. 2006a; Li et al. 2006b) and four Case-Control/HHRR (Bobb et al. 2005; Guimares et al. 2007; Heiser et al. 2007; Zoroglu et al. 2003) studies were identified with no ‘risk’ allele indicated, given the lack of previous evidence suggesting an association between this polymorphism and ADHD. Similar to the results for rs6313, the results of this meta-analysis (Fig. 15c) were non-significant (fixed effects: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.94–1.14, χ2 = 0.57, two-tailed P = 0.449) with no evidence for heterogeneity (Q-statistic χ2 = 2.97, P = 0.705; I 2 = 0). Thus, the present meta-analytic results do not suggest an association between childhood ADHD and HTR2A.
Tryptophan hydroxylase genes (TPH1 and TPH2)
Tryptophan hydroxylase catalyzes tryptophan to 5-hydroxytryptophan (5HT), which is subsequently decarboxylated to form the neurotransmitter serotonin. Thus, tryptophan hydroxylase is the rate-limiting enzyme in the production of serotonin. Two isoforms of tryptophan hydroxylase have been identified. The first is coded by the gene TPH1, which has been mapped to chromosome 11p15.3-p14 (Craig et al. 1991). This gene was originally believed to be totally responsible for tryptophan hydroxylase expression in the brain, thus was studied as a candidate gene for mood disorders (see Oswald et al. 2004 for a review) as well as impulsivity and aggressiveness (Roy and Linnoila 1988) and ADHD (Brookes et al. 2006a; Tang et al. 2001). More recent data suggest a second isoform coded by the gene TPH2, located on chromosome 12q21.1, is responsible for tryptophan hydroxylase expression in the brain (Walther et al. 2003). Thus, recent association studies of ADHD have focused on TPH2 rather than TPH1.
Several studies tested for an association between TPH1 and ADHD before it was discovered that this gene is not responsible for tryptophan hydroxylase expression in the brain. These studies largely focused on a silent A → C transition in intron 7 of the gene (rs1800532). Two TDT (Brookes et al. 2006a; Li et al. 2006c) and two Case-Control/HHRR (Ribases et al. 2009; Tang et al. 2001) studies were identified that tested for an association between this SNP and childhood ADHD and were appropriate for meta-analysis. Because the initial studies investigating this association reported negative results, a ‘risk’ allele was not indicated. The results of this meta-analysis (shown in Fig. 16) did not support an association between rs1800532 and ADHD (fixed effects: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.89–1.10, χ2 = 0.06, two-tailed P = 0.813; random effects: OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.83–1.12, χ2 = 0.19, two-tailed P = 0.662), though there was moderate but non-significant evidence of heterogeneity (Q-statistic χ2 = 5.10, P = 0.164; I 2 = 41). Thus, the present meta-analysis is not suggestive of an association between ADHD and TPH1.
Despite stronger evidence supporting a role for TPH2 involvement in the etiology of ADHD, evidence for its association with ADHD has been relatively mixed. Two initial studies supported a relation between ADHD and TPH2, with one study reporting an association with two SNPs located in the promoter region (Walitza et al. 2005), and a second study reporting an association with SNPs in introns 5 and 8 (Sheehan et al. 2005). Sufficient data were available to conduct meta-analyses of the association between ADHD and two SNPs in intron 5 (rs1843809 and rs1386493).
For rs1843809, data were available from four TDT studies (Brookes et al. 2006a; Mick et al. unpublished data; Sheehan et al. 2005, 2007). Based on the initial report, the T allele was designated as the ‘risk’ allele (Sheehan et al. 2005). Results of the meta-analysis (Fig. 17a) were nonsignificant (fixed effects: OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.82–1.12, χ2 = 0.26, P = 0.696; random effects: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.73–1.82, χ2 = 0.35, P = 0.276) though significant and substantial heterogeneity in effect sizes was observed across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 19.46, P = 0.0002; I 2 = 84). A review of the forest plot depicting these effect sizes (Fig. 17a) suggested that this heterogeneity was largely due to the significant associations of Sheehan et al. (2005) and Brookes et al. (2006a) that were reported for opposing alleles. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the Sheehan et al. (2005) study provided the largest contribution to the observed heterogeneity as removing this study from the analysis reduced the Q-statistic to nonsignificance (Q-statistic χ2 = 5.46, P = 0.065; I 2 = 63) though removing the Brookes et al. (2006a) study also led to a substantial reduction in heterogeneity (Q-statistic χ2 = 7.35, P = 0.025; I 2 = 73). Further, removing the Sheehan et al. (2005) study yielded little change in the evidence for association (random effects: OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.66–1.25, χ2 = 0.34, P = 0.720), whereas removing the Brookes et al. (2006a) study yielded evidence for association that approached a statistical trend (random effects: OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 0.84–2.29, χ2 = 1.61, P = 0.102). Nonetheless, these findings should be interpreted with caution given that they are based on just three studies.
Similar results were obtained for the meta-analysis of the association between ADHD and rs1386493. The ‘T’ allele was designated as the high-risk allele based on the single study that reported a significant association between this SNP and ADHD (Brookes et al. 2006a). The same four TDT studies included in the meta-analysis for rs1843809 also provided appropriate data for this meta-analysis (Brookes et al. 2006a; Mick et al. unpublished data; Sheehan et al. 2005, 2007). The results, shown in Fig. 17b, were again nonsignificant (fixed effects: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.96–1.30, χ2 = 2.20, P = 0.069; random effects: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.77–1.40, χ2 = 0.06, P = 0.400) though there was a trend towards an association for the fixed effects analysis. Notably, however, substantial evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes was again observed across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 9.76, P = 0.021; I 2 = 69) that was largely due to the significant associations of Sheehan et al. (2005) and Brookes et al. (2006a) that were reported for opposing alleles (Fig. 17b). Sensitivity analyses suggested that the Brookes et al. (2006a) and Sheehan et al. (2005) studies both provided substantial contributions to the observed heterogeneity as removing either study from the analysis reduced the Q-statistic to non-significance (Brookes et al. (2006a) removed: Q-statistic χ2 = 2.58, P = 0.274; I 2 = 22; Sheehan et al. (2005) removed: Q-statistic χ2 = 3.49, P = 0.174; I 2 = 43). Further, removing the Sheehan et al. (2005) study resulted in a trend for association (random effects: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.93–1.49, χ2 = 1.92, P = 0.083), whereas removing the Brookes et al. (2006a) study yielded little change in the evidence for association (random effects: OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.71–1.17, χ2 = 0.54, P = 0.769). These results should be interpreted cautiously, however, given that like those described for rs1843809, they are based on three studies.
The observed heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies for the two meta-analyzed TPH2 SNPs makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions regarding the relation between ADHD and TPH2. Given that studies have reported significant evidence for association with specific SNPs but with opposing alleles, it is possible that a susceptibility locus for ADHD lies within or near TPH2 that is in partial linkage disequilibrium with the meta-analyzed SNPs. Thus, further research is necessary to explore a potential ADHD-TPH2 association.
Monoamine oxidase A (MAOA)
The monoamine oxidase genes are contiguous to one another on chromosome Xp11.23 (Lan et al. 1989) and encode enzymes involved in the metabolism of dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. Given that each of these neurotransmitters is thought to play a role in ADHD, the two monoamine oxidase genes, MAOA and MAOB, are interesting candidates for association with ADHD. Further, treatment studies have suggested that monoamine oxidase inhibitors can reduce ADHD symptom levels (Zametkin et al. 1985). More specific support for MAOA as a candidate gene for ADHD comes from a linkage study conducted in a large Dutch family demonstrating a relation between MAOA and impulsive, aggressive behavior (Brunner et al. 1993). In addition, an MAOA knockout mouse has been shown to display increased levels of aggressive behavior associated with increased levels of monoaminergic neurotransmitter levels (Cases et al. 1998). Given such evidence, MAOA has received more attention as a candidate gene for ADHD then MAOB.
Initial association studies of ADHD and MAOA focused on a dinculeotide repeat near MAOA, and while both studies reported significant evidence of an association, a different allele was associated with ADHD in each study (Jiang et al. 2001; Payton et al. 2001). Recent studies have focused largely on a functional 30-bp VNTR 1.2 kb upstream of the gene that has been previously associated with impulsivity and aggression (Caspi et al. 2002; Manuck et al. 2000). This polymorphism consists of alleles of 2, 3, 3.5, 4, and 5 copies with evidence suggesting the 2 and 3 repeat alleles are less efficiently transcribed than the longer alleles (Deckert et al. 1999), though there is some evidence to suggest that the 5 allele also results in less efficient transcription (Meyer-Lindenberg et al. 2006; Sabol et al. 1998). Nonetheless, the majority of studies testing for association between this polymorphism and ADHD have relied on the classification system described by Deckert et al. (1999) in which the 2- and 3-repeat alleles are considered ‘low-activity’ alleles and the 3.5-, 4-, and 5-repeat alleles are considered ‘high-activity’ alleles.
Three TDT (Domschke et al. 2005; Manor et al. 2002b; Xu et al. 2007a) and three Case-Control/HHRR (Das et al. 2006; Lawson et al. 2003; Lung et al. 2006) studies were identified for meta-analysis that had tested for an association between this MAOA VNTR and ADHD. Based on the initial study of this association (Manor et al. 2002b), the 3.5-, 4-, and 5- repeat alleles were designated as the ‘risk’ alleles and contrasted against the 2- and 3-repeat alleles. Results, shown in Fig. 18, indicated a non-significant and weak association between ADHD and the high activity alleles (fixed effects: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.84–1.24, χ2 = 0.04, P = 0.424; random effects: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.72–1.43, χ2 = 0.01, P = 0.464) with substantial heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 15.28, P = 0.009; I 2 = 67). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study, as these remained very similar with the exclusion of each study in turn, including the first study and the studies with the highest and lowest odds ratios.
Based on these results, a priority for future research is investigating sources of the heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies. Notably, a potential gene × environment interaction has been reported regarding the association between aggression and the MAOA VNTR. These studies suggested that the relation between experiencing maltreatment as a child and subsequently engaging in antisocial behavior in adolescence and adulthood was moderated by MAOA genotype at this locus (Caspi et al. 2002; Manuck et al. 2000). Specifically, individuals with the ‘low-activity’ alleles (i.e., 2- and 3-repeats) showed a stronger relation between childhood maltreatment and subsequent antisocial behavior than individuals with the ‘high-activity’ alleles (i.e., 3.5-, 4-, and 5-repeats). These studies suggest that environmental variables could moderate the association between ADHD and MAOA, thus explaining some of the heterogeneity in effect sizes observed in the present meta-analysis.
Cholinergic pathway
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor 4 (CHRNA4)
Several lines of evidence have suggested a relation between the nicotinic neurotransmitter system and ADHD symptoms. For example, nicotine administration has been shown to improve attention and working memory deficits in adults diagnosed with ADHD (Levin 2002) and nicotine agonists have been shown to reduce ADHD symptom severity (Wilens et al. 2006). In addition, nicotine administration has been shown to significantly alter dopamine activity and produce increased locomotor activity in genetically intact mice (Fung and Lau 1988; Grady et al. 1992) and DAT1 knockout-mice (Weiss et al. 2007a; Weiss et al. 2007b). Given such evidence, researchers have begun to examine different aspects of the nicotinergic system and nicotine receptors specifically, with the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α4 subunit gene (CHRNA4) receiving the most attention thus far.
CHRNA4 has been mapped to chromosome 20q13.2, and is highly expressed in the frontal lobes (Steinlein et al. 1995). Kent et al. (2001) conducted the first study to test for linkage and association between CHRNA4 and ADHD. Using a TDT, they reported negative evidence of association between ADHD and a single polymorphism in exon 5 of the gene in a sample of 70 children diagnosed with ADHD. More recent studies have focused on two SNPs in exon 5 of the gene (rs2273506 and rs6090384) (Bobb et al. 2005; Todd et al. 2003), though additional studies have conducted more thorough screens of CHRNA4 using SNPs spanning the length of the gene (Brookes et al. 2006a; Guan et al. 2008; Lee et al. 2008).
Three TDT (Brookes et al. 2006a; Lee et al. 2008; Todd et al. 2003) and two Case-Control/HHRR (Bobb et al. 2005; Guan et al. 2008) studies were identified for the present meta-analysis of association between childhood ADHD and CHRNA4. These five studies included tests of association with one or more of the exon 5 SNPs in CHRNA4 described above (rs2273506 and rs6090304). For the meta-analysis of rs2273506, the ‘T’ allele was designated as the risk allele based on the initial report (Todd et al. 2003). The results (Fig. 19a) suggested a trend towards an association with ADHD (fixed effects: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.92–1.54, χ2 = 1.82, P = 0.089). There was no significant evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 2.34, P = 0.504; I 2 = 0), thus a random effects meta-analysis was not conducted. A sensitivity analysis indicated that the trend for an association between ADHD and rs2273506 was largely driven by a single study (Todd et al. 2003), as removal of this study reduced the trend towards association to nonsignificance (fixed effects: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.83–1.45, χ2 = 0.44, P = 0.258).
For the meta-analysis of rs6090384 (Fig. 19b), the ‘T’ allele was designated as the ‘risk’ allele again based on the initial report (Todd et al. 2003). The results of this meta-analysis also suggested a trend towards association with childhood ADHD (fixed effects: OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.92–1.72, χ2 = 2.04, P = 0.076; random effects: OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 0.89–1.84, χ2 = 1.76, P = 0.093) with no significant evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 3.91, P = 0.271; I 2 = 23). Sensitivity analyses indicated this association reached significance after removing the Brookes et al. (2006a) study (random effects: OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 0.96–2.17, χ2 = 3.15, P = 0.038), though removing any of the other studies reduced the trend to non-significance (data not shown). It is likely that the fluctuations in the significance of this association observed in the sensitivity analyses were influenced by the small number of studies included in the meta-analysis.
In summary, the present review suggests a possible association between childhood ADHD and CHRNA4. These results should be interpreted with caution, however, given that only four studies were included in the meta-analyses of both CHRNA4 SNPs. Nonetheless, CHRNA4 continues to represent an interesting candidate gene for ADHD given the suggested associations between the nicotinergic neurotransmitter system and ADHD.
Nervous system development pathways
Synaptosomal-associated protein 25 gene (SNAP-25)
Recent studies testing for genetic influences that underlie ADHD have begun to consider candidate genes outside of the major neurotransmitter systems. Like the candidate genes discussed thus far, these genes are typically selected based on their function and the plausibility of their putative etiological role for ADHD. SNAP-25, which has been mapped to chromosome 20p11.2 (Maglott et al. 1996), is an example of such a gene that has received considerable attention in relation to ADHD. It codes for a protein involved in axonal growth and synaptic plasticity, as well as in the docking and fusion of synaptic vesicles in presynaptic neurons necessary for the regulation of neurotransmitter release (Sollner et al. 1993). The coloboma mouse strain, which has been bred lacking one copy of the SNAP-25 gene following a radiation-induced deletion, displays hyperactive behavior and provides a potential animal model of ADHD (Hess et al. 1992).
Several studies have tested for linkage and association between SNAP-25 and ADHD, and these studies have consistently genotyped multiple SNPs within the gene rather than focusing on any single polymorphism. As a result, seven polymorphisms within or near SNAP-25 were included in four studies as required for meta-analysis in the present review. To aid in the presentation of the data, only the meta-analytic results for four SNPs that were genotyped in five or more studies were included in the present review of the association between childhood ADHD and SNAP-25. These include rs362987 located in intron 4, rs363006 located in intron 6, rs3746544 in the 3′UTR, and rs1051312 also in the 3′UTR. The three SNPs not included are rs1889189 located in the 5′ flanking region, rs6039806 located in intron 2, and rs8636 located in the 3′UTR, all of which yielded nonsignificant results, though significant heterogeneity was observed in the effect sizes across studies for rs6039806 (data not shown).
For the meta-analysis of the association between ADHD and rs362987, four TDT studies (Brookes et al. 2006a; Feng et al. 2005a; Kim et al. 2007) and one Case-Control/HHRR study (Guan et al. 2008) were identified. Given the significant association reported in the initial study examining this relation (Feng et al. 2005a), the ‘A’ allele was designated as the risk allele. The results of the meta-analysis (Fig. 20a) were nonsignificant (fixed effects: OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.90–1.12, χ2 = 0.01, P = 0.461; random effects: OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.84–1.18, χ2 = 0.00, P = 0.488), though there was suggestive evidence of heterogeneity in the effect sizes observed across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 7.80, P = 0.099; I 2 = 49). The meta-analysis for rs363006 (Fig. 20b) included five TDT (Brookes et al. 2006a; Feng et al. 2005a; Kim et al. 2007; Renner et al. 2008) and two Case-Control/HHRR studies (Guan et al. 2008; Mill et al. 2004b), and also yielded nonsignificant results (‘G’ allele—fixed effects: OR = 0.98 95% CI = 0.86–1.11, χ2 = 0.10, P = 0.626; random effects: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.86–1.15, χ2 = 0.01, P = 0.547). No significant heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies was observed for the meta-analysis of rs363006 (Q-statistic χ2 = 6.94, P = 0.326; I 2 = 14). Sensitivity analyses for these polymorphisms indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study.
In contrast to these negative results, the analysis of rs3746544, which lies in the 3′UTR, provided significant evidence supporting an association between ADHD and SNAP-25. Four TDT studies (Feng et al. 2005a; Kim et al. 2007; Kustanovich et al. 2003) and three Case-Control/HHRR studies (Brophy et al. 2002; Choi et al. 2007; Mill et al. 2004b) were identified for this meta-analysis. Given that previous studies had not reported a significant association between this polymorphism and ADHD, a ‘risk’ allele was not designated. Nonetheless, the results of the meta-analysis, shown in Fig. 20c, provided evidence of a significant association between ADHD and the ‘T’ allele of rs3746544 (fixed effects: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.01–1.31, χ2 = 4.71, two-tailed P = 0.030) with no evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 2.69, P = 0.847; I 2 = 0). Due to this lack of heterogeneity a random effects meta-analysis was not conducted for this association. Sensitivity analyses for rs3746544 indicated that the significance of this result did not depend on any particular study.
It is interesting to note that a nearby SNP also in the 3′UTR of SNAP-25 failed to support an association with ADHD. Four TDT (Feng et al. 2005a; Kim et al. 2007; Kustanovich et al. 2003) and two Case-Control/HHRR (Brophy et al. 2002; Mill et al. 2004b) studies were identified that examined the association between ADHD and rs1051312. Based on the original report (Brophy et al. 2002), the ‘T’ allele was designated as the ‘risk’ allele. Results of the meta-analysis (Fig. 20d) were nonsignificant (fixed effects: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.89–1.18, χ2 = 0.14, P = 0.356; random effects: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.86–1.31, χ2 = 0.30, P = 0.298). Nonetheless, moderate evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies that approached significance was observed (Q-statistic χ2 = 9.70, P = 0.084; I 2 = 48). Sensitivity analyses suggested that the largest contribution to the observed heterogeneity came from the Brophy et al. (2002) study given that removal of this study substantially reduced the significance of the Q-statistic (χ2 = 3.38, P = 0.497; I 2 = 0), as well as reducing the evidence for association between this polymorphism and ADHD (random effects: OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.85–1.14, χ2 = 0.07, P = 0.602).
In summary, several studies have comprehensively tested for association between SNAP-25 and ADHD with multiple polymorphisms spanning the length of the gene. Among these polymorphisms, the 3′UTR SNP rs3746544 yielded evidence of a modest but significant association between childhood ADHD and SNAP-25. Thus, further studies are needed to determine whether rs3746544 represents the functional variant underlying this association or whether another polymorphism in strong linkage disequilibrium with rs3746544 is responsible for the reported association.
Brain derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF)
The brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) has been mapped to chromosome 11p13 (Maisonpierre et al. 1991). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor belongs to a family of proteins, known as neurotrophins, involved in promoting neurogenesis, neuronal survival, and synaptic plasticity (Mattson 2008). BDNF has been shown to influence the mesolimbic and corticolimbic reward pathways in the brain by modulating their response to dopamine (Guillin et al. 2001). In addition, BDNF has been shown to enhance the effects of stimulants on these dopaminergic pathways (Hall et al. 2003; Horger et al. 1999) making it an interesting candidate gene for ADHD (Tsai 2003).
A common polymorphism resulting in a valine to methionine amino acid substitution at codon 66 (Val66Met; rs6265) has been identified in BDNF that has been shown to influence the intracellular trafficking and activity-dependent secretion of BDNF in brain (Chen et al. 2004; Egan et al. 2003). Four TDT (Brookes et al. 2006a; Kent et al. 2005; Lee et al. 2007; Schimmelmann et al. 2007) and four Case-Control/HHRR (Friedel et al. 2005; Guan et al. 2008; Xu et al. 2007b) studies were identified for meta-analysis that tested for association between this Val66Met polymorphism and ADHD. Based on previous research (Egan et al. 2003; Kent et al. 2005), the ‘G’ or Valine allele was designated as the ‘risk’ allele. Results of this meta-analysis, shown in Figure 21, were nonsignificant (fixed effects: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.91–1.12, χ2 = 0.02, P = 0.406). There was no evidence of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (Q-statistic χ2 = 6.31, P = 0.504; I 2 = 0), thus a random effects meta-analysis was not conducted. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled estimates of effect size and their significance did not depend on any particular study. Thus, the present meta-analysis does not support an association between ADHD and the Val66Met polymorphism in BDNF. It should also be noted that despite an initial report suggesting that the Val66Met polymorphism was associated with ADHD only through paternal inheritance (Kent et al. 2005), subsequent studies failed to replicate this result (Lee et al. 2007; Schimmelmann et al. 2007). Thus, there is currently little evidence to suggest a relation between ADHD and BDNF.
Discussion
Several polymorphisms in candidate genes were associated with childhood ADHD, including several markers in the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems, and suggested associations in CHRNA4 and SNAP25. The associated markers included SNPs as well as VNTRs some of which lay within coding regions and others within regulatory regions, though further research is needed to determine if these markers represent true causal variants as their function generally remains unknown. Heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies characterized several of the reviewed markers, including some that showed significant evidence for association and others that did not. This highlights the need for future studies that examine differences in sample and methodological characteristics that can explain such heterogeneity and point to ways of maximizing associations.
Significant associations with candidate gene polymorphisms in this review were modest in magnitude, with Odds ratios ranging from 1.12 to 1.33. There are several possible reasons why the effect sizes for associations between childhood ADHD and candidate gene polymorphisms are so modest. First, related to the point above, heterogeneity both within and across studies in sample characteristics or important methodological features may result in a dilution of the true effect size by mixing together samples in which the association is strong with those in which it is weak or non-existent. Studies may differ considerably in methodological rigor and quality in ways that could have a significant impact on their likelihood of detecting a significant association and the estimation of its magnitude. Along these lines, very few studies reported any quality control analyses other than tests of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, and many studies omitted such tests or reported their results in a cursory fashion (e.g., whether or not they were significant). Researchers should endeavor to provide additional psychometric data on their assessment procedures (e.g., reliability and validity) and analyses of the quality of the genotyping conducted. The latter might include call rates, similarity of obtained allele frequencies to those in public databases (e.g., the International HapMap Consortium 2003), and repeated genotyping consistency.
Second, all of the associations we meta-analyzed and reviewed herein were for single polymorphisms in genes. It is conceivable that while any single genetic marker confers only a small risk for disorder, considering multiple markers in a gene in tandem may result in larger effects. Although researchers have begun genotyping multiple markers in candidate genes, analyses of association are typically conducted on each marker singly (and occasionally in haplotypes). Use of recently developed multilocus tests of association between a disorder or trait and multiple markers across a gene may yield more substantial effect sizes and stronger evidence for association (Xu et al. 2006).
Third, it is possible that our best guesses regarding candidate genes for ADHD based on their function and perceived etiological relevance are just not good enough. Many psychiatric and medical genetics researchers have become profoundly skeptical of the candidate gene approach given the plethora of associations that have failed to replicate despite highly plausible etiological relevance and the enthusiasm over positive results from an initial study. This has led many to invest more strongly in genome wide association scans (GWAS), of which the first few for ADHD are beginning to appear (see review by Franke et al. 2009, this issue). It is possible that associations with the positional candidates that emerge from such exploratory searches will be more replicable and show stronger effects than the functional candidate genes that have been studied to date. Consistent with this, replicable associations were found for three of the functional candidate genes (5HTT, DAT1, and SLC6A2) that have also emerged as positional candidates from extant genome scans of ADHD. Promising positional candidates (e.g., DOCK3) and positional/functional hybrid candidates (e.g., SLC9A9, CDH13) are beginning to be investigated in association studies of ADHD. Nonetheless, it also is quite possible that any genes that we find to be associated with ADHD will have similarly small effect sizes, in keeping with the multifactorial polygenic etiology that is thought to characterize ADHD and other psychiatric disorders. This possibility only highlights the need for much larger sample sizes than those that currently characterize association studies of ADHD. Such samples, both from single sites and from multi-site studies that are becoming the norm in psychiatric and medical genetics, will greatly facilitate the detection of replicable associations and more accurate estimation of the magnitude of risk conferred, as well as allow us to leave behind genes that while plausible candidates are not borne out by the empirical evidence.
The present study attempted to provide a quantitative review of frequently studied candidate gene polymorphisms for ADHD. Though meta-analysis provides a rigorous method for integrating findings for commonly studied candidate genes, this approach cannot be applied to genes that have only recently been suggested as candidates or have been under-studied to this point. Thus, several genes that have shown promising evidence for association with childhood ADHD could not be included in the present review. For example, dopa decarboxylase (DDC), which is involved in dopamine and serotonin synthesis, has been associated with childhood ADHD in several studies (Brookes et al. 2006a; Guan et al. 2008; Hawi et al. 2001; Ribases et al. 2009), but these studies have used largely non-overlapping SNP sets to test for association. Similarly, genes such as the dopamine D1 receptor gene (DRD1; Misener et al., 2004; Bobb et al., 2005), the dopamine D1 receptor interacting protein gene (DRD1IP; CALCYON—Laurin et al., 2005), and the serotonin 1D receptor gene (HTR1D—Li et al. 2006d; Ribases et al. 2009) are promising candidates given significant evidence of association with ADHD in preliminary reports. While we have tried to quantitatively summarize the current findings from candidate gene studies of ADHD, future meta-analytic reviews will be necessary as investigations of the genes that underlie ADHD continue to progress.
References
Achenbach TM, Edelbrock CS (1979) The child behavior profile: II. Boys aged 12–16 and girls aged 6–11 and 12–16. J Consult Clin Psychol 47:223–233
American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC
Andersen PH, Gingrich JA, Bates MD, Dearry A, Falardeau P, Senogles SE, Caron MG (1990) Dopamine receptor subtypes: beyond the D1/D2 classification. Trends Pharmacol Sci 11:231–236
Andrews GD, Lavin A (2006) Methylphenidate increases cortical excitability via activation of alpha-2 noradrenergic receptors. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:594–601
Arcos-Burgos M, Castellanos FX, Konecki D, Lopera F, Pineda D, Palacio JD, Rapoport JL, Berg K, Bailey-Wilson J, Muenke M (2004a) Pedigree disequilibrium test (PDT) replicates association and linkage between DRD4 and ADHD in multigenerational and extended pedigrees from a genetic isolate. Mol Psychiatry 9:252–259
Arcos-Burgos M, Castellanos FX, Pineda D, Lopera F, Palacio JD, Palacio LG, Rapoport JL, Berg K, Bailey-Wilson JE, Muenke M (2004b) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a population isolate: linkage to loci at 4q13.2, 5q33.3, 11q22, and 17p11. Am J Hum Genet 75:998–1014
Arnsten AF (2006) Fundamentals of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: circuits and pathways. J Clin Psychiatry 67(Suppl 8):7–12
Arnsten AF, Li BM (2005) Neurobiology of executive functions: catecholamine influences on prefrontal cortical functions. Biol Psychiatry 57:1377–1384
Asghari V, Schoots O, van Kats S, Ohara K, Jovanovic V, Guan HC, Bunzow JR, Petronis A, Van Tol HH (1994) Dopamine D4 receptor repeat: analysis of different native and mutant forms of the human and rat genes. Mol Pharmacol 46:364–373
Asghari V, Sanyal S, Buchwaldt S, Paterson A, Jovanovic V, Van Tol HH (1995) Modulation of intracellular cyclic AMP levels by different human dopamine D4 receptor variants. J Neurochem 65:1157–1165
Asherson P, Brookes K, Franke B, Chen W, Gill M, Ebstein RP, Buitelaar J, Banaschewski T, Sonuga-Barke E, Eisenberg J, Manor I, Miranda A, Oades RD, Roeyers H, Rothenberger A, Sergeant J, Steinhausen HC, Faraone SV (2007) Confirmation that a specific haplotype of the dopamine transporter gene is associated with combined-type ADHD. Am J Psychiatry 164:674–677
Bakker SC, van der Meulen EM, Oteman N, Schelleman H, Pearson PL, Buitelaar JK, Sinke RJ (2005) DAT1, DRD4, and DRD5 polymorphisms are not associated with ADHD in Dutch families. Am J Med Genet B 132B:50–52
Banerjee E, Sinha S, Chatterjee A, Gangopadhyay PK, Singh M, Nandagopal K (2006) A family-based study of Indian subjects from Kolkata reveals allelic association of the serotonin transporter intron-2 (STin2) polymorphism and attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Am J Med Genet B 141B:361–366
Banoei MM, Majidizadeh T, Shirazi E, Moghimi N, Ghadiri M, Najmabadi H, Ohadi M (2008) No association between the DAT1 10-repeat allele and ADHD in the Iranian population. Am J Med Genet B 147B:110–111
Barr CL, Wigg K, Malone M, Schachar R, Tannock R, Roberts W, Kennedy JL (1999) Linkage study of catechol-O-methyltransferase and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet 88:710–713
Barr CL, Wigg KG, Feng Y, Zai G, Malone M, Roberts W, Schachar R, Tannock R, Kennedy JL (2000a) Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and the gene for the dopamine D5 receptor. Mol Psychiatry 5:548–551
Barr CL, Wigg KG, Wu J, Zai C, Bloom S, Tannock R, Roberts W, Malone M, Schachar R, Kennedy JL (2000b) Linkage study of two polymorphisms at the dopamine D3 receptor gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet 96:114–117
Barr CL, Feng Y, Wigg KG, Schachar R, Tannock R, Roberts W, Malone M, Kennedy JL (2001) 5′-untranslated region of the dopamine D4 receptor gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet 105:84–90
Barr CL, Kroft J, Feng Y, Wigg K, Roberts W, Malone M, Ickowicz A, Schachar R, Tannock R, Kennedy JL (2002) The norepinephrine transporter gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet 114:255–259
Battersby S, Ogilvie AD, Blackwood DH, Shen S, Muqit MM, Muir WJ, Teague P, Goodwin GM, Harmar AJ (1999) Presence of multiple functional polyadenylation signals and a single nucleotide polymorphism in the 3′ untranslated region of the human serotonin transporter gene. J Neurochem 72:1384–1388
Becker K, El-Faddagh M, Schmidt MH, Esser G, Laucht M (2008) Interaction of dopamine transporter genotype with prenatal smoke exposure on ADHD symptoms. J Pediatr 152:263–269
Beischlag TV, Marchese A, Meador-Woodruff JH, Damask SP, O’Dowd BF, Tyndale RF, van Tol HH, Seeman P, Niznik HB (1995) The human dopamine D5 receptor gene: cloning and characterization of the 5′-flanking and promoter region. Biochemistry (Mosc) 34:5960–5970
Beitchman J, Davidge KM, Kennedy JL, Atkinson L, Lee V, Shapiro S, Douglas L (2003) The serotonin transporter gene in aggressive children with and without ADHD and nonaggressive matched controls. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1008:248–251
Bellgrove MA, Hawi Z, Lowe N, Kirley A, Robertson IH, Gill M (2005) DRD4 gene variants and sustained attention in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): effects of associated alleles at the VNTR and -521 SNP. Am J Med Genet B 136B:81–86
Beninger RJ, Banasikowski TJ (2008) Dopaminergic mechanism of reward-related incentive learning: focus on the dopamine D(3) receptor. Neurotox Res 14:57–70
Benjamin J, Li L, Patterson C, Greenberg B, Murphy D, Hamer D (1996) Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of Novelty Seeking. Nat Genet 12:81–84
Bhaduri N, Mukhopadhyay K (2006) Lack of significant association between −1021C → T polymorphism in the dopamine beta hydroxylase gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci Lett 402:12–16
Bhaduri N, Das M, Sinha S, Chattopadhyay A, Gangopadhyay PK, Chaudhuri K, Singh M, Mukhopadhyay K (2006) Association of dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) polymorphisms with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Indian population. Am J Med Genet B 141B:61–66
Biederman J, Faraone SV (2002) Current concepts on the neurobiology of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Attent Disorders 6(Suppl 1):S7–S16
Biederman J, Kim JW, Doyle AE, Mick E, Fagerness J, Smoller JW, Faraone SV (2008) Sexually dimorphic effects of four genes (COMT, SLC6A2, MAOA, SLC6A4) in genetic associations of ADHD: a preliminary study. Am J Med Genet B 147B:1511–1518
Blum K, Noble EP, Sheridan PJ, Montgomery A, Ritchie T, Jagadeeswaran P, Nogami H, Briggs AH, Cohn JB (1990) Allelic association of human dopamine D2 receptor gene in alcoholism. JAMA 263:2055–2060
Bobb AJ, Addington AM, Sidransky E, Gornick MC, Lerch JP, Greenstein DK, Clasen LS, Sharp WS, Inoff-Germain G, Wavrant-De Vrieze F, Arcos-Burgos M, Straub RE, Hardy JA, Castellanos FX, Rapoport JL (2005) Support for association between ADHD and two candidate genes: NET1 and DRD1. Am J Med Genet B 134B:67–72
Bowden CL, Deutsch CK, Swanson JM (1988) Plasma dopamine-beta-hydroxylase and platelet monoamine oxidase in attention deficit disorder and conduct disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 27:171–174
Brookes KJ, Xu X, Chen CK, Huang YS, Wu YY, Asherson P (2005) No evidence for the association of DRD4 with ADHD in a Taiwanese population within-family study. BMC Med Genet 6:31
Brookes K, Xu X, Chen W, Zhou K, Neale B, Lowe N, Aneey R, Franke B, Gill M, Ebstein R, Buitelaar J, Sham P, Campbell D, Knight J, Andreou P, Altink M, Arnold R, Boer F, Buschgens C, Butler L, Christiansen H, Feldman L, Fleischman K, Fliers E, Howe-Forbes R, Goldfarb A, Heise A, Gabriels I, Korn-Lubetzki I, Marco R, Medad S, Minderaa R, Mulas F, Muller U, Mulligan A, Rabin K, Rommelse N, Sethna V, Sorohan J, Uebel H, Psychogiou L, Weeks A, Barrett R, Craig I, Banaschewski T, Sonuga-Barke E, Eisenberg J, Kuntsi J, Manor I, McGuffin P, Miranda A, Oades RD, Plomin R, Roeyers H, Rothenberger A, Sergeant J, Steinhausen HC, Taylor E, Thompson M, Faraone SV, Asherson P, Johansson L (2006a) The analysis of 51 genes in DSM-IV combined type attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: association signals in DRD4, DAT1 and 16 other genes. Mol Psychiatry 11:934–953
Brookes KJ, Mill J, Guindalini C, Curran S, Xu X, Knight J, Chen CK, Huang YS, Sethna V, Taylor E, Chen W, Breen G, Asherson P (2006b) A common haplotype of the dopamine transporter gene associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and interacting with maternal use of alcohol during pregnancy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:74–81
Brookes KJ, Neale BM, Sugden K, Khan N, Asherson P, D’Souza UM (2007) Relationship between VNTR polymorphisms of the human dopamine transporter gene and expression in post-mortem midbrain tissue. Am J Med Genet B 144B:1070–1078
Brookes KJ, Xu X, Anney R, Franke B, Zhou K, Chen W, Banaschewski T, Buitelaar J, Ebstein R, Eisenberg J, Gill M, Miranda A, Oades RD, Roeyers H, Rothenberger A, Sergeant J, Sonuga-Barke E, Steinhausen HC, Taylor E, Faraone SV, Asherson P (2008) Association of ADHD with genetic variants in the 5′-region of the dopamine transporter gene: evidence for allelic heterogeneity. Am J Med Genet B 147B:1519–1523
Brophy K, Hawi Z, Kirley A, Fitzgerald M, Gill M (2002) Synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP-25) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): evidence of linkage and association in the Irish population. Mol Psychiatry 7:913–917
Brunner D, Hen R (1997) Insights into the neurobiology of impulsive behavior from serotonin receptor knockout mice. Ann N Y Acad Sci 836:81–105
Brunner HG, Nelen M, Breakefield XO, Ropers HH, van Oost BA (1993) Abnormal behavior associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A. Science 262:578–580
Carrasco X, Rothhammer P, Moraga M, Henriquez H, Aboitiz F, Rothhammer F (2004) Presence of DRD4/7R and DAT1/10R allele in Chilean family members with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Rev Med Chil 132:1047–1052
Carrasco X, Rothhammer P, Moraga M, Henriquez H, Chakraborty R, Aboitiz F, Rothhammer F (2006) Genotypic interaction between DRD4 and DAT1 loci is a high risk factor for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Chilean families. Am J Med Genet B 141B:51–54
Cases O, Lebrand C, Giros B, Vitalis T, De Maeyer E, Caron MG, Price DJ, Gaspar P, Seif I (1998) Plasma membrane transporters of serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine mediate serotonin accumulation in atypical locations in the developing brain of monoamine oxidase A knock-outs. J Neurosci 18:6914–6927
Caspi A, McClay J, Moffitt TE, Mill J, Martin J, Craig IW, Taylor A, Poulton R (2002) Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 297:851–854
Chakravarti A (1999) Population genetics—making sense out of sequence. Nat Genet 21:56–60
Chang FM, Kidd JR, Livak KJ, Pakstis AJ, Kidd KK (1996) The world-wide distribution of allele frequencies at the human dopamine D4 receptor locus. Hum Genet 98:91–101
Chen K, Yang W, Grimsby J, Shih JC (1992) The human 5-HT2 receptor is encoded by a multiple intron-exon gene. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 14:20–26
Chen ZY, Patel PD, Sant G, Meng CX, Teng KK, Hempstead BL, Lee FS (2004) Variant brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (Met66) alters the intracellular trafficking and activity-dependent secretion of wild-type BDNF in neurosecretory cells and cortical neurons. J Neurosci 24:4401–4411
Cheuk DK, Wong V (2006) Meta-analysis of association between a catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behav Genet 36:651–659
Cheuk DK, Li SY, Wong V (2006a) Exon 3 polymorphisms of dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Chinese children. Am J Med Genet B 141B:907–911
Cheuk DK, Li SY, Wong V (2006b) No association between VNTR polymorphisms of dopamine transporter gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Chinese children. Am J Med Genet B 141B:123–125
Cho SC, Kim JW, Kim BN, Hwang JW, Park M, Kim SA, Cho DY, Yoo HJ, Chung US, Son JW, Park TW (2008a) No evidence of an association between norepinephrine transporter gene polymorphisms and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a family-based and case-control association study in a Korean sample. Neuropsychobiology 57:131–138
Cho SC, Kim JW, Kim BN, Hwang JW, Park M, Kim SA, Cho DY, Yoo HJ, Chung US, Son JW, Park TW (2008b) Possible association of the alpha-2A-adrenergic receptor gene with response time variability in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet B 147B:957–963
Choi TK, Lee HS, Kim JW, Park TW, Song DH, Yook KW, Lee SH, Kim JI, Suh SY (2007) Support for the MnlI polymorphism of SNAP25; a Korean ADHD case-control study. Mol Psychiatry 12:224–226
Ciliax BJ, Drash GW, Staley JK, Haber S, Mobley CJ, Miller GW, Mufson EJ, Mash DC, Levey AI (1999) Immunocytochemical localization of the dopamine transporter in human brain. J Comp Neurol 409:38–56
Comings DE, Comings BG, Muhleman D, Dietz G, Shahbahrami B, Tast D, Knell E, Kocsis P, Baumgarten R, Kovacs BW et al (1991) The dopamine D2 receptor locus as a modifying gene in neuropsychiatric disorders. JAMA 266:1793–1800
Comings DE, Wu S, Chiu C, Ring RH, Gade R, Ahn C, MacMurray JP, Dietz G, Muhleman D (1996) Polygenic inheritance of Tourette syndrome, stuttering, attention deficit hyperactivity, conduct, and oppositional defiant disorder: the additive and subtractive effect of the three dopaminergic genes—DRD2, D beta H, and DAT1. Am J Med Genet 67:264–288
Cook E Jr, Stein M, Krasowski M, Cox N, Olkon D, Kieffer J, Leventhal B (1995) Association of attention-deficit disorder and the dopamine transporter gene. Am J Hum Genet 56:993–998
Cornish KM, Manly T, Savage R, Swanson J, Morisano D, Butler N, Grant C, Cross G, Bentley L, Hollis CP (2005) Association of the dopamine transporter (DAT1) 10/10-repeat genotype with ADHD symptoms and response inhibition in a general population sample. Mol Psychiatry 10:686–698
Craig SP, Buckle VJ, Lamouroux A, Mallet J, Craig IW (1988) Localization of the human dopamine beta hydroxylase (DBH) gene to chromosome 9q34. Cytogenet Cell Genet 48:48–50
Craig SP, Boularand S, Darmon MC, Mallet J, Craig IW (1991) Localization of human tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) to chromosome 11p15.3–p14 by in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 56:157–159
Cubells JF, Kranzler HR, McCance-Katz E, Anderson GM, Malison RT, Price LH, Gelernter J (2000) A haplotype at the DBH locus, associated with low plasma dopamine beta-hydroxylase activity, also associates with cocaine-induced paranoia. Mol Psychiatry 5:56–63
Curran S, Mill J, Sham P, Rijsdijk F, Marusic K, Taylor E, Asherson P (2001a) QTL association analysis of the DRD4 exon 3 VNTR polymorphism in a population sample of children screened with a parent rating scale for ADHD symptoms. Am J Med Genet 105:387–393
Curran S, Mill J, Tahir E, Kent L, Richards S, Gould A, Huckett L, Sharp J, Batten C, Fernando S, Ozbay F, Yazgan Y, Simonoff E, Thompson M, Taylor E, Asherson P (2001b) Association study of a dopamine transporter polymorphism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in UK and Turkish samples. Mol Psychiatry 6:425–428
Curran S, Purcell S, Craig I, Asherson P, Sham P (2005) The serotonin transporter gene as a QTL for ADHD. Am J Med Genet B 134B:42–47
D’Souza UM, Russ C, Tahir E, Mill J, McGuffin P, Asherson PJ, Craig IW (2004) Functional effects of a tandem duplication polymorphism in the 5′ flanking region of the DRD4 gene. Biol Psychiatry 56:691–697
Daly G, Hawi Z, Fitzgerald M, Gill M (1999) Mapping susceptibility loci in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: preferential transmission of parental alleles at DAT1, DBH and DRD5 to affected children. Mol Psychiatry 4:192–196
Das M, Mukhopadhyay K (2007) DAT1 3′-UTR 9R allele: preferential transmission in Indian children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet B 144B:826–829
Das M, Bhowmik AD, Sinha S, Chattopadhyay A, Chaudhuri K, Singh M, Mukhopadhyay K (2006) MAOA promoter polymorphism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in indian children. Am J Med Genet B 141B:637–642
Deckert J, Catalano M, Syagailo YV, Bosi M, Okladnova O, Di Bella D, Nothen MM, Maffei P, Franke P, Fritze J, Maier W, Propping P, Beckmann H, Bellodi L, Lesch KP (1999) Excess of high activity monoamine oxidase A gene promoter alleles in female patients with panic disorder. Hum Mol Genet 8:621–624
Demchyshyn L, Sunahara RK, Miller K, Teitler M, Hoffman BJ, Kennedy JL, Seeman P, Van Tol HH, Niznik HB (1992) A human serotonin 1D receptor variant (5HT1D beta) encoded by an intronless gene on chromosome 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:5522–5526
Dempster EL, Mill J, Craig IW, Collier DA (2006) The quantification of COMT mRNA in post mortem cerebellum tissue: diagnosis, genotype, methylation and expression. BMC Med Genet 7:10
Deupree JD, Smith SD, Kratochvil CJ, Bohac D, Ellis CR, Polaha J, Bylund DB, Team UCAR (2006) Possible involvement of alpha-2A adrenergic receptors in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: radioligand binding and polymorphism studies. Am J Med Genet B 141:877–884
Domschke K, Sheehan K, Lowe N, Kirley A, Mullins C, O’Sullivan R, Freitag C, Becker T, Conroy J, Fitzgerald M, Gill M, Hawi Z (2005) Association analysis of the monoamine oxidase A and B genes with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an Irish sample: preferential transmission of the MAO-A 941G allele to affected children. Am J Med Genet B 134B:110–114
Doucette-Stamm LA, Blakely DJ, Tian J, Mockus S, Mao JI (1995) Population genetic study of the human dopamine transporter gene (DAT1). Genet Epidemiol 12:303–308
Driscoll DA, Spinner NB, Budarf ML, McDonald-McGinn DM, Zackai EH, Goldberg RB, Shprintzen RJ, Saal HM, Zonana J, Jones MC et al (1992) Deletions and microdeletions of 22q11.2 in velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Am J Med Genet 44:261–268
Dwivedi Y, Pandey GN (1998) Quantitation of 5HT2A receptor mRNA in human postmortem brain using competitive RT-PCR. NeuroReport 9:3761–3765
Ebstein R, Novick O, Umansky R, Priel B, Osher Y, Blaine D, Bennett E, Nemanov L, Katz M, Belmaker R (1996) Dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of Novelty Seeking. Nat Genet 12:78–80
Egan MF, Kojima M, Callicott JH, Goldberg TE, Kolachana BS, Bertolino A, Zaitsev E, Gold B, Goldman D, Dean M, Lu B, Weinberger DR (2003) The BDNF val66met polymorphism affects activity-dependent secretion of BDNF and human memory and hippocampal function. Cell 112:257–269
Eisenberg J, Mei-Tal G, Steinberg A, Tartakovsky E, Zohar A, Gritsenko I, Nemanov L, Ebstein RP (1999) Haplotype relative risk study of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): association of the high-enzyme activity Val allele with ADHD impulsive-hyperactive phenotype. Am J Med Genet 88:497–502
El-Faddagh M, Laucht M, Maras A, Vohringer L, Schmidt MH (2004) Association of dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a high-risk community sample: a longitudinal study from birth to 11 years of age. J Neural Transm 111:883–889
Erdmann J, Shimron-Abarbanell D, Rietschel M, Albus M, Maier W, Korner J, Bondy B, Chen K, Shih JC, Knapp M, Propping P, Nothen MM (1996) Systematic screening for mutations in the human serotonin-2A (5-HT2A) receptor gene: identification of two naturally occurring receptor variants and association analysis in schizophrenia. Hum Genet 97:614–619
Eubanks JH, Djabali M, Selleri L, Grandy DK, Civelli O, McElligott DL, Evans GA (1992) Structure and linkage of the D2 dopamine receptor and neural cell adhesion molecule genes on human chromosome 11q23. Genomics 14:1010–1018
Evangelou E, Trikalinos TA, Salanti G, Ioannidis JP (2006) Family-based versus unrelated case-control designs for genetic associations. PLoS Genet 2:e123
Faraone SV, Asherson P (2005) The molecular genetics of ADHD: a view from the IMAGE Project. Psychiatric Times 22
Faraone SV, Khan SA (2006) Candidate gene studies of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 67(Suppl 8):13–20
Faraone S, Biederman J, Weiffenbach B, Keith T, Chu M, Weaver A, Spencer T, Wilens T, Frazier J, Cleves M, Sakai J (1999) Dopamine D4 gene 7-repeat allele and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 156:768–770
Faraone S, Doyle A, Mick E, Biederman J (2001) Meta-analysis of the association between the 7-repeat allele of the dopamine D(4) receptor gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 158:1052–1057
Faraone S, Perlis R, Doyle A, Smoller J, Goralnick J, Holmgren M, Sklar P (2005) Molecular genetics of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Biol Psychiatry 57:1313–1323
Feng Y, Crosbie J, Wigg K, Pathare T, Ickowicz A, Schachar R, Tannock R, Roberts W, Malone M, Swanson J, Kennedy JL, Barr CL (2005a) The SNAP25 gene as a susceptibility gene contributing to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Mol Psychiatry 10:998–1005 973
Feng Y, Wigg KG, Makkar R, Ickowicz A, Pathare T, Tannock R, Roberts W, Malone M, Kennedy JL, Schachar R, Barr CL (2005b) Sequence variation in the 3′-untranslated region of the dopamine transporter gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Am J Med Genet B 139B:1–6
Fiskerstrand CE, Lovejoy EA, Quinn JP (1999) An intronic polymorphic domain often associated with susceptibility to affective disorders has allele dependent differential enhancer activity in embryonic stem cells. FEBS Lett 458:171–174
Floresco SB, Tse MT (2007) Dopaminergic regulation of inhibitory and excitatory transmission in the basolateral amygdala-prefrontal cortical pathway. J Neurosci 27:2045–2057
Frank Y, Pergolizzi RG, Perilla MJ (2004) Dopamine D4 receptor gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Pediatr Neurol 31:345–348
Franke B, Neale BM, Faraone SV (2009) Genome-wide association studies in ADHD. Hum Genet. doi:10.1007/s00439-009-0663-4
Frankle WG, Huang Y, Hwang DR, Talbot PS, Slifstein M, Van Heertum R, Abi-Dargham A, Laruelle M (2004) Comparative evaluation of serotonin transporter radioligands 11C-DASB and 11C-McN 5652 in healthy humans. J Nucl Med 45:682–694
Friedel S, Horro FF, Wermter AK, Geller F, Dempfle A, Reichwald K, Smidt J, Bronner G, Konrad K, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Warnke A, Hemminger U, Linder M, Kiefl H, Goldschmidt HP, Siegfried W, Remschmidt H, Hinney A, Hebebrand J (2005) Mutation screen of the brain derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF): identification of several genetic variants and association studies in patients with obesity, eating disorders, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet B 132B:96–99
Friedel S, Saar K, Sauer S, Dempfle A, Walitza S, Renner T, Romanos M, Freitag C, Seitz C, Palmason H, Scherag A, Windemuth-Kieselbach C, Schimmelmann BG, Wewetzer C, Meyer J, Warnke A, Lesch KP, Reinhardt R, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Linder M, Hinney A, Remschmidt H, Schafer H, Konrad K, Hubner N, Hebebrand J (2007) Association and linkage of allelic variants of the dopamine transporter gene in ADHD. Mol Psychiatry 12:923–933
Fung YK, Lau YS (1988) Receptor mechanisms of nicotine-induced locomotor hyperactivity in chronic nicotine-treated rats. Eur J Pharmacol 152:263–271
Gainetdinov RR, Wetsel WC, Jones SR, Levin ED, Jaber M, Caron MG (1999) Role of serotonin in the paradoxical calming effect of psychostimulants on hyperactivity. Science 283:397–401
Galili-Weisstub E, Segman RH (2003) Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder: review of genetic association studies. Israel J Psychiatry 40:57–66
Gelernter J, Kennedy JL, van Tol HH, Civelli O, Kidd KK (1992) The D4 dopamine receptor (DRD4) maps to distal 11p close to HRAS. Genomics 13:208–210
Gelernter J, Kruger S, Pakstis AJ, Pacholczyk T, Sparkes RS, Kidd KK, Amara S (1993) Assignment of the norepinephrine transporter protein (NET1) locus to chromosome 16. Genomics 18:690–692
Gelernter J, Pakstis AJ, Kidd KK (1995) Linkage mapping of serotonin transporter protein gene SLC6A4 on chromosome 17. Hum Genet 95:677–680
Genro JP, Zeni C, Polanczyk GV, Roman T, Rohde LA, Hutz MH (2007) A promoter polymorphism (−839 C → T) at the dopamine transporter gene is associated with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Brazilian children. Am J Med Genet B 144B:215–219
Genro JP, Polanczyk GV, Zeni C, Oliveira AS, Roman T, Rohde LA, Hutz MH (2008) A common haplotype at the dopamine transporter gene 5′ region is associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet B 147B:1568–1575
Giros B, Jaber M, Jones SR, Wightman RM, Caron MG (1996) Hyperlocomotion and indifference to cocaine and amphetamine in mice lacking the dopamine transporter. Nature 379:606–612
Gogos JA, Morgan M, Luine V, Santha M, Ogawa S, Pfaff D, Karayiorgou M (1998) Catechol-O-methyltransferase-deficient mice exhibit sexually dimorphic changes in catecholamine levels and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:9991–9996
Gornick MC, Addington A, Shaw P, Bobb AJ, Sharp W, Greenstein D, Arepalli S, Castellanos FX, Rapoport JL (2007) Association of the dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene 7-repeat allele with children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): an update. Am J Med Genet B 144B:379–382
Grady S, Marks MJ, Wonnacott S, Collins AC (1992) Characterization of nicotinic receptor-mediated [3H] dopamine release from synaptosomes prepared from mouse striatum. J Neurochem 59:848–856
Greenwood TA, Alexander M, Keck PE, McElroy S, Sadovnick AD, Remick RA, Shaw SH, Kelsoe JR (2002) Segmental linkage disequilibrium within the dopamine transporter gene. Mol Psychiatry 7:165–173
Guan L, Wang B, Chen Y, Yang L, Li J, Qian Q, Wang Z, Faraone SV, Wang Y (2008) A high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism screen of 23 candidate genes in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: suggesting multiple susceptibility genes among Chinese Han population. Mol Psychiatry 14:546–554
Guillin O, Diaz J, Carroll P, Griffon N, Schwartz JC, Sokoloff P (2001) BDNF controls dopamine D3 receptor expression and triggers behavioural sensitization. Nature 411:86–89
Guimares APM, Zeni C, Polanczyk GV, Genro JP, Roman T, Rohde LA, Hutz MH (2007) Serotonin genes and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a Brazilian sample: preferential transmission of the HTR2A 452His allele to affected boys. Am J Med Genet B 144B:69–73
Guindalini C, Howard M, Haddley K, Laranjeira R, Collier D, Ammar N, Craig I, O’Gara C, Bubb VJ, Greenwood T, Kelsoe J, Asherson P, Murray RM, Castelo A, Quinn JP, Vallada H, Breen G (2006) A dopamine transporter gene functional variant associated with cocaine abuse in a Brazilian sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:4552–4557
Hall FS, Drgonova J, Goeb M, Uhl GR (2003) Reduced behavioral effects of cocaine in heterozygous brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) knockout mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:1485–1490
Halperin JM, Newcorn JH, Schwartz ST, Sharma V, Siever LJ, Koda VH, Gabriel S (1997) Age-related changes in the association between serotonergic function and aggression in boys with ADHD. Biol Psychiatry 41:682–689
Hawi Z, McCarron M, Kirley A, Daly G, Fitzgerald M, Gill M (2000a) No association of the dopamine DRD4 receptor (DRD4) gene polymorphism with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the Irish population. Am J Med Genet 96:268–272
Hawi Z, Millar N, Daly G, Fitzgerald M, Gill M (2000b) No association between catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene polymorphism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an Irish sample. Am J Med Genet 96:282–284
Hawi Z, Foley D, Kirley A, McCarron M, Fitzgerald M, Gill M (2001) Dopa decarboxylase gene polymorphisms and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): no evidence for association in the Irish population. Mol Psychiatry 6:420–424
Hawi Z, Dring M, Kirley A, Foley D, Kent L, Craddock N, Asherson P, Curran S, Gould A, Richards S, Lawson D, Pay H, Turic D, Langley K, Owen M, O’Donovan M, Thapar A, Fitzgerald M, Gill M (2002) Serotonergic system and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a potential susceptibility locus at the 5-HT(1B) receptor gene in 273 nuclear families from a multi-centre sample. Mol Psychiatry 7:718–725
Hawi Z, Lowe N, Kirley A, Gruenhage F, Nothen M, Greenwood T, Kelsoe J, Fitzgerald M, Gill M (2003) Linkage disequilibrium mapping at DAT1, DRD5 and DBH narrows the search for ADHD susceptibility alleles at these loci. Mol Psychiatry 8:299–308
Hawi Z, Segurado R, Conroy J, Sheehan K, Lowe N, Kirley A, Shields D, Fitzgerald M, Gallagher L, Gill M (2005) Preferential transmission of paternal alleles at risk genes in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Am J Hum Genet 77:958–965
Hebebrand J, Dempfle A, Saar K, Thiele H, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Linder M, Kiefl H, Remschmidt H, Hemminger U, Warnke A, Knolker U, Heiser P, Friedel S, Hinney A, Schafer H, Nurnberg P, Konrad K (2006) A genome-wide scan for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in 155 German sib-pairs. Mol Psychiatry 11:196–205
Heils A, Teufel A, Petri S, Stober G, Riederer P, Bengel D, Lesch KP (1996) Allelic variation of human serotonin transporter gene expression. J Neurochem 66:2621–2624
Heinz A, Goldman D, Jones DW, Palmour R, Hommer D, Gorey JG, Lee KS, Linnoila M, Weinberger DR (2000) Genotype influences in vivo dopamine transporter availability in human striatum. Neuropsychopharmacology 22:133–139
Heiser P, Dempfle A, Friedel S, Konrad K, Hinney A, Kiefl H, Walitza S, Bettecken T, Saar K, Linder M, Warnke A, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Schäfer H, Remschmidt H, Hebebrand J (2007) Family-based association study of serotonergic candidate genes and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a German sample. J Neural Transm 114:513–521
Hess EJ, Jinnah HA, Kozak CA, Wilson MC (1992) Spontaneous locomotor hyperactivity in a mouse mutant with a deletion including the Snap gene on chromosome 2. J Neurosci 12:2865–2874
Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558
Hinshaw SP (1987) On the distinction between attentional deficits/hyperactivity and conduct problems/aggression in child psychopathology. Psychol Bull 101:443–463
Hoenicka J, Aragues M, Ponce G, Rodriguez-Jimenez R, Jimenez-Arriero MA, Palomo T (2007) From dopaminergic genes to psychiatric disorders. Neurotox Res 11:61–72
Holmes J, Payton A, Barrett J, Hever T, Fitzpatrick H, Trumper A, Harrington R, McGuffin P, Owen M, Ollier W, Worthington J, Thapar A (2000) A family-based and case-control association study of the dopamine D4 receptor gene and dopamine transporter gene in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Mol Psychiatry 5:523–530
Hong J, Shu-Leong H, Tao X, Lap-Ping Y (1998) Distribution of catechol-O-methyltransferase expression in human central nervous system. NeuroReport 9:2861–2864
Horger BA, Iyasere CA, Berhow MT, Messer CJ, Nestler EJ, Taylor JR (1999) Enhancement of locomotor activity and conditioned reward to cocaine by brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Neurosci 19:4110–4122
Housley DJ, Nikolas M, Venta PJ, Jernigan KA, Waldman ID, Nigg JT, Friderici KH (2009) SNP discovery and haplotype analysis in the segmentally duplicated DRD5 coding region. Ann Hum Genet (epub ahead of print
Huang YS, Lin SK, Wu YY, Chao CC, Chen CK (2003) A family-based association study of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and dopamine D2 receptor TaqI A alleles Transmission disequilibrium testing of dopamine-related candidate gene polymorphisms in ADHD: confirmation of association of ADHD with DRD4 and DRD5. Chang Gung Med J 26:897–903
Ichikawa M, Okamura-Oho Y, Okunishi R, Kanamori M, Suzuki H, Ritani A, Nitta H, Eguchi N, Urade Y, Hayashizaki Y (2005) Expression analysis of genes responsible for serotonin signaling in the brain. Neurobiol Dis 19:378–385
Ickowicz A, Feng Y, Wigg K, Quist J, Pathare T, Roberts W, Malone M, Schachar R, Tannock R, Kennedy JL, Barr CL (2007) The serotonin receptor HTR1B: gene polymorphisms in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet B 144B:121–125
Internation HapMap Consortium (2003) The International HapMap Project. Nature 426:789–796
Ioannidis JP (2003) Genetic associations: false or true? Trends Mol Med 9:135–138
Ioannidis JP, Ntzani EE, Trikalinos TA, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG (2001) Replication validity of genetic association studies. Nat Genet 29:306–309
Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA, Ntzani EE, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG (2003) Genetic associations in large versus small studies: an empirical assessment. Lancet 361:567–571
Jacobsen LK, Staley JK, Zoghbi SS, Seibyl JP, Kosten TR, Innis RB, Gelernter J (2000) Prediction of dopamine transporter binding availability by genotype: a preliminary report. Am J Psychiatry 157:1700–1703
Jiang SD, Xin RN, Qian YP, Lin SC, Tang GM, Wang DY et al (1999) The relationship between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and dopamine transporter 1 gene. Chinese J Nerv Ment Dis 25:355–357
Jiang S, Xin R, Lin S, Qian Y, Tang G, Wang D, Wu X (2001) Linkage studies between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and the monoamine oxidase genes. Am J Med Genet 105:783–788
Jiang H, Xie T, Ramsden DB, Ho SL (2003) Human catechol-O-methyltransferase down-regulation by estradiol. Neuropharmacology 45:1011–1018
Jiang SD, Wu XD, Zhang Y, Tang GM, Qian YP, Wang DX (2005) No association between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and catechol-O-methyltransferase gene in Chinese. Yi chuan Xue Bao 32:784–788
Jin H, Oksenberg D, Ashkenazi A, Peroutka SJ, Duncan AM, Rozmahel R, Yang Y, Mengod G, Palacios JM, O’Dowd BF (1992) Characterization of the human 5-hydroxytryptamine1B receptor. J Biol Chem 267:5735–5738
Kahn RS, Khoury J, Nichols WC, Lanphear BP (2003) Role of dopamine transporter genotype and maternal prenatal smoking in childhood hyperactive-impulsive, inattentive, and oppositional behaviors. J Pediatr 143:104–110
Kazeem GR, Farrall M (2005) Integrating case-control and TDT studies. Ann Hum Genet 69:329–335
Kebir O, Tabbane K, Sengupta S, Joober R (2009) Candidate genes and neuropsychological phenotypes in children with ADHD: review of association studies. J Psychiatry Neurosci 34:88–101
Kent L, Middle F, Hawi Z, Fitzgerald M, Gill M, Feehan C, Craddock N (2001) Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha4 subunit gene polymorphism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatr Genet 11:37–40
Kent L, Doerry U, Hardy E, Parmar R, Gingell K, Hawi Z, Kirley A, Lowe N, Fitzgerald M, Gill M, Craddock N (2002) Evidence that variation at the serotonin transporter gene influences susceptibility to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): analysis and pooled analysis. Mol Psychiatry 7:908–912
Kent L, Green E, Hawi Z, Kirley A, Dudbridge F, Lowe N, Raybould R, Langley K, Bray N, Fitzgerald M, Owen MJ, O’Donovan MC, Gill M, Thapar A, Craddock N (2005) Association of the paternally transmitted copy of common Valine allele of the Val66Met polymorphism of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene with susceptibility to ADHD. Mol Psychiatry 10:939–943
Kereszturi E, Kiraly O, Csapo Z, Tarnok Z, Gadoros J, Sasvari-Szekely M, Nemoda Z (2007) Association between the 120-bp duplication of the dopamine D4 receptor gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: genetic and molecular analyses. Am J Med Genet B 144B:231–236
Kieling C, Roman T, Doyle AE, Hutz MH, Rohde LA (2006) Association between DRD4 gene and performance of children with ADHD in a test of sustained attention. Biol Psychiatry 60:1163–1165
Kim SJ, Badner J, Cheon KA, Kim BN, Yoo HJ, Kim SJ, Cook E, Leventhal BL, Kim YS (2005a) Family-based association study of the serotonin transporter gene polymorphisms in Korean ADHD trios. Am J Med Genet B 139B:14–18
Kim YS, Leventhal BL, Kim SJ, Kim BN, Cheon KA, Yoo HJ, Badner J, Cook EH (2005b) Family-based association study of DAT1 and DRD4 polymorphism in Korean children with ADHD. Neurosci Lett 390:176–181
Kim CH, Hahn MK, Joung Y, Anderson SL, Steele AH, Mazei-Robinson MS, Gizer I, Teicher MH, Cohen BM, Robertson D, Waldman ID, Blakely RD, Kim KS (2006a) A polymorphism in the norepinephrine transporter gene alters promoter activity and is associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:19164–19169
Kim JW, Kim BN, Cho SC (2006b) The dopamine transporter gene and the impulsivity phenotype in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a case-control association study in a Korean sample. J Psychiatr Res 40:730–737
Kim JW, Biederman J, Arbeitman L, Fagerness J, Doyle AE, Petty C, Perlis RH, Purcell S, Smoller JW, Faraone SV, Sklar P (2007) Investigation of variation in SNAP-25 and ADHD and relationship to co-morbid major depressive disorder. Am J Med Genet B 144B:781–790
Kim JW, Biederman J, McGrath CL, Doyle AE, Mick E, Fagerness J, Purcell S, Smoller JW, Sklar P, Faraone SV (2008) Further evidence of association between two NET single-nucleotide polymorphisms with ADHD. Mol Psychiatry 13:624–630 Epub 2007 Sep 18
Kirley A, Hawi Z, Daly G, McCarron M, Mullins C, Millar N, Waldman I, Fitzgerald M, Gill M (2002) Dopaminergic system genes in ADHD: toward a biological hypothesis. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:607–619
Kopeckova M, Paclt I, Petrasek J, Pacltova D, Malikova M, Zagatova V (2008) Some ADHD polymorphisms (in genes DAT1, DRD2, DRD3, DBH, 5-HTT) in case-control study of 100 subjects 6–10 age. Neuroendocrinol Lett 29:246–251
Kotler M, Manor I, Sever Y, Eisenberg J, Cohen H, Ebstein RP, Tyano S (2000) Failure to replicate an excess of the long dopamine D4 exon III repeat polymorphism in ADHD in a family-based study. Am J Med Genet 96:278–281
Kustanovich V, Merriman B, McGough J, McCracken JT, Smalley SL, Nelson SF (2003) Biased paternal transmission of SNAP-25 risk alleles in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Mol Psychiatry 8:309–315
Kustanovich V, Ishii J, Crawford L, Yang M, McGough JJ, McCracken JT, Smalley SL, Nelson SF (2004) Transmission disequilibrium testing of dopamine-related candidate gene polymorphisms in ADHD: confirmation of association of ADHD with DRD4 and DRD5. Mol Psychiatry 9:711–717
Laakso A, Pohjalainen T, Bergman J, Kajander J, Haaparanta M, Solin O, Syvalahti E, Hietala J (2005) The A1 allele of the human D2 dopamine receptor gene is associated with increased activity of striatal l-amino acid decarboxylase in healthy subjects. Pharmacogenet Genomics 15:387–391
LaHoste G, Swanson J, Wigal S, Glabe C, Wigal T, King N, Kennedy J (1996) Dopamine D4 receptor gene polymorphism is associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Mol Psychiatry 1:121–124
Lan NC, Heinzmann C, Gal A, Klisak I, Orth U, Lai E, Grimsby J, Sparkes RS, Mohandas T, Shih JC (1989) Human monoamine oxidase A and B genes map to Xp 11.23 and are deleted in a patient with Norrie disease. Genomics 4:552–559
Lander ES, Schork NJ (1994) Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 265:2037–2048
Langley K, Payton A, Hamshere ML, Pay HM, Lawson DC, Turic D, Ollier WER, Worthington J, Owen MJ, O’Donovan MC, Thapar A (2003) No evidence of association of two 5HT transporter gene polymorphisms and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatr Genet 13:107–110
Langley K, Marshall L, van den Bree M, Thomas H, Owen M, O’Donovan M, Thapar A (2004) Association of the dopamine D4 receptor gene 7-repeat allele with neuropsychological test performance of children with ADHD. Am J Psychiatry 161:133–138
Langley K, Turic D, Peirce TR, Mills S, Van Den Bree MB, Owen MJ, O’Donovan MC, Thapar A (2005) No support for association between the dopamine transporter (DAT1) gene and ADHD. Am J Med Genet B 139B:7–10
Langley K, Turic D, Rice F, Holmans P, van den Bree MB, Craddock N, Kent L, Owen MJ, O’Donovan MC, Thapar A (2008) Testing for gene × environment interaction effects in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and associated antisocial behavior. Am J Med Genet B 147B:49–53
Lasky-Su J, Banaschewski T, Buitelaar J, Franke B, Brookes K, Sonuga-Barke E, Ebstein R, Eisenberg J, Gill M, Manor I, Miranda A, Mulas F, Oades RD, Roeyers H, Rothenberger A, Sergeant J, Steinhausen HC, Taylor E, Zhou K, Thompson M, Asherson P, Faraone SV (2007a) Partial replication of a DRD4 association in ADHD individuals using a statistically derived quantitative trait for ADHD in a family-based association test. Biol Psychiatry 62:985–990
Lasky-Su J, Biederman J, Laird N, Tsuang M, Doyle AE, Smoller JW, Lange C, Faraone SV (2007b) Evidence for an association of the dopamine D5 receptor gene on age at onset of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Ann Hum Genet 71:648–659
Lasky-Su J, Lange C, Biederman J, Tsuang M, Doyle AE, Smoller JW, Laird N, Faraone S (2008) Family-based association analysis of a statistically derived quantitative traits for ADHD reveal an association in DRD4 with inattentive symptoms in ADHD individuals. Am J Med Genet B 147B:100–106
Laucht M, Becker K, Schmidt MH (2006) Visual exploratory behaviour in infancy and novelty seeking in adolescence: two developmentally specific phenotypes of DRD4? J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47:1143–1151
Laucht M, Skowronek MH, Becker K, Schmidt MH, Esser G, Schulze TG, Rietschel M (2007) Interacting effects of the dopamine transporter gene and psychosocial adversity on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms among 15-year-olds from a high-risk community sample. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64:585–590
Laurin N, Misener VL, Crosbie J, Ickowicz A, Pathare T, Roberts W, Malone M, Tannock R, Schachar R, Kennedy JL, Barr CL (2005) Association of the calcyon gene (DRD1IP) with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Mol Psychiatry 10:1117–1125
Lawson DC, Turic D, Langley K, Pay HM, Govan CF, Norton N, Hamshere ML, Owen MJ, O’Donovan MC, Thapar A (2003) Association analysis of monoamine oxidase A and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet B 116B:84–89
Le Coniat M, Sokoloff P, Hillion J, Martres MP, Giros B, Pilon C, Schwartz JC, Berger R (1991) Chromosomal localization of the human D3 dopamine receptor gene. Hum Genet 87:618–620
Lee J, Laurin N, Crosbie J, Ickowicz A, Pathare T, Malone M, Tannock R, Kennedy JL, Schachar R, Barr CL (2007) Association study of the brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) gene in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet B 144B:976–981
Lee J, Laurin N, Crosbie J, Ickowicz A, Pathare T, Malone M, Kennedy JL, Tannock R, Schachar R, Barr CL (2008) Association study of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha4 subunit gene, CHRNA4, in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Genes Brain Behav 7:53–60
Lesch KP (2001) Variation of serotonergic gene expression: neurodevelopment and the complexity of response to psychopharmacologic drugs. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 11:457–474
Lesch KP, Bengel D, Heils A, Sabol SZ, Greenberg BD, Petri S, Benjamin J, Muller CR, Hamer DH, Murphy DL (1996) Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science 274:1527–1531
Levin ED (2002) Nicotinic receptor subtypes and cognitive function. J Neurobiol 53:633–640
Levy F (1991) The dopamine theory of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Aust NZ J Psychiatry 25:277–283
Li S, Cullen WK, Anwyl R, Rowan MJ (2003) Dopamine-dependent facilitation of LTP induction in hippocampal CA1 by exposure to spatial novelty. Nat Neurosci 6:526–531
Li J, Wang Y, Zhou R, Zhang H, Yang L, Wang B, Khan S, Faraone SV (2005) Serotonin 5-HT1B receptor gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Chinese Han subjects. Am J Med Genet B 132B:59–63
Li D, Sham PC, Owen MJ, He L (2006a) Meta-analysis shows significant association between dopamine system genes and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Hum Mol Genet 15:2276–2284
Li J, Wang Y, Zhou R, Wang B, Zhang H, Yang L, Faraone SV (2006b) No association of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with genes of the serotonergic pathway in Han Chinese subjects. Neurosci Lett 403:172–175
Li J, Wang Y, Zhou R, Zhang H, Yang L, Wang B, Faraone SV (2006c) Association between tryptophan hydroxylase gene polymorphisms and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Chinese Han population. Am J Med Genet B 141B:126–129
Li J, Zhang X, Wang Y, Zhou R, Zhang H, Yang L, Wang B, Faraone SV (2006d) The serotonin 5-HT1D receptor gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in Chinese Han subjects. Am J Med Genet B 141B:874–876
Li J, Wang Y, Zhou R, Zhang H, Yang L, Wang B, Faraone SV (2007) Association between polymorphisms in serotonin transporter gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Chinese Han subjects. Am J Med Genet B 144B:14–19
Lim MH, Kim HW, Paik KC, Cho SC, Yoon DY, Lee HJ (2006) Association of the DAT1 polymorphism with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a family-based approach. Am J Med Genet B 141B:309–311
Lohmueller KE, Pearce CL, Pike M, Lander ES, Hirschhorn JN (2003) Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease. Nat Genet 33:177–182
Lotrich FE, Pollock BG (2004) Meta-analysis of serotonin transporter polymorphisms and affective disorders. Psychiatr Genet 14:121–129
Lotta T, Vidgren J, Tilgmann C, Ulmanen I, Melen K, Julkunen I, Taskinen J (1995) Kinetics of human soluble and membrane-bound catechol O-methyltransferase: a revised mechanism and description of the thermolabile variant of the enzyme. Biochemistry (Mosc) 34:4202–4210
Lowe N, Kirley A, Hawi Z, Sham P, Wickham H, Kratochvil CJ, Smith SD, Lee SY, Levy F, Kent L, Middle F, Rohde LA, Roman T, Tahir E, Yazgan Y, Asherson P, Mill J, Thapar A, Payton A, Todd RD, Stephens T, Ebstein RP, Manor I, Barr CL, Wigg KG, Sinke RJ, Buitelaar JK, Smalley SL, Nelson SF, Biederman J, Faraone SV, Gill M (2004a) Joint analysis of the DRD5 marker concludes association with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder confined to the predominantly inattentive and combined subtypes. Am J Hum Genet 74:348–356
Lowe N, Kirley A, Mullins C, Fitzgerald M, Gill M, Hawi Z (2004b) Multiple marker analysis at the promoter region of the DRD4 gene and ADHD: evidence of linkage and association with the SNP -616. Am J Med Genet B 131B:33–37
Lunetta KL, Faraone SV, Biederman J, Laird NM (2000) Family-based tests of association and linkage that use unaffected sibs, covariates, and interactions. Am J Hum Genet 66:605–614
Lung FW, Yang P, Cheng TS, Kao WT (2006) No allele variation of the MAOA gene promoter in male Chinese subjects with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychobiology 54:147–151
MacKenzie A, Quinn J (1999) A serotonin transporter gene intron 2 polymorphic region, correlated with affective disorders, has allele-dependent differential enhancer-like properties in the mouse embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:15251–15255
Maglott DR, Feldblyum TV, Durkin AS, Nierman WC (1996) Radiation hybrid mapping of SNAP, PCSK2, and THBD (human chromosome 20p). Mamm Genome 7:400–401
Maher BS, Marazita ML, Ferrell RE, Vanyukov MM (2002) Dopamine system genes and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis. Psychiatr Genet 12:207–215
Maisonpierre PC, Le Beau MM, Espinosa R 3rd, Ip NY, Belluscio L, de la Monte SM, Squinto S, Furth ME, Yancopoulos GD (1991) Human and rat brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3: gene structures, distributions, and chromosomal localizations. Genomics 10:558–568
Malleret G, Hen R, Guillou JL, Segu L, Buhot MC (1999) 5-HT1B receptor knock-out mice exhibit increased exploratory activity and enhanced spatial memory performance in the Morris water maze. J Neurosci 19:6157–6168
Manor I, Kotler M, Sever Y, Eisenberg J, Cohen H, Ebstein RP, Tyano S (2000) Failure to replicate an association between the catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a second, independently recruited Israeli cohort. Am J Med Genet 96:858–860
Manor I, Eisenberg J, Tyano S, Sever Y, Cohen H, Ebstein RP, Kotler M (2001) Family-based association study of the serotonin transporter promoter region polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet B 105B:91–95
Manor I, Tyano S, Eisenberg J, Bachner-Melman R, Kotler M, Ebstein RP (2002a) The short DRD4 repeats confer risk to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a family-based design and impair performance on a continuous performance test (TOVA). Mol Psychiatry 7:790–794
Manor I, Tyano S, Mel E, Eisenberg J, Bachner-Melman R, Kotler M, Ebstein RP (2002b) Family-based and association studies of monoamine oxidase A and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): preferential transmission of the long promoter-region repeat and its association with impaired performance on a continuous performance test (TOVA). Mol Psychiatry 7:626–632
Manor I, Corbex M, Eisenberg J, Gritsenkso I, Bachner-Melman R, Tyano S, Ebstein RP (2004) Association of the dopamine D5 receptor with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and scores on a continuous performance test (TOVA). Am J Med Genet B 127B:73–77
Manuck SB, Flory JD, Ferrell RE, Mann JJ, Muldoon MF (2000) A regulatory polymorphism of the monoamine oxidase-A gene may be associated with variability in aggression, impulsivity, and central nervous system serotonergic responsivity. Psychiatry Res 95:9–23
Martin P, Waters N, Schmidt CJ, Carlsson A, Carlsson ML (1998) Rodent data and general hypothesis: antipsychotic action exerted through 5-Ht2A receptor antagonism is dependent on increased serotonergic tone. J Neural Transm 105:365–396
Mattson MP (2008) Glutamate and neurotrophic factors in neuronal plasticity and disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1144:97–112
McCracken JT, Smalley SL, McGough JJ, Crawford L, Del’Homme M, Cantor RM, Liu A, Nelson SF (2000) Evidence for linkage of a tandem duplication polymorphism upstream of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Mol Psychiatry 5:531–536
McEvoy B, Hawi Z, Fitzgerald M, Gill M (2002) No evidence of linkage or association between the norepinephrine transporter (NET) gene polymorphisms and ADHD in the Irish population. Am J Med Genet 114:665–666
Meyer-Lindenberg A, Buckholtz JW, Kolachana B, RH A, Pezawas L, Blasi G, Wabnitz A, Honea R, Verchinski B, Callicott JH, Egan M, Mattay V, Weinberger DR (2006) Neural mechanisms of genetic risk for impulsivity and violence in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6269–6274
Michelson D, Allen AJ, Busner J, Casat C, Dunn D, Kratochvil C, Newcorn J, Sallee FR, Sangal RB, Saylor K, West S, Kelsey D, Wernicke J, Trapp NJ, Harder D (2002) Once-daily atomoxetine treatment for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry 159:1896–1901
Mill J, Curran S, Kent L, Richards S, Gould A, Virdee V, Huckett L, Sharp J, Batten C, Fernando S, Simanoff E, Thompson M, Zhao J, Sham P, Taylor E, Asherson P (2001) attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the dopamine D4 receptor gene: evidence of association but no linkage in a UK sample. Mol Psychiatry 6:440–444
Mill J, Asherson P, Browes C, D’Souza U, Craig I (2002) Expression of the dopamine transporter gene is regulated by the 3′ UTR VNTR: Evidence from brain and lymphocytes using quantitative RT-PCR. Am J Med Genet 114:975–979
Mill J, Curran S, Richards S, Taylor E, Asherson P (2004a) Polymorphisms in the dopamine D5 receptor (DRD5) gene and ADHD. Am J Med Genet B 125B:38–42
Mill J, Richards S, Knight J, Curran S, Taylor E, Asherson P (2004b) Haplotype analysis of SNAP-25 suggests a role in the aetiology of ADHD. Mol Psychiatry 9:801–810
Mill J, Xu X, Ronald A, Curran S, Price T, Knight J, Craig I, Sham P, Plomin R, Asherson P (2005) Quantitative trait locus analysis of candidate gene alleles associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in five genes: DRD4, DAT1, DRD5, SNAP-25, and 5HT1B. Am J Med Genet B 133B:68–73
Misener VL, Luca P, Azeke O, Crosbie J, Waldman I, Tannock R, Roberts W, Malone M, Schachar R, Ickowicz A, Kennedy JL, Barr CL (2004) Linkage of the dopamine receptor D1 gene to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Mol Psychiatry 9:500–509
Munafo MR, Clark T, Flint J (2005) Does measurement instrument moderate the association between the serotonin transporter gene and anxiety-related personality traits? A meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry 10:415–419
Murphy DL, Andrews AM, Wichems CH, Li Q, Tohda M, Greenberg B (1998) Brain serotonin neurotransmission: an overview and update with an emphasis on serotonin subsystem heterogeneity, multiple receptors, interactions with other neurotransmitter systems, and consequent implications for understanding the actions of serotonergic drugs. J Clin Psychiatry 59(Suppl 15):4–12
Neuman RJ, Lobos E, Reich W, Henderson CA, Sun LW, Todd RD (2007) Prenatal smoking exposure and dopaminergic genotypes interact to cause a severe ADHD subtype. Biol Psychiatry 61:1320–1328
Neville MJ, Johnstone EC, Walton RT (2004) Identification and characterization of ANKK1: a novel kinase gene closely linked to DRD2 on chromosome band 11q23.1. Hum Mutat 23:540–545
Nicodemus KK (2008) Catmap: case-control and TDT meta-analysis package. BMC Bioinf 9:130
Noain D, Avale ME, Wedemeyer C, Calvo D, Peper M, Rubinstein M (2006) Identification of brain neurons expressing the dopamine D4 receptor gene using BAC transgenic mice. Eur J NeuroSci 24:2429–2438
Noble EP, Blum K, Ritchie T, Montgomery A, Sheridan PJ (1991) Allelic association of the D2 dopamine receptor gene with receptor-binding characteristics in alcoholism. Arch Gen Psychiatry 48:648–654
Norton N, Owen MJ (2005) HTR2A: association and expression studies in neuropsychiatric genetics. Ann Med 37:121–129
O’Neill MF, Heron-Maxwell CL, Shaw G (1999) 5-HT2 receptor antagonism reduces hyperactivity induced by amphetamine, cocaine, and MK-801 but not D1 agonist C-APB. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 63:237–243
Ogdie MN, Macphie IL, Minassian SL, Yang M, Fisher SE, Francks C, Cantor RM, McCracken JT, McGough JJ, Nelson SF, Monaco AP, Smalley SL (2003) A genomewide scan for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in an extended sample: suggestive linkage on 17p11. Am J Hum Genet 72:1268–1279
Okuyama Y, Ishiguro H, Toru M, Arinami T (1999) A genetic polymorphism in the promoter region of DRD4 associated with expression and schizophrenia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 258:292–295
Oldenhof J, Vickery R, Anafi M, Oak J, Ray A, Schoots O, Pawson T, von Zastrow M, Van Tol HH (1998) SH3 binding domains in the dopamine D4 receptor. Biochemistry (Mosc) 37:15726–15736
Oquendo MA, Hastings RS, Huang Y-Y, Simpson N, Ogden RT, Hu X-Z, Goldman D, Arango V, Van Heertum RL, Mann JJ, Parsey RV (2007) Brain Serotonin Transporter Binding in Depressed Patients With Bipolar Disorder Using Positron Emission Tomography. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64:201–208
Oswald P, Souery D, Mendlewicz J (2004) Molecular genetics of affective disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 28:865–877
Ozaki N, Rosenthal NE, Pesonen U, Lappalainen J, Feldman-Naim S, Schwartz PJ, Turner EH, Goldman D (1996) Two naturally occurring amino acid substitutions of the 5-HT2A receptor: similar prevalence in patients with seasonal affective disorder and controls. Biol Psychiatry 40:1267–1272
Pacholczyk T, Blakely RD, Amara S (1991) Expression cloning of a cocaine- and antidepressant-sensitive noradrenaline transporter. Nature 350:350–354
Park L, Nigg JT, Waldman ID, Nummy KA, Huang-Pollock C, Rappley M, Friderici KH (2005) Association and linkage of alpha-2A adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms with childhood ADHD. Mol Psychiatry 10:572–580
Payton A, Holmes J, Barrett JH, Hever T, Fitzpatrick H, Trumper AL, Harrington R, McGuffin P, O’Donovan M, Owen M, Ollier W, Worthington J, Thapar A (2001) Examining for association between candidate gene polymorphisms in the dopamine pathway and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a family-based study. Am J Med Genet 105:464–470
Pennington BF, Ozonoff S (1996) Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 37:51–87
Petronis A, Van Tol HH, Lichter JB, Livak KJ, Kennedy JL (1993) The D4 dopamine receptor gene maps on 11p proximal to HRAS. Genomics 18:161–163
Pliszka SR, McCracken JT, Maas JW (1996) Catecholamines in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: current perspectives. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 35:264–272
Ponce G, Hoenicka J, Rodriguez-Jimenez R, Gozalo A, Jimenez M, Monasor R, Aragues M, Rubio G, Jimenez-Arriero MA, Ramos JA, Palomo T (2004) IDRD2 TaqIA polymorphism is associated with urinary homovanillic acid levels in a sample of Spanish male alcoholic patients. Neurotox Res 6:373–377
Qian Q, Wang Y, Zhou R, Li J, Wang B, Glatt S, Faraone SV (2003) Family-based and case-control association studies of catechol-O-methyltransferase in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder suggest genetic sexual dimorphism. Am J Med Genet B 118B:103–109
Qian Q, Wang Y, Zhou R, Yang L, Faraone SV (2004) Family-based and case-control association studies of DRD4 and DAT1 polymorphisms in Chinese attention deficit hyperactivity disorder patients suggest long repeats contribute to genetic risk for the disorder. Am J Med Genet B 128B:84–89
Quist JF, Barr CL, Schachar R, Roberts W, Malone M, Tannock R, Basile VS, Beitchman J, Kennedy JL (2000) Evidence for the serotonin HTR2A receptor gene as a susceptibility factor in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Mol Psychiatry 5:537–541
Renner TJ, Walitza S, Dempfle A, Eckert L, Romanos M, Gerlach M, Schafer H, Warnke A, Lesch KP, Jacob C (2008) Allelic variants of SNAP25 in a family-based sample of ADHD. J Neural Transm 115:317–321
Ribases M, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Hervas A, Bosch R, Bielsa A, Gastaminza X, Artigas J, Rodriguez-Ben S, Estivill X, Casas M, Cormand B, Bayes M (2009) Exploration of 19 serotoninergic candidate genes in adults and children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder identifies association for 5HT2A, DDC and MAOB. Mol Psychiatry 14:71–85
Risch NJ (2000) Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature 405:847–856
Risch N, Merikangas K (1996) The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 273:1516–1517
Ritz M, Lamb R, Goldberg S, Kuhar M (1987) Cocaine receptors on dopamine transporters are related to self-administration of cocaine. Science 237:1219–1223
Rogeness GA, Hernandez JM, Macedo CA, Mitchell EL (1982) Biochemical differences in children with conduct disorder socialized and undersocialized. Am J Psychiatry 139:307–311
Rogeness GA, Crawford L, McNamara A (1989) Plasma dopamine-beta-hydroxylase and preschool behavior in children with conduct disorder. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 20:149–156
Roman T, Schmitz M, Polanczyk G, Eizirik M, Rohde LA, Hutz MH (2001) Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a study of association with both the dopamine transporter gene and the dopamine D4 receptor gene. Am J Med Genet 105:471–478
Roman T, Schmitz M, Polanczyk GV, Eizirik M, Rohde LA, Hutz MH (2002) Further evidence for the association between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and the dopamine-beta-hydroxylase gene. Am J Med Genet 114:154–158
Roman T, Schmitz M, Polanczyk GV, Eizirik M, Rohde LA, Hutz MH (2003) Is the alpha-2A adrenergic receptor gene (ADRA2A) associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Am J Med Genet B 120B:116–120
Rowe D, Stever C, Giedinghagen L, Gard J, Cleveland H, Terris S, Mohr J, Sherman S, Abramowitz A, Waldman I (1998) Dopamine DRD4 receptor polymorphism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Mol Psychiatry 3:419–426
Rowe DC, Van den Oord EJ, Stever C, Giedinghagen LN, Gard JM, Cleveland HH, Gilson M, Terris ST, Mohr JH, Sherman S, Abramowitz A, Waldman ID (1999) Dopamine D2 receptor gene variants: association and linkage studies in impulsive-addictive-compulsive behaviour. Mol Psychiatry 4:580–586
Roy A, Linnoila M (1988) Suicidal behavior, impulsiveness and serotonin. Acta Psychiatr Scand 78:529–535
Rubinstein M, Phillips TJ, Bunzow JR, Falzone TL, Dziewczapolski G, Zhang G, Fang Y, Larson JL, McDougall JA, Chester JA, Saez C, Pugsley TA, Gershanik O, Low MJ, Grandy DK (1997) Mice lacking dopamine D4 receptors are supersensitive to ethanol, cocaine, and methamphetamine. Cell 90:991–1001
Sabol SZ, Hu S, Hamer D (1998) A functional polymorphism in the monoamine oxidase A gene promoter. Hum Genet 103:273–279
Saudou F, Amara DA, Dierich A, LeMeur M, Ramboz S, Segu L, Buhot MC, Hen R (1994) Enhanced aggressive behavior in mice lacking 5-HT1B receptor. Science 265:1875–1878
Scanlon PD, Raymond FA, Weinshilboum RM (1979) Catechol-O-methyltransferase: thermolabile enzyme in erythrocytes of subjects homozygous for allele for low activity. Science 203:63–65
Schimmelmann BG, Friedel S, Dempfle A, Warnke A, Lesch KP, Walitza S, Renner TJ, Romanos M, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Linder M, Schafer H, Seitz C, Palmason H, Freitag C, Meyer J, Konrad K, Hinney A, Hebebrand J (2007) No evidence for preferential transmission of common valine allele of the Val66Met polymorphism of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) in ADHD. J Neural Transm 114:523–526
Schinka JA, Busch RM, Robichaux-Keene N (2004) A meta-analysis of the association between the serotonin transporter gene polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and trait anxiety. Mol Psychiatry 9:235–238
Schmidt L, Fox N, Perez-Edgar K, Hu S, Hamer D (2001) Association of DRD4 with attention problems in normal childhood development. Psychiatr Genet 11:25–29
Schmitz M, Denardin D, Silva TL, Pianca T, Roman T, Hutz MH, Faraone SV, Rohde LA (2006) Association between alpha-2A-adrenergic receptor gene and ADHD inattentive type. Biol Psychiatry 60:1028–1033
Schulz KP, Fan J, Tang CY, Newcorn JH, Buchsbaum MS, Cheung AM, Halperin JM (2004) Response inhibition in adolescents diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during childhood: an event-related FMRI study. Am J Psychiatry 161:1650–1657
Seaman MI, Fisher JB, Chang F, Kidd KK (1999) Tandem duplication polymorphism upstream of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4). Am J Med Genet 88:705–709
Seeger G, Schloss P, Schmidt MH (2001) Functional polymorphism within the promoter of the serotonin transporter gene is associated with severe hyperkinetic disorders. Mol Psychiatry 6:235–238
Sen S, Villafuerte S, Nesse R, Stoltenberg SF, Hopcian J, Gleiberman L, Weder A, Burmeister M (2004) Serotonin transporter and GABA(A) Alpha 6 receptor variants are associated with neuroticism. Biol Psychiatry 55:244–249
Sery O, Drtilkova I, Theiner P, Pitelova R, Staif R, Znojil V, Lochman J, Didden W (2006) Polymorphism of DRD2 gene and ADHD. Neuroendocrinol Lett 27:236–240
Sheehan K, Lowe N, Kirley A, Mullins C, Fitzgerald M, Gill M, Hawi Z (2005) Tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH2) gene variants associated with ADHD. Mol Psychiatry 10:944–949
Sheehan K, Hawi Z, Gill M, Kent L (2007) No association between TPH2 gene polymorphisms and ADHD in a UK sample. Neurosci Lett 412:105–107
Sherrington R, Mankoo B, Attwood J, Kalsi G, Curtis D, Buetow K, Povey S, Gurling H (1993) Cloning of the human dopamine D5 receptor gene and identification of a highly polymorphic microsatellite for the DRD5 locus that shows tight linkage to the chromosome 4p reference marker RAF1P1. Genomics 18:423–425
Simsek M, Al-Sharbati M, Al-Adawi S, Ganguly SS, Lawatia K (2005) Association of the risk allele of dopamine transporter gene (DAT1*10) in Omani male children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clin Biochem 38:739–742
Smith KM, Daly M, Fischer M, Yiannoutsos CT, Bauer L, Barkley R, Navia BA (2003) Association of the dopamine beta hydroxylase gene with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: genetic analysis of the Milwaukee longitudinal study. Am J Med Genet B 119B:77–85
Smoller JW, Biederman J, Arbeitman L, Doyle AE, Fagerness J, Perlis RH, Sklar P, Faraone SV (2006) Association between the 5HT1B receptor gene (HTR1B) and the inattentive subtype of ADHD. Biol Psychiatry 59:460–467
Solanto MV (1998) Neuropsychopharmacological mechanisms of stimulant drug action in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review and integration. Behav Brain Res 94:127–152
Sollner T, Whiteheart SW, Brunner M, Erdjument-Bromage H, Geromanos S, Tempst P, Rothman JE (1993) SNAP receptors implicated in vesicle targeting and fusion. Nature 362:318–324
Sparkes RS, Lan N, Klisak I, Mohandas T, Diep A, Kojis T, Heinzmann C, Shih JC (1991) Assignment of a serotonin 5HT-2 receptor gene (HTR2) to human chromosome 13q14-q21 and mouse chromosome 14. Genomics 9:461–465
Spencer T, Heiligenstein JH, Biederman J, Faries DE, Kratochvil CJ, Conners CK, Potter WZ (2002) Results from 2 proof-of-concept, placebo-controlled studies of atomoxetine in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 63:1140–1147
Spivak B, Vered Y, Yoran-Hegesh R, Averbuch E, Mester R, Graf E, Weizman A (1999) Circulatory levels of catecholamines, serotonin and lipids in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 99:300–304
Stahl SM (2003) Neurotransmission of cognition, part 3. Mechanism of action of selective NRIs: both dopamine and norepinephrine increase in prefrontal cortex. J Clin Psychiatry 64:230–231
Stein DJ, Hollander E, Liebowitz MR (1993) Neurobiology of impulsivity and the impulse control disorders. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 5:9–17
Steinlein OK, Mulley JC, Propping P, Wallace RH, Phillips HA, Sutherland GR, Scheffer IE, Berkovic SF (1995) A missense mutation in the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha 4 subunit is associated with autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy. Nat Genet 11:201–203
Stevenson J, Langley K, Pay H, Payton A, Worthington J, Ollier W, Thapar A, Stevenson J, Langley K, Pay H, Payton A, Worthington J, Ollier W, Thapar A (2005) attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with reading disabilities: preliminary genetic findings on the involvement of the ADRA2A gene. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 46:1081–1088
Sunahara RK, Guan HC, O’Dowd BF, Seeman P, Laurier LG, Ng G, George SR, Torchia J, Van Tol HH, Niznik HB (1991) Cloning of the gene for a human dopamine D5 receptor with higher affinity for dopamine than D1. Nature 350:614–619
Sunohara GA, Roberts W, Malone M, Schachar RJ, Tannock R, Basile VS, Wigal T, Wigal SB, Schuck S, Moriarty J, Swanson JM, Kennedy JL, Barr CL (2000) Linkage of the dopamine D4 receptor gene and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39:1537–1542
Swanson JM, Sunohara GA, Kennedy JL, Regino R, Fineberg E, Wigal T, Lerner M, Williams L, LaHoste GJ, Wigal S (1998) Association of the dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene with a refined phenotype of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a family-based approach. Mol Psychiatry 3:38–41
Swanson J, Oosterlaan J, Murias M, Schuck S, Flodman P, Spence MA, Wasdell M, Ding Y, Chi HC, Smith M, Mann M, Carlson C, Kennedy JL, Sergeant JA, Leung P, Zhang YP, Sadeh A, Chen C, Whalen CK, Babb KA, Moyzis R, Posner MI (2000a) Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder children with a 7-repeat allele of the dopamine receptor D4 gene have extreme behavior but normal performance on critical neuropsychological tests of attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4754–4759
Swanson JM, Flodman P, Kennedy J, Spence MA, Moyzis R, Schuck S, Murias M, Moriarity J, Barr C, Smith M, Posner M (2000b) Dopamine genes and ADHD. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24:21–25
Taerk E, Grizenko N, Ben Amor L, Lageix P, Mbekou V, Deguzman R, Torkaman-Zehi A, Ter Stepanian M, Baron C, Joober R (2004) Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val108/158 Met polymorphism does not modulate executive function in children with ADHD. BMC Med Genet 5:30
Tahir E, Curran S, Yazgan Y, Ozbay F, Cirakoglu B, Asherson PJ (2000a) No association between low- and high-activity catecholamine-methyl-transferase (COMT) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a sample of Turkish children. Am J Med Genet 96:285–288
Tahir E, Yazgan Y, Cirakoglu B, Ozbay F, Waldman I, Asherson PJ (2000b) Association and linkage of DRD4 and DRD5 with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a sample of Turkish children. Mol Psychiatry 5:396–404
Tang G, Ren D, Xin R, Qian Y, Wang D, Jiang S (2001) Lack of association between the tryptophan hydroxylase gene A218C polymorphism and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in Chinese Han population. Am J Med Genet 105:485–488
Thompson J, Thomas N, Singleton A, Piggott M, Lloyd S, Perry EK, Morris CM, Perry RH, Ferrier IN, Court JA (1997) D2 dopamine receptor gene (DRD2) Taq1 A polymorphism: reduced dopamine D2 receptor binding in the human striatum associated with the A1 allele. Pharmacogenetics 7:479–484
Todd RD, Jong YJ, Lobos EA, Reich W, Heath AC, Neuman RJ (2001a) No association of the dopamine transporter gene 3′ VNTR polymorphism with ADHD subtypes in a population sample of twins. Am J Med Genet 105:745–748
Todd RD, Neuman RJ, Lobos EA, Jong YJ, Reich W, Heath AC (2001b) Lack of association of dopamine D4 receptor gene polymorphisms with ADHD subtypes in a population sample of twins. Am J Med Genet 105:432–438
Todd RD, Lobos EA, Sun LW, Neuman RJ (2003) Mutational analysis of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha 4 subunit gene in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence for association of an intronic polymorphism with attention problems. Mol Psychiatry 8:103–108
Tsai SJ (2003) Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and brain-derived neurotrophic factor: a speculative hypothesis. Med Hypotheses 60:849–851
Turic D, Williams H, Langley K, Owen M, Thapar A, O’Donovan MC (2005) A family based study of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Am J Med Genet B 133B:64–67
Usiello A, Baik JH, Rouge-Pont F, Picetti R, Dierich A, LeMeur M, Piazza PV, Borrelli E (2000) Distinct functions of the two isoforms of dopamine D2 receptors. Nature 408:199–203
Vallone D, Picetti R, Borrelli E (2000) Structure and function of dopamine receptors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24:125–132
Van Tol HH, Wu CM, Guan HC, Ohara K, Bunzow JR, Civelli O, Kennedy J, Seeman P, Niznik HB, Jovanovic V (1992) Multiple dopamine D4 receptor variants in the human population. Nature 358:149–152
Vandenbergh DJ, Persico AM, Hawkins AL, Griffin CA, Li X, Jabs EW, Uhl GR (1992) Human dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) maps to chromosome 5p15.3 and displays a VNTR. Genomics 14:1104–1106
Volkow N, Ding Y, Fowler J, Wang G, Logan J, Gatley J et al (1995) Is methylphenidate like cocaine? Arch Gen Psychiatry 52:456–463
Waldman ID (2005) Statistical approaches to complex phenotypes: evaluating neuropsychological endophenotypes for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 57:1347–1356
Waldman I, Gizer I (2006) The genetics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clin Psychol Rev 26:396–432
Waldman I, Rhee S (2002) Behavioral and molecular genetic studies. In: Sandberg S (ed) Hyperactivity and Attention Disorders of childhood, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 290–335
Waldman I, Rowe D, Abramowitz A, Kozel S, Mohr J, Sherman S, Cleveland H, Sanders M, Gard J, Stever C (1998) Association and linkage of the dopamine transporter gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: heterogeneity owing to diagnostic subtype and severity. Am J Hum Genet 63:1767–1776
Waldman ID, Nigg JT, Gizer IR, Park L, Rappley MD, Friderici K (2006) The adrenergic receptor alpha-2A gene (ADRA2A) and neuropsychological executive functions as putative endophenotypes for childhood ADHD. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 6:18–30
Walitza S, Renner TJ, Dempfle A, Konrad K, Wewetzer C, Halbach A, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Remschmidt H, Smidt J, Linder M, Flierl L, Knolker U, Friedel S, Schafer H, Gross C, Hebebrand J, Warnke A, Lesch KP (2005) Transmission disequilibrium of polymorphic variants in the tryptophan hydroxylase-2 gene in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Mol Psychiatry 10:1126–1132
Walther DJ, Peter JU, Bashammakh S, Hortnagl H, Voits M, Fink H, Bader M (2003) Synthesis of serotonin by a second tryptophan hydroxylase isoform. Science 299:76
Wang B, Wang Y, Zhou R, Li J, Qian Q, Yang L, Guan L, Faraone SV (2006) Possible association of the alpha-2A adrenergic receptor gene (ADRA2A) with symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet B 141:130–134
Wang Y, Wang Z, Yao K, Tanaka K, Yang Y, Shirakawa O, Maeda K (2008) Lack of association between the dopamine transporter gene 3′ VNTR polymorphism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Chinese Han children: case-control and family-based studies. Kobe J Med Sci 53:327–333
Warren JT Jr, Peacock ML, Fink JK (1992) An RsaI polymorphism in the human serotonin receptor gene (HTR1A): detection by DGGE and RFLP analysis. Hum Mol Genet 1:778
Weinshilboum R, Dunnette J (1981) Thermal stability and the biochemical genetics of erythrocyte catechol-O-methyl-transferase and plasma dopamine-beta-hydroxylase. Clin Genet 19:426–437
Weiss S, Nosten-Bertrand M, McIntosh JM, Giros B, Martres MP (2007a) Nicotine improves cognitive deficits of dopamine transporter knockout mice without long-term tolerance. Neuropsychopharmacology 32:2465–2478
Weiss S, Tzavara ET, Davis RJ, Nomikos GG, Michael McIntosh J, Giros B, Martres MP (2007b) Functional alterations of nicotinic neurotransmission in dopamine transporter knock-out mice. Neuropharmacology 52:1496–1508
Wigg K, Zai G, Schachar R, Tannock R, Roberts W, Malone M, Kennedy JL, Barr CL (2002) attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and the gene for dopamine Beta-hydroxylase. Am J Psychiatry 159:1046–1048
Wigg KG, Takhar A, Ickowicz A, Tannock R, Kennedy JL, Pathare T, Malone M, Schachar R, Barr CL (2006) Gene for the serotonin transporter and ADHD. No association with two functional polymorphisms. Am J Med Genet B 141B:566–570
Wilens TE, Verlinden MH, Adler LA, Wozniak PJ, West SA (2006) ABT-089, a neuronal nicotinic receptor partial agonist, for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: results of a pilot study. Biol Psychiatry 59:1065–1070
Willcutt EG, Doyle AE, Nigg JT, Faraone SV, Pennington BF (2005) Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analytic review. Biol Psychiatry 57:1336–1346
Xu C, Schachar R, Tannock R, Roberts W, Malone M, Kennedy JL, Barr CL (2001) Linkage study of the alpha2A adrenergic receptor in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder families. Am J Med Genet 105:159–162
Xu X, Knight J, Brookes K, Mill J, Sham P, Craig I, Taylor E, Asherson P (2005a) DNA pooling analysis of 21 norepinephrine transporter gene SNPs with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: no evidence for association. Am J Med Genet B 134:115–118
Xu X, Mill J, Chen CK, Brookes K, Taylor E, Asherson P (2005b) Family-based association study of serotonin transporter gene polymorphisms in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder No evidence for association in UK and Taiwanese samples. Am J Med Genet B 139B:11–13
Xu X, Rakovski C, Xiping X, Laird N (2006) An efficient family-based association test using multiple markers. Genet Epidemiol 30:620–626
Xu X, Brookes K, Chen CK, Huang YS, Wu YY, Asherson P (2007a) Association study between the monoamine oxidase A gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Taiwanese samples. BMC Psychiatry 7:10
Xu X, Mill J, Zhou K, Brookes K, Chen CK, Asherson P (2007b) Family-based association study between brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene polymorphisms and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in UK and Taiwanese samples. Am J Med Genet B 144B:83–86
Xu X, Duman EA, Anney R, Brookes K, Franke B, Zhou K, Buschgens C, Chen W, Christiansen H, Eisenberg J, Gabriels I, Manor I, Marco R, Muller UC, Mulligan A, Rommelse N, Thompson M, Uebel H, Banaschewski T, Buitelaar J, Ebstein R, Gill M, Miranda A, Mulas F, Oades RD, Roeyers H, Rothenberger A, Sergeant J, Sonuga-Barke E, Steinhausen HC, Taylor E, Faraone SV, Asherson P (2008) No association between two polymorphisms of the serotonin transporter gene and combined type attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet B 147B:1306–1309
Yang JW, Jang WS, Hong SD, Ji YI, Kim DH, Park J, Kim SW, Joung YS (2008) A case-control association study of the polymorphism at the promoter region of the DRD4 gene in Korean boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: evidence of association with the -521 C/T SNP. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32:243–248
Yang-Feng TL, Kobilka BKC MG, Lefkowitz RJ, Francke U (1987) Chromosomal assignment of genes for an alpha-adrenergic receptor (ADRAR) and for another member of this receptor family coupled to guanine nucleotide regulatory proteins (RG21). Cytogenet Cell Genet 46:722–723
Zabetian CP, Anderson GM, Buxbaum SG, Elston RC, Ichinose H, Nagatsu T, Kim KS, Kim CH, Malison RT, Gelernter J, Cubells JF (2001) A quantitative-trait analysis of human plasma-dopamine beta-hydroxylase activity: evidence for a major functional polymorphism at the DBH locus. Am J Hum Genet 68:515–522
Zabetian CP, Buxbaum SG, Elston RC, Kohnke MD, Anderson GM, Gelernter J, Cubells JF (2003) The structure of linkage disequilibrium at the DBH locus strongly influences the magnitude of association between diallelic markers and plasma dopamine beta-hydroxylase activity. Am J Hum Genet 72:1389–1400
Zametkin A, Rapoport JL, Murphy DL, Linnoila M, Ismond D (1985) Treatment of hyperactive children with monoamine oxidase inhibitors. I. Clinical efficacy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42:962–966
Zhang XN, Ruan LM, Le YP, Zhang Y (2003) Association analysis between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and Val158Met polymorphism of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene. Zhonghua yi xue yi chuan xue za zhi 20:322–324
Zhao AL, Su LY, Zhang YH, Tang BS, Luo XR, Huang CX, Su QR (2005) Association analysis of serotonin transporter promoter gene polymorphism with ADHD and related symptomatology. Int J Neurosci 115:1183–1191
Zoroglu SS, Erdal ME, Alasehirli B, Erdal N, Tutkun H, Savas HA, Herken H (2002) Significance of serotonin transporter gene 5-HTTLPR and variable number of tandem repeat polymorphism in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychobiology 45:176–181
Zoroglu SS, Erdal ME, Erdal N, Ozen S, Alasehirli B, Sivasli E (2003) No evidence for an association between the T102C and 1438 G/A polymorphisms of the serotonin receptor gene in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a Tukish population. Neuropsychobiology 47:17–20
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Stephen Faraone, members of the Collaborative ADHD Genetics Consortium (PI-Dr. Stephen Faraone, R13MH59126-0641), and those researchers that provided manuscripts and data for inclusion in this review. Preparation of this article was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health to IRG (T32 AA007573; PI Dr. Fulton Crews).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gizer, I.R., Ficks, C. & Waldman, I.D. Candidate gene studies of ADHD: a meta-analytic review. Hum Genet 126, 51–90 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-009-0694-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-009-0694-x