Suppression of ethanol self-administration in alcoholics by contingent time-out from social interactions

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(74)90007-2Get rights and content

Abstract

In a residential research ward setting six volunteer chronic alcoholics were given daily access to 17 alcoholic drinks provided that a minimum of 40 min elapsed between receiving successive drinks. Each drink contained 1 oz 95-proof ethanol in orange juice. During baseline phases subjects were free to drink and socialize on the dayroom. However, during social time-out phases subjects were not permitted to socialize for the 40 min period following receipt of each drink. This contingent social time-out manipulation was systematically replicated across three conditions which varied with respect to the number of non-contingent ward privileges available. The results show that contingent social time-out suppressed drinking; and its effectiveness depended directly upon the conditions of available privileges. Within individual subjects, contingent time-out was increasingly effective in suppressing drinking as the available privileges were increasingly restricted.

References (19)

  • G. Bigelow et al.

    Alcoholic drinking: Suppression by a brief time-out procedure

    Behav. Res. & Therapy

    (1974)
  • P.E. Nathan et al.

    An experimental analysis of the behavior of alcoholics and nonalcoholics during prolonged experimental drinking: A necessary precursor of behavior ther

    Behav. Therapy

    (1971)
  • M.E. Bernal et al.

    Behavior modification and the brat syndrome

    J. consult. clin. Psychol.

    (1968)
  • D. Bostow et al.

    Modification of severe disruptive and aggressive behavior using brief timeout and reinforcement procedures

    J. appl. Behav. Anal.

    (1969)
  • J.D. Burchard et al.

    An analysis of timeout and response cost in a programmed environment

    J. appl. Behav. Anal.

    (1972)
  • J. Burchard et al.

    The modification of delinquent behavior through operant conditioning

    Behav. Res. & Therapy

    (1965)
  • O. Diethelm et al.

    Psychotherapeutic interviews and alcohol intoxication

    Q. J. Stud. Alcohol

    (1962)
  • R.F. Docter et al.

    Immediate and prolonged psychophysiological effects of sustained alcohol intake in alcoholics

    Q. J. Stud. Alcohol

    (1964)
  • R. Griffiths et al.

    Alcohol self-administration and social interactions in alcoholics

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (26)

  • Animal models of social contact and drug self-administration

    2015, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    Similarly, subjects in another study reported higher ratings of intoxication when tested with a social partner who also drank alcohol than when tested with a social partner who did not drink alcohol (Kirkpatrick and de Wit, 2013). Consistent with increased alcohol consumption and subject-rated effects in social contexts, Griffiths and colleagues (1974) reported that placing time-outs from social interaction contingent on alcohol choice was sufficient to suppress the choice to drink alcohol. Taken together, these findings reveal that the presence of a peer and his or her drinking behavior critically influence the subjective and reinforcing effects of alcohol.

  • Cocaine abuse versus cocaine dependence: Cocaine self-administration and pharmacodynamic response in the human laboratory

    2010, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
    Citation Excerpt :

    To examine differences between cocaine abusers with and without cocaine dependence with respect to their response to cocaine, drug-directed behaviors, or factors that may confer risk or resiliency to drug-taking and relapse in the laboratory, this study capitalized upon paradigms designed to assess drug-seeking behavior that have been developed and widely explored with non-human and, to a lesser extent, human subjects. Human self-administration studies have examined the influence of pharmacological factors (e.g., Fischman et al., 1990; Foltin and Fischman, 1994) and environmental factors (Griffiths et al., 1974; Silverman et al., 1994) on drug self-administration. To our knowledge, this paradigm has not been applied to study individual differences in the vulnerability to cocaine dependence, differences between groups who vary in their drug use characteristics, or the influence of environmental and pharmacological factors on cocaine-seeking behavior in dependent and non-dependent drug users.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text