Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 588, Issue 1, 14 August 1992, Pages 104-114
Brain Research

Research report
Opiate infusion into nucleus accumbens: contrasting effects on motor activity and responding for conditioned reward

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(92)91349-JGet rights and content

Abstract

In the present experiments, we examined the roles of opiate receptor subtypes in the nucleus accumbens in spontaneous motor behavior and responding for conditioned reward. Locomotor activity was measured using photocell cages and reward-related responding was determined in the conditioned reinforcement (CR) paradigm. In the CR paradigm, food-deprived rats were trained to associate a compound stimulus with food reward, and were subsequently tested for responding on the a lever that resulted in presentation of the compound stimulus alone. In all experiments, various opiate agonists were microinjected into the nucleus accumbens. In the activity studies, morphine sulfate (mixed μ and δ agonist; 0.025, 0.25 and 2.5 μg/0.5 μl) caused an initial inhibition followed by a disinhibition of activity while [d-Ala2-Met5]-enkephalin (DALA) (mixed μ and δ agonist; 0.25, 2.5 and 5.0 μg/0.5 μl) elicited an immediate potentiation of locomotor activity. The behavioral profile following [d-Ala2-N-MePhe4-Gly-ol5-enkephalin] (DAMGO; μ agonist; 0.01, 0.1 and 1.0 μg/0.5 μl) was similar to morphine. In contrast, [d-Pen2.5]-enkephalin (DPEN; δ agonist; 0.02, 0.2 and 2.0 μg/0.5 μl) induced an immediate, but relatively short-lasting activation. Both DALA and DPEN also dose-dependently enhanced rearing; rearing was not affected by the other treatments. U50,488H (κ agonist; 0.0186, 0.186 and 1.86 μg/0.5 μl) had no effect on any aspect of motor activity. In contrast to effects on motor activity, none of the opiate agonists significantly potentiated responding for CR, although morphine infusion did tend to increase responding somewhat. In contrast, d-amphetamine (20 μg/0.5 μl) did potentiate responding, as previously reported. A distinction between the effects of opiates and psychostimulants on reinforced responding is hypothesized based on differential modulation of dopamine release. These experiments demonstrate a dissociation of the effects of opiates on locomotor activity and reward-related responding.

References (51)

  • K.A. Trujillo et al.

    Effects of opiate antagonists and their quaternary analogues on nucleus accumbens self-stimulation

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1989)
  • P. Vezina et al.

    Sensitization occurs to the locomotor effects of morphine and the specific μ opioid receptor agonist, DAGO, administered repeatedly to the ventral tegmental area but not to the nucleus accumbens

    Brain Res.

    (1987)
  • Bruning, J.L. and Kintz, B.L., Computational Handbook of Statistics, Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL,...
  • M.F. Chesselet et al.

    Morphine and δ-opiate in vivo dopamine release in cat caudate nucleus

    Nature

    (1981)
  • L. Churchill et al.

    Enkephalinergic regulation from the nucleus accumbens of locomotion stimulated by GABAergic antagonist in the ventral pallidum

    IBRO Abstr.

    (1991)
  • V. Daugé et al.

    Comparison of the behavioral effects induced by adminstration in rat nucleus accumbens or nucleus caudatus of selective μ and δ opioid peptides of kelatrophan an inhibitor of enkephalin-degrading-enzymes

    Psychopharmacology

    (1988)
  • V. Daugé et al.

    Blockade of dopamine receptors reverses the behavioral effects of endogenous enkephalins in the nucleus caudatus but not in the nucleus accumbens: differential involvement of δ and μ opioid receptors

    Psychopharmacology

    (1989)
  • G. Deneau et al.

    Self-administration of psychoactive substances by the monkey

    Psychopharmacologia

    (1969)
  • G. Di Chiara et al.

    Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats

  • R.P. Dilts et al.

    Autoradiographic localization of δ opioid receptors within the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system using radioiodinated [2-d-pencillamine, 5-d-penicillamine]enkephalin (1251-DPDPE)

    Synapse

    (1990)
  • R.S. Duman et al.

    Acute and chronic opiate-regulation of adenylate cyclase in brain: specific effects in locus coeruleus

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1988)
  • L. Grinspoon et al.

    Cocaine. A Drug and its Social Evolution

    (1976)
  • U. Havemann et al.

    Locomotor activity of rats after injection of various opioids into the nucleus accumbens and the septum mediale

    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol.

    (1985)
  • M.H. Hejina et al.

    Opioid receptor-mediated inhibition of dopamine-sensitive adenylate cyclase in different rat brain regions

    IBRO Abstr.

    (1991)
  • P.W. Kalivas et al.

    Effects of daily cocaine and morphine treatment on somatodendritic and terminal field dopamine release

    J. Neurochem.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (88)

    • Shifting motivational states: The effects of nucleus accumbens dopamine and opioid receptor activation on a modified effort-based choice task

      2021, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it is less clear whether similar treatments increase the incentive properties of food-associated cues, as has been shown with dopamine receptor agonists [e.g., 54]. Reports using conditioned reinforcement paradigms have yielded conflicting results, with NAc μ-opioid receptor stimulation causing enhancement of lever pressing for food-reinforced cues in one report [55], but not in another [56]. Pavlovian-instrumental transfer is enhanced by NAc injections of DAMGO [57], which supports a potential role for μ-opioid receptors in driving incentive motivation toward Pavlovian cues.

    • Mu-opioid receptor activation in the medial shell of nucleus accumbens promotes alcohol consumption, self-administration and cue-induced reinstatement

      2016, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, NAc DAMGO increased lever pressing for alcohol-paired cues in a cue-induced reinstatement test, suggesting that DAMGO potentiates the reinforcing properties of conditioned incentive cues. Previous studies with food reward have reported no increase in conditioned reinforcement by NAc DAMGO in a classic conditioned reinforcement paradigm (Cunningham and Kelley, 1992) and a decrease in “cue-induced” reinstatement (Guy et al., 2011). These results may be due to a combination of the biphasic nature of DAMGO effects in NAc and the relatively brief nature of the tests in these cases (45 and 20 min, respectively).

    • Mapping brain circuits of reward and motivation: In the footsteps of Ann Kelley

      2013, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, microinjections of amphetamine or DAMGO into NAc shell or core produces robust increases in cue-triggered ‘wanting’ for sugary rewards as measured in Pavlovian to instrumental transfer (PIT) or in neuronal incentive salience signals (Pecina and Berridge, 2008; Wyvell and Berridge, 2000). Similarly, microinjections of DAMGO or amphetamine raise conditioned reinforcement value or breakpoint values in instrumental tests that might reflect incentive salience (Cunningham and Kelley, 1992; Kelley and Delfs, 1991; Zhang et al., 2003). We have found that DAMGO microinjections in other striatal-type structures such as the central amygdala also increase cue-triggered ‘wanting’ in PIT and likewise increase the motivational magnet strength of an individual's favorite reward cue in a sign-tracking versus goal-tracking test (autoshaping) (DiFeliceantonio and Berridge, 2012; Mahler and Berridge, 2009, 2012).

    • Nucleus accumbens dopamine and mu-opioid receptors modulate the reinstatement of food-seeking behavior by food-associated cues

      2011, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      While stimulation of mu-opioid receptors of the NAcc does increase the effort that rats will expend to obtain sucrose reinforcement [43], this is not the first report that has failed to show enhanced responding to reward-associated cues following NAcc mu-opioid stimulation in the absence of primary food reinforcement. Previously, Cunningham and Kelley [44] reported no effects of NAcc opiate receptor activation on lever responding in a conditioned reinforcement paradigm. Likewise, the current experiments do not support a role for ventral striatum mu-opioid receptors in enhancing the incentive value of reward-predictive cues.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text