Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 617, Issue 2, 23 July 1993, Pages 303-308
Brain Research

Lack of sensitization or tolerance to the facilitating effect of ventral tegmental area morphine on lateral hypothalamic brain stimulation reward

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(93)91098-DGet rights and content

Abstract

Unilateral microinjections of morphine (2.5 μg/0.5 μl) into the ventral tegmental area potentiated the rewarding effects of lateral hypothalamic brain stimulation, causing parallel leftward shifts of the functions relating response rate to stimulation frequency. Testing was repeated eight times with no evidence of reliable day-to-day changes either in the direction of sensitization or in the direction of tolerance to the reward-facilitating effects of the drug. The injection dose was sufficient to cause contraversive circling that continued long after the period of reward testing; as with the reward-facilitation, there was neither tolerance nor sensitization to this locomotor effect of the drug. The same dose given to control animals that were not tested for self-stimulation caused progressively stronger circling with repeated testing. Lack of sensitization of the reward-facilitating effects of ventral tegmental morphine raises the possibility of some degree of independence of the brain mechanisms of drug-induced locomotion and of reward-facilitation.

Reference (53)

  • JoyceE.M. et al.

    The effect of morphine applied locally to mesencephalic dopamine cell bodies on spontaneous motor activity in the rat

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1979)
  • KokkinidisL. et al.

    Enhanced self-stimulation responding from the substantia nigra after chronic amphetamine treatment: a role for conditioning factors

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1980)
  • KsirC. et al.

    Exposure to nicotine enhances the behavioral stimulant effect of nicotine and increases binding of [3H]acetylcholine to nicotinic receptors

    Neuropharmacology

    (1985)
  • LiebmanJ.M.

    Discriminating between reward and performance: a critical review of intracranial self-stimulation methodology

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (1983)
  • MiliaressisE.

    A miniature, moveable electrode for brain stimulation in animals

    Brain Res. Bull.

    (1981)
  • MiliaressisE. et al.

    The curve-shift paradigm in self-stimulation

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1986)
  • NabeshimaT. et al.

    Development of tolerance and supersensitivity to phencyclidine in rats after repeated administration of phencyclidine

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1987)
  • PhillipsA.G. et al.

    Reinforcing effects of morphine microinjection into the ventral tegmental area

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1980)
  • PiazzaP.V. et al.

    Stress- and pharmacologically-induced behavioral sensitization increases vulnerability to acquisition of amphetamine self-administration

    Brain Res.

    (1990)
  • PredyP.A. et al.

    Sensitization to the effects of repeated amphetamine administration on intracranial self-stimulation: evidence for changes in reward processes

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1984)
  • Rompre´P.-P. et al.

    Opioid-neuroleptic interaction in brain stem self-stimulation

    Brain Res.

    (1989)
  • SegalD.S. et al.

    Long-term administration of d-amphetamine: progressive augmentation of motor activity and stereotypy

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1974)
  • TilsonH.A. et al.

    Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance tod-amphetamine induced motor activity

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1973)
  • van ReeJ.M. et al.

    Involvement of neurohypophyseal peptides in drug-mediated adaptive responses

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1980)
  • VezinaP. et al.

    Conditioning and place-specific sensitization of increases in activity induced by morphine in the VTA

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1984)
  • WelzlH. et al.

    Self-administration of small amounts of morphine through glass micropipettes into the ventral tegmental area of the rat

    Neuropharmacology

    (1989)
  • Cited by (31)

    • The rewarding and locomotor-sensitizing effects of repeated cocaine administration are distinct and separable in mice

      2012, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Drugs of abuse, regardless of pharmacological class, potentiate the rewarding value of brain stimulation-reward, or BSR (Kornetsky and Bain, 1992; Kornetsky and Duvauchelle, 1994). Unlike their effects on locomotor behavior, the effects of psychostimulants (Bauco and Wise, 1997; Frank et al., 1988; Gilliss et al., 2002; Kenny et al., 2003; Wise and Munn, 1993) and opioids (Bauco et al., 1993; Esposito and Kornetsky, 1977) on BSR do not appear to sensitize with repeated exposure. Cocaine exposure alters synthesis and membrane trafficking of AMPA-sensitive glutamate receptor (AMPAR) subunits in an anatomically specific manner.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text