Elsevier

Neuropharmacology

Volume 18, Issue 12, December 1979, Pages 931-950
Neuropharmacology

“Paradoxical” effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs in hyperactive children from the standpoint of behavioural pharmacology

https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3908(79)90157-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Following a brief review of the effectiveness of psychomotor stimulant drugs in treating childhood hyperkinesis, the hypothesis of a “paradoxical” drug response is examined. The importance of three main factors, besides dosage, derived from consideration of studies in behavioural pharmacology. is assessed: rate-dependency; attention and stereotypy; and subjective and social effects. Rate-dependent effects of drugs in animals occur when the control rate of responding is related to the drug effect. A dose-dependent inverse relationship between control rate and drug effect is generally found within individual cases responding in operant situations, after treatment with stimulant drugs. This rate-dependency also occurs between organisms, such that those organisms with high control rates (for example, of operant behaviour, or spontaneous motor activity) show proportionately smaller increases in rate, or reductions in rate with amphetamine-like drugs. This article extends this form of analysis to hyperactive children in two populations receiving methylphenidate. In a third population, of normal adults and normal children, as well as hyperactive children, an inverse relationship between control rate of activity and the effects of 0.5 mgkg of d-amphetamine is found, accounting for about 38% of the variability. Therefore, the rate-reducing effects of psychomotor stimulants might arise in part as a consequence of the high rates of control responding in the hyperactive child, rather than from a unique “paradoxical” response. The effects of stimulants on “attention” in hyperactive children similarly might be predicted from studies on normal adults. Some evidence of an “over-focusing” of attention in hyperactive children treated with methylphenidate is presented in a test of cognitive flexibility. This lack of cognitive flexibility might be related to behavioural stereotypies found in animals and Man following stimulants. Finally, many of the subjective and social responses to stimulants in hyperactive children are not necessarily anomalous. The implications for clinical practice and for animal models of the hyperkinetic syndrome are discussed.

References (98)

  • R.L. Sprague et al.

    Relationship between activity level and delay of reinforcement

    J. exp. child Psychol.

    (1966)
  • K.M. Taylor et al.

    Differential effects of d- and l-amphetamine on behavior and on catecholamine disposition in dopamine and norepinephrine containing neurons of rat brain

    Brain Res.

    (1971)
  • S.R. Bareggi et al.

    Paradoxical effect of amphetamine in an endogenous model of the hyperkinetic syndrome in a hybrid dog: correlation with amphetamine and p-hydroxyamphetamine blood levels

    Psychopharmacology

    (1979)
  • R.A. Barkley

    Predicting the response of hyperkinetic children to stimulant drugs: a review

    J. abnorm. child Psychol.

    (1976)
  • R.A. Barkley et al.

    The effects of methylphenidate on the mother-child interaction of hyperactive children

    Archs gen. Psychiat.

    (1979)
  • M.D. Beecher et al.

    Rate-dependent effect of amphetamine in rats: extension to between subjects effect

    Psychopharmacologia. Berl.

    (1976)
  • E.A. Berg

    A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking

    J. gen. Psychol.

    (1948)
  • C. Bradley

    The behavior of children receiving benzedrine

    Am. J. Psychiat.

    (1937)
  • P.B. Bradley et al.

    The effects of some drugs on the electrical activity of the brain

    Brain

    (1957)
  • D. Broadbent

    Decision and Stress

    (1971)
  • S.B. Campbell

    Mother-child interaction: a comparison of hyperactive, learning disabled and normal boys

    Am. J. Orthopsychiat.

    (1975)
  • B.A. Campbell et al.

    Paradoxical effects of amphetamine on pre-weanling and post-weanling rats

    Science

    (1977)
  • S.O. Cole

    Hyperkinetic children: The use of stimulant drugs evaluated

    Am. J. Orthopsychiat.

    (1975)
  • C. Conners et al.

    The effects of methylphenidate on symptomology and learning in disturbed children

    Am. J. Psychiat.

    (1963)
  • C.K. Conners et al.

    Effect of dextroamphetamine on children

    Archs gen. Psychiat.

    (1967)
  • C.K. Conners et al.

    Dextroamphetamine sulfate in children with learning disorders: effects on perception, learning achievement

    Archs gen. Psychiat.

    (1969)
  • S.A. Corson et al.

    Tranquilising effects of d-amphetamine on hyperkinetic untrainable dogs

  • M.B. Denckla et al.

    Tics following methylphenidate administration, a report of 20 cases

    JAMA

    (1976)
  • P.B. Dews

    Studies on behavior. IV. Stimulant actions of methamphetamine

    J. Pharmac. exp. Ther.

    (1958)
  • P.B. Dews

    Rate-dependency hypothesis

    Science

    (1977)
  • P.B. Dews et al.

    Schedules of reinforcement

  • V.I. Douglas

    Stop, look and listen: the problem of sustained attention and impulse control in hyperactive and normal children

    Can. J. Behar. Sci. Rev. Can. Sci. Comp.

    (1972)
  • S.M. Eastgate et al.

    Behavioural effects of methylphenidate in 6-hydroxydopamine treated neonatal rats

    Psychopharmacology

    (1978)
  • E.K. Ellinwood et al.

    Amphetamine stereotypy: the influence of environmental factors and prepotent behavioural patterns on its topography and development

    Biol. Psychiat.

    (1975)
  • M.J. Ellis et al.

    Methylphenidate and the activity of hyperactives in the informal setting

    Child Dev.

    (1974)
  • L.C. Epstein et al.

    Correlation of dextroamphetamine excretion and drug response in hyperkinetic children

    J. nerv. ment. Dis.

    (1968)
  • H.L. Evans et al.

    Diurnal rhythm in behavioral effects of methamphetamine,p-chloromethamphetamine, and scopolamine

    J. Pharmac. exp. Ther.

    (1973)
  • B.F. Feingold

    Why Your Child is Hyperactive

    (1974)
  • R.D. Freeman

    Minimal brain dysfunction, hyperactivity, and learning disorder: epidemic or episode?

  • M. Golter et al.

    Growth, behavior and brain catecholamines in lead-exposed neonatal rats: a reappraisal

    Science

    (1975)
  • F.A. Gonzalez et al.

    Mathematics underlying the rate-dependency hypothesis

    Science

    (1977)
  • L. Goodman et al.

    The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics

    (1975)
  • D.G. Grahame-Smith

    Animal hyperactivity syndromes—do they have any relevance to minimal brain dysfunction

  • J. Kagan

    Impulsive and reflective children: significance of conceptual tempo

  • J.L. Katz et al.

    Mathematics relevant to rate-dependent drug effects

    Biobehav. Rev.

    (1979)
  • R.T. Kellener et al.

    Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs

    Ergben. Physiol.

    (1968)
  • D.F. Klein et al.

    Diagnosis of minimal brain dysfunction and hyperkinetic syndrome

  • H. Kløve

    Clinical neuropsychology

  • R.M. Knights

    Psychometric assessment of stimulant-induced behavior change

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text