Brief communicationIndividual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization
References (18)
- et al.
Sensitization to amphetamine and stress may involve nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortex
Brain Res.
(1979) - et al.
Experimental approach to individual vulnerability to psychostimulant addiction
Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.
(1989) - et al.
Amphetamine and apomorphine responses in the rat following 6-OHDA lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi and corpus striatum
Brain Res.
(1975) - et al.
Selective 6-OHDA-induced dstruction of mesolimbic dopamine neurons: abolition of psychostimulant-induced locomotor activity in rats
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
(1976) - et al.
Motor activity changes and conditioned taste aversions induced by administration of scopolamine in rats: role of the area postrema
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1986) - et al.
Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis
Brain Res. Rev.
(1986) - et al.
Persistent sensitization of dopamine neurotransmission in vntral striatum (nucleus accumbens) produced by prior experience with (+)-amphetamine: a microdialysis study in freely moving rats
Brain Res.
(1988) - et al.
Response of mesocortical-frontal dopaminergic neurons in rats after long-term isolation
Nature
(1980) - et al.
Repeated stress increases locomotor response to amphetamine
Psychopharmacology (Berlin)
(1984)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (181)
Novelty preference does not predict trait cocaine behaviors in male rats
2022, Addiction NeuroscienceThe sensation seeking trait confers a dormant susceptibility to addiction that is revealed by intermittent cocaine self-administration in rats
2021, NeuropharmacologyCitation Excerpt :It is worth noting however, that although statistically significant, the relationship between locomotor reactivity and FR1 intake and Q0 was weak (~R2 = 0.03 for both indices) and baseline Q0 differences were not observed between HR and LR rats in Experiment 2. Despite this, our data are consistent with many previous reports indicating that novelty seeking is a reliable predictor of low-effort drug intake (Hooks et al., 1991a, b; Klebaur et al., 2001; Marinelli and White, 2000; Piazza et al., 1989). It is well-recognized that drug exposure itself is a predisposing factor for addiction (Ahmed, 2012).
A systematic review of equine personality
2020, Applied Animal Behaviour ScienceSocial Defeat Stress, Sex, and Addiction-Like Behaviors
2018, International Review of NeurobiologyDifferential housing and novelty response: Protection and risk from locomotor sensitization
2017, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Copyright © 1991 Published by Elsevier Inc.