Trends in Biotechnology
Volume 12, Issue 5, May 1994, Pages 199-206
ReviewAntibody design: Beyond the natural limits
References (50)
J. Mol. Biol.
(1977)- et al.
J. Mol. Biol.
(1985) - et al.
Immunomethods
(1992) - et al.
Methods Enzymol.
(1991) - et al.
J. Mol. Biol.
(1988) - et al.
Adv. Protein Chem.
(1985) J. Mol. Biol.
(1992)- et al.
J. Mol. Biol.
(1992) - et al.
Mol. Immunol.
(1991) - et al.
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
(1991)
Mol. Immunol.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
(1990)
Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest
(1992)
EMBO J.
(1986)
J. Mol. Biol.
(1987)
Nature
(1989)
J. Exp. Med.
(1970)
Cited by (42)
Practical Guide to ELISA Development
2013, The Immunoassay Handbook: Theory and Applications of Ligand Binding, ELISA and Related TechniquesPractical Guide to ELISA Development
2013, The Immunoassay HandbookApplication of computer-assisted molecular modeling for immunoassay of low molecular weight food contaminants: A review
2009, Analytica Chimica ActaCitation Excerpt :Structural information resulting from molecular interactions between an antibody and antigen can help in understanding the effect of mutations on the affinity and specificity of the antibody [95]. Antibodies with improved affinity can be generated by increasing the number of favorable interactions at the antibody–antigen interface [96]. However, a detailed interpretation of mutational effects on affinity requires precise high-resolution structures, which can be obtained by using X-ray crystallography, but are often not available due to the difficulty and expense of X-ray crystallography.
Z<inf>basic</inf>-A novel purification tag for efficient protein recovery
2007, Journal of Chromatography AFunctional mapping and single chain construction of the anti-cytokeratin 8 monoclonal antibody TS1
2007, Molecular ImmunologyThe fibronectin type III domain as a scaffold for novel binding proteins
1998, Journal of Molecular Biology
Copyright © 1994 Published by Elsevier Ltd.