Elsevier

Biochemical Pharmacology

Volume 55, Issue 5, 1 March 1998, Pages 549-556
Biochemical Pharmacology

Commentary
Rethinking receptor-G protein-effector interactions

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(97)00361-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Hundreds of different receptors regulate the activity of effector proteins with the assistance of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins). The hypothesis that G protein-coupled receptors (R) govern their effectors (E) indirectly via a shuttling mechanism involving the exchange of heterotrimeric G proteins (Gαβγ) or parts thereof (Gα, Gβγ) between ephemeral R-G and G-E complexes has become firmly established. While there is no direct evidence for the cyclical formation and dissociation of these complexes during signalling, experimental changes in second messenger production, GTPase activity, and the binding characteristics of agonists, antagonists, and guanine nucleotides commonly are believed to reflect perturbations in the equilibria between G protein and the other two components. However, a growing body of evidence seems to argue against the shuttling model. The random, transient association of G protein and receptor is largely inconsistent with the binding of agonists to receptors and the allosteric regulation of that binding by guanine nucleotides. Also, the prevailing paradigm does not readily account for receptor-effector coupling specificity, as the promiscuous interaction of most G proteins with both receptors and effectors in vitro is at odds with the general failure of G proteins to be shared among ostensibly congruous signal transduction pathways in vivo. The latter paradox would be obviated by the simultaneous interaction of G protein with both receptor and effector. Indeed, various findings indicate that R-G-E complexes do occur. How and where in the cell such complexes are assembled and disassembled should provide important clues to the true mechanism of G protein-linked transduction.

References (59)

  • TE Hebert et al.

    A peptide from a β2-adrenergic receptor domain inhibits both receptor dimerization and activation

    J Biol Chem

    (1996)
  • GYK Ng et al.

    Dopamine D2 receptor dimers and receptor-blocking peptides

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (1996)
  • T Michel et al.

    Hormonal inhibition of adenylate cyclase

    J Biol Chem

    (1982)
  • DR Brandt et al.

    Catecholamine-stimulated GTPase cycle. Multiple sites of regulation by β-adrenergic receptor and μg2+ studied in reconstituted receptor Gs vesicles

    J Biol Chem

    (1986)
  • T Murayama et al.

    [3H]GDP release from rat and hamster adipocyte membranes independently linked to receptors involved in activation or inhibition of adenylate cyclase. Differential susceptibility to two bacterial toxins

    J Biol Chem

    (1984)
  • SE Senogles et al.

    The D2-dopamine receptor of anterior pituitary is functionally associated with a pertussis toxin-sensitive guanine nucleotide binding protein

    J Biol Chem

    (1987)
  • I Knezevic et al.

    Identification of Gq as one of the G-proteins which copurify with human platelet thromboxane A2/prostaglandin H2 receptors

    J Biol Chem

    (1993)
  • F Yi et al.

    Structural and functional studies of cross-linked Go protein subunits

    J Biol Chem

    (1991)
  • RM Huff et al.

    Subunit interactions of native and ADP-ribosylated α39 and αn41, two guanine nucleotide-binding proteins from bovine cerebral cortex

    J Biol Chem

    (1986)
  • NS Basi et al.

    GTP binding to Gs does not promote subunit dissociation

    Cell Signal

    (1996)
  • I Marbach et al.

    β Subunit copurifies with GppNHp-activated adenylyl cyclase

    J Biol Chem

    (1990)
  • G Berstein et al.

    Phospholipase C-β1 is a GTPase-activating protein for Gq/11, its physiologic regulator

    Cell

    (1992)
  • GH Biddlecome et al.

    Regulation of phospholipase C-β1 by Gq and ml muscarinic cholinergic receptor. Steady-state balance of receptor-mediated activation and GTPase-activating protein-promoted deactivation

    J Biol Chem

    (1996)
  • PA Slesinger et al.

    Identification of structural elements involved in G protein gating of the GIRK1 potassium channel

    Neuron

    (1995)
  • ML Dufau et al.

    Properties of detergent-solubilized adenylate cyclase and gonadotropin receptors of testis and ovary

    Mol Cell Endocrinol

    (1977)
  • EJ Goetzl et al.

    Inhibition of human HL-60 cell responses to chemotactic factors by antisense messenger RNA depletion of G proteins

    J Biol Chem

    (1994)
  • YF Liu et al.

    G protein specificity in receptor-effector coupling

    J Biol Chem

    (1994)
  • N Macrez-Leprêtre et al.

    Distinct functions of Gqand G11 proteins in coupling α1-adrenoceptors to Ca2+ release and Ca2+ entry in rat portal vein myocytes

    J Biol Chem

    (1997)
  • WP Hausdorff et al.

    A mutation of the β2-adrenergic receptor impairs agonist activation of adenylyl cyclase without affecting high affinity agonist binding. Distinct molecular determinants of the receptor are involved in physical coupling to and functional activation of Gs

    J Biol Chem

    (1990)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Fine-tuning of GPCR signals by intracellular G protein modulators

      2013, Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      A mechanism based on random collisions between G proteins and their receptors and effectors would imply that all compatible signaling partners can interact within the plasma membrane of a cell; however, signaling among the dozens of GPCRs within a typical cell tends to be discrete and many biochemically possible pathways evidently are not utilized.15–18 An alternate view is that G proteins do not shuttle freely between GPCR and effector proteins,19 which in turn suggests that signaling complexes containing receptor, G protein and effector can exist.14 The latter idea is supported by a considerable body of physical and functional evidence,20 and in some cases GPCRs, G proteins, and effectors are found to form stable complexes through which signaling can occur.20,21

    • Agonist-selective dynamic compartmentalization of human mu opioid receptor as revealed by resolutive FRAP analysis

      2010, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      GPCR are remarkably efficient and rapid at transmitting the signal despite the involvement of interactions with numerous partners. Thus, compartmentalization of the receptors with their partners, G-proteins and effectors, may explain the signal transduction properties (6–8). The dynamics of GPCR in the plasma membrane and its relationship with receptor function are central to the actively developing field of research that is the functional and structural organization of cell membranes (9–11).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text