Selectivity of μ-opioid receptor determined by interfacial residues near third extracellular loop

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00578-1Get rights and content

Abstract

We hypothesized that the selectivity profile of the rat μ-opioid receptor for opioid receptor-selective ligands is determined by the nature of the amino acid residues at highly divergent sites in the ligand-binding pocket. To determine which characteristics of these residues contribute to opioid receptor ligand selectivity, we made various mutant receptors that replaced the Lys303 and Trp318 residues near the extracellular interface of transmembrane domains VI and VII, respectively. Ligand binding determinations using transiently transfected monkey kidney epithelial (COS-1) cells show that Lys303 mutations cause little change in the receptor binding profile, whereas the Trp318 mutant receptors have considerably lower affinity for μ-opioid receptor-selective ligands and greatly increased affinity for δ-opioid receptor-selective ligands. The nature of these mutations show that this effect is not due to sterics or charge alone. [35S]guanosine-5′-O-(3-thio)-triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS) activity assays show that these residues may influence functional, as well as binding selection. We conclude that a primary role for Trp318 is to form a basis for ligand selectivity.

Introduction

Due to their sequence homology and to the availability of a wide range of ligands, the G-protein-coupled opioid receptors offer an excellent opportunity for studying the molecular basis of ligand selectivity and activity. Little work has been done in determining the contribution of divergent amino acid residues within the transmembrane domains of opioid receptors in determining selectivity or function. Few sites in the transmembrane domains of these receptors demonstrate convincing divergence in amino acid chemical functionality Meng et al., 1993, Thompson et al., 1993, Kieffer et al., 1992, Bunzow et al., 1994. One such site is the Lys303 in the rat μ-opioid receptor. This residue corresponds to Trp284 in the rat δ-opioid receptor, Glu297 in the rat κ-opioid receptor, and Gln286 in the rat orphan-opioid receptor. Among this set of amino acids, there is considerable diversity in chemical functionality (i.e., positively charged, aromatic hydrophobic, negatively charged, and polar neutral residues).

This current analysis was undertaken in an effort to determine the functional implications of amino acid divergences of this type. One possibility is that the nature of the amino acid does not matter at these sites, and that any amino acid will suffice. Alternatively, these amino acids may form the basis of opioid receptor ligand selectivity. If the latter argument is true, then one should be able to substitute the amino acid of one receptor type for the other and show that it leads to altered, or even reversed opioid receptor ligand selectivity. For example, if one were to replace Trp318 in the μ-opioid receptor with leucine (the homologous δ-opioid receptor residue) to yield the W318L-μ receptor mutant, and subsequently show that this mutant binds δ-opioid receptor-selective ligands with higher affinity, and μ-opioid receptor-selective ligands with lower affinity, then that would be clear evidence in support of the argument that the residue serves an important role in discriminating between ligands of different opioid receptor selectivities.

Site-directed mutagenesis studies which yield a “gain-of-function” of this type have been reported previously by this laboratory — the orphan-opioid receptor was converted into a receptor which recognized opioid receptor-selective antagonists (Meng et al., 1996). In the present work, two divergent sites (Lys303 and Trp318 in the μ-opioid receptor) were chosen in an effort to determine their importance in producing opioid receptor selectivity. Mutations at these sites were made and assayed for their ability to bind opioid receptor-selective ligands as determined by radioligand competition, and for their ability to transduce message, as determined by agonist-induced [35S]guanosine-5′-O-(3-thio)-triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS) binding.

Few mutational analyses have been performed on these two sites or their homologues in the other opioid receptors. Published reports include a κ-opioid receptor mutant (E297K), that was shown to have decreased affinity for the κ-opioid receptor-selective ligand norbinaltorphimine, yet unchanged affinity for the less opioid receptor-selective ligands diprenorphine and naloxone (Hjorth et al., 1995). The wild-type κ-opioid receptor was also shown to be convertible to one which bound with high affinity and was activated by the μ-opioid receptor-selective agonist peptide [d-Ala2, N-MePhe4,Gly-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) by changing only four residues, two of which being homologous to the ones reported in this work (Seki et al., 1998). More attention has been paid to Trp284 in the δ-opioid receptor Varga et al., 1996, Valiquette et al., 1996, although these latter two studies produced somewhat disparate results, possibly due to the difference in the amino acid to which the target residue was mutated. Recently, it was reported that a W318A mutation of the μ-opioid receptor yields a receptor in which specific binding was nearly undetectable (Xu et al., 1999). However, only a very limited number of ligands was tested, and the gain-of-function towards non-μ-opioid receptor-selective ligands was not explored.

Thus, although there is scattered evidence that these sites are important for determining the pharmacological profiles of opioid receptor-selective ligands, these sets of data have yet to reveal a full picture of how the opioid receptor amino acid residues influence ligand characteristics such as affinity, selectivity, and potency. The μ-opioid receptor has a complex set of determinants for these ligand characteristics Onogi et al., 1995, Seki et al., 1998. When one is making mutant opioid receptors, one should evaluate carefully the nature of the amino acid residue of the wild-type and consider the nature of the amino acid to which the residue will be mutated. In the present study, Lys303 was mutated to glutamine, glutamic acid, and tryptophan. This chemically diverse set of amino acids at this position were chosen to help reveal the chemical requirements which determine μ-opioid receptor-selective ligand affinity, activity, and selectivity. These mutated residues represent the amino acids present at the homologous positions in the other (non-μ) opioid receptors. Similarly, Trp318 was mutated to leucine and lysine, both to elucidate the chemical requirements at this site for high affinity ligand binding, and to determine whether this residue acts as a selectivity switch. For both sets of μ-opioid receptor mutants (K303 and W318), the homologous δ-opioid receptor residue is represented. If these mutant receptors bind a class of molecules which are traditionally considered as selective for the δ-opioid receptor, then there is compelling reason to conclude that the mutated residues are important in determining selectivity.

Section snippets

Drugs and chemicals

Dulbecco's modified essential medium, fetal calf serum, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were from Gibco/BRL Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). FuGene6 was from Roche (Indianapolis, IN, USA) Naltrexone, naloxone, naloxonazine, bremazocine, and naltrindole were from Research Pharmaceuticals International (Natick, MA, USA). DAMGO, [d-Pen2, d-Pen5]enkaphalin) (DPDPE, and d-Phe-c[Cys-Tyr-d-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen]-Thr-NH2 (CTAP, where Pen=Penicillamine (β,β′-dimethylcysteine)) were from

Ligand binding characteristics of mutant and wild-type receptors

Table 1 shows the results of the radioligand competition assays for the mutant and wild-type rat μ-opioid receptors. Inspection of the data reveal that there is little difference in ligand binding properties between the wild-type μ-opioid receptor and the K303 mutant receptors. The affinity constants for bremazocine determined by Scatchard analysis did not differ dramatically from that of the wild-type μ-opioid receptor. Substitution for the tryptophan in position 318, however, caused a marked

Discussion

The hypothesis that Lys303 and Trp318 of the rat μ-opioid receptor — sites which display varying amino acid residue functionality at homologous sites across the opioid receptor class — serve as key sites for binding μ-opioid receptor-selective ligands, and excluding δ-opioid receptor-selective ligands was confirmed in part and refuted in part. Substitution of Lys303 with amino acids present in the homologous position of the other opioid receptors led to little change in ligand affinities. Only

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Professor James Woods of the Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, for providing various alkaloid ligands used in this study. We also thank Dr. Qiang Wei for helpful discussions about assay protocol and pharmacological characterization of the ligands presented in this study. We also thank Linda M. Gates for her assistance in tissue culture. This work was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, Grant numbers RO1-DA08920 (H. Akil) and

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (45)

  • A comprehensive evaluation of the potential binding poses of fentanyl and its analogs at the µ-opioid receptor

    2022, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    The detailed contact frequency analysis (see Method) indicates that the bound fentanyl molecules in both APFC and FPADT conditions form the ionic interaction with Asp1493.32, and commonly contact many other residues (Table 1). From previously reported mutagenesis work relevant to fentanyl binding at the MOR (Table S4), we found mutations of the residues that are not directly involved in interacting with either APF or FPA pose, Ile4.56, Val4.60, and Lys6.58 have no effect on fentanyl binding [62,63]. However, the substitutions of His6.52 to Asn or Gln have no effect as well, indicating a polar residue can be tolerated at this position, while the aromatic property of His is not critical [64].

  • Affinity, potency, efficacy, selectivity, and molecular modeling of substituted fentanyls at opioid receptors

    2020, Biochemical Pharmacology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Mutation of W-3187.35 to leucine causes a two-fold decrease in binding affinity as the key hydrogen bond is not formed. On the other hand, replacement with lysine maintains the hydrogen bond and increases affinity two-fold [56]. This observation suggests the importance of the hydrogen bond established between N-phenyl-propanamide and W-3187.35.

  • Structural insights into ligand recognition and selectivity for classes A, B, and C GPCRs

    2015, European Journal of Pharmacology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, the indole ring of naltrindole would produce steric hindrance with the bulky aromatic side chain at the position 7.35 in the μ and κ receptors. Mutations of μ receptor W3187.35 to leucine and lysine greatly increased affinity of δ receptor-selective ligands but considerably lowered affinity of μ receptor-selective ligands (Bonner et al., 2000). These results support the critical role of the position 7.35 in opioid receptor subtype selectivity.

  • Single Amino Acid Variation Underlies Species-Specific Sensitivity to Amphibian Skin-Derived Opioid-like Peptides

    2015, Chemistry and Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Recent structural studies of antagonist-bound human MOR and DOR (Fenalti et al., 2014; Granier et al., 2012; Manglik et al., 2012) show that residue 7.35 (Trp318 and Leu300, respectively) lies at the entrance to the binding site and is likely to be a part of the receptor specificity determinant (Fenalti et al., 2014; Granier et al., 2012; Manglik et al., 2012; Filizola and Devi, 2013). The Leu7.35Trp mutation in human DOR resulted in decreased affinity for some of the DOR-specific ligands (Pepin et al., 1997), whereas mutations of the conserved tryptophan in MOR suggested the key role of this residue for MOR specificity (Bonner et al., 2000; Xu et al., 1999). As opioid-like peptides from frog skin are thought to be a natural defense mechanism (Lazarus et al., 1994; Lazarus and Attila, 1993), it would thus be advantageous for frogs that these peptides are inactive, although one would expect them to activate the receptors of potential frog predators.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text