Opinion
Comparing nuclear receptors in worms, flies and humans

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01859-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Complete nucleotide sequences are now available for different species of the animal kingdom: Caenorhabditis elegans – a nematode, Drosophila – an insect, and humans – a mammal. Such information makes it possible to compare the set of nuclear receptors found in these organisms, and to discuss the possible reasons for the differences observed. The human genome sequencing identified few new receptors, which implies that most nuclear receptors have now been found. However, information about polymorphisms and regulating sequences, obtained through genomic sequencing, will be important for understanding receptor function and disease mechanisms. The surprisingly large number of nuclear receptors in C. elegans might have implications for the development of pharmaceuticals and the understanding of the function of these animals. By contrast, Drosophila has few nuclear receptors; however, examination of the unique nuclear receptors provides information about the function of these receptors.

Section snippets

Nuclear receptors in humans: preliminary results of genomic sequencing

The human genome is now more or less completely sequenced 2, 3, which marks a breakthrough in terms of nuclear receptor research. Recently, a preliminary version of the sequence completed by Celera was made available to large parts of the academic community, and a parallel effort has also been conducted at public research centers. From these results, it is clear that few nuclear receptors have evaded detection by conventional cloning methods, as judged from searches based on both DBD and LBD

Nuclear receptors in C. elegans and Drosophila

The small nematode C. elegans was the first multicellular organism whose genome was completely sequenced, a task that was completed in December 1998 (Ref. 8). Analysis of the sequence data provided a surprising result regarding the number of nuclear receptors in this organism. Based on similarities in the signature motif of the nuclear receptor superfamily, the DNA-binding domain, the C. elegans genome was shown to contain 270 nuclear receptors, which is more than four times the number

Why does C. elegans have so many receptors, and Drosophila so few?

An obvious question following the mapping of the genomes of one nematode and one insect is why the nuclear receptor gene family has undergone this unparalleled amplification in the nematode C. elegans. To understand the relevance of this observation one must take a closer look at the biology of C. elegans. One property that distinguishes C. elegans from both mammals and insects is the extremely large proportion of the cells of the animal that are nerve cells.

The complete organism has 959 cells,

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council (No. 13X-2819) and from KaroBio AB.

References (25)

  • H. Nishigori

    Mutations in the small heterodimer partner gene are associated with mild obesity in Japanese subjects

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2001)
  • C. elegans Sequencing Consortium

    Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology

    Science

    (1998)
  • Cited by (45)

    • Covalent ligands of nuclear receptors

      2023, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
    • Revisiting the role of GCNF in embryonic development

      2013, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Human GCNF was reported to be isolated from a human embryonic carcinoma cell line in 1996 [4] and human testis cDNA libraries in 1997 and 1998 [5–8]. Drosophila melanogaster DmHR4 and Caenorhabditis elegans CeNHR-91 are paralogs of GCNF [9,10]. Blast search shows that DmHR4 shares similarity with mGCNF: amino acids 66–155 of mGCNF with 63% identity, 76% positivity and 1% gap; amino acids 296–347 of mGCNF with 33% identity, 69% positivity and 0 gap; amino acids 383–474 of mGCNF with 24% identity, 48% positivity and 13% gap.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text