Miscellaneous
Effectiveness of Spironolactone Plus Ambrisentan for Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (from the [ARIES] Study 1 and 2 Trials)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.051Get rights and content

In translational models of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), spironolactone improves cardiopulmonary hemodynamics by attenuating the adverse effects of hyperaldosteronism on endothelin type-B receptor function in pulmonary endothelial cells. This observation suggests that coupling spironolactone with inhibition of endothelin type-A receptor–mediated pulmonary vasoconstriction may be a useful treatment strategy for patients with PAH. We examined clinical data from patients randomized to placebo or the selective endothelin type-A receptor antagonist ambrisentan (10 mg/day) and in whom spironolactone use was reported during ARIES-1 and -2, which were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials assessing the effect of ambrisentan for 12 weeks on clinical outcome in PAH. From patients randomized to placebo (n = 132) or ambrisentan (n = 67), we identified concurrent spironolactone use in 21 (15.9%) and 10 (14.9%) patients, respectively. Compared with patients treated with ambrisentan alone (n = 57), therapy with ambrisentan + spironolactone improved change in 6-minute walk distance by 94% at week 12 (mean ± SE, +38.2 ± 8.1 vs +74.2 ± 27.4 m, p = 0.11), improved plasma B-type natriuretic peptide concentration by 1.7-fold (p = 0.08), and resulted in a 90% relative increase in the number of patients improving ≥1 World Health Organization functional class (p = 0.08). Progressive illness, PAH-associated hospitalizations, or death occurred as an end point for 5.3% of ambrisentan-treated patients; however, no patient treated with ambrisentan + spironolactone reached any of these end points. In conclusion, these pilot data suggest that coupling spironolactone and endothelin type-A receptor antagonism may be clinically beneficial in PAH. Prospective clinical trials are required to further characterize our findings.

Section snippets

Methods

Patients with World Health Organization (WHO) group I PAH who had received treatment in the randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trials ARIES-1 (n = 201) and ARIES-2 (n = 192) were eligible for analysis. The full methods and results for both studies have been reported previously.7, 8 Patients received for 12 weeks either placebo or the selective endothelin type-A receptor antagonist ambrisentan at 5 or 10 mg/day orally in ARIES-1 or 2.5 or 5 mg/day orally in ARIES-2. The primary end point

Results

Of patients randomized to placebo (n = 132) or ambrisentan 10 mg/day (n = 67), concurrent spironolactone use was identified for 21 (15.9%) and 10 (14.9%) patients, respectively. Compared with ambrisentan alone (n = 57), patients in the ambrisentan + spironolactone group (n = 10) were more likely to have WHO functional class III/IV and tended to have worse baseline 6-MWD, pulmonary vascular resistance, and plasma BNP concentration, although no clinically meaningful differences between treatment

Discussion

Despite increasing evidence implicating the involvement of vasoactive hormones such as aldosterone in the pathophysiology of PAH,2, 6, 10, 11, 12 reports on the clinical application of aldosterone antagonists in this disease are limited to only individual patients.3, 13 This study represents the first report describing data collected systematically in patients with PAH for whom spironolactone was identified as part of the therapeutic profile.

Akin to ARIES-1 and ARIES-2, we observed that

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to graciously acknowledge the efforts of the ARIES trial investigators.

References (21)

  • S. Bansal et al.

    Role of vasopressin and aldosterone in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a pilot study

    Contemp Clin Trials

    (2009)
  • S. Shapiro et al.

    Frequency of edema in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension receiving ambrisentan

    Am J Cardiol

    (2012)
  • N. Galié et al.

    Ambrisentan therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2005)
  • S. Cabrol et al.

    Intravenous epoprostenol in inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

    J Heart Lung Transplant

    (2007)
  • B.A. Maron et al.

    Plasma aldosterone levels are elevated in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the absence of left ventricular heart failure: a pilot study

    Eur J Heart Fail

    (2013)
  • F.S. De Man et al.

    Dysregulated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system contributes to pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2012)
  • T.V. Martyniuk et al.

    [Activity of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and vasopressin level in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension]

    Ter Arkh

    (1998)
  • J.M. Elinoff et al.

    A pilot study of the effect of spironolactone therapy on exercise capacity and endothelial dysfunction in pulmonary arterial hypertension: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Trials

    (2013)
  • B.A. Maron et al.

    Aldosterone inactivates the endothelin-B receptor via a cysteinyl thiol redox switch to decrease pulmonary endothelial nitric oxide levels and modulate pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Circulation

    (2012)
  • N. Galiè et al.

    Results of the Ambrisentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Efficacy Studies (ARIES) Study 1 and 2

    Circulation

    (2008)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (81)

  • Comprehensive review on novel targets and emerging therapeutic modalities for pulmonary arterial Hypertension

    2022, International Journal of Pharmaceutics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Ambrisentan, selective ETA receptor antagonist was evaluated in ARIES-1 and ARIES-2 trial and exhibited improvements in 6MWD and NYHA FC. Ambrisentan was shown to be more effective and reduced liver side effects in comparison with bosentan (Maron et al., 2013). Sitaxentan, a selective ETA receptor antagonist, was voluntarily withdrawn by the licence holder from market in 2010 due to its liver toxicity cases in trials.

  • Mineralocorticoid receptor activation and antagonism in cardiovascular disease: cellular and molecular mechanisms

    2022, Kidney International Supplements
    Citation Excerpt :

    Gene expression analyses and in vitro studies point at an interaction between endothelial cells and other cell types in the process, involving the endothelin-1 signaling pathway and paracrine crosstalk via exosomes.50,108,109,111 A post hoc analysis from the Ambrisentan for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (ARIES) 1 and 2 trials suggested a beneficial effect of spironolactone when added to the endothelin-1 receptor antagonist ambrisentan in patients with PH.112 A prospective randomized phase 2 clinical trial on MRA use in PH is currently ongoing (NCT01712620). Knowledge of MR effects in cardiovascular disease continues to expand, pointing to new potential indications for MRAs.

  • Therapeutic approaches to improve pulmonary arterial load and right ventricular–pulmonary arterial coupling

    2022, Textbook of Arterial Stiffness and Pulsatile Hemodynamics in Health and Disease
  • Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor Use and Mortality in Pulmonary Hypertension: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Database

    2021, Chest
    Citation Excerpt :

    Two previous studies suggest that AA therapy indeed is prescribed preferentially in patients with greater pulmonary vascular disease burden. First, in the Ambrisentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Efficacy Study (ARIES) trial of ambrisentan for PAH, enrolled patients were treated with spironolactone based on the discretion of their personal physician.19 Analysis of these patients demonstrated that 61% of patients were prescribed spironolactone to treat “RV failure,” “refractory edema,” or “electrolyte imbalances.”

View all citing articles on Scopus

This work was supported by grants HL105301 to Dr. Leopold; HL61795, HL48743, HL107192, HL070819, and HL108630 to Dr. Loscalzo; 1K08HL111207-01A1 to Dr. Maron from the US National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Maryland) and the Lerner Foundation (Boston, Massachusetts) at Brigham and Women's Hospital (Dr. Maron) and grant 11POST6720000 to Dr. Maron from the American Heart Association (Dallas, Texas).

See page 725 for disclosure information.

View full text