Review
Cardiac gene regulatory networks in Drosophila

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2008.09.002Get rights and content

Abstract

The Drosophila system has proven a powerful tool to help unlock the regulatory processes that occur during specification and differentiation of the embryonic heart. In this review, we focus upon a temporal analysis of the molecular events that result in heart formation in Drosophila, with a particular emphasis upon how genomic and other cutting-edge approaches are being brought to bear upon the subject. We anticipate that systems-level approaches will contribute greatly to our comprehension of heart development and disease in the animal kingdom.

Introduction

A central goal of developmental biology is to identify and characterize the genes which control the formation of specific cells, tissues, or organs within the body. Much recent progress has been driven by the increasing realization that genes controlling organ formation are implicated in congenital birth defects, as well as diseases in later life. Thus, genes whose normal function is to create cell types in the embryo, can also destroy those structures when mutated. Of equal importance, it is now apparent that genes showing evolutionary conservation in sequence frequently show evolutionary conservation in function. Thus, the analysis of development in model organisms has provided important insight into developmental mechanisms (reviewed in [1]).

It is also apparent that the complex tissues and organs of higher animals arise from the concerted actions of very large numbers of genes influencing cell behavior and function. These genes, many of them regulatory in nature, are known to function as components of regulatory networks; and there is increasing evidence that the genetic networks have also been conserved through evolution. Defining the parameters of such regulatory networks, and how the networks have evolved, has become a central challenge in the field (reviewed in [2]).

One of the earliest organs to form in the mammalian body is the heart. Significant progress has been made in defining the genes which contribute to heart development, in a diverse array of animal models (reviewed in [3], [4], [5]). Many of these critical genes play regulatory roles, and the roles of individual genes in contributing to the overall genomic regulatory network for cardiogenesis is becoming clear.

We recently presented a developmental regulatory network for cardiogenesis in Drosophila and mammals, drawing attention to the striking conservation in function for several named factors [3]. While this network provides insight into the cadre of genes controlling cardiac development, it does not provide a sense for how regulatory interactions change over time. In addition, it does not take into account the plethora of new information and new technologies available to the developmental cardiologist. As more data become available, it is incumbent upon us to find ways to analyze the data and to use it to generate predictive models regarding both normal cardiac development and cardiac disease mechanisms.

In this review, we have updated the gene regulatory interactions that are known to take place during Drosophila cardiac development. In doing this, we have parsed the embryonic period to a series of critical stages, and we have focused upon the known regulatory events taking place at each stage. This allows us to visualize cardiac development as a series of interdependent processes, starting prior to gastrulation, and culminating in the formation of a functioning heart tube only 20 hours later.

Section snippets

The embryology of Drosophila cardiac development

Cardiac tissue in Drosophila, as in other animals, arises from the mesoderm. The cellular details of cardiac cell specification and morphogenesis are described in Fig. 1. Mesodermal cells are specified early in fly development as a ventral group of cells, which invaginates to form a layer within the embryo (Fig. 1A–A”). Mesodermal cells then spread laterally and dorsally, and those that migrate the furthest become restricted to a dorsal mesoderm fate via the action of the dorsally-derived TGFß

The dorsoventral axis: several domains contribute to cardiac specification

The first critical decision made during the formation of cardiac tissue is to pattern the embryo along the dorsoventral axis. The dorsoventral patterning mechanism promotes the formation of a gradient of nuclear Dorsal protein from low in the dorsal region, through moderate in lateral regions, to high in ventral regions (Fig. 2). On a superficial level, this decision is important since it results in the specification of the mesoderm as the ventral-most group of cells in response to the highest

The dorsal mesoderm

Specification of the dorsal mesoderm begins when the underlying mesodermal layer comes into the vicinity of the dorsal ectoderm (Fig. 1B–B”). In response to the ectodermally produced Dpp signal, the dorsal ridge of the mesodermal layer is specified, as expression of a number of molecular markers becomes restricted to this region. Specifically, expression of the cardiogenic factor tinman (tin) narrows down from the broad expression in trunk mesoderm to a slimmer band corresponding to the dorsal

Specification of distinct progenitors within the cardiac mesoderm: the Eve pericardial cell

By the end of stage 10 of Drosophila embryogenesis, the newly formed cardiac mesoderm comprises spaced clusters of cells situated at the dorsal ridge of the mesoderm, under the intersection points between Dpp and Wg ectodermal signals [38]. From this presumptive cardiac field, three elements emerge: a subset of dorsal body wall muscles; cardial cells (cardiomyocytes); and pericardial cells. There is still much to learn about the mechanisms that specify cardial cell progenitors at this stage. By

Diversifying the cardiac tube: the anteroposterior axis

As the linear cardiac tube is being formed via the convergence of two rows of cardial cells, cells along the anteroposterior (AP) axis are programmed to assume distinct cell fates. This programming is most apparent in the patterning of Svp cells in the developing dorsal vessel: whereas ten trunk segments contribute cells to the cardiac tube, only in the most posterior seven segments do Svp cells form. There are additionally a number of genes, both regulatory and structural, whose patterns of

Cardiac structural genes: a common code for a common pattern of expression?

Expression of a set of genes that directly determine cardiac function is the ultimate goal of the differentiation process, yet as described below, significant diversity is apparent both in patterns of structural gene expression and mechanisms of structural gene regulation. Cardiac structural genes can be tentatively grouped into sub-categories of (i) general muscle-specific genes and (ii) cardiac-specific genes, although there are also several genes, such as svp and brokenhearted, which show

Concluding comments

Significant progress has been made over the last few years in identifying how cardiac cells are specified in the embryo and how their differentiation is regulated. It is now apparent that the process of cardiogenesis, in organisms from flies to man, arises from the action of a conserved network of regulatory interactions. New technological approaches are further identifying genes which are expressed in the cardiac tissue, defining their functions in that tissue, and demonstrating how their

Acknowledgements

Research in the Cripps Laboratory is supported by grants from the NIH (GM61738, HL080545) American Heart Association, Pacific-Mountain Affiliate, and the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation.

References (110)

  • H.T. Nguyen et al.

    Drosophila mef2 expression during mesoderm development is controlled by a complex array of cis-acting regulatory modules

    Dev. Biol.

    (1998)
  • S. Vincent et al.

    The Drosophila protein Dof is specifically required for FGF signaling

    Mol. Cell

    (1998)
  • A. Stathopoulos et al.

    Genomic regulatory networks and animal development

    Dev. Cell

    (2005)
  • A. Stathopoulos et al.

    Whole-genome analysis of dorsal–ventral patterning in the Drosophila embryo

    Cell

    (2002)
  • W.K. Lockwood et al.

    The patterns of wingless, decapentaplegic, and tinman position the Drosophila heart

    Mech. Dev.

    (2002)
  • L.A. Raftery et al.

    TGF-beta family signal transduction in Drosophila development: from Mad to Smads

    Dev. Biol.

    (1999)
  • A. Letsou et al.

    Drosophila Dpp signaling is mediated by the punt gene product: a dual ligand-binding type II receptor of the TGF beta receptor family

    Cell

    (1995)
  • K. Gajewski et al.

    Pannier is a transcriptional target and partner of Tinman during Drosophila cardiogenesis

    Dev. Biol.

    (2001)
  • J. Roose et al.

    TCF transcription factors: molecular switches in carcinogenesis

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1999)
  • H. Clevers

    Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in development and disease

    Cell

    (2006)
  • M. Park et al.

    The wingless signaling pathway is directly involved in Drosophila heart development

    Dev. Biol.

    (1996)
  • R. Hoffmans et al.

    Pygopus and legless provide essential transcriptional coactivator functions to armadillo/beta-catenin

    Curr. Biol.

    (2005)
  • M.S. Halfon et al.

    Ras pathway specificity is determined by the integration of multiple signal-activated and tissue-restricted transcription factors

    Cell

    (2000)
  • A. Carmena et al.

    Reciprocal regulatory interactions between the Notch and Ras signaling pathways in the Drosophila embryonic mesoderm

    Dev. Biol.

    (2002)
  • S. Knirr et al.

    Molecular integration of inductive and mesoderm-intrinsic inputs governs even-skipped enhancer activity in a subset of pericardial and dorsal muscle progenitors

    Dev. Biol.

    (2001)
  • J. Liu et al.

    Spatial specificity of mesodermal even-skipped expression relies on multiple repressor sites

    Dev. Biol.

    (2008)
  • F. Schweisguth

    Regulation of notch signaling activity

    Curr. Biol.

    (2004)
  • M. Freeman et al.

    The argos gene encodes a diffusible factor that regulates cell fate decisions in the Drosophila eye

    Cell

    (1992)
  • M. Park et al.

    Mesodermal cell fate decisions in Drosophila are under the control of the lineage genes numb, Notch, and sanpodo

    Mech. Dev.

    (1998)
  • J. Liu et al.

    Hedgehog and RAS pathways cooperate in the anterior–posterior specification and positioning of cardiac progenitor cells

    Dev. Biol.

    (2006)
  • J. Sellin et al.

    Dynamics of heart differentiation, visualized utilizing heart enhancer elements of the Drosophila melanogaster bHLH transcription factor Hand

    Gene Expr. Patterns

    (2006)
  • L. Perrin et al.

    Drosophila cardiac tube organogenesis requires multiple phases of Hox activity

    Dev. Biol.

    (2004)
  • K.M. Ryan et al.

    Homeotic selector genes control the patterning of seven-up expressing cells in the Drosophila dorsal vessel

    Mech. Dev.

    (2005)
  • K.M. Ryan et al.

    The NK homeodomain transcription factor Tinman is a direct activator of seven-up in the Drosophila dorsal vessel

    Dev. Biol.

    (2007)
  • P.C. Lo et al.

    A role for the COUP-TF-related gene seven-up in the diversification of cardioblast identities in the dorsal vessel of Drosophila

    Mech. Dev.

    (2001)
  • J.D. Hendren et al.

    Cardiac expression of the Drosophila Sulphonylurea receptor gene is regulated by an intron enhancer dependent upon the NK homeodomain factor Tinman

    Mech. Dev.

    (2007)
  • T. Sandmann et al.

    A temporal map of transcription factor activity: mef2 directly regulates target genes at all stages of muscle development

    Dev. Cell.

    (2006)
  • K.K. Kelly et al.

    Drosophila MEF2 is a direct regulator of Actin57B transcription in cardiac, skeletal, and visceral muscle lineages

    Mech. Dev.

    (2002)
  • S.B. Carrol et al.

    Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of evo devo and the Making of the Animal Kingdom

    (2005)
  • D. Davidson et al.

    Bioinformatics beyond sequence: mapping gene function in the embryo

    Nat. Rev. Genet.

    (2001)
  • N. Azpiazu et al.

    Segmentation and specification of the Drosophila mesoderm

    Genes Dev.

    (1996)
  • R. Ponzielli et al.

    Heart tube patterning in Drosophila requires integration of axial and segmental information provided by the Bithorax Complex genes and hedgehog signaling

    Development

    (2002)
  • T.L. Lovato et al.

    The Hox gene abdominal-A specifies heart cell fate in the Drosophila dorsal vessel

    Development

    (2002)
  • E.J. Ward et al.

    Characterization of a novel subset of cardiac cells and their progenitors in the Drosophila embryo

    Development

    (2000)
  • A.D. Alvarez et al.

    pannier and pointedP2 act sequentially to regulate Drosophila heart development

    Development

    (2003)
  • D.F. Poulsen

    Histogenesis, organogenesis, and differentiation in the embryo of Drosophila melanogaster meigen

  • M. Fujioka et al.

    Embryonic even skipped-dependent muscle and heart cell fates are required for normal adult activity, heart function, and lifespan

    Circ. Res.

    (2005)
  • D.J. Pan et al.

    Functional analysis of the Drosophila twist promoter reveals a dorsal-binding ventral activator region

    Genes Dev.

    (1991)
  • J. Jiang et al.

    The dorsal morphogen gradient regulates the mesoderm determinant twist in early Drosophila embryos

    Genes Dev.

    (1991)
  • M. Leptin

    twist and snail as positive and negative regulators during Drosophila mesoderm development

    Genes Dev.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (43)

    • Akirin is critical for early tinman induction and subsequent formation of the heart in Drosophila melanogaster

      2021, Developmental Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In summary, our data highlight the critical dose-dependent nature of the initial Twist-mediated expression of tinman for the ultimate success of the morphological and developmental program of the embryonic heart. While previous studies have determined that this initial expression of Tinman is solely required to further restrict the area of the dorsal mesoderm and to begin specifying the heart (reviewed in (Bryantsev and Cripps, 2009), the significant reduction in tinman expression level that we report in akirin mutants, the decreased numbers of Tinman-positive cardiomyocytes, and the cardiac phenotypes reported herein indicate that failure to establish the proper level of Tinman in the earliest steps of cardiac mesoderm specification is critical for later downstream successful heart development and function. We attempted to restore early Twist-dependent tinman expression by inducing tinman expression throughout the mesoderm in an akirin mutant background.

    • Drosophila as a Model to Understand Second Heart Field Development

      2023, Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text