Elsevier

Biochemical Pharmacology

Volume 98, Issue 4, 15 December 2015, Pages 541-555
Biochemical Pharmacology

Commentary
New paradigms in GPCR drug discovery

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2015.08.085Get rights and content

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain a major domain of pharmaceutical discovery. The identification of GPCR lead compounds and their optimization are now structure-based, thanks to advances in X-ray crystallography, molecular modeling, protein engineering and biophysical techniques. In silico screening provides useful hit molecules. New pharmacological approaches to tuning the pleotropic action of GPCRs include: allosteric modulators, biased ligands, GPCR heterodimer-targeted compounds, manipulation of polypharmacology, receptor antibodies and tailoring of drug molecules to fit GPCR pharmacogenomics. Measurements of kinetics and drug efficacy are factors influencing clinical success. With the exception of inhibitors of GPCR kinases, targeting of intracellular GPCR signaling or receptor cycling for therapeutic purposes remains a futuristic concept. New assay approaches are more efficient and multidimensional: cell-based, label-free, fluorescence-based assays, and biosensors. Tailoring GPCR drugs to a patient’s genetic background is now being considered. Chemoinformatic tools can predict ADME-tox properties. New imaging technology visualizes drug action in vivo. Thus, there is reason to be optimistic that new technology for GPCR ligand discovery will help reverse the current narrowing of the pharmaceutical pipeline.

Introduction

G protein (heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs), also known as 7 transmembrane helical (7TM) receptors, remain a major source of new pharmaceuticals and the focus of extensive research efforts in academia, government and pharma. Recent reviews cover the structural features of the receptors [1], [2], [17] and the chemical aspects of orthosteric [16], [18] and allosteric [88] ligands.

Among the 19 approved drug products with the greatest sales revenues at their peak year in the period up to 2013, 7 are directed toward GPCRs (Table 1) [3]. That is equal to the number of biologic drugs (non-GPCR directed) in the same category of top earners. One of those GPCR drugs, the antithrombotic drug Plavix 1 (Fig. 1) and the highest in revenues during that period, serves as a prodrug that must be activated in the liver [4]. Other GPCR-related drugs in the blockbuster category, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), increase the synaptic availability of natural neurotransmitters that act at GPCRs. Since 2013, 15 GPCR-related drugs were approved as new chemical entities (NCEs) in 31 months, with exclusions as specified in Table 2. Among these NCEs, naloxegol 12 is a derivative of a known opioid receptor (OR) antagonist that is covalently linked to a short polyethylene glycol (PEG) chain to prevent its intestinal absorption; thus, it selectively blocks opiate receptors in the gut to prevent side effects of systemic opiates [5]. Several of these new drugs treat sleep conditions: suvorexant 10 blocks two subtypes of the orexin receptor, which is a first drug in that category [6]. Approval of a melatonin receptor agonist, tasimelteon 13 followed several other approved drugs acting at the same GPCR [7].

The GPCR field is advancing rapidly, and new paradigms for GPCR drug discovery must be considered in the larger context of drug discovery. Drug discovery for GPCR targets has encountered many of the limitations associated with a changing paradigm for drug discovery in general, and there are many commentaries on why the pharmaceutical pipeline has narrowed [84]. Classical approaches to drug discovery have waning productivity; the linear, stepwise and iterative process through which new compounds progressed is now being modified [8]. Traditionally, the target pathway involved a single mechanism, with one-dimensional activity being measured. The classical approaches have not continued to yield new drugs as in past decades, despite the explosion in the number of new chemical substances accessible to researchers. The resource of greater chemical diversity has not yet led to an increase in the number of approved drugs each year, which is either declining or holding steady. Currently, new approaches to the identification of structural leads and their optimization and new technology for characterizing drug action are aiding GPCR drug discovery [12]. GPCR drug action is much more nuanced than previously recognized, and the uncontrolled variation in formerly neglected or unknown pharmacological parameters can likely lead to a lack of efficacy – or undesirable side effects – in later clinical trials [13]. In addition to directly acting GPCR modulators, many approved drugs influence GPCR action indirectly, for example SSRIs and other inhibitors of the transporter family. This commentary does not cover inhibitors of transport or generation of neurotransmitters, which have been reviewed elsewhere [14]. However, modulation of signaling and regulation pathways directly associated with GPCR activation is within the present scope.

Section snippets

New technology for GPCR structural characterization

The most important new approach in GPCR technology is the structure-based design of agonist and antagonist ligands. New GPCR X-ray structures, including both antagonist-bound and agonist-bound complexes, provide detailed insight into the structural basis of drug action and guide the design of new ligands [2], [15]. Over 100 3D structures of GPCRs with either an agonist or an antagonist bound have been reported [16]. Technological advances that facilitated this revolution in the way we approach

Diversity of GPCRs and their action

7TM proteins are the largest single family of proteins, corresponding to ∼4% of those coded by the human genome. Most of the roughly 400 nonolfactory, human GPCRs have not yet been exploited as pharmaceutical targets [141]. There are still ∼120 orphan GPCRs for which the endogenous ligand is unknown, but even for hundreds of nonorphan GPCRs untapped potential exists. Formerly orphan GPCRs that are deorphanized, such as GPR119 and GPR120, are proving useful in drug discovery [44], [46], [51].

In vitro characterization

Newly developed in vitro and in vivo assay and screening approaches are accelerating the discovery of new leads for GPCR ligands. These approaches include fluorescence-based screens in cells or membranes [131], bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based biosensors [91], and label free drug discovery [133]. For example, the G protein α (energy donor) and γ (energy acceptor) subunits may be labeled with matched fluorescent proteins to achieve a BRET signal when activated by a GPCR

Conclusions

In conclusion, there is reason to be optimistic that new approaches, technologies and efficiencies for GPCR ligand discovery will help improve the current narrowing of the pharmaceutical pipeline. The discovery of GPCR lead compounds and their optimization are now structure-based, thanks to advances in X-ray crystallography, protein engineering and biophysical techniques. New pharmacological approaches include: allosteric modulators, biased ligands, GPCR heterodimer-targeted compounds,

Acknowledgment

Support from the NIH Intramural Research Grant Z01 DK031117 (NIDDK) is acknowledged.

References (162)

  • P. Fishman et al.

    Pharmacological and therapeutic effects of A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) agonists

    Drug Discov. Today

    (2012)
  • Z.G. Gao et al.

    Probing biased/partial agonism at the G protein-coupled A2B adenosine receptor

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (2014)
  • P.M. Giguere et al.

    Tuning up the right signal: chemical and genetic approaches to study GPCR functions

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol

    (2014)
  • J.D. Violin et al.

    Biased ligands at G-protein-coupled receptors: promise and progress

    Trends Pharmacol. Sci.

    (2014)
  • Z.G. Gao et al.

    Translocation of arrestin induced by human A3 adenosine receptor ligands in an engineered cell line: comparison with G protein-dependent pathways

    Pharmacol. Res.

    (2008)
  • E. Malach et al.

    Membrane-permeable tastants amplify β2-adrenergic receptor signaling and delay receptor desensitization via intracellular inhibition of GRK2’s kinase activity

    Biochim. Biophy.s Acta.

    (2015)
  • G.E. Woodard et al.

    Regulators of G-protein-signaling proteins: negative modulators of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling

    Int. Rev. Cell. Mol. Biol.

    (2015)
  • L. Jia et al.

    A mechanism regulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling that requires cycles of protein palmitoylation and depalmitoylation

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2014)
  • N.M. Urs et al.

    Integrated approaches to understanding antipsychotic drug action at GPCRs

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.

    (2014)
  • R.J. Winquist et al.

    The fall and rise of pharmacology —(Re-) defining the discipline?

    Biochem. Pharmacol

    (2014)
  • Z.G. Gao et al.

    Functionally biased modulation of A3 adenosine receptor agonist efficacy and potency by imidazoquinolinamine allosteric enhancers

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (2011)
  • M. Vilums et al.

    When structure-affinity relationships meet structure-kinetics relationships: 3-((Inden-1-yl) amino)-1-isopropyl-cyclopentane-1-carboxamides as CCR2 antagonists

    Eur. J. Med. Chem.

    (2015)
  • I. Gsandtner et al.

    protein-independent signaling of a G protein-coupled receptor: direct binding of arno/cytohesin-2 to the carboxyl terminus of the A2A adenosine receptor is necessary for sustained activation of the ERK/MAP kinase pathway

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2005)
  • P. Zhang et al.

    Allosteric activation of a G protein coupled receptor with cell-penetrating receptor mimetics

    Biol. Chem.

    (2015)
  • V. Katritch et al.

    Structure-function of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily

    Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.

    (2013)
  • K.A. Jacobson et al.

    New insights for drug design from the X-ray crystallographic structures of GPCRs

    Mol Pharmacol

    (2012)
  • http://pharmamkting.blogspot.com/2013/01/lipitor-plavix-last-of-small-molecule.html and...
  • A.L. Beitelshees et al.

    Clopidogrel pharmacogenetics promising steps towards patient care?

    Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.

    (2006)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Effects of pharmaceutical PEGylation on drug metabolism and its clinical concerns

    Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol.

    (2014)
  • C.D. Cox et al.

    Discovery of the dual orexin receptor antagonist [(7R)-4-(5-chloro-1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl)-7-methyl-1,4-diazepan-1-yl][5-methyl-2-(2H-1,2,3-triazol-2-yl) phenyl]methanone (MK-4305) for the treatment of insomnia

    J. Med. Chem.

    (2010)
  • M. MacCoss et al.

    Organic chemistry in drug discovery

    Science

    (2004)
  • J.J. Irwin et al.

    ZINC: a free tool to discover chemistry for biology

    J. Chem. Inf. Model.

    (2012)
  • D. Rodríguez et al.

    Molecular docking screening using agonist-bound GPCR structures: probing the A2A adenosine receptor

    J. Chem. Inf. Model.

    (2015)
  • M. Reutlinger et al.

    Combining on-chip synthesis of a focused combinatorial library with computational target prediction reveals imidazopyridine GPCR ligands

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2014)
  • D. Fuoco

    Hypothesis for changing models: current pharmaceutical paradigms, trends and approaches in drug discovery

    PeerJ

    (2015)
  • S. Moro et al.

    Role of the extracellular loops of G protein-coupled receptors in ligand recognition: a molecular modeling study of the human P2Y1 receptor

    Biochemistry

    (1999)
  • G. Torres et al.

    Plasma membrane monoamine transporters: structure, regulation and function

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • M. Michino et al.

    What can crystal structures of aminergic receptors tell us about designing subtype-selective ligands?

    Pharmacol. Rev.

    (2015)
  • J. Shonberg et al.

    GPCR Crystal structures: Medicinal chemistry in the pocket

    Bioorg. Med. Chem.

    (2014)
  • B. Kobilka

    The structural basis of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling (nobel lecture)

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2013)
  • S.P. Andrews et al.

    Structure-based and fragment-based GPCR drug discovery

    ChemMedChem

    (2014)
  • S.G. Rasmussen et al.

    Crystal structure of the β2 adrenergic receptor-Gs protein complex

    Nature

    (2011)
  • A. Zhukov et al.

    Biophysical mapping of the adenosine A2A receptor

    J. Med. Chem.

    (2011)
  • D. Weichert et al.

    Covalent molecular probes for class A G protein-coupled receptors: advances and applications

    ACS Chem. Biol.

    (2015)
  • E. Ghosh et al.

    Methodological advances: the unsung heroes of the GPCR structural revolution

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (2015)
  • D. Milić et al.

    Large-scale production and protein engineering of G protein-coupled receptors for structural studies

    Front. Pharmacol.

    (2015)
  • A.K. Shukla et al.

    Visualization of arrestin recruitment by a G-protein-coupled receptor

    Nature

    (2014)
  • G.J. van Westen et al.

    Identifying novel adenosine receptor ligands by simultaneous proteochemometric modeling of rat and human bioactivity data

    J. Med. Chem.

    (2012)
  • A.C. Kruse et al.

    Structure and dynamics of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

    Nature

    (2012)
  • F. Xu et al.

    Structure of an agonist-bound human A2A adenosine receptor

    Science

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text