Elsevier

Brain Research Reviews

Volume 53, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 27-38
Brain Research Reviews

Review
Neuroanatomical, molecular genetic, and behavioral correlates of fragile X syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a leading cause of inherited mental retardation. In the vast majority of cases, this X-linked disorder is due to a CGG expansion in the 5′ untranslated region of the fmr-1 gene and the resulting decreased expression of its associated protein, FMRP. FXS is characterized by a number of cognitive, behavioral, anatomical, and biological abnormalities. FXS provides a unique opportunity to study the consequence of mutation in a single gene on the development and proper functioning of the CNS. The current focus on the role of FMRP in neuronal maturation makes it timely to assemble the extant information on how reduced expression of the fmr-1 gene leads to neuronal dysmorphology. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent genetic, neuroanatomical, and behavioral studies of fragile X syndrome and to offer potential mechanisms to account for the pleiotropic phenotype of this disorder.

Introduction

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common form of inherited mental retardation and developmental delay. The exact prevalence figures have not been firmly established, although estimates range between 1 in 4000 males and 1 in 8000 females to 1 in 1250 males and 1 in 2500 females (Turner et al., 1996, Warren and Nelson, 1994, Oostra et al., 1993). The causative mutation is a (CGG) expansion of the 5′-untranslated region of the X-linked fmr-1 gene, as first described by Verkerk et al. (1991). The expansion mutation leads to the hypermethylation of the promoter region and ensuing silencing of the gene, leading to a reduced expression of Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP).

Fragile X syndrome is characterized by a constellation of clinical manifestations including mild to severe mental retardation, hyperactivity, and autism (Hatton et al., in press). Although fragile X children often display autistic features, there may be a qualitative difference in autistic behavior between children with fragile X and autism (Demark et al., 2003). At a cognitive level, FXS is associated with deficits in short-term memory (Loesch et al., 2004), visuo-spatial abilities (Crowe et al., 1990), and linguistic processing (Belser and Sudhalter, 2001). The physical phenotype comprises a broad forehead, large prominent ears, mitral valve prolapse, dermatoglyphic abnormalities, and macroorchidism in postpubescent males (Meryash et al., 1984). Behavioral characteristics include poor eye contact, hand flapping, tactile defensiveness, impulsivity, and aggression (Lachiewicz et al., 1994).

Autopsy studies on fragile X brain specimens and on fmr-1 KO mice reveal neuronal abnormalities in the neocortex. Among the more striking features are dendritic spines that have an immature morphology—i.e., thin, elongated, and lack the typical “mushroom shape” found in mature neurons (Comery et al., 1997, Irwin et al., 2001, Irwin et al., 2002, Rudelli et al., 1985, Wisniewski et al., 1991). Histological studies on brains from FXS individuals have revealed higher spine density along dendrites (Irwin et al., 2001),which is typical in the developing brain before synaptic elimination. These data suggest that FXS is associated with abnormalities in developmental maturation (Irwin et al., 2000). Although the exact function of FMRP remains elusive, it is known to bear several features common to RNA-binding proteins.

Over the past decade, there has been mounting evidence that the FMRP protein represses the translation of its target mRNAs (Adinolfi et al., 2003, Laggerbauer et al., 2001, Mazroui et al., 2002, Mazroui et al., 2003, Zalfa et al., 2003). This function in conjunction with its known presence in dendrites and dendritic spines suggests that FMRP may repress the local translation of mRNAs (Churchill et al., 2002). The reduced expression of FMRP, as occurs in FXS, may therefore lead to abnormally increased translation of proteins involved in neuronal maturation. The finding that spine elongation is a translation-dependent mechanism substantiates this theory (Vanderklish and Edelman, 2002, Vanderklish and Edelman, 2005).

The current focus on the role of FMRP in neuronal maturation makes it timely to assemble the extant information on how reduced expression of the fmr-1 gene leads to neuronal dysmorpholgy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent genetic, neuroanatomical, and behavioral studies of fragile X syndrome and to offer potential mechanisms to account for the pleiotropic phenotype of this disorder.

Section snippets

The genetics of fragile X syndrome

Until recently, little was known about the genetic determinants of fragile X syndrome. In 1969, Lubs (1969) described a specific chromosomal variant that segregated with mental retardation over three generations. The anomaly consisted of a constriction at the end of the long arm of chromosome X noticed in metaphase spreads from mentally retarded individuals. A subsequent study enabled the localization of the X-linked anomaly to Xq27.3 (Harrison et al., 1983) and the variant was then known as

Neuroanatomy of fragile X syndrome

In the normal population, fmr-1 mRNA and its associated protein are expressed in a broad range of tissues. Of particular importance is the finding of high fmr-1 expression in neurons of fetal and adult brains (Abitbol et al., 1993, Devys et al., 1993). A significant outcome of expression analysis studies is the finding that the anatomical regions where the fmr-1 gene is highly expressed are believed to be associated with the major phenotypic abnormalities in FXS. We review the link between

Overproduction and elimination: a question of balance

It is now well established that competition occurs among developing neurons whereby some synapses are eliminated and others are strengthened (Katz and Crowley, 2002, Shatz and Stryker, 1978). This maturation process involves the transition from small synapses with thin, long dendritic spines, to more bulbous synapses associated with shorter, “mushroom-shaped” dendritic spines (Fiala et al., 1998, Greenough and Chang, 1985, Harris, 1999, Holtmaat et al., 2005). The neuronal morphology of the FXS

Neuropsychological deficits in fragile X syndrome

It is now well established that fragile X syndrome is associated with spatial deficits, i.e., impairments in the processing of visual spatial information to discriminate and manipulate figures and objects, as well as attentional and inhibitory impairment. This section provides a review of these neuropsychological deficits associated with FXS.

Heterogeneous phenotype in fragile X syndrome

An effort to determine the role of the FMRP protein in normal cells is crucial to understanding the mechanisms that lead to fragile X syndrome. A particular challenge in this regard is associated with the wide discrepancy in the FXS phenotype. A number of recurring clinical traits found in FXS have led to the establishment of a “13-item checklist” (Hagerman et al., 1991). This checklist encompasses both physical and behavioral traits that are typically found in FXS patients. However, given the

Conclusion

A major finding from neuroanatomical studies of autopsy material is dendritic spine dysgenesis that arises in FXS. This finding has been extended to more recent studies of fmr-1 knockout mice. Dendritic dysmorphology, which is characterized by abnormally long and thin spines, suggests that FXS is associated with an incomplete neuronal maturation process. Although the role of the FMRP protein in this process remains elusive, it appears to be involved in synaptic protein synthesis. Recent studies

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a research grant to A.C. from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The authors would like to thank Dr. Evan Balaban for valuable comments on an earlier version of this article.

References (136)

  • K.M. Harris

    Structure, development, and plasticity of dendritic spines

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (1999)
  • A.J. Holtmaat et al.

    Transient and persistent dendritic spines in the neocortex in vivo

    Neuron

    (2005)
  • G. Jeffery

    The albino retina: an abnormality that provides insight into normal retinal development

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1997)
  • W.R. Kates et al.

    Reliability and validity of MRI measurement of the amygdala and hippocampus in children with fragile X syndrome

    Psychiatry Res.

    (1997)
  • J. Li et al.

    Reduced cortical synaptic plasticity and GluR1 expression associated with fragile X mental retardation protein deficiency

    Mol. Cell. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • M. Marin-Padilla

    Structural abnormalities of the cerebral cortex in human chromosomal aberrations: a Golgi study

    Brain Res.

    (1972)
  • S.M. McBride et al.

    Pharmacological rescue of synaptic plasticity, courtship behavior, and mushroom body defects in a Drosophila model of fragile X syndrome

    Neuron

    (2005)
  • C.J. Moore et al.

    A neuropsychological investigation of male premutation carriers of fragile X syndrome

    Neuropsychologia

    (2004)
  • F. Munir et al.

    A neuropsychological profile of attention deficits in young males with fragile X syndrome

    Neuropsychologia

    (2000)
  • W. Paradee et al.

    Fragile X mouse: strain effects of knockout phenotype and evidence suggesting deficient amygdala function

    Neuroscience

    (1999)
  • M. Abitbol et al.

    Nucleus basalis magnocellularis and hippocampus are the major sites of FMR-1 expression in the human fetal brain

    Nat. Genet.

    (1993)
  • M.T. Abrams et al.

    Molecular-neurobehavioral associations in females with the fragile X full mutation

    Am. J. Med. Genet.

    (1994)
  • S. Adinolfi et al.

    The N-terminus of the fragile X mental retardation protein contains a novel domain involved in dimerization and RNA binding

    Biochemistry

    (2003)
  • C.T. Ashley et al.

    FMR1 protein: conserved RNP family domains and selective RNA binding

    Science

    (1993)
  • C.T. Ashley et al.

    Human and murine FMR-1: alternative splicing and translational initiation downstream of the CGG-repeat

    Nat. Genet.

    (1993)
  • D. Bachner et al.

    Enhanced Fmr-1 expression in testis

    Nat. Genet.

    (1993)
  • M. Backes et al.

    Cognitive and behavioral profile of fragile X boys: correlations to molecular data

    Am. J. Med. Genet.

    (2000)
  • N. Barnea-Goraly et al.

    White matter tract alterations in fragile X syndrome: preliminary evidence from diffusion tensor imaging

    Am. J. Med. Genet., B Neuropsychiatr. Genet.

    (2003)
  • T.L. Baumgardner et al.

    Specification of the neurobehavioral phenotype in males with fragile X syndrome

    Pediatrics

    (1995)
  • R.C. Belser et al.

    Conversational characteristics of children with fragile X syndrome: repetitive speech

    Am. J. Ment. Retard.

    (2001)
  • L. Bennetto et al.

    Neuropsychology

  • E. Berry-Kravis et al.

    Psychopharmacology in fragile X syndrome-present and future

    Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev.

    (2004)
  • M. Bredenkotter et al.

    Visual system alterations in White Zebra Finches

    Brain Behav. Evol.

    (1996)
  • M. Calvani et al.

    l-Acetylcarnitine treatment on fragile X patients hyperactive behaviour

    Rev Neurol

    (2001)
  • A.E. Chudley et al.

    Fragile (X) X-linked mental retardation I: relationship between age and intelligence and the frequency of expression of fragil (X)(q28)

    Am. J. Med. Genet.

    (1983)
  • J.D. Churchill et al.

    A converging-methods approach to fragile X syndrome

    Dev. Psychobiol.

    (2002)
  • C. Cianchetti et al.

    Neuropsychological, psychiatric, and physical manifestations in 149 members from 18 fragile X families

    Am. J. Med. Genet.

    (1991)
  • T.A. Comery et al.

    Abnormal dendritic spines in fragile X knockout mice: maturation and pruning deficits

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1997)
  • K.M. Cornish et al.

    Differential impact of the FMR-1 full mutation on memory and attention functioning: a neuropsychological perspective

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • K. Cornish et al.

    Attention and language in fragile X

    Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev.

    (2004)
  • Y. Curlis et al.

    Haplotype study of intermediate-length alleles at the fragile X (FMR1) gene: ATL1, FMRb, and microsatellite haplotypes differ from those found in common-size FMR1 alleles

    Hum. Biol.

    (2005)
  • D.M. Dacey et al.

    Dendritic field size and morphology of midget and parasol ganglion cells of the human retina

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1992)
  • G.H. Daly et al.

    The relationship between ambient lighting conditions, absolute dark-adapted thresholds, and rhodopsin in black and hypopigmented mice

    Vis. Neurosci.

    (2004)
  • J.C. Darnell et al.

    FMRP RNA targets: identification and validation

    Genes Brain Behav.

    (2005)
  • J.L. Demark et al.

    Behavioral relationship between autism and fragile X syndrome

    Am. J. Ment. Retard.

    (2003)
  • B.B. de Vries et al.

    Mental status and fragile X expression in relation to FMR-1 gene mutation

    Eur. J. Hum. Genet.

    (1993)
  • D. Devys et al.

    The FMR-1 protein is cytoplasmic, most abundant in neurons and appears normal in carriers of a fragile X premutation

    Nat. Genet.

    (1993)
  • C. Dombrowski et al.

    Premutation and intermediate-size FMR1 alleles in 10572 males from the general population: loss of an AGG interruption is a late event in the generation of fragile X syndrome alleles

    Hum. Mol. Genet.

    (2002)
  • S. Eliez et al.

    Brain anatomy, gender and IQ in children and adolescents with fragile X syndrome

    Brain

    (2001)
  • J.C. Fiala et al.

    Synaptogenesis via dendritic filopodia in developing hippocampal area CA1

    J. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text