Elsevier

Cellular Signalling

Volume 20, Issue 2, February 2008, Pages 323-336
Cellular Signalling

Isolation and characterization of a novel human RGS mutant displaying gain-of-function activity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.10.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins play a crucial role in the adaptation of cells to stimulation by G protein-coupled receptors via heterotrimeric G proteins. Alterations in RGS function have been implicated in a wide range of disease states, leading to many researchers focusing on controlling the action of these regulatory proteins. Previous studies have centered on reducing or inhibiting the action of RGS proteins, utilizing inactive mutants or small molecular RGS inhibitors. Here we describe the isolation and characterization of a novel human RGS4 mutant which displays enhanced or gain-of-function (GOF) activity. RGS4S30C demonstrates GOF activity both in an in vivo yeast-based signalling pathway and in vitro against the Gαo1 subunit contained in an α2A-adrenoreceptor-Gαo1C351I fusion protein. Mutational analysis of serine 30 identified a number of alternative substitutions that result in GOF activity. GOF activity was retained upon transposition of the serine 30-cysteine mutation to the equivalent serine residue in human RGS16. As with previously identified GOF mutants, RGS4S30C/S30F/S30K demonstrate increased steady state protein levels, however these mutants also demonstrate enhanced GAP activity through an additional mechanism distinct from the increased protein content. The identification of human RGS mutants with GOF activity may provide novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of signaling-based diseases and the ability to transpose these mutations to other human RGS proteins extends their application to multiple pathways.

Introduction

A vast array of cellular responses is mediated by the stimulation, and subsequent downstream signaling, of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A key component in signal transduction through GPCRs is the heterotrimeric G protein, consisting of a Gα, a Gβ and a Gγ subunit. Stimulation of the GPCR results in exchange of GDP for GTP on the Gα subunit, generating active Gα-GTP which interacts with effectors to propagate the signal. Deactivation of Gα-GTP is achieved through the intrinsic GTPase activity of the Gα subunit. This activity is accelerated by the presence of GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) including regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins [1].

RGS proteins comprise a substantial family with over 30 mammalian members [1]. These proteins, characterized by a conserved 130 residue RGS-fold, can be divided into 6 subfamilies on the basis of sequence identity and the additional domains and motifs they contain [2]. The simplest RGS proteins, comprising little more than the RGS-fold, are contained within the B/R4 family and are characterized by a conserved 33 residue N-terminal amphipathic helix implicated in membrane localization [3], [4], [5]. The prototypical member of the B/R4 family, RGS4, is a 205 residue protein with short N-and C-termini in addition to the RGS-fold, and the simplicity of this protein has led to its use in numerous studies to investigate the mode of action of RGS proteins.

Alterations in RGS function have been implicated in a number of disease states, including cardiac disease [6], cancer [7] and schizophrenia [8]. The wide ranging effects of RGS proteins have led to many attempts to either increase or decrease their GAP activity. The majority of these studies have focused on reducing the activity of RGS proteins by isolating mutants with either reduced or absent GAP activity [9], [10], and also identifying molecules capable of inhibiting RGS action [11], [12], [13]. Mutants of the human proteins RGS4 and RGS5 have been identified which demonstrate gain-of-function (GOF) activity as a result of increased protein expression/stability [14], [15]. However, only one study, involving the prototypical RGS protein SST2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has isolated an RGS mutant with enhanced activity but unaltered expression levels [16]. Here we report isolation of a mammalian RGS4 mutant which has both increased steady state protein levels and enhanced GAP activity through an additional, distinct mechanism.

Historically, the genetic amenability and tractability of yeast have played a major role in the understanding of RGS function (reviewed [17]). The simplicity and plasticity of the yeast has facilitated large-scale mutagenic screens which would not have been possible in mammalian systems [12], [13]. The pheromone-response pathway of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe consists of a GPCR signaling cascade containing the three main components of the signaling unit, a GPCR, a Gα subunit and a single RGS protein [18]. Each of these components can be functionally replaced with their mammalian homologues, thus allowing their actions to be studied in isolation [17], [19], [20].

The present study describes the isolation of a GOF mutant of the human RGS4 protein, RGS4S30C, through a random genetic screen in S. pombe. Subsequent characterization utilizing both S. pombe and a mammalian in vitro assay demonstrated GOF activity against Gαo1. Furthermore, this study also illustrates the ability to transpose the identified mutation to RGS16, another member of the B/R4 family of RGS proteins, thus allowing additional pathways to be targeted. RGS proteins are crucial regulators of GPCR signaling pathways and the ability to influence the action of these proteins utilizing GOF mutants may provide a novel basis for future therapeutic strategies.

Section snippets

Yeast strains, reagents and general methods

General yeast procedures were performed as described previously [21], [22]. Culture media used were yeast extract (for routine cell growth) and a defined minimal medium (for selective growth). Plates utilized were supplemented amino acid plates lacking leucine (AA), AA plates lacking uracil, and AA plates incorporating 5-fluoro-orotic acid (FOA).

Random mutagenesis of RGS4

RGS4 mutants were generated by multiple rounds of error-prone polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Thermus aquaticus (Taq) DNA polymerase (Invitrogen)

Human RGS4 can be functionally expressed in S. pombe

To determine if RGS4 could be functionally expressed within S. pombe a previously developed yeast strain (JY731) was employed which incorporates a pheromone-inducible reporter, sxa2>ura4, but lacks the endogenous RGS protein, Rgs1p [27]. Signaling responses were assayed utilizing agar plates containing FOA and varying concentrations of P-factor (Fig. 1A). Exposure of the ura4 reporter strain to P-factor results in pheromone-dependent production of orotidine 5′-monophosphate decarboxylase

RGS4S30C demonstrates GOF activity

This study describes the isolation and characterization of a specific RGS4 mutant (RGS4S30C) displaying both increased steady state protein levels and enhanced GAP activity. RGS4S30C was analyzed in vitro and demonstrated an increased ability to enhance the GTPase activity of receptor-activated Gαo1 (Fig. 4). Mutational analysis demonstrated that conversion of serine 30 in RGS4 to several different residues (most notably phenylalanine and lysine) resulted in an increase in both protein levels

Conclusion

Alterations in GPCR signalling play a major role in many disease states and the ability to manipulate the action of regulatory proteins could have far-reaching implications. This study describes the isolation and characterization of a single amino acid mutation in the N-terminus of RGS4 which confers GOF activity. In addition to enhanced protein levels at steady state, the identified mutants also generate increased GAP activity by a currently unknown mechanism. Previous studies have identified

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council CASE studentships with AstraZeneca (C.H. and Z.B.) and the University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (G.L.). We thank Stuart Allen for technical assistance and Alan Goddard for assistance with preparation of the manuscript.

References (38)

  • G.B. Willars

    Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol.

    (2006)
  • L.S. Bernstein et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • S.P. Srinivasa et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • K.H. Young et al.

    Methods Enzymol.

    (2004)
  • I.V. Davydov et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • C. Hill et al.

    Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol.

    (2006)
  • G. Ladds et al.

    Cell. Signal.

    (2007)
  • J. Davey et al.
  • K. Maundrell

    Gene

    (1993)
  • C.S. Hoffman et al.

    Gene

    (1987)
  • A. Cavalli et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • J. Ellis et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2006)
  • K.L. Neitzel et al.

    Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol.

    (2006)
  • J.J. Tesmer et al.

    Cell

    (1997)
  • T. Anger et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • E.M. Ross et al.

    Annu. Rev. Biochem.

    (2000)
  • S.P. Srinivasa et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1998)
  • S.K. Ajit et al.

    Cell. Signal.

    (2004)
  • E.L. Riddle et al.

    Circ. Res.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text