The structure of the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Rlf in complex with the small G-protein Ral identifies conformational intermediates of the exchange reaction and the basis for the selectivity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2015.12.006Get rights and content

Abstract

CDC25 homology domain (CDC25-HD) containing Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors (GEFs) initiate signalling by small G-proteins of the Ras-family. Each GEF acts on a small subset of the G-proteins only, thus providing signalling selectivity. Rlf is a GEF with selectivity for the G-proteins RalA and RalB. Here the crystal structure of Rlf in complex with Ral is determined. The Rlf·Ral complex crystallised into two different crystal forms, which represent different steps of the exchange reaction. Thereby general insight in the CDC25-HD catalysed nucleotide exchange is obtained. In addition, the basis for the selectivity of the interaction is investigated. The exchange activity is monitored by the use of recombinant proteins. Selectivity determinants in the binding interface are identified and confirmed by a mutational study.

Introduction

Small G-proteins are well recognised as molecular switches, which cycle between a GDP and a GTP bound state. Only the GTP bound state is able to interact with effector proteins to transmit the signal. Transition to the GDP bound state occurs via hydrolysis of the bound GTP by the intrinsic GTPase activity of the G-protein. This reaction is accelerated by GTPase activating proteins (GAPs). Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors (GEFs) catalyse the release of G-protein bound nucleotides and thereby allow rebinding of a new nucleotide. As the cellular concentration of GTP is higher than of GDP, the interaction of the GEF with the G-protein will predominantly result in GTP loading. The catalytic mechanism of the GEF reaction is based on a partial overlap of the binding interface for the nucleotide and for the GEF in the G-protein. In course of the exchange reaction, the GEF approaches the nucleotide bound G-protein such that a ternary complex is formed. In this complex the GEF is initially only loosely bound, but upon establishing its full binding interface with the G-protein the nucleotide is partially competed out of its binding site. Once loosely bound the nucleotide dissociates and a tight complex of GEF and G-protein is established. By reversing these steps a nucleotide can approach the complex of GEF and G-protein, such that a ternary complex is formed and compete out the GEF. Structural information is available on the stable binary complexes (Bos et al., 2007, Vetter and Wittinghofer, 2001) but little information is available of the intermediate conformational states during the transition between the stable binary complexes.

The Ras family of small G-proteins is constituted of 36 members and sub-grouped into to “the Ras-proteins” (H-Ras, K-Ras, N-Ras, M-Ras and R-Ras), “the Ral-proteins” (RalA and RalB), “the Rap-proteins” (Rap1A, Rap1B, Rap2A, Rap2B and Rap2C) and “the rest” (the remaining 24 members). “The Ras-proteins”, are established oncogenes and frequently found mutated in tumours (Karnoub and Weinberg, 2008). The Ral-GEFs Rgl1, Rgl2/Rlf, Rgl3 and RalGDS connect Ras signalling to “the Ral-proteins”. These GEFs contain a Ras Association (RA) domain at their C-terminus which binds specifically to the GTP bound form of Ras. This allows Ras·GTP to recruit the RalGEFs to membrane compartments where Ral is localised as well. “The Ral-proteins” are involved in the control of exocytosis (Moskalenko et al., 2002), endocytosis (Jullien-Flores et al., 2000), gene regulation (de Ruiter et al., 2000) and cellular transformation (Urano et al., 1996, White et al., 1996). They are in part responsible for the transforming phenotype of oncogenic Ras mutations and recently got attention in cancer therapy due to the development of Ral-targeting small molecules (Yan et al., 2014).

In addition to the RA domain at the C-terminus Ral-GEFs contain a REM domain and a CDC25-homology domain (CDC25-HD) at the N-terminus. REM domains co-occur with CDC25-HD (Quilliam et al., 2002). They mainly stabilise the fold of the CDC25-HD but the REM-domain of SOS, a Ras-GEF, is also involved in an allosteric regulation of exchange activity (Sondermann et al., 2004). The CDC25-HD mediates the guanine nucleotide exchange activity and is found in GEFs for G-proteins of the Ras-family. While GEFs for the Ras-, Rap-, and Ral-proteins are known, GEFs for “the rest” are unknown (Popovic et al., 2013b). Based on their specificity the GEFs are classified as Ras-, Rap- and Ral-GEFs. Ral-GEFs are assumed to be truly Ral-specific (Albright et al., 1993, Ferro et al., 2008, Wolthuis et al., 1997), while some Ras-/Rap-GEFs act on both Ras- and Rap-proteins and are thus crossing the subgroup border. The selectivity of Ras- and Rap-GEFs was systematically analysed and the amino acid residues in the G-proteins that determine selectivity were identified (Popovic et al., 2013b). The findings were rationalised based on the known crystal structures of CDC25-HD in complex with small G-proteins, the crystal structures of the Ras-GEF SOS1 in complex with H-Ras (Boriack-Sjodin et al., 1998) and the Rap-GEF Epac2 in complex with Rap1B (Rehmann et al., 2008). However, the selectivity of RalGEFs was not analysed and it is unclear how selectivity towards Ral-proteins is achieved. This aspect will be addressed here.

Section snippets

Protein purification

Several constructs of Ral homologues were expressed as GST-fusion proteins from pGEX4T3: RalB Homo sapiens amino acids 1–206, 1–179 and 12–179; RalA Saguinus oedipus amino acids 1–206, 1–179 and 12–179; and dRal Drosophila melanogaster amino acids 1–201, 1–176, 10–176 and 10–201. The GST-tag was removed by thrombin cleavage as described (Rehmann, 2006). Rlf (Rgl2, Mus musculus amino acid 50–514) was expressed and purified as described (Popovic et al., 2013a).

Determination of GEF activity

The exchange activity is measured in

Crystal structure of the Rlf·dRal complex

Diffracting crystals were obtained from a complex of a truncated construct of Rlf containing residues 50–514 (referred to as Rlf here after) and the homologue of Ral from Drosophila (Fig. 1A, B and Table 1). The Rlf construct contains the REM domain and the CDC25-HD but lacks the RA domain. It displays similar catalytic activity as full length Rlf (Popovic et al., 2013a). Structures obtained from two crystals belonging to two different forms were solved and refined. The data sets for form I and

Conclusions

Rlf acts exclusively as a GEF for Ral-proteins. The structural and mutational study presented here has identified amino acid residues that are critical for the selective recognition of Ral by Rlf. Asp71Ral and Ile75Ral are crucial for the Rlf-catalysed exchange reaction. Mutations of these residues in Ral result in the loss of Rlf-catalysed exchange activity. Furthermore, if the corresponding residues in Ras, the G-protein of the Ras-family that has the highest sequence homology to Ral, are

Acknowledgements

We thank Piet Gros for access to crystallisation robots, Martin Lutz for discussion, the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility for providing synchrotron facilities and the scientists at ESRF_ID23-1 for help with data collection. M.P. and M.R.d.L. were supported by the TI Pharma Project T3-106 to J.L. Bos, and H.R. by the Chemical Sciences of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

References (29)

  • C.F. Albright et al.

    Characterization of a guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator for a ras-related GTPase

    EMBO J.

    (1993)
  • P.A. Boriack-Sjodin et al.

    The structural basis of the activation of Ras by Sos

    Nature

    (1998)
  • N.D. de Ruiter et al.

    Ras-dependent regulation of c-Jun phosphorylation is mediated by the Ral guanine nucleotide exchange factor-Ral pathway

    Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (2000)
  • E. Ferro et al.

    G-protein binding features and regulation of the RalGDS family member, RGL2

    Biochem. J.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (6)

    • The RAL signaling network: Cancer and beyond

      2021, International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      These studies confirm a very similar tertiary fold between RALA and RALB and reveal that different effectors differentially engage the two switch regions for interaction (e.g., SEC5 binds predominantly to switch I, while EXO84 binds both switch regions). Amino acids D71 and I75 were identified as residues critical for conferring specificity for RALGEFs (Popovic et al., 2016). The sequences of both switch regions are identical between RALA and RALB.

    • Inhibition of Ral GTPases using a stapled peptide approach

      2016, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      This indicates that SP1 binds to both switch 1 and switch 2. The recent structure of Ral with a GEF protein (Rlf) shows that switch 2 is involved in the GEF interaction and is also important for Ral versus Ras selectivity (25). There are currently no structures of Rals in complex with cognate GAPs, but the RalGAP proteins have the closest homology with RapGAPs, and a Rap1b·Rap1GAP complex shows that both switch regions of the Rap protein are involved in the interaction (51).

    View full text