Elsevier

Neuropharmacology

Volume 64, January 2013, Pages 424-431
Neuropharmacology

Valproic acid but not d-cycloserine facilitates sleep-dependent offline learning of extinction and habituation of conditioned fear in humans

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.07.045Get rights and content

Abstract

The effectiveness of d-cycloserine (DCS), an N-methyl-d-aspartate glutamate receptor partial agonist, and valproic acid (VPA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in facilitating the extinction of fear-conditioned memory has been explored in humans and animals. Here, we confirmed whether DCS (100 mg) and VPA (400 mg) act in off-line learning processes during sleep or waking, for further clinical application to anxiety disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We performed a randomized, blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 90 healthy adults. Visual cues and electric shocks were used as the conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US), respectively. The extinction effect was observed not in simple recall after the extinction of coupled CS–US, but was observed in the post-re-exposure phase after unexpected re-exposure to reinstatement CS–US coupling. Newly acquired conditioned fear was also eliminated or habituated by DCS and VPA administration, in line with previous findings. Furthermore, VPA facilitated the off-line learning process of conditioned fear extinction and habituation during sleep, while DCS facilitated this process during waking. These novel findings suggest that DCS and VPA might enhance exposure-based cognitive therapy for anxiety disorders and PTSD by reducing the vulnerability to reinstatement and preventing relapses of fear-conditioned responses, and provide evidence for a peculiarity of the sleep-dependent off-line learning process for conditioned fear extinction.

This article is part of a Special Issue entitled ‘Cognitive Enhancers’.

Highlights

d-Cycloserine (DCS) and valproic acid (VPA) aid in extinction of conditioned fear. ► The effects of DCS and VPA on offline learning during sleep and waking were examined. ► DCS facilitates offline learning of fear extinction during waking. ► VPA facilitates offline learning of fear extinction during sleep.

Introduction

Fear conditioning involves learning that certain environmental stimuli predict aversive events to promote survival in the face of present and future threats. The experimental fear-conditioning paradigm, in which a neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) acquires aversive properties as a consequence of being paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US), implicitly promotes association between the CS and US. Although fear-conditioning is an essential component of defensive behavior systems (Fanselow, 1998), it is also involved in the pathophysiology of fear circuit disorders, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anxiety disorders (Shin and Liberzon, 2010). Fear extinction, a relearning paradigm of CS–US dissociation in which fear-conditioned subjects are repeatedly exposed to a CS without a US under the same context, overwhelms established conditioned fear (Myers and Davis, 2002; Quirk and Mueller, 2008). Thus, fear extinction has been considered a psychophysiological model of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for those disorders (Quirk et al., 2006).

Learning occurs with repetitive training on-line, but it can also strengthen off-line between training-retest sessions, including sleep periods (Diekelmann and Born, 2010; Stickgold, 2005). N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor involvement has been indicated in off-line learning of conditioned fear extinction, rather than in encoding (on-line learning) with repeated exposure to CS–US dissociation. NMDA glutamate receptor activation mediates a long-lasting increase in intracellular synaptic potentiation (Artola and Singer, 1987; Rumpel et al., 1998), which is thought to elicit synaptic plasticity and off-line learning (Kirkwood et al., 1996; Miller et al., 1989). Off-line learning of conditioned fear extinction was impaired by NMDA receptor antagonist administration during the post-training period (Santini et al., 2001). In contrast, the NMDA receptor partial agonist d-cycloserine (DCS) enhances off-line learning of conditioned fear extinction (Ledgerwood et al., 2003). DCS also enhances the effects of exposure-based cognitive-behavioral therapies for anxiety disorders (Guastella et al., 2008; Hofmann et al., 2006; Kushner et al., 2007; Otto et al., 2010; Ressler et al., 2004; Wilhelm et al., 2008).

Although its clinical efficacy has not yet been clarified, valproic acid (VPA), a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor (Göttlicher, 2004), also has a positive effect on off-line learning of conditioned fear extinction in rats (Bredy et al., 2007; Bredy and Barad, 2008). VPA is used as an anticonvulsant but also strongly inhibits HDAC and increases mRNA. HDAC inhibitors and histone acetyltransferases (HATs), which cause chromatin structure relaxation and tension, lead to enhanced and diminished DNA transcription, respectively (Varga-Weisz and Becker, 1998; Yang and Seto, 2007). Since histone acetylation regulation is critical for fear conditioning (Levenson et al., 2004), VPA could accelerate delayed consolidation of conditioned fear extinction.

Several questions remain regarding whether the pharmacological effects of DCS and VPA on extinction and habituation learning of human fear conditioning predominantly act in on-line (acquisition) or off-line (delayed consolidation) processes, and whether DCS and VPA activate off-line learning during sleep or wakefulness. Although sleep is crucial to the off-line development of various learning domains (Diekelmann and Born, 2010; Stickgold, 2005), off-line learning can also occur during wakefulness (Sheth et al., 2009; Song et al., 2007), suggesting that differences in the delayed learning process during sleep and wakefulness result from corresponding differences in background mechanisms such as changes in synaptic signaling efficiency and gene transcription levels (Carr et al., 2011; Diekelmann and Born, 2010; Tononi and Cirelli, 2006).

A previous study suggested that both DCS and VPA enhance extinction learning of human fear conditioning and simultaneously prevent new acquisition of fear conditioning through so-called “habituation learning” (Kuriyama et al., 2011a). Although DCS exhibited a similar effect on reinstatement in rats (Ledgerwood et al., 2004), the effects of DCS and VPA on extinction and habituation learning were robust when reinstatement stimuli were exposed, rather than during the extinction and habituation learning per se, in humans (Guastella et al., 2007; Kuriyama et al., 2011a). When these drugs are applied clinically during exposure therapy for anxiety disorders or PTSD, we do not require enhancement of acquisition learning but rather enhancement of extinction learning of the fear (Hofmann, 2008). Therefore, in the current study, we explored whether DCS and VPA facilitate on-line or off-line learning of conditioned fear extinction and habituation in humans. We also examined whether the effects of DCS and VPA on off-line extinction and habituation learning of conditioned fear are observed during sleep or wakefulness.

Section snippets

Subjects

Ninety healthy college students (mean age ± standard error of the mean (SEM): 21.4 ± 0.16 y; age range: 20–28 y; 23 females) with no history of drug/alcohol abuse or neurological, psychiatric, or sleep disorders were registered as study subjects. Females in the follicular phase of their regular menstrual cycles were included. Subjects were instructed not to consume drugs, alcohol, or caffeine from 24 h before the study to its conclusion and to maintain a normal sleep–wake cycle. Three subjects

Extinction and acquisition learning in conditioned responses

CRs by repetitive learning of the CS–US pair association in the extinction situation were strengthened and retained during the first learning session. We observed significant main effects of situation and trial, but no significant effect of treatment or schedule or all interactions, including the situation × trial interaction, on SCR levels at the first learning session (see Table 1, upper left, and Fig. 2A). Post-hoc tests revealed a significantly higher mean SCR level during extinction (2.05

Discussion

Although initial learning of conditioned fear was similarly acquired in all experimental groups during the first learning session and VPA-specific psychomotor side effects appeared not to influence CS recognition performance (see Supplementary Material and Methods), VPA pre-treatment alone reduced fear CRs in the extinction and acquisition situations during the second leaning session. DCS blocked the effect of reinforced CS–US pairing only in the waking group, and conversely, VPA blocked the

Disclosure statement

All authors declare that they have no competing financial, personal interests or potential conflicts of interest within 3 years of beginning the work submitted that could inappropriately bias our work.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sayori Koyama and Mikiko Kimura for technical assistance in the experimental trial.

This work was funded by a grant from the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) program from the Japan Science and Technology (JST) Corporation, a grant from Takeda Science Foundation.

References (58)

  • M.G. Kushner et al.

    D-cycloserine augmented exposure therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • J.M. Levenson et al.

    Regulation of histone acetylation during memory formation in the hippocampus

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • K.M. Myers et al.

    Behavioral and neural analysis of extinction

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • O.A. Onur et al.

    The N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor co-agonist d-cycloserine facilitates declarative learning and hippocampal activity in humans

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • M.W. Otto et al.

    Efficacy of d-cycloserine for enhancing response to cognitive-behavior therapy for panic disorder

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • G.J. Quirk et al.

    Prefrontal mechanisms in extinction of conditioned fear

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • G. Tononi et al.

    Sleep function and synaptic homeostasis

    Sleep Med. Rev.

    (2006)
  • P.D. Varga-Weisz et al.

    Chromatin-remodeling factors: machines that regulate?

    Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol.

    (1998)
  • B.J. Wilder et al.

    Review of valproate monotherapy in the treatment of generalized tonic-clonic seizures

    Am. J. Med.

    (1988)
  • A. Artola et al.

    Long-term potentiation and NMDA receptors in rat visual cortex

    Nature

    (1987)
  • T.W. Bredy et al.

    The histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid enhances acquisition, extinction, and reconsolidation of conditioned fear

    Learn. Mem.

    (2008)
  • T.W. Bredy et al.

    Histone modifications around individual BDNF gene promoters in prefrontal cortex are associated with extinction of conditioned fear

    Learn. Mem.

    (2007)
  • R.A. Bryant et al.

    Imaginal exposure alone and imaginal exposure with cognitive restructuring in treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (2003)
  • M.F. Carr et al.

    Hippocampal replay in the awake state: a potential substrate for memory consolidation and retrieval

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2011)
  • S. Chateauvieux et al.

    Molecular and therapeutic potential and toxicity of valproic acid

    J. Biomed. Biotechnol.

    (2010)
  • J.P. Chhatwal et al.

    Amygdala BDNF signaling is required for consolidation but not encoding of extinction

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2006)
  • S. Diekelmann et al.

    The memory function of sleep

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2010)
  • E.B. Foa

    Prolonged exposure therapy: past, present, and future

    Depress. Anxiety

    (2011)
  • R. Guzman-Marin et al.

    Suppression of hippocampal plasticity-related gene expression by sleep deprivation in rats

    J. Physiol.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text