Socially mediated alcohol preferences in adolescent rats following interactions with an intoxicated peer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2004.07.010Get rights and content

Abstract

This study focuses on “passive social influences” (alcohol-related information acquired by an organism that interacts with an intoxicated counterpart) that can potentially affect alcohol preference in adolescent rats. Five experiments were conducted to investigate whether repeated social interactions with an intoxicated peer can generate alcohol-related memories that lead an animal to exhibit heightened alcohol olfactory preference patterns. Juvenile experiences with alcohol were operationalized as follows: interactions with an alcohol-intoxicated peer (Experiment 1), with an alcohol-scented cotton surrogate (Experiment 2) or with an anesthetized alcohol-intoxicated partner (Experiments 3–5). Periadolescents were then evaluated in a two-way location olfactory test where they had the opportunity to investigate a hole scented with alcohol odor or vanilla (an odorant naturally preferred by the strain of rats here utilized). Only juveniles that interacted with an alcohol-intoxicated peer were found to exhibit a significant change in alcohol odor preferences when compared to appropriate controls that interacted with a non-intoxicated peer. Alcohol odor exposure alone or interactions with an anesthetized alcohol-intoxicated peer were not sufficient to establish changes in preference for alcohol sensory cues. Results indicate that social interactions with an intoxicated peer determine heightened preference for alcohol cues in periadolescents. The establishment of this preference seems to require behavioral manifestations of the intoxicated counterpart, instead of just being dependent on an olfactory pre-exposure to alcohol cues.

Introduction

In humans, social influences on alcohol-related behaviors and expectations have been consistently reported. These influences have been classified into two main categories (Graham et al., 1991): “active social influences” that imply the explicit offer to drink alcohol and “passive social influences” that refer to a subject's perception of the reinforcement patterns of alcohol on other peers. It has been argued that social influences (e.g. peer norms, siblings' and parental drinking patterns as well as perceived availability of alcohol) are among the strongest predictors of alcohol initiation, consumption patterns and plans of future drinking (Epstein et al., 1999a, Epstein et al., 1999b, Wood et al., 2001).

Animal studies appear to provide cost-effective models in the examination of neurobehavioral characteristics underlying the rewarding effects of drugs and how social and environmental stimuli modulate drug seeking and self-administration during adolescence (Spear, 2000). Yet, there are relatively few animal studies that have explicitly analyzed how social factors lead to the initiation of alcohol consumption. This social approach could be essential to understand the mechanisms that explain how the indirect perception of alcohol-related effects in an intoxicated peer can modulate latter responsiveness to the drug in young organisms. According to the human literature, active social influences are significantly associated with alcohol use and alcohol-derived problems, but passive social influences constitute the strongest predictors of this phenomena (Wood et al., 2001). Thus, the development of animal models related with passive social influences are particularly important when examining the mechanisms of social-mediated juvenile alcohol acceptance.

Adolescent rats exhibit specific patterns of social interactions that are markedly different from those observed in younger and older subjects. They spend more time interacting with peers when compared with other age groups and reach peak levels in terms of playing behavior. The stimuli derived from social interactions between juveniles aids in the establishment of new behaviors and skills that are essential for independence and lead to social adjustments to the demands of adulthood (van den Berg et al., 1999).

Social interaction in periadolescent rats has been considered as a reinforcer in place preference conditioning (Calcagnetti and Schechter, 1992) and maze-learning (Humphrey and Einon, 1981, Normansell and Panksepp, 1990). Furthermore, in rats as well as in other rodent species, food preferences are established via social interactions (rat: Galef and Whiskin, 2000, Galef et al., 1990, Galef et al., 1994; Acomys cahirinus: McFadyen-Ketchum and Porter, 1989; Meriones unguiculatus: Valsecchi et al., 1996; Mus domesticus: Choleris et al., 1997; Spermophilus beldingi: Peacock and Jenkins, 1988). These studies are based on the cultural transmission of food preferences that can either enhance the consumption or counteract an aversion to a given food. These effects are attained as a function of the interaction between an animal that has had recent access to an unusual food (demonstrator) and a naïve animal, which interacts with the former (observer). The observer is then tested to determine whether a specific affective component of the food has been transmitted or not (Galef and Wigmore, 1983, Galef and Whiskin, 2000, Posadas-Andrews and Roper, 1983).

According to Galef and Wigmore (1983) and Galef et al. (1994), the learning process generating changes in diet preference must take place in association with a conspecific even though physical contact is not necessary. Observer rats that are allowed to smell but not to have physical contact with anesthetized demonstrators still express the preference for the food eaten by the demonstrator (Galef and Stein, 1985, Galef and Wigmore, 1983, Galef et al., 1985). Observers do not exhibit changes in food preference when the odor of the diet is presented in a rat-sized cotton ball (Galef and Stein, 1985, Galef and Wigmore, 1983, Galef et al., 1985).

Social factors modulate alcohol self-administration in rats. Housing conditions as operationalized through complete, partial or null social isolation exert significant effects upon alcohol intake (Wolffgramm, 1990). Isolated rats drink more alcohol when compared with partially isolated or group-housed subjects. When focusing on group-housed animals, subordinate rats consume more alcohol than dominant ones (Wolffgramm and Heyne, 1991). Heightened alcohol consumption in isolated or subordinate rats appears to obey to antianxiety effects of alcohol that alleviate the stress originated by specific social conditions (Wolffgramm, 1990, Wolffgramm and Heyne, 1991). Under this perspective, negative rather than appetitive reinforcing effects of alcohol seem responsible in the modulation of alcohol self-administration patterns.

It has been reported that heightened alcohol consumption results from the interaction of infant (Hunt et al., 2000) and periadolescent observers (Hunt et al., 2001) with an intoxicated age peer. It is unknown whether this effect obeys to social transmission of food preferences or if the interaction with the intoxicated peer generates a stressful condition in the observer, which later utilizes the drug in order to mitigate an aversive emotional state. It seems necessary to note that alcohol strongly affects social interactions. Alcohol dosing parameters seem crucial in determining either social facilitation or inhibition (Panksepp et al., 1987, Stewart and Grupp, 1985, Varlinskaya et al., 2001). It is conceivable that the observer's perception of these pharmacologically driven effects can play a role in the emotional content of the memory acquired while interacting with the intoxicated peer.

Until now, the impact of early social interactions with an intoxicated peer on subsequent alcohol responsiveness has been evaluated using forced or voluntary intake tests (Hunt et al., 2000, Hunt et al., 2001). In the present study, socially mediated changes in alcohol responsiveness were evaluated in periadolescent rats through the use of an olfactory preference test. The test procedure was selected to explicitly avoid positive or negative reinforcing properties of the drug during the evaluation phase. In other words, we intended to address whether social interactions with an alcohol-intoxicated peer generates specific seeking behavior of the drug without the intervention of alcohol's pharmacological properties; a strategy that should contribute clarifying the affective value of the memory that is originally established.

As will be described in detail, the first experiment in this study clearly indicated that heightened predisposition to investigate alcohol odor cues are observed in juveniles following brief interactions with a mildly intoxicated partner. Two additional experiments assessed if these odor preferences are also established through mere pre-exposure to the drug's sensory cues (Experiment 2) or through exposure to an intoxicated conspecific whose behavioral repertoire was absent due to anesthesia (Experiments 3–5). These additional experiments provide information relevant to the extent that alcohol-seeking behavior is dependent upon experience with the drug's sensory cues and/or upon ethological cues derived from the intoxicated demonstrator.

Section snippets

Experiment 1

Adolescent rats were allowed to freely interact with either an alcohol-intoxicated or a non-intoxicated peer. Intoxicated demonstrators were subjected to the effects of a subnarcoleptic alcohol dose (1.5 g/kg), which has previously been shown to exacerbate alcohol consumption in periadolescent observers (Hunt et al., 2001). In the present study, observers were evaluated in a two-way olfactory locational test where animals could investigate alternative sections of the apparatus scented with

Experiment 2

The main goal of this experiment was to assess if juveniles will also change their behavioral repertoire in response to alcohol odor when previously exposed to the smell of the drug in the absence of a social partner. According to prior studies, mere exposure to chemosensory cues of a given diet is not as effective as when the sensory experience occurs within a social context in terms of modulating subsequent choice behavior (Galef, 1989, Heyes and Durlach, 1990). Yet, it is important to note

Experiment 3

According to the preceding experiments, changes in alcohol responsiveness were observed only when periadolescents interacted with an intoxicated counterpart (Experiment 1). Mere pre-exposure to alcohol odor was not sufficient to generate a significant change in how juveniles later investigated this sensory cue (Experiment 2). To further analyze how observers obtain information from a given demonstrator, in the present experiment we examined whether changes in alcohol responsiveness will also

Experiment 4

As indicated, alcohol olfactory preferences were established in observer rats after interacting with an active alcohol-intoxicated demonstrator (Experiment 1) but not with an intoxicated counterpart under the effects of anesthesia (Experiment 3). Alcohol olfactory information is likely to be acquired due to nonmetabolic elimination of alcohol through expired air of the demonstrator animal. In rats, there exists a near perfect positive correlation between blood alcohol levels and those attained

Experiment 5

Based on the results of the previous experiment, it was decided to assess changes in alcohol olfactory responsiveness in subjects that under the effects of ketamine anesthesia show similar BALs as the ones encountered in active juveniles exposed to a 1.5 g/kg alcohol dose. Following this goal, observers had the possibility of interacting with either anesthetized peers administered with a 2.0 g/kg or with alcohol-free animals that also were unconscious due to the effects of ketamine. This

General discussion

The results of the present study seem to be in agreement with prior research focusing on social transmission of alcohol-related information during periadolescence (Hunt and Hallmark, 2001, Hunt et al., 2001). In the present study, alcohol-related information arising from the interaction with a moderately intoxicated peer was sufficient to modify subsequent responsiveness towards alcohol-related cues. Specifically, heightened predisposition to actively investigate alcohol's olfactory cues was

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the following grants: PICT 5-7053 from Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica, Ramón Carrillo and Arturo Oñativia from Ministerio de Salud, Argentina, RO1AA11960-06 from the National Institute on Alcohol and Alcoholism and by a fellowship from Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas awarded to J.M.F.V. The authors wish to express their gratitude to Beatriz Haymal for her technical assistance.

References (70)

  • B.G. Galef et al.

    Transfer of information concerning distant foods: a laboratory investigation of the “information-center” hypothesis

    Anim. Behav.

    (1983)
  • B.G. Galef et al.

    Carbon disulfide: a semiochemical mediating socially-induced diet choice in rats

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1988)
  • A.J. Hiltunen et al.

    Concentrations of ethanol in rebreathed air of rats: correlation with the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol

    Alcohol

    (1989)
  • Y. Hishimura

    Re-examination of the poisoned-partner effect with the two-bottle testing method

    Behav. Processes

    (2000)
  • J.C. Molina et al.

    Changes in alcohol intake resulting from prior experiences with alcohol odor in young rats

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1984)
  • F. Molina et al.

    Determination of ethanol in biological samples by head-space gas chromatography

    J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.

    (1992)
  • M.Y. Pepino et al.

    Behavioral detection of low concentrations of ethanol in milk in the preweanling rat

    Alcohol

    (1998)
  • M.Y. Pepino et al.

    Infant rats respond differentially to alcohol after nursing from an alcohol intoxicated dam

    Alcohol

    (1999)
  • L.A. Pohorecky

    Interaction of alcohol and stress: a review

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (1981)
  • L.A. Pohorecky et al.

    A new method for the determination of blood ethanol levels in rodents

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1982)
  • A. Posadas-Andrews et al.

    Social transmission of food preferences in adult rats

    Anim. Behav.

    (1983)
  • L.P. Spear

    The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2000)
  • R.B. Stewart et al.

    Comparison of alcohol-prefering P and nonprefering NP rats on tests of anxiety and for the anxiolytic effects of alcohol

    Alcohol

    (1993)
  • J. Wolffgramm et al.

    Social behavior, dominance, and social deprivation of rats determine drug choice

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1991)
  • A.A. Bachmanov et al.

    Chemosensory factors influencing alcohol perception, preferences, and consumption

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (2003)
  • J.S. Baer et al.

    Prenatal alcohol exposure and family history of alcoholism in the etiology of adolescent alcohol problems

    J. Stud. Alcohol

    (1998)
  • J.S. Baer et al.

    A 21-year longitudinal analysis of the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on young adult drinking

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • D.C. Blanchard et al.

    Alcohol and anxiety: effects on offensive and defensive aggression

    J. Stud. Alcohol, Suppl.

    (1993)
  • R.J. Blanchard et al.

    Alcohol, aggression and the stress of subordination

    J. Stud. Alcohol, Suppl.

    (1993)
  • S.M. Brasser et al.

    Physiological and behavioral effects of acute ethanol hangover in juvenile, adolescent, and adult rats

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • Duarte, E. Interacción entre los efectos incondicionales motores del alcohol y procesos de aprendizaje no asociativos...
  • J.A. Epstein et al.

    Impact of social influences and problem behavior on alcohol use among inner-city Hispanic and black adolescents

    J. Stud. Alcohol

    (1999)
  • J.A. Epstein et al.

    Etiology of alcohol use among Hispanic adolescents: sex-specific effects of social influences to drink and problem behaviors

    Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med.

    (1999)
  • B.G. Galef

    Social influences on food choices of Norway rats and mate choices of Japanese quails

    Int. J. Comp. Psychol.

    (2001)
  • B.G. Galef et al.

    Demonstrator influence on observer diet preference: analyses of critical social interactions and olfactory signals

    Anim. Learn. Behav.

    (1985)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Animal models of social contact and drug self-administration

      2015, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several studies have replicated these effects and suggested that social transmission may depend on the age, sex, and novelty of the social partner (Hallmark et al., 2004; Honey et al., 2004; Maldonado et al., 2008). Importantly, shifts in ethanol preference were not observed after interactions with an ethanol stimulus alone (i.e., ethanol-soaked cotton ball) or with a sedated partner administered ethanol (Fernandez-Vidal et al., 2004). Although it is important to note that these studies do not specifically examine the influence of a peer at the time of drug consumption, they do indicate an individual's behavior under an acutely intoxicated state may later influence the ethanol intake of a social partner.

    • Ethanol-induced conditioned partner preference in female mice

      2013, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is widely recognized that the company you keep while drinking (peers, family) influences ethanol consumption [1], especially in women [2]. Similarly, in animal studies, mice paired with an intoxicated cage-mate will voluntarily consume more ethanol than mice paired with a sober companion [3]. This indicates that social interactions promote ethanol intake.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    J.C. Molina also works at the Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, C.P. 5000 Córdoba, Argentina.

    View full text