Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Expression and treatment of pain-related behavioral depression

Abstract

Pain is often associated with clinically relevant depression of behavior and mood, and relief of pain-related depression is a common goal of treatment in both human and veterinary medicine. In the development of pharmacological compounds to treat pain and related depression, preclinical studies may be used to evaluate the analgesic potential of new drugs. Such studies require reliable, accurate assays of pain-related behavioral depression in animals. Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) is a type of operant conditioning procedure that produces stable baseline behavioral response rates. The author reviews recent research on the use of ICSS to evaluate the expression and pharmacological modulation of pain-related behavioral depression in rats. Results suggest that assays of pain-depressed behavior using ICSS may serve as a useful new tool to improve the translation of preclinical findings to clinical results in analgesic drug development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) is an operant conditioning procedure that produces stable baseline behavioral response rates for research on pain-related behavioral depression.
Figure 2: Pain-related depression of ICSS response rate.
Figure 3: Ketoprofen blocks acid-induced depression of ICSS response rate.
Figure 4: Effects of candidate analgesic compounds on acid-induced depression of ICSS response rate.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pain terms: a list with definitions and notes on usage. Recommended by the IASP Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain 6, 249–252 (1979).

  2. Melzack, R. & Katz, J. in Textbook of Pain (eds. McMahon, L.R. & Koltzenburg, M.) 291–304 (Elsevier, London, UK, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Flecknell, P.A. Refinement of animal use—assessment and alleviation of pain and distress. Lab. Anim. 28, 222–231 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McGrath, P. in Textbook of Pain (eds. McMahon, L.R. & Koltzenburg, M.) 305–315 (Elsevier, London, UK, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Research Council. Recognition and Alleviation of Pain in Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009).

  6. Negus, S.S. et al. Preclinical assessment of candidate analgesic drugs: recent advances and future challenges. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 319, 507–514 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Negus, S.S., Bilsky, E.J., Pereira Do Carmo, G. & Stevenson, G.W. in Analgesia: Methods and Protocols (ed. Szallasi, A.) 79–91 (Humana, New York, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Blackburn-Munro, G. Pain-like behaviours in animals—how human are they? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 25, 299–305 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vierck, C.J., Hansson, P.T. & Yezierski, R.P. Clinical and pre-clinical pain assessment: are we measuring the same thing? Pain 135, 7–10 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Whiteside, G.T., Adedoyin, A. & Leventhal, L. Predictive validity of animal pain models? A comparison of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for pain drugs in rats and humans. Neuropharmacology 54, 767–775 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mogil, J.S. Animal models of pain: progress and challenges. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 283–294 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mao, J. Current challenges in translational pain research. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 33, 568–573 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bair, M.J., Wu, J., Damush, T.M., Sutherland, J.M. & Kroenke, K. Association of depression and anxiety alone and in combination with chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary care patients. Psychosom. Med. 70, 890–897 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldenberg, D.L. Pain/Depression dyad: a key to a better understanding and treatment of functional somatic syndromes. Am. J. Med. 123, 675–682 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Institute of Medicine. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011).

  16. Cleeland, C.S. & Ryan, K.M. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore 23, 129–138 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dworkin, R.H. et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 113, 9–19 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 8th edn. (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011).

  19. Stevenson, G.W., Bilsky, E.J. & Negus, S.S. Targeting pain-suppressed behaviors in preclinical assays of pain and analgesia: effects of morphine on acetic acid-suppressed feeding in C57BL/6J mice. J. Pain 7, 408–416 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferster, C.B. & Skinner, B.F. Schedules of Reinforcement (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1957).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelleher, R.T. & Morse, W.H. Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. Ergeb. Physiol. 60, 1–56 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Skinner, B.F. The experimental analysis of behavior. American Scientist 45, 343–371 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Martin, T.J., Buechler, N.L., Kahn, W., Crews, J.C. & Eisenach, J.C. Effects of laparotomy on spontaneous exploratory activity and conditioned operant responding in the rat: a model for postoperative pain. Anesthesiology 101, 191–203 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Olds, J. & Milner, P. Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 47, 419–427 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stellar, J.R. & Stellar, E. The Neurobiology of Motivation and Reward (Springer, New York, 1985).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Carlezon, W.A. Jr. & Chartoff, E.H. Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) in rodents to study the neurobiology of motivation. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2987–2995 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Reid, L.D. in Methods of Assessing the Reinforcing Properties of Abused Drugs (ed. Bozarth, M.A.) 391–420 (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Stellar, J.R. & Rice, M.B. in The Neuropharmacological Basis of Reward (ed. Liebman, J.M. & Cooper, S.J.) 14–65 (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vlachou, S. & Markou, A. in Animal Models of Drug Addiction (ed. Olmstead, M.C.) 3–56 (Humana, New York, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Pereira Do Carmo, G., Stevenson, G.W., Carlezon, W.A. & Negus, S.S. Effects of pain- and analgesia-related manipulations on intracranial self-stimulation in rats: further studies on pain-depressed behavior. Pain 144, 170–177 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Negus, S.S., O'Connell, R., Morrissey, E., Cheng, K. & Rice, K.C. Effects of peripherally restricted κ opioid receptor agonists on pain-related stimulation and depression of behavior in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 340, 501–509 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hendershot, L.C. & Forsaith, J. Antagonism of the frequency of phenylquinone-induced writhing in the mouse by weak analgesics and nonanalgesics. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 125, 237–240 (1959).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mogil, J.S., Wilson, S.G. & Wan, Y. in Methods in Pain Research (ed. Kruger, L.) 11–39 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stevenson, G.W. et al. Targeting pain-depressed behaviors in preclinical assays of pain and analgesia: drug effects on acetic acid-depressed locomotor activity in ICR mice. Life Sci. 85, 309–315 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Leitl, M. & Negus, S.S. Role of toll-like receptor 4 in pain-depressed behavior. Society for Neuroscience. New Orleans, LA, 13–17 October 2012.

  36. Ewan, E.E. & Martin, T.J. Rewarding electrical brain stimulation in rats after peripheral nerve injury: decreased facilitation by commonly abused prescription opioids. Anesthesiology 115, 1271–1280 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Langford, D.J. et al. Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse. Nat. Methods 7, 447–449 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Urban, R., Scherrer, G., Goulding, E.H., Tecott, L.H. & Basbaum, A.I. Behavioral indices of ongoing pain are largely unchanged in male mice with tissue or nerve injury-induced mechanical hypersensitivity. Pain 152, 990–1000 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Seminowicz, D.A. et al. MRI structural brain changes associated with sensory and emotional function in a rat model of long-term neuropathic pain. Neuroimage 47, 1007–1014 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kwilasz, A.J. & Negus, S.S. Dissociable effects of the cannabinoid receptor agonists Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and CP55940 on pain-stimulated versus pain-depressed behavior in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 343, 389–400 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Altarifi, A. & Negus, S.S. Effects of mu opioid receptor agonists on pain-stimulated and pain-depressed behaviors in rats. Society for Neuroscience. New Orleans, LA, 13–17 October 2012.

  42. Negus, S.S. et al. Effects of the δ opioid receptor agonist SNC80 on pain-related depression of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) in rats. J. Pain 13, 317–327 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rosenberg, M., Carroll, F.I. & Negus, S.S. Effects of monoamine reuptake inhibitors in assays of acute pain-stimulated and pain-depressed behavior in rats. J. Pain 14, 246–259 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, R.I., Johnson, R.P., Lee, J.C. & Waite, E.M. The oral analgesic efficacy of bicifadine hydrochloride in postoperative pain. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 22, 160–164 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Webb, S.S., Smith, G.M., Evans, W.O. & Webb, N.C. Toward the development of a potent, nonsedating, oral analgesic. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 60, 25–28 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Villemure, C., Laferrière, A.C. & Bushnell, M.C. The ventral striatum is implicated in the analgesic effect of mood changes. Pain Res. Manag. 17, 69–74 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wood, P.B. Role of central dopamine in pain and analgesia. Expert Rev. Neurother. 8, 781–797 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang, J.C., Clark, W.C., Dooley, J.C. & Mignogna, F.V. Effect of intranasal cocaine on experimental pain in man. Anesth. Analg. 61, 358–361 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Younger, J., Aron, A., Parke, S., Chatterjee, N. & Mackey, S. Viewing pictures of a romantic partner reduces experimental pain: involvement of neural reward systems. PLoS One 5, e13309 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ling, W., Mooney, L. & Hillhouse, M. Prescription opioid abuse, pain and addiction: clinical issues and implications. Drug Alcohol Rev. 30, 300–305 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Negus, S.S., Gatch, M.B., Mello, N.K., Zhang, X. & Rice, K. Behavioral effects of the delta-selective opioid agonist SNC80 and related compounds in rhesus monkeys. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 286, 362–375 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nicholson, K.L. et al. Preclinical evaluation of the abuse potential of the analgesic bicifadine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 330, 236–248 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Negus, S.S., Morrissey, E.M., Rosenberg, M., Cheng, K. & Rice, K.C. Effects of kappa opioids in an assay of pain-depressed intracranial self-stimulation in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 210, 149–159 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Roughan, J.V., Wright-Williams, S.L. & Flecknell, P.A. Automated analysis of postoperative behaviour: assessment of HomeCageScan as a novel method to rapidly identify pain and analgesic effects in mice. Lab. Anim. 43, 17–26 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Cobos, E.J. et al. Inflammation-induced decrease in voluntary wheel running in mice: a nonreflexive test for evaluating inflammatory pain and analgesia. Pain 153, 876–884 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Matson, D.J. Inflammation-induced reduction of spontaneous activity by adjuvant: a novel model to study the effect of analgesics in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 320, 194–201 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Pardo, E.G. & Rodríguez, R. Reversal by acetylsalicylic acid of pain induced functional impairment. Life Sciences 5, 775–781 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Negus, S.S., Leitl, M. & Banks, M.L. Pain-related depression of the mesolimbic dopamine system in rats: expression, blockade by analgesics, and role of endogenous kappa opioids. American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 51st Annual Meeting. Hollywood, FL, 2–6 December 2012.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Stevens Negus.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Negus, S. Expression and treatment of pain-related behavioral depression. Lab Anim 42, 292–300 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.255

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.255

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing