Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Active site remodelling accompanies thioester bond formation in the SUMO E1

Abstract

E1 enzymes activate ubiquitin (Ub) and ubiquitin-like (Ubl) proteins in two steps by carboxy-terminal adenylation and thioester bond formation to a conserved catalytic cysteine in the E1 Cys domain. The structural basis for these intermediates remains unknown. Here we report crystal structures for human SUMO E1 in complex with SUMO adenylate and tetrahedral intermediate analogues at 2.45 and 2.6 Å, respectively. These structures show that side chain contacts to ATP·Mg are released after adenylation to facilitate a 130 degree rotation of the Cys domain during thioester bond formation that is accompanied by remodelling of key structural elements including the helix that contains the E1 catalytic cysteine, the crossover and re-entry loops, and refolding of two helices that are required for adenylation. These changes displace side chains required for adenylation with side chains required for thioester bond formation. Mutational and biochemical analyses indicate these mechanisms are conserved in other E1s.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Analogues of the Ub/Ubl-adenylate and E1Ub/Ubl tetrahedral intermediates.
Figure 2: Structural changes in SUMO E1 accompany transitions from adenylate to tetrahedral intermediate.
Figure 3: Conformational changes within the Cys domain.
Figure 4: Active sites in E1/SUMO1-AMSN and E1SUMO1-AVSN.
Figure 5: Side chains required for adenylation are dispensable for formation of the tetrahedral intermediate analogue.
Figure 6: Side chains required for formation of the thioester bond or the tetrahedral intermediate analogue are dispensable for adenylation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Protein Data Bank

Data deposits

The atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the RCSB database under accession codes 3KYC and 3KYD.

References

  1. Johnson, E. S. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73, 355–382 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Melchior, F. SUMO–nonclassical ubiquitin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 591–626 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hershko, A. & Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 425–479 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Laney, J. D. & Hochstrasser, M. Substrate targeting in the ubiquitin system. Cell 97, 427–430 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dye, B. T. & Schulman, B. A. Structural mechanisms underlying posttranslational modification by ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 36, 131–150 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Capili, A. D. & Lima, C. D. Taking it step by step: mechanistic insights from structural studies of ubiquitin/ubiquitin-like protein modification pathways. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 726–735 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schulman, B. A. & Harper, J. W. Ubiquitin-like protein activation by E1 enzymes: the apex for downstream signalling pathways. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 319–331 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Walden, H. et al. The structure of the APPBP1-UBA3-NEDD8-ATP complex reveals the basis for selective ubiquitin-like protein activation by an E1. Mol. Cell 12, 1427–1437 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lois, L. M. & Lima, C. D. Structures of the SUMO E1 provide mechanistic insights into SUMO activation and E2 recruitment to E1. EMBO J. 24, 439–451 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, I. & Schindelin, H. Structural insights into E1-catalyzed ubiquitin activation and transfer to conjugating enzymes. Cell 134, 268–278 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, D. T. et al. Basis for a ubiquitin-like protein thioester switch toggling E1–E2 affinity. Nature 445, 394–398 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu, X. et al. Designed semisynthetic protein inhibitors of Ub/Ubl E1 activating enzymes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 10.1021/ja9088549 (25 January 2010).

  13. Muir, T. W. Semisynthesis of proteins by expressed protein ligation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72, 249–289 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayward, S. & Berendsen, H. J. Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: new results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme. Proteins 30, 144–154 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lake, M. W., Wuebbens, M. M., Rajagopalan, K. V. & Schindelin, H. Mechanism of ubiquitin activation revealed by the structure of a bacterial MoeB–MoaD complex. Nature 414, 325–329 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gulick, A. M. Conformational dynamics in the acyl-CoA synthetases, adenylation domains of non-ribosomal peptide synthetases, and firefly luciferase. ACS Chem. Biol. 4, 811–827 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Haas, A. L. & Rose, I. A. The mechanism of ubiquitin activating enzyme. A kinetic and equilibrium analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 257, 10329–10337 (1982)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pickart, C. M., Kasperek, E. M., Beal, R. & Kim, A. Substrate properties of site-specific mutant ubiquitin protein (G76A) reveal unexpected mechanistic features of ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1). J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7115–7123 (1994)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reverter, D. & Lima, C. D. Insights into E3 ligase activity revealed by a SUMO–RanGAP1–Ubc9–Nup358 complex. Nature 435, 687–692 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu, P. Y. et al. A conserved catalytic residue in the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme family. EMBO J. 22, 5241–5250 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yunus, A. A. & Lima, C. D. Lysine activation and functional analysis of E2-mediated conjugation in the SUMO pathway. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 491–499 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Verdecia, M. A. et al. Conformational flexibility underlies ubiquitin ligation mediated by the WWP1 HECT domain E3 ligase. Mol. Cell 11, 249–259 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Soucy, T. A. et al. An inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme as a new approach to treat cancer. Nature 458, 732–736 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mossessova, E. & Lima, C. D. Ulp1-SUMO crystal structure and genetic analysis reveal conserved interactions and a regulatory element essential for cell growth in yeast. Mol. Cell 5, 865–876 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Knuesel, M., Cheung, H. T., Hamady, M., Barthel, K. K. & Liu, X. A method of mapping protein sumoylation sites by mass spectrometry using a modified small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 (SUMO-1) and a computational program. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1626–1636 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Storoni, L. C., McCoy, A. J. & Read, R. J. Likelihood-enhanced fast rotation functions. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 432–438 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Reverter, D. & Lima, C. D. A basis for SUMO protease specificity provided by analysis of human Senp2 and a Senp2-SUMO complex. Structure 12, 1519–1531 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brünger, A. T. et al. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 54, 905–921 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. 50, 760–763 (1994)

  31. Jones, T. A., Zou, J. Y., Cowan, S. W. & Kjeldgaard, M. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A 47, 110–119 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Laskowski, R. A., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. Main-chain bond lengths and bond angles in protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 231, 1049–1067 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Delano, W. L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (DeLano Scientific, 2002); 〈http://www.pymol.org

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Armstrong for Ub and Ub E1 clones and N. Takeda for assistance in graphic art preparation. This work is based on research conducted at the NE-CAT beamlines of the Advanced Photon Source, supported by RR-15301 from the NCRR at the NIH. Use of the APS is supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. D.S.T. is an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellow. X.L. and D.S.T. were supported by NIH R01 AI068038 and the NYSTAR Watson Investigator Program. S.K.O., A.D.C. and C.D.L. were supported by NIH R01 GM065872, F32 GM075695 (A.D.C.), and the Rita Allen Foundation (C.D.L.).

Author Contributions Experiments were performed by S.K.O., A.D.C., X.L. and C.D.L. Data were analysed by S.K.O., A.D.C., X.L., D.S.T. and C.D.L. The manuscript was prepared by S.K.O., D.S.T. and C.D.L.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Derek S. Tan or Christopher D. Lima.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figures 1-7 with Legends and Supplementary References. (PDF 3505 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olsen, S., Capili, A., Lu, X. et al. Active site remodelling accompanies thioester bond formation in the SUMO E1. Nature 463, 906–912 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08765

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08765

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing