Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Transcription factors as targets for cancer therapy

Key Points

Summary

  • Signalling proteins, which are often mutated in cancer, change transcription patterns.

  • Many more signalling proteins are affected in cancer than transcription factors, electing transcription factors as cogent targets.

  • One or more latent cytoplasmic transcription factors (such as STATs, NF-κB, β-catenin and Notch intracellular domain (NICD)) have increased activity in most human cancers, and in many cases prevent apoptosis of cancer cells.

  • Necessary physical interaction among transcription factors and cofactors in the nucleus affords selective sites of potential drug action.

  • Should pharmacology of transcription-factor inhibition be the wave of the future? It might be difficult, but it should not be impossible.

Abstract

A limited list of transcription factors are overactive in most human cancer cells, which makes them targets for the development of anticancer drugs. That they are the most direct and hopeful targets for treating cancer is proposed, and this is supported by the fact that there are many more human oncogenes in signalling pathways than there are oncogenic transcription factors. But how could specific transcription-factor activity be inhibited?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Generalized signalling pathway.
Figure 2: WNT signals through β-catenin.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Varmus, H. E. Oncogenes and transcriptional control. Science 238, 1337–1339 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blume-Jensen, P. & Hunter, T. Oncogenic kinase signalling. Nature 411, 355–365 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vogt, P. K. Jun, the oncoprotein. Oncogene 20, 2365–2377 (2001).The discoverer of JUN presents an excellent summary of the first nuclear oncogene.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Futreal, P. A. et al. Cancer and genomics. Nature 409, 850–852 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Green, D. R. & Evan, G. I. A matter of life and death. Cancer Cell 1, 19–30 (2002).Authoritative account of the importance of apoptosis in cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibbs, J. B. Mechanism-based target identification and drug discovery in cancer. Science 287, 1969–1973 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Biederer, C., Ries, S., Bandts, C. H. & McCormick, F. Replication-selective viruses for cancer therapy. J. Mol. Med. 80, 163–175 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McCormick, F. Cancer gene therapy: fringe or cutting edge? Nature Rev. Cancer 1, 130–141 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57–70 (2000).Widely quoted summary of the requirements to make a human cancer cell.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bachur, N. R. in Encyclopedia of Cancer 2nd edn Vol. 1 (ed. Bertino, J. R.) 57–61 (Academic Press, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Tilley, W. D., Clarke, C. L., Birrell, S. N. & Bruchovsky, N. Hormones and cancer: new insights, new challenges. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 12, 186–188 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barnes, P. J. Anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids: molecular mechanisms. Clin. Sci. 94, 557–572 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brivanlou, A. H. & Darnell, J. E. Jr., Signal transduction and the control of gene expression. Science 295, 813–818 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vogt, P. K., Bos, T. J. & Doolittle, R. F. Homology between the DNA-binding domain of the GCN4 regulatory protein of yeast and the carboxyl-terminal region of a protein coded for by the oncogene jun. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 84, 3316–3319 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Derijard, B. et al. JNK1: a protein kinase stimulated by UV light and Ha-Ras that binds and phosphorylates the c-Jun activation domain. Cell 76, 1025–1037 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Denhardt, D. T. Oncogene-initiated aberrant signaling engenders the metastatic phenotype: synergistic transcription factor interactions are targets for cancer therapy. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 7, 261–291 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stark, G. R., Kerrr, I. M., Williams, B. R., Silverman, R. H. & Schreiber, R. D. How cells respond to interferons. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 227–264 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Levy, D. & Darnell, J. E. Jr., STATs: transcriptional control and biologic impact. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 651–662 (2002).Most up-to-date review of the STAT protein family, which is important in cancer.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Darnell, J. E. Jr., STATs and gene regulation. Science 277, 1630–1635 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Groner, B. et al. Regulation of the trans-activation potential of STAT5 through its DNA-binding activity and interactions with heterologous transcription factors. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 10 (Suppl. B), S15–S20 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aittomaki, S. et al. Cooperation among Stat1, glucocorticoid receptor, and PU.1 in transcriptional activation of the high-affinity Fc gamma receptor I in monocytes. J. Immunol. 164, 5689–5697 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Look, D. C., Pelletier, M. R., Tidwell, R. M., Roswit, W. T. & Holtzman, M. J. Stat1 depends on transcriptional synergy with Sp1. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30264–30267 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, X., Wrzeszczynaska, M. H., Horvath, C. M. & Darnell, J. E. Jr., Interacting regions in Stat3 and c-Jun that participate in cooperative transcriptional activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7138–7146 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Starr, R. & Hilton, D. J. Negative regulation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Bioessays 21, 47–52 (1999).Authoritative summary of how cells switch off this important signalling pathway.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aoki, N. & Matsuda, T. A nuclear protein tyrosine phosphatase TC-PTP is a potential negative regulator of the PRL-mediated signaling pathway: dephosphorylation and deactivation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5a and 5b by TC-PTP in nucleus. Mol. Endocrinol. 16, 58–69 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shuai, K. Modulation of STAT signaling by STAT-interacting proteins. Oncogene 19, 2638–2644 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu, C. L. et al. Enhanced DNA-binding of a Stat3-related protein in cells transformed by the Src oncoprotein. Science 269, 81–83 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bowman, T., Garcia, R., Turkson, J. & Jove, R. STATs in oncogenesis. Oncogene 19, 2474–2488 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bromberg, J. F. et al. Stat3 as an oncogene. Cell 98, 295–303 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Takeda, K. et al. Stat3 activation is responsible for IL-6-dependent T cell proliferation through preventing apoptosis: generation and characterization of T cell- specific Stat3-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 161, 4652–4660 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takeda, K. et al. Enhanced Th1 activity and development of chronic enterocolitis in mice devoid of Stat3 in macrophages and neutrophils. Immunity 10, 39–49 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shen, Y., Devgan, G., Darnell, J. E. Jr, & Bromberg, J. F. Constitutively activated Stat3 protects fibroblasts from serum withdrawal and UV-induced apoptosis and antagonizes the proapoptotic effects of activated Stat1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1543–1548 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lacaronique, V. et al. A TEL–JAK2 fusion protein with constitutive kinase activity in human leukemia. Science 278, 1309–1312 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lacronique, V. et al. Transforming properties of chimeric TEL–JAK proteins in Ba/F3 cells. Blood 95, 2076–2083 (200).

  35. Song, J. I. & Grandis, J. R. STAT signaling in head and neck cancer. Oncogene 19, 2489–2495 (2000).Importance of persistently active STAT3 in human cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Catlett-Falcone, R. et al. Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling confers resistance to apoptosis in human U266 myeloma cells. Immunity 10, 105–115 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yoshikawa, H. et al. SOCS-1, a negative regulator of the JAK/STAT pathway, is silenced by methylation in human hepatocellular carcinoma and shows growth-suppression activity. Nature Genet. 28, 29–35 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, Q. et al. Multilevel dysregulation of STAT3 activation in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive T/null-cell lymphoma. J. Immun. 168, 466–474 (2002).References 36–38 provide evidence of the importance of STAT3 in clinical cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Perkins, N. D. The Rel/NF-κB family: friend and foe. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 434–440 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Israel, A. IκB kinase all zipped up. Nature 388, 519–521 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sen, R. & Baltimore, D. Inducibility of kappa immunoglobulin enhancer-binding protein NF-κB by a posttranslational mechanism. Cell 47, 921–928 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tam, W. F., Wang, W. & Sen, R. Cell-specific association and shuttling of IκBα provides a mechanism for nuclear NF-κB in B lymphocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 4837–4846 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Song, H. Y., Rothe, M. & Goeddel, D. V. The tumor necrosis factor-inducible zinc finger protein A20 interacts with TRAF1/TRAF2 and inhibits NF-κB activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 6721–6725 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Thanos, D. & Maniatis, T. Virus induction of human IFN beta gene expression requires the assembly of an enhanceosome. Cell 83, 1091–1101 (1995).Early description of the protein complex that functions as the enhanceosome.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rayet, B. & Gelinas, C. Aberrant REL/NF-κB genes and activity in human cancer. Oncogene 18, 6938–6947 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ni, H. et al. Analysis of expression of nuclear factor B (NF-κB) in multiple myeloma: downregulation of NF-κB induces apoptosis. Br. J. Haematol. 115, 279–286 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Izban, K. F. et al. Characterization of NF-κB expression in Hodgkin's disease: inhibition of constitutively expressed NF-κB results in spontaneous caspase-independent apoptosis in Hodgkin and Reed–Sternberg cells. Mod. Pathol. 14, 297–310 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kim, D. W. et al. Activation of NF-κB/REL occurs early during neoplastic transformation of mammary cells. Carcinogenesis 21, 871–879 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tai, D. I. et al. Constitutive activation of nuclear factor kappaB in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 89, 2274–2281 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Taipale, J. & Beachy, P. A. The Hedgehog and Wnt signalling pathways in cancer. Nature 411, 349–354 (2001).Excellent review of two signalling pathways and how they might connect to human cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Barish, G. D. & Williams, B. O. in Signaling Networks and Cell Cycle Control (ed. Gutkind, J. S) 53–82 (2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. Kolligs, F. T. et al. Gamma-catenin is regulated by the APC tumor suppressor and its oncogenic activity is distinct from that of beta-catenin. Genes Dev. 14, 1319–1331 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Wong, C. M., Fan, S. T. & Ng, I. O. L. Beta-catenin mutation and overexpression in hepatocellular carcinoma: clinicopathologic and prognostic significance. Cancer 92, 136–145 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. van de Wetering, M. et al. Armadillo coactivates transcription driven by the product of the Drosophila segment polarity gene dTCF. Cell 88, 789–799 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kramps, T. et al. Wnt/wingless signaling requires BCL9/legless-mediated recruitment of pygopus to the nuclear beta-catenin-TCF complex. Cell 109, 47–60 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Parker, D. S., Jemison, J. & Cadigan, K. M. Nucleotide Pygopus, a nuclear PHD-finger protein required for Wingless signaling in Drosophila. Development 129, 2565–2576 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Thompson, B., Townsley, F., Rosin-Arbesfeld, R., Musisi, H. & Bienz, M. A new nuclear component of the Wnt signalling pathway. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 367–373 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Barker, N. & Clevers, H. Catenins, Wnt signaling and cancer. Bioessays 22, 961–965 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hovanes, K. et al. Beta-catenin-sensitive isoforms of lymphoid enhancer factor-1 are selectively expressed in colon cancer. Nature Genet. 28, 53–57 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D. & Lake, R. J. Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science 284, 770–776 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Weinmaster, G. Notch signal transduction: a real Rip and more. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, (2000).Authoritative summary of Notch signalling.

  62. Davis, R. L. & Turner, D. L. Vertebrate Hairy and Enhancer of split related proteins: transcriptional repressors regulating cellular differentiation and embryonic patterning. Oncogene 20, 8342–9357 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Jarriault, S. et al. Signalling downstream of activated mammalian Notch. Nature 377, 355–358 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Oswald, F. et al. p300 acts as a transcriptional coactivator for mammalian Notch-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 7761–7774 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Ellisen, L. W. et al. TAN-1, the human homolog of the Drosophila Notch gene, is broken by chromosomal translocations in T lymphoblastic neoplasms. Cell 66, 649–661 (1991).Connects the Notch pathway to human cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Callahan, D. & Callahan, R. The mouse mammary tumor associated gene INT3 is a unique member of the NOTCH gene family (NOTCH4). Oncogene 14, 1883–1890 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Capobianco, A. J., Zagouras, P., Blaumueller, C. M., Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. & Bishop, J. M. Neoplastic transformation by truncated alleles of human NOTCH1/TAN1 and NOTCH2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6265–6273 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Jang, M. S., Zlobin, A., Kast, W. M. & Miele, L. Notch signaling as a target in multimodality cancer therapy. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 2, 55–65 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Fitzgerald, K., Harrington, A. & Leder, P. Ras pathway signals are required for notch-mediated oncogenesis. Oncogene 19, 4191–4198 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Ingham, P. W. Transducing Hedgehog: the story so far. EMBO J. 17, 3505–3511 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Kalderon, D. Transducing the Hedgehog signal. Cell 103, 371–374 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Price, M. A. & Kalderon, D. Proteolysis of the Hedgehog signaling effector cubitus interruptus requires phosphorylation by glycogen synthase kinase 3 and casein kinase 1. Cell 108, 823–835 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ruiz i Altaba, A. Gli proteins and Hedgehog in signalling. Trends Genet. 15, 418–425 (1999).Connects human cancer with the Hedgehog pathway.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Cheng, S. Y. & Bishop, J. M. Suppressor of Fused represses Gli-mediated transcription by recruiting the SAP18–mSin3 corepressor complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5442–5447 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang, B., Fallon, J. F. & Beachy, P. A. Hedgehog-regulated processing of Gli3 produces an anterior/posterior repressor gradient in the developing vertebrate limb. Cell 100, 423–434 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Riefenberger, J. et al. Missense mutations in SMO in sporadic basal cell carcinomas of the skin and primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the central nervous system. Cancer Res. 58, 1798–1803 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Goodrich, L. V., Milenkovic, L., Higgins, K. M. & Scott, M. P. Altered neural cell fates and medulloblastoma in mouse patched mutants. Science 277, 1109–1113 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Hahn, H. et al. Rhabdomyosarcomas and radiation hypersensitivity in a mouse model of Gorlin syndrome. Nature Med. 4, 619–622 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. van Dam, H. & Castelazzi, M. Distinct roles of Jun: Fos and Jun: ATF dimers in oncogenesis. Oncogene 20, 2453–2464 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Hartl, M. & Vogt, P. K. A rearranged junD transforms chicken embryo fibroblasts. Cell Growth Differ. 3, 909–918 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Vandel, L. et al. Stepwise transformation of rat embryo fibroblasts: c-Jun, JunB, or JunD can cooperate with Ras for focus formation, but a c-Jun-containing heterodimer is required for immortalization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1881–1888 (1996).Emphasizes the importance of multiple events in tumorigenesis.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Gille, H., Strahl, T. & Shaw, P. E. Activation of ternary complex factor Elk-1 by stress-activated protein kinases. Curr. Biol. 5, 1191–1200 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Davidson, B. et al. Ets-1 messenger RNA expression is a novel marker of poor survival in ovarian carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 7, 551–557 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Shaywitz, A. J. & Greenberg, M. E. CREB: a stimulus-induced transcription factor activated by a diverse array of extracellular signals. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 821–861 (1999).Excellent summary of CREB — one of the most well-studied transcription factors.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Fambrough, D., McClure, K., Kazlauskas, A. & Lander, E. S. Diverse signaling pathways activated by growth factor receptors induce broadly overlapping, rather than independent, sets of genes. Cell 97, 727–741 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Gilliland, D. G. The diverse role of the ETS family of transcription factors in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 7, 451–453 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Nesbit, C. E., Tersak, J. M. & Prochownik, E. V. MYC oncogenes and human neoplastic disease. Oncogene 18, 3004–3016 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Grandori, C., Cowley, S. M., James, L. P. & Eisenman, R. N. The Myc/Max/Mad network and the transcriptional control of cell behavior. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 653–699 (2000).Discoverer of MYC transcriptional activity provides up-to-date summary.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Eisenman, R. N. Deconstructing Myc. Genes Dev. 15, 2023–2030 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Wu, L. et al. The E2F1-3transcription factors are essential for cellular proliferation. Nature 414, 457–462 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Eymin, B., Gazzeri, S., Brambilla, C. & Brambilla, E. Distinct pattern of E2F1 expression in human lung tumours: E2F1 is upregulated in small-cell-lung carcinoma. Oncogene 20, 1678–1687 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Chen, X. et al. Gene expression patterns in human liver cancers. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13, 1929–1939 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Perou, C. M. et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406, 747–752 (2000).Among one of the first comprehensive gene-array reports: strengths and weaknesses discussed.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Rosenwald, A. et al. The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 1937–1947 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Davis, R. E. & Staudt, L. M. Molecular diagnosis of lymphoid malignancies by gene expression profiling. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 9, 333–338 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Abbott, A. News Feature: On the offensive. Nature 416, 470–474 (2002).Summary of where cancer pharmacology stands now.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Malik, H. S., Eickbush, T. H. & Goldfarb, D. S. Evolutionary specialization of the nuclear targeting apparatus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13738–13742 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Malik, S. & Roeder, R. G. Transcriptional regulation through mediator-like coactivators in yeast and metazoan cells. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 277–283 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Park, H. S., Lin, Q. & Hamilton, A. D. Supramolecular chemistry and self-assembly special feature: modulation of protein–protein interactions by synthetic receptors. Design of molecules that disrupt serine protease-proteinaceous inhibitor interaction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5105–5109 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Ohkanda, J., Knowles, D. B., Blaskovich, M. A., Sebti, S. M. & Hamilton, A. D. Inhibitors of protein farnesyltransferase as novel anticancer agents. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2, 303–323 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Peczuh, M. W. & Hamilton, A. D. Peptide and protein recognition by designed molecules. Chem. Rev. 100, 2479–2494 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Cochran, A. G. Antagonists of protein–protein interactions. Chem. Biol. 7, R85–R94 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Eckert, D. M., Malashkevich, V. N., Hong, L. H., Carr, P. A. & Kim, P. S. Inhibiting HIV-1 entry: discovery of D-peptide inhibitors that target the gp41 coiled-coil pocket. Cell 99, 103–115 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Berg, T. et al. Small-molecule antagonists of Myc/Max dimerization inhibit Myc-induced transformation of chicken embryo fibroblasts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3830–3835 (2002).First description of a small molecule that inhibits transcription-factor dimerization.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. McBride, K. M., Banninger, G., McDonald, C. & Reich, N. C. Regulated nuclear import of the STAT1 transcription factor by direct binding of importin-α. EMBO J. 21, 1754–1763 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Haspel, R. L. & Darnell, J. E. Jr. A nuclear protein tyrosine phosphatase is required for the inactivation of Stat1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10188–10193 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

Cancer.gov

brain cancer

breast cancer

colon cancer

head and neck cancer

hepatocellular carcinoma

Hodgkin's disease

leukaemia

lymphomas

medulloblastoma

multiple myeloma

prostate cancer

rhabdomyosarcomas

skin cancer

small-cell lung cancer

FlyBase

Armadillo

Delta

Dishevelled

Hedgehog

ptc

Serrate

smo

LocusLink

A2M

ABL

APC

β-catenin

γ-catenin

CBP

CREB

CREM

Delta-like

E2F1

E2F2

E2F3

E-cadherin

EGF

EGFR

FOS

Frizzled

GLI1

GLI2

GLI3

GR

GSK3β

HMG1

BCL9

IκB

IL-1

IL-6

IRF3

Jagged

JAK

JUN

JUNB

JUND

MAX

MYC

NF-κB

Notch1

Notch2

Notch3

Notch4

p53

p300

PDGFR

PIAS3

PU.1

RAS

RB

SP1

SRC

STAT1

STAT3

STAT4

STAT5

TCF4

TGF-β

TNF-α

WNT

<i>Saccharomyces</i> Genome Database

GCN4

Glossary

SRC-LIKE

The generic name for proteins that are similar to v-src, the oncogene of Rous sarcoma virus.

SH2 DOMAIN

(Src homology 2 domain). A protein motif that recognizes and binds tyrosine-phosphorylated sequences, and thereby has a key role in relaying cascades of signal transduction.

ANKYRIN REPEATS

Short amino-acid repeats that were first identified in the protein ankyrin, to which a number of cytoplasmic proteins bind.

IMPORTIN(S)

A family of proteins (also called karyopherins) that combine with 'cargo' proteins in the cytoplasm and engage the nuclear import machinery to bring proteins into the nucleus.

ENHANCEOSOME

A group of transcription factors that are bound to regulatory DNA elements that act in concert to activate gene transcription.

REED–STERNBERG CELLS

Characteristic large stellate lymph-node cells that are associated with Hodgkin's disease.

PROTO-ONCOGENES

Normal cellular genes that, when mutant or overactive, contribute to cancerous transformation in cells.

REL PROTEINS

Family name for a group of proteins that have sequence similarity to the oncogene in the chicken virus (v-rel) that causes reticulo-endothelial tumours.

WINGLESS

(Wg). The gene discovered early in Drosophila genetics that encodes a protein that is very similar to a DNA integrase named Int that is encoded by a retrovirus. The original term Int was melded with Wg to produce the current term WNT.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Darnell, J. Transcription factors as targets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2, 740–749 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc906

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc906

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing