Skip to main content
Log in

What Makes an Antipsychotic ‘Atypical’?

Conserving the Definition

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
CNS Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Current usage of the term ‘atypical’ in relation to antipsychotics lacks clear theoretical underpinnings and rigour in application. The prevailing definition of atypicality is a reduced liability to induce extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). However, this definition appears incomplete in the face of numerous other limitations associated with antipsychotics that can impact adversely on patient well-being; these encompass issues of efficacy, non-motoric physiology and quality of life.

On this basis, more conservative, operationalised criteria for atypical antipsychotic activity can be offered and applied to representative classical versus more recently introduced antipsychotics. These criteria include a reduced liability to induce EPS, but also superior efficacy, efficacy in patients who do not respond to classical antipsychotics, and no induction of subjective dysphoria, sedation, autonomic/cardiac effects, sexual dysfunction and bodyweight gain, and no elevation of prolactin levels or other endocrine effects. Such criteria codify yet higher aspirations for treatment with the welcome array of newer agents that is currently emerging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deniker P. Discovery of the clinical use of neuroleptics. In: Parnham MJ, Bruinvels J, editors. Discoveries in pharmacology, vol 1. Psycho- and neuro-pharmacology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1983: 163–80

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baldessarini RJ. Drugs and the treatment of psychiatric disorders. In: Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Rail TW, et al., editors. Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. New York: MacMillan, 1985: 387–445

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meltzer HY. Atypical antipsychotic drugs. In: Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ, editors. Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress. New York: Raven Press, 1995: 1277–86

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pickar D. Prospects for pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia. Lancet 1995; 345: 557–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerlach J, Casey DE. Drug treatment of schizophrenia: myths and realities. Curr Opin Psychiatry 1994; 7: 65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kane JM. Drug therapy: schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 34–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Meltzer HY. Atypical antipsychotic drug therapy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In: Hirsch SR, Weinberger DR, editors. Schizophrenia. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995: 485–502

    Google Scholar 

  8. Owens DGC. Adverse effects of antipsychotic agents: do newer agents offer advantages? Drugs 1996; 51: 895–930

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McCreadie RG, Todd N, Livingston M, et al. A double blind comparative study of remoxipride and thioridazine in the acute phase of schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1988; 78: 49–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Keks N, McGrath J, Lambert T, et al. The Australian multicentre double-blind comparative study of remoxipride and thioridazine in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994; 90: 358–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carpenter WT, Buchanan RW. Schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 681–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Waddington JL. The clinical psychopharmacology of antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia. In: Hirsch SR, Weinberger DR, editors. Schizophrenia. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995: 341–57

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schulz SC, Buckley PF. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In: Hirsch SR, Weinberger DR, editors. Schizophrenia. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995: 469–84

    Google Scholar 

  14. Awad GA. Subjective response to neuroleptics in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1993; 19: 609–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goff DC, Shader RI. Non-neurological side effects of antipsychotic agents. In: Hirsch SR, Weinberger DR, editors. Schizophrenia. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995: 566–84

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bitton R, Schneider B. Endocrine, metabolic and nutritional effects of psychotropic drugs. In: Kane JM, Lieberman JA, editors. Adverse effects of psychotropic drugs. New York: Guildford Press, 1992: 341–55

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rojansky N, Wang K, Halbreich U. Reproductive and sexual adverse effects of psychotropic drugs. In: Kane JM, Lieberman JA, editors. Adverse effects of psychotropic drugs. New York: Guilford Press, 1992: 356–75

    Google Scholar 

  18. Waddington JL. Schizophrenia, affective psychosis and other disorders treated with neuroleptic drugs: the enigma of tardive dyskinesia, its neurobiological determinants and the conflict of paradigms. Int Rev Neurobiol 1989; 31: 297–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson C. Concensus statement: the use of high dose antipsychotic medication. Br J Psychiatry 1994; 164: 448–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pisciotta AV. Hematological reactions associated with antipsychotic drugs. In: Kane JM, Lieberman JA, editors. Adverse effects of psychotropic drugs. New York: Guilford Press, 1992: 376–94

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waddington, J.L., O’Callaghan, E. What Makes an Antipsychotic ‘Atypical’?. CNS Drugs 7, 341–346 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-199707050-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-199707050-00001

Keywords

Navigation