Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Pharmacological Reviews
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Pharmacological Reviews

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit Pharm Rev on Facebook
  • Follow Pharm Rev on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Review ArticleReview Article
Open Access

WNT Signaling in Cardiac and Vascular Disease

Sébastien Foulquier, Evangelos P. Daskalopoulos, Gentian Lluri, Kevin C. M. Hermans, Arjun Deb and W. Matthijs Blankesteijn
Martin C. Michel, ASSOCIATE EDITOR
Pharmacological Reviews January 2018, 70 (1) 68-141; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.117.013896
Sébastien Foulquier
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands (S.F., K.C.M.H., W.M.B.); Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium (E.P.D.); Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine (G.L., A.D.); and Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (A.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evangelos P. Daskalopoulos
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands (S.F., K.C.M.H., W.M.B.); Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium (E.P.D.); Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine (G.L., A.D.); and Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (A.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gentian Lluri
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands (S.F., K.C.M.H., W.M.B.); Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium (E.P.D.); Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine (G.L., A.D.); and Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (A.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin C. M. Hermans
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands (S.F., K.C.M.H., W.M.B.); Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium (E.P.D.); Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine (G.L., A.D.); and Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (A.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arjun Deb
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands (S.F., K.C.M.H., W.M.B.); Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium (E.P.D.); Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine (G.L., A.D.); and Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (A.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Matthijs Blankesteijn
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands (S.F., K.C.M.H., W.M.B.); Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium (E.P.D.); Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine (G.L., A.D.); and Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (A.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin C. Michel
Roles: ASSOCIATE EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Synthesis, posttranslational modification, and exporting of WNT proteins. After translation of WNT proteins, a palmitoleate group is attached by Porcupine in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). This promotes the binding to Wntless (WLS), a chaperone protein that facilitates the migration of WNT through the Golgi complex. When WNT has reached the plasma membrane, it can either be secreted in exosomes or be attached to lipoproteins or Swim proteins; this is required to shield the large lipophilic moiety and increase the water solubility of the WNT protein. WNT can also attach to the plasma membrane of the producing cell by forming a complex with heparin sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG). Upon delivery of WNT to the plasma membrane, WLS is recycled via the retromer complex to the Golgi apparatus.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Mechanisms of regulating WNT signaling activity. (A) In the absence of regulating mechanisms, WNT can bind to the FZD/LRP5/6 complex and activate signaling. (B) In the classic view, soluble frizzled-related proteins (sFRPs) can bind WNT and prevent its interaction with the receptor complex. However, sFRPs can modulate Wnt signaling in different ways, as described in the text (C). Adenomatous polyposis coli downregulated-1 (APCDD1) is a membrane-bound glycoprotein that can bind WNT and prevent its interaction with the receptor complex. (D) WNT-inhibitory factor (WIF) is a secreted protein shown to attenuate WNT signaling by binding the protein that prevents the association with the receptor complex. (E) Tiki is a transmembrane protein with proteolytic activity, cleaving an peptide of 8–20 amino acids from the N-terminal part of WNT proteins. This causes the formation of oligomers of WNT proteins that are inactive in signal transduction. (F) Notum is a carboxylesterase capable of removing the palmitoleic acid residue from WNT, making the protein biologically inactive.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Regulation of the amount of FZD protein on the plasma membrane. (A) Association of the transmembrane E3 ligases RNF43 and/or ZNRF3 with the FZD receptor complex induces its ubiquitination and leads to internalization of the receptor complex, making it unavailable for stimulation with WNT. (B) R-spondin is capable of redirecting the E3 ligases toward LGR4 or -5, inducing the internalization of this transmembrane protein rather than the FZD/LRP5/6 complex. This effectively leaves more FZD receptors at the plasma membrane, available for stimulation with WNT proteins.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Schematic representation of the WNT/β-catenin signal transduction pathway. (Left) In the “Off” state, β-catenin is bound in a so-called β-catenin destruction complex containing glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), axin, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) and casein kinase-1 (CK-1). The kinases in this complex phosphorylate β-catenin, thereby targeting it for degradation by the ubiquitin proteasome system. (Right) In the “On” state, the receptor complex consisting of frizzled and LRP5/6 bind WNT, which recruits the disheveled (DVL) protein to the plasma membrane. Subsequently, several components of the β-catenin destruction complex are recruited to the membrane, which prevents the phosphorylation of β-catenin. Therefore, this protein can now accumulate in the cytoplasm and translocate to the nucleus to associate with transcription factors and stimulate the transcription of WNT target genes such as cycline-D1, c-myc, and axin2.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Schematic representation of the planar cell polarity pathway. In this pathways two receptor complexes are formed at the opposite sides of a cell: On one side, frizzled forms a complex with Flamingo/Celsr, disheveled (Dvl), and Diego/Diversin, whereas the other side the complex consists of Flamingo/Celsr, Van Gogh/Vang, and Prickle. The extracellular parts of these complexes interact, thereby controlling the cellular polarization via activation of JNK/p38 MAPK, small GTPase and Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) signaling. Although the role of Wnt in this signal transduction cascade is only partially understood, this protein may interfere with the Vangl1-FZD interaction. This could subsequently disturb the balance between the signaling of the Vang1/Prickle/Celsr complex and the FZD/DVL/Diego/Celsr complex.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    The role of WNT signaling in sprouting angiogenesis. In this process, tip cells provide directional cues to the sprout cells that can proliferate and initiate the formation of a new vessel. WNT signaling can contribute to the proliferation and tube formation of the stalk cells. The effect of WNT signaling on the tip cells is likely to be indirect via the expression of delta-like ligand-4 (Dll4) in the stalk cells, which activates Notch signaling in the tip cells.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    WNT signaling in atherosclerosis. The contribution of WNT signaling to the development and progression of atherosclerosis is described at the intima and media levels with a central role for the contribution of monocytes/macrophages (section VII.A). ABCA1, ATP-binding cassette transporter 1; agLDL, aggregated LDL; ox-LDL, oxidized LDL; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein-1.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Different sites of pharmacological intervention in WNT signaling. Details are provided in section XI. (1) Targeting of FZD proteins (e.g., vantictumab or UM206); (2) WNT scavengers (e.g., ipafricept); (3) Porcupine inhibitors (e.g., LGK974 or IWP-2); (4) Glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β) inhibitors (e.g., LiCl, valproic acid, 6-BIO); (5) Casein kinase-1 (CK1) inhibitors (e.g., pyrvinium); (6) Tankyrase inhibitors (e.g., XAV939, IWR-1); (7) Inhibitors of the interaction between β-catenin and the TCF transcription factors (e.g., ICRT3, -5, and -14, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs); (8, 9, 10) Inhibitors of the interaction of the transcription complex with the cofactors p300, CBP, and BCL9 (e.g., windorphen, ICG-001, and SAH-BCL9).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1 

    Wnts and cardiovascular development

    GenePathwayRoleReference
    WNT1β-catenin mediatedCardiac neural crest cell development and outflow tract developmentBrault et al. (2001)
    WNT2Bnon-β-catenin mediatedInhibition of cardiac progenitor cellsWang et al. (2007)
    WNT3Aβ-catenin mediatedMesoderm formationLiu et al. (1999)
    Inhibition of cardiac progenitor cellsMarvin et al. (2001)
    WNT5Anon-β-catenin mediatedCardiomyocyte differentiation and outflow tract septationSchleiffarth et al. (2007)
    WNT7Anon-β-catenin mediatedConduction system developmentBond et al. (2003)
    WNT9Bβ-catenin mediatedEpicardium development and coronary artery formationZamora et al. (2007)
    WNT11non-β-catenin mediatedCardiomyocyte differentiationPandur et al. (2002)
    Outflow tract septationZhou et al. (2007)
    Conduction system developmentBond et al. (2003)
    • View popup
    TABLE 2 

    Interventions in WNT synthesis and secretion

    InterventionUseProposed TargetEffectAffinityReference
    Porcn genetic deletionIn vivo (mice)Porcn geneInhibition of WNT3A secretionn/aBarrott et al. (2011)
    IWP-1In vitroPORCN proteinInhibition of WNT secretion (WNT1, -2, and -3A?)IC50: 58 nMChen et al. (2009a)
    IWP-2In vitroPORCN proteinInhibition of WNT-1, -2, −3a secretionIC50: 27 nMChen et al. (2009a)
    IWP-3In vitroPORCN proteinInhibition of WNT secretion (WNT1, -2, and -3A?)IC50: 40 nMChen et al. (2009a)
    IWP-4In vitroPORCN proteinInhibition of WNT secretion (WNT1, -2, and -3A?)IC50: 25 nMChen et al. (2009a)
    IWP-L6In vitroPORCN proteinInhibition of WNT secretionIC50: 0.5 nMWang et al. (2013b)
    LGK974In vitroPORCN proteinInhibition of WNT1, -2, -3, -3A, −6, -7A, and -9A secretionIC50: 0.3–0.4 nM (depending on the cell assay)Liu et al. (2013)
    ETC-159In vitroPORCN proteinInhibition of WNT1, -2, -3A, -6, -7B, −8A, -9A, -9B, and -10B secretionIC50: 2.9 nM β-catenin reporter assay)Madan et al. (2016a)
    IC50: 18.1 nM (mouse PORCN inhibition)
    WNT-C59In vitro and in vivo (mice)PORCN proteinInhibition of WNT1, -2, -3A, -6, -7B, −8A, -9A, -9B, and -10B secretionIC50: 74 pM (WNT-3a-mediatedProffitt et al. (2013)
    TOPFLASH assay)
    Compound 53In vitroPORCN proteinInhibition of WNT-3a secretionIC50: 0.5 nMXu et al. (2016)
    4,4-DiOMEAIn vitroPORCN protein?Inhibition of WNT-16 secretionIC50: 7.6 ± 1.5 nMRamirez de Molina et al. (2015)
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Extracellular targeting of the Wnt signaling pathway

    InterventionUseProposed TargetEffectAffinityReference
    OMP-18R5 (mAb)In vitro and in vivo (mice)FZD1, FZD2, FZD5, FZD7, FZD8Inhibition of WNT-FZD interactionn/aGurney et al. (2012)
    OTSA101 (mAb) + Yttrium 90In vitro, in vivo (mice) and CTFZD10Inhibition of WNT-FZD interactionn/aFukukawa et al. (2008)
    TT641 (pAb)In vitro and in vivo (mice)FZD10Inhibition of WNT-FZD interactionn/aNagayama et al. (2005)
    1.99.15 (mAb)In vitro and in vivo (mice)FZD4Inhibition of WNT-FZD interactionn/aPaes et al. (2011)
    pAb against FZD5In vitroFZD5Inhibition of WNT-FZD interactionn/aSen et al. (2001)
    Ab against FZD7In vitro and in vivo (chick embryo)FZD7Inhibition of WNT-FZD interactionn/aPode-Shakked et al. (2011)
    OMP-54F28 fusion proteinIn vitro, in vivo (mice) and CTFZD8-interacting WNT ligandsInhibition of WNT-FZD interactionn/aLe et al. (2015), Fischer et al. (2015)
    Jimeno et al. (2014)
    UM206In vitro and in vivo (mice)FZD1 and FZD2Inhibition of WNT-FZD interactionIC50: 2.10 nM for rFZD1;Laeremans et al. (2011)
    IC50: 0.0169 nM for rFZD2Uitterdijk et al. (2016)
    Foxy5 + FZD5 receptor-blocking AbIn vitro and in vivo (mice)FZD5Mimicking of WNT5A (effect independent of β-catenin)n/aSafholm et al. (2006)Safholm et al. (2008)
    Box5In vitroFZD5 (?)Blockade of WNT5A signalingn/aJenei et al. (2009)
    3235–0367In vitroFZD8 CRDInhibition of WNT-FZD interactionIC50: 7.1 μMLee et al. (2015)
    1094–0205In vitroFZD8 CRDInhibition of WNT-FZD interactionIC50: 5 μMLee et al. (2015)
    2124–0331In vitroFZD8 CRDInhibition of WNT-FZD interactionIC50: 10.4 μMLee et al. (2015)
    NSC36784In vitroFZD8 CRDInhibition of WNT-FZD interactionIC50: 6.5 μMLee et al. (2015)
    NSC654259In vitroFZD8 CRDInhibition of WNT-FZD interactionIC50: 5.7 μMLee et al. (2015)
    NiclosamideIn vitroFZD1 (internalization)Inhibition of WNT-FZD interactionIC50: 0.5 μMChen et al. (2009b)
    In vitroLRP6LRP6 degradationIC50: 0.33–0.75 μMLu et al. (2011b)
    (depending on the cell line)
    CurcuminIn vitroFZD1Inhibition of WNT-FZD interaction (?)n/aYan et al. (2005)
    In vitroWNT3A; LRP6Inhibition of WNT-FZD interaction (?)n/aZheng et al. (2017)
    In vitroWNT10B; FZD2; LRP5Enhancement of WNT-FZD interactionn/aAhn et al. (2010)
    anti-Sclerostin AbIn vitroSclerostin bindingPrevention of Sclerostin-mediated disruptionn/avan Dinther et al. (2013)
    to LRP5/6of LRP5/6-FZD complex formation
    SalinomycinIn vitroLRP6 (?)Inhibition of WNT1/FZD5/LRP6 andIC50: 163 nM (WNT-1)Lu et al. (2011)
    WNT3/FZD5/LRP6 complexes
    In vitroLRP6Inhibition of WNT/FZD/LRP6 complex (?)n/aLu and Li (2014)
    LeptinIn vivo (mice)LRP6; WNT4 and WNT7 (?);Enhancement of WNT4/FZD/LRP6n/aBenzler et al. (2013)
    GSK-3βand WNT7A/FZD/LRP6 complexes
    SilibininIn vitroLRP6Inhibition of WNT3A/FZD/LRP6 complexIC50: 34–122 μM (depending on the cell line)Lu et al. (2012)
    anti-LRP6 AbsIn vitroLRP6Inhibition of WNT1 and WNT3A-mediated cascaden/aEttenberg et al. (2010)
    (WNT/FZD/LRP6 complex?)
    In vitroLRP6Inhibition or enhancement of WNT1/2/2B/4/6/7A/7B/8A/9B/10A/10B-mediatedn/aGong et al. (2010)
    cascade (WNT/FZD/LRP6 complex?)
    28aa peptideIn vitro andin vivo (mice)LRP5/6Mimicking of LRP5/6-domain → Enhancement ofn/aHay et al. (2012)
    WNT signaling (via N-cadherin)
    DKK1 and DKK2In vivo (Xenopus embryos)LRP6Inhibition of WNT signalingn/aMao et al. (2001)
    anti-DKK1 AbIn vitro and in vivo (mice)DKK1Neutralization of DKK1 → Enhancement of WNT signalingn/aSato et al. (2010b)
    BHQ880 mAbIn vitro, in vivo (mice) and CTDKK1Neutralization of DKK1 → Enhancement of WNT signalingn/aFulciniti et al. (2009)
    Iyer et al. (2014)
    DKK1 vaccineIn vivo (mice)DKK1Enhancement of DKK1 levels → Inhibition of WNT signalingn/aQian et al. (2012)
    Iminooxothiazolidines (Compounds 1–34)In vitrosFRP1Inhibition of sFRP1 → Enhancement of WNT signalingEC50: 7.2 μM (Compound 1)Shi et al. (2009)
    WAY-316606In vitrosFRP1Inhibition of sFRP1 → Enhancement of WNT signalingIC50: 0.5 μMBodine et al. (2009)
    EC50: 0.65 μMMoore et al. (2010)
    N-substituted piperidinylIn vitrosFRP1Inhibition of sFRP1 → Enhancement of WNT signalingIC50: 0.04–0.87 μMMoore et al. (2010)
    diphenylsulfonyl sulfonamidesED50: 0.07–1.9 μM
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Interventions in the intracellular compartment

    InterventionUseProposed targetEffectAffinityReference
    1. Interventions Targeting Disheveled
    3289–8625In vitro and in vivo (Xenopus embryos and mice)DVL PDZBlockade of DVL → Inhibition of WNT signalingIC50: 10.5 μMGrandy et al. (2009)
    NSC668036In silico and in vivo (Xenopys embryos)DVL PDZBlockade of DVL → Inhibition of WNT signalingn/aShan et al. (2005)
    J01-017aIn silicoDVL PDZBlockade of DVL → Inhibition of WNT signalingn/aShan et al. (2012)
    FJ9In vitro and in vivo (mice)DVL PDZFZD7-DVL PDZ interaction disruption → Inhibition of WNT signalingn/aFujii et al. (2007)
    PolyR-DBMEx vivo and in vitroDVL-CXXC5FZD7-DVL PDZ interaction disruption → Inhibition of WNT signalingn/aKim et al. (2015)
    KY-02327In silico, in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo (mice)DVL-CXXC5FZD7-DVL PDZ interaction disruption → Inhibition of WNT signalingIC50: 3.1 μMKim et al. (2016)
    KY-02061In silico, in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo (mice)DVL-CXXC5FZD7-DVL PDZ interaction disruption → Inhibition of WNT signalingIC50: 24 μMKim et al. (2016)
    pen-N3In silico and in vitroDVL PDZBlockade of DVL → Inhibition of WNT signalingIC50: 11 ± 4 μMZhang et al. (2009b)
    2. Interventions Targeting Axin
    XAV939In vitro and in vivo (mice)axinInduction of protein levels and stabilization of axin → Enhancement ofIC50: 0.114–2.194 μM (PARP1/2);Huang et al. (2009), Wang et al. (2014a)
    axin-GSK3β complex formation → Inhibition of Wnt SignalingIC50: 0.004–0.011 μM (TNKS1/2)
    IWR-1 and IWR-2In vitro and in vivo (zebrafish and mice)axinInduction of protein levels and stabilization of axin → Enhancement ofIC50 IWR-1: 0.18 μM;Chen et al. (2009), Wang et al. (2014a)
    axin-GSK3β complex formation → Inhibition of Wnt SignalingIC50 IWR-2: 0.23 μM
    XAV939 + 5-FU or cisplatinIn vitroaxinInduction of protein levels and stabilization of axin → Enhancement ofn/aWu et al. (2016b)
    axin-GSK3β complex formation → Inhibition of Wnt Signaling
    XAV939 + ICAT + niclosamideIn vitroaxin; β-catenin/Stabilization of axin (XAV939), β-catenin/p300 complex inhibition (ICAT),n/aOno et al. (2014)
    p300 complex; FZD1FZD1 internalization (niclosamide) → Inhibition of Wnt Signaling
    E7449In vitro and in vivo (mice)axin/PARPsTNKS proteins inhibition → Stabilization of axin → Inhibition of Wnt signalingIC50 PARP1/2: 1–2 nM, IC50 TNKS1/2: 50–120 nMMcGonigle et al. (2015)
    WXL-8In vitro and in vivo (mice)axin/TNKSsTNKS proteins inhibition → Stabilization of axin → Inhibition of Wnt signalingIC50: 9.1 nM (TNKS1)Ma et al. (2015)
    JW67, JW74 and JW55In vitro and in vivo (Xenopus embryos and mice)axinTNKS proteins inhibition → Induction of protein levels and stabilization of axin →IC50 JW67: 1.17 mM; IC50 JW64: 790 nM;Waaler et al. (2011), (2012)
    Enhancement of axin-GSK3β complex formation → Inhibition of Wnt SignalingIC50 JW55: 470 nM
    Compounds 13 and 14In silico and in vitroaxin/TNKSsTNKS proteins inhibition → Stabilization of axin → Inhibition of Wnt signalingIC50 = 2 nM (for TNKs2)Nathubhai et al. (2017)
    WIKI4In vitroaxin/TNKSsTNKS proteins inhibition → Halting of axin ubiquitination →IC50: 15 nM (TNKS2)James et al. (2012)
    Stabilization of axin → Inhibition of WNT signaling
    G007-LKIn vitro and in vivo (mice)axin/TNKSsTNKS proteins inhibition → Stabilization of axin → Inhibition of WNT signalingIC50: 0.08 μMLau et al. (2013)
    AZ1366 + EGFR-inhibitorIn vitro and in vivo (mice)axin/TNKSsTNKS proteins inhibition → Stabilization of axin → Inhibition of WNT signalingn/aScarborough et al. (2017)
    AZ1366 + irinotecaninIn vitro and in vivo (mice)axin/TNKSsTNKS proteins inhibition → axin induction →n/aQuackenbush et al. (2016)
    IWRs (1-5)In vitro and in vivo (zebrafish)axin/TNKSsTNKS proteins inhibition → Induction of protein levels and stabilization of axin →IC50: 0.18–2.0 μMChen et al. (2009)
    Enhancement of axin-GSK3β complex formation → Inhibition of Wnt Signaling
    NVP-TNKS656In silico and in vitroaxin/TNKSsTNKS proteins inhibition → Induction of protein levels and stabilization of axin →IC50: 0.006 μM (TNKS2)Shultz et al. (2013)
    Enhancement of axin-GSK3β complex formation → Inhibition of Wnt Signaling
    Compounds 9 and 25In silico and in vitroaxin/TNKSsTNKS proteins inhibition → Induction of protein levels and stabilization of axin →IC50: <0.003 μM (compound 9:)Johannes et al. (2015)
    Enhancement of axin-GSK3β complex formation → Inhibition of Wnt SignalingIC50: 0.005 μM (Wnt cell) (compound 25)
    SEN461In vitro and in vivo (Xenopus embryos and mice)axin
(not via TNKs?)Induction of protein levels and stabilization of axin → Enhancement of axin-GSK3βIC50: 18 μM (TNKS1); IC50: 2.9 μM (TNKS2);De Robertis et al. (2013)
    complex formation → Inhibition of Wnt SignalingIC50: 0.2–1.9 μM (Ca cell assays)De Robertis et al. (2014)
    Tigecycline
(monotherapy or + paclitaxel)In vitro and in vivo (mice)axin1Induction of protein levels and stabilization of axin1 → Enhancement of axin-GSK3βn/aLi et al. (2015)
    complex formation → Inhibition of Wnt Signaling
    SKL2001In vitroaxinDisruption of the axin/β-catenin interaction → Activation of Wnt signalingn/aGwak et al. (2012)
    3. Interventions Targeting CK1
    PyrviniumIn vitro and in vivo (Xenopus embryo and mice)CK1Induction of CK1α → Enhancement of axin-GSK3β complex formation → Inhibition of Wnt Signalingn/aSaraswati et al. (2010), Thorne et al. (2010)
    CKI-7In vitro (Xenopus embryos and C. elegans)CK1/DVLInhibition of CK and DVL → Inhibition of Wnt Signalingn/aPeters et al. (1999)
    IC261In vitroCK1Targeting of CK1ε → Inhibition of Wnt SignalingIC50: 0.5–86 μM (depending on cell line treated)Kim et al. (2010b)
    SB203580In vitroCK1Targeting of CK1δ/ε → Inhibition of Wnt Signaling?Laco et al. (2015)
    SR-3029In vitro and in vivo (mice)CK1Targeting of CK1δ → Inhibition of Wnt Signalingn/aRosenberg et al. (2015)
    4. Interventions Activating GSK3β
    CurcuminIn vitroGSK3βAkt inhibits p-GSK3β → activation of GSK3β → Enhancement of
destruction complex → Inhibition of Wnt SignalingIC50: 25 mM (after 24 hours treatment) and
18.4 mM (after 48 hours treatment)Choi et al. (2010)
    9-Hydroxycanthin-6-oneIn vitro and in vivo (zebrafish embryos)GSK3βInduction of GSK3β → Inhibition of Wnt Signaling
(without involvement of CK)IC50: 36.7 - > 40 μM (depending on cell line)Ohishi et al. (2015)
    All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)In vitroGSK3βInduction of GSK3β → Inhibition of Wnt Signalingn/aZhu et al. (2015)
    S-ibuprofenIn vitroGSK3βInduction of p-GSK3β → Inhibition of Wnt Signaling
(NF-κB also involved)n/aGreenspan et al. (2011)
    5. Interventions Inhibiting GSK3β
    LithiumIn vitroGSK3β
(and β-catenin)Inhibition of GSK3β (+ up-regulation of β-catenin) → Activation of Wnt Signalingn/aWexler et al. (2008)
    Valproic acidIn vitroGSK3βInhibition of GSK3β → Activation of Wnt Signalingn/aChen et al. (1999)
    6-bromoindirubin-3′-oxime
(BIO)In vitro and in vivo (mice)GSK3βCompetitive inhibition of GSK3β → Activation of Wnt Signalingn/aKohler et al. (2014)
    In vitro (incl. stem cells)GSK3βInhibition of GSK3β → Activation of Wnt Signalingn/aSato et al. (2004), Wen et al. (2010), Tseng et al. (2006)
    IBU-POIn vitroGSK3βInduction of p-GSK3β → Inhibition of GSK3β → Activation of Wnt Signalingn/aFarias et al. (2005)
    CurcuminIn vitroGSK3β
(and axin)Inhibition of GSK3β (and axin) → Activation of Wnt Signalingn/aAhn et al. (2010)
    SB-216763 and SB-415286In vitroGSK3α/βInhibition of GSK3β → Activation of Wnt SignalingID50: 34 nM (SB-216763); IC50: 78 nM (SB-415286)Coghlan et al. (2000)
    KenpaulloneIn vitro (stem and progenitor cells)GSK3Inhibition of GSK3 → Activation of Wnt Signalingn/aLange et al. (2011)
    CHIR 99021In vitro (incl. embryonic stem cells)GSK3α/βInhibition of GSK3β → Activation of Wnt SignalingIC50: 5 nM (GSK3β)Bennett et al. (2002), Ye et al. (2012), Hou et al. (2013)
    Naujok et al. (2014)
    CG0009In vitroGSK3βInduction of Ser9 p-GSK3β and inhibition of Tyr215 p-GSK3β → Inhibition of GSK3β →Activation of Wnt SignalingIC50: 0.49–>100 μM (depending on cell type in the assay)Kim et al. (2013)
    L803-mtsIn vitro and in vivo (mice)GSK3Inhibition of GSK3 → Activation of Wnt SignalingIC50: 40 μMPlotkin et al. (2003), Kaidanovich-Beilin et al. (2004)
    • View popup
    TABLE 5 

    Interventions in β-catenin and gene transcription

    InterventionUseProposed targetEffectAffinityReference
    1. Targeting of the TCF/LEF Transcription Factors
    iCRT3, iCRT5 and iCRT14In vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 8.2 nM (iCRT3); IC50: 18.7 nM (iCRT5); IC50: 40.3 nM (iCRT14) - in STF16 luciferase assayGonsalves et al. (2011), Griffiths et al. (2015)
    Thiazole and oxazoleIn vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aNarayanan et al. (2012)
    15-oxospiramilactone (NC043)In vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 0.9–6.9 μM (depending on the cell type)Wang et al. (2011b)
    HenryinIn vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 0.6 ± 0.02 μM (ST-luciferase assay)Li et al. (2013c)
    11α,12α-epoxyleukamenin E (EPLE)In vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aYe et al. (2015)
    LF3In silico, in vitro and in vivo (mice)β-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 2.4–4.0 mM (HeLa cells); IC50: 22.2 ± 4.9 mM (HEK293 TOPFlash assay)Fang et al. (2016)
    BC-21In silico and in vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 5 μM (β-catenin-TCF4 inhibition assay)Tian et al. (2012)
    BC-23 (monotherapy or with radiation therapy)In silico and in vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 5 μM (β-catenin-TCF4 inhibition assay)Zhang et al. (2016a)
    PNU-74654In vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 117.2–5026.0 μM (depending on time and cell line used in the assay)Leal et al. (2015)
    PKF115-584In vitro and in vivo (Xenopus embryos)
In vitro and in vivo (mice)β-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction, TCF binding with DNA, β-catenin/APC complex formation and antagonism of exogenous β-catenin → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 3.2 μM (β-catenin - TCF4 inhibition assay)
IC50: 0.31–2.05 μM (sphere forming assay, range depending on cell type)Lepourcelet et al. (2004), Hallett et al. (2012)
    CGP049090In vitro and in vivo (Xenopus embryos)β-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction, TCF binding with DNA, β-catenin/APC complex formation and antagonism of exogenous β-catenin → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 8.7 μM (β-catenin-TCF4 inhibition assay)Lepourcelet et al. (2004)
    PKF222-815In vitro and in vivo (Xenopus embryos)β-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction and antagonism of exogenous β-catenin → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 4.1 μM (β-catenin - TCF4 inhibition assay)Lepourcelet et al. (2004)
    PKF118–310In vitro and in vivo (mice)β-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction and antagonism of exogenous β-catenin → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 0.8 μM (β-catenin-TCF4 inhibition assay)Lepourcelet et al. (2004)
    In vitro and in vivo (mice)IC50: 0.54–1.54 μM (sphere forming assay, range depending on cell type)Hallett et al. (2012)
    DaxxIn vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexBinding to TCF4 → Potentiation of β-catenin/TCF4-mediated transcriptional activation → Activation of WNT Signalingn/aHuang and Shih (2009)
    QuercetinIn vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aPark et al. (2005)
    IsoquercitrinIn vitro and in vivo (Xenopus embryos)β-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aAmado et al. (2014)
    6,7-dihydroxycoumarin (Aesculetin)In vitro and in vivo (Xenopus embryos and mice)β-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aLee et al. (2013)
    CurcuminIn vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aJaiswal et al., 2002
    In vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexDecrease of TCF4, CBP and p300 protein levels → Interference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aTeiten et al. (2011)
    AspirinIn vitroβ-catenin-TCF gene transcriptionSuppression of gene transcription of β-catenin/TCF4 → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aDihlmann et al. (2001)
    IndomethacinIn vitroβ-catenin-TCF gene transcriptionSuppression of gene transcription of β-catenin/TCF4 → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aDihlmann et al. (2001)
    Celecoxib and 2,5-dimethyl-celecoxibIn vivo (mice)β-catenin and TCF4 expressionSuppression of β-catenin and TCF4 expression (not clear if the complex formation itself is affected) → Inhibition of TCF-mediated transcription → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aFan et al. (2011), Egashira et al. (2017)
    SulindacIn vitro and in vivo (mice)TCF gene transcriptionSuppression of gene transcription of TCF → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 1.8–33.9 μM (for COX-1/2 and cGMP)Tinsley et al. (2010)
    In vitroβ-catenin and TCF4 expressionSuppression of gene transcription of TCF and β-catenin synthesis → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 75–83 μM (following 72 hour treatment of various human cancer cell lines)Li et al. (2013)
    ICATIn vitro and in vivo (Xenopus embryos)β-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aTago et al. (2000)
    In vitroβ-catenin-TCF/LEF complexInterference with the β-catenin/TCF/LEF interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aDaniels and Weis (2002)
    2. Targeting of CBP
    ICG-001 (PRI-724)In vitro, in vivo (mice) and CTCBPDisruption of the β-catenin/CBP interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 3 μM (TOPFlash assay)Emami et al. (2004), Henderson et al. (2010), El-Khoueiry et al. (2013), Sasaki et al. (2013)
    PMED-1In silico and in vitroCBPDisruption of the β-catenin/CBP interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 4.87–32 μM (depending on cell type in the TOPFlash assay)Delgado et al. (2014)
    CurcuminIn vitroCBPDecrease of TCF4, CBP and p300 protein levels → Interference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aTeiten et al. (2011)
    3. Targeting of p300
    ICATIn vitrop300Inhibition of the β-catenin/Lef1/p300 interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aDaniels and Weis (2002)
    ICAT-61 (helical domain of ICAT)In vitrop300Disruption of the β-catenin/p300 interaction (but no interference with the binding of TCF/LEF) → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aDaniels and Weis (2002)
    Windorphen (WD)In vitro and in vivo (Zebrafish embryos)p300Disruption of the β-catenin/p300 interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 4.2 μM (p300); IC50: 1.5 μM (WNT3a-inducible TOPFlash assay)Hao et al. (2013)
    IQ1In vitro and in vivo (mice)p300Disruption of the β-catenin/p300 interaction → Amplification of the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Activation of WNT Signaling (paradox?)n/aSasaki and Kahn (2014)
    Bisdemethoxycurcumin (BDMC) and demethoxycurcumin (DMC)In vitrop300Downregulation of p300 (without effects on TCF4 or β-catenin levels) → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aRyu et al. (2008)
    CurcuminIn vitrop300Decrease of TCF4, CBP and p300 protein levels → Interference with the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aTeiten et al. (2011)
    4. Targeting of BCL9
    Carnosic acid (CA)In silico and in vitroβ-catenin/BCL9 complexInterference with β-catenin/BCL9 interaction and degradation of β-catenin → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/ade la Roche et al. (2012)
    In silico and in vitroβ-catenin/BCL9 complexInterference with β-catenin/BCL9 interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 8.7 ± 1.5–20 ± 0.18 μM (depending on cell line)Hoggard et al. (2015)
    LATS Large Tumor Suppressor (LATS) 2In vitro and in vivo (mice)β-catenin/BCL9 complexInterference with β-catenin/BCL9 interaction → Inhibition of WNT Signalingn/aLi et al. (2013)
    Compound 11In silico and in vitroβ-catenin/BCL9 complexInterference with β-catenin/BCL9 interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 22 ± 4.0–26 ± 6.6 μM (depending on cell line)Wisniewski et al. (2016)
    SAH-BCL9In vitro and in vivo (mice)β-catenin/BCL9 complexInterference with β-catenin/BCL9 interaction → Inhibition of WNT SignalingIC50: 135–810 nM (depending on assay)Takada et al. (2012)
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Pharmacological Reviews: 70 (1)
Pharmacological Reviews
Vol. 70, Issue 1
1 Jan 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Pharmacological Reviews article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
WNT Signaling in Cardiac and Vascular Disease
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Pharmacological Reviews
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Pharmacological Reviews.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Review ArticleReview Article

WNT Signaling in Cardiovascular Disease

Sébastien Foulquier, Evangelos P. Daskalopoulos, Gentian Lluri, Kevin C. M. Hermans, Arjun Deb and W. Matthijs Blankesteijn
Pharmacological Reviews January 1, 2018, 70 (1) 68-141; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.117.013896

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Review ArticleReview Article

WNT Signaling in Cardiovascular Disease

Sébastien Foulquier, Evangelos P. Daskalopoulos, Gentian Lluri, Kevin C. M. Hermans, Arjun Deb and W. Matthijs Blankesteijn
Pharmacological Reviews January 1, 2018, 70 (1) 68-141; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.117.013896
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. The History of WNT Signaling
    • III. Components of the Receptor Complex
    • IV. Regulation of WNT Signaling
    • V. Signal Transduction
    • VI. WNT Signaling in Cardiac and Vascular Development
    • VII. WNT Signaling in Vascular Disease
    • VIII. WNT Signaling in Cardiac Disease
    • IX. WNT Signaling in Stem Cells
    • X. Crosstalk between WNT Signaling and Other Signal Transduction Pathways
    • XI. Therapeutic Interventions
    • XII. Future Perspectives
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Molecular Mechanisms of CO-Mediated Signaling
  • Pharmacology of Matrix Metalloproteinases
  • Quantitative Proteomics in Translational Pharmacokinetics
Show more Review Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Pharmacological Reviews
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0081 (Online)

Copyright © 2022 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics