Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Pharmacological Reviews
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Pharmacological Reviews

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit Pharm Rev on Facebook
  • Follow Pharm Rev on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Review ArticleReview Article

Cognitive Effects of MDMA in Laboratory Animals: A Systematic Review Focusing on Dose

Madeline M. Pantoni and Stephan G. Anagnostaras
Timothy A. Esbenshade, ASSOCIATE EDITOR
Pharmacological Reviews July 2019, 71 (3) 413-449; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.118.017087
Madeline M. Pantoni
Molecular Cognition Laboratory, Department of Psychology (M.M.P., S.G.A.) and Program in Neurosciences (S.G.A.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephan G. Anagnostaras
Molecular Cognition Laboratory, Department of Psychology (M.M.P., S.G.A.) and Program in Neurosciences (S.G.A.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy A. Esbenshade
Roles: ASSOCIATE EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Chemical structure of ±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (https://chem.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus/name/mdma%20hcl, Open Source).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    MDMA in the form of “Ecstasy” tablets (http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/programs/forensicsci/microgram/mg0103/mg0103.html, Open Source).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    MDMA crystalline powder in capsule form, commonly referred to as “Molly” (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1884576, Open Source).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Contents of 4063 samples of street MDMA tested by EcstasyData.org and other organizations between 1996 and 2017. Samples sold as MDMA contained either MDMA only, MDMA in combination with other substances, or no MDMA at all. Less than half of street MDMA samples contained MDMA only and more than half of street MDMA samples consisted partially or entirely of other substances (original figure; data redrawn with permission from https://www.ecstasydata.org/stats.php).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Dose-dependent effects of MDMA on the radial arm maze task. 0.75 mg/kg MDMA had no effect on overall accuracy (A) or errors (B), while 3 and 4 mg/kg MDMA impaired overall accuracy (A) and increased working (4 mg/kg only) and reference memory errors (B). Data redrawn with permission from Figs. 1 and 3 in Kay et al. (2010).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Dose-dependent effects of MDMA on a variation of the Morris water maze task. 0.3, 1.0, 1.7 mg/kg MDMA had no effect on working memory (acquisition) or spatial learning (performance), while 3 mg/kg MDMA impaired spatial learning (performance). Data redrawn with permission from Fig. 4 (middle) in Galizio et al. (2014).

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Dose-dependent effects of MDMA on novel object recognition. Pretreatment with three doses of 3 mg/kg MDMA had no effect on exploration time of the novel and familiar objects during the test trial (A) or the discrimination ratio [novel/(novel+familiar)] (B), while pretreatment with three doses of 6 mg/kg MDMA significantly decreased exploration time of the novel object (A) and the discrimination ratio (B). Data redrawn with permission from Fig. 3, A and C in Rodsiri et al. (2011).

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Dose-dependent effects of MDMA on passive avoidance. Posttraining doses of 2.5 and 5 mg/kg MDMA enhanced long-term memory, while posttraining doses of 1 and 10 mg/kg MDMA had no effect on long-term memory. Data redrawn with permission from Fig. 5 in Budzynska et al. (2017).

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Breakdown of findings from all 90 experiments. Most experiments (46 out of 90) found no effects of MDMA on cognition.

  • Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    Breakdown of findings from 23 working memory (A), 24 spatial learning and memory (B), 27 nonspatial learning and memory (C), and 14 fear-motivated learning and memory (D) experiments.

  • Fig. 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 11.

    Breakdown of findings from experiments that administered MDMA at doses of less than 3 mg/kg [(A); n = 15], 3–6 mg/kg [(B); n = 31], 7.5–10 mg/kg [(C); n = 50], and 15–30 mg/kg [(D); n = 31]. There is no evidence that MDMA produces cognitive impairments at doses below 3 mg/kg (A), and the evidence regarding doses of 3–30 mg/kg is mixed (B–D).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Studies examining the effects of MDMA on attention

    ArticleTaskaSubjectsbDoses/FrequencycTimelinedEffectse
    Taffe et al., 20015-CSRTMonkeys (R), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.m.) × 2/day, 4 daysTraining: Predrug Testing: On-Drug, Postdrug↓ (On-Drug), ⌀ (Postdrug)
    Taffe et al., 20025-CSRTMonkeys (R), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.m.) × 2/day, 4 daysTraining: Predrug Testing: Postdrug⌀
    • ↵a Studies used the 5-choice serial reaction time (5-CSRT) task.

    • ↵b Species (strain), age, and sex of subjects. Strains include rhesus (R) monkeys.

    • ↵c Dose, route, and frequency of MDMA administration. Treatment days/weeks are consecutive unless noted as “spaced.”

    • ↵d When training and testing occurred in relation to drug treatment. Pre- and post-drug training/testing were always conducted off-drug.

    • ↵e Effects of drug treatment on attention: ⌀ No Effect, ↓ Impairment, ↑ Enhancement.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Studies examining the effects of MDMA on working memory

    ArticleTaskaSubjectsbDoses/FrequencycTimelinedEffectse
    Harper et al., 2005DMSRats (SD), Adult, Male0.3, 1, 2, or 3 mg/kg (i.p.)*Training: Predrug / Testing: On-Drug⌀
    Harper, 2011DMSRats (SD), Adult, Male3 mg/kg (i.p.)*Training: Predrug / Testing: On-Drug⌀
    Frederick et al., 1995aDMSMonkeys (R), Adult, Male0.1, 0.3, or 1 mg/kg (i.m.)*Training: Predrug / Testing: On-Drug⌀
    Frederick et al., 1995bDMSMonkeys (R), Adult, Male0.1 → 0.3 → 1 → 3 → 5.6 → 10 → 20 (14 days each) mg/kg (i.m.) × 2/day, 14 wk AND 0.3, 1, 1.75 or 3 mg/kg (i.m.)*Training: Predrug / Testing: On-Drug⌀
    LeSage et al., 1993DMSPigeons (WC), Adult0.32, 1, 1.7, 3.2, or 4.2 mg/kg (i.m.)* AND 3.2 (20 days) → 4.2 (1 day) → 3.2 (5 days) → 5.6 (1 day) mg/kg (i.m.) × 1/day, 27 daysTraining: Predrug / Testing: On-Drug⌀
    Taffe et al., 2001DNMSMonkeys (R), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.m.) × 2/day, 4 daysTraining: Predrug / Testing: On-Drug, Postdrug⌀
    Marston et al., 1999DNMSRats (LH), Adult, Male10 → 15 → 20 (1 day each) mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 3 daysTraining: Predrug / Testing: Postdrug↓
    Hawkey et al., 2014OSTRats (SD), Adult, Male0.3, 1, 1.8, or 3 mg/kg (i.p.)* OR 10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 4 daysTraining: Predrug / Testing: On-Drug (Single), Postdrug (Repeated)⌀
    Costa et al., 2014SAMice (B6), Adol.→Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 2 days/wk (spaced), 9 wkTesting: Off-Drug1, Postdrug⌀
    Edut et al., 2011SAMice (ICR), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1Testing: Postdrug⌀
    Cassel et al., 2005SARats (LE), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 4 daysTesting: Postdrug⌀
    Kolyaduke and Hughes, 2013SARats (PVG/c), Adol.→Adult, Male/Female10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 10 daysTesting: Postdrug⌀
    Ricaurte et al., 1993DARats (LE), Adult, Male20 mg/kg (s.c.) × 2/day, 4 days/wk, 2 wk (spaced)Training/Testing: Postdrug⌀
    Young et al., 2005DARats (W), Adult, Male1.25, 2.25, or 5 mg/kg (i.p.)*Training: Predrug / Testing: On-Drug⌀ (1.25 and 2.25 mg/kg) ↓ (5 mg/kg)
    Viñals et al., 2012DAMice (B6), Adult, Male3 or 30 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 4 daysTraining: Predrug / Testing: Postdrug⌀
    Hernandez-Rabaza et al., 2010RAMRats (LE), Adol., Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2Training: Postdrug⌀
    Ros-Simó et al., 2013RAMMice (CD1), Adol., Male20 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2Training: Predrug, Off-Drug2, Postdrug⌀
    Kay et al., 2010RAMRats (SD), Adult, Male0.75, 3, or 4 mg/kg (i.p.)*Training: Predrug, On-Drug⌀ (0.75 and 3 mg/kg) ↓ (4 mg/kg)
    Kay et al., 2011RAMRats (SD), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 4 AND 4 mg/kg (i.p.)*Training: Postdrug (10 mg/kg) and On-Drug (4 mg/kg)⌀
    Harper et al., 2013RAMRats (SD), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 4 AND/OR 4 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/wk, 6 wkTraining: Postdrug (10 mg/kg) and On-Drug (4 mg/kg)⌀
    Braida et al., 2002RAMRats (W), Adult, Male1, 2, or 3 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 3 daysTraining: Predrug, On-Drug⌀ (1 and 2 mg/kg) ↓ (3 mg/kg)
    Robinson et al., 1993MWMRats (SD), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 4 daysTraining: Postdrug⌀
    Galizio et al., 2014MWMRats (SD), Adult, Male0.3, 1, 1.7, 3, or 5.6 mg/kg (i.p.)*Training: Predrug / Testing: On-Drug⌀
    • ↵a Studies used the delayed matching-to-sample (DMS), delayed nonmatching-to-sample (DNMS), odor span task (OST), spontaneous alternation (SA), delayed alternation (DA), radial arm maze (RAM), and Morris water maze (MWM) tasks.

    • ↵b Species (strain), age, and sex of subjects. Strains include rhesus (R) monkeys; White Carneau (WC) pigeons; Lister Hooded (LH), Long Evans (LE), PVG/c hooded, Sprague-Dawley (SD), and Wistar (W) rats; and C57BL/6 (B6), CD1, and ICR mice.

    • ↵c Dose, route, and frequency of MDMA administration. Treatment days/weeks are consecutive unless noted as “spaced.”

    • ↵d When training and testing occurred in relation to drug treatment. Pre- and post-drug training/testing were always conducted off-drug.

    • ↵e Effects of drug treatment on nonspatial working memory [DMS/DNMS, OST, DA (only Viñals et al., 2012)] and spatial working memory [SA/DA (except Viñals et al., 2012), RAM, MWM]: ⌀ No Effect, ↓ Impairment, ↑ Enhancement.

    • 1 Off-drug training/testing took place on day(s) without drug administration.

    • ↵2 Off-drug training/testing took place immediately before drug administration on (last) day of treatment.

    • ↵* Within-subjects design (all animals were tested multiple times at each dose including saline).

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Studies examining the effects of MDMA on spatial learning and memory

    ArticleTaskaSubjectsbDoses/FrequencycTimelinedEffectse
    Taghizadeh et al., 2016MWMRats (W), Adult, Male5, 10, or 15 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 4 daysAcquisition: On-Drug / Probe: PostdrugProbe: ↓
    Mirzaei et al., 2013MWMRats (W), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1 OR × 2/day, 7 daysAcquisition: PostdrugAcquisition: ⌀
    Sprague et al., 2003MWMRats (SD), Adult, Male20 mg/kg (s.c.) × 2Acquisition/Probe: PostdrugAcquisition: ⌀ / Probe: ↓
    Cunningham et al., 2009MWMRats (SD), Adult, Male7.5 mg/kg (i.p.) × 4Acquisition/Probe: PostdrugAcquisition: ⌀ / Probe: ↓
    Able et al., 2006MWMRats (SD), Adult, Male15 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4Acquisition/Probe: PostdrugAcquisition: ⌀ / Probe: ↓
    Cohen et al., 2005MWMRats (SD), Adult, Male15 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4Acquisition/Probe: PostdrugProbe: ⌀
    Skelton et al., 2008MWMRats (SD), Adult, Male15 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4 OR × 4/day, 1 day/wk, 5 wkAcquisition/Probe: PostdrugAcquisition/Probe: ⌀
    Camarasa et al., 2008MWMRats (LE), Adult, Male15 mg/kg (s.c.) × 2/day, 4 daysAcquisition/Probe: PostdrugAcquisition/Probe: ↓
    Abad et al., 2014MWMRats (SD), Adol., Male20 mg/kg (s.c.) × 2/day, 4 daysAcquisition/Probe: PostdrugAcquisition: ↑ / Probe: ⌀
    Busceti et al., 2008MWMMice (B6), Adult, Male5 or 15 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 6 daysAcquisition/Probe: PostdrugAcquisition: ↓ / Probe: ↓ (7 days later; 40 days later - 15 mg/kg), ⌀ (40 days later - 5 mg/kg)
    Kermanian et al., 2012MWMRats (SD), Adult, Male10 or 20 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 7 daysAcquisition: PostdrugAcquisition: ↓
    Soleimani Asl et al., 2015MWMRats (SD), Adult, Male/Female5 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 7 daysAcquisition/Probe: PostdrugProbe: ↓
    Soleimani Asl et al., 2011MWMRats (SD), Adult, Male5, 10, or 20 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 7 daysAcquisition/Probe: PostdrugProbe: ⌀
    Soleimani Asl et al., 2013MWMRats (SD), Adult, Male5, 10, or 20 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 7 daysAcquisition/Probe: PostdrugProbe: ↓
    Robinson et al., 1993MWM Var.Rats (SD), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 4 daysTraining/Probe: Postdrug⌀
    Galizio et al., 2014MWM Var.Rats (SD), Adult, Male0.3, 1, 1.7, 3, or 5.6 mg/kg (i.p.)*Training: Predrug / Acquisition: On-Drug⌀ (0.3, 1, and 1.7 mg/kg) ↓ (3 and 5.6 mg/kg)
    Compton et al., 2011MMW Var.Rats (LE), Adol.→Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 6 days (spaced)Training/Acquisition: Postdrug↓
    Edut et al., 2011MWM Var.Mice (ICR), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1Acquisition: Postdrug⌀
    Hernandez-Rabaza et al., 2010RAMRats (LE), Adol., Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2Training: Postdrug⌀
    Ros-Simó et al., 2013RAMMice (CD1), Adol., Male20 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2Training: Predrug, Off-Drug2, Postdrug↓
    Kay et al., 2010RAMRats (SD), Adult, Male0.75, 3, or 4 mg/kg (i.p.)*Training: Predrug, On-Drug⌀ (0.75 mg/kg), ↓ (3 and 4 mg/kg)
    Kay et al., 2011RAMRats (SD), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 4 AND 4 mg/kg (i.p.)*Training: Postdrug (10 mg/kg) and On-Drug (4 mg/kg)↓
    Harper et al., 2013RAMRats (SD), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 4 AND/OR 4 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/wk, 6 wkTraining: Postdrug (10 mg/kg) and On-Drug (4 mg/kg)↓
    Young et al., 2005SDRats (W), Adult, Male1.25, 2.25, or 5 mg/kg (i.p.)*Training: Predrug / Testing: On-Drug⌀
    • ↵a Studies used the Morris water maze (MWM), radial arm maze (RAM), and spatial discrimination (SD) tasks.

    • ↵b Species (strain), age, and sex of subjects. Strains include Long Evans (LE), Sprague-Dawley (SD), and Wistar (W) rats; and C57BL/6 (B6), CD1, and ICR mice.

    • ↵c Dose, route, and frequency of MDMA administration. Treatment days/weeks are consecutive unless noted as “spaced.”

    • ↵d When training and testing occurred in relation to drug treatment. Pre- and post-drug training/testing were always conducted off-drug.

    • ↵e Effects of drug treatment on spatial learning (MWM-Acquisition) and spatial reference memory (MWM-Probe, RAM, SD): ⌀ No Effect, ↓ Impairment, ↑ Enhancement.

    • ↵2 Off-drug training/testing took place immediately before drug administration on (last) day of treatment.

    • ↵* Within-subjects design (all animals were tested multiple times at each dose including saline).

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Studies examining the effects of MDMA on nonspatial learning and memory

    ArticleTaskaSubjectsbDoses/FrequencycTimelinedEffectse
    Ros-Simó et al., 2013NORMice (CD1), Adol., Male20 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2Training: Predrug, Off-Drug2 / Testing: Postdrug [72 h delay]↓
    Shortall et al., 2013NORRats (LH), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 2 daysTraining/Testing: On-Drug [2 h delay]↓
    Nawata et al., 2010NORMice (CD1), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1 OR × 1/day, 7 daysTraining/Testing: Postdrug [3 h delay]⌀ (Single), ↓ (Repeated)
    Edut et al., 2011NORMice (ICR), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1Training/Testing: Postdrug [24 h delay]⌀ (7 days later), ↓ (30 days later)
    Rodsiri et al., 2011NORRats (LH), Adult, Male3 or 6 mg/kg (i.p.) × 3Training/Testing: Postdrug [2 h delay]⌀ (3 mg/kg), ↓ (6 mg/kg)
    Piper et al., 2008NORRats (SD), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4Training/Testing: Postdrug [15 min and 60 min delays]⌀
    Able et al., 2006NORRats (SD), Adult, Male15 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4Training/Testing: Postdrug [1 h delay]⌀
    Cohen et al., 2005NORRats (SD), Adult, Male15 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4Training/Testing: Postdrug [1 h delay]⌀
    Skelton et al., 2008NORRats (SD), Adult, Male15 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4 OR × 4/day, 1 day/wk, 5 wkTraining/Testing: Postdrug [1 h delay]⌀
    Morley et al., 2001NORRats (W), Adult, Male5 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 2 days OR × 4/day, 2 daysTraining/Testing: Postdrug [15 min and 60 min delays]⌀ (Single; Repeated - 60 min delay) ↓ (Repeated - 15 min delay)
    McGregor et al., 2003NORRats (W), Adult, Male5 mg/kg (i.p.) × 4/day, 2 daysTraining/Testing: Postdrug [1 h delay]↓
    Abad et al., 2014NORRats (SD), Adol., Male20 mg/kg (s.c.) × 2/day, 4 daysTraining/Testing: Postdrug [1 h delay]⌀
    van Nieuwenhuijzen et al., 2010NORRats (W), Adult, Male5 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 10 daysTraining/Testing: Postdrug [1 h delay]↓
    Kolyaduke and Hughes, 2013NORRats (PVG/c), Adol.→Adult, Male/Female10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 10 daysTraining/Testing: Postdrug [15 min delay]⌀
    García-Pardo et al., 2017NORMice (OF1), Adol., Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 4 days (spaced)Training/Testing: Postdrug [1 min delay]⌀
    Llorente-Berzal et al., 2013NORRats (W), Adol.→Adult, Male/Female10 mg/kg (s.c.) × 2/day, 4 days (spaced)Training/Testing: Postdrug [4 h delay]⌀
    Piper and Meyer, 2004NORRats (SD), Adol., Male10 mg/kg (s.c.) × 2/day, 6 days (spaced)Training/Testing: Postdrug [15 min delay]↓
    Piper et al., 2005NORRats (SD), Adol., Male5 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4/day, 6 days (spaced)Training/Testing: Postdrug [15 min and 30 min delays]⌀
    Clemens et al., 2007NORRats (W), Adult, Female8 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/wk, 16 wkTraining/Testing: Postdrug [20 min delay]⌀
    Costa et al., 2014NORMice (B6), Adol.→Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 2 days/wk (spaced), 9 wkTraining/Testing: Off-Drug1, Postdrug [1 h delay]⌀ (Off-Drug), ↓ (Postdrug)
    Schulz et al., 2013NORRats (W), Adol./Adult, Male7.5 mg/kg (s.c.) × 1/day (10 days) and 2/day (5 days), 15 days (spaced/randomized)Training/Testing: Postdrug [25 min delay]↓
    Abad et al., 2016NORMice (B6), Adol.→Adult, Male5 (2 wk) → 7.5 (3 wk) → 10 (3 wk) mg/kg (s.c.) × 3/day, 1 day/wk, 8 wkTraining/Testing: Postdrug [1 h and 24 h delays]⌀ (1 h delay), ↓ (24 h delay)
    Skelton et al., 2008NPRRats (SD), Adult, Male15 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4 OR × 4/day, 1 day/wk, 5 wkTraining/Testing: Postdrug [1 h delay]⌀
    Pompei et al., 2002SRRats (SD), Adult, Male1, 5, or 10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 8 daysTraining: Off-Drug2 / Testing: On-Drug [2 h delay]↑ (1 and 5 mg/kg), ⌀ (10 mg/kg)
    Able et al., 2006CWMRats (SD), Adult, Male15 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4Testing: Postdrug↓
    Skelton et al., 2008CWMRats (SD), Adult, Male15 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4 OR × 4/day, 1 day/wk, 5 wkTesting: Postdrug⌀
    Vorhees et al., 2011CWMRats (SD), Adult, Male15 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4Testing: Postdrug⌀
    • ↵a Studies used the novel object recognition (NOR), novel place recognition (NPR), social recognition (SR), and Cincinnati water maze (CWM) tasks.

    • ↵b Species (strain), age, and sex of subjects. Strains include Lister Hooded (LH), PVG/c hooded, Sprague-Dawley (SD), and Wistar (W) rats; and C57BL/6 (B6), CD1, ICR, and OF1 mice.

    • ↵c Dose, route, and frequency of MDMA administration. Treatment days/weeks are consecutive unless noted as “spaced.”

    • ↵d When training and testing occurred in relation to drug treatment, and duration of delay period between training and testing for recognition tasks. Pre- and post-drug training/testing were always conducted off-drug.

    • ↵e Effects of drug treatment on nonspatial learning (CWM) and recognition memory (NOR, NPR, SR): ⌀ No Effect, ↓ Impairment, ↑ Enhancement.

    • 1 Off-drug training/testing took place on day(s) without drug administration.

    • 2 Off-drug training/testing took place immediately before drug administration on (last) day of treatment.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Studies examining the effects of MDMA on fear-motivated learning and memory

    ArticleTaskaSubjectsbDoses/FrequencycTimelinedEffectse
    Moyano et al., 2004PARats (W), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1Training: On-Drug Testing: Postdrug↓
    Moyano et al., 2005PARats (W), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1 AND/OR × 2/day, 4 daysTraining: On-Drug (Single), Postdrug (Repeated) Testing: Postdrug↓ (Single) ⌀ (Repeated)
    Barrionuevo et al., 2000PARats (W), Adult, Male20 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1Training: On-Drug Testing: Postdrug↓
    Budzynska et al., 2017PAMice (SW), Adult, Male1, 2.5, 5, or 10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1Training: Off-Drug2 Testing: Postdrug↑ (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) ⌀ (1 and 10 mg/kg)
    Shariati et al., 2014PARats (W), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1 OR × 1/day, 2 day/wk, 3 wkTraining: Off-Drug2 Testing: Postdrug↓
    Jahanshahi et al., 2013PARats (W), Adult, Male2.5, 5, or 10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 3/day, 1 day/wk, 4 wkTraining: Predrug Testing: Postdrug↑
    Timár et al., 2003PARats (W), Adol., Male10 mg/kg (s.c.) × 4Training/Testing: Postdrug⌀
    Murnane et al., 2012PAMice (SW), Adol., Male10 or 20 mg/kg (i.p.) × 4Training/Testing: Postdrug⌀
    García-Pardo et al., 2015PAMice (OF1), Adol., Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 4 days (spaced)Training/Testing: Postdrug↓
    García-Pardo et al., 2017PAMice (OF1), Adol., Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 4 days (spaced)Training/Testing: Postdrug↓
    Rodríguez-Arias et al., 2011PAMice (OF1), Adol., Male10 or 20 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 2 days/wk, 2 wkTraining/Testing: Postdrug⌀
    McNamara et al., 1995PARats (SD), Adult, Male5, 10, or 20 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2/day, 4 daysTesting: Postdrug⌀
    Shortall et al., 2013FCRats (LH), Adult, Male10 mg/kg (i.p.) × 1/day, 3 days (spaced)Training: Off-Drug2 Testing: Postdrug⌀
    Johansson et al., 2015FCMice (ICR), Adult, Male20 mg/kg (i.p.) × 2Training/Testing: Postdrug↓
    • ↵a Studies used the passive avoidance (PA) and contextual fear conditioning (FC) tasks.

    • ↵b Species (strain), age, and sex of subjects. Strains include Lister Hooded (LH), Sprague-Dawley (SD), and Wistar (W) rats; and ICR, OF1, and Swiss Webster (SW) mice.

    • ↵c Dose, route, and frequency of MDMA administration. Treatment days/weeks are consecutive unless noted as “spaced.”

    • ↵d When training and testing occurred in relation to drug treatment. Pre- and post-drug training/testing were always conducted off-drug.

    • ↵e Effects of drug treatment on learning and memory: ⌀ No Effect, ↓ Impairment, ↑ Enhancement.

    • 2 Off-drug training/testing took place immediately before drug administration on (last) day of treatment.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Pharmacological Reviews: 71 (3)
Pharmacological Reviews
Vol. 71, Issue 3
1 Jul 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Pharmacological Reviews article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cognitive Effects of MDMA in Laboratory Animals: A Systematic Review Focusing on Dose
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Pharmacological Reviews
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Pharmacological Reviews.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Review ArticleReview Article

Cognitive Effects of MDMA in Laboratory Animals

Madeline M. Pantoni and Stephan G. Anagnostaras
Pharmacological Reviews July 1, 2019, 71 (3) 413-449; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.118.017087

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Review ArticleReview Article

Cognitive Effects of MDMA in Laboratory Animals

Madeline M. Pantoni and Stephan G. Anagnostaras
Pharmacological Reviews July 1, 2019, 71 (3) 413-449; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.118.017087
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. ±3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine Dose
    • III. Neurotoxicity in Animals and Humans
    • IV. Cognitive Effects in Humans
    • V. Cognitive Effects in Animals—Systematic Review
    • VI. Analysis of Findings
    • VII. High Doses and Neurotoxicology of Drugs of Abuse
    • VIII. Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Review of Natural Language Processing in Pharmacology
  • PHARMACOGENOMICS: Driving Personalized Medicine
  • Potassium Channels in Parkinson's Disease
Show more Review Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Pharmacological Reviews
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0081 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics