Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Pharmacological Reviews
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Pharmacological Reviews

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Visit Pharm Rev on Facebook
  • Follow Pharm Rev on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Review ArticleReview Article
Open Access

Therapeutic Targeting of the Complement System: From Rare Diseases to Pandemics

Peter Garred, Andrea J. Tenner and Tom E. Mollnes
Finn Olav Levy, ASSOCIATE EDITOR
Pharmacological Reviews April 2021, 73 (2) 792-827; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000072
Peter Garred
Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (P.G.); Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Neurobiology and Behavior, and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California (A.J.T.); and Research Laboratory, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway, Faculty of Health Sciences, K.G. Jebsen TREC, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway (T.E.M.); Centre of Molecular Inflammation Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (T.E.M.); and Department of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (T.E.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea J. Tenner
Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (P.G.); Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Neurobiology and Behavior, and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California (A.J.T.); and Research Laboratory, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway, Faculty of Health Sciences, K.G. Jebsen TREC, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway (T.E.M.); Centre of Molecular Inflammation Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (T.E.M.); and Department of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (T.E.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom E. Mollnes
Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (P.G.); Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Neurobiology and Behavior, and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California (A.J.T.); and Research Laboratory, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway, Faculty of Health Sciences, K.G. Jebsen TREC, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway (T.E.M.); Centre of Molecular Inflammation Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (T.E.M.); and Department of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (T.E.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tom E. Mollnes
Finn Olav Levy
Roles: ASSOCIATE EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    An overview of the complement system with focus on most relevant targets for therapeutic inhibition. The complement system acts as a recognition system and can recognized danger and be activated through three initial pathways (upper part of figure), all converging to the cleavage of C3 to generate C3a and C3b (middle part of figure). The classical pathway (CP) is typically activated by antibodies, but amyloid β fibrils and pentraxins, including CRP, serum amyloid P component (SAP), and PTX3, can activate C1. The lectin pathway (LP) is activated through recognition of carbohydrates by MBL, ficolins, and collectins. Furthermore, LP activation may be mediated through IgM antibodies (e.g., directed against damaged self antigens). Both the CP and the LP activate C4 to C4a, and C4b and C2 subsequently bind to C4b and make the C4bC2b convertase after C2 is cleaved to C2a and C2b. The alternative pathway (AP) is activated by foreign or damaged cells, as facilitated by the continuous spontaneous hydrolysis of C3. AP also has an important function in the complement system providing an amplification loop enhancing C3 activation independent of which pathway that is initially activated. This effect is enhanced due to properdin (FP), the only positive regulator in the complement system, which stabilizes the C3 convertase. Cleavage of C3 leads to formation of a C5 convertase, cleaving C5 into C5a and C5b. The anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a bind to the receptors C3aR, C5aR1, and C5aR2, leading to downstream production of proinflammatory and/or anti-inflammatory mediators (lower left part of figure). C5b initiates the formation of the TCC, which forms the membrane attack complex (MAC) if inserted into a membrane (bottom part of figure). This may lead to lysis of bacteria and cells or in sublytic doses to activation of cells. The cleavage and inactivation of C3b generate iC3b, binding to complement receptors CR3 (CD11b/CD18) and CR4 (CD11c/CD18) and facilitating phagocytosis, oxidative burst, and downstream inflammation (right part of figure). The complement system is tightly regulated by soluble inhibitors (marked in yellow), including C1-inhibitor (C1-INH), factor H (FH), factor I (FI), C4BP, carboxidase inactivation of the anaphylotoxins (AI), vitronectin (Vn), and clusterin (CLU), keeping the continuous low-grade activation in the fluid phase in check. Host cell membranes are equipped with a number of inhibitors to protect them against attack by complement (right part of figure), including MCP (CD46), CR1 (CD35), DAF (CD55) controlling C4 and C3 activation, and CD59 protecting against final assembly of the C5b-9 complex. Some selected attractive targets for therapeutic inhibition are indicated by red asterisks. Although many more could have been included, we selected C1s as a specific target from the CP, MBL, and MASP-2 from the LP, factor B, factor D, and properdin as specific for the AP and then C3 as the major component at which all three pathways converge and would be a very efficient blocker of the system. C5 is the next main candidate to block completely, as it will block the inflammatory potent C5a fragment and formation of the inflammatory and lytic C5b-9 complex or the solueble form sC5b-9. In addition, C5a can be inhibited, preserving the C5b-9 pathway, or the C5b7 can be blocked to prevent C5b-9 formation, leaving C5a open. Finally, the anaphylatoxin receptor’s axes can be blocked to prevent signaling. In particular, blocking of C5aR1 will attenuate the proinflammatory inflammation, whereas the effects of blocking C3aR and C5aR2 receptors are to be studied in more detail since they might have more anti-inflammatory effects. FB, factor B. (The figure is a modified version of one published in J Leukoc Biol (2014) 101:193–204. Barratt-Due A, Pischke SE, Nilsson PH, Espevik T, Mollnes TE. Copyright by Mollnes TE.)

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Cascade principles and the need for balance and homeostasis. (A) Illustration of a cascade with the potential for amplification and thus the need for inhibition. The balance is kept under control as long as the activation occurs locally. If the activation is overwhelming, such as in systemic inflammation, the explosive response might kill the host. (B) Normal homeostasis with balance between inhibition and activation. (C) Hypoactivation due to loss of function on ordinary components or gain of function in regulators, with both leading to the same phenotype. (D) The opposite situation with gain of function in ordinary components and loss of function of regulators resulting in the same hyperactivation phenotype. FB, factor B; FH, factor H; FI, factor I.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Loss of host cell regulators leads to attack by the host’s own complement. (A) A normal erythrocyte protected from complement by DAF (CD55) and CD59. (B) An erythrocyte from a patient with PNH, which is caused by a clonal deletion in enzyme enabling GPI anchors, which is responsible for binding both DAF (CD55) and CD15 to the surface, resulting in cell lysis. (C) PNH cell from a patient treated with eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody blocking cleavage of C5. The cell is protected from C5b-9 attack. FB, factor B.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Signs and symptoms of inflammation. The classic four characteristics seen in any inflammation: calor, rubor, tumor, and dolor. Later, function loss was also added to these. Reprinted with permission from Lawrence T, Willoughby DA, and Gilroy DW (2002) Anti-inflammatory lipid mediators and insights into the resolution of inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology 2:787–795. Printed with permission from Nat Rev Immunol.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Immunohistochemically detected deposition of complement in tissue. (A) C5aR1 antagonist (PMX205) reduces microglial cells (IBA-1) and CD68 surrounding amyloid plaques in an Alzheimer disease mouse model. Representative hippocampal images of ThioS (fAβ green), Iba1 (microglia, blue), and CD68 (lysosomal marker, red) in 15-month-old Tg2576 after treatment with the C5aR1 antagonist PMX205 (B1-B4) or untreated (A1-A4) for 12 weeks. C5aR1 antagonist treatment showed reduced microglial cells (IBA, blue) surrounding amyloid plaques (ThioS, green) and accompanied by a reduction of the lysosomal marker CD68 (red). Courtesy of Angela Gomez-Arboledas. (B) Deposition of C5b-9 in a porcine glomerulus from a case with factor-H deficiency and C3 glomerulopathy presented as dense deposit disease (kindly provided by Professor Johan Høgset Jansen). (C) C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries in a kidney undergoing acute antibody-mediated rejection (kindly provided by the Department of Pathology at Oslo University Hospital).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Immunoassay for detection of complement activation. This ELISA illustrates the first specific assay for detection of sC5b-9 based on mAbE11 produced in our laboratory in 1985 reacting specifically with a neoepitope in C9 exposed only when C9 is incorporated in the C5b-9 complex (Mollnes et al., 1985). The assay is a traditional sandwich immunoassay, and many variants exist with different detection antibodies on the top, reacting with one of the other components of the complex. An increased level of sC5b-9 indicates that the complement cascade has been activated to the very end.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Immunoassay for detection of total complement function. This assay is used to screen for complement deficiencies in each activation pathway and to evaluate the effect of treating patients with, for example, a C5 inhibitor. (A) Normal serum leading to complete assembly of the C5b-9 being similar to the membrane attack complex complex, as it is bound to the plastic surface not measuring sC5b-9. All three pathways show 100% activity. (B) Serum from a patient who is C5-deficient. The assembly will stop at the level of C5, and all three wells will have 0% activity. (C) Serum from a patient treated in excess with the mAb eculizumab blocking C5 cleavage. This will give the same phenotype as the patient who is genetically deficient. If eculizumab is discontinued it will gradually disappear, and the situation will be similar to the one presented in (A), in which the inhibitory anti-C5 mAb is not present any longer, and the activity will be 00% as before treatment started. HRP, horseradish peroxidase.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Pharmacological Reviews: 73 (2)
Pharmacological Reviews
Vol. 73, Issue 2
1 Apr 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Pharmacological Reviews article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Therapeutic Targeting of the Complement System: From Rare Diseases to Pandemics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Pharmacological Reviews
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Pharmacological Reviews.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Review ArticleReview Article

Pharmacological Targeting the Complement System

Peter Garred, Andrea J. Tenner and Tom E. Mollnes
Pharmacological Reviews April 1, 2021, 73 (2) 792-827; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000072

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Review ArticleReview Article

Pharmacological Targeting the Complement System

Peter Garred, Andrea J. Tenner and Tom E. Mollnes
Pharmacological Reviews April 1, 2021, 73 (2) 792-827; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000072
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Complement Deficiencies and Loss- or Gain-of-Function Mutations
    • III. Role of Complement in Disease Pathophysiology
    • IV. Therapeutic Complement Inhibition
    • V. Mode of Complement Inhibition
    • VI. Assays for Diagnostics and for Treatment Follow-up
    • VII. Consequences of Therapeutic Complement Inhibition
    • VIII. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Modeling Pharmacokinetic Natural Product–Drug Interactions
  • Viral GPCRs as Attractive Targets
Show more Review Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Pharmacological Reviews
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0081 (Online)

Copyright © 2021 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics