Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Pharmacological Reviews
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Pharmacological Reviews

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit Pharm Rev on Facebook
  • Follow Pharm Rev on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Review ArticleReview Article
Open Access

Immunology and Technology of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccines

Simone Pecetta, Sven Kratochvil, Yu Kato, Kumaran Vadivelu and Rino Rappuoli
Qiang Ma, ASSOCIATE EDITOR
Pharmacological Reviews January 2022, 74 (1) 313-339; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000285
Simone Pecetta
Research and Development Centre, GSK, Siena, Italy (S.P., K.V., R.R.); Ragon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.); IconOVir Bio, San Diego, California (Y.K.); and La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California (Y.K.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sven Kratochvil
Research and Development Centre, GSK, Siena, Italy (S.P., K.V., R.R.); Ragon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.); IconOVir Bio, San Diego, California (Y.K.); and La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California (Y.K.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yu Kato
Research and Development Centre, GSK, Siena, Italy (S.P., K.V., R.R.); Ragon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.); IconOVir Bio, San Diego, California (Y.K.); and La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California (Y.K.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kumaran Vadivelu
Research and Development Centre, GSK, Siena, Italy (S.P., K.V., R.R.); Ragon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.); IconOVir Bio, San Diego, California (Y.K.); and La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California (Y.K.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rino Rappuoli
Research and Development Centre, GSK, Siena, Italy (S.P., K.V., R.R.); Ragon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.); IconOVir Bio, San Diego, California (Y.K.); and La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California (Y.K.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qiang Ma
Roles: ASSOCIATE EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    Basics of antibody and cell-mediated immunity. After encounter with the virus, immune cells known as antigen-presenting cells activate antigen-specific T cells that act either as support to other cell types by producing cytokines and stimulatory molecules (CD4+, also referred to as helper T cells) or attack the infected cells participating in infection clearance (CD8+, also referred to as cytotoxic T cells). Helper T cells can be further divided in Th1, Th2, or other subtypes, which differentially affect the immune effector response. Antigen-specific B cells, also acting as antigen-presenting cells, are activated by helper T cells and either immediately start producing antibodies or undergo affinity maturation into the germinal center of secondary lymphoid tissues (not represented in the figure) before differentiating into plasma cells that produce high affinity antibodies that neutralize the virus (Abbas et al., 2012).

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Immunity to SARS-CoV-2. (A) Immunologic targets of SARS-CoV-2, highlighting the four main viral antigens. (B) Plot of putative correlation of neutralizing antibody levels with protection from infection and disease. A first wave of IgM and IgA antibodies might confer a degree of protection against SARS-CoV-2, but their levels rapidly decrease. On the contrary, IgG antibodies, appearing later during natural infection, are mostly correlated with protection. In case of active immunization, neutralizing IgG responses are induced in naïve individuals, with levels varying depending on the vaccine platform and immunization strategy used. In the case of vaccination of previously infected individuals, neutralizing IgG levels are much higher, boosting memory B cell responses developed during natural infection. In time, IgG levels might decrease below a protective threshold, requiring booster vaccination.

  • Fig. 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3

    Clinical features of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized by three stages of acute infection of progressive severity. After the acute phase, a period of persistent disease can occur (Brodin, 2021; Hu et al., 2021; Sudre et al., 2021). *Postacute sequalae in <5% of patients (Sudre et al., 2021).

  • Fig. 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4

    Origin and timeline of appearance for notable SARS-CoV-2 variants. The origin of viral variants across the world and the date of their earliest documentation during the COVID-19 pandemic (World Health Organization, 2021c).

  • Fig. 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5

    Terminology of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Brief description of the terminology used in the manuscript referred to SARS-CoV-2 virus (Rambaut et al., 2020; Mascola et al., 2021).

  • Fig. 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6

    SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations in notable viral variants. (A) SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer and biologically relevant mutations, modeled on PDB 7C2L. One protomer is highlighted, showing the NTD in green and RBD in two shades of blue. Residues with dotted lines are hidden in this view. (B) Summary of SARS-CoV-2 variant-defining mutations and major biologic effects.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Characteristics, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the most advanced SARS-CoV-2 vaccines

    For each vaccine, different methods were used to assess immunogenicity and reactogenicity; the data reported in the table are for reference only and not for comparison. Vaccines clinical trial data were retrieved from the World Health Organization COVID-19 vaccine tracker (http://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines). Vaccine approval status was retrieved from regulatory agencies websites and McGill University’s COVID-19 vaccine tracker (http://covid19.trackvaccines.org/vaccines/). Where available, vaccine efficacy estimates assessed in certain countries or against a specific variant are provided.

    Vaccine (Manufacturer)ConstructDose
    Schedule
    Pivotal Clinical TrialsApproval StatusVaccine Efficacy (%)Neutralizing Antibodies (GMT)T cell ResponseReferences
    Inactivated vaccines
    CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech)Whole virion inactivated
    Adj: Alum
    3 μg
    D0, 14
    Ph 3 in China, UAE, Turkey, BrazilChina (8-Feb-21)
    Approved in 41 countries
    Brazil: 50.4%
    UAE: 86%
    Turkey: 91.25%a
    Baseline: 2.0
    Postvac: 27.6
    NA(Zhang et al., 2021b)
    BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm)4 μg
    D0, 21
    Ph 3 in ChinaEUA in China (31-Dec-20), Approved in 66 countriesChina: 79.34%bBaseline: 2.0
    Postvac: 282.7
    NA(Xia et al., 2021)
    Viral vector vaccines
    ChAdOx1
    (Astra Zeneca)
    Chimpanzee Ad encoding full length S protein5x1010 vp
    D0, 28
    D0, 72
    Ph 3 in UK, Brazil, RSA
    (N = 30,000)
    Ph 2: RSA
    EUA in UK (30-Dec-20),
    EU (29-Jan-21)
    Approved in 124 countries
    70.4%i (interim analysis)
    66.7%i (full analysis)
    RSA: 21.9%
    Alpha: 70.4%
    Beta: 10.4%c
    Delta: 67%
    Baseline: 20
    Postvac: 277
    IFNγ
    T cells
    (Emary et al., 2021; Lopez Bernal et al., 2021; Madhi et al., 2021; Voysey et al., 2021a; Voysey et al., 2021b)
    Gam-COVID-Vac (Gamaleya Research Institute)Ad26 (prime) + Ad5 (boost) encoding full length S protein1x1011 vp
    D0, 21
    Ph 3 in Russia
    (N = 33,758)
    Russia (5-Dec-20)
    Approved in 72 countries
    91.6%dBaseline: 1.25
    Postvac: 49.25 (frozen);
    45.95 (lyophilized)
    CD4+
    CD8+
    (Logunov et al., 2021; Logunov et al., 2020)
    Ad5-nCov
    (CanSino Biologics)
    Ad5 encoding full length S protein5x1010 vp
    D0
    Ph 3 in Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia
    (N = 40,000)
    China (29-Jun-2020)
    Approved in 9 countries
    65.7%bBaseline: 4.0
    Postvac: 18.3
    Th1 biased(Zhu et al., 2020a; Zhu et al., 2020b)
    Ad26.COV2.S
    (Janssen/ Johnson & Johnson)
    Ad5 encoding S-2P additional cleavage site stabilizing mutations5x1010 vp
    D0, 56
    Ph 3 in the US, Brazil, RSA
    (N = 43,783)
    EUA in the US (27-Feb-21)
    Approved in 75 countries
    over 14D postvac: 66.9%
    over 28D postvac: 66.1%
    US (96% D614G): 72.0%
    Brazil (69% Zeta; 31% D614G): 68.1%
    RSA (95% Beta): 64.0%e
    Baseline: <LLoQ
    Postvac: 827
    Th1 biased(Sadoff et al., 2021a; Sadoff et al., 2021b)
    Nucleic acid-based vaccines
    BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer)Nucleoside-modified mRNA encoding S-2P formulated in LNP30 μg
    D0, 21
    Ph 3 in US, EU, RSA, LATAM (N = 43,548)EUA in the US (11-Dec-20), EU (21-Dec-20)
    Approved in 103 countries
    95.3%f
    Delta: 88%
    Baseline: 10
    Postvac: 361
    CD4+
    Th1 biased
    CD8+
    (Chen et al., 2021b; Lopez Bernal et al., 2021; Walsh et al., 2020)
    mRNA-1273
    (Moderna)
    100 μg
    D0, 28
    Ph 3 in US
    (N = 30,420)
    EUA in the US (18-Dec-20), EU (06-Jan-2021)
    Approved in 76 countries
    94.1%g
    Delta: 84.8%
    Baseline: 4
    Postvac: 654.3
    Th1 biased(Baden et al., 2021; Jackson et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2021)
    CVnCoV
    (CureVac)
    Sequence optimized mRNA encoding S-2P formulated in LNP12 ug
    D0, 28
    Ph 2b/3 in EU, LATAM
    (N = 39,693)
    —47%Baseline: 5
    Postvac: 113
    NA(CureVac, 2021; Kremsner et al., 2021)
    Recombinant protein vaccines
    NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax)Full length S-2P + additional cleavage site stabilizing mutations
    Adj: Matrix-M1
    5 μg
    D0, 21
    Ph 3 in UK
    (N = 30,000; interim analysis:15,000);
    Ph 2b in RSA
    (N = 4,400)
    —UK (>50% Alpha): 89.3%
    RSA (>90% Beta): 49.4%
    wild-type: 95.6%
    Alpha: 85.6%
    Beta: 60%h
    Baseline: 20
    Postvac: 3906
    Th1 biased(Keech et al., 2020; Novavax, 2021)
    SCB-2019
    (Clover Biopharmaceuticals)
    Native-like trimeric S protein
    Adj: CpG/ Alum
    30 μg
    D0, 21
    Ph 2/3 in LATAM, Asia, Europe, Africa (N = 22,000)—79% (>73% Delta)Baseline: <5
    Postvac: 1050
    Th1 biased(Clover, 2021; Richmond et al., 2021)
    CoVLP (Medicago/GSK)Prefusion stabilized S protein displayed as self-assembling VLPs
    Adj: CpG/ AS03
    3.75 μg
    D0, 21
    Ph 3 in US, Canada, UK
    (N = 30,000)
    —NABaseline: 20
    Postvac:
    56.6 (CpG)
    811.3 (AS03)
    IFNy
    IL4
    (Ward et al., 2021)
    • Adj, adjuvant; D, day; postvac, postvaccination; vp; viral particles per vaccine dose; N, number of participants; NA, not available/applicable; UK, United Kingdom; RSA, Republic of South Africa; US, United States; UAE, United Arab Emirates; LATAM, Latin America; Ad, adenovirus; LLoQ, lower limit of quantitation; S-2P, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with prefusion stabilizing mutation; LNP, lipid nanoparticle.

    • Endpoints for assessment of vaccine efficacy were:

    • aMild to severe cases of COVID-19.

    • bNot available.

    • cNucleic acid amplification test-confirmed COVID-19 combined with at least one qualifying symptom (fever ≥37.8°C, cough, shortness of breath, or anosmia or ageusia) more than 14 days after the second dose.

    • dProportion of participants with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 from day 21 after receiving the first dose.

    • ePrevention of moderate to severe/critical COVID-19 confirmed by real time PCR combined with at least one new worsening signs or symptoms.

    • fLaboratory-confirmed COVID-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose in participants who had been without serologic or virologic evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection up to 7 days after the second dose.

    • gPrevention of COVID-19 illness with onset at least 14 days after the second injection in participants who had not previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2.

    • hFirst occurrence of PCR-confirmed symptomatic (mild, moderate, or severe) COVID-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second study vaccination in serologically negative (to SARS-CoV-2) adult participants at baseline.

    • iAverage of two regimens.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Pharmacological Reviews: 74 (1)
Pharmacological Reviews
Vol. 74, Issue 1
1 Jan 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Pharmacological Reviews article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Immunology and Technology of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccines
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Pharmacological Reviews
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Pharmacological Reviews.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Review ArticleReview Article

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Immunology and Technology

Simone Pecetta, Sven Kratochvil, Yu Kato, Kumaran Vadivelu and Rino Rappuoli
Pharmacological Reviews January 1, 2022, 74 (1) 313-339; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000285

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Review ArticleReview Article

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Immunology and Technology

Simone Pecetta, Sven Kratochvil, Yu Kato, Kumaran Vadivelu and Rino Rappuoli
Pharmacological Reviews January 1, 2022, 74 (1) 313-339; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000285
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Overview
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Infection and Disease
    • III. Immunity to SARS-CoV-2
    • IV. Vaccine-Elicited Immunity
    • V. SARS-CoV-2 Notable Variants
    • VI. Discussion
    • VII. Perspective: The Challenges Ahead
    • VIII. Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Adaptive Immune System and Depression
  • Pharmacotherapeutics of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy
  • Therapeutic Opportunities for Brain Revascularization
Show more Review Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Pharmacological Reviews
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0081 (Online)

Copyright © 2022 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics