Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Pharmacological Reviews
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Pharmacological Reviews

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit Pharm Rev on Facebook
  • Follow Pharm Rev on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Review ArticleReview Article
Open Access

Elucidating the Interactome of G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Receptor Activity-Modifying Proteins

Ilana B. Kotliar, Emily Lorenzen, Jochen M. Schwenk, Debbie L. Hay and Thomas P. Sakmar
Gunnar Schulte, ASSOCIATE EDITOR
Pharmacological Reviews January 2023, 75 (1) 1-34; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000180
Ilana B. Kotliar
Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Signal Transduction, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York (I.B.K., E.L., T.P.S.); Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Chemical Biology, New York, New York (I.B.K.); Science for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH–Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden (J.M.S.); Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (D.L.H.); and Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Division for Neurogeriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden (T.P.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ilana B. Kotliar
Emily Lorenzen
Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Signal Transduction, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York (I.B.K., E.L., T.P.S.); Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Chemical Biology, New York, New York (I.B.K.); Science for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH–Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden (J.M.S.); Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (D.L.H.); and Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Division for Neurogeriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden (T.P.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emily Lorenzen
Jochen M. Schwenk
Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Signal Transduction, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York (I.B.K., E.L., T.P.S.); Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Chemical Biology, New York, New York (I.B.K.); Science for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH–Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden (J.M.S.); Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (D.L.H.); and Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Division for Neurogeriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden (T.P.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jochen M. Schwenk
Debbie L. Hay
Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Signal Transduction, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York (I.B.K., E.L., T.P.S.); Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Chemical Biology, New York, New York (I.B.K.); Science for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH–Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden (J.M.S.); Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (D.L.H.); and Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Division for Neurogeriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden (T.P.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Debbie L. Hay
Thomas P. Sakmar
Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Signal Transduction, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York (I.B.K., E.L., T.P.S.); Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Chemical Biology, New York, New York (I.B.K.); Science for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH–Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden (J.M.S.); Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (D.L.H.); and Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Division for Neurogeriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden (T.P.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas P. Sakmar
Gunnar Schulte
Roles: ASSOCIATE EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    GPCR classifications based on phylogenetic analysis. The phylogenetic tree positions of GPCRs tested for RAMP interactions are indicated. Adapted from Lv et al. (2016).

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Summary of how RAMPs modulate GPCR biology. The four major regulatory effects of RAMPs on RAMP-interacting GPCRs are shown, with techniques commonly used to interrogate the regulatory effect or the presence of the complex in green text bubbles.

  • Fig. 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3

    Schematic highlighting the most common methodologies used to identify GPCR–RAMP interactions.

  • Fig. 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4

    Structure of CALCRL in complex with RAMP1 and CGRP obtained from cryo-EM (PDB code: 6E3Y) (Liang et al., 2018). Center panel: CALCRL, rainbow color gradation from deep blue (N-terminal tail) to deep red (C-terminal tail); RAMP1, magenta; CGRP, gray. The original published structure also included the bound G protein, which has been removed here for clarity. The N-terminal tails and the ECDs of CALCRL and RAMP1 are at the top, while their C-terminal tails and intracellular domains (ICDs) are at the bottom. The C-terminal residues of RAMP1 that stretch beyond the membrane bilayer are not resolved (dashed line). All residues of RAMPs that interact with CALCRL as determined by all recent cryo-EM structures are shown as sticks in the center and right-side insets (Liang et al., 2018; Liang et al., 2020a; Josephs et al., 2021). Similarly, residues of CALCRL that may interact with either RAMP1, 2, or 3 are shown as sticks in the center panel and right-side insets. In the right-side insets, any atoms between CALCRL and RAMP1 that are within 4 Å of each other are marked with yellow dashed lines. The left-side boxed structure shows interacting residues as spheres to highlight the potential CALCRL–RAMP interaction interface. All RAMP amino acid residues with potential interactions with CALCRL are shown as magenta spheres. Amino acid residues in the TM, ECL, and ECD regions of CALCRL that potentially interact with RAMPs are shown as blue spheres.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Reports of GPCRs tested for RAMP interaction, followed by summary statistics GPCRs are grouped by family and sorted alphabetically within each family. Key references are provided.

    GPCRAbbreviationUniprotFamilyRAMP
    Adhesion G-protein coupled receptor F5ADGRF5Q8IZF4AdhesionRAMP3 (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    Cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 2CELSR2Q9HCU4AdhesionNone (only RAMP2 tested) (Barbash et al., 2019)
    Frizzled family receptor 1FZD1Q9UP38FrizzledNone (only RAMP2 tested) (Barbash et al., 2019)
    Calcium-sensing receptorCaSRP41180GlutamateRAMP1 and 3 (Bouschet et al., 2008; Bouschet et al., 2005; Desai et al., 2014)
    Pituitary adenylate-cyclase activating polypeptide type 1ADYCAP1R1P41586SecretinRAMP1, 2, and 3 (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    RAMP2 and 3 (M. Harris et al., preprint, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.08.436756)
    Calcitonin receptor-like receptorCALCRLQ16602SecretinRAMP1, 2 and 3 (McLatchie et al., 1998) and many others (including solved structures)
    Calcitonin receptorCALCRP30988SecretinRAMP1, 2 and 3 (Armour et al., 1999; Christopoulos et al., 1999) and many others
    Corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1CRHR1P34998SecretinNone (Tasma et al., 2020)
    RAMP2 (Wootten et al., 2013; Wootten et al., 2013;Bailey et al., 2019)
    RAMP3 (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    RAMP2,3 (M. Harris et al., preprint)
    Corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 2CRHR2Q13324SecretinNone (Lorenzen et al., 2019; Tasma et al., 2020)
    None (only RAMP2 tested) (Bailey et al., 2019)
    RAMP2,3 (M. Harris et al., preprint)
    Glucagon receptorGCGRP47871SecretinRAMP2 (Christopoulos et al., 2003; Weston et al., 2015; Cegla et al., 2017; McGlone et al., 2021)
    RAMP1,3 (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    RAMP1,2,3 (Shao et al., 2022; M. Harris et al., preprint)
    Growth hormone-releasing hormoneGHRHRQ02643SecretinNone (Christopoulos et al., 2003)
    RAMP2,3 (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    RAMP1,2,3 (Shao et al., 2022; M. Harris et al., preprint)
    RAMP1,2 with splice variant 1 of GHRHR (Shao et al., 2022)
    Gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptorGIPRP48546SecretinRAMP1,2,3 (Lorenzen et al., 2019; Shao et al., 2022; M. Harris et al., preprint)
    Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptorGLP1RP43220SecretinNone (Christopoulos et al., 2003; Wootten et al., 2013)
    RAMP2,3 (Shao et al., 2022)
    RAMP1,2,3 (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    (M. Harris et al., preprint)
    Glucagon-like peptide 2 receptorGLP2RO95838SecretinNone (Christopoulos et al., 2003)
    RAMP1,2,3 (Lorenzen et al., 2019; M. Harris et al., preprint)
    RAMP3 (Shao et al., 2022)
    Parathyroid hormone 1 receptorPTH1RQ03431SecretinRAMP2 (Christopoulos et al., 2003; Nemec et al., 2022)
    RAMP1,3 (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    RAMP2,3 (M. Harris et al., preprint)
    RAMP3 (Phelps et al., 2005)
    Parathyroid hormone 2 receptorPTH2RP49190SecretinRAMP3 (Christopoulos et al., 2003)
    RAMP1,2 (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    RAMP1,2,3 (M. Harris et al., preprint)
    Secretin receptorSCTRP47872SecretinRAMP3 (Harikumar et al., 2009)
    RAMP1,2 (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    RAMP1,2,3 (Shao et al., 2022; M. Harris et al., preprint)
    VIP and PACAP receptor 1VIPR1P32241SecretinRAMP1,2,3 (Christopoulos et al., 2003) (M. Harris et al., preprint)
    RAMP2,3
    (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    VIP and PACAP receptor 2VIPR2P41587SecretinRAMP1,2,3 (Wootten et al., 2013; (M. Harris et al., preprint)
    RAMP2,3
    (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    Atypical chemokine receptor 1ACKR1Q16570RhodopsinRAMP1,2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    Atypical chemokine receptor 2ACKR2O00590RhodopsinRAMP1,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    Atypical chemokine receptor 3ACKR3P25106RhodopsinRAMP2,3 (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    RAMP1,2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    Atypical chemokine receptor 4ACKR4Q9NPB9RhodopsinRAMP2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    Atypical chemokine receptor 5ACKR5O00421RhodopsinNone (Mackie et al., 2019)
    Adenosine A2B receptorADORA2BP29275RhodopsinRAMP2 (Barbash et al., 2019)
    Beta 2 adrenergic receptorB2ADRP07550RhodopsinNone (Mackie et al., 2019; Shao et al., 2022; M. Harris et al., preprint)
    C-C Chemokine receptor type 1CCR1P32246RhodopsinRAMP1,2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-C Chemokine receptor type 2CCR2P41597RhodopsinRAMP2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-C Chemokine receptor type 3CCR3P51677RhodopsinRAMP1,2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-C Chemokine receptor type 4CCR4P51679RhodopsinRAMP1,2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-C Chemokine receptor type 5CCR5P51681RhodopsinNone (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    RAMP2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-C Chemokine receptor type 6CCR6P51684RhodopsinRAMP1,2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-C Chemokine receptor type 7CCR7P32248RhodopsinNone (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    RAMP3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-C Chemokine receptor type 8CCR8P51685RhodopsinRAMP3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-C Chemokine receptor type 9CCR9P51686RhodopsinRAMP1,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-C Chemokine receptor type 10CCR10P46092RhodopsinRAMP1,2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    Chemokine-like receptor 1CMKLR1Q99788RhodopsinRAMP2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    Chemokine C-X3-C receptor 1CX3CR1P49238RhodopsinRAMP1,2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-X-C chemokine receptor type 1CXCR1P25024RhodopsinRAMP1,2 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-X-C chemokine receptor type 2CXCR2P25025RhodopsinRAMP2,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-X-C chemokine receptor type 3CXCR3P49682RhodopsinNone (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    RAMP3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4CXCR4P61073RhodopsinNone (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    RAMP1,3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-X-C chemokine receptor type 5CXCR5P32302RhodopsinNone (Mackie et al., 2019)
    C-X-C chemokine receptor type 6CXCR6O00574RhodopsinRAMP3 (Mackie et al., 2019)
    Proteinase-activated receptor 2F2RL1P55085RhodopsinNone (only RAMP2 tested) (Barbash et al., 2019)
    Proteinase-activated receptor 2F2RL3Q96RI0RhodopsinRAMP2 (Barbash et al., 2019)
    G-protein coupled receptor 4GRP4P46093RhodopsinRAMP1,2,3 (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1GPR30Q99527RhodopsinRAMP3 (Lenhart et al., 2013)
    Melatonin-related receptorGPR50Q15385RhodopsinNone (only RAMP2 tested) (Barbash et al., 2019)
    Probably G protein-coupled receptor 141GPR141Q7Z602RhodopsinRAMP2 (Barbash et al., 2019)
    Probably G protein-coupled receptor 141GPR160Q9UJ42RhodopsinNone (only RAMP2 tested) (Barbash et al., 2019)
    G protein-coupled receptor 176GPR176Q80WT4RhodopsinNone (only RAMP2 tested) (Barbash et al., 2019)
    G-protein coupled receptor 182GRP182O15218RhodopsinRAMP1,2,3 (Lorenzen et al., 2019)
    Leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 4LGR4Q9BXB1RhodopsinNone (only RAMP2 tested) (Barbash et al., 2019)
    P2Y purinoceptor 8P2RY8Q86VZ1RhodopsinRAMP2 (Barbash et al., 2019)
    Neurotensin receptor type 1NTSR1P30989RhodopsinNone (only RAMP2 tested) (Barbash et al., 2019)
    δ-type opioid receptorOPRD1P41143RhodopsinRAMP2 (Barbash et al., 2019)
    Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1S1PR1P21453RhodopsinNone (only RAMP2 tested) (Barbash et al., 2019)
    Chemokine XC receptor 1XCR1P46094RhodopsinNone (Mackie et al., 2019)
    Summary statisticsRAMP1RAMP2RAMP3
    No. of GPCR interactors (at least one study)283041
    SecretinRhodopsinGlutamateAdhesionFrizzled
    No. of GPCRs that interact with any RAMP(s) (based on at least one report)152911—
    No. of GPCRs that don’t interact with any RAMP (based on at least one report)58a—11
    No. of GPCRs in the family15719223311
    • Key references provided.

    • aAnd 7 additional instances where the GPCR does not appear to interact with a RAMP, but only RAMP2 was tested.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Summary of experimental methods used to identify GPCR–RAMP interactions Studies are sorted chronologically.

    StudyMethodLooked forGPCR–RAMP testedAlso looked at
    McLatchie et al. (1998)Expression cloningSignaling in response to CGRPDiscovered CALCRL–RAMP1,2,3Ligand binding, FACS for RAMP and CALCRL surface expression, immunoblot (crosslinking, radioligand labeling, glycosylase treatment)
    Christopoulos et al. (1999)Radioligand bindingIncreased binding of amylin and salmon CT upon RAMP expressionDiscovered CALCR–RAMP1,2,3Competition assay for peptide radioligand binding, cAMP response, immunoblot (crosslinking), IF for RAMP1 localization
    Christopoulos et al. (2003)IFIncreased RAMP surface expressionInteracting: VIPR1–RAMP1,2,3
    GCGR–RAMP2
    PTH1R–RAMP2
    PTH2R–RAMP3
    Noninteracting: GHRH, VIPR2, GLP1R, GLP2R
    VIPR1 signaling (cAMP, PI), radioligand binding
    Bouschet et al. (2005)IFIncreased GPCR surface expression
    GPCR–RAMP colocalization
    Interacting: CaSR–RAMP1,3
    Noninteracting: CaSR–RAMP2
    Surface biotinylation,
    siRNA KD of RAMP1 (look at CaSR surface expression), co-IP,
    IF of GPCR with different cell compartment markers, GPCR glycosylation changes
    Harikumar et al. (2009)Fluorescence, BRETIncreased RAMP surface expression
    Saturating BRET signal that increases then plateaus.
    Interacting: SCTR–RAMP3
    Noninteracting: SCTR–RAMP1,2
    Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (look for fluorescence at the PM), assays with truncation and chimeric mutants of SCTR with WT or truncation mutants of RAMP, SCTR signaling (cAMP, Ca2+ flux, ERK1/2 phosphorylation)
    Wootten et al. (2013)ELISAIncreased RAMP surface expression
    Increased GPCR surface expression
    Interacting: VIPR2–RAMP1,2,3, CRHR1–RAMP2
    Noninteracting: GLP1R
    G-protein binding to GPCR, GPCR signaling (cAMP, Ca2+ flux), in vivo experiment (measured plasma levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone in RAMP2+/− mice)
    Lenhart et al. (2013)IF
    BRET
    Increased RAMP surface expression and colocalization with GPCR,
    Saturating BRET signal that increases then plateaus
    Interacting: GPR30–RAMP3Co-IP, expression changes in vivo, localization, changes in vivo, in vivo experiment (studied cardiac fibrosis and left ventricular hypertrophy in RenTgMk; RAMP3+/+ and RAMP3−/− mice)
    Cegla et al. (2017)
    (Note: GPCR–RAMP interaction was previously published)
    IFChanges in GPCR surface expression
    GPCR–RAMP co-localization
    GCGR–RAMP2Radioligand binding, GPCR signaling with RAMP2 overexpression or siRNA KD (cAMP, Ca2+ flux, β-arrestin1 recruitment)
    Barbash et al. (2019)MERFISHSignificant changes in GPCR expression at the mRNA level upon RAMP2 co-expression14 GPCRs: ADORA2B, S1PR1, NTSR1, OPRD1, F2RL3, GPR50, GPR141, GPR160, GPR176, LGR4, P2YR8, CELSR2, FZD1 (tested with RAMP2 only)Bioinformatics comparison with phylogenic correlation coefficient
    Bailey et al. (2019)FACS
    ELISA
    Increased RAMP surface expression (FACS)
    Increased GPCR surface expression (ELISA)
    Interacting: CRHR1α, CRHR1β–RAMP2
    Noninteracting:
    CRHR2β–RAMP2
    GPCR signaling (cAMP), GPCR and RAMP expression (mRNA), molecular modeling of interaction interface
    Lorenzen et al. (2019)SBAHigh median fluorescence intensity signal relative to controlOverview: 15 Secretin GPCRs plus ACKR3, ADGRF5, CCR5, CCR7, CXCR3, CXCR4, GPR4, GPR182 (with all 3 RAMPs)PLA
    Mackie et al. (2019)BRET
    FACS
    Saturating BRET signal that increases then plateaus
    Increased RAMP surface expression
    Overview: 24 Chemokine GPCRs (with all 3 RAMPs)PLA, co-IF with different biomarkers, ACKR3 signaling (cAMP), coculture scavenging activity assay, in vivo experiment (retinal angiogenesis in Admhi/hi, Adm+/+, Ackr3+/−, Ackr3−/−, RAMP3+/+, and RAMP3−/− mice)
    Shao et al. (2022)BRET
    IF
    Saturating BRET signal that increases then plateaus
    Altered RAMP surface expression and colocalization,
    Overview: 7 glucagon family GPCRs (with all 3 RAMPs)GPCR signaling (cAMP, Gαq activation, β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2 recruitment)
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Published structures with RAMPs Asterisk (*) indicates structure obtained by cryo-electron microscopy. Otherwise, structures obtained by X-ray crystallography. All structures marked Full include the ECD and TM domains of the RAMP, with no or very poor C-terminal density observed. Stabilizing mutations made to the RAMP and/or GPCR are not listed but may be present.

    GPCRRAMPFull length?Relevant molecules presentOther molecules presentPDB RefRef
    NoneRAMP1ECD onlyMSE2YX8Kusano et al. (2008)
    NoneRAMP2ECD onlyCa+22XVTNot published (Quigley, 2010)
    NoneRAMP2ECD onlyMSE3AQEKusano et al. (2012)
    CALCRLRAMP1ECD (both RAMP and GPCR)Olcegepant3N6, 3N7, sulfate ion3N7Ster Haar et al. (2010)
    CALCRLRAMP1MBP–RAMP1 ECD–CALCRL ECD fusionAM variantMaltose5V6YBooe et al. (2018)
    CALCRLRAMP1MBP–RAMP1 ECD–CALCRL ECD fusionAM2Maltose, sodium ion6D1URoehrkasse et al. (2018)
    CALCRLRAMP1ECD + TM (no C terminus), CALCRL full lengthCGRP, Gs heterotrimerNb356E3Y*Liang et al. (2018a)
    CALCRLRAMP1ECD (both RAMP and GPCR)Telcagepant3N6, N7R3N7Rter Haar et al. (2010)
    CALCRLRAMP1ECD (both RAMP and GPCR)(unliganded)sulfate ion, MSE3N7Pter Haar et al. (2010)
    CALCRLRAMP1MBP–RAMP1 ECD–CALCRL ECD fusionCGRP analogMaltose, magnesium ion4RWGBooe et al. (2015)
    CALCRLRAMP1ECD (both RAMP and GPCR)Erenumab (Fab)6UMGGarces et al. (2020)
    CALCRLRAMP1MBP–RAMP1 ECD–CALCRL ECD fusionOlcegepantSN6, tetraethyl glycol (PG4), maltose, alpha-D-glucopyranose6ZISBucknell et al. (2020)
    CALCRLRAMP1MBP–RAMP1 ECD–CALCRL ECD fusionHTL22562tetraethyl glycol (PG4), maltose, alpha-D-glucopyranose6ZHOBucknell et al. (2020)
    CALCRLRAMP1MBP–RAMP1 ECD–CALCRL ECD fusionHTL0028125 (macrocycle)Unknown (PDB entry on hold)7P0FCansfield et al. (2022)
    CALCRLRAMP1MBP–RAMP1 ECD–CALCRL ECD fusionMacrocycle compound 13Unknown (PDB entry on hold)7P0ICansfield et al. (2022)
    CALCRLRAMP1ECD + TM (no C terminus), CALCRL full lengthDetergent micelle7KNT*Josephs et al. (2021)
    CALCRLRAMP1ECD + TM (no C terminus), CALCRL full lengthCGRPDetergent micelle7KNU*Josephs et al. (2021)
    CALCRLRAMP2ECD onlyMSE3AQFKusano et al. (2012)
    CALCRLRAMP2MPB-RAMP2 ECD–CALCRL ECD fusionAMMaltose, 1,2-ethanediol4RWFBooe et al. (2015)
    CALCRLRAMP2MPB–RAMP2 ECD–CALCRL ECD fusionhigh-affinity AM (37-52) S45R/K46L/S48G/Q50Walpha-D-glucopyranose-(1-4)-alpha-D-glucopyranose, maltose, formic acid, amino group6V2EBooe et al. (2020)
    CALCRLRAMP2FullAM, Gs heterotrimerNb356UUN*Liang et al. (2020a)
    CALCRLRAMP3FullAM2, Gs heterotrimerNb356UVA*Liang et al. (2020a)
    CALCRLRAMP3FullAM, Gs heterotrimerNb356UUS*Liang et al. (2020a)
    CALCRRAMP1FullRat amylin, Gs heterotrimerNb35, P42, phosphatidylethanolamine, cholesterol hemisuccinate, palmitic acid, 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-beta-D-glucopyranose7TYF*Cao et al. (2022)
    CALCRRAMP1FullSalmon CT, Gs heterotrimerNb35, cholesterol hemisuccinate, palmitic acid, 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-beta-D-glucopyranose7TYW*Cao et al. (2022)
    CALCRRAMP2FullRat amylin, Gs heterotrimerNb35, cholesterol hemisuccinate, palmitic acid, 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-beta-D-glucopyranose7TYX*Cao et al. (2022)
    CALCRRAMP2FullSalmon CT, Gs heterotrimerNb35, cholesterol hemisuccinate, palmitic acid, 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-beta-D-glucopyranose7TYY*Cao et al. (2022)
    CALCRRAMP2FullCT, Gs heterotrimerNb357TYH*Cao et al. (2022)
    CALCRRAMP3FullRat amylin, Gs heterotrimerNb35, P42, cholesterol hemisuccinate, palmitic acid, 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-beta-D-glucopyranose7TZF*Cao et al. (2022)
    • MBP, maltose binding protein; MSE, selenomethionine, an L-peptide linking molecule; Nb35, Nanobody 35.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Pharmacological Reviews: 75 (1)
Pharmacological Reviews
Vol. 75, Issue 1
1 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Pharmacological Reviews article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Elucidating the Interactome of G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Receptor Activity-Modifying Proteins
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Pharmacological Reviews
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Pharmacological Reviews.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Review ArticleReview Article

GPCR–RAMP Interactome

Ilana B. Kotliar, Emily Lorenzen, Jochen M. Schwenk, Debbie L. Hay and Thomas P. Sakmar
Pharmacological Reviews January 1, 2023, 75 (1) 1-34; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000180

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Review ArticleReview Article

GPCR–RAMP Interactome

Ilana B. Kotliar, Emily Lorenzen, Jochen M. Schwenk, Debbie L. Hay and Thomas P. Sakmar
Pharmacological Reviews January 1, 2023, 75 (1) 1-34; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000180
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Overview
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Strategies to Identify GPCR–RAMP Interactions
    • III. Molecular Characterization of GPCR–RAMP Interactions
    • IV. Perspectives and Future Directions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Pathways for nonhormonal male contraceptive development
  • The SLC6A15-SLC6A20 neutral amino acid transporter subfamily
  • Microbiota and pain perception in Parkinson's Disease
Show more Review article

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Pharmacological Reviews
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0081 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics